MAURICE KIRK HEARING – POLICE WITNESSES IN HIDING

BOYCOTT02 Legal Battles

Reports on his current court case that started September 7, 2010 and previous stories. Please sign our online petition asking for Fair Trials and Compensation instead of an effective remedy before national authorities – in defence of Maurice and many other victims of financial exploitation and legal oppression. Here’s the newsletter that invited people to sign. And here are the first wonderful comments by signatories.

Breaking News:

October 2011: Maurice on hunger strike in HMP Cardiff. See http://bit.ly/qnyRUtPolitical asylum granted by France – to a British citizen – for the first time since the French Revolution…For first time visitors, a one-page summary is on a complementary and introductory blog.  Also, Maurice on a 12-minute video in Jersey.

  • Maurice accused of suffering from Narcissistic Personality Disorder (NPD?

    Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) is a personality disorder[1] in which the individual is described as being excessively preoccupied with issues of personal adequacy, power, prestige and vanity. This condition affects one percent of the population.[2][3] First formulated in 1968, it was historically called megalomania, and is severe egocentrism.

    The current formulation of Narcissistic personality disorder in the diagnostic manual DSM-IV has been criticised for failing to describe the range and complexity of the disorder; it focuses overly on “the narcissistic individual’s external, symptomatic, or social interpersonal patterns–at the expense of his or her internal complexity and individual suffering” which has reduced its clinical utility

    Pilot Mag Apr 2002 Profile Pt 2_0001.pdf

    09 08 28 SPECT & MRI Scans.pdf

    09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009  REDACTED.pdf

    [Extract from my 15th May 13 e-mail to Inspector Grothier of South Wales Police Professional standards Dept. HQ. Bridgend]

    Inspector Andrew Rice of South Wales Police

    Mr Ebbs/Alexander gives evidence in Cardiff Civil Justice Centre today, 15th May 2013 at around 10.30 and as both you and your vast legal team very well know you should be there to witness the evidence and read his statement by your QC as ‘non controversial’ 12 10 26 Ebbs Statement.pdf

    You need, may  I suggest, to be talking with the trial judge and/or clerk of the court as to timing but, in the interests of so called ‘justice’ and the Rule of Law,bring a few friends.

    (After a good lunch with Andy Aishe, all paid for by Mr Alexander, they both gave evidence)

    Air traffic controller, Jonathan Clayton (JC) and Inspector Steve Parry, both vital eye witnesses, have both been ‘spirited away for a few weeks by the police, until the case is over. Despite witness summonses served they currently, as for those below, enjoy the protection of the ‘taffia’.

    13 05 12 Gafael st.pdf (Mr Anthony G Gafael has been summoned by special court order to give evidence this Friday at 10am)

    On 24th May at Cardiff Civil Justice Centre there will be an application for the production of :

    Barbara Wilding, ex Chief Constable, ex Inspector Howard Davies, ex  Chief inspector Brian Jenner, ex Inspector Robert Nelson Roe, ex Inspector Sean Trigg and serving Inspectors, Steve Parry and Andrew Rice and Sgt Kilberg, all for being implicated in bullying, misfeasance, malicious prosecutions and false imprisonments and having my vehicles destroyed or stolen and setting up a Penarth police station car park ‘sting’.

    10 09 28 Murphy Statement_0001.pdf

    13 05 14 D Insurance st.pdf

    13 05 04 Receptionis st.pdf

    IWitness Statement Kevin Fairman.docx

    1. The police watch my BMW motor bike being stolen, Ex police officer Booker from Llantwit Major, slipping it out on cross examination.

    2. Gerald Thomas (Gerry) I meet on the Cardiff prison exercise yard, while I am in for ‘trading machine guns’ and who tells me how he heard the theft going on at the back of the Barry veterinary Hospital. He heard it on his illegal police scanner radio.

    3. He hears it has crashed not a few hundred yards from where he lives and so nips down to watch the police arriving and the rider running away.

    4. Gerry notices ‘a foreign number plate’ on it actually being ‘all numbers’—-Guernsey.

    5. The police wait until the garage truck arrives to recover the bike.

    6.  BUT by the time he gets to the incident with police still in attendance no number plate is on the bike!

    7.  So back at his garage he has to remove the bike panelling to locate the chassis number, rings it in to the Barry police station in order that the ‘owner’ can be traced.

    8. six weeks later ‘Yosser’ Nigel Hughes, a BMW rider in the police force, comes into my hospital with a rescued, off the M4, young Rottweiler which he hopes to keep. A ‘conversation takes place’ that causes Mr C at the garage, another client, to return my bike.

    The following photo is of his original record book to confirm , which he did in court, the police only needed it chassis number to audit trail its route of owner ship. Oh, surprise,  surprise, I had bought it off a Guernsey police officer, a Mr Farnham son of someone ‘in music’.

    But the Ely police, only a few months earlier, had me jailed in Cardiff prison for stealing it and being unable to serve a summonses as they neither knew who I was nor where I lived.

    Note the details re contacting Barry police station (in red) and chassis numbered with name of owner put in six weeks later.

    Out of 50 other such pages, of years of ‘recoveries’ in this book, no over incident is so recorded. It stinks, Dad, doesn’t it?

    Just one of the 31 incidents in his hearing in four other actions  lodged and similarly delayed waiting to be listed for trial, NHS(Wales) Caswell Clinic and a certain ‘W11 Lewis machine gun’ case that will be a lot more fun to manage  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo26-otaPmo&list=UUo40Twnjw5Z8kYBGqrZHlzw&index=4

    And now something completely different!

    MAD, BAD and DANGEROUS to KNOW

    PILOT MAGAZINE article will be featured, per page, in following blogs starting with the first page, I suppose. Material for it was sort of acquired by a very old friend, the then editor, Philip Whiteman, whilst we enjoyed the occasional few bottles of very fine claret.

    Pilot Mag April 2002 page 1.pdf

    Maurice@kirkflyingvet.com  & 07907937953

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

VICKI HAIGH RELEASED FROM PRISON

VICKI

 

Victoria Haigh Released!

video:   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IYAqgKEsujE

published on 18 May 2013

from  David Gale·

Victoria Haigh released following a campaign by UKIP’s David Gale after she was unlawfully imprisoned. Seen here reunited with her daughter after an emergency release instruction brought her detention to an end. Previously a candidate for Police and Crime Commissioner in Derbyshire, Gale has reported senior officers in both Nottinghamshire Probation Trust and the Ministry of Justice for the criminal offence of misconduct in public office. For more information on this and other cases in the Kids for Cash Court Scandal visit: http://www.facebook.com/KidsForCashCo

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

PLEASE HELP IF YOU CAN…

hello – can youhelp this guy below? i am going to send him £30 – perhaps to can too and it will pay for at least one visit @ £60. I think its worth it, and one cant take it with one…Paul Manning can be contacted on fb or thru me…tks  jg

A father that wishes to remain anonymous asked me to publish this for him, help him if you can. “Hi everyone, I have just had my final court hearing, it was meant to be 3 days long but after 4 hours I was told I should be having contact and it will start as soon as the contact centre can take us. Because I have not seen him for the last 22 months (since he was 2 weeks old) contact must start off on a fully supervised basis and be reduced to supported contact when the contact centre sees fit. All of this will then be reviewed when I get back to court in November. GREAT news! However, due to CAFCASS wiping thier hands of the case, social services never having involvement and Legal Aid no longer funding contact centres I have been told I need to pay for the centre myself. At the moment I am not working and am going to be struggling to get back into work due to some physical and emotional ill health but I am confident in the future I will. The supervised contact will be £100 every 2 weeks and then, when its reduced to supported contact, will be £60 every 2 weeks. I have NO idea other than selling everything I own how I’m going to raise the money. I have spent the last 3 days emailing and phoning about 25 advice lines, support groups and charitable trusts but had no luck and it so far doesn’t look like there is any coming my way. Does anyone please have any Ideas where I could get help with funding for this? This is the last of many huge hurdles I need to overcome before I can FINALLY start a relationship with my son. Thank you PS. I have been ordered by the judge not to discuss my case on Facebook, this is why I cannot post this direct.

Like · · Share · 47 minutes ago ·

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

GRANDMA B UPDATE 15 MAY 13

grandmabOperation Countryman II (2): Savile Gate

See on Scoop.itThe Abuse of Grandma B

SAVILE GATE: Operation Countryman II (2) In the second of his Operation Countryman II series of articles investigating corruption in North Yorkshire Police (NYP), TIM HICKS continues his investigation into the cover up over the way Alderman Peter …

 

Peter Hofschröer‘s insight:

North Yorkshire Police clearly have something very unsavory to hide. One of their senior officers was a member of Savile’s “Friday Morning Club”, where a number of police officers regularly met. Of course, they did not abuse children there, but drunk tea.

Yes, believe that, don’t we. Just like they do not abuse elderly people, unlawfully evict them from their homes before trying to fraudulently sell them.

There are those who tell us that the majority of officers of this force are decent, hard-working people. Then why don’t they do the decent thing and arrest all the criminals in their own ranks? Or is that too much hard work for them?

See on www.real-whitby.co.uk

 

source:  http://grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/operation-countryman-ii-2-savile-gate/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

FROM NORMAN SCARTH 8/5/13 – STAND UP + BE COUNTED!!!

FROM NORMAN SCARTH  8/5/13  – STAND UP + BE COUNTED!!!

c5862-siegeovrnorman

above – from 1999
From Norman Scarth 8/5/13:
“Note that this ‘Crime & Justice’ organisation has been in existence since 1931, they claim to be ‘very influential’. If that be so, how on earth does ‘Justice’ in Britain come to be in the state it is?  What on earth have these people been doing for the last 82 years? It is obvious they live in ‘Academic Fairyland’! Can you attend and drag them into the real world?  I would like to do so, but for obvious reasons am unable to. I WILL be writing to tell why I had to flee from the land of my birth and seek refuge in Ireland! Norman Scarth.
Meeting in Liverpool Friday.”
abeba-scarth
above = also from 1999
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

MAURICE KIRK APPEAL HEARING UPDATE 7/5/13 – HOW DO THEY GET AWAY WITH IT?

02 Legal Battles

                Day 47 of Kirk v South Wales Police Cardiff Harassment Trial & My Late Mother

Today I hoped to start my evidence and did.

By the end of today the trial judge had ordered me to read my June 2009 sixty four page Claimant statement not read since the police helicopter, overhead, had ordered the twenty five, many armed, police officers to surround our home, snatch our daughter for social Services and have me jailed, for life.

To do the latter a corrupt Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, forensic psychiatrist was blackmailed to falsify my medical records only to be thwarted by our best MP, for many years, Walter Sweeny Esq, now so desperately needed in Westminster as his stand over Maastricht has now proved.

09 06 19   64 pages of Witness Statement of Maurice John Kirkl.pdf

Why did I never look at yet alone read the document…..because it proved to be the ‘last straw’ for my then wife who then instigated immediate divorce proceedings.

So much for the desperation and expense such a thoroughly corrupt police force are prepared to spend your money to protect the ring while frightening away so many of their good ‘foot soldiers’ from a vocation so essential to any civilised community.

Rick outside the court, today, protesting……..

rick7

Rick on the Roof

Fighting for all the same reasons, if only he knew it……including the UK’s thoroughly corrupt legal trade, not all of them, I hasten to add but they destroyed my life as well!                                                                                                                                                                 

Claimant’s Position Statement

6th May 2013

1.      Owing to the court allocated time left and Claimant’s difficulties, 50% being entirely his responsibility, he has been reluctant to serve all the witness summonses on his proposed witnesses until clarification can be made by the court and Defendant as to just how much and just how long is ‘needed’ by the Claimant in order to give his evidence, call witnesses and part settle the problems listed below.

2.     Key Claimant witnesses of fact have either been opposed by Defendant or refused by the trial judge with the Claimant even having to seek permission for summonses.

3.      There remains an outstanding appeal on that and other matters to a higher court.

4.      The Claimant’s fifty odd leaver arch files of exhibits, served on the Defendant years ago, to ‘settle’ instead of having to witness lawyers continuing to ‘milk’ the tax payer or himself, has now witnessed the Defendant having had to ‘cherry pick’ documents from them in order to produce any semblance of a court bundle for each of the thirty one police incidents identified in the cause.

5.      Without the availability to the court of the Claimant’s twenty years of records it is a wonder as to just how this Defendant could have mustered an ounce of justification as to its position today and continue to try and explain away the need for such ‘extreme’ and ‘unusual’ unlawful conduct.

6.      In the time remaining the Claimant has extracted some one hundred or so pages from his exhibit files to a new ‘green’ file to be served on the court today. He has only had time to get through around twenty of the files and so is directing his interest primarily on incidents that appear to have been avoided, so far, by the Defendant, that of police ‘covert surveillance’, the incidents and court cases ‘missed out’ by Dolmans, solicitors, drafting of the then Chief Constable’s February 2009 affidavit appearing to leave her as suffering from a bout of ‘selective amnesia’.

Witness list problems for the Claimant

1.     Inspector Rice should be recalled to give evidence in the light of still more new information.

He was the Barry custody sergeant on the night the Claimant was being detained in custody for an alleged Breach of the Peace very soon dropped by the CPS for fear of publicity.

Rice, having had drafted no less than four versions, all incorrect, of a ‘Breach of the Peace’ allegation committed by the Claimant,  later to be witnessed by the clerk of the Barry Magistrates court and CPS officer Jackie Seels only, the latter then refused to give evidence, whilst in the Cardiff Crown Court witness box, “for fear of incriminating myself”.

Their Worships were not even informed of the circumstances in the case nor allowed sight, as with the prisoner, of the erroneous documentation ‘before them’ or why, before a different court outside the area, many months later the matter was mysteriously dropped for fear, it is recorded [see in seven of the claimant’s leaver arch files], this Claimant ‘may go to prison’.

2.      Retired police officer, ‘Yusser’ Nigel Hughes,appears reluctant in giving evidence relating to Inspectors and ex Barry Inspectors Rice, Howard Hughes and Trigg.

3.     Retired CPS prosecutor Stan Stoffa continues to enjoy immunity to prosecution, as does Seels, by HM Partnership and both need to give evidence re Inspector Rice.

4.      1995 Police officer Ridley, of the covert surveillance team, is also needed having gathered evidence on the Claimant’s numerous vehicles, obtained from a foreign jurisdiction, as did both 1993 Cardiff police and 1993 llantwit Major PC Booker, to harassment.

  1. 5.      The then Special Constable Frank O’Briananother part of the covert surveillance team referred to by an earlier defence witness, Special Constable Deryn Matin,‘spying’ on her own veterinary surgeon was known about by Dolmans from the start.

6.      Jonathan Clayton of ATC, Cardiff Airport, refuses to produce needed evidence of the dangerous and quite unnecessary helicopter chase across the Vale of Glamorgan.

  1. 7.      Inspector Steve Parry has suddenly gone on an ‘extended leave’, the police tell me after a ‘Steve Parry’, located by my private detective, denied all knowledge of any issue I raised over the telephone, this week end.
  2. 8.      Anthony Gafael was been traced, in the eleventh hour and given clear evidence, that can be proved contradicts both retired Chief Inspector Brian Jennerand retired Inspector Robert Nelson Roe. This requires an outside police force investigation.

From Maurice Kirk received  6/5/13

- statements relavent to the police actions upon his proposed vets surgery – just one of an infinite number of harassments M Kirk has suffered at the hands of BARRY POLICE.  His hearing continues at Cardiff Civil Justice Centre.

1]  13 05  03 Witness Statement MK employee.pdf (179.65KB)

http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/tkijy6

2]  Gaphael Statement.pdf (256.03KB)

=============================

02 Legal Battles

                One Million Pounds Costs & English Press cover Story while Senior Police Officers Refused as Claimant’s Witnesses

Is there still nothing new under the Sun?

20 years of Welsh Police dirty tactics just like my 10 years in Guernsey

13 05 05 REDACTED Statement of Insurance Agent.pdf

13 05  03 Witness Statement MK employee.pdf

13 05 04 Gaphael Statement.pdf

02 01 29 Barrister Witness Statement.pdf

09 06 17 Pilot of G-KIRK Statement.pdf

00 03 07 CAA McKENNA letter.pdf

93 03 24 Vet Nurse Statement.pdf

Barbara Wilding was just a little too late to stop me signing my brief statement

as the armed police helicopter hovered overhead, looking for fictitious WW1 machine guns, while waiting for armed police to surround our home in the Vale. We were peacefully drinking afternoon tea in the garden….

Once ‘Operation Chalice ‘ had me well and truly incarcerated for nearly eight months in HM Cardiff Prison the b*stds, under ‘Operation Orchid’ tried to snatch our then 10 year old daughter and put her into ‘care’ using Vale of Glamorgan Social Services……evil b*stds.

09 06 19   64 pages of Witness Statement of Maurice John Kirkl.pdf

Inspector Steve Parry of Barry Police Station

(He spread the rumour I always took a swig of high alcohol mouth-wash each time a police car was spotted on my tail!)

I contacted Steven Parry on the telephone at his home address, recently but he denied being a police officer.

I therefore informed the court of just some of my obvious intentions over him, a Barbara Wilding, past Chief Constable and Defendant in this case and a certain forensic psychiatrist who also can be found, for service of a witness summons, in the same area on the outskirts of Bridgend.

For a bit of fun, yesterday, I rang the police direct, as several serving police on cross examination had told the Cardiff court they had ‘no idea’ or ever ‘heard of’ a detective called Steve Parry.

The lady on the other end of the 101 call was so apologetic as, apparently, Detective Inspector Steve Parry had just started his ‘extended leave’ and was therefore unavailable.

http://litigantsinperson.wordpress.com/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x4kCarvoR7Y

Statement of Truth

I, XXXX XXXXXXXX, confirm that the content of this, my statement, is true to the best of my belief and will say:

1.      I was employed by Mr Kirk in the early 90s as a veterinary receptionist and worked in both his Llantwit Major, Burial Lane and Caerau, Cardiff veterinary surgeries.

2.      I was a witness, in mid 1993, to the police, in force, come to his adjacent flat to the surgery when he had complained of being assaulted by ‘squatters’, had forced entry into the dwelling and were now refusing to leave.

3.      I was also aware the Mr Kirk purchased one Kg of sulphur in order to deter their re entry for the next few days.

4.      But later, during 1993/94, I witnessed the burglary damage of his Llantwit surgery and heard him complaining that the police refused, on each occasion, to even visit the ‘scene of crimes’ and investigate.

5.      I waited a long time on both occasions but no police ever arrived.

6.      On one occasion Mr Kirk had to eventually have a builder, a Mr Fairman, travel from Barry to make the smashed door secure as many dangerous drugs were in the surgery.

7.      I was also aware of his Citroen car that had been vandalised, (smashed windscreen or burnt out?)  parked at the back of his Barry surgery with the police, again, refusing to investigate at all.

8.      I attended Barry magistrates, on Mr Kirk’s instructions, as no one was likely to recognise me as a new member of his staff. I witnessed lots of police kept waiting as Mr Kirk had suffered a motor cycle accident and was in Bridgend hospital.

9.      The case continued without him despite his secretary having contacted the court with the relevant information.

10.  I heard in the court the police speaking to the prosecutor and saying, ‘we are eventually going to get the b std’.

11.  I signed a sworn affidavit, for Mr Kirk’s Appeal in London and attended the subsequent Crown Court hearing tin Cardiff.

Signed

13 05 01 REDACTED EXTRACT Witnesses Ruling  draft ASL.doc

So far in this trial at least four police and ex police under cross examination , working in the Vale at around the relevant times, do not know or heard of a Detective Inspector Stephen Parry, currently at Barry police station. I have had over two months, so far, of this sort of deceit and I am going to do something about it.

It takes the English press to cross the bridge to cover this scandalous trial as All Welsh newspapers have an apparent ‘D’ notice slapped on them.

Yesterday

Retired Sgt Booker’s evidence was considered, for most of the day, over his 1993 ‘liaisons’ with Guernsey police, a predictable line of questioning after some twenty odd police or ex police had flatly denied they had ever heard of me or my wicked Guernsey saga until each time I was arrested (see schedule)

SCHEDULE SWP FINAL.pdf

I appear to now start my evidence on Tuesday (for a little while) at 10.30am

http://kirkflyingvet.com/tags/Guernsey/default.aspx

93 11 08 Rtd Sgt Booker re arrest.pdf

20 05 16 16th May 2000 Booker St.pdf

Nazi Acquittal.docx

Guernsey Legal Aid association docs are all destroyed

December 1992 I am accused of arson while being grilled at Barry police station as the remains of my Guernsey litigation papers destined for RCJ and ECHR smouldered in the ashes…..ITV news footage….

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FJU6U8OdPUc&list=UUo40Twnjw5Z8kYBGqrZHlzw&index=3

http://youtu.be/DWmJGa9RsyM

PHOTO by ‘Rick on the Roof’!

MORE documents later

May Day Command Centre earlier that morning

Published                    May 01 2013, 09:20 AM                    by                    Maurice Kirk

Comments

WhistleBlower2                                    said:

Well well – “It’s not about the money, money, money …” as the song goes – is it?

So splash out & charge a million pounds in costs to defend “the indefensible” to save face / the probity / and the busted pitiful ‘credibility’ of all the leading actors who have ‘always’ managed to evade giving testimony themselves on oath [neat trick that] who have been caught out with their trousers down around their ankles. Talk about the Cognitive Dissonance ‘kicking in’ of The CPS and their friends when they have been irrefutibly proven to have got it clearly wrong in the first instance … ohh no never admit that they got it wrong …

One has to wonder if there had ever been some legal advice given in the past, that the case ought to have been settled out of court but for some or other reason that advice was overlooked?

                                    May 5, 2013 10:48 PM

Maurice Kirk                                    said:

I am refused as Claimant witnesses, during  this next month of evidence being given, the main ring leaders, mainly senior to the rank of police inspector, such as…..the list is almost endless!

                                    May 6, 2013 2:19 AM
—————————————————————————

THIS WHAT IT IS ALL ABOUT

To stop this on going trial , currently in Cardiff County Court, for police now proven police criminal conduct and harassment damages,  from ever reaching cross examination stage, first it was ‘my possession of a machine gun ‘fiasco and then the State playing this fabricated medical ‘findings’, their ‘Gulag Card’, as seventeen years of police harassment, so far and HM assisted ‘treacle treatment; though Cardiff’s iniquitous law courts had failed to block the true state of both our law courts , prisons and police forces, right across The Principality.

09 09 03 MG Trans Redacted.pdf

Their Lordships, together with the documentary evidence that Dr X knowingly falsified, in the presence of South Wales Police officers, his Sect 9 countersigned witness statements, to obtain my false imprisonment, are to consider the ‘ramifications’ of the enclosed transcript from part of 4th May 12 ‘Breach of Restraining Order’ conviction hearing, now the  subject of their deliberations.

The transcript clearly indicates, just as in the 2010 ‘machine gun’ scandalous jury trial, l was refused even my legal papers and personal court exhibits even in the court room!

On 4th May 2012 His Honour Judge Curran QC, whilst I was forced to be absent due to requiring urgent medical attention, had refused me Dr X or any others, named, to be either my ‘character witness’ or as a ‘witness of fact’.

On 1st December 2011 District Judge John Charles had done exactly the same, in my absence, when he convict me for ‘harassment’ of Dr Williams following the publishing of further falsifed documents by Dr X, namely,  my series of NHS (Wales) Caswell Clinic psychiatric reports culminating, on 2nd December 2009, at Cardiff Crown Court, that I be further sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act, due to ‘significant brain damage’ and ‘possible cancer’, in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison.

Closer scutiny of my Caswel Clinic, Bridgend, medical records, discloses, as in his October 2009 psychiatric report, his other and most pressing reason as to why I had to be moved to Broadmoor or Ashworth was because of ‘veiled’ threats , he told me, of ‘reprisals’ by an old gentleman by the name of Norman Scarth!

T20120090 – Kirk – proc from 10.40 – 12.26 – 04.05.12.pdf

Experts in the field confirm there was no sign of relevant brain damage BEFORE Dr. X even writes the report without appropriate qualifications.

On 7th August 09, when he wrote his first released psychiatric report, [previous others only for MAPPA South Wales Police meetings], as His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC stated, when refusing, recently, to ‘strike out’ my one million pound damages claim against NHS (Wales), without evening examining his patient!

09 09 01radiologist scans report.pd

09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009  REDACTED.pdf

09 12 02 Transcript Crn Crt REDACTED.pdf

09 12 17  Court Hearing to Extend IPP.pdf

Published                    Mar 10 2013, 08:56 AM                    by                    Maurice Kirk

source:  http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2013/03/10/lord-leveson-to-hear-maurice-s-application-at-the-criminal-court-of-appeal-sitting-at-cardiff-crown-court.aspx

—————————-

from earlier:

Legal Battles

                I am Arrested at Cardiff Civil Justice Centre requiring 2 Paddy Waggons and Police Car!     Can you Find me RICK ON THE ROOF?

Police oppose bail and lock me up for the night charged with ‘common assault’ on CPS Barrister David Gareth Evans whilst carrying out a ‘Private Person’s Arrest for Perverting the Course of Justice in Magistrates on 1st Dec 2011 and before the Jury trial on 4th May 2012.

Reasons on previous blogs.

THE REAL REASON was because ex Chief Inspector Jenner, ex Robert Nelson Rice and serving Inspector Andrew Rice all committed perjury before the court , a few weeks ago and are being summoned back to court to be further cross examined.

Roe is before the Cardiff County Court, 4th floor, on Monday 29th April at 10.30am ( he orchestrated the breaking into my Cardiff veterinary surgery, with a sledge hammer and crow bar, to put back Jenner’s daughter, with a known drug dealer, in surgery flat.

Police officer Brown ,who , in 1993, had me sent to Cardiff Magistrates and so to jail, as being ‘unidentified ‘ in to be crossexamined on Monday afternoon.

As usual, lunch is on me!

http://www.barryanddistrictnews.co.uk/news/4400480._Rick_on_the_Roof__trial_continues/

09 02 17 WPC Brown nee Biddle s9 statement.pdf

This is a typical example, in court tomorrow, of some thirty odd Chief Constable of South Wales incidents all designed to finance the lawyer trade’ ‘gravy train’, always financed by YOU or ME

Police, whilst I was being interrogated late last night, refused to accept or read the defence statement , below, served on the Chief Constable before I was arrested.

Three proper Cardiff Magistrates, this morning heard how I was under imprisonment in the court by a Lee Barker, sitting in his office in the court cells and was needed to give evidence in the 25th June hearing.

I URGENTLY NEED TO KNOW ‘RICK on the ROOF’s contact details…thankyou

Their worships were also informed that I attempted, for the fifth time of visiting Cardiff Central Police Station, on the issues most relevant, I was refused any police officer to take my written complaints.

Evans was allowed to file his s9 MG11 witness statement, at the station, without any delay.

Kirk v South Wales Police      BS614159

FAO Defendant,

Evidence of Similar Fact

  1. A four year campaign, instigated by the then Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, in order to getting  me lawfully shot as a MAPPA level 3 target, was assisted throughout by Dolmans, solicitors of Cardiff purely to delay these current court proceedings.
  1. Evidence has been heard, throughout the past eight weeks of your police having made use of a sledge hammer and crow bar in order to gain entry to my veterinary surgery and overhead flat just to re install a daughter of a Chief Inspector Jenner ‘shacked up’ with a believed to be drug dealer.
  1. Ex Inspector Robert Nelson Roe is currently giving evidence on how he received a complaint from the ‘tenant’ but has denied even knowing me yet alone taking any of my numerous complaints of the thousands of pounds of criminal damage that had been caused by this couple.

13 04 22 SWP Defendants Position Statement.pdf

  1. I have been allowed to tape record the evidence of certain police and ex police officers but it appears, before I receive the final ruling on it, that I cannot keep the tapes for more than ten days, when they must be destroyed nor may I duplicate and take the information to an outside police force or use it in my planned private criminal prosecutions. The case continues for a further month, at least.
  1. An Inspector Andrew Rice, I am told, crossed the Severn Bridge with others to persuade a prosecution witness, in a trial in Bristol , to alter his evidence against me.
  1. During this trial he has, so far, denied being aware of an incident in Barry magistrates when I was forced to make a private person’s arrest on Crown Prosecutor Stan Stoffa, acting for Barbara Wilding, when the police were trying to prosecute me for a speeding offence. All along they had a clear photograph of the driver caught on a roadside camera, a member of my employ.
  1. Barbara Wilding’s February 2009 signing of her affidavit was delayed for six weeks, contrary to the 2008 court order, in order for Dolmans to assist in using falsified medical evidence, in order for me to be incarcerated to stop the above sort of evidence ever seeing the light of day. She denied knowledge of court cases or the break-ins to my various veterinary surgeries having ever occurred.
  1. Barbara Wilding has been protected from giving evidence in this twelve week trial just as those were in my criminal trials who conspired with her, in February 2009, to have me first jailed, on the 22nd June 2009 for trading in machine guns.
  1. Then, when that was due to fail, considered me mentally ‘unfit’ to stand trial. There is, of course, complete press censorship over all this, a case, yet again of‘evidence of similar fact’.
  1. Today, an ex police inspector, by the name of Howard Davies confirmed that his‘witness statement’, for these ongoing civil proceedings, was sent in the post by Dolmans simply for him to sign. He had earlier given false evidence, in Cardiff Crown Court, on an incident at the Vale of Glamorgan Show contributing to my name being removed from the veterinary register for life.
  1. Without your police first successfully having blackmailed an NHS(Wales) doctor to say I was so dangerous, Operations ‘Chalice’ and ‘Orchid’ could not of hatched the 2009 ‘WW1machine gun’/'Edwardian shooting walking stick’ imprisonments with Dolmans as your legal advisers.
  1. The lack of integrity within the Welsh Crown Prosecution Service, over all these issues, is also seriously being exposed in these civil proceedings. Your armed officers, using Social Services, even attempted to snatch our then ten year old daughter which instigated immediate unwanted divorce proceedings.
  1. I made a private person’s arrest, before witnesses and covered by CCTV, on a culprit, now traced, being a key player in my complaint of cover up within Cardiff’s judicial system and frightening control over its regional media.
  1. Arrested barrister, David Gareth Evans, admitted before His Honour Judge John Curran QC and me, that he believed he needed to be my defence witness in the 4th May 2012 jury trial over the ‘Breach of a Restraining Order’, an order never served on me in the first place. Why? He retained the draft order.
  1. He admitted being the author and being in control of the draft version of a proposed ‘restraining order’ that had, in fact, been shown to me in the cells in 2011, caught on cell CCTV and recorded, obviously, in both court and custody records.
  1. But the trial jury saw none of it despite their jury note specific request withheld, incidentally, from me throughout the remainder of the trial, my having to be taken back to the prison following my forced ejection from the dock whilst trying to produce vital defense documents.
  1. I am concerned that my repeated requests, to attending Cardiff Civil Justice Centre staff, for the police to be called was complied with and despite waiting for well over an hour obtained no police assistance what so ever.
  1. Both my Bristol solicitors and Cardiff barrister have been attempting, for many months now, to obtain CPS documentation, such as court depositions and record of at least eight previous court hearings from David Garreth Evans and others for ECHR, the Criminal Case Review Commission, General Medical Council and Bar Council.
  1. My latest fabricated imprisonment, in August 12, flowed from Evans’ prosecution as barrister in both the original 2011 magistrates and jury trial hearings for alleged harassment and breach of a restraining order.
  1. The police know last summer’s allegation of harassment was false but refuse to act on my complaint of perverting the course of justice. My lawyers do even get replies to their correspondence. This further false evidence, previously much controlled by Evans, unchallenged in ALL criminal courts of Cardiff, so far, are again laid by NHS (Wales) personnel, immune themselves to prosecution, had me jailed for many months, just as with the ‘machine gun’, simply to prejudice these twenty year running civil proceedings.

1] After a few months of my imprisonment, last summer, the CPS dropped all charges and I am denied those papers needed in this trial.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc                                       25thApril 2013

The Supreme Court of England and Wales and GMC is where this South Wales Scandal is destined

                    Published                    Apr 25 2013, 09:55 PM                    by                    Maurice Kirk

Comments

No Comments

About Maurice Kirk

                    Maurice was born 12th March1945, a war baby, in Taunton, Somerset, West of England,  within a final family of four brothers and one sister while mother and father were working 24/7 to run a country veterinary practice. Country pursuits very much dominated his spare time from most sports with his passion still for hunting , shooting and fishing! Maurice is currently trying to fly to South Africa in  his WW2 Piper Cub,registration G-KURK. His other D-Day Cub, G-KERK, is destined, on skis, for a rather taller mountain after his promise to Sir Edmond, six years ago. Meanwhile, the task of obtaining justice in the UK courts, in order to practice veterinary surgery, is proving to be somewhat elusive.Authority has quite another agenda.

source:  http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2013/04/25/vet-arrested-drunk-in-charge-south-wales-police-style-tomorow-in-court.aspx

below: Maurice at Cardiff Central hospital in September 2011 after being taken there after a beating by prison personnel during just one of many incarcerations for no reason connected to the Musa case – see

...aa 01-12-11_1811

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

NIGEL COOPER UPDATE 4/5/13 – LETTER TO THE QUEEN – BELGIAN ROYAL JUDGEMENT

As each day passes the loving parent of stolen children gather momentum. There are so many groups of 1000′s of parent, BUT.. and I will emphasis BUT, each group remains alone.  There is an old statement. “Untied we stand, divided we fall”.  So I will ask you all one again.  Join this group and become part of something much bigger.  https://www.facebook.com/groups/savingbailiekatecooper/ You are all aware, that it the Queen fails to reply to my letter with the return of my daughter I will issue criminal charges against HM Queen Elizabeth for contempt or court for refusing a court order.  “Oh that will not be in a secret court, it will be very public!
———————————————————–

Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II Queen of England Buckingham Palace London England … 29th April 2013

Reference (a) King Albert II royal assent judgment 14th March 2012 (below)

Reference (b) UK’s Mr. Moylan’s blatant refusal to obey the law. (below)

Ma’am,

My name is Mr. Nigel Cooper, a Belgian habitual resident of many years.  I am in possession of the judgment at reference (a).  The judgment is a Belgian judgment, an E.U. judgment and an International judgment. It is also the continued binding to the ratification of the Hague convention, the treaty of Rome and the Lisbon treaty that was recently ratified and signed by your current Prime Minister Mr. David Cameron on 11th October 2011 in Lisbon, Portugal transferring pillar one of law to Europe. I once served for you in the Royal Navy. I severed for twenty-two and a half years, (D175549N). I went to war three times in your name. I was abused in the Royal Navy when persons under your name injected me with the bio-hazard “Anthrax” against the Geneva convention! I was awarded thirteen medals in your name. I took my skills to NATO where I continued to work for peace, freedom, democracy and the law. I want to know why Mr. Andrew Moylan has the right to disobey the law? As all officers of your courts draw their ultimate power from you, I want to know why you have authorized the officers of your courts to break the law? I am in possession of a lawful judgment served against the UK. Your family courts have tried everything possible to stop me enforcing my judgment. I have been lied to and I have had my civil rights abused against my right as laid down in the Magna Charta. I have been witness to the perversion of justice, perjury and fraud.

I have had my life threatened to a point where my address is no longer disclosed. What I have been witness to is the greatest abuse of power in the history of mankind. Ma’am, I want my judgment enforcing in full, where the ultimate responsibility lay’s with you. As it is clearly sated in the judgment: “everybody is supposed to obey the law”, Ma’am that is you and I include. This letter exposes me to a potential act of treason before you. That is, if I was a resident of your country; that is, if I hold your passport; for which I longer wish to hold. I once believed in my queen and country, I fought for the freedom of your country. Now your families courts abuse the very man who was prepared to lay down his life for that queen and country; when asked where I am from, at this time, alas I am utterly ashamed to have to call myself British! Though I write this letter to your personally, I write this letter in public, my judgment is public for all to read, therefore every document generated in the execution of this judgment is also public.  This document has been published publically in accordance with the law. Please enforce my judgment and return my daughter in accordance with the law.

Respectfully

Mr. Nigel Cooper

—————————————————————-

 

Cde N° : 188

REGISTRAR OFFICE

COUNTY COURT OF MONS

R.G. : 11/3804/A

We, Albert II, King of Belgium,

To all, present and future, let hereby known :

Mrs. Benedetti Sylvia

Solicitor

Rue Sainte-Victoire, 25

7301 Hornu

NOTIFICATIONS 14 MARCH 2012

1322 DECIES § 7

JUDICIAL NOTIFICATIONS

1 Central Authority

2 Parties

1 PR

PRESIDENTIAL CHAMBER

Directory number 12/2869

Year Two Thousand and Twelve, on March Fourteenth;

Following his deliberation, Xavier HIERNAUX, Single Judge of the County Court of Mons, Hainaut Province, assisted by Christine VACHAUDEZ, Registrar in this jurisdiction, has handed down in summary proceedings the following verdict in open court :

R.G. N°11/3804/A

IN THE CASE OF :

Mister Nigel Cooper,

Domiciled in 7020 MONS (Belgique), Rue Grande, 205/2.2 ;

The Applicant ;

Attending the hearing, assisted by his Counsel Mrs Sylvia BENEDETTI, Solicitor, whose Law Firm is registered in 7031 HORNU (Belgique), rue Sainte-Victoire, 25 ;

AGAINST :

Mrs Gail COOPER,

Domiciled in 41, Ennerdale, Albany, Washington, NE37 1 BW (United Kingdom) ;

The Defendant ;

Neither attending nor represented at the hearing ;

IN THE PRESENCE OF :

Mister Henri RENARD, Substitute for the Royal Prosecutor

of the Public Prosecuting Office of the Mons County Court, 7000 Mons, and whose offices are registered in 7000 MONS, rue de Nimy, 28 ; Representing at the hearing, THE FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE OF JUSTICE,

Central Authority of Judicial Cooperation in civil matters,

Legislation Bureau of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms

File WL 16/LH/2011/1213/VA

Offices registered at 1000 BRUXELLES, boulevard de Waterloo, 115 ;

Upon the decision filed in the registry of this Court on 21 December 2011, and rendered on 25 November 2011 by the High Court of Justice of London denying the return to Belgium of the child Bailie Kate COOPER, born on 1 August 2003, and the related documents, forwarded by the Belgian Central Authority under article 1322 decies § 1 of the judicial Code, pursuant to article 11.6 of the Regulations (EC) following the consultation of the British Central Authority on an application for obtaining the immediate return of a child, initiated by the Belgian Central Authority on 14 October 2011, under the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the civil aspects of child abduction and articles 1322 bis to 1322 quaterdecies of the judicial Code ;

Upon the notification given on 23 December 2011 to Gail COOPER, Nigel COOPER, the Office of the Mons Public Prosecutor, on 4 January 2012 to Mrs Stephanie ADAMS, Solicitor, and Mr Graeme Langlands, Solicitor (Millsdonkin&co, Solicitors) ;

Upon the conclusions submitted and based on article 11 of Brussels II bis and article 1322 bis of the judicial Code for Nigel COOPER, initialed by the Registry of the Court on 31 January 2012 as well as the attached file of documents ;

Upon the notices 1322 decies of the judicial Code, sent on 1 February to the Office of the Mons Public Prosecutor, Nigel COOPER, his counsel, Gail COOPER, Mrs Stephanie ADAMS, Solicitor, Mr Graeme Langlands, Solicitor (Millsdonkin&co, Solicitors), regarding the hearing set on 22 February 2012 ;

Upon the correspondence from Millsdonkin&co, Solicitors (Mrs Gail COOPER’s counsel in England), addressed to the Registry of the Court on 10 February 2012 ;

Upon the correspondence received by fax from Williscroft & co, Solicitors (Mr Nigel COOPER’s counsel in England), and initialed by the Registry of the Court on 13 February 2012 ;

Upon the transcript of the 24 November 2011 hearing held under British Jurisdiction, sent by fax in its English version and initialed by the Registry of the Court on 21 and 22 February (fax and correspondence), and its corresponding English translation ;

Upon the correspondence from the Sunderland City Council, sent by fax to the Registry of the Court on 22 February 2012 ;

Heard at the hearing on 22 February 2012 :

Mister Henri RENARD, substitute for the Mons Public Prosecutor,

Mister Nigel COOPER, assisted by his counsel Mrs BENEDETTI, Solicitor, and an English language interpreter, Mrs Catherine REYNELBERGE,

The trial debates have been declared closed and the cause has been taken under advisement,

Upon, provided at such hearing : the files for Nigel COOPER ;

Upon the fact that, although regularly convened by the Registry of the Court, the Defendant Gail COOPER did not attend nor was she represented at Our 22 February 2012 Hearing ;

That as far as she is concerned the Court shall rule by default and without further examination, on the basis of the means, files, and conclusions presented and provided by the attending parties ;

 

OBJECT AND ADMISSIBILITY OF THE REQUEST

 

Given the request, formulated by the conclusions provided to the Registry of the Court on 31 January 2012 for Nigel COOPER, on the basis of article 11 of the European Regulations No. 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003, also known as “Brussels II bis” and article 1322 bis of the judicial Code, is disposed to grant to Nigel COOPER primary custody of his daughter Bailie Kate COOPER, born on 1 August 2003 in Coventry (united Kingdom) from his union with Gail COOPER, and therefore order immediate return of the child to the Kingdom of Belgium, in this case to the domicile of her father, registered in 7020 MONS (Belgium), rue Grande, 205/2.2 and in this respect, on forfeiture of a penalty of 500 euros per day of delay, Our decision being additionally supplemented by the passport certificate in accordance with the “BRUSSELS II bis” Regulation, under the conditions, modalities and authorizations better outlined in the arrangement scheme of the initiating proceedings ; that subsequently the request is pursuing the right for secondary custody in favor of Nigel COOPER regarding his daughter Bailie Kate COOPER, the modalities being better detailed in the operative part of the conclusions ;

That this request, justified in its means and submitted within the legal deadline, shall be receivable ;

CAUSE FOR THE REQUEST

Brief background facts

Considering that the applicant Nigel COOPER settled in Belgium in January 2006 as he was hired as Principal Consultant for Network Security at SHAPE ;

Considering that he was later joined by his daughter on 12 October 2006 as attested by the residence certificate written and signed by the Civil Registrar of the City of Mons on 30 September 2011, based on a private power of attorney provided by the defendant Gail COOPER on 5 August 2006, which reads as follows : “I, Gail COOPER, mother of Bailie Kate COOPER, authorize

Bailie Kate COOPER to live with her father Nigel COOPER” ;

That the defendant later joined the applicant and his daughter on 20 January 2007 to live with him, first in Mons, than later in Lessines ;

Considering that during the period of the time they lived together, the applicant obviously catered to the well-being of his daughter, mainly by himself and because of the clear addiction to drugs and alcohol which already afflicted the defendant at the time ;

That, no less than twenty-five independent testimonies were written and provided to the file of the applicant in order to attest of the true attentive care he was providing his daughter, as well as the quality of the level of education he was offering her ;

Considering that on 3 March 2011, the defendant committed a felony by taking the child Bailie Kate to the United Kingdom, and did so after having willingly misled to local authorities of the City of Lessines, in playing on the existing similarity of names between the applicant, herself, and a someone named Paul COOPER, who was her first husband, and father of a daughter named Keeva-Rae, the so-called Paul COOPER granting the defendant, after signing a private power of attorney on 7 December 2007, full authority to leave the Kingdom of Belgium with his daughter Keeva-Rae COOPER ;

That on 5 November 2011, the Mayor of the City of Lessines acknowledged that he had indeed been completely misled and as a result stated so in writing, explaining that in fact the applicant Nigel COOPER had never given to the defendant Gail COOPER the written authorization to leave the Belgian territory accompanied by their daughter Bailie COOPER;

That in accordance to the provisions of the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the civil aspects of international child abduction, the applicant COOPER contacted on 21 September 2011 the Belgian Central Authority, i.e. the Federal Public Service of Justice to notify them of the parental abduction and thus asked for the immediate return of the child to Belgium ;

That, in addition, the child contacted her father again as early as 13 November 2011 to let him know that she felt unsafe with her mother and her new partner, this once again proving the alcoholism and drug abuse of the defendant, Gail COOPER ;

That the British High Court of Justice ordered against the return of the child on 25 November 2011 ;

And that following a decision that can be criticized on many grounds, which were clearly taken out of context or subject to a utterly subjective and inadequate interpretation, Our British counterpart considered that the applicant Nigel COOPER had simply, through his mere acts, given his consent to the mother to take the child, under article 13 of the Hague Convention ;

Debate

Considering that We do not wish to remind of the legal, international, and internal provisions applicable in this case, since “no one is supposed to ignore the Law” ;

That the request of Nigel COOPER, which aims to grant him custody of his daughter, is fundamentally based on article 11.7 of the Brussels II Regulations ;

That there is no doubt whatsoever that the whole family was residing in Belgium until the defendant Gail COOPER committed a felony ;

That the child Bailie Kate was therefore indeed a legal resident in Belgium ;

Considering that the applicant never gave his consent for his daughter to depart to the United Kingdom ;

That it has been clearly established that the defendant COOPER misled the authorities of the City of Lessines in order to get hold of the authorizations she needed ;

That the letter written on 1 March 2011 by the applicant to the defendant, reference C38 of the file of British Court, relates exclusively to the applicant’s consent to the departure of his wife, and not the departure of his daughter ;

That indeed, this document clearly bears the following reference “the departure and return of Mrs Gail COOPER to the United Kingdom” ;

That the interpretation of the British Judge regarding the email that Gail COOPER addresses to the applicant on 15 August 2011, is in fact exactly the opposite of its actual meaning ;

That this email does not, in any case, lead to the conclusion that there was no illegal departure of the child ;

Considering also that the financial support offered by Nigel COOPER to his spouse does not demonstrate his will to offer child support contributions to his spouse in the maintenance and educational costs of his daughter, hence does not either automatically imply that Gail COOPER does in effect and lawfully benefit from the prerogatives of custody rights, but rather show that he is strictly complying with his duty of supporting his spouse while in marriage, as described in article 203  in the Belgian Civil Code;

Considering that at every single contact between the applicant and his daughter by videoconference, the child strongly expressed her wishes to go back to Belgium, and that this clearly indicates that she was not properly cared for by her mother and the partner of her mother ;

That the British Social Services, warned by the applicant’s letter, took over the case while the  Children Social Welfare Services of Sunderland presented a written agreement to the parties on 12 January 2012, which aim was to minimize (sic!) all risks for Bailie and promote her emotional, social, and physical well-being – agreement made between Mrs Gail Cooper, her current partner Derek JOHNSON and the Sunderland Local Authority ;

That, in accordance to the above-mentioned agreement, Mr Derek JOHNSON was no longer authorized to stay overnight at the residence of the defendant whenever the child was present, going as far as pointing out that when the child was staying at the residence, Mr JOHNSON and the defendant COOPER should refrain from consuming alcohol or any illicit drugs “resic!” ;

That the above-mentioned agreement also suggested that the defendant should report to a service called “Riverside Women in Need”, which is sponsored by the University of Sunderland and meant to help victims of domestic abuse, this very invitation clearly indicating the level of “quality” of the relation between the defendant and her partner Derek JOHNSON ;

That the later was supposed to report to a service called “The Head Project”, sponsored by the same university and meant to help abusive and violent individuals, this invitation obviously being a consequence of the similar invitation made to the defendant COOPER… ;

Considering that in planning the hearings of the British High Court of Justice scheduled on 24 and 25 November 2011, an independent consulting organization called “CAFCASS” as per the translation “Service of counsel and support to the family court” provided a child abduction report, which made us believe beyond any reasonable doubt that what Bailie Kate COOPER genuinely wished for was to go back and live under the roof of her father, as Mrs Liliane ODZE reports ;

That this report indeed shows that even if the child remains, and it is by far understandable, torn apart by the inevitable conflict of loyalty between parents, she does not however shows any clear preference in her wishes in remaining in England but rather she insists on going back to her father’s home, while expressing her wish to meet regularly with her maternal grandfather, and, of course, her mother ;

That the British Judge should have, in view of all the elements which were given to his appreciation, ordered the evident return of the child in the country of her choice, i.e. the Kingdom of Belgium ;

That We shall order this course of action, which also obviously meets the greater and objective interests of the child ;

That no guarantee can be obtained in this regard within the home of her mother, knowing that the removal and/or control precautions of the mother and her partner as described in the agreement made on 12 January 2012 do not strictly constitute a binding constraint or even an obligation ;

Considering finally that Our decision will be supplemented with the passport certificate as referred to in article 42 of the Brussels II bis Regulation; passport certificate which is to be handed to the applicant Nigel COOPER, along with this decision ;

That based on the Rule of Law, the home of the parent who is honorable and capable to respect the prerogatives of the custody of his child must be preferred to any other care structure or any other home of replacement, as respectable as these may be ;

That Nigel COOPER effectively complies with these conditions and requirements in this case ;

FOR THOSE REASONS,

We, Xavier HIERNAUX, Single Judge, assisted by Christine VACHAUDEZ, Registrar ;

Upon the provisions of the law of 15 June 1935 applied in this case, and article 107 of the law of 22 December 1998 ;

Upon article 11 of the European Regulations Nr. 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003, also known as “Brussels II bis” and article 1322 bis of the judicial Code ;

Hereby record the claim, denials and reservations of the appearing party, and deem all further or contrary conclusions unsubstantiated;

Having heard Mister Henri RENARD, Substitute for the Royal Prosecutor, who gave his assent at the hearing of 22 February 2012 ;

Rule by default

against the defendant Gail COOPER, and upon hearing the other parties in summary proceedings ;

Declare the request of Nigel COOPER admissible,

And pronounce his request well-founded for the specific purpose stated below ;

As a result :

Grant custody rights for the child Bailie Kate COOPER, born in Coventry (United Kingdom) on 1 August 2003, to Nigel COOPER, her father, with whom the child will have her official residence ;

Order the immediate return of Bailie Kate COOPER, born on 1 August 2003, to the Kingdom of Belgium, and in this case within the official residence of her father Nigel COOPER, as registered rue Grande, 205/2.2 in 7020 MONS, and in the absence of complying with the obligation of return of the child by the defendant Gail COOPER , we condemn her to a daily fine amounting to FIVE HUNDRED EUROS (500€) for the delay in the return of the child, to be enforced and paid starting on the day following the service of this decision ;

Declare that this decision is supplemented by the passport certificate referred to in article 42 of the Brussels II bis Regulation, which is delivered to Nigel COOPER upon sending it to him ;

Authorize, as needed, Nigel COOPER to take back or arrange the removal of his daughter Bailie COOPER as soon as this decision is rendered ;

Empower the Police Forces to retrieve this child wherever she may be located, whether a bailiff is present or not as per his mission of executing the present judgment ;

Expressly authorize the Police Forces as well as the bailiff to force any entrance, even private and even if it is somewhere else than the school she attends or the domicile of Gail COOPER, this for the sole purpose of retrieving Bailie, if necessary with the assistance of a locksmith in order to open and even break open doors, may these be private entrances ;

Declare that the entire fees and disbursements generated by the execution of this decision will have to be paid exclusively by the defendant Gail COOPER, and condemn her to pay back to Nigel COOPER  all fees he may have given up front, upon a simple justification of payment ;

Condemn Gail COOPER to pay the costs and expenses of these proceedings, as they are not to be settled by Nigel COOPER and deemed to be lawfully reserved in accordance to article 21 of the judicial Code ;

Declare the present judgment to be provisionally enforceable aside from any appeal and without any security nor special cantonment offer ;

This is our judgment and it is pronounced in French, at the public hearing of the Presidential Chamber, at the Mons Court of Justice, on the day, month, and year mentioned on top, where sat :

Mister Xavier HIERNAUX, single Judge,

Madam Christine VACHAUDEZ, Registrar.

