MAURICE KIRK: LATEST NEWS, 23 OCT. ’14 – PLS SIGN THE PETITION – + more

 

From Maitice Kirk’s site: http://www.kirkflyingvet.com 

LATEST NEWS 23 Oct. 2014

“Some rare news from Maurice 

” Since he was released from Cardiff prison in July and then imprisoned again for no good reason other than to keep him from revealing the truth

about the Cardiff cabal, Maurice has been severely restricted in the information he can get out.

Fortunately, despite all his contacts being removed from his “approved” list of phone numbers there is still one member of his family that he is able to communicate with. Yesterday he called and summarized his position thus:14:
:
I have not had a single warning issued to me but now I find that I am up for a disciplinary hearing next Monday for assault. The Prison Staff maintain that “I have assaulted someone at a particular location in the wing. They have declared that they have evidence but refuse to use CCTV evidence that would have filmed the incident from a camera in full view of the position. They do use another camera that does not/cannot show the actual ‘incident’ and they refuse to identify the  4 or 5 staff who were in the immediate area nor any of the prisoners who must have seen what actually happened as they are on the video tape. What makes this look so strange is that the exact same method was used to convict me of assaulting a Prison Officer Rogan in the Cardiff vehicle lock when I put my hand on his arm to make a citizen’s arrest when at least six cameras would have recorded the incident clearly. The powers-that-be are desperate to keep me inside as long as possible so that I cannot continue my civil court case nor gain the organ of publicity which would expose the falsehoods, mistakes and cover-ups which purport to be Justice in South Wales today.

Maurice Kirk

A7306AT

HMP Swansea” [ends]
: ———————————————————–
PLEASE SIGN 
What is happening to Maurice Kirk is unspeakable
Please  sign  this:

•Petitioning Rt Hon Theresa May MP 

This petition will be delivered to:
Home Secretary
Rt Hon Theresa May MP
Prime Minister
Rt Hon David Cameron MP
British Broadcasting Corporation
BBC
HM Chief Inspector of Prisons
Nick Hardwick CBE
Member of Parliament
Alun Cairns MP
HMP Swansea Governor / Director
Lauren Watson
Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice
Rt Hon Chris Grayling MP
Minister of State for Policing, Criminal Justice and Victims
Rt Hon Mike Penning MP
Deputy Prime Minister
Rt Hon Nick Clegg MP
Leader of Her Majesty’s Official Opposition
Rt Hon Ed Miliband MP
First Secretary of State and Leader of the House of Commons
Rt Hon William Hague
Assistant Whip and Minister for Prisons, Probation and Rehabilitation
Andrew Selous MP

Please release Maurice J Kirk BVSc from HMP Swansea asap!

 

 http://www.change.org/p/rt-hon-theresa-may-mp-please-release-maurice-j-kirk-bvsc-from-hmp-swansea-asap

[ends]

—————————————————————–

Maurice has no brain tumour as a consultant psychiatrist claimed – without even being qualified to diagnose such, and without even giving Maurice a medical examination either – an outrage!! Maurice suffered greatly because of this false report, in the courts and elsewhere – and was even imprisoned as a result in Ashworth closed hospital – 

5 important documents received from Maurice a few days ago, followed by letter from Prime Minister, the recent radio broadcast video, + more – [click on the pic, then click on it again to enlarge]:
 1] The Great Wheelchair Conspiracy 
 2] Obstruction to Medical Care 
 3] Prosecutor Evidence 1 Dec 2011 “Harrassment of Police Psychiatrist”
4] Fabricated Medical Records Refused Correction 
 5] Prisoner Brief Complaints List

http://butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/21/5-important-documents-from-maurice-kirk-14-oct-2014-more/

M. KIRK – BARRISTERS DOCUMENT 29 SEPT. 14

http://wordpress.com/post/27830020/6867

From earlier = 16 SHEETS FROM MAURICE KIRK 16 DEC. 13

http://www.butlincat.blogspot.co.uk/2013/12/16-sheets-from-maurice-kirk-16-dec-13.html

Maurice Kirk’s site is:  http://www.kirkflyingvet.com

Scroll down for more posts, or see “archives” on the right of the page… 

kirk 1ba

above: Maurice Kirk outside Cardiff Civic Centre with some of his legal files at the start of his civil case against certain authorities – this case is still ongoing and not ended due to his dubious imprisonment from 16 October 2013.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged ,

5 IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS FROM MAURICE KIRK 14 OCT. 2014, + MESSAGE TO THE JUSTICE, + ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMITTEE 23 OCT. ’14

 

5 important documents received from Maurice a few days ago, followed by letter from Prime Minister, the recent radio broadcast video, + more – [click on the pic, then click on it again to enlarge]:
1] The Great Wheelchair Conspiracy 

2] Obstruction to Medical Care 
3] Prosecutor Evidence 1 Dec 2011 “Harrassment of Police Psychiatrist” 
4] Fabricated Medical Records Refused Correction 
5] Prisoner Brief Complaints List
3] 61474145314421435146
7148Received from Maurice on the 14 Oct:
“Meeting yesterday
probation assessment
for release on licence,
Barry police station, probation
manager admitted police opposing
my release, are still working off Dr.
Tegwyn Williams’ 19/10/09 and
30/09/09 psychiatric reports!!
and what doctor told 2/12/09
courts and judge Bidder QC.
MAPPA, police arranging I have  another psychiatric report.”
The reports he is referring to are from the doctor, the head of “Caswell Clinic”, Wales, who was in no way qualified to make such a report, stating MK had a “brain tumour” without MK even having a medical examination.
 A subsequent and proper NHS brain scan of 28 Nov. 2013 showed no signThe reports he is referring to are from the doctor, the head of “Caswell Clinic”, Wales, who was in no way qualified to make such a report, stating MK had a “brain tumour” without MK even having a medical examination for such!

kirk-brain-scan
A letter from the doctor at HMP Cardiff “Healthcare” also confirmed this, as well as MK not having “cancer”, or “P.D.D.” [Paranoid Delusional Disorder] as certain parties are attempting to state:

 KIRK healthcare 5 MAR14 14939
The report was used in court hearings to the detriment of MK. viz. being locked up in a closed hospital [Ashorth] for 3 months in 2009 when the report was manufactured. The doctor has now left the NHS and doesnt have to face proper and true justice for his actions.
The F.O.I.A. request [Subject Access Request] to the Sec. of State Mr. C. Grayling, and to also the governor of HMP Swansea regarding the release of MK’s medical records to the surgeons so they can perform MK’s long awaited stomach operation proved a waste of time as no response was offered to the request. The matter was progressed  to the Information Commissioner#s Office via a recorded delivery 1st class letter sent on the 8th October. I received a standard acknowledgement letter dated 9 October just after – this must have been sent immediately on the receipt of my communication to them, however on calling the ICO today 16 Oct. they proved to be not so helpful. 
I called them to find out what was happening regarding my contacting them, if anything, and when would an Allocation Officer be dealing with the matter I raised and when would a case number be allocated? The person called answered my questions by asking “how long is a piece of string?” We know that the length of a piece of string is what it is and is irrelavant. When asked further the figure of 2 months for the matter to be dealt with [if at all] and be alocated a case number was stated.
 I pointed out a serious medical operation had been put on hold for over 7 months now because the records had not been forthcoming, and the response to my telling this ICO representative this was “did you tell the ICO this?” I said this information was very much in the communication sent to them – but it seems to have been ignored. The ICO representative suggested I write to say the matter is urgent, which of course had already been stated in so many words in my original letter to them, which had every communication regarding the request beginning 22 Aug. sent to the parties already mentioned. 
The prime minister replied to my informing him of what was going on regarding this operation not happening and why.PRIME 8 REDACT OCT14 133
  and the response received was that the information was forwarded to the minister for health and the Mo.J.. [I am not expecting any response].  I replied the M.o.J. were very much aware of what was going on and always had been as I, for one, had been informing them and other government departments about developments over a time span of many months.
This day [16 Oct.]  last year MK lost his freedom, and now he is in a wheelchair, lost over 20 kilos in weight, and is still in great pain and is also on severe restrictions in HMP Swansea where he has done nothing to deserve such targetting.
Truly outrageous.  
MAURICE KIRK’S SISTER CELIA – RADIO INTERVIEW
video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c3tg6pDdR8&feature=youtu.be
Rough Justice: South Wales Police persecute former vet & pilot Maurice Kirk who’s suing them

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , ,

Ritual child abuse Netherlands

Ritual child abuse Netherlands.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

‘Compelling evidence’ that Rotherham officials ‘ignored numerous, credible warnings’ about child abuse

A Home Affairs Committee report published today says there is “compelling evidence” that Rotherham officials “ignored numerous, credible warnings” about child abuse.

Rotherham officials 'ignored numerous, credible warnings
The 70 page document follows up the report by Professor Alexis Jay which identified 1,400 cases of child sexual exploitation in the South Yorkshire town. It identifies key issues highlighted by the report and officials’ responses to it.

The Committee found in June 2013 that Rotherham council had been “inexcusably slow” to recognise the scale of the abuse. This is blamed on a “woeful lack of professional curiosity, or even indifference, from the council Chief Executive…to the Director of Children’s Services…through the Local Safeguarding Children’s Board.”

The report also criticised individual practitioners who “dismissed the victims – children as young as 12 – as ‘prostitutes’.”

Today’s report says that improvements were made since that time but states that “although the local authority now recognises the nature and extent of localised grooming in South Yorkshire…it is clear that senior leadership in rotherham council failed in their duty of care towards these girls.”

The Home Affairs Committee report reveals that between the publication of the report in August 2014 and 1 October 2014, 29 new cases of child sexual exploitation were reported to Rotherham’s Public Protection Unit.

MPs have scrutinised the response of officials in Rotherham to concerns raised during the 16-year period covered in the Jay report. These centre on issues raised by a Home Office investigator in 2002 and the work of Risky Business – a specialist project set up to tackle exploitation in the area.

Professor Jay’s report raised concerns about the work of a researcher in Rotherham between 2000-2002 who claimed data related to her investigation into child abuse in the area had been “removed” from her office.

The researcher’s draft report “contained severe criticisms of the agencies in Rotherham involved with CSE. The most serious concerned alleged indifference towards, and ignorance of, child sexual exploitation on the part of senior managers. The report also stated that responsibility was continuously placed on young people’s shoulders rather than with the suspected abusers.”

The Committee report states:

This is not the first case in which it has been alleged that files of information relating to child sexual exploitation have disappeared. The proliferation of revelations about files which can no longer be located gives rise, whether fairly or not, to public suspicion of a deliberate cover-up.

– Home Affairs Committee

It says the only way to tackle such suspicions is to have a “full, transparent and urgent investigation” and urges the Home Office to do everything in its power to locate any missing files.

The report found the Risky Business project passed information to South Yorkshire Police and Rotherham Council from 2003 which included details of how many cases they dealt with and details of those cases. In addition, another researcher, Dr Angie Heal, met with South Yorkshire Police Chief Constable David Crompton, to discuss her evidence of “on-street grooming”.

The Home Affairs Committee concludes:

There is compelling evidence that both Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council and South Yorkshire Police ignored numerous, credible warnings about the scale of child sexual exploitation in Rotherham. Given that these warnings came from Risky Business and others who had been expressly tasked with investigating and tackling the problem, it is difficult to understand why they were not taken more seriously. It is even suggested that documentary evidence was stolen in order to suppress it. It is hard to resist the conclusion that, if the Council and Police had taken these warnings seriously, the abusers could have been brought to justice more quickly and some of the later victims could have been spared their ordeal.

– Home Affairs Committee

The role of Police and Crime Commissioners has been called into question by the Committee after South Yorkshire’s PCC Shaun Wright refused to resign in the wake of the scandal.

South Yorkshire's PCC Shaun Wright 

Wright eventually resigned on 16 September, but his initial refusal brought to light the fact that PCCs cannot be removed from post except in the case of criminal prosecution.

Sheffield City Council unanimously passed a vote of no confidence in Shaun Wright and the county’s Police and Crime Panel indicated it would support emergency legislation to enable the urgent removal of PCCs.

The Home Affairs Committee has now published a draft bill proposing two methods by which PCCs could be removed.

The Committee says: “We are concerned that at present there is no mechanism at all to suspend or remove a Police and Crime Commissioner for behaviour which falls short of criminal. We recommend that new legislation be brought in to provide for a Police and Crime Commissioner to be subject to recall.”

One of the suggestions is that a PCC could be removed if a Police and Crime Panel passed a motion of no confidence and if one or more local authorities representing at least half the population of the police area have passed a motion of no confidence in the Commissioner.

The Home Affairs Committee is made up of ministers from all the main parties:

  • Rt Hon Keith Vaz (Chair) (Lab) (Leicester East)
  • Ian Austin (Lab) (Dudley North)
  • Nicola Blackwood (Con) (Oxford West and Abingdon)
  • James Clappison (Con) (Hertsmere)
  • Michael Ellis (Con) (Northampton North)
  • Paul Flynn (Lab) (Newport West)
  • Lorraine Fullbrook (Con) (South Ribble)
  • Dr Julian Huppert (Lib Dem) (Cambridge)
  • Yasmin Qureshi (Lab) (Bolton South East)
  • David Winnick (Lab) (Walsall North)

source:  http://www.itv.com/news/calendar/2014-10-18/compelling-evidence-that-rotherham-officials-ignored-numerous-credible-warnings-about-child-abuse/

Last updated Fri 17 Oct 2014
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged ,

GRANDMA B CASE: ROBERT HOFSCHROER + FAMILY FACING CRIMINAL CHARGES

grandzRobert Hofschröer & Family facing Criminal Charges

Criminal charges are now being preferred against Robert, Diane and Martin Hofschröer.

Watch this space for more news!

Scroll down for many posts, or check archives on the right…

the blog:  http://grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/1-new-items/breaking-news-robert-hofschroer-family-facing-criminal-charges/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

#ThePaedophileHunter Shames police and politicians

 

#ThePaedophileHunter Shames police and politicians.

#ThePaedophileHunter Shames police and politicians

Stinson Hunter is a product of the care system. By his own admission he was a bad lad when he was younger. He does not want to talk about whether he was sexually abused, but being in “care” he saw things.

He catches paedophiles out with his small team who pretend to be young children of 11 to 13. He arranges to meet them.  Then he names and shames them on video on social media. Everything is given to the police.

The programme is here [1] You decide.

The public response was amazing. #ThePaedophileHunter trended on twitter. His Kickstarter fundraising [2] was zooming up by the minute. An hour after the programme he had reached exceeded his  target of £10, 000 to carry our further projects from 880 donors.

Why? Because he is doing something about paedophiles and is passionate about it.   The  political parties are not doing it. Why because they are riddled with paedophiles. The police are not doing enough – through incompetence, lack of resources, political interference, corruption and freemasonry and interference of Special Branch and MI5.

Why has little been done about Operation Spade? Even Essex Police Comissioner wants answers from the NCA and Essex Police. No one has any faith in the NCA to investigate themselves and give the public the facts. Why are paedophiles in power not arrested and charged? Why are the National Crime Agency not even remotely accountable to the public or the Freedom of Information? Why was Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP) put in NCA?

Jim Gamble, head of CEOP is getting fed up. In the last 24 hours he has tweeted

Jim Gamble @JimGamble_INEQE. In @NCA_UK child protection is a priority. In @CEOPUK it was THE priority. Balance has shifted 2far. #CEOP has 2few specialists resources

Jim Gamble @JimGamble_INEQE. Will Home Sec be called 2account for her 2010 decisions re @CEOPUK Broken promises 2invest & build on its previous success @CommonsHomeAffs

Jim Gamble @JimGamble_INEQE . Jst spoke 2 @BBCEssex re #Goldberg case blaming @CEOPUK is 2simplistic. They’re overstretched & under resourced. Neglected by @UKHomeOffice

Why do our public servants – the Politicians and and Police hide the truth from the public?

Nottingham City and County Councils have announced that they are carrying out an inquiry.[4]  Even the Nottingham Police want one. But these 3 corporations are exactly the 3 authorities under whose care the children were abused and have been covering up. They are investigating themselves.

As for the sickening debacle of Theresa May choosing 2 wildly inappropriate chairs for the overarching child sexual abuse inquiry, which was announced nearly 3 months ago [5]. At least the first had the good grace to resign. The disgustingly contemptuous Fiona Woolf is sticking like poo to a shoe, and even 1 months after being appointed refuses even to deign to give a statement on her friend Leon Brittan who not only is under suspicion of covering up child abuse networks when he was Home Secretary, but also is under accusation of rape from a woman AND accusations of being a serial paedophile, AND has a legal action being taken against him.

The centre of this particular paedophilic cover up is of course the Home Office. They funded the Paedophile Information Exchange, which was even partly run from there.  They will feature heavily in any overarching child abuse inquiry, are under an inquiry as to the cover up of several dossiers of a parliamentary paedophilic network, they are under a review of a review of the PIE funding. BUT who chooses the Inquiry chairs and members? The Home Secretary of the Home Office.

Theresa May, please think of what harm you are doing to the victims of child abuse. But you obviously do not care, otherwise you would not act as you have. Your lack of compassion revolts me but no longer surprises me. Your political agenda dominates. Greed for power. I believe that the political agenda is driven by blackmail. Many people are in “democratic” power precisely because they are paedophiles, who are easy to blackmail by the people in real power-  the bankers, the corporations and the even more shady. The time for your ilk in power is coming to an end.

Links

[1] Stinson Hunter The Paedophile Hunter http://www.channel4.com/programmes/the-paedophile-hunter/4od#3765848

[2] Stinson Hunters Kickstarter crowdfunding project. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/stinsonhunter/project-1

[3] 2104 Oct 1 Police Oracle Ian Weinfass. Police and crime commissioner says questions must be asked of both the NCA and Essex Police.http://www.policeoracle.com/news/Investigation/2014/Oct/01/Child-abuse-deputy-head-More-questions-over-CEOP_85676.html

[4] 2014 Sept 31 Hucknall Dispatch Andy Done-Johnson Council orders child abuse review http://www.hucknalldispatch.co.uk/news/local/council-orders-child-abuse-review-1-6869677

[5] 2014 July 7 Telegraph video http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10951506/Theresa-May-launches-major-new-inquiry-into-child-sex-abuse-allegations.html

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged ,

M. KIRK – BARRISTERS DOCUMENT 29 SEPT. 14

The reply to the outrageous document produced by the CPS “barrister” helping prosecute Maurice: 

From: J. Graham, concerned citizen

To: Mr. C. Grayling, Secretary of State for Justice

Dear Secretary of State for Justice Mr. Grayling,

I wish to draw your attention to this outrageous document [attached] from this CPS “barrister” “C. Smyth”, who is helping to prosecute Mr. Maurice Kirk, whose contents amount to clear perversions of justice. Indeed, the very submitting of this document by Mr. Smyth is itself an abuse of process and an act of perversion of justice.

In this document this barrister states that Mr. M. Kirk should not question certain characters in open court. Whyever not? What is Mr. Smyth attempting to cover up by not letting any of these 3 answer Mr. Kirk’s questions?  Perhaps something very disadvantageous to the Crown’s case against Mr. Kirk?

Mr. Smyth also gives us his bizarre opinions regarding Mr. Kirk’s past actions – and I quote:

“2: The defendant has demonstrated in past and present court proceedings that he will go to exaggerated lengths to pursue perceived grievances”.

This statement – someones mere opinion – is only that – an opinion from someone trying to help prosecute Mr. Kirk. Opinions are not facts – and this is yet another blatant attempt by Mr. Smyth to not only sway the court but also to pervert the course of justice by attempting to silence Mr. Kirk, and deny him the most basic of Human Rights – Mr. Kirk’s own voice. Mr. Kirk has a voice, and has every right to use it wherever he likes, despite Mr. Smyth’s wholly prejudiced opinions.
This barrister’s attempts, in my humble opinion, seem to be blatant attempts at silencing Mr. Kirk from cross-examining witnesses by the use of this barrister’s mere opinions, which are not facts in any shape or form, which go against not only Mr. Kirk’s Human Rights, but also against the very spirit of the law. The only reason Mr. Smyth, in my humble opinion, is trying to silence Mr. Kirk is because he simply will not like what Mr. Kirk has to say, nor will he like the questions Mr. Kirk might ask the 3 persons Mr. Smyth mentions.

sincerely,

J. Graham  concerned citizen

12
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

IRISH IN BRITAIN REPRESENTATION GROUP (IBRG)

IRISH IN BRITAIN REPRESENTATION GROUP (IBRG)
 
Working Against all the Odds!!
<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><><<<<<<<<<<<<<<>  
27 September 2014
FAO: Mark Frissora, Chief Executive
Hertz Ireland Head Office
Ferrybank
Wexford
Tel: 00353 (0)53 915 2500
 
 
Dear Mark Frissora,
 
Re: Tim Fleming,  
Please peruse the chain of correspondence below, which is self-explanatory and warrants a FULL investigation forthwith.
 
Mr Fleming states below; “Hertz withdrew from my bank account on 14/08/14 a further 130.95 Euros some 3 days after the vehicle was returned  – This is the HALLMARK of the Zionist, who have corrupted Ireland to the core, and gave the Irish a bad name around the WORLD. – A foreign power has taken over Ireland, which is High Treason!
 
From the comments below, Hertz has a long history of this kind of skulduggery, which is not being addressed, as it is continuing unabated, as you can see here, which is only an example, as this STEALING is widespread: -
 
1. Re: Hertz or “Hurts”?
13 May 2012, 20:33
We get good service from Hertz in the USA, but we certainly weren’t happy about our Ireland Hertz rental. We paid for CDW and Super CDW and were assured by the agent at the Dublin airport that we were now covered for everything except tires and putting the wrong fuel into the car. When we turned the car in at SNN, the agent there insisted on billing us 90 euros for scratches on the hubcap which he said were not covered. Although we sent a complaint about this to Hertz in Ireland about two weeks ago, our e-mail has never even been acknowledged. Hertz USA claims to be unable to do anything about this issue. Since we prefer self-drive vacations, we feel stymied about renting a car again in Ireland.
 
 
18. Re: Hertz or “Hurts”?
02 November 2012, 15:09
We just got home from Ireland and also had major problems with Hertz
We booked through a travel agent to avoid these problems as we had gone through them before. It made it worse. Hertz charged our card unbeknown to us for
and additional 700 euros, charged us for travel insurance which we didn’t need
as we already had it through the travel agent and credit card. Charged us for fulling up the take even though we brought it back full and a much larger tank amount. Faked an invoice that appeared after we were home and complaining to the company.
Hertz doesn’t seem to care at all. Attitude is it’s your fault we were able to do this to you. Should be more careful next time.
Anybody have an idea how to stop them from the bad business practices to unsuspecting travellers?
 
33. Re: Hertz or “Hurts”?
10 November 2012, 17:00
You have insurance with your credit card already. Hertz knows this and even though we said no, showed proof of coverage and did not sign anything for an agreement. Hertz charged us for the SC and DBP. –  They waited until we left to charge the card.
 
 
It is evident, like the Hertz Victims above that, Mr Fleming, couldn’t get any satisfaction from Hertz, as he was being stonewalled having taken his money; after he had left Ireland.
 
How do you think this kind of chicanery is affecting the trade and tourist industry in Ireland?
 
Why should Tim Fleming or, anyone else for that matter, be conned out of money by Hertz for goods or services not supplied; after he / they had left Ireland?
 
Magna Carta 1215 the Law of the Land:  As Ireland is a Common Law jurisdiction, if need be, this case will be processed under Common Law via a Trial by an independent and informed Jury.  – And NOT by Zionist ‘Judges’ working for the interests of the state of Israel stealing Gentiles assets:
 
The Constitutional Common Law of the Land has been HIJACKED by the; “Inside Britain’s (And Ireland’s) Israel Lobby” –
Video – Channel 4 UK – Broadcast November 16, 2009
Dispatches: Inside Britain’s Israel Lobby
Dispatches investigates one of the most powerful and influential political lobbies in Britain, which is working in support of the interests of the State of Israel.
Political commentator Peter Oborne investigates how accountable, transparent and open to scrutiny the lobby is, particularly in regard to its funding and financial support of MPs.
Oborne examines how the lobby operates from within parliament and the tactics it employs behind the scenes when engaging with print and broadcast media.
 
 
Disturbing number of Jewish lawyers and judges in Britain’s KEY legal positions
 
And if us Gentiles dare look for our guaranteed rights, having been ROBBED, they pull the anti-Sematic card on us; to silence us in order to TORTURE & ROB us further with IMPUNITY: –
 
I speak from my own personal experience and the experience of THOUSANDS of cases that I have worked on 24/7 since May 1990
 
This Zionist MAFIA Gangster, Alan Shatter, fooled the Irish People and has done irreversible HARM to Ireland: -
Camillus – Occidental Observe March 2, 2013
For the past two years Ireland’s immigration policy has been in the hands of Alan Shatter, a Jew and an outspoken partisan of Israel. Alan Shatter, born and bred in Dublin of Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe, has made it Irish policy to increase Third World immigration to the Emerald Isle. As Minister of Justice, Equality, and Defence, Shatter is exerting his considerable clout to skew the Republic’s Middle East policy, formerly supportive of the Palestinians and critical of Israel, toward Zionist aims. 
 
 
How did this Zionist Gangster, Alan Shatter, get to be the Justice Minister in Ireland?  –  Yes, they go for ALL the KEY positions!  
 
Alan Shatter has got rid of the Irish People from Ireland and filled it with FOREIGNERS!
 
 
Robert and Ben Briscoe, Jewish lord mayors of Dublin
” The obtuseness of White men would be incredible, if it were not attested by innumerable examples. The Irish, for example, still venerate the memory of the “great Irish patriot,” Robert Briscoe, and his “heroic part in the Irish revolt [against Britain],” his heroism having consisted of inciting murders and planning riots from a place of safety and of smuggling into Ireland arms and bombs that the Irish purchased at high prices from Jewish dealers. They venerate that hero because their newspapers tell them to, and they do so quite oblivious of the fact that “Briscoe” did not have in his veins a drop of Irish blood, being the offspring of Jews who crawled into the island from Lithuania, either before or after his birth. In March 1957, he strutted through Boston at the head of a procession of Irish, suitably adorned while the band played “Wearing of the Green” and he waved his cane at the cheering crowds of “those dumb Micks,” as he called them when speaking later to a German-American, although the Jew seems to have concealed his contempt for his dupes when he was with them.”
Revilo P. Oliver
 
 
The ENEMY within that have DESTROYED Ireland – North and South: –  These are the Mafia Gangsters that have HIJACKED the Common Law of the Land:
History of the Jews in Ireland
The history of the Jews in Ireland extends back nearly a thousand years.
 
Yes, Organised Crime in Israel now has a global reach, with direct impact inside the United Kingdom and Ireland: -
 
Israeli Mafia
ISRAEL, A PROMISED LAND FOR ORGANISED CRIME?
Organised crime in Israel now has global reach, with direct impact inside the United States
Organised crime has longstanding roots in Israel
LANSKY by Hank Messick:  “Jews control crime in the United States”
 
 
PORNOGRAPHY AS A SECRET WEAPON - May 9, 2014
Jews use pornography “to destroy gentile morals”                                                      
“Jews are the driving force behind the modern pornographic industry,” he tells us smugly, “and their motivation is, in part, to destroy gentile morals.”
 
“In July 2000, Brazilian police tried to arrest the Israeli vice-consul in Rio de Janeirio, Arie Scher. He was wanted on suspicion of running a child porn ring from the Israeli embassy…  he hopped on a plane to Tel Aviv and that was the last that was heard of him.
 
 
MAGNA CARTA 1215 = FOREVER
The peace they promise is never-ending war
 
 
You will never understand Jewish leaders until you accept the fact that Jews must be cast out from every society that befriended them and gave them shelter.
 
They were NOT Irish governments; they were Zionist Mafia Gangster Governments: –    
IrishCentral NEWS
Paul Hill says Guildford Four were abandoned by Irish governments
An emotional Paul Hill has told Irish radio that previous Irish governments did nothing to support the Guildford Four and others, including the Birmingham Six, in their fight to clear their names.
 
 
The Zionists favourite weapon against us Gentiles to kill off our DNA with ABILIFY Drugs, and worse, behind locked doors: -
THE HIDDEN ENEMY
Inside Psychiatry’s Covert Agenda
“We have never drugged our troops to this extent and the current increase in suicides is not a coincidence.
 
Today, with militaries of the world awash in psychiatry and psychiatric drugs, 23 soldiers and veterans are committing suicide every day. Psychiatrists say we need more psychiatry.
 
Featuring interviews with over 80 soldiers and experts, this penetrating documentary shatters the façade to reveal the real culprits who are destroying our world’s militaries from within
 
There is serious danger lurking everyplace now for us Gentiles, with NO access to Common Law Courts of Law. – Not even on a holiday to Ireland!
 
Robert Fisk
Middle East correspondent for London’s Independent, often outspoken and out of step with the rest of the mainstream media
 
Due Process does NOT mean Jew Process.
 