C. VACHAUDEZ X. HIERNAUX.

 

Presented on 15 March 2012

not registrable

Chief Inspector a.I.

Ch. FRETIN

R.G. 11/3804/A

Summon and hereby order all Judicial Officers to enforce the existing judgment to this end ;

To all our Public Prosecutors and Royal Prosecutors at the County Courts to assist them and to the Commanders and Officers of the Public Force to support when they are legally required to do so.

In witness whereof, the present order has been legally signed and sealed by the Court.

For certified execution delivered to Mister Nigel Cooper.

(seal of the County Court of Mons) The Chief Registrar

M-J SAUCEZ

Registrar’s Office of the County Court of Mons

Date : 16/03/2012  Der : 2843

8 pages at 2,85 euros

Duties paid : 22,80 euros

The Chief Registrar

M-J SAUCEZ

 

#################################

 

Attatched is the “judgement” given by the top Belgian judge which the UK government is ignoring, breaking international law!

UPDATES – NIGEL COOPER – APRIL 2013

Cover Photo

UK Caught Stealing Children

 

“Just to keep you all up to date with what I am doing and why I am doing this. 1. September 2011 My daughter is kidnapped from Belgium 2. November 2011 The Hague request’s for return. (UK refused on Article 13) 3. December 2011 Belgium issues a seizure notice of the Hague article (11) 4. February 2012 Belgium hears and re-tries the seizure case and awards the immediate return of my daughter to Belgium under Article 11, under international law, under Belgian law, Under UK law, under E.U. law, under universal law. Belgium writes the perfect judgement and has the judgment sworn as omnipotent before King Albert II, King of Belgium; who then declares the judgement as a royal decree! 5. March 16th 2012 Belgian Bailiff flies to the UK to serve notice of the judgement on the EJC in the Strand London, Bailiffs receipt note held on record in the Royal courts of Mons Belgium. 6. March 16th 2012 Belgian advocate instructs Sunderland Social services that a return order has been issued by the King of Belgium. 7. March 16th Sunderland Social services “refuse” the “non-refusable”? 8. March 16th Belgian advocate informs Sunderland Social servers in the name of “Ms. Joanna Bonar” that she acting as the legal representative of the UK, have just breached The Hague convention, the Lisbon treaty and many more. 9. April 2012 Justice Moylan formally refuses international law, refuses my right of appeal, refuses my civil rights, my human rights and condones the kidnapping of my daughter, harbors a known felon who has a bench warrant out against her. 10. I’ve now been refused every form of legal assistance in the UK to recover my daughter. 11 16Th April 2013… to this day the UK refuses to return my daughter and has broken just above every law there is! 12. I’ve had 5 death treats made against me from the UK, via telecom calls, or published articles. 13. The UK went as far as to interfere with NATO’s employment schemes and had me dismissed for no reason what so ever. 14. I’ve had to move out of Belgium and go into hiding due to the threats on my life, all for asking the law to be obeyed! 15. The list of wrongs just keep going and the power of the judgment keep growing, to a point I was granted rights of Bailiff, I was grants right of arrest, I was grants unlimited resource to enforce the judgement; and as I started by telling you, the judgment is perfect, there is an “UNLIMITED” indemnity clause, the UK will have to pay for the total cost of this case as to date this case has not been enforced as it is deemed under article 21 of the law that all costs will be born by Ms. Cooper, who in turn; the Sunderland Social Services have sworn on oath to cover all costs of Ms. Cooper.

When this case is enforced it will bankrupt Sunderland city, It will bankrupt Sunderland local authorities, it will bankrupt the central authority and higher. The judgement is perfect and it will kill the forced adoption in the UK once and for all. The Judgement was is perfect, the judgement is a master of English. The UK have been caught stealing children for profit.

I will not stop and I will not bow down to the UK.From Nigel Cooper – 17 April 2013:

UK Caught Stealing Children

To all of you who and following my battle with the UK to see justice severed. Well! What can one say! Justice in the UK? That is a very silly thing to mutter, to a point that you can’t put justice and the UK in the same sentence it does not work! I once thought, a very long time ago that the social services was just that, a SERVICE for humanity when in fact it is a profit making mechanism bolstered by the abduction of international children, you and I call that kidnap, oh an that is an international felony under the international penal code, but the UK just ignore that one, it does not count when the UK’s name is used. I once thought a judge was an honorable person! I see no honor amongst the thieves of the courts of the UK. … I once though that the UK stood for the rights of freedom and liberty as laid down in the Magna Carta 1297 A.D, and in the rights and freedoms of lords and men of 1100 A.D.It seems that those enshrined laws and covenants go by the wayside when the social services, when the judges, when the corrupt police get involved.

I once thought that truth would prevail! That’s until I discovered the fake doctors and social workers, the fake legal people, the fake M.P.s and much more. So how much is a child worth to the UK? Moreover, how much is a child worth to you! I know that there is NO SUM on this planet that can replace what has been stolen from myself, and to multiply that figure to cover every stolen child and we are in the realms of an evil deed that is so great, so evil, so woefully painful to parents it transcends all realms of humanity. For what I see, the social service’s are undertaking is the greatest abuse of power in the history of mankind. If the UK supports this act of abuse of power, then the world should turn its back up on the UK, the world should cast down a shadow over the UK and reject the UK from the community of mankind, the UK should be openly punished before the eyes of humanity for humanity, for each and every one of us. From a time before Christ….. A wise king known as King Solomon was tasked with the fable of two women and a child. I suggest you read it. I will fight for my daughter, I will lay down my life for my daughter, I will see justice served if it is the last thing I do in my life.I will not bow down the UK, I will never agree to the lies and frauds of the UK. To that end..

Sir, Madam I am looking for two things:

1. Good international legal assistance

2. Good media coverage.

I am in possession of the perfect judgment sworn before the King of Belgium, King Albert II as the omnipotent judgement. It is perfect at every point of law. I want someone to force this judgement to be obeyed in the UK. I openly offer 1,000,000 Euros to any person who get’s my judgment enforced in full. If you would like to read the judgement…

I’ll send you a copy just ask me….

mr.nigel.cooper@gmail.com

Respectfully

Mr. Nigel Cooper

######################################

UK Caught Stealing Children

When I am asked to “prove” ??? the UK steals children for profit.. I reply!

How much information do you want? You need documents facts, books? Tax returns? Companies House financial returns? All you have to do is ask people here, each one of them can give you a big slice of this information. There are bigger players who have been at this for many years collecting and collating information. I am not just one person I am one of 10′s of 1000′s of parents who have worked this out. It does not take rocket science to do this, just a good head and a clear understanding of public records. To put just one person into the picture.. “A single Doctor” This doctor who is actually not a doctor but a fake, her company ( a doctor as a company).. make 43,000% yes forty three thousand percent profit in a 12 month period.

Questions??? Why was this abnormal profit not investigated by HMRC or Companies house, or whoever was paying the doctor for services rendered why did they not ask. Then there are the so called M.P. for families? Hold on a second is this the same M.P. how publicly boasts of is prowess with women? Is this the same M.P. who “girl-friend” is a director of a THE company that provides all of the IT infrastructure to the foster homes and centers? Is this the same M.P. who ranted for so long on a families bill that was nothing more than a whitewash of the facts. So not the Core-IT directors and just “aquired” the group of people who form expert witness’s.. So now the Social Services, have the doctors, the legal teams, the so called expert witness’s and the judges all colluding?

You’ve got no idea what’ going on! each week some 250 to 300 children are taken.. Yes a 1000 children a month taken for no reason other that for profit. The SS staff take the children so they have a job, they pass it up the chain to the legal teams have a job and make a profit, the courts have their own budget that just get bigger and bigger. The foster homes, cafcass teams, social workers, doctors, police, judges, and much more are all involved is creating a vast financial turnover in children for profit. Give the past figures and records, it dose not take too much effort to extrapolate those figures into a future forecast. That forecast is damming beyond belief, by the years 2020, at the rate the UK is stealing children, they will be able to wholesale children like a commodity, like, gas, coal and steal. Stealing children is very big money!

Hence my original statement.”

————————————————-

video: NIGEL COOPER – CHILD STEALING – UK BREAKS INTERNATIONAL LAW

UK Column Live – Nigel Cooper live on UK CAUGHT STEALING CHILDREN

72 min. video:

——————————————————

. from:   nigel cooper

Published on 29 Mar 2013

“I told the would I would not stop! I will not stop, I will publish to the world. What I do I do not do for myself only, I do for the community of mankind, for… “We the people for the people”, Let no man take from mankind the gift of mother nature the gift of life, let alone a judge or social worker.”

———————————- “EUROPEAN COURTS COME AFTER UK ‘SOCIAL SERVICES”

http://www.cornwallcommunitynews.co.uk/2013/04/03/european-courts-come-after-uk-social-services/

“A European judge has ordered police to force Britain’s rogue ‘family courts’ to hand back a child they kidnapped from her father.

Judges in Belgium made the landmark ruling ordering officials in the UK’s tyrannical secret law courts to give former NATO security contractor Nigel Coopers daughter back to him….”  contd.

Do you know of a scandal involving the SS in Cornwall? Have your efforts to publicise your case come to nothing because no-one will listen? Let us know. Just post below.

source: http://www.cornwallcommunitynews.co.uk/2013/04/03/european-courts-come-after-uk-social-services/

—————

Nigel Cooper: see much more, who did it, and vital comments:  “BANNED from the UK: NATO Security Consultant because the “UK has been caught red handed stealing children”

http://punishmentwithoutcrime.wordpress.com/2013/03/11/banned-from-the-uk-nato-security-consultant-because-the-uk-has-been-caught-red-handed-stealing-children/

———————

Nigel Cooper: be.linkedin.com/in/mrnigelcooper/ Skype: n1gelc00per Tel +32 065822500  (Home) Tel +32 0470177526 (GSM – Primary) Tel +32 0478506328 (GSM – Secondary)

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

VICKI HAIGH GIVEN 28 DAYS – UPDATE 3 MAY 13

Following on from last week   [received}:

“…Vicky is in Peterborough jail this time having been given 28 days without a trial. It seems very clear that her entrapment and arrest came about as a consequence of her approaching the police and CPS over re-investigating the evidence of her ex-husband David Tune’s sexual abuse of their older daughter R.”

What is this place coming to??

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

NIGEL COOPER – LETTER TO THE QUEEN – 29/4/13

Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II Queen of England Buckingham Palace London England … 29th April 2013
Reference (a) King Albert II royal assent judgment 14th March 2012 (Attached)
Reference (b) UK’s Mr. Moylan’s blatant refusal to obey the law. (Attached)
Ma’am,
My name is Mr. Nigel Cooper, a Belgian habitual resident of many years.  I am in possession of the judgment at reference (a).  The judgment is a Belgian judgment, an E.U. judgment and an International judgment. It is also the continued binding to the ratification of the Hague convention, the treaty of Rome and the Lisbon treaty that was recently ratified and signed by your current Prime Minister Mr. David Cameron on 11th October 2011 in Lisbon, Portugal transferring pillar one of law to Europe. I once served for you in the Royal Navy. I severed for twenty-two and a half years, (D175549N). I went to war three times in your name. I was abused in the Royal Navy when persons under your name injected me with the bio-hazard “Anthrax” against the Geneva convention! I was awarded thirteen medals in your name. I took my skills to NATO where I continued to work for peace, freedom, democracy and the law. I want to know why Mr. Andrew Moylan has the right to disobey the law? As all officers of your courts draw their ultimate power from you, I want to know why you have authorized the officers of your courts to break the law? I am in possession of a lawful judgment served against the UK. Your family courts have tried everything possible to stop me enforcing my judgment. I have been lied to and I have had my civil rights abused against my right as laid down in the Magna Charta. I have been witness to the perversion of justice, perjury and fraud.
I have had my life threatened to a point where my address is no longer disclosed. What I have been witness to is the greatest abuse of power in the history of mankind. Ma’am, I want my judgment enforcing in full, where the ultimate responsibility lay’s with you. As it is clearly sated in the judgment: “everybody is supposed to obey the law”, Ma’am that is you and I include. This letter exposes me to a potential act of treason before you. That is, if I was a resident of your country; that is, if I hold your passport; for which I longer wish to hold. I once believed in my queen and country, I fought for the freedom of your country. Now your families courts abuse the very man who was prepared to lay down his life for that queen and country; when asked where I am from, at this time, alas I am utterly ashamed to have to call myself British! Though I write this letter to your personally, I write this letter in public, my judgment is public for all to read, therefore every document generated in the execution of this judgment is also public.  This document has been published publically in accordance with the law. Please enforce my judgment and return my daughter in accordance with the law.
Respectfully
Mr. Nigel Cooper

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

ROBERT GREEN SHOULD NOT BE IN COURT TOMORROW!! EDINBURGH, 1 MAY 13

Angiolini, along with MacKaskill and Salmond should be behind bars!!
From Robert Green’s blog:
Friday, 26 April 2013
TOO HOT TO HANDLE?
The next hearing over Angiolini`s action against me is set to take place again at the Court of Session, Parliament Square, Edinburgh at 10.00 hrs on Wednesday 1st May. If anyone is able to come along to support me, I would be most grateful. On this occasion, I am forced to represent myself as no Legal Aid is likely to be provided for me to be professionally represented. It seems that now Angiolini has amended her citation to include defamation, it appears that defence is more difficult, on the basis that someone as eminent as Elish Angiolini is simply too important to be criticised, unless you can actually prove your allegations.
That this state of affairs actually exists in Britain may come as a complete surprise to anyone who does not live under a totalitarian regime. In the rest of the UK, ex-Prime Ministers such as Tony Blair and Baroness Thatcher have been condemned in the most vitriolic way many times over the years, but as far as I know, no one has actually been jailed for these verbal attacks, however severe or unfair.
I suppose one has to concede that Elish Angiolini is far more important that either of them. One only has to be thought to have claimed that she is unsuitable for a specific job to find oneself snatched from home and thrown into prison. As far as Scotland is concerned, the famous East German film “The Lives Of Others” is now “The Lives of Us”! The timidity of the Scottish media has always baffled those who live outside the country. Now I think we know why. Freedom of the press and freedom of expression no longer exist there. The all-powerful Scottish magic circle holds both media and people in its iron grip. So Scottish children and the disabled get raped – who dares to say or do anything about it? Not the media, with some honourable exceptions and certainly not the police. The latter seem to largely exist to ensure magic circle criminals are never arrested. That is not to say that Scottish police are not competent when dealing, for example, with drunks fighting in a Glasgow bar, but when it comes to vulnerable Scots being sexually abused, the police are more likely to support the perpetrators. It is a shocking state of affairs and I do not think that what I have said is too much of an exaggeration. Going back to my case, of course, I shall be hopelessly disadvantaged by having to represent myself in a civil case in a foreign land, in legal terms, where I not only have no knowledge of Scottish Civil Law, but also as a non-Scot and non-resident have absolutely no legal obligation to know it. On the other hand, my opponent is a QC and former head of the justice system, using two of Scotland`s most expensive law firms, Balfour & Manson and Levy & McRae. One is clearly not enough for someone as eminent as Angiolini.
Nonetheless, last week I asked the current Lord Advocate, Frank Mulholland , to provide the court with an assurance that no public funds are being utilised for Angiolini`s private action, following press reports that a secret “slush fund” is thought to exist to enable senior Crown Office officials, past as well as present, to access public money for personal financial gain. The current head of the justice system has so far failed to provide this assurance for the court. Also, certain items have been discovered this week within the bundle presented by Balfour & Manson. These are private and confidential emails between me and colleagues that could only realistically have been obtained unlawfully. Appropriate action is already under way to discover how these items could have possibly got into Angiolini`s lawyer`s hands. They have some explaining to do. Of course, Angiolini is saying that I have made all kinds of inaccurate allegations to defame her. It is most outrageous that she now intends to sue me, as I provided her with every opportunity to address these concerns she claims to have by citing her as a witness at my trial. There, she would have been given every chance to defend herself, on oath , during cross-examination. If her sworn testimony held that I had been mistaken in any way,
I would have made a public retraction and apology. She failed to allow me that opportunity by refusing to be questioned in a court of law. Why she refused to attend must be a matter for speculation, but it is hard to escape the conclusion that she did not wish to be faced with a situation where she had to choose between the truth and perjury. What kind of person with nothing to hide would avoid the chance to put the record straight in a public court? I do not pretend to imagine whether someone with the apparent status of a high priestess would actually deign to attend the hearing on Wednesday. Nobody seems to know.
Posted by Robert Green at 20:14 2 comments:
source + much more at:
——————————————–
THE FACTS OF THE CASE == Description: HOLLIE GREIG CASE PDF FILE:
ROBERT GREEN EXPOSES SATANIC RITUAL CHILD ABUSE
HOLLIE GREIG – ROBERT GREENS older BLOG
ROBERT GREEN INTERVIEW- EDGE MEDIA 25 8 11 =
Autumn 2009 was the 1st time the HOLLIE GREIG case was ever mentioned online…
HOLLIE GREIG 15 MIN SPECIAL – TONY LEGEND MANCHESTER RADIO ONLINE 10 4 2011
ROBERT GREEN ON HOLLIE GREIG – P DROCKTON RADIO 5 3 2010
HOLLIE GREIG OFFICIAL SITE =
————————————————–
Friday, 19 April 2013
LOCKERBIE – POLICE TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF CRIMINALITY AT THE SCOTTISH CROWN OFFICE
The announcement of an investigation of this kind will probably come as no surprise to many people who have had any appreciable contact with the Crown Office in Edinburgh and certainly as no surprise at all to those who have followed the Hollie Greig case. It is already perfectly clear, based on the evidence now available, that senior figures in the justice system have blatantly and publicly lied about certain crucial aspects of the Lockerbie case and the reasons given for the release of Abdelbaset Al-Megrahi. Although this terrible crime could hardly be further removed from the crimes committed against Hollie Greig, some of the same individuals in Scotland are involved in both of the cover ups, which required the imprisoning of innocent people. Protests against the conviction of Mr Al-Megrahi have come from a numerous and wide variety of eminent and respected persons, including Dr Jim Swire, Professor Noam Chomsky, Professor Robert Black QC, Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Kate Adie. Additionally, in general terms, the Crown Office has been publicly described as “institutionally corrupt” by distinguished counsel Jock Thomson QC.
In 2009, Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill and the then Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini both made public statements relating to the release of Mr Al-Megrahi that were later shown to be entirely false. What is more, both senior officials must have known at the time that the CIA had bribed key prosecution witness Tony Gauci to the tune of $2 million in order to help secure Mr Al-Megrahi`s conviction. Clearly, in those circumstances, Gauci`s evidence could on no account be regarded as being  reliable. In short, it would not be unreasonable to suggest that the CIA`s action in paying this witness indicated that it did not wish the identity or identities of the real culprit(s) to be discovered. Knowledge of this information did not prevent Elish Angiolini, in September 2009, from “deploring” Mr Al-Megrahi`s plan to appeal against his conviction. What could possibly be described as deplorable the desire of a man, seriously ill and imprisoned a long way from his own country and family, to lodge an appeal against a conviction that was already known to be transparently unsound? On Wednesday, 1st May, at the Court of Session in Parliament Square, Edinburgh, at 10.00 hrs, a further hearing is due to take place over my challenge against
Elish Angiolini`s civil action to effectively silence me over salient aspects of Hollie`s case. I was so grateful to all the supporters of the Hollie Greig case for attending the previous hearing on 6th March and filling the Court. Their decency, compassion and courage is appreciated and the many messages received from those who could not be there was also a source for gratitude. If it is not too much to ask, I would be most thankful for any similar displays of support on 1st May. It is not yet known whether Elish Angiolini will actually decide to make her first appearance on this occasion. It should not be forgotten that many of the allegations she has made against me could have been resolved, had she not refused to face cross-examination at my trial when cited as a defence witness to do so. Surely, it may be argued that if Elish Angiolini had nothing to conceal, one might have expected her to take up the opportunity I offered her to speak publicly about the issues raised, on Oath.
Posted by Robert Green at 15:07 6 comments: Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Monday, 8 April 2013
HOLLIE GREIG COVER UP – THE ENGLISH COLLABORATORS
The Scottish authorities have been frequently heavily criticised on this blog as they are chiefly responsible for the outrageous betrayal of Hollie and other sexual abuse victims, past, present or future, in Scotland. It should not, however, be overlooked that there are a number of English collaborators who hold a place of shame in this ongoing scandal. Scotland does not deserve all the blame. One of these is Carol Boys, CEO of the Down`s Syndrome Association. Like Esther Rantzen of Childline, who was happy to share one of Jimmy Savile`s moments of glory, whilst knowing all the time of his reputation of being a foul abuser of children. Moreover, Esther Rantzen refused to lift a finger to help Hollie when I approached her. When I was first asked to help Hollie, one of my initial ports of call was naturally the Down`s Syndrome Association, who had supported Hollie`s claims totally, even to the extent of providing documents written by Ruth Beckmann and Susannah Seymann to that effect. Susannah, in particular, backed Hollie most loyally, assisted by John Smithies, the association`s press officer. Both Susannah and John told me that they were well aware that Down`s Syndrome children were being subjected to sexual abuse on a considerable scale, especially in Scotland, which is why the DSA was keen to support my efforts on behalf of Hollie.
I kept the two officials informed of the steps I was taking and told them that Hollie had been interviewed again at length by Grampian Police on 8th September 2009, in my presence. Near the end of October 2009, whilst the police investigation was supposedly under way, I received a call from John Smithies, who told me that he had been summoned to a meeting with Carol Boys.to discuss the possible risk to the DSA if it continued to support Hollie.He asked if any legal threats had been made to me. At that time, I had received none at all. When I next spoke to John a few days later, he told me that Carol Boys had dismissed him.  He went on to say that whilst he had been advised not to communicate with me, he suggested that I ring Susannah Seymann, as he told me “She knows everything”. Unfortunately, Susannah, a very nice lady, would no longer speak to me and neither would Carol Boys. It would therefore be reasonable to suspect that Carol Boys had been “got at”, although by whom remains a mystery. A good man has lost his job and the interests of Hollie and others with Down`s Syndrome who may be at risk have thus been betrayed by the very organisation that is supposed to stand up for them. I have no doubt that the DSA continues to do a lot of good work, but the issue I have referred to remains there to be addressed. The phone number of the Down`s Syndrome Association is 0333 1212300 and its email, info@downs-syndrome.org.uk Then we come to Conservative-controlled Shropshire Council. On 3rd June 2010, at around 13.30hrs, I was called by DC Ed Bates of West Mercia Police, responding to a request from Shropshire Council Social Services Department.
Although Hollie was not nor had ever been under the care of the council, he told me that Social Services was “worried about Hollie and Anne`s safety”. DC Bates asked if I knew where they were. I could not understand the basis for this concern as Anne had told me a few days earlier that she and Hollie proposed to take a short holiday although I did not know where, This proved to have been the case. My assurance, subsequently entirely justified, did not prevent, just 90 minutes after the call, Shropshire Council  staff and police officers, accompanied by a dog, breaking into and vandalising Hollie and Anne`s home. The team remained for several hours in the small bungalow, taking with them Anne`s computer and documents. It hardly needs saying how much alarm and distress this cruel and unjustified intrusion caused Hollie and Anne, following all the suffering they had faced in Scotland. Knowing the background, what kind of people could stoop to doing such a thing. A considerable number of MPs, from all parties and in various areas of the country, have now either spoken up for or shown interest in Hollie`s case and full support has been received from Nigel Farage and UKIP, who even withdrew its candidate to help with my election campaign for Hollie at Aberdeen South in 2010. It would, however, be particularly appreciated if Conservative Cabinet Minister, Owen Paterson, Hollie`s MP, could somehow find the courage to stand up for her too. His numbers are 0207 219 5185 or 01978 710073.
Posted by Robert Green at 21:21 6 comments: Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
————————————————–
Friday, 19 April 2013
LOCKERBIE – POLICE TO INVESTIGATE ALLEGATIONS OF CRIMINALITY AT THE SCOTTISH CROWN OFFICE
The announcement of an investigation of this kind will probably come as no surprise to many people who have had any appreciable contact with the Crown Office in Edinburgh and certainly as no surprise at all to those who have followed the Hollie Greig case. It is already perfectly clear, based on the evidence now available, that senior figures in the justice system have blatantly and publicly lied about certain crucial aspects of the Lockerbie case and the reasons given for the release of Abdelbaset Al-Megrahi. Although this terrible crime could hardly be further removed from the crimes committed against Hollie Greig, some of the same individuals in Scotland are involved in both of the cover ups, which required the imprisoning of innocent people. Protests against the conviction of Mr Al-Megrahi have come from a numerous and wide variety of eminent and respected persons, including Dr Jim Swire, Professor Noam Chomsky, Professor Robert Black QC, Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Kate Adie. Additionally, in general terms, the Crown Office has been publicly described as “institutionally corrupt” by distinguished counsel Jock Thomson QC. In 2009, Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill and the then Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini both made public statements relating to the release of Mr Al-Megrahi that were later shown to be entirely false.
What is more, both senior officials must have known at the time that the CIA had bribed key prosecution witness Tony Gauci to the tune of $2 million in order to help secure Mr Al-Megrahi`s conviction. Clearly, in those circumstances, Gauci`s evidence could on no account be regarded as being  reliable. In short, it would not be unreasonable to suggest that the CIA`s action in paying this witness indicated that it did not wish the identity or identities of the real culprit(s) to be discovered. Knowledge of this information did not prevent Elish Angiolini, in September 2009, from “deploring” Mr Al-Megrahi`s plan to appeal against his conviction. What could possibly be described as deplorable the desire of a man, seriously ill and imprisoned a long way from his own country and family, to lodge an appeal against a conviction that was already known to be transparently unsound? On Wednesday, 1st May, at the Court of Session in Parliament Square, Edinburgh, at 10.00 hrs, a further hearing is due to take place over my challenge against Elish Angiolini`s civil action to effectively silence me over salient aspects of Hollie`s case. I was so grateful to all the supporters of the Hollie Greig case for attending the previous hearing on 6th March and filling the Court. Their decency, compassion and courage is appreciated and the many messages received from those who could not be there was also a source for gratitude.
If it is not too much to ask, I would be most thankful for any similar displays of support on 1st May. It is not yet known whether Elish Angiolini will actually decide to make her first appearance on this occasion. It should not be forgotten that many of the allegations she has made against me could have been resolved, had she not refused to face cross-examination at my trial when cited as a defence witness to do so. Surely, it may be argued that if Elish Angiolini had nothing to conceal, one might have expected her to take up the opportunity I offered her to speak publicly about the issues raised, on Oath.
Posted by Robert Green at 15:07 6 comments: Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook
Monday, 8 April 2013
HOLLIE GREIG COVER UP – THE ENGLISH COLLABORATORS
The Scottish authorities have been frequently heavily criticised on this blog as they are chiefly responsible for the outrageous betrayal of Hollie and other sexual abuse victims, past, present or future, in Scotland. It should not, however, be overlooked that there are a number of English collaborators who hold a place of shame in this ongoing scandal. Scotland does not deserve all the blame. One of these is Carol Boys, CEO of the Down`s Syndrome Association. Like Esther Rantzen of Childline, who was happy to share one of Jimmy Savile`s moments of glory, whilst knowing all the time of his reputation of being a foul abuser of children. Moreover, Esther Rantzen refused to lift a finger to help Hollie when I approached her. When I was first asked to help Hollie, one of my initial ports of call was naturally the Down`s Syndrome Association, who had supported Hollie`s claims totally, even to the extent of providing documents written by Ruth Beckmann and Susannah Seymann to that effect. Susannah, in particular, backed Hollie most loyally, assisted by John Smithies, the association`s press officer. Both Susannah and John told me that they were well aware that Down`s Syndrome children were being subjected to sexual abuse on a considerable scale, especially in Scotland, which is why the DSA was keen to support my efforts on behalf of Hollie.
I kept the two officials informed of the steps I was taking and told them that Hollie had been interviewed again at length by Grampian Police on 8th September 2009, in my presence. Near the end of October 2009, whilst the police investigation was supposedly under way, I received a call from John Smithies, who told me that he had been summoned to a meeting with Carol Boys.to discuss the possible risk to the DSA if it continued to support Hollie.He asked if any legal threats had been made to me. At that time, I had received none at all. When I next spoke to John a few days later, he told me that Carol Boys had dismissed him.  He went on to say that whilst he had been advised not to communicate with me, he suggested that I ring Susannah Seymann, as he told me “She knows everything”. Unfortunately, Susannah, a very nice lady, would no longer speak to me and neither would Carol Boys. It would therefore be reasonable to suspect that Carol Boys had been “got at”, although by whom remains a mystery. A good man has lost his job and the interests of Hollie and others with Down`s Syndrome who may be at risk have thus been betrayed by the very organisation that is supposed to stand up for them. I have no doubt that the DSA continues to do a lot of good work, but the issue I have referred to remains there to be addressed.
The phone number of the Down`s Syndrome Association is 0333 1212300 and its email, info@downs-syndrome.org.uk Then we come to Conservative-controlled Shropshire Council. On 3rd June 2010, at around 13.30hrs, I was called by DC Ed Bates of West Mercia Police, responding to a request from Shropshire Council Social Services Department. Although Hollie was not nor had ever been under the care of the council, he told me that Social Services was “worried about Hollie and Anne`s safety”. DC Bates asked if I knew where they were. I could not understand the basis for this concern as Anne had told me a few days earlier that she and Hollie proposed to take a short holiday although I did not know where, This proved to have been the case. My assurance, subsequently entirely justified, did not prevent, just 90 minutes after the call, Shropshire Council  staff and police officers, accompanied by a dog, breaking into and vandalising Hollie and Anne`s home. The team remained for several hours in the small bungalow, taking with them Anne`s computer and documents. It hardly needs saying how much alarm and distress this cruel and unjustified intrusion caused Hollie and Anne, following all the suffering they had faced in Scotland. Knowing the background, what kind of people could stoop to doing such a thing. A considerable number of MPs, from all parties and in various areas of the country, have now either spoken up for or shown interest in Hollie`s case and full support has been received from Nigel Farage and UKIP, who even withdrew its candidate to help with my election campaign for Hollie at Aberdeen South in 2010. It would, however, be particularly appreciated if Conservative Cabinet Minister, Owen Paterson, Hollie`s MP, could somehow find the courage to stand up for her too. His numbers are 0207 219 5185 or 01978 710073.
Posted by Robert Green at 21:21 6 comments: Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to Facebook

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

NORMAN SCARTH – N YORKS POLICE UNDER CC BETTISON

April 26, 2013

Police State In Action: W.Yorks Police under Bettison! – Norman Scarth

Below you will find an open letter,a copy of which was sent to relevant recipients as shown in the narrative.

I would ask you to please bear in mind whilst you are reading this that the complainant was a man of 86 years of age at the time of this debacle and travesty that begs to call itself Justice! Whether you agree or disagree with Mr. Scarth’s point of view ,this is most certainly not the sort of behavior we should be expected to tolerate by our Men in Blue!

If after reading this you are still not convinced that we are a police state, then I would ask you to please leave contact details so that I can personally book you into your local ’funny farm!’

West Yorkshire Police when under Chief Constable Sir Norman Bettison.

Chief Constable Sir Norman Bettison, West Yorkshire Police.

SCROLL DOWN TO SEE A VIDEO OF NORMAN

To the Independent Police Complaints Commission, to D.T.Hough of Sussex University, who is doing an investigation into Corruption & to Helen Grant MP, Minister for Victims.

Other concerned people have complained to you on my behalf about the unlawful seizing & retention of my computer by West Yorkshire Police.  I understand they have been given the brush-off.

However (bad though it was), they told only a tiny part of the full extent of what was undoubtedly police crime.

I tell more now, ask that you to treat it as an OFFICIAL COMPLAINT, & that you give it a File Number.

Norman Scarth

 

Forced to flee the land of my birth I am now in Ireland, not daring to set foot in England ever again for fear of worse crime by West Yorkshire Police.  What a tragedy, that the land for which I fought in World War 2 has become just as bad as the one we were fighting against all those years ago; that I have been forced to flee from England in much the same way as the Jews (the lucky ones)were forced to flee from Germany in the 1930s.

Norman Scarth

THE FACTS OF ‘THE FOULEST HONEY-TRAP EVER’:

1)      Before Britain became a Police State, when there was an allegation that a minor ‘crime’ had been committed, normal practice was that a Summons was sent by post, requiring the person to attend a magistrates’ court to answer the charge.

NOT SO NOW!

2)      On 29th September 2011 I was making a protest in a public place, asking Judge Jonathan Lee Rose to resign. Someone thought fit to call the police: At first they were aggressive towards me, but then realised I was doing nothing unlawful. One of them said, “I will stay to protect you.”

3)      However, in the weeks which followed, much was going on behind the scenes.

4)      At the EXTRA-JUDICIAL instigation of Jonathan Lee Rose (seriously abusing his power), West Yorkshire Police used much manpower to organise & mount a seriously unlawful attack upon me. This took place at about 10am on 26th October 2011.

5)      A word about my then home: It is within a block of 42 ‘Sheltered Housing’ flats, specifically designed to keep old folks safe from unwanted callers.

6)      For visitors to gain access, they must first press buttons to communicate with an occupant via an intercom. IF the occupant wishes to see that person, s/he then presses a button to unlock the outside door.

 

7)      Anyone who enters without the invitation of an occupier is a trespasser. This applies to police as much as anyone else.

To go back again to the time before Britain became a Police State.  At that time most of the good people of Britain felt it their duty to assist the police if necessary.   That was how I felt, & on occasion have done exactly that when thinking a police officer needed support.

9)      Unfortunately, the present day successors to Dixon of Dock Green are more like the Stazi or Gestapo. It is a reflection on Britain today that all too many people turn their backs or run away when seeing oppressive police in action – fearful that they could be next!.

10)  Even worse, there are those who, anxious to ingratiate themselves, are as willing to help the present day Gestapo-like police in their oppressive & illegal conduct, as I was to help Sergeant Dixon.  This applies to the staff of Incommunities Ltd., the landlords of my ‘Sheltered’(??) housing.

11)  At this point it is pertinent to question whether Incommunities staff might have given assistance to Anders Behring Breivik had he asked for it? (Breivik was the man who put on a police uniform before going on to murder a great many people in Norway),

12)  With no warrant for my arrest or entry to my ‘Sheltered Housing’(???) flat, these rogue police officers obtained the collusion of staff of Incommunities Ltd (who were SUPPOSED to be protecting me) to spring what I have described as ‘The Foulest Honey-trap Ever’.

13)  Warden Jackie Pullan not only allowed the mob-handed gang of police into the block of flats, but it was she who suggested the ploy to lure me from my flat, & gave them access to the empty flat next door from which the brutal police were able to spring their trap.

14)  A police woman in plain clothes prostituted herself. She knocked on my door &, when I opened it on the chain, said, “My grandma is moving in next door, but is having problems with the refrigerator switching. Can you help please?”

15)  Wearing pyjamas at the time, I said “Of course I will, just wait till I get dressed”, put on trousers, shirt & flip-flops & went the few yards to the next door, leaving my own door open.

16)  As I reached the other door, 4 or 5 male police pounced, snapped handcuffs on me & gabbled something about arresting me for blah blah blah blah!

17)  Few men of my age (86 then) would NOT have had a heart attack or stroke.

18)  Jackie Pullan later admitted she was conscious of this. – but still played her part with enthusiasm!

19)  I was indeed in great shock, but asked them to let me switch off my computer & cooker & lock my door.  They refused, dragging me in my inadequate clothing to what some have called Bradford Lubyanka.

20)  There I was kept for 14 hours, subjected to questioning by an exceptionally nasty policewoman.

21)  It took them that amount of time to think of something to charge me with, & I was eventually released at midnight to make my own way home, my very skimpy clothes quite inadequate for the cold weather.

22)  This all took place under the ‘leadership’ of Chief Constable Sir Norman Bettison, of whom we are beginning to learn much!  He himself has now been forced to resign, & is awaiting investigation by the Independent Police Complaints Commission.  It is no surprise that those under him felt able to do as they wished without regard to the law or humanity!

23)  At least 12 police officers were involved in this ‘sting’ against me, to say nothing of the senior officers who authorised it.  Apart from the crime against me, this was a criminal waste of police manpower, resources & public money – at a time when stringent cuts are being made in REAL policing!

24)  The attack itself was bad enough, but it was (& is being) compounded again & again by further actions.

25)  While I was at Bradford Lubyanka, having prevented me from closing my door, they had entered my home (without a warrant), unlawfully seized my computer, mobile phone, loud hailer & I don’t know what else.

26)  On that computer is evidence needed by me, not only to defend myself against the malicious prosecution which eventually came about, & the later attempt by the Attorney General to have me ‘Committed’ (which was itself related to this matter), but for my own attempts to seek remedies in the courts for serious harm done to me.

27)  To deny me that computer is ‘Perverting the Course of Justice’, A CRIME SUBJECT TO LIFE IMPRISONMENT.  That they are STILL retaining that equipment, CONTINUING the crime, is beyond belief!

28)  Further compounding of the attack on 26th October 2011 has been collusion between West Yorkshire Police & the Crown Prosecution Service to pretend that words I had spoken amounted to a ‘crime’, when anyone with even basic knowledge of the English language could see there had been none, & compounded even further by a Kangaroo Court ‘trial’ in Manchester on 29th May 2012.

29)  The pretence by WYP & CPS at the ‘trial’ that a crime had been committed surely amounts to Deception of the Court, Perjury, Perverting the Course of Justice &/or misconduct in Public Office?

30)  We must suppose that the seizing of my computer was on the pretence of gaining evidence of crime?

31)  In fact, after examining the computer, the malicious charges against me were actually reduced, indicating they found no evidence of crime on it whatsoever.  At least, not crime by me!  There IS on it evidence of POLICE crime, which no doubt is the reason they are determined not to return it to me!

32)  However, there was ANOTHER motive for reducing the ‘crime’ from indictable to ‘Summary only’ – a most ULTERIOR motive!    It was to ensure the matter would NOT come before jury, who would have been horrified to hear of the ‘Honey-trap’ & would undoubtedly have acquitted.  Lay magistrates were also likely to have acquitted – which is why it was put before a District Judge – a lawyer who is a paid servant of The State & could be relied upon to support colleagues in the CPS & Police!

33) Following my ‘conviction’ in his Kangaroo Court (when I was not present), District Judge Taaffe ordered that £650 be taken from my old age pension, for ‘fine & costs’.   There is MUCH  more to tell about this whole affair - including the ‘trial’ - but no time to tell it now.

Norman Scarth.

PS:  The seizing of my loud-hailer was the least of the crimes against me, but it shows the minds of these people that they should seize it for the purpose of ‘investigating a crime’.  What could they possibly expect to learn from it?  NS.

source: Inquiring Minds

Related articles

source:  http://cpnagasaki.wordpress.com/2013/04/26/police-state-in-action-w-yorks-police-under-bettison-norman-scarth/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

MAURICE KIRK – ARRESTED…AGAIN 26/4/13

from earlier:

Legal Battles

                I am Arrested at Cardiff Civil Justice Centre requiring 2 Paddy Waggons and Police Car!     Can you Find me RICK ON THE ROOF?

Police oppose bail and lock me up for the night charged with ‘common assault’ on CPS Barrister David Gareth Evans whilst carrying out a ‘Private Person’s Arrest for Perverting the Course of Justice in Magistrates on 1st Dec 2011 and before the Jury trial on 4th May 2012.

Reasons on previous blogs.

THE REAL REASON was because ex Chief Inspector Jenner, ex Robert Nelson Rice and serving Inspector Andrew Rice all committed perjury before the court , a few weeks ago and are being summoned back to court to be further cross examined.

Roe is before the Cardiff County Court, 4th floor, on Monday 29th April at 10.30am ( he orchestrated the breaking into my Cardiff veterinary surgery, with a sledge hammer and crow bar, to put back Jenner’s daughter, with a known drug dealer, in surgery flat.

Police officer Brown ,who , in 1993, had me sent to Cardiff Magistrates and so to jail, as being ‘unidentified ‘ in to be crossexamined on Monday afternoon.

As usual, lunch is on me!

http://www.barryanddistrictnews.co.uk/news/4400480._Rick_on_the_Roof__trial_continues/

09 02 17 WPC Brown nee Biddle s9 statement.pdf

This is a typical example, in court tomorrow, of some thirty odd Chief Constable of South Wales incidents all designed to finance the lawyer trade’ ‘gravy train’, always financed by YOU or ME

Police, whilst I was being interrogated late last night, refused to accept or read the defence statement , below, served on the Chief Constable before I was arrested.

Three proper Cardiff Magistrates, this morning heard how I was under imprisonment in the court by a Lee Barker, sitting in his office in the court cells and was needed to give evidence in the 25th June hearing.

I URGENTLY NEED TO KNOW ‘RICK on the ROOF’s contact details…thankyou

Their worships were also informed that I attempted, for the fifth time of visiting Cardiff Central Police Station, on the issues most relevant, I was refused any police officer to take my written complaints.

Evans was allowed to file his s9 MG11 witness statement, at the station, without any delay.

Kirk v South Wales Police      BS614159

FAO Defendant,

Evidence of Similar Fact

  1. A four year campaign, instigated by the then Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, in order to getting  me lawfully shot as a MAPPA level 3 target, was assisted throughout by Dolmans, solicitors of Cardiff purely to delay these current court proceedings.
  1. Evidence has been heard, throughout the past eight weeks of your police having made use of a sledge hammer and crow bar in order to gain entry to my veterinary surgery and overhead flat just to re install a daughter of a Chief Inspector Jenner ‘shacked up’ with a believed to be drug dealer.
  1. Ex Inspector Robert Nelson Roe is currently giving evidence on how he received a complaint from the ‘tenant’ but has denied even knowing me yet alone taking any of my numerous complaints of the thousands of pounds of criminal damage that had been caused by this couple.

13 04 22 SWP Defendants Position Statement.pdf

  1. I have been allowed to tape record the evidence of certain police and ex police officers but it appears, before I receive the final ruling on it, that I cannot keep the tapes for more than ten days, when they must be destroyed nor may I duplicate and take the information to an outside police force or use it in my planned private criminal prosecutions. The case continues for a further month, at least.
  1. An Inspector Andrew Rice, I am told, crossed the Severn Bridge with others to persuade a prosecution witness, in a trial in Bristol , to alter his evidence against me.
  1. During this trial he has, so far, denied being aware of an incident in Barry magistrates when I was forced to make a private person’s arrest on Crown Prosecutor Stan Stoffa, acting for Barbara Wilding, when the police were trying to prosecute me for a speeding offence. All along they had a clear photograph of the driver caught on a roadside camera, a member of my employ.
  1. Barbara Wilding’s February 2009 signing of her affidavit was delayed for six weeks, contrary to the 2008 court order, in order for Dolmans to assist in using falsified medical evidence, in order for me to be incarcerated to stop the above sort of evidence ever seeing the light of day. She denied knowledge of court cases or the break-ins to my various veterinary surgeries having ever occurred.
  1. Barbara Wilding has been protected from giving evidence in this twelve week trial just as those were in my criminal trials who conspired with her, in February 2009, to have me first jailed, on the 22nd June 2009 for trading in machine guns.
  1. Then, when that was due to fail, considered me mentally ‘unfit’ to stand trial. There is, of course, complete press censorship over all this, a case, yet again of‘evidence of similar fact’.
  1. Today, an ex police inspector, by the name of Howard Davies confirmed that his‘witness statement’, for these ongoing civil proceedings, was sent in the post by Dolmans simply for him to sign. He had earlier given false evidence, in Cardiff Crown Court, on an incident at the Vale of Glamorgan Show contributing to my name being removed from the veterinary register for life.
  1. Without your police first successfully having blackmailed an NHS(Wales) doctor to say I was so dangerous, Operations ‘Chalice’ and ‘Orchid’ could not of hatched the 2009 ‘WW1machine gun’/'Edwardian shooting walking stick’ imprisonments with Dolmans as your legal advisers.
  1. The lack of integrity within the Welsh Crown Prosecution Service, over all these issues, is also seriously being exposed in these civil proceedings. Your armed officers, using Social Services, even attempted to snatch our then ten year old daughter which instigated immediate unwanted divorce proceedings.
  1. I made a private person’s arrest, before witnesses and covered by CCTV, on a culprit, now traced, being a key player in my complaint of cover up within Cardiff’s judicial system and frightening control over its regional media.
  1. Arrested barrister, David Gareth Evans, admitted before His Honour Judge John Curran QC and me, that he believed he needed to be my defence witness in the 4th May 2012 jury trial over the ‘Breach of a Restraining Order’, an order never served on me in the first place. Why? He retained the draft order.
  1. He admitted being the author and being in control of the draft version of a proposed ‘restraining order’ that had, in fact, been shown to me in the cells in 2011, caught on cell CCTV and recorded, obviously, in both court and custody records.
  1. But the trial jury saw none of it despite their jury note specific request withheld, incidentally, from me throughout the remainder of the trial, my having to be taken back to the prison following my forced ejection from the dock whilst trying to produce vital defense documents.
  1. I am concerned that my repeated requests, to attending Cardiff Civil Justice Centre staff, for the police to be called was complied with and despite waiting for well over an hour obtained no police assistance what so ever.
  1. Both my Bristol solicitors and Cardiff barrister have been attempting, for many months now, to obtain CPS documentation, such as court depositions and record of at least eight previous court hearings from David Garreth Evans and others for ECHR, the Criminal Case Review Commission, General Medical Council and Bar Council.
  1. My latest fabricated imprisonment, in August 12, flowed from Evans’ prosecution as barrister in both the original 2011 magistrates and jury trial hearings for alleged harassment and breach of a restraining order.
  1. The police know last summer’s allegation of harassment was false but refuse to act on my complaint of perverting the course of justice. My lawyers do even get replies to their correspondence. This further false evidence, previously much controlled by Evans, unchallenged in ALL criminal courts of Cardiff, so far, are again laid by NHS (Wales) personnel, immune themselves to prosecution, had me jailed for many months, just as with the ‘machine gun’, simply to prejudice these twenty year running civil proceedings.

1] After a few months of my imprisonment, last summer, the CPS dropped all charges and I am denied those papers needed in this trial.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc                                       25thApril 2013

The Supreme Court of England and Wales and GMC is where this South Wales Scandal is destined

                    Published                    Apr 25 2013, 09:55 PM                    by                    Maurice Kirk

Comments

No Comments

About Maurice Kirk

                    Maurice was born 12th March1945, a war baby, in Taunton, Somerset, West of England,  within a final family of four brothers and one sister while mother and father were working 24/7 to run a country veterinary practice. Country pursuits very much dominated his spare time from most sports with his passion still for hunting , shooting and fishing! Maurice is currently trying to fly to South Africa in  his WW2 Piper Cub,registration G-KURK. His other D-Day Cub, G-KERK, is destined, on skis, for a rather taller mountain after his promise to Sir Edmond, six years ago. Meanwhile, the task of obtaining justice in the UK courts, in order to practice veterinary surgery, is proving to be somewhat elusive.Authority has quite another agenda.

source:  http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2013/04/25/vet-arrested-drunk-in-charge-south-wales-police-style-tomorow-in-court.aspx

...aa 01-12-11_1811

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

UNACCEPTABLE!! THE SINISTER SPREAD OF “JUSTICE” BEHIND CLOSED DOORS – C. BOOKER,DAILY MAIL, 23/4/13

 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2313761/The-sinister-spread-justice-closed-doors.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

The sinister spread of justice behind closed doors

PUBLISHED:22:50 GMT, 23 April 2013| UPDATED:23:48 GMT, 23 April 2013
Wanda Maddocks was jailed 'in secret' for trying to remove her father from a care home where his family thought he was in danger of dying
Wanda Maddocks was jailed ‘in secret’ for trying to remove her father from a care home where his family thought he was in danger of dying
Today’s revelations in the Mail about Wanda Maddocks, the woman imprisoned by a judge for trying to remove her 80-year-old father from a care home where he was being held against his family’s wishes, are truly shocking.
Most disturbing of all is that it is only thanks to persistent inquiries by the Mail that we know of her fate at all — for the court heard the case in secret and chose not to publish the ruling containing details of her sentence.
The court that conducted itself in this manner is the mysterious and secretive Court of Protection, set up in 2005 under the Labour government’s Mental Capacity Act to give state officials quite extraordinary powers over the lives of people who are deemed no longer fit to handle their own affairs.
Miss Maddocks was found guilty of contempt because she ignored the Court of Protection’s orders not to interfere with her father’s life in the care home.
What angered the judge and the council involved, Stoke-on-Trent, was not just that she took her father away but that she desperately tried to publicise what was happening to him by writing a leaflet about it.
Of course, the case is complicated and highly emotive — one in which family members concerned for their ailing, elderly father are pitted against professionals and state employees who insist they know better.
But it is also part of a deeply worrying trend of secret justice taking hold across Britain, where journalists, the public and even defendants are barred from hearing evidence, while those in the dock often have no legal representation.
The Court of Protection is making huge numbers of judgments in secret which devastate families such as that of Wanda Maddocks.

More…

Only this week, there was the tragic case of a 64-year-old mother from a working-class family who left her husband and ran off with her neighbour to the Midlands, without an explanation.
The family spent months trying to track her down, and finally found her in a nursing home after she had suffered a massive stroke that left her needing 24-hour care. When they called to see her, the nursing home — claiming she had written letters saying she wanted to break off contact with them — called the police.
John Maddocks was being held in a care home against his families wishes under the Labour government's Mental Capacity Act
John Maddocks was being held in a care home against his families wishes under the Labour government’s Mental Capacity Act
After hearing the evidence in secret, the judge decided the family should no longer have contact with their mother — even though an American forensic expert who used computer analysis on handwriting testified that he was ‘99.9 per cent’ certain the letters were written by the man she ran off with.
For months I have been following a terrifying case involving a council which cannot be named, and which has similarly been hidden away from public view by another judge of the same Court of Protection.
The story would make your hair curl. But because it is under the aegis of the Court of Protection, I am forbidden from reporting on it at all. None of its details can be made public.
Local press that did cover the story so irked the council and the judge that other media were told that any further reporting of the case would be a contempt of court, punishable by imprisonment.
Like the case of Miss Maddocks, it highlights a tendency to allow Britain’s courts to hide their workings from public view behind a wall of secrecy.
The Mail mounted a hard-hitting campaign for open justice after the Government proposed last year that judges could be allowed to hold secret hearings in terrorist cases, on the grounds that allowing these to be reported might be damaging to ‘national security’.
Similar concerns have been expressed over the fear that the Leveson inquiry might trigger a massive extension in the powers of judges to throw up a blanket of secrecy around other types of cases they are hearing, such as those involving celebrities keen to preserve their reputation.
But the terrifying fact is that we already have a whole swathe of secret courts in this country, where judges are allowed to exclude the public and the Press, and to issue draconian gagging orders to prevent anything being reported of what goes on.
Any breach of those orders can be ruled a contempt of court, punishable not just by imprisonment but by the confiscation of an offender’s possessions.
What angered the judge and the council involved, Stoke-on-Trent (pictured) was not just that Miss Maddocks took father away but that she desperately tried to publicise what was happening to him
What angered the judge and the council involved, Stoke-on-Trent (pictured) was not just that Miss Maddocks took father away but that she desperately tried to publicise what was happening to him
One of the most glaring examples of justice behind closed doors is to be found in the extraordinary goings on of our so-called ‘child protection’ system, where social workers using family courts can too often tear families apart for the flimsiest and most dubious of reasons,
In such cases, all the normal principles of British justice can be turned on their heads. The rules, which in criminal courts require evidence to be put to a proper test, can be routinely ignored.
Social workers and lawyers can trot out hearsay allegations which are accepted by the court as if they were proven fact, ‘expert psychologists’ are paid thousands of pounds to come up with patently ridiculous reports, which parents fearful that they may lose their children for ever are not permitted to question.
Secretive route: Police could soon be banned from identifying people they have arrested by a recommendation of the Leveson Inquiry
Police could soon be banned from identifying people they have arrested by a recommendation of the Leveson Inquiry
What is so shocking to parents who fall foul of this system — as I have learned from talking to scores of them over the years — is how they can find themselves being treated, without any need for proof, as criminals, having to listen to any kind of allegation being made against them without being given a right of reply.
The point is that none of these abuses could take place if the judges had not been allowed to hide away the workings of these courts behind a far greater wall of secrecy than anything intended by the politicians who passed the supposedly well-meaning Acts of Parliament which gave them their powers in the first place.
The overwhelming moral of all this is that wherever courts are allowed to operate in secret, the system is likely to be corrupted.
Few things are more sinister in Britain today than all those pressures to extend even further that suffocating blanket of secrecy, for we can already see — as in the frightening case of Miss Maddocks and the Court of Protection — how easily it can lead to any sense of justice being thrown out of the window.
—————————————————————————–

The Sun nails clerk

Cops probe court corruption

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

OUTRAGEOUS! FROM NORMAN SCARTH 25/4/13

To: certain MPs + others

From: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk

Subject: W.Yorks Police under Bettison!

Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:32:25 +0100

West Yorkshire Police when under Chief Constable Sir Norman Bettison.

(The text has also been sent as an attchment, for ease of printing).

To the Independent Police Complaints Commission, to D.T.Hough of Sussex University, who is doing an investigation into Corruption & to Helen Grant MP, Minister for Victims. 

Other concerned people have complained to you on my behalf about the unlawful seizing & retention of my computer by West Yorkshire Police.  I understand they have been given the brush-off.

However (bad though it was), they told only a tiny part of the full extent of what was undoubtedly police crime.

I tell more now, ask that you to treat it as an OFFICIAL COMPLAINT, & that you give it a File Number.

Forced to flee the land of my birth I am now in Ireland, not daring to set foot in England ever again for fear of worse crime by West Yorkshire Police. What a tragedy, that the land for which I fought in World War 2 has become just as bad as the one we were fighting against all those years ago; that I have been forced to flee from England in much the same way as the Jews (the lucky ones) were forced to flee from Germany in the 1930s.

Norman Scarth

-- – - – - – - – - – - –

THE FACTS OF ‘THE FOULEST HONEY-TRAP EVER’:

1)Before Britain became a Police State, when there was an allegation that a minor ‘crime’ had been committed, normal practice was that a Summons was sent by post, requiring the person to attend a magistrates’ court to answer the charge.   NOT SO NOW!

2)On 29th September 2011 I was making a protest in a public place, asking Judge Jonathan Lee Rose to resign.   Someone thought fit to call the police: At first they were aggressive towards me, but then realised I was doing nothing unlawful.  One of them said, “I will stay to protect you.”

3)However, in the weeks which followed, much was going on behind the scenes.

4)At the EXTRA-JUDICIAL instigation of Jonathan Lee Rose (seriously abusing his power), West Yorkshire Police used much manpower to organise & mount a seriously unlawful attack upon me.  This took place at about 10am on 26th October 2011.

5)A word about my then home: It is within a block of 42 ‘Sheltered Housing’ flats, specifically designed to keep old folks safe from unwanted callers.

6)For visitors to gain access, they must first press buttons to communicate with an occupant via an intercom.  IF the occupant wishes to see that person, s/he then presses a button to unlock the outside door.

7)Anyone who enters without the invitation of an occupier is a trespasser.  This applies to police as much as anyone else.

8)To go back again to the time before Britain became a Police State. At that time most of the good people of Britain felt it their duty to assist the police if necessary.   That was how I felt, & on occasion have done exactly that when thinking a police officer needed support.

9)Unfortunately, the present day successors to Dixon of Dock Green are more like the Stazi or Gestapo.  It is a reflection on Britain today that all too many people turn their backs or run away when seeing oppressive police in action – fearful that they could be next!.

10)Even worse, there are those who, anxious to ingratiate themselves, are as willing to help the present day Gestapo-like police in their oppressive & illegal conduct, as I was to help Sergeant Dixon.  This applies to the staff of Incommunities Ltd., the landlords of my ‘Sheltered’(??) housing.

11)At this point it is pertinent to question whether Incommunities staff might have given assistance to Anders Behring Breivik had he asked for it?(Breivik was the man who put on a police uniform before going on to murder a great many people in Norway),

12)With no warrant for my arrest or entry to my ‘Sheltered Housing’(???) flat, these rogue police officers obtained the collusion of staff of Incommunities Ltd (who were SUPPOSED to be protecting me) to spring what I have described as ‘The Foulest Honey-trap Ever’.

13)Warden Jackie Pullannot only allowed the mob-handed gang of police into the block of flats, but it was she who suggested the ploy to lure me from my flat, & gave them access to the empty flat next door from which the brutal police were able to spring their trap.

14)A police woman in plain clothes prostituted herself.   She knocked on my door &, when I opened it on the chain, said, “My grandma is moving in next door, but is having problems with the refrigerator switching. Can you help please?”

15)Wearing pyjamas at the time, I said “Of course I will, just wait till I get dressed”, put on trousers, shirt& flip-flops & went the few yards to the next door, leaving my own door open.

16)As I reached the other door, 4 or 5 male police pounced, snapped handcuffs on me & gabbled something about arresting me for blah blah blah blah!

17)Few men of my age(86 then) would NOT have had a heart attack or stroke.

18)Jackie Pullan later admitted she was conscious of this. – but still played her part with enthusiasm!

19)I was indeed in great shock, but asked them to let me switch off my computer & cooker & lock my door.  They refused, dragging me in my inadequate clothing to what some have called Bradford Lubyanka.

20)There I was kept for 14 hours, subjected to questioning by an exceptionally nasty policewoman.

21)It took them that amount of time to think of something to charge me with, & I was eventually released at midnight to make my own way home, my very skimpy clothes quite inadequate for the cold weather.

22)This all took place under the ‘leadership’ of Chief Constable Sir Norman Bettison, of whom we are beginning to learn much!   He himself has now been forced to resign, & is awaiting investigation by the Independent Police Complaints Commission. It is no surprise that those under him felt able to do as they wished without regard to the law or humanity!

 23)At least 12 police officers were involved in this ‘sting’ against me, to say nothing of the senior officers who authorised it.  Apart from the crime against me, this was a criminal waste of police manpower, resources & public money – at a time when stringent cuts are being made in REAL policing!

24)The attack itself was bad enough, but it was (& is being)compounded again & again by further actions.

25)While I was at Bradford Lubyanka, having prevented me from closing my door, they had entered my home (without a warrant), unlawfully seized my computer, mobile phone, loud hailer & I don’t know what else.

26)On that computer is evidence needed by me, not only to defend myself against the malicious prosecution which eventually came about, & the later attempt by the Attorney General to have me ‘Committed’ (which was itself related to this matter), but for my own attempts to seek remedies in the courts for serious harm done to me.

27)To deny me that computer is ‘Perverting the Course of Justice’, A CRIME SUBJECT TO LIFE IMPRISONMENT.  That they are STILLretaining that equipment, CONTINUING the crime, is beyond belief!

28)Further compounding of the attack on 26th October 2011 has been collusion between West Yorkshire Police & the Crown Prosecution Service to pretend that words I had spoken amounted to a ‘crime’, when anyone with even basic knowledge of the English language could see there had been none, & compounded even further by a Kangaroo Court ‘trial’ in Manchester on 29th May 2012.

29)The pretence by WYP & CPS at the ‘trial’ that a crime had been committed surely amounts to Deception of the Court, Perjury, Perverting the Course of Justice &/or misconduct in Public Office?

30)We must suppose that the seizing of my computer was on the pretence of gaining evidence of crime?

31)In fact, after examining the computer, the malicious charges against me were actually reduced, indicating they found no evidence of crime on it whatsoever.  At least, not crime by me!  There ISon it evidence of POLICE crime, which no doubt is the reason they are determined not to return it to me!

32)However, there was ANOTHER motive for reducing the ‘crime’ from indictable to ‘Summary only’  – a most ULTERIOR motive!    It was to ensure the matter would NOT come before jury, who would have been horrified to hear of the ‘Honey-trap’ & would undoubtedly have acquitted.   Lay magistrates were also likely to have acquitted – which is why it was put before a District Judge – a lawyer who is a paid servant of The State & could be relied upon to support colleagues in the CPS & Police!

33) Following my ‘conviction’in his Kangaroo Court (when I was not present), District Judge Taaffe ordered that £650 be taken from my old age pension, for ‘fine & costs’.   There is MUCH  more to tell about this whole affair - including the ‘trial’ - but no time to tell it now.

Norman Scarth.

PS:  The seizing of my loud-hailer was the least of the crimes against me, but it shows the minds of these people that they should seize it for the purpose of ‘investigating a crime’.   What could they possibly expect to learn from it?

NS.

scroll down for more Norman Scarth posts.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

NIGEL COOPER – THE JUDGEMENT – THE KING OF BELGIUM 14 MARCH 2012

Cde N° : 188

REGISTRAR OFFICE

COUNTY COURT OF MONS

R.G. : 11/3804/A

We, Albert II, King of Belgium,

To all, present and future, let hereby known :

 Mrs. Benedetti Sylvia

Solicitor

Rue Sainte-Victoire, 25

7301 Hornu

NOTIFICATIONS 14 MARCH 2012

1322 DECIES § 7

JUDICIAL NOTIFICATIONS

1 Central Authority

2 Parties

1 PR

PRESIDENTIAL CHAMBER

Directory number 12/2869

Year Two Thousand and Twelve, on March Fourteenth;

Following his deliberation, Xavier HIERNAUX, Single Judge of the County Court of Mons, Hainaut Province, assisted by Christine VACHAUDEZ, Registrar in this jurisdiction, has handed down in summary proceedings the following verdict in open court :

R.G. N°11/3804/A

IN THE CASE OF :

Mister Nigel Cooper,

Domiciled in 7020 MONS (Belgique), Rue Grande, 205/2.2 ;

The Applicant ;

Attending the hearing, assisted by his Counsel Mrs Sylvia BENEDETTI, Solicitor, whose Law Firm is registered in 7031 HORNU (Belgique), rue Sainte-Victoire, 25 ;

AGAINST :

Mrs Gail COOPER,

Domiciled in 41, Ennerdale, Albany, Washington, NE37 1 BW (United Kingdom) ;

The Defendant ;

Neither attending nor represented at the hearing ;

IN THE PRESENCE OF :

Mister Henri RENARD, Substitute for the Royal Prosecutor

of the Public Prosecuting Office of the Mons County Court, 7000 Mons, and whose offices are registered in 7000 MONS, rue de Nimy, 28 ; Representing at the hearing, THE FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE OF JUSTICE,

Central Authority of Judicial Cooperation in civil matters,

Legislation Bureau of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms

File WL 16/LH/2011/1213/VA

Offices registered at 1000 BRUXELLES, boulevard de Waterloo, 115 ;

Upon the decision filed in the registry of this Court on 21 December 2011, and rendered on 25 November 2011 by the High Court of Justice of London denying the return to Belgium of the child Bailie Kate COOPER, born on 1 August 2003, and the related documents, forwarded by the Belgian Central Authority under article 1322 decies § 1 of the judicial Code, pursuant to article 11.6 of the Regulations (EC) following the consultation of the British Central Authority on an application for obtaining the immediate return of a child, initiated by the Belgian Central Authority on 14 October 2011, under the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the civil aspects of child abduction and articles 1322 bis to 1322 quaterdecies of the judicial Code ;

Upon the notification given on 23 December 2011 to Gail COOPER, Nigel COOPER, the Office of the Mons Public Prosecutor, on 4 January 2012 to Mrs Stephanie ADAMS, Solicitor, and Mr Graeme Langlands, Solicitor (Millsdonkin&co, Solicitors) ;

Upon the conclusions submitted and based on article 11 of Brussels II bis and article 1322 bis of the judicial Code for Nigel COOPER, initialed by the Registry of the Court on 31 January 2012 as well as the attached file of documents ;

Upon the notices 1322 decies of the judicial Code, sent on 1 February to the Office of the Mons Public Prosecutor, Nigel COOPER, his counsel, Gail COOPER, Mrs Stephanie ADAMS, Solicitor, Mr Graeme Langlands, Solicitor (Millsdonkin&co, Solicitors), regarding the hearing set on 22 February 2012 ;

Upon the correspondence from Millsdonkin&co, Solicitors (Mrs Gail COOPER’s counsel in England), addressed to the Registry of the Court on 10 February 2012 ;

Upon the correspondence received by fax from Williscroft & co, Solicitors (Mr Nigel COOPER’s counsel in England), and initialed by the Registry of the Court on 13 February 2012 ;

Upon the transcript of the 24 November 2011 hearing held under British Jurisdiction, sent by fax in its English version and initialed by the Registry of the Court on 21 and 22 February (fax and correspondence), and its corresponding English translation ;

Upon the correspondence from the Sunderland City Council, sent by fax to the Registry of the Court on 22 February 2012 ;

Heard at the hearing on 22 February 2012 :

Mister Henri RENARD, substitute for the Mons Public Prosecutor,

Mister Nigel COOPER, assisted by his counsel Mrs BENEDETTI, Solicitor, and an English language interpreter, Mrs Catherine REYNELBERGE,

The trial debates have been declared closed and the cause has been taken under advisement,

Upon, provided at such hearing : the files for Nigel COOPER ;

Upon the fact that, although regularly convened by the Registry of the Court, the Defendant Gail COOPER did not attend nor was she represented at Our 22 February 2012 Hearing ;

That as far as she is concerned the Court shall rule by default and without further examination, on the basis of the means, files, and conclusions presented and provided by the attending parties ;

OBJECT AND ADMISSIBILITY OF THE REQUEST

 

Given the request, formulated by the conclusions provided to the Registry of the Court on 31 January 2012 for Nigel COOPER, on the basis of article 11 of the European Regulations No. 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003, also known as “Brussels II bis” and article 1322 bis of the judicial Code, is disposed to grant to Nigel COOPER primary custody of his daughter Bailie Kate COOPER, born on 1 August 2003 in Coventry (united Kingdom) from his union with Gail COOPER, and therefore order immediate return of the child to the Kingdom of Belgium, in this case to the domicile of her father, registered in 7020 MONS (Belgium), rue Grande, 205/2.2 and in this respect, on forfeiture of a penalty of 500 euros per day of delay, Our decision being additionally supplemented by the passport certificate in accordance with the “BRUSSELS II bis” Regulation, under the conditions, modalities and authorizations better outlined in the arrangement scheme of the initiating proceedings ; that subsequently the request is pursuing the right for secondary custody in favor of Nigel COOPER regarding his daughter Bailie Kate COOPER, the modalities being better detailed in the operative part of the conclusions ;

That this request, justified in its means and submitted within the legal deadline, shall be receivable ;

CAUSE FOR THE REQUEST

Brief background facts

Considering that the applicant Nigel COOPER settled in Belgium in January 2006 as he was hired as Principal Consultant for Network Security at SHAPE ;

Considering that he was later joined by his daughter on 12 October 2006 as attested by the residence certificate written and signed by the Civil Registrar of the City of Mons on 30 September 2011, based on a private power of attorney provided by the defendant Gail COOPER on 5 August 2006, which reads as follows : “I, Gail COOPER, mother of Bailie Kate COOPER, authorize

Bailie Kate COOPER to live with her father Nigel COOPER” ;

That the defendant later joined the applicant and his daughter on 20 January 2007 to live with him, first in Mons, than later in Lessines ;

Considering that during the period of the time they lived together, the applicant obviously catered to the well-being of his daughter, mainly by himself and because of the clear addiction to drugs and alcohol which already afflicted the defendant at the time ;

That, no less than twenty-five independent testimonies were written and provided to the file of the applicant in order to attest of the true attentive care he was providing his daughter, as well as the quality of the level of education he was offering her ;

Considering that on 3 March 2011, the defendant committed a felony by taking the child Bailie Kate to the United Kingdom, and did so after having willingly misled to local authorities of the City of Lessines, in playing on the existing similarity of names between the applicant, herself, and a someone named Paul COOPER, who was her first husband, and father of a daughter named Keeva-Rae, the so-called Paul COOPER granting the defendant, after signing a private power of attorney on 7 December 2007, full authority to leave the Kingdom of Belgium with his daughter Keeva-Rae COOPER ;

That on 5 November 2011, the Mayor of the City of Lessines acknowledged that he had indeed been completely misled and as a result stated so in writing, explaining that in fact the applicant Nigel COOPER had never given to the defendant Gail COOPER the written authorization to leave the Belgian territory accompanied by their daughter Bailie COOPER;

That in accordance to the provisions of the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the civil aspects of international child abduction, the applicant COOPER contacted on 21 September 2011 the Belgian Central Authority, i.e. the Federal Public Service of Justice to notify them of the parental abduction and thus asked for the immediate return of the child to Belgium ;

That, in addition, the child contacted her father again as early as 13 November 2011 to let him know that she felt unsafe with her mother and her new partner, this once again proving the alcoholism and drug abuse of the defendant, Gail COOPER ;

That the British High Court of Justice ordered against the return of the child on 25 November 2011 ;

And that following a decision that can be criticized on many grounds, which were clearly taken out of context or subject to a utterly subjective and inadequate interpretation, Our British counterpart considered that the applicant Nigel COOPER had simply, through his mere acts, given his consent to the mother to take the child, under article 13 of the Hague Convention ;

Debate

Considering that We do not wish to remind of the legal, international, and internal provisions applicable in this case, since “no one is supposed to ignore the Law” ;

That the request of Nigel COOPER, which aims to grant him custody of his daughter, is fundamentally based on article 11.7 of the Brussels II Regulations ;

That there is no doubt whatsoever that the whole family was residing in Belgium until the defendant Gail COOPER committed a felony ;

That the child Bailie Kate was therefore indeed a legal resident in Belgium ;

Considering that the applicant never gave his consent for his daughter to depart to the United Kingdom ;

That it has been clearly established that the defendant COOPER misled the authorities of the City of Lessines in order to get hold of the authorizations she needed ;

That the letter written on 1 March 2011 by the applicant to the defendant, reference C38 of the file of British Court, relates exclusively to the applicant’s consent to the departure of his wife, and not the departure of his daughter ;

That indeed, this document clearly bears the following reference “the departure and return of Mrs Gail COOPER to the United Kingdom” ;

That the interpretation of the British Judge regarding the email that Gail COOPER addresses to the applicant on 15 August 2011, is in fact exactly the opposite of its actual meaning ;

That this email does not, in any case, lead to the conclusion that there was no illegal departure of the child ;

Considering also that the financial support offered by Nigel COOPER to his spouse does not demonstrate his will to offer child support contributions to his spouse in the maintenance and educational costs of his daughter, hence does not either automatically imply that Gail COOPER does in effect and lawfully benefit from the prerogatives of custody rights, but rather show that he is strictly complying with his duty of supporting his spouse while in marriage, as described in article 203  in the Belgian Civil Code;

Considering that at every single contact between the applicant and his daughter by videoconference, the child strongly expressed her wishes to go back to Belgium, and that this clearly indicates that she was not properly cared for by her mother and the partner of her mother ;

That the British Social Services, warned by the applicant’s letter, took over the case while the  Children Social Welfare Services of Sunderland presented a written agreement to the parties on 12 January 2012, which aim was to minimize (sic!) all risks for Bailie and promote her emotional, social, and physical well-being – agreement made between Mrs Gail Cooper, her current partner Derek JOHNSON and the Sunderland Local Authority ;

That, in accordance to the above-mentioned agreement, Mr Derek JOHNSON was no longer authorized to stay overnight at the residence of the defendant whenever the child was present, going as far as pointing out that when the child was staying at the residence, Mr JOHNSON and the defendant COOPER should refrain from consuming alcohol or any illicit drugs “resic!” ;

That the above-mentioned agreement also suggested that the defendant should report to a service called “Riverside Women in Need”, which is sponsored by the University of Sunderland and meant to help victims of domestic abuse, this very invitation clearly indicating the level of “quality” of the relation between the defendant and her partner Derek JOHNSON ;

That the later was supposed to report to a service called “The Head Project”, sponsored by the same university and meant to help abusive and violent individuals, this invitation obviously being a consequence of the similar invitation made to the defendant COOPER… ;

Considering that in planning the hearings of the British High Court of Justice scheduled on 24 and 25 November 2011, an independent consulting organization called “CAFCASS” as per the translation “Service of counsel and support to the family court” provided a child abduction report, which made us believe beyond any reasonable doubt that what Bailie Kate COOPER genuinely wished for was to go back and live under the roof of her father, as Mrs Liliane ODZE reports ;

That this report indeed shows that even if the child remains, and it is by far understandable, torn apart by the inevitable conflict of loyalty between parents, she does not however shows any clear preference in her wishes in remaining in England but rather she insists on going back to her father’s home, while expressing her wish to meet regularly with her maternal grandfather, and, of course, her mother ;

That the British Judge should have, in view of all the elements which were given to his appreciation, ordered the evident return of the child in the country of her choice, i.e. the Kingdom of Belgium ;

That We shall order this course of action, which also obviously meets the greater and objective interests of the child ;

That no guarantee can be obtained in this regard within the home of her mother, knowing that the removal and/or control precautions of the mother and her partner as described in the agreement made on 12 January 2012 do not strictly constitute a binding constraint or even an obligation ;

Considering finally that Our decision will be supplemented with the passport certificate as referred to in article 42 of the Brussels II bis Regulation; passport certificate which is to be handed to the applicant Nigel COOPER, along with this decision ;

That based on the Rule of Law, the home of the parent who is honorable and capable to respect the prerogatives of the custody of his child must be preferred to any other care structure or any other home of replacement, as respectable as these may be ;

That Nigel COOPER effectively complies with these conditions and requirements in this case ;

FOR THOSE REASONS,

We, Xavier HIERNAUX, Single Judge, assisted by Christine VACHAUDEZ, Registrar ;

Upon the provisions of the law of 15 June 1935 applied in this case, and article 107 of the law of 22 December 1998 ;

Upon article 11 of the European Regulations Nr. 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003, also known as “Brussels II bis” and article 1322 bis of the judicial Code ;

Hereby record the claim, denials and reservations of the appearing party, and deem all further or contrary conclusions unsubstantiated;

Having heard Mister Henri RENARD, Substitute for the Royal Prosecutor, who gave his assent at the hearing of 22 February 2012 ;

Rule by default

against the defendant Gail COOPER, and upon hearing the other parties in summary proceedings ;

Declare the request of Nigel COOPER admissible,

And pronounce his request well-founded for the specific purpose stated below ;

As a result :

Grant custody rights for the child Bailie Kate COOPER, born in Coventry (United Kingdom) on 1 August 2003, to Nigel COOPER, her father, with whom the child will have her official residence ;

Order the immediate return of Bailie Kate COOPER, born on 1 August 2003, to the Kingdom of Belgium, and in this case within the official residence of her father Nigel COOPER, as registered rue Grande, 205/2.2 in 7020 MONS, and in the absence of complying with the obligation of return of the child by the defendant Gail COOPER , we condemn her to a daily fine amounting to FIVE HUNDRED EUROS (500€) for the delay in the return of the child, to be enforced and paid starting on the day following the service of this decision ;

Declare that this decision is supplemented by the passport certificate referred to in article 42 of the Brussels II bis Regulation, which is delivered to Nigel COOPER upon sending it to him ;

Authorize, as needed, Nigel COOPER to take back or arrange the removal of his daughter Bailie COOPER as soon as this decision is rendered ;

Empower the Police Forces to retrieve this child wherever she may be located, whether a bailiff is present or not as per his mission of executing the present judgment ;

Expressly authorize the Police Forces as well as the bailiff to force any entrance, even private and even if it is somewhere else than the school she attends or the domicile of Gail COOPER, this for the sole purpose of retrieving Bailie, if necessary with the assistance of a locksmith in order to open and even break open doors, may these be private entrances ;

Declare that the entire fees and disbursements generated by the execution of this decision will have to be paid exclusively by the defendant Gail COOPER, and condemn her to pay back to Nigel COOPER  all fees he may have given up front, upon a simple justification of payment ;

Condemn Gail COOPER to pay the costs and expenses of these proceedings, as they are not to be settled by Nigel COOPER and deemed to be lawfully reserved in accordance to article 21 of the judicial Code ;

Declare the present judgment to be provisionally enforceable aside from any appeal and without any security nor special cantonment offer ;

This is our judgment and it is pronounced in French, at the public hearing of the Presidential Chamber, at the Mons Court of Justice, on the day, month, and year mentioned on top, where sat :

Mister Xavier HIERNAUX, single Judge,

Madam Christine VACHAUDEZ, Registrar.

C. VACHAUDEZ X. HIERNAUX.

Presented on 15 March 2012

not registrable

Chief Inspector a.I.

Ch. FRETIN

R.G. 11/3804/A

Summon and hereby order all Judicial Officers to enforce the existing judgment to this end ;

To all our Public Prosecutors and Royal Prosecutors at the County Courts to assist them and to the Commanders and Officers of the Public Force to support when they are legally required to do so.

In witness whereof, the present order has been legally signed and sealed by the Court.

For certified execution delivered to Mister Nigel Cooper.

(seal of the County Court of Mons) The Chief Registrar

M-J SAUCEZ

Registrar’s Office of the County Court of Mons

Date : 16/03/2012  Der : 2843

8 pages at 2,85 euros

Duties paid : 22,80 euros

The Chief Registrar

M-J SAUCEZ

#################################

Attatched is the “judgement” given by the top Belgian judge which the UK government is ignoring, breaking international law!
UPDATES – NIGEL COOPER – APRIL 2013
Cover Photo

 

UK Caught Stealing Children
“Just to keep you all up to date with what I am doing and why I am doing this. 1. September 2011 My daughter is kidnapped from Belgium 2. November 2011 The Hague request’s for return. (UK refused on Article 13) 3. December 2011 Belgium issues a seizure notice of the Hague article (11) 4. February 2012 Belgium hears and re-tries the seizure case and awards the immediate return of my daughter to Belgium under Article 11, under international law, under Belgian law, Under UK law, under E.U. law, under universal law. Belgium writes the perfect judgement and has the judgment sworn as omnipotent before King Albert II, King of Belgium; who then declares the judgement as a royal decree! 5. March 16th 2012 Belgian Bailiff flies to the UK to serve notice of the judgement on the EJC in the Strand London, Bailiffs receipt note held on record in the Royal courts of Mons Belgium. 6. March 16th 2012 Belgian advocate instructs Sunderland Social services that a return order has been issued by the King of Belgium. 7. March 16th Sunderland Social services “refuse” the “non-refusable”? 8. March 16th Belgian advocate informs Sunderland Social servers in the name of “Ms. Joanna Bonar” that she acting as the legal representative of the UK, have just breached The Hague convention, the Lisbon treaty and many more. 9. April 2012 Justice Moylan formally refuses international law, refuses my right of appeal, refuses my civil rights, my human rights and condones the kidnapping of my daughter, harbors a known felon who has a bench warrant out against her. 10. I’ve now been refused every form of legal assistance in the UK to recover my daughter. 11 16Th April 2013… to this day the UK refuses to return my daughter and has broken just above every law there is! 12. I’ve had 5 death treats made against me from the UK, via telecom calls, or published articles. 13. The UK went as far as to interfere with NATO’s employment schemes and had me dismissed for no reason what so ever. 14. I’ve had to move out of Belgium and go into hiding due to the threats on my life, all for asking the law to be obeyed! 15. The list of wrongs just keep going and the power of the judgment keep growing, to a point I was granted rights of Bailiff, I was grants right of arrest, I was grants unlimited resource to enforce the judgement; and as I started by telling you, the judgment is perfect, there is an “UNLIMITED” indemnity clause, the UK will have to pay for the total cost of this case as to date this case has not been enforced as it is deemed under article 21 of the law that all costs will be born by Ms. Cooper, who in turn; the Sunderland Social Services have sworn on oath to cover all costs of Ms. Cooper.
When this case is enforced it will bankrupt Sunderland city, It will bankrupt Sunderland local authorities, it will bankrupt the central authority and higher. The judgement is perfect and it will kill the forced adoption in the UK once and for all. The Judgement was is perfect, the judgement is a master of English. The UK have been caught stealing children for profit.
I will not stop and I will not bow down to the UK.

From Nigel Cooper – 17 April 2013:

UK Caught Stealing Children

To all of you who and following my battle with the UK to see justice severed. Well! What can one say! Justice in the UK? That is a very silly thing to mutter, to a point that you can’t put justice and the UK in the same sentence it does not work! I once thought, a very long time ago that the social services was just that, a SERVICE for humanity when in fact it is a profit making mechanism bolstered by the abduction of international children, you and I call that kidnap, oh an that is an international felony under the international penal code, but the UK just ignore that one, it does not count when the UK’s name is used. I once thought a judge was an honorable person! I see no honor amongst the thieves of the courts of the UK. … I once though that the UK stood for the rights of freedom and liberty as laid down in the Magna Carta 1297 A.D, and in the rights and freedoms of lords and men of 1100 A.D.It seems that those enshrined laws and covenants go by the wayside when the social services, when the judges, when the corrupt police get involved.

I once thought that truth would prevail! That’s until I discovered the fake doctors and social workers, the fake legal people, the fake M.P.s and much more. So how much is a child worth to the UK? Moreover, how much is a child worth to you! I know that there is NO SUM on this planet that can replace what has been stolen from myself, and to multiply that figure to cover every stolen child and we are in the realms of an evil deed that is so great, so evil, so woefully painful to parents it transcends all realms of humanity. For what I see, the social service’s are undertaking is the greatest abuse of power in the history of mankind. If the UK supports this act of abuse of power, then the world should turn its back up on the UK, the world should cast down a shadow over the UK and reject the UK from the community of mankind, the UK should be openly punished before the eyes of humanity for humanity, for each and every one of us. From a time before Christ….. A wise king known as King Solomon was tasked with the fable of two women and a child. I suggest you read it. I will fight for my daughter, I will lay down my life for my daughter, I will see justice served if it is the last thing I do in my life.I will not bow down the UK, I will never agree to the lies and frauds of the UK. To that end..

Sir, Madam I am looking for two things:

1. Good international legal assistance

2. Good media coverage.

I am in possession of the perfect judgment sworn before the King of Belgium, King Albert II as the omnipotent judgement. It is perfect at every point of law. I want someone to force this judgement to be obeyed in the UK. I openly offer 1,000,000 Euros to any person who get’s my judgment enforced in full. If you would like to read the judgement…

I’ll send you a copy just ask me….

mr.nigel.cooper@gmail.com

Respectfully

Mr. Nigel Cooper

######################################

UK Caught Stealing Children

When I am asked to “prove” ??? the UK steals children for profit.. I reply!

How much information do you want? You need documents facts, books? Tax returns? Companies House financial returns? All you have to do is ask people here, each one of them can give you a big slice of this information. There are bigger players who have been at this for many years collecting and collating information. I am not just one person I am one of 10′s of 1000′s of parents who have worked this out. It does not take rocket science to do this, just a good head and a clear understanding of public records. To put just one person into the picture.. “A single Doctor” This doctor who is actually not a doctor but a fake, her company ( a doctor as a company).. make 43,000% yes forty three thousand percent profit in a 12 month period.

Questions??? Why was this abnormal profit not investigated by HMRC or Companies house, or whoever was paying the doctor for services rendered why did they not ask. Then there are the so called M.P. for families? Hold on a second is this the same M.P. how publicly boasts of is prowess with women? Is this the same M.P. who “girl-friend” is a director of a THE company that provides all of the IT infrastructure to the foster homes and centers? Is this the same M.P. who ranted for so long on a families bill that was nothing more than a whitewash of the facts. So not the Core-IT directors and just “aquired” the group of people who form expert witness’s.. So now the Social Services, have the doctors, the legal teams, the so called expert witness’s and the judges all colluding?

You’ve got no idea what’ going on! each week some 250 to 300 children are taken.. Yes a 1000 children a month taken for no reason other that for profit. The SS staff take the children so they have a job, they pass it up the chain to the legal teams have a job and make a profit, the courts have their own budget that just get bigger and bigger. The foster homes, cafcass teams, social workers, doctors, police, judges, and much more are all involved is creating a vast financial turnover in children for profit. Give the past figures and records, it dose not take too much effort to extrapolate those figures into a future forecast. That forecast is damming beyond belief, by the years 2020, at the rate the UK is stealing children, they will be able to wholesale children like a commodity, like, gas, coal and steal. Stealing children is very big money!

Hence my original statement.”

————————————————-

video: NIGEL COOPER – CHILD STEALING – UK BREAKS INTERNATIONAL LAW

UK Column Live – Nigel Cooper live on UK CAUGHT STEALING CHILDREN
72 min. video:
——————————————————
. from:   nigel cooper
Published on 29 Mar 2013
“I told the would I would not stop! I will not stop, I will publish to the world. What I do I do not do for myself only, I do for the community of mankind, for… “We the people for the people”, Let no man take from mankind the gift of mother nature the gift of life, let alone a judge or social worker.”
———————————- “EUROPEAN COURTS COME AFTER UK ‘SOCIAL SERVICES”
http://www.cornwallcommunitynews.co.uk/2013/04/03/european-courts-come-after-uk-social-services/

“A European judge has ordered police to force Britain’s rogue ‘family courts’ to hand back a child they kidnapped from her father.

Judges in Belgium made the landmark ruling ordering officials in the UK’s tyrannical secret law courts to give former NATO security contractor Nigel Coopers daughter back to him….”  contd.

Do you know of a scandal involving the SS in Cornwall? Have your efforts to publicise your case come to nothing because no-one will listen? Let us know. Just post below.

source: http://www.cornwallcommunitynews.co.uk/2013/04/03/european-courts-come-after-uk-social-services/

—————

Nigel Cooper: see much more, who did it, and vital comments:  “BANNED from the UK: NATO Security Consultant because the “UK has been caught red handed stealing children”

http://punishmentwithoutcrime.wordpress.com/2013/03/11/banned-from-the-uk-nato-security-consultant-because-the-uk-has-been-caught-red-handed-stealing-children/

———————

Nigel Cooper: be.linkedin.com/in/mrnigelcooper/ Skype: n1gelc00per Tel +32 065822500  (Home) Tel +32 0470177526 (GSM – Primary) Tel +32 0478506328 (GSM – Secondary)

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

FACTS AND FIGURES, + RUBBISH ON THE CHILDSTEALING AGENDA 19/4/13

DAILY MAIL, 17 APRIL 13 – THE NSPCC ARE ONE OF THE ORGANISATIONS BEHIND THE CHILDSTEALING RACKET IN THE UK – WHICH SPREADS WORLDWIDE VIA THE U.N. – ALL BACKED BY BRITISH TAX MONEY.

How do they know this? do they go into the hiomes and see the abuse?  of course they dont – its propaganda used to steal children – and there mustake record is out of all comprehension.

Im not putting bullshxt like this on my blog – the rubbish is here: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2310840/Thousands-children-abused-homes-protected-local-authorities-damning-NSPCC-report-warns.html?ito=feeds-newsxml

a] “Figures at an all time high for children being removed from families, most often good, loving ones” – Daily Mail April 12 2012 =

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2128987/Children-stolen-state.html

b] “Children waiting for adoption at an all time high.”

https://vimeo.com/57835089

c] United Nations childstealing agenda – by whistleblower Ukrainian priest:

https://vimeo.com/64441928

d]  Daily Mail – Figures for “Adoption and children in state care across England: get the data”

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/sep/26/adoption-and-care-statistics-england?intcmp=239

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

ALL CHANGE – BUT IS ANYTHING GOING TO BE DONE ABOUT THE RANCID CORRUPTION WITHIN NORTH YORKS POLICE?

grandmab

New post on grandmabarbara

PSNI Officer Lands North Yorkshire Chief Post | UK Police News – Police Oracle

by Grandma B

See on Scoop.itThe Abuse of Grandma B

Police Service of Northern Ireland ACC is surprise appointment and sees officer who started career in Greater Manchester Police return to England.

Peter Hofschröer‘s insight:

Will the new CC carry out the corruption investigation into North Yorkshire Police as Lord Maginnis has requested in Parliament?

“The Hofschroer case has been on my desk for several years now. A widow in her 80s was dispossessed of her home in a way that implies collusion between certain family members and the Social Services. A son who has come to the rescue has been harried by the North Yorkshire police (that particularly dubious constabulary merits careful investigation) to the extent that he and his aged mother have been pursued through an Interpol warrant to their “refuge” in Austria.

http://www.epolitix.com/latestnews/article-detail/newsarticle/proper-delegation-please-not-abdication/

See on www.policeoracle.com

Grandma B | 19/04/2013 at 12:13 | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/p1Nj7d-39I
Comment    See all comments    Like
Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/2013/04/19/psni-officer-lands-north-yorkshire-chief-post-uk-police-news-police-oracle/
Thanks for flying with WordPress.com

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

UPDATE – “UK CAUGHT STEALING CHILDREN” 17 APRIL 2013

Cover Photo

From Nigel Cooper – 17 April 2013:

UK Caught Stealing Children

UK Caught Stealing Children

To all of you who and following my battle with the UK to see justice severed.  Well!  What can one say!  Justice in the UK? That is a very silly thing to mutter, to a point that you can’t put justice and the UK in the same sentence it does not work! I once thought, a very long time ago that the social services was just that, a SERVICE for humanity when in fact it is a profit making mechanism bolstered by the abduction of international children, you and I call that kidnap, oh an that is an international felony under the international penal code, but the UK just ignore that one, it does not count when the UK’s name is used. I once thought a judge was an honorable person! I see no honor amongst the thieves of the courts of the UK. … I once though that the UK stood for the rights of freedom and liberty as laid down in the Magna Carta 1297 A.D, and in the rights and freedoms of lords and men of 1100 A.D.It seems that those enshrined laws and covenants go by the wayside when the social services, when the judges, when the corrupt police get involved. I once thought that truth would prevail! That’s until I discovered the fake doctors and social workers, the fake legal people, the fake M.P.s and much more. So how much is a child worth to the UK?  Moreover, how much is a child worth to you!  I know that there is NO SUM on this planet that can replace what has been stolen from myself, and to multiply that figure to cover every stolen child and we are in the realms of an evil deed that is so great, so evil, so woefully painful to parents it transcends all realms of humanity.  For what I see, the social service’s are undertaking is the greatest abuse of power in the history of mankind. If the UK supports this act of abuse of power, then the world should turn its back up on the UK, the world should cast down a shadow over the UK and reject the UK from the community of mankind,  the UK should be openly punished before the eyes of humanity for humanity, for each and every one of us. From a time before Christ…..  A wise king known as King Solomon was tasked with the fable of two women and a child.  I suggest you read it.  I will fight for my daughter, I will lay down my life for my daughter, I will see justice served if it is the last thing I do in my life.I will not bow down the UK, I will never agree to the lies and frauds of the UK. To that end.. Sir, Madam I am looking for two things: 1. Good international legal assistance 2. Good media coverage. I am in possession of the perfect judgment sworn before the King of Belgium, King Albert II as the omnipotent judgement.  It is perfect at every point of law.  I want someone to force this judgement to be obeyed in the UK.  I openly offer 1,000,000 Euros to any person who get’s my judgment enforced in full. If you would like to read the judgement…

I’ll send you a copy just ask me….

mr.nigel.cooper@gmail.com

Respectfully

Mr. Nigel Cooper

############################################

UK Caught Stealing Children

When I am asked to “prove” ??? the UK steals children for profit.. I reply!

How much information do you want? You need documents facts, books? Tax returns? Companies House financial returns? All you have to do is ask people here, each one of them can give you a big slice of this information. There are bigger players who have been at this for many years collecting and collating information. I am not just one person I am one of 10′s of 1000′s of parents who have worked this out. It does not take rocket science to do this, just a good head and a clear understanding of public records. To put just one person into the picture.. “A single Doctor” This doctor who is actually not a doctor but a fake, her company ( a doctor as a company).. make 43,000% yes forty three thousand percent profit in a 12 month period. Questions??? Why was this abnormal profit not investigated by HMRC or Companies house, or whoever was paying the doctor for services rendered why did they not ask.   Then there are the so called M.P. for families? Hold on a second is this the same M.P. how publicly boasts of is prowess with women? Is this the same M.P. who “girl-friend” is a director of a THE company that provides all of the IT infrastructure to the foster homes and centers? Is this the same M.P. who ranted for so long on a families bill that was nothing more than a whitewash of the facts.   So not the Core-IT directors and just “aquired” the group of people who form expert witness’s.. So now the Social Services, have the doctors, the legal teams, the so called expert witness’s and the judges all colluding?   You’ve got no idea what’ going on! each week some 250 to 300 children are taken.. Yes a 1000 children a month taken for no reason other that for profit.   The SS staff take the children so they have a job, they pass it up the chain to the legal teams have a job and make a profit, the courts have their own budget that just get bigger and bigger. The foster homes, cafcass teams, social workers, doctors, police, judges, and much more are all involved is creating a vast financial turnover in children for profit. Give the past figures and records, it dose not take too much effort to extrapolate those figures into a future forecast. That forecast is damming beyond belief, by the years 2020, at the rate the UK is stealing children, they will be able to wholesale children like a commodity, like, gas, coal and steal. Stealing children is very big money! Hence my original statement

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

UPDATE MICHAEL DOHERTY 17 APRIL 2013

Michael Doherty update 17 April 13:

Michael Doherty

Stitch up in Stevenage update; CPS call in ‘special prosecutor’ for appeal….. as many know I was prosecuted and pronounced guilty in Stevenage magistrates court back in January. … the matter was appealed and scheduled for trial mid July. the CPS made an exparte application to move it back one month so they can bring in a ‘special prosecutor’..

. looks like they are shitting themselves and bringing in the big guns…

well I’ve got a huge gun on my side; ‘the truth’

august 20th st Albans crown court

 Michael Doherty For those with no idea what this is about and why they might need a ‘special prosecutor’ to shore the case ….