The Art of Deception:  From Due Process to Jew Process; for OPPRESSION, ROBBERY, TERRORISM and never-ending WAR: – 
 
Exposed in the Press in Britain but covered-up by the Zionist Press in Ireland.  Editor & Reporters at the Limerick Leader attacks the messengers: –
The Independent: By Tom Harper, Investigations Reporter on Friday 10 January 2014
The corruption of Britain: UK’s key institutions infiltrated by criminals
 
Secret report shows how organised crime infiltrated judicial system as well as police with prison service and HM Revenue & Customs also compromised
 
Tiberius disclosed that the Met interviewed the journalist who wrote the story after the murder of Solly Nahome, a Jewish money launderer credited as the “brains” behind the Adams’ criminal empire.
 
The Turkish drug dealer was later convicted and told police he was an HMRC informant. He said he knew of “corrupt contacts within the police” and had a Cyprus-based customs officer as a handler who “took money off him”.
 
 
The Independent: By Tom Harper, Investigations Reporter on Sunday 12 January 2014
Revealed: How gangs used the Freemasons to corrupt police
Gangsters able to recruit police officers through secret society, says investigation for Scotland Yard
 
Secret networks of Freemasons have been used by organised crime gangs to corrupt the criminal justice system, according to a bombshell Metropolitan Police report leaked to The Independent.
 
Freemasonry has long been suspected of having members who work in the criminal justice system – notably the judiciary and the police.
 
The political establishment and much of the media often dismiss such ideas as the work of conspiracy theorists
 
 
Lord Justice” David Neuberger was one of the Zionist Mafia ‘Judges’ that ROBBED me and  Gedaljahu Ebert: -
Daily Mail:  By Richard Littlejohn on 13 August 2014
Democracy? No, Britain’s now a judicial dictatorship – and it’s time for revolution, writes RICHARD LITTLEJOHN
 
It’s bad enough when government policy is re-written by unelected jurists from countries such as the former Soviet satellite states, with no distinguished history of respect for genuine human rights.
 
But increasingly, British judges are flexing their muscles, too. Lord Neuberger, president of Britain’s Supreme Court — a typical Blairite, European-style institution — has admitted that the Human Rights Act has given the courts a blank cheque to make up laws as they go along.
 
Judges are using the excuse of ‘human rights’ to establish new rules on everything from privacy and sham marriages to assisted suicide. They are handing down the most perverse interpretations of statute, which often fly in the face of justice and decency.
 
Yet far from expressing reservations about this unaccountable judiciary and its implications for democracy, Neuberger declares that it’s a good thingbecause it keeps governments in check.
 
That stands the entire principle of British justice on its head.
 
The judiciary regularly displays undisguised contempt for public opinion, for the people who pay their wages.
 
Another judge, Peter King, said recently: ‘There seems to be an expectation that the public interest trumps everything else. It seems to me that is not necessarily the case.’
 
He was justifying his decision to grant a Bangladeshi double murderer the right to move to England, where he has relatives, under the section of the Act that guarantees ‘the right to a family life’.
 
Most Tories want to replace the Human Rights Act with a British Bill of Rights. Why? We managed perfectly well for centuries. Britain had one of the most humane and effective legal systems on Earth, evolved from Magna Carta. Our common law served us well.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2723472/Democracy-No-Britain-s-judicial-dictatorship-s-time-revolution-writes-RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN.html
 
 
 Nonfeasance, Misfeasance, and Malfeasance … 
 
Nonfeasance is to ignore and take no indicated action – neglect.
 
Misfeasance is to take inappropriate action or give intentionally incorrect advice.
 
Malfeasance is hostile, aggressive action taken to injure the client’s interests.
 
 
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

First Minister in missing records riddle over Hollie Greig abuse allegations

First Minister in missing records riddle over Hollie Greig abuse allegations.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

NORMAN SCARTH WRITES – 26 SEPT. 2014

Radio tonight 6pm re bent council, et al.
Norman Scarth
Date: 26 September 2014 14:22

Subject: Next Radio Interview

Could I ask you to share this link with everybody suitable on your lists and ask them to listen in to the show?

http://www.grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/1-new-items/york-council-bully-boys-back-in-action/

Thanks,
Peter

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

MAURICE KIRK’S SISTER CELIA – RADIO INTERVIEW

video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c3tg6pDdR8&feature=youtu.be

Rough Justice: South Wales Police persecute former vet & pilot Maurice Kirk who’s suing them

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE: 23 SEPT. “14: DOCUMENTS RECEIVED

2 documents received from MK today 23 Sept ’14:

1] “Oral Hearing re: “Recall to Custody” Appeal”  8 Sept.:  photo 1093_zpsfb0957a8.jpg

2] “Malicious Prosecution without Trial” 8 Sept.

 photo 1094_zpsb8fde86d.jpg

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

ANDY FLYNN: LETTER TO HOME AFFAIRS SELECT COMMITTEE:

 

 

Andy Flynn writes, 21 Sept. 2014:

“My email today to the Home affairs select committee:

Dear Home affairs select committee

In November 2013 I reported serious crimes including fraud to Staffordshire Police, this followed a civil case in which the same person was involved in evidence tampering and illegally accessing my medical record following a lengthy campaign of harassment and stalking some of which involved Police officers.

Police had previously refused to take any action after I had received threats to kill, harassment at my work place and reported an armed assailant outside my home.

The individual concerned has connections within the Police service, I did not get a response to my report made in November 2013 until February 2014 when a Detective Tomlinson of Burton-On-Trent CID attempted to block the investigation. During an initial investigation in to Tomlison’s actions, he lied to a senior officer, saying I had refused to provide a statement so he could not continue his investigation.

This was in April 2014, Staffordshire Police have so far given poor excuses numerous times as to why the investigation in to Tomlionson’s actions has not reached a conclusion.

My report is substantiated with damning evidence against both Tomlinson and the person who committed the fraud. on top of this, I have previously been subjected to physical threats from a Police officer when I provided him with vehicle registration numbers of individuals involved in the harassment, two other Police officers were persistent in trying to get information relating to my landlord to undermine my relationship with him. They even went to the extreme of fabricating allegations of a previous incident which did not take place.

When I wrote to the IPCC I was referred back to the same forces who were responsible for the malpractice, harassment and failure to take action.

It is of grave concern that the threats against me might be carried out while the Police seem happy to assist the perpetrators.

I would very much like to present evidence of what the Police are doing to prevent justice while harassing me, and how poor accountability is allowing serious misconduct and perverting the course of justice by Police officers to go unchecked and unchallenged.

I look forward to hearing from you soon.”

See archives on right for more posts on this atrocious case.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

PATRICK CULLINANE WAS DEFRAUDED OF HIS HOME – AND EVERYTHING HE HAD…VIDEOS

21 September 2014

FAO: Phillip Inman and Alan Rusbridger Economics Correspondent &amp; Editor The Guardian Kings Place 90 York Way London N1 9GU 

Dear Phillip Inman and Alan Rusbridger, 

HMRC’s unidentified informant that alleged I owed tax of £68,831.31, is inadmissible in evidence on the basis it is hearsay. 

FVE – FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING High Court, Leeds on Friday, 19th Sep 2014.

An eye-witness despatch from a hearing concerning The Great British Mortgage Swindle  

CITY OF CORRUPTION: THE HEART OF THE ROTTEN LAIR OF THE PSYCHOPATHIC BANKSTER.

One knows that things are stirring amongst the good people of these lands when 22 attendees in a high court hearing for a damages claim resulting from a criminal eviction, laugh as one when the judge asks, “but you DID receive the money, miss campbell?” 

The truth was swift to respond: “No. I have never seen any evidence of a loan, in spite of asking for it!” http://roguemale.org/2014/09/20/fve-fraud-vitiates-everything/#more-1062  

Thirteen High Court Judges CONSPIRED with HMRC, the Insolvency Service, the Official receiver, KPMG my Trustee in Bankruptcy, Moon Beever my Trustees Solicitors, MPs, the Bailiffs, the Police; Lord Chancellors, CPS and Psychiatrists to DEFRAUD me of my home, and my worldly possessions.  How was I made Bankrupted when I had NO debt and the Inland Revenue owing me over £5,000 in tax rebates? – 

Report by Phillip Inman of The Guardian, Financial Section, Monday 25 August 2008

Evidence put to the high court shows that Cullinane, far from owing tax, was due a rebate.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2008/aug/25/tax.taxandspending1

 

The 13 High Court Judges who conspired in Patrick Cullinane’s case to cover-up the HMRC’s INFORMANT and defraud him: -

  1. Mr Registrar Pimm 
  2.  
  3. Mr Registrar Simmonds 
  4.  
  5. Mr Registrar Baister 
  6.  
  7. Mr Justice Jacobs 
  8.  
  9. Mr Justice Neuberger – Promoted for Crime:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2012/jul/12/lord-neuberger-appointed-supreme-court-president
  10.  
  11. Lord Justice Stewart-Smith  –  Also covered-up the Hillsborough disaster.
  12.  
  13. Mr Jonathan Parker 
  14.  
  15. Mr Justice Hart 
  16.  
  17. Master Leslie
  18.  
  19. Mrs Justice Ebsworth 
  20.  
  21. Mr Justice Ferris 
  22.  
  23. Mr Justice Pumfrey
  24.  
  25. Mr Justice Mann

Thirteen JURISDICTIONLESS High Court ‘Judges’ denied me a DISCLOSURE of the Inland Revenue’s Proof of Claim for £68,831.31 against me and also violated my guaranteed rights in Common Law to a Trial by my Peers.  For his crimes; ‘Lord Justice’ David Neuberger was promoted to the highest Judge in the UK having STOLEN my home and possessions by CONSPIRING to pervert the course of justice and denying me Due Process via the Constitutional Common Law of the Land. 

The Police in the UK are so INFILTRATED by the Zionist Mafia and FREEMASONS GANGSTERS that they treat blatant FRAUD by Government Organisations against We the People as a CIVIL matter: -

The police have told Patrick Cullinane on VIDEO that the robbery of his home and possessions is a civil matter: -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeI1xO4luPg 

Patrick Cullinane was FRAUDULENTLY Bankrupted on 6th December 1996  for £86,831.31, without evidence or investigation; it was criminal, ruthless and despicable. –  Zionist, ‘Lord Justice’ David Neuberger perverted the course of justice in Cullinane’s case: - 

Daily Mail:  By Richard Littlejohn on 13 August 2014

Democracy? No, Britain’s now a judicial dictatorship – and it’s time for revolution, writes RICHARD LITTLEJOHN 

It’s bad enough when government policy is re-written by unelected jurists from countries such as the former Soviet satellite states, with no distinguished history of respect for genuine human rights. 

But increasingly, British judges are flexing their muscles, too. Lord Neuberger, president of Britain’s Supreme Court — a typical Blairite, European-style institution — has admitted that the Human Rights Act has given the courts a blank cheque to make up laws as they go along. 

Judges are using the excuse of ‘human rights’ to establish new rules on everything from privacy and sham marriages to assisted suicide. They are handing down the most perverse interpretations of statute, which often fly in the face of justice and decency. 

Yet far from expressing reservations about this unaccountable judiciary and its implications for democracy, Neuberger declares that it’s a good thing — because it keeps governments in check. 

That stands the entire principle of British justice on its head. 

The judiciary regularly displays undisguised contempt for public opinion, for the people who pay their wages. 

Another judge, Peter King, said recently: ‘There seems to be an expectation that the public interest trumps everything else. It seems to me that is not necessarily the case.’ 

He was justifying his decision to grant a Bangladeshi double murderer the right to move to England, where he has relatives, under the section of the Act that guarantees ‘the right to a family life’. 

Most Tories want to replace the Human Rights Act with a British Bill of Rights. Why? We managed perfectly well for centuries. Britain had one of the most humane and effective legal systems on Earth, evolved from Magna Carta. Our common law served us well. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2723472/Democracy-No-Britain-s-judicial-dictatorship-s-time-revolution-writes-RICHARD-LITTLEJOHN.html 

 Nonfeasance, Misfeasance, and Malfeasance …   

Nonfeasance is to ignore and take no indicated action – neglect. 

Misfeasance is to take inappropriate action or give intentionally incorrect advice. 

Malfeasance is hostile, aggressive action taken to injure the client’s interests. 

HMRC’s unidentified informant that alleged I owed tax of £68,831.31, is inadmissible in evidence on the basis it is hearsay.

 

Zionist: ‘Lord Chief Justice’ David Neuberger must be made to remember the fact, as well as the entire Judiciary of these lands the inescapable truth: - 

FRAUD VITIATES EVERYTHING 

Yours truthfully,
Patrick Cullinane, Common Law Lawyer and Victim of Jew Process in the UK’s COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts.

Video:  Patrick Cullinane at the House of Commons 23/09/2009

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eFakScc9Z80

Patrick Cullinane Protest at the Royal Courts of Justice, Oct. 1 – 4 2013

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2013/10/03/paul-cullinane-protest-at-the-rcj-london-2-sept-2013/

:

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

MAURICE KIRK – DOCUMENTS RECEIVED WHICH TELL OF HIS HELL

 

Documents received from Maurice – position statements, + much more detailing recent events and the horrific targetting hes having to endure, far from the norm under the so-called “justice” system, where he’s treated like no other. 

Maurice has been denied a serious stomach operation since March – over 5 months ago now, and in just under a month he will have been incarcerated a year – the “sentence” he was given finishing weeks ago.
 These documents show a disgraceful abuse of power and process against a totally harmless elderly man who wouldn’t hurt a fly yet is classified now alongside some of the most violent and psychotic amongst us, as a MAPPA Level 2 subject – who cared for animals so much he made caring for them his full time vocation – until that was taken away, too…
18 documents [after clicking the link click the blue box that shows "download", and then click "open" which will appear]:
File 1:
https://www.sendspace.com/file/u570ff
 File 2:
 https://www.sendspace.com/file/vta792
 File 3:
https://www.sendspace.com/file/bce8r1
 File 4:
 https://www.sendspace.com/file/evchev
 File 5:
 https://www.sendspace.com/file/q77tw8
 File 6:
 https://www.sendspace.com/file/dg3b78
 File 7:
 https://www.sendspace.com/file/htsiqr
 File 8:
 https://www.sendspace.com/file/astfqb
 File 9:
 https://www.sendspace.com/file/6vw821
 File 10:
 https://www.sendspace.com/file/ujys3k
 File 11:
 https://www.sendspace.com/file/q7rj8o
 File 12:
 https://www.sendspace.com/file/if70no
 File 13:
 https://www.sendspace.com/file/io62tn
 File 14:
 https://www.sendspace.com/file/3p8qo1
 File 15:
 https://www.sendspace.com/file/h8b5r4
 File 16:
 https://www.sendspace.com/file/g71xhz
 File 17:
 https://www.sendspace.com/file/cp5agi
 File 18:
 https://www.sendspace.com/file/oowlhg
Letter sent to Mr. D. Cameron, the prime minister, Ms. T. May, Home Secretary, and Mr. C. Grayling, the Sec. of State for Justice – no acknowledgement or reply has been received:
“To:  Mr.D. Cameron, 10 Downing St., London, SW1A 2AA   
8 September 2014
Dear Mr. Cameron,
I have to write to you regarding the situation of Mr. Maurice J. Kirk, 69, at present in HMP Swansea, no. A7306AT.
Mr. Kirk has serious medical issues to do with his stomach, these ailments beginning approximately 6 weeks ago at the end of the first week in March 2014 when in HMP Cardiff, and continuing after he was moved to HMP Swansea in July 2014.
The surgeons at Llandough Hospital, Wales, are aware of Mr. Kirk’s much needed operation but cannot act because Mr. Kirk’s medical records are being refused to be given to them, or Mr. Kirk, especially those records held at or originating from the “Caswell Clinic”, Wales..
This situation of parts of Mr. Kirk’s stomach hanging from his rectum, and very painfully so too, will not disappear magically overnight, unfortuinately, so I ask you sincerely – please, as a person in the position you are in H.M. government, to  allow the surgeons and Mr. Kirk the medical records that are needed so urgently, which will allow this long awaited stomach operation to take place. Please stop this harmful deliberate refusal to access his medical records, particularly from the “Caswell Clinic”, Wales, to which Mr. Kirk is well known
In 2013 I had cause to write to the Ministry of Justice about a similar situation concerning another inmate, and I attatch to this letter the reply received from the MoJ, which clearly states, and I quote:
 “…and I have to tell you that all organisations delivering NHS care strive to ensure that all patients receive the best possible treatment”.
If I may be so bold as to say those sentiments are far from being meaningful regarding Mr. Kirk, as a serious operation is being waylaid because medical records will not be given to the surgeons, or Mr. Kirk, no matter how many times he has asked the appropriate departments for them, especially H.M. prisons personnel.
Please see to it that Mr. Kirk gets the treatment he so urgently has been needing now for over 6 weeks since the stomach problems began.
I attatch also a letter of permission” from Mr. Kirk to myself to liase with parties on his behalf.
Thank you for your time,
sincerely,
[name]
concerned citizen
 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

NEELU BERRY ATTACKED / LIEN / AFFADAVIT: BABY SUNAINA

———- Forwarded message ———-
From: lou lotus <lotusprincess4u@googlemail.com>
Date: 16 September 2014 13:34
Subject: Neelu attacked & Oyster Card snatched by 7 transport Police

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wPF5OwD0Xg Threatened with arrest in a civil matter, assaulted, detained on platform, intimidated, harassed, abused, until given penalty of £20 despite oyster robbing millions
 
 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1wPF5OwD0Xg – Neelu attacked & robbed at Paddington on Sunday 14 Sept 2014 at 6pm
 
Do NOT use bank cards on oyster machines
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: lou lotus <lotusprincess4u@googlemail.com>
Date: 16 September 2014 01:15
Subject: Judge conspires in property heist by solicitors

Dear All,
The transcript attached is evidence of fraud, treason, bias, pre-determination, property heist…
Its happening every day, the judge is acting outside his oath of office and dishonouring me and my family
They are all doing this – so he agreed to pay me £5,000,000 million commercial lien under UCc 1-308 & 3-503
Neelu
Feedback welcome

 

CLAIM OF LIEN FOR £14 TRILLION ON LONDON POLICE CHIEF

RECEIVED: NOTICE OF CLAIM TO POLICE BOSS + MORE:
FROM: lou lotus 
 Attachment: [below]
09 SEPT. 2014

see attached and below

Lady Neelu Chaudhari

Lady Neelu Chaudhari, Lady Raj Chaudhari & Lady Sadhana Chaudhari,

 c/o ADDRESS REDACTED, UK

09/09/2014

Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe

c/o Councillors, leaders

Houses of Parliament, London

Affidavit, in settlement of Commercial Lien UCc 3-503 & 1-308

Read carefully, it means what it says, it says what it means

Ref: Final Settlement in Commercial Lien CAD2327/29May2014, Uniform Commercial code UCc 3-503 Notice of Dishonour to penalties, Without Prejudice to privileges, UCc 1-308 in the sum of £14 Trillion for reparations of Dishonour by UK public servants against UK public since UCc Geneva Convention 1930, see http://www.icj2.webs.com/notarised paragraphs 1cc, 2b, 3o, 3p.

Dear Sir Hogan-Howe

You are required to notify all public servants in public service in the UK to act with Honour or face on-the-spot fine of £5,000,000 for each Dishonour hereafter.  As all leaders in the UK have been made aware, that pursuant to the Geneva Convention 1930, most corporate governments including the United Kingdom, and therefore all companies/corporations registered there-under, are operating illegally due to their bankruptcy and insolvency. This is evidenced by the Gold Standard Act Amendment Bill 227, 21 September 1931 [suspended] and the subsequent Uniform Commercial code (“UCc” International Law).  All man-made laws, Acts of Parliament thereafter are null & void as are all decisions thereunder constitute Dishonour UCc 1-308 & 3-503.

This is a final Notice of Acceptance on behalf of the UK public the sum of £14,000,000,000,000 (Fourteen Trillion), for the above Dishonour in accordance with biblical law [Leviticus 26 v 28 and Proverbs 6 v 30-31]. That is sevenfold of £2 Trillion  x 7 (Total £ 14 Trillion Commercial Lien) for reparations for Dishonours since 1930, all public buildings are hereby solely for the benefit of communities (with honour).

 AND I make this Solemn Declaration conscientiously believing the same to be true, and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835

NAME           Lady Neelu Chaudhari

Declared this ____________________ day of ____________________, 20____.

 WITNESS 1.                                                                                    WITNESS 2.

NAME           Lady Sadhana Chaudhari                     NAME Lady Raj Chaudhari

 Without Prejudice UCc 1-308: A party that with explicit reservation of privileges performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the privileges reserved. Contract revoked, rejected, denied and dishonoured, UCc 3-503 without prejudice, UCc 1-308

! NEELU sc raj nc 090914 ucc letter lien 6

See More + VIDEOS:  THE AFFADAVIT OF NEELU BERRY – THE DEATH OF BABY SUNAINA

 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/08/21/outrageous-unbelievable-crimes-by-uk-police-the-affadavit-of-neelu-berry-the-death-of-baby-sunaina/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged ,

PATRICK CULLINANE WRITES: IRISH IN BRITAIN REPRESENTATION GROUP [IBRG]

 

IRISH IN BRITAIN REPRESENTATION GROUP (IBRG)
 
Working Against all the Odds!!
<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><><<<<<<<<<<<<<<> 
 
15 September 2014
Dear Gentiles and Non-Zionist Media Truthers,
 
Bob Marley: “The people who are trying to make this world worse, are not taking a day off, how can I?
 
If you missed this CCHR Exhibition it was educational and brilliantly presented; leaving no doubts whatsoever about the: “Industry of Death”


From: CCHR London [mailto:p.fletcher@cchr.org.uk]
Sent: 01 September 2014 09:25
To: Patrick Cullinane
Subject: Patrick, The Exhibition Returns To London
Importance: High
 
                   The Citizens Commission on Human Rights UK
      
 
 
 
 
 
Monday, September 01


Industry of Death Travelling Exhibit
Ealing Town Hall, London 8 Sept 2014 – 11 Sept 2014
 
Drugs prescribed to children labelled with so-called Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) are now being shown to cause some children to die prematurely from heart attacks, or to commit suicide, manifest violent behaviour or even homicide, as seen in schoolyard massacres in recent years. Then there are young mums, and the elderly population, all being targeted by psychiatry.
 
THE HIDDEN ENEMY
Inside Psychiatry’s Covert Agenda
“We have never drugged our troops to this extent and the current increase in suicides is not a coincidence.
 
Today, with militaries of the world awash in psychiatry and psychiatric drugs, 23 soldiers and veterans are committing suicide every day. Psychiatrists say we need more psychiatry.
 
Featuring interviews with over 80 soldiers and experts, this penetrating documentary shatters the façade to reveal the real culprits who are destroying our world’s militaries from within
 
Your help is needed to make the truth known. Come and be a part of the team that is exposing the truth about psychiatry. You can make a difference.
 
Call Candy Welsh at CCHR UK to find out more:
 
Please note:  The CCHR save me and, several of my clients over the years, from a fate worse than death inside these Nazi Secure Mental Health units; because we were complaining about CONSPIRACIES against us by CORRUPT Government Organisations.  Release Stephen Clarke NOW: =
 
Patrick Cullinane’s address in the House of Commons on 23 April 2009
“This is a short video of the corruption at the Inland Revenue; who conspired with High Court ‘Judges’ and the Police to pervert the course of Justice.  Trial by Jury is the ONLY answer to this Government’s Tyranny.”
 
In the public interest:  It is imperative that the Citizens Commission on Human Rights UK is adequately funded to tour Schools and Universities up and down the UK, with a permanent ‘Industry of Death Exhibition’ at a central London location, as CCHR has proven, beyond any reasonable doubt that, Psychiatry is a complete FRAUD.  – And the People must know about this!
 
Thirteen Zionist High Court Judges abused their positions and violated the Constitutional Common Law of the Land, Magna Carta 1215, to defraud me of my home and possessions by denying me Due Process via Trial by Jury, which is my guaranteed right in Common Law. – These are the lunatics that need Sectioning in Secure Mental Health Units, as they have proved themselves to be a great danger to members of the public, by violating the Law of the Land in unison to defraud We the People.    
 
Because of my own nightmare experience in the UK Courts, I am a Common Law Lawyer now, and have dealt with over a thousand cases, with the same outcome:  NO Due Process, NO Justice!  – This is the Zionist SCAM / PLOT that has caused “THE CORRUPTION OF BRITAIN”:
 
The Independent: By Tom Harper, Investigations Reporter on Friday 10 January 2014
The corruption of Britain: UK’s key institutions infiltrated by criminals
 
Secret report shows how organised crime infiltrated judicial system as well as police with prison service and HM Revenue & Customs also compromised
 
Tiberius disclosed that the Met interviewed the journalist who wrote the story after the murder of Solly Nahome, a Jewish money launderer credited as the “brains” behind the Adams’ criminal empire.
 
The Turkish drug dealer was later convicted and told police he was an HMRC informant. He said he knew of “corrupt contacts within the police” and had a Cyprus-based customs officer as a handler who “took money off him”.
 
http://www.campaignsforjustice.com/sites/default/files/GMB%20Campaigns%20for%20Justice%20conference%20September%202014.jpg
 
As heard on 5th and 6th of September 2014, at the GMB Campaign for Justice Conference in John Moores University Liverpool: -
 
Alistair Morgan is 27-years looking for justice after his private investigator brother Daniel was found with an axe in his head in a London pub car park, 2 days after he spoke of uncovering “serious police corruption”
 
Ricky Tomlinson of the Shrewsbury 24 Campaign is 42-years looking for justice having been JAILED for taking part in building workers picketing during the 1972 national strike.
 
Margaret Aspinall of the Hillsborough 96 Campaign is 25-years looking for justice for the families who lost loved ones.  ‘Lord Justice’ Steward-Smith and former Lord Chancellor, Jack Straw MP, who were involved in my case also perverted the course of justice in the Hillsborough Disaster. –  Police altered 116 statements.
 
Tim Fleming of the IBRG is 45-years looking for justice having been Blacklisted in 1969 for joining the Trade Union Movement to prevent slaughter on UK’s Construction Sites.
Dave Smith of the Blacklisting Support Group  for building workers: –  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9AYtVv444pA
 
David Hooper, General Secretary of the Durham Miners: “Tatchers death a great day for all the miners” –  http://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/10340484.Thatcher_death__a_great_day_for_all_the_miners_/    
 
Patrick Cullinane of the IBRG is looking for justice for 28-years having been targeted by the Inland Revenue, now HMRC, and FRAUDULENTLY Bankrupted, on trumped up charges for, £68,831.31, without any PROOF whatsoever, while 13 High Court Zionist ‘Judges’ refused to ORDER a disclosure, and operated courts without Juries, to pervert the course of justice, which is High Treason. = Framed-Up.
 
Magna Carta 1215 must be RESTORED immediately to deal with these Zionist Mafia Gangsters who have HIJACKED the Law of the Land and taken over our Courts to TERRORISE and FLEECE us Gentiles out of existence.  The Zionist ENEMY within!
 
Report by Phillip Inman of The Guardian, Jobs & Money, Saturday May 10, 2003:
This man was right all along
Patrick Cullinane has fought a running battle with the Inland Revenue since the day he was accused of not paying income tax. And the taxman fought dirty – so dirty he lost his home and nearly lost his sanity. Now, a batch of confidential documents reveal fatal weaknesses in the Revenue’s case. Phillip Inman reports
 
 
THE VIDEO THE MEDIA DOESN’T WANT YOU TO SEE !
Bob Marley: “The people who are trying to make this world worse, are not taking a day off, how can I?  
 
The Zionist Mafia can ONLY be STOPPED via Trial by an informed Jury.
 
Yours truthfully,
 
Patrick Cullinane, Common Law Lawyer and Victim of Jew Process in the UK’s COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts.
 
Backed by the   and the GMB Campaign for Justice.
 
Attachments area
Preview YouTube video Patrick Cullinane’s address in the House of Commons on 23 April 2009.wmv

Patrick Cullinane’s address in the House of Commons on 23 April 2009.wmv

Preview YouTube video Dave Smith, Blacklisting Support Group

Dave Smith, Blacklisting Support Group

Preview YouTube video THE VIDEO THE MEDIA DOESN’T WANT YOU TO SEE !