STITCH UP IN STEVENAGE THE FILM:

PART 1 – http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZjgSA9cPDQ [nearly 7500 hits]

 

THREATS MADE AGAINST ME!
I am writing this in case anything untoward happens to me as a public record.
Just to keep it public (many know this) that I am running two criminal prosecutions against members of the Metropolitan Police. These are serious charges and the cases are ongoing. … In Nov 2011 a suited man approached a family member in a london park and handed them a sealed letter. The letter identified me and made veiled threats that; “There is no way we are going to allow the continuation of this persecution of innocent people” verbatim (note IPCC claim this is not a threat) At the time there was only the criminal prosecution of the Metropolitan police (this is still the case) so the letter and the case most certainly were connected. Plainly someone or a group had decided that their best method to stop a jury deciding a case was to make threats and attempt to interfere with judicial proceedings. The matter was reported to Deputy Assistant Commissioner Mark Simmonds and much feet dragging later they started some sort of lame investigation. An investigation during which they didn’t even speak with me. This became a complaint to the professional standards Dept who claimed that the letter was not about me….. The appeal to the IPCC accepted that the letter was about me, but should never have been passed to me, therefore their perverse rational continued, I was not the intended victim…. Of course the letter, clearly states for that family member to influence me to stop or certain consequences would occur. I have posted this snippet from the IPCC for the public record. [decision taken by Maneer Asfar head of complaints] Be very aware, that the police, it seems throughout it’s organisation is prepared to act in a manner akin to a criminal enterprise. That when a serious offence of witness interference/interference with criminal trials/blackmail occurs, if they did it, they won’t investigate it.
My story started with my standing up to a bully police officer, XH284 BARRY HARGREAVES, now no longer a police officer for the Met. It continued when I became concerned with the police to investigate sexual offences against children, now plainly vindicated as correct following recent IPCC admissions.
It is clear such a route is fraught with real danger. This will not deter me in seeking what is right and I thank you all for your continued support and watching my back.
Michael Doherty
JusticeNOW

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

M KIRK UPDATE 17 APRIL 13 – PLS HELP FIND THIS PERSON

Maurice Kirk asks can this person be found?:

On 17 April 2013 06:30, Maurice Kirk <maurice@kirkflyingvet.com> wrote:

“urgently need this guy located with tel number , thank you…see enclosed Hearsay Notice

PS 1846 Brown was custody sergeant at Fairwater police station, Cardiff, on 20th May 1993″

KIRK 17 APRIL13KIRK 2 17 APRIL13

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

NIGEL COOPER UPDATE 16 APRIL 2013 12.00 GMT

  • Just to keep you all up to date with what I am doing and why I am doing this.
    1. September 2011 My daughter is kidnapped from Belgium 2. November 2011 The Hague request’s for return. (UK refused on Article 13)
    3. December 2011 Belgium issues a seizure notice of the Hague article (11)
    4. February 2012 Belgium hears and re-tries the seizure case and awards the immediate return of my daughter to Belgium under Article 11, under international law, under Belgian law, Under UK law, under E.U. law, under universal law. Belgium writes the perfect judgement and has the judgment sworn as omnipotent before King Albert II, King of Belgium; who then declares the judgement as a royal decree!
    5. March 16th 2012 Belgian Bailiff flies to the UK to serve notice of the judgement on the EJC in the Strand London, Bailiffs receipt note held on record in the Royal courts of Mons Belgium.
    6. March 16th 2012 Belgian advocate instructs Sunderland Social services that a return order has been issued by the King of Belgium.
    7. March 16th Sunderland Social services “refuse” the “non-refusable”?
    8. March 16th Belgian advocate informs Sunderland Social servers in the name of “Ms. Joanna Bonar” that she acting as the legal representative of the UK, have just breached The Hague convention, the Lisbon treaty and many more.
    9. April 2012 Justice Moylan formally refuses international law, refuses my right of appeal, refuses my civil rights, my human rights and condones the kidnapping of my daughter, harbors a known felon who has a bench warrant out against her.
    10. I’ve now been refused every form of legal assistance in the UK to recover my daughter.
    11 16Th April 2013… to this day the UK refuses to return my daughter and has broken just above every law there is!
    12. I’ve had 5 death treats made against me from the UK, via telecom calls, or published articles.
    13. The UK went as far as to interfere with NATO’s employment schemes and had me dismissed for no reason what so ever.
    14. I’ve had to move out of Belgium and go into hiding due to the threats on my life, all for asking the law to be obeyed! 15. The list of wrongs just keep going and the power of the judgment keep growing, to a point I was granted rights of Bailiff, I was grants right of arrest, I was grants unlimited resource to enforce the judgement; and as I started by telling you, the judgment is perfect, there is an “UNLIMITED” indemnity clause, the UK will have to pay for the total cost of this case as to date this case has not been enforced as it is deemed under article 21 of the law that all costs will be born by Ms. Cooper, who in turn; the Sunderland Social Services have sworn on oath to cover all costs of Ms. Cooper. When this case is enforced it will bankrupt Sunderland city, It will bankrupt Sunderland local authorities, it will bankrupt the central authority and higher. The judgement is perfect and it will kill the forced adoption in the UK once and for all. The Judgement was is perfect, the judgement is a master of English. The UK have been caught stealing children for profit. I will not stop and I will not bow down to the UK.
    Scroll down for more articles / videos, + here:
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

MAURICE KIRK – UPDATE 12/4/13 – BLOCKED APPEAL, + more

kirk2

Above: Maurice Kirk outside Cardiff Civic Justice Center, Febuary 2013

I am showing these documents from M Kirk to highlight the utter abuse he has always suffered in the courts, particularly in Wales, but also in London. These documents show the abject abuse of power by those put in positions of responsiblity, that are paid astronomical salaries with the British peoples money but simply refuse to do the job they are there to do  – drunk with power this oligarchy rides roughshod over citizens rights seemingly at whim – in this case Maurice Kirks’ rights are written away – as his career as a vetinary surgeon was – in worthless text by persons not fit to hold the positions they do. No wonder this country is in such a mess and shocking cases like the Musa’s and so many others are hidden away in the dark corridors of oh so dubious “power”, making a joke out of “justice” and all that stands for.

kirk 1 12 april 13kirk 2 12 april

and from 2007 – click for M Kirks PDF 07 07 25 Court of Appeal Blocked Application

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

CHILD STEALING: C. BOOKER WRITES 6/4/13, MUSA, NIGEL COOPER…and more…

CHILD STEALING: C. BOOKER WRITES 6/4/13, NIGEL COOPER…and more…

0]  Letter to 5 ministers at the Ministry of Justice 20 March 2013 [still unanswered] + many Christopher Booker “Sunday Telegraph” articles relating to the Musa Family Case, from April 2010 to April 2013, + more, including his own [March 2013]:

http://www.sendspace.com/filegroup/azeZNx%2BmDAglWfV5OrVGiL9YZZ3Mmtdu

————————————————-

1] The lawyer mother who beat the social workers

A barrister who fought for parents trying to keep their children found herself a victim of the same system

The more the mother expressed unhappiness about the situation the social worker had created, the more she was told she was being 'obstructive' (picture posed by model)

The more the mother expressed unhappiness about the situation the social worker had created, the more she was told she was being ‘obstructive’ (picture posed by model) Photo: ALAMY

4:45PM BST 06 Apr 2013

Whenever I report a new story of parents struggling to prevent social workers seizing their children for what seems no good reason, I try to give a new slant on the wider picture of how our ”child protection’’ system has gone so tragically off the rails.What makes this week’s example so unusual is that it centres on a barrister who for 10 years fought hundreds of cases on behalf of parents trying to hold on to their children, in a system where she describes them as being “like lambs led to slaughter” – only to find herself a victim of the same system after she complained to the police over serious allegations made by her older daughter against the girl’s father.

The police called in Barnet social services, who initially shared the mother’s concerns, advising that the girl should have no more contact with her drug-addicted father. But when a new social worker took over, she took the opposite view, working for the child to live with the father. This made the girl so miserable that she took to self-harming by slashing herself, leaving her mother distraught.

The more the mother expressed unhappiness about the situation the social worker had created, the more she was told she was being ”obstructive’’ and that there were “concerns about her parenting”. Last December she was summoned to a meeting to be told that the council wished to apply for care orders on both her children. Knowing how automatically the courts grant such orders, the mother – who although British was also an Israeli citizen – saw her only hope of retaining her children was to escape to Israel.

Within 36 hours, having obtained written permission from the older girl’s father, she took her daughters, now aged 14 and five, on several flights across Europe, terrified each time they landed that she might be arrested by police.

Scarcely had they arrived in Israel than she heard that the council had been granted care orders. Barnet approached our embassy in Tel Aviv to arrange for the children to be deported to Britain, with the co-operation of Israeli social services. After assessing the family, however, the Israelis advised that they could see no reason why the children – now having nightmares about being returned – should not remain in Israel.

Related Articles

In Britain the matter returned to court before a circuit judge, who criticised Barnet for its “relentless” pursuit of the family, ordering a further hearing in February. At this, although the social worker testified that the older girl had said that she would be happy to live in foster care in England, the mother was allowed to take part by video link, along with a “guardian” from the court advisory service, Cafcass, who had interviewed the 14-year-old on Skype. When the guardian supported the children’s wish to remain with their mother, the judge ruled that the children were now out of English jurisdiction, ordering Barnet to withdraw its case.

The two overjoyed children are thus free to continue living with their mother in Israel, with no more nightmares about being bundled on to a plane to live with strangers 2,000 miles from what they now regard as their new home.

Says the mother, in words many other parents would echo, “It seems my only real mistake was to dare to seek help from the authorities in the first place. source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/mother-tongue/familyadvice/9974950/The-lawyer-mother-who-beat-the-social-workers.html?fb

————————————————-

2] EUROPEAN COURTS COME AFTER UK ‘SOCIAL SERVICES

A European judge has ordered police to force Britain’s rogue ‘family courts’ to hand back a child they kidnapped from her father.

Judges in Belgium made the landmark ruling ordering officials in the UK’s tyrannical secret law courts to give former NATO security contractor Nigel Coopers daughter back to him.

‘Social Services’, the notorious branch of the infamous courts whose staff physically carry out child abductions, have as yet refused.

The scandal cements Britains growing international reputation as a routine violator of Article 8 of the UN Convention on Human Rights, the ‘right to a family life’ and will strengthen calls for the abolition of the hated ‘family division’.

Mr Cooper served in the Royal Navy for 20 years. He lost his child after her drunken and drug-addicted mother took her away to Sunderland.

Feminist zealots in the Social Services department of the local council kidnapped the girl after targeting the vulnerable mother. Just as with the Baby P scandal, they refused to acknowledge the existence of the childs natural father.

42 year old decorated seaman Mr Cooper has been forced to pursue his own case through court in Belgium after a bent British judge banned him from talking about the abduction of his child in the UK.

The father of one says since going public he’s has been contacted by ‘thousands’ of British parents whose children have been taken by the adoption and fostering industries.

The remarkable ruling he’s been awarded by a court in Belgium demands the child return to her father and that the British state effectively pay compensation for the ordeal they have put the young girl through.

This is a common call from civil rights protestors, who seek first abolition of the secret state, then for its worst offenders to be jailed for their crimes, and compensation issued from their ill gotten gains.

In a 32 minute video the father of one has recorded and sent live on the internet he asks other victims of the secretive and unnaccountable Social Services to expose individual social workers, and challenge the authority of Lord Matthew Thorpe, the head of the hated famlily division.

Like most officials of the so-called ‘family division’, Lord Thorpe is a sociopathic bigot, whose day job breaking up families is relieved only by his failure to be a good parent himself .

Here’s Mr Coopers video exposing how the UK abducted his child as part of an ongoing scandal – big news in Europe, but kept from the public by the self censored UK press.

Feel free to share this video as widely as you can.

Do you know of a scandal involving the SS in Cornwall? Have your efforts to publicise your case come to nothing because no-one will listen? Let us know. Just post below.

source: http://www.cornwallcommunitynews.co.uk/2013/04/03/european-courts-come-after-uk-social-services/

MORE: THE COOPER CASE:

BANNED from the UK: NATO Security Consultant because the “UK has been caught red handed stealing children”

see much more at: http://punishmentwithoutcrime.wordpress.com/2013/03/11/banned-from-the-uk-nato-security-consultant-because-the-uk-has-been-caught-red-handed-stealing-children/

——————————————————————————-

3]

CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

All over the country many children are being removed from good families under the most dubious of circumstances by town councils, SS and others, often in via the Secret Family Courts. When told about irregularities in cases the authorities do nothing. It is time it was stopped.
Chiwar and Gloria Musa outside the RCJ, August 2011 with the very much victimised Maurice Kirk’

THE MUSA CASE – 7 CHILDREN REMOVED BY A COUNCIL

” On the 8 April 2010 at around 4pm 8 policemen let themselves in by key to the Musa family council home and removed the Musa’s 5 children without any notice or prearrangement. The children were removed on what later were found to be totally untrue allegations made by certain employees at Y council. All allegations have been disproven, the allegations ranging from the children not being the Musas offspring and were being trafficked, to the children being beaten and generally mistreated by their parents.      Regarding the child trafficking allegation that the children were not the Musas offspring and they were part of a child trafficking network, DNA tests instigated by the Musa parents taking an unusually phenominally long time to undertake proved without a shadow of a doubt that the children were indeed the Musas children, proving also the children were in no way being trafficked in any shape or form. After this allegation was disproved other equally ridiculous allegations were made to keep the children from returning to their once happy home. One such allegation was that Gloria Musa was an active sex worker – a prostitute – who plied her trade not only in front of and with her church congregation but also in front of her children. She is, in fact. an ordained bishop in the Evangelical Church of Africa and is not and has never been what this allegation alleges. This ridiculous allegation was made with no evidence of any kind to substantiate it yet the court believed this nonsense, along with other unsubstantiated allegations such as the children being beaten by the parents, even though medical examinations made when the council took the children showed no sign of anything to back their allegations of cruelty by the parents towards their children. Even though the allegations were proven groundless never was it mentioned that the children were to be returned to their parents as they should have been, of course. Quite the opposite in fact took place in that a 6th child was removed from the Musa parents, the hitherto unborn baby at the time of the April 8 2010 child removals. The baby x6 was stolen once at her birth, the violence of the police during the removal operation in the hospital at 3 in the morning directly after Gloria had just given birth nearly killing this defenceless mother {she is still suffering appalling injuries to this day which the prison,for she is in prison {see update below} will not address by denying her proper medical treatment}.
The baby was returned later after a matter of weeks, but was stolen again on even more dubious allegations on June 28th 2011, and the parents have not seen the baby since that date. The baby’s removal, like the entire case, needs an honest investigation away from the entities already involved…”

 contd. at: http://truth-wars.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,68.msg125.html#msg125

UPDATE APRIL 2013:

20 March 2013 – The Musa Case:

Letter sent 20 March 2013 to Ministry of Justice Royal Mail Recorded Delivery [no replies recd. as of 16 April 2013]:

http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/6num38

ALREADY sent by Royal Mail recorded delivery letter {twice} + and email to LORD MCNALLY, justice minister + K. CLARKE, sec of state for justice, 3 Sept. 2012:

“For the attention of: the Minister of State, {and Deputy Leader of the House of Lords} -  the Rt. Hon. Lord McNally, and the Lord Chancellor, Secretary of State for Justice – the Rt. Hon. Mr. K. Clarke QC MP…”

http://butlincat.wordpress.com/2012/09/04/sent-by-rec-del-email-to-lord-mcnally-and-k-clarke-mp-3-sept-12/

These 2 vids from 2011 INTERVIEWS WITH THE MUSA PARENTS GLORIA + CHIWAR MUSA, APRIL 2011: – before their imprisonment on 28 Niv. 2011: [total 26 mins]

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=11f53cd65762834b3af0b2d&skin_id=1603&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url    http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=11f5398ceed4e4e312670f4&skin_id=601&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text

Video: The Musa Case – The Irregular Interim Care Order Hearings [13 mins.] :

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=112fcc1c0f20e8dd7545242&skin_id=3000&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

Musa Case Affadavits:

File1: from Moji Word, American and Nigerian presidential candidate  File Name: MUSA MOJI AFFADAVIT.pdf  Description: MOJI WORD AFFADAVIT 20/4/11  File Size: 182.1 KB

Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/5tt9am

File 2:  Gloria Musa statement to the court Nov. 2011:  File Name: MUSA FULL PDF 4 3 12.pdf  Description: RESUME / GLORIA STATEMENT 4/3/12  File Size: 130.6 KB

Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/imddy9

————————

The African publication “The Leadership”‘s articles are just 2 of many African exposes on the Musa case:

http://leadership.ng/nga/articles/5282/2011/09/17/british_journalist_writes_jonathan_over_seized_nigerian_children.html

http://leadership.ng/nga/articles/4068/2011/08/21/british_govt_detains_nigerian_couple%E2%80%99s_six_children.html

————   Related Articles:

April 2008 Daily Mail = “Baby P council falsely accused me of abusing a child, reveals whistleblower who feared she’d lose her daughter.” {By Eileen Fairweather} =   http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1086196/Baby-P-council-falsely-accused-abusing-child-reveals-whistleblower-feared-shed-lose-daughter.html

Figures at an all time high for children being removed from families, most often good, loving ones – Daily Mail April 12 2012 =   http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2128987/Children-stolen-state.html

################################################################

RELATED ARTICLES:

NIGEL COOPER FAMILY CASE:

BANNED from the UK: NATO Security Consultant because the “UK has been caught red handed stealing children”

SEE HERE FOR MANY IMPORTANT VIDEOS + much more at:

http://punishmentwithoutcrime.wordpress.com/2013/03/11/banned-from-the-uk-nato-security-consultant-because-the-uk-has-been-caught-red-handed-stealing-children/                         N. COOPER:  EUROPEAN COURTS COME AFTER UK ‘SOCIAL SERVICES

A European judge has ordered police to force Britain’s rogue ‘family courts’ to hand back a child they kidnapped from her father.

http://www.cornwallcommunitynews.co.uk/2013/04/03/european-courts-come-after-uk-social-services/

——————————————-

MORE:

1] ANOTHER SERIOUSLY OUTRAGEOUS CASE:

WARNING: HARROWING VIDEO:

“Received:   “Of all the SS child snatching films I have watched this has to be the most distressing I have seen, I became so angry with emotion that I couldn’t stop crying. This is the cruel social services at their worst, at their most evil, at their most heartless. You will notice that once they had forcibly grabbed little Ben they were out of the door like a flash, leaving the grieving mother to cope with her distress on her own, with no care for her, no remorse and no doctor on scene to help the poor woman. This is what our country has come to, this is child snatching at its most extreme. If I had been there I’m sorry to say that if I had a gun I would have used it, this film was that upsetting to me, and no I’m not crazy, I just care too much. If you care then please make this go viral and share it like I have and make your own comments too. Dear God help all our little children and protect them all from the wickedness of the Social services scum that steal kids from innocent parents.”

https://www.facebook.com/video/embed?video_id=443476159069924

2}  April 2008 Daily Mail = “Baby P council falsely accused me of abusing a child, reveals whistleblower who feared she’d lose her daughter.” {By Eileen Fairweather} =

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1086196/Baby-P-council-falsely-accused-abusing-child-reveals-whistleblower-feared-shed-lose-daughter.html

3}  Figures at an all time high for children being removed from families, most often good, loving ones – Daily Mail April 12 2012 =

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2128987/Children-stolen-state.html

4}  Children waiting for adoption figures at all time high:

https://vimeo.com/57835089

—————————————————

The Baylis Family Case: [numerous sites have been erased online, inc. many from the family themselves]:

http://butlincat.wordpress.com/2013/04/08/the-baylis-family-case-meet-dennis-g-nissen-abductor/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

UPDATE APRIL 2013: THE BAYLIS FAMILY CASE – MEET DENNIS G. NISSEN, ABDUCTOR

  • NB: SOME LINKS [videos, etc.] BELOW MAY NOT WORK THROUGH BEING DEACTIVATED BY CERTAIN PARTIES BUT WILL BE RESTORED ASAP:.
  • JULY, 2012
  • Meet Dennis G. Nissen, paedophile and abductor of the Baylis children Kevin and Jenvey…
  • NISEN
  • The emails from Dennis. G. Nissen to the Baylis family -
  • WARNING =
  • http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/gz15z0
  •                    ——————————————-
  • video: MEET DENNIS. G. NISSEN: [this may have been deactivated by certain parties but will be reuploaded asap.}
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ypo8b8LpdqM&feature=relmfu
  •                ————————————————-
  •   The Oliviers – protectors of the paedophile Dennis G. Nissen
  • ===========================
  • The Baylis Family Child Abductions by paedophile Dennis G. Nissen:
  • from: http://baylis-family.info/
  • A Brief Introduction Posted on September 26, 2011 by Justice
  • The following information pertains to one particular family who has been subjected to human trafficking. Currently in the world, a rough estimate of people being trafficked soars at a whopping 12.3 million and being the fastest and second largest illegal market trailing only to drug trafficking. This means that 1.8 of every 1000 people falls victim to this horrific crime and increasingly to 3 to every 1000 people in Asia and the Pacific. Human Trafficking generates an estimated $35-$36 billion dollars annually and comes in all shapes and sizes. Human Trafficking in essence is nothing more than a modern term for slavery, where people are forced either into labor, or sexual exploitation against their will. Statistically speaking women are most vulnerable to being traffic making up 56% of all adults and children being trafficked worldwide. Almost 70% of these cases are directly relating to sexual trafficking, in which the victim is abducted and forced into sexual activities. Even though most of the victims originate from impoverished Third-World Countries, the destinations of the trafficked victims are generally intended for the First-World. Even though the means of human trafficking have become incredibly sophisticated the truth remains; slavery is as real as it was hundreds of years ago, the industry has only gone covert. In order for a victim to be trafficked into a country many things need to occur. The first incident is the actual abduction which requires man power and resources. From that moment the person may be shipped to their destination where “fake passports and birth certificates” can be obtained from corrupt government officials. Finally the victim may be sold or traded to a buyer of where they will be drugged, abused, exploited and ultimately murdered in cold blood. This is the sad and tragic tales of millions of people from all over the world. The United Kingdom is one of the major destinations for all human trafficked victims coming from across the globe. Most of the victims being brought into the United Kingdom are women and children used for all sorts of illicit purposes. To fully understand the issue it is necessary to listen to the “voices of the invisible”, the people who are made silent in captivity. We will be guiding the reader through the story of the Baylis family, who has been subjected to the horrors of human trafficking in 1997. The ultimate goal of the Baylis family is not only to create awareness on the issue, but most importantly to obtain freedom from their oppressors. To this day the people who were responsible for abruptly and violently kidnapping and trafficking the mother and the children, are still in search of the family who has been granted humanitarian asylum in Mexico. In order to make you, the reader, become fully aware of the extent of this evil and illicit market, the Baylis have dared to step out and tell their story. The following information is 100% real and current and explained from the view point of the victims themselves. We hope that this information will “create awareness” and hopefully “inspire action” from all societies and all individuals from around the globe. This is a very real and serious issue that must be made a global priority to pursuit and capture all criminals involved.
  • Exposing the UK Family Courts, with Jeremy Baylis:
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXNXz7OKf00&feature=relmfu
  • Maryna Du Plessis Baylis facebook page:
  • https://www.facebook.com/Mattessons#!/maryna.baylis
  • “Justice for Kevin and Jenvey Baylis” facebook page
  • https://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/pages/Justice-for-Kevin-and-Jenvey-Baylis/257438517674217
  • “Justice for Kevin and Jenvey Baylis” facebook group
  • https://www.facebook.com/?ref=home#!/groups/133812500079910/
  • Jenvey and Kevin Baylis
  • …see  http://baylis-family.info/  for full story.
  •                     ————————————————-
  •      
  •   Dennis Nissen, paedophile                   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
  • HUMAN TRAFFICKING – THE SHOCKING CRIMES AGAINST THE BAYLIS FAMILY – SINCE THE 90′s
  • Message and official notifications of serious organised crimes to: UKHTC@soca.x.gsi.gov.uk {SOCA: Serious Organised Crime Agency} and CEOP including emails sent to the BAYLIS family from the subject named in the message to SCOTLAND YARD BELOW – DENNIS NISSEN :  http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/il53ui
  • From: To: referrals@ceop.gsi.gov.uk
  • Cc:
  • Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 11:25 AM
  • Subject: CEOPS – BAYLIS FAMILY
  • To whom it may concern at CEOP Referrals:
  • Ref. 24960 JC
  • hi, I am ———  and with reference to the conversation by phone at approx. 14.37 GMT today 27 Feb. with a male whose name I did not get at i believe the “referrals” at CEOP pls may i forward the details {below} of what happened re: my original contact with yourselves CEOP, who i was put in touch with during the later part of my call today, having called SOCA who put me through to this gentleman. My original contact with CEOP concerned one now 11 yr old FAVOUR MUSA but I called today because of the horrific crimes which are going on even though the authorities have been contacted about it by the Baylis’s themselves concerning the BAYLIS’s 2 children who have now disappeared with the abuser DENNIS NISSEN. It seems they are geting nowhere, their children are missing and nobody is doing anything positive regarding stopping the abuse they must be suffering – the abuse consisting of perverse sexual abuse and violent physical abuse perpetrated by one DENNIS NISSEN.
  • The details of what the Baylis parents have put online are directly below concerning their children, and the Favor Musa abuse details are contained within the article below that. I only mention this here now because it was referred to in my call and anyway, nothing has been done about Favor Musa who has disappeared which in itself is a crime which has not been investigated properly by the genuine authorities. Hopefully if you are a genuine government agency you will be able to help stop these children suffering any more, as various other authorities have not done as we know. Thank you for your time.
  • J. Graham
  •   17.03 GMT  27 Feb. 2012.
  • the above email sent to SOCA,  {SCOTLAND   YARD   SERIOUS   ORGANISED  CRIME AGENCY , CEOP, + 250 media / + to all MPs} ——————————————————–
  • date: 26 February 2012 08:29 subject: CRIMES AGAINST THE BAYLIS FAMILY
  • 1}        MUST READ!=  The Baylis Story = http://baylis-family.info/
  • 2}       The Baylis family UPDATE on the 17th February 2012 {this is an update to this: http://baylis-family.info/ }
  • “AS you all know the Baylis boys, Kevin and Jenvey were abducted by fraud on the 10th October 2011, by Mr. Dennis Gordon Nissen, DR. Jennifer Mary Gray (Mrs. Jennifer Hogg) and the United Kingdom embassy in Mexico City. Mr. Nissen did retrieval off the children, a procedure that can only legally be done when both biological parents are dead. The UK embassy supported the fact that the parents were dead.
  • There were an international order issued, stating that the children have to live for two months in the United Kingdom in the Care of their mother, Maryna Baylis and father Jeremy Lynn Baylis, then they must move to South Africa with their parents, Maryna and Jeremy Baylis. So Mexico declared the parents alive.
  • Nissen forced the children with the support of the UK embassy staff onto the UK embassy premises, never to be seen again by their parents or biological grandparents.
  • The parents notified the authorities, in Mexico and abroad, it is being dealt with as a criminal abduction and unlawful removal of the Baylis boys, by the authorities. The children managed to get distressed messages to their parents via the internet and you tube.
  • The parents emailed the UK family courts, Royal courts of justice, only to be informed that their children is in court proceedings in the UK, and that there was a hearing on the 21st October 2011, setting aside any international rights on these two South African citizens, and any international orders regarding these children are null and void. The parents cannot appeal anything decided in the Family court in the UK regarding their children, they cannot participate in the proceedings due to the fact that they are dead.
  • The parents got informed that the children are in the care of Mr. Charl Olivier and Mrs. Bronwan Howell- Olvier, family of Nissen. The parents cannot object to where the children are, or who sees them nor have any contact with them. The parents and their extended family have no rights to contact with the children, the parents and their extended family is not considered as cares for the children, and will never have contact with them again. The children are forced to have contact with their abuser and abductor, Mr. Dennis Gordon Nissen.
  • THESE CHILDREN WERE UNDER HUMANITERIAN PROTECTION AGAINST THE UNITED KINGDOM AND MR. DENNIS GORDON NISSEN.
  • The mother then got informed she can write a letter to her children as a form of contact, she wrote a letter and then got told it is emotional abusive and harmful, as she referred to their pass and their time in Mexico and fun things they did as a family, and activities the children did with their grandparents, and she referred to school. This were deemed emotional abuse and emotional harmful, by SARAH BOLD, the court appointment attorney for the boys guardian, JENNY RYAN. So the message were not passed on, Maryna was told she can wish Jenvey happy birthday, she send him a message saying happy birthday
  • and that they miss him, and hope he has a great day with his brother Kevin, this were again deemed emotional harmful and emotional abuse as she referred to his birthday, and were not passed on.
  • So the UK abducted the children out of a 3rd party country that protected the children against their abuser and the UK, then they take the children to court, put them into Nissen’s family care, and then inform them that they will never see their parents again. This is in the BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD, accordingly to the UK LAW. THE UK WHO IS IGNORING INTERNATIONAL LAW REGARDING THESE INTERNATIONAL CHILDREN.
  • The parents were given a letter, in January 2012, written by the Olivier’s. In this letter, the Olivier’s admitted to perverting the cause of justice, the Olivier’s, has been showing the children videos of Nissen and photos, making Nissen out to be a helpful and fun loving, and very nice person, who never shouts at any one. They told the children that their memories the children have of the abuse they suffered by the hand of Nissen, is nothing but untrue. They are fake memories of Nissen and not the real person. Mr. and Mrs. Olivier are holding 2 internationally abducted children in their care. The letter included that the children are well and are not missing their parents, they settled into life with the Olivier’s and are happy to do what the Olivier’s wants them to do.
  • But 2 weeks later the parents received a copies of psychological reports that were done on the boys, and in this report there is a letter dated end of January from the Olivier’s to the psychologist, stating that since they had the boys, since shortly after their abduction, Jenvey, had soiling problems, he was soiling the bed, the dinner table, the walls, poo run down his legs, and he even started to wet the bed, the psychologist put it down to JENVEY BEING AUTISTIC AND NOT HAVING CONTROL OVER HIS BOWELS AND BLADDER MOVEMENTS.
  • Jenvey suffered while living in the UK abuse by the hands of Nissen, whenever Jenvey finds himself in a stressful, environment he has small soiling accidents. Nothing ever like what the Olivier’s were describing, he never wet his bed since he left nappies behind. If they had contacted the parents, the parents could have told them what it is all about. Jenvey is suffering a lot of emotional damage and harm, he is not autistic. But the emotional upset is ignored.
  • Kevin is classed as autistic by the psychologist as well, and got anger problems and got hatred against the UK. The Olivier’s pointed out in the letter to the psychologist that Kevin is negative about contact with Nissen and so is Jenvey, they both hate England and want their mother, but the Olivier’s and Jenny Ryan has made it clear to them that they will never see their parents again. They are now the property of the UK; two foreign citizens is now UK property. Kevin is very violent and very moody.
  • The psychologist has ruled that the children cannot speak in court in the UK; they are incapable of expressing their views of what is happening to them, as they are emotionally distressed. He also ruled that yes they have suffered sexual abuse, psychical abuse and neglect and they can pinpoint their abuser. They can tell the psychologist very clearly what Nissen and his friends did to them, and how he abused others.
  • We need to point out that the Olivier’s perverted the cause of justice so badly that when social services eventually did a S47 investigation against Nissen, the children were too scared to talk about the abuse and so confuse, as to whether they can trust their own memories or not. As adults that the court say needs to look after you, won’t hurt you will they.
  • But the psychologist and the Olivier’s feel that they are incapable of expressing their views in the UK court, they are now diagnosed with AUTISM, ADHD, and they are declared so stupid, that they can’t even feed themselves, let alone think for themselves.
  • So on the 10th October 2011, psychologist in an international court stated the children is not autistic, not ADHD and that can think for themselves and that their view on the abuse they suffered has to be considered. But the UK says no they are too stupid and emotionally unstable to testify or state their views.
  • Let’s see you get pulled out of your bed at 5:30am by 35 strangers, your abuser is standing in your house in your bedroom laughing at your distress, and you are then forced to talk about your abuse without your parents in the room with you or anyone that you trust. You are then forced to listen to your abuser blackmailing you with your belongings he stole in 2009. The psychologist states you cannot leave the country with this man because you are at risk from him; this man is a danger to you.
  • This man storms out of the room then call the so called judge over gives him an envelope and then you know you are being forced into the UK embassy without saying good bye to your parents and without your clothing or toys.
  • You are then force to the UK against your will, you are then told you will never see your parents, you are placed with the Olivier’s that you only ever saw 3 times in your life and the Olivier’s admitted to that. You are then forced to have contact with your abuser as it is his right, granted by the UK court, which is ignoring international rulings.
  • Then because you are frightened and cry yourself to sleep, you are classed emotionally unstable to testify about your ordeal and about the abuse Nissen but you through.
  • Under the above circumstance any normal child, adult, male or female, would be emotionally unstable, let alone a child who lived in protection for nearly 3 years against his abuser, let alone someone who might have a learning difficulty. That does not mean that the court should not hear them, and listen to them, even if it is just the judge on her own with them.
  • The Olivier’s proud themselves, in calling themselves Christians; if you search them on the internet you find their involvement with various churches and groups. They are not experience with abuse victims, victims that are now put back into contact with the abuser, the Olivier’s themselves states that for 72 hours around the contact day with Nissen, the children are out of sorts, Jenvey soils and wet his bed, Kevin disappears, and they refuse to get out of the car at the contact center. But the children’s guardian, Jenny Ryan informs the court that contact is going well, the emotional abuse and harm that goes with it does not matter.
  • So this would make you wonder what work the Olivier’s do for the church in the United Kingdom, as apparently it involves children. You have to ask yourself the question is it a front so they can scout out under privileged children for the gang of pedophiles that Mr. Nissen belongs to, to abduct and put on the market for sex slaves.
  • Jeremy and Maryna Baylis had no contact from their children they had distress messages that Kevin has left around the internet, where he knew only his parents that truly love him, will find it.
  • Like the Olivier’s stated in a disgusted way in their letter to the psychologist, that it is upsetting for them, when Kevin states that being a Baylis means everything to him as his real dad, Jeremy Baylis, thought him to be the man he is. All Nissen ever showed him was abuse and neglect and how to hurt people.
  • The parents are working with the authorities, who are dealing with the abduction of the boys, and who is preparing the prosecution of the abductor.
  • It is a very hard time for the parents and their families, as the abusive emails they received from Nissen, is being ignored by the UK court, as the children’s attorney who was aware of the abusive emails since 2010, but ignored acting on it. Nissen and the children’s guardian informed the court that the abusive emails, were written by the Baylis family. The Baylis family can proof that the email IP addresses comes from the UK and is fix UK IP addresses and that the devices in question belongs to Nissen and his friends. These emails were investigated by an independent investigation company, but yet the UK will not accept any evidence that put Nissen in a bad light. But Nissen can get his family, friends and himself to contact the Baylis family, their extended family and their supporters, they can be abusive, rude and upsetting, that is ok. But as soon as it get entered as evidence against Nissen, then everyone object to having it submitted. WHY WHAT HAVE THEY GOT TO HIDE.
  • The receivers of the emails have given permission to friends and family to publish these emails and IP reports, for the world to see as they know Nissen and his friends monitor all their post on the internet. And hopefully the press will make the judge and other parties in the proceeding realize that Nissen got a serious psychological problem. It is important to point out that his mother is bi-polar, and he is borderline bi-polar as well, but he is more psychotic, when you read his emails it is very clear that he remembers all crimes he commit to people, but only when he feels like putting pressure on his victims.
  • Nissen is nothing but an abuser, he raped his victims, he hit his victims and he seriously caused damaged to children, but his defense is IT WAS NOT ME.
  • He sent abusive emails, when questioned about it, he will deny it, when proven wrong with an IP address and location, and then he blames his friends. The one excuse given to the court was, I did not write it, Mrs. Lyons did, I gave her a handwritten note of what I wanted her to enclose in the email. I gave her my log in details. 5 minutes later he declared under oath that no one ever has his log in details to his email account.
  • The Baylis boys have not been seen or heard of since 10th October 2011, the UK is ignoring UN and INTERNATIONAL law, and they are ignoring the protection the boys were in. The UK is holding 2 foreign nationals hostage, just like the others they are doing it to.
  • These children needs to be found and reunited with their family.”
  • ——————————————————————–
  • MESSAGE FROM JENVEY BAYLIS Jenvey’s life story

    I am Jenvey Trevor Duplessis Baylis, I am 12 years old, I was born in the 1st February 2000.I am part of a loving family, even though we not together at the moment. I got a great daddy, his name is Jeremy, he is strong and big and he is my hero. I am going to be what he was when I am big. I got a wonderful mommy, Maryna, she is a wonderful person and when you read our story you will know why she is so wonderful. She will give her life for us. I got a brother Kevin who is 15 and sometimes kevin can be a pain, but most of the time he is my best friend and my 2nd Hero. In the past 8 months he has been my everything, my mom , my dad and my brother most important he is my protector.

    I will have to start at the beginning of my twelve years on earth for you to understand what I am going through, and why we not with our parents, and maybe you can help us get back together, to be happy and safe. I would love to appeal to the public to watch our videos on You Tube, join our Facebook pages, and groups, visit our website, and if you can donate some money that our parents can afford to continue the fight for us. My mommy bake the nicest cakes and cook wonderful food from all over the world, she can always give you some cake as a thank you, or a copy of the one of the 4 books I wrote about my feelings using dragons, it is all done by myself and my brother help with the drawings he is a great artist and a wonderful brother. I would like to appeal to the goverments of the USA and South Africa and the rest of the world to reunite us with our loving parents and to stop our life of abuse by the hands of Dennis Gordon Nissen, the Oliviers and the United Kingdom. I would like to remind the UN that we were in INTERNATIONAL HUMANITERIAN PROTECTION AGAINST NISSEN AND THE UNITED KINGDOM due to the abuse we suffered. Please take us back to our parents. My story begins on the 1st Feb 2000, but before that my parents met I think in 1993 or 1994, they had my big brother I know that in 1996, as he was born then and he is 15. My story I was born into a happy family, I was not aware of what happened before my birth I only know what happened after my birth. We went back to South Africa as a family, my daddy worked away a lot as he is an American, I cannot talk about his work, as his country might get upset over it. In 2001 a strange man that I later learned was Dennis Gordon Nissen, came with a lot of people and took all of us, mommy kevin and me back to England. He was a rude man, always shouting, screaming and hitting us all. He would do rude things to mommy and Kevin, and tell me I am next. He always had loads of friends there doing the same thing to mommy and us, and sometimes there was other woman and children as well. I was 18 months old, when Nissen came into the house the one day, he shouted at mommy and told her she was a piece of S&(^$&(, he picked me up and throw me against the cement surround by the fireplace. My little head at the back was cut opened. Kevin called an ambulance and they rushed me to hospital. I had a total of over 90 stiches but into my head to stop the bleeding. Kevin and mommy tried to tell the doctors what happened, but Mr Nissen and a lady called Jennifer Hogg sat there telling the doctors that mommy and Kevin is sick, I only played with my push along toy and I fell backwards and hurt my head. The police believed them as Jennifer was a doctor in DERBYSHIRE. After that my abuse got worse, Nissen and his friends will do sex acts on me and would force me to suck their privates. It was horrible. We would wake up with sore bodies, and feeling sick, then we knew they put things in our food to make us sleep. It was awful. He was always hitting us, and hurting us and mommy. He would not stop. We phoned the police and they wont help us neither. AS Nissen would not let the police see us. It was awful and hurtfull and we all cried a lot. We hardly saw daddy as Nissen made it clear if he comes near us he will kill us. Mommy managed to move us to London, hoping that we can reach daddy and that we can be safe once again. That did not happen as Nissen followed us and his friends in the police found us and made us have him back in the house. The abuse started again really badly he would drug us, he would do all sort of things to us. He was filming it and it was never less than 3 people doing things to us, they would hit us and make us cry, they will force things into our bums and they would force things into our mouths. They would cut us and leave marks, bite marks, cuts and all sort of things. When we showed the school, Nissen will tell them that we were hurting ourselves, he was not doing it. He told the school we were autistic and always hurting ourselves, it was all lies, but they all believed him not us, why would they not believe us. Ouma and Oupa my grandparents from South Africa moved to England in 2004 or 2005 to live near us, we told them what was happenng and Oupa could see for himself, that Nissen was very evil. The abuse did not stop because they were there it got worse. In 2007 daddy told mommy enough is enough he is going to marry us and take us to safety. I was so glad as my dream of becoming a Navy Seal will come true then. It took them 2 years to get us to leave England, it was not overnight. Our last few months in England was hell, Nissen dislocated mommy’s left arm and shoulder really badly, while she was packing our things up. Oupa had to take her to hospital. Daddy arrived to help us and boy that was fun as Nissen stayed away. Nissen is scared of daddy. The last time we saw Nissen was in June 2009 when he came to the storage unit and attack mommy, he told her she is a slut and a whore and no decent man will have her, he told us we are scum and that he will kill us one day, without thinking twice. He does not want to see us alive or near him. On June 26th we left the United Kingdom for my faviorate place in the world. Mexico. My parents were going to get married and we were going to live happily together without Nissen around us. Boy we had fun, mommy and daddy got married on the 14th July 2009 and we had a good life, but on the 10th August 2009 we had an email saying nissen wanted us back in England. Mommy and us got scared, but the lawyers said don’t worry he cant do it. Mommy and daddy dealt with all that, and only told us what we needed to know. In june 2010 mommy had to attend court via a video camera. In that hearing the English court said that Nissen got no rights to us. We were all so happy as we started to live our lives. Just before that, In Feb 2010, Nissen told Mexico we were here illegally, and we ended up in immigration. We stayed there for 72 days, and they then told us we are legal in Mexico, and that Kevin and I need to file for protection so that Nissen cannot force us back to England. We were granted something called INTERNATIONAL HUMANITERIAN PROTECTION against NISSEN AND THE UNITED KINGDOM. We started to attend school, mommy and daddy started to work, and mommy’s friend asked her to bake cookies and cakes for her, so that the children in the building can sell it for pocket money, mommy got paid for it, but all the children in Mexico can work from the age of 8 after school and in holidays to earn pocket money, I made loads of money, I worked for a computer, and I worked for games and books. Kevin worked for a Playstation 3. We all had fun, we were a family happy and relaxed and everything else. Until the day before Kevin’s 15th birthday, then our nightmare started again. At 5.30 in the morning more than 35 people broke into our house and tried to take us from our beds, Nissen stood there saying “that is them. Take them to the British embassy”. We were screaming and shouting and said we were not going anywhere with him, we want our parents to come with us, they tried to separate us from our parents. But we were fighting. Then a man calling himself said he is a judge if we don’t go to England we need to go to a court, he took us to a court where he told us we don’t have to go with Nissen. We just need to talk to Nissen he lied to us. I now wish that Kevin and myself punched Nissen in front of this man like we wanted to. They took us to the English embassy, the would not let mommy or daddy in, the only thing I had with me is SAM the dog my favourite blue toy dog that daddy Jeremy brought me when I was a new baby, They dragged kevin away from us Kevin could not say bye or have a hug from mommy and daddy, they were pushing and hitting Kevin and Kevin broke the guys nose. They came for me dragged me out of daddy’s arms I never kissed my mommy goodbye never…. They separated us on the other side and they told us we are now British and we will never see our parents again ever. They took us out of Mexico, to England. We left messages for mommy and daddy all over the internet they would not allow us to call mommy and daddy like they said they would, we were suppose to go to South Africa not England. The abuse started the minute we were landing. He, that is Nissen Raped my brother and then me, and he laughed at Kevin and told him you are 15 it is legal to have gay sex with you now. You are going to learn what it is to be whores, and you will earn the money back that I spent on finding you. He started hitting us, drugging our food, and everything else. Towards the end of October he told us he went back to court and we will now for ever stay by him and his cousins Bronwyn Howell Olivier and Charl Olivier. The abuse continued Nissen filmed it all, we were told mommy can write to us, but we never get anything and we know she writes as she puts it on the internet. I started soiling myself from being scared all the time and wetting the bed. We cry our self to sleep eveynight, they told us the one person is from court that mommy and daddy is dead and then they told us that we will never see them again if we tell the UK what Nissen is doing to us. Nissen got a strange man to talk to us, who told the court we are to stupid to tell the court where we want to live or what we want to do . this man lied to them, but one thing that he did tell the truth about was that we could tell him true memories about the abuse we suffered and by whom we suffered the abuse. He told them that it was Nissen, but then he told them that we are too emotionally disturbed to be truthful witnesses to a crime. He told them that it is better for us just to be left with Nissen and the Oliviers, and that we continue to believe that mommy and daddy is dead. They told us in February this year that they will never let us go near our parents again and that they took medical swabs from two children and send it away with Nissen, claiming it to be ours. So that Nissen can claim us as his. They never took swabs from us, never. Nissen is not our legal father he got no rights to us, the judge said so in front of us that day in June 2010. Why break up our family now, why? We know mommy and daddy is trying to find us we know they don’t have a lot of money. We are leaving them messages all over the internet, but the Oliviers don’t like us using the internet so we need to steal internet time when they and nissen is not there. We don’t want to have a live of abuse we want to be little boys playing in the park and having fun, we want to drive mommy and daddy mad with loud music, and staying out late. I want to be a USA NAVY SEAL and I want to be the best one there is. I want to show America I am proud to be American and South African. I want my family back together. I want to be by my dog, and my mom and dad and our friends. I know my mommy will say it is not I WANT it is I NEED or I WOULD LIKE. SO I WOULD LIKE THE WORLD TO KNOW THAT I AM 12 YEARS OLD, I NEED MY PARENTS AND MY FAMILY AND THEIR LOVE, I WOULD LIKE THE WORLD TO REUNITE US PLEASE. This is all I want for the rest of my life is to be with my family free from abuse. Please help us as the abuse is daily and I am sure you don’t have to have sex everyday of your life, I am sure you don’t have to be hit and punched every day of your live and you don’t need to be told everyday that you are a piece of shit and no good. PLEASE HELP US. Jenvey            >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> New facebook pages: Kevin andJenvey Baylis: Political prisoners in the UK
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

WARNING: DISTRESSING CHILD SNATCHING VIDEO – + PETER HOFSCHROER WRITES re: “GRANDMA B” Case

From Peter Hofshroer  6/4/13 [see the "Grandma B link below]:

“Dear Sir or Madam,

I am forwarding a link (below) this most harrowing video to            you as an example of how the British authorities unlawfully            remove children from their parents. I couldn’t watch it all,            it was so upsetting.

Sadly, this sort of behaviour is the rule and not the            exception. Belgian TV recently ran a documentary on the            theft of 67,000 children by the authorities in Britain.

Please see:

http://grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/1-new-items/belgian-tv-accuses-uk-social-services-of-massive-organised-abuse/

Britain is the centre of a massive international            child-trafficking industry. Most of the children disappear            without trace. The stories I have heard about what happens            to the victims are too shocking to describe.

As the British authorities are generating massive sums of         money from this crime, they are obviously unwilling to act.

I do hope this serious crime can be dealt with at an            international level and brought to an end.

Hope this information is of help.

Yours sincerely,

Peter Hofschröer

[ends]  SCROLL DOWN FOR RADIO I’VIEW AND MORE ARTICLES!!

————————————————–

 ——– Original Message ——–

WARNING: DISTRESSING CHILD SNATCHING VIDEO:

Received today:

“Of all the SS child snatching films I have watched this has to be the most distressing I have seen, I became so angry with emotion that I couldn’t stop crying. This is the cruel social services at their worst, at their most evil, at their most heartless. You will notice that once they had forcibly grabbed little Ben they were out of the door like a flash, leaving the grieving mother to cope with her distress on her own, with no care for her, no remorse and no doctor on scene to help the poor woman. This is what our country has come to, this is child snatching at its most extreme. If I had been there I’m sorry to say that if I had a gun I would have used it, this film was that upsetting to me, and no I’m not crazy, I just care too much. If you care then please make this go viral and share it like I have and make your own comments too. Dear God help all our little children and protect them all from the wickedness of the Social services scum that steal kids from innocent parents.”

video:

ends

————————————————

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

please help MAURICE KIRK – UPDATE – 2 APRIL 2012 – HIS CASE CONTINUES AT CARDIFF CIVIC JUSTICE CENTRE

...aa 01-12-11_1811

Above = Maurice Kirk at Cardiff Central hospital – taken there after being roughed up by staff at Cardiff prison – scroll down for his recorded calls explaining…

CASH REWARD for RETURN of MY LAP TOP STOLEN TODAY in ELY CARDIFF

I am in Cardiff Civil Justice Centre court tomorrow at 10. 30am fighting a three month trial of 20 years of police bullying. I will pay cash for its immediate return one black Toshiba lap top, I think, ‘NO QUESTIONS ASKED’, no one else involved.

Please tel 07907937953  maurice@kirkflyingvet.com or call in at motor bike shop next to reptile shop on Cowbridge Road West…I will deal with an ‘intermediary’

Also stolen is my blue disability badge and the CD in the lap top, at the time, that stored police custody videos, going back 15 years, the Chief Constable has appeared, the way their defence is beginning to unfold, forgotten about!

THANK YOU!!

For Pete’s sake, boys, I was your ELY veterinary surgeon for many years, first in Grand Avenue and then next to the Reptile shop, until South Wales Police successfully applied, in 2001, to the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, to successfully have my name removed from the veterinary register. They resorted to this, with fabricated allegations and convictions, once they had given up up trying to invalidate my motoring insurance, demanding to see my documents more than 35 times in 8 years. This was to put sufficient pressure on the insurance companies identified, just as Guernsey police had succeeded in doing to assist in my removal from the island, for me to be unable to make an income working on the farms etc through out the Vale of Gamorgan.

http://youtu.be/DWmJGa9RsyM http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=a3xl4TvHtOE&feature=endscreen

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGb6fy9IH4c

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGb6fy9IH4c

http://kirkflyingvet.com/tags/Guernsey/default.aspx

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5ywSaTRv3Y

Llantwit Major’s police sergeant ‘Killer’ Kilberg Video to follow proved lying to both custody sergeant and His Honour Judge Seys Llewellin QC, last month, one of the

custody videos now the police legal team are so desperate to block tomorrow, http://youtu.be/eBkNCYYfJOE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oo26-otaPmo&list=UUo40Twnjw5Z8kYBGqrZHlzw&index

source:  http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2013/04/02/cash-reward-for-return-of-my-lap-top-stolen-in-ely-cardiff.aspx

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

AUDIO FROM NIGEL COOPER 31 MAR 13 – PLEASE SHARE

Audio with Anne-Marie Hutchinson – Hear the recording:

HUTCHINSON

https://www.facebook.com/?ref=tn_tnmn#!/photo.php?v=10200341258846992&amp;set=vb.620193324674077&amp;type=2&amp;theater

UK legal system refusing internation legal aid

This is a short audio captured in conversation with the famous “Anne Marie Hutchinson O.B.E” She is out-right refusing to assist in the lawful return of my daughter. — in London.

##########################

Please read in full…. Share, post email… Thank you

“Cde N° : 188  REGISTRAR OFFICE COUNTY COURT OF MONS

R.G. : 11/3804/A   We, Albert II, King of Belgium, To all, present and future, let hereby known :

Mrs Benedetti Sylvia Solicitor  Rue Sainte-Victoire, 25  7301 Hornu

NOTIFICATIONS 14 MARCH 2012

1322 DECIES § 7

JUDICIAL NOTIFICATIONS

1 Central Authority

2 Parties

1 PR PRESIDENTIAL CHAMBER   Directory number 12/2869   Year Two Thousand and Twelve, on March Fourteenth;

Following his deliberation, Xavier HIERNAUX, Single Judge of the County Court of Mons, Hainaut Province, assisted by Christine VACHAUDEZ, Registrar in this jurisdiction, has handed down in summary proceedings the following verdict in open court :

R.G. N°11/3804/A  IN THE CASE OF : Mister Nigel Cooper, Domiciled in 7020 MONS (Belgique), Rue Grande, 205/2.2 ;

The Applicant ; Attending the hearing, assisted by his Counsel Mrs Sylvia BENEDETTI, Solicitor, whose Law Firm is registered in 7031 HORNU (Belgique), rue Sainte-Victoire, 25 ;

AGAINST :

Mrs Gail COOPER, Domiciled in 41, Ennerdale, Albany, Washington, NE37 1 BW (United Kingdom) ;

The Defendant ; Neither attending nor represented at the hearing ;

IN THE PRESENCE OF : Mister Henri RENARD, Substitute for the Royal Prosecutor of the Public Prosecuting Office of the Mons County Court, 7000 Mons, and whose offices are registered in 7000 MONS, rue de Nimy, 28 ;

Representing at the hearing, THE FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE OF JUSTICE, Central Authority of Judicial Cooperation in civil matters, Legislation Bureau of Fundamental Rights and Freedoms  File WL 16/LH/2011/1213/VA  Offices registered at 1000 BRUXELLES, boulevard de Waterloo, 115 ;

Upon the decision filed in the registry of this Court on 21 December 2011, and rendered on 25 November 2011 by the High Court of Justice of London denying the return to Belgium of the child Bailie Kate COOPER, born on 1 August 2003, and the related documents, forwarded by the Belgian Central Authority under article 1322 decies § 1 of the judicial Code, pursuant to article 11.6 of the Regulations (EC) following the consultation of the British Central Authority on an application for obtaining the immediate return of a child, initiated by the Belgian Central Authority on 14 October 2011, under the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the civil aspects of child abduction and articles 1322 bis to 1322 quaterdecies of the judicial Code ; Upon the notification given on 23 December 2011 to Gail COOPER, Nigel COOPER, the Office of the Mons Public Prosecutor, on 4 January 2012 to Mrs Stephanie ADAMS, Solicitor, and Mr Graeme Langlands, Solicitor (Millsdonkin&co, Solicitors) ;

Upon the conclusions submitted and based on article 11 of Brussels II bis and article 1322 bis of the judicial Code for Nigel COOPER, initialed by the Registry of the Court on 31 January 2012 as well as the attached file of documents ;

Upon the notices 1322 decies of the judicial Code, sent on 1 February to the Office of the Mons Public Prosecutor, Nigel COOPER, his counsel, Gail COOPER, Mrs Stephanie ADAMS, Solicitor, Mr Graeme Langlands, Solicitor (Millsdonkin&co, Solicitors), regarding the hearing set on 22 February 2012 ;

Upon the correspondence from Millsdonkin&co, Solicitors (Mrs Gail COOPER’s counsel in England), addressed to the Registry of the Court on 10 February 2012 ;

Upon the correspondence received by fax from Williscroft & co, Solicitors (Mr Nigel COOPER’s counsel in England), and initialed by the Registry of the Court on 13 February 2012 ;

Upon the transcript of the 24 November 2011 hearing held under British Jurisdiction, sent by fax in its English version and initialed by the Registry of the Court on 21 and 22 February (fax and correspondence), and its corresponding English translation ;

Upon the correspondence from the Sunderland City Council, sent by fax to the Registry of the Court on 22 February 2012 ;

Heard at the hearing on 22 February 2012 : Mister Henri RENARD, substitute for the Mons Public Prosecutor, Mister Nigel COOPER, assisted by his counsel Mrs BENEDETTI, Solicitor, and an English language interpreter, Mrs Catherine REYNELBERGE, The trial debates have been declared closed and the cause has been taken under advisement, Upon, provided at such hearing : the files for Nigel COOPER ;

Upon the fact that, although regularly convened by the Registry of the Court, the Defendant Gail COOPER did not attend nor was she represented at Our 22 February 2012 Hearing ;

That as far as she is concerned the Court shall rule by default and without further examination, on the basis of the means, files, and conclusions presented and provided by the attending parties ;   I. OBJECT AND ADMISSIBILITY OF THE REQUEST

Given the request, formulated by the conclusions provided to the Registry of the Court on 31 January 2012 for Nigel COOPER, on the basis of article 11 of the European Regulations No. 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003, also known as “Brussels II bis” and article 1322 bis of the judicial Code, is disposed to grant to Nigel COOPER primary custody of his daughter Bailie Kate COOPER, born on 1 August 2003 in Coventry (united Kingdom) from his union with Gail COOPER, and therefore order immediate return of the child to the Kingdom of Belgium, in this case to the domicile of her father, registered in 7020 MONS (Belgium), rue Grande, 205/2.2 and in this respect, on forfeiture of a penalty of 500 euros per day of delay, Our decision being additionally supplemented by the passport certificate in accordance with the “BRUSSELS II bis” Regulation, under the conditions, modalities and authorizations better outlined in the arrangement scheme of the initiating proceedings ; that subsequently the request is pursuing the right for secondary custody in favor of Nigel COOPER regarding his daughter Bailie Kate COOPER, the modalities being better detailed in the operative part of the conclusions ;

That this request, justified in its means and submitted within the legal deadline, shall be receivable ;

II. CAUSE FOR THE REQUEST   Brief background facts   Considering that the applicant Nigel COOPER settled in Belgium in January 2006 as he was hired as Principal Consultant for Network Security at SHAPE ;

Considering that he was later joined by his daughter on 12 October 2006 as attested by the residence certificate written and signed by the Civil Registrar of the City of Mons on 30 September 2011, based on a private power of attorney provided by the defendant Gail COOPER on 5 August 2006, which reads as follows : “I, Gail COOPER, mother of Bailie Kate COOPER, authorize Bailie Kate COOPER to live with her father Nigel COOPER” ;

That the defendant later joined the applicant and his daughter on 20 January 2007 to live with him, first in Mons, than later in Lessines ;

Considering that during the period of the time they lived together, the applicant obviously catered to the well-being of his daughter, mainly by himself and because of the clear addiction to drugs and alcohol which already afflicted the defendant at the time ;

That, no less than twenty-five independent testimonies were written and provided to the file of the applicant in order to attest of the true attentive care he was providing his daughter, as well as the quality of the level of education he was offering her ;   Considering that on 3 March 2011, the defendant committed a felony by taking the child Bailie Kate to the United Kingdom, and did so after having willingly misled to local authorities of the City of Lessines, in playing on the existing similarity of names between the applicant, herself, and a someone named Paul COOPER, who was her first husband, and father of a daughter named Keeva-Rae, the so-called Paul COOPER granting the defendant, after signing a private power of attorney on 7 December 2007, full authority to leave the Kingdom of Belgium with his daughter Keeva-Rae COOPER ;

That on 5 November 2011, the Mayor of the City of Lessines acknowledged that he had indeed been completely misled and as a result stated so in writing, explaining that in fact the applicant Nigel COOPER had never given to the defendant Gail COOPER the written authorization to leave the Belgian territory accompanied by their daughter Bailie COOPER;

That in accordance to the provisions of the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the civil aspects of international child abduction, the applicant COOPER contacted on 21 September 2011 the Belgian Central Authority, i.e. the Federal Public Service of Justice to notify them of the parental abduction and thus asked for the immediate return of the child to Belgium ;

That, in addition, the child contacted her father again as early as 13 November 2011 to let him know that she felt unsafe with her mother and her new partner, this once again proving the alcoholism and drug abuse of the defendant, Gail COOPER ;

That the British High Court of Justice ordered against the return of the child on 25 November 2011 ;

And that following a decision that can be criticized on many grounds, which were clearly taken out of context or subject to a utterly subjective and inadequate interpretation, Our British counterpart considered that the applicant Nigel COOPER had simply, through his mere acts, given his consent to the mother to take the child, under article 13 of the Hague Convention ;

Debate

Considering that We do not wish to remind of the legal, international, and internal provisions applicable in this case, since “no one is supposed to ignore the Law” ;

That the request of Nigel COOPER, which aims to grant him custody of his daughter, is fundamentally based on article 11.7 of the Brussels II Regulations ;

That there is no doubt whatsoever that the whole family was residing in Belgium until the defendant Gail COOPER committed a felony ;

That the child Bailie Kate was therefore indeed a legal resident in Belgium ;

Considering that the applicant never gave his consent for his daughter to depart to the United Kingdom ;

That it has been clearly established that the defendant COOPER misled the authorities of the City of Lessines in order to get hold of the authorizations she needed ;

That the letter written on 1 March 2011 by the applicant to the defendant, reference C38 of the file of British Court, relates exclusively to the applicant’s consent to the departure of his wife, and not the departure of his daughter ;

That indeed, this document clearly bears the following reference “the departure and return of Mrs Gail COOPER to the United Kingdom” ;

That the interpretation of the British Judge regarding the email that Gail COOPER addresses to the applicant on 15 August 2011, is in fact exactly the opposite of its actual meaning ;

That this email does not, in any case, lead to the conclusion that there was no illegal departure of the child ;

Considering also that the financial support offered by Nigel COOPER to his spouse does not demonstrate his will to offer child support contributions to his spouse in the maintenance and educational costs of his daughter, hence does not either automatically imply that Gail COOPER does in effect and lawfully benefit from the prerogatives of custody rights, but rather show that he is strictly complying with his duty of supporting his spouse while in marriage, as described in article 203 in the Belgian Civil Code;

Considering that at every single contact between the applicant and his daughter by videoconference, the child strongly expressed her wishes to go back to Belgium, and that this clearly indicates that she was not properly cared for by her mother and the partner of her mother ;   That the British Social Services, warned by the applicant’s letter, took over the case while the Children Social Welfare Services of Sunderland presented a written agreement to the parties on 12 January 2012, which aim was to minimize (sic!) all risks for Bailie and promote her emotional, social, and physical well-being – agreement made between Mrs Gail Cooper, her current partner Derek JOHNSON and the Sunderland Local Authority ;

That, in accordance to the above-mentioned agreement, Mr Derek JOHNSON was no longer authorized to stay overnight at the residence of the defendant whenever the child was present, going as far as pointing out that when the child was staying at the residence, Mr JOHNSON and the defendant COOPER should refrain from consuming alcohol or any illicit drugs “resic!” ;

That the above-mentioned agreement also suggested that the defendant should report to a service called “Riverside Women in Need”, which is sponsored by the University of Sunderland and meant to help victims of domestic abuse, this very invitation clearly indicating the level of “quality” of the relation between the defendant and her partner Derek JOHNSON ;

That the later was supposed to report to a service called “The Head Project”, sponsored by the same university and meant to help abusive and violent individuals, this invitation obviously being a consequence of the similar invitation made to the defendant COOPER… ;

Considering that in planning the hearings of the British High Court of Justice scheduled on 24 and 25 November 2011, an independent consulting organization called “CAFCASS” as per the translation “Service of counsel and support to the family court” provided a child abduction report, which made us believe beyond any reasonable doubt that what Bailie Kate COOPER genuinely wished for was to go back and live under the roof of her father, as Mrs Liliane ODZE reports ;

That this report indeed shows that even if the child remains, and it is by far understandable, torn apart by the inevitable conflict of loyalty between parents, she does not however shows any clear preference in her wishes in remaining in England but rather she insists on going back to her father’s home, while expressing her wish to meet regularly with her maternal grandfather, and, of course, her mother ;

That the British Judge should have, in view of all the elements which were given to his appreciation, ordered the evident return of the child in the country of her choice, i.e. the Kingdom of Belgium ; That We shall order this course of action, which also obviously meets the greater and objective interests of the child ;

That no guarantee can be obtained in this regard within the home of her mother, knowing that the removal and/or control precautions of the mother and her partner as described in the agreement made on 12 January 2012 do not strictly constitute a binding constraint or even an obligation ;

Considering finally that Our decision will be supplemented with the passport certificate as referred to in article 42 of the Brussels II bis Regulation; passport certificate which is to be handed to the applicant Nigel COOPER, along with this decision ;

That based on the Rule of Law, the home of the parent who is honorable and capable to respect the prerogatives of the custody of his child must be preferred to any other care structure or any other home of replacement, as respectable as these may be ;

That Nigel COOPER effectively complies with these conditions and requirements in this case ;

FOR THOSE REASONS,

We, Xavier HIERNAUX, Single Judge, assisted by Christine VACHAUDEZ, Registrar ;

Upon the provisions of the law of 15 June 1935 applied in this case, and article 107 of the law of 22 December 1998 ;

Upon article 11 of the European Regulations Nr. 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003, also known as “Brussels II bis” and article 1322 bis of the judicial Code ; Hereby record the claim, denials and reservations of the appearing party, and deem all further or contrary conclusions unsubstantiated;

Having heard Mister Henri RENARD, Substitute for the Royal Prosecutor, who gave his assent at the hearing of 22 February 2012 ;

Rule by default against the defendant Gail COOPER, and upon hearing the other parties in summary proceedings ;

Declare the request of Nigel COOPER admissible, And pronounce his request well-founded for the specific purpose stated below ;

As a result :

Grant custody rights for the child Bailie Kate COOPER, born in Coventry (United Kingdom) on 1 August 2003, to Nigel COOPER, her father, with whom the child will have her official residence ;

Order the immediate return of Bailie Kate COOPER, born on 1 August 2003, to the Kingdom of Belgium, and in this case within the official residence of her father Nigel COOPER, as registered rue Grande, 205/2.2 in 7020 MONS, and in the absence of complying with the obligation of return of the child by the defendant Gail COOPER , we condemn her to a daily fine amounting to FIVE HUNDRED EUROS (500€) for the delay in the return of the child, to be enforced and paid starting on the day following the service of this decision ;

Declare that this decision is supplemented by the passport certificate referred to in article 42 of the Brussels II bis Regulation, which is delivered to Nigel COOPER upon sending it to him ;

Authorize, as needed, Nigel COOPER to take back or arrange the removal of his daughter Bailie COOPER as soon as this decision is rendered ;

Empower the Police Forces to retrieve this child wherever she may be located, whether a bailiff is present or not as per his mission of executing the present judgment ;

Expressly authorize the Police Forces as well as the bailiff to force any entrance, even private and even if it is somewhere else than the school she attends or the domicile of Gail COOPER, this for the sole purpose of retrieving Bailie, if necessary with the assistance of a locksmith in order to open and even break open doors, may these be private entrances ;

Declare that the entire fees and disbursements generated by the execution of this decision will have to be paid exclusively by the defendant Gail COOPER, and condemn her to pay back to Nigel COOPER all fees he may have given up front, upon a simple justification of payment ;

Condemn Gail COOPER to pay the costs and expenses of these proceedings, as they are not to be settled by Nigel COOPER and deemed to be lawfully reserved in accordance to article 21 of the judicial Code ;

Declare the present judgment to be provisionally enforceable aside from any appeal and without any security nor special cantonment offer ;

This is our judgment and it is pronounced in French, at the public hearing of the Presidential Chamber, at the Mons Court of Justice, on the day, month, and year mentioned on top, where sat : Mister Xavier HIERNAUX, single Judge, Madam Christine VACHAUDEZ, Registrar.

C. VACHAUDEZ X. HIERNAUX.

Presented on 15 March 2012  not registrable Chief Inspector a.I.  Ch. FRETIN

R.G. 11/3804/A  Summon and hereby order all Judicial Officers to enforce the existing judgment to this end ; To all our Public Prosecutors and Royal Prosecutors at the County Courts to assist them and to the Commanders and Officers of the Public Force to support when they are legally required to do so. In witness whereof, the present order has been legally signed and sealed by the Court. For certified execution delivered to Mister Nigel Cooper.   (seal of the County Court of Mons) The Chief Registrar M-J SAUCEZ

Registrar’s Office of the County Court of Mons

Date : 16/03/2012 Der : 2843  8 pages at 2,85 euros

Duties paid : 22,80 euros

The Chief Registrar M-J SAUCEZ “

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

NORMAN SCARTH 27/03/13 – “1st attempt to ‘silence’ me! Opportunity to redeem yourselves. Final Solution?”

scarth 27mar13

above: the front page of Norman Scarth’s purported “appeal documents” - a farce,. by all accounts. This being a typical case where legal representatives, instead of delivering the truth of the case outright mislead all and sundry with some concocted versions or other of their own to paint a totally unrealistic picture which they would have pass as the truth, but of course palms are greased and favours acknowledged to create a totally fake case to which, in this particular instance - the defendant, then 74 years old received a sentence of 10 years imprisonment – the conviction based on, he alleges, miscarriages and perversions of justice. Other words for this type of behaviour by those supposed to uphold the law and see to it that the truth is brought before the “courts” being “total and utter corruption”, of course…

From: Norman Scarth (againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk)
Sent: 27 March 2013 10:48:26
To: s.nathan@bindmans.com (s.nathan@bindmans.com); a.waldman@doughtystreet.co.uk (a.waldman@doughtystreet.co.uk)
Cc: Norman Scarth (againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk)

To Messrs Sashy Nathan of Bindmans Solicitors, & Amos Waldman, barrister, of Doughty Street Chambers.An opportunity to redeem yourselves.Gentlemen,

1). As you know, I make no complaint that you failed to beat the attempt by the Attorney General’s to put me in a Stalinis ‘Mental Hospital’.

2). Fortunately I was able to do that myself, the Lord Chief Justice unable to hide his frustration at not being able to impose ‘A MEDICAL DISPOSAL’ by putting me in such a place for the rest of my life.

MEDICAL DISPOSAL?  Those words are chillingly reminescent of ‘THE FINAL SOLUTION’!

3). My complaint against you is that you did not even try to beat the malicious ‘Claim’, which was not aven a criminal prosecution!

4). Worse than that, you allowed poisonous lies (completely irrelevant to the charges against me!) to be told about me in court & made no attempt to stop them or challenge them, in spite of my having given you the true facts.  You thus ensured that Public & Press galleries (& thus the public at large), heard only the lies, & would accept them as facts.

5). Your ignorance of the law was breath-taking (including grounds for appeal); you contemptuously ignored my attempts to point you in the right direction, your excuses for this being ridiculous.

6). It was my intention to tell the Legal Aid people to reclaim whatever money has been paid to you on my behalf.

7). However, I give you an opportunity to redeem yourselves.  As you will be aware, in April 2000 I was‘convicted’ (in a Kangaroo/Quisling ‘court’),the ten year sentence (at the age of 75) being evidence of the malice of Judge David Ronald Bentley.

8). The ‘trial’ was grotesque, as was what purported to be my appeal, clearly evidenced in the front page of whatpurported to be the transcript of that ‘appeal’.  You have already seen it, but I attach it again for convenience.

9). No mention was ever allowed (at either ‘trial’ or ‘appeal’)of the attack on me on 9th August 1999.  It was an attempt to silence me, PERMANENTLY-  no exaggeration to describe it as a very clever assassination attempt.

It failed only because my constitution proved stronger than most men of my age (74 then).

10). Anyway, if you will put in an appeal against that conviction & sentence (there are a multitude of grounds), I will drop my idea of asking the Legal Aid people to recover the money paid to you.

Looking forward to an early reply,

Norman Scarth.

SCARTH BEATING 1 10 11

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

LATEST COMMENTS: “THE ABUSE OF GRANDMA B”, + SCROLL DOWN FOR RADIO INTERVIEW!!

The latest comments, + scroll down for radio interview with ANONYMOUS RADIO:

“This email was addressed to Eric Pickles and c/c nywy.pcpt@cps.gsi.gov.uk northyork.complaints@cps.gsi.gov.uk enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk pccnorthyorkshire-pcc.gov.uk mconnor@selby.gov.uk programmeofficer@selby.gov.uk nigel.adams.mp@parliament . Copies have been sent to Tim Madwick, Simon Denis, Kayley Scaife, Richard Abbott, Jim Shanks, PCC (Julia Mulligan@ now defunct), all at North Yorks Police  several DCLG Public Servants ALL Selby District Councillors, private planners, York Magistrates Court, 5 email addresses at Spawforths Ltd, ALL Selby District Parish Councils, Local and National press and BBC Sky news and my tweets on SElby District Council criminality @ucimup right across government and judiciary – I hit the limit for tweets sent in a day and was stopped tweeting yesterday.

“But Ian

How far are you practically?

Have you managed to get the CPS involved?

Are the Police investigating?

Have there been any enquiries by the Police?”

————————————————————————

As you seem to expect me to ‘handle’ the situation, so every other authority is looking for someone else to ‘handle’ the problem, and for the last two years, at least!

And the problem comes home to Selby District’s honourable Councillors.

I bumped into ‘Grandma B’ in my researches, absolutely astonishing!  GOOGLE IT AND BE ASTONISHED!!

Police corruption in North Yorkshire is at a level which even Lord Maginnis taking the root problem of corrupt police working with social services and even NHS at the quickest way of ridding the world of seniors to share in their wealth (it is incredible!) to House of Lords has been unable to successfully challenge.

And it appears this little earner has gone nationwide. How?  By ‘word of mouth’?  Or is simply that investigations into paying for care home places met to show the opportunity to like-minded mercenary police/social care workers/NHS workers who simultaneously took the opportunity to gain? And right across the Nation? ELSEWHERE, OUTRIGHT MURDER HAS TAKEN PLACE!!!

No body will regard themselves as capable of cracking the problem Selby District has, if the North Yorkshire Police are involved, especially if Lord Maginnis and the House of Lords can’t touch them – York Magistrates Court refused to pass my indictments onto CPS according to law!

(One deep into the ‘earner’ is Mr Moreton, ex Grandma Barbara ‘case’, after ‘retiring from ill health’ with pension, of course, ended up regaining his health to run Selby ‘Community Policing’)

No body or public body is going to get involved after knowledge of what has gone on without it being able to be checked.

It is down to the untainted councillors as public servants to proactively exercise their duty of care to their electorate by demanding an Extraordinary Meeting, and to begin a process of revelation which might have far reaching national consequences and repercussions eventually.

I gave you the ‘big picture’ and it seems barely credible to me though evidence abounds.

North Yorkshire law seems paralysed – the Police Commissioner is running side-shows to avoid involvement.

And something has to be done soon if the can of worms is not to infect the whole of society IRREPARABLY!”

  • Grandma B

    /      26/03/2013

    “Thanks for your comments. When this affair started, we were still naive enough to believe we were dealing with a small group of corrupt officials, whose superiors would deal with quickly. That was five years ago. As you mention, raising the case the House of Lords has not stopped the abuse. Every government department and every official we have gone to for help has been obstructive. What causes more concern is the way their brush-offs are phrased the same way, suggesting that they are being guided centrally at a high level.”

The Abuse of Grandma B – a sad story told by Peter Hofschröer

Grandma B is now 82 years old. She is wheelchair-bound and very frail. The past three years of her life have been horrendous. She lost her husband of 60 years, but that was the easy part. She has also been the victim of sustained and systematic abuse in which she has been defrauded of her house, subjected to threats and harassment because she will not hand over her life savings to her abusers, then unlawfully evicted from her house and stranded abroad, with her abusers trying, fortunately unsuccessfully, to fraudulently sell her house.

You may well ask who would do such an awful thing to a little, old lady in a wheelchair. Sadly, most abuse takes place within the family and this is very much the case here. The main abusers are Grandma B’s older son, his wife and her two adult grandchildren.

Grandma B’s younger son was working abroad when he noticed something was very wrong. He immediately rushed back home, where his worst fears were confirmed. While he was travelling, his 87 year-old father was admitted to hospital with a serious heart complaint caused by neglect. His mother too was seriously ill due to neglect. His older brother and his family lived just around the corner, but had done little to help Grandma B and her very sick husband.

A year before this, Grandma B and her husband had signed over their house to the older son and his family on the understanding they would care for them. Their younger son agreed to this, because he was living and working abroad and could not provide the level of care needed. Hardly was the ink on the agreement dry when the older son and his family started running Grandma B and her husband down, hoping they would pass on as soon as possible.

When, in April 2008, the younger son arrived in the parental home, he was horrified by what he saw. He dropped what he was doing, gave up his job and home and became the full-time carer for his parents. His father led a full and happy life in his last months. His mother’s physical health has improved dramatically since the younger son took over her care.

As soon as the younger son took over the care of his parents, the older son and his family started a campaign of harassment designed to drive him out of the parental home and to seize control of their finances. Matters reached such a level in September 2008, that the younger son reported the criminal offences to the police and the abuse to social services.

What followed from there can only be described as a nightmare. The police made several attempts to arrest the carer on the basis of false allegations, while social services fabricated allegations against him in an attempt to have his powers of attorney revoked and the care of his parents placed in the hands of their abusers.

A few days after the younger son made his complaint, the police arrived at the parental home to investigate a complaint he has “stolen” his parents’ money. They had no evidence to support this allegation made by the abusers, but refused to record a complaint of harassment by the abusers.

Social services blocked all attempts at getting the abuse investigated. Grandma B’s social worker made a false allegation of assault against her carer, an unfit, middle-aged man. Social services withdrew this allegation when they were shown evidence that the social worker was a black-belt in martial arts. His claim to have been overpowered and physically ejected from the parental home without injury looked a little ridiculous, to say the least.

On the morning Grandma B’s husband of 60 years died, the police unlawfully raided her house. They allowed her abusers to charge in, assault her and bawl insults at her over her husband’s still warm corpse. When her carer stood between her and her abusers to protect her, the police officers pushed him out of the way and threatened to arrest him.

In the following months, the abusers stalked Grandma B, attempted to break into her house and send her abusive letters. The police refused to uphold the law and arrest the criminals in question.

An independent investigation into Social Service’s handling of the case criticised them and required them to reopen the safeguarding investigation. Months later, they did, but the police and Social Services withheld all evidence of abuse.

Instead, they fabricated abuse allegations against the carer and applied to the Office of the Public Guardian to have his powers of attorney annulled. The Office of the Public Guardian established the allegations made by Social Services were false and rejected the application.

Grandma B then went on her wheelchair to a local council meeting to hand out a leaflet protesting about the way the police and social services were treating her. Her local ward councillors set police officers in stab-vests on to her, threatening to arrest her for distributing a “defamatory” leaflet. When her carer pointed out that defamation is a civil matter and not a police matter, the officers looked a little flummoxed, but still tried to prevent her from exercising her democratic right of peaceful protest. Grandma B is a veteran of the Second World War and stood her ground. When her carer called out to the police sergeant attending the meeting in front of the 30 or so members of the public present that she should arrest these officers for harassing a vulnerable person, they beat a hasty retreat. The sergeant refused to uphold the law.

Instead, two days later, the local police fabricated the first Harassment Warning against her carer.  A couple of weeks later, they fabricated a second warning and were clearly intending to fabricate a third, at which point the carer could have been arrested.

In the ensuing two years, the carer’s legal representatives both in Britain and abroad have made a couple of dozen requests for sight of the evidence to support these unsigned, undated harassment warnings which are not legally valid. The police have produced nothing other than excuses and have refused every opportunity to sign these warnings for fear of perjuring themselves. The police inspector that issued the warnings took “early retirement” when challenged by the carer’s solicitor to produce the evidence.

Exhausted by this constant harassment, Grandma B went abroad on holiday for Christmas 2009. The police tipped off her abusers she was away from home, who then forced entry, changed the locks and unlawfully evicted her. After stealing her valuables in full view of the police, they tried to fraudulently sell her house. Fortunately, Grandma B’s solicitor prevented them from doing so.

However, her abusers and their friends in the police and local authority then fabricated a kidnapping allegation against her carer. This request to arrest the carer went from the local CID to Special Branch, to SOCA, to New Scotland Yard, to Interpol London, Interpol in the country in question, then to the national police headquarters and provincial police headquarters before landing on the desk of a local police officer in a remote Alpine village.

The expectation here was obvious: the local country bumpkin plod would be so impressed by the provenance of this request that he would summon up reinforcements before daring to attempt to tackle this known, hardened, serious international criminal.

It did not quite work out like that. Two weeks before this request arrived, the police officer and his good wife had been among the many guests at the local pub at Grandma B’s 82nd birthday party. He had been sceptical about the stories he had heard about official corruption in Britain, but now he was supposed to arrest the carer for kidnapping his mother, holding her against her will and incommunicado. He obviously knew these allegations were false, but being a professional, he carried out a proper investigation. His report made it clear that the British police had knowingly lied to Interpol to help corrupt officers defraud a little, old lady on a wheelchair.

This attempt by corrupt British police to abuse honest local police officers to carry out criminal acts on their behalf is now under investigation by the local foreign ministry.

Had the carer not been so lucky, then the chances are he would have been remanded in custody pending extradition, while Grandma B would have been returned to Britain and to the tender mercies of social services. Her assets would then have been plundered and divided up between the gang of criminals running this racket.

There have now been five independent reviews of this case. All have called for it to be reopened. Both the police and local authority have ignored these requests.

So what is going on here and who is involved? The main abuser is employed by local social services. He, his wife and daughter have provided support services to the local police. They all know who the isolated old people in their area with assets are. It would seem they are systematically targeting defenceless old people and seizing control of their assets before bundling them off into a council home, then selling their assets. The cash then gets laundered through a dodgy private care company as “care fees” and the police officers, social workers, council officials and local politicians involved then pocket the money. The perfect crime, as who is going to listen to a confused, old lady in a home, whose contact with the outside world they are controlling?

This is rampant corruption and serious, organised crime. Nobody in authority in North Yorkshire – including a certain senior police officer in the news at present – will respond to correspondence and deal with this case.

How many more victims are there?”

UK WAR ON PENSIONERS: ‘The Abuse of Grandma B’

February 9, 2013  By 1 Comment
How corrupt Officials are plundering the Assets of the elderly ‘Grandma B’ is now 83 years old
She is wheelchair-bound and very frail. The past four years of her life have been horrendous. She lost her husband of 60 years, but that was the easy part. She has also been the victim of sustained and systematic abuse in which she has been defrauded of her house, subjected to threats and harassment because she will not hand over her life savings to her abusers, then unlawfully evicted from her house and stranded abroad, with her abusers trying, fortunately unsuccessfully, to sell her house fraudulently.
You may well ask who would do such an awful thing to a little, old lady in a wheelchair. Sadly, most abuse takes place within the family and this is very much the case here. The main abusers are Grandma B’s older son, his wife and her two adult grandchildren.  Grandma B’s younger son was working abroad when he noticed something was very wrong. He immediately rushed back home, where his worst fears were confirmed.While he was travelling, his 87 year-old father was admitted to hospital with a serious heart complaint caused by neglect. His mother too was seriously ill due to neglect. His older brother and his family lived just around the corner, but had done little to help Grandma B and her very sick husband. A year before this, Grandma B and her husband had signed over their house to the older son and his family on the understanding they would care for them. Their younger son agreed to this, because he was living and working abroad and could not provide the level of care needed. Hardly was the ink on the agreement dry when the older son and his family started running Grandma B and her husband down, hoping they would pass on as soon as possible.When, in April 2008, the younger son arrived in the parental home, he was horrified by what he saw. He dropped what he was doing, gave up his job and home and became the full-time carer for his parents. His father led a full and happy life in his last months. His mother’s physical health has improved dramatically since the younger son took over her care.As soon as the younger son took over the care of his parents, the older son and his family started a campaign of harassment designed to drive him out of the parental home and to seize control of their finances. Matters reached such a level in September 2008, that the younger son reported the criminal offences to the police and the abuse to social services.What followed from there can only be described as a nightmare. The police made several attempts to arrest the carer on the basis of false allegations, while social services fabricated allegations against him in an attempt to have his powers of attorney revoked and the care of his parents placed in the hands of their abusers.A few days after the younger son made his complaint, the police arrived at the parental home to investigate a complaint he has “stolen” his parents’ money. They had no evidence to support this allegation made by the abusers, but refused to record a complaint of harassment by the abusers.Social services blocked all attempts at getting the abuse investigated. Grandma B’s social worker made a false allegation of assault against her carer, an unfit, middle-aged man. Social services withdrew this allegation when they were shown evidence that the social worker was a black-belt in martial arts. His claim to have been overpowered and physically ejected from the parental home without injury looked a little ridiculous, to say the least.On the morning Grandma B’s husband of 60 years died, the police unlawfully raided her house. They allowed her abusers to charge in, assault her and bawl insults at her over her husband’s still warm corpse. When her carer stood between her and her abusers to protect her, the police officers pushed him out of the way and threatened to arrest him.

In the following months, the abusers stalked Grandma B, attempted to break into her house and send her abusive letters. The police refused to uphold the law and arrest the criminals in question.

An independent investigation into Social Services’ handling of the case criticised them and required them to reopen the safeguarding investigation. Months later, they did, but the police and Social Services withheld all evidence of abuse.

Instead, they fabricated abuse allegations against the carer and applied to the Office of the Public Guardian to have his powers of attorney annulled. The Office of the Public Guardian established the allegations made by Social Services were false and rejected the application.

Grandma B then went on her wheelchair to a local council meeting to hand out a leaflet protesting about the way the police and social services were treating her. Her local ward councillors set police officers in stab-vests on to her, threatening to arrest her for distributing a “defamatory” leaflet. When her carer pointed out that defamation is a civil matter and not a police matter, the officers looked a little flummoxed, but still tried to prevent her from exercising her democratic right of peaceful protest. Grandma B is a veteran of the Second World War and stood her ground. When her carer called out to the police sergeant attending the meeting in front of the 30 or so members of the public present that she should arrest these officers for harassing a vulnerable person, they beat a hasty retreat. The sergeant refused to uphold the law.

Instead, two days later, the local police fabricated the first Harassment Warning against her carer. A couple of weeks later, they fabricated a second warning and were clearly intending to fabricate a third, at which point the carer could have been arrested. A file recently obtained from the Office of the Public Guardian shows this was planned to be on Christmas Day 2009, when the main abuser and corrupt police officers were planning to raid Grandma B’s house – unlawfully again, of course.

In the ensuing two years, the carer’s legal representatives both in Britain and abroad have made dozens of requests for sight of the evidence to support these unsigned, undated harassment warnings which are not legally valid. The police have produced nothing other than excuses and have refused every opportunity to sign these warnings for fear of perjuring themselves. The police inspector that issued the warnings took “early retirement” when challenged by the carer’s solicitor to produce the evidence.

Exhausted by this constant harassment, Grandma B went abroad on holiday for Christmas 2009. The police tipped off her abusers she was away from home, who then forced entry, changed the locks and unlawfully evicted her. After stealing her valuables in full view of the police, they tried to fraudulently sell her house. Fortunately, Grandma B’s solicitor prevented them from doing so.

However, her abusers and their friends in the police and local authority, then fabricated a kidnapping allegation against her carer. This request to arrest the carer went from the local CID to Special Branch, to SOCA, to New Scotland Yard, to Interpol London, Interpol in the country in question, then to the national police headquarters and provincial police headquarters before landing on the desk of a local police officer in a remote Alpine village.

The expectation here was obvious: the local country bumpkin plod would be so impressed by the provenance of this request that he would summon up reinforcements before daring to attempt to tackle this known, hardened, serious international criminal.

It did not quite work out like that. Two weeks before this request arrived, the police officer and his good wife had been among the many guests at the local pub at Grandma B’s 82nd birthday party. He had been sceptical about the stories he had heard about official corruption in Britain, but now he was supposed to arrest the carer for kidnapping his mother, holding her against her will and incommunicado. He obviously knew these allegations were false, but being a professional, he carried out a proper investigation. His report made it clear that the British police had knowingly lied to Interpol to help corrupt officers defraud a little, old lady on a wheelchair.

This attempt by corrupt British police to abuse honest local police officers to carry out criminal acts on their behalf is now under investigation by the local foreign ministry.

Had the carer not been so lucky, then the chances are he would have been remanded in custody pending extradition, while Grandma B would have been returned to Britain and to the tender mercies of social services. Her assets would then have been plundered and divided up between the gang of criminals running this racket.

There have now been five independent reviews of this case. All have called for it to be reopened. Both the police and local authority have ignored these requests.

So what is going on here and who is involved? The main abuser is employed by local social services. He, his wife and daughter have provided support services to the local police. They all know who the isolated old people in their area with assets are. It would seem they are systematically targeting defenceless old people and seizing control of their assets before bundling them off into a council home, then selling their assets. The cash then gets laundered through a dodgy private care company as “care fees” and the police officers, social workers, council officials and local politicians involved then pocket the money. The perfect crime, as who is going to listen to a confused, old lady in a home, whose contact with the outside world they are controlling?

This is rampant corruption and serious, organised crime. Nobody in authority in North Yorkshire will respond to correspondence and deal with this case.

Questions are now being asked in Parliament about this case. See here: http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2011-11-22a.220.0&s=speaker%3A10406+section%3Awrans#g220.1

source: http://21stcenturywire.com/2013/02/09/uk-war-on-pensioners-the-abuse-of-grandma-b/

—————————————————————————–
N + E Feldmeiers’s message to MP’s:
“IN AND FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST
Please would you HELP us?…
The council contractors are WITHOLDING OUR PASSPORTS,birth certificates and all other private documents including medical records/x rays,my mothers eight and half year childhood rape court case file etc etc………..(EVERYTHING WE OWN)
The council continue to fight us and have retained at tax payers expense etc:
DAVID CALLOW
12 KINGS BENCH WALK
TEMPLE
EC4Y 7EL
Please would you help in some way?
Local Authorities Contractors Masons Moving group Ltd are holding all our life-time-possessions/ belongings/irreplaceable sentimental belongings to ransom (unlawfully and illegally…

My mother and I became homeless in [31/07/08]. The Vale of Glamorgan local authority placed all our belongings with their contractors, Masons Moving Group Ltd (“Masons Ltd”) for safe keeping, whilst we were placed under a re-homing scheme.

When we were no longer homeless, Masons Ltd denied access/return, and continues to deny, access to / the return of our possessions. This has been for [11/05/09]. Masons are withholding all our possessions, which include passports, original birth certificates, as well as furnishings- beds/sofa/white goods, and irreplaceable personal effects.)Heritage/Original family photographs of us and all our loved ones/living and deceased…

Masons Ltd have put undue pressure [Duress/threatened blackmailed my mother to sign a contract [and pay £330 monthly fees or they would 'sell' or 'Dispose' all property] (which would give them authority to deal with our possessions). We declined to sign the contract. My mother is on Disability Living Allowance and I am main and only full time carer.[Ms E Feldmeier has numerous medical conditions (life threatening)

Mason’s Ltd provided me [2/03/11] with evidence of selling SOME our original family photographs including original framed photographs of ancestors and 1479 family tree…..

Further background.

I gave up my job to become a full time carer for my grandmother who required round the clock nursing care (was in a vegetative state due to medical negligence in 2001).

We were in accomodation that my grandmother kept falling in such confined places…The local Authority (HOMES4U) did not grant us any of our bids for a disabled friendly property,for which there were many so… Social Services (SS) (senior social worker Jayne Morgan) told us to move asap,and find a property in the private sector….and go for the first property that we could take reciept of a HOSPITAL BED,HOIST and all manner of nursing equipment…….(we remained in this property despite exceptional hardship and going without basic essentials to ensure we meet the shortfall (were there for 7 and half years)

However, we reached the point in [2008] when we could no longer afford the costs for rent and looking after my grandmother, because of the ongoing lack of support from the local authority….and the local authority said they would help provided we get the Estate Agent to execute a warrent of possession and effectually make us legally homeless to which the local authority said they would then have a duty of care towards my disabled seriously ill mother and myself.

The Local Authority has paid Masons in full (tax payer) out of public purse…

Masons are the councils contractors,there is no contract between us and the council or Masons….

Masons will NOT comunicate with us………………….we do not know where our LIFE TIME OF BELONGINGS are………

This case encompasses my mothers life and my grandmothers life……….
My mother is over 60 years old without an sofa,bed,washing machine….etc etc
(I am on aprox £1.53 per hour (Carers Allowence benefit) I/we can not afford to replace anything that is being held to ransom from us…
Nigh on eight years of child rape court files/case notes (highly sensitive and confidental) that may have been read by anyone…..
We have no beds,no sofa,no washing machine for three years todate…we cannot afford to replace anything….
They (councils contractors) have over £250,000 (and thats just the replaceable belongings/white goods etc) home/house contents….and all personal belongings……..(irreplaceable family heritage etc)
Before we tried court an two advocates were blocked by the council and Masons Moving group Ltd….
We have tried all over UK (by email/letter) for help with this matter.
Thank you

Nadia & Ellinor Feldmeier

#####################################

grandmabarbara

* RADIO INTERVIEW *

http://www.onetruemedia.com/otm_site/view_shared?p=11d595277423e9978346ffa&skin_id=701&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

[the interview above from "Anonymous Radio"]

The story of how corrupt police officers and social workers are abusing a little, old lady on a wheelchair

Grandma B on 01/10/2012•  Permalink

Posted in Uncategorized

Pages

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

UPDATE NORMAN SCARTH SUN. MARCH 24 – “To Helen Grant, MP,…”

SCARTH

above:  from earlier – an article about Norman Scarth.

To Victims Minister Helen Grant.

From a victim. Video of PM w/veterans​.

“To Helen Grant MP,

Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Victims & the Courts,
Ministry of Justice.
Dear Minister,
As a victim of crime, you are my only hope.
Now aged 87, for many years I have been a victim of the criminal element within the police (which is currently being exposed more & more).  In my case, they have been acting at the instigation of (& protected by) the criminal element within the judiciary (though they are not being exposed as the police are).  Their criminal actions increased after my single-handed success in the European Court of Human Rights brought a vital change in British Law, incorporated into the 1998 Human Rights Act.   The change is much disliked by lawyers & judges, & in consequence I have suffered a great deal of persecution.  Far from lessening as I get older, it has been increasing, to such an extent that, at the age of 86, I was forced to flee the land of my birth -
THE LAND FOR WHICH I FOUGHT IN WORLD WAR II – & seek safety in the Republic of Ireland.
What is my remedy please?
In the link below is a video of the Prime Minister with the Arctic Convoy veterans he had invited to Downing Street to receive the Arctic Star medal from him.   He praised them as ‘Heroes’.  I served on those convoys, but was NOT invited to Downing Street.
Could you please ask Mr Cameron if there is anything he can do to enable me to return to the England I loved, & to live out what few years are left to me without fear?
Norman Scarth
The giving out of the medals – MINUS NORMAN SCARTH!! =

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-21845753

Re. ECt-HR:  See  Scarth v UK, 33745/96 “

SCARTH BEATING 1 10 11

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION: THE UK IS REFUSING TO UPHOLD INTERNATIONAL LAW

PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION: THE  UK IS REFUSING TO UPHOLD INTERNATIONAL LAW:

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/saving-bailie/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Top police ‘protected celebrity suspects’ The Times 20/03/13

police saville2

police3

from “The Times”:

Top police ‘protected celebrity suspects’

#tomorrowspaperstoday

http://t.co/mXyty0sMME

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

HOLLIE GREIG CASE: ROBERT GREEN’S BLOG 1 – 15 MARCH

A HOLLIE ROBERThg

From Robert Green’s blog 1 – 15 March: http://robertgreensblog-holliegreigcampaign.blogspot.ch/

FRIDAY 15 MARCH

THE LIES OF KENNY MACASKILL

Before moving on to this subject, may I first thank everyone for the truly amazing response to my last blog, calling for support for Rusty (Timothy Rustige), who faces a Hearing in Aberdeen on Wednesday morning. Prisoners of Conscience International do a wonderful job and Rusty is a fearless campaigner against injustice. He is thus exactly the type of person the current vile Scottish SNP regime would want to crush.
Kenny MacAskill is Scotland`s Justice Secretary. Therefore, he holds a position of great responsibility and trust in administering justice in Scotland.
In 2009, Mr MacAskill lied about the reason for the release of the convicted and so-called Lockerbie bomber, Mr Al-Megrahi. At the time, the Justice Secretary already knew that evidence had been uncovered that indicated that Mr Al-Megrahi should never have been convicted in the first place. Even prosecuting judge Lord Fraser of Carmyllie had conceded that the conviction was unsound.
None of this has prevented Mr MacAskill from being prepared to lie and to lie before the whole world.
He has also stated that a thorough police investigation into the Hollie Greig case has taken place. At my trial a year ago, it was established beyond reasonable doubt that no such investigation had ever occurred.
Under cross-examination by Defence Counsel Andy Lamb QC, Grampian Police`s DC Lisa Jane Evans answered that none of the people identified by Hollie Greig in her formal complaint had ever been questioned by the police. Moreover, fourteen of the individuals named by Hollie called by the prosecution were also each asked by Mr Lamb if they had ever been questioned by the police in respect of the allegations made against them by Hollie Greig. They all swore that they had not.
I have ascertained that Mr MacAskill has been informed of this and has been presented with copies of all the expert witness statements supporting Hollie`s claims, along with the Police Complaints Commission Scotland document confirming that Grampian Police had withheld such expert witness statements from the Prosecutor.
Officers from Operation Yewtree have recently contacted the Scottish authorities over concerns about the Hollie Greig case. They have also been provided with the blatant untruth that “a thorough police investigation has taken place”, based on the aforesaid false and misleading statement made by Kenny MacAskill.
Meanwhile, justice is denied and Scottish children and the disabled in the Aberdeen area remain at risk.
Returning to the Lockerbie case, at least it can be safely assumed that in 2009, the Justice Secretary, along with Lord Advocate Elish Angiolini and First Minister Alex Salmond,would have been placed under extreme external pressure to lie about Mr Al-Megrahi, as to tell the truth would have meant exposing the cynicism and duplicity of American foreign policy during the eighties.
What pressure, then, may have been placed upon Mr MacAskill to lie so transparently over the Hollie Greig case?
The Prime Minister has authorised action in order to protect civilians in such countries as Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya and Mali.
What action does he now propose to take in order to protect defenceless British citizens in Scotland?

Wednesday, 13 March 2013

SUPPORT FOR TIMOTHY RUSTIGE
On Wednesday, 20th March, Timothy Rustige (Rusty), of Prisoners of Conscience International, is due to appear at an interim hearing at Aberdeen Sheriff Court at 10.00 hrs, facing a criminal charge. I would appreciate it if anyone in the area who believes in decency, justice and the protection of Scottish children and the disabled against sexual abuse, may be able to attend in support of Rusty.
Rusty was snatched from his home near Manchester in March last year by Grampian Police, had his home violated and was taken to Aberdeen and thrown into a police cell on the orders of Dame Elish Angiolini.
In comparison, we now know that Sir Jimmy Savile spent 50 years raping, molesting and terrorising defenceless children, the sick and disabled. He was never even arrested and it is known that the police actually threatened some of his victims with arrest , should they persist with their allegations against this great man, friend of Prime Ministers and the Royal Family.
An outside observer, unfamiliar with the current ways of Britain, would logically conclude that Rusty`s alleged crime, by definition, must be far worse than any of those attributed to Savile.
What unspeakable crime then, could Rusty possibly be accused of?
Well, it is said that he actually had the temerity of suggesting that the much-loved Dame Elish Angiolini may not be entirely suitable for a senior, publicly-funded post at St Hugh`s College, Oxford.
I know, it is shocking.
In defence of Dame Elish, she really does have many powerful and influential admirers. One group may include members of Scotland`s paedophile elite, who will doubtless be immensely grateful for her contribution in connection with Operation Planet in 1991, in trying to have certain sexual acts involving minors decriminalised.
Another section of devotees is certain to exist within the quaintly named “Scottish justice system”. Dame Elish bravely stood up against the Supreme Court, who ruled that those charged with crimes by the police in Scotland should be allowed to have a lawyer present at the time, under human rights legislation. To give her credit, Angiolini was having none of this “human rights” nonsense and maintained her stance, even when severely admonished by Lord Hope, of the Supreme Court (see the Peter Cadder ruling).
Finally, perhaps the most powerful of all her admirers may be found within the CIA, who must have greatly appreciated her keeping her mouth shut over as to who was really responsible for the Lockerbie bombing and by gallantly resisting all efforts to get to the truth, in her previous role of Lord Advocate.
There is much more to be said about Dame Elish`s public record, but this information should be enough to convince anyone to treat her henceforward with the degree of respect that she truly deserves.
On another point, it has been reported that Mr Cameron, on being questioned about the jailing of Chris Huhne, stated that it demonstrated that however high you may be, you are within reach of the law. The Prime Minister might try telling that to the victims of Jimmy Savile and Cyril Smith. To bring us up-to-date, he may also try telling that to the relatives of the 1,200 people who needlessly died at the hands of the NHS in Mid-Staffs. He may try telling that to Hollie Greig.
Can anyone be in doubt that we now live in a perverted, inverted country where right is wrong and wrong is right?