THE VIDEO THE MEDIA DOESN’T WANT YOU TO SEE !
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

Michael Doherty’s Private Prosecution starts in Luton Crown Court, tomorrow 15 Sept. 2014

Michael Doherty’s Private Prosecution starts in Luton Crown Court, tomorrow,

Monday 15th September, 10am.
This is an historic event & CAN be the start of something very, VERY big!
I do not normally ask people to ‘send this viral’, but on this occasion I DO -
and echo the words of Henry V before Agincourt:
“Gentlemen in England now abed shall think themselves accursed they were not here,
and hold their man-hoods cheap whiles any speaks,
that fought with us upon Saint Crispin’s Day!”
 Be there – or be square !!!
 GOOGLE MICHAEL DOHERTY PRIVATE PROSECUTION!


signed
x
CHECK IN ARCHIVES FOR ARTICLES ON THIS CASE

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged ,

CLAIM OF LIEN FOR £14 TRILLION ON LONDON POLICE CHIEF

RECEIVED: NOTICE OF CLAIM TO POLICE BOSS + MORE:
FROM: lou lotus 
 Attachment: [below]
09 SEPT. 2014
 
 to bernard.hogan-., David, Timothy, Anthony, Robert, GL-cao.corresp., simon.danczuk.., Tom, richard.little., Rebel, Phillip, Alan, Paul, John, John, John, Timothy, Tony, Charles, david, Steve, DS:, Gedaljahu, Paul, Dafydd

see attached and below

Lady Neelu Chaudhari

Lady Neelu Chaudhari, Lady Raj Chaudhari & Lady Sadhana Chaudhari,

 c/o ADDRESS REDACTED, UK

09/09/2014

Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe

c/o Councillors, leaders

Houses of Parliament, London

Affidavit, in settlement of Commercial Lien UCc 3-503 & 1-308

Read carefully, it means what it says, it says what it means

Ref: Final Settlement in Commercial Lien CAD2327/29May2014, Uniform Commercial code UCc 3-503 Notice of Dishonour to penalties, Without Prejudice to privileges, UCc 1-308 in the sum of £14 Trillion for reparations of Dishonour by UK public servants against UK public since UCc Geneva Convention 1930, see http://www.icj2.webs.com/notarised paragraphs 1cc, 2b, 3o, 3p.

Dear Sir Hogan-Howe

You are required to notify all public servants in public service in the UK to act with Honour or face on-the-spot fine of £5,000,000 for each Dishonour hereafter.  As all leaders in the UK have been made aware, that pursuant to the Geneva Convention 1930, most corporate governments including the United Kingdom, and therefore all companies/corporations registered there-under, are operating illegally due to their bankruptcy and insolvency. This is evidenced by the Gold Standard Act Amendment Bill 227, 21 September 1931 [suspended] and the subsequent Uniform Commercial code (“UCc” International Law).  All man-made laws, Acts of Parliament thereafter are null & void as are all decisions thereunder constitute Dishonour UCc 1-308 & 3-503.

This is a final Notice of Acceptance on behalf of the UK public the sum of £14,000,000,000,000 (Fourteen Trillion), for the above Dishonour in accordance with biblical law [Leviticus 26 v 28 and Proverbs 6 v 30-31]. That is sevenfold of £2 Trillion  x 7 (Total £ 14 Trillion Commercial Lien) for reparations for Dishonours since 1930, all public buildings are hereby solely for the benefit of communities (with honour).

 AND I make this Solemn Declaration conscientiously believing the same to be true, and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835

NAME           Lady Neelu Chaudhari

Declared this ____________________ day of ____________________, 20____.

 WITNESS 1.                                                                                    WITNESS 2.

NAME           Lady Sadhana Chaudhari                     NAME Lady Raj Chaudhari

 Without Prejudice UCc 1-308: A party that with explicit reservation of privileges performs or promises performance or assents to performance in a manner demanded or offered by the other party does not thereby prejudice the privileges reserved. Contract revoked, rejected, denied and dishonoured, UCc 3-503 without prejudice, UCc 1-308

! NEELU sc raj nc 090914 ucc letter lien 6

See More:  THE AFFADAVIT OF NEELU BERRY – THE DEATH OF BABY SUNAINA

 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/08/21/outrageous-unbelievable-crimes-by-uk-police-the-affadavit-of-neelu-berry-the-death-of-baby-sunaina/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

5 SEPT: MAURICE KIRK: DOLMANS SOLICITORS, GMC WILL NOT ERASE FALSE REPORT ABOUT NON-EXISTENT “BRAIN TUMOUR”

The nefarious plot to isolate Maurice photo POSSTMT15AUG14_zps3446bd82.jpg

Maurice writes of the way in which the system is being manipulated in order to separate him from his legal papers, his funds, visitors and McKenzie Friend assistance. The whole charade of releasing him on licence, under ridiculous one hour curfew conditions, only to have him recalled to prison within a week, without any evidence of wrongdoing, was just a ploy to isolate him from any chance of winning his civil case against the South Wales police and exposing the greed and corruption that is so rampant in public office.

He seems to be up against a wall, with every move stymied before he has made it. All his attempts to use the safeguards built in to our Law to expose the plot against him come to nothing, bogged down in the mire of indifference to the truth. Sunk in the fog of cognitive dissonance.

The perpetrators of this perversion and deception of the people of this country should take note, the paedophilic scum in the higher echelons of public life are being exposed, one by one for what they are. The satanic scum who are bastardising our justice system in their own interests are surely not far behind them!

There is only one other victim of police persecution who can ‘compete’ with the torture that Maurice has to endure: survivor of sexual abuse and whistleblower of paedophilia Brian Pead, author of From Hillsborough to Lambeth. They are both Litigants in Person prevented from advancing their cases from ‘within’!”
by G.
source: http://www.kirkflyingvet.co.uk/blogs/news/archive/2014/08/20/the-nefarious-plot-to-isolate-maurice.aspx

##############################################

Documents received from Maurice Kirk 4 Sept. 2014:
2 sheets from the well known  legal firm “Dolmans Solicitors”,
and
2 sheets from the GMC, who claim they do not have the power to change the false report of M Kirk having a “brain tumour” – that false report made by the doctor who ran [owned?] the Caswell Clinic where MK was incarcerated for 3 months during his 8 month imprisonment in 2009, before being released without a bye or a leave, and without a penny compensation for false imprisonmet for all that time. MK has been imprisoned at least 17 times since 2009, locked away for a period of nearly 3 years – for what? there were next to no actual genuine convictions made to justify those imprisonments – so why the victimisation? Could it be that MK has long running civil cases against the S Wales police – and those imprisonments were made to halt his progress in those cases – exactly as he is being imprisoned now – to halt his progress? Of course it could be – AND IT IS!!! 

Regarding the 2 sheets from the GMC – they claim they do not have the power to make null and void  the false report made by this doctor claiming MK had a “brain tumour” when he hadnt – the report made without any medical examination anyway of MK. Have you ever heard anything so ridiculous?
  How come this doctor is left free to practice at all when he’s manufactured a false report thats caused so much grief for a citizen?
How many other false reports on citizens has he made, and if he has – why hasn’t he been reprimanded for such an unspeakable act? Who else has suffered at his hands?
Why hasnt he been charged and convicted of making such a blatantly false report which has been used by judges in courts of law?
 Why is he, as we are told, “immune from prosecution” from British justice? And more to the point – what did he do to get into that unique clique that is above the law that arent bound by British justice [what there is of it]?
It is truly disgraceful what is going on here.
It appears not to matter that a subsequent official NHS “brain scan” proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that MK has no “brain tumour”! [the reports here: http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/03/07/m-kirk-position-statement-3-march-14-letter-from-prison-healthcare/ ].
KIRK BRAIN SCAN
Even the HMP Cardiff “Healthcare” doctor has written a formal letter stating MK had no “brain tumour” – so WHY DO THE GMC REFUSE TO CHANGE THIS FALSE REPORT? IT IS RUBBISH AND 100% INACCURATE!!
KIRK healthcare 5 MAR14 14939
The documents received 4  Sept. 2014 from MK:
rom “Dolmans Solicitors”:File 1:
Download Link:
 File 2:
Download Link:
From the “GMC” – WHO REFUSE TO  CHANGE THE STATUS OF THE FALSE REPORT STATING MK HAS A “BRAIN TUMOUR”, Surely they should be held to account!!!  HOW MANY OTHER FALSE REPORTS ON CITIZENS HAS THIS CHARLETAN DOCTOR MADE AND IS GETTING AWAY WITH AS HE IS REGARDING MAURICE KIRK?
 
############################################################

 photo TELE_zps422b63bf.jpg

 Doctors escaping disciplinary hearings by taking early retirement

Stephen Barclay, the Conservative MP, warns families who lose loved ones through “medical incompetence” are suffering “double injustice” as those responsible are not held to account

Taken across the NHS, the figures suggest it is facing a shortage of 15,000 nurses and 4,000 doctors

Doctors are escaping disciplinary hearings by taking early retirement Photo: ALAMY

By  Steven Swinford, Senior Political Correspondent

19 Aug 2014

Dozens of doctors accused of serious malpractice have escaped disciplinary hearings by taking early retirement, according to new figures.

Stephen Barclay, a Conservative MP, said families who have lost loved ones because of “medical incompetence” are suffering further “injustice” because those responsible are not held to account.

Figures obtained by Mr Barclay reveal that 39 doctors have removed themselves from the medical register – a process known as “voluntary erasure” – in the last three years instead of facing investigations into their fitness to practise.

The GMC has refused to release the names of all bar seven of the doctors, despite concerns that they could still be working either in the healthcare sector even in Britain or abroad.

There are additional concerns that the system means that serious clinical malpractise is not properly investigated. Mr Barclay called for the loophole to be closed to end the “culture of secrecy”.

Related Articles
NHS doctors and nurses must apologise for care failings, says Jeremy Hunt
12 Jan 2014
‘Jaw-dropping’ rise in NHS claims after scandals
19 Jul 2013
Trust by trust, the Keogh Report’s findings
16 Jul 2013
Up to 3,000 ‘died needlessly’ in NHS trusts under investigation
24 Apr 2013
Owning up
12 Jan 2014

He called on the government to make “urgent amendments” to the Medical Act to close the loophole.

He said: “There is a systemic failure in the disciplinary process that applies to doctors which gives insufficient weight to patients and their families. Voluntary erasure enables GPs to play for time, delay disciplinary hearings and then to walk away before they have concluded.

“There is a culture of secrecy because names are routinely not made public. In other cases, where doctors have been named, they are able to call a halt to their own disciplinary case.

“It is a double tragedy for families. The tragedy of clinical incompetence is compounded by a failure of the disciplinary process. There is a wider point as the failure to reach a conclusion in these cases means nothing is proven, and therefore the wider lessons to be learnt are not being highlighted.”

Rob Jones, an obstetrician who delivered David Cameron’s daughter Florence, was allowed to stand down despite a ‘surgical incident’ and amid concerns he may have failed to spot cancerous tumours in patients.

Dr Sabah Al-Zayyat, the consultant paediatrician who failed to diagnose Baby P’s broken back, was also granted voluntary erasure on health grounds.

Erasure is granted if doctors are in the later stages of their careers, if there is a strong likelihood they would not return to practice in the UK or elsewhere and if it is in the interests of patient safety to remove them from the register.

They can no longer practice in the UK, and the GMC also alerts other authorities throughout the world.

In many cases, though, the GMC rules that it is in the public interest for doctors to appear before panels.

Niall Dickson, chief executive of the General Medical Council, said: “Let us be clear a doctor who takes voluntary erasure while under our procedures cannot practise medicine in the UK.

“There is no better way to protect the public than stopping them from practising as a doctor. If at any time they then tried to get back on the register the case against them would become active again and where there are serious concerns realistically it is highly unlikely they could ever practise again.

“However we have called for a further reform in this area. Where doctors want to leave the register while under investigation we would like to have power to give them the equivalent of a ‘dishonourable discharge’ – where they accept they were facing serious allegations, they want to leave and we want them to go.

“Unfortunately this reform like many others is currently stuck in a legislative logjam – we very much hope it will be taken up by the government in power after the next election.”

source:  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/11065094/Doctors-escaping-disciplinary-hearings-by-taking-early-retirement.html

kirkb

Maurice in happier days, when practising as a vetinerary surgeon, before they took that away from him, and his licence to fly his airplanes. How cheap and low they are!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged ,

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 2 SEPT. ’14 – NEW DOCUMENTS RECEIVED – POSITION STATEMENT ETC.

Documents received from MK on 1 Sept. 14.
These documents are a concise report by Maurice Kirk, the first 5 sheets entitled “Pre-action protocol regards the fairness, proportionality, apparent bias and bad faith in the decision of 11 July 2014 to recall Mr. M. Kirk to prison”, questioning, amongst other important subjects, the legality of the “brain tumour” report and the making of it by the “doctor” – one point considering the allegation that this doctor was in no way qualified to make such a report for a court, especially, it is alleged elsewhere, without even the examining of Mr. Kirk for the report.

1040.jpg (1.69MB)
https://www.sendspace.com/file/brofiv

1041a.jpg (2.47MB)
https://www.sendspace.com/file/ojc7en

1042a.jpg (2.35MB)
https://www.sendspace.com/file/8yb98t

1043a.jpg (2.76MB)
https://www.sendspace.com/file/viarh7

1044a.jpg (2.48MB)
https://www.sendspace.com/file/9fmjyg

The 6th sheet is entitled “Position Statement – 15 August 2014″, by M Kirk:

1045.jpg (1.63MB)
https://www.sendspace.com/file/w0ya56

 …and the 7th sheet entitled “Parole Board Direction”

1047.jpg (2.20MB)
https://www.sendspace.com/file/wkfzij

It should be noted that since the report made by the doctor stating M Kirk had a brain tumour [now proven false - see official NHS "brain scan" CTI report 17/12/13 which shows no tumour in MK's brain, plus letter from HMP Cardiff "Healthcare doctor" stating also officially MK has no "brain tumour"] here:

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/03/07/m-kirk-position-statement-3-march-14-letter-from-prison-healthcare/ ]

 M Kirk has been imprisoned at least 17 times – for a total of nearly 3 years locked away, with the majority of the charges causing the incarcerations being dropped without conviction.
 One such incarceration, for a period of 8 months, in 2009, saw MK placed in a  closed hospital ["Caswell clinic" - run by the same doctor responsible for the false "brain tumour report"] for 3 months of that 8 months, before a responsible doctor there realised MK shouldnt be there and consequently obtained his release.
Also since 2009 MK has been stopped 35 times whilst driving his car – the reason being for alleged “drink/driving”, although no charges have ever been brought by the S. Wales police – see more:

   http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/07/17/update-maurice-kirk-17-july-2014/

With so much taxpayers money being spent by the authorities – over at least £1,000,000 – surely a proper honest inquiry should be held, conducted by parties far removed from those involved at present, to show the infinite irregularities which have  taken place over a period of many years by ceertain authorities – especially the police and courts acting officially on what is now proven to be the completely fake report stating M Kirk had a brain tumour when he hadnt, this report made by a former NHS consultant psychiatrist without any evidence of any kind, which saw an innocent citizen locked away for 8 months as a result – 3 of those 8 months seeing M Kirk sectioned in a closed hospital, with all that entailed.
Since the time these irregularities befalling M Kirk began – the figure of 20+ years has been quoted regarding M Kirk’s targetting – MK has had not only his licence to practise as a vetinerary surgeon removed from him, but also taken away was his licence to fly his airplanes.
MK is still awaiting a serious stomach operation as mentioned in earlier commnents and posts – those medical records which are holding up this operation still not forthcoming.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

UPDATE: PARENTS ARRESTED – ASHYA KING – 31 AUGUST 2014

UPDATE – “The Guardian” – 09.00 31 August ’14 = “Parents arrested as missing Ashya King found by police in …

The Guardian ‎- 3 hours ago

The international hunt for Ashya King, the missing five-year-old boy with a brain tumour, came to a dramatic end on Saturday night when his …cont. at: http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/aug/31/ashya-king-found-spain-parents-arrested

VIDEO:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=14ETQn9ZPwk

~~UPDATE ON ASHYA KING!

Naveed King on youtube

~~Published on 30 Aug 2014


This is an update video on the progress of Ashya, he was taken away by police around 1 hour ago at 20:30 on the 30th of August. This video will explain what my father did and why.

I give permission for all to use this video as long as the full video is shown or only if a link is given to this video. Only reason if people and companies twist stories for their benefit to make it sound better or more interesting to watch.

Just received word that hundreds of people wanted to send money to him, I think thats okay, but if its not then I will remove it from the description.

~~Paypal:
naveedgamer@gmail.com

The “press” reports etc.: http://www.google.co.uk/search?sourceid=navclient&amp;aq=&amp;oq=ashya&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;rlz=1T4ACPW_enGB602GB602&amp;q=ashya+king&amp;gs_l=hp..0.0i3j0l4

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

ROTHERHAM CHILD ABUSE SCANDAL LASTING 14 YEARS!! POLICE + COUNCIL KNEW BUT DID NOTHING!! 26AUG14

ROTHERHAM CHILD ABUSE SCANDAL LASTING 14 YEARS!! POLICE + COUNCIL KNEW BUT DID NOTHING!! 26AUG14

from butlincat1 on Vimeo.

It is truly OUTRAGEOUS that the SOUTH YORKS POLICE and ROTHERHAM COUNCIL KNEW ABOUT THIS LONG LASTING ABUSE AS CHILDREN WERE REPORTING THE CRIMES TO THEM BUT THEY DID NOTHING!!!
SHOWN FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY!

========================

Revealed: How fear of being seen as racist stopped social workers saving up to 1,400 children from sexual exploitation at the hands of Asian men in just ONE TOWN

  • Report found 1,400 children abused between 1997 and 2013 in Rotherham
  • The figure is likely to be a conservative estimate of the true scale
  • Victims terrorised with guns and doused in petrol and threatened with fire
  • More than a third of the cases were already know to agencies 
  • Author of the report condemned ‘blatant’ failings by council’s leadership
  • Action blocked by political correctness as staff ‘feared appearing racist’ 
  • Majority of victims described the perpetrators as ‘Asian’ men 
  • Leader of Rotherham Council has stepped down with immediate effect  
  • No council employees will receive disciplinary action, leaders state 
The sexual abuse of about 1,400 children at the hands of Asian men went unreported for 16 years because staff feared they would be seen as racist, a report said today. 
Children as young as 11 were trafficked, beaten, and raped by large numbers of men between 1997 and 2013 in Rotherham, South Yorkshire, the council commissioned review into child protection revealed. 
And shockingly, more than a third of the cases were already know to agencies. 
But according to the report’s author: ‘several staff described their nervousness about identifying the ethnic origins of perpetrators for fear of being thought racist’.
Scroll down for video
Sex gang: Adil Hussain (left) and Razwan Razaq (right) were jailed in 2010 for abusing children in Rotherham
Sex gang: Adil Hussain (left) and Razwan Razaq (right) were jailed in 2010 for abusing children in Rotherham

Horrific: A report has discovered that 1,400 children were sexually exploited in Rotherham over a 16-year period. Adil Hussain (left) and Razwan Razaq (right) were jailed in 2010 for grooming young girls in the town
Gang: Umar Razaq was another of the five-strong sex gang jailed and placed on the sex offenders' register

Professor Alexis Jay, who wrote the report, condemned the ‘blatant’ collective failures by the council’s leadership, concluding: ‘It is hard to describe the appalling nature of the abuse that child victims suffered.’
The landmark report which exposed widespread failures of the council, police and social services revealed:
  • Victims were doused in petrol and threatened with being set alight, terrorised with guns, made to witness brutally-violent rapes and told they would be the next if they spoke out;
  • They were raped by multiple perpetrators, trafficked to other towns and cities in the north of England, abducted, beaten and intimidated;
  • One victim described gang rape as ‘a way of life'; 
  • Police ‘regarded many child victims with contempt'; 
  • Some fathers tried to rescue their children from abuse but were arrested themselves; 
  • The approximate figure of 1,400 abuse victims is likely to be a conservative estimate of the true scale of abuse.
The lack of reports was partly down to a fear of being racist, Prof Jay wrote, as the majority of the perpetrators were described as ‘Asian men’, and many were said to be of Pakistani origin. 
One young person told the inquiry that ‘gang rape’ was a usual part of growing up in the area of Rotherham where she lived.
Zafran Ramzan

In two cases, fathers had tracked down their daughters and tried to remove them from houses where they were being abused – only to be arrested themselves when police were called to the scene. 
And one child declined her initial offer to give a statement after allegedly receiving a text from a perpetrator threatening to harm her younger sister.
The failures happened despite three reports between 2002 and 2006 ‘which could not have been clearer in the description of the situation in Rotherham’.
Prof Jay said the first of these reports was ‘effectively suppressed’ because senior officers did not believe the data.
The other two were ignored, the professor said. 
Fears had also been raised by schools over the 16 years but the alerts went uninvestigated.
Teachers reported seeing children as young as 11, 12 and 13 being picked up outside schools by cars and taxis, given presents and mobile phones and taken to meet large numbers of unknown men in Rotherham or other local towns and cities. 
The majority of victims believed the perpetrators to be their boyfriend who gave them gifts, alcohol and drugs. Some of the victims still maintain they were not groomed or abused.
Analysing the case studies, Prof Jay said many of the children came from dysfunctional families, had parents with addictions, and had suffered domestic or sexual abuse as a child.
Condemned: Professor Alexis Jay, author of the report, blasted the 'blatant' failing of Rotherham Council

Widespread: More than a third of the sexual abuse cases were known to agencies but not followed up

Some had serious mental health problems.
Councillors seemed to dismiss previous reports as a one-off problem which they hoped would go away, according to Prof Jay.
She said: ‘Others remembered clear direction from their managers not to do so.’
The spotlight first fell on Rotherham in 2010 when five men, described by a judge as ‘sexual predators’, were given lengthy jail terms after they were found guilty of grooming teenage girls for sex. 
The five men – Umar Razaq, Adil Hussain, Razwan Razaq, Zafran Ramzan, and Mohsin Khan – preyed on their victims over several months and threatened them with violence if they refused their advances.
One of the men branded his victim a ‘white bitch’ when she resisted, while a second smirked: ‘I’ve used you and abused you.’
The men, all British-born Pakistanis, attacked the four girls in play areas, parks and in the back of their cars, Sheffield Crown Court heard.

NO COUNCIL EMPLOYEES WILL FACE DISCIPLINARY ACTION OVER ABUSE 

Martin Kimber said no council employees will face disciplinary action following the damning report

No council employees will face disciplinary action in a town where 1,400 children suffered sexual exploitation in a 16-year period, the local authority’s chief executive has said.
Rotherham Council leader Roger Stone resigned today following the publication of a shocking report which detailed gang rapes, grooming, trafficking and other sexual exploitation on a wide scale in the South Yorkshire town.
But Shaun Wright, the current Police Commissioner for South Yorkshire is Shaun Wright, who was widely criticised for failing to tackle sex abuse in Rotherham during his five-year stint in the council’s children and young people’s department, said he is more determined than ever to lead a Police Force that ‘effectively roots out the evil criminals who carry out such disgraceful abuse’.
Council chief executive Martin Kimber said he did not have the evidence to discipline any individuals working for the council despite the report saying there had been ‘blatant’ collective failures by its leadership at the time.
Mr Kimber said: ‘Officers in senior positions responsible for children’s safeguarding services throughout the critical periods when services fell some way short of today’s standards do not work for the council today.
‘To that extent, I have not been able to identify any issues of professional practice related to current serving officers of this council that would require me to consider use of disciplinary or capability procedures.’
Mr Stone said in a statement: ‘Having considered the report, I believe it is only right that I, as leader, take responsibility on behalf of the council for the historic failings that are described so clearly in the report and it is my intention to do so.
‘For this reason, I have today agreed with my Labour group colleagues that I will be stepping down as leader with immediate effect.’
A statement released on behalf of Mr Wright said: ‘Professor Jay’s report makes recommendations for improvements in the way South Yorkshire Police deal with these crimes, and Mr Wright will be meeting with the Chief Constable to ensure these are implemented in full.
‘He is more determined than ever to lead a Police Force that effectively roots out the evil criminals who carry out such disgraceful abuse to South Yorkshire children and brings them to justice.’
Professor Alexis Jay, who wrote the report, said she found examples of ‘children who had been doused in petrol and threatened with being set alight, threatened with guns, made to witness brutally-violent rapes and threatened they would be next if they told anyone’.
She said: ‘They were raped by multiple perpetrators, trafficked to other towns and cities in the north of England, abducted, beaten and intimidated.’
She said she found that girls as young as 11 had been raped by large numbers of men.
They gave them gifts and introduced them to their friends. The girls were abused so frequently that after many months it ‘became a way of life’.
The girls, who were being monitored by social services, were eventually rescued by police and removed from their homes amid growing concerns for their safety.
The leader of Rotherham Council, Roger Stone, has today quit in light of the findings. He has led the council since 2003. 
The current Police Commissioner for South Yorkshire is Shaun Wright, who was widely criticised for failing to tackle sex abuse in Rotherham during his five-year stint in the council’s children and young people’s department.
From 2005 to 2010, Cllr Wright was in charge of children’s services in the borough and worked closely with Joyce Thacker, who became Director of Children’s Services in 2008. 
The prosecution was the first of a series of high-profile cases in the last four years that have revealed the exploitation of young girls in towns and cities including Rochdale, Derby and Oxford.

HORRIFIC MURDER OF GIRL, 17, KILLED FOR ‘BRINGING SHAME’ ON TWO PAKISTANI FAMILIES WHOSE MEN HAD USED HER FOR SEX… AND SOCIAL WORKERS KNEW SHE WAS AT RISK FROM THE AGE OF 11

Laura Wilson, 17, was murdered for bringing shame on the families of two Pakistani men who had used her for sex

The spotlight fell on Rotherham in 2010, after Laura Wilson, 17, was murdered for bringing shame on the families of two Pakistani men who had used her for sex.

It was later revealed that social workers had known for six years that the white teenage mother was at clear risk from predatory Asian gangs, and had received information about certain adults suspected of targeting her from the age of 11.

Laura, 17, had been groomed by a string of British Pakistanis before she was stabbed and thrown into a canal to die for informing her abusers’ families of the sexual relationships.

Her killer Ashtiaq Asghar, who was 18 at the time, was given a life sentence and will serve a minimum of 17-and-a-half years after he pleaded guilty to murdering Laura in October 2010.

In 2012, the council’s Safeguarding Children Board published a serious case review but key passages which reveal they knew she was at particular risk from ‘Asian men’ had been blocked out with black lines.
The council went to court in an attempt to tried to suppress the hidden information after a uncensored copy of the report was leaked to the Times newspaper but they abandoned legal action.

The uncensored report confirms that Laura, identified as Child S, had dealings with 15 agencies and identified ‘numerous missed opportunities’ to protect her.

It states that she eventually became ‘almost invisible’ to care professionals.

The hidden information included the knowledge that at the age of 13 Laura and a friend had been given alcohol by men at a takeaway who then asked what she would give them in return.

Murder: Laura was stabbed repeatedly by 18-year-old Ashtiaq Asghar before being thrown into this South Yorkshire canal to die
Murder: Laura was stabbed repeatedly by 18-year-old Ashtiaq Asghar before being thrown into this South Yorkshire canal to die

She had also been referred to a child sexual exploitation project just three months after her 11th birthday. Another censored passage reveals that Laura had been ‘mentioned’ during a 2009 police inquiry that eventually led to the conviction of five Pakistani men for sex offences against three underage girls.

While the published report mentioned the fact that a friend, who Laura knew when she was 10, was ‘thought to have become involved in sexual exploitation’, it concealed the succeeding passage which read: ‘with particular reference to Asian men’.

In August 2013, four women launched legal action against Rotherham council over ‘systematic failures’ to protect them from ‘sexual abuse by predatory men when they were children’ according to their lawyers.

One girl, known only as ‘Jessica’ claims she was abused daily as a 14-year-old by a 24-year-old man after social services failed to accept that she was a victim grooming.

On one ocassion married father-of-two Arshid Hussain was even caught with the half naked schoolgirl under his bed but documents revealed that police arrested her – and let him go.

Rotherham, South Yorkshire, has become known as Britain’s under-age sex capital, after a string of high profile cased where authorities have let down vulnerable children.

In another shocking case, reported in 2012, a 13-year-old girl told police how she had been groomed and raped by an Asian sex gang.

She wrote a harrowing letter to herself at the age of 14 addressed to her alter-ego Michelle, in which she wrote, ‘I feel like the Asians really hate me even when they say they love me’.

The girl, who told police in 2003 about the rape that took her virginity and the time five men queued outside a bedroom to demand sex from her, added, ‘They took all my dreams and my life away from me.’

Warnings: The report comes after two others done between 2002 and 2006 which 'could not have been clearer'

Children as young as 11 were doused in petrol and threatened with fire and told not to speak out in the town (pictured)

Following the 2010 case, The Times claimed that details from 200 restricted-access documents showed how police and child protection agencies in the South Yorkshire town had extensive knowledge of these activities for a decade, yet a string of offences went unprosecuted.
The allegations led to a range of official investigations, including one by the Home Affairs Select Committee.
Yvette Cooper MP, Labour’s Shadow Home Secretary, called the report ‘utterly devastating’ and praised the victims for coming forward.
She said: ‘Their bravery in coming forward to give evidence to this inquiry is truly admirable. We can only hope this will help to protect other children from abuse in the future.
”That is why it is urgent that the Government gets the overarching inquiry into child abuse up and running. We need this to focus on gaps in the current child protection system, as well as historic child abuse.’
Last year, South Yorkshire police and crime commissioner (PCC) Shaun Wright said there had been ‘a failure of management’ at South Yorkshire Police as he responded to a report into his force on this issue by Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC).