Friday, 8 March 2013

OPERATION YEWTREE/HOLLIE GREIG/ANGIOLINI
First, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to all of those people who were good enough to fill the Court on Wednesday in support of my challenge to Elish Angiolini`s legal action, which was intended to silence me. I was very moved that these kind people came along at very short notice, even from England, on a cold March morning in Edinburgh. May I also thank all those of you who were thoughtful enough to send me messages of support prior to the Hearing. It meant a lot to me and I know that this loyal backing means a great deal to Hollie.
I was treated very fairly by the sheriff, Lord Glennie, who adjourned the hearing until 1st May in order for me to obtain the level of professional legal representation he believed was necessary in order to defend myself against Angiolini. I am also grateful for the efficient manner in which I was represented by my Counsel, Laura-Anne Van Der Westhuizen. The next hearing is scheduled to be on Wednesday 1st May. There are no reporting restrictions.
Elish Angiolini appears to be under the impression that in spite of being an individual who is highly paid from public funds, she has been treated harshly by my criticism of her conduct whilst in public office. Any possible misunderstandings that she may perceive to exist could well have been resolved by now, had she not chosen to refuse to be cross-examined under Oath at my trial when cited to do so.
She did not appear at the hearing and neither did one of her chief lawyers, the highly controversial Professor Peter Watson of Levy & McRae. It is Watson who was behind the cruel and disgracefully unbalanced article that appeared in the Sunday Herald on 17th June 2012. What is there to be said about a powerful and influential man who is prepared to authorise a public attack on a defenceless and disabled woman rape victim?
Operation Yewtree approached me a few weeks ago following widespread public concern about the handling of  Hollie`s case. I was invited to be interviewed at the HQ in London and to provide copies of all expert witness supporting documents as well as those indicating the existence of Grampian Police corruption and the possible obstruction by leading figures in the Scottish establishment. The interviewing officers made it clear that due to the extraordinary circumstances surrounding the case and those connected to it, which included the mysterious death of Robert David Greig, it would need to be examined at a high level. I warned the officers that the Scottish authorities would place every possible obstacle in their path when Operation Yewtree tried to establish the truth about these horrific crimes.
The officers agreed that they could find no reason whatsover for the failure of Grampian Police to even question one of the 29 people, alleged perpetrators and fellow victims, named in my presence by Hollie before DC Lisa Evans on 8th September 2009. This utter and unjustifiable failure by the police was established at my trial.
All this has not prevented Mr John McSporran, of the Police Complaints Commission Scotland, from regurgitating Justice Secretary Kenny MacAskill`s ludicrous mantra that “a thorough police investigation had already taken place”. I have asked the current Commissioner, John McNeill, if he agrees with Mr McSporran. I have also asked him to confirm that he is aware of the contents of page 31 of the previous PCCS report that states that Grampian Police deliberately withheld two crucial expert witness statements from the Prosecutor. These documents were those of Dr Jack Boyle and Dr Eva Harding, which unequivocally supported Hollie`s claims and within the statements, four of the alleged perpetrators were actually named, as well as a reference to a previously recorded sexual offence by one of them. The PCCS at the time of the initial investigation were also aware that the police had intervened before Hollie`s first allegations, when Anne Greig had been injured to the extent that she had to spend one night in hospital after being hit over the head with a vacuum cleaner by one of those named in the aforesaid documents.
At least, I do understand now that the Scottish authorities have finally accepted that Hollie has been the victim of serious sexual crimes. As a competent and truthful witness, she has clearly named her attackers. What is the so-called Scottish justice system going to do about it?
Those who may also wish to discover why the PCCS appear to be preventing Operation Yewtree from instigating a proper inquiry into extremely serious sexual crimes should call 01698 542900.
The intervention of Operation Yewtree has come as a result of all the wonderful and persistent efforts from many of the readers of this blog. Your gallant perseverance in informing politicians and the media have also been highly influential and I thank you all for your decency, compassion and courage in trying to have a proper investigation into this terrible scandal, which like the Savile debacle, has resulted in defenceless children and the disabled suffering unspeakable ordeals as a result of the craven or acquiescent conduct of those we trust to protect our most vulnerable citizens.
Thank you all again for everything you have done over the past few years. Hollie Greig is an amazingly courageous woman. She deserves every support and so do all the other victims of such vile crimes perpetrated by Savile and those like him.

Friday, 1 March 2013

IN COURT IN EDINBURGH, WEDNESDAY 6TH MARCH
I am challenging the Citation issued on behalf of Elish Angiolini, which was designed to effectively prevent me from criticising her conduct in public office.
A hearing will be held at 10.00 hrs, at the Court of Session, Parliament House, Parliament Square, Edinburgh EH1 1RQ, case number A237/12. I shall be present, as emergency Legal Aid has just been granted to me, following months of effort, so that I can finally have an appropriate level of legal representation. The Court is open to both press and public and if anyone in the Edinburgh area would be so kind as to attend, it would be greatly appreciated.
Since being served the Citation on 15th May 2012, whilst I was still in prison and thus had no opportunity to challenge it at the outset, I have been persistently denied the Legal Aid I require in order to challenge what I believe to be an imposition on my right to freedom of speech. I also regard it as against the wider public interest, as it is linked to having the effect of partially suppressing issues related to the horrifying crimes committed against Hollie Greig.
Furthermore, it has been discovered that an objection had been lodged in order to block the application for the provision of the Legal Aid on which I was dependent. Clearly, this could only have been motivated by a desire to place me at a most unfair disadvantage in Court. In legal terms, as a foreigner in a country in which I do not reside and with no knowledge nor requirement to have knowledge of Scottish Law, it would have been utterly unacceptable and thus flies in the face of any civilised concept of justice. This situation would have been amplified further by the fact that my adversary is a wealthy woman with extensive knowledge of and influence within the Scottish legal system.
The identity of the individual responsible for presenting the objection remains a mystery. The senior partners of Angiolini`s two representing law firms, Alfred Tyler of Balfour Manson and Peter Watson of Levy & McRae refuse to comment. Who knows?
I must stress that the hearing is a procedural one, so that it is unlikely that any firm outcome will be reached, but if anyone can come along, I should be most grateful.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

Parents win damages against Baby P council

 photo SHOE2.jpg

above: from earlier

.####################################################################################

Thursday, 14 March 2013

Parents win damages against Baby P council

Parents win damages against Baby P council over social workers’ decision to investigate whether she was being ill-treated

  • Judge said Haringey Council’s social workers should not have investigated
  • They approached child’s GP and her school without parents’ permission
  • Child’s mother said her family had gone through ‘a nightmare’

By Anthony Bond PUBLISHED:17:40, 14 March 2013| UPDATED:17:55, 14 March 2013

    • The parents of a young girl have won High Court damages over an ‘unlawful’ decision by social services to investigate whether their child was being ill-treated or was at risk of suffering significant harm.

A judge ruled there was no basis on which the London Borough of Haringey’s social workers should have started the inquiry – including approaching the child’s GP and her school. Judge Anthony Thornton, sitting at London’s High Court, declared: ‘There was no evidential, reasonable basis upon which the inquiry could have been launched.

Pay out: The parents of a young girl have won High Court damages over an 'unlawful' decision by social services to investigate whether their child was being ill-treated or was at risk of suffering significant harm

Pay out: The parents of a young girl have won High Court damages over an ‘unlawful’ decision by social services to investigate whether their child was being ill-treated or was at risk of suffering significant harm

‘The defendant (Haringey) acted unlawfully in not seeking (the parents’) consent before approaching their child’s GP and school and without seeking information from them.’

The judge quashed the decision to commence the investigation, made under Section 47 of the 1989 Children Act, in May 2011. He also ordered Haringey to pay the parents, referred to as AB and CD, £2,000 to compensate them for the infringement of their Article 8 rights to ‘private and family life’ under the European Convention on Human Rights.

More…

The child’s mother, ‘AB’, who cannot be named for legal reasons, later described what had happened to her family as ‘a nightmare’. She said council social workers had acted ‘outrageously’ and added: ‘They thought they were completely unaccountable – but today they have been held to account by the court. ‘This is a landmark case for parents. One wonders how many families are out there suffering.’ It was revealed in court that the mother is herself a self-employed consultant working in the field of child protection and her husband a senior social worker.

Decision: A judge ruled there was no basis on which the London Borough of Haringey¿s social workers should have started the inquiry. Haringey council building is pictured

Decision: A judge ruled there was no basis on which the London Borough of Haringey’s social workers should have started the inquiry. Haringey council building is pictured

The judge said the decision to make inquiries about the six-year-old child was taken by Sylvia Chew, the head of Haringey’s Service for First Response (SFR), responsible for frontline child protection work. SFR had reacted to what was ‘highly likely’ to have been a ‘malicious’ tip-off. An unsigned letter dated March 11 2011, addressed to the council’s ‘social services child abuse department’, was received by SFR on April 15, said the judge. The anonymous writer claimed to be a neighbour of the family and wrote of having ‘some very big worries about how they are looking after the young girl in the house’. The writer asked Haringey: ‘Please could you make sure that the little girl is all right.’

The mother was described as ‘always shouting and screaming at the little girl’ and had been seen ‘pulling the little girl along by her arm and slapping her’. The letter went on: ‘The little girl looks so unhappy. She is not allowed to speak to anyone and when you see her in the street the little girl looks very sad and never raises her head to look at you.’ The judge said the only indication of a decision to launch an investigation under Section 47, which allows in-depth inquiries, was Ms Chew’s letter of May 5 2011 stating that ‘this department will be undertaking a Section 47 investigation’.

Tragic: Haringey council has faced devastating criticism in the past over the Baby P, pictured, and Victoria Climbie cases

Tragic: Haringey council has faced devastating criticism in the past over the Baby P, pictured, and Victoria Climbie cases

An SFR screening team made background inquiries which showed that the child had not come to the attention of the police. On April 26 2011 the team sent an information request form to the child’s GP without first obtaining the consent of the parents, said the judge. The form stated that SFR was ‘currently working with the family’ after a member of the public had reported ‘emotional and physical abuse’. The form sought information about the child’s health history, ongoing needs and about ‘possible abuse risk indicators’. The judge said the GP was ‘perturbed’ because the request form had not been signed by one of the child’s parents.

 

Gone: The former director of children's services at London's Haringey council Sharon Shoesmith is pictured

Gone: The former director of children’s services at London’s Haringey council Sharon Shoesmith is pictured

When he telephoned SFR, he was informed by a team member that, at that stage, ‘all that was asked for was the parents’ names and contact numbers and whether the GP had any concerns about the child’. The GP said the family were well-known to him and he had no concerns. The screening team also emailed the nurse at the child’s school and asked whether the school had any information to add. The judge said: ‘There was no answer from the school, which is not surprising since the parents’ consent to make these inquiries had not previously been obtained.’

The team was, however, able to obtain ‘no fewer than three mobiles and one landline telephone numbers for the family’ from the school and was also told the child was not known to social services. The case was then referred to Haringey’s First Response Team 1 (FRT1), and a student social worker member was tasked to contact the family and carry out further checks. The judge said the social worker, Mr Mamattah, telephoned one of the mobile numbers. ‘At that moment, CD (the father) was driving AB and himself back from a visit to his father and, having stopped the car at the side of the road, he answered the call at about 2.00pm.’

When Mr Mamattah explained that he was calling about his daughter, AB said he was ‘flabbergasted’ and that Mr Mamattah should speak to his wife, who worked in child protection. The judge said AB ‘reacted strongly’. With her knowledge of child protection procedures, it seemed to her that Haringey had made several serious errors in the way it had dealt with her daughter’s case. The judge ruled that AB had legitimate grounds for complaint. He said both parents were entitled to an order quashing ‘the purported Section 47 inquiry decision’, and a declaration that, in any event, no proper decision had been taken. The child was not at risk of significant harm and it was highly likely that the anonymous referral was malicious.

Haringey council has faced devastating criticism in the past over the Baby P and Victoria Climbie cases, in which social workers were condemned for failing to take action in time to save the lives of battered children. But today it was accused of acting too hastily and engaging in a knee jerk reaction in a case where parents were blameless. Lynne Featherstone, MP for Hornsey and Wood Green, said later: ‘Not only did Haringey Council act unlawfully throughout the investigation, they have also breached the Human Rights Act and will have to pay compensation accordingly. ‘This is a damning verdict. Yet again, Haringey children’s services have failed. Even after Baby P, they still have not managed to get the department in order. Haringey children, parents and residents deserve better.’

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2293432/Parents-win-damages-Baby-P-council-social-workers-decision-investigate-ill-treated.html#ixzz2NYHE83gw Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

BANNED from the UK: NATO Security Consultant because the “UK has been caught red handed stealing children”

cooperBANNED from the UK: NATO Security Consultant because the “UK has been caught red handed stealing children”

March 11, 2013

This 32 minute video [below] is another ‘story’ of child snatching – this time Sunderland County Council – naming the people responsible for

  • taking Nigel Cooper‘s daughter
  • dismissing him from NATO
  • trying to gag him and to accept British jurisdiction, even though he is a Belgian resident.

He is the quintessential English gentleman who has been put into exile for 10 years. He knows what he’s talking about:

  • a Principal Network Security consultant to NATO
  • who spent 22 years in the Royal Navy and earned 13 medals in the name of Her Majesty
  • and served for 7 years to protect children under the hospice of NATO.

Here he is the accuser

  • of the UK not just stealing his daughter but thousands of children for 80 plus years
  • “you stole my daughter”
  • “you are a plain thief”
  • the UK is stealing children for profit!

I will use this judgement

  • to bring down the UK
  • to free every single child in the UK that you’ve stolen.

Belgium has empowered me with this silver bullet [the judgement with highlights and emphasis added by the blogger]

I, Nigel Cooper, grant to every person the right to hold this document in the name of the Law. You are instructed in accordance with the Law.

The 32 minute video:

Posted byat
15:34
—————————————————–

MUST SEE!! videos: UK Column Live – 14th March 2013

UK Column Live – 14th March 2013 . from ukcolumn Louise Collins and Brian Gerrish with today’s news update including the DWP targets 120,000 families to reframe their behaviour, jobcentre staff force claimants to lie on their CVs, Prince Charles visits the regime financing Al Qaida in Syria, and the US Department of Defence rethinks giving medals to drone operators
————————-
UK Columnn Live -
Child Stealing By The State; The Bonnie Lewis Case . from ukcolumn on 14 Mar 2013
Brian Gerrish interviews Kevin Edwards who describes the Bonnie Lewis case, where Social Services kidnapped a 12 year old girl at gunpoint and using a false passport, while she was receiving medical treatment in the USA.

———————————
N.B. John Graham aka butlincat wishes to state categorically and emphatically that he is in no way aligned to one Sabine Mcneil or any of her alleged “organisations” or “sites”. Many people say she is working for the other side and he agrees with them!!
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

UPDATE MAURCE KIRK – 11 MAR 13

FROM M KIRK 11 Mar 13:
“Police Helicopter Chase Low Level Over Vale of Glamorgan Amusingly Fails to Catch Pilot Without a Licence in Court Tomorrow … County Court in Cardiff, tomorrow, 12th March, pilot’s 68th birthday, will disclose a a very dangerous escapade. Also, we continue the failed prosecution of the same pilot accused of breaching Sect 5 of Terrorism Act when flying to Eire  to hunt with the County Meath fox hounds, in a 1954 old two seat aircraft, out of a farmer’s field near Cowbridge! Do come as it willcould be as amusing as the last three weeks of a three month trial following 20 years of relentless  police bullying and bugger the cost
  Published Mar 11 2013, 05:19 PM by Maurice Kirk
source:

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

GRANDMA B UPDATE 11 MARCH 13

UK WAR ON PENSIONERS: ‘The Abuse of Grandma B’

February 9, 2013  By 1 Comment
How corrupt Officials are plundering the Assets of the elderly ‘Grandma B’ is now 83 years old
She is wheelchair-bound and very frail. The past four years of her life have been horrendous. She lost her husband of 60 years, but that was the easy part. She has also been the victim of sustained and systematic abuse in which she has been defrauded of her house, subjected to threats and harassment because she will not hand over her life savings to her abusers, then unlawfully evicted from her house and stranded abroad, with her abusers trying, fortunately unsuccessfully, to sell her house fraudulently.
You may well ask who would do such an awful thing to a little, old lady in a wheelchair. Sadly, most abuse takes place within the family and this is very much the case here. The main abusers are Grandma B’s older son, his wife and her two adult grandchildren.  Grandma B’s younger son was working abroad when he noticed something was very wrong. He immediately rushed back home, where his worst fears were confirmed.While he was travelling, his 87 year-old father was admitted to hospital with a serious heart complaint caused by neglect. His mother too was seriously ill due to neglect. His older brother and his family lived just around the corner, but had done little to help Grandma B and her very sick husband. A year before this, Grandma B and her husband had signed over their house to the older son and his family on the understanding they would care for them. Their younger son agreed to this, because he was living and working abroad and could not provide the level of care needed. Hardly was the ink on the agreement dry when the older son and his family started running Grandma B and her husband down, hoping they would pass on as soon as possible.When, in April 2008, the younger son arrived in the parental home, he was horrified by what he saw. He dropped what he was doing, gave up his job and home and became the full-time carer for his parents. His father led a full and happy life in his last months. His mother’s physical health has improved dramatically since the younger son took over her care.As soon as the younger son took over the care of his parents, the older son and his family started a campaign of harassment designed to drive him out of the parental home and to seize control of their finances. Matters reached such a level in September 2008, that the younger son reported the criminal offences to the police and the abuse to social services.What followed from there can only be described as a nightmare. The police made several attempts to arrest the carer on the basis of false allegations, while social services fabricated allegations against him in an attempt to have his powers of attorney revoked and the care of his parents placed in the hands of their abusers.A few days after the younger son made his complaint, the police arrived at the parental home to investigate a complaint he has “stolen” his parents’ money. They had no evidence to support this allegation made by the abusers, but refused to record a complaint of harassment by the abusers.

Social services blocked all attempts at getting the abuse investigated. Grandma B’s social worker made a false allegation of assault against her carer, an unfit, middle-aged man. Social services withdrew this allegation when they were shown evidence that the social worker was a black-belt in martial arts. His claim to have been overpowered and physically ejected from the parental home without injury looked a little ridiculous, to say the least.

On the morning Grandma B’s husband of 60 years died, the police unlawfully raided her house. They allowed her abusers to charge in, assault her and bawl insults at her over her husband’s still warm corpse. When her carer stood between her and her abusers to protect her, the police officers pushed him out of the way and threatened to arrest him.

In the following months, the abusers stalked Grandma B, attempted to break into her house and send her abusive letters. The police refused to uphold the law and arrest the criminals in question.

An independent investigation into Social Services’ handling of the case criticised them and required them to reopen the safeguarding investigation. Months later, they did, but the police and Social Services withheld all evidence of abuse.

Instead, they fabricated abuse allegations against the carer and applied to the Office of the Public Guardian to have his powers of attorney annulled. The Office of the Public Guardian established the allegations made by Social Services were false and rejected the application.

Grandma B then went on her wheelchair to a local council meeting to hand out a leaflet protesting about the way the police and social services were treating her. Her local ward councillors set police officers in stab-vests on to her, threatening to arrest her for distributing a “defamatory” leaflet. When her carer pointed out that defamation is a civil matter and not a police matter, the officers looked a little flummoxed, but still tried to prevent her from exercising her democratic right of peaceful protest. Grandma B is a veteran of the Second World War and stood her ground. When her carer called out to the police sergeant attending the meeting in front of the 30 or so members of the public present that she should arrest these officers for harassing a vulnerable person, they beat a hasty retreat. The sergeant refused to uphold the law.

Instead, two days later, the local police fabricated the first Harassment Warning against her carer. A couple of weeks later, they fabricated a second warning and were clearly intending to fabricate a third, at which point the carer could have been arrested. A file recently obtained from the Office of the Public Guardian shows this was planned to be on Christmas Day 2009, when the main abuser and corrupt police officers were planning to raid Grandma B’s house – unlawfully again, of course.

In the ensuing two years, the carer’s legal representatives both in Britain and abroad have made dozens of requests for sight of the evidence to support these unsigned, undated harassment warnings which are not legally valid. The police have produced nothing other than excuses and have refused every opportunity to sign these warnings for fear of perjuring themselves. The police inspector that issued the warnings took “early retirement” when challenged by the carer’s solicitor to produce the evidence.

Exhausted by this constant harassment, Grandma B went abroad on holiday for Christmas 2009. The police tipped off her abusers she was away from home, who then forced entry, changed the locks and unlawfully evicted her. After stealing her valuables in full view of the police, they tried to fraudulently sell her house. Fortunately, Grandma B’s solicitor prevented them from doing so.

However, her abusers and their friends in the police and local authority, then fabricated a kidnapping allegation against her carer. This request to arrest the carer went from the local CID to Special Branch, to SOCA, to New Scotland Yard, to Interpol London, Interpol in the country in question, then to the national police headquarters and provincial police headquarters before landing on the desk of a local police officer in a remote Alpine village.

The expectation here was obvious: the local country bumpkin plod would be so impressed by the provenance of this request that he would summon up reinforcements before daring to attempt to tackle this known, hardened, serious international criminal.

It did not quite work out like that. Two weeks before this request arrived, the police officer and his good wife had been among the many guests at the local pub at Grandma B’s 82nd birthday party. He had been sceptical about the stories he had heard about official corruption in Britain, but now he was supposed to arrest the carer for kidnapping his mother, holding her against her will and incommunicado. He obviously knew these allegations were false, but being a professional, he carried out a proper investigation. His report made it clear that the British police had knowingly lied to Interpol to help corrupt officers defraud a little, old lady on a wheelchair.

This attempt by corrupt British police to abuse honest local police officers to carry out criminal acts on their behalf is now under investigation by the local foreign ministry.

Had the carer not been so lucky, then the chances are he would have been remanded in custody pending extradition, while Grandma B would have been returned to Britain and to the tender mercies of social services. Her assets would then have been plundered and divided up between the gang of criminals running this racket.

There have now been five independent reviews of this case. All have called for it to be reopened. Both the police and local authority have ignored these requests.

So what is going on here and who is involved? The main abuser is employed by local social services. He, his wife and daughter have provided support services to the local police. They all know who the isolated old people in their area with assets are. It would seem they are systematically targeting defenceless old people and seizing control of their assets before bundling them off into a council home, then selling their assets. The cash then gets laundered through a dodgy private care company as “care fees” and the police officers, social workers, council officials and local politicians involved then pocket the money. The perfect crime, as who is going to listen to a confused, old lady in a home, whose contact with the outside world they are controlling?

This is rampant corruption and serious, organised crime. Nobody in authority in North Yorkshire will respond to correspondence and deal with this case.

Questions are now being asked in Parliament about this case. See here: http://www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2011-11-22a.220.0&s=speaker%3A10406+section%3Awrans#g220.1

source: http://21stcenturywire.com/2013/02/09/uk-war-on-pensioners-the-abuse-of-grandma-b/

—————————————————————————–
N + E Feldmeiers’s message to MP’s:
“IN AND FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST
Please would you HELP us?…
The council contractors are WITHOLDING OUR PASSPORTS,birth certificates and all other private documents including medical records/x rays,my mothers eight and half year childhood rape court case file etc etc………..(EVERYTHING WE OWN)
The council continue to fight us and have retained at tax payers expense etc:
DAVID CALLOW
12 KINGS BENCH WALK
TEMPLE
EC4Y 7EL
Please would you help in some way?
Local Authorities Contractors Masons Moving group Ltd are holding all our life-time-possessions/ belongings/irreplaceable sentimental belongings to ransom (unlawfully and illegally…

My mother and I became homeless in [31/07/08]. The Vale of Glamorgan local authority placed all our belongings with their contractors, Masons Moving Group Ltd (“Masons Ltd”) for safe keeping, whilst we were placed under a re-homing scheme.

When we were no longer homeless, Masons Ltd denied access/return, and continues to deny, access to / the return of our possessions. This has been for [11/05/09]. Masons are withholding all our possessions, which include passports, original birth certificates, as well as furnishings- beds/sofa/white goods, and irreplaceable personal effects.)Heritage/Original family photographs of us and all our loved ones/living and deceased…

Masons Ltd have put undue pressure [Duress/threatened blackmailed my mother to sign a contract [and pay £330 monthly fees or they would 'sell' or 'Dispose' all property] (which would give them authority to deal with our possessions). We declined to sign the contract. My mother is on Disability Living Allowance and I am main and only full time carer.[Ms E Feldmeier has numerous medical conditions (life threatening)

Mason’s Ltd provided me [2/03/11] with evidence of selling SOME our original family photographs including original framed photographs of ancestors and 1479 family tree…..

Further background.

I gave up my job to become a full time carer for my grandmother who required round the clock nursing care (was in a vegetative state due to medical negligence in 2001).

We were in accomodation that my grandmother kept falling in such confined places…The local Authority (HOMES4U) did not grant us any of our bids for a disabled friendly property,for which there were many so… Social Services (SS) (senior social worker Jayne Morgan) told us to move asap,and find a property in the private sector….and go for the first property that we could take reciept of a HOSPITAL BED,HOIST and all manner of nursing equipment…….(we remained in this property despite exceptional hardship and going without basic essentials to ensure we meet the shortfall (were there for 7 and half years)

However, we reached the point in [2008] when we could no longer afford the costs for rent and looking after my grandmother, because of the ongoing lack of support from the local authority….and the local authority said they would help provided we get the Estate Agent to execute a warrent of possession and effectually make us legally homeless to which the local authority said they would then have a duty of care towards my disabled seriously ill mother and myself.

The Local Authority has paid Masons in full (tax payer) out of public purse…

Masons are the councils contractors,there is no contract between us and the council or Masons….

Masons will NOT comunicate with us………………….we do not know where our LIFE TIME OF BELONGINGS are………

This case encompasses my mothers life and my grandmothers life……….
My mother is over 60 years old without an sofa,bed,washing machine….etc etc
(I am on aprox £1.53 per hour (Carers Allowence benefit) I/we can not afford to replace anything that is being held to ransom from us…
Nigh on eight years of child rape court files/case notes (highly sensitive and confidental) that may have been read by anyone…..
We have no beds,no sofa,no washing machine for three years todate…we cannot afford to replace anything….
They (councils contractors) have over £250,000 (and thats just the replaceable belongings/white goods etc) home/house contents….and all personal belongings……..(irreplaceable family heritage etc)
Before we tried court an two advocates were blocked by the council and Masons Moving group Ltd….
We have tried all over UK (by email/letter) for help with this matter.
Thank you

Nadia & Ellinor Feldmeier

#####################################

grandmabarbara

* RADIO INTERVIEW *

http://www.onetruemedia.com/otm_site/view_shared?p=11d595277423e9978346ffa&skin_id=701&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

[the interview above from "Anonymous Radio"]

The story of how corrupt police officers and social workers are abusing a little, old lady on a wheelchair

Grandma B on 01/10/2012•  Permalink

Posted in Uncategorized

Pages

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

LORD LEVESON TO HEAR MAURICE KIRK”S APPLICATION

ImageProxy

above:  M Kirk with the much persecuted Musa parents outside the RCJ, September 2011

Legal Battles

                 Lord Leveson to hear Maurice’s Application at The Criminal Court of Appeal sitting at Cardiff Crown Court on14th March 13

THIS WHAT IT IS ALL ABOUT

To stop this on going trial , currently in Cardiff County Court, for police now proven police criminal conduct and harassment damages,  from ever reaching cross examination stage, first it was ‘my possession of a machine gun ‘fiasco and then the State playing this fabricated medical ‘findings’, their ‘Gulag Card’, as seventeen years of police harassment, so far and HM assisted ‘treacle treatment; though Cardiff’s iniquitous law courts had failed to block the true state of both our law courts , prisons and police forces, right across The Principality.

09 09 03 MG Trans Redacted.pdf

Their Lordships, together with the documentary evidence that Dr X knowingly falsified, in the presence of South Wales Police officers, his Sect 9 countersigned witness statements, to obtain my false imprisonment, are to consider the ‘ramifications’ of the enclosed transcript from part of 4th May 12 ‘Breach of Restraining Order’ conviction hearing, now the  subject of their deliberations.

The transcript clearly indicates, just as in the 2010 ‘machine gun’ scandalous jury trial, l was refused even my legal papers and personal court exhibits even in the court room!

On 4th May 2012 His Honour Judge Curran QC, whilst I was forced to be absent due to requiring urgent medical attention, had refused me Dr X or any others, named, to be either my ‘character witness’ or as a ‘witness of fact’.

On 1st December 2011 District Judge John Charles had done exactly the same, in my absence, when he convict me for ‘harassment’ of Dr X following the publishing of further falsifed documents by Dr X, namely,  my series of NHS (Wales) Caswell Clinic psychiatric reports culminating, on 2nd December 2009, at Cardiff Crown Court, that I be further sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act, due to ‘significant brain damage’ and ‘possible cancer’, in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison.

Closer scutiny of my Caswel Clinic, Bridgend, medical records, discloses, as in his October 2009 psychiatric report, his other and most pressing reason as to why I had to be moved to Broadmoor or Ashworth was because of ‘veiled’ threats , he told me, of ‘reprisals’ by an old gentleman by the name of Norman Scarth!

T20120090 – Kirk – proc from 10.40 – 12.26 – 04.05.12.pdf

Experts in the field confirm there was no sign of relevant brain damage BEFORE Dr. X even writes the report without appropriate qualifications.

On 7th August 09, when he wrote his first released psychiatric report, [previous others only for MAPPA South Wales Police meetings], as His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC stated, when refusing, recently, to ‘strike out’ my one million pound damages claim against NHS (Wales), without evening examining his patient!

09 09 01radiologist scans report.pd

09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009  REDACTED.pdf

09 12 02 Transcript Crn Crt REDACTED.pdf

09 12 17  Court Hearing to Extend IPP.pdf

                    Published                    Mar 10 2013, 08:56 AM                    by                    Maurice Kirk
———————————————————————————————————————————
SCROLL DOWN FOR MORE UPDATES
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

UPDATE MAURICE KIRK 8 MAR 13 – POSITION STATEMENT

kirk2

above: M. Kirk stands ready  while Mr. T. Ewing, legal whizz contemplates  M Kirks legal documents outside Cardiff Civil Justice Centre on Day 1 of the neverending saga of the shocking mistreatment of Maurice Kirk by S Wales authorities.

Maurice Kirk = Position statement 7 Mar 13

Maurice Kirk v South Wales Police                       BS614159

8th March 2013

Claimant’s Position Statement

1. The Claimant has fear of becoming even more bored if senior and ex senior police officers, such as the court experienced yesterday, persist in continuing to ‘lie through their back teeth’ while everyone sits around doing nothing about it.

2. Yesterday’s Action ONE Para 8.26, Break- in to my Cardiff veterinary surgery, at 175 Cowbridge Road West, using a sledge hammer and crow bar) and my subsequent arrest, not theirs, for the ‘eviction of tenants’, ex police inspector ROBERT ROE stated, on oath, that the tenant’s six page 1995 witness statement of complaint was written by him stating both he, of Ely Police station , almost next door and ANTHONY GAFAEL, the other tenant, had entered the flat on that same date.

3. We had already heard from the police QC that it was not written by ROE but written by the investigating police officer in the case, a police officer ROCHE, yet to give evidence, who, in turn, will deny any knowledge of my Barry police station arrest by two plain clothes, my being in breach of the Tenancy Act, no, I was only arrested once and by a uniformed officer, for the one charge of ‘criminal damage’!

4. I am bemused as to how both ex senior police officers, with usual “I know nothing” mentality and with repetitive ‘selective amnesia’ tricks, are not immediately arrested for perjury unless Principality courts are all like this?

5. Chief Inspector Genner said he, following a telephone call from his distraught daughter, drove straight to the surgery and saw Roe while and advised his daughter to have no further involvement in the matter.

6.  Was it a ‘Trojan team’ from police higher command, to break in and re insert Alison into her flat, that Genner saw at the surgery because Roe said he never saw him?

7. Both ROE and Genner bluntly denied ‘any knowledge’ of what happened after their single visit to my surgery, one seeing his daughter with her property, some purported ‘stolen’ and some suffering purported ‘criminal damage’, while the police officer also said he ‘washed his hands of the affair’, saying it was a civil matter for the County Council, possibly and even wrote a report to them!

8. AND yet no police, so far, remember my much detailed statement of complaint, with photographs, of the thousands of pounds of water damage done by these bone fide two tenants causing the ceiling of my operating theatre to collapse onto my operating table fortunately not while I was at work.

9. The Chief Constable, Barbara Wilding, denied knowledge of any of this affair, in her 25th Feb 09 sworn affidavit just as she did for the police, to be heard today, mysteriously only now disclosing their existence some near 20 years after the event!

10.  Some to give evidence to day even when Ex Police inspector Sydney Griffiths was, back in 2006, commissioned to establish the truth of my then twenty three incidents of complaint and Force Solicitor, Leighton Hill, advising for the preservation of all original documents, specifically for this three month running trial.

APPLICATION ISSUEs TO BE RAISED IN COURT  11. The Claimant now applies, under the rules of ‘best evidence’, for sight of all original witness statements as the Police legal team have stopped examining their own witnesses, whilst on oath, while the ‘burden of proof’ remains on them.

12. An interim payment by the Defendant for damages claimed to indicate, if nothing else, some semblance of ‘Equality in Arms’

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

###############

further articles by Maurice from this hearing can be found @ http://www.kirkflyingvet.com

kirk2a

what its all about – M Kirks priceless legal files which have taken forever to get together…

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

THE MUSA CASE – 7 children gone…

[size=12pt][b]All over the country many children are being removed from good families under the most dubious of circumstances by town councils, SS and others, often in via the Secret Family Courts. When told about irregularities in cases the authorities do nothing. It is time it was stopped. [/b]

[img]http://i511.photobucket.com/albums/s357/butlincat/MUSASKIRKRCJAUG11a-1.jpg[/img] Chiwar and Gloria Musa outside the RCJ, August 2011 with the very much victimised Maurice Kirk’

THE MUSA CASE – 7 CHILDREN REMOVED BY A COUNCIL :

On the 8 April 2010 at around 4pm 8 policemen let themselves in by key to the Musa family council home and removed the Musa’s 5 children without any notice or prearrangement. The children were removed on what later were found to be totally untrue allegations made by certain employees at Y council. All allegations have been disproven, the allegations ranging from the children not being the Musas offspring and were being trafficked, to the children being beaten and generally mistreated by their parents. Regarding the child trafficking allegation that the children were not the Musas offspring and they were part of a child trafficking network, DNA tests instigated by the Musa parents taking an unusually phenominally long time to undertake proved without a shadow of a doubt that the children were indeed the Musas children, proving also the children were in no way being trafficked in any shape or form. After this allegation was disproved other equally ridiculous allegations were made to keep the children from returning to their once happy home. One such allegation  was that Gloria Musa was an active sex worker – a prostitute – who plied her trade not only in front of and with her church congregation but also in front of her children. She is, in fact. an ordained bishop in the Evangelical Church of Africa and is not and has never been what this allegation alleges. This ridiculous allegation was made with no evidence of any kind to substantiate it yet the court believed this nonsense, along with other unsubstantiated allegations such as the children being beaten by the parents, even though medical examinations made when the council took the children showed no sign of anything to back their allegations of cruelty by the parents towards their children. Even though the allegations were proven groundless never was it mentioned that the children were to be returned to their parents as they should have been, of course. Quite the opposite in fact took place in that a 6th child was removed from the Musa parents, the hitherto unborn baby at the time of the April 8 2010 child removals. The baby x6 was stolen once at her birth, the violence of the police during the removal operation in the hospital at 3 in the morning directly after Gloria had just given birth nearly killing this defenceless mother {she is still suffering appalling injuries to this day which the prison,for she is in prison {see update below} will not address by denying her proper medical treatment}.

The baby was returned later after a matter of weeks, but was stolen again on even more dubious allegations on June 28th 2011, and the parents have not seen the baby since that date. The baby’s removal, like the entire case, needs an honest investigation away from the entities already involved.

Around 4 months after the children were removed the eldest, now 12 year old x1, complained of being “inappropriatly touched” – sexually molested in other words – by the teenage habitee of the home she was placed in. Ever since this child complained of this appalling sexual harrassment, in August 2010, all contact visits ordered by the court ceased – which was against all the orders the courts themselves made, against the governments “Childrens Charter” {which actually promotes contact between removed children and their parents}, and against the entire familiy’s Human Rights. For the child X1 not to have been seen for over 18 months since she claimed of being a victim of sexual abuse is surely outrageous. Nor has anybody from the Nigerian High Commission seen any of the children either during this entire period – especially after an injunction was put in place to stop anyone from the Commission seeing the children when the parents were imprisoned on remand the 28th November 2011 – some of the diplomats at the Commission are actually Godparents of some of the Musas’ children – and for over 18 months from when the child made the allegation of sexual abuse to her parents they did not know whether the child was alive or dead, or was even in this country as the council refused not only to allow any contact visits  but also refused to give any details whatsoever about the child when the parents enquired after her wellbeing. This is surely disgraceful and plainly cruel – the child was made to simply vanish from her parents lives to be never seen again. The council had also allegedly changed this childs name – this article on “Parent Alienation Syndrome” shows how changing a childs name, location and lifestyle can turn her away from her loving parents and all she knew before her removal – a psychological “confidence trick” to which some vulnerable children can easily be made to succomb to – with or without prescribed medication. Often the entire trauma of the forced breakdown of the childs former loving family life helps the new identity take root – it is a form of Mind Control:

[url=http://www.coeffic.demon.co.uk/pas.htm]http://www.coeffic.demon.co.uk/pas.htm[/url]

Although commonly used in divorce cases it can of course be used to alienate parents after the child is moved into a foster home.

Recently on the 28th June 2011 the Musas took their baby x3 to Z hospital, London as they thought she seemed to have a fever – a temperature. This was enough for Z council to arrange for the police to remove the baby, claiming minutes later she had been administered hard drugs, even though tests taken by medical staff at the hospital at the time proved negative for all drugs in not only the baby but also in both parents. Nevertheless an Emergency Protection Order {EPO} was placed on the baby immediately and she has been removed from the Musa family and not seen by them since, even though the reasons for the baby’s removal are totally fictional. At a court hearng on the 7th July the judge, who happened to be the original judge who ordered the removal of the other 5 children, believing the Z councils allegations, confirmed he would be issuing an Interim Care Order {ICO} on the newly taken baby, thus effectively removing her from the parents care, when a 2 week period was up. This he duly did, and the x3 has not now been seen since 28th June 2011, some 16 months ago from the date of her removal. For no contact visits to be allowed during this period is totally illegal, against all orders the court has made regarding the childrens contact visits with their parents, against the “Childrens Act” and against the parents and baby’s Human Rights.

Allegations by the council, in the early stages of this case, were that Gloria Musa was given opium by her stepfather whilst in the UK as a teenager. These are complete lies, yet were part and parcel of the allegations used to remove and keep these children. Gloria Musa has no stepfather, has never taken opium at any time, and was not in the UK as a teenager. This is just one totally false allegation fabricated by the council and used in the removal of the Musa children. It has been said by the president of the secret closed family courts that “professionals dont lie”. This in itself is completely untrue which should be ignored completely always. There is overwhelming evidence of lies being told in this Musa case let alone numerous other cases of child removal in the UK, such as the cases of Vicki Haigh, Maureen Spalek, Cheryl Stannard, Eve Pears, the Baylis family, Paul Manning and many more – which of course is completely unacceptable. The people removing the children are public servants and are not paid to act like this – their wages are paid partly by the very people having their children removed under seemingly very dubious circumstances – it is wrong. The figures are at an all time high [from 14 April 2012]:

[url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2128987/Children-stolen-state.html]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2128987/Children-stolen-state.html[/url]

and are likely to increase {from the tv news 28 Dec. 2012]:

[url=https://vimeo.com/56277626]https://vimeo.com/56277626[/url]

Many other irregularities and anomalies exist in this outrageous case, from outright witness intimidation {see a witness’s story here:

[url=http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/qbgf23]http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/qbgf23[/url]

to much more.  The court orders concerning contact visits with the children have not been adhered to by the agency responsible for them on scores of occasions, and nothing has ever been done about this, causing much unneccassary grief, worry and financial hardship for these parents who seem to have been targetted by Haringey council employees and those connected to it. Supporters have written hundreds of emails and many letters sent by postal recorded delivery to MPs and other so-called “authority figures” {such as police and a Chief Constable} all of which have been totally ignored, and have made each and every person told absolutely aware of so many irregularities an and crimes committed in this appalling case and who exactly has undertaken what is described. Even so nothing is ever done about anything by anybody clearly and concisely told about the unacceptable events, even when trying to inform them of 9 year old girl x1 {at the time} being sexually molested by a teenager she was sadly placed at the home of. The Musa parents were remanded in prison on the 28th November 2011 and after a trial which began in May 2012 and lasted 6 weeks approx. they were found guilty of “mistreatment of their children” {see update below} and sentenced to 7 years each, and to be deported immediately on release back to Nigeria.

By a “balance of probabilities” at a Family Court last November at a 6 day hearing the verdict was given in favour of the prosecutions case. Injunctions against me forbid me to say any more about this, but the Musa parents are far removed from anything to do with what is alleged and did not even have legal representation for that important hearing as they simply couldnt get any, and they have not had legal representation for most of the legal hearings held, as not only can legal representatives not be got to represent the family for some strange reason as i said, but those that do take the case on strangely “change” after a couple of weeks to act in a way completely opposite to that which they should, viz. they stop acting in the parents interests. The legal profession is a very closely knit one – so many are “pals” with the “you scratch my back and ill scratch yours” attitude and many are previous colleagues even and word soon gets about which cases are a “no-no” and those which have a “tick” by their name – those “no-no”s seem to be protected by secrecy laws and dubious “high-ups” {who we the tax-payer pay the salaries of] who cannot afford any more public scandals such as the very sad “Baby P” case, of which it is well known Haringey council played a major part, {see:  [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Baby_P]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Baby_P[/url] } and sadly we all know what happened to poor Peter Connolly, R.I.P.  Bless him and may he be at peace always…

There is a list of solicitors I personally have who’s actions leave much to be desired who most definately have not acted in their clients interests in this case – like, for example, not turning up for an important hearing as they were supposed to as Mr. Paul K-W didnt. The list is long and it is such a shame things have come to be how they are.

The sentencing at the Musa’s trial was given on the August 14 2012 at Z crown court. [see below for update}. A whistleblower from the crown court where the trial was held for the criminal case against the Musa parents has said the jury was not picked as it should have been - from the Electoral Roll etc.. Rather, it was handpicked by certain parties. Also questions must be asked as to the eligibility of the judge who presided over the trial.  The defence team did not do their jobs in so many ways, or they knew about certain things and did not act correctly as they should have. Much is to be said about their legal prowess which varied from sheer utter incompetance to blind ignorance of the basic facts of the case. The Musa family are paying dearly for these characters mistakes, deliberate and not and were, sadly, in a "no win" situation.   One can imagine that this case which began really around Christmas of 2009 has many twists and turns, but not only that but numerous irregularities and even outright crimes exist, undertaken by people who know better. The evidence for all I allege can be produced at any time.      These are just the basic facts of this harrowing case but so many more irregularities exist, and it is such a shame this has to be written at all.

This is a true sworn statement and I contend a factual opinion of what has taken place and any further details can be given on request from me John Graham adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk.

Video: The Musa Case - The Irregular Interim Care Order Hearings:

[url=http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=112fcc1c0f20e8dd7545242&skin_id=3000&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url]http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=112fcc1c0f20e8dd7545242&skin_id=3000&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url[/url]

——————————————————————————————

UPDATE  16  AUG.  2012   The Musa parents received 7 years imprisonment on the 14 Aug. 2012 at Y Court, and are to be deported to Nigeria immediately on finishing their sentence. They have served already 259 days leading up to today in custody in  prison.   Although grief stricken on receiving this verdict they bore the outrage with dignity before being dragged away from the glass-lined witness box to be taken back to their respective prisons to begin their completely unjust sentences.   Chiwar called at 7.30 pm and seemed very reasonable in the circumstances.   A great travesty of justice was performed today.   An appeal will be lodged alongside the appeal for the conviction itself.   There needs to be a thorough honest investigation and enquiry into the entire Musa case of their 7 children being removed by the UK government, where so many irregularities exist, along with contraventions of court orders, and blatant breaches of every family members human rights time and time again. Regarding unanswered irregularities, as of the 9 Sept. 2012 there is still missing electronic data connected to the 2nd youngest baby x3′s medical records on her entry into hospital on the morning of 28 June 2011 that needs to be addressed, and also a handwritten “letter” allegedly written by the eldest Musa daughter x1, now 12, has never been officially confirmed as being written by her by any trained official graphologist but should have been. There is the unaddressed allegation that x1 suffered sexual abuse at the hands of the teenage member of the household she was placed with immediatly on being removed from her family in April 2010. The police have refused to investigate  properly in any shape or form anything regarding this matter, even though I have officially notified the Chief Constable of Dorset 3 times about this, along with every MP time and time again along with other government departments.  These last 3 matters mentioned have not been addressed properly at all by the Musa’s legal representatives, who seem to have shirked completely certain responsibilities they clearly have regarding the important subjects just mentioned.

Other subjects exist too that need to be addressed but havent been, such as the childrens contact visits with their parents not taking place {for over 18 months in the case of the eldest child x1}, the worthless travel warrants issued to the Musa parents for the contact visits, which were continuously given even though the council were fully aware the travel warrants the Musas were given were worthless and unusable, and the feasance and malfeasance etc of the childrens “guardian solicitor”, for whom the Solicitors Regulation Authority refused to investigate time after time when official complaints were issued to them regarding her irresponsible, unprofessional and often criminal behaviour along with the Legal Ombudsman who also ignored notifications of serious wrongdoing by this rogue solicitor. Indeed, when I complained to the Legal Ombudsman about the actions of the SRA refusing to deal with the irresponsible behaviour by the children’s “guardian solicitor” and about my other grievances I was informed that the department was “closed” to me on these matters! “Closed” indeed!

The prisons the Musas are resident at have consistently failed to provide the proper care and responsibility they are supposed to – mail to the Musas is often undelivered to them or takes weeks to get to them, prearranged visits are denied whereby visits are officially made yet when the visitors go they are denied seeing either Musa, and more – but the most serious inaction by Holloway womens prison is regarding the medical care Gloria is and was supposed to receive whilst resident with them – that medical care being almost nonexistent most of the time even though numerous government agencies have been notified time and time again about the situation.     Chiwar has never ever set eyes on his newborn son born on March 10 2012, let alone ever hold him in his arms, and Gloria has only ever had a fleeting glimpse of her new son during birth and at no time since. They may never see any of their children ever again, as everything will be done to discourage any knowledge of anything to do with their children ever reaching these victimised and tortured parents once their lengthy prison sentences are completed and they are deported back to Africa. It is a public scandal and what has and is happening and something needs to be done about it immediately lest anything like this ever happens to any innocent victims ever again.   >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>   1} In this video {15 Aug. 2012} UK Column’s Brian Gerrish mentions the Musa case at 22 minutes in =    N.B.  =  BEGINS AT 21 MINUTES IN:   [url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EHugZXDc7sY#ws]UK Column Live – 15th August 2012[/url]   2}  Video: The Musa Case – The Irregular Interim Care Order Hearings: [url=http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=112fcc1c0f20e8dd7545242&skin_id=3000&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url]http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=112fcc1c0f20e8dd7545242&skin_id=3000&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url[/url]

3}  Reporter Christopher Bookers articles for the “Sunday Telegraph” on this case {these links stop Aug. 2011 – more articles exist} =   [url=http://mauricejohnkirk.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/11-08-03-sunday-telegraph.pdf]http://mauricejohnkirk.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/11-08-03-sunday-telegraph.pdf[/url]   4}  April 2008 Daily Mail = “Baby P council falsely accused me of abusing a child, reveals whistleblower who feared she’d lose her daughter.” {By Eileen Fairweather} =   [url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1086196/Baby-P-council-falsely-accused-abusing-child-reveals-whistleblower-feared-shed-lose-daughter.html]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1086196/Baby-P-council-falsely-accused-abusing-child-reveals-whistleblower-feared-shed-lose-daughter.html[/url]

5}  Figures at an all time high for children being removed from families, most often good, loving ones – Daily Mail April 12 2012 =   [url=http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2128987/Children-stolen-state.html]http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2128987/Children-stolen-state.html[/url]   6} The African publication “The Leadership”‘s articles are just 2 of many African exposes on the case:

[url=http://leadership.ng/nga/articles/5282/2011/09/17/british_journalist_writes_jonathan_over_seized_nigerian_children.html]http://leadership.ng/nga/articles/5282/2011/09/17/british_journalist_writes_jonathan_over_seized_nigerian_children.html[/url]

[url=http://leadership.ng/nga/articles/4068/2011/08/21/british_govt_detains_nigerian_couple%E2%80%99s_six_children.html]http://leadership.ng/nga/articles/4068/2011/08/21/british_govt_detains_nigerian_couple%E2%80%99s_six_children.html[/url]

7]  Children waiting for adoption figures at all time high:

[url=https://vimeo.com/57835089]https://vimeo.com/57835089[/url]

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

INTIMIDATION OF WITNESSES IN THE MUSA CASE

“This:   [url=http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/qbgf23]http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/qbgf23[/url]   is a heartrending account of a friend of the Musas. Read it and hear your heart friends. The truth will come out, we know this. The Musas are strong and they are not counterfeit ministers parading around in sheep’s clothing. They are true born again believers who are spirit-filled and yes they believe in power evangelism and the baptism of the Holy Spirit and the gifts.    We know there are fraudsters and there is the counterfeit church. Throughout the bible Jesus warns us to beware of those who call Him Lord but He will say depart from Me I never knew you. The Musas will look to the Lord through this as they have Christians around the world fasting and praying for them three days every single month and praying daily for the truth to come to the fore. I have faith in the people of this nation, the general public, but sadly my faith in the government and the state church has diminished. Did you know the man presiding over the Musa criminal trial is an ordained Anglo Catholic minister and a deacon in the Ordinate? Gloria Musas is an Ordained Bishop in the African Evangelical Church and her husband is an Apostle. What a conflict of interest?   Also Judge REDACTED said: ‘She styles herself as a Bishop!’ Gloria Musa does not ‘style’ herself as a Bishop, she IS a Bishop. She is a Nigerian bishop. When she writes to me from Holloway prison, she signs the letter Bishop Gloria. So many good men and women have been imprisoned for righteousness sake. Dig deep into your hearts readers and ask the question: what is the truth in all of this? Jesus said: If you seek the truth with all your heart, soul and strength you will find it.   Jesus is the truth, the way and the life! There is no other way.   The Musas came here to evangelise the UK; they came as missionaries. Google Musas, Haringey and you will get mountains of information, their facebook pages, You Tube Channel, Judge’s Judgement’s, witness statements, videos of facts…..it’s all available on the world wide web. We don’t need to rely on the main stream media who don’t investigate and get to the heart of the matter.

Where is justice when we cannot have a voice?

by Jackie H.” ———————————————————————————

For more on the Musa case, Maurice Kirk, the Baylis family, Norman Scarth:

[url=http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com]http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com[/url]

…butlincat.[i][/i][/b][/size]

Maurice Kirk, Musa campaigner, at present in Cardiff prison for the 3rd time in the past 12 months on totally dubious “charges” – pls see my wordpress blog for recent phone calls from Cardiff prison + his case- + see videos on youtube, one being [url=http://www.youtu.be/a3xl4TvHtOE]http://www.youtu.be/a3xl4TvHtOE[/url]

——————————————-

see more / source:  http://truth-wars.co.uk/forum/index.php/topic,68.msg125.html#msg125

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

MAURICE KIRK HEARING 7 MARCH 13

a m kirk...aa  2 01-12-11_1812MAURICE KIRK HEARING – TODAYS OFFICIAL REPORT TO COME: STOP PRESS

Tomorrow 7th March Police Defend Their Smashing Their Way into my Surgery with Sledge Hammer and Crow Bar

14th Day of Three Month Damages Trial

The fun starts 10.30am at Cardiff Civil Justice Centre…..bring a packed lunch and a friend, fineFrench cigars and candy floss served at the interval

Court Order prevents me from publishing the vital exhibits but it is a public hearing…..remind me, every one for me to ask permission of the trial judge that you can take notes (on my behalf) as things are going to move quickly, in order for Defendant to steam roller over the truth.

FACTS:  as to what happen at my Cardiff surgery around 6th June 1995 concerning an alleged eviction of supect drug dealer and his Mol

£1000 for eye witnesses to this multiple police incident at 175 Cowbridge Road West CARDIFF (next to Reptile shop), surgery being now the ‘last thing’ in two wheel transport…..’Mr Scooter’ (Cardiff)….google and see

————————————–

source: http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2013/03/06/stop-press-tomorrow-7th-march-police-defend-their-smashing-their-way-into-my-surgery-with-sledge-hammer-and-crow-bar.aspx

see http://www.kirkflyingvet.com  for much more …:

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | 1 Comment

MORE OUTRAGEOUS VICTIMISATION!! – FROM N SCARTH 5 + 6 MAR 13

Letter from Treasury Solicitor:

“The Attorney General willl drop the case if you promise to stop exposing corruption”.  !!!

(For those with the stamina to coninue following this saga.  Only a 1,000 words this time). NS.


From: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk To: civilappeals.registry@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk Subject: 2013//P1/10211. AG v S. Further Grounds(3) Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 13:36:23 +0000

N.Scarth ref: AG-v-S-130306-Grnds4Appeal-3           Civil Appeal Ref:2013/PI/10211To the Civil Appeals Registry civilappeals.registry@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk.

Your ref: 2013/PI/10211                                 (again sent as an attachmnet for ease of printing).

QB Case Number CO/3898/2012 Attorney General v Norman Scarth.

Appeal against the ORDER by Lord Chief Justice Lord Igor Judge, 23rd January 2013.

FURTHER GROUNDS FOR APPEAL.

THIRD INSTALMENT OF GROUNDS FOR APPEAL

(1) The further one looks into this matter, the dirtier it becomes.The more desperate the legal professionals are to silence me, the more they ignore the law which they purport to uphold.

(2) In Lazarus Estates v Beasley, CA 1956, Denning & Parker, LJJ ruled that “Fraud vitiates everything.”Denning LJ said: “No judgment of a court, no order of a Minister, can be allowed to stand if it has been obtained by fraud. Fraud unravels everything.”Parker LJ observed that fraud vitiates all transactions known to the law of however high a degree of solemnity.

(3) There has indeed been fraud involved in this matter.If the Attorney General contests this appeal, he will no doubt claim that the Denning/Parker ruling was that the fraud must have been proved, & that is true.This is where tacit collusion between the various branches of the legal profession come into play.

(4) I currently have three actions in the High Court concerning fraud against me (along with other criminality).The Attorney General’s Application to put me in a Stalinist Nuthouse has been progressed by what might be called the ‘attacking’ side of the Treasury Solicitor’s Dept.The OTHER side of his Dept. (Stephen Jones & others) along with several ‘Masters’ in the RCJ are deliberately blocking those High Court actions of mine, for the ulterior motive of preventing the fraud being proved.

(5) Fortunately, I do not have to rely on the Lazarus Estates ruling.There is the Nixon v Lowndes case (Kings Bench Irish Reports of 1910[?]) In that case it was ruled: ‘If, in the course of a civil action, the suspicion of crime comes to light, the civil action MUST be suspended until the criminal matters have been investigated.’ NOTE:It says the SUSPICION of crime!

(6) LCJ Lord Judge ignored this most important ruling.He had before him evidence of serious crime against me in the lead up to this matter, including pictures of the result of a brutal kicking inflicted on me by West Yorkshire Police.He even mentioned the pictures in his Judgment, but seemed to consider the brutal kicking of an old man as of no importance! (My manifesto as a candidate for the 1997 General Election is relevant here:I may refer to it later.)

(7) Not only was there criminality in the months & years leading up to this matter, but serious crime by James Spybey of the Treasury Solicitor’s Dept. during the course of the action, blatantly evidenced in one letter from him to Bindmans Solicitors.

(8) That letter, dated 3 October 2012, ref Z1204309/ZER/B$ says, inter alia, “… if your client provides a written undertaking not to repeat his contemptuous behaviour, the Solicitor General would, of course, reconsider the public interest in continuing with proceedings.”

(9) ALL my actions for the last 17 years have been for the purpose of exposing the corruption which, regrettably, is rampant in our courts.Nothing is MORE ‘In the Public Interest’.

(10)The letter makes it absolutely clear that the purpose of this action has been to stop me exposing corruption, & the offer to drop the proceedings is an inducement to me to do so.This is seriously criminal on many levels, yet Lord Judge is again blind to the fact.

(11)I may of course be wrong.Perhaps corruption is not rampant in our courts?Perhaps there is no corruption at all?Perhaps all our judges are saints, incapable of sin?

(12)Perhaps it is as Lord Denning said in one of his lectures to the Holdsworth Club at Birmingham University, “No English judge has been biased for the last 300 years”.

(13)This was rather contradicted by his words in Sirrus v Moore, 1974, in which he said, “No matter that (a judge) be motivated by the utmost malice, greed, envy & all uncharitableness, he is not liable to any action”.This self-proclaimed immunity was falsely proclaimed, but accepted as the word of God ever since.

(14)It was contradicted even more when he said, “Better that innocent men should remain in prison than that the integrity of the judiciary be impugned”.

(15)This was in gross contempt of his own Judicial Oath, & that of the Sovereign, in whose name he purported to act.Those very words belie that ‘integrity’.Those very words show they are not the Demi-Gods they proclaim themselves to be, but mortals, with all the faults & failings that mortals are heir to.

(16)Many, including successive Governments, Parliaments, the so-called ‘News Media’ (of whom Josef Goebbels would have been proud), the Prison Service & the ECtHR, secretly agree with Denning, though they do not admit it as plainly as he did.

(17)Only once or twice a century is a senior judge forced to resign, as happened to Mr Justice Harman (c 1998), when QCs accused him of being ‘Rude, slow, & knowing little of footballers or pop-singers”. If those were the only faults we could count ourselves lucky. There are others guilty of far worse who continue in office.

(18)We all know what happens to the rest of the apples in a barrel if the rotten ones are not removed.Therein lies the reason for the state of ‘Justice’ in present day Britain.Behind the facade of ‘Democracy’, the nation is ruled by an oligarchy as bad as in any Banana Republic, or other Totalitarian State of the past.

(19)As I have said elsewhere, this matters little to me at my age (& feeling safe in the Republic of Ireland), but I was once proud to be British, & hate to see the current state of the nation, a nation where Right & Wrong have been turned upside down, back to front & inside out. STATEMENT OF TRUTH:The facts as stated above are true to the best of my knowledge, belief & recollection.

Norman Scarth, Wednesday 6th March 2013.

NORMAN SCARTH WRITES:  29 09 12

WHY SHOULD NORMAN SCARTH PAY A PENNY TO THESE DUBIOUS CHARACTERS WHEN GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES HAVE ROBBED HIS LIFSAVINGS IN THE PAST?? 

THIS IS CONVENIENTLY FORGOTTEN BY THESE INHUMAN GOVERNMENT CRONIES!!

TS OUTRAGEOUS ANYONE COULD EVEN THINK OF THESE CHARACTERS GETTING DIRTY MONEY THE WAY THEY SET OUT BELOW, BY STEALING IT FROM NORMAN SCARTH!!

#                              #                                   #

From: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk

To: paul.mitchell@tsol.gsi.gov.uk

CC: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk

Subject: Please pass my thanks to Master Eastman. Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2013 00:53:08 +000

To the Masters Support Unit.
Re. HQ12X00738.  Scarth v Secretary of State for ‘Justice’(????) & 2 others.
I confirm receipt of of the mail as below, & the ORDER of ‘Master’ Eastman attached to it.
‘Be you never so high, the law is above you’.
‘Be you never so low, the lawyer is below you’. I note that Eastman’s ORDER says: -
“The Claimant’s Claim against the first, Second & Third Defendants be struck out as being totally without merit. The Claimant do pay the First, Second & Third Defendants’ joint costs of the action assessed in the sum of £1,748 to be paid within 28 days.” 
Knowing that the corruption of the legal profession in Britain runs from the top judge in the land (currently Lord Chief Justice Lord Igor Judge) to the bottom, I started this action, & others, NOT with any hope of success, but simply to obtain more evidence of the corruption.
Please express my gratitude to ‘Master’ Eastman for providing it.
It is a fact that all over the world, the profession of lawyer is despised more than any other.   It is also a fact that in Britain the worst of them become judges.   . It a tragedy beyond words that millions of men gave their lives in World War 2, then to find that Britain is a country where subhuman shyster Quislings such as Eastman (without shame, conscience or soul), can so abuse their power, glorying in what they believe to be their untouchability,   Such conscience as they have is ‘for hire’.
“The times they are a’changing”.  Many who were equally sure of their untouchability are finding they are not.
   Norman Scarth. PS: Such is the incompetence of Court Service staff (the least of their faults), you can’t even get the title of the case right.  Do you file it under  ‘You’?.
PPS:
And what if I don’t pay within 28 days? 
What is Master Eastman going to do about it?

From: Paul.Mitchell@TSOL.GSI.GOV.UK

Subject: You v Secretary of State for Justice & 2 Ors
RE: HQ12X00738
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2013 16:09:53 +0000 Dear Mr Scarth

I write further to the hearing that took place on 27 February 2013 before Master Eastman and attach herewith a copy of the Order made, which is self-explanatory.

I will send you a sealed copy as soon as we have received the same from the Court.

Please acknowledge receipt of the same.

Yours sincerely

Paul Mitchell

Litigation Group A1

T 020 7210 3444| F 020 7210 3250

Treasury Solicitor’s Department

One Kemble Street | London | WC2B 4TS

DX 123242 KINGSWAY

SCARTH BEATING 1 10 11SEE BELOW FOR MORE ARTICLES

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

THE HOLLIE GREIG CASE IS VERY REAL!! – HOLLIE GREIG NEWSLETTER – 3 MARCH 2013

hgHOLLIE GREIG NEWSLETTER – 3 MARCH 2013

Perhaps the police and other assorted spooks who are hacking my mail, phones and computers would like to read excerpts from the latest “Hollie Greig Newsletter” produced by B. Mckenzie:
“Dear All
Anne in court London: Anne is due back in the Court of Protection/Royal Courts of Justice regarding Hollie’s care on Thursday 7th March, 10 am. Apologies for the short notice as usual, I was waiting for this to firm up which it still hasn’t. So could anyone who might be able to come along please email me, then if the hearing is cancelled I can let you know it’s off.  Sorry about the uncertainty but of course this is all part of the general nuisance we are up against at the moment;
Robert in court Edinburgh: Coincidentally Robert will be in court in Edinburgh this week at the Court of Session, Holyrood Wednesday 6th March 10 am and would welcome a bit of support, for details see http://robertgreensblog-holliegreigcampaign.blogspot.ch/;
Paedophile Information Exchange: Michael Murrin continues to press for the P.I.E. records to be released into the public domain. Please find attached his latest letter to Cameron on the subject which is full of incriminating pictures. He believes and I agree that in the present context of the investigation of high-level paedophilia  the public have a need and a right to know who signed up to that network in the late ’70s-early ’80s, one of the campaigning objects of which was to lower the age of consent to 5 – yes 5! And note, Michael factors in Hollie’s case and the Scottish paedophile rings;
Write to your MP: Following on from the issue of P.I.E it would be appropriate and timely to forward Michael’s letter to your MP (as an attachment, so that the pictures all come through) and ask to be reassured that he or she is NOT on the P.I.E. list, at present being held by Scotland Yard and MI5. If the MP comes back with “certainly not” take that at face-value for the moment and ASK HIM/HER TO SIGN THE PETITIONS at the end of the letter to Cameron. If the MP refuses to answer, send the email again, and again, then after the 3rd time say “I note that you are refusing to answer this question and I have informed Mr Murrin accordingly;”
Mother’s Day: To celebrate Mother’s Day Sunday 10th March I will be standing on a soap-box at Speaker’s Corner in Hyde Park, clad in a Hollie T-shirt of course! and talking about what is happening to mothers and children in our society and around the world. It would be great if a few could join me, I’ll have some Hollie T-shirts with me in case you haven’t got one. I’ll be there from 3-5 and we could have a cuppa and a chat in the cafe afterwards;
‘Make Wars History’: As some will remember, MWH was my previous campaign and by no means completely abandoned, children and families being the main victims of these illegal and horrifically destructive 21st C wars. So I am pleased to be helping Chris Coverdale set up a meeting in Parliament on the morning of Tuesday 19th March, chaired as previously by John McDonnell MP. 20 March as you know is 10 years from the invasion of Iraq. More details will be sent out but please note the date meantime;
‘McKenzie Enemies’/Hollie Greig Hoax team in London: As some are aware, HGH in the persons of Sarah McLeod, Rachel Keeley and Sylvia Major addressed a meeting of the David Icke (London) group last Sunday. Anne, Robert, Brian Gerrish and I were invited to participate but unanimously declined. I told the organiser in no uncertain terms what I thought of this meeting and put pressure on her to call it off which she did not appreciate but I trust in time she and others who took umbrage will forgive my vehement stance. I’m all for free speech in principle but absolutely draw the line at engaging with people supportive of paedophiles and who endorse police non-investigation of this foul crime;
More light on Hollie’s story: One of the reasons given for having the above meeting was to clarify parts of Hollie’s story people find confusing, especially due to HGH’s deliberate muddying of the waters (so why anyone would think that having them down to speak would help bring clarity beats me!)
We fully appreciate that it is hard to get your head round certain aspects of the story and we are really looking forward to everything being out in the open, once the court process is concluded.
Meanwhile, there is at least one aspect of the case which is not off-limits, namely the death of Hollie’s uncle Roy Greig. So here is a video about the incident, one in a series put together by Sophie when she was working with Anne on her documents in 2011. It shows clearly the parallels between the murder of Malcolm Webster’s wife Claire in a car-fire in 1994 and the suspicious death of Roy in a similar incident in 1997. It should be remembered that Sylvia Major’s late husband Terry was Grampian Police’s Chief Fingerprint Officer at the time both of Roy’s death and of the reporting of Hollie’s abuse 3 years later when no forensics were done. CFO was a civilian post in the case of that force but Major would have been none the less highly influential.
—————————————————————————————————————–
hg8

THE FACTS OF THE CASE == Description: HOLLIE GREIG CASE PDF FILE:

http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/qjg3ob

ROBERT GREEN EXPOSES SATANIC RITUAL CHILD ABUSE

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kaRI-h9jVxM&feature=uploademail

HOLLIE GREIG – ROBERT GREENS BLOG

http://holliedemandsjustice-robertgreensblog.blogspot.com/2011_10_01_archive.html

ROBERT GREEN INTERVIEW- EDGE MEDIA 25 8 11 =

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLF35AAC01128C697D

Autumn 2009 was the 1st time the HOLLIE GREIG case was ever mentioned online…

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mhfju-nNlgY

HOLLIE GREIG 15 MIN SPECIAL – TONY LEGEND MANCHESTER RADIO ONLINE 10 4 2011

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqN1-3CIqQw

ROBERT GREEN ON HOLLIE GREIG – P DROCKTON RADIO 5 3 2010

http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLBA1F5B143DC56468

HOLLIE GREIG OFFICIAL SITE =

http://www.holliedemandsjustice.org/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

FREEMASONS IN THE POLICE

FREEMASONS POLICE

Tuesday, 15 January 2013

FREEMASONS IN THE POLICE – 1997 – THINK WHAT IT MUST BE LIKE TODAY…

see the full article with much more info:  http://ecbiz126.inmotionhosting.com/~intmen5/masonicpolice.htm

Freemasons in the police

Published January 1997 No comments… »

Today the Guardian publishes for the first time what we believe is a unique photograph. It pierces the wall of secrecy which surrounds one of Britain’s most mysterious organisations by revealing a large gathering of London policemen wearing the white gloves, embroidered sashes and lambskin aprons of the worshipful order of freemasonry. At the time that the picture was taken, these 60 men were members of Masonic Lodge number 9179, known as the Manor of St James, which was founded eleven years ago, on January 27 1986, for the exclusive use of Scotland Yard officers who had worked in the West End of London.
The picture, which has been leaked to the Guardian by non-Masonic Metropolitan police officers, appears to have been taken at one of their inaugural meetings and includes men who then occupied some of the most powerful jobs in the force. Since April 1985, when Sir Kenneth Newman was Commissioner, Scotland Yard have been advising their officers to stay away from the lodges. According to The Principles of Policing, which was produced under Sir Kenneth: “The discerning officer will probably consider it wise to forgo the prospect of pleasure and social advantage in freemasonry so as to enjoy the unreserved regard of all those around him. It follows from this that one who is already a freemason would also be wise to ponder from time to time whether he should continue as a freemason.” And yet the Manor of St James is still active. On Monday of this week, a Guardian photographer caught dozens of former and serving police officers as they made their way through the crowded pavements of St James’s Street, off Picadilly. Wearing dinner jackets and carrying their Masonic regalia in flat black brief cases, they converged on number 86, an imposing sandstone building which looks like any of the gentleman’s clubs around the corner, in Pall Mall, but which is in fact the site of a Masonic temple. Inside, they gathered to hold their annual ritual to install a London policeman as the new master of the lodge, to elect other police officers as their stewards, tylers and almoners, and to consider the names of prospective new members, all of them drawn from the past and present ranks of the Metropolitan Police, all of them willing to be blindfolded with a noose around their neck and a dagger to their heart while they are warned that if they break their vows of secrecy and loyalty, they will have their throats cut and their tongues torn out by the root. And then, until late into the night, they dined together. The leaking of the photograph co-incides with new efforts by politicians and senior police officers to meet public concern about the role of freemasons in law-enforcement. Masons insist that they are misunderstood and that their organisation stands for service to “our God, our country and our laws”. Critics fear that the secrecy of the organisation and its stern oaths of “mutual defence and support” conflict with a police officer’s need to be seen to apply the law impartially.
The Police Complaints Authority, which says its own ranks are free of masons, is pressing for a new law to compel police masons to declare their membership on a register of interests. Last October, the Association of Chief Police Officers, ACPO, supported the move. And today (Jan 29), the House of Commons Select Committee on Home Affairs continues its own inquiry into the issue, taking evidence from ACPO as well as from the Police Federation, which represents lower ranks and which is fighting for the status quo. Until now, the issue has been as secretive as it has been controversial. The evidence of the membership of the Manor of St James is that freemasonry reaches high into the command structure of the Metropolitan Police. Among the founder members of the lodge was Gilbert Kelland, who was in charge of all of London’s three thousand detectives when he was the Assistant Commissioner for Crime from 1977 to 1984. He is pictured here in his regalia, in the third row back, three from the right. Among his worshipful brothers who joined the lodge, in spite of Sir Kenneth’s request, are two Deputy Assistant Commissioners, Peter Nievens and Edgar Maybanks; twelve commanders, including George Churchill-Coleman and Jim Neville, both of whom headed the Anti Terrorist Squad, and Malcolm Campbell, who was the head of Scotland Yard’s intelligence branch; John Cass, who was a Scotland Yard commander before becoming co-ordinator for the nation’s regional crime squads; at least two dozen chief superintendents; a dozen superintendents; and more than a score from the lower ranks. One of the few officers in the lodge who did take Sir Kenneth’s advice is Tony Speed, who is now the Assistant Commissioner for Central London. He said last week that he had followed his father and grandfather into the Craft, joining his first lodge when he was 21. “There was no furore about it in those days and I have to say that in something like 20 years as a mason I never came across anything that made me feel ashamed or that I felt was wrong. But then about ten years ago, the public perception began to change and we were advised that we should reconsider our position and so, simply because of this problem of perception, I resigned.” Most of his colleagues in the lodge did not see it that way. Malcolm Campbell is still serving as a commander and has not resigned from the lodge but says that he no longer attends its functions. Many of the others in the picture are now retired although sources who know the Manor of St James say they have been joined by a steady stream of serving officers.
Martin Short, author of the most detailed account of modern British freemasonry, Inside The Brotherhood, estimates that 20% of London officers belong to Masonic lodges. He says there is cause for concern about this and in December, he gave evidence to the Select Committee inquiry of a case he had researched recently in Lancashire which, he told them, “demonstrates just how badly the administration of justice can go wrong when police, Crown Prosecution solicitors and private citizens are all in the same Masonic lodge.” This story began one night in 1988 when two Leicester businessmen were taking a late-night drink in a hotel in Blackburn. A group of burly strangers in dinner jackets ordered them out of the bar. The Leicester men declined to go. The strangers then announced that they were policemen and proceeded to beat them up. They then called other police who arrested the two Leicester men and charged them with assaulting police officers. When the Leicester men were released on bail the next morning, they found that the hotel manager had seized their belongings until they agreed to pay for damage caused by the fight and that someone had let all the air out of their car tyres and removed their hub caps. The Blackburn police and Crown prosecutors pursued the case to court, where the two Leicester men faced substantial jail sentences for allegedly assaulting policemen. But the case fell apart. The jury rejected all of the police evidence and found that the Leicester businessmen were not guilty of any offence at all. The judge signalled his own view by taking the unusual step of ordering that the defendants’ costs should be paid out of the public purse. The two men then sued for assault, wrongful arrest, malicious prosecution, conspiracy to injure and libel. In an out-of-court settlement, they were awarded £170,000, most of which was paid on behalf of the policemen by the Lancashire force. Martin Short told the Select Committee that freemasonry was at the heart of this case. The two Leicester men had stumbled into the tail-end of a Masonic event, a dinner organised by the Victory lodge of Blackburn. This lodge, said Short, is dominated by police officers: the policemen who were involved in the original fight, the officer who subsequently investigated the incident, a senior official in the Crown Prosecution office which handled the case, and the manager of the hotel where the dinner took place were all members of the Victory lodge. No-one is suggesting that all Masonic officers are corrupt or even liable to become corrupt. However, in the past, there have been occasions when Masonic lodges have acted as nests of corruption, where detectives have rubbed shoulders with professional criminals in an atmosphere of friendship and loyalty with disastrous results. When Scotland Yard’s Obscene Publications Squad was destroyed by scandal in the late 1960s, twelve officers were jailed for taking bribes from pornographers. All of them were masons, including the head of the squad, Detective Chief Superintendent Bill Moody, who had even helped one of the pornographers he was supposed to be arresting to become a member of his own lodge. On the other side of the argument, there have been high-profile examples of Masonic officers fighting corruption.
During the Operation Countryman inquiry in the 1980s, it was a Masonic detective chief superintendent, John Simmons, who secretly tape-recorded his brother mason, Detective Chief Inspector Phil Cuthbert, boasting of his villainy and of the involvement of other senior officers in taking bribes and setting up armed robberies. However, Simmons was later ostracised by his lodge, while Cuthbert continued to be welcomed, even after he had been convicted and jailed for three years. Some of the most angry critics of freemasonry are police officers who do not belong to the lodges. They fear that masons may promote brother officers and conceal each other’s wrong doing and that, on occasion, they might abuse their internal powers to discipline troublesome non-masonic officers. One serving Metropolitan Police detective said: “This is a secret society at the heart of Scotland Yard. I have no doubt that some masons use the lodges to get their way and this is not acceptable for the public or for the police service as a whole.” The Police Complaints Authority says that some officers have approached them privately to voice their concerns about some masonic colleagues. One non-masonic officer says he reported to his commander that colleagues had invented a fictitious informer so that they could claim reward money for crimes which they solved and then share it among themselves. He claims that he was moved sideways while his colleagues were allowed to carry on and that he subsequently discovered that the corrupt officers and the commander were all “on the square”. Another claims to have heard a superintendent boasting that he was recruiting a new officer to his squad and that he was shortlisting only masons. The Police Complaints Authority has run into problems with masonic officers. On one occasion a man complained that he had been charged as the result of a masonic conspiracy. He then discovered that the superintendent who was investigating his complaint was himself a mason. The superintendent resigned and was replaced by a second officer who also turned out to be a mason. On another occasion, a provincial Chief Constable simply refused to ask whether one of his officers, who was looking into allegations about masons, was himself a member of a lodge.
Masons played a prominent part in the demise of John Stalker, the former Deputy Chief Constable of Manchester who tried to unravel a cover-up of political shootings in Northern Ireland and in the case of the Scotland Yard Chief Inspector Brian Woolard, who found evidence that his career had been blighted by senior masons after he attempted to uncover the role of civilian masons in a fraud. Masonic officers argue that policemen who want to be corrupt can make bad friendships through golf clubs or Round Table dinners, and that the lodges have no special influence. When Sir Kenneth Newman produced his advice in 1985, his office considered all of the available evidence. The booklet which he produced acknowledged that the lodges offered friendship, a chance to mix with “some of the most distinguished people in the land” and an invitation to self-improvement. It noted that many of the allegations that were made against them were unsupported or plain wrong. Yet it concluded that some of the allegations were reliable and that the exclusivity of the lodges, the oddness of their rituals and their collection of coded signals amounted to a significant problem. “They militate against the acceptance, by colleagues and citizens alike, of an officer who is a freemason as a man on whose fairness it is possibly to rely always and unquestionably… A freemason’s oath holds inevitably the implication that loyalty to fellow freemasons may supersede any other loyalty.” The worshipful brothers of the Manor of St James disagree. The two sides of the story came face to face late last year when the current Metropolitan Commissioner, Sir Paul Condon, appeared in front of the Select Committee which is investigating freemasonry in law enforcement. The Commissioner had reassured the committee that all was well but, as he prepared to leave, he was confronted by Chris Mullin, the ebullient Labour MP for Sunderland South, who had acquired his own copy of our photograph. Mullin pulled out the picture and told the Commissioner: “I thought you might like to have a look at your alternative command structure.”

SOURCE:  http://ecbiz126.inmotionhosting.com/~intmen5/masonicpolice.htm

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

FROM M KIRK 18 FEB 13 – “WE’LL GET THE BAXTARD”…

Such is British justice – said by a court official  regarding M Kirk: “…we’ll get the ba-tard!”…

kirk 18 feb

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

UPDATE 15 FEB.: MAURICE KIRK DAMAGES TRIAL BEGINS ON THE 23 FEB 13

1]  13 02 13 HM Crown Prosecution Service                                                            ref.docx

HM Crown Prosecution Service

Ref: 1203241 D Cardiff/London

Ref: C0O/3970/2012 &CO/6357/2012 13th Feb 13

‘Breach of Restraining Order’ Appeal never served on me in the first place

1.I must have telephoned both CPS in London and Cardiff offices in excess of twenty times, visited the RCJ four times on the matter, written some thirty or so letters, just to get you both to release the evidence needed for the appeal due in the RCJ any day now. I do not even have your judges summary for immediate website publication and still further tape recordings.

2.Especially the lies the police doctor gave in a signed police statement, last summer that I had been ‘moved on’ by police from his home, just to get me jailed for nearly three months, in another  attempt to stop my one million pound NHS damages from claim progressing. You lot ‘eventually’ realised, as in the ‘machine’ gun scandal and original ‘harassment’ conviction, the South Wales Police had gone out of their way, anything to prejudice my civil actions on extreme police bullying and have me ‘stitched up’ on false doctor’s evidence, himself promised immunity to prosecution, first, by eleven Cardiff Crown Court judges, then the GMC and now, your very own selves.

3.Cardiff Crown refuse me access to the building at all or listen to the evidence in the 4th May 12 trial because it caught the prison guards confirming I had been removed from the court building, dripping blood from my arse and against my clear wishes, contrary with my request for specifically named defence witnesses, Dr Williams and Dr Gaynor Jones included, to carry on and give the relevant defence evidence the judge knew, very well, was needed and even asked for by a the jury!

4.Curran QC had been briefed by the Cardiff Cabal to do otherwise.

5.I have asked for your agreement, for the RCJ, re my tape recordings of the scandalously run original Cardiff Magistrates ‘harassment’ hearings to be played, including several Crown Court related hearings, 1st March 12 for example, catching my 15th Nov 11, denied at the time, lawyer’s legal papers, handed towards me by my ‘Mackenzie Friend’, from the well of the court, my own legal papers from my prison cell, eye witnesses, the right to cross examine anyone or call the known seven police men who had originally indicated the enclosed (original illegally switched CPS exhibit mid trial, also caught on tape) ‘Wanted’ poster of a South Wales Police blackmailed psychiatrist, was not any public order offence.

6.All this week not one of you will even discuss the possibilities of further variation of the 1st Dec 11 ‘Restraining Order,’ in the light of new evidence, some under your control only and still further evidence of the doctor’s continuing blatant deceit hatched long before the 8th June MAPPA level 3 meeting with Barbara Wilding falsifying her 25/26th Dolmans drafted Feb 09 sworn affidavit originally ordered by Nicholas Chambers Q.C. on the old argument for all court cases, failed disclosure of the truth.

7.Yesterday, despite days of Cardiff CPS promises, for named lawyers to ring me back to expedite the further changes to the order, never served on me, your phone was fixed to block any of my further incoming calls.

8.Your state pension is guaranteed so what is it that bugs you? You knew from the start the police had repainted that machine gun to try and fool the jury, your 2nd Dec 09 CPS barrister lied to HHJ Neil Bidder QC, that I was so dangerous with a ‘brain tumour’ and ‘significant brain damage’ I needed IPP incarceration to Ashworth High Security Prison for life or are you only troubled in the way , from the same 9 Park Place barrister’s chambers, each time, David Gareth Evans told the judge Curran., on 2/3rd May 12, he may have to be my defence witness over the draught restraining order as he had directed to me, in my court cell , on 1st Dec 11 and NOT the final version because the same custody officer, Lee Barker , had gone home, two hours earlier, despite telling the jury he had ‘unlocked’ my cell and handed it to me.

9.Are you concerned I was beaten up, again, this time for refusing to leave my cell, that day, demanding court papers, when the ‘Order’ may well have been brought down as I was being released, not to the prison for my later release, as is customary, because I had no less than 10 human rights workers from all over Europe to witness, for themselves, causing the abrupt shortening of my already served prison sentence and witness just how totally evil the Cardiff judiciary is if you so foolishly declare yourself as born an Englishman? 10.Are you going to accede to my previous reasonable and relevant requests for previous court documents, by email, or not?

Yours truly,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc Copy to:  Criminal Court of Appeal

#############################################

2]     13 02 14 Seys Ll QC.pdf

FAO

His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC

Cardiff Civil Justice Centre

Cardiff

Wales

14th Feb 13

Your Honour,

Maurice Kirk v South Wales Police 18

th

Feb 13 Trial

Urgent Medical Issues include;

A. As to whether I have ‘Paranoid Delusional Disorder’, a fixed

belief un amenable to reason in that I am being persecuted by the

South Wales Police?

B. Do I have ‘significant brain damage’ and ‘a possible brain

tumour’ as diagnosed by NHS (Wales) and Defendant’s MAPPA

doctor?

C. Both MAPPA and NHS (Wales) have refused medical care, a

follow up brain scan or even search for an alternative opinion,

while all the Welsh courts, to whom I have applied, Cardiff

prison, Cardiff police and NHS (Wales), continue to deny me

access to appropriate medical attention or be seen by my doctor at

Caswell Clinic, Bridgend. What will this court do about it?

D. I am repeatedly refused my right, under the Prevention of

Harassment Act 1997, to therefore continue a course of conduct to

detect or prevent further crime. All related to this same Caswell

Clinic forensic psychiatrist having been blackmailed to fabricate

my 2008 forensic history to order to make me eligible for MAPPA

Level 3 registration, be remanded in custody and denied my

eligibility for the return of my professional pilots licences.

Further to an apparent alarming conversation, only this morning, with NHS (Wales)

solicitors, indicating my attempts to obtain the police medical evidence, that was before the

2nd

Dec 2009 Cardiff Crown Court, that I have irreversible and ‘significant brain damage’,

——————————————————————————–

Page 2

2

compounded by a possibly brain cancer, is stayed on your 30th January 13 enclosed Court

Orders.

South Wales Police whilst denying me bail, in their attempts to have me further MAPPA

sectioned to Ashworth High Security Prison, possibly for life, were dependant, again, on

their own blackmailed Caswell Clinic psychiatrist, neither appropriately qualified to interpret

my brain scans for a criminal court nor having even examined me to obtain my original 2009

section 35 long incarceration, following next Monday’s Defendant falsifying evidence before

nine Cardiff judges that I was in breach of Section 6 of 1968 fire arms Act in having a WW1

Lewis Machine gun bolted to my Farnborough air show display biplane, sold on at least a

year before!

In the absence of immediate Crown Court disclosure, to allow me to hear medical evidence

on court CDs but not on the official transcripts, for the ridiculously delayed Court of Appeal

hearing, for my GP to so advise and for the NHS/Caswell Clinic, Bridgend authorities to

disclose that medical information, I cannot be diagnosed as fit to stand trial.

That being said, this police psychiatrist is available to you to give precisely what he gave to

the 1st June 2009 IAG police HQ meeting and subsequent six or so MAPPA meetings, held

in Caswell Clinic, he as Clinical Director, in total absence of other required ‘agents’,

contrary to UK statute otherwise the court may remain in some difficulties.

The very same difficulties that caused the delay of this trial proceeding in each of the last

four attempts, in 20 years, all due to the nefarious conduct of the Defendant and its

lawyers, based on avarice with far too much help from Cardiff judges and Luigi Stranati,

HMCTS Area Controller in their joint failed attempts to have me registered a ‘vexatious

litigant’ . It means my current fitness to attend court continues to remain in doubt and the

evidence, that has repeatedly been used against me, to have me struck off, ‘fined’ well over

£500,000 and repeatedly jailed, continues to be unlawfully withheld by the Cardiff courts

and its agents, South Wales Police and Welsh NHS, which is why, in interests of justice

(Article 6 etc), these proceedings should not be heard by anyone in a Welsh court room

and should be consolidated with the deliberately buried ‘ machine gun’ and ‘NHS

psychiatrist fraud’ million pound damages claims in a High Court well out of Wales.

The 2011 Cardiff magistrates tapes, now disclosed to the Criminal Court of Appeal, reveal

rampant criminal conduct by District Judge John Charles, the South Wales Police and CPS

barrister, anything to honour their agreement to give the NHS doctor immunity to prosecution

if I was going to defend myself from the mandatory 10 year prison sentence in lieu of

attempted IPP during the ‘machine gun ‘scandal.

I also renew my application that the Defendant should make its first attempt to settle ‘out of

court’, something its lawyers have always refused to consider due to the Cardiff cabal’s most

un regulated but lucrative ‘gravy train’.

My 1994 Bristol solicitors were instructed to fight but of their own volition, having perused

the evidence of apparent extreme police bullying and following South Wales Police

clandestine communications with Guernsey, in attempts, agtain, to ban my driving and

therefore veterinary income, proposed settlement with Dolmans, the Chief Constable’s

solicitors but were, of course, ignored.

——————————————————————————–

 

Page 3

3

Your Honour will re call, in your refusal to adjourn one of the 1990s police motoring

incidents, part of this 20 year running damages action next week, my consultant surgeon’s

evidence was not accepted despite the fact I was on morphine sulphate prescription following

a particularly painful abdominal operation.

Your Honour will also recall your July/August 2010 MAPPA disclosure refusal, to order the

South Wales Police t disclose they had evidence that I was in possession of a ‘machine gun’,

significant brain damage authenticated by MAPPA Level 3, the record attached to relevant

witnesses I need for next week’s trial, that the Defendant, then Barbara Wilding, was acting

on her own fabricated fraudulently portrayed February 2009 sworn affidavit, ordered to be

signed by her and no one else, by your honour’s predecessor, Nicholas Chambers QC who, in

the extreme circumstances, also granted me a jury trial.

FAO

Criminal Court of Appeal’s ‘Breach of Restraining Order’ Appeal.

1. FAO County Court listings/District Judge Bodfan Jenkins

re recent variation of 1st Dec 11 Restraining Order originally issued by District Judge John

Charles in my absence and never served on me. Judge Charles denying me my right to cross

examine any prosecution witness nor have any of the evidence challenged by the unlawfully

imposed court defence Swansea solicitor, Mr Williams, believed a relative to the police

psychiatrist (all accurately recorded evidence on my court tapes).

2. FAO South Wales Police psychiatrist

re his 2009 medical reports Defendant, following last week’s County Court ruling with your

refusing to ‘strike out’ my one million pound damages claim against NWS (Wales) and the

‘on the sick’ police psychiatrist.

3. FAO Tottenham Police re Sept 11 psychiatric reports causing my being again

sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act from evidence ,alonme, from South

Wales Police 2009 Caswell Clinic psychiatric reports

4. FAO Le Procureur, Palais de Justice, St Brieu, Brittany, France

Cotes D’amor gendarmes Feb 2012 psychiatric reports causing my being sectioned under the

French equivalent law and detained to Pontivy hospital following communication with south

Wales Police via Interpol relating to my application for asylum, in Paris, following South

Wales Police MAPPA meetings being made aware I had been set up, by the Defendant and

its psychiatrist to having me shot.

5. FAO District Judge John Charles

re his obscene orders preventing my cross examining the police in the subsequent 28th Nov

10 ‘common assault’ conviction hearings, (later unopposed at appeal in Bristol Crown Court),

the judge Charles using the excuse of my daily intake of morphine sulphate, obtained in my

absence due to the ill health, his having been supplied by a copious number of independent

——————————————————————————–

 

Page 4

4

medical reports that my urgently needed total hip replacement operation was only being

refused by NHS (Wales) as I was recorded as having ‘significant brain damage.

Judge Charles gave no reason for denying my cross examining in 2011 magistrates and its 1st

March 12 appeal in Cardiff Crown Court but court records were eventually slipped out, years

later ,that Crown Orders of 14

th

Nov 12, just before the magistrates case’s evidence was heard

, subject to RCJ JR CO/2012/6357, also held up on London ,due to petty tribal politics, that

the then soon retiring HHJ Llewellyn Jones QC had ordered Charles to have me convicted,

what the sentence was to be but more importantly, I was not allowed to cross examine the

police under any circumstances

6. FAO Cardiff CPS

re the same old police psychiatrist MG 11 August 12 police witness statement, this time,

further fabricating evidence to obtain, now, nearly three years in custody, so far, on this

doctor’s evidence alone —-stating, this time, I had been ‘moved on’ from his home by the

police and that I was the only cause for he and his wife, Dr Janis Hillier, to be on long term

sick!

Dr Hillier is needed by witness summons, to prove fraud throughout these civil proceedings

now as a new witness on 18th Feb 13, at the commencement of the three month damages trial

to expedite issues over my capacity, competence and culpability or not of where this British

law court currently stands.

7. FAO CPS (London) and case worker at RCJ

Whereas district judge Charles used my comprehensive medical evidence and psychiatric

reports from the police, in his August 10 order, to block a stitched up criminal allegation

being blown apart5 in open court, in that I was not allowed to cross examine anyone, he

appeared to be in problems by the 2011the ‘harassment’ hearing, leading to the 1

st

Dec 11

conviction, as I had to go to France to obtain the operation and was, therefore, no longer

incapacitated to cross examine anyone as I was no longer dependant on ‘mind bewildering’

drugs only imposed by this inherent hatred of the English.

Please find enclosed, also, my yesterday’s letter to the Criminal Court of Appeal and CPS that

appears to have e-mail ‘bounced’ and your 13th Aug 10 appearing to accept my medical

reports that were also put before District Judge John Charles and causing an adjournment in

one but refused, out right by Judge Charles.

Yours

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Copies to:

Criminal Court of Appeal

CCRC

CPS

######################################

3]  13 01 30 Applic to Strike Out One Million Pound Claim against NHS Refused.pdf

General Form of Judgment or Order

MR MAURICE KIRK

rt Claimant

Ref VJM/KIRK

DR T REDACTED

1’1 Defendant

Ref TWFI.448470.48

PROFESSOR R REDACTED

2″ Defendant

Ref TWH.448470.48

DISCONTINUED

3rd Defendant

Ref

MINISTRY OF JUSTICE

4th Defendant

Ref Z I 1056677/SJS/A I

Before His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn Q.c. sitting at Cardiff County Court, Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, 2

Park Street, Cardiff, CFI() 1ET.

Upon hearing the Claimant in person and Counsel for the Defendants

Or

IS ORDERED THAT

1. The Application of the Claimant is refused.

2. The Application of the Defendants is adjourned generally with permission to restore on 14 days notice to the

Claimant.

3. Costs of the Defendants application reserved.

Dated 30 January 2013

The court office at Cardiff County Court, Cardiff Civil Justice Centre, 2 Park Street, Cardiff, CHO JET is open between 10:00 am and 2:00 pm Monday to Friday. When

corresponding with the court, please address forms or letters to the Court Manager and quote the claim number. Tel: 02920 376400 Fax: 029 20376475

Produced by:Mrs R Pahl

N24 General Form of Judgment or Order

CJR065

####################################################

4]  10 08 13.docx

10 08 13

Dear Mr Kirk and Ms Standley,

Please see the attached letter from His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn Q.C.

Please also see the letter below from His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn Q.C.

In response to the email forwarded from Mr Kirk via Dolmans Insofar as he relies on medical grounds of inability to deal with proceedings, in support of the application to adjourn the civil trial listed for September, and in answer to the e-mail enquiry from Mr Kirk dated 11th August sent to the solicitors for the Defendant and relayed by them to the court, it is essential for the court to receive independent medical report of his inability or difficulty to deal with proceedings.

The court is not in a position to know who the relevant doctor or doctors are from whom medical report should be sought. He should seek written report from those medically qualified who are treating him and /or are able to furnish medical report authoritatively in respect of his condition, ability or lack of ability to conduct matters.

If the complaint is of physical disability the court will consider what arrangements if any are necessary and/or feasible to make allowance for his condition during any trial and self-evidently any medical report will need to deal with whether any disability can be accommodated by such arrangements. If the complaint is of other disability the same considerations apply. Regards

Rosie Williams

Rosie Williams Personal Assistant to His Honour Judge A Seys Llewellyn Q.C./Cynorthwywr Personol Ei Anrhydedd Barnwr A Seys Llewellyn Q.C.

Tel: 02920 376400

Cardiff Civil Justice Centre/Canolfan Y Llysoedd Sifil Caerdydd

Help us be green & save paper- do you need to print this email?

Oes angen ichi brintio’r ebost hwn? Arbedwch bapur – a hel

BELOW – Maurice at Cardiff hospital in 2012 after being beaten by numerous prison personnel during an enforced stay [for no reason whatsoever other than to cause him hassle and grief and waylay his cases aganst these dubious authorities in S Wales]

...aa 01-12-11_1811

———————————————————————-

 Legal Battles

                             “WE WILL GET THE B**ST**D” TRIAL NEXT WEEK

  “We Will GetThe B**st**d”

BARRY POLICE over heard at the start of all this bullying, circa 1993, by my shocked veterinary nurse

               Also see overhead video BELOW
Come to three months of tribal deceitful jibberish in an environment we all should be thoroughly ashamed of.The result was decided, over 19 years ago, in some dark satanic mill, when my Bristol solicitors indicated it would be sensible to settle. But Dolmans, solicitors, of Cardiff, were already on the ‘gravy train’.

Crown Prosecution Service

Cardiff

9th Feb 2013

Variation of Restraining Order to obtain Medical Attention

Dear Sir,

A recent circuit judge, over my one million pound NHS (Wales)/ Caswell Clinic damages claim, had to remind the NHS barrister that the Caswell Clinic psychiatrist had asked the 2009 Cardiff Crown Court that I be sectioned and jailed under the 1983 Mental Health Act with neither the relevant forensic history nor even examining his potential patient!

As you know the South Wales Police then had him re-apply to the very same court, in December 2009, frantic to stop the publicity of my ‘WW1 machine gun’ trial happening, that I be further incarcerated but IPP this time, in Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Prison, probably for life.

The fact that the Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, doctor was under pressure on a delicate domestic matter, called black mail by Barbara Wilding, the then Chief Constable and my Defendant in next week’s three month damages trial, is by no way a coincidence.

The doctor will feature heavily on 18th February and is to be called as a key prosecution witness.

Whereas your CPS colleague witnessed ‘variation’ in the 1st December 2011 ’Restraining Order’,suitably recorded, in my last magistrates’ applications, allowing me now to publish the doctor’s name, I was disappointed to be then accosted by two plain clothed police officers suggesting I had breached that order when visiting an Ely, Cardiff, psychiatric unit, ‘Ty Catrin’, simply to attend a prior engagement by invitation from a female Caswell Clinic doctor.

Dr Gaynor Jones is but one from Caswell Clinic and to include past HM prosecutors I have applied for to be my witnesses for my pending appeals currently before Criminal Court of Appeal in London.

I had hoped to speak to you, to avoid writing to the European Court today but no one ever seems to be ‘available’.I therefore wrote and copied it to you, by earlier e-mail, on the serious matter of my still being refused medical attention in South Wales, my having to travel always to France each time.

Kicking my application into the ‘long grass’, to some date in April, means I may be deemed medically unfit as is the view of the South Wales Police when instigating my recent imprisonment in France.

The fact remains that the police doctor was knowingly dishonest and police will not investigate because they are the police officers, next week, defending their own immunity to prosecution for 20 years of bullying. That fiasco, as fiasco it will be, will be followed by finally unblocked seven Actions, including falsified MAPPA registration, fabricated medical records ‘accepted’as correct by no less than Cardiff judges! Do I now accept I have ‘significant brain damage’ and a possible brain tumour, just what your HM CPS barrister, Richard Thomlow, told His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC and HM barrister David Gareth Evans ‘acted on’ in order to prosecute me for ‘harassment’?

My unlawfully blocked one million pound damages claim, surrounding your client’s malicious prosecution and long imprisonment, re police painting my Farnborough display aircraft’s ‘machine gun’a different colour, anything to try and fool the jury, has been deliberately buried by Cardiff courts for two years. There are too many other pending Actions to list here.