‘I ABHOR THE LIFELONG DAMAGE THAT WAS WREAKED UPON THE LIVES OF ALL THOSE AFFECTED': STATEMENT FROM ROTHERHAM COUNCIL LEADER ROGER STONE AS HE STEPS DOWN FOLLOWING DAMNING REPORT

Resigned: Roger Stone has stepped down with immediate effect following the release of the report

Rotherham child sex victim, 15, doused in petrol and threatened with fire after she was trafficked to three different cities

One victim of child sex abuse in Rotherham was trafficked for sex to Leeds, Bradford and Sheffield by the time she was 15-years-old and was doused in petrol and threatened with being set alight.
The girl, referred to only as Child B in today’s report, was threatened with being forced into prostitution, her older sibling was taken to hospital, and the windows of their house were shattered.
The report said she was ‘groomed by an older man involved in the exploitation of other children’.
The report said: ‘Child B loved this man. He trafficked her to Leeds, Bradford and Sheffield and offered to provide her with a flat in one of those cities.
One victim of child sex abuse in Rotherham was trafficked for sex to Leeds, Bradford and Sheffield by the time she was 15-years-old and was doused in petrol and threatened with being set alight

‘A child protection referral was made but the social care case file recorded no response to this.’
The report detailed how ‘within just a few months Child B and her family were living in fear of their lives’.
The report said: ‘Child B and her mother refused to have anything more to do with the police because they believed the police could do nothing to protect them.’
It added: ‘Child B had been stalked and had petrol poured over her head and was threatened with being set alight.
‘She took overdoses. She and her family were too terrified to make statements to the police.’
The report said the teenager was homeless by the time she was 18.
It concluded: ‘She referred herself to children’s social care and was given advice about benefits. No further action was taken. This child and her family were completely failed by all services with the exception of Risky Business (a local support group).’
A girl referred to as Child D was 13 when she was groomed, raped and trafficked by a violent sexual predator in the town.
‘Police and children’s social care were ineffective and seemed to blame the child,’ the report said.
It said: ‘An initial assessment accurately described the risks to Child D but appeared to blame her for “placing herself at risk of sexual exploitation and danger”.’
And the report concluded: ‘Other than Risky Business, agencies showed no comprehension that she had been groomed at 13, that she was terrified of the perpetrators, and that her attempts to placate them were themselves a symptom of the serious emotional harm that child sexual exploitation had caused her.’

source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2734694/It-hard-appalling-nature-abuse-child-victims-suffered-1-400-children-sexually-exploited-just-one-town-16-year-period-report-reveals.html#ixzz3BXqAOy92

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

Under ‘family friendly’ Tories, yet more children go into care – BOOKER


Too many children are removed from families for no justifiable reason, often because of government policies

Light at the end of the tunnel

Taken: nearly 30,000 children have been removed from families in England in the past year  Photo: ALAMY
It was curiously timely that David Cameron’s promise last week to put “the family” at the heart of all of his government’s policies should have coincided with the release of figures showing that last month the number of applications by social workers to take children into “care” was the highest on record. Up 18 per cent on the figure for July last year, many of these 1,013 applications covered more than one child, bringing the number of children being removed from their families in England alone in the past year to nearly 30,000.
What Mr Cameron may not be aware of is the immense groundswell of concern that far too many of these children are now being removed from their parents for no justifiable reason, thanks not least to the policies of his own government. Among the growing mountain of evidence for this was a powerful documentary, Don’t Take My Child, broadcast in ITV’s Exposure series on July 15 (which can still be seen via a link on the Forced Adoption website). This included interviews with several experts, including a former High Court judge, a top barrister for children, and a very senior social worker, all making the same point: that instead of trying to support families as they used to, too many social workers now seem bent on tearing them apart, not least to meet this government’s drive to see more children adopted.
The documentary opens with a terrifying sequence showing a newborn baby being snatched from its distraught parents by Staffordshire social workers and police. Much of what follows recounts the equally harrowing ordeals of other parents, only now free to speak about their experiences because, very unusually, they eventually managed to get their children back. Particularly telling is the story of Lucy Allan, a prospective parliamentary candidate for Mr Cameron’s Conservative Party, who describes the Kafkaesque nightmare that unfolded when her son was seized by Wandsworth social workers for reasons eventually found to be wholly baseless.
But what gives this documentary unprecedented authority is that these first-hand examples of how sadly the system has become corrupted from its original laudable aims are punctuated by interviews with some of the most senior experts from within the system itself. Sir Mark Hedley, a recently retired family court judge, emphasises that the shift from trying to give parents help to the almost routine removal of their children, has been “a major policy change”. He is echoed by Bridget Robb, head of the British Association of Social Workers, who says that “this government is much harsher than previous governments” in favouring the removal of children rather than giving help to “birth parents”, and “that is new”. Martha Cover, chair of the Association of Lawyers for Children, makes the same charge: that we are “moving away rather rapidly” from “giving support” towards “having children placed for adoption”, pointing out that Britain is now second only to the US in the proportion of children being “removed from their natural family and placed for adoption against their wishes”.
But the irony is that, despite our education ministry’s new passion for adoption, volubly championed by Michael Gove when he was Education Secretary (and who was successfully adopted himself), the number of children being adopted still remains ridiculously small: around 4,000 a year, compared with the 28,000 children who have this year been taken into care. This leaves an additional 24,000 children haplessly in state “care”, the cost of which alone, according to a new report from the Audit Commission, now averages £50,000 a year for each child. And this is not even to mention the unimaginable unhappiness inflicted on the tens of thousands of families who wrongly fall foul of this weirdly inhuman system.
In 2010, Mr Cameron told the House of Commons: “It is right to judge a society on how it cares for its most vulnerable, especially our children. So should not our legacy to future generations be to do all we can to make sure that the lessons learnt from these appalling events are learnt and applied so that such terrible mistakes will never be made again.” He was apologising for the horrifying scandal whereby, half a century ago, 130,000 children were secretly torn from their families, to be shipped abroad to a miserable new life in Australia and elsewhere. Little does he realise that a similar national scandal is unfolding right now – for which much of the blame lies with his own government.

source:  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/mother-tongue/familyadvice/11051938/Under-family-friendly-Tories-yet-more-children-go-into-care.html

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged ,

GMB “CAMPAIGNS FOR JUSTICE” CONFERENCE FRIDAY 5TH & SATURDAY 6TH SEPTEMBER

There will be speakers from the different campaigns for justice for those who have suffered as a consequence of powerful forces thinking they are above the law and it is now time to try to join the dots in these campaigns says GMB   GMB has organised a 2 day “Campaigns for Justice” conference at John Moores University in Liverpool on

Friiday and Saturday 5th & 6th September.  

Speakers at the conference will include

     ·    Margaret Aspinall (Hillsborough Family Support Group)    

 ·    Andy Burnham (Shadow Health Secretary)      ·    Tom Watson (MP)      

·    Ricky Tomlinson (Shrewsbury 24 Campaign)      ·  

 Dave Hopper (Durham Miners Association) will speak about Orgreave and       the treatment of miners by the same police who marshalled       Hillsborough.      

·    Bryan Davies (Remploy)      

·    Dave Smith (Blacklisting Support Group),  

   ·    Eddie Marnell one of the jailed workers at Cammel Lairds and still       trying to get papers released.      ·    

Neil Findlay (MSP) on issues related to miner’s strike.    

 ·    David Conn (The Guardian)    

 ·    Alistair Morgan who has for 24 years fought to get his brothers       killers brought to justice after he exposed “serious police       corruption”

.   Neil Smith, GMB political officer, said

“GMB is involved in a number of campaigns for justice for people who have suffered as a consequence of powerful forces thinking they are above the law.   We have lined up speakers involved with the different campaigns. It is now time to try to join the dots in these different campaigns for justice.   Tickets will be on a strictly invitation only basis, but interested parties can contact GMB to secure an invite. The tickets are free.

We will make full details of the conference available shortly.

Media are welcome to apply for credentials.”   End  

Contact

Neil Smith 07740 804063 or

Terry Mellor 07970 410905 or 0161 627 3062 or contact

Neil Smith by email: neil.smith@gmb.org.uk or

GMB press office 07921 289880.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

UPDATE MAURICE KIRK – DENIED MEDICAL RECORDS FOR MEDICAL OPERATION – OUTRAGEOUS!

Documents from MK received tody August 19 2014. MK states the prison and Caswell Clinic are refusing to let the surgeon at the hospital [for his medical operation] or MK have his medical records. This is barbaric as a serious medical operation, long overdue, is being blocked by this deliberate action of not releasing his medical records. MK has already lost at least 20 kilos and needs this operation urgently.

I ask people with a conscience to please complain to the Governor at Swansea prison, and to those at Caswell Clinic about this refusal to release MK’s medical records. See link 9 below where MK states about this refusal to release his medical records.

File 1:

https://www.sendspace.com/file/b3om5s

File 2:

https://www.sendspace.com/file/ux8h3x

File 3:

https://www.sendspace.com/file/fhodxl

File 5:

https://www.sendspace.com/file/f2pvuy

File 8:

https://www.sendspace.com/file/x5ab8y

File 9:

https://www.sendspace.com/file/ni0rtn

—————————————————————————–

Latest documents from MK,69, received on the 14 Aug. and shortly before [click on the link, a window will appear, click on the blue box at the bottom of the page, then another page should show at the very bottom the options "open" "save" + save as" - no viruses in any of this]

File 1:

download link: http://www.sendspace.com/…/0gnzb9

File 2:

http://www.sendspace.com/…/qsa60z

File 3:

http://www.sendspace.com/…/jj3ci7

File 4:

http://www.sendspace.com/…/is5jxh

File 5:

http://www.sendspace.com/…/q97jyg

File 6:

http://www.sendspace.com/…/tpm6fn

File 7:

http://www.sendspace.com/…/6v66rx

File 8:

http://www.sendspace.com/…/w16q3e

File 9:

http://www.sendspace.com/…/ncwjmk

Some pages may be hard to read, because MK has been denied reading spectacles and simply cannot see to write half the time. I think it is fair to say MK is treated like an animal – in fact, we treat animals better!!

Regarding his being classified a MAPPA Level 3 subject – he has been made now a MAPPA 2 subject- a tiny tiny piece of progress that shouldn’t have to be made anyway as MK hasn’t done anything to justify such a drastic step of coming under MAPPA at all. Making someone a MAPPA subject is a very handy was to place the severest of restrictions upon that person – even prolonging ones imprisonment, such has happened exactly to MK now.

Still MK’s appeal documents aren’t sent when he tries to send them, or take a phenomenally long time to reach their destination – another deliberate ploy to block any progress MK has every right to make.

Communications to the Secretary of State Mr. Grayling [and many of them too!] are, of course, ignored wholesale, telling of the disgraceful treatment MK gets in these Welsh prisons. Everything is cruelly ignored. Hospital appointments and serious operations [for his colon problem] are also tampered with and cancelled without notice. None of these people doing this ignoring of what is really happening could do one single week of what MK is having to put up with, yet we, the UK taxpayer, is actually paying for the “privilege” of having these people in positions of responsibility and office. Authorities written to – the P+P.O., NOMS, MoJ.,IMB, + more, even human rights organisations do nothing when told about MK’s treatment in the courts [eg. his being denied so many witnesses,legal documents or parts thereof,+ more], in the Welsh prisons [too much to mention here], or his denied medical treatment situation – even the denial of a pair of eye spectacles. A reply from the Lord Chief Justice’s office stated I should try the Citizens Advice Bureaux for answers When written to explaining the numerous irregularities befalling MK. I was dumbfounded to read that I should go to the C.A.B. as surely one would expect those in the higher echelons of it all to show an atom of interest in how the system they are very much part of has become, when MK is incarcerated now for 10 months now not for doing anything wrong, but because his civil case against those authorities who have together targeted him for so many years was getting towards its end, and this could not be allowed to happen.

Meanwhile, the consultant psychiatrist – who made a false report stating MK had a brain tumour when he hadnt, also without even examining MK, for which MK suffered and has been suffering so much as a result since 2009 when the false report was manufactured – walks as free as a bird.

kirk 1ba

Posted in Uncategorized

OUTRAGEOUS! UNBELIEVABLE!! CRIMES BY UK POLICE: THE AFFADAVIT OF NEELU BERRY – THE DEATH OF BABY SUNAINA

Crimes by UK Police – Affidavit by Mrs Neelu Berry 01 of 02

Crimes by UK Police – Affidavit by Mrs Neelu Berry 02 of 02

Published on 27 May 2014

Neelu Berry, a witness to the murder of her neice, baby Sunaina, in the care of London Borough of Redbridge has been a victim of fraud by the Local Authority, Health Service, Home Office, Foreign Office, British Embassy in India and the Justice Ministeries in the UK.

Before we can bring back common law, the profit making Corporations must be closed by the process of a Commercial Maritime Lien under the Uniform Commercial Code UCc 1-308 3-508, which are to do with the Biblical God save man Dominion over Earth. The individual sovereign must follow due process, which the family of baby Sunaina has done, which the authorities are aware of but instead of ceasing and desisting, they have increased the frequency & severity of crimes against the whistleblowers and witnesses to the corporate crimes since 2000 ongoing to date. A Notice of Claim, Cease & Desist is hereby issued in this affidavit for the Commercial Lien under UCc. The Trust is a common law Pure Trust, protected by Trustees, which is subject to a Commercial Maritime Lien after following the due process of remedy, negotiated with the individuals running the corporations to be held responsible, so that public officers cannot hide behind laws which protect corporations and profit. Section 17 of PACE did not apply to victims of crime, Police had no authority to do what they did. They should have refused to act without the sealed Warrant. In order to remove personal liability, Public Officers must give names of higher officers pulling the strings, hiding behind control desks. We are sovereign and divine.

http://sunaina2007.tripod.com

http://www.icj13.webs.com/evidence Transcripts of some of my family’s cases
http://www.icj2.webs.com to join UK common law jury pool
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=laBke&#8230; 27 min Crimes by Police at the home of Neelu Berry in Ilford 24 May 2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3U-pi&#8230; 7min Crimes by Police, Neelu’s sister, Sadhana was arrested at the home of Neelu’s housebound mother in Sidcup Kent 25 May 2014
http://www.mc1215.webs.com Patrick Cullinane cases
http://www.nationallibertyalliance.org join international jury pool
http://www.godskyearth.org Prosperity funds from King of Kings

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 16 AUG. 2014

Latest News

Code Napoleon showing through the veneer!

A draconian punishment regime seems to have been imposed upon Maurice since he has been returned to prison in Swansea. News just in reveals that he has lost as much as 20 kilos in weight. He is being kept confined and denied contact with other prisoners. He is not allowed to make phone calls out of the prison and has not been allowed to send out his appeal. Still no reasons for his licence revocation have been forthcoming, apart from a terse “he behaved badly”.

More than a week after he was recalled to prison, ostensibly on the orders of the home secretary, the “authorities” have still failed to come up with any sort of plausible reason as to why he was recalled.

This is because they are in a bit of a bind, contrary to what they would have us believe, Maurice was actually recalled to prison under European law and not under English Law.(remember the “fish tank” they put him in in court?)

This can be discerned because there is actually NO REASON under English Law why he can be recalled as he hasn’t actually done anything wrong! English Law also says that they must provide him with the reasons within 5 days of his re-arrest, well that has come and gone!

Under the alternative Code Napoleon, which is slowly being introduced by stealth, they need no reason, as he is already guilty under that twisted doctrine. All that is needed is for someone to make an accusation, no matter how trivial or unsubstantiated and they have him guilty until proven innocent and hence they can put him back in prison, indefinitely!

The trouble they now have is that their scam is in danger of being exposed, unless they can come up with a reason that will be plausible under English Law then it will be obvious to any thinking person that they are using a different law, a different set of rules. Obviously they are not yet ready to expose the full extent of their deceit in robbing the British people of their historic right to justice and protection from a corrupt state. (If anyone reading this is in any doubt as to wether our state is corrupt, then ask yourself who has the power to cover up the enormous and extensive network of paedophiles that have been and are now infesting the corridors of power?)

This is where they are stumbling because there just simply is NO REASON to put the man back in prison under our own Law. They are frantically having MAPPA meetings to try and find a way around this problem, but it seems as if they might have shot themselves in the foot, so to speak, (possibly with a machine gun!)

Here is what Maurice thinks about the situation in a letter that he has sent to the criminal court appeal office, the criminal case review commission and to his trial judge at Cardiff civil court;

Published Jul 28 2014, 02:41 AM

Comments: butlincat:

Latest documents from MK,69, received on the 14 Aug. and shortly before [click on the link, a window will appear, click on the blue box at the bottom of the page, then another page should show at the very bottom the options "open" "save" + save as" - no viruses in any of this]

File 1:

download link: http://www.sendspace.com/…/0gnzb9

File 2:

http://www.sendspace.com/…/qsa60z

File 3:

http://www.sendspace.com/…/jj3ci7

File 4:

http://www.sendspace.com/…/is5jxh

File 5:

http://www.sendspace.com/…/q97jyg

File 6:

http://www.sendspace.com/…/tpm6fn

File 7:

http://www.sendspace.com/…/6v66rx

File 8:

http://www.sendspace.com/…/w16q3e

File 9:

http://www.sendspace.com/…/ncwjmk

Some pages may be hard to read, because MK has been denied reading spectacles and simply cannot see to write half the time. I think it is fair to say MK is treated like an animal – in fact, we treat animals better!!

Regarding his being classified a MAPPA Level 3 subject – he has been made now a MAPPA 2 subject- a tiny tiny piece of progress that shouldn’t have to be made anyway as MK hasn’t done anything to justify such a drastic step of coming under MAPPA at all. Making someone a MAPPA subject is a very handy was to place the severest of restrictions upon that person – even prolonging ones imprisonment, such has happened exactly to MK now.

Still MK’s appeal documents aren’t sent when he tries to send them, or take a phenomenally long time to reach their destination – another deliberate ploy to block any progress MK has every right to make.

Communications to the Secretary of State Mr. Grayling [and many of them too!] are, of course, ignored wholesale, telling of the disgraceful treatment MK gets in these Welsh prisons. Everything is cruelly ignored. Hospital appointments and serious operations [for his colon problem] are also tampered with and cancelled without notice. None of these people doing this ignoring of what is really happening could do one single week of what MK is having to put up with, yet we, the UK taxpayer, is actually paying for the “privilege” of having these people in positions of responsibility and office. Authorities written to – the P+P.O., NOMS, MoJ.,IMB, + more, even human rights organisations do nothing when told about MK’s treatment in the courts [eg. his being denied so many witnesses,legal documents or parts thereof,+ more], in the Welsh prisons [too much to mention here], or his denied medical treatment situation – even the denial of a pair of eye spectacles. A reply from the Lord Chief Justice’s office stated I should try the Citizens Advice Bureaux for answers when written to explaining the numerous irregularities befalling MK. I was dumbfounded to read that I should go to the C.A.B. as surely one would expect those in the higher echelons of it all to show an atom of interest in how the system they are very much part of has become, when MK is incarcerated now for 10 months now not for doing anything wrong, but because his civil case against those authorities who have together targeted him for so many years was getting towards its end, and this could not be allowed to happen.

Meanwhile, the consultant psychiatrist – who made a false report stating MK had a brain tumour when he hadnt, also without even examining MK, for which MK suffered and has been suffering so much as a result since 2009 when the false report was manufactured – walks as free as a bird.

SOURCE: http://kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/news/archive/2014/07/28/code-napoleon-showing-through-the-veneer.aspx#comments

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

ANDY FLYNN – LETTER TO IPCC 14 AUG. 2014

Andy Flynn

My Email to the Independant Police Complaints Commission requesting assistance in investigating the activity of Staffordshire Police who have been blocking investigations in to criminal activity.
Dear IPCC

May I please again ask for your assistance and for you to hold an independent investigation in to the actions of officers in the Police service protecting Mrs S F and her partner Mr C L.

Above is a letter I received in May 2014 confirming the assignment of an Officer to investigate my complaint. It is now August, I have received no report in to the findings of the investigation and it is clear any unprejudiced investigation will not be possible.

My original complaint was that in November 2013 I reported serious crimes committed by Mrs S F of [redacted], it took successive complaints to the IPCC and Staffordshire PCC’s officer before I received an acknowledgement. It then took further complaints before finally at the end of February 2014, some 4 months later – I received a call from a Detective T.

Detective T took clear steps and told outright lies in order to block any unbiased investigation in to Mrs Flynn’s actions. I now find that Staffordshire Police’s professional standards department are reluctant to hold an open investigation in to any connection between Mr L’s Police acquaintances, Detective T’s actions and the force’s lack of willingness to investigate Mrs F.

I understand the IPCC have been given greater powers to investigate serious matters involving Police Corruption and request this matter is dealt with as soon as possible.

Kind regards

A Flynn
[address redacted]

CC
Rt Hon Theresa May MP Home SecretaryLike · · Share

Scroll down for more articles on this case, or see archives on the right.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

FROM PATRICK CULLINANE: AFFADAVIT: HARROW COUNCIL’S OLIGARCHY

Common Law Courts will be coming to a Court near YOU shortly! 

 

From: Patrick Cullinane [mailto:patrick.cullinane@tiscali.co.uk] Sent: 10 August 2014 10:07Subject: Affidavit: Freedom of Information Request (FOI) re Headstone Lane width restrictions & UNLAWFUL Penalty Charge Notices’
 
IRISH IN BRITAIN REPRESENTATION GROUP (IBRG)
 
Working Against all the Odds!!
<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><><<<<<<<<<<<<<<> 

10 August 2014
FAO: Paul Najsarek, David Perry, Caroline Bruce and David Eaglesham
Harrow Borough Council
Civic Centre
Station Road
Harrow
Middlesex, HA1 2XY
Tel:
020 8863 5611
 
Freedom of Information Request (FOI) re Headstone Lane width restrictions & UNLAWFUL Penalty Charge Notices’
 
Affidavit of Patrick Cullinane of the above address:
 

1.      Harrow Borough Council did WRONG in erecting a hazardous obstruction in Headstone Lane that is damaging motor vehicles and forcing We the People to drive through their ‘BUSES ONLY’ SCAM to raise REVENUE from law abiding People.

 

2.      Common Law does NOT include any statutes made by government or decisions made by judges.
 
3.      Magna Carta 1215 guarantees We the People Due Process via Trial by Jury for EVERY case Civil, Criminal and Fiscal:
 
4.      Therefore, what law is Harrow Council using to collect this victimless revenue from  your scammed Victims via ENTRAPMENT?
 
5.      I have been observing this SCAM for many years now, as I have received hundreds of complaints, and when I went through there myself, twice, I damaged my 18” alloy wheels.  The wheel alignment of my car was also damaged and virtually pulled the low profile tyres off of my motor vehicle costing me £380.04  : –
 

          
Harrow Borough Council must pay back this money to me for vandalising my motor vehicle and making it un-roadworthy.  I still travel this route to visit family members at the other side of this revenue monstrosity, but I now go through where the ‘BUSES ONLY’ go and wave to the FRAUDULENT UNLAWFUL SPY CAMERA that is watching us without our consent: -
 
In the Public Interest, under the Freedom of Information Act 2000, I request the following information
 

6.      How much revenue has this ‘Width Restriction’ generated for Harrow Borough Council year by year in the last 5-years?

 

7.      How many complaints has Harrow Council received about this ‘Width Restriction’ year by year in the last 5-years?
 
8.      How many claims for damaged vehicles has Harrow Council received re this ‘Width Restriction’ year by year in the last 5-years?
 
9.      How much revenue has Harrow Council paid out for damaged vehicles re this ‘Width Restriction’ year by year in the last 5-years?
 
10.  How many PCN’s has Harrow Council processed through Common Law Courts re this ‘Width Restriction’ year by year in the last 5-years?
 
11.  What date and year was this ‘Width Restriction’ put in place in Headstone Lane?  – And who was the Council’s Chief Executive then?
 
12.  Apart from generating revenue; why did Harrow Council erect this hazardous obstruction in Headstone Lane in the first place?
 
13.  How many people were killed or injured at this spot before erecting this hazardous obstruction in Headstone Lane?
 
14.  On Friday 25 July 2014, I visited the ‘Width Restriction’ in Headstone Lane to measure the height of the kerb and observe drivers and vehicles how they negotiated the two chicanes within the ‘Width Restriction’, which proved impossible for over TWENTY drivers in a 60 minute period.  The kerb height was 5” to 6” along the ‘Width Restriction’ and looking at vehicles with low profile tyres having to mount the kerb was sickening to watch what; Harrow Council will do to law abiding people for to make money out of them.
 
15.  The two STEEL Poles 31” high bore all the evidence of the CRIMINALITY and persecution that Harrow Council is inflicting on decent people to make MONEY out of them.
 
16.  Where are the Health and Safety Officers in Harrow, as these damaged vehicles are a danger to other road users?  – And how much money are the Police and the Commercial Kangaroo Courts making out of these un-roadworthy damaged vehicles in FINES?
 
17.  It is imperative that I am supplied with ALL the names of the Bailiff Firms that Harrow Council used to collect revenue since the erection of the ‘Width Restriction’ (CASH COW) in Headstone Lane.
 
18.  Who at Harrow Council authorised the issuing of warrants to Bailiffs without seeing the inside of a court?  = Judge, Jury and Executioner!
 
19.  Where are the English and Irish businesses in the Borough of Harrow now?  Harrow Council has NOT been a Public Services for at least 30-years, it is a DICTATORSHIP, as it has been infiltrated by Criminal Gangsters who are supported by the Harrow Times and the Harrow Observer to the detriment of the English and Irish communities who are virtually wiped out and have NO amenities and facilities for our communities, as they were ROBBED off of us and given to other communities.
 
20.  On Friday 25 July 2014, I took photographs of the broken reflectors, side mirrors, headlights etc, which I will be using to support my Affidavit that I will be putting before a Jury in the Queen’s Bench of the High Court to rule on, as this FRAUD and TORTURE of innocent families via Jew Process in Britain cannot go on: –  

 
Virtually, the Last Irishman standing:  Seamus Gaughan, an immigrant Irishman is also a victim of this revenue TRAP, as it broke his wing mirror, and before he done any further damage, he reversed out and went through the ‘BUSES ONLY’, which is the SCAM: –  Who is now going to pay for the mirror and to have the tyres and tracking checked?
 
The following is one of the ‘Jew Process’ wholesale FRAUDS that Harrow Borough Council used to cleanse the once largest ethnic immigrant Irish community from the Borough of Harrow, while the Zionist Press remained SILENT: -
 
 
 
 
 
 
Harrow Borough Council’s Lying Policy
See the following case of Arnold Layne and Harrow Council Plc using Newlyn Bailiffs Plc to DEFRAUD the People without Due Process; as it has now become Jew Process across Britain in their very own Commercial Kangaroo Courts and their Thug Bailiffs TERRORISING and ROBBING the People out of existence. – Apart from the chosen ones!
 
The UK is a Common Law jurisdiction and NOT a Judge, Local Government, Police or Magistrates’ jurisdiction: –
 
Due process is the legal requirement that the state must respect all of the lawful rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects individual persons from it. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of law.
 
Due Process does NOT mean Jew Process.
 
Disturbing number of Jewish lawyers and judges in Britain’s KEY legal positions
 
 
Magna Carta (1215) {Article 38} reads:  “In future no official shall put anyone to trial merely on his own testimony, without reliable witnesses produced for this purpose.”
 
{Article 39} reads:  “No freeman shall be arrested or imprisoned or deprived of his freehold or outlawed or banished or in any way ruined, nor will we take or order action against him, except by the lawful judgment of his equals (Trial by Jury) and according to the law of the land.”
 
{Article 40} reads: “To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay Right or Justice.”
 
{Article 45} reads: “We will appoint as justices, constables, sheriffs, or bailiffs only such as know the law of the realm and mean to observe it well.
 
 
Jew Process in the Peoples Courts is what caused, “THE CORRUPTION OF BRITAIN” – And CLEANSED the ethnic immigrant Irish community by FLEECING us without Jury Trials.  A foreign power has hijacked the Law of the Land = Magna Carta 1215:
 
THIRTEEN High Court Judges denied me my Constitutional Common Law rights under Magna Carta 1215 to a Trial by Jury:  =  HIGH TREASON
The Independent: By Tom Harper, Investigations Reporter on Friday 10 January 2014
The corruption of Britain: UK’s key institutions infiltrated by criminals
 
Secret report shows how organised crime infiltrated judicial system as well as police with prison service and HM Revenue & Customs also compromised
 
Tiberius disclosed that the Met interviewed the journalist who wrote the story after the murder of Solly Nahome, a Jewish money launderer credited as the “brains” behind the Adams’ criminal empire.
 
The Turkish drug dealer was later convicted and told police he was an HMRC informant. He said he knew of “corrupt contacts within the police” and had a Cyprus-based customs officer as a handler who “took money off him”.
 
Now you/we know why the Police and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) are NOT prosecuting FRAUD : -
The Independent: By Tom Harper, Investigations Reporter on Sunday 12 January 2014
Revealed: How gangs used the Freemasons to corrupt police
Gangsters able to recruit police officers through secret society, says investigation for Scotland Yard
 
Secret networks of Freemasons have been used by organised crime gangs to corrupt the criminal justice system, according to a bombshell Metropolitan Police report leaked to The Independent.
 
Freemasonry has long been suspected of having members who work in the criminal justice system – notably the judiciary and the police.
 
The political establishment and much of the media often dismiss such ideas as the work of conspiracy theorists
 
 
Thirteen High Court Judges CONSPIRED with HMRC, the Insolvency Service, the Official receiver, KPMG my Trustee in Bankruptcy, Moon Beever my Trustees Solicitors, MPs, the Bailiffs, the Police; Lord Chancellors, CPS and Psychiatrists to DEFRAUD me of my home, and my worldly possessions.  How was I made Bankrupted when I had NO debt and the Inland Revenue owing me over £5,000 in tax rebates? –
 
Report by Phillip Inman of The Guardian, Financial Section, Monday 25 August 2008
Evidence put to the high court shows that Cullinane, far from owing tax, was due a rebate.
 
The 13 High Court Judges who conspired in Patrick Cullinane’s case to cover-up the HMRC’s INFORMANT and defraud him: -
  1. Mr Registrar Pimm
 
  1. Mr Registrar Simmonds
 
  1. Mr Registrar Baister
 
  1. Mr Justice Jacobs
 
  1. Mr Justice Neuberger – Promoted for Crime:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2012/jul/12/lord-neuberger-appointed-supreme-court-president
 
  1. Lord Justice Stewart-Smith  –  Also covered-up the Hillsborough disaster.
 
  1. Mr Jonathan Parker
 
  1. Mr Justice Hart
 
  1. Master Leslie
 
  1. Mrs Justice Ebsworth
 
  1. Mr Justice Ferris
 
  1. Mr Justice Pumfrey
 
  1. Mr Justice Mann
 
Thirteen JURISDICTIONLESS High Court ‘Judges’ denied me a DISCLOSURE of the Inland Revenue’s Proof of Claim for £68,831.31 against me and also violated my guaranteed rights in Common Law to a Trial by my Peers.  For his crimes; ‘Lord Justice’ David Neuberger was promoted to the highest Judge in the UK having STOLEN my home and possessions by CONSPIRING to pervert the course of justice and denying me Due Process via the Constitutional Common Law of the Land.
 
Jew Process in the UK is guilty of High Treason and Genocide, as Jewish lawyers and judges in Britain hold ALL the KEY legal positions and have stripped us of our properties.  Notwithstanding, the KEY positions held by Jews in Parliament, Media, Police and Local Governments: –
 
 
The Press is a key weapon in a just society to expose wrong-doing: –
 
However, the Zionist controlled Press in Harrow, Barnett, Brent and Ealing failed the immigrant ethnic Irish community, which led to our demise.  We were denied our rights to Trial by Jury.  Harrow, Brent, Barnett and Ealing Councils took FULL advantage of this and ROBBED us of EVERYTHING we ever had.
 
DO NOT IGNORE THIS AFFIDAVIT
 
As former Leader, Susan Hall, and former Chief Executive, Michael Lockwood, ignored all my previous correspondence, and would NOT meet me.  As the evidence demonstrates, a complete oppressive DICTATORSHIP that we were/are FORCED to live under with NO remedies whatsoever.
 
Our Public Servants have gone INSANE with assumed power!  – Magna Carta 1215 is the ONLY remedy – Trial by Jury.  And NOT Trial by Jew, as We the People are subjected to now in the UK and stripped of our ASSETS.
 
Yours truthfully,
 
Patrick Cullinane, Common Law Lawyer and Victim of ‘Jew Process’ and the UK’s COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts.
 
From: Finlay.Flett@harrow.gov.uk [mailto:Finlay.Flett@harrow.gov.uk] Sent: 07 August 2014 11:25To: patrick.cullinane@tiscali.co.uk
Subject: Headstone Lane width restrictions/Penalty Charge Notices
 
Dear Patrick,
Following up on our conversation this morning, here are the contact details which you requested.  I hope that you find this useful.
Regards
Finlay
 
The team I believe have responsibility for the width restriction itself is managed by David Eaglesham (david.eaglesham@harrow.gov.uk)
The Corporate Director for this area is Caroline Bruce (caroline.bruce@harrow.gov.uk)
The Interim Head of Paid Service (equivalent to Chief Executive) is Paul Najsarek (paul.najsarek@harrow.gov.uk)
The Lead of the Council is Cllr David Perry (david.perry@harrow.gov.uk)
 
Finlay Flett
Head of Service, Corporate Business Support
Harrow Council
 
 



Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

APPALLING POLICE CORRUPTION – ANDY FLYNN

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

APPALLING POLICE CORRUPTION – ANDY FLYNN

APPALLING POLICE CORRUPTION – ANDY FLYNN

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

GRANDMA B: NEW RADIO INTERVIEW 25 JULY 2014

Info

Awake Radio interviews Grandma B’s carer on the latest developments in the case in which the authorities in Britain, Austria and Germany have pursued an 85 year-old invalid across Europe in their attempts to defraud her of her assets. On 6 May 2014, she was abducted to prevent her fighting back any more. She is now being held hostage.
 
###########################################################

*GERMAN POLICE TO PRESS CHARGES AGAINST GRANDMA B?”

From Peter Hofschroer 20 May 2014:

“We have just heard from our lawyers in Germany.
It seems the German police want to press criminal charges against both Grandma B and her carer. We do not yet have any firm information as to what for, but suspect it has to with the unlawful raid by German police on her refuge in Germany on 6th May 2014, in which they kidnapped her and handed her over to her abusers.
Please see: https://www.grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/1-new-items/german-police-kidnap-grandma-b/
Both Grandma B and her carer were ill in bed when the German police broke into their flat without an arrest warrant, a search warrant or any lawful reason to be there.
Hearing the noise of a dozen or so police officers breaking down the front door and an inside door of their flat to the protests of their neighbours, Grandma B asked her carer what she should do. She was in bed ill, wearing only her nightdress.
Her carer suggested she should put on her underwear and out in her teeth so she should have at least some dignity before the police burst into her bedroom.
When they did, they attacked her carer, who, as a registered invalid, was incapable of offering any resistance.
The last Grandma B saw of her carer was when he was handcuffed on the floor in front of her and had pepper gas sprayed into his eyes at point-blank range, before he was thrown down the stairs and carted away to a police cell. So much gas was released that Grandma B was choked.
She was then spirited off to England, when she is now being held prisoner.
So what charges are the German police going to press against Grandma B? She is 85 years old, an invalid and bed-ridden. As such she could not have raised a finger in self-defence. But knowing how strong her spirit is, she may well have spat in the faces of these German police perverts.
More news when we have it.”
  

source: http://www.grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/1-new-items/german-police-to-press-charges-against-grandm-b/
Scroll down and look in archives for previous posts and radio interviews…
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

NORMAN SCARTH WRITES 29 JULY 2014

To Sir Jeremy Sullivan

Office of the Senior President of Tribunals

Sir,

Having been told that complaints against N J Warren should be sent to you, I do so now, though not expecting much when a complaint about what is really quite serious crime is to be dealt with by someone who is a colleague.

Consider: This relates to a cover-up which has been on-going since 8th August 1999, when I was the victim of what it is no exaggeration to call an attempted assassination, to stop my exposure of widespread corruption in the courts, of which I had newly become aware. Had it succeeded, it would have been the perfect murder – ‘Death from Natural Causes’.

Well, it failed, & my exposure of corruption has continued. So also have the attempts to silence me! During the 15 years since that first attack there have been more terror attacks, physical assaults, malicious prosecutions, Kangaroo Courts, incarceration.in many different prisons & so-called ‘Mental Hospitals’.

Old age hasn’t saved me, & I was imprisoned again at the age of 86. Following which, I belatedly realised it was time to leave the land of my birth (the land for which I fought in WW2!) & seek safety in the Republic of Ireland. England is NOT a safe place for those who dares to expose corruption.

It hardly needs saying that the cover-up of crime such as described above, is itself serious crime. N J Warren is party to that cover-up, along with many others. To say nothing of his petty, spiteful ‘Order’, as punishment (effectively a fine), that I must use expensive snail-mail, denying me modern methods of communication..

My release from prison in 2011 only came about because of outrage from abroad (it was even on Russian TV!) but the persecution didn’t end then.

From July 2012, the then Attorney General, Dominic Greave contemptuously ignored the Civil Procedure Rules, trying to silence me by having me incarcerated again, for which he enlisted the aid of HM Solicitor General, HM Treasury Solicitor & their staffs, Lord Chief Justice Lord Igor Judge (NO LESS)), several Lord Justices, several Puisne Judges, Circuit Judges, District Judges, Court Service staff, police, bailiffs, Old Uncle Tom Cobley an’ All an’ All!

To waste such vast sums of taxpayers’ money was itself a crime, especially when all concerned knew the whole exercise was futile from the word go. With me safe in Ireland I was able to watch with amusement the antics in the Royal Courts of Justice. Why on earth was it started, & why was it allowed to continue? When LCJ Lord Judge did impose two prison sentences on me, I was able to cock a snook at him from afar.

Well, Sir Jeremy, what now? Do you ignore this, as the brave Admiral Brigstocke? (see below). Do you come out with the usual stock phrases of gobble-de-gook? Do you send me on a wild goose chase somewhere else?

Or, do you show that there is at least one honest lawyer in Britain?

The ‘Culture of Cover-Up’ is disintegrating in other aspects of British life, e.g. Savile & the BBC, phone hacking, Hillsboro’, abuse in Childrens’ Homes, etc. etc.

Perhaps the ‘Wind of Change’ is about to blow through the Legal Establishment? Are you are the man who is going wield the bellows?

We shall see.

Norman Scarth.

From: grc@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
To: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 16:38:16 +0100
Subject: RE: Complaint against N J Warren?

Dear Mr Scarth,

A complaint about the Chamber President must be submitted in writing to the Senior President of Tribunals, as follows:

Sir Jeremy Sullivan, Office of the Senior President of Tribunals

Royal Courts of Justice, Strand, London WC2A 2LL

Yours faithfully,

Tribunal Clerk, HM Courts & Tribunals
First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber)
P.O. Box 9300
Leicester, LE1 8DJ
Tel: 0300 123 4504
http://www.justice.gov.uk/tribunals/general-regulatory-chamber

From: Norman Scarth [mailto:againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk]
Sent: 28 July 2014 12:04
To: GRC@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
Subject: Complaint against N J Warren?

PS: It is a poor reflection on the Royal Navy of today, that Admiral Brigstocke ignored an S O S message from a man who served on the Arctic Convoys of WW2. Those who know nothing of them should see http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-21845753 NS.

From: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk
To: informationtribunal@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
CC: richard.bailey@ico.org.uk; mark.thorogood@ico.gsi.gov.uk; simon@simonhughes.org.uk; ben.bradshaw.mp@parliament.uk; aacpresidentpa@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk; alanmdransfield@gmail.com
Subject: Complaint against N J Warren?
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 11:50:24 +0100

I too ask to be advised the correct procedure for lodging formal complaint against Judge N J Warren.
I did make complaint about him to Admiral Sir John Brigstocke, KCB, the Judicial Appointments & Conduct Ombudsman, but there has not even been acknowledgment from the Admiral (which brings to mind the SS Californian and her Captain Stanley Lord, who became notorious for their failure to respond to distress signals sent up by Titanic).
Norman Scarth.
Email: againstcorruption@Hotmail.co.uk

Subject: EA/2014/0149 Dransfield v ICO
From: alanmdransfield@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 10:22:34 +0100
CC: Richard.Bailey@ico.org.uk; Mark.Thorogood@ico.gsi.gov.uk; simon@simonhughes.org.uk; ben.bradshaw.mp@parliament.uk; aacpresidentpa@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk
To: informationtribunal@hmcts.gsi.gov.uk

Dear Sirs
Please resend me another PDF copy of the recent decision by Judge NJ Warren which I received on Sat 26th July.

Please also advise the correct procedure for lodging formal complaint against Judge NJ Warren.

Name redacted

...a scarth3.xxx jpg

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

AT NOTTINGHAM COURT 25 JULY – Melanie Shaw, Beechwood Child Abuse Witness, Held in Peterborough Prison

 photo mel_zps537493a9.jpg

The Beechwood Children’s Home abuse witness is being held in Peterborough prison after unknown police action on Thursday, 10th July, and a secret court hearing on Friday, 11th July 2014. For the personal safety of the individual and in the wider public interest we are naming the witness as Melanie Shaw. 

     On Friday, 11th July, the UK Column reported that a “key whistleblowing witness and victim of child abuse at Nottingham Beechwood Children’s Home is effectively missing after sending a text to the UKColumn starting ‘pls ring urgent, something has happened n I don’t trust the police and I may be locked up tomorrow.’ Sent at 21:22 on Wednesday, 9th July 2014 the UK Column has been trying to locate the witness ever since.”

Despite telephone calls by UK Column and members of the public to Nottinghamshire police over the weekend, we were unable to establish the precise whereabouts of Melanie. We remained concerned for her safety in light of civilian police staff claims that she was safe, without any supporting facts as to what had happened, or where she was being held. Late on Friday afternoon Melanie Shaw’s solicitor was also unaware of the police action or his clients location.

At 1127 on Monday, 14th July we received a call from a friend of Melanie who informed us that she was being held in Peterborough prison after being picked up by Nottinghamshire police on Friday and held in cells overnight. After a Court hearing the following day, for which it is still not known if Melanie had proper legal representation or the benefit of public and press attendance, she was remanded to Peterborough prison. This category B prison run by Sodexo had a reputation in 2011 for drugs, bullying and violence. As the country’s only male and female prison, it has a maximum capacity of 840 and boasts a Mother and Baby Unit for 12 mums. 

Melanie’s incarceration appears to be based on allegations that she set fire to a neighbours shed – a charge which Melanie denies. Melanie has reported to the UK Column that individuals linked to her bail conditions had been harassing her in recent weeks.

This latest punitive action on a child abuse victim by Nottingham Police and the Courts, follows the removal of her child by Social Services and disruptive action by the Local Council in respect of her home. Melanie claims she had been warned she could have her child taken when she first blew the whistle on Beechwood in 2011. 

Melanie originally approached the UK Column because she wanted to expose the truth of the vicious rapes, sexual and physical abuse, and psychological intimidation that she and some 100 other young children suffered at Nottingham Beechwood childrens home.  Clearly frightened of the police after irregularities in their investigations, Melanie strongly suspected that the police, Local Authorities and Members of Parliament, were already attempting to cover-up the Beechwood abuse.

Following Elm House child abuse London, BBC’s Jimmy Savile, and particularly in light of the ongoing exposure of the cover-up of paedophile rings within Westminster and the wider establishment, the UK Column believes that many of Melanie’s concerns are fully justified. Our opinion is reinforced by the fact that five other women known to the UK Column, who, having reported paedophile activity, have been harassed by the police and Local Authorities and later sectioned in psychiatric units. In two other UK Column cases where Social Services have been attempting to steal children, parents have also been falsely accused of arson attempts.

Three Nottingham MPs, Vernon Coaker, Lilian Greenwood and Chris Leslie

Three Nottingham MPs, Vernon Coaker, Lilian Greenwood and Chris Leslie have so far failed to respond to UK Column enquires as to their action to help Beechwood victims and protect other children from abuse. Their silence says much.

source:   http://www.ukcolumn.org/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , ,

KELLIE COTTAM [FORCED ADOPTION EXPOSED] WITH CAROL WOODS – CHILD PROTECTION WHISTLEBLOWER DOWN AT S.C.O.T. UK

Kellie Cottam (Forced Adoption Exposed) with Carol Woods CP whistle blower down at S.C.O.T UK .
Kellie Cottam

 video:   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96NI_YBclck

published on 23 Jul 2014

Carol Woods is an ex child protection officer a level 3 social worker. Who after being asked to edit paper work, take children from loving Mothers, targeting families and many other things. SHE BLEW THE Whistle. I only had 10% battery on my ipad so this is a brief interview with Carol down at S.C.O.T UK outside Downing Street. To learn more about Carol Google Carol Woods, Lancashire
more:

video:     http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PukfRbz5vuI

Kellie Cottam (Forced Adoption Exposed) reporting from S.C.O.T UK outside 10 Downing Street
Kellie Cottam

Kellie Cottam – the blog:
http://www.forcedadoptionexposed.blogspot.co.uk/

scroll down for more posts on Kellie Cottam

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

UPDATE MAURICE KIRK 21 JULY 2014

As of late 2013 MK had also been stopped 35 times whilst driving his car, allegedly for drink/driving reasons. No charges were ever brought after any “stop”, and on occasions after being taken to a police station for an alcoholic breath test he was released without the test even being given!! Could it not be said that being stopped 35 times without any “positive result” since 2009 by the very people his civil case is against is clearly and undeniably “harassment” by them?

Latest update on 21 July ’14.

Maurice had been moved to another hellhole on Thursday 17th but HMP Swansea prison regime decided not to tell anybody, so when a friend and supporter went for a visit on the following Sunday a warder only then told him, after the supporter had waited in the actual visiting room for MK for some time, that MK had been moved 4 days previously to another prison. Another gross irregularity enacted by these charletans running these hellhole prisons.

A family member writes 21 July 2914:

“X went to Swansea to visit Maurice as arranged. He checked in went through the searches and even went into the hall. After 10 mins a screw came up and told him. ‘Are you waiting to see Kirk? Well he was moved to HMP Parc last Thursday’ (the day he was due his internal examination at a Cardiff Hospital.)
 
I cannot get info that he really is there…data protection! He may be in the morgue at a Welsh Hospital for all I know!
 
Anyway stop sending him post to Swansea for the moment until the Probation Service confirm to me tomorrow where he is.
 
I am trying ‘e mail a prisoner’ to Parc, Bridgend.
 
Frustrated but not so frustrated as my brother!”

Words fail me as to the deliberate misbehaviour of these so-called prison warders who have agreed to a code of ethics when doing their job – they simply aren’t worth a quarter of the salaries they are paid by the taxpayer as it seems many of them are not competent enough to act responsibly, which the job demands . They are an absolute burden who follow  their own rules and not those set out by government – some of them nothing more than violent thugs as has already been shown by MK’s beatings whilst in HMP Cardiff in October 2013 and September 2011 – both assaults carried out by the same criminal senior officer at HMP Cardiff whose name is well known!!

More:

” I hear this being said in a police station in South Wales as a long running Civil Action Case against South Wales Police halts as the victim of many years of police harassment is again stopped in his tracks by a fictitious charge.
 
This has happened over 17 times since the opening of the case. Each time there are complaints by the victim; each time these are ignored and more often than not the victim is held in prison for weeks away from his legal papers unable to progress the case only to be released at the end of it with no apology from the police nor from the justice system.
 
Now this victim is being branded as having ‘a paranoid personality’ and likely to be locked away in a secure hospital wing so that the civil case will be finally abandoned. This is the catch-all phrase used by government and its officials to remove people who challenge an abuse of power.
 
In the meantime the South Wales Police, using nefarious means, has seen to it that this ‘irritant’ has lost his licence to practise his vocation; is banned from contacting his daughter (there have been no sexual charges laid against him nor has he laid a finger against his family); almost made bankrupt, hence the need to defend himself in court, and has been held in prison erroneously for over three years in the last five mainly based on a medical report written by a corrupt psychiatrist who has now been de-licenced and removed from the South Wales Health Service.
 
The judge in the case has tried hard to keep the appellant in contact with his legal papers but each time he has the means to extract the necessary details from the pile of paper and he is able to contact the court with typewritten letters and documents he is moved from within the Prison Service and his papers moved and thus jumbled up again needing hours of re-sorting. Do remember that a prisoner is not allowed paper clips, sticky tape, easy access to photocopying, hole-puncher and the usual accessories of an office.
 
As the victim’s  sister I ask ‘Is there a politician, journalist or lawyer able to rescue Maurice Kirk from the State?’ 

=======================================

Following on from the earlier posts [scroll down for posts on MK’s release from HMP Cardiff for 6 days before being recalled to HMP Swansea – this time for the [bogus] breaking of his release licence.

UPDATE 17 July 2014:

More on MK’s present situation:

“M is so sure he has a date with an operating table for colonoscopy today at the Heath that he has followed the hospital’s instructions and has not eaten since Monday morning.
 
He says he is not allowed loose 1st class stamps and only 2nd class ones already stuck to envelopes!
 
Only allowed one phone number
 
Huge difficulties accessing the ability to send in Appeal Papers to the courts.
No access to the library and its law books
 
Has had no reasons as to why he is in Swansea rison”

A letter was received from MK 17th July ’14:
“BS614159

15 July 2014

To Whom It May Concern – please forward.

I have been diagnosed as MAPPA Level 3 Barry police station as PPD [Paranoid Personality Disorder] and therefore revoking my 11 July 2014 licence that allowed me to commence 1 month for closing submissions [for his civil cases against S. Wales police + others...ed.]“

1A

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

UPDATE: THE INHUMAN PERSECUTION OF MAURICE KIRK, 16 JULY 2014

Maurice Kirk, rearrested last Thursday on ridiculous charges of “bad behaviour” whilst released from prison “on licence”, living forcibly in a Swansea bail hostel, and having to “sign on” there EVERY HOUR so as to make his presence known, sends the message below.

It is fair to say they are so desperate to keep MK incarcerated  so he can’t continue his civil case against  the S. Wales police + others regarding 20+ years of outrageous and blatant targeting and harassment towards him they had to let him out on licence – a deliberate act – so as to rearrest him a few days later on ridiculous fictional charges of “bad behaviour”. This bizarre conspiracy designed to  kick into touch his ongoing civil case against the S. Wales police and make  it simply “go away”… Meanwhile numerouse recorded delivery letters and emails sent to  many so-called “government figures” including the Secretary of State Grayling, the M.o.J., the N.O.M.S., the I.M.B., the P.+P. O. and more detailing concisely the brutal and deliberate criminal persecution of Maurice Kirk, 69, are all SYSTEMATICALLY IGNORED by all receiving the messages – with all  the characters making MK’s life a living hell able to continue their unspeakable actions without any hitch of any kind!!

How on earth has it come to this and why isn’t anything done about this cabal conspiring to cover each others backs and in the process make a complete and utter mockery out of the laws in place?, because that is exactly what is happening here – all paid for by the taxpaying general public!!!

From MK 16 July 2014:

“M is not ALLOWED to use 1st class stamps so only 2nd class please! (any 1st class ones go into his possessions (one hopes)

He is not allowed to write direct to courts…’they’ address the envelopes

Habeas Corpus

Only one phone number

Urgent representations delayed

Slow 2nd class mail only allowed            (why?)

Swansea Prison is furious that ‘they have been dumped on by HMP Cardiff

but it is all to do with MAPPA

1.

No bail hostel found under Bidder’s instructions 3rd Jan 14 (blocked by MAPPA)

2.

Not allowed out with tag on 3rd May 2014

3.

Recalled from a licence with end date 7th March 2015 and draconian conditions by MAPPA

4. True release date 25th July 2014  (see Rowe document of 3rd July)

NOW BEING HELD ILLEGALLY.”

“MAPPA3 nonsense to do with keeping me in prison upto Prosecutor Arrest Trial…now delayed to 17 Nov 14 in Bristol where they hope I will have 1 yr sentence .

Everyone protecting their own backs:
a) when held for 1 hr in Barry Police Cell on 14 Oct before interview the sergeant woman feinted illness so she wasn’t involved in interview (only Gunney)

Judge said at end of Newport Trial: ‘if only you had signed for the passport’
(for Judge’s protection)

CPS Smyth deliberately played the 1st CD of 14 Oct interview so that neither the jury nor the defendant  saw the real one…….to protect himself. He knows that the whole thing was a set up.

As M is on B Wing he has no access to the library and its Law Books. They are denying him the ability to send out any appeals.

He is starving himself in readiness for the op booked for tomorrow although he has been told it has been cancelled.”

kirk rcj musa12

Scroll down for more articles

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged ,

Nottinghamshire Child Abuse Witness Taken By Police, Now Missing

A key whistleblowing witness and victim of child abuse at Nottingham Beechwood Children’s Home is effectively missing after sending a text to the UK Column starting…”pls ring urgent, something has happened n I don’t trust the police and I may be locked up tomorrow…” Sent at 21:22 on Wednesday 9th July 2014 the UK Column has been trying to locate the witness ever since. 

 

 

This witness has reported to us rape, intimidation, beatings, physical and emotional threats as just some of the abuses suffered by vulnerable young children at Beechwood, but some youngsters were also witnesses to ‘suicides’ – children ‘falling’ from upper windows. Other witnesses report that children’s bodies were hidden on the site.

Fearful for the physical safety of this highly vulnerable witness, who already alleges a police cover-up and is fearful of the police, we contacted Nottinghamshire Police via their 101 phone line. 

After speaking to the civilian telephone operator and expressing grave concerns for the safety of the witness, Nottingham police were asked if the witness had been arrested and if they were safe. In a short return call the operator said that a police officer had said that the witness was safe. Unconvinced by the vague reply, we asked the name of the police officer and a shoulder number. The operator said they were unsure. They were also unsure as to whether the witness had been judged ‘safe’ at home, had been arrested and was ‘safe’ in custody, or was in a psychiatric facility.

The UK Column duly asked for clarification from a named police officer with their personal number and was promised a call from such an officer. No such call was received overnight. Our worst fear remains that the witness has been sectioned and held in a psychiatric unit in order to silence them.

Early this morning Friday, 11th July 2014 the UK Column again made contact with Nottingham police via their media team. Again requesting information as to the whereabouts and safety of the witness, Richard from the media team would only confirm that the witness was safe, but would not give their location, state if they had been arrested nor give details of the police officer or their official number. He also appeared unsure as to why the police refusal to give full and proper details about the location and safety of a vulnerable child abuse witness would be in the public interest.

The UK Column has also expressed concerns for the safety of this individual to Bassetlaw Nottingham Labour MP John Mann. Mr Mann has recently spoken out about child abuse in Westminster stating that ”there was a cover-up with regard to child abuse investigations in Nottingham.” He also reported on his Twitter post:

On Monday Nottm court Beechwood children’s home abuse. No prosecutions for 100 victims. County Council denying liability.

Further posts state:

No answer yet on how many files destroyed by Notts County Council involving child abuse..Notts County Council offering [£]9000 to child abuse victims but admitting no liability.

BBC Nottingham news team who have previously reported on the horrific child abuses at Beechwood, were also informed by the UK Column of the witness safety concerns, particularly in light of increasing reports from across UK of police forces failing to investigate paedophiles, and reports by witnesses of police harassment and threats to silence them. 

To date Nottingham City and Nottingham County Council, holding joint responsibility for the now closed Beechwood home, have paid out some £250,000 in compensation to 17 victims. It is believed the payouts included gagging orders. Nottingham police have previously stated to UK Column that over 92 victims of Beechwood abuse have come forward, but there is no murder investigation.

Again, because of the sensitivity of this case we are extremely concerned for the safety of this witness. We would like to ask that members of the public contact Nottingham Police about the Beechwood child abuse witness via their local 101 telephone number and ask for more information.  

Nottinghamshire Chief Constable Chris Eyre

SOURCE: http://www.ukcolumn.org/article/nottinghamshire-child-abuse-witness-taken-police-now-missing

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

UPDATE 10 JULY: M KIRK REARRESTED – MORE SOON – MAURICE KIRK RELEASED – BUT IS HE ANY BETTER OFF? 10 JULY 2014

Maurice Kirk was arrested on the 10 July on dubious charges, designed to put him baxk in HMP Cardiff and far away from the civil case he was pursuing against 20+ years of chronic targeting by S Wales police and others: From the 8 July 14:
Latest News

Maurice Vacates His Cell for Rolf Harris  

14/05/14                Appellant to Criminal Court of Appeal             BS614159 
                                                                                                                T20131144 Etc                                                                                                          

         3rd Breach of ‘Restraining Order’ 17th March14 Cardiff Crown Court Trial

My attempt to submit further ‘Grounds’ already with Criminal Court of Appeal
 
GROUNDS INCLUDE
    1. Refused medical attention
    2. Refused process legal aid form
    3. Refused access to lawyer in prison
    4. Refused glasses in court
    5. Refused legal papers in court
    6. Refused, either in court or in prison, to interview defence witnesses
    7. Refused access to his own funds 
    8. Refused outstanding relevant appeals/applications required to be heard first
    9.  
    10. Refused access to his legal papers in prison
    11. Refused the right to call defence witnesses

    12. Refused the his right to cross examine
    13. Refused Sect 8 police disclosure or basic primary disclosure despite promises, over 22 years, by countless South Wales Police and CPS personnel. 
This list is far from exhaustive
Maurice J Kirk A7306AT
HMP Cardiff
South Wales
UK 

[ Deja Vu? Who remembers Maurice rebuking R'olf Harris up on stage before 400 veterinary surgeons and police being called ?] 

Swansea incarceration (a whole new meaning to Oscar Wilde’s ‘Reading Gaol’ and the ‘book on the book’) 

 Swansea ‘tunnel types’ you may bump into when leaving Swansea train station via their underpass 

  

  

A Swansea Castle dungeon break out  

STOP PRESS  (10th July 2014)
 
South Wales Police’s  contentious NHS Zero Tolerance policy, to ‘arrest on sight’ anyone who dare question any one in a doctor’s surgery I have now witnessed for myself. Cardiff prison is full of them.   .
PLEASE NOTE
1. South Wales Police are refused some court applications, I am told, to ‘vary’ HM Prosecutor’s ‘Restraining Order’ as protection from being gaoled or struck off
2. My 17th Nov 14 Bristol Crown Court Appeal, moved to England as with previous ones to avoid the publicity, was first listed last November, yes, last November !!
3. Her Honour Judge Eleri Rees had agreed, last September,  it was to be heard first because of CPS failure to disclosure public court records
[ I am waiting for transcripts to arrive at me new Swansea residence in order to publish these public documents world wide].
 
4. If anyone out there can explain as to just what is going on then please, please comment on current blog or ring me 
5. Cardiff Cabal admit, in writing this time, I am registered MAPPA but for what? What nefarious conduct is afoot this time to delay my 22 year civil damages claim? Please, someone, advise
 
6. Please visit as  there is precious little time left and take me out for afternoon ‘tea’ in sweet sunny Swansea
7.  I have to report on the hour and  every hour between 6am and 6pm
8.  I am being ‘set up’ to an alleged breach of licence conditions so be quick!
9.  No proof is needed, as if there ever was in any Cardiff ‘court’, because:
         I will get arrested without any warning 
         I will not pass GO
         I will not collect £200
         I will go directly to prison
         I will not go via  any court
         I will get no appropriate appeal procedure
The decision will have been taken in the same MAPPA Barry police station office by the very same 8th June 2009 cabal that conspired for the ‘machine gun’ conspiracy shredding the records as they speak 
 
 
 
 
my tel:  07907937953 or 07598801723 I need your help
maurice’kirkflyingvet.com
 
 
Highly Dangerous’ Prisoner moved out for Rolf Harris.
MAPPA Level 3
1.       HM Probation Service officers joined us at the gates of the prison for a specially assembled HM prison van escort to somewhere out west. This unusual clearance was granted by Sir Peter Vaughan, The Chief Constable for South Wales Police, having personally chaired, most likely, the hurriedly needed MAPPA meeting at Barry police station for a quick disposal of one of their country’s registered top 5% most dangerous victims of the regime.
 
2.        On a previous but equally bizarre 2009 occasion I was left ‘at large’ for three weeks quite unaware of the Barry police station’s MAPPA decision. Then armed police with helicopter swooped on the family while we enjoyed a quiet Sunday’s afternoon tea in the garden.
 
3.       That 8th June 2009 MAPPA decision included The Vale of Glamorgan Probation Service and NHS Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, psychiatric staff sitting around discussing my fate. Were I to be incarcerated in Ashworth Psychiatric hospital IPP indefinitely or by introducing the Chief Constable’s new ‘shoot to kill’ policy and simply taking me out and having me shot?
 
 
4.       But I also had an urgent agenda after being locked up for a further nine months over the issuing of NHS fabricated medical records. Bang goes my four weeks again, I sighed, originally  requested to the County Court in order to complete closing legal submissions for my euphemistically so called ‘civil remedy’ route, anything to slow down police harassment.   
 
5.       It had not gone unnoticed by their victim, incidentally, on how the prison had taken the precaution in allowing him to leave with no money or signature required except for some ‘restraining order’ recently deemed as possibly ‘meaningless’ by a Cardiff Crown Court
 
6.       The hundred and sixty odd pounds found in my pockets, following my dubious October 2013 arrest in Barry police station, also failed to feature in ‘discharge’ papers explaining why, perhaps, they had withheld my passport last time despite court directions to the contrary.
 
7.       A prison van was also to join my entourage with two more government officials, dedicated to me for the whole day, simply to carry some forty odd bags of leaver arch files to some far away ‘lock up’. Somehow I was expected to visit it, each day, to prepare the civil damages claims but in between the MAPPA designated one hour compulsory ‘signing in’ ritual.
 
8.       What benefit, this time around, was it if for the South Wales Police to delay the civil proceedings if not identical to the Caswell Clinic 2009 fabricated police psychiatric reports  needing police officers to paint a WW1 Lewis machine gun just to fool yet another jury?
 
9.       My court designated Mackenzie friend, in order to bar him as an eye witness in this week’s Crown Court’s proceedings, had stood patiently throughout with alternative transportation.
 
10.   This will continue as long as no one  is found accountable   
and the money does not run out! 

  

South Wales Police’s MAPPA Level 3 ‘Approved Premises’ Swansea
Staff will be asked:
1.       Why do South Wales Police conveniently use 1997 Harassment Act in order to have me gaoled despite legal argument that it is clearly an abuse of process?
 
2.       Why will no one disclose, in writing, the purpose of this current Swansea incarceration?
 
3.       Why am I registered MAPPA level 3?
 
4.       When was I registered MAPPA level 3?
 
5.       Who caused my registration if not to obstruct current civil proceedings in County Court?
 
6.       Why was I registered in June 2009 and at Barry Police Station?
 
7.       Why was I then removed from the MAPPA register on 17th December 2009?
 
8.       Was it before or after the Newport Crown Court ‘machine gun’ hearing (transcript later)?
 
9.        Why am I again on the MAPPA register?
 
10.   Who caused my MAPPA registration again?
 
11.   Why  is the ‘Executive Summary’ for all MAPPA Barry police station decisions, with their contemporaneous notes, not now disclosed following November 2013 County Court ruling?
 
12.   Why do all Cardiff courts refuse PII MAPPA legal argument relating to my restraining order?
 
13.   Why refused the right to even apply for variation to my restraining order?
 
14.   Why not allowed to challenge the police application for my Ashworth IPP incarceration?
 
15.   Why is NHS (Wales) not allowed to correct or clarify my medical records?
 
MAPPA’s reason for my passport being ‘withheld’ for nearly a year and my being arrested ‘for entering a prison without permission’ trying to get it back is all to prolong this incarceration to further affect the 22 year running police malicious prosecution’s case. These letters, for example, display ‘what really goes on in our courts’ and you or someone ‘near and dear’ may be next
 
14 06 18 arbitration reminder.doc
 
Outside Supreme Court of Appeal and HM Privy Council with ‘trusty scribe’ and RCVS application 
 
To be continued with copies of ‘leaked’ MAPPA documents and transcripts 
Maurice J Kirk BVSc
Tel 07907937953 or 07598801723 
p3 of my licence I have taken down as there may be valid argument it is security sensitive……it was put up because the last judge rebuked me , while halving my prison sentance on appeal (MAPPA told prison to hold my valuables), saying if I had signed for my passport, in the first place, at the prison exit last September we need not have had all these court cases!
Marvelous! I never signed a purported licence this time around either, leaving the prison to Swansea ‘approved premises’, as there is no legal obligation AND as no one but no one,  to date, timed 315 hours local time on 11th July 1014, will explain why I am on MAPPA regime at all ?
Janet Kirk had the inicietive to get my passport out of the court despite my needing it for a vital defence exhibit 
t
 
14/05/14                Appellant to Criminal Court of Appeal             BS614159
                                                                                                                       T20131144                                                                                                                                    Etc
 
         3rd Breach of ‘Restraining Order’ 17th March14 Cardiff Crown Court Trial
My attempt to submit further ‘Grounds’ already with Criminal Court of Appeal 
GROUNDS INCLUDE
    1. Refused medical attention
    2. Refused process legal aid form
    3. Refused access to lawyer in prison
    4. Refused glasses in court
    5. Refused legal papers in court
    6. Refused, either in court or in prison, to interview defence witnesses
    7. Refused access to his own funds
    8. Refused outstanding relevant appeals/applications required to be heard first
    9. Refused access to his legal papers in prison
    10. Refused the right to call defence witnesses
    11. Refused the his right to cross examine
    12. Refused Sect 8 police disclosure or basic primary disclosure despite promises, over 22 years, by countless South Wales Police and CPS personnel. 
This list is far from exhaustive
Maurice J Kirk A7306AT
HMP Cardiff
South Wales
UK
I HAVE JUST RECEIVED  8,700 e-mails to read in order to update this current blog…….. when time!!!!  
 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

ENQUIRY ANNOUNCED INTO CHILD ABUSE, TV NEWS 8 JULY – PARLIAMENTARY QUESTIONS: WHERE ARE THE 114 MISSING FILES?

From the tv News =

GOVERNMENT CHILD ABUSE ENQUIRIES TO BE HELD – 8 JULY 2014

from butlincat1 on Vimeo.

Shown for educational purposes only

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION FOR A GOVT. ENQUIRY! / TELEGRAPH: Lord Tebbit: there ‘may well’ have been a Government cover-up of child abuse

The veteran former minister says it was the instinct of people at the time to protect ‘the system’ and not to delve too deeply into uncomfortable allegations

Norman Tebbit

Lord Tebbit says he thinks there may well have been an establishment cover-up of child abuse in the 1980s Photo: Andrew Crowley/The Telegraph
A veteran former Conservative minister who served in the cabinet with Lord Brittan has said there “may well” have been an establishment cover-up of child abuse in the 1980s.
Lord Tebbit, who served in a series of ministerial posts under Margaret Thatcher at the same time as Lord Brittan, the former Home Secretary, said the instinct of people at the time was to protect “the system” and not to delve too deeply into uncomfortable allegations.
His comments come as Francis Maude, the Cabinet minister, said a probe was necessary to finally “lift up the drains” on who knew what about historic allegations of child abuse.
The Home Office announced a fresh review into what happened to a file alleging paedophile activity at Westminster which was handed to the then home secretary Leon (now Lord) Brittan by the Tory MP Geoffrey Dickens.
Appearing on BBC1’s The Andrew Marr Show, Lord Tebbit said: “At that time I think most people would have thought that the establishment, the system, was to be protected and if a few things had gone wrong here and there that it was more important to protect the system than to delve too far into it.

“That view, I think, was wrong then and it is spectacularly shown to be wrong because the abuses have grown.” Asked if he thought there had been a “big political cover-up” at the time, he said: “I think there may well have been. But it was almost unconscious. It was the thing that people did at that time.” Speaking on Pienaar’s politics on BBC Radio 5 live Maude added that “nobody can be above the law” and “justice has to be done” over the allegations of child abuse.

Nigel Evans, the Conservative MP, said that someone “within the Home Office” must know what happened to the file.

He told Pienaar’s politics: “There will be more than one person who would know that that file existed and has read that file and took the decision either to destroy it or if it’s not been destroyed, it is somewhere, and I think that they really do need now to turn the Home Office upside down.”

He added: “If nobody comes forward then they really do need to look absolutely everywhere to ensure that as Francis Maude said, nobody is above the law, we need to make sure that the people inside that file are properly investigated, and the question is, why weren’t they investigated in the first place?”

Lord Brittan, now a Conservative peer, was challenged over what he knew about the dossier detailing an alleged Westminster paedophile ring that was passed to him when he was home secretary and later disappeared.

Lord Brittan confirmed that he was handed a “substantial bundle of papers” when he was Home Secretary, an office he held from 1983 until 1983.

The papers were compiled by Geoffrey Dickens, then a Conservative MP, who had investigated child abuse networks.

Simon Danczuk, the Labour MP for Rochdale, has said that the Dickens papers contained details of paedophiles operating a network around Westminster.

Lord Brittan said that he passed the papers to Home Office officials and asked them to “look carefully” at the material they contained to see if any action was needed.

That investigation found that Lord Brittan had acted appropriately, the Home Office said. It also “found no evidence of Mr Dickens expressing dissatisfaction about the action taken in respect of the information he had passed on”.

The Home Office investigation “shows that appropriate action and follow up happened” in relation to the papers, Lord Brittan said.

An internal review of hundreds of files last year found 13 previously undisclosed “items of information about alleged child abuse – including four implicating Home Office officials”.

Mark Sedwill, who has been appointed by David Cameron to investigate claims of a Whitehall cover-up of political paedophiles, revealed that 114 potentially relevant files” were “presumed destroyed, missing or not found”.

An independent legal figure, expected to be a promised QC, is to be appointed to conduct a review of the Home Office’s handling of the case.

The news comes as it emerged that Lord Brittan had been interviewed by police over a historical rape allegation.

The Independent on Sunday reported that Mr Britton was accused of raping a 19-year-old female student in 1967. He was not an MP at the time of the alleged incident at his London flat.

According to his lawyers Lord Brittan will not be making a comment today, but it is understood he strongly denies the allegation.

In a statement, a Metropolitan Police spokesman said a man in his 70s had been interviewed under caution. 

source:  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/10949428/Lord-Tebbit-there-may-well-have-been-a-Government-cover-up-of-child-abuse.html ###########>##########################################################################

PAEDOPHILES IN WESTMINSTER. THE GREAT COVER UP. 

5.7.14

The more you hear and read about ‘the lost dossier’ of papers surrounding a paedophile ring centred on Parliament, the more it stinks of conspiracy and cover up. The Tories are panicking and running for cover. Cameron should instigate a proper, formal and independent Inquiry, not a Home Office Investigation. Is he implicated in this too? Geoffrey Dickens MP had a half hour meeting in 1983 with the then Home Secretary Leon Brittan during which he presented a large dossier of proof and discussed its contents with Brittan. Bear in mind that this information was a potential nuclear bomb waiting to go off. Brittan says he just handed the papers to The Home office to deal with and now assumes that they took appropriate action. How could an intelligent politician leave such a potentially damaging time bomb at the back of his mind and not even check to see what was happening on at least a daily basis? Maybe we should rename him Pinocchio Brittan?

• In 1981, Dickens named the former British High Commissioner to Canada, Sir Peter Hayman, as a paedophile in the House of Commons, using parliamentary privilege so he could not get sued for slander. Dickens asked why he had not been jailed after the discovery on a bus of violent pornography. In April 1981 Sir Michael Havers, the Attorney General, said in parliament that while Hayman was a member of the Paedophile Information Exchange, he was never a member of the executive committee, so was not prosecuted as others were for publishing contact advertisements. Was Havers a part of the paedophile ring too? Or was he just covering up for his public school buddy?

• On 29 November 1985, Dickens complained in the House of Commons that he had suffered harassment following his naming of Hayman. “The noose around my neck grew tighter after I named a former high-flying British diplomat on the Floor of the House. Honourable Members will understand that where big money is involved, and as important names came into my possession, so the threats began. First, I received threatening telephone calls followed by two burglaries at my London home. Then, more seriously, my name appeared on a multi-killer’s hit list. By 17 May 1995 Dickens was dead, and his voice had been silenced.

• In February 2013, Labour MP Tom Watson asked the Home Office for Dickens’ dossier. A Home Office review in 2013 concluded that any information requiring investigation was referred to the police but revealed that Mr Dickens’ dossier was “not retained”. It had been destroyed. • In July 2014, the issue was raised again by Labour MP Simon Danczuk, Former Director of Public Prosecutions, Lord Macdonald, said the circumstances in which the dossier had gone missing was alarming and recommended an inquiry into the fate of the dossier. Prime Minister David Cameron asked the Home Office Permanent Secretary to investigate what had happened to the missing dossier. Danczuk responded that another internal inquiry was merely trying to limit damage, and that a public inquiry was necessary to retain public confidence.”

SIGN THE PETITION FOR AN ENQUIRY INTO CHILD ABUSE: The above from the comments:  

http://www.change.org/en-GB/petitions/david-cameron-and-theresa-may-establish-a-national-inquiry-into-allegations-of-organised-child-abuse#

——————————————————————–

From the tv News =

GOVERNMENT CHILD ABUSE ENQUIRIES TO BE HELD – 8 JULY 2014

from butlincat1 on Vimeo.

Shown for educational purposes only

Photo: When will they tell us?Photo: 2Photo: 3

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

TELEGRAPH: JUDGE SLAMS HARINGEY COUNCIL OVER MY MOST SHOCKING FAMILY CASE EVER – CHRISTOPHE​R BOOKER

Haringey went ‘behind my back’, says Mr Justice Holman over forced break-up of family

Mr Justic Holman condemned Haringey for having deceitfully broken both procedures and the law Photo: Alamy
Of all the scores of cases I have followed over the past five years where families have been torn apart by social workers and the courts, one has stood out as more shocking and harrowing than any. From 2010 on, when five children were removed from a Nigerian couple, Mr and Mrs Musa, and then a sixth was violently wrested from Mrs Musa’s arms by six police and three social workers when she was lying helpless on a hospital bed breastfeeding the baby to which she had just given birth, I wrote about this case in heavily redacted form more than any other (a seventh child was later also taken from her at birth). I can only now name both Haringey council (of “Baby P” fame) and the Musas, thanks to three very remarkable recent High Court judgments by Mr Justice Holman, which he ordered to be published on the Bailii court website, specifically allowing both the council and the parents to be identified.
Holman only came into this case at the end of a four-year long saga that had already been before more than half a dozen other High Court judges. What he had to decide was whether, as an earlier judge had ruled they must be, the five older children, now in different foster homes, should be allowed to maintain contact with the two youngest (who have been sent for adoption and whom Haringey wishes to be given new names). Holman discovered, first, that Haringey had secretly and blatantly disobeyed that earlier ruling, by last year breaking off the children’s contact for several months until, in December, they were allowed to meet for a final “goodbye session”.
Holman repeatedly expressed his astonishment that the council had knowingly broken a court order in this way. But he was then even more astonished to discover that Haringey had managed to get the court website to remove the very judgment he had ordered to be published. In his own words, Haringey had, “gone completely behind my back”, to persuade “Bailii to remove from the public website” the judgment that he had “deliberately placed” there, “pursuant to the practice direction of the President of the Family Division” (Lord Justice Munby, who has been valiantly striving to open up the family courts to “the glare of publicity”).
Again and again in his forensically argued judgments, Holman condemned Haringey for having deceitfully broken both procedures and the law, expressing his “grave concern” at what the council had been doing. While he very reluctantly concluded that, following that illegal “goodbye session”, it was probably not practical to undo the damage, he ended one judgment by saying, “On that incredibly melancholy note, and with the utmost despair on my part, I draw the present hearing to a close.”
But Holman was careful to say that he was not familiar with all the earlier stages of this case, although he knew that it has been widely referred to on the internet and has aroused huge public concern in Nigeria. Had he in fact known all of what Haringey and the courts have done to this family since 2010, he would have been utterly appalled. Right from the start, the children were initially removed from their parents on allegations so implausible that the council eventually had to drop them and come up with new ones, quite different. After many more tragic twists and turns to the story, the parents ended up, following a very odd criminal trial, being given long prison sentences,
The children who, in the early days, were constantly pleading to be allowed to come home, have, for four years, been kept unhappily in foster care, where they are now condemned to remain. Mrs Musa, whom I knew as a smartly dressed, capable and obviously devoted mother, has been reduced by her beatings in prison to a physical wreck. If, one day, the full story of the fate of this family can be told, it will be seen as a truly major scandal. Haringey’s bid to have Holman’s judgment suppressed was only the latest instance of an official cover-up that has so far been terrifyingly successful. Last Thursday, by another, very different judge, the council was finally given almost everything over those poor children’s future it had asked for.

SOURCE: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10946414/Judge-slams-Haringey-council-over-my-most-shocking-family-case-ever.html

Here is the HHJ Holman judgement of the 26 April 14: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2014/1341.html
Same case, from April: 

 Gloria Musa: her Deteriorating Health Condition in HMP Send:
5 July 2014

When I, with another friend visited Gloria Musa on Saturday 28th June 2012 on a social visit at HMP Send, we were shocked not only by at Gloria’s physical state of health and well-being, but also by what she told us on this visit.
She told us that she now had a “lump” in her groin area, presumably brought on by the infection she has as a result of bleeding from internally for so long since giving birth to a baby on March 10 2012. This ailment has never been addressed properly by any health official anywhere, as its obvious if this had happened Gloria would not be still bleeding, and, we are told, awakening each new day in bloodstained bedsheets.
It is thought this “lump” Gloria now has could also have been caused by her possibly having an untreated hernia, originating from the birth of her child in March 2014.
The authorities especially prison department personnel, including the Prisons and Probation Ombudsman, and the Minsistry of Justice, N.O.M.S., and the I.M.B. have been told time and time again about Gloria’s serious medical conditions, including:

a] her painful hip and knee problems,
b] the “lump” she speaks of in her groin area,
c] along with a painful infection which carries with it “warts”in her groin area, making it very painful to sit down on anythuing except a cushion, we have been told, and
d] her continuous bleeding from her stomach, the blood exiting from her groin area,
e] Gloria is now vomiting continually also, and
f] her eyesight is failing.
g] Gloria speaks of having painful mouth ulcer alsos.
After a fall in the past from her wheelchair whilst in HMP Holloway it is understood, when she called supporters, she had a cut had which was possibly broken too. This hand has now reset but not to how it shouldve done. Gloria told us when calling in distress directly after her fall that when she asked for help in the prison she was told by warders that as she was a bishop she should “heal herself”. It is understood Gloria was finally given a plaster to put on the cut to her hand, but anyone seeing Gloria now can see the damage to her hand where the bones have not reset properly.

Most of these ailments have been with Gloria a very long time but nothing has been done by anybody to remedy and rectify properly these serious medical health conditions.On complaining to the Ministry of Justice [their reply is attatched to this note] their reply stated that all inmates get the best possibl;e NHS care. Other departments written to state whichever department cannot intervene in single case – apparently not even if they are as serious as Gloria’s obvious lack of medical treatment..

Furthermore, we were told on our visit on the 28 June that the standard waste bins in her cell are not being emptied, and the contents, which include items such as bloody tissues etc. used to deal with and clean her bleeding in her groin, and the contents from her continual vomiting are left to accumulate in these receptacles for periods of time. Gloria is bedridden and unable to clear this waste, she tells us.This is completely unhygenic, and surely goes against the Health and Safety Regulations in place at the prison.

We were also told how certain warders are telling Gloria that they “hate her” – showing her absolute contempt,which goes against these prison warders code of conduct for dealing with prison inmates.
We were also told how certain warders have been telling other inmates to avoid Gloria Musa at all costs, that she is an appalling mother guilty of heinous crimes. This again is completely unacceptable behaviour for a prison warder.

I ask you to understand what is going on here as this appalling lack of medical care and disgraceful victimisation against this vulnerable and very ill lady should not be taking place as it has been from day 1 of her entry into the UK prison system on the 28 November 2011.

Please see the attatched letter from the Ministry of Justice concerning inmates and the healthcare they supposedly get. This most definately is not the case for Gloria’ Musa, or if she is getting the best of healthcare, why is she still bleeding from internally for over 27 months, along with her numerous other continuing serious ailments?

J. Graham
Mckenzie friend to the Musa family and concerned citizen

UPDATED 5 July 2014 – this is a true sworn statement and for confirmation of anything written kindly confirm with Bishop Gloria Musa.

Attatched are a tiny sample from numerous replies from departments relating to Gloria Musa’s health and medical creonditions, including:

2 replies from the Inspector of Prisons

1 from the I.M.B.,

1 from N.O.M.S.

2 sheets from Prime Solicitors from August 2013 [entitled "gloria prime1 9aug"  + "gloria1 prime1 9aug"],

 plus an official complaint Gloria made re: being constantly harassed by certain prison personnel,

a letter from Killick, HMP Holloway governor, who states she will not be communicating with me re: Gloria – this sent after my very 1st communication to her. Maybe she knew something we didn’t?, viz., how Gloria would be treated whilst in her prison? Gloria’s health deteriorated rapidly after entering HMP Holloway. Needless to say, a great amount of discernment must be used when reading the government departments replies as they contain many inaccuracies – eg., Gloria has agreed to medical treatment, and we  swathe effects on a visit of her being on at least 5 unspecified medications, which made her ill – so ill in fact she had to come off these drugs. When asked for the names of the drugs Gloria was not told, worryingly. She  stated at the time, on a visit, that she was losing the sight of her left eye since taking the prescribed medications she knew not the names of, and suffered much nausea also. That is one fallacy in the letters of reply – there are more.

Also attatched is Gloria Musa’s affidavit 11/2011

REPLY FROM M.o.J. regarding prison inmates medical treatment:

white2 011aa.jpg2.jpgz

10 attachments — Download all attachments   View all images   Share all images  
HARDWICK REDAXCTED REPLY 20MAR134682.jpg HARDWICK  REPLY 20MAR134682.jpg
1739K   View   Share   Download  
HARDWICK 12 12 2012268 redacted.jpg HARDWICK 12 12 2012268 redacted.jpg
970K   View   Share   Download  
MOJ 15 JAN REDACT.jpg MOJ 15 JAN REDACT.jpg
2720K   View   Share   Download  
KIILLICK 10OCT12349 2.jpg KIILLICK 10OCT12349 2.jpg
1147K   View   Share   Download  
gloria3  9aug13277.jpg gloria3 9aug13277.jpg
3777K   View   Share   Download  
IMBLETTER  8 SEPT 12163A.jpg IMBLETTER 8 SEPT 12163A.jpg
730K   View   Share   Download  
gloria1 prime1 9aug13276A.jpg gloria1 prime1 9aug13276A.jpg
1230K   View   Share   Download  
gloria prime1 9aug13275.jpg gloria prime1 9aug13275.jpg
1598K   View   Share   Download  
a1.jpg a1.jpg
14K   View   Share   Download  
MUSA WALL 14 10 11 11_10_10_Affidavit.pdf MUSA WALL 14 10 11 11_10_10_Affidavit.pdf
424K  
View   Download  
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

Let public into family courts, says top judge: Sir James Munby suggests ‘certain types of family case’ could be held as open hearings

Plan raises prospect of ordinary people being allowed to attend courts

Cases have been closed because of fears over damaging gossip
June 14 2014

Sir James Munby, said he would talk to lawyers, judges and social work chiefs about 'the possible hearing in public of certain types of family case'
Sir James Munby, said he would talk to lawyers, judges and social work chiefs about ‘the possible hearing in public of certain types of family case’

Members of the public could be allowed in to the family courts to watch cases for the first time, a senior judge said yesterday.

  •  The leading family law judge, Sir James Munby, said he would talk to lawyers, judges and social work chiefs about ‘the possible hearing in public of certain types of family case’.
    Sir James’ plan raises the prospect of ordinary people being allowed to attend courts as they decide on cases of children taken from their parents into state care, adoption, and where children should live when their families break up.
    In the past such cases have always been closed to the public because of fears that neighbours and those who knew the families could go to the family courts and then spread damaging gossip about children.
    The promise to gather ‘preliminary pre-consultation views’ on allowing the public into family courts will be part of a paper on ending secrecy in the courts to be published shortly by Sir James, who is President of the Family Division.
    The Daily Mail’s campaign against secret justice has highlighted controversial decisions made behind closed doors in the family courts and the closely-related and even more secretive Court of Protection, which deals with the affairs of vulnerable adults.
    Last year the Mail revealed that the Court of Protection secretly imprisoned a 50-year-old woman, Wanda Maddocks, for trying to get her elderly father out of a care home where she thought his life was in danger. 

Sir James has since forbidden secret imprisonment and has ordered that judges must publish their rulings in family and Court of Protection cases.
Yesterday he said in a circular sent to judges that he is to press for further moves towards openness.
Approved journalists have been allowed in to family court hearings since 2009 following an attempt to open up the courts by Labour Justice Secretary Jack Straw.
However Mr Straw’s rules  applied only to journalists, not to members of the public, and allowed judges to apply reporting restrictions so that nothing about the cases they observed could be published.
Sir James’ circular also promised that his consultation, to be published ‘shortly’, will press for the publication of court documents, so that outsiders who attend family courts will be able to understand lawyers and judges who argue their case by reference to secret documents.
It will also call for better announcements in advance of what cases will be in the courts and when.
‘I will be canvassing views as to any ways in which the guidance can be improved, and, perhaps, extended,’ Sir James said.

source:: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2661967/Let-public-family-courts-says-judge-Sir-James-Munby-suggests-certain-types-family-case-held-open-hearings.html#ixzz35p9wWhpL

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged ,

Conference: Children Screaming To Be Heard – 25 JULY 2014

Has anything changed regarding the child removals, like the figures going down at all over the years? They continue rising, with Cameron setting ever higher targets:

JANUARY 2013:

Children waiting for adoption figures at all time high:

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/121893/ADOPTION__FIGURES_AT_ALL_TIME_HIGH_OF_CHILDREN_IN_CARE_WAITING_FOR_ADOPTION__SKY_NEWS_21_JAN_13/

—————————————————-
Sir James Munby, “President of the Family Division”

Appeal judge slams decision which led to baby being taken from parents unjustly

Sir James Munby#s reforms – what happened?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2583949/Ministers-blocking-secret-court-reform-Concerns-falling-deaf-ears-says-judge.html#ixzz2wTLzn9wl

—————————————————-

MailOnline article 26 July 2013 by Sue Reid: “For years I fought against secret courts breaking up families. At last there’s hope?”
What happened??

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2377084/SUE-REID-For-years-I-fought-secret-courts-breaking-families-At-theres-hope.html#ixzz2aJqP7uQa

——————————————
res

UPCOMING CONFERENCE 25 JULY 2014:

http://www.researchingreform.net/2014/06/23/conference-children-screaming-to-be-heard-attend-attend-attend/

Conference: Children Screaming To Be Heard – Attend, Attend, Attend!

Posted by Natasha in Children

Maggie Tuttle over at Children Screaming to Be Heard, a charity dedicated to helping children inside the care system find their voice and speak out about the often appalling treatment they receive (including denial of contact with parents and extended family), has put together a cracking conference, and worth going to if you can find the time.

The tickets are absolutely free. The event takes place on 25th July, from 9am-5pm, at Resource for London, on Holloway Road.

We’ve added the press release for you, below:

Children Screaming to be Heard Conference

(Registered Charity No. 1144679)

A Voice for the Silent Witnesses and their Families

25 July 2014 at 9am – 5pm

Resource For London, 356, Holloway Road, London N7 6PA

http://www.resourceforlondon.org/contact-us/how-to-find-us

9.45 Albina Koumirova will speak of her art exhibition for the children – 15 minutes

10.00 Rosie, the little girl who spoke in the House of Commons last year, told MP’s how she was denied her rights to be with her family as a child – 20 minutes

10.20 Michael Unsworth. Short video from the Australian who wrote and recorded the song Calling Me, Calling You- 10 minutes

10.30 Laura Lian, the sculptress, who has designed the monument for the abused children – 10 minutes

10.40 The Emperor Rosko, famous DJ. A short statement read out on why he is supporting the charity -5 minutes

10.45 Tim Spearman, author of the book launched at the conference and written for the children – 15 minutes

11.00 John Hemming MP – 30 minutes – with questions and answers

11.30 Vicky Haigh via video link – pedophiles and the families – 15 minutes

11.45 Coffee Break

12.15 Sonia Poulton, journalist and broadcaster, a voice for the people – 20 minutes

12.35 Brian Daniels, Citizens Commission on Human Rights, speaking on the drugging of children – 25 minutes

13.00 Lunch until 14.30

14.30 Ian Joseph – forced adoption, a punishment without a crime – 30 minutes

15.00 Dr. C. Dennhey, Child Psychiatrist speaking on extended families – 30 minutes

15.30 Michael Bailey, Barrister of Tanfield Chambers – 30 minutes

16.00-17.00 Questions and Answers

The Charity – do check out their website, it’s very nicely done and informative, too.

http://www.childrenscreamingtobeheard.com

Free Tickets for the conference

https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/children-screaming-to-be-heard-the-silent-witnesses-conference-tickets-10908400319

—Painting by guest speaker, Albina Koumirova

source: http://researchingreform.net/2014/06/23/conference-children-screaming-to-be-heard-attend-attend-attend/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

Social Services chief’s husband was drug-addicted violent terrorist

 photo mailza_zps16af3326.gif

Quote from below: “…he had computer memory sticks and confidential files relating to scandals about children in care in the county. “

ByMartin Delgado, Mail on Sunday Reporterand Andrew Young
ok
lisa christensen
Boss: Lisa Christensen, head of Norfolk children’s services

A Social Services chief who played a key role in the forcible adoption of three children is married to a convicted terrorist with a history of drink and drug abuse.

Lisa Christensen, director of children’s services in Norfolk, is the wife of Jack Prescott, who was given a 15-year prison sentence for involvement in a bomb attack on the home of a Tory Cabinet Minister.

Prescott, 64 – a self-confessed former heroin addict and thief – was a founder member of the Angry Brigade, Britain’s only home-grown urban terrorist group, which carried out 25 attacks on Government buildings, embassies and corporations.

His past has come to light because he was recently convicted of assaulting Ms Christensen.

She failed to tell Norfolk County Council about her husband’s violent past when she was appointed head of Social Services in 2002.

Two years later, she became the authority’s £120,000-a-year director of children’s services with responsibility for schools, child protection ad young people in care.

In that role, she approved the forced removal of Mark and Nicky Webster’s three children, all then under five – a decision condemned by Liberal Democrat MP Norman Lamb as ‘an appalling miscarriage of justice’ and which has been highlighted by The Mail on Sunday.

The Websters fought a long battle to prove they had not harmed their children. Last year, experts agreed that leg injuries suffered by one youngster were due not to physical abuse but to a disorder that stopped him eating anything other than soya milk.

jack prescott
Husband: Jack Prescott under arrest in 1971.

The couple, who have since had another child, are now making legal history by trying to reverse the adoption of their three older children.

Mr Prescott’s past was revealed last week when he made a series of drunken phone calls to his wife’s office, following a court case in which he admitted assaulting her during a row at the family home.

In one call, he told Ms Christensen’s secretary that he had computer memory sticks and confidential files relating to scandals about children in care in the county.

Although a police investigation concluded that he held no such information, Ms Christensen, 52, was embarrassed and upset by the calls. She is understood to have felt obliged at this point to tell town hall chiefs about her husband’s criminal record.

The couple, who married in 1992, are now separated, although they are still listed at the same address on the electoral roll. Neighbours in the Norfolk village of Mattishall, where the couple have a £350,000 detached Victorian cottage, said they were living together until just a few weeks ago.

angry brigade attack

Angry Brigade attack on the Minister’s house

One woman, who declined to be named, said: ‘Those of us who knew him fairly well were aware he has a problem with alcohol. It was something he’s quite open about. But it’s a real shock to hear he’s been violent as well.’

Another friend said: ‘He was certainly living with Lisa until the incident when the police were called. I think she threw him out after that, but whether permanently or not
I don’t know.’

Prescott was considered highly dangerous as a result of his terrorist exploits and when he was sentenced at the Old Bailey in 1971 the judge, Mr Justice Melford Stevenson, told the painter and decorator he had been convicted of complicity ‘in the most evil conspiracy I have ever had to deal with’.

When he was arrested over the bomb plot, Prescott was on parole from prison, where he had been serving five years for firearms offences.

Then 27, he already had convictions for theft, housebreaking and assault but his sentence on the terrorism charges was later cut from 15 years to ten by the Court of Appeal.

Unlike other members of the Angry Brigade, most of whom were middle-class and university-educated, Prescott came from a staunchly working-class Scottish background.

Born in Dunfermline, he was brought up in an orphanage after the death of
his mother. He committed his first offence, the theft of a bicycle, at 14 and became a heroin addict.

He told the jury at his terrorism trial: ‘I was taking eight grains of heroin and other drugs every day and I sold all my personal possessions to buy drugs.’

In November 1970, the Angry Brigade, which embraced an anarchistic, anti-capitalist ideology, exploded a device under a BBC van at the Miss World contest. Shortly afterwards, a document was delivered to a London newspaper. Headed ‘Communique No1’, it claimed responsibility for the outrage.

Two more bombs were detonated outside the North London home of Employment Secretary Robert Carr and this was followed by further attacks on political targets. No one was killed in the campaign but one person was injured.

The cell was broken up when detectives raided a rented flat in Stoke Newington, North London.

Five of the group were convicted of conspiracy but no one was ever found guilty of planting the bombs.

After serving his sentence, however, Prescott wrote to Carr and his family to apologise for his role in leaving the bombs at his home.

Mr Prescott is now in custody after Thetford magistrates heard he slapped his wife several times on the nose and cheeks, leaving her uninjured but with a tingling feeling in her face. The court was told he had alcohol and mental health problems and should be given credit for pleading guilty. He will be sentenced on December 22.

Last night, Norfolk County Council chief executive David White said: ‘Lisa Christensen was still a schoolgirl when the man who later became her husband was arrested in 1971 and the couple didn’t meet until long after he had served his sentence.

‘We rightly require job candidates to supply information about any criminal convictions they may hold but that does not apply to their partners and Lisa did not share that information with us when she was appointed, probably because it is something that happened more than 35 years ago.

‘I am sad for her and her family that Jack’s personal demons should now be a source of such trauma.’

A council spokesman added: ‘We only became aware of Jack Prescott’s past last week following the domestic assault which led to him being arrested and appearing in court.’

Ms Christensen said: ‘This is a very sad matter for me and my family and we sincerely hope that expert treatment will be offered to Jack and taken up by him.’

Other members of the Angry Brigade have disappeared from view over the years.

But Angela Mason, who was tried and acquitted of planting bombs, is
a former leader of gay rights group Stonewall and now works for the Government as national adviser at the Improvement and Development Agency for local government.

Chris Bott, who was also acquitted, was marketing manager of the
ill-fated Left-wing newspaper News on Sunday, which closed after a few months in 1987. He lives in France.

Source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1094490/Social-Services-chiefs-husband-drug-addicted-violent-terrorist.html#ixzz35L2OHLEb

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

NORMAN SCARTH WRITES 13 JUNE 14 – SECRET COURTS ARE NOT NEW! + PART 2

Norman Scarth

16:53 (2 hours ago)

to guyvassall-ada., joshua, rwhittamqc, anestaweekes, teamm, clerks, lawinaction, richardfowler

To Mr Guy Vassal-Adams, Barrister, Matrix Chambers.

(Cc to Presenter Joshua Rosenberg, to the LAW IN ACTION team, & to the legal experts who spoke on the BBC Radio 4 programme broadcast on Thursday 12th June 2104.)

Sir,

Answering Mr Joshua Rosenberg’s question about criminal trials being heard in secret, you said it was ‘Unprecedented': That you had ‘never heard of the whole of a criminal trial being held in secret’ (or words to that effect).

For all your studying & experience, it would appear there is a most important gap in your knowledge of law as it is practiced in Britain. There is at least one case which, in some respects, was even more disturbing than the current one which is causing such a furore.

The case was Regina v Norman Scarth, heard before Judge David Ronald Bentley in Sheffield Crown Court in April 2001. The fact that it have been moved from the Defendant’s home area, making it a difficult journey for the 75 year old World War II veteran to get to the court, or for his supporters to attend, was only one of the many oppressive features. Bentley having banned The Press (see below, & see attachment) he made no attempt to hide his hatred for the Litigant In Person – this one in particular! (for his reasons, see elsewhere).

At the very beginning of the ‘hearing’, the defending barrister asked to retire from the case, claiming, quite rightly, that she knew nothing about it, having received no briefing whatsoever from the solicitor! Just five minutes later, the solicitor herself asked to be excused – leaving the Defendant completely unrepresented!

Bentley refused the old man’s request for an adjournment to find other representation. More than that, he refused to allow him even five minutes to prepare his own defence, but said “Get on with it!”. None of this was reported in The Press. It couldn’t be, as he had banned Press Reporting! (Attached is his Order). One might have expected this to have started alarm bells ringing with those who claim to be concerned about such things, & brought protests from The Press (as has happened with the current case!)

There were none: They were happy to say away for the whole of the ‘trial’. Not till it was over did The Press publish their ‘Reports’. Which prompts the question: How were they able to do this, when no reporters were ever present? Obviously, they published what they were told by the prosecution. Needless to say, THEY didn’t tell how Bentley had not only banned Press Reporting, but also banned the Defendant’s witnesses & evidence! Or how Bentley had this veteran of the Arctic Convoys of WW2 literally dragged & thrown back down to the cells when he dared to complain at Bentley’s gross mis-conduct!

Having himself fed monstrous lies & distortions of the truth to the jury to get the ‘guilty’ verdict he wanted, for a first ‘offence’ by this 75 year old veteran (where others would have been given Probation, Community Service, Suspended Sentence or similar), Bentley imposed a sentence to ensure he died in prison: Six years in prison plus four years on extended licence.

How do I know so much? Well, the victim of this Secret Trial was me. And no, I didn’t die during the six years of incarceration, but lived to continue my mission in life – as in my email address!

Lived long enough to be imprisoned AGAIN, at the age of 85 – for Contempt of Court by Judge Jonathan Rose, who sentenced me to six months in the ‘Hell Hole’ known as Armley Gaol.

Lived long enough to have TWO MORE prison sentences imposed on me for the same ‘offence’ at the age of 87 – by no less a person than LCJ Lord Igor Judge!

(Quite a coincidence he was one of the ‘experts’ on your programme? Another co-incidence: That my alleged ‘offence’ was that I had ‘recorded a hearing’, one of the subjects in your programme being the RECORDED trial of Oscar Pistorious in South Africa.)

Fortunately, I had belatedly realised that Britain is not a safe place for those who dare to tell the truth, & had fled to the safety of Ireland, able to cock a snook at Lord Judge from afar!

You might like to look at

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hampshire-21845753

for David Cameron expressing ‘the gratitude of the nation’ to some of the few men who are left who served on the Arctic Convoys, as I did, though, needless to say, I was not present at Downing Street. Then consider how Judge Bentley, Judge Jonathan Rose, LCJ Lord Judge & a host of other legal professionals have shown their ‘gratitude’ to me.

Perhaps you people, who are so concerned about ‘Human Rights’, ‘Fair Trials’ etc., etc., will be more aware of the ‘debt you owe’ to those like me, & will take up the matter? Not for MY sake (I wear my convictions as badges of honour), but to prove your commitment to the principles you claim to espouse?

That which is above is a tiny part of the full horror story.

I await your responses with baited breath.

Failure to respond will say more than a million words.

SCARTH 13JUNE14.jpg2

Part Two:

To Mr Guy Vassal-Adams, Barrister, Matrix Chambers.

(Cc to Presenter Joshua Rosenberg, to the LAW IN ACTION team, & to the legal experts who spoke on the BBC Radio 4 programme broadcast on Thursday 12th June 2104.)

(The original message is included at the bottom, with a couple of typos corrected, & syntax improved).

SECRET TRIALS: PART TWO.

In the original message, I told how Bentley made no attempt to hide his hatred of me & that readers should ‘see elsewhere’ for the reasons. Time to tell them now.

UNTIL THE AGE OF 70, I was proud to be British, proud to have ‘Done My Bit’ to keep Hitler from our shores, lucky to survive when brave men (of both sides), were dying around me in large numbers. I believed, as we were constantly told, the ‘British Judges Are The Finest In The World’.

FROM THE AGE OF 70 came a succession of shocks, all my life long beliefs shattered, as I learned there were many rotten apples in the judiciary, that corruption is rampant in the courts. In memory of all those men who had died around me, & what we BELIEVED we were fighting for, I could not turn my back, & made it my mission in life to expose the rotten apples. Needless to say, this did not endear me to the profession.

In 1997 I stood as a candidate at the General Election as an Independent Old Age Pension, & published the book, ‘CAUSE for CONCERN’. My main point, in manifesto & book, was about violent attacks on the old & vulnerable – virtually UNHEARD of until the 1960s, but which, by then, had become daily occurrences.

My second point was corruption in the courts, of which I had newly become aware. At the time I was regarded by TPTB as a noisy old buffoon, a Parliamentary No-Hoper.

This changed with my SINGLE-HANDED success in the European Court of Human Rights, Scarth v UK, 33745/96. It brought a vital change in British law, incorporated into the 1998 Human Rights Act. (See letter dated 1/9/98 from Geoffrey Hoon MP, then Lord Chancellor Irvine’s spokesman in The Commons, attached). One might have expected this to have brought me some respect from the professionals? Not so: They dislike trespassers on ‘their’ patch. The change was much hated by lawyers & judges – & I am hated for it!

Up till then, hearings ‘In Chambers’ had always been in secret, barristers & judge in a huddle together. Cynics would say that was when it was decided who was going to win!

As a result of the ECt-HR ruling in Scarth v UK, ALL hearings – INCLUDING those ‘In Chambers’, MUST be open to the public, ‘other than in exceptional circumstances’, which must of course be stated.

It is ironic that the man who brought this about should himself suffer the injustice of a grotesque, Star Chamber ‘trial’. True, the public gallery was open, but with no Press, & no-one in the gallery allowed to make any record, not even with pencil & paper, it was effectively in secret.

In fact, two of my supporters were there, but Bentley had them arrested!!

He then asked the Attorney General (or some such official) to think of something they could be charged with, but the AG declined & they were released, though badly shaken by such intimidation.

There is much more, but that must wait for Part Three.

Norman Scarth.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

THE SHOCKING MUSA CASE – CHILDREN’S IDENTITIES CHANGE HEARINGS + HHJ HOLMAN JUDGEMENT 16 APRIL 14

musa-coupleA

Regarding Haringey Council’s abominable actions towards the Musa children, regarding the enforced  stopping of the mutual contact visits between all the Musa children, which went totally against the judgement of another judge, HHJ Charles in 2011, HHJ Holman said at the end of his personal participation in the hearings =

“It is probable, therefore, that today is my last personal involvement in this case. I can only say that I part from it with a sense of the utmost despair that a terrible thing has happened in relation to all these children which should never, without due consideration, have been allowed to happen. “

It must be said Haringey councils flouting of the orders, along with their previous behaviour within the Musa case, showed the utmost irresponsibility and bland unprofessionalism.

======================================

From: =http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed128794

Local authority seeks new identities for two children in care

Holman J calls Haringey Council to ‘pause for thought’

The London Borough of Haringey has applied for an order permitting it to change the forenames and surname of two children whom it is placing for adoption.

In London Borough of Haringey v Musa [2014] EWHC 962 (Fam) the court heard applications concerning a sibling group of seven children. The parents are Nigerian, but have lived in England and are currently in prison serving sentences after convictions of ill-treatment of all or some of their children.

The five eldest children are all in the care of Haringey, but adoption has not been contemplated for any of them. They are currently all placed in long term foster homes in three different homes. In May 2012 placement orders were made in relation to the two youngest children. In the latter proceedings, in the view of the guardian, then representing all seven children, there needed to be “high priority” to long-term direct contact between all seven children.

Haringey sought leave to change the surname of the youngest two children to a new surname and, whilst not expressly referred to in the formal application, made “absolutely plain” that it desired to change the forenames of both those children. The local authority was fearful that unless the two youngest children were given completely new identities with completely new names, they would be tracked down by the parents and the placement potentially destabilised.

Holman J, hearing the application, said:

“[T]o change now the forenames by which a child, now almost four, has been known and has known herself throughout her whole life obviously raises considerable issues with regard to her sense of identity and self-esteem. She is old enough to appreciate that some rather radical change is being made in relation to her identity, but nowhere near old enough to understand the reasons why that is proposed. It seems to me, therefore, that in relation both these children (and especially the older of the two) the application to change their names, and particularly their forenames, is one of considerable delicacy and difficulty which will require very careful consideration by the court.”

The local authority also sought permission to terminate all direct contact between the five oldest children on the one hand and the two youngest children on the other hand.

Holman J, refusing to consider either matter in the single day which had been estimated for them, said:

“[U]ntil today it does not seem to have occurred to anyone that this is an application upon which a guardian needs to be appointed, not only for the two youngest children, but also separately for the eldest children.”

Later he said:

“It is patent that this application, in particular in relation to contact, directly engages and impacts upon both the rights and the welfare of all of them. They are currently regularly seeing their youngest two siblings. There is patently, therefore, a “family life” between all seven of them, and the rights of the five eldest children under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights are patently engaged by this case (as also are the rights under Article 8 of the two youngest children).”

He added:

“[T]hey [the local authority] need to pause for thought and to recall that at the time of the making of the placement orders the expert, … the children’s own guardian, and also the judge himself all clearly and strongly considered that high priority must be given to long-term direct contact between all seven siblings.”

Noting the delay which had already occurred, the judge fixed a further hearing specifically for directions only in just over three weeks’ time.”

The  full HHJ Holman judgment is below.

17/4/14

source: http://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed128794

—————————————————————–

From Capital Bay 18 Febuary 2014

http://www.capitalbay.com/latest-news1/473806-appeal-judge-slams-decision-which-led-to-baby-being-taken-from-parents-unjustly.html%5B

Sir James Munby, “President of the  Family Division”

Appeal judge slams decision which led to baby being taken from parents unjustly 

Judges and social workers have been conspiring to remove children unjustly from their parents, scathing High Court ruling said today

•Condemned family court judges for ‘clandestine arrangement’ in which they rubber-stamped the demands of social workers without fair hearing

•By Steve Doughty
PUBLISHED: 18 February 2014 

•Judges and social workers have been conspiring to remove children unjustly from their parents, a scathing High Court ruling said today.
• It condemned family court judges for a ‘clandestine arrangement’ which meant that they simply rubber-stamped the demands of social workers without giving a fair hearing to the pleas of parents.
•Rulings by family judges were ‘cut and pasted’ from recommendations emailed to the court by social workers, the High Court found.

Judges and social workers have been conspiring to remove children unjustly from their parents, a High Court ruling suggested today (stock picture)Judges and social workers have been conspiring to remove children unjustly from their parents, a High Court ruling suggested today (stock picture)
The secret dealings between council officials and local judges were revealed in a High Court appeal in which Mrs Justice Pauffley ordered that a mother be re-united with her baby.
The baby was taken by social workers following a court case described by Mrs Justice Pauffley as ‘profoundly alarming’.
The High Court judge warned that ‘the practices I have described are not confined to this area but are widespread across the country’.
She said of the case, which involved judges at an unnamed family court and social workers employed by an unnamed council: ‘It is difficult to view the justices as having been independent and impartial if, as happened here, they simply adopted the local authority’s analysis of what their findings and reasons might comprise.
‘Just because there may be tacit acceptance on the part of many professionals within the family justice system that the practice which operated here exists, that does not mean it is right.
‘It is patently wrong, must stop at once and never happen again.’
The order to end collusion between judges and social workers was endorsed yesterday by the most senior family judge, President of the Family Division Sir James Munby.
In a circular to lawyers, Sir James warned all judges and lawyers to ‘carefully consider’ the case and added that Mrs Justice Pauffley ‘had to deal with circumstances which I hope will never recur.’ The scandal over secret deals between judges and social workers is the latest upheaval in a year of growing controversy over the family courts, the closely-associated Court of Protection, and the way the public has been routinely prevented from knowing what goes on in them.
Last year the Daily Mail revealed that a judge at the Court of Protection had sent a woman to jail in secret after she refused to stop trying to remove her father from a care home where she believed his life was in danger. All information about the imprisonment of Wanda Maddocks was banned from publication until the Mail investigated the case.
In December the Court of Protection was discovered to have ordered behind closed doors that a pregnant Italian woman must undergo a compulsory caesarean operation. The mother, Alessandra Pacchieri, was later told by a family court judge, again in secret, that her baby would be taken for adoption in Essex.

The order to end collusion between judges and social workers was endorsed yesterday by the most senior family judge, President of the Family Division Sir James Munby
 
The order to end collusion between judges and social workers was endorsed yesterday by the most senior family judge, President of the Family Division Sir James Munby
The secrecy surrounding the two court systems is now being loosened on the instructions of Sir James, who has acted to prevent both clandestine imprisonment and the removal of children from foreign mothers by British judges.
The exposure of private arrangements between family judges and social workers was exposed following an appeal by a mother whose child was taken into care.
The 32-year-old mother, a longstanding drug and drink abuser with a history of domestic violence, had had seven previous children. Six are living with their two fathers and one is in the process of being adopted. When she became pregnant again, she was given a place in a unit run by a specialist family drugs and alcohol service.
Mrs Justice Pauffley said it was ‘plain’ that social workers took a decision in advance to remove her baby, who was born in October last year. They cited the mother’s bleak history.
Family judges first heard the case on 1 November. They were presented with an expert report on the mother, commissioned by social workers and prepared by chartered clinical psychologist Dr Celest Van Rooyen. The psychologist, who also gave ‘very strong and powerful’ evidence in person, said the baby was at risk of harm.
The judges declared that ‘the immediate risk of harm is such that his safety requires the continuing removal from his mother’s care. It is proportionate and in his best interests.’ At a second hearing a week later, the same judges said the baby should stay with foster parents because ‘he needs to form an attachment with his primary carers.’ Mrs Justice Pauffley criticised the handling of the case in blunt and uncompromising language.
She said the Van Rooyen report on the mother had been researched and written in a day and the psychologist had spoken neither to the mother nor the medical and psychological experts with whom she and the baby were living. Instead, Dr Van Rooyen had relied on documents and a phone call to a social worker.
Mrs Justice Pauffley said: ‘It surprises and alarms me that Dr Van Rooyen was asked, and was prepared, to provide a report during the course of a single working day, a terrifyingly tight timeframe, and on the basis of papers supplemented by a telephone conversation with a local authority professional who had never met the mother.
‘I struggle to understand how Dr Van Rooyen’s apparently firm opinions, adverse to the mother, could have been formed given the complete absence of any kind of discussion with her.’ The High court judge said the family court judges had not written their own ‘findings of fact and reasons’ – their ruling in the case. The entire document had instead been emailed to them by lawyers for the local council before the 1 November hearing.

John Hemming, the Lib Dem MP who has campaigned against secrecy in the family courts, said: ‘I am pleased that the senior judges are acting to stop stitch ups and “clandestine” fixing of decisions in the lower courts’

John Hemming, the Lib Dem MP who has campaigned against secrecy in the family courts, said: ‘I am pleased that the senior judges are acting to stop stitch ups and “clandestine” fixing of decisions in the lower courts’
A near-identical document was drawn up by the judges after the second hearing. Mrs Justice Pauffley said this was ‘the result, almost certainly of cutting and pasting.’ Mrs Justice Pauffley said this practice ‘has become the norm’ in local family courts.
She said she was ‘profoundly alarmed’ at the practice, which was widespread.
‘There was, apparently, an established but largely clandestine arrangement between the local authority and the court which, to my mind, has considerable repercussions for justice.’ Mrs Justice Pauffley added: ‘In public law proceedings the local authority is the applicant. It is not and should never be seen as the decision maker. That is the role of the court.
‘There is no room for confusion. Justice must be upheld. There is no scope for dilution of that fundamental concept.’
John Hemming, the Lib Dem MP who has campaigned against secrecy in the family courts, said: ‘I am pleased that the senior judges are acting to stop stitch ups and “clandestine” fixing of decisions in the lower courts.
‘What really matters, however, is getting independent evidence into the process rather than the opinion of local authority employees who are instructed in what to say by their management, who are instructed by government as to what outcomes they want.

source:  http://www.capitalbay.com/latest-news1/473806-appeal-judge-slams-decision-which-led-to-baby-being-taken-from-parents-unjustly.html

=====================================

A report  of the hearing on April 11 2014 by someone who was present [not myself!!]

“Haringey are unbelievable having maintained today at the point where Mr Justice Holman intended determining the scope of the assessments that the CAFCASS officers were to conduct into contact continuing between the 5 older and the 2 younger Musa children that they had already had a farewell contact in the middle of December?!!!
 Mr Justice Holman was furious as this meant that Haringey had unilaterally decided to breach a High Court order, having only submitted their application for a cessation of contact between the sibling groups on 16/1/14 yet their having allegedly pulled the plug on contact and according to them let the children know this would be their last contact a month earlier!! This advise  came completely out of the blue since the judge had had a clear expectation and understanding from the social worker’s statement produced in February and from what was said at the last hearing on March19th that contact was proceeding and regular and that it was to be properly assessed.
 Quoting from his judgement of 19/3/14 para8 he read out : ‘the formal order of CharlesJ dated 8thMay 2012..provides that:
 “Until further order of the court… The applicant and any persons with whom(the youngest two children) are placed shall allow (the youngest two children) to together have reasonable direct contact with their siblings…” The five eldest children are then named.
 Then in para 9: ‘since then, time has, of course, gone by. I understand that there is indeed regular, though not necessarily frequent, direct face-to-face contact involving all seven children. It appears that all the children enjoy and gain support from that contact.’
 Then at para 14: ‘At paragraph44 of her second statement in support of this application, dated 10th February2014, the current social worker, Miss x, said as follows:
 “The grief caused to the eldest five siblings at losing direct contact with their two younger siblings until they are at least 18 years of age will be painful. The job of the caring adults in their lives(their foster carers,social workers, therapists)is to help them cope with their pain and loss by conducting an ongoing narrative about their journey into care and providing them with a safe therapeutic space to talk about their feelings and emotions.”
 It was clearly evident that for all these stated concerns in respect of potentially terminating contact between the children Haringey had brazenly gone ahead and terminated contact almost 4 months ago PRIOR to submitting an application to Court seeking authority to do so and Without putting in place Any of the therapeutic interventions which they maintained would be so vital if contact between the 2 sibling groups were to be terminated.
 Mr Justice Holman referred to his ‘righteous anger’ at what had occurred and strenuously took Haringey to task over this however it appeared that he was ready to accept this unexpected advice Without checking it out or Verifying it via speaking to the children especially the elder child who is now 13. (I say this although I had to leave at 4.30pm to return home]
 Very disappointingly as well the barrister for Gloria had met with the 2 CAFCASS officers/Guardians prior to the hearing commencing and was clearly ready to support the outcomes Haringey had set out to achieve by accepting that in the circumstances ie since contact had allegedly already been unlawfully terminated and the children purportedly told that they were having a farewell contact back in December (although no corroboration of this was provided or sought) the CAFCASS officers would not intend to visit and speak to the children or to witness contact between them.
 The representative for one of the Guardian’s maintained that she was speaking entirely on behalf of the children despite the fact that the only assessment that she was proposing was to speak to the adoptive parents in respect of their views about the issue of the younger children’s  names changing (including christian names) and in respect of sibling contact, the outcome of which is entirely easy to predict, and then went on to emphasise that it had taken Haringey Council 18 months to identify this adoptive couple and that if this placement fell through it would be ‘catastrophic’ for the younger 2 children and very difficult to find them an alternative adoptive placement. There is of course always the option of their not being adopted. Mr Justice Holman was not particularly impressed with this either and emphasised the fact that Haringey had been fully aware from the outset of the order of Mr Justice Charles emphasising the importance of the continuation of sibling contact and should therefore have been mindful of this when looking to find an appropriate placement for the children.
 This represented another reason for the judge being enfuriated and challenging them about their submissions since he had fully intended ordering that they conduct a full assessment of contact.
 Interestingly the judge’s attention had been drawn to the internet coverage of the case by the Local Authority barrister and she had rather shot herself in the foot in doing this as this opened Mr Justice Holman’e eyes to the outspoken concerns of many parties to the iniquities in respect of the management and conduct of this case.
 This then led to his ignoring the Guardian’s legal representative when she maintained that it would not be in the children’s best interests for the judgements on bailii to display the family name Musa. Mr Justice Holman at this point delivered fairly lengthy and careful deliberations about the importance of freedom of expression and the public’s right to know about a case in which it was clearly taking a very close interest. He even referred to other very high profile cases which had been in the glare of the media citing the Jon Venables and Robert Thompson case (the killers of Jamie Bulger) and the Mary Bell case and stating that the public had a right to know about these cases.
 He further referred to the Magna Carta ie the Great Charter of the Liberties of England in an endeavour to demonstrate the importance of the public’s right to know – in this case when the authorities themselves have clearly been up to no good.
 He expanded on how he recognised this case to be of strong public interest by citing the number of websites and blogs devoted to coverage of it, plus the keen interest shown by Nigerian citizens based in the UK as evidenced by the attendance and advice of Francis Enya and the lawyer from the Nigeria High Commission plus he referred to the case having been discussed on the floor of the Nigerian parliament.
 Mr Justice Holman was also highly critical of Haringey for having his judgement of 19/3/14 removed from bailii and did provide his detailed directions that ALL judgements pertaining to the Musa case should appear on bailii with the family name Musa clearly displayed plus Haringey Council named and ordered that any subsequent reproductions in any format be entitled to contain the names also.
 Re the contempt of court issue whereby Haringey wilfully flouted and breached the order of Mr Justice Charles of 8/5/12 expressly advising that even after the 2 younger children had been placed they should continue to have contact with their older siblings Mr Justice Holman granted Haringey the right to draft a reply in defence of the accusations being made against them prior to his delivering his judgement on the matter. He stated that having looked into the matter he had regretfully discovered the fact that because the order of Mr Justice Charles of 8/5/12 had not contained a penal notice he would not be in a position to impose a fine upon Haringey Council for their serious wrongdoing nor indeed would he be legally entitled to seek to have those responsible prosecuted. He made it plain however that he would not tolerate this behaviour and that that the authority Would be Named and Shamed.
 A further hearing at which Mr Justice Holman will deliver his outstanding judgement following receipt of Haringey Council’s submissions in defence of their actions is likely to have been agreed for some time shortly after Easter however since I was forced to leave around 4.30pm prior to the end of what should have been a fairly short hearing in order to catch my 5.30pm coach from Victoria back to Norwich I do not at this point know the further date that had been agreed nor in fact the specific directions Mr Justice Holman must inevitably have given in respect of assessments to be conducted and the dates by which these need to be concluded.”
April 11 2014.

=======================================================================

The previous hearing to the above hearing on the 11 April, on the 3 April:

DAILY TELEGRAPH  3 APRIL 2014

Plan to give adopted children new identities to stop birth parents finding them

Social services ask High Court to give two young children new names and even cut links with other siblings to protect them from abusive parents

By  John Bingham, Social Affairs Editor

 03 Apr 2014

Two young children currently being placed for adoption should be given completely new identities to prevent their abusive parents tracking them down through an internet campaign, the High Court has been told.

Social workers also want to sever all contact between the children, aged two and three, and their five older brothers and sisters to make it more difficult for their parents, who are currently in prison, to re-establish contact.

But Mr Justice Holman urged caution over the “highly unusual” plan set out by social workers from Haringey, north London, and urged them to “pause for thought” despite a desire to prevent any further delay in the adoption process.

He said that while it is common for children to be given new surnames on adoption it was highly unusual to give children new first names, except occasionally for babies.

The change could, he said, have a profound effect on them, particularly on the older of the two children, a girl who is now almost four.

Related Articles 
Secret adoption register opened to would-be parents
 01 Mar 2014
Mother loses custody battle over ‘permissive’ parenting style
 17 Feb 2014

He added that it was clear the plan to cut contact would also cause “grief, pain and loss” to the five other children who, although they don’t live with them, know their younger siblings and have a bond with them.

Adjourning the case for further expert input, he said he was “frankly astonished” that there had been an expectation he would reach a decision in a single day’s hearing, as previously planned.

Details of the Family Division case emerged in a judgment which has been published. The five older children, who range in age from six to 13 were all taken into care several years ago and are now in long-term foster placements.

The parents, who are Nigerian, are in prison for abuse and are banned from further contact.

But the younger pair were taken into care later and the adoption process begun.

As part of the plan Haringey social workers have proposed giving them new names and banning contact with the older children in case this enabled the parents eventually to intrude into their new lives.

“I understand that the essential reasoning and justification that lies behind that is that the parents of the children promoted a considerable campaign on the internet and in other places with regard to this case so that the names of their children have apparently gained some notoriety,” the judge explained.

“The local authority – and maybe also the prospective adopters – are fearful that unless the two youngest children are given completely new identities with completely new names, they will be tracked down and the placement potentially destabilised.”

He said that, although the plan was well intended: “To change now the forenames by which a child, now almost four, has been known and has known herself throughout her whole life obviously raises considerable issues with regard to her sense of identity and self-esteem.

“She is old enough to appreciate that some rather radical change is being made in relation to her identity, but nowhere near old enough to understand the reasons why that is proposed.

“It seems to me, therefore, that in relation both these children (and especially the older of the two) the application to change their names, and particularly their forenames, is one of considerable delicacy and difficulty which will require very careful consideration by the court.”

A further hearing will take place next week. [see  report above dated 11 April] .

source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10742205/Plan-to-give-adopted-children-new-identities-to-stop-birth-parents-finding-them.html

===================================-

HHJ Holman’s Judgement 16 April 2014:

England and Wales High Court (Family Division) Decisions


You are here:BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales High Court (Family Division) Decisions >> London Borough of Haringey v Musa [2014] EWHC 1341 (Fam) (16 April 2014)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2014/1341.html
Cite as: [2014] EWHC 1341 (Fam)


[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


 

Neutral Citation Number: [2014] EWHC 1341 (Fam)
Case No. FD14P00069

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE
FAMILY DIVISION

Royal Courts of Justice
16th April 2014

B e f o r e :

MR JUSTICE HOLMAN
(sitting throughout in public)
B E T W E E N :

____________________

LONDON BOROUGH OF HARINGEY Applicants
- and -
MUSA Respondents

____________________

MR R. HOWLING QC (instructed by the Legal Services Department of the London Borough of
Haringey) appeared on behalf of the applicants.
MISS J. ATKINSON (instructed by Sam Solicitors) appeared on behalf of the respondent mother.
THE RESPONDENT FATHER did not appear and was not represented.

____________________

HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT
____________________

Crown Copyright ©

MR JUSTICE HOLMAN: 

  1. I have heard this case throughout today in public and now give this judgment in public. It follows on from two previous recent hearings before me, also in public, on the 19th March 2014 and the 11th April 2014. The judgments that I gave on each of those dates are also fully public judgments and publicly available on the Bailii website. As a matter of identification, the judgment of the 19th March 2014 is under neutral citation number [2014] EWHC 962 (Fam), and the judgment of the 11th April 2014 is under neutral citation number [2014] EWHC 1200 (Fam). Each of those judgments were to some extent sequential, the one to the other, and this judgment is clearly sequential to both of them. For those reasons, I will not repeat at any length what is already set out in those two judgments. Effectively, anyone who chooses to read the present judgment needs first to read both of those judgments.
  2.  
  3. However, the position that has now emerged since my judgment of last Friday, the 11th April 2014, is, in my view, one of great gravity, and in order to put it into context I must, as briefly as possible, summarise the facts. The case concerns a sibling group of seven children who are full siblings of each other. They now fall into two sub-groups. The five eldest range in age from 13 to nearly seven; the two youngest are aged about three-and-three-quarters and just two. There was a long hearing before a High Court judge, Charles J, in May 2012. The applicants in these proceedings and at that hearing were the local authority, the London Borough of Haringey. For reasons which are very fully explained in the judgment of Charles J of May 2012, he decided that the five eldest children should be placed in the care of the London Borough of Haringey on care plans which contemplated that they would be fostered throughout the remainder of their childhoods, but not adopted. The two youngest children were made the subject of placement orders which authorised the London Borough of Haringey to place them with a view to adoption. At that time all the children, although living in a number of different settings, had contact with each other, although the seventh and youngest child was merely a baby. The case therefore raised, in obvious and stark form, the question whether or not, and to what extent and by what means, there should be long-term contact between the various children both before and after the contemplated adoption of the two youngest. 
  4.  
  5. There was considerable evidence as to that issue, including the report and recommendation of a consultant child and adolescent psychiatrist who is referred to in the judgment of Charles J as Dr A. The outcome, insofar as it concerned contact, was summarised by me in a passage between paragraphs 5 to 8 of my judgment of the 19th March 2014. At the risk of repetition, but because it is the essential backcloth to, and context of, the present judgment, I will just read out those paragraphs.  

    “5. During the course of the hearing before him (which related not only to the two youngest children but to all seven children – see the heading to his judgment and resulting order) Charles J gave careful consideration to whether or not there should be longer term direct contact between the five eldest children on the one hand and the two youngest children on the other hand, even after placement and ultimate adoption. As I understand it, an expert who had given advice in the case very strongly recommended that there should be ongoing long-term direct contact [that is, face-to-face contact] between all seven children in the overall best interests of them all. At paragraph 158 of his judgment Charles J said: 

    ‘Neither the local authority, nor the guardian, sought an order for sibling contact and both invited me to make a placement order with a recital, proposed by the guardian, indicating that the local authority accepted the evidence and considerations of Dr A and the guardian that high priority be given to direct post-placement contact between all the siblings.’

    6. Pausing there, it can be seen, therefore, that in the view of the guardian, then representing all seven children, there needed to be ‘high priority’ to long-term direct contact. At paragraph 159 of his judgment Charles J continued: 

    ‘To my mind, if prospective adopters are told that high priority is being given to inter-sibling contact, and thus far it seems to me if the process is to be transparent and true to its word, the children will not be placed with them unless they are prepared to offer it, it is difficult to see why an order that provides for this would put them off.’

    7. At paragraph 164 he continued: 

    ‘So, I will make an interim contact order that, unless and until the court orders otherwise, both before and after placement the local authority and any persons with whom they are placed under the placement orders are to allow [the two youngest children] together to have reasonable direct contact with all of their full siblings.’

    8. In order to give effect to that, the formal order of Charles J dated 8th May 2012 (I understand that he formally handed down his judgment a week or so later) provides that: 

    ‘… until further of the court … the applicant and any persons with whom [the youngest two children] are placed shall allow [the youngest two children] to together have reasonable contact with their siblings …’

    The five eldest children are then named.”

  6. I may be naïve, but it seems to me that those words of Charles J in his judgment, and the language of his formal order could not be more clear nor more straightforward. So, just to summarise this situation as this case left Charles J in May 2012:  (1) All parties, including the local authority, considered that “high priority” needed to be given to direct contact between all the siblings, not only before but also after placement with a view to adoption. (2) The anticipation of Charles J clearly was that prospective adopters could and should be found who would not be “put off” by that prospect. (3) There was an order in the clearest possible terms that the local authority had to allow direct contact between all the siblings both before and also after placement. That follows from the language of the order which binds not only the local authority but also “any persons with whom [the youngest two children] are placed …” The involvement of the persons with whom the children were placed was obviously only of relevance because the judge clearly intended and ordered that direct contact should continue not only before but after placement. 
  7. For an appreciable period of time direct contact did take place regularly between the five eldest children and the two youngest children, although the seventh and youngest of all did not always attend due to his very young age. 
  8.  
  9. During 2013 the local authority identified the present prospective adoptive family. I have learned from documents produced by the local authority today that it was in May 2013 that there was an assessment of the prospective adopters as to their suitability to adopt these particular children, and it was during May that those prospective adopters were first informed about these particular children. 
  10.  
  11. As I have explained in my first two judgments, this case proceeded in the court room until part way through the hearing last Friday morning on a clear understanding on my part, shared by the Queen’s Counsel then appearing on behalf of the local authority, Miss Sarah Morgan QC, that arrangements for direct contact between all the children were still current. As I described in my judgment of the 11th April 2014, it came as a considerable surprise and shock to me and to many other people in the court room (and, I infer, also to Miss Morgan herself) when during the course of that hearing she was passed a note to the effect that there had actually been a “goodbye” or “farewell” occasion of contact between all seven children as long ago as Saturday the 14th December 2013. It is impossible to overstate the profundity and implications of that for the future course of this case and the future lives of all seven of these children. Until that moment I personally had totally understood and assumed that the contact was continuing and that the issue for the court to decide in the present applications was whether, after thoroughly investigating and weighing all relevant factors, that contact should later be drawn to a close. The reason why the local authority say that direct contact must end is an understandable reason. They say that it is of the utmost importance for the two youngest children to preserve and protect the confidentiality of the family and whereabouts in which those children are to live. There is an obvious problem when a sibling group of children meet that things may be said, or slip out, such that one or more of the elder children learn the identity of the adoptive family or their whereabouts; and that that information might very rapidly find its way to one or both of the parents of the children or generally into the public domain, and the adoptive placement might be imperilled. 
  12.  
  13. All of that is a familiar problem and risk in cases of this kind, and one which I readily understand. But there is another side to it which requires very careful consideration also. That is the very point that had been described, and indeed ruled upon, by Charles J after that long hearing in May 2012, namely the importance of, and “high priority” which needed to be given to, maintaining an inter-sibling relationship between all seven of these children. It is my experience that social workers and others sometimes overlook in these tragic situations that relationships between siblings may be the most enduring of all relationships in many people’s lives. Put bluntly, these children are all likely to be alive long after most of us in the court room, and prospective adopters and others, are long since dead. So there is always very considerable importance in these tragic situations of fragmented families in very carefully considering whether or not, and if so, how, long-term inter-sibling contact can be maintained even after adoption. 
  14.  
  15. At all events, the application by the local authority before the court is effectively to vary the subsisting order by Charles J as to long-term direct contact so as to enable it to be terminated. However, as I said in paragraph 23 of my judgment of the 11th April 2014, “It may not be possible now to unscramble the egg”. It is not for me at this short hearing to prejudge what the final decision will be as to direct contact at the three-day hearing that has been fixed to start on the 1st July 2014. But, speaking for myself, I very clearly understand how extraordinarily difficult it may now be to resume and recreate any direct contact between the five eldest children on the one hand and the two youngest children on the other hand. 
  16.  
  17. It necessarily follows from the fact that the local authority arranged that “goodbye” or “farewell” contact on the 14th December 2013, with the intention that there should be no further direct contact at all between the five eldest children and the two youngest children, that the local authority have put themselves in a state of, frankly, flagrant breach of the order of Charles J of the 8th May 2012 from which I have quoted. It simply should not have happened that way. Last Friday Miss Morgan was not in a position to give to me and the other parties any account, description or explanation of how this frankly catastrophic situation had arisen, so I made an order last Friday that:  

    “The local authority must by [today] file and serve a detailed statement which is limited to, but deals in full with, when, why, and by whom the decision was made that on the 14th December 2013 a contact meeting between all seven children took place which has been described in court today as a ‘goodbye’ contact meeting and that no further direct contact would take place thereafter …” 

    I then arranged for this further hearing today in order that I could give consideration to that evidence once it had been assembled and filed by the local authority. I explained at the time that I regretted having to give such a relatively short period of time for the local authority in which to prepare that evidence, but today is the last day of the legal term before Easter and if this hearing had not taken place today there would have been a long and undesirable further delay. So I express my gratitude to the London Borough of Haringey and, in particular, to the two makers of statements to which I will shortly refer, for the speed with which they have indeed attempted to comply with that part of my order last week. 

  18. In the upshot, I now have two statements. One is by Miss Annie Walker, who is the deputy head of services for the Children in Care Court Team of the London Borough of Haringey. She exhibits to her statement a volume of minutes of children in care meetings and other meetings that are described as “professionals’ meetings”. The other statement is by Ms. Elaine Redding, who is the assistant director of Children and Young People’s Services for the London Borough of Haringey. I intend to quote at a little length from those two statements for they tell the tale in their own words. At paragraph 5 of her statement Miss Walker says:  

    “… Although there are records referring to the issue of contact, I have not been able in this process to identify any decision making documentation which would assist me and the court in pinpointing when and who made the decision to terminate contact, prior to the matter being resorted to court and to arrange and undertake goodbye contact on the 14th December 2013.” 

    Pausing there, the date upon which the matter was “resorted to court” was as recently as the 16th January 2014, when the formal application for permission to terminate contact was first issued in the court. Continuing with the statement of Miss Walker: 

    “6. I have located looked after review records which refer to the reduction or variation of contact but they did not assist me in identifying who made and when, the decisions in respect of which the court seeks clarity. The current social work team were allocated in October 2013 and from my discussion with them they continued with what they mistakenly believed was the decision to cease contact …” 

    Miss Walker then describes the process of identifying prospective adopters and that the present prospective adopters were approved as adopters in July 2013. She then says at paragraph 15: 

    “15. A hiatus in contact between the two younger children and their older siblings took place and there was no contact in August 2013, September and October 2013. October’s contact did not take place due to severe weather conditions. I am unable to see any written material indicating either how or why the decision was made for August or September contact to be cancelled. This omission is being taken very seriously and will be incorporated into our learning.” 

    Miss Walker then refers to: 

    “A professionals’ meeting was held on the 11th December 2013. At this meeting a goodbye visit/wish you well visit was arranged for the 14th December 2013 to take place in the older siblings’ placement facilitated by the foster carers …”

    She then describes how the eldest children were prepared for that meeting by their social worker and the youngest children were prepared by a psychotherapist. Still referring to the professionals’ meeting on the 11th December 2013 Miss Walker then says, at paragraph 21: 

    “21. The documents record the need to seek permission of the court to vary the contact order of Mr Justice Charles. This part of the document is legally privileged but this submission is made so that this court can clearly understand that the need to approach the court for a variation had been understood but it had not been married to the impending farewell visit. This is the central mistake in the case and one which the local authority both recognises and apologises for.” 

    It is right to say, as Mr Rex Howling QC, who appears on behalf of the London Borough of Haringey today, pointed out, that the minutes of the professionals’ meeting of the 11th December 2013 record that the legal adviser, Rosita Moise, was not present at the meeting but had sent apologies. It appears, therefore, that there was no lawyer or representative of the legal department of the London Borough of Haringey present at that critically important meeting of the 11th December 2013. 

  19. Despite everything that Mr Howling has said, I remain frankly baffled as to how those who were present at that meeting, which included such senior staff of the local authority as the adoption team manager who was chairing the meeting, can have thought that it was right and appropriate to allow a goodbye or farewell contact to take place about three days later when they knew, as the redacted minutes of that meeting apparently record, that they needed the permission of the court to vary the contact order of Charles J, and yet did not first pause to take legal advice from their own legal department, if not counsel. 
  20.  
  21. In her statement Ms. Redding, the assistant director of children’s services, says, at paragraph 3:  

    “3. It is my opinion that there was well intentioned change effected around the planning for these children which incorrectly failed to take into account the legal framework. It is clear that aspects of the team’s compliance with court orders made in respect of the children fell unacceptably short of good practice.” 

    A little further on she says, at paragraph 5: 

    “5. I am satisfied that in this case there was good liaison between professionals to support the children’s welfare needs, regular direct liaison between the social work and adoption teams and that the looked after children reviews took place. It is, however, unclear to me precisely when the decision was made to both reduce contact and arrange a farewell visit.” 

    Ms. Redding concludes her statement by saying, at paragraph 6: 

    “6. This authority takes its statutory responsibility seriously and it is my intention to ensure full compliance. In light of the lessons brought to my attention as a result of this case, the authority will review internal processes to ensure that best practice is adhered to at all times. In particular, I intend to ensure that every child’s care plan for each LAC review contains details of the current contact arrangements. I am confident that my managers will share my commitment to effect appropriate change.” 

  22. Judges should avoid cynicism, but I cannot help observing how often in recent decades one has read and heard of local authorities learning lessons and proposing to review internal processes to ensure that failures will not happen again. The essential failures in this case almost beggar belief. Over a period of several months last year this local authority seem to have got themselves into a position whereby they were proposing to act, and then did act, in direct breach of the order of the court, which, I stress, had originally been made for reasons with which the local authority themselves agreed. There seems to have been a great lack of communication between a range of different professionals such that in the end no one knew what had been decided by whom or when or why, and everyone seems completely to have overlooked, at any rate until the professionals’ meeting on the 11th December 2013, that there was in place a very clear court order in relation to these children. Mr Rex Howling QC himself has said this morning that there was in this case “systemic corporate failure”. 
  23.  
  24. It provisionally appears to me that the failure goes even further. Since amendments were made to the Children Act 1989 in 2008, local authorities have been required to appoint an “independent reviewing officer” for the case of every child whom they are looking after. By section 25B of the Children Act 1989 the first listed of the duties and functions of the independent reviewing officer are to “monitor the performance by the local authority of their functions in relation to the child’s case”. The whole point and purpose of the system and machinery of independent reviewing officers is precisely to keep the local authority (who are no doubt extraordinarily busy and overworked) on their toes and to be asking awkward questions. An independent reviewing officer clearly had been appointed in relation to all seven of these children, although I do not currently know the date when she was appointed. In all or most of the minutes of meetings throughout 2013 that are exhibited to the statement of Miss Walker dated the 15th April 2014 there are clear references to a named independent reviewing officer being present at a whole series of meetings. Specifically, the independent reviewing officer was present at a meeting on the 29th October 2013 in the minutes of which the following passage appears:  

    “[The sixth of the children] is one of seven children. She and her five older siblings had regular contact but a decision was made to stop this contact and she has not seen her siblings since July. It is not clear how this decision was made and it is a concern that contact should stop without adequate preparation. [The social worker] will discuss restarting contact with the siblings with her manager and the IRO will also ask that it start again. Ideally contact should take place again and then a farewell contact arranged for all the siblings at a time appropriate in terms of the adoption plan.”

    So just pausing there, that is a minute of a meeting at which the independent reviewing officer was present which records that, for reasons which were “not clear”, the contact had stopped since July. It is true that the minutes then record that the IRO will ask that it start again, but they go on clearly to contemplate that contact would take place again “and then a farewell contact arranged …”. So the question inevitably arises, how was it that the independent reviewing officer, whose statutory duty was to monitor the performance by the local authority of their functions in relation to these children, was not saying loud and clear at the meeting, and subsequent to the meeting, that there could not lawfully be a farewell contact unless and until this matter had first been raised with the court? Instead, the minutes record that “The IRO is in agreement with the plan.”

  25. It provisionally appears that the role and involvement of the IRO in this case failed to give to all these children the protection which her role was intended to afford. However, the IRO in question (whom I have deliberately not named in this judgment) is not present and may, to date, know very little about recent events in these proceedings. I accordingly intend to make an order today that she must file and serve a detailed statement in which she: (i) states the date of her appointment as IRO in this case; (ii) identifies for which children she is IRO [although I have been told today that she is the IRO for all seven]; (iii) specifies the date and scope of every meeting attended by her since her appointment; (iv) explains in detail and in full when and how she first became aware of any decision by the local authority to terminate contact between the five eldest and the two youngest children; (v) explains in detail and in full when and how she first became aware that contact between the five eldest and the two youngest children had in fact been terminated or suspended; and (vi) describes what steps, if any, she took to ensure that the local authority did not act in breach of paragraph 3 (b) of the order of Charles J made on the 8th May 2012 with regard to inter-sibling contact. So far as that aspect of the case is concerned, one can only wait and see what emerges. 
  26.  
  27. On behalf of the London Borough of Haringey, Mr Howling, both by his written position statement dated today and also by his oral submissions today, has made the following points and submissions. First, he stresses that the local authority have taken very seriously the thrust of my order last Friday requiring them to produce a statement and all relevant minutes and records. He says, and I readily accept, that considerable resources, time and effort have been thrown into addressing the concerns which I expressed last Friday. Second, he says, however, that despite a “thorough trawl” through the minutes and records it remains the position that the local authority cannot identify when, where or by whom the fateful decision was taken, nor can they explain why it was not fully and properly minuted. He has said that the lesson for the local authority is “the need for an audit trail” and at that point said that there had been “systemic corporate failure”. Third, he submitted that the main lesson to be learned is that local authority minutes need to include with every minute the current contact arrangements and the details of any relevant court order. 
  28.  
  29. I cannot help feeling that this is, frankly, a very elementary point that one would have thought was part of the basic training of any social worker. Precisely because local authorities are under-resourced and over-stretched, and precisely because individual social workers and other staff members may come and go from a particular case (and I am very conscious that the present social worker was only first involved in this case last October), it is of the utmost and blindingly obvious importance that reliable, detailed records need to be maintained of every important decision, when it was taken, by whom it was taken, and why it was taken. I would have thought also that it was blindingly obvious that if there is a court order having ongoing impact on a case (as an order for contact does) then that should be very prominently attached to every file and, frankly, every important minute or record in a case such as this. On behalf of the local authority, Mr Howling has repeated the apology that is expressed in the statement of Miss Walker at paragraph 21 that I have read. He says that an apology is due on two levels. One is to the court, and the other is to the children concerned. I am, frankly, least bothered in this case about an apology as such to the court. But as these children grow up, and when they are adult, each of them will need a clear narrative and explanation as to events that took place in their lives and, so far as the present matter is concerned, how it came about that the five eldest lost all direct contact with the two youngest. In my view, some very clear and abject documents need to be prepared by this local authority, addressed to each of these children, explaining to them these events and how it all came about, and apologising to them. 
  30.  
  31. Apologies are also due to the parents of these children. It is perfectly true that both parents are currently serving prison sentences for, as I understand it, offences against some of these children. It is perfectly true that under the order of, I think, Charles J, neither parent is currently entitled to any direct contact with any of their children. But they remain the parents of the children and they share parental responsibility for these children with the local authority. They continue to be concerned about the welfare and wellbeing of their children. The mother, in particular, has made recent statements in which she repeatedly implores that direct contact be maintained between all seven of her children. It is unclear whether she knows even now that that contact had already been broken. I do not know her reaction to it, for her solicitors and counsel have not yet been able to obtain instructions from her because of the difficulty of access to her in prison. But she and the father knew and know that in May 2012 a High Court judge, for the reasons he gave, made the order that he did with regard to direct contact. They were entitled to assume that the London Borough of Haringey would obey the order of the court. They, too, would be justified in feeling surprise and shock, and probably much more extreme emotions, on learning that, in defiance of that order, that contact has now completely ended. So, in my view, the London Borough of Haringey owe and must convey abject apologies also to the parents of these children. 
  32.  
  33. I have already given directions for a three day hearing starting on Tuesday, 1st July 2014 both on the issue of changes of names for the two youngest children and on this issue of inter-sibling direct contact. As I have said, it may now be too late to unscramble the egg on the issue of contact, and the local authority may most probably have created a fait accompli. I am not scheduled to be the judge who hears that hearing due to other commitments. It is probable, therefore, that today is my last personal involvement in this case. I can only say that I part from it with a sense of the utmost despair that a terrible thing has happened in relation to all these children which should never, without due consideration, have been allowed to happen.  _________
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged ,

24 HOURS IN POLICE CUSTODY: CONFESSIONS OF A PAEDOPHILE

 

24 HOURS IN POLICE CUSTODY: CONFESSIONS OF A PAEDOPHILE – EPI. 3 SE. 1

I love the way one of the paedos in this prog declares his innocence, as if he’s doing nothing wrong by watching penetrsative interaction with minors, of which he has scores of levels 1 – 4 videos, and scores of indecent images. . Sickening.
This prog. will only be viewable for another 29 days on 4oD site.
Shown for educational purposes only.

Full show:

http://www.channel4.com/programmes/24-hours-in-police-custody/4od

Series 1 Episode 3

9PM Mon 13 October 2014

Duration: 47:26

This episode follows the team of four detectives working full-time on child abuse cases in the dedicated Safeguarding Investigation Unit at Luton Police Station.
News spreads across the county about a suspected paedophile trying to abduct young children on their way home from school. Local press coverage has led to hundreds of calls from panicked parents to the police.
With the culprit at large, cameras follow the Major Crime Unit as they lead the operation to arrest a third suspect following a nine-year-old girl’s statement and an e-fit description. After two previous suspects have been released without charge, have they now got the right man?
In the public protection unit, DC Annie Fowler and DC Selena Humphreys believe they have finally gathered enough evidence, including thousands of images and hundreds of videos of extreme child abuse, to ensure the suspect is remanded in prison pending a trial.
Following his second arrest, he makes a frank and shocking confession. The detectives take this new information to the Crown Prosecution Service in the hope of preventing him from committing any more offences.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 469 other followers