Successive clearly spineless Cardiff judges have refused any of my cases, civil, family or criminal, being transferred to an English court following your disastrous move, last year, in transferring my ‘common assault’ case to Bristol, when ex South Wales Police officer, Derrick Hasan had violently pushed me off my crutches and down the Cardiff Crown Court steps to break my leg.

I was always immune to prosecution, from the start, in the suggestion I circulated ‘Wanted’ posters, by section 3 a) & c) of the 1997 Act and is now supported by my library of tape recordings from original magistrates and Crown Court hearings, exposing what is routine ‘abuse of process’, needing cyberspace coverage worldwide, ‘in the interest of the public’, as I believe you call it.

I, like Norman Scarth Esq., am also too old to turn a blind eye at the routine manner your Cardiff courts’continue to pervert the course of justice meaning that both Norman and myself have little chance in considering your future proceedings with the respect all law courts should command.

It is a matter for you, of course, what you should do, bearing in mind no less than eleven Cardiff judges wished to ‘believe’the Caswell Clinic, when it said I had ‘significant brain damage’ and too dangerous to be released, thus allowing the Chief Constable to having me registered MAPPA level 3, one of the 5% most dangerous within our UK’s population.

With regards to my 8 Feb 2013 letter of applications to the European Court of Human Rights please could the Crown Prosecution Service review:

1. what is a ‘proportionate response’ to the above facts

2. whether you agree that I will continue to avoid contact with Dr Tegwyn Williams while the CPS consider whether to set up a process to receive still more evidence on this doctor’s most recent criminal wrongdoing and

3.dating from 2009 to the present day. I was sectioned, last month, under the French Mental Health Act as in Tottenham police station over the Nigerian Musa family scandal, each time only on this doctors fabricated evidence

4. his false 2011/12 MG11police witness signed statements, copies of which you refuse to re release, that led to the South Wales Police having my locked up in Cardiff prison for months on end, only for you, yet again, to drop all charges

5. your agreement that, while you know Dr T Williams already has his criminal wrongdoing it negates the 1st December 11 ‘restraining order’, under sub section 3 a)& c) of 1997 Act (to detect or prevent further crime), suggesting no other conditions against me should now remain.

6.To list your hearing and other civil actions, smack in the middle of next week’s trial, at my huge expense, is as I would expect from a UK judiciary that stinks and is rotten to the core.

I assume you do not mind that I publish in full all legal papers in this case that are intended for the European Court of Human Rights.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

View the Cardiff police angrily beating me up at a traffic jam and then in the police cells:
DAMAGES THREE MONTH TRIAL STARTS 18th Feb13 @ Cardiff Civil Justice Centre having been deliberately delayed for nearly 20 years
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

FORMAL COMPLAINT RE: COLLUSION, FRAUD, FALSE INSTRUMENT etc etc etc 7 FEB 13

Formal Complaint re Collusion, Fraud, FALSE INSTRUMENT and NO due process via Trial by Jury for Laurence McGeough: -


John Hemming 

 

This may interest you:

—– Original Message —–

Cc:
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 12:30 PM
Subject: Re: Formal Complaint re Collusion, Fraud, FALSE INSTRUMENT and NO due process via Trial by Jury for Laurence McGeough: -

Dear Patrick,    RE;  Laurence McGeough                       You are brave and honourable man, I am sickened to witness such rough justice being dished out daily at these Kangaroo Courts,  THIS MUST STOP, Surely as a European Citizen this case can be escalated to the highest level of the Legal System and EXPOSE THESE GANGESTERS   What are our MP’s doing ?   Did you see Dispatches Programme last week on the Andrew Mitchell incident &   ( recorded on CCTV at the very gates of the House of Commons ) we should all be very concerned about the Collusion/Corruption surrounding us in the UK ENOUGH IS ENOUGH , united we stand, we will not take it any more     TRIAL BY JURY IS DEMOCRACY  &  TRIAL BY JUDGE IS TYRANNY   Keep up your excellent work, you have a lot of support out there,  Good Luck.    Regards   Tim  Fleming On 06/02/2013 18:24, Patrick Cullinane wrote:

IRISH IN BRITAIN REPRESENTATION GROUP (IBRG)

Working Against all the Odds!!

<>>>>>>>><>

6th February 2013

FAO:  Patti Nephews, Court Manager

Uxbridge County Court

501 Uxbridge Road

Hayes

Middlesex, UB4 8HL

Tel: 020 8756 3520

 

 

Patti Nephews:

Laurence McGeough -v- United Kingdom Member State

 

Laurence McGeough, 83 Windmill Lane, Greenford, Middlesex, UB6 9DR

Formal Complaint:  Under European Union Laws& the Common Laws in the UK

 

 

At Uxbridge County on 20 December 2012 Patrick Cullinane of the IBRG served District Judge Wood with the attached submission on behalf of his client Laurence McGeough.

 

Judge Wood called Court Security saying, “Mr Cullinane had NO right to represent Laurence McGeough in court and demanded that he represent himself against a Barrister and two Solicitors when he had no knowledge of the law whatsoever.  The man was SICK.

 

Mr Cullinane told Judge Wood that she had “no jurisdiction to oppose him and was operating a Kangaroo Court”

 

When the Court Security, Mr Zeeshan Khan arrived, he ordered Mr Cullinane to leave the court.  Mr Cullinane refused and told Mr Khan that he had no authority to demand that he leave the court, as he had broken no law.  Mr Cullinane told Mr Khan not to be harassing him and that he was protecting the scene of a crime and was calling the Police to confiscate the Court Tape and arrest District Judge Wood as she was operating a Kangaroo Court.

 

When the Police arrived, PC Strong XH 515 and PC Gibson XH 158.  The two Police Officers would not listen to Mr Cullinane and PC Gibson told him that he would arrest him if he did not leave the court immediately.  Mr Cullinane handed PC Gibson a copy of the submission that he served on Judge Wood, but he flatly refused to take it, as he was in a very threatening and aggressive mode.  PC Gibson was COLLUDING with Judge Wood.

 

When everyone had left the court building without any hearing whatsoever, Judge Wood made up the following order: -

 

This is aFALSE INSTRUMENT for the purpose of FRAUD, as District Judge Wood never heard the “Defendant in Person”, as Laurence McGeough had left the court building with his legal representative Mr Cullinane: -

 

Judge Wood advised Mr Cullinane that the proceedings were being recorded; therefore, it is imperative that a copy of the Court Tapes are made available to Laurence McGeough and Patrick Cullinane, as they are both victims of serious crimes and inhuman and degrading treatment, which will be on the Court Tapes.

 

The following letter from Stephen Pound MP is a typical example of howshyster MPs leave their constituents to the mercy of the Kangaroo Courts in the UK, to be PERSECUTED and ROBBED by COLLUDING Law—yers, Police, Bailiffs and Judges without due process of the law: -

 

 

Mr Cullinane was informed by Laurence and Peter McGeough that when they visited Stephen Pound’s surgery on 4th January 2013 for EFFECTIVE representation, he kept quizzing them about Mr Cullinane’s qualifications.  What is this FRAUD getting taxpayers money for, when he is leaving Patrick Cullinane doHIS work, while he is shoring up the ENTRENCHED CORRUPTION in our Courts?  This FRAUDSTER, like numerous other MPs should resign immediately, as they are COLLUDING with the CRIMINALS to ROB their constituents.

 

<!–[if !supportLists]–>1.   <!–[endif]–>With a fobbing off letter like this, what do the likes of Stephen Pound MP know about his constituents GUARANTEED rights in Common Law to due process via Trial by Jury?  Stephen Pound MP is abusing public office; while having the barefaced cheek to question his constituents about Patrick Cullinane’s qualifications. And what is Mr Pound NOW going to do about Uxbridge County Court manufacturing a FALSE INSTRUMENT to ROB his constituent Laurence McGeough and destroy this immigrant Irish family?  – And does Mr Pound know anything about the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 as the FALSE INSTRUMENT was handed to him in his surgery on 4th January 2013 by Laurence and his father Peter.  And now ALL you upholders of the Rule of Law in the UK know exactly what Mr Pound he did with it.

 

 

You will see that there is nothing whatsoever on here that Mr Heck knows anything about due process  and the Common Law Trial by Jury: -

Dirk van Heck Barristers

 

Following a pupillage at Maitland Chambers, Dirk worked for two independent think tanks, where he gained knowledge of international, European and human rights law, before commencing practice at the Bar.

 

Following a pupillage at Maitland Chambers, Dirk worked for two independent think tanks, where he gained knowledge of international, European and human rights law, before commencing practice at the Bar.

 

Between 2009 and early 2012, he was employed in the Litigation & Insolvency Department of leading offshore law firm Maples and Calder, in the British Virgin Islands (“BVI”), where he acted as both barrister and solicitor.  This period of employment included a large amount of Commercial Court work, involving Dirk advocating alone against QCs (some based in the BVI and others in London), as well as a secondment to Maples and Calder’s Cayman Islands office.

 

Dirktakes instructions directly from members of the public under the Direct Public Access scheme.

http://www.1ec.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=132&Itemid=120

 

What is Dirk van Heck demanding money for when he has shown himself to be a complete FOOL about Common Law, which is the law of the LAND?  Mr Heck is also blinded to the conflict of interest of representing a firm of Solicitors one day and a member of the public the next. – “Commercial Court work”… supported by MPs and enforced by Police an Bailiffs. –It is so outrageous, that you could not make it up: -

 

 

Due process:  is the legal requirement that the state must respect all of the legal rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects the individual person from harm. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of law.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_process

 

 

 

Magna Carta (1215) {Article 38} reads:  “In future no official shall put anyone to trial merely on his own testimony, without reliable witnesses produced for this purpose.”

 

{Article 39} reads:  “No freeman shall be arrested or imprisoned or deprived of his freehold or outlawed or banished or in any way ruined, nor will we take or order action against him, except by the lawful judgment of his equals (Trial by Jury) and according to the law of the land.”

 

{Article 40} reads: “To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay Right or Justice.”

http://www.iamm.com/magnaarticles.htm

 

 

No Act of Parliament can take away We the Peoples’ Common Law rights, to due-process via the Trial by Jury.

 

Our legal future had already been shaped in 1215; peruse the following very important article and, ALL the 8 comments to it, very carefully:-

 

Shaping our legal future -  17 February 2012

Trial by jury: the importance of “ordinary”jurors

http://www.halsburyslawexchange.co.uk/trial-by-jury-the-importance-of-ordinary-jurors/#comment-14641

 

 

CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

Chapter VI – JUSTICE


Article 47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial

Everyone whose rights and freedoms guaranteed by the law of the Union are violated has the right to an effective remedy before a tribunal in compliance with the conditions laid down in this Article.

Everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time byanindependent and impartial tribunal previously established by law. Everyone shall have the possibility of being advised, defended and represented. Legal aid shall be made available to those who lack sufficient resources in so far as such aid is necessary to ensure effective access to justice.

http://infoportal.fra.europa.eu/InfoPortal/infobaseShowContent.do?btnCat_253&btnCountryBread_169

 

 

 

International Tribunal into Crimes of Church and State

ITCCS Communique 23 July 2012: Brussels, London, Ottawa

Published on Jul 23, 2012 by ITCCSInternational

The Case against the Crown, the Vatican and other Agents of Genocide: Common Law Courts, Indictments and Juries to be Established by September 15, 2012 – A Call for Citizen Participation

http://2012indyinfo.com/2012/07/25/itccs-communique-23-july-2012-brussels-london-ottawa/

 

 

District Judge Wood has committed TREASON.

 

The above was also witnessed by Timothy Fleming an observer and Peter McGeough, who is Laurence’s father.

 

“The entire­administration is engaged in a criminal act”: - Which usVICTIMS have been screaming about for decades: -

guardian.co.uk: By George Monbiot on Monday 1 February 2010

Mock this campaign if you like, but how else can Blair be held to account?

With the limits of power in Britain so ill-defined, the only way a reckoning for Iraq will ever come is via a citizen’s arrest

Comments (410)

 

What else can you do? When the entire­administration is engaged in a criminal act, when there isno clear separation of powers between the government and the judiciary, when those appointed to hold the government to account are as scary as a litter of kittens, where do you turn? Do you appeal to the attorney general’s office to prosecute itself?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/feb/01/blair-arrest-crime-national-memory

 

 

The Times: By Heather Brooke – 28 July 2010

The courts are open but justice is a closed book

We are denied even the barest details of what goes on in supposedly public legal proceedings

http://heatherbrooke.org/2010/article-co urt-secrecy/comment-page-1/#comment-5067

 

 

Pair jailed without due process of the law of the LAND  =  Trial by Jury: -

Halifax Courier – Published Date: 07 September 2007 Pair jailed for recording court hearing TWO men have been sent to prison for recording court proceedings. http://www.halifaxcourier.co.uk/news/Pair-jailed-for-recording-court.3185526.jp

 

 

guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 17 January 2012

Bashing trial by jury is pathetically predictable

Michael Mansfield

 

Comments (96)

Governments needing a facelift often attempt to curtail jury trial. Quick-fix supermarket justice must be resisted

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jan/17/trial-by-jury-bashing-predictable?newsfeed=true

 

We the People in the UK have a legitimate excuse, and duty, to tape-record proceedings in Her Majesty’s Courts in the UK Member State, as they are Corporate / CommercialKangaroo Courts perverting the course of justice to raise revenue and oppress the people.

 

The usual Barrister SCAM:  Just prior to entering the court, in the hallway, the Barrister Dirk Van Heck handed Mr Cullinane a document, which was headed “CLAIMANT’S CHRONOLOGY” and dated 19 December 2012.  Mr Cullinane asked the Barrister what he was doing here as there was FRAUD in the case?  Which the Barrister replied as he walked away, “It is too late now to claim FRAUD”.  Mr Cullinane shouted after him that, “FRAUD was always claimed in the case”.  What law exactly did Mr Heck and Judge Wood learn at Law School?

 

Patrick Cullinane also petitioned the Queen on numerous occasions, and this also failed: -

 

PUBLISHED: By Claire Ellicott on5 February 2013

Palace knifeman ‘wanted Queen to help him get back £170,000 stolen in property deal’

The businessman Tasered outside Buckingham Palace wanted to appeal directly to the Queen after claiming no one would help him when nearly £170,000 was stolen from him, his family said.

Yesterday, the grandfather’s family told the Mail that he was in a ‘desperate situation’ after losing his business and savings and had been driven to despair after police refused to help him. They claim a solicitor, who has since been disqualified from practising for a year, stole £168,000 from him in a property deal.

 

Rehman, from Harrow, North-West London, lost his business and savings as a result and is desperate for justice, but had been told by police that he should pursue a civil case

 

Rehman’s family said he had spent £30,000 on legal fees trying to recover his money. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2273506/Palace-knifeman-wanted-Queen-help-170-000-stolen-property-deal.html#axzz2K4IaEaoh

 

 

Note how the COLLABORATORS call in the Psychiatrists’ when you start to expose their CORRUPTION and start to look for JUSTICE:-

Patrick Cullinane’s address in the House of Commons on 23 April 2009

“This is a short video of the corruption at the Inland Revenue; who conspired with High Court ‘Judges’ and the Police to pervert the course of Justice.  Trial by Jury is the ONLYanswer to this Government’s Tyranny.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFakScc9Z80

 

 

Report by Phillip Inman of The Guardian, Jobs & Money, Saturday May 10, 2003:

This man was right all along

Patrick Cullinane has fought a running battle with the Inland Revenue since the day he was accused of not paying income tax. And the taxman fought dirty – so dirty he lost his home and nearly lost his sanity. Now, a batch of confidential documents reveal fatal weaknesses in the Revenue’s case. Phillip Inman reports

http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2003/may/10/tax.scamsandfraud

 

 

The following is what Summary Justice did to me.  I was on PAYE on an Emergency Tax Code, where HMRC owed me thousands of £s in tax rebates. And they still do to this day, 6th February 2013: –

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/feb/10/harry-redknapp-taxman-hmrc?commentpage=2#start-of-comments

 

 

Thirteen High Court Judges COLLUDED with HMRC, the Insolvency Service, KPMG my Trustee in Bankruptcy, my MPs, the Bailiffs, the Police and Psychiatrists to ROB Mr Cullinane of his home, and his worldly possessions: -

Report by Phillip Inman of The Guardian, Financial Section, Monday 25 August 2008

Evidence put to the high court shows that Cullinane, far from owing tax, was due a rebate.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2008/aug/25/tax.taxandspending1

 

The Judges in Mr Cullinane’s case are: -

  1. Mr Registrar Pimm
  2. Mr Registrar Simmonds
  3. Mr Registrar Baister
  4. Mr Justice Jacobs
  5. Mr Justice Neuberger – Promoted for Crime: http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2012/jul/12/lord-neuberger-appointed-supreme-court-president
  6. Lord Justice Stewart-Smith  -  Also covered-up the Hillsborough disaster.  See below: -
  7. Mr Jonathan Parker
  8. Mr Justice Hart
  9. Master Leslie
  10. Mrs Justice Ebsworth
  11. Mr Justice Ferris
  12. Mr Justice Pumfrey
  13. Mr Justice Mann.

All the above High Court Judges have proved themselves to be corrupt to the core, as theevidence demonstrates. They conspired with each other and the Inland Revenue and Police to ROB me of my home and possessions:

 

 

BBC NEWS on 19 December 2012

Hillsborough disaster and its aftermath

Lord Justice Stuart-Smith’s conclusion was that the fresh evidence did not add anything significant to the understanding of the disaster, and that while statements should not have been edited, this was simply an “error of judgement”.

Jack Straw accepted the findings and ruled out a new inquiry, but in August 1998 the Hillsborough Family Support Group brought charges of manslaughter against David Duckenfield and his deputy, Supt Bernard Murray, in a private prosecution.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19545126

 

 

Jack Straw also COLLUDED in Patrick Cullinane’s case and ignored ALL his correspondence for HELP: -

Videos from the House of Lords on 9 March 2010: -

Here are recordings of “victims turned starfighters” introducing themselves on 9th March 2010:

[Please listen to what Brian Hudson has to say about the conman Jack Straw at number two introduction]

http://edm1297.info/2010/03/11/tackling-the-serious-oppression-of-hm-subjects/

 

 

Don’t forget: KPMG as my Trustee in Bankruptcy conspired with the Inland Revenue and the High Court to ROB me of my home and possessions:

The Guardian: By Rob Evans and Polly Curtis on Thursday 17 June 2010

Tax boss most wined and dined mandarin –study

HMRC head David Hartnett attended 107 events in three years, with accountancy firms among those extending largesse

Hartnett sat down with representatives of the “big four” accountancy firms 27 times. He ate with KPMG 10 times … • Datablog: see the full list of civil servants entertained details

http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2010/jun/17/hmrc-head-tax-corporate-entertainment

 

 

As the Police in the UK are totally corrupted by 50 years of Rupert Murdoch and his gutter press reporters attacking Whistle Blowers for their own ends: -

Tony Farrell – Institutional Denial and the Police Service (WeAreChange Manchester)

Tony Farrell, the Police Intelligence Analyst Fired For Blowing the Whistle On False Flag Terror speaking to WeAreChange Manchester

After stating that the threat from internal tyranny “far exceeded” that posed by Islamic terrorism, Farrell’s Director of Intelligence responded by saying, “Tony, you and I will never get them to tell the truth….we are mere foot-soldiers of the government.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=45ggImuqyUc

 

 

The Police in the UK are so CORRUPT now that they treat blatant FRAUD against We the People as a CIVIL (sic) matter: -

The police have told me on VIDEO that the robbery of my home and possessions is a civil matter: -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeI1xO4luPg

 

Mr Cullinane’s MPs told him that it WAS a police matter, but failed to contact the Police on Mr Cullinane’s behalf.  Which demonstrates the COLLUSION.  Just like Stephen Pound MP did to his constituents Patricia Miller-Foulds and Laurence McGeough: -

 

Stephen Pound MP has left this old English lady on the Streets; ROBBEB of her own HOME and EVERYTHING.  Mr Cullinane also contacted Mr Pound about this old English lady’s plight.  His office staff contacted Patricia Miller-Folulds and said, Mr Cullinane was abusive to them.  This is the EVIL scam these SHYSTERS are pulling every day on old and vulnerable people like Patricia Miller-Foulds.  She is still on the Streets: -

Forums > WE ARE ANGRY – The executive MUST RECOGNISE OUR CONSTITUTION > STASI-LIKE BEHAVIOUR REPORTS

BAILIFFs SOLICITORS, POLICE, COURTS – CASE of PATRICIA MILLE-FOULDS By Elizabeth Watson ONE VOICE ACTION GROUP.

http://weareangry.co.uk/Discussion/tabid/822/aft/225/afpg/2/language/en-GB/Default.aspx

 

 

Fraud Act 2006

1 Fraud

(1) A person is guilty of fraud if he is in breach of any of the sections listed in

subsection (2) (which provide for different ways of committing the offence).

(2) The sections are—

(a) section 2 (fraud by false representation),

(b) section 3 (fraud by failing to disclose information), and

(c) section 4 (fraud by abuse of position).

(3) A person who is guilty of fraud is liable—

(a) on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12

months or to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum (or to both);

(b) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding

10 years or to a fine (or to both).

 

 

Theft Act 1968

1 Basic definition of theft.E+W

(1) A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently

depriving the other of it; and “thief” and “steal” shall be construed accordingly.

“Property”.E+W

(1)“Property” includes money and all other property, real or personal, including things in action and other intangible property.

 

 

Such is the state of justice in the UK today, we have the rule of Law–yersand Judges, who have hijacked the Rule of Law for their own COMMERCIAL gain.  Which has nothing whatsoever to do with natural justice: -

 

A report by Aidan Radnedge in the METRO newspaper on 23 January 2013, which was headed, “Male suicide at 10-year high as recession bites”…

Some 4,552 men killed themselves in 2011“  -  in the UK

 

There is NO Rule of Law or protection in our courts, only ROBBERY, and no accountability whatsoever.  It is GENOCIDE.

 

The Leveson Inquiry – Forgetful Editors

Tell your friends because the newspapers won’t.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hkpE4jle4VE

 

 

We have massive problems in the UK with getting the Local and National Media to publish anything to do with Judges operating Kangaroo Courts and Members of Parliament COLLUDING with Judges and Law–yers by fobbing off their PERSECUTED and ROBBED constituents. – The following will explain why: -

 

The Real News – Published on 28 Jan 2013

Spies and the Media

Anaie Machon: Intelligence agencies infiltrate and actively work to influence mainstream media

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NcPGitZHE0U&feature=youtube_gdata_player

 

On 20 December 2012, having been evicted from the court by the police, Mr Cullinane visited Trinity Mirror Southern in Uxbridge with Laurence McGeough, Timothy Fleming and Peter McGeough and they spoke to the News Editor Alan Hayes and gave him a copy of the attach document that was served on District Judge Wood.

 

God help We the People in the UK, as we do NOT have the protection of the law, and the Media and Politicians are involved.

 

Official Notice –We the Peopledemand: As Sovereign flesh and blood human beings, we accept and acknowledge your oath of office, as you entered into office to protect and uphold our God given rights, Treaty rights and Common Law rights in these MALICIOUS abuse of process matters.

 

As this is a very serious case; we look forward to a positive response at your earliest convenience, as our client is getting pains in his chest, and his  work and family life is being affected badly.  DO NOT MURDER THIS IMMIGRANT IRISHMAN.  Laurence McGeough is owed hundreds of thousands of pounds in compensation for the HELL he has been put through by the (COMMERCIAL) Justice system in the UK, which is run by Law—yers andJudges.

 

Please advise:  As to which person or persons’ in the UK have the legal expertise in COMMON LAW JURISDICTION to investigate this CRIMINAL abuse of process case properly.  Notwithstanding, that the UK is a Common Law Jurisdiction.  But not many Judges, Law—yers or MPs are aware of this FACT, as you will see from this correspondence.  The likes ofStephen Pound MP needs to read this correspondence, very, very carefully!

 

For ALL the above reasons We the People have lost ALL faith and confidence in the Complaints Systems’ in the UK.

 

We await your reply, as Judge Wood has shown herself to be a serious danger to members of the public that enter HER court.

 

Please acknowledge the safe receipt of this correspondence by return of email.

 

Yours truthfully,

 

Patrick Cullinane

Common Law: Legal Adviser, McKenzie Friend, Caseworker for the IBRG and Victim of HM COLLUDING Partnerships.

<><><><><><><>

 

PS.  The British Army is the ONLY remedy now for this ENTRENCHED CORRUPTION in the UK.  Justice will have to come from the barrel of a GUN.  Otherwise, who is going to restore the RULE OF LAW in our Courts ???   Amen.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

M KIRK UPDATE 8 FEB 13 – + more

M KIRK TRANSCRIPT  – recd. 8 Feb. 13

12 05 04 RO Trial T20120090 – kirk – All proeedings – 04.05.12.pdf

http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/hgz1kd

————————————-

Please see attatched as received re: Maurice Kirk, at the Criminal Court of Appeal 13 Feb 2013.

Thank you.

http://www.sendspace.com/filegroup/4bZfv3PDGttUoNacXTZvZwKHZNv5G98T

——————————–

MAURICE KIRK COURT STATEMENT 18 JAN 13

...aa  2 01-12-11_1812

above – Maurice Kirk in hospital taken from Cardiff prison durng one of his many enforced stints there recently, which are very questionable. See below for many posts on Maurice Kirk and see his site http://www.kirkflyingvet.com

From Maurice Kirk  18 01 13 =

Criminal Court of Appeal Criminal                                                                         

ref.:  1203241 D Royal Courts of Justice Court                           

ref: CO/3970/2012 &amp;CO/6357/2012                                                                                                                                                  1CF 03546

18th January 2013 Dear Case Worker,                                   

Regina v Kirk  

            Breach of Restraining Order Appeal

Supervised Personal Recording of Cardiff Courts’ Evidence

Further to my 9th Jan 2013 Application to hear Cardiff Crown Court’s digitally recorded records of both 1st /2nd  March 12 and 2nd/4th May12 Crown Court hearings , before Their Honours Judge Hughes and  Judge Curren QC, respectively, it is refused by HMCTS Director Luigi Stranati, so I apply for the following as local authorities also refuse, before ,during and after trials, despite my written and verbal requests for material evidence contained in :

  1. Copy of Cardiff Crown Court logs
  1. GEOamey Custodial Services logs (asked for by the jury and refused) and copy of CCTV (asked for by the jury) identifying five officers who threw me onto the floor, whilst ejecting me from my cell followed with my crutches thrown onto my head with my huge bag of legal papers.
  1. Cardiff Magistrates court logs (asked for by the jury and refused) and CCTV (asked for by the jury and refused) of each of the hearings relating to the Harassment conviction
  1. HM Prison custody records, during my times imprisoned and to include my full medical records as referred to in trial and appeal transcripts
  1. I request the unusual permission to serve on the Appeal Court a series of court sound recordings of the 10th Nov11 to 1st Dec 11 Cardiff summary proceedings before District Judge John Charles which clearly indicate, for example, that the prosecution exhibits were switched between prosecution witnesses, mid trial, by the Crown Prosecutor, David Gareth Evans, caught on tape trying to remedy the situation with the judge after I spotted it. His application was to alter the status of two differently worded WANTED posters one being an exhibit, my refused examination of it, marked as to prove it was sent internally by Caswell Clinic via the Post Office!
  1. The taped record also, for example, catches the judge refusing me any of my legal papers either from my cell or from my Mackenzie Friend, carrying them in his arms, having just collected them from a lawyer whose covering letter was confiscated by the who had failed, via the court, to give me his covering letter of legal advice because Judge John Charles refused to hand it over y not knowing decisions by The Recorder of Cardiff had already pre empted the hearings’ outcome.

1

Maurice outside Tottenham police station Sept. 2011. He had been held there on at least 1 occasion around that time on very questionable reasoning – and unsuccessful attempts were made to section him and the Musa parents Chiwar and Gloria who were incarcerated for no reason in the cells there, hence the megaphone and Maurice’s attempts to console them during there enforced removals. The solicitor who attended the Musas there after told me was subject to an attempt to throw him out of the police station – something he’d never experienced the like of before in his entire career as a legal practitioner in this once fine country of ours – he  told me laughing afterwards.

Gloria was treated particularly badly there then – stripped of almost every item of clothing – denied a blanket and put in a freezing cell for a weekend. They were released without charge after a few days of course.

—————————————————-

ImageProxy

M Kirk with the Musas outside the RCJ lst September 2012

02 Legal Battles

                House of Commons Tuesday 15th Janury 2013

Supporters, please now go out and disseminate this recording (and 74 others later) of your typical judge in Cardiff waxing elequent across the Principality, expecting  some of us to tolerate an ounce of his jibberish.

God help the indigenous population when they  finally get judicial autonomy.

VN850036.WMA

—————————————————————————-

Criminal Court of Appeal    ref: 201203241 D

Administrative Court      ref: CO/3970/2012 &amp;CO/6357/2012

Royal Courts of Justice Court       London

13th January 2013

Dear Case Lawyer,

Appeals against Restraining Order and Breach Thereof

  1. The South Wales Police psychiatrist’s protection appears extreme and again highlighted in the enclosed hand written notes taken by one of many helpers, in the public gallery, all determined to witness the original  summary conviction of ‘harassment’ re fabricated medical evidence, in Nov/ Dec2011 Cardiff Magistrates before District Judge John Charles.
  2. If you accept it as evidence I wish, also, to forward the taped recordings of those quite unusual proceedings when the judge ruled, for no good reason, just as a year earlier [‘common assault' conviction obtained in my absence quashed in May12 Bristol Crown Court], that I was not allowed call or cross examine the police while repeatedly denying my access my own legal papers, even those from my solicitor he had sent, originally, directly to the judge!
  3. Judicial Review Applications CO/3970/2012 &amp; CO/6357/2012 cover some these facts surrounding this and magistrate’s subsequent 1st March 12 Cardiff Crown Court appeal, before his Honour Judge Hughes is where, for no reason, I was, again refused my right to cross examine any prosecution witnesses or have my legal papers in court or call my main defence witnesses.
  4. Their tactic was hatched during the farcical 2010 ‘WW1 Lewis machine gun’ trial, on its 2nd day of its two week hearing, following my cross examination of the first four policemen that caused, not just those in the public gallery but also the jury of my innocence.
  5. Nine members of the jury told us after, in a Cardiff restaurant, “We were forced to return and sit there for another ten days”!
  6. My ability to prepare and attend High Court hearings, in those two years and process these JRs in an orderly manner, was thwarted by these allegations, exemplified from those of many similar prison telephone tapes, enclosed, indicating the conditions I had to endure whilst incarcerated in HM Cardiff Prison BEFORE and DURING the 1st Dec11 conviction,1st March 12 Appeal and 4th May 2012  ‘Breach of Restraining Order’ conviction, subject to my much delayed London appeal before the Criminal Court of Appeal.
  7. I apply, as I am refused, for the release of Cardiff prison and GEOamey custody records and to hear the 4th May 12 Court CDs.

Yours faithfully,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Samples 30 odd telephone prison tapes during mmy two years of Cardiff Cabal persecution

Do you recognise my photo of the Coronation Street lying  little b**tch, who’s name escapes me and who opened the door to me but committed perjury while telling the jury what then happened. Did it affectthe Nigerian Musa Haringay Council six snatched chilodren trial? It gave the parents seven imprisonment LONG OVERDUE for an appeal

http://www.onetruemedia.com/otm_site/view_shared?p=10bc7eafa4ebcf7e30f2d27&amp;skin_id=701&amp;utm_source=otm&amp;utm_medium=text_url

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=10b5b2c2f8021694ab225f2&amp;skin_id=1702&amp;utm_source=otm&amp;utm_medium=text_url

http://www.onetruemedia.com/otm_site/view_shared?p=116ea8568481d69d52553f4&amp;skin_id=1702&amp;large

29th November 11 Public Gallery witness notes for my bizarre ‘Harassment’ Cardiff Magistrates hearing

Dr Magistrates Evidence.pdf

15th Nov 11 Solicitor letter blocked by Luigi Stranati HMCTS Delivery Director

11 11 25 Solicitor letter to Cardiff Magistrates REDACTED.pdf

09 12 02 Transcript Crn Crt REDACTED.pdf

09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED.pdf

Witness Summonses applied for rogue MAPPA doctor and my preference, Dr Gaynor Jones, psychiatrist of Caswell Clinic

This ridiculous case, just to obtain medical attention, continues in Cardiff magistrates in a few days, before District Judge Bodfan Jenkins.

Well worth a visit with candy floss and ice cream served in the interval.

09 12 02 Transcript Crn Crt REDACTED.pdf

09 09 30 INTERIM PSYCHIATRIC REPORT Oct1 2009 REDACTED.pdf

13 01 07 Magiistrates reply re Dr witness summons

Legal Advisor                                                                                         ref 1200734025

Magistrates

Cardiff CF24 ORZ

11th January 2013

Dear Sir,

Doctors’ Witnesses Summonses for 22nd January 13 Hearing

Your asking why I need these doctors to give evidence, following District Judge Bodfan Jenkins’ predictable refusal to allow me to have a ‘restraining order’ varied, in order to receive medical attention, I would of thought somewhat obvious.

  1. Doctor  ****** ********, South Wales Police’s MAPPA Psychiatrist

This gentleman wrote the enclosed 30th September 2009 psychiatric report for Cardiff Crown and civil courts recommending I be further sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act but registered IPP, Imprisonment for Public Protection, probably for life.

This Welsh doctor pressed that I be transferred to Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Hospital but, he wrote, only because of  threats to him by a Norman Scarth RN Rtd as Caswell Clinic was only a medium security psychiatric prison with a 14ft fence.

On 2nd December 2009 this individual, fully supported by Crown Prosecutor barrister, Richard Thomlow and already accepted by at least seven previous Welsh judges, all recommending my continued incarceration, whilst unconvicted and that I must remain locked up in either Cardiff prison or in his own experimental facility, Caswell Clinic.

This police doctor always gave this information (transcripts enclosed), in my absence, for some reason and always without my designated legal representation present. This time, before His Honour Judge Neil bidder QC, he stated I may have a brain tumour but that I suffered ‘significant brain damage’ that was, most likely, irreversible.

No one notified moi of any of this until many, many months later when I luckily escaped by being released from prison. I had been found not guilty for trading in WW1Lewis machine guns, other alleged prohibited weapons and being in possession of a small arsenal of machine gun ammunition enough, apparently, to start a war.

have since then experienced not inconsiderable inconvenience in my failed attempts for clarification of this medical evidence, little obtained only by my three times having to apply, for my own medical records, under the Freedom of Information Act!

No one, to date, in the Principality has indicated the moral fibre to simply elucidate.

  1. Dr Gaynor Jones, Caswell Clinic is a lady, however, I can trust will give  medical evidence for my need for the court to vary the Restraining Order

Maurice Kirk BVSc

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

FROM N SCARTH IS NOT VIOLENT!! 4 2 13 + – “A half-hearted ‘supporter’ is worse than an enemy.”

SCARTH COURT DOC  4 FEB 13Some people bring up the fact that I was ‘convicted of a violent crime’.  Yes, it is true I do ‘have a conviction for violence’ – like Timothy John Evans, Mahmood Marchant, George Kelly, Kevin Callan, Stefan Kisko, Anthony Steele, & all too many others!
BUT -  IT WAS IN A QUISLING (Star Chamber) COURT. 
My lawyers having abandoned me, my witnesses & my evidence were banned by Judge David Ronald Bentley, who also banned The Press (see Banning Order, attached).
With them absent, he made no attempt to hide his hatred of me, having me literally thrown back down to the cells – three times – when I dared to complain of his gross misconduct.
How on earth could The Press publish their Reports, en no reporters were ever IN court to see
& hear what happened?
Simple – they published what they were told by the prosecution lawyers!
Norman Scarth.
PS:  I regard that ‘conviction’ as a badge of honour, that they should go to such extreme lengths to silence me.   NS.

————————————–

well said Norman. 

———- Forwarded message ———- From: Norman Scarth <againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk> Date: 3 February 2013 11:56 Subject: AttGen v Scarth.  With ’allies’ like these …?  ‘Report’ from an ‘observer’(???) To: Norman Scarth <againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk>

Poisonous lies & twisted truth by the Attorney General (as only lawyers know how), added to by Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge, are further distorted by this ‘observer’.

Not wanting to send this out without giving ‘B’ the chance to comment, I sent a Draft to her, hoping her response might be such that I would not send it out at all.  There has been no response. (Her ‘Report’ mentions a Jewish MOSQUE!!!)

-       – - – - – - – - – - -  – - -  – - – - – - – -

To ‘B’: I have seen attacks on you by others, & have been disturbed by them.

Below is a message (2,747 words) I was thinking to send to my mailing list. I hope your response might make me think otherwise.

(You will see I do not mention your name).

- – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - -

Subject line: Bad enough to be attacked by Quislings, but …

When you have suffered attacks by Quislings as much as I have, further attacks by them are like water off a ducks back.

It wounds much deeper when the attacks are from those who claim to be on the same side.

A person who claims to be a public campaigner in the truth and justice movement” attended my ‘trial’ before Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge on 23rd January 2013 at the Royal Court of ‘Justice’(??)Below is her Report to me, & below that are exchanges between us (& one message that was NOT sent to me).

From: b

To: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk Subject: RE: LCJ Judge had the chance to prove me wrong – but muffed it! Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 00:12:29 +0000

Hi Norman

I was at the RCJ Court 5 this morning and heard it all, a pretty dreadful picture of you was painted by the AG’s counsel! Was it true that you attacked someone with a chainsaw on court premises, shouted obscenities through a loud hailer to Judge Rose & his family at the Shadwell Mosque (a Jewish MOSQUE???) as they arrived for prayers on the Jewish New Year, leafleted the Harrogate Mosque (ANOTHER Jewish MOSQUE???) with anti-Jewish leaflets and called some court usher a whore?

The Judge’s conclusion was that you are mentally-ill! at the same time your needing to record court proceedings on account of being aged and deaf was accepted at face-value with the advice that you could have applied to any of the various courts you were in for permission to record the proceedings for your own use (provided they would not be posted on YouTube etc.) indeed LCJ Judge said, had you attended today and requested to record the proceedings he would have granted you permission! And of course as you will have heard from Mr Waldman or Patrick C you’ve been given a 1 year suspended sentence meaning you can safely return and provided you do not re-offend all will be well. B (If she believes one word of that she will believe anything! My response below).

From: Norman Scarth [mailto:againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk] Sent: 24 January 2013 01:36 To: b Cc: a handful of others Subject: Pure poison!!!

I am most grateful to you for attending ‘B’, but slightly disappointed that you feel the need to ask me about the poisonous lies (highlighted above), which, even if true, were completely irrelevantto the charge against me. SURELYyou could see that they were there just to blacken my character, the intention that they will be published all over Britain by the so-called ‘News Media’, while the Legal/Judicial Mafia will come out as compassionate, saintly people, smelling of roses? I will not dignify such monstrous lies by defending myself against them, except to say that those who spoke or wrote them deserve to have their tongues cut out. ‘The judge’s conclusion was that I was mentally ill”. THERE YOU HAVE IT! To offer leaflets & use a camera is the action of someone who is mentally ill! Only the most twisted, diseased mind could think that!

Had I attended, there is not the slightest doubt that, instead of imposing the prison sentence, he would have had me dragged off to a Stalinist Nuthouse, probably to suffer the same fate as Andy McCardle (see attachment).

The best thing I ever did in my life was to get out of Britain, the land of which I was once so proud, believing, as we were constantly told, that “BRITISH JUDGES ARE THE FINEST IN THE WORLD”. I now feel ashamed that I was so gullible for so long! This shows the twisted purpose behind their supposedintentions to ‘make courts more open’, by allowing parts of the proceedings to be broadcast: They will ONLY be broadcasting the summing up by the shysters who sit as judges, & the public will swallow it, as if God had spoken! The tragedy is not that these things can happen, but that the British People ALLOW them to happen! PLEASE, ‘B’, don’t swallow poison. You say,you can safely return and provided you do not re-offend all will be well.” ‘Re-offend’?RE-OFFEND‘?I will expose these evil monsters while ever there is breath in my body! Norman Scarth. PS: As for the suggestion that I ‘could have applied to any of the various courts you were in for permission to record the proceedings’. I will forward to you something I have sent to x. NS.

-From: B
Sent: 24  January 2013 12:26:23 To: ‘Norman  Scarth’ (againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk) Cc: …..

Hi Norman

No I haven’t swallowed their poison as you put it, but what I am concerned to know is, in making the shocking allegations that the AG’s Counsel came up with, repeated by LCJ Judge in his summing up, that you behaved as highlighted below, DOES THE AG/CROWN HAVE A SINGLE SHRED OF HARD EVIDENCE? Ie. a copy of the leaflet you are alleged to have given out at the Harrogate synagogue, video footage of you ranting anti-semitic obscenitiesat the congregation of a synagogue on Jewish New Year’s Day, CCTV footage of the incidents at the court, etc.

(CERTAINLY they have ‘hard evidence’ – which proves I did NOT! They DO have copies of the leaflet AND video footage! On neither of them are there ANYanti-semitic or obscene words. Anyone that knows me will tell that I do not like obscenities in others, men or women, nor do I use them myself – Judge Jonathan Rose & Lord Justice Pitchford were both lying when they said so.)

Do you see what I’m saying? As a public campaigner in the truth and justice movement(??) I’m hugely concerned about all the lying that goes on unchecked in court, I’d love to be able to say publicly (through my loud hailer!) that EVEN THE ATTORNEY GENERAL LIED to make a case against an elderly war-hero standing up against official corruption and INVENTED all kinds of defamatory stuff against him FOR WHICH THERE IS NO HARD EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER! in the full confidence that there really is none. (I SINCERELY HOPE YOU WILL!) Do you see where I’m coming from? I agree it may be technically “irrelevant to the case”but it is hugely relevant to the PR side of all of this and to getting wider public support for you and what you stand for. What looks on the face of it like a monumentally brave stance against official corruption would be considerably undermined if it could be not just said but PROVED you have been rude and abusive, verbally or otherwise to anyone along the way, never mind who they are or even what they’ve done. Some would still say you were justified but the detractors would go into top gear to press the British public’s buttons –people are in general squeamish about rudeness in any shape or form and anti-semitism is a no-no, end of.

Looking at it another way, if all of this stuff has been fabricated against you yet presented as fact in the highest court in the land by the top echelon of the legal establishment, that in itself is a massive wake-up call. This was not Plumstead Magistrates, this was Court 5 RCJ, the President’s court where this stuff was being spewed out yesterday.

As for “re-offend” again I am repeating the judge’s words not mine!

I was/am merely an observer in these proceedings, I confess I hadn’t as yet done much checking out of your campaigning activity and went into court yesterday partly to find out some of this history (AND SWALLOW THE LIES!) and also hear what the judge might say about the use of recording equipment in court. So I was a bit taken aback when all this stuff came spewing forth that you are alleged to have said and done, supporting the contention that you are mentally deranged – my first thought as always in such circumstances was, is there any evidence??

B

- – - – - – - – - – -

From: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk To: b. (along with letter from Councillor Carter & ‘Siege over Norman’article)

CC: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk Subject: 8th August 1999. (correction: it was 9th August) Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:37:41 +0000

Dear B, (now amended, better structured than the original, with a few more facts, but still only a part of the full horror). I am grateful that you wrote as you did, otherwise I may never have known how truly awful was the ‘hearing’ before the Lord Chief Justice on 23rd January 2013. That he should allow such poisonous lies to be told – completely irrelevant to the charge against me – was diabolical. Unfortunately, all too many swallow them, including some of my ‘supporters’ who are less than staunch, demanding that I answer the lies.

I just do not have time left to live to do so, but to them I say, “You are asking the wrong questions of the wrong man: Why don’t you ask the Government, the Judiciary & the Police about the events of 9th August 1999?” (Eleven months BEFORE the ‘crime’ I am supposed to have committed!)

On that day came the first potentially lethal terror attack on me by a mob-handed gang of West Yorkshire Police, being used as a PRIVATE ARMY, without even the PRETENCEof a lawful excuse! There has been a NATIONWIDE cover-up of that police crime – Amnesty International, Liberty, Justice (all controlled by lawyers),ALL the ‘News Media’, MPs et al joining in the cover-up! See attached letter from Leeds Councillor Amanda Carter. It was a wonderful letter, but she got a contemptuous brush-off from the police, as did others who wrote. There is more to tell however: a couple of days later she contacted me, begging, “PLEASE keep me out of this!”

Why should she back-track so badly? She was a new, idealistic councillor, newly married to Andrew Carter, a very EXPERIENCEDcouncillor, Leader of the Conservative Group on Leeds City Council. It is blindingly obvious she had written the letter without telling him, that when he learned of it he had blown her head off for getting involved! There is more to tell about them, but no time now. Norman Scarth. PS: Newspaper report, ‘Siege Over Norman’ also attached, which you may be able to read, but not fully understand without explanation. Again, there is more to tell. PPS: That terror arrack was intended to silence me, a heart attack or a stroke the hoped for outcome. Few men of my age (74 then) would not have had one or the other. It came JUST SEVENTEEN DAYSafter my single-handed success in the European Court of Human Rights, and JUST SIX WEEKSafter I had told Lord Woolf in the Civil Appeal Court, “Her Majesty the Queen, whose courts these are, is badly served by the shysters who now infest the judiciary!”Was there a connection? Was there also a connection with the fact that I had ANOTHER Application in to the ECt-HR – MUCHhotter than the previous, successful one? With the trauma of the terror I was not able to progress it further, so they WERE successful in stopping that! Norman Scarth

I could accept that ‘B’ was simply reporting what she heard in court, but for the fact that having received the above, she took not the slightest notice(even with the letter from Councillor Carter),nor did she respond to me, but sent the message below to others, one of whom who forwarded it to me. Otherwise I would have had no knowledge of it.

“When we attack people and use offensive language IT PROVIDES THE OTHER SIDE WITH AMMO TO ATTACK US!

As illustrated in the proceedings against Norman Scarth in the High Court on Wednesday. Norman is another with excellent intentions and one of the very best but may not have his tongue under control either. (faint praise, ending with a sneer).

Norman claims it is all lies he insulted the Jewish community, I don’t know what the truth is in this situation to be honest but completely don’t approve of insulting whole communities so if he did do that, even if under duress it makes it hard to work with Norman and back him up wholeheartedly.

(Despite receiving my emails for about 3 years she has never,ever, responded, much less ‘worked with me’, or ‘backed me up’ –even HALF-heartedly).

My barrister tells me,

In giving the court’s judgment, Lord Judge specifically referred to the fact that some of the history set out in the Attorney General’s application was not relevant. He confirmed that the court had disregarded those matters in arriving at its decision.

17. He referred in particular to the section of Mr Scarth’s statement in which he took exception to the allegations of racial abuse. The court had clearly considered that section and taken into account the fact that it was not relevant to the Attorney-General’s application.

(He should of course have censured the AGmost severely for including them, but didn’t).

So, though ‘The Court’ had (supposedly!)disregarded those matters’, it seems that ‘B’ had NOT! The intention of the AG to plant those lies in the brain of observers had been successful with ‘B’:they were going to remain there WHATEVER I said, AND she was going to spread them far & wide.

NOTE:‘B’ demands of me, “DOES THE AG/CROWN HAVE A SINGLE SHRED OF HARD EVIDENCE? Ie. a copy of the leaflet you are alleged to have given out at the Harrogate synagogue, video footage of you ranting anti-semitic obscenities

CERTAINLY they have copies of the leaflet ANDvideo footage! On neither of them are there ANY anti-semitic or obscene words. Anyone that knows me will tell that I do not like obscenities in others, men or women, nor do I use them myself – Judge Jonathan Rose & Lord Justice Pitchford were both lying when they said so.

‘B’effectively demands I waste my very precious time (as I have done now)producing‘evidence’ to convince HER that they were lies. You don’t need ‘evidence’ to know that an egg is rotten: the stench is unmistakeable! Equally so the stench of corruption. A pity ‘B’ has no sense of smell.

She was present when the Lord Chief Justice was presiding over a most blatant Quisling/Kangaroo Court, but had not the wit to see it. Perhaps she will see it now? If not, then her claim to be, a public campaigner in the truth and justice movement”is questionable.

Around 1900, Press Baron Lord Northcliffe said, “The power of The Press is great, but the power of suppression is much greater”. The same with the courts: ‘B’ was ‘force-fed’ the monstrous lies, even though the LCJ had said they were irrelevant! (They were also highly improper, & SHOULD have resulted in the AG’s Application being thrown out by the LCJ).

In stark contrast, neither the Press nor those in the public gallery were ALLOWEDto hear my rebuttals, not ALLOWEDto hear about ‘The Foulest Honey-Trap Ever’, or hear of evidence proving official transcripts are so grossly inaccurate they are worthless.  This was quite disgraceful, as was the conduct of those who were supposed to be ‘my’ lawyers, who allowed it to happen, frightened to death to challenge the big boys of their profession.

Norman Scarth.

PS: A half-hearted ‘supporter’ is worse than an enemy. NS.”

##############################

Related:  See:   ”Who wanted Kay shut up?”

NORMAN SCARTH WRITES:  29 09 12

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment