Remember?   2 April 2013

“I could live on £53 in benefits a week, says Iain Duncan Smith”

Work and pensions secretary has been challenged to fulfil his claim that he could live on £53 a week in benefits



meanwhile Febuary 2016:


Victim of George Osborne’s psychiatrist brother tells of sex in his family home and the death threats from his wife who told her: ‘Adam likes to watch me with other men’

  • Dr Adam Osborne was struck off for life by the General Medical Council 
  • He admitted conducting a relationship with the mother of two 
  • The woman gave a disturbing and astonishing account of her treatment
  • She claimed he manipulated her into acting as a ‘sex toy’ to fulfill fantasies 

Read more:

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

PLS SIGN: Saudi Arabia is bombing schools, hospitals, even weddings in Yemen.


Saudi Arabia is bombing schools, hospitals, even weddings in Yemen. With weapons from Europe, the US, and Canada. But in 48 hours, the European Parliament could table a vote for an arms embargo. The Saudis are unloading massive pressure to block the vote. Only overwhelming public support can push this through. Sign the urgent petition:                            

Sign the petition


Dear friends,

They bomb schools, hospitals, even wedding parties.

What Saudi Arabia is doing in Yemen is disgusting — and they’re doing it with weapons they buy from Europe, the US, and Canada. [with money from the banks – UK BANKS INCLUDED!!]

But in 48 hours we can do the unthinkable — win a landmark decision that could stem the flow of weapons to the Saudis.

The European Parliament is two days away from having a proposed EU-wide arms embargo put to a vote — but under heavy Saudi lobbying, some politicians are wavering.

Now more than ever, these leaders need to see that people from every corner of the Earth are looking to them to stand up and say “NO” to Saudi Arabia and their atrocities.

Sign the urgent petition calling for an arms embargo — let’s show the EU champions overwhelming public support:

This is how we can help end wars — by cutting off the supplies that fuel them. Calling for an embargo would have been unthinkable a few years ago because of western governments’ tight relationship with the regime, but this total disregard for human rights has made it impossible for them to look the other way. Europe could now vote for an embargo — they just need to feel the public is watching and cares.

A Saudi bomb killed over 200 family members at a wedding party, and a recent leaked UN report found that fleeing civilians were shot by helicopters — that’s an image hard to shake. Saudi Arabia started these attacks last year as part of a proxy war with Iran.
Both sides are guilty of appalling violence. And while this vote won’t end the carnage overnight, it will send a clear political signal that the EU won’t trade weapons with a regime that indiscriminately bombs civilians. From there we can begin to stop all governments from flooding this war with weapons.

The regime is not the only one benefiting from these deals. European arms dealers are making billions of dollars from the bloodshed in Yemen! If we don’t raise our voices these billionaires and Saudi Arabia will lobby to keep this horrific war going.

Wael*, an Avaaz member who’s survived daily airstrikes in Yemen, says that “history will remember those helping to bring peace.” Let’s come together now for Wael, his family, and millions of others.

Add your name — we have just days to help stop weapon sales to Saudi — then tell everyone:

What makes our community special is that we feel connections between each other and come together in massive numbers to bring change to issues that would otherwise be silenced. Let us come together now and do what we do best to help save the millions of Yemenis whose lives are on the line.

With hope,
Danny, Rewan, Alice, Mohammad, Alex, Antonia, Emma and the entire Avaaz team

*To protect his identity, Wael’s name has been changed.

More information

UN report into Saudi-led strikes in Yemen raises questions over UK role (The Guardian)

Yemen conflict: Saudi-led coalition targeting civilians, UN says (BBC)

EU to probe Saudi arms trade (The National)

Saudi Arabia becomes world’s biggest arms importer (The Guardian) is a 42-million-person global campaign network that works to ensure that the views and values of the world’s people shape global decision-making. (“Avaaz” means “voice” or “song” in many languages.)
Avaaz members live in every nation of the world; our team is spread across 18 countries on 6 continents and operates in 17 languages. Learn about some of Avaaz’s biggest campaigns here, or follow us on Facebook or Twitter.


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment


Matt Taylor for SPCC 2016

matt taylor blasting news

Having begged for money to finance my dreams and aspirations for global domination lol, (which wasn’t well received with a whopping 14 thumbs down) I’m happy to introduce Blasting News UK.



It would appear the Conservative Party has initiated a new policy in which only the fittest survive. Complimenting their historic conservative ideology of looking after number one, recent changes in how the most vulnerable in society are treated by the State demonstrate a secret new policy in action.


On-line journalist Chris Spivey boasts his next article has the potential to bring the British establishment crashing down and see the demise of the British Royal family.


Since sticking my head down the fabled…

View original post 197 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


Give Me Back ELMO
We got Sir James Munby again on video ignoring us and refusing to talk!. If the Prime Minister can stop and talk to us why can’t the President of the family division?? Still think he’s on our side? #NewF4J #StopTheWarOnDads

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment


 98 people like this campaign

$9,744 of $15k
Raised by 119 people in 39 months

Created November 16, 2012
John Kenneth Hutchison

From 2014:


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment


John Pilger writes:

One of the epic miscarriages of justice of our time is unravelling. The United Nations Working Group on Arbitrary Detention – the international tribunal that adjudicates and decides whether governments comply with their human rights obligations – has ruled that Julian Assange has been detained unlawfully by Britain and Sweden.
After five years of fighting to clear his name – having been smeared relentlessly yet charged with no crime – Assange is closer to justice and vindication, and perhaps freedom, than at any time since he was arrested and held in London under a European Extradition Warrant, itself now discredited by Parliament.
The UN Working Group bases its judgements on the European Convention on Human Rights and three other treaties that are binding on all its signatories. Both Britain and Sweden participated in the 16-month long UN investigation and submitted evidence and defended their position before the tribunal. It would fly contemptuously in the face of international law if they did not comply with the judgement and allow Assange to leave the refuge granted him by the Ecuadorean government in its London embassy.

In previous, celebrated cases ruled upon by the Working Group – Aung Sang Suu Kyi in Burma, imprisoned opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim in Malaysia, detained Washington Post journalist Jason Rezaian in Iran – both Britain and Sweden have given support to the tribunal. The difference now is that Assange’s persecution and confinement endures in the heart of London.
The Assange case has never been primarily about allegations of sexual misconduct in Sweden. The Stockholm Chief Prosecutor, Eva Finne, dismissed the case, saying, “I don’t believe there is any reason to suspect that he has committed rape” and one of the women involved accused the police of fabricating evidence and “railroading” her, protesting she “did not want to accuse JA of anything”. A second prosecutor mysteriously re-opened the case after political intervention, then stalled it.
The Assange case is rooted across the Atlantic in Pentagon-dominated Washington, obsessed with pursuing and prosecuting whistleblowers, especially Assange for having exposed, in WikiLeaks, US capital crimes in Afghanistan and Iraq: the wholesale killing of civilians and a contempt for sovereignty and international law.  None of this truth-telling is illegal under the US Constitution. As a presidential candidate in 2008, Barack Obama, a professor of constitutional law, lauded whistleblowers as “part of a healthy democracy [and they] must be protected from reprisal”.
Obama, the betrayer,  has since prosecuted more whistleblowers than all the US presidents combined. The courageous Chelsea Manning is serving 35 years in prison, having been tortured during her long pre-trial detention.
The prospect of a similar fate has hung over Assange like a Damocles sword. According to documents released by Edward Snowden, Assange is on a “Manhunt target list”. Vice-President Joe Biden has called him a “cyber terrorist”. In Alexandra, Virginia, a secret grand jury has attempted to concoct a crime for which Assange can be prosecuted in a court. Even though he is not an American, he is currently being fitted up with an espionage law dredged up from a century ago when it was used to silence conscientious objectors during the First World War; the Espionage Act has provisions of both life imprisonment and the death penalty. 
Assange’s ability to defend himself in this Kafkaesque world has been handicapped by the US declaring his case a state secret. A federal court has blocked the release of all information about what is known as the “national security” investigation of WikiLeaks.
The supporting act in this charade has been played by the second Swedish prosecutor, Marianne Ny. Until recently, Ny had refused to comply with a routine European procedure that required her to travel to London to question Assange and so advance the case that James Catlin, one of Assange’s barristers, called “a laughing stock … it’s as if they make it up as they go along”. Indeed, even before Assange had left Sweden for London in 2010, Marianne Ny made no attempt to question him. In the years since, she has never properly explained, even to her own judicial authorities, why she has not completed the case she so enthusiastically re-ignited – just as the she has never explained why she has refused to give Assange a guarantee that he will not be extradited on to the US under a secret arrangement agreed between Stockholm and Washington. In 2010, the Independent in London revealed that the two governments had discussed Assange’s onward extradition.
Then there is tiny, brave Ecuador. One of the reasons Ecuador granted Julian Assange political asylum was that his own government, in Australia, had offered him none of the help to which he had a legal right and so abandoned him. Australia’s collusion with the United States against its own citizen is evident in leaked documents; no more faithful vassals has America than the obeisant politicians of the Antipodes.
Four years ago, in Sydney, I spent several hours with the Liberal Member of the Federal Parliament, Malcolm Turnbull. We discussed the threats to Assange and their wider implications for freedom of speech and justice, and why Australia was obliged to stand by him. Turnbull is now the Prime Minister of Australia and, as I write, is attending an international conference on Syria hosted the Cameron government – about 15 minutes’ cab ride from the room that Julian Assange has occupied for three and a half years in the small Ecuadorean embassy just along from Harrods. The Syria connection is relevant if unreported; it was WikiLeaks that revealed that the United States had long planned to overthrow the Assad government in Syria. Today, as he meets and greets, Prime Minister Turnbull has an opportunity to contribute a modicum of purpose and truth to the conference by speaking up for his unjustly imprisoned compatriot, for whom he showed such concern when we met. All he need do is quote the judgement of the UN Working Party on Arbitrary Detention. Will he reclaim this shred of Australia’s reputation in the decent world? What is certain is that the decent world owes much to Julian Assange. He told us how indecent power behaves in secret, how it lies and manipulates and engages in great acts of violence, sustaining wars that kill and maim and turn millions into the refugees now in the news. Telling us this truth alone earns Assange his freedom, whereas justice is his right.
John Pilger, 5 February 2016

John Pilger speaking at the 2016 Invasion Day Sydney March

228 Years and still fighting for Sovereignty, Treaty, Social Justice

Indigenous Social Justice Association (ISJA) Sydney and Redfern Aboriginal Tent Embassy (RATE) and other organizations are called all to unite together for an Invasion Day March Tuesday 26th January 2016. The Invasion Day March was called for 10am at the Block Redfern then marching into the city.

For further information please visit
Please also see
John Pilger speaking at the 2016 Invasion Day Sydney March from Respect and Listen on Vimeo.


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 1 Comment

IPCC Upholds Ella Draper’s Appeal

Dearman Does Hampstead

This is a very important document and action in her case.

From her website at




Recent News:






We here at DDH sincerely hope that the re-investigation of her case

has shown/will show the true facts and that her children are returned to

her immediately without further delay.

View original post

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


7pm today Uk Time That’s 2pm Eastern time   Andy @ Neelu Interview world bank whistle-blower Karen Hudes

Who is Karen Hudes?

Karen Hudes studied law at Yale Law School and economics at the University of Amsterdam. She worked in the US Export Import Bank of the US from 1980-1985 and in the Legal Department of the World Bank from 1986-2007. She established the Non Governmental Organization Committee of the International Law Section of the American Bar Association and the Committee on Multilateralism and the Accountability of International Organizations of the American Branch of the International Law Association.

Simplifying problems of international law and economics and finding the solutions is not an easy task.  How can one planet sustain its West using counterfeit currencies, whilst the BRICS nations trade using gold?

What does the World Bank have to do with the world’s gold?  What is money? What are local currencies?  What is country debt? How do we avoid a currency war?  How do we implement debt forgiveness, forbid usury, forbid tax on income – under God’s laws or natural laws, internationally.

Karen Hudes is the ideal person to discuss these issues and the remedies we seek .

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Aids blast by judge in ‘gay boy’ scandal (16.5.86)


The Sun, 16 May 1986 p.11


A judge slammed the scandal of ‘rentboy’ vice rings in London’s West End yesterday as he jailed a gay social worker for four years.

Judge John Hazan QC, said at the Old Bailey: ‘This evil trade must stop.

“One can only hope that the realisation by punters of the dangers of sexual transmission of diseases such as AIDS will give them cause for thought.”

His attack came after Abraham Jacob, 45, was convicted of living off the earnings of teenaged male prostitutes.

The judge told him: “You must learn that young men are not pieces of meat on display on a rack to be sold like merchandise in the market.”

Jacob who cared for the elderly was found guilty by [  ] majority after the jury retired for 14 hours.

The court heard that Jacob, a senior care officer with London’s Islington council worked…

View original post 60 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Stephen Fry and the paedophiles


Sicko Fry

What do we really know about BBC luvvie Stephen Fry?

At first glance he appears to be no more than a pompous, arrogant, smug, prat, who loves to lecture all and sundry about grammar and gayness.

Look a little deeper though and an altogether more disturbing picture emerges of someone up to his neck in filth of the highest order.

StephenFryFry and hubbie

Does Stephen Fry have anything to tell officers investigating Britain’s VIP child-abuse ring?

According to Pink News, Fry was sexually assaulted as a child.

” TV personality Stephen Fry has revealed that he was sexually assaulted by another pupil while at school.

Appearing on the new More 4 programme Shrink Rap, Fry said that an encounter with a sixth former during his first year of boarding school led to the assault.

According to sources close to the programme, Fry denies that the event had lasting consequences for his mental health.”

View original post 1,952 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment



Originally posted

Before reblogging this new post by Tim Tate, I just wanted to explain that I and the Needleteam can personally vouch that the identification of the U.S General alluded to below is absolutely accurate.


This is the story of two war heroes – highly decorated soldiers both – and of how the Metropolitan Police responded to allegations about them concerning child sexual abuse.

Their contrasting stories should be examined by the Goddard Enquiry. But whether this happens may depend on public pressure for an open and transparent process.  There is no doubt that Goddard and her teams of barristers should ask details questions about both men’s cases. Because the way each of these two very senior military leaders was treated encapsulates precisely the problems  her investigation into the handling of historic child sexual abuse allegations was established to examine.

We can – because he has…

View original post 1,253 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


This gallery contains 68 photos.

Originally posted on Matt Taylor for SPCC 2016:
Matt Taylor for SPCC 2016 View original post

Gallery | Leave a comment


Matt Taylor for SPCC 2016

Mr Matthew Taylor.

Shadow Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner.

Dear Sir.

With reference to the ongoing nightmare that you are attempting to expose and highlight to the citizens of Sussex and to the entire population of Uk.

We are appalled at the level of criminality that has been reported to “SUSSEX POLICE” through the disgraced coward and “Ex-CHIEF CONSTABLE” Mr Martin Richards, who ran away from Mr Setchfield, and, then followed swiftly on by the new “CHIEF CONSTABLE” of “SUSSEX POLICE” Mr Giles York, who is also a coward and who is living a life of pure fantasy by foolishly believing that the “SETCH-GATE” scandal, as it has now been named, will disappear without being dealt with.

It is a true fact, that in all of the very serious circumstances that do seriously still exist within the “SUSSEX POLICE SERVICE” which you will surely agree with us as a candidate in the forthcoming PCC elections of (2016), that the most serious circumstances (which are very far from ideal) have been fraudulently…

View original post 475 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why the bloody hell hasn’t Esther Rantzen been arrested yet?

Another parasite above the law…


Evil bitch

What do we really know about decrepit BBC hag Esther Rantzen?

At first glance she appears to be no more than a lying, vain, fake, two-faced, duplicitous piece of filth, up to her neck in shite of the very highest order.

Look a little closer though and an altogether more disturbing picture emerges.

What important information does Esther Rantzen have to tell officers investigating Britain’s VIP paedophile ring?

Esther NSPCCBBC Paedo Ring

In an article describing the paedophile ring at the BBC, Esther Rantzen slyly pretended she wasn’t fully aware of Jimmy Savile and had only heard ‘gossip’ about his abuse of thousands of children.

She must think we were fucking born yesterday.

In fact, Rantzen knew damn well what was going on because she herself is a key player in the whole sordid child-abuse scandal and despite many victims personally telling her what they had been subjected to, she refused to listen.

View original post 2,388 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment


This gallery contains 24 photos.

Originally posted on Matt Taylor for SPCC 2016:
Katy Bourne, the out-going Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner and Sussex Police have blocked me rather than confront me over the numerous examples of police corruption I’ve whiffed under their nose since setting…

Gallery | Leave a comment


Matt Taylor for SPCC 2016

let-them-eat-cake-katy-bourne“Police and Crime Commissioner Katy Bourne has raised the precept by £10.49 since taking office.”

Elected the first Police and Crime Commissioner for Sussex, Katy Bourne was put into the privileged and prestigious position of completing three tasks, to which she would be paid a handsome sum of £85K a year, complete with an office and team of people costing a further £1 million a year to assist her.

  • Holding the Chief Constable to account.

  • Setting the Police Priorities

  • Setting the Police Precept (Tax)

Since 2012 I’ve demonstrated conclusively that Katy Bourne has failed to hold the Chief Constable to account. There is no doubting this. If you haven’t been reading then you really have been missing a trick. On more than a dozen occasions I’ve put forward the contention that Katy Bourne failed to hold the Chief Constable Martin Richards to account, by allowing him to retire early…

View original post 1,501 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


Matt Taylor for SPCC 2016


Incredulous as it sounds, it appears that officers within Sussex Police with a personal vendetta against a certain David Russell of whom someone or another served with in the Navy have taken it on themselves to use the resources of Sussex Police and the Law in general to victimise and terrorise David Russell, no relation to the David Russell who served in the Navy.
As David writes, “I thought that my identity had been used only it now turns out that a number of police officers that have a grudge against a David Russell they used to serve with in the navy had set the address up in Midhurst. These matters are being dealt with predominantly by ex naval officers, initially they tried to section me basing their reasons on the medical records of the David Russell that was in the navy. When…

View original post 1,887 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


Matt Taylor for SPCC 2016

Mr Matthew Taylor

Shadow Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner.

Dear Mr Taylor.

We are writing to you to thank you so very much for all of the hard work and care that you have taken whilst carrying out your duties as the Shadow Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner.

We do realise that some particular individuals find it hard to understand that to be in a position of the SSPCC, such as you are, and, where you have personally and constantly gone out of your way to hold the Sussex Police and Crime Commissioner, Mrs Katy Bourne to account, is not only a very frustrating job to have taken on but an unpaid job that has little benefits or rewards. The amount of extra scrutiny and such a watchful eye that you have, highlights perfectly your commitment to the position. This makes clear the position on matters that involve the citizens of Sussex, which is of course a must.

We would like to offer you our continued support in the unpaid position that…

View original post 313 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


Matt Taylor for SPCC 2016

Unable to avoid the unavoidable, presented here today is the indisputable proof that Katy Bourne has failed in her duty to hold the Chief Constable to account, has broken all her oaths and pledges since coming to office and most shameful of all, aided and abetted criminals, leaving them free to pervert the rule of the Law and Justice.

Set out in a formal letter sent to Katy Bourne on Monday 23rd June 2014, the stark facts that Katy Bourne has failed in her duty is exposed once and for all for everyone to see.
Printed in its entirety below, it proves conclusively that Katy Bourne has criminally chosen to ignore serious crimes at the heart of Sussex Police and pretend it doesn’t exist.
Before we go any further, let me take you back to November 22 2012, the day Katy Bourne pledged her Oath of Office.
I Katy Bourne of Ansty, Sussex do hereby declare that I accept the office of…

View original post 2,794 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Who killed Peaches Geldof?


Peaches Geldof

In their desperation to keep a lid on Britain’s dirty secrets, the filth who run this septic isle will stop at nothing to cover their tracks- and that includes murder.

Anyone with inside knowledge about VIP paedophiles rings is soon silenced if they dare to speak out.

Look what happened to Princess Diana and Jill Dando.

Savile and DianaJim and DiDiana Murdered

Did the same fate befall Peaches Geldof ?

In July 2014, we posted the following:

” Did Peaches Geldof really die of a heroin overdose, or was she murdered, like many before her, because she had knowledge of the powerful VIP paedophile ring linked to the BBC, Government and Royalty?

Are the filthy British Establishment willing to stop at nothing to cover their sordid secrets?

She had already tweeted the name of the mothers who helped depraved singer Ian Watkins abuse babies.

Ian Watkins Fearne CottonIan Watkins FilthPeaches tweet

Ian Watkins was once the boyfriend of Fearne Cotton.

Fearne Cotton’s…

View original post 1,086 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Filthy Britain’s Wall of Shame


Cameron and Christopher Shaletop-tory-filth1

Shrivelled schmuck David Cameron has got some fucking chutzpah.

Despite being known as a necrophiliac, liar, thief, traitor and all round shady bastard, Dave has just gone and accused Russian president Putin of probably being responsible for the death of Alexander Litvinenko.


Of course, as pointed out by the Daily Mail, Britain had more reason to kill him than Putin did.

Theresa Maythatcher and savile

So we can only assume that Cameron and his sicko sidekick Theresa May have been forced by their Israeli masters to use the scandal as a way of deflecting from the VIP paedophile scandal which is currently engulfing the UK Establishment.

blair-cover-up2Savile filthgreville-janner2BBC Paedos

Quite bizarrely, one of the barristers representing the Litvinenko family is none other than sly twat Ben Emmerson QC.

Emmerson has been roped in to put a dampener on the UK child- abuse inquiry headed by Justice Lowell Goddard and has already alienated many abuse victims with…

View original post 184 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment


From Andy Peacher of FreedomTalk Radio:





Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

PATRICK CULLINANE: “IRISH IN BRITAIN REPRESENTATION GROUP” 19 JAN. + “US Jewish billionaires fund stealing West Bank Palestinian land””


 Working Against all the Odds!!


42 Augustine Road

Harrow Weald, Harrow,Middlesex, HA3 5NP

19 January 2016

FAO: Police Ombudsman’s Office

New Cathedral Buildings

Writers’ Square

11 Church Street

Belfast, BT1 1PG

Tel: 028 9082 8600

Formal Complaint as to how my telephone call was dealt with by the Police Ombudsman’s Office in Belfast yesterday re Police Officer Thomas Anthony Carlin, where the male who never gave his name, put the phone down on me, which shows who he is working for:

The correspondence below is self-explanatory and supports Officer Carlin’s case, in Common Law, against ‘Lord Justice’ Gillen and ‘Mr Justice’ Horner, who are acting outside of their jurisdiction and the Law of the Land:  

Please rush a copy of this correspondence, in its entirety, to Police Officer Carlin to show him the support he has received from around the WORLD for standing up to the JEWdicial Khazarian Mafia, who are CRIMINALLY  dispossessing us of our Homes, Possessions and Happiness via Summary Judgement: = without due process of the Common Law of the Land: = Trial by Jury: –

THIRTEEN High Court Judges denied me my Constitutional Common Law rights under Magna Carta 1215 to a Trial by Jury:  =  HIGH TREASON: 

How was I Bankrupted when I had NO debt and the Inland Revenue owing me over £5,000 in tax rebates? – The answer is, I was NEVER Bankrupted.

You can check this out on the London Gazette and the Independent Insolvency Registrar: –

Report by Phillip Inman of The Guardian, Jobs & Money, Saturday May 10, 2003:

This man was right all along

Patrick Cullinane has fought a running battle with the Inland Revenue since the day he was accused of not paying income tax. And the taxman fought dirty – so dirty he lost his home and nearly lost his sanity. Now, a batch of confidential documents reveal fatal weaknesses in the Revenue’s case. Phillip Inman reports

Report by Phillip Inman of The Guardian, Financial Section, Monday 25 August 2008

Evidence put to the high court shows that Cullinane, far from owing tax, was due a rebate.

The 13 Khazarian Mafia High Court Judges who conspired in Patrick Cullinane’s case to terrorise and defraud him in the interests of the state of Israel: – 

  1. Mr Registrar Pimm
  2. Mr Registrar Simmonds
  3. Mr Registrar Baister
  4. Mr Justice Jacobs
  5. Mr Justice Neuberger  –  A Jew Promoted for his Crime:
  6. Lord Justice Stewart-Smith  –  Also covered-up the Hillsborough disaster.
  7. Mr Jonathan Parker
  8. Mr Justice Hart
  9. Master Leslie
  10. Mrs Justice Ebsworth
  11. Mr Justice Ferris
  12. Mr Justice Pumfrey
  13. Mr Justice Mann

Not one of these 13 Khazarian Mafia Judges has been brought to justice yet for ROBBING me of my Home & Possessions via Summary Judgement = without any TRIAL; when they had NO jurisdiction whatsoever to do so!  – In LAW, I was guaranteed a Trial by my Peers:

NOTE: It has become very dangerous for ordinary members of the public to report serious crime now to the UK Police:

The Spectator: by Neil Darbyshire on 7 March 2015   –   278 Comments

The shocking truth about police corruption in Britain

It’s a growing problem. But they’re hunting whistleblowers instead

Why are UK’s Police travelling to Israel?

“Your Police are being trained by the Israeli Army to defeat and control their enemy, and when your police come back, you become their enemy” — Eran Efrati — Israeli Army Whistleblower warns the American public in March 2014

Our totally Corrupt Government Organisations’ have been infiltrated and HIJACKED by the Satanic Khazarian Mafia to ROB, TERRORISE & GENOCIDE us Christians / Gentiles / Goyim without Due Process of the LAW:

International Mens’ Organisation

The laws they (Khazarian Mafia) are using to rape and murder are tyrannical laws conjured up by despots who use freemason lackeys to do their bidding and bears no resemblance to what should be a just and moral set of rules and regulations to protect ALL the population from threats both from within and without the country they live in.

The following is what was pushed through my door yesterday, 18/01/2016, and when I rang the number and spoke to, Debbie Nunro, and when I told her that I was feeling nervous, on the edge, not being able to stop or control worrying 24/7, and NO time for pleasure and happiness, as Harrow Council had unlawfully authorised Newlyn Bailiffs to TERRORISE me, over Christmas and the New Year holidays, and ROB me of £512.00 and STEAL my motor vehicle and possessions on BOGUS documents without Due Process of the LAW.  Debbie said that they were not in a position to do anything about that, but she said, wait and I will see if somebody else can help.  After about 7mins Debbie came back and wanted my telephone number and someone would contact me.  I said, I want everything in writing, as the Satanic Khazarian Mafia had targeted me to SILENCE me, and gave her my email address.  You will receive an email later today, she said.  Like the Samaritans in Harrow this is yet another ENTRAPMENT SCAM for the Christians / Gentiles / Goyim to ‘FIX’ our Khazarian Mafia problems forever with DRUGS and Genocide us. – My score on here is 12; therefore this outfit is part of the Khazarian Mafia, as they only incarcerate and DRUG / MURDER the whistleblowers and do nothing about the problem: –

This is frightening when this outfit can do nothing about UK Courts, Harrow Council & Newlyn Bailiffs TERRORISING & ROBBING us of our Money, Motor Vehicles, Property and Peace of Mind without due process of the LAW.  – Why is there NO name on this correspondence, which is the HALLMARK of the Khazarian Mafia, as they know they are working UNDERHAND against, We the People, to cause us further Harm, Loss & Injury: –  

—–Original Message—– From: Iapt Harrow (CENTRAL AND NORTH WEST LONDON NHS FOUNDATION TRUST) [] Sent: 18 January 2016 15:34 To: Subject: Harrow Talking Therapies

Dear Patrick,

Thank you very much for contacting the Harrow Talking Therapies service.  I understand you did not wish to be contacted by telephone today.  I am emailing to see if we could call you at a convenient time to understand more about your difficulties and establish whether our service might be able to help you?  If we cannot help, we will try and think about other organisations that might be able to support you.

It would be very helpful if you could e-mail us with a suitable time and number to call, and also include the name and address of your GP.

 Please note that our service only operates between the hours of 9am – 5pm Monday to Friday.  We are not a crisis service, so if you need immediate support you can contact your GP, or attend any Accident and Emergency Department.  You can also ring the Out of Hours Crisis Service on 0800 0234 650 and they will be able to assist you.

 With best wishes,

 Harrow Talking Therapies Duty Team

                         Please note the Out of Hours Crisis Service number is 0800 0234 650

 Tel: 020 8515 5015/6   Fax: 020 8869 2317

Email: Web:

 Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust Harrow Talking Therapies T Block, Northwick Park Hospital Watford Road Harrow, HA1 3UJ

 Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust (CNWL) is one of the largest non-acute trusts in the UK, caring for people with a wide range of physical and mental health needs. We have approximately 7,000 staff who provide healthcare to a third of London’s population and across wider geographical areas, including Milton Keynes, Kent and Surrey.


As a Foundation Trust we involve service users, carers, the public, staff and partner organisations in the way that we are run and our future development. If you are interested in becoming a member of our Foundation Trust please visit:

Patrick Cullinane

22 hrs ·


Police Officer who ‘threatened to arrest judge in court’ faces contempt trial 15 Jan 2016

A POLICE officer is facing the threat of prison next week after a lengthy legal battle over a house repossession allegedly led to extraordinary scenes in the High Court.

The officer is to go on trial for contempt of court after it is claimed he approached one of Northern Ireland’s most senior judges and threatened to arrest him.

Dressed in full uniform of the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) as he attended the Royal Courts of Justice in Belfast again on Thursday (January 14), Thomas Anthony Carlin declined to apologise for his actions at an earlier hearing.


He also rejected an offer of legal representation and asked to have a jury decide on his behaviour towards Lord Justice Gillen.


But another judge refused his request, instead listing the case to be heard by him on Monday (January 18).


Mr Justice Horner said: “I’m going to arrange for a trial to take place on this issue of whether or not there has been contempt in the face of the court.


“I will hear it, there will not be a jury.” He also warned the policeman that, if found guilty, he could be fined or sent to prison.


Police Professional :: News :: Officer who ‘threatened to arrest judge in court’ faces contempt…

Police Professional

Erik Olsen, Steve Nucker, Karen ‘Wills’ Smith and 52 others like this.

Sean Hinton Was once told by a judge that the police have no authority in the Court room….And Crown Courts operate every day without juries…plenty of mugs plead ” guilty “……

Rob Walmsley these unlawful places must be overthrown!

Stone Ivor · Friends with Richard Head

Rob Walmsley

Nita Benfield i dont like the ‘legal’ word in that statement. no sireee.

Like · Reply · 2 · 21 hrs

Rob Walmsley didn’t notice that Nita Ta

Like · Reply · 21 hrs

Write a reply…

Sam Rapuano · Friends with Nita Benfield and 6 others

Think I may change my name to Freeman Rapuano wink emoticon

Like · Reply · 1 · 13 hrs

John O’Grady What unbelievable arrogance by these legal half wits in fancy dress costumes. Now…you arrogant pricks… How about that for “contempt of court” assholes.

Unlike · Reply · 1 · 12 hrs · Edited

Ann Branley


Unlike · Reply · 2 · 10 hrs

Write a reply…


Unlike · Reply · 4 · 10 hrs

Dónal Ó Baoill · 3 mutual friends

Sorry guys, yer not freemen… Yer citizens.

Police Officer who ‘threatened to arrest judge in court’ faces contempt trial 15 Jan 2016

The 43-year-old had been representing himself in the legal battle with Santander bank over a property in Co Antrim, which has been ongoing for more than two years in the courts.
At the end of the hearing he allegedly got up and moved towards the bench, claiming he was going to arrest Lord Justice Gillen.

This was a lawful arrest, as ‘Lord Justice’ Gillen was operating a Court without a JURY in a Common Law Jurisdiction. – Northern Ireland is NOT a (Khazarian Mafia) Judge jurisdiction; is it?
Security and court staff intervened before he was led from the courtroom.

The Court Staff deliberately perverted the course of justice, as they are aware it is a Common Law Jurisdiction.

The officer was arrested on suspicion of two counts of common assault, but subsequently released without charge.

It was Police Officer, Thomas Anthony Carlin, that was assaulted in the in line with his sworn oath to uphold the Common Law of the Land. The Police Ombudsman of Northern Ireland was also notified.

When I rang the Police Ombudsman of Northern Ireland on:  028 9082 8600 – yesterday, 18/01/2016 and told them that Northern Ireland is a Common Law Jurisdiction where due process is via Trial by Jury, and NOT the jurisdiction of Khazarian Satanic Mafia Judges who should be arrested.  He put the phone down on me, as he knew the Police Officer was doing his duty, and ‘Lord Justice’ Gillen and ‘Mr Justice’ Horner should have been arrested.
Mr Carlin is alleged to have interrupted proceedings without justification, refused to resume his seat, approached the presiding judge, threatened to arrest him without lawful excuse and physically interfered with a court tipstaff.

This is a FRAME-UP of a law abiding Police Officer, who was trying to uphold the Common Law of the Land and was attacked and overpowered by Court Staff and a Court Tipstaff. 

He had been given until Thursday to secure a lawyer, apologise and provide an explanation for his behaviour.

The Jury will order the Police to arrest the ‘Judges’ with NO jurisdiction when they hear these 3 Orders alone.  – Which is why these Khazarian Satanic Mafia ‘Judges’ don’t want Juries; when they have NO say whatsoever in the matter. But shortly after entering the courtroom again in PSNI uniform and hat, Mr Carlin made his position clear.

Good for him, Officer Carlin, but where are his fellow Police Officers who have also sworn oaths to uphold the Law of the Land? – where Due Process is by a Trial – by a Jury of our Peers. He told Mr Justice Horner: “I believe for me to apologise to the court would be abandoning my defence.”

You are correct Officer Carlin: And Mr Justice Horner has NO jurisdiction to Threaten, Bully and Terrorise you into his Khazarian Mafia jurisdiction: = without a Jury.  Where there is only one winner; irrespective of the evidence.
The offer of legal assistance from a law firm which deals with the Police Federation for Northern Ireland was also rejected.

Officer Carlin is no FOOL, as he rejected the “legal” assistance to destroy him, as it is NOT lawful assistance: = Trial by Jury
Mr Carlin further claimed: “I acted in my capacity as a police officer, I believed a crime had been committed (and) it was outrageous in nature.

You are correct Officer Carlin: The serious crimes of Judges’ operating Courts’ without a Jury had been committed, which indeed is outrageous in nature, as it is High Treason  and Crimes against Humanity:

“I believe the tipstaff and court staff who intervened… obstructed me in the execution of my duty.”

In LAW you are correct again Officer Carlin:  Do the Tipstaff and Court Staff not know the Due Process of the Law of the Land?  – Therefore, why are they breaking the Common Law of the Land then? = Trial by Jury!  

At one stage Mr Justice Horner asked if he denied the alleged behaviour set out in writing.

‘Mr Justice’ Horner and ‘Lord Justice’ Gillen crimes against humanity were set out in writing over 800-years ago in the Magna Carta document, which is known as the Great Charter that these Khazarian Mafia Judges are ignoring: –  Officer Carlin is doing an excellent job upholding the Common Law of the Land: –

Magna Carta (1215) {Article 38} reads:  “In future no official shall put anyone to trial merely on his own testimony, without reliable witnesses produced for this purpose.”

{Article 39} reads:  “No freeman shall be arrested or imprisoned or deprived of his freehold or outlawed or banished or in any way ruined, nor will we take or order action against him, except by the lawful judgment of his equals (Trial by Jury) and according to the law of the land.”

{Article 40} reads: “To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay Right or Justice.”

Article 45} reads: “We will appoint as justices, constables, sheriffs, or bailiffs only such as know the law of the realm and mean to observe it well.

“I completely dispute those facts,” the officer replied.


The Police swear an Oath to protect Life, Property and uphold the Law of the Land.  Therefore, what is Officer Carlin supposed to do; break the Law of the Land for the Khazarian Mafia, like the rest of the Police Officers?

The judge then cautioned him: “You realise that should you be found guilty of contempt in the face of the court you will be

liable for a number of penalties including imprisonment.”

Again, ‘Mr Justice’ Horner had no jurisdiction to CAUTION and THREATEN Officer Carlin, as he was observing his oath to uphold the Common Law of the Land.

Mr Carlin responded that he would comply with the findings of a jury. However, he was told to turn up on Monday for a trial to be decided by Mr Justice Horner alone.

No informed Jury on the land will convict Officer Carlin, but they will ALL convict  and JAIL: ‘Mr Justice’ Horner and ‘Lord Justice’ Gillen: –

Now you know why the Satanic Khazarian Mafia Judges don’t want Juries and Video Cameras in their COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts, which must be brought to an END forthwith, to STOP the  Genocide of, We the People, by the Satanic Khazarian Mafia Judges operating our Courts without Juries and ROBBING us of EVERYTHING without Due Process of the LAW.  –  Harrow Council and Newlyn Bailiffs have devised a better SCAM; they put BOGUS documents through your door demanding MONEY £512.00 without any Court process whatsoever, which is blatant TERRORISM & FRAUD with impunity as, We the People, have no Courts of Law to protect ourselves from this day light ROBBERY and TERRORISM from our Local Governments’:

Tim Heritage

8 hrs ·

wonder if i can remember to follow up on this

[ ] refused a jury Mr Justice Horner said: “I’m going to arrange for a trial to take place on this issue of whether or not there has been contempt in the face of the court. I will hear it, there will not be a jury.”

Policeman who allegedly threatened to arrest judge to go on trial for contempt

Dressed in full uniform as he attended the Royal Courts of Justice in Belfast, Thomas Anthony Carlin declined to apologise for his actions at an earlier hearing|By Alan Erwin

Top of Form


You and Robert Eyres like this.



2016 is going to be OUR year; the BIG BOYS have the gloves OFF, as you can see from the following LINK: –
The REBEL: By Benjamin Fulford on 06 January 2016 A concerted push is under way to end Khazarian mafia rule this year

The Rebel – A concerted push is under way to end Khazarian mafia rule this year

Forget about thought police, political correctness and censorship! Get to know Jew-aware activists! Communicate with like-minded people, follow free-spirited media, study and discuss history and current events, and broadcast HD quality videos up to a size of 2GB.|By Benjamin Fulford

Like · Reply · Remove Preview · 5 hrs

Bottom of Form

Were, We the People, born to be ROBBED & TERRORISED by the Satanic Khazarian Mafia?  – God is taking revenge right now to protect what is left of his flock from the LAWBREAKERS in our Government Organisations’ that have been infiltrated by the Satanic Khazarian Mafia: –

We look forward to your reply; NOT further ROBBERIES & TERRORISM without the LAW please.

Yours truthfully,
Patrick Cullinane, Common Law Lawyer and Victim of Jew Process in the UK’s COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts.


Uri Avnery – US Jewish billionaires fund stealing West Bank Palestinian land


The Widening Gap

by Uri Avnery, with Gush Shalom

[ Editor’s note: Uri takes us into the belly of the Zionist beast today, and with a multi-pronged attack. He covers settler aggression in taking over West Bank land, American Jewish billionaires funding that effort through the support of fascist Israeli groups, and then the media controversies there in reporting on it all.

Here in the US, Israeli Lobby media watchers have a good record on keeping in-depth articles articles on these crimes against humanity in Israel as it covers their supporters here, those bought or blackmailed and the useful idiots, so they can avoid embarrassing questions was to why they bend over for these monsters. The same goes for the Christian Zionist community.

I learned this by accident years ago when I began reading the Israeli media and saw endless nasty topics constantly exposed there as the various Israeli factions went after each other where they gave no quarter. If such think were attempted by non-Jews, on the same topics and using the same language, we all know there would be screams to high heaven of ‘anti-semitism”.

This has become an acceptable social terrorism weapon to destroy even the most minor Israeli critics in the classic demonstration of what can happen to people who think they have the right to speak out. And yes, we have aiders and abettors, even in the media, who sit by and watch this all happen without lifting a finger or daring say a word in opposition.

When have ever heard of a media trade group or union walk out in a strike to demand the infiltration of the Israel lobby censors be cleaned out and their whole sordid history exposed. Heaven knows the material is all readily available without getting into the classified stuff, which is even worse.

The bottom line is basically a cowardice problem. Uri is lucky as there really is free press in Israel as their people feel they have a right to it. They just don’t feel anyone else does if they don’t want something published about Israel or Jews in general… Jim W. Dean ]


First published  …  January 16, 2016

Ilana Dayan

Ilana Dayan

In any list of Israel’s 100 most important women, Ilana Dayan would occupy a prominent position.

Dayan (no relation to the late general with the eye patch) is the host of one of the most prestigious television programs. While Israeli TV in general is slowly sinking into a morass of stupid “reality” entertainment, her program, named “Uvdah” (“Fact”), stands out as a beacon of responsible investigative journalism, of the kind my late weekly news magazine was known for.

In general, Dayan has always been considered as mildly “leftist” – since uncompromising criticism of the powers that be is generally identified with the Left.
Now she is being accused of serving the extreme, near-fascist Right. Shocking.

In the furious debate that ensued, Dayan quoted me for support. For 40 years, my magazine carried on its masthead the slogan “Without Fear, Without Prejudice”. Dayan claimed that was acting according to this motto.

This compels me to get involved in the dispute – against my better judgment.

The background of this affair concerns the very foundation of the Israel-Palestine conflict. Since the Six-day War of 1967, Israel has been occupying, among other territories, the area called by the Arabs, many Israelis and most of the rest of the world “the West Bank” (of the Jordan river) and by the Israeli government and right-wing Israelis “Judea and Samaria”, their Biblical appellation.

Almost since the beginning of the occupation, the Israeli right-wing has been making strenuous efforts to “settle the land” – putting up Jewish settlements, towns, villages and small “outposts” all over the place.

To whom do the lands, on which the settlements are built, officially belong? Much of it was “government land”. This goes back to the Ottoman Empire. Communal land reserves, which did not belong to individual fellahin (farmers) but to the entire village, were registered in the name of the Sultan. Under the British “Government of Palestine” it became “government land”. When the Israeli army occupied the territory, the Israel government just laid its hands on all these properties. Which means that this land is now being held solely for the benefit of Jewish settlers.

Other areas of land were simply expropriated by the military government for “security reasons” or “public purposes” – and then turned over to the settlers.
Many of these settlements are manifestly illegal, even according to the Israeli law prevailing in these areas. But the law is very rarely applied. The Israeli military government, the army and the police quite openly support the settlements, protect them and connect them to Israeli grids. The courts very rarely intervene.

Yet what about settlements which are being set up on privately-owned Arab lands? Ah, there’s the rub. All possible and impossible tricks have been used to take them over. Among them, the use of false documents, false signatures, often of dead owners. But the most common method is the use of Arab middlemen.

For the Palestinian people, this is an existential struggle. The Israeli Right, which now dominates the government, does not hide its vision of a country free of Palestinian Arabs (“Araberrein” in German). The vision of the entire country settled by Jews, with no one else around, has strong attractions for some, especially in religious circles.

The settlers and their allies have created an entire network for “legal” land acquisition. They approach an Arab owner and offer hugely inflated prices for his land. The money comes from Jewish billionaires in the United States or from secret government funds. The Arab owner is sorely tempted. He wants to sell and run away with the money. But he is afraid of his neighbors and of Palestinian fanatics.

This is where the Arab middlemen come in. They act as agents of the settlers and buy the desired land, in a way that enables the sellers to claim that they sold their property to other Arabs.

For the Palestinian community, these middlemen are worse than traitors. They endanger the very existence of the Palestinian people. They arouse intense fury.

That is where the TV report of Ilana Dayan starts. It centers on an Israeli peace activist called Ezra Nawi, an Iraqi-Jewish name. He is very active in the Hebron area in the southern West Bank. I have known his name for decades.

My impression has always been that Nawi is a kind of a loner, selflessly at work to help the Palestinians, connected with some of the many active Israeli peace organizations, especially Ta’ayush.

Hebron is a center of the most fanatical Jewish settlers. It is there that the settler-mass-murderer Baruch Goldstein massacred dozens of Arabs while they were praying in the mosque, after which he was killed by the enflamed survivors. He is now revered by the settlers as a saint.

These settlers are engaged in a prolonged struggle to get all the Arabs out of the surrounding villages. They destroy their homes, cut down their fruit trees, fill their wells with dirt. Ezra Nawi works untiringly to help the Arabs to hold on.

On the settlers’ side there are several Jewish fascist organizations (sorry, no other appellation quite meets the case), who are lavishly financed by US Jewish billionaires.

As now appears, these organizations have built an espionage network to infiltrate Israeli peace and human rights groups. One of their agents succeeded in winning the confidence of the unsuspecting Nawi, who, in a moment of self-aggrandizement, bragged that he had disclosed the names of Arab land-sale middlemen to the Palestinian security forces, who executed them for treason.

The fascist organization turned the information over to Ilana Dayan, who made it the centerpiece of her weekly TV program. Nawi made a run for the airport, but was taken off the plane by the police. So here we are.

In the furious debate now raging in the media, Dayan is accused by leftists like Gideon Levy of having become a turncoat and serving the fascists. Dayan responded with a furious article, in which she cited my motto. It is not her concern, she claimed, to ask herself whether her disclosures serve the Left or the Right. Her job is only to make sure that they are true.

Also, she asserts, it is not her business to investigate the motives of the people who supply the information. There, again, I have to agree with her. Important information may sometimes emanate from quite disgusting sources. The public good may demand its publication nonetheless.

I am against the death penalty under any circumstances. I am also against torture. However, I have never seen any evidence that the Palestinian security services have executed Arab land-sale middlemen, though some may have been interrogated harshly.

There is a comic angle, too. Nawi is accused of having contacts with foreign agents, a crime that equals espionage. Which foreign agents? The security services of the Palestinian Authority, under the command of Mahmoud Abbas. Yet only a few days ago the Israeli security service disclosed that the two security services – the Israeli and the Palestinian – work closely together to prevent Arab “terrorism” and that many Israeli lives have been saved this way. So when are the Palestinian services enemies, contact with whom is such a serious crime?

Another question concerns the disclosure that extreme right-wing organizations, financed by foreign (Jewish-American) donors, are conducting widespread secret espionage activities against Israeli activists. How come the Shin-Bet doesn’t know about this – or if they do know, why do they keep it secret?

One thing is certain: Israeli politics is becoming uglier by the day. The gap between left and right is turning into a gulf of hatred. The right-wing uses methods that remind me of what I saw as a child in 1933 Germany.


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Lord Bramall and Britain’s dirty secrets

Outrageous that they would kill citizens to keep their dirty secrets covered up. What kind of Royal family is that – because much is linked to them?


bramall and queenie

Old sins cast long shadows.

Never more so than in the case of Britain’s murderous VIP paedophile network.

We’re witnessing before our very eyes the quite unbelievable lengths the establishment will go to to prevent the full and sordid truth emerging.


If letting vile boy-rapist Greville Janner off the hook wasn’t bad enough, we’re now supposed to accept that any allegations made against the scum who run this country must be false and the victims coming forward must have mental health issues.

Old duffer, Lord Edwin ‘Dwin’ Bramall, has been ranting about how innocent he is and his accuser needs to be sectioned.

Are you innocent Dwin?

Are you really?

Just because the Met Police had insufficient evidence to proceed that can hardly equate to being totally exonerated now can it?

And when you add in the fact that Dwin is a long-standing shady Queen’s Lord Lieutenant,  it…

View original post 1,910 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Lord Janner: The Henriques Report

One law for one, and another for the rich elite.


The Full Henriques Report can be found HERE


On Friday 15 January, Mr Justice Openshaw brought to an end criminal proceedings against Lord Greville Janner for child sexual offences, after the Central Criminal Court received formal evidence of his death.

The conclusion of criminal proceedings means that the findings of an independent inquiry into the handling of past allegations of sexual abuse by Lord Janner can now be published.

The Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) commissioned the inquiry last year, when she stated that decisions not to prosecute following previous investigations into Lord Janner were wrong. Retired High Court Judge Sir Richard Henriques was asked to conduct a thorough and independent review into the CPS decision making and handling of all past allegations relating to the Lord Janner case and to make any recommendations he felt appropriate.

The independent inquiry found:

  • The decision not to charge Lord Janner in…

View original post 961 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment



19 Jan. 2016

Janner’s court appearance 14/08/15 + Lord Janner sued by six alleged victims who claim he abused them as children 20/08/15


Shown for Educational Purposes



Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Operation Midland: Context And Consequences – by Gojam

by | January 18, 2016 · 10:07 am


According to the available evidence, on the 19th May 2014 DCI Paul Settle was removed from heading the Metropolitan Police Service’s (MPS) investigation into paedophile activity by establishment figures. The previous September Settle had concluded, following advice from the CPS, that the investigation into a rape allegation from 1967 against Lord Brittan by a witness known as ‘Jane’ should not proceed as the allegation could not be ‘made out’ in law. ‘Jane’ was informed and later in February met with DCI Settle who explained to the witness why the investigation had been dropped. Unhappy with the decision, ‘Jane’ contacted Exaro News and Tom Watson MP, both of whom she had previously had contact with. Tom Watson wrote to the Director of Public Prosecution requesting that the decision not to question Lord Brittan under caution be reviewed and Exaro News reported these developments.Media pressure mounted and by the 17th of May, the weekend preceding DCI Settle’s removal, a flurry of media reports appeared – notably on the Exaro News website and in The Mirror giving an account of ‘Jane’s’ alleged rape  which, it was later said, differed from the statements given to the police.

What actually happened on the morning of Monday 19th May 2014 within the MPS, following these weekend media reports is difficult to ascertain. What we do know with some certainty is that DCI Settle had refused to interview Leon Brittan under caution, believing such a course of action to be unlawful and that as a consequence he was removed from the investigation. The decision to interview Lord Brittan was taken on the same day and on the 30th May Lord Brittan was indeed interviewed under caution.The 19th May 2014 therefore marks a significant turning point for the MPS’s investigation into VIP child abuse and for many key figures. Not least DCI Paul Settle himself who following his removal was considered ‘rogue’ by senior MPS management and  has spent the last 2 years in limbo. He also faces an investigation by the IPCC on trumped up allegations made by another Exaro ‘witness’ who was subsequently found to have been lying about VIP child abuse, known as ‘Darren’. As a consequence it is unclear how much longer the MPS will be able to count on DCI Settle’s experience and integrity as an available resource to them.The 19th May 2014 was also a turning point for Field Marshal Lord Bramall and former MP Harvey Proctor, though neither could know that at the time, for it seems unlikely that had DCI Settle remained in post, the incredible allegations made by their accuser known as ‘Nick’ would not have led to the disgraceful situation that we can see now, for it was only a few months after DCI Settle’s removal that Exaro News published its first story about ‘Nick’ and his allegations and Operation Midland was conceived.Much criticism has been levelled at Det Supt Kenny McDonald who led the investigation, especially for his public description of Nick’s allegations as “credible and true” but in the interests of fairness perhaps we should consider the context in which he came to the job. He would have seen his predecessor DCI Settle removed from his position by the MPS management for failing to do Exaro News’s bidding, he would have seen his predecessor labelled ‘rogue’and his career stalled. Given the circumstances, it is easy to see why Det Supt McDonald took the road he did. Under such pressure, it is certainly understandable even if it is not quite forgivable.

Less understandable are the decisions taken by Assistant Commissioner Steve Rodhouse (but that is a different article).The 19th of May 2014 not only marks a turning point  for the high profile people mentioned above but also for genuine victims of child sexual abuse. Child abuse is not restricted to any strata of society. Cyril Smith, Lord Janner and Sir Peter Morrison are all examples of politicians that have sexually abused children and there are almost certainly others. I have always said that the best way of discrediting genuine cases of child abuse is to hype up false allegations building them higher and higher, until they eventually fall and bury the truth under the rubble of lies.What is welcome is that the press seem to be differentiating between the genuine cases and the false allegations. It would have been a far simpler narrative just to label all allegations as false and the media much prefer simple narratives to such complex issues. Still, it will be harder than it has been over the last few years for genuine survivors of child sexual abuse to be heard, especially if the abuser is well known.

Leon Brittan died before he was cleared of raping ‘Jane’, the investigation unnecessarily extended due to media pressure and the cowardly inability of Rodhouse and others to admit that they were wrong to reopen the investigation. At least Lord Bramall is around to learn that this ludicrous investigation has been dropped but the fact that Rodhouse only notified Bramall and the press of this development on Friday evening, and that the statement should be so weak and equivocal reflects badly on those behind it.It is media management at its worst and as a consequence pressure will mount on the Met to be more forthcoming about the paucity of evidence against Lord Bramall and their failure to recognise their mistakes and apologise to him.I’ll end with one piece of advice to Steve Rodhouse and the Metropolitan Police Service’s management which I’m confident Field Marshall Lord Bramall will appreciate for it is from Napoleon:

“Never Reinforce Failure.”


Filed under Abuse, News, Politics

6 responses to “Operation Midland: Context And Consequences.

    1. Pingback: Operation Midland: Context And Consequences. | Alternative News Network

    1. I believe that ‘Darren’ withdrew his allegations because his children might be taken away from him, as the police had reported him to social services?

    1. dpack

      “You must build your House of Parliament on the river: so… that the populace cannot exact their demands by sitting down round you.”

      “All the business of war, and indeed all the business of life, is to endeavour to find out what you don’t know by what you do; that’s what I called “guessing what was at the other side of the hill.”


    1. Owen

      On This Day – 40 years ago
      – see Comments by bobchewie:

      On the morning of the 18th January 1976, Peter Watts, aged 15, left a note in his home in Colwyn Bay, Wales, stating that he was going to a friend’s house to study for an exam. Around 01.30 the next morning he was found dying in the underpass near Euston Square tube station in London. A taxi-driver found him lying on the road with a fractured skull, cracked ribs and broken shoulder, and rushed him to nearby University College Hospital, where he died. The coroner concluded that Peter’s injuries were all consistent with a fall from a great height rather than assault or self-injury. Curiously, Peter’s father said he knew no one in London, and no witnesses who might have seen him travel by train to Chester and then London, arriving at Euston station, were found. Furthermore, forensic examination revealed that the boy and his clothes were ‘impeccably clean’, as though he had just been bathed and his clothes washed. Even his skull wound had no sign of dirt or grit – expected if he had fallen on his head from the overpass above .

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Hampstead Cover-Up: WBB INTERVIEW: State Sponsored Trauma Based Mind Control 18 JAN. + more interviews + IPCC + Medical Report

Hampstead Cover-Up & State Sponsored Trauma Based Mind Control


After that interview, this from Ella + Abraham:

“We have been aware of David Shurter as a cointel disinfo shill for a while. This was confirmed when he lied about knowing Tavitrained Charlotte Ward/Jaqui Farmer, & then staged a fake public falling out with her in a “secret” Facebook group in order to ingratiate himself with us . They worked together on a video in January 2013.

We played along in order to give him enough rope (hemp of course.) He once again exposed his intent, when after arranging an interview with one of his “contacts” a certain Steve, they both persistently attempted to locate us by encouraging us to record the interview via landline. We recorded the interview via Skype, with Shurter and Steve dominating the conversation. We had discussed sharing with their audience the part hempseed nutrition played in the children’s disclosures, but they expressed concern. We explained that the nutritional aspect was an integral part of the case, and they became agitated, so we agreed not to mention it.
Cathy O’brien explains that Cannabis/ Hemp/Marijuana deletes and prevents mind control.
We did NOT argue for an hour and 20 minutes as implied in their latest attempted hatchet job where they expose their obvious intent. We weren’t pleased with the interview, but were grateful for the chance to introduce the case to the American audience. Shurter then organised another interview with Doug Miller, another known F.B.I./C.I.A. agent, which we declined. Shortly after Shurter arranged yet another interview, this time with Ed Opperman.
Opperman obviously knew little of the facts of the case, repeatedly referring to Pauffley’s fraudulent judgement of March 19th 2015. However it wasn’t until we exposed the Trauma Based Mind Control element of the case that he showed his true colours, at one stage denying the veracity of our disclosure by saying,”..but that’s not true”
After the 2 hour show , he requested we do a further hour which we did . We agreed that he would air the show on Christ mass day. He however posted the video on his YT channel on the 22nd of December, and then accused us of leaking the show after 2222 found the show on his YT channel and reposted it. He threatened 2222 with copyright infringement, along with a tirade of verbal abuse insults and accusations.
2222 explained that because Opperman had posted the video on his YT channel it was considered fair game in Child Abuse cases, particularly in this case, where the guilty/State have been attempting to control the narrative and prevent the TRUTH from being revealed. We did tell 2222 & another supporter who were scheduled to interview us that we would do the Opperman interview first as he was waiting and eager. We also recorded the interview using a new mike, as listeners had complained of sound quality of previous interviews.
Ed Opperman seemed genuine, but has accused us of leaking our version to 2222. That is an easily disproven lie, as our vocals on our recording are much clearer due to the new microphone. Why would he do that, and why would we jeopardise the opportunity to reveal the TRUTH to his extensive network of listeners ?
Ed Opperman did express upset at the comments from Dearman’s 40 or so sock puppets,( he created some new socks for Christ Mass)
Youtube pulled 2222’s version but we still have the comments that show Opperman’s true colours.
Neither Opperman nor Shurter have replied to polite emails attempting to resolve what ‘could’ have been a misinnerstanding.
They have however recorded two shows where they blatantly and clumsily attempt to discredit us,( Abraham particularly )
They have been in a Tavispin since we publicly exposed the Tavistate/ British Intelligence, C.I.A. Trauma Based Mind Control aspects of the case, and these accusations are their attempt to discredit us, and control the narrative of the case. They obviously don’t want this info revealed to the U.S. public, and have staged this charade as an excuse not to air the revealing interview.They, (Shurter particularly) are concerned that they are unable to contain the story of State sponsored Mind Control Programs in schools to create an army of New Word Order slaves.
They are unaware that the Hampstead Cover Up is a poisoned chalice to ALL who come with ignoble intent.
The use of Occult practices, Luciferian/Satanic/Wicca, hypnosis, drugs etc. are all elements of State sponsored Trauma Based Mind Control programs, that are used to mislead & cover up the TBMC programs that have infested schools and pre schools/nurseries around the world,so no we haven’t dismissed the occult element in favour of MK Ultra/ Monarch, State sponsored Trauma Based Mind Control programs.We are merely explaining how they all fit together. Their lies and Tavispin are transparent and they are merely the latest to be exposed by the Metaphysics of the Hampstead Cover Up.
Apologies for the length of this explanation, but these agents have dug a rather deep hole which they have proceeded to fall in.
Respect and Best wishes for the New Year.
e & a “

Mother Ella Draper Witness Statement 21 March 2015

A.L. Webre: Part I: Ella Draper & Abe Christie’s testimony on Hampstead pedophilia the UK High Court excluded 31 March 2015


HAMPSTEAD COVER-UP on WorldBeyondBelief w/Ella and Abraham

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

CLIFF RICHARD IS SET TO LEARN IF HE’LL FACE CHARGES + Does This BANNED Video Prove Cliff Richard is a Paedophile? + more

Sir Cliff is set to learn if he faces charges

Sir Cliff Richard will learn if he faces charges over historic sex allegations within WEEKS, it has been claimed.
The 75-year-old singer, who has denied abusing at least two boys in the 1980s, was quizzed by South Yorkshire Police after his luxury £3million home in Berkshire was raided back in August 2014.
He has not been arrested or charged and police are now about to wrap on their 18-month investigation.
Mark William-Thomas, an anti-sex abuse campaigner, told The Sun newspaper: “The file is expected to go to the Crown Prosecution Service within the next eight weeks.”
 Sir Cliff Richard
Sir Cliff Richard was quizzed by police

Sir Cliff insists the claims are “completely false” and police have drawn a veil of secrecy over their ­investigation sparked by allegations that a young boy was molested at a religious rally held by preacher Billy Graham in ­Sheffield in 1985.
A second allegation was then made by a man who claimed to have taken part in a music video in 1981.
A source close to the investigation said: “Police are still pursuing lines of enquiry from the interview with Sir Cliff in November.”

 Sir Cliff Richards
The singer has been in good spirits

Sir Cliff, who has been spending time in Portugal and Barbados, recently thanked fans for their support after a difficult few years, during which he has also lost close friends.
He said on Facebook: “I send lots of love…once again I wish you all peace and joy this Christmas.”
One fan Rascalini Scaloppini responded: “Dearest Sir Cliff. You are simply the very best.”
Mirror Celebs has contacted South Yorkshire Police and Sir Cliff’s rep for comment.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment


Edward Snowden @Snowden 30 Dec 2015

Without Tor, when you walk the streets of the internet, you’re always watched.
Edward Snowden @Snowden · 30 Dec 2015  
If you watch only one thing today, make it George Torwell: #SupportTor @thejuicemedia #32c3 

@Snowden Is there any reason to use Tor over my encrypted VPN?

Edward Snowden
VPNs are good, but their weakness is the single point of failure: hack or subpoena that one point to see everything.
@Snowden VPN is only one hop. The VPN server knows where you are and where you are talking to. Tor doesn’t have that weakness
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 23/01/16 + “Officer who ‘threatened to arrest judge in court’ faces contempt trial” + “SWP ABUSE OF PROCESS” etc. 17 JAN. 2016

23 Jan. 2016:  “My family, today, following my unanswered 6th Jan 16 letter to CCRC, is again nagging me as to whether you intend confirming my complaint of this new evidence of still more theft of the official HMCTS records of my 1st Dec 2011 harassment conviction:

1. will go to the CCRC immediately or better
2. immediately an outside police force and
3. will you  ask the CCRC to investigate the complete disappearance of the original police court exhibits used in both 1st Dec 2011 magistrates and 1st April 2012 Cardiff Crown Court hearings so urgently needed for ECHR/RCVS and His Honour Judge Seys Llewellin QC in the ongoing  BS614519 cases against the South Wales Police? 
Remember, my sister, J Matthews and others all heard the Crown court office admit the police had already seized some of these court records, following the arrest of the Crown Prosecutor, David Garreth Evans, which is why, no doubt, I was denied them for numerous juries and court appeals ever since.
Police protected lying DrTegwyn Mel Williams and Professor  Rodger Wood of Swansea University will remain immune to even investigation yet alone prosecution while this is not done.
Lord Leveson et al, in RCJ March 2013 judgement, openly admit they had no knowledge of  4th May 2012 jury request, in writing, to see these clerk of the court’s 1st Dec 2011 notes seen being written by me and my murmurating McKenzie Friends in the public gallery
J Matthews even tape recorded the proceedings albeit for other purposes.
It all stinks, does’nt it?”


Maurice Kirk writes:

“Almost identical facts to my 1983 arrest of Guernsey magistrate who knowingly perverted the course of justice by countermanding Royal Court Order for police doctor to give evidence 

Officer who ‘threatened to arrest judge in court’ faces contempt trial

15 January 2016

“A POLICE officer is facing the threat of prison next week after a lengthy legal battle over a house repossession allegedly led to extraordinary scenes in the High Court.
The officer is to go on trial for contempt of court after it is claimed he approached one of Northern Ireland’s most senior judges and threatened to arrest him.
Dressed in full uniform of the Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) as he attended the Royal Courts of Justice in Belfast again on Thursday (January 14), Thomas Anthony Carlin declined to apologise for his actions at an earlier hearing.
He also rejected an offer of legal representation and asked to have a jury decide on his behaviour towards Lord Justice Gillen.
But another judge refused his request, instead listing the case to be heard by him on Monday (January 18).
Mr Justice Horner said: “I’m going to arrange for a trial to take place on this issue of whether or not there has been contempt in the face of the court.
“I will hear it, there will not be a jury.” He also warned the policeman that, if found guilty, he could be fined or sent to prison.
Mr Carlin’s alleged outburst came at the end of a ruling in a long-running house repossession case in the High Court on Tuesday.
The 43-year-old had been representing himself in the legal battle with Santander bank over a property in Co Antrim, which has been ongoing for more than two years in the courts.
At the end of the hearing he allegedly got up and moved towards the bench, claiming he was going to arrest Lord Justice Gillen.
Security and court staff intervened before he was led from the courtroom.
The officer was arrested on suspicion of two counts of common assault, but subsequently released without charge.
The Police Ombudsman of Northern Ireland was also notified.
Mr Carlin is alleged to have interrupted proceedings without justification, refused to resume his seat, approached the presiding judge, threatened to arrest him without lawful excuse and physically interfered with a court tipstaff.
He had been given until Thursday to secure a lawyer, apologise and provide an explanation for his behaviour.
But shortly after entering the courtroom again in PSNI uniform and hat, Mr Carlin made his position clear.
He told Mr Justice Horner: “I believe for me to apologise to the court would be abandoning my defence.”
The offer of legal assistance from a law firm which deals with the Police Federation for Northern Ireland was also rejected.
Mr Carlin further claimed: “I acted in my capacity as a police officer, I believed a crime had been committed (and) it was outrageous in nature.
“I believe the tipstaff and court staff who intervened… obstructed me in the execution of my duty.”
At one stage Mr Justice Horner asked if he denied the alleged behaviour set out in writing.
“I completely dispute those facts,” the officer replied.
The judge then cautioned him: “You realise that should you be found guilty of contempt in the face of the court you will be liable for a number of penalties including imprisonment.”
Mr Carlin responded that he would comply with the findings of a jury. However, he was told to turn up on Monday for a trial to be decided by Mr Justice Horner alone.”



Maurice J Kirk BVSc            12th Jan. 2016      

1. Claimant 12th January 2016 Position Statement 

Defendant’s Position Statement (1)

2.  Mackenzie Friend Matthews Claim Synopsis

160110 Matthews Claim Synopsis

3. CCRC 12th Jan 2016 New Evidence Judicial Review Application   

160112 CCRC New Evidence BS614519 etc

4. Mackenzie Friend new evidence indicating both 4th May 2012 judge, His Honour Judge John Curran QC and Crown Prosecutor, David Gareth Evans misdirected both the jury and Lord Justice Leveson et al at the March 2013 Criminal Court of Appeal  

120504 Jury request rwritten down by MF


Draft: Prepared Police Helicoptor Incident Appeal Document 29/11/15

15 11 29 Prep Police Helicopter Incident Appeal DRAFT

“SW Police Abuse of Process” regarding  M. Kirk cases:

151028 Gerald Thomas 2nd witness statement

151228 SWP MJK Requests F

Approved SWP Judgment KIRK2


Lord Griffith1

Machine Gun legal argument

SWP schematic record of motoring inc

SW Police MAPPA Police Board Fabrication:



16th Jan 2016          Case no. BS619514 plus Eight More

“Dear Mr Leithley,
        Maurice Kirk v The Chief Constable of South Wales
1. Please send copies of Cardiff Magistrates’ file for 1st Dec 2011, re my harassment conviction of  police blackmailed doctor, Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams ,over a Dr Hillier of Caswell Clinic, Bridgend, lying about my mental state in order to falsify data before His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC on 2nd Dec 2009 when I was refused attendance to my own ‘machine gun’ pre management hearing. 
2. Both also lied to have me again locked up for the 2nd alleged ‘breach of a restraining order’, in 2010, when police attended their house to stop me just  in time, apparently, from burning their house down.

3. What ever became of that jerry can of Avgas and my guns they confiscated, we will never know as both were needed today.

4.The conviction had followed the required HHJ Llewellyn Jones QC 2009 order to help get get me locked away in Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital, for life, after botched attempt at Barry police station, on  8th June 2009, of MAPPA’s clandestine hearing caused its ‘minutes’ to be leaked and published on various web sites.
5. Did I send you a copy of it all about Barbara Wilding’s obsession for Wales to have a ‘shoot to kill’ policy’ for anyone putting her pension at risk?

6. All this was to avoid these civil damages claims to be heard his Thursday.

7. There are at least six versions of HMCTS (Wales) court records, by now, floating around between the latest Chief Constable, CPS Wales, CPS England, numerous Cardiff courts, MAPPA and CCRC, as the then prosecutor, a David Gareth Evans, had to be arrested, following his switching of court exhibits etc leading to prison officers, Rogan, being also arrested inside  Cardiff prison re South Wales Police getting him to steal my passport.
8. The first of them, on 4th May 2012, with jury, by jury note, specifically asking for the clerk of the court’s notes, apparently, only to be lied to by HHJ John Curran, when I was not there, indicating they did not exist possibly saying this to them as just reliant on CPS man Evans again!  Could Enid Blyton do better?
9. The police have now confiscated, not just Geoamey Custody Services records of CPS Evans’ ‘draft’ restraining order, being brought to my 1st Dec 211 court cell by four guards, as I was MAPPA 3/3 so very violent, on 1st Dec11 but also the  court exhibits, to avoid their use before not three subsequent juries but also the 4th but now the clerk of the court’s notes recording the draft being brought down to the cells that day.
10. Police also refuse to disclose the all important custody records of that 1st Dec 2011 day, re my missing the Musa family stolen six children Haringey Council scandal court case, two days before, that had caused my immediate ‘gate arrest’, that same day, to obtain the conviction of my ‘failing to attend my criminal court hearings’ in order to further frustrate this week’s Cardiff court hearing.
11 We need people in the public gallery on Thursday, do we not, to witness first hand just what the Welsh judicial cartel are prepared to do just to obtain autonomy for the Principality meaning, in effect, its own independent police force from England?

12. How many versions can you obtain, please,  for 21st Jan 2016 County Court hearing, before His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC’ but the original police/CPS non ‘tampered with’ version would be preferable?

Thank you.”


UPDATE 12 Jan. 2016:

Reflecting on the South Wales Police’s persecution in order to have Maurice Kirk’s name removed from the veterinary register is the subject on 21st January 2016 in Cardiff County Court INCLUDING THIS:

DRAFT BS614519 etc
Dec 2011 CCRC Application
Ms Jenny Thomas,
Criminal Cases Review Commission,
5 St Philips Place
Birmingham B3 2PW
6th January 2016

Dear Madam,

New Evidence Re Cardiff Magistrates Refusal to Disclose Court File

1. Further to Mr Leithley’s 30th July 2015 submissions, re later applications to you, my Bristol solicitors have now caused the court, after my four years of trying, to disclose more official court records albeit counterfeit.

2. You will see that this same court record, originally sent to you in January2012 to copy, even before my harassment appeal and jury trial’s conviction of a supposed ‘breach of a restraining order’, purportedly served on me on 1st Dec 2011 in the court cells, is depleted yet again making it at least six occasions by the time it has sent to my barrister.

3. It is unfortunate your predecessor had not given me copy in 2012 or yourself in 2013 as I would have been released from prison within days.

4. The following six HMCTS officers each have obtained different records by now when purported to be the original 1st Dec 2011‘magistrates file’.

5. Cardiff court were well aware, of my 2011 Judicial Review Application from prison and that that specific record therein, eg clerk’s variations of his original ‘contemporaneous notes’/District Judge John Charles court orders, mid trial/ record of what went on in the cells/ switched and added CPS court exhibits, mid trial/ police seized court exhibits to prevent their identity in the Cardiff Crown Court March 2013 3rd ‘breach ‘ jury trial, was needed for it and yet it was tampered with to assist in a non acquittal as different cases just happened to come along.

6. HMCTS officers. so far implicated, include those of:

i) Cardiff Magistrates from September 2011
ii) Cardiff County Court from same date
iii) Cardiff’s Crown Prosecution from same if not before
iv) CCRC from January 2012 if not before
v) Cardiff Crown Court from December 2011 onwards
vi) Bristol’s Crown Prosecution Service from May 2011
vii) Especially clandestine Cardiff Crown Court hearing in 2014
viii) My Cardiff barrister from 2015
ix) And now back again to CCRC in January 2016
It stinks, does it not?

7. You will recall the ‘court file ‘came to you following my request for seizure even before the contemporaneous clerk of the court’s notes were further altered, as also happened with the official court log, as they were the only court record of what actually occurred in those ten or so shambolic court hearings.

8. Your Annex to regulations indicates you must now disclose a certified true copy of the January 2012 received court file containing clerk’s notes

9. Geoamey Custodial Services refuse to disclose anything at all!

10. South Wales Police, similarly, also refuse to disclose anything. Their relevant custody record, as I had been immediately ‘gate arrested’, whilst injured from being dragged out of the custody suite by five very angry custody staff, must have registered my complaint and identity along with whatever was or was not stuffed into my trouser pocket.

11. Three of the five guards had witnessed the hand written ‘draft’ restraining order being offered to me inside the cell, to read, before it was to be returned to court for correction and typing.

12. All five must have seen the comical spectacle of a quivering clerk of the court hiding outside the prisoners area, all behind lock and key, in an empty cell for fear, he had been told by police, CPS and now Geoamey (see court exhibit prisoner movement records) that I was a very ‘violent’, likely to try and escape and a rare MAPPA level 3 category 3 registered victim that traded in machine guns and live ammunition and tried to burn doctors’ houses down.

13. Court exhibits submitted by the CPS barrister and requested by the 4th May 2012 Jury, as I had proof these exhibits had already been seized by the South Wales Police, were last seen in a ridiculous 1st March 2012 HHJ Hughes appeal hearing BUT witnessed by my faithful Mackenzie Friends.

14. You will recall Lord Leverson et al, in March 2013 Criminal Court of Appeal judgment, indicated (paragraph 9 was it?) that there was no record of the jury having ever asked to see these records of ‘service in the cells’ and yet their jury ‘note’ explicitly requested just that.

15. Remember Cardiff Crown Court deliberately refused to disclose that ‘jury note’ to me, the Defendant, as the judge had already been shown the magistrate’s file by CPS barrister, David Gareth Evans, the original magistrates prosecutor in a pre trial management hearing.

16. Under cross examination the cell custody officer, Leigh Barker, had just told the jury he had specifically had the assurance from Mr Michael Williams, clerk of the court, while he was hiding in an empty cell, that there would be record kept of this ‘service’ where, when and by whom.

17. I now enclose extract of a contemporaneous note taken by a refused defence witness, one of many, who watched with amazement as the judge ‘directed’ the jury that such record of a draft or final court order having been served on a prisoner was never written down if conducted in a prisoner’s cell by the then manager in charge.

18. The jury retired for a long time before accepting the judge’s directions and delivered a 10 to 2 verdict.

19. Panic had set in by then, before so many able and concerned witnesses in the public gallery, to cause the district judge to cut short the police prearranged prison term by a few days meaning I was immediately given release but had refused to go for four hours without a written account as to the verdict conducted in my absence.

20. One junior Geoamey officer attempted to stuff papers in my pocket, not Barker for he had left, off duty, at 2.40pm as recorded in his diary.

21. Neither police nor Geoamey will disclose evidence of ‘service’ as I had been severely assaulted at 5pm in the cells, yet again, causing Barker to have to state on oath that it was he who had served the final restraining order at around 1pm when it was impossible to have even been typed as ’service’ was due to take place, as usual, in the prison on release date.

22. I now enclose extract of a contemporaneous note taken by a refused defence witness, one of many, who watched with amazement as the judge ‘directed’ the jury that such record of a draft or final court order having been served on a prisoner was never written down if conducted in a prisoner’s cell by the then manager in charge.

23. The jury retired for a long time before accepting the judge’s directions and delivered a 10 to 2 verdict but the court were never going to tell me.

24. My attempt to produce court exhibits and documentary proof of their conspiracy from my rectum, as I was not allowed my pen or papers in cells or court, soon scuppered my chances of being told of the jury requests, which of my witnesses had attended and not, substance of the inevitable CPS applications when their cases fall apart as in both the machine gun and fabricated psychiatric ones using Dr Tegwyn Williams.

25. I will identify which Mackenzie Friend wrote these notes to support my now privately obtained magistrates and Crown court tape recordings to show there has been an abuse of process and clear perversion of justice.

26. I enclose a summary of a remarkably similar conducted Cardiff court hearing, to protect the police informant on 1st December 2011, a Mr Jeff Matthews, as he has been allowed to steel around £20,000 of my money as full but not yet final payment.

27. You will note South Wales Police refuse to intervene and Cardiff court, this very week, have again been nobbled to protect Matthews’ barrister, Trevis, from lying to a Judge Denyer QC and Mr Justice Newrey QC in Bristol’s High Court, by this over arching HM Partnership fanaticism you all so desperately hang onto to preserve your ‘white collar’ tax payer’s funded ‘gravy train’.

28. This twenty odd years of Cardiff’s cabal conduct has cost me, so far, my health, wealth, over three years in prison and a marked deterioration of my ‘state of mind’ and not assisted, I must say, by your insistence that I only communicate with the CCRC via a lawyer.

29. I have now trawled London, Bristol, Taunton, Birmingham and even Cardiff for legal representation since I first communicated with you with little success.

30. This real lack of independence in our UK’s legal profession, when the paid players are forced to contend with being HM officers for automatic guarantee to immunity to prosecution if they were not, must be changed with radical reform.

31. Having to put up with our quite outdated and sometimes corrupt judicial system is one thing but if you are well paid for it, unlike a litigant in person not even allowed his costs when he wins, then it is another.

32. Could you possibly assist me in this travesty or do I again go public on more sensitive material gathered in these past 23 years of persecution in Wales with it about to being granted not just with its very own police force but also its own judiciary answerable to precisely no one.

Yours sincerely,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc
Contact via or Telephone 24/7 on 07708586202



  Claimant’s 2nd January 2016 Position Statement


South Wales Police breach Article 3 of the European Court of Human Rights

What is torture?

 Torture occurs when someone acting in an official capacity (for example a police officer or soldier) deliberately causes serious pain or suffering (physical or mental) to another person. This might be to punish someone, or to intimidate or obtain information from them.

24th August 2010 MAPPA Executive Summary (enclosed)

The 25th July 2011 ‘Judge’s ‘Note’ (enclosed), is factually incorrect.

The Note

1. Paragraph 6 identifies the content of part of ‘leaked minutes’, now in possession of the lower court as served by the Appellant, indicating the Chief Constable deliberately delayed the arrest of her victim, for two weeks, in hope he may be shot

2. Paragraph 7 identifies those present, on 8th June 09, at the MAPPA registration meeting in Barry police station, consisting only of senior police officers and their chief psychiatrist, Dr Tegwyn Williams with his psychiatric nurse, Ms Elizabeth Paul, to take notes.

3. The clandestine manner was contrary to regulations with the co-ordinator, Mr Nigel Rees, having to deny relevant regulations exist.

4. Police nefarious conduct is highlighted by the evidence within the enclosed twelve pages of correspondence once the Appellant first became aware, in autumn 2009, he was a MAPPA registered victim of some sort or other.

See enclosed:

5. Paragraph 8 content confirms that the 8th June Barry police minutes, apparently relied upon for Appellant’s MAPPA registration, was as equally erroneous as the Executive Summary, while also redacting any sensitive record, explaining why Dolmans so fiercely resisted its disclosure (see transcript) before the nurse’s leaking a little part of the truth.

6. Paragraph 9 is misleading in that the Appellant was a MAPPA subject before 8th June 09.

7. Paragraph 10 again is misleading. His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, in November 2008, had no proper cooperation from Dolmans as to who was to sign the affidavit as the solicitors knew, as has now been proved, fabrication of evidence in the original criminal hearings was normally excepted there never is any intervention by those so adjudicating proceedings.

8. BUT their fabricated police evidence, in this civil court, was reliant on the police:

i) preventing the Appellant from having witness summonses served
ii) withholding the identity of police officers and other eye witnesses for service
iii) ignoring numerous Appellant applications surrounding the numbered identity numbers of some forty odd police incidents involving the Appellant
iv) having free access to copy, alter or confiscate court records, as was done in twenty four of the thirty three incidents, currently under appeal, now repeated in the stayed Judicial Review Application over 1st Dec 2011 Cardiff magistrates fiasco. The Appellant neither received a lawful harassment conviction nor did he receive in his court cell, that day, the now defunct ‘restraining order, quashed by a Cardiff court following the sacking of Dr Tegwyn Willams who now has to work abroad.

9. MAPPA ‘minutes’, recording the Appellant ‘attempted to enter police HQ’ and was unsuccessful’ and ‘has taken to Bridgend police station’ could not be further from the truth.

10. These are deliberate lies as, on that 18th June 2009, the Appellant had gained access to the Chief Constable’s inner sanctum, to exchange witness statements with him following a direct order from his Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC.

11. Exactly as was needed to be done, back in the 70s at Taunton police station, to again prove conspiracy from the highest level, did the Appellant obtain entry to the Chief Superintendant’s office to foil the original ‘dreamed up’ fire arms conspiracy that has, ever since, ‘triggered’ harassment anywhere he then chose to work as a veterinary surgeon across the British Isles.

12. The South Wales Police MAPPA ‘minutes’, of course, failed to record that the Appellant was already walking out before being surrounded by tin-hatted, flack jacketed police officers while sporting both stun grenades and their own model of machine gun.

13. Not once did the Appellant get asked as to the whereabouts of his own machine gun, as they searched his motor vehicle (see website photographs and police CCTV) as Senior management had known, all along, she had already been sold almost a year earlier and examined on day of sale, by an armourer no less, as still being decommissioned with an issued proof house certificate.

14. Only the jury, in that scandalously evil January 2010 Cardiff court room, were not made aware of it as even the majority in the audience, in the public gallery, already knew as did the CPS barrister, Mr Richard Thomlow, unless, perish the thought, the police had lied to him as well?

15. This deliberate police inference, to obstruct the Appellant from getting his evidence before both his civil and criminal courts had the full backing of Dolmans, the Chief constable’s solicitors, as they were all ’officers of the HM court’ and therefore immune to prosecution.

16. It was precisely why the Appellant’s private investigator, employed to serve witness summonses on behalf of the Claimant, indicated a ‘search and service’ bill was likely to be in excess of £10,000 just to find the nearly two hundred police and private civilian addresses across the UK. It would require his having to laboriously follow them home from work or after having collected their children at schools to achieve lawful service.

17. This retrospectively written document, ‘the executive summary’, was hurriedly prepared by senior police officers following the Appellant’s successful application before this trial judge. Its fabrication was to further influence civil proceedings by using extremely erroneous ‘facts’ deliberately concocted in order to pervert the course of justice.

18. Paragraph 11.1. The Appellant knew where some could be found as they were clients

19. Paragraph 11.2. Of course the gun had ‘live ammunition’. All but one cartridge was still in the gun’s magazine when lying on the court room table and, no doubt, they were the very same ones seen on the You Tube piece of film played to the jury off the Appellant’s website, as, would you believe, prosecution evidence.

20. Again, police continually refused to disclose what they did with the missing one and the ammunition deliberately left out, by the Appellant, as a paper weight, following the first of many aborted visits to the Appellant’s airfield to snatch his then ten year old daughter to be put into the dreaded ‘Council care ‘ for, no doubt, a random adoption.

21. The police, for some weird reason, chose to try and fool the jury by using that same You Tube footage had already caused them to repaint their own exhibit a different colour.

22. But who cares what the South Wales Police regularly get up to when the locals all seem to be so looking forward to their very own police force and autonomous judiciary free from the constraints of either Whitehall or Strasbourg?

23. Wherein the ‘facts’ that are directly related to the registered ‘victim’, in the MAPPA Summary’, precious little is true from any of its twelve or so pages other than, perhaps, the correct spelling of ‘Maurice Kirk’.

6. Police criminal conduct had originally been planned at Bridgend HQ immediately following the successful Appellant’s 2008 application forcing the Chief Constable to sign her own sworn affidavit of truth.

7. Having now signed that there had been ‘full disclosure’ of the facts, to which the Appellant was entitled, she has now an inveterate liar which explains her need for immediate Fixated Threat Assessment Centre (FTAC) intervention fortunately very soon stopped by direct Home Office intervention.

8. So she switched to nebulous MAPPA in order to use her blackmailed chief forensic psychiatrist, Dr Tegwyn Williams, to have her victim shot or locked up for life, anything to block this civil case.

9. To further torture their victim and so affect his performance as the Claimant, having also failed in having him shot, Barbara Wilding had her victim incarcerated in Cardiff prison by using this fabricated information throughout this ‘executive summary’.

10. Without a remotest hope of any fire arms conviction being successful, from either the W11 Lewis machine gun or June 2009 $10,000 worth of confiscated and never returned legally held weapons, Barbara Wilding had him sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act s. 35 for her , Caswell Clinic prison, Bridgend, South Wales.

11. On 2nd December 2009, with further use of the erroneous content of this ‘executive summary’ but this time ensuring it was in a ‘closed court’ before His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC, unbeknown to the then Claimant, the Chief Constable had tried yet again to torture her victim by applying, on still withheld Tegwyn Williams’ oral medical evidence, that he be further incarcerated but this time, indefinitely, in Ashworth high security Psychiatric Hospital.

12. Police doctor, without appropriate qualifications or evidence, had stated, Maurice Kirk had ‘significant irreversible brain damage’ with Mr Thomlow chipping in to say the doctor had said it as it was believed to be caused from a brain tumour.

13. At January 2013’s 0CF03922 Cardiff County Court ‘strike out’ application, for the Appellant’s damages claim against NHS (Wales) with both Dr Tegwyn Williams and Swansea University’s Professor Rodger Wood’s having falsified police medical records, to further pervert the course of justice, His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC refused it being struck out as the police psychiatrist had not even been qualified to diagnose from specialist brain scans. There, also, already existed, orchestrated by Dr Williams on behalf of the Chief Constable, Applicant brain scans taken about two weeks earlier proving to be non specific

14. To this day the Appellant has never been told about this or had subsequent follow up investigations by NHS (Wales) a seriously implanted party in this conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.

15. This attempt failed miserably, to have the Appellant locked away for life without trial, only because the Appellant’s old friends, past Vale of Glamorgan MP, Walter Sweeney and his lovely consultant radiologist, Nuala, together had obtained an expert opinion before His Honour Judge Bidder QC, proving both CPS and police also as flagrant liars.

16. With her victim released back in Cardiff prison, in December 2009 and with no less than seventeen doctors and forensic psychiatrists, now, having opposed the findings of Dr Tegwyn Williams she was forced to remove the Appellant from the MAPPA register entirely but making quite sure the Appellant, meaning the media, knew nothing about these unusual and exceptional changes of events as it had been the fear of the media and certain of his followers that caused the registration in the first place (see September 09 and 19th October 2009 Psychiatric reports by Dr Williams).

17. The Appellant was difficult to be illuminated now he was in prison on 17th December 2009 no longer in the elite top 5% MAPPA most dangerous in the UK so anything had to be done to avoid both the imminent civil trial and ‘machine gun’ hearings being so ‘risky’ to her pension due to her in just a few days time.

18. ‘Risky’ as it involved just too many police officers expected to survive their lying, for her and their pensions, under cross examination in not just one but both Cardiff County and Crown Courts.

Using the erroneous executive summary, yet again, she therefore did the following:

i) Had her staff ‘repaint’ the gun in an attempt to fool the jury

ii) used both seller and buyer of ‘the gun’ as prosecution witnesses

iii) planted a police informant on the jury

iv) switched ‘Foxy’, her undercover agent, to a male person in witness box when, originally, a WPC had telephoned both him and then, wife

v) instructed her own agent in court, now His Honour Judge Richard Thomlow, NOT TO DISCLOSE the aircraft log book to the jury as it distinctly recorded this decommissioned relic was registered as an integral part of the British registered aeroplane

vi) successfully opposed release on bail using fabricated PNC data

vii) introduced, in the dying minutes another ‘prohibited weapon’ dressed up, this time, as a 30 mm US machine gun!
viii) jury trial judge, His Honour Paul Thomas QC, refused this Appellant examination of either ‘guns’, their paper work or the a/c log books, with Tomlow denying any certification record even existed not realising his victim, from his dock, could see the a/c books had half slipped out from where they had been hidden on the police solicitor’s bench right behind him.

This 1918 DH2 replica, used at Farnborough Air Show as a display aircraft, had caused the Appellant to be well versed in Civil Aviation Authority legislation and had particularly sharpened up finger nails on his left hand to expose the police evilness right before the jury.

Whereas this above list, in the February 2010 criminal trial acquittal, is far from exhaustive the few examples, below, from the ninety nine witnesses heard in the deliberately denied jury civil trial, during its twenty three year duration, barely scratches the surface of all the evidence now available to an outside police force required by this Appellant to force disclosure.

By using same executive summary ‘evidence’, to pervert the civil trial, she did the following:

i) blocked Appellant from serving summons on key witnesses
ii) had his witnesses threatened or gaoled so not to be available to give evidence
iii) kept having her victim gaoled on fabricated allegations, in France, three times around London, Cardiff, Portsmouth and Cosham, before and especially after the ‘machine gun’ /Dr Tegwyn Williams fiasco, with no intention ever of obtaining a conviction but just delay for memories to fade
iv) in opposing her victim bail, these past 23 years, by failed disclosure and false PNC
v) confiscation of Crown Court exhibits (1st May 12, 4th May 12, 3rd Oct 12 etc
vi) alteration and/or shredding of HMCTS court records (1st Dec 2011, 4th May 12 etc
vii) succeed in causing serious memory and hearing loss of Appellant by her forced Caswell Clinic’s horrific experience not knowing whether drugged every night.

to be continued

Posted by Maurice Kirk on Sunday, January 3, 2016


In amongst my 200 hundred broken arch lever files, today, against the South Wales Police, I found a NHS (Wales) solicitor’s letter containing my particulars of claim, stayed by the current trial judge and originally for next 21st January 2016 hearing, to argue as to whether it is allowed to go ahead or not, bearing in mind a number of ‘white collar workers ‘ in south Wales are facing prison sentences should I finally obtain court and medical records.

No doubt a local masonic nobbly knees cabal, in association with HM Partnership, had already ruled on this delicate matter long before our recent trial, of 23 years standing, had even started.


 above: Extract from CPS MG% doc for jury and judge stupidly identifying the real ‘foxy as opposed to the man in court wh o gave evidence on her behalf owing to a ‘logistics problem that could not be remedied without quashing police evidence


 No incident ever recorded of violence on staff recorded and stupidly lifted and wrongly interrpted from DR Tegwyn williams last paras of 19th Oct 09 fairy tale




alse NHS Wales medical reports remain affecting my employment search, returned to veterinary register and renewal of my commercial licence all wanted for my flight in the cub to Cape town





One tiny atom of the massive iceberg that is Maurice’s 20+ years of [alleged] harassment / persecution by S. Wales police is partly described in these 2 pdf docs [which also are relavent to the 2nd post below, entitled: MAURICE KIRK: “A sample of South Wales Police’s 23 years of conduct” 2 Dec. 2015 Posted on

Pdf files:

930520 police interview tape extract

930520 custody records

 – one could assume there are many many more events similar to those described in these files that Maurice has had to put up with over the years – which, mostly, it has to be said – are ignored wholesale by those put in positions of “judging” us in our “courts” when he has managed to get the injustices into a “court” room.  Suffice to say MK has served at least 4 years in custody since 2008 due to matters beyond his control,  often being held on remand in prison for months on end before all charges against him are dropped – with no compensation in any form given to him for these lost and lengthy periods of time in his life.  doc 17dec15

KIRK SWPOLICE 17DECBARRY VET last pic received

[There are a total of 13 pages – 247 posts, beginning in 2011, on this site relating to MK and what he has endured – some are shown below].

And so it goes…

Maurice Kirk’s site is

MAURICE KIRK: “A sample of South Wales Police’s 23 years of conduct” 2 Dec. 2015

7.jpga  [above: May, 2015, after his release from HMP, after serving 17 months approx. imprisonment – a term that saw numerous irregularities far from the norm when serving a custodial sentence, including the denial of a serious and urgent medical operation on his stomach [a colostomy or very similar], which was a scandal in itself…MK finding himself bedridden, and eventually in a wheelchair for approx. 6 months because of the untreated medical problem. Letters to the P.M., the Ministry of Justice, the Sec. of State, the Home Secretary and many more proved futile, and MK was refused the medical operation for over a year.]

Maurice Kirk has been put in prison roughly 6 times since 2008, the time totalling over 4 years behind bars, connected, basically, to the allegation that he broke a “restraining order” served upon him, relating to “harassing” or even “contacting” a now ex-NHS consultant doctor who manufactured a false report on Maurice, stating he had a “brain tumour“, and was a danger to society. It has now come to light officially that no “restraining order” was ever served upon Maurice, something he has always maintained, but been unable to prove.

The false medical report was made, presumably, in an attempt to  put Maurice in a closed psychiatric hospital forever. Why? Perhaps it was because he was deemed a thorn in the side of certain authorities he was trying to get justice over [via his “damages claim”] relating to endless alleged “targeting” he complained of that had been occurring for over 20 years. 

Maurice has been classed as a “MAPPA 3” level convict in the past, a classification so serious there are only  150+ subjects classified as this in the country, mostly violent psychopaths on life sentences in prison. Due to Maurice’s diligence and refusal to give in or be intimidated by the attempts to get him incarcerated forever in a criminal mental hospital, the attempts have, [so far],  failed. Maurice has just served nearly 18 months in prisons based on the allegation that he broke the terms of this [alleged non-existent] “restaining order” – a term which saw him go on “hunger strike” for over 30 days, simply to obtain a single letter out of those holding him, relavent to the non-existent “brain tumour”. 

During this incarceration he was denied an urgent medical operation for an extremely painful and serious stomach ailment – a colostomy or similar was urgently needed but always denied him – the ailment had him in a wheelchair for months as he was unable to walk. He tells us often there was no help for him to get on his bed at night, so he had to sleep in his wheelchair. The urgent operation he so urgently needed was always refused because certain of Maurice’s medical documents, linked to the false report made hy the now ex-NHS consultant, were always denied to the surgeons who were to do this operation, who needed to see the documents before acting, for safety’s sake. Letters to the Prime Minister and all the rest about this matter failed miserably, time after time. Painkillers were often not given to him, he alleges, when he most needed them, when he was in agony for hours as a result. Maurice’s site is

2 Dec. 2015 – A sample of South Wales Police’s 23 years of conduct =

1] DRAFT – Action 3, 5.1-3 – the VW Campervan around the Hayes Roundabout 21 May 2002.

2]  DRAFT – Retired Inspector  Howard Davies Spite repeated in RCVS Trial

3]    DRAFT – Action 1 claim 8.5 24th March 1993 stopped by PC Jane Lott.


Action 3, 5.1-3 the VW Campervan around the Hayes Roundabout 21 May 2002.

This is a claim that Mr Kirk was unlawfully arrested and thereafter unlawfully detained in custody, on allegation of driving whilst disqualified and failing to produce a driving licence. He was driving his VW campervan. On it there were displayed banners complaining of, as he would describe it, the appalling state of our courts. He drove the vehicle round and round the monument at The Hayes Cardiff. (The road layout has changed since, but at the relevant time it was possible for a vehicle to circle the monument). It is common ground that (the then) PC Cocksey 3619 and PC 1215 Osbourne attended, and that PC Cocksey arrested Mr Kirk on the basis that he was driving whilst disqualified. He was taken to the police station arriving there according to the custody log at 14.42 on 21 May 2002. In the event, he was detained in the police station until 08.32 the next morning when he was taken under escort to the Magistrates Court.

The pleaded case is that “on 21 May 2002 the Defendant, in Cardiff, maliciously and without reason or probable cause arrested and detained in custody the Claimant on motoring allegations that included driving whilst disqualified and failing to produce a driving licence. The Claimant held a valid driving licence about his person on the 21 May 2002 and was never asked to produce it. On the 22 May at Cardiff Magistrates, the Defendant withdrew the charges of driving whilst disqualified and failing to produce a driving licence” (Bundle A3/4.170).

The pleaded Defence is that “sometime after 2.00pm on 21 May 2002 the Claimant was observed to be driving his Volkswagen Caravanette, round and round the monument of The Hayes, Cardiff. A check was made on the Police National Computer, which identified the Claimant as a disqualified driver. Police Constable Cocksey then stopped and arrested the Claimant for driving whilst disqualified. The Claimant was then taken to Cardiff Central Police Station. Once at the police station the Claimant refused to cooperate with the Custody Officer by refusing to disclose his personal details….. He was subsequently charged with driving whilst disqualified and other road traffic offences. The Custody Officer then wished to bail the Claimant but the Claimant refused to be bailed. The Custody Sergeant who also suspected that in the circumstances the Claimant might further drive whilst disqualified, therefore authorised the Claimant’s detention until he could be brought before the magistrates the following day….. if, which is not admitted, the Claimant was not disqualified from driving, and the Defendant avers the officer was entitled to rely upon the information he had received from the Police National Computer and therefore was acting lawfully when relying upon the said information, he arrested the Claimant”.

I received witness statement and oral evidence from the following: Mr Kirk himself; PC Cocksey, PC Osbourne, PC 1060 Andrew Lloyd James who conducted a tape recorded interview with Mr Kirk at 16.21 to 16.35 hours (during which Mr Kirk denied that he was disqualified from driving) and who charged Mr Kirk (driving whilst disqualified, failing to produce a driving licence, no insurance, no MOT); PS 4008 Linda Canterbury, the custody sergeant on duty when Mr Kirk was brought in to Cardiff Central Police Station; PS 2788 Geoffrey Roberts, the custody sergeant who took over at 18.50 hours [and PC 1953 Andrew Williams the gaoler assistant to the custody sergeant from 19.00 hours that day, and who processed Mr Kirk’s property at the police station].

I also received the evidence of Mrs Kirstie Kirk, the former wife of Mr Kirk, who in May 2002 made a handwritten record of the contact she had had with the police about Mr Kirk’s detention, both overnight on 21 May 2002 and when he was arrested whilst driving in Cowbridge (see below). Her evidence was uncontroversial.

Mr Kirk had been disqualified from driving by reason of successive convictions then on his record. The disqualification was for a period of six months from 11 April 2002, taking into account 6 penalty points imposed by Cardiff Magistrates Court on 11 April 2000 for no insurance.

As recorded in a letter of 22 May 2002 (the day after arrest) from Cardiff Magistrates Court, under the hand of a T Dodson, ‘Principal Legal Adviser’, “Mr Kirk has convinced the Crown Prosecution Service that he did indeed have insurance cover in respect of that allegation and on 20 May 2002 District Judge Watkins used her common law powers to allow Mr Kirk to change his plea to not guilty. The CPS offered no evidence and the case was dismissed. With the consequent reduction in number of 6 points, Mr Kirk no longer falls to be disqualified under the provisions of section 35, and accordingly District Judge Morgan has today used his powers under Section 110 Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980 to remove the disqualification imposed by the Crown Court.” (letter to DVLA asking they amend their records accordingly, Bundle A3/4.188, emphasis supplied).

There is no doubt that Mr Kirk was driving round and round the monument at The Hayes many times on 21 May 2002.  In his statement of 19 June 2009, he described it as well over 50 times; in a statement of 2002, he described it as “for some 30 to 40 times”. He was trailing his coat.

In his witness statement of 19 June 2009, he says that PC Cocksey, “well known to me”, arrested him for driving whilst disqualified and later, in custody, “765 … concocted other charges, including, of course no insurance. One I remember without any records at hand was having no licence, when I produced it in court for all to see before I was even released. 766. Later the police pursued the remaining charge, no insurance with all others slowly withdrawn or quashed in court. 767. The production of my insurance was, I remember, the 35th time I had been ordered to produce, so I refused. 768. Following much argument with a senior CPS Prosecutor, brought in especially to deal with this case and the clerk of the court,…. the case was quashed my never needing to produce proof of insurance”. (Bundle A3/4.173B).

It is common ground that on 21 May 2002 Mr Kirk insisted to those who arrested him, and detained him, that he was not disqualified from driving.

When eventually he did appear at the Magistrates Court on 13 August 2002, he declined to give evidence, yet the Magistrates Court acquitted him of the charge of failing to have insurance for the vehicle. He asked for a case to be stated by the Justices, and they did so, but in the following terms:

“The Defendant appeared in Court on 22 May 2002 and pleaded not guilty to the charge. The case was listed for a pre trial review on 4 July 2002 where the Defendant maintained his not guilty plea and declined to produce a certificate of insurance for inspection. We heard the case on 13 August 2002….. During cross examination of PC James the Defendant claimed he had been stopped 34 times by the police. The Prosecutor made an admission under Section 10 of the Criminal Justice Act 1967 that the Defendant had been stopped on a number of occasions in the past and that he had no convictions for not having insurance. At the conclusion of the evidence of the prosecution the Defence declined to give evidence, and submitted that the evidence that he had been stopped in the past when linked to no previous convictions for not having insurance was sufficient to discharge the burden of proof, on the balance of probabilities, that he had a valid policy of insurance on this occasion too….. we found that in all likelihood Maurice Kirk had been the holder of a valid certificate of insurance at the time he was arrested and accordingly dismissed the case.

The Defendant applied for costs from central funds. We found the following facts: The Defendant was the holder of a valid certificate of insurance. The Defendant had had ample opportunity to show that certificate to the Prosecutor on the two previous occasions that he had appeared in Court and had chosen not to do so. When asked why he did not produce it he said that if the police knew who his insurance was they would take steps to ensure the company would cease to insure him.

We were of the opinion the Defendant had been in a position to stop the proceedings at any time by producing his insurance. He had chosen not to because of his antipathy to the police whom he wished to inconvenience by making them come to court and give evidence. Through his actions he had forced the hand of the Crown Prosecution Service into prosecuting the case and he had acted unreasonably in all the circumstances. Accordingly we did not allow the Defendant’s costs to be met from Central Funds”. (Bundle A3/4.283-285).
Mr Kirk’s pleaded case in relation to the incident of 21 May 2002, (quoted above), makes no claim in respect of prosecution on the charge of no insurance which was brought but later dismissed, doubtless because of the caustic terms of the case stated by the magistrates who dismissed the charge. 

The other charges laid by PC James against Mr Kirk were driving while disqualified, failing to produce a driving licence for examination by the police, and driving a vehicle in respect of which no MOT Certificate had been issued (charge sheet Bundle A3/4.245). Mr Kirk’s reply on being charged is recorded as “I don’t believe I’m a bad driver”, a charge sheet which on this occasion he signed (same reference A3/4.245).

PC James states that he conducted a tape recorded interview, and it is stated, in “Summary of Evidence” (which I find is likely to be a police document, being on ‘Form NG5’, as is the charge sheet) that the interview was by means of audio tape cassette with a reference CA/6381/02. That summary records that Mr Kirk denied being a disqualified driver during this interview (Bundle A3/4.246). “During interview Kirk admitted driving motor vehicle…. Kirk believed that he was not disqualified when driving the vehicle as he stated that he has been to court and has had the driving points, to which the disqualification relates, taken off” (record of interview Bundle A3/4.247).

As to the driving licence, in an unsigned statement, (it would appear made in 2002 for his solicitors for the purpose of pleading the case), Mr Kirk stated that he appeared in court next day and “offered my driving licence for all to see from the dock once the charges were read out” (Bundle A3/4.240). The record of interview written by PC James is less than a dozen lines long, and is devoted only to driving whilst disqualified. There is no record of the driving licence being produced to the police at the police station; but I find this unsurprising, in that in cross examination, Mr Kirk told me that it was from his pocket that he produced the licence “before he was released”, but that he had had it “in my sock. I often kept it in my sock. So it wouldn’t go walkabout”.

Two days after his release from custody, Mr Kirk wrote to South Wales Police at Cardiff Central police station stating “I require full custody records relating to the above incident [21 May 2002] to include the unexpurgated version of both the overhead video showing the incident at the scene in The Hayes and in the custody suite.” (A3/4.258). He pursued these requests by further letters dated 27 May 2002, 6 June 2002 and 14 August 2002 (Bundle A3/4.259, 260 and 269).

I do not have, in any of the Bundles, documents identifying the date when other charges were withdrawn or dismissed. It is at least an oddity that Mr Kirk should be charged with an offence of having no MOT certificate, when at A3/4.212 the custody record documents the property on Mr Kirk’s person as including an ‘MOT certificate’ (not further specified) (A3/4.212). The custody sergeant Linda Canterbury says in her witness statement that she cannot now [statement 22/08/2003] remember which vehicle that certificate referred to, but it is likely that it related to another vehicle; “I cannot now however remember any specific detail in this regard”. It was in fact PC 3227 Adrian Williams who carried out the search of Mr Kirk’s personal possessions as items of property. Asked in oral evidence by Mr Kirk why the search showed an MOT certificate when Mr Kirk was charged with having no MOT, his answer was “Were you really? I didn’t know”. PC James was the charging officer. In answer to myself, he could not help me with which vehicle the MOT Certificate was for, or for what dates.

In cross examination PC Williams said to Mr Kirk, “You were furious. I’d say you were very agitated, I remember you definitely expressed a sense of injustice that you were there”. “He said something like, I’m not disqualified, as if he’d been brought in for no reason.  It wouldn’t be the first time I’ve heard that, to be honest, it’s the PNC which is usually the determinative factor which tells us whether someone is disqualified or not”.

It is convenient first to turn to the evidence of PC Cocksey and PC Osbourne, who left Cardiff Central Police Station to go to The Hayes, where Mr Kirk was stopped.

According to PC Osbourne, in his witness statement, he was at Cardiff Central Police Station at about 14.00 hours

“when I viewed the CCTV which showed a VW van with large signs fitted to its sides. I saw that the vehicle kept turning around the statue roundabout situated on The Hayes at its junction with Hill Street. I was made aware that the driver was Mr Maurice Kirk. As a result of the above I had a conversation with Police Constable Cocksey and we then drove to The Hayes in a marked police van…” (paragraphs 4 and 5, Bundle A3/4.190, emphasis supplied).

His notebook is to the same effect, namely that he saw the CCTV showing the van and “was made aware” that the driver was Mr Maurice Kirk (Bundle 3/4.194). In oral evidence in chief, Mr Osbourne described the beginnings of this incident in neutral terms, “I became aware of a van with a sign being attached to it being driven in the city…. I became aware the driver was Mr Kirk with whom I’d dealt on a couple of occasions”.

The account of PC 3619 Cocksey is somewhat different. According to his witness statement, at 14.00 hours he was on duty in the parade room at Cardiff Central Police Station, parading officers who were about to come onto the afternoon duty, and as he did so,

“I saw a green Volkswagen Campervan pass by the side of the police station. As it did so PC 1215 Osbourne, who stood at the side entrance door of the parade room suddenly shouted out, “It’s the flying vet, Maurice Kirk driving that van. I’m sure he is a disqualified driver” (emphasis supplied). A few minutes later PC Osbourne entered the parade room and informed me that Mr Kirk was a disqualified driver. It is my understanding that PC Osbourne had conducted a Police National Computer check and as a result of that check it was believed that he was a disqualified driver. At about 14.10 hours… we became aware from the CCTV shown in the parade room that Mr Kirk was driving a green and white caravanette van [around the monument at The Hayes]. It was reported that he kept driving round and round the monument” (witness statement 1st November 2008 paragraphs 5-7 Bundle A3/4.175).

This closely follows what is set out in a witness statement dated 21 May 2002 itself, signed by PC Cocksey, who said in oral evidence that this would have been typed up “probably within an hour of the incident” (Bundle A3/4.183, and oral evidence 5 April 2013).

The apparent enthusiasm, (indeed excitement), here described by PC Cocksey rings true, when I consider the quite remarkable shortness of time which elapsed in the incident on 5th April 2000 before PC Osbourne, having alighted from his police vehicle, was smashing the window of Mr Kirk’s car. I am not revisiting the claim made by Mr Kirk in respect of that incident, which stands struck out, but the fact that only a very few seconds elapsed between alighting and smashing the window of Mr Kirk’s car on that occasion, two years earlier, is a free standing fact easily visible on the video recording, which I permitted to be adduced at trial, and which I watched being played.

That police overhead video in Newport Road catches PC Osbourne smashing car window assaulting and dragging the Appellant out, both unlawfully, but enough both sides of the cut tape to see it is doctored.
 It almost succeeded in obliterating the serious assault by Osbourne on an unsuspecting parked driver in a lawfully driven road worthy vehicle.

This, with other violent acts, like Inspector Khilberg again doing exactly the same thing in a second Llantwitt Major incident but, as with similar incidents, stuck out of the claims which this Claimant disputes.

Again, contrary to the management’s judge’s November 2008 disclosure, by sworn affidavit, that original un cut video has never been disclosed.

The account of PC Cocksey for the trial before me is that at The Hayes Monument he got out of the police vehicle and,

“Using a number 1 stop signal, that means that I raised my right hand with my palm towards the driver of the vehicle, I indicated for him to stop. [Para 9] It appeared to me that Mr Kirk, although driving at a relatively slow speed, about 2-5 miles per hour, was not going to stop. He was still driving towards me although I had offered the stop signal. [Para 10] As Mr Kirk approached I stepped to the offside of the vehicle, that was towards the driver’s side and I could see that the driver’s door window was fully open. Mr Kirk stared directly at me, the vehicle was still moving. Through the open window I could see the ignition keys so I reached in through the window and I switched the ignition off. This caused the vehicle to stall and come to a stop” (witness statement paragraphs 8-10 Bundle A3/4.176, emphasis supplied).

In oral evidence, Mr Kirk agreed PC Cocksey stepped in front of his van and held his arm up, but he did not agree that he failed to stop: “No. I stopped”. In his written statement, prepared on the day of the incident itself, Mr Cocksey had stated not that he had to stop Mr Kirk by reaching in to remove the ignition key, but “I then approached the campervan which was still moving at slow speed and on nearing the side of the van, I indicated to the driver who I then saw to be Mr Maurice Kirk, stop. He immediately stopped as requested and I then opened the drivers door and removed the ignition key….” (Bundle A3/4.183, emphasis supplied).

Insofar as it goes to credit, I am fully satisfied that Mr Kirk did not fail to stop at the roundabout when required to do so. On the very day of the incident PC Cocksey, recorded that Mr Kirk had stopped when indicated by himself to stop. I therefore do not accept that the vehicle was caused to stop by PC Cocksey performing some manoeuvre of reaching into the vehicle window to take away the ignition keys and thus causing the vehicle to stall. The account of a driver having failed to stop, even at very low speed, when driving towards a police officer would be prejudicial to judgment upon what the driver did that day, and raises obvious question as to PC Cocksey should have given that account in 2008, and why he maintained it in cross examination before me. I regret that there is no reasonable explanation for the discrepancy in his evidence.
However this account of failing to stop when driving towards the policeman played no part in the report to the custody sergeant, and it appears that it played no part in the custody sergeant’s decision to detain Mr Kirk.

In oral evidence, Mr Kirk put to both police officers that at the scene he was dragged from his van by Mr Cocksey, with unreasonable force. PC Osbourne told me repeatedly that he “literally” didn’t remember the mode of arrest, and illustratively when Mr Kirk put it to him that he had been dragged from his high van seat so as to strike the pavement said “whether you hit the road, I don’t remember. I believe there was a struggle, but I don’t remember”.

On the one hand, PC, (now PS) Cocksey told me that he had not met Mr Kirk before; the sequence of events suggested by him on PC Osbourne’s first sighting of Mr Kirk rings true; and there is no evidence to indicate that there had been prior direct dealing between Mr Kirk and himself. On the other hand, PS Cocksey’s account as to stopping, in the witness statement and oral evidence at trial, is unacceptably different from his contemporaneous account.

On a later incident Cocksey violently assaulted the Appellant at the public counter of the Cardiff County Court and then caused further police bullying by provoking a false imprisonment the length of which was only cut by the intervention of a senior police officer with no evidence offered of any offence. That incident has not been allowed to be heard, for compensation because it was obviously involved HMCS staff who saw it all.

The particulars of claim for civil damages, identifying this incident, is just one of many unlawfully stayed claims by this trial judge when this judgment indicates all allegations over 23 years should have been consolidated for the High Court’s early consideration.

In turn, the account of PC Osbourne, as he then was, was that “the vehicle failed to stop so I pulled the police van in front of the still circling VW van, causing it to stop. I saw PC Cocksey go to the driver’s side of the car” (Bundle A3/4.190, emphasis supplied) is yet again different to either Mr Kirk’s account or that given by PC Cocksey. On the balance of probabilities I respectfully prefer, and unhesitatingly adopt, the factual account of Mr Kirk of the stopping at the roundabout to that of the police officers.

“He would say that, wouldn’t he?”  (Mandy Rice-Davis, High Court circa 1963)
As to arrest at the scene, the critical question is what the state of mind of the arresting officers was. The notebook of PC Osbourne does not record enquiry of the Police National Computer while at Cardiff Central police station as to the status of Mr Kirk as a qualified or disqualified driver, but it does record “placed into the hands of custody staff. Crown Court Liaison/PC Caroline Hopkins re copy of disqualification” (Bundle A3/4.195, emphasis supplied). In his 2003 witness statement, Mr Osbourne states that when Mr Kirk was conveyed to Cardiff Central police station and taken before the custody sergeant, “I made enquiries with PC Caroline Hopkins of the Crown Court Liaison staff and I obtained from her a copy of a document showing that Mr Kirk was disqualified from driving. I handed this document to PC Cocksey….” (witness statement paragraph 10 Bundle A3/4.191).

The summary of evidence on Form MG5 (see above) stated that, after PC Osbourne’s initial shouting out that it was the flying vet, “A few minutes later, after PC Osbourne had carried out a PNC check on Kirk, PC Osbourne re-entered the parade room at Cardiff Central Police Station and informed Acting Sergeant 3619 Cocksey that Kirk was still shown on the PNC as being a disqualified driver” (Bundle A3/4.246).

No document has been produced before me such as Mr Osbourne states he obtained from PC Caroline Hopkins; and the witness statements of Mr Cocksey make no reference to receiving a document from PC Osbourne, (compare PC Osbourne witness statement paragraph 10 referred to above). However the notebook of PC Osbourne does record contact with Caroline Hopkins in respect of disqualification (see quotation above).

I will shortly turn to the evidence of PS Linda Canterbury, but there is relevant and in my view important evidence given by PS Geoffrey Roberts who took over as custody sergeant for the 7.00pm tour of duty. At paragraph 20, he states that Mr Kirk spoke to him asking why he was still in custody, and at paragraph 21 “it is unusual to have a person of Mr Kirk’s qualifications and education in custody and I do have a great deal of respect for him and the work that he does. I therefore promised him that I would double check the records in relation to his disqualification, which I did. I discovered that he was a disqualified driver by the Courts and I further discovered earlier that day a lady from the Crown Court Liaison Department had obtained a document directly from the Crown Court confirming that Mr Kirk’s disqualification was still in being.” (Bundle 3/4.226, emphasis supplied). This was not challenged at trial.  This is consistent with the correspondence from Cardiff Magistrates’ Court, which records on 20 May 2002 the guilty plea entered by Mr Kirk in respect of no insurance on 5.4.2000 being vacated by the District Judge on 20 May 2002, all endorsements relating to that matter being therefore removed with immediate effect, and quite separately on 22 May 2002 District Judge Morgan using his powers to remove disqualification imposed by the Crown Court (respectively Bundle A3/4.186 and 188). This was, of course, after Mr Kirk had been detained overnight at Cardiff Central police station and produced to the court on 21 May 2002.
For completeness, I record that leading counsel for the Defendant showed PC Cocksey a Crown Court disqualification form at A2/6.270, which shows disqualification to run from 11 April 2002, but he did not recollect if this was the document referred to in notes of the Magistrates Court hearing of 13 August 2002.  He said that it was the type of document the female liaison officer would be able to get hold of.

The custody sergeant on the day of arrest was PS Canterbury. In the custody record, circumstances of arrest and grounds for detention are recorded as “14.42 Central arrest: The DP has been arrested for driving whilst disqualified….seen driving around and around the monument… was observed on camera and a PNC check was carried out and the DP was recognised as a disq. driver. Checks were made and the DP was arrested” (A3/4.204, emphasis supplied). The witness statement of Mr James states that at 16.00 hours he spoke with Acting Sergeant Cocksey who “showed me a document, which was the result of a Court appeal by Mr Kirk, showing that he had been banned from driving for 6 months commencing on 11 April 2002. He was also shown on the Police National Computer as being a disqualified driver”. (A3/4.197).

The system in being at that time appears profoundly unsatisfactory to me. It exposed a driver to the risk of being stopped and detained for driving while disqualified, where the underlying reason for his disqualification had been removed. However in law he remains disqualified until by order of the court the disqualification is removed.  Thus the driver remains at risk of being stopped on suspicion of driving while disqualified. There ought to be a system or mechanism which ensured that a driver is not a risk of being stopped, and/or detained when the underlying reason for disqualification has been removed by court order. However I find on the balance of probabilities that as of 20 and 21 May 2002 the DVLA record would have recorded Mr Kirk as being disqualified: see the letter Cardiff Magistrates court addressed to the DVLA dated 22 May 2002 above which shows that it was only on that date that the disqualification was removed. The DVLA record would have been corrected only after receipt of that letter; and this independently corroborates the police evidence of what they received by way of information on enquiry.

In his undated statement, probably of 2002, Mr Kirk says, “As I left the Cardiff Magistrates Court on 20 May 2002 after District Judge Ms Watkins reinstated my driving licence (sic) I stopped and refused to go any further until I had the assurance that the CPS would notify all the police in the area and the other courts that I was entitled to drive AND I would not drive until I had a fax from the Court in confirmation” (Bundle A3/4.240). There is no evidence that such a fax was sent or received; from Mr Kirk or elsewhere; the manuscript notes of Mrs Kirstie Kirk record “a letter drafted – obviously had not received” (A3/4.173H) . Unless some such step were taken to notify those responsible for the Police National Computer, the PNC would continue to show Mr Kirk as a disqualified driver. PS Geoffrey Roberts was called to give oral evidence, but his evidence (namely that ‘he discovered earlier that day a lady from the Crown Court Liaison Department had obtained a document directly from the Crown Court confirming that Mr Kirk’s disqualification was still in being’) was not challenged.

I have reflected on all of the evidence. On the balance of probability, and on the totality of the evidence, I find it more likely than not that (a) the PNC was consulted by PC Osbourne before he and PC Cocksey left the Cardiff Central Police Station and that (b) after Mr Kirk was arrested and taken to the police station a later and further check was made with a Liaison Officer to the Crown Court which respectively (i) still showed Mr Kirk as a disqualified driver, and (ii) did not reveal that at the Magistrates Court the step had been taken which would lead inevitably to a disqualification being set aside.

In making this finding, I have relied first and foremost on the evidence of other police officers: PS Geoffrey Roberts, the record of disqualification which was at the time on the PNC, the contemporaneous correspondence from Cardiff Magistrates’ court, and the contemporaneous entry in the notebook of PC Osbourne in relation to the female police liaison officer, rather than the witness evidence of PC Cocksey or PC Osbourne alone, each of whom I found most unimpressive as witnesses. The accounts of these two officers as to the stopping itself of Mr Kirk’s vehicle in the Hayes are, with the exception of PC Cocksey’s contemporaneous witness statement of 21 May 2002, conspicuously not acceptable.

By August 2002 when the contested hearing took place at the Magistrates Court, the question of driving whilst disqualified was no longer live (see eg prosecution note at A3/4.265).

It follows that the claim for unlawful arrest cannot succeed. The arresting officers did in fact honestly suspect Mr Kirk of committing the offence of driving while disqualified, and on the basis of the information available to them there were reasonable grounds to support that suspicion.

At trial Mr Kirk did not pursue criticism of the custody officers for his detention (as opposed to the actions of the arresting officers). Nonetheless I should briefly consider their actions because the pleaded case is, in general terms, “unlawfully arrested and detained in custody on motoring allegations”. PS Linda Canterbury, according to evidence which was not challenged, (and which is mirrored in the custody record at A3/4.207), was willing to bail Mr Kirk with conditions that he was not to drive a vehicle but he stated that he would sign the bail only under duress; she therefore believed that if bailed he would drive again, and she remanded him in custody to prevent further offences being committed (custody record A3/4.207 at 18.02, 18.03). The same view was taken by PS Roberts on his taking over (custody record A3/4.208 at 19.12) and on review shortly before 4 am (A3/4.210 at 03.57). Each custody officer had, in these circumstances, power to detain Mr Kirk and in the absence of anything to show that contrary to the PNC record Mr Kirk was not (or was no longer) disqualified it is not possible to argue that the decision to detain was Wednesbury unreasonable.

There is no claim alleged of malicious prosecution

But there is for overarching repetition of such conduct over 23 years of police bullying.  



Retired Inspector  Howard Davies Spite repeated in RCVS Trial

  1. Action 1 claim 8.16 re-arrest 9 August 1994 for alleged damage to wing mirror. This is on the same day as the preceding incident. The pleaded claim is that Mr Kirk was the subject of unlawful arrest, that he was wrongfully charged with criminal damage and that he was unlawfully detained in custody between 13.00 and 16.00 or thereabouts.
  1. It is helpful first of all to set out the factual background. Almost as soon as Mr Kirk was released from custody he went via the police station car park to a security door, and as Inspector Davies opened it to leave the police station Mr Kirk brushed past him and entered the secure area. He was in search of his dog, Molly. In short, Mr Kirk had to be physically forced out of the police station, initially being restrained by Mr Davies who was then assisted by DC Vennors.
  1. To put it neutrally, Mr Kirk was consumed by intense physical determination to resist removal, in pursuit of his wish urgently to remove his dog from conditions where he thought her at risk of infection where waif and stray dogs were sometimes kept. I do not relate the detail, from witness statements or oral evidence, because there is in essence no difference in the account of Mr Kirk, Mr Davies, or Mr Vennors as to the physical circumstances; subject to this, that Mr Kirk told me that Mr Davies “was having fun, he was baiting” whereas Mr Davies told me that the situation was all of Mr Kirk’s own making. Mr Kirk did not dispute that his re-entry by the security door was some 6 minutes after his release on bail. If, as he says in his witness statement of 15 November 1994, at first he had waited his turn in the foyer to speak to the enquiry clerks about his dog (A1/4.36I) then it is plain that he had not waited very long.

This is yet another police provoking incident of typical spite mentality with the usual bullying in a vain attempt to cause their victim to either just close the palm of his hand and/or lift an arm, sufficient to guarantee an assault conviction (not jury eligible), while laughingly indicating a deliberate initial delay for the release of his gun dog. Delay only now cut short by the Appellant’s unrepentant actions.

A not dissimilar tactic to the second 22nd June 2009 police unit, this time unarmed, to provoke their victim by their surrounding his wife and 10 year old daughter, Genevieve, at their home with admitted intention of taking their daughter into Vale of Glamorgan Council care. Kirstie was faced with a police pre prepared MG11 witness statement to sign citing a history of perceived mental abhorrations sufficient to have him legally sectioned to avoid the deliberately delayed machine-gun jury trial for yet another longer incarceration whist their victim was unconvicted.

The main police purpose was to further delay this civil trial to allow witnesses to move away or die off, vital documents to go missing and memories for both parties to fade.

The initial police Trojan unit, via helicopter and six plus police vehicles (twenty four officers were counted) Barbara Wilding knew was doomed for failure from the very start but provoked by Dolmans solicitors laying false allegations, anything to make money for their planned new premises in the centre of Cardiff.

After it was found the police had painted the WWI decommissioned antique, first bolted to his Replica 1916 DH2 biplane, to try and fool the jury he was later further tricked and found guilty and fined £50 for ‘attempting to shoot the Lord Mayor’ with it.

  1. Neither Mr Davies nor Mr Vennors suggested that Mr Kirk physically assaulted either of them, rather that he braced himself rigidly, first trying to hold onto a hand rail against removal. I am satisfied that he was impatient, demanding, intransigent, and difficult. I see no reason to doubt that Mr Davies told Mr Kirk, when he first went in, “You can’t come in this entrance, Mr Kirk” and shortly afterwards, “You can’t go this way. Go back to the front foyer and sort it out there” (Mr Davies witness statement A1/4.57). In evidence before me, the whole demeanour of Mr Kirk was that he was entitled to disregard the police secure custody area arrangements. I consider it likely that Mr Kirk was in a temper when he entered the police station by this door. Conversely, he describes Mr Davies as “angry, very angry”. I suspect he was, and understandably so, faced with the intemperate behaviour of Mr Kirk.
  1. Whilst the witness statement of Mr Kirk refers to “assault” by Inspector Davies, and his letter of 10 August 1994 states he wishes to make a complaint of “assault” by Inspector Davies ( A1/4.139), the pleaded allegation is as recited above, that he was unlawfully arrested and the subject of an unlawful charge of criminal damage.
  1. The pleaded allegation is that “As the Plaintiff left the police station and went to his car on the 9th August 1994 he was stopped and pushed by one of the Defendant’s police officers”. This is plainly incorrect. However this is a pleading drafted by solicitors, and it is not what Mr Kirk set out in his statement of 15 November 1994 (or in his witness statement of 19 June 2009 which deals with this in the two paragraphs 581-582 at A1/4.36C). The Particulars of Claim allege that after he was pushed by one of the Defendant’s police officers, “he was immediately re-arrested upon an unlawful charge of criminal damage at 1:00pm. He was released at 4:00pm. The charge of criminal damage was subsequently withdrawn”.
  1. In more detail it is pleaded that Mr Kirk “was manhandled by one Inspector Davies and pushed or dragged onto the door of the coroner’s officer car coming into contact with the door mirror” and that “he was unlawfully detained in custody between 13:00 and 16:00 hours or thereabouts”. He was in fact in detention for broadly that period: the custody record shows that he was arrested at 13:02 hours; that at 13:20 the custody sergeant noted the earlier record of Dr Baig suggesting he be x-rayed; that at 15:20 Mr Kirk was taken to Barry Accident Unit for x-ray returned at 16:07; and that he was released at 16:10 hours (A1/4.129 to 131).
  1. The Defence pleads the factual detail of trying to remove Mr Kirk from the police station and then asserts that “eventually the officers were able to take the Plaintiff out of the building. The Plaintiff continued to struggle violently. He then struck the wing mirror of the motor vehicle belonging to the coroner. The wing mirror fell to the floor in several pieces. Chief Inspector Davies then arrested the Plaintiff for criminal damage. Subsequently the wing mirror was put back together, whereupon the Plaintiff was released having been informed that no further action would be taken. At all material times the police officer had reasonable cause to suspect that the Plaintiff had committed an arrestable offence”.
  1. In his witness statement of November 1994 Mr Kirk states that “clearly the 2 policemen had lost their tempers… I was dragged out… when we got to the custody suite Inspector Davies said “Book him for criminal damage and lock him up”. The Inspector refused to give further details saying that it could be dealt with by the next shift at 2 o’clock. It was still only about 1 o’clock”. In oral evidence, Mr Kirk told me that Mr Davies lost his temper and “he caused the minor damage to the car by his actions not mine”; it was Mr Davies who was the belligerent officer. He stressed the words “lock him up”. In cross examination, he said that he was deliberately pushed against the car, by Mr Davies, not by the other officer. “He pushed me, not threw me, he pushed me violently”. As to the mirror of the car, he told me that he never saw it, that it was one of those folding types, but “I can’t say yes or no” to whether the mirror on the car was broken.
  1. As to matters once Mr Kirk was removed outside the police station door, the account of Mr Davies is that “at this stage Kirk was walking backwards but still leaning forwards pushing and struggling against myself and my colleague. I still had hold of one arm and DC Vennors had hold of the other arm. As we passed the coroner’s vehicle Kirk was still struggling violently and tumbled against the coroner’s vehicle hitting the wing mirror, which then fell to the floor in several pieces” (witness statement A1/4.108 paragraph 9). He arrested Mr Kirk for criminal damage, cautioned him and escorted him up the stairs to the custody suite, Mr Kirk at one point stopping and appearing to deliberately fall backwards. [Mr Kirk dissented from ‘deliberately falling’ but did remember clenching his fists and saying “that’s all you people understand”]. Mr Davies says that he returned via the car park and noted “that the wing mirror appeared to be badly damaged lying in pieces on the ground” (emphasis supplied). At about 4.00pm he met in the car park with PS Kendall, PC Crabtree and PC Ruth Wells “who were attempting to repair the broken wing mirror. After several minutes of trying to place the pieces back together to see precisely what was broken and or missing it suddenly sprang back into place” (paragraph 12). He then instructed Sergeant Kendall to release Mr Kirk with no further action to be taken.
  1. I have no statement from PCs Crabtree or Ruth Wells. In his statement, Mr Vennors says “as we got Mr Kirk outside into the car park and moved him a short distance from the door, part of Mr Kirk’s body, the middle part, struck a wing mirror on a car door. At this time we still had hold of him trying to restrain him but he still continued to struggle and resist. I can’t remember much about the mirror, I can’t remember if it fell to the floor but all I remember is hearing a cracking sound. At this point Inspector Davies told Mr Kirk that he was arresting him for causing criminal damage”. In oral evidence, Mr Vennors did not dissent from the proposition that the wing mirror was pushed backwards: it was Mr Kirk’s actions which caused that by struggling with himself and Mr Davies, but he would say that Mr Kirk did not do it intentionally: if he had thought that he would have noted it in his notebook.
  1. Mr Davies spoke of Mr Kirk being known to him. Of some interest, Mr Vennors, asked about the general view in the police station of Mr Kirk, said he had heard as a passing remark, “Not to be disrespectful, but he was a bit of a pain in the arse – of a difficult nature” and he thought he was made aware of “many many” incidents of contact between Mr Kirk and the police.

“Many, many incidents”

  1. Police Sergeant Kendall, the Custody Sergeant from 2:00pm, noted in the custody record “Maurice Kirk arrested at 13:02 hours by A/C Insp Davies for an offence of criminal damage caused after Kirk was seen in the station yard and having refused to leave fell against a motor vehicle parked in the station causing damage to a wing mirror [emphasis supplied] …. 13:10 notification rights no reply personal details refused – Mr Kirk refuses to speak at this time; and at 16:10, “while examining the damage – vehicle subject of this event the mirror was able to be replaced and no apparent damage had been caused [emphasis supplied]. These window [illegible word] have a design feature enabling them to be pushed back. Accused informed of this and released NFA”. Mr Kendall told me in oral evidence that the information in the entry at 16:10 would have been given to him by another officer; but he told me that it became apparent to him that there was no damage on the vehicle, no glass was broken and the mirror could be put back.
  1. It will be seen that Mr Davies says that the mirror had fallen to the floor in several pieces. (i) If Mr Davies’ account is correct that the wing mirror fell to the floor in several pieces it is at least odd that the mirror “suddenly sprang back into place”. (ii)  If it had fallen to the floor in pieces, in my view it is strongly probable view that Mr Vennors would have noticed that; but he did not, and he does not suggest that it was broken in pieces. (iii) Mr Davies says that PS Kendall was present with PC Crabtree and PC Ruth Wells (from whom I have no statements) when the mirror sprang back into place: Mr Kendall gives, and gave, no account of re-assembling parts which had fallen from the wing mirror, or of the mirror springing back into place, and he told me that it became apparent to him that there was no damage – not that there had been damage but damage which it proved possible to repair. (iv) The entry in the custody record (“have a design feature enabling them to be pushed back”) suggests that it was straightforward to push the mirror back. (v) I note that when Mr Kirk was making formal complaint, in November 1994, he stated that the wing mirror clicked outwards but did not come off the car and that he could see the mirror and its mounting was not damaged. (vi) It would be odd, if there were a complete answer to this in the efforts of PC Crabtree and PC Ruth Wells, that there was and is no note, or witness statement, or explanation of difficulty in tracing them.

The classic example of a pragmatic busy custody police sergeant, PS Kendall, ‘taking it in the neck’ ever since for acting responsibly contrary to an irate inspector in charge of Barry police station following the collapse of yet more motoring prosecutions. Davies was intent on further promotion for his fast approaching retirement pension.

  1. Mr Davies’ demeanour in giving evidence as a witness was extremely wary. I am careful not to attach undue importance to the demeanour of a witness. Equally I take no account of Mr Kirk’s complaint that he was assaulted by Mr Davies in an incident at the Vale of Glamorgan Show some years later, because the claim in respect of that incident has been struck out. Nonetheless, in the light of the evidence and observations set out above, I find Mr Davies’ account of the mirror failing to pieces improbable. In oral evidence, Mr Davies said that the decision to detain Mr Kirk was that of the custody sergeant, but he also said that he did not remember whether he did or did not say “lock him up”. I am satisfied that he did say that, and that he did so in anger and temper, outraged by the intemperate stance of Mr Kirk at and within the secure door of the police station.

Stuck out? Prosecuting barrister at the 2002 RCVS hearing, to obtain the Appellant’s name being removed from the veterinary register for life, wrote to the court stating Howard had ‘struck the first blow’ before Mr Kirk was successfully convicted, for life, for simply brushing the arm off   his shoulder of a huge security guard who had then been called to run down the slope to knock the appellant, from behind, to the ground.

The outcome of any summary prosecution of ‘common assault’ in Bridgend or Cardiff magistrates had the notoriety of favouring the South Wales Police and in this case both CPS and police custody records needed to be changed by then cutody officer, the recurrent Sgt Rice in these three Actions, from a ‘Breach of the Peace’ type arrest.

In that initial hearing, before the Appellant’s un noticed secretary, owing to the forged ‘information laid the appellant was denied the opportunity to plead guilty to a BOP allegation as the CPS file was withheld from the Their Worships.

  1. Mr Kirk can have no complaint about being forcibly removed from the secure area of the police station. He was acting with lordly contempt, oblivious of what any reasonable member of the public would and should have done. I am not entirely without sympathy for Mr Davies’ anger. However I find on the strong balance of probability that in fact all that had happened was Mr Kirk fell against the wing mirror and it was pushed back, it had not fallen to the floor in pieces, and the absence of real damage could and should have been established by Mr Davies or other officers almost immediately afterwards. I am not in a position safely to conclude on the balance of probability that he did in fact establish that immediately afterwards; but in my judgment, even allowing for the margin of appreciation to be allowed to a police officer, Mr Davies did not have reasonable cause to suspect that Mr Kirk had committed an arrestable offence proper and the decision to arrest was not one which was within the wide ambit of permissible discretion in the Wednesbury sense. It follows that the Defendant has not shown that his detention from 13.02 to 16.10 was lawful and that there was unlawful arrest.
  1. Mr Kirk was not ever charged with malicious damage, and so the claim for malicious prosecution fails.
  1. This is not an occasion which arose out of police conspiracy. It arose out of Mr Kirk’s own intemperate actions, and his patrician contempt for the ordinary and reasonable restriction of the public from entering certain parts of the police station.   



3]    DRAFT

1. Action 1 claim 8.5 24th March 1993 stopped by PC Jane Lott.

The allegation is that on 24 March 1993 “the Defendant maliciously and without reasonable and probable cause stopped the Plaintiff outside his hospital and reported him for various alleged offences and laid an information before local Magistrates” for having a tyre with insufficient tread. “The Defendant knew that no examination of the tyre took place in the presence of the Plaintiff and his passenger and that the Defendant knowingly altered the HORT 1 to pervert the course of justice after the motorists copy had been issued”.

1. The Defence is that PC Jane Lott was driving in Church Road, Barry when she noticed an oncoming Ford Escort car which appeared not to be displaying a vehicle excise licence; she turned round and followed the vehicle until it stopped at Tynewydd Road; the Plaintiff was reluctant to answer questions; the police officer examined the vehicle and observed that one of the tyres appeared to have “insufficient” tread. It is denied that PC Lott falsified any document or evidence. It is further denied that she acted unlawfully or that the mattbers complained of give rise to the alleged or any cause of action.

A pattern of again falsifying police documents, to obtain a conviction for their ’bread and butter’, that only luckily failed to succeed in that the appeal judge held a private pilot’s licence. Barry police followed their regular clandestine night examination of the Appellant’s veterinary vehicles all parked outside his surgery, over a part worn tyre, that had already been changed before the date of this incident.

The unfair passage of time caused the 24/7 surveillance evidence, on oath by the Appellant, being devoid of corroboration by his own secretary in attending, living retired some many years abroad, to attend the hearing.

Demise of one witness and disappearance of two more plus the fact it would have been the ‘kiss of death’ for the Appellant’s income should 24/7 of the surgery, later veterinary hospital, been known to his other clients.  

1. It is common ground that PC Lott issued an HORT 1 form to Mr Kirk at the roadside. Following that, a summons was issued. It is common ground that Mr Kirk was driving the Ford Escort vehicle 54925 (it being a Channel Islands registration); that Mr Scott Parry, a young trainee veterinary nurse, was in the passenger seat of the car while it was being driven; and that the car came to a stop outside Mr Kirk’s veterinary surgery in Barry.

1. As I will relate, it is clear that after the initial conversation between PC Lott and Mr Kirk at his car window, Mr Parry got out and made trips from the car into the surgery to carry items from the car into the surgery.

When both Appellant and veterinary nurse, Mr Parry, gave evidence that Lott had pulled up alongside, abreast, approached the driver’s window and immediately referred to both tax disc and rear tyre, unable to have been seen from where she admitted standing, did the Crown Court judge find in the Appellant’s acquittal.

Family have since asked the obvious whether the current civil court judge, who adjudicated on more than one of these incidents in current civil claims, had been sitting on the Lott Appeal would the Claimant have been acquitted?

Mr Parry’s hand written statement, made almost immediately after the incident, was never ever shown again to him again during the lapse of 20 years to prove the point.

In nearly all motoring incidents South Wales Police always attempted to refer to any Guernsey motorcycles, a van or various cars as Jersey registered deliberately, it is submitted, to avoid observation by successive welsh courts that Barry police, including LLantwitt Major & Cowbridge sub stations, appeared to have a singularly close interest in the Appellant’s welfare originating from Guernsey since 1993.

A still outstanding warrant for his arrest on the Bailiwick was tested by his deliberately visiting St Peter Port central police station, some years ago, when attempting, it appeared, to be applying for asylum. No such arrest was forthcoming.

Some alleged failure by the Appellant to attend Guernsey for some minor public order allegation, doomed with the previously sixteen similarly spurious charges in a row, Barry police had propagated to justify for 24/7 surveillance culminating in their quarry later being registered as a most rare MAPPA 3/3 victim.

1. In terms of prosecution, the procedural history is as follows. On 30th March 1993 Mr Kirk attended Barry Police Station where force civilian clerk Clare (then) Reohorn recorded that he had produced his licence, and an insurance certificate (which Miss Reohorn recorded as “also covers policy held to drive any other vehicle not owned by policyholder”) (A1/1.89).

. By late May it must have been intended that the tyre matter be prosecuted, since on 31st May 1993 PC Lott made a handwritten section 9 statement (A1/1.94). A summons was issued on 28th June 1993 for having one tyre with insufficient tread (A1/1.96).

1. Mr Kirk having pleaded not guilty, the matter was tried at the Barry Magistrates Court on 11th October 1993 when both Mr Kirk and PC Lott gave evidence. It seems more likely, on his own evidence, that Mr Parry was not called to give evidence on that occasion. On 25th October 1993, dealing with sentence, the magistrates imposed a disqualification from driving for 6 months but suspended it pending appeal (A1/1.110). Mr Kirk lodged handwritten Notices of Appeal both on 11th October 1993 and 25th October 1993 (A1/1.113 and 115). The appeal was heard by His Honour Judge Burr and magistrates at Cardiff Crown Court on 17 December 1993 when appeal against conviction was allowed.

1. In his witness statement of 19 June 2009 Mr Kirk states that he saw the female police officer driving (at speed) in the opposite direction to himself but that as he and his passenger arrived at his surgery in Tynewydd Road Barry, and he was about to get out, the same police car pulled up alongside and PC Lott quickly alighted. “[She] came directly to me, still sitting in the driver’s seat. She immediately stated I had no tax and that I had a damaged non-roadworthy tyre. I found this amazing because this was all said without her walking sufficiently around to the front of the car to even see the windscreen or walk to the rear of the car to examine the tyres” (paragraphs 442, 443 A1/1.63B). He states that it was obvious to him that the car had been examined before, “by the police surveillance team, one night, who checked up with Guernsey as to whether the tax was up to date”. In his witness statement, Mr Kirk says that after the conversation at the window of his car the police woman only then went to the front of the car, as if having forgotten, quickly glanced “and never even stooped once to examine the tyre” (para 449).

1. Mr Kirk states that at the Crown Court Appeal, PC Lott “in the face of the Court, had produced her HORT 1 carbon copy significantly different to the original retained by me, my having experienced so many such falsified police documents in the past….. the police officer between Magistrates hearing and Crown Court had altered her written records and was made to admit it, tape recorded. The judge seriously rebuked her” (paragraphs 484 and 485).

1. In her witness statement of 28 February 2000 Ms Lott (by then Sergeant 4059 Lott) states that she was unable to locate her official pocket book in that when she transferred from the Traffic Department, certain pocket books were mislaid including this one. She saw the Ford Escort motor car driving towards her; her attention was drawn to it because it was not displaying a vehicle excise licence and looked in a poor state of repair; as a result she turned and followed and pulled in when it stopped. Mr Kirk was obstructive in his manner from the time that she started to talk to him; initially he did not answer questions with regard to the ownership of the vehicle but did eventually tell her that it was owned by Marianne, refusing to give her the address. In particular she states on getting out of her vehicle and speaking to Mr Kirk she indicated that she had stopped him as no tax had been displayed, and went through the normal procedure namely requesting driving licence and insurance; she then checked the vehicle “including tyres by walking round the vehicle”; and that this was her normal practice on stopping a vehicle. She remembered indicating to Mr Kirk a defective tyre on the vehicle. She could not remember what he said to her or whether he even looked at her or acknowledged that the tyre was defective. During her dealings with Mr Kirk his demeanour “was of non cooperation, bordering on being offensive”. Having reported Mr Kirk, she then continued her duties. She states that with an HORT 1 form, the top copy is given to the motorist, with another two carbon copies retained. “If there are any other relevant details then I will write these at the side of the other copies”.

Was it convenient for police to ‘mislay’ contemporaneous reord in the light of His Honour Judge Burr’s castigation?

1. At page A1/1.87 is a copy of the HORT form issued on this occasion. In evidence before me, Mrs Lott (she retired as a police officer in August 2010) told me that this was the carbonated copy, retained by her, of which she could be sure because it was a matter of course for her at the time to make any notes around the carbonated copy, “every time I stopped a vehicle”, if there was a defective tyre identified. At page A1/1.88 is a copy of the HORT 1 form issued on that occasion, which appears to be the top copy given to Mr Kirk. It identifies under “defects found”, “rear O/S tyre”.

1. On the copy of the form, at A1/1.87, there is handwriting which does not appear on A1/1.88, namely at the top there is written “Def tyre no VEL” and at the side “no markings”. In her section 9 witness statement, she had described the tyre as “devoid of tread”. Her evidence to me was clear that this was not a case of a worn tyre, but one which was bald. She did not measure the tyre because “if there is no tread at all, you don’t need to”. Asked whether a rectification ticket was issued, she was unsure of the year when such forms were introduced and said “if it’s borderline, you would consider a VDR, but this tyre was bald”. I note that she was then attached to the traffic department at Eastern Traffic Sector.
2. She told me that this vehicle looked an older car, in a poor state of repair, that she was an experienced traffic officer at the time and “you see no vehicle licence and quite often you find there’s no documents [i.e., if you stop the driver]”. In his own evidence later, Mr Kirk was surprised that he had given the police officer so much detail, such as the name of the registered keeper Marianne Fanshawe, but he did not challenge that he had done so, and it is clear he did since it is written on the copy of the HORT 1 form itself (see A1/1.87).

1. It was put to her that Mr Kirk’s passenger said that she had not even gone to the front of the car, answering “obviously when you stopped I could see that there was no excise licence displayed”, in that she did not accuse Mr Kirk of not having a vehicle licence but asked about the vehicle licence, and, “after, I asked about the tyre”. She said that at no time was she the subject of direct criticism addressed to her by the judge and she did not remember a complaint being made against her after the event. (There is no transcript of what the judge may have said in allowing the appeal).

She lied. His Honour Judge Burr had castigated her for altering the HORT 1 between magistrates conviction and Crown Court just as did this same civil court judge when another similarly minded Barry police officer was caught at the subsequent criminal appeal for an incident not a stone’s throw away from Lott’s high speed U turn to give chase on the unsuspecting motorist.

The Claimant had the habit of reserving evidence of corruption for inevitable Crown Court appeals as they were the only courts of record. When denied his own tape recording, with clerk of the court’s note invariably being denied him if there was even the slightest whiff of police impropriety.

The Appellant’s very high rate of success in Guernsey’s summary hearings, angering their local police, was only because he could produce transcripts at the appeals, if needed, despite their permanent jury, many of which were magistrates, were part voted on by the Bailiwick’s magistrate’s prosecutors.

1. I heard evidence from Mr Scott Parry. He was the passenger. At the time, he was a very young man, a trainee veterinary nurse. This incident was on 24 March 1993 and the HORT 1 form records the time when stopped as being 13:50 hours. At A1/1.63F there is a statement, handwritten by Mr Parry, with written at its foot “24.3.93 3pm”. He told me that after the initial conversation between the police officer and Mr Kirk, he left the car. (“To be honest, I was quite concerned, as a young person, with the police being involved and I did not want to be any part of it”). He did not remember whether he was then taking things in and out of the surgery, but thought it possible. (The evidence of Mr Kirk and Mrs Lott is that he was doing so). He told me that when Mr Kirk was coming into the surgery, after the stop, he was asked by Mr Kirk do you remember what you heard? “Good. Go straight back in and write it down”, and that he did so.

1. The statement of ‘24.3.93’ reads “Mr Kirk and myself were driving at a slow speed, close behind another car along the Church Road. The police car with a policewoman driving and no passengers drove past us at a steady speed without looking at our car. As Mr Kirk and myself pulled alongside the veterinary practice the same police car drove up from behind and pulled alongside our car. The policewoman got out of her car and came straight to the driver’s door and declared that Mr Kirk had no tax. She did not lean to look at the tax disc nor the damaged tyre”.

1. In oral evidence, his recollection was that the police officer pulled in behind them and then came straight to the driver’s door and Mr Kirk’s window. He agreed that there may have been conversation between the police officer and Mr Kirk during the time that he was taking things in and out of the surgery and he might have missed some of that conversation. Such is in my view illustrated, in that he did not remember hearing any enquiry about ownership of the car [“definitely not”] or that it belonged to a Marianne Fanshawe. As to the time when the police officer drove past [“without looking at our car”] he agreed that he couldn’t say that she did not look towards their car [“absolutely not”]. He acknowledged that his statement of the time had referred to the police car pulling “alongside”, not behind their car, and said that that must be correct; he did not remember that in great detail. Asked whether he saw whether she went to the rear of the car he answered “No. She went to the window, they had a conversation, and then I left”.

1. Mr Kirk, on his own evidence, did not call Mr Parry as a witness at the magistrates’ court. In cross-examination, he put to Mrs Lott “He didn’t give evidence at the magistrates’ as I wanted to lose so I could have you.  I keep my witnesses for appeal cases to show the deceitfulness of people like you”. It is an unusual stance.

Police harassment was ‘unusual and extreme’ since December 1992 when accused of burning out his beloved WW2 piper cub aircraft that was not even insured.

1. For the record, Mrs Lott said in her witness statement that she was led to believe that the young man who had given evidence at the Magistrates Court also gave his evidence at the appeal and that this differed from what he had said on that occasion (witness statement paragraph 18 A1/1.69).  Nothing placed before me supports the assertion that he had done so. 

1. If there was ever a witness who was transparently honest, it was Mr Parry. He was anxious to confine himself to that which he had, not that which he had not, observed. He agreed that the initial enquiry might have been, not about not having tax, but about not displaying a tax disc [“quite possibly”]. He agreed that he had left to take things in to the surgery. He adhered to his evidence that the policewoman did not lean to look at the tax disc nor the damaged tyre while he was there.

So how could this incident fall in favour of the defence?

1. In oral evidence, Mr Kirk did not have any command of the detail of his complaints to the police after this incident. I therefore myself directed his attention to them one by one. By letter dated 26 October 1993 he wrote to the ‘Chief Police Officer, Barry Police Station’ complaining of a number of incidents recently involving his arrest and detention, and stating “I have been to see Inspector Trigg on a number of occasions concerning harassment and still certain officers under your control persist in squandering the tax payers money hoping to gain early promotion. Last week for example a WPC Lott or Stott blatantly lied to the Court saying that I had a totally bald rear tyre. When did you last see a local businessman driving a car with a bald tyre as opposed to an illegal tread?” (A1/1.97, this clearly being a reference to the evidence of PC Lott at Barry Magistrates Court on 11 October 1993).

1. I further directed his attention to a formal record of complaint dated 28.10.1993, recorded by Inspector Coliandris of Barry Police Station on 28 October 1993 on his attendance in person at that station. On re-reading it, he told me that it was a “pretty good summary” of his weekly complaints. “Mr Kirk is making complaints at two levels: Firstly he is alleging some sort of ‘conspiracy between police officers to target him and to prosecute and to harass his staff. He claims he has ‘inside’ information [i.e. from inside the job and from ‘gossip’ overheard by his acquaintances of what officers have been overheard to say off duty] that local police are mounting a campaign against him. He states he has information in this respect but is not ready at this time to disclose it. More specifically, Mr Kirk refers to an incident which occurred believed in Barry in March of this year. On this occasion he was stopped by PC Lott who was driving a traffic vehicle. Mr Kirk was subsequently reported for a defective tyre offence and appeared at Barry Magistrates Court on 25.10.93…. Mr Kirk alleges that the reporting officer, PC Lott perjured herself at this Court hearing… in two respects (1) she told the Court the tyre was bald (and it was not according to the Complainant) and (2) she told the Court that she had examined the defective tyre (when she had not)”. (A1/1.84 – 86).

1. By letter dated 3 February 1994 to Inspector Manners at Bridgend Police Headquarters, he wrote “PC Lott . Further to our interview yesterday I wish to confirm that my complaint covered the following points: 1. At the incident she was extremely officious, did not examine the vehicle before saying I had a damaged tyre and no tax and did not inform me verbally, or in writing, that I had a tyre that was totally devoid of tread and no wall marking. 2. At the Magistrates hearing she said that she examined the tyre and tax situation prior to speaking to me…. 3. At the Appeal she said the same but this time that Mr Parry was not present when she spoke to me contrary to my evidence and that of Mr Parry. At the appeal she was made to admit that she altered her notebook since the incident contrary to her evidence in chief and altered the HORT form causing a rebuke from the judge” (A1/1.105).

1. For completeness, I record that in the Bundle at A1/1.111 there are handwritten notes by Mr Kirk relating to the hearing of 11/10/1993, but the internal evidence suggests they were written after the appearance of 25.10.1993.  They do not in themselves assist me. 

1. First, Mr Kirk’s memory for what has happened at a court is not, or is not consistently, reliable. Illustratively only, in the course of the hearing before me he has on occasions completely mis-remembered what a witness has said even shortly before; and he has continued to remember the successful appeal court hearing at Cardiff Crown Court of 14 May 1998 (in respect of Action 2 claim 4) as being before His Honour Judge Gaskell, whereas it was in fact before myself sitting as a Recorder.  Second, these notes were, by their internal evidence, not made contemporaneously.

This learned civil judge erred by refusing to recuse himself when having been significantly involved with several of the incidents appearing in this civil claim

1. An earlier letter of complaint of 20 May 1993 (to the Chief Officer, Barry Police Station, headed “harassment” refers to an accusation by PC Lott concerning no tax “and bald tyre”. (A1/1.93). This is of significance, because it was written by Mr Kirk before he will have seen any document or section 9 statement from PC Lott referring to a bald tyre, suggesting that reference to or assertion of a bald tyre was made by her at the scene, not merely later. Mr Kirk is an intelligent man, and in cross examination when his attention was drawn to this reference to a bald tyre he quickly grasped the point and indeed said to leading counsel for the Defendant, “I’m warming to your suggestion”.

1. As to the sequence of enquiry, he either agreed, or was not inclined to doubt, that PC Lott had asked whether he was the owner of the vehicle, for details of the registered keeper, and that he would have expressed the question ‘Had she nothing better to do with her time?’ (as PC Lott said he did).

1. He gave two answers of potential importance in cross examination. First, he told me that he did not ever see PC Lott go round to the front of the car but she might have gone round the back; and “I think I may have seen her go round the back, she did not go round the front…. [Q. She would have been in the area where the rear tyre was?] Yes”. Second, he did not dissent when it was put to him that PC Lott said at the scene that no excise licence was displayed.

1. On the other hand, he remained adamant that PC Lott raised the question at the time before she had any opportunity to observe it. He said with emphasis, can you imagine a veterinary surgeon driving round on a bald tyre. He also told me that the last thing he wished was to give a reason for the police to stop him, and that he had given very clear instructions to those who maintained the vehicles which he used to ensure that they were in legal condition.

1. Mrs Lott had told me in cross examination that she would have to bend down to look at the condition of a tyre.  In some respects her evidence varied. At one point she said that she may have checked Mr Kirk out on the PNC (Police National Computer) and that it didn’t happen all the time; whereas earlier she told me that she would have carried out a PNC check.

1. At one point she said that ‘every time she stopped a vehicle’ she would make notes around the carbonated copy of the HORT 1 form; shortly thereafter she said that she imagined she probably would have done. These variations in evidence, when given for events of 20 years before, are of less force than if recorded at the time, when also she had transferred from the Traffic Division in July 1995.

1. In itself it is surprising if she recorded jottings only on the carbonated copy. It is even less obvious why she should do so, if as she told me (i) “those notes would be made at the time whilst I was with the person I was speaking to” and (ii) she would “write [her] note right after, either in the driving seat or at the police station”.  It may not be unlawful but it is plainly unsatisfactory that she should have done so.

The Claimant’s submission is that Lott’s jottings only on the HORT 1 carbonated copy was unlawful.

1. Her police notebook is not available. After she was called to give evidence, I heard evidence from Inspector David Griffiths who in 1996 was tasked with enquiries into complaints by Mr Kirk. In response to Mr Leighton Hill of the Force Solicitor’s Office he wrote by letter December 5 1996 in respect of this incident “the officer…was PC 4059 Jane Lott. This officer is currently on maternity leave. However I have spoken to the officer and informed her of the claim….. The officer is making enquiries to locate and forward to me a copy of her pocket notebook for the relevant date”. I have recorded at paragraph 43 above her explanation of it not being found, which relates to a transfer of duties which took place in 1995. Given the strength of Mr Kirk’s complaint one might expect PC Lott to have become aware of the complaint, in the period following the incident itself, but this she denies. Inspector Coliandris, who received Mr Kirk’s complaint, was not called to give evidence. I make no inference adverse to the Defendant from this in itself, because it appears that he was reluctant to appear in particular for reasons of ill health. Nonetheless it means that I have no evidence from him of what investigation direct with PC Lott he did or did not make. It is however true that he had taken the record of complaint on 28 October 1993, prior to the successful appeal at the Crown Court on 17 December 1993.

1. After the successful appeal at Crown Court, it is plain that Mr Kirk sought an appointment with Inspector Manners to discuss the allegations; but a letter dated 24th January 1994 indicates that Mr Kirk had not attended the arranged appointment at his own premises and the matter was left by letter for him to renew the matter, “Should I not hear from you within the next 14 days, I will assume that you do not wish to pursue the matter” (A1/1.118).

1. In the light of the detailed complaint by letter, and then by personal attendance on Inspector Coliandris, it seems unlikely to me that the fact of complaint was not brought in some way to the attention of PC Lott. Either her evidence on this point is not right, or there was a signal failure on the part of the police at the time to follow up the complaint with enquiry of the police officer against whom the complaint was made. In the light of her evidence (in general terms) that she was not made aware of complaint “after the event”, when there is contemporaneous correspondence of Inspector David Griffiths in 1996 that he had spoken to the officer and informed her of the complaint (paragraph 65 above), the former is the more likely.    

1. Mr Kirk placed before the Crown Court evidence from Mr Holmes of WF Holmes and Sons Limited Garage, Barry: “16 December 1993 we serviced Maurice Kirk’s vehicles and would be very surprised that we would have missed a defective tyre during routine inspection. During the 2 years we have dealt with Mr Kirk I do not recall any of his vehicles running on defective tyres”. I heard evidence from Anthony Holmes, the brother of the author of the letter, that he ‘totally agreed with’ what his brother there said. He did remember an old left hand drive Escort. He said that they did not actually do tyres, but if on servicing Mr Kirk’s vehicle they had seen a bald tyre they would have told him and he would have taken it elsewhere. He pointed out that they may have seen the car only on MOT. As is plain from its date, this letter was produced for the Crown Court appeal hearing the next day.

Neither a tax disc nor an MOT was legally required in Barry and was necessary for one of many reasons for the Claimant needing to regularly change his fleet of foreign cars and motor bikes, at significant personal expense, to make it more difficult to be identified as a driver when trying to practice his vocation on the farms in the Vale of Glamorgan.

Appellant’s June 2009 64 page unfinished witness statement, recording this, was cut short due to the armed arrival of a police helicopter and police cars on the pretext of looking for prohibited weapons at his home.

The witness statement referred to his need to even have a blow-up sex doll in the passenger seat at night as used in both Taunton and Guernsey on night farm visits.

1. There was also in evidence, as there was before the Crown Court, from the depot manager Mr S Kirke of Watts Tyres and Exhausts, Cadoxton, Barry that “over the past year we have changed many tyres for Mr M J Kirk. In my experience I have found him to be very conscientious about legality of his tyres” (signed, 15 December 1993). Leading counsel for the Defendant accepted that this could go in evidence, Mr Kirk not having been able to locate the witness, without accepting the content or accuracy of the letter. 

There were at least four more witnesses in this and other incidents lost due to the passage of time.

1. Lastly, the record of allowing the appeal includes ‘reason for decision’ “Bench are not entirely sure that the police officer got it right on the day, find it a matter of concern that defect of tyre was not spelt out to the appellant. Not satisfied so as to be sure that tyre was bald as exact state and condition of tyre should have been recorded. Appeal therefore allowed” (A1/1.101).

1. The evidence of PC Lott is unsatisfactory in certain respects, as I relate above. In my judgment on the strong balance of probabilities the tyre was not literally bald, in the light of the independent general evidence as to servicing and Mr Kirk’s then wish to avoid drawing the attention of the police to his vehicle or vehicles. It is this, rather than complaint of any possible defective condition, which is the thread running through Mr Kirk’s complaints at the time. I conclude that (a) PC Lott did raise with Mr Kirk a defective, and asserted bald, tyre in the light of (i) the fact that he thought he may have seen her go round the back of the car where the tyre in question was, (ii) the top copy of the HORT1 form given to him referring to a defective tyre, and (iii) the fact that he wrote referring to accusation of a “bald tyre” before he had seen her witness statement or heard her give her evidence; (b) as Mr Scott Parry relates, PC Lott did not raise the tyre when she first stopped Mr Kirk but rather spoke to Mr Kirk about the excise licence; this is also what she herself said, in that she did so after questions about driving licence and insurance and then looking round the car (paragraph 43 above). The reasons given for writing further words on a copy of the HORT1 form not given to the motorist are unsatisfactory: see above.

1. Did PC Lott consciously fabricate account of a bald tyre, or a defective tyre at all? The latter is inherently improbable – a motorist given the HORT1 form stating “defects found defective tyre” could go straight to a garage to have the contrary recorded. On the evidence relating to this incident alone I have concluded, not without hesitation, that it is more likely that her description of the tyre was the product of a momentary and cavalier inspection, maybe nettled by Mr Kirk’s attitude. Mrs Lott gave evidence fairly early during the course of trial. I understood Mr Kirk at that stage to consider that this incident had been set up, perhaps by her husband also then a serving police officer (see statement at paragraph 453, Bundle at 63C). It is not a suggestion that Mr Kirk pursued further, in particular when Mr Lott gave evidence in the trial much later.

Again there was no good reason for the applicant to raise a question guaranteed a preplanned rebuttal and a negative answer or was it likely police were ‘out to get him’ being admitted? (see affidavit for JR by veterinary nurse overhearing police stating just this phrase at the back of the magistrate’s court).

1. However before reaching a final conclusion on this incident, (or on others), I have studied with care the pattern of incidents relied upon.

1. On the one hand, as I observed in his demeanour to various witnesses over 49 days of evidence, Mr Kirk can vary between charm, warmth, and self-deprecating humour to dismissive sarcasm, anger and/or great verbal hostility. On his own evidence, he is capable of mixing with persons of all classes, (including those whom he would describe as “pond life”) but there is a strong element of the patrician in him. Different police officers spoke of him on the one hand as ‘a character’, eccentric, or personally liking him; and at the other extreme, and – much more often – as frustrating, awkward, obtuse, and dismissive. I have no doubt of his capacity to provoke strong reaction in some police officers by willingness to dismiss their enquiries, or adopt toward them an openly contemptuous attitude – even if it may have been fuelled by his experience actual or perceived of the police elsewhere. If he is known by local police officers to be a, or the, local veterinary surgeon, it would be surprising if his manner of dealing with police officers in one complaint call or incident were not often related to other police officers in local stations.
2. On the other hand, as I conclude elsewhere, his own view of his notoriety or importance in the news, is greatly disproportionate to its true measure. Mr Kirk considers, I am sure with conviction, that he is extremely widely known by reason of his history, his aviation exploits, his high profile when in Guernsey (being eager to publish the picture of himself going in to court in Guernsey dressed in a Nazi officer’s uniform), and not least the undoubted fact of arson to a building of his in which a beloved small aircraft was destroyed. The latter, in Barry, is likely to have lingered in local memory. I heard from a considerable number of police officers during the hearing.  This has been trial by a judge without a jury and I encouraged them, without dissent from Mr Kirk and a good deal of approval on his part, to tell me frankly what his reputation was and I have summarised the range of views immediately above.  I am satisfied that the majority of those stationed in Barry had some idea of him and of the canteen view of him, but that many of those who had dealings with him, from a number of police stations, were simply unacquainted with him or with any reputation of his. Where he accepted this or did not challenge it, as is so in many cases, he appeared disappointed. In the aviation world he may have been well known; it does not follow that police officers in other police stations will have known him or of him.

1. In turn, the thesis of ongoing police surveillance involves expenditure of considerable police resource.  It would have been of a professional man, a veterinary surgeon and one called in on occasion by the police to deal with animals; and one who at this comparatively early stage of involvement with South Wales police, was only fairly recently resident in South Wales. 

1. I indicated during case management before trial that I would be alert to which police officers were stationed at which police stations, in which departments, and on which shifts, in order to consider what degree of acquaintance there was or may have been those police officers involved in one incident and those involved in others. For the record, I did so throughout trial and I have done so in the course of preparing this judgment. 

1. PC Lott was attached to Eastern Traffic Sector, based at Cardiff; not one of the police stations local to Mr Kirk’s then residence or practice.  There is no evidence to suggest knowledge by her at the relevant time of a reputation of Mr Kirk, either with the police generally or with individual police officers. For the record, the first involvement with Mr Kirk of Jonathan Lott her husband was much later.

1. Later in this judgment I examine enquiries, by South Wales Police, of the police in Guernsey.  The vehicle in question in this incident had a Guernsey registration.  There is however nothing in the documents or the oral evidence given, (nor was there suggestion by Mr Kirk to PC Lott in cross-examination), that the stop was motivated by awareness of any feud of the Guernsey police against Mr Kirk or a request to her arising from it. In particular, enquiries were made of Mr Kirk’s background by PS Booker, who became aware of a list of convictions of Mr Kirk in Guernsey, but PS Booker was stationed at another police station local to Mr Kirk and his involvement with Mr Kirk was in October 1993.

1. For completeness, the detention of Mr Kirk for some days, following what has come to be referred to in these proceedings as the Grand Avenue arrest, was yet to occur. 

Seriously Incorrect Representation

The Appellant was not even prosecuted for a ‘bald tyre’ until AFTER the May 1993 Grand Avenue ‘garrotte type instrument’ fiasco when a string of charges all had to be ignominiously dropped with subsequent damaging publicity distantly related to our Prince of Wales.

The malicious May 1993 incarceration in Cardiff prison of their graphically described Guernsey victim, over the phone from the Channel Islands, was specifically explained in this civil court by the very Grand Avenue arresting officer who had been deliberately advised by Dolmans, solicitors, not to mention the outstanding Guernsey warrant either to His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC or the Appellant.

Within hours of this very information being recorded in Cardiff’s police station a senior South Wales Police officer was on his feet to inform Cardiff magistrates that the Appellant could not be identified.

The real reason for the indefinite incarceration of their victim was while Guernsey made up its mind that the alleged offence in Guernsey, a year earlier, could justify extradition. This took four days.

What is at the heart of this matter is that with the majority of these failed South Wales Police prosecutions over 23 years, when a member of the public annot find legal representation in the locality was committed to commence civil damages claims from outside Wales.

 He first had to be persuaded by hisBristol lawyers, Bobbetts Mackan, that only way ‘to get the deceitful little bastards of his back’ we needed first a jury trial, move it all to the High Court outside Wales and they would settle out of court.

Plain avarice by the Defendant’s lawyers, Dolmans, of Cardiff, caused no such early settlement or mediation for the tax payer.

The management civil judge in this case, His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, knew a great deal more about the Grande Avenue and seven other distinct police conspiracies in this case than he we was prepared to publically disclose.

It was not necessarily his responsibility but he did order, despite complaint by Dolmans, just before handing the case over to the trial judge, to order Barbara Wilding to personally sign a sworn affidavit that, amongst a plethora of still undisclosed relevant police records, this Guernsey warrant of arrest was in existence, relevant to the next 20 years of police conduct but under CPR it was to be disclosed to the Claimant BEFORE the 47 day trial due to commence in the summer of 2009.

It is the Appellant’s humble submission that the Chief Constable’s February 2009 affidavit, deliberately signed six weeks late, as the Appellant had already pre empted her move and had already approached, by a house visit to Highgrove bearing the letter asking for His Royal Highness’ intervention over this false imprisonment and malicious prosecutions originating from his farm in Llantwitt Major.
First FTAC/ GP intervention of their victim failed, then MAPPA 3/3 terrorism registration, reliant of their Chief Psychiatrist, failed, then the criminal complaint by Dolmans failed, then the machine-gun and proceeds of crime charges failed, to affect their proposed ‘coups de gras’ on 2nd December 2009 before his Honour Judge Nicholas Bidder QC.

Application included evidence that the Appellant had ‘significant brain damage’ and a possible brain tumour needing him to have him immediately transferred from Cardiff prison, on remand, to Ashworth High Security Psychiatric Hospital, indefinitely to avoid the already doomed 2010 machine gun trial as it had become known the police had been identified painting the antique a different colour to try and fool the jury.

1. As to the thesis of targeting of him by PC Lott, I may summarise. In a number of the incidents which I have to examine, the evidence of both police officers and Mr Kirk is that the vehicle he was driving was in, to put it politely, anything but mint condition.  There was in fact no challenge by Mr Kirk to the evidence of PC Lott that this car was in somewhat scruffy condition. I would accept that it is easy enough for a traffic police officer to spot when a vehicle is not displaying a road tax licence. Mr Kirk did not suggest that it did display one. This incident is early in the series of encounters between Mr Kirk and those police based at stations local to his residence and surgeries. PC Lott was attached to Eastern Traffic Sector, based at Cardiff. I am un-persuaded that the “stop” by PC Lott was a targeted stop of Mr Kirk, as opposed to a “stop” of a vehicle not displaying a road tax licence.

1. Where on earth in the law is there written a veterinary surgeon or anyone else for that matter, be allowed to drive a car that is anything but safe and unlawful? One of the cases completely lost on all allegations by the police, appealed before this civil judge, featured, from memory, one of his practice cars happening to have a recently acquired cracked windscreen for which he was acquitted.

1. There was in fact no stop, since Mr Kirk had brought his car to a stop.  If it was not a targeted intervention but one in response to seeing a vehicle without a displayed road tax licence, it was lawful for a police officer to ask the driver questions in respect of it.

1. It is demonstrated that PC Lott referred to a bald tyre at the scene itself, (witness Mr Kirk’s letter complaining that she accused him of a bald tyre, before ever hearing or seeing her evidence).

1. On the balance of probabilities on the whole of the evidence in the case, I do reach the conclusion that the description of this tyre as bald and the consequent prosecution for a defective tyre was the product of a cursory and cavalier inspection, one maybe nettled by Mr Kirk’s attitude, but not shown to be one motivated by malice or lack of good faith. The Claimant in such an action must show not only that the prosecution as determined in his favour but that the Defendant acted without reasonable and probable cause and that the Defendant acted maliciously. This incident reflects extremely poorly on the judgment and practice of PC Lott at that time, but (i) I am left uncertain whether there was absence of reasonable and probable cause, and critically (ii) the evidence does not permit me fairly to conclude that the Defendant by PC Lott acted maliciously.

to be continued



maurice 9 june 20152

Maurice Kirk has been put in prison 6 times since 2008, the time totalling over 3 years behind bars, connected, basically, to the allegation that he broke a “restraining order” served upon him, relating to “harassing” or even “contacting” a now ex-NHS consultant doctor who manufactured a false report on Maurice, stating he had a “brain tumour“, and was a danger to society. It has now come to light officially that no “restraining order” was ever served upon Maurice, something he has always maintained, but been unable to prove.

The false medical report was made, presumably, in an attempt to  put Maurice in a closed psychiatric hospital forever. Why? Perhaps it was because he was deemed a thorn in the side of certain authorities he was trying to get justice over [via his “damages claim”] relating to endless alleged “targeting” he complained of that had been occurring for over 20 years. 

Maurice has been classed as a “MAPPA 3” level convict in the past, a classification so serious there are only  150+ subjects classified as this in the country, mostly violent psychopaths on life sentences in prison. Due to Maurice’s diligence and refusal to give in or be intimidated by the attempts to get him incarcerated forever in a criminal mental hospital, the attempts have, [so far],  failed. Maurice has just served nearly 18 months in prisons based on the allegation that he broke the terms of this [alleged non-existent] “restaining order” – a term which saw him go on “hunger strike” for over 30 days, simply to obtain a single letter out of those holding him, relavent to the non-existent “brain tumour”. 

During this incarceration he was denied an urgent medical operation for an extremely painful and serious stomach ailment – a colostomy or similar was urgently needed but always denied him – the ailment had him in a wheelchair for months as he was unable to walk. He tells us often there was no help for him to get on his bed at night, so he had to sleep in his wheelchair. The urgent operation he so urgently needed was always refused because certain of Maurice’s medical documents, linked to the false report made hy the now ex-NHS consultant, were always denied to the surgeons who were to do this operation, who needed to see the documents before acting, for safety’s sake. Letters to the Prime Minister and all the rest about this matter failed miserably, time after time. Painkillers were often not given to him, he alleges, when he most needed them, when he was in agony for hours as a result.

UPDATE 27 Oct. 2015:

HMC&TS Manager
Cardiff County Court
Wales, UK.

Your ref BS614159 etc

27th Oct 2015

Dear Sir/Madam,

Am I entitled to an approved copy of the judgment, please, as I assume the police have had copies for some time?

Does this mean the unfortunate staying of the police machine gun conspiracy/falsified medical records/vexatious litigant damages claims and a host of others, of almost daily harassment up to and including this month  and still  displaying police nefarious conduct, will now be expedited and heard in an open public court?

Are these outstanding claims now also being allowed to be expedited to Court of Appeal in the light of both your court and transcribers having refused me the current transcript for BS614159 to draft an appeal in remaining 20 days?

Likewise, does the joint police/HMC&TS behaviour, refusing  both a lawyer’s and my requests for copies for these outstanding damages claims, release of Cardiff (original and forged) courts records (including the clandestine quashing of sacked  Dr T W’s originally unlawful restraining order)  and release of police seised Crown Court exhibits matters, to be also expedited to Court of Appeal?

Yours truly,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc


On 27 Oct 2015 HMCTS wrote:

Dear Mr Kirk,

I will be sending out copies of the approved Judgment today. As yet no-one has had a copy apart from the draft which was sent to both parties.

May I ask that you let me have a current postal address for you?

The remaining matters in your email I have forwarded to His Honour for his comments.


On 27 Oct 2015 11:21, “Maurice Kirk” wrote:

Last email   cut short by some error on my part do doubt.

My addess is currently in France which is too slow and xx  xxxxxxx xx Barry  has squatters ……suggest I collect from court sometime if not too dangerous to enter Wales now

On 27 Oct 2015 11:06, “Maurice Kirk” wrote:

The police, I have noticed over the years, obtain documemts from courts in electronic form but repeatedly I am refused copy by email either from the court or police solicitors


Thank you


On 19 Oct 2015 14:17, H”.M. Court Service”  wrote:

Dear Ms Standley and Mr Kirk,
I am writing to inform you that the Judgment will be formally handed down on Monday 26th October at 10.00am with a time estimate of 5 minutes. Parties are not to attend.
The matter will be re-listed to address any consequential matters and costs on a date yet to be fixed.
May I please have availability for November and December? Thank you.


Personal Assistant to His Honour Judge Z  QC
Designated Civil Judge for Wales


The Judgement:

KIRK jmt ASL 2014 02 09 final corrected for typos 2015 10 26


UPDATE:  21 OCTOBER 2015:  “Jury Notes Witheld: Criminal Cases Review Commission: New Evidence”:12

Maurice writes on the latest development to a saga of targeting that has lasted over 20 years – he has the proof that the “restraining order” on him was never served in the first place – something that he has been trying to get since 2011.

Maurice Kirk 13 Oct. 2015: [ from: ]  

“Breaking News:

‘Breached’ Restraining Order never ever was served on their victim in the first place!

Their Lordships’ March 2013 judgement has been located to reveal, in paragraph 9, they were never aware of a ‘jury note’, as with the victim, specifically asking Judge X, QC, on 4th May 2012, for 1st December 2011 Cardiff clerk of the court’s court file re ‘harassment of a doctor’ conviction.

para 9

His Honour, apparently, in the police victim’s forced absence for urgent medical attention, was informed by the HM Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) there were no court records available relevant to the jury’s wishing to see proof after the gaoler had specifically admitted, but only on cross examination, Geoamy had no record either of any ‘service’ in the cells by them.  So just who did then?

It has only just been established, via Bristol solicitors and the Criminal Cases Review Commission, when the latter seized the court file in February 2012, that there was no record at all in either the clerk’s contemporaneous notes or court log either.

 Police records of their victim’s ‘gate arrest’, immediately after his 1st Dec 2011 release, show no evidence either of a ‘restraining order’ was served. 

Their blackmailed police psychiatrist, made to fabricate psychiatric reports to scupper their victim’s long running damages claims of police bullying, harassment, malicious prosecutions and false imprisonments, was soon sacked from NHS (Wales).

Their victim has served six prison terms so far, over this, totalling well over three years of his life.”  –   [ends].

Below, jury note withheld from MK and their Lordships. Below that, part of a transcript relating to the alleged “non-existent” order:4th May 2015 REDACT Jury Note withheld from victim and Lordshipsnote 2 REDACT2 res. order comment by judge

From Maurice Kirk: 2 official requests for documents, so far denied:APP FOR DOCS REDACT


Scroll down for many posts relating to Maurice’s 20+ years of being targeted and his battle for justice.

Maurice’s site is


Maurice Kirk 02 October 2015 

“Released from police cells, following yet more Cardiff police nonsense, Maurice’s next talk in Wales is being planned for this Wednesday, 7th Oct 15……who wants it where and what about?

Subjects usually include:

Flight to Australia in 1943 Piper Cub, crash in Japan, ditch in Caribbean,
Trading in ‘machine guns’,being falsely sectioned and gaoled under UK, French and Texan Mental Health Acts following rogue Caswell Clinic, Bridgend police psychiatrist was given immunity to prosecution.

Immunity given by GMC,all Cardiff law courts, HM Crown Prosecution Service and Welsh police for him to write Maurice’s medical records without either qualification or the remotest of understanding of five brain specialists reports in his possession proving him a blatant liar.

With this forensic psychiatrist’s support, before HHJ Neil Bidder QC with Maurice locked up below, South Wales Police applied for Maurice to be incarcerated indefinitely, to avoid the imminent,doomed from the start, machine gun trial, to Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital for their protection for further civil damages claims by Maurice and others being filed with the courts.”2 oct 152 oct 15 2

Above: October 1 at 3:27pm ·

“Jersey police chose not to carry out the South Wales Police arrest warrant owing to its stupidity but this did not deter the one facing the camera, who refused to identify himself, giving the usual ‘Starskey and Hutch’ with his mate. Radio’ing on to Dinard the authorites refused me access to my aircraft to tie her down for the night , for fear I may fly away. If it had not been for a passing couple from Egland, in their PA140, nothing would have been tied down……I was forced to return to England by boat without all my papers and luggage left in the aircraft , with William, only to be arrested by bemused English police at Portsmouth Harbour!

Oil leak 5 nautical east of Sark and then invited to Jersey as a precaution.”


from Maurice Kirk UPDATE 1/10/15


South Wales Police had to spring a six month old allegation on me at Portsmouth docks yesterday to cause maximum damage to both me and my family and have me gaoled again over the ‘machine gun’ conspiracy due to be broadcast last night at Cardiff Aero Club.
SO, I will give the talk next week and go global…….watch this space.

Below: MK = “A sample of falsified legal documents by court clerk altering Cardiff Magistrates log book the CCRC now refuse to disclose as also promised immunity to Judicial Review legislation…..All to stop my further exposing the deceit that is rife across South Wales’ judiciary and penal system with both about to go autonomous, would you believe!!””

kirk altered docfrom 29/09/2015 =

Re MAURICE KIRK: : the latest farce, message from MK = “Just released no charge or summons or interview 14 hours in custody to block machine gun talk tonight”  – S Wales police have been targeting MK for over 20 years and this latest is just another example!

From yesterday afternoon: = Maurice [Kirk] sends his profuse apologies but tells us he is unable to do his presentation tonight in Cardiff due to the S. Wales’ police’s need to interview him, and when he is freed he will contact all accordingly.

“Maurice Kirk
6 hrs · ago 02.30am =
Just released from Fareham police station after 14 hours deliberate custody to stop my Cardiff aero club two hour illistrated talk, this evening, including detailed facts of South Wales Police concocted machine gun conspiracy with NHS (Wales) to gaol me to delay my civil damages claim for being stopped over 40 times to identify and lean on my motoring insurance companies. Then, when police realised an acquittal imminent, had me falsely sectioned to further delay cicil damages claim of now 23 years! Then rogue police doctor fabricated brain scan results ans applied I be further section, this time for life, in Ashworth high security psychiatric gaol . After acquittal the police had to again paint the gun a different colour this time not the jury but the man who bought it the jury queried should have been in the dock with me!”

Check the archives below for many “Maurice Kirk” posts. Maurice’s site is:

pic below from last year when mk doing another extremely questionable sentence:

Butlin Cat's photo.

Maurice writes 29/07/15:

“Maurice Kirk’s Complaint of Theft to City of London Police Online

1. The victim was either in South Wales Police (MAPPA) custody or in prison throughout the period of time of the fraud. 

2. Following the victim’s allocation to a so called ‘friend’, to collect both monies due direct from tenants and receive, via the Vale of Glamorgan Council, housing benefit from other tenants, Jeffrey Matthews stole the lot.

3. The monies were to be paid into the victim’s bank account and pay for his so called ‘friend’s ‘out of pocket’ expenses.

4. The monies (approximately 23,000 pounds sterling) was also to pay for victim’s mortgage, council taxes and standing orders etc

5. MAPPA level 3 category 3 surveillance of the victim by South Wales Police means a police authority is already a witness to this well documented fraud.

6. Jeffrey Matthews has been a police informant, to the South Wales Police, since or before 1st December 2011. 

7. The delay in reporting this serious crime is due to the victim’s personal experiences of the possible consequences to the thief if only left in the hands of the South Wales Police.

8. Irrespective of either Jeffrey Matthews’ current state of mental health or immunity to prosecution he need only return the monies or produce proof as to its whereabouts to avoid alternative consequences.

29th July 2015″




Maurice Kirk with Norman Scarth, Ireland, June 9th ’15.

Facts came to light very recently regarding an individual everyone connected to Maurice trusted as a loyal supporter many had met on occasions, usually during court hearings where Maurice Kirk was having to defend his good name against often fictitious charges brought by a certain police force in Wales. It transpires that this individual was nothing more than a professional police informant, and had been alongside Maurice in his legal dealings in the courts on occasions in the role of a Mackenzie Friend for Maurice as far back as 2011, when Maurice was having to endure court hearings over a lengthy period of time. In 2009 Maurice faced serious firearms charges against him, brought by S. Wales police. This case has hitherto been entitled “the machine gun case”, and involved MK having in his possession and old WW2 machine gun that had been acquired when MK purchased an old WW2 airplane – this machine gun being still mounted on the airplane when it was purchased, although rendered useless and inoperable. This informant came on the scene during a court case involving Maurice in 2011, where this 2009 non-conviction played a role.

One might have thought the purchase of an old World War 2 airplane, with its mounted but inoperable machine gun mounted upon would have been a relatively harmless affair, but no – this was an ideal situation for a certain police force to manipulate and bring serious firearms charges against MK – the very same police force which has been allegedly hounding MK for 20+ years – in an attempt to get MK locked away for a very long time at Her Majesty’s Pleasure. Fortunately for Maurice, after a lengthy trial over these firearms charges where he defended himself, he was acquitted of all charges but not after having to be imprisoned on remand for 8 months – something he has never been compensated for. Maurice has, or are pending, at least 35 legal cases against this police force, for alleged harassment.

Where does this “‘police informant” fit into all this? Well, a stranger appeared during a 2011 magistrate’s court hearing trial – a person nobody at the time knew, who posed as a simple interested member of the public. It turns out this seemingly harmless “interested member of the public” was allegedly working for the police, and was aqllegedly actually wired for sound during those court hearings which had the ramifications from the 2009 machine gun trial – it emerged later that this JM, as mentioned in the statement below, had allegedly audio recorded the entire court hearings – recording everything said by anybody – as an alleged police informant, perhaps to provide a complete audio record for the police to be used at a later date.

A lot cannot be reported here and now but recent developments have transpired to show that this informant, JM in MK’s statement below from a couple of days ago, had allegedly defrauded MK of some thousands of pounds whilst MK was locked away recently for 17 months on an alleged completely fictitious charge. MK had trusting this individual so much that he was given the privilege of handling the financial aspect of rent being paid for accommodation a 3rd party was paying in a property MK owned. It is alleged now that this individual did not see to it that the rent for the accommodation was paid, and instead kept the money for himself – the amount being allegedly misdirected into this person’s possession accruing to some thousands of pounds over a period of many months, this alleged fraud only coming to light after MK was released from custody in late March this year after being locked away for some 17+ months. This individual used to visit MK often during this time period as a Mackenzie Friend, but all the time acting in a duplicitious role – that of a complete and utter traitor also. There is much more to be said that cannot because of an ongoing matters regarding the allegedly stolen money involving this character MK references in his statement below, who everyone connected to MK past and present trusted implicitly, and who was considered a loyal and trusty friend. Unfortunately, this wasnt the case. More news when we have it.

Below, Maurice Kirk’s statement from a couple of days ago:

Queens Square Barrister Chambers Bristol  further implicated in the Cardiff ‘machine gun’ Conspiracy

1.Police informant, Jeff Matthews, was first tape recording for the police in my 1st December 2011 Cardiff Magistrates where the district judge, John Charles, was attempting to cover up the South Wales Police conspiracy by using a Caswell Clinic police psychiatrist and a WW1 Lewis machine gun. Remember, John, Judge Richard Thomlow and the now sacked doctor failed to convince His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC I must be sectioned MAPPA 3/3 to Ashworth psychiatric prison.

2.At that section 2 ‘harassment’ allegations hearing, the area court manager, Luigi Strinati, was seen frantically taking chairs out of the court room to avoid members of the public, gathering in significant numbers, to witness barrister, David Gareth Evans, switching and later confiscating, on behalf of the police, the court exhibits. Even the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), when asked to investigate the apparent string of abuses, would not disclose them to my jury.

3.Norman will remember, in the late 90s, it was under the same Luigi numerous of my Kirk v South Wales Police damages claims files had been ‘lost’ in that ‘leaked memos’ ‘to and frowing’ between HM Solicitor General’s offices only to fail getting me registered a ‘vexatious litigant’!

4.Both Cardiff and Bristol judges, in turn, have directed Queen Square Chambers and elsewhere to obtain the 1st December 2011 magistrates records, that prove my innocence and no ‘restraining order’ was ever served on me that day but the cabal in court , yesterday, over rides each time.

5.The latest twist Guy, for example, would be interested to know, having sat through the 2010 farcical ‘machine gun trial, when the police had painted her a different colour to fool the jury, Jeff has also defrauded Cardiff County Council for thousands in benefits.

6.Sabine, you remember, brought retired lawyers to witness the early stages of the Cardiff cabal antics while Steve observed both police and NHS (Wales) lawyers in the well of the court. Why?

7.Another Queens Square barrister, yesterday (Trevis or Travis), thought ‘I might like to see these’, quote unquote, when handing to me a same date Jeff Matthews comical witness statement, in rebuttal, concerning my reluctant need to suing him for stealing as I languished in Swansea gaol.

8.Judge Denyer ruled had he known I had not paid some minor solicitor’s bill, some four years ago, he would never have granted his June 2015 ‘freezing order’ on Matthews in the first place!  It was clearly in my affidavit. The prosecuting CPS barrister for my incarceration, a Mr Smyth, also from Travis’s same chambers, would you believe, had often given legal advice to my then so called ‘McKenzie friend’ Matthews explaining, may be, why my each successive lawyer has been warned off, ever since, from obtaining the original CPS promised custody and court files. 

Cardiff court/custody records have now been‘re written’ following the 2013 CCRC’s request to see them. Documents of conspiracies are on 

  Please see these attatchments from MK’s site:

15 07 12 blog (2).docx


Scroll down for a list of MK posts from this site, from the present back to 2013:


Maurice Kirk’s site, soon to be relocated, is .

Below – pic taken 09 May ’15


 More posts from 2015 + until September 2014 – see archives for posts before that:




NEW!! Maurice Kirk uncaged and branchaged 3 April 2015


MAURICE KIRK RELEASED + Documents [02/02/2015]: “Regina v. Kirk M. J. – “Summing Up”: IMPORTANT IRREGULARITIES EXPLAINED







MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 15 FEB. 2015 – regarding “the fairness, proportionality, apparent bias and bad faith in the decisions of 11 July 2014 to recall Mr. Maurice Kirk to prison”, + more:

MAURICE KIRK – THE STORY SO FAR – A BRIEF SYNOPSIS [UNTIL OCT. 2014] – FILES B, C, D. [30 pages] inc. “Fabicated Medical Records”, “Breach of Restraining Order Appeal” statement 6/6/14, + more:


























See archives at bottom of page from before 19 September ’14, or on right for posts from 2013 / 14.

M kirk SEPT 2013 1ba.jpgA.jpgB 

The above is a pic from Febuary 2013, outside the Cardiff Civic Centre – MK with some of his legal files to be used in his case against S. Wales police force.

 >>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

 photo BARRY_zps0hjorw7k.jpg 


– see the radio broadcast interview with MK’s sister on “Dialect Radio”, September 2014 =

video: “Rough Justice: South Wales Police persecute former vet & pilot Maurice Kirk who’s them”


Barry’s ‘flying vet’ fails in legal bid Barry And District News: APPEAL: Flying vet Maurice Kirk. 7:40am Thursday 7 July 2011

Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

ATTEMPTS by Barry’s ‘flying vet’ to bring criminal charges against a former chief constable, psychiatrist and solicitor were thwarted by a judge last week. Firearms charges for Barry’s ‘Flying Vet’ Barry And District News: Firearms charges for Barry's 'Flying Vet' 7:30am Thursday 25 June 2009

Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

BARRY’S ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk has been charged with alleged firearms offences Barry’s ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk cleared of firearms charges Barry And District News: FLYING VET: Maurice Kirk. 7:30am Thursday 11 February 2010

Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

BARRY’S ‘flying vet’ was this week cleared of charges relating to owning and trying to sell a machine gun.

‘Flying Vet’ sent to US psychiatric unit 11:33am Thursday 1 May 2008

  • Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template
  • BARRY’S ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk was this week locked up in an American psychiatric unit – after landing his plane near George W Bush’s Texas ranch.


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

JANNER “ABUSED AT 12 CHILDREN’S HOMES” + Ex-Army chief Lord Bramall faces no further action over abuse claims – BBC News + MORE 16 JAN.

Ex-Army chief Lord Bramall faces no further action over abuse claims – BBC News









Ex-Army chief Lord Bramall faces no further action over …

Former head of the Army Lord Bramall tells the BBC he is pleased no action will be taken against him in connection with allegations of historical child abuse.


View on





Lambeth child sex abuser Leslie Paul ‘could have been st…

A 64-year-old man who has been jailed for sexually abusing children in care could have been stopped years earlier, a victim from London claims.
Preview by Yahoo
Saddleworth councillor Mike Buckley refuses to quit over…

A councillor convicted of downloading indecent images of boys defies calls for him to resign.
Preview by Yahoo

Lord Janner ‘abused 12 at children’s homes’ – BBC News

Twelve former residents of children’s homes say they were abused by Lord Janner, a BBC investigation has found, as criminal proceedings end.
Preview by Yahoo

Lord Janner: Criminal proceedings over abuse claims end …

Criminal proceedings against the late peer Lord Janner over sex abuse charges have ended because of his death, a judge at the Old Bailey says.
Preview by Yahoo
Reply to all

The weird world of Theresa May – By thecolemanexperience, January 15, 2016


 Tory slapper Theresa May is up to her neck in filth of the highest order.
As well as being one of the most evil, duplicitous pieces of scum crawling the corridors of Whitehall, she is also manically obsessed with Israel and recently declared that:
” without its Jews, Britain would not be Britain” , ” Jewish people have long been an important and integral part of this country”, and “We cherish the enormous contribution you make – not just in the past, but today and every day”.

Zio May

She also bizarrely claimed that: “If the Jewish community does not feel secure then our whole national fabric is diminished”  and promised to work closely with the Mossad controlled bully-boy CST ( Community Security Trust),
The CST is run by Guinness fraudster, Gerald Ronson, who is the cousin of boy-rapist Leon Brittan and Malcolm ‘the poof’ Rifkind and not-dead paedo, Greville Janner.
Gerald Ronson FilthCSTLeon Brittan Old
Ronson once owned a fake charity with his sicko sidekick Shirley ‘I’ve legged it to Israel’ Porter.
Shirl cleared off when she was embroiled in the Westminster Homes for Votes scandal and was vilified in the media and High Court for her gerrymandering.
shirley-porter1Scallywag Front Page
What nobody realised at the time was the ‘ Homes for Votes’ scandal was a total charade, used to cover the crimes of WC councillors linked to the Dolphin Square boy-brothel, and to deflect attention away from the brilliant investigative journalism of Scallywag.
Simon Regan and his team had uncovered the sickening secrets of Dolphin Square and its links to the Bryn Alyn home, where boys were trafficked from North Wales to be abused by VIP filth.
Bryn Alyn HallFemale MP Abused Boy in Care
Tory boy-rapist, Derek Laud and his sick chum Ian Greer organised sickening parties at the Pimlico address, which were attended by many of the British Establishment, not least Westminster Councillors, Simon Milton, Robert Davis and Alan Bradley.
Derek Laud Big BrotherWestminster Councillors- Simon Milton and Robert Davis
Simon Milton and Robert Davis were feted as the new faces of homosexual London and were best pals with Boris Johnson and Shirley Porter.
Simon Milton mysteriously dropped down dead, less than two days after we asked him about a suspicious company he owned called Robingold.
Did he really die or did Shirley Porter and Boris help him escape to his homeland of Israel?
Leon Brittan is not dead either and got a one-way ticket to Tel-Aviv when he realised his pedophile crimes were about to be discovered.
Strangely, Theresa May is in charge of the fake child-abuse investigation that promises to be one of the biggest whitewashes this country has ever seen.
Fiona Woolf hagButler Sloss
She has shown utter contempt for abuse victims and is more interested in ensuring that the truth about Britain’s VIP paedo-ring is never exposed than getting justice for the thousands of children whose lives have been ruined.
Tory Ministerpaedo-ring-number-101
The former leader of Westminster Council, Colin Barrow is also up to his neck in filth of the highest order.

Colin Barrow

He was named in Wikileaks documents as being a money-launderer and drug-dealing Mr-Fixit and most definitely has links to the paedo-ring.
Quite coincidentally, Barrow is also the director of the Policy Exchange organisation along with Times editor Danny Finkelstein.
Danny the fakeSicko May
Danny recently claimed that child-abuse allegations are ‘tiresome’ and anyone believing them is a ‘nutter.’
He is a long term lover of boy-rapist Greville Janner ( who also legged it to Israel) and has stated that isn’t evil for poor people to sell their organs to the rich.
DannytheFink and Greville Jannergreville-janner2
How macabre.
Some people believe that raped children are often killed and their bodies are then sold on the black market.
Israel is well-known for trafficking organs.
Conservative Friends Israelchristian-dave-21
By a strange coincidence, Theresa May also used to own a business with Colin Barrow
She and her husband are also shareholders in vile security set-up, G4s
The company has long been criticised for its inhumane treatment of prisoners worldwide and most especially in Palestine
G4s is a private security company that provides services and equipment to Israeli prisons, checkpoints, the Apartheid Wall and the Israeli police. G4S provides security systems and other services for major Israeli prisons which hold Palestinian political prisoners from occupied Palestinian territory inside Israel. This is in contravention of Article 76 of the Fourth Geneva Convention which prohibits the transfer of prisoners from occupied territory into the territory of the occupier.

prisoners palestine

G4S also provides equipment for prisons and detention facilities in the occupied West Bank,  at which human rights organisations have documented systematic torture and ill treatment of Palestinian prisoners, including child prisoners. G4S provides equipment and services to Israeli checkpoints in the West Bank that form part of the route of Israel’s illegal Wall and to the terminals isolating the occupied and besieged territory of Gaza.
G4S has also signed contracts for equipment and services for the West Bank Israeli Police headquarters and to private businesses based in illegal Israeli settlements.’
G4s has recently been in the news in the UK, where it has emerged that young lads are routinely being abused:
Three employees of G4S, the multinational company known for the 2012 Olympics security fiasco, have been arrested by Kent police after a BBC program caught them on camera abusing teenagers at a detention center.

Medway G4s


The BBC investigative program Panorama aired shocking footage Monday night of youths at a facility in the UK city of Rochester being hit in the head, choked, and verbally abused by G4S guards.
Secretly-filmed video also shows officers entering a room and ignoring pleas for help from a boy who says he can’t breathe.”
This emerging scandal is similar to the years of abuse suffered by boys at the Meldomsley detention centre. Leon Brittan was implicated in the abuse.


Theresa May is a close friend and political ally of David Cameron.
Christian Dave 5Dave and Tess
Davey-boy is being blackmailed up to his eyeballs by Intel agencies and is controlled behind the scenes by Rupert Murdoch and Danny Finkelstein.
He was recently subject to rumours that he performed a sex-act on a dead pig.
We have it on good authority that it took place on a dead child.
Theresa May is trying to push through new snooping-powers that would allow the government to spy on everyone’s browsing history.
When asked if she would allow the UK public to see details of her internet use she declined.
How very, very strange indeed.
Is there more to Theresa May than meets the eye?
We haven’t got a bloody clue.
Have you?

A Scandal! Theresa May, Prudential & G4S

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment


January 9, 2016January 9, 2016 Community, Police Corruption, Sussex Police

Published on 6 Jan 2016

The depths of Sussex Police’s depravity, criminality and dishonesty knows no bounds. Take for example the Brighton Scandal which has everyone involved. Sussex Police, The Argus Newspaper and Brighton’s MP’s and other notable figures. No one is immune; everyone is involved in the coverup of a despicable and cruel smear against an innocent mentally ill man.

Read more:


Matt Taylor for SPCC 2016

View original post

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

#Whistleblower Kids are telling the truth: Britain is run by Satanists



gab and ali

Alisa and Gabriel are two of the bravest children to have ever walked this earth.

Despite being threatened with death by their psychotic shit-faced father, Ricky Dearman, they came forward and told the world of their treatment at the hands of Britain’s Satanic filth.

Ricky Dearman Satanic shitChristchurch School

They told us all that they were being sadistically raped and abused by teachers, social workers, parents , vicars, solicitors and many others at their Hampstead primary school, Christchurch.

They spoke of Satanic rituals involving trafficked babies being murdered and videos of the horrific ‘orgies’ being sold across the world.

Quite unbelievably, despite damning medical and witness evidences, no police investigation has ever taken place.

Instead, we were witness to one of the biggest establishment cover-ups this country has ever seen.

Complicit bitch Judge Pauffley completely ignored all testimony from the children and set about annihilating the children’s mother by way of a brutal character assassination.

Judge Pauffley Bitch

Local Satanic-rag, the Ham and High, came out in full-force in defence of the accused child-abusers and against the mother.

The reason being is that their owners are also part of the vile child-abuse ring which swamps Britain.

Please don’t be fooled into thinking that the “Hampstead” scandal is limited to a few schools in London either.

By no means.

The child-raping, devil-worshipping, baby-murdering, torture ring is going on right across this fucked-up island.

Only now, due to Alisa and Gabriel’s brave testimony, have we been able to hear from the mouth of babes, the level of depravity involved.

Because dear reader know this.

Behind the pomp and pageantry of Filthy Britain lies a most disturbing and evil secret.

At this very moment children are being buggered to death in this country by the very crème de la crème of society.

They are being battered into silence.

Their legs are being broken.

Their necks are being slit open.

Their blood is being drained.

They are being forced into murderous rituals.

And across the globe, twisted paedophilic-scum are paying huge sums of money to watch these debauched orgies and snuff-films.

The viewers of this filth include royals, ministers, doctors, teachers, military officers, rabbis, lawyers, judges, showbiz stars and businessmen, to name but a few.

This is Britain’s’ dirty secret.

Exposed, for the whole world to see:

We are run by Satanic child-murderers who gain pleasure from seeing babies and children brutally beaten-up, raped and killed.

Well no fucking more.

We intend to bring this whole shower of shite down if it’s the last fucking thing we do.

So help us God.

The clock is ticking now.

It’s only a matter of time.



Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments





Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse announces first investigations


The Chair of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse has today announced the first phase of investigations into the extent to which institutions have failed to protect children from sexual abuse. Hon. Lowell Goddard DNZM announced the Inquiry’s first 12 investigations which will begin immediately and provided a statement on the work of the Inquiry to date.

In her statement the Chair said:

“I am pleased to launch the Public Hearings Project by announcing the start of the Inquiry’s investigative work. Twelve investigations are proposed for this first phase. They will all begin with immediate effect and most, if not all, will culminate in public hearings. They represent the first phase of the inquiry’s investigations and are by no means the total of the work we intend to conduct; further investigations will be announced as the Inquiry progresses.

“By adopting both an institution-specific and a thematic approach, we will ensure that the Inquiry reaches its conclusions on as broad an evidence base as possible. We will not be limited to considering the particular institution that is the focus of the investigation, but will address the range of institutional responsibility for child protection.

“There is no doubt that the task we have set ourselves in the first phase is ambitious. To run 12 investigations in parallel represents an organisational challenge that is unprecedented in a public inquiry in the UK. We are determined to succeed and expect full cooperation of all institutions and individuals who can assist us in our work.”

The 12 investigations are:

  1. Children in the Care of Lambeth Council
  2. Children in the Care of Nottinghamshire Councils
  3. Cambridge House, Knowl View and Rochdale Council
  4. Child Sexual Abuse in the Anglican Church
  5. Child Sexual Abuse in the Roman Catholic Church
  6. The Sexual Abuse of Children in Custodial Institutions
  7. Child Sexual Abuse in Residential Schools
  8. The Internet and Child Sexual Abuse
  9. Child Exploitation by Organised Networks
  10. The Protection of Children Outside the United Kingdom
  11. Accountability and Reparations for Victims and Survivors
  12. Allegations of Child Sexual Abuse Linked to Westminster

The Inquiry website has been updated with documents providing more detail of the scope and focus of each of the 12 investigations. Procedural timetables for each investigation will be published early in the New Year.

Commenting on the procedure for the investigations, the Chair said:

“It is impossible to put a timescale on the completion of all of this work, but it is reasonable to assume that while some of the investigations may be completed within 18 months, others may take several years to conclude. In some cases, overlapping criminal proceedings may cause substantial delay to the progress of individual investigations. Nonetheless, in my Opening Statement I committed to completing the work of the Inquiry within five years and my current assessment is that that timeframe, whilst ambitious, is achievable.”

The Victims and Survivors Consultative Panel to the Inquiry said:

“Too many victims and survivors of child sexual abuse have suffered in silence. These investigations will give public voice to that suffering and bring greater understanding of why so many horrific crimes went unreported and undetected for so long. They will enable the Inquiry to make proposals for reforms that will better protect children in the future and improve the support and reparation available to victims and survivors.

“We welcome the progress of the Truth Project element of the Inquiry, enabling victims and survivors through their personal accounts to contribute to the Inquiry’s work. We encourage anyone who is a victim or survivor of child sexual abuse and who wants to share their experience to contact the inquiry.”

The investigations fall into two categories; institution-specific and thematic. Taken together they will cut across the five workstreams of the Inquiry:

  • Allegations of abuse by people of prominence in public life – led by the Chair, Hon. Lowell Goddard DNZM
  • Education and religion – led by Panel member, Prof. Malcolm Evans OBE
  • Criminal Justice and law enforcement – led by Panel member, Drusilla Sharpling CBE
  • Local authorities and voluntary organisations – led by Panel member, Prof. Alexis Jay OBE
  • National and private service organisations – led by Panel member, Ivor Frank

Update Statement November 2015
Business Update Statement
Update Statement November 2015 – FAQs



Campaigners have welcomed a “powerful” announcement that Nottinghamshire councils will be investigated over historic child sexual abuse claims at care homes.

By DanRobinson  |  Posted: November 27, 2015

Mickey Summers has campaigned for justice
Nottingham City Council and Nottinghamshire County Council will be scrutinised over alleged “failings to protect children in [their] care or supervision”.
Justice Lowell Goddard, chairwoman of the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, said in a speech yesterday the alleged victims would have the chance to make their voices heard in an investigation of “unprecedented” scale.
A number of allegations of historic abuse in children’s homes, previously operated by councils and other organisations, have been made, dating back to the 1950s.


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment


Nottingham Police Station stormed in protest at Police protection of Government Paedophiles

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Letter to #Goddard #CSA Inquiry: Protecting #MelanieShaw and Other #ChildAbuse #Survivors

Letter to

via Letter to #Goddard #CSA Inquiry: Protecting #MelanieShaw and Other #ChildAbuse #Survivors.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

60 Minutes: SPECIAL INVESTIGATION: SPIES, LORDS AND PREDATORS + “Senior MP accused of child sex abuse: Two MPs report same serving Labour politician to police over sex attacks and corruption claims”



  Still Oaks Still Oaks

Published on 19 Jul 2015
SPECIAL INVESTIGATION: Spies, Lords & Predators

It’s shaping up to be the biggest political scandal in Britain’s history. There is new evidence that some of the country’s most respected men were in fact depraved paedophiles. Leaders that were preying on children as young as eight and nine. Many of the kids were trafficked from state-run homes and other institutions to be abused by MPs, Lords, and spies. They were protected from on high by a secret code, and have never been held to account for their horrific crimes. 60 Minutes investigates the scandal and the cover up, speaks to the victims and the witnesses, and confronts a member of the notorious paedophile information exchange. Reporter Ross Coulthart also reveals how children were killed in order to protect this network of predators – and how the driver to the Australian High Commissioner could hold the key to blowing this case wide open.

Reporter: Ross Coulthart

Producer: Stephen Rice


  Senior MP accused of child sex abuse: Two MPs report same serving Labour politician to police over sex attacks and corruption claims

Labour MP John Mann one of the informants to pass information to police
A fortnight ago a Conservative MP told police about the same politician
Unnamed MP is accused of offering political favours to a brothel owner
Also claimed they were arrested for indecency in public place with a minor

By Glen Owen and Miles Goslett For The Mail On Sunday
Published: 07:46 EST, 19 July 2015  | Updated: 09:28 EST, 19 July 2015

A senior Labour MP has been reported to police by two fellow MPs over claims of child sex abuse, The Mail on Sunday has learned.

One of the informants, Labour MP John Mann, passed details about the prominent individual to officers earlier this year.

Then, a fortnight ago, a Conservative MP went to the same police force armed with information about the same individual, some of which had been provided to him by a former Government Minister.

It is believed to be the first time that a sitting MP has been scrutinised by any of the ongoing police investigations into child abuse, representing a further extension of the ever-widening sphere of historic sex allegations.

Mr Mann handed his information over to an ongoing criminal investigation into another public figure, which included links between that figure and the Labour MP.

The Conservative MP’s allegations about the MP, which date back to the late 1980s, include claims that the MP had been arrested for indecency in a public place with a minor – during which he is said to have assaulted the arresting officers.

It is claimed the MP had performed political favours for the owner of a brothel in his constituency in which men consorted with underage males.

The Conservative MP also made further allegations about drink-driving, assault and corruption involving the Labour MP.

A BBC News team, headed by a journalist who specialises in reporting on sex abuse crimes, is also understood to have had access to the information. The team, which has been granted significant resources by bosses, has already started interviewing potential witnesses about the MP. Director-general Tony Hall has been made aware of the special project.

Mr Mann, a former member of the Treasury Select Committee, has established a strong campaigning record on the issue of abuse, and last year he compiled a dossier of historic allegations which detailed claims against 12 former Government Ministers.

The Met Police are carrying out Operation Fairbank, an umbrella inquiry into historical child sex abuse claims involving politicians in the House of Commons and House of Lords and other leading public figures

The Met Police are carrying out Operation Fairbank, an umbrella inquiry into historical child sex abuse claims involving politicians in the House of Commons and House of Lords and other leading public figures. 

Earlier this year Mr Mann claimed that the number of victims could reach ‘tens of thousands’.

He said: ‘The state can’t deal with the numbers of people coming forward. The police and social services cannot cope with the volume that’s there, even now. And we’re hardly at the beginning of people coming forward.’

There are a total of five police investigations under way across the country into historical abuse allegations, of which the main one is Operation Fairbank – the Met Police’s umbrella inquiry into historical child sex abuse claims involving politicians and other leading public figures.

The Independent Police Complains Commission are also investigating if there was an Establishment cover-up of the late Cyril Smith MP's abuse of boys

The Independent Police Complains Commission are also investigating if there was an Establishment cover-up of the late Cyril Smith MP’s abuse of boys

The police watchdog, the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), is also investigating claims that there was an Establishment cover-up over the abuse perpetrated by the late Liberal MP Cyril Smith, including threatening a police officer with the Official Secrets Act after he said he had found the MP with two teenage boys in 1988.

Twenty-three people have claimed they were abused by the Liberal MP, who died aged 82 in 2010.

The Commons and the House of Lords are featuring heavily in the investigations. Earlier this year, Scotland Yard officers contacted Lawrence Ward, the Serjeant at Arms, the Commons’ most senior security official, to ask him to search files kept on MPs.

Mr Ward told the officers that if they produced a warrant, they could enter the Commons to investigate the files themselves on a ‘case by case basis’.

Earlier this month, Justice Lowell Goddard finally opened the public inquiry into child sex abuse, vowing that ‘no one, no matter how powerful’ will be able to avoid its scrutiny.

The New Zealand judge – brought in to head the inquiry after her two predecessors resigned over concerns about their links to the Establishment – said it could take a decade to complete. Her works covers five key areas of society from ‘the corridors of power in Westminster to children’s homes in the poorest parts of the country’.

Another abuse campaigner, Labour’s Tom Watson, has called for the inquiry to be given full access to MI5’s secret files containing the names of offenders.

Last night, the police force which has received the information about the Labour MP said it was unable to comment on any ongoing investigations which had not included any arrests.

Mr Mann declined to comment.



Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

OUTRAGEOUS TARGETING!: Melanie Shaw released by Devon & Cornwall Police, but is harassed anew – 6 July 2015


Melanie Shaw released by Devon & Cornwall Police, but is harassed anew

by B Gerrish 6 July 2015

Melanie was released from Charles Cross at approximately 2104 and was in a distressed state, as her mobile phones had been confiscated

Yesterday morning at 0907 Melanie Shaw was taken to Charles Cross police station in Plymouth after being apprehended by Devon and Cornwall police at a local guest house. After an urgent text message from her, nothing more was heard until yesterday evening when Melanie called the UKColumn to say that she had been released on bail.

We understand that Melanie was questioned in respect of alleged harassment of a senior Nottingham officer dating back to January this year. Melanie is bemused by the fact that this allegation is now being put forward some six months after the event is alleged to have occurred. She also states that the allegation appears highly questionable after she has repeatedly and publicly accused Nottingham police officers of harassment, bullying and intimidating behaviour in Nottingham, and at her own home, over the last few months.

It is believed a duty solicitor was present during the police interview, but apparently no local mental health support staff were available, despite local Plymouth MP’s recently assuring members of the public that Charles Cross custody suites included such provision.

Melanie was released from Charles Cross at approximately 2104 and was in a distressed state, as her mobile phones had been confiscated by the police, and she had no money. Having warned her off from returning to her accomodation, Devon and Cornwall Police appeared prepared to allow this highly vulnerable person to sleep on the streets. In the event, Melanie received the necessary support from local members of the public who have helped her previously, and she was provided with new accomodation.

As part of her bail conditions Melanie is ordered to report back to Charles Cross police station in September.

These latest events around Melanie Shaw raise further serious questions as to the actions of both Nottingham and Devon and Cornwall Police. Just how can two major police forces use significant numbers of officers to track, report and harass a child abuse whistleblower over many months, yet claim budget cuts prevent them from carrying out front line policing to catch real and dangerous criminals?  Why did Nottingham police use 6 – 7 black dressed heavily armed officers to smash their way into Melanie’s Nottingham home, when there was then no arrest or charges laid? Why did Devon and Cornwall police use 3 male officers and 1 policewoman to hammer on the UKColumn office door at 0730 in the morning to aggressively demand the whereabouts of Melanie Shaw?

The only reasonable explanation likely to be accepted by the man on the Clapham omnibus is that the level of force was deliberately designed to harass and intimidate. That being so we must then ask why would these two police forces need to intimidate a child abuse whistleblower and members of the public supporting her? There appears just one logical answer, and that is both Nottingham and DCC police are collaborating to silence a key whistleblower in the Beechwood children’s home abuse case. If so their motives for doing such a thing are unclear.

Please read our earlier report below for further comment.


News Flash: Melanie Shaw Taken By Devon And Cornwall Police

by Brian Gerrish | Saturday, 4th July 2015

The morning after her arrival in Plymouth, three aggressive male officers and one female, were hammering at the door of the UKColumn Offices demanding to know where ‘Brian’ was and the whereabouts of Melanie Shaw.

At 0907 this morning 4 July 2015 Beechwood child abuse victim and whistleblower Melanie Shaw sent a text saying “Ring me urgently…I’m at station with the police, he’s been nice…well both have, 2 of the good guys…” We have heard nothing more.

Melanie had sought refuge in Plymouth after weeks of harassment and abuse by Nottingham police. It seems that Britain’s police have unbridled power and money for operations to track, harass and arrest child abuse victims. They cannot of course stop criminal bankers, corrupt MPs or perverted Judges and senior police. 

The morning after her arrival in Plymouth, three aggressive male officers and one female, were hammering at the door of the UKColumn Offices demanding to know where ‘Brian’ was and the whereabouts of Melanie Shaw.

After receiving no help they departed. Rude, aggressive police, chasing not a serious criminal, but a frightened extremely vulnerable and very brave lady, who has suffered unbelievable abuse within the State ‘care system.’

We suspect that Melanie is already on her way back to Nottingham, to be held in a circle of abusive authorities acting under the so called Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements MAPPA. When David Cameron said that child abuse was a matter of National Security he meant just that. So deep, so entrenched and so vicious is institutional child abuse in Britain that its exposure is capable of bringing down the UK government. The evidence already available in the public domain shows that Westminster is desperate to cover-up the widespread penetration of paedophiles within our political and public systems.

Highly intelligent, and with an excellent memory, Melanie Shaw represents a real threat to national security. Her testimony of her own abuse and that of hundreds of other youngsters, and the trafficking and the murders, is enough to cause the highest heads to roll. She must therefore be silenced by the State at all costs.

Melanie Shaw is now once again encarcerated in the gulug of the corrupt criminal British police and justice system. She will no doubt endure further abuse, bullying, harassment and solitary confinement ‘punishment regimes.’

In the time I have known Melanie I have come to recognise an unbelievably brave lady who is worth 1,000 David Camerons, Theresa Mays or Alison Saunders. In fact there is no comparison.

That our british police constables should now prostitute themsleves to a peadophilic Westminster administration is a dangerous tragedy. Their blind willingness to support criminal activity and their failure to uphold the law will certainly rebound, since the emerging police state will eventually consume them and their families…for the revolution always consumes its young.

If by some unlikely occurence we find that Melanie is receiving tender care in the hand of Devon and Cornwall Police and Mental Services I will be grateful. My sentiments stand however, as she is but one of thousands of children stolen and abused by a corrupt criminal British state. 

To readers of whatever nationality, I apologise for all the actions of this vile British government and establishment. It is beholdent on all of us to take all appropriate action to bring these people to justice. 

We will report further when we can.”


Posted in Uncategorized


  • melNews Flash: Melanie Shaw Taken By Devon And Cornwall Police


    | Saturday, 4th July 2015

    The morning after her arrival in Plymouth, three aggressive male officers and one female, were hammering at the door of the UKColumn Offices demanding to know where ‘Brian’ was and the whereabouts of Melanie Shaw.

    At 0907 this morning 4 July 2015 Beechwood child abuse victim and whistleblower Melanie Shaw sent a text saying “Ring me urgently…I’m at station with the police, he’s been nice…well both have, 2 of the good guys…” We have heard nothing more.

    Melanie had sought refuge in Plymouth after weeks of harassment and abuse by Nottingham police. It seems that Britain’s police have unbridled power and money for operations to track, harass and arrest child abuse victims. They cannot of course stop criminal bankers, corrupt MPs or perverted Judges and senior police. 

    The morning after her arrival in Plymouth, three aggressive male officers and one female, were hammering at the door of the UKColumn Offices demanding to know where ‘Brian’ was and the whereabouts of Melanie Shaw.

    After receiving no help they departed. Rude, aggressive police, chasing not a serious criminal, but a frightened extremely vulnerable and very brave lady, who has suffered unbelievable abuse within the State ‘care system.’

    We suspect that Melanie is already on her way back to Nottingham, to be held in a circle of abusive authorities acting under the so called Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements MAPPA. When David Cameron said that child abuse was a matter of National Security he meant just that. So deep, so entrenched and so vicious is institutional child abuse in Britain that its exposure is capable of bringing down the UK government. The evidence already available in the public domain shows that Westminster is desperate to cover-up the widespread penetration of paedophiles within our political and public systems.

    Highly intelligent, and with an excellent memory, Melanie Shaw represents a real threat to national security. Her testimony of her own abuse and that of hundreds of other youngsters, and the trafficking and the murders, is enough to cause the highest heads to roll. She must therefore be silenced by the State at all costs.

    Melanie Shaw is now once again encarcerated in the gulug of the corrupt criminal British police and justice system. She will no doubt endure further abuse, bullying, harassment and solitary confinement ‘punishment regimes.’

    In the time I have known Melanie I have come to recognise an unbelievably brave lady who is worth 1,000 David Camerons, Theresa Mays or Alison Saunders. In fact there is no comparison.

    That our british police constables should now prostitute themsleves to a peadophilic Westminster administration is a dangerous tragedy. Their blind willingness to support criminal activity and their failure to uphold the law will certainly rebound, since the emerging police state will eventually consume them and their families…for the revolution always consumes its young.

    If by some unlikely occurence we find that Melanie is receiving tender care in the hand of Devon and Cornwall Police and Mental Services I will be grateful. My sentiments stand however, as she is but one of thousands of children stolen and abused by a corrupt criminal British state. 

    To readers of whatever nationality, I apologise for all the actions of this vile British government and establishment. It is beholdent on all of us to take all appropriate action to bring these people to justice. 

    We will report further when we can.”


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , ,

MELANIE SHAW video 04 OCT. 2015 – 03 Oct. video,Interview 24 July, The Nottingham Common Purpose Effect, + “FREE MELANIE SHAW” April ’15 demo [videos] + more

From Melanie Shaw 4 Oct. 2015 – Pls watch this, its all about the money. Then share Posted by Melanie Shaw on Sunday, October 4, 2015



03 Oct.: Pls share, just filmed. Thank you. This is all for children suffering today, the car crash adults of tommorow. Posted by Melanie Shaw on Saturday, October 3, 2015


Melanie Shaw interview on 24 July 2015

Melanie Shaw talks to Anna Bragga about Beechwood, confessions of a serial killer and persecution

 BeechWood Survivor Melanie Shaw Exclusive Interview July 26, 2015:


Melanie Shaw at Glastonbury Town Hall – 8th July 2015 

Published on 10 Jul 2015
Melanie Shaw was released from Peterborough SODEXO private prison a few days before this recording.
Most of the six months sentence (for a spurious arson charge) was spent in solitary confinement.
Melanie was refused medication and treatment for a leg ulcer.
What Melanie has undergone can be descibed as nothing less than torture.
Melanie speaks of murder and satainc rituals in state run care homes for children


  • News Flash: Melanie Shaw Taken By Devon And Cornwall Police


    Brian Gerrish

    | Saturday, 4th July 2015

    The morning after her arrival in Plymouth, three aggressive male officers and one female, were hammering at the door of the UKColumn Offices demanding to know where ‘Brian’ was and the whereabouts of Melanie Shaw.
  • At 0907 this morning 4 July 2015 Beechwood child abuse victim and whistleblower Melanie Shaw sent a text saying “Ring me urgently…I’m at station with the police, he’s been nice…well both have, 2 of the good guys…” We have heard nothing more.
  • Melanie had sought refuge in Plymouth after weeks of harassment and abuse by Nottingham police. It seems that Britain’s police have unbridled power and money for operations to track, harass and arrest child abuse victims. They cannot of course stop criminal bankers, corrupt MPs or perverted Judges and senior police. 
  • The morning after her arrival in Plymouth, three aggressive male officers and one female, were hammering at the door of the UKColumn Offices demanding to know where ‘Brian’ was and the whereabouts of Melanie Shaw.
  • After receiving no help they departed. Rude, aggressive police, chasing not a serious criminal, but a frightened extremely vulnerable and very brave lady, who has suffered unbelievable abuse within the State ‘care system.’
  • We suspect that Melanie is already on her way back to Nottingham, to be held in a circle of abusive authorities acting under the so called Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements MAPPA. When David Cameron said that child abuse was a matter of National Security he meant just that. So deep, so entrenched and so vicious is institutional child abuse in Britain that its exposure is capable of bringing down the UK government. The evidence already available in the public domain shows that Westminster is desperate to cover-up the widespread penetration of paedophiles within our political and public systems.
  • Highly intelligent, and with an excellent memory, Melanie Shaw represents a real threat to national security. Her testimony of her own abuse and that of hundreds of other youngsters, and the trafficking and the murders, is enough to cause the highest heads to roll. She must therefore be silenced by the State at all costs.
  • Melanie Shaw is now once again encarcerated in the gulug of the corrupt criminal British police and justice system. She will no doubt endure further abuse, bullying, harassment and solitary confinement ‘punishment regimes.’
  • In the time I have known Melanie I have come to recognise an unbelievably brave lady who is worth 1,000 David Camerons, Theresa Mays or Alison Saunders. In fact there is no comparison.
  • That our british police constables should now prostitute themsleves to a peadophilic Westminster administration is a dangerous tragedy. Their blind willingness to support criminal activity and their failure to uphold the law will certainly rebound, since the emerging police state will eventually consume them and their families…for the revolution always consumes its young.
  • If by some unlikely occurence we find that Melanie is receiving tender care in the hand of Devon and Cornwall Police and Mental Services I will be grateful. My sentiments stand however, as she is but one of thousands of children stolen and abused by a corrupt criminal British state. 
    To readers of whatever nationality, I apologise for all the actions of this vile British government and establishment. It is beholdent on all of us to take all appropriate action to bring these people to justice. 
  • We will report further when we can.”
  • source:


    Brian Gerrish interviews child abuse survivor and Nottingham Beechwood children’s home whistleblower Melanie Shaw. Recently released from HMP Peterborough where she suffered nearly 6 months in solitary confinement, was denied medical treatment and was subjected to significant bullying and harassment, Melanie has also been harassed by Nottingham police.
    In a catalogue of threats and intimidation Nottinghamshire Police have subjected her to unwanted phone calls, followed her, attended her home to threaten her with arrest and used a team of 6-7 black dressed ‘heavies’ to smash in her back door. Already suffering PTSD as a result of her abuse as a toddler by her own family, and subsequently through abuse by children’s services in Beechwood, there is no doubt that the actions of Nottingham Police have been designed to intimidate and ultimately silence Melanie.
    It is her testimony of the rape and murder of children at Beechwood in 2011 which started Operation Daybreak. For Melanie the subsequent vicious action by the police is simply to silence her and to protect abusers within the establishment and political magic circle.
    How can David Cameron and Theresa May’s Conservative Government allow this brutal treatment of vulnerable child abuse survivors? How could Crown Prosecution Boss Alison Saunders help protect Lord Janner from justice, but facilitate the vicious abuse of Melanie Shaw via ‘StarChamber Courts’ without proper legal representation, or a Jury, or the Public, or the Press? There can only be one answer. The British government in its broadest sense, across all three parties, Conservative, Labour and Liberal Democrat are collaborating, not to expose and stop child abuse, but to protect abusers.
    Watch this powerful insight into the horrific world of Melanie Shaw as a result of her simply telling the truth.

    MELANIE SHAW IS FREE: CHARGES HAVE BEEN DROPPED – 12 JUNE 2015 photo mel_zps7gct8nkm.jpg





 photo 1_zpsxcmyizdx.jpg

Most of us cannot even imagine what she has suffered. Many simply cannot bear to hear what she has experienced, never mind worry that she is presently making financial profit for the Directors and Shareholders of Sodexo private prison.  
Melanie Shaw tears up Chris Leslie letter

Most of us cannot even imagine what she has suffered. Many simply cannot bear to hear what she has experienced, never mind worry that she is presently making financial profit for the Directors and Shareholders of Sodexo private prison. 
Yet one kind man took Melanie under his wing, looked after her, gave her a lovely home and fathered a child she loved. Strengthened by a stable family home and the passage of time, Melanie then found the courage to speak out about her abuse and those of many other children at Beechwood children’s home Nottingham. The local police took her evidence seriously and started Operation Daybreak – they soon admitted that up to 150 children were likely to have suffered. Many other children’s homes were implicated.
Far from being protected, nurtured and praised Melanie Shaw was quickly returned to prison. It would seem that Nottingham police became nervous when she discovered that they had lied over their interviewing of witnesses. Fitted up with charges of arson and criminal damage, Melanie was sentenced to 3 years community service and branded mentally ill. Her real sentence was to start when she returned home. Tired, distraught and still suffering post traumatic stress from her abusive history, she was denied any help from Nottingham Social Services or Mental Health Services. Credit where it is due though, Nottingham Social Services had previously been remarkably efficient in taking her son into ‘care’ after she was charged with the arson offence.
Alone without access to money, except for that provided by the generosity of the UKColumn readers and other members of the public, Melanie was subjected to repeated harassment by the police. Intimidating telephone calls, followed by police cars in public, her house broken into by heavyweight police in black, arrested for visiting the bank, Melanie was brutalised by the very public services that claim they are there to protect.
The stress took its toll and she became volatile – but who wouldn’t? Her unpredictable behaviour allowed Nottingham police and the Crown Prosecution Services to cook up more charges – unlawful imprisonment of a paramedic two offences under the Communications Act. Further charges of breaching her probation service conditions were also concocted, however these were later dropped.
Returned to HMP Peterborough after a secret court hearing, Melanie has repeatedly been denied her desired legal representation – that of her trusted and capable Lay Legal Advisor. Instead she has been bullied by the Judge into using VHS Fletchers law firm, who happen to be the very people she sacked for their poor performance and unqualified staff in her first trial. Now incarcerated in the same Sodexo prison that has previously denied her medical treatment, pushed her into solitary confinement, bullied her and denied her basic human rights, Melanie is now being blocked from receiving telephone calls or letters from those who can help her. She is due to appear in court for a ‘mention request’ on 8th May 2015. The next hearing will then be 18th May for a case management hearing.
In the meantime, and as Sodexo’s profits rise, we must never forget Melanie Shaw or her vicious treatment at the hands of the British State. Why? Because when there is no justice or law, any of us could be next.


 photo luke_zpsa0jsjusr.jpg
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,


 BBC Radio 4 “The Report” 23 April ’15 [from the iplayer online]:
sat cult that wasnt

The Satanic Cult That Wasn’t

Listen in pop-out player

How Satanic abuse accusations in a North London suburb went global, but turned out to be untrue. Melanie Abbott investigates.It’s members are, it’s claimed, drawn mainly from a school and church in Hampstead. They are said to wear shoes made of baby skin, to dance with the skulls of dead babies and to sexually abuse young children. But the cult doesn’t exist. The claims are, according to a High Court Judge, ‘baseless’ and those who have sought to perpetrate them are ‘evil’.

Available now [for a limited time] 

28 minutes
source [for a limited time]
Scroll down for more posts or see archives on the right of page or at the very bottom for posts on “Hampstead SRA” involving the “Whistleblower Kids”

Hampstead satanic ritual abuse enquiry and the BBC with the father.
Sent 20 April 2015
To: Louisa Compton
Cc: Keith Blackmore: Victoria Derbyshire
Subject: Ricky Dearman interview by Victoria Derbyshire of the BBC

Dear Ms Compton

Many thanks for your prompt and courteous reply.
Whilst I recognise the recent highly controversial decision by Justice
Pauffley gives the BBC legal licence to take the current editorial line,
this by no means equates to that line representing either an ethical or a
sound journalistic position.

Perhaps you could begin to justify your position by answering the following

1. did your research include speaking to the mother or other adults close to
the children who believe their claims?

2. Did your research involve speaking to the children?

3. Did your research involve speaking to charities and survivor groups
familiar with the effects of satanic ritual abuse on the victim,
particularly when that individual is still a child?

4. Did you talk to the police officers who were threatened and told to stop
investigating the case or else their careers and their family’s safety would
be in jeopardy?

5. Did you ask the police how many of the accused were formally questioned?

6. Did you ask the police how many premises were forensically examined?

7. Did you ask the police how many computers were seized and examined for
child abuse images and video content?

Only if you can answer yes to all of these, legitimately claim some
understanding of the damaged mental state of the SRA survivors and the
tendency for them to retract accusations when isolated and confronted by
authority figures, and show that you have considered all the relevant facts
of the case could your current editorial line be seen as a mistake rather
than feeble support for a corrupt establishment narrative.

The bottom line is this; the accusations were made by the children (a point
not made obvious on the short clip on your website). This cannot be
described as baseless, for it was based on victim testimony, which I am sure
you realise is most compelling. Whatever the qualification of the judge, she
cannot make black into white; allegations with a basis into ones without;
and she cannot convince a public awakened by two years of truth regarding
the establishment cover-up of child rape and sodomy that it is time to go to
sleep once again.

 Neither can you.

I remain most concerned but hope you will consider the above carefully.

David Scott BEeng, AMICE, CEng, MIStructE, MIES.



Satanic Child Abuse Hampstead – The Grandparents have their say.. (Subtitles)     
Published on 25 Feb 2015

The Russian grandparents say they have come to the UK to take the children home to a normal family and school life in Russia where they can recover from their ordeal.

Legal Documents..…


Ella Draper & Abe Christie First Interview — Hampstead Whistleblower Kids by allmoderncons allmoderncons 01/04/15

Scroll down for more posts on the Hampstead “Whistleblower Kids” or see the archives.

March 11th, 2015.
Leaked Medical Reports End All Doubt About Sexual Abuse Claims.

The medical reports end any debate regarding the fact that children A and G were the victims of child sexual abuse in Hampstead and underline the criminal nature of the police interviews of September 17th, 2014. The question now is who is being protected? Who has the influence and power to cause the British police such an obvious and inexplicable mid investigation rethink? Clearly there is much more than a Z grade actor and the reputation of a school at stake here. Neither would logically merit the police choice to destroy this investigation and cover up these heinous crimes.
Background Chronology
September 5th 2014.
“A referral was made to the Barnet CAIF by (mother’s partner’s) brother in law who is a special constable. Following a disclosure by A and G that they had been sexually abused by their father and “teachers” and were part of a cult. This disclosure had been made when they were in Morocco over the summer. And the parents stated they were unsure who to inform as many people seemed to be involved, (including allegedly police and social workers.)
Initial police interviews conducted.
8/9/14. Initial strategy meeting held.
10/9/14. Visit to family home ahead of ABE interview.
11/9/14. Emergency Police Protection Order issued after the ABE yesterday evening during which witness A, witness G and witness E (mother) were interviewed separately.
Allegations of physical abuse from the mother’s partner towards both children and sexual abuse against both children by their father and “teachers”. They are now in Emergency Foster Placement.”

Police conduct the retraction interviews in transparent attempt to bury the truth and vandalise justice.
Interviewing officers clearly bully false retractions from the children for unknown reasons that can only be sinister.
22/9/14. Police inform the mother E that they have found that the crimes against the children cannot be confirmed. The investigation is over.
22/9/14. Dr. Hodes writes the second medical report affirming the veracity of the sexual abuse allegations despite the retractions. Dr. Hodes cites a specific research finding that found that 16% of victims will retract the allegations and affirming therefore that the physical evidence of abuse should outweigh the retractions.

Lindsay C Malloy, MA Thomas D Lyon JD, and Joia A Quas
Fillal Dependency and recantation of Child Sex Abuse Allegations.
J.Am Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 46:2, 2007.

These statements were made without reference to the disgraceful performance of the interviewing officer in the retraction interviews, which only strengthen Dr. Hodes’ assertions.
The Medical Reports. Who wrote them and are they authentic?
There are two Medical Reports, one dated September 15th, 2014, the other September 22nd. Written on the stationary of the University College of London in a way that leaves no doubt as to their authenticity. Background checks on the names of the people who signed the documents end any doubt . To illustrate this I will cite the best known of the Doctors who have signed these reports Dr. Deborah Hodes (FRCPCH) Consultant Community Paediatrician. A cursory internet search indicates that Dr. Hodes is employed in that role at the University College London and is an expert in the field of child abuse having more than twenty years experience.

Dr Deborah Hodes

Dr Deborah Hodes Consultant Paediatrician an expert with decades of experience and she is unequivocal. Abuse occurred.

Dr Deborah Hodes Consultant Paediatrician an expert with decades of experience and she is unequivocal. Abuse occurred.

The first report dated September 15th appears to have been written by Dr Harriett Gunn (SHO Senior House Officer)* but is also signed by Dr. Hodes,  The second Report of September 22nd appears to have been written entirely by Dr. Hodes, as she is the sole signatory.
The Medical Examiners are highly experienced and well qualified.
This does not mean that they are infallible, of course, but these medical reports have been signed by medical practitioners considered to be authorities in the field with decades of experience.
Dr, Deborah Hodes,  part of the examination and assessment team that physically examined the children on several occasions is absolutely unequivocal, even after the retraction interviews  that the children have physical injuries, that substantiate their claims of physical abuse at the hands of the mother’s partner and more importantly the sexual abuse at the hands of the father and cohorts.

A Brief Overview of the Facts that Emerge from the Medical Reports.
The counter narrative states that the children’s stories were coached and fed to them by their mother’s partner who was himself guilty of minor physical abuse of the children.

The police retraction interviews tried to construct a narrative that the children had been denying the actions of the mother’s partner whilst making the claims against the father and school, yet the Medical Reports show that the children made the claims concurrently and were concurrently examined for both the injuries related to the minor physical abuse at the hands of the mother’s partner and the extremely serious sexual abuse at the hands of the father and staff at the school.
The male has one scar on his anus consistent with blunt force trauma, the female has several and has actually been physically damaged by the abuse in ways that really do not bear mentioning suffice to say that she has multiple injuries “consistent with the application of a blunt instrument.”
They could not be clearer. Someone has been doing deeply unpleasant things to these children, the more lurid claims relating to this case may be exaggerated, but there is a very simple and unmistakeable truth expressed in those medical reports.
After they were taken into Foster care, the children were heard to discuss the use of Vaseline as a lubricant their abusers used on them. They are no longer in the presence of the mother’s partner, there is no need for any story to be told, yet they were speaking about it in a matter of fact way.

The children independently told their story on multiple occasions to numerous Doctors and other disinterested parties and were consistent in their claims against both parties. There was medical evidence to support the claims that were made against both parties.
Both children were observed to be suffering the symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Both children complained at their treatment at the hands of the mothers partner, yet it was absolutely clear to the examiners that it was the father they feared. Each child independently expressed the fear that their father would kill them, one had nightmares about it. Expressions of fear do not get more profound than that.

The details outlined in these reports are deeply unpleasant. Unfortunately it is necessary to do this and I will ensure that only the completely necessary information is included. There is a duty to attempt to spread the truth in a matter of gross injustice such as this case represents and I have sought not to identify anyone by name other than the Doctors whose role appears to have been an honourable one.
Key Excerpts from the Two Medical Reports.
September 15th, 2014.
“Witness G “does not report any history of constipation or diarrhoea . However he does report that it does often hurt and he has often bled when opening his bowels although this had decreased significantly in the past two months which his sister says is because it is two months since they have seen their father. (the children were also removed from the school). He opens his bowels everyday and reports that his stool is soft. “( a detail that is unfortunately necessary due to later events)
Physical Abuse.
“Both G and A report that they have been hit multiple times with a metal spoon by mother’s partner over the head and the legs. They also report they have been pushed into walls. They also allege that mother’s partner holds his hand over their mouth till they “can’t breathe.” On a recent visit to Morocco over the summer witness G explains that he was hit on the ear by the mother’s partner in the left ear which caused his ear to bleed and his left eye to be swollen and bruised. G and A said that G was then not allowed to leave the holiday home until the bruises had disappeared.”
(Note: the details contained here completely destroy the notion that these allegations were made as the result of coaching. Did the mother’s partner also coach the children to make all these detailed and specific allegations against him? Of course he didn’t. The fact that these allegations against the mother’s partner were made at the same time as the allegations of sexual abuse is clearly overwhelming evidence that these children spoke the truth to the best of their ability about both issues and were not under external control of either party to a custody dispute as they made the allegations.)

Sexual abuse allegations.
“ A has explained that at school a teacher named Mr. H calls children over and makes them take off their underwear. A explained that she and other children including G are made to bend over and a “plastic willy” is inserted into the anus. Whilst Mr. H holds onto their hips. A also stated that Mr.H “makes noises” while this is done.
Of note, she says that he gives them a refresher bar to eat as a reward and to chew on while this is happening so they “can’t scream or make a noise” and they are asked to face forwards and not look backwards. G has said that the same thing has happened to him. G says that after this has happened he has bleeding from the anus and subsequently. it is very painful when he opens his bowels.”
Victim G Physical injuries described.
His (G) anus was examined in the left lateral position using gentle buttock separation for 30 seconds. He had one anal fissure scar at 9 o’clock on examination of the anus. There was no reflex anal dilation.”

“In both the general physical examination and the genital examination of G today. There are physical signs consistent with the allegations given by G and A. The scar in the anus is from a healed fissure, secondary to the application of a blunt penetrating force that he (G) has alleged.
In summary, G has physical signs consistent with his allegations of both physical abuse and sexual abuse. “
Dr. Harriett Gunn (SHO) to
Dr. Deborah Hodes.
Medical Report Dated September the 22nd 2014.

The report begins with Dr, Hodes outlining her extensive experience in the field. Twenty four years worth.
Dr.Hodes states that she was present at two strategy meetings and two physical examinations relating to this case. In addition Dr. Hodes has spoken to Camden area social workers and also reviewed the photographic evidence pertaining to the children’s injuries.

Victim and WItness A on September 17th 2014.
Victim and Witness A during a Police interview.

Summary of Relevant Evidence Victim A..
“She alleged that lubrication was used prior to the insertion of the penis or plastic penis and identified and discussed this with her foster carer.. She also told me about having had an injection. She alleged that bleeding occurred after the event and then had pain on opening her bowels.”
“She told me that she has difficulty getting to sleep and she has bad dreams including dreaming of her father killing her ”
Physical Findings.
“Below is a list of injuries found in a physical examination of A shown in body maps and the police photographs.”

1.“3 x 4mm abrasion to the pinna of her left ear and 3mm laceration posterior to her left ear overlying the mastoid, A alleged she was pinched and picked up by her ear on Morocco.”
2. “7mm longtitudinal abrasion (excoriated) on the right lateral aspect of her right ankle. A alleged she had been pushed against an outside wall and “had picked it” when she was in Morocco.”
3. “2.0cm x 0.5cm healing abrasion on the left side of the chin. A alleged that she was hit across the face with a metal spoon while in Morocco.“
Below is a list of injuries found on ano-genital examination of A recorded in the DVDs.
(Warning Note: This is deeply unpleasant and awful and a quick summary is that there are multiple and in my opinion horrific injuries to A’s nether regions)
“1. In the left lateral position with gentle buttock separation there was anal laxity and a brief view of the rectum. In the knee chest position with gentle buttock separation, there was reflex anal dilation (RAD) after 5-10 seconds. The reflex anal dilation continued and there was a view into the rectal ampulla and there was no stool present.
2. There was a healed scar in the ruggae at the 10 -11 o’clock position extending from the anal orifice to the anal verge. It was seen in both the left lateral position and the knee to chest position. The abnormalities in the ruggae at the 4 0′ c;ock and 5 o’clock positions may represent healed scar tissue or variation in the ruggae.configuration.”
There are between two and four injuries, with two undoubted and two speculative.
Conclusions regarding the allegations.
“The physical injuries found on her skin are consistent with the physical abuse she described.
In the absence of a history of constipation, medical illness or accidental trauma according to the GP’s notes, the anogenital findings of the scar and the RAD are consistent with her allegations of the application of a blunt penetrating force to her anus (2); sexual abuse.”
She has described symptoms of post traumatic stress.”

Summary of A and G by Dr. Hodes.
“In my opinion A and G are suffering significant harm as evidenced by the following:-
1.Both children have physical signs of physical abuse that support their allegations.
2.Both children have physical signs of sexual abuse that support their allegations.
3.They have symptoms of post traumatic stress.
4. It is now understood from a 2007 substantiated study of child sexual abuse that retraction occurs far more commonly (16% in this series) than previously thought.
5. In my opinion, the extensive and detailed accounts given by both children that were repeated to different professionals contain details of sexual acts that such young children would need to have direct experience of.”  (Note: in order to be able to describe them is the unwritten implication.)

To put it simply, Dr. Hodes is stating that there is physical evidence in support of both sets of allegations which really highlights how farcical the entire “they were coached” counter-narrative really is. Because children who have been coached to make false allegations in order to influence a custody battle we are told, were not even coached to lie about the minor physical injuries they suffered at the hands allegedly of the mother’s partner. What kind of coaching is that?
It really shows the desperation to protect that this preposterous and absurd notion was even floated as the counter-narrative. It is pathetic and insulting. Truly laughable.

Dr Hodes signature
Dr. Hodes signs off on the September 22nd report. She plainly rejected the retractions.

Ethical and Legal Issues.
The leaking of these documents may constitute a criminal offense, I honestly do not know, but it is obvious that these records have been released in the broader public interest in order to oppose and expose a clear and outrageous injustice. These are exceptional circumstances in which otherwise unethical or even unlawful actions are necessary and just in my opinion.
Why is this happening?
It beggars belief that this investigation was curtailed and destroyed in order to protect a Z grade actor or even the Staff and Institutional reputation of the school and church involved. Something far more important is being protected here, but it is completely unclear whom or what have managed to engineer the stunning travesty that led to the Investigating Police coaching and bullying retractions from the child victims, Witnesses and Victims A and G.
The real mystery at this point is who is protecting this and why?
The way it is being covered up you would almost get the on it’s face ludicrous idea that this was some type of mad, satanic leadership induction program. The people involved may believe they are doing what is right for their children in some sick parallel universe sense.

We Are Living in a Twilight Zone of Serial Denial.
It is completely possible that elements of the stories the children tell that do not relate to events they actually witnessed may be embellished or even incorrect. There is sadly no doubt that whatever the veracity of the claims the police made a decision, a bizarre and inexplicable decision to destroy the case and conduct a cover up. Unless and until the police have a rethink as is inevitable but may take  decades, there is little that can be done to even begin to seek justice for the Hampstead victims beyond trying to expose this to enough people that it causes an uproar that requires an immediate police rethink.
We seem to exist in a bizarre twilight zone where anyone with any connection to power can apparently do what they like to children and expect to suffer only the infamy of the grave. As long as you are not fussed about your reputation when deceased and you are connected you do not even have to be discreet. Once you die it will all emerge of course and your name and reputation will be destroyed but other than that there is no penalty.
While it has become clear again and again that the unthinkable has actually been rather routine, that these unbelievably evil crimes have been happening for decades and yet when confronted with a genuine contemporary cover up, the entire “official” British media have literally not a word to say.

Other than the Hamptead and Highgate Express. The local weekly paper had their say recently,  they covered the story from the point of view of the alleged perpetrators, predictably, so the reference to the case was rather incidental, but telling.
Google under fire after leaked personal details of Hampstead residents remain on web – Crime &amp; Court – Hampstead Highgate Express
The real story is instantly dismissed thus “The claims, which the mainstream media is barred by court order from reporting on, are said to have been investigated by police and found to be baseless.” Which I think can be fairly claimed to be a downright lie. Perhaps gratitude is the right response to the total lack of mainstream news coverage. Please note the brazen hypocrisy of the Hampstead and Highgate Express stating that “ which the mainstream media is barred by court order from reporting on” before continuing “are said to have been investigated by police and found to be baseless.” Clearly reporting (and indeed completely mendaciously and inaccurately) without naming or even alluding to a source, let alone any evidence to back up their dishonest claim. I hope they are proud of their work at the Hampstead and Highgate Express. Their efforts in support of evil will be rewarded in the deserved manner eventually I am sure, one way or another. It’s only a matter of time.
Return #WhistleblowerKids and #AbuseSurvivors to their Russian Family!
Sabine Kurjo McNeill | Voluntary Public Interest Advocacy
14 09 15 Medical report.pdf – Google Drive
14 09 22 Medical report.pdf – Google Drive
Royal Free Hospital in Hampstead to be investigated over links with Jimmy Savile – Health – Hampstead Highgate Express
PLAYLIST of 45 videos re #Whistleblower and #WhistleblowerKids | ‘Whistleblower Kids’ in the Court of Public Interest
JUSTICE DENIED: Live Recording as Police raid Pedophile Ring Whistle-blower kids mum’s home
Abusers Online | ‘Whistleblower Kids’ in the Court of Public Interest
Whistleblower Kids’ in the Court of Public Interest | From Child Snatching and the Secrecy of Family Courts to Forced Adoptions, Child Sexual Exploitation and Satanic Ritual Abuse
JOINING Video Dots with #WhistleblowerKids: Exposing World run by Powerful #Paedophiles | ‘Whistleblower Kids’ in the Court of Public Interest
Dr Deborah Hodes
FORWARD UK on Twitter: “FORWARD Trustee, Dr Deborah Hodes, announces opening of the first specialist #FGM clinic in London
ZeeklyTV – Anonymous’s Channel
Dr Hodes Sources.
Lindsay C Malloy, MA Thomas D Lyon JD, and Joia A Quas
Fillal Dependency and recantation of Child Sex Abuse Allegations.
J.Am Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 46:2, 2007.

Bradley Ar, Wood, JM, How Do Children Tell?
The disclosure process in child sexual abuse.
Negl. 20 881-891. 1996

The British Medical Association Confidentiality Guide for Staff.(called the confidentiality toolkit)
Excerpts Relevant to this Case.
1. The duty of confidentiality
Confidentiality is an essential requirement for the preservation of trust between patients and health professionals and is subject to legal and ethical safeguards. Patients should be able to expect that information about their health which they give in confidence will be kept confidential unless there is a compelling reason why it should not. There is also a strong public interest in maintaining confidentiality so that individuals will be encouraged to seek appropriate treatment and share information relevant to it.

Using and disclosing information
3. data should be anonymised wherever possible .
occasionally, when it is not practicable to obtain consent, information may be disclosed where the law requires or where there is an overriding public interest, eg where child abuse is suspected
• disclosures should be kept to the minimum necessary to achieve the purpose
5. Anonymisation
Information may be used more freely if the subject of the information is not identifiable in any way.
Usually, data can be considered to be anonymous where clinical or administrative information is separated from details that may permit the individual to be identified such as name, date of birth and postcode. Even where such obvious identifiers are missing, rare diseases, drug treatments or statistical analyses which have very small numbers within a small population may allow individuals to be identified. A combination of items increases the chances of patient identification.
When anonymised data will serve the purpose, health professionals must anonymise data to this
extent and, if necessary, take technical advice about anonymisation before releasing data. Whilst it is not ethically necessary to seek consent for the use of anonymised data, general information about when their data will be anonymised should be available to patients.
*S.H.O Senior House Officer A junior doctor in the pre Modernising Medical Careers era (pre-2007) of training in the UK, in the 2nd post-graduate year–i.e., immediately after the PRHO–pre-registration house officer year, which is now designated Foundation Year 1–FY1. SHOs are now called FY-2. Some SHO posts still exist and are taken as a prelude to certain specialities–e.g., surgery, but are no longer a standard year in training schemes for junior doctors in the UK



Memorandum on Eyewitness Evidence of the Organized Abduction, Torture, Exploitation and Murder of Women and Children on Canada’s West Coast – UTAH’S MORMON SATANIC RITUAL ABUSES AND BLOODY RITUAL MURDERS

From the Files of the Community Task Force on the Disappeared – Downtown Eastside of Vancouver

Memorandum on Eyewitness Evidence of the Organized Abduction, Torture, Exploitation and Murder of Women and Children on Canada’s West Coast


1.     An organized system of abduction, exploitation, torture and murder of large numbers of women and children appears to exist on Canada ’s west coast, and is operated and protected in part by sectors of the RCMP, the Vancouver Police Department (VPD), the judiciary, and members of the British Columbia government and federal government of Canada , including the Canadian military.

2.     This system is highly funded and linked to criminal organizations including the Hell’s Angels, the Hong Kong Triad, and unnamed individual “free lance” mobsters from Vancouver and the USA . It is funded in part by a massive drug trade, with which it is intimately connected.

3.     This system is decades-old and has been supplied for many years with women and children from aboriginal reserves and residential schools, with the paid collusion of lawyers, clergy and officials of the Roman Catholic, Anglican and United Church of Canada, along with state-funded aboriginal leaders and officials of the Department of Indian Affairs.

4.     This system is international in scope, Vancouver being one spoke in a wheel of pedophilia, sex slavery, human organ black markets, “snuff” films and violent child pornography that has outlets throughout the Pacific Rim world, particularly in China and Thailand.

5.     This system relies upon a network of complicity extending to the highest levels of power in Canada and other nations, involving coroners, judges, doctors, clergy, politicians and social workers, as well as the media. It also relies upon a network of “body dumping grounds” and mass graves, located in remote rural areas or on aboriginal reserves and both church and Crown land, where human remains are regularly disposed of by RCMP officers.

6.     This system is kept in place because of a practice and philosophy of tolerance and protection by the established police, judicial, military, church and governmental institutions in Canada and elsewhere. The crimes committed by individual officers of the police, churches, court and government against women and children caught in this system are known and tolerated by these institutions.

Eyewitness Accounts

Eyewitness #1: Caucasian woman, age forty nine, domiciled in Vancouver at 2618 West 8th Avenue , ph: 778-386-7024.Given name of witness is Annie PARKER, who claims to have personal knowledge of the allegations made herein. Statement video-recorded on 16 February 2006, in Vancouver .

1.     The witness states that during the spring of 2000, she was severely assaulted by an officer of the RCMP, Bruce MICHAELSON, in her Vancouver home after requesting RCMP assistance to deal with harassment from her ex-husband. MICHAELSON tortured the witness and compelled her to join what she terms “the hooker game”, where she learned the facts alleged herein.

2.     The alleged “hooker game” is a protected system run by Vancouver police and RCMP officers in which prostitutes are arrested, drugged, raped and sometimes filmed as part of violent pornographic and “snuff” movies, in which they are tortured and killed on film. The women killed in this manner are then disposed of at special body dumping sites monitored by the police.

3.     The witness claims that there are two levels of the “hooker game”: the simplest level involves the arrest, drugging and raping of prostitutes, then releasing them. The witness estimates that at least one-quarter of all Vancouver policemen take part in this level of the “hooker game”, and that the rest of the police force as well as the Mayor and Chief of Police are aware of it. The higher level of the game involves the use of prostitutes in snuff and pornographic films, and in torturing and murdering them. While unaware of the details of the more extreme level of the game, most police know of its existence but do not betray it or its practitioners for fear that their involvement in the lower level of the game will be exposed.

4.     The witness claims that the drug most commonly used on victims of the “hooker game” is SCOPALAMINE, a hypnotic barbituate often termed a “rape drug”, in which the victim is “zombified”, obeying any command, and then is unable to remember the events for some time. However, memory can return, and the fear of this occurring has prompted MICHAELSON and other participants in the more extreme game to murder the victims and dispose of their bodies. MICHAELSON is the key actor in this body disposal system, according to the witness.

5.     Soon after the assault of the witness by MICHAELSON in the spring of 2000, she was taken by MICHAELSON to one of the locations of the “hooker game”: a “clubhouse” for policemen in either the penthouse of the Century Plaza Hotel or in the basement of the Hotel Georgia in downtown Vancouver . Witness claims that this clubhouse hosts a “pornographic film studio where woman are raped and tortured on film”. MICHAELSON is described by the witness as “a pimp and drug dealer for all the Vancouver cops and their friends … a lot of the dealing goes on at the clubhouse.”

6.     Witness states that MICHAELSON works out of a North Vancouver RCMP detachment and is on the city drug squad, having access to large volumes of illicit drugs that he sells to policemen and others.

7.     At one of the clubhouses described in Point No… 5, the witness was introduced by MICHAELSON to Willy PICTON and Steven PICTON, who ran and continue to run a pornography and snuff film business from Port Coquitlam (alias “Piggy’s Palace”). The witness was subsequently taken by Steven PICTON to the Port Coquitlam site (alias “Piggy’s Palace”) on several occasions to engage in sex and drugs. At this site, she witnessed young girls being drugged and raped, including on film, after being brought to the site by RCMP officers. Witness describes seeing three RCMP officers, including MICHAELSON, at Piggy’s Palace, engaged in drugs and in raping women. Witness states that “ten of the twelve recently murdered women were last seen in the company of RCMP guys..”

8.     At Piggy’s Palace the witness also met Jean-Guy BOUDRAIS or BEAUDRAIS, whom witness claims is the serial killer responsible for the murder of many of the women in the downtown eastside of Vancouver over the past ten years. Witness states that BOUDRAIS is a close associate of MICHAELSON, obtains women and drugs from him, and relies on MICHAELSON to dispose of his victims after he has raped, tortured and killed them. Witness says that BOUDRAIS works for a computer programming company tied to the Canadian military or the federal government, and gives seminars in Ontario and Montreal , where he is domiciled. Witness claims that BOUDRAIS, like MICHAELSON, is a Freemason.

9.     Witness claims that Steven PICTON is the ringleader of the snuff film operation that formerly operated out of Piggy’s Palace, and which has now moved to an undisclosed location in Coquitlam. One of PICTON’s associates operates a front for snuff films out of a company named “Goodbye Girls” at 999 West Broadway in Vancouver . Witness claims that snuff film victims’ bodies are weighted with cement blocks and dumped in Beaver Lake in Stanley Park ..

10. Witness claims that a snuff film network in Vancouver involves MICHAELSON, a CBC cameraman named Gerry DUNNE associated with Pogo Productions, a film maker named Dave COLLINS who owns Lions Gate Studios, an underworld enforcer named LARRY, a porn film star named Tom TASSE, and the PICTON brothers. TASSE worked in a snuff film studio in the basement of a North Vancouver home a few blocks from MICHAELSON’s RCMP office. Snuff films sell for up to $250,000 and have eager buyers in Asian countries and the USA .

11. Witness was told by MICHAELSON that he acts as the main supplier of women and drugs for this snuff film network and for the “hooker game” with the assistance of three “dirty cops”: a local policeman named Bob KRISKO, and two RCMP officers named DAVE and STEVEN. Both of the latter cops are associated with the Missing Women’s Task Force and use this position to prey on and rape/murder street women in Vancouver ..

12.  Witness claims that both DAVE and STEVEN are also associated with BOUDRAIS and have raped and murdered women with him, including Brianne VOTH, age 19, who was abducted, raped and drowned in 2004 in Coquitlam by BOUDRAIS and STEVEN, in association with a prostitute named Stella MALLOWAY.

13. Witness was told by MICHAELSON that either DAVE or STEVEN own a cabin that serves as a body dumping site for women killed by them, BOUDRAIS and others. The cabin is located ten minutes’ drive west of Horseshoe Bay on the Sea to Sky Highway , in a hunting camp off a dirt road. Bodies are dumped in a metal cistern at this site.

14. Witness states that MICHAELSON introduced her to BOUDRAIS in 2002 and BOUDRAIS abducted her and drove her to this body dumping site. When witness began screaming and claimed that others knew she was with him, BOUDRAIS returned her to Vancouver after raping her. While threatening witness not to talk, BOUDRAIS told her that he and DAVE and STEVEN murder on average four to six women every year.

15. After this attack by BOUDRAIS, witness began to seek outside help, including by contacting the FBI (see Point No.16 below), and as a consequence was nearly killed by MICHAELSON in retaliation. On January 9 of either 2003 or 2004, MICHAELSON broke into the Kitsilano apartment of the witness and broke her ribs, jaw and arm with a baseball bat. MICHAELSON then tied her up, put her in trunk of his car and drove her to the policemen’s “clubhouse” in the Hotel Georgia basement. MICHAELSON then said to the witness, “Now I’ll show you what we do to hookers”, and proceeded to torture her with dental instruments, including on her genitalia, branding her cult-style with an insignia. MICHAELSON then told the witness “We own you now”, and put her to work as a prostitute and lure to attract other women into the game.

16. The witness went to Vancouver General Hospital for treatment after her torture, and was treated at the Oak street clinic by a Dr. Jean McLENNAN or McLAREN. A report of her injuries was filed by this doctor with the Vancouver Police Deaprtment that same week.

17.  The “hooker game” receives judicial protection from at least one judge, a justice GROBBERMAN, who prior to being a judge served in the provincial Attorney-General’s office under the very man, Ernie QUANTZ, who organized a judicial cover-up on behalf of several prominent pedophiles during the 1980’s. The witness claims seeing other judges and Prime Minister Paul MARTIN at the policemen’s clubhouse in downtown Vancouver during the same evening that MICHAELSON and the PICTON brothers were present, and while drugs and prostitutes were being used. Also in attendance that evening were members of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) and Canadian military officers.

18. After she was attacked by BOUDRAIS, the witness phoned the FBI and asked for an investigation of BOUDRAIS, which occurred in 2005. The FBI investigators were misdirected by MICHAELSON to a false witness who shared the same first name as the witness, and as a result the FBI claimed that there was no evidence against BOUDRAIS. VPD detective Rabinovitch who assisted the FBI also claimed that BOUDRAIS could not be found even though he was circulating openly in Vancouver at the same time. One of the FBI investigators told the witness, however, that BOUDRAIS’s description matched those of the Green River Killer, a serial rapist and murderer in the USA who is still at large.

19. Witness claims that MICHAELSON provides security for foreign diplomats in Vancouver and film industry stars, including Eddie MURPHY, to whom MICHAELSON introduced the witness in 2002. Witness claims that MURPHY raped and sadistically assaulted her, slicing her skin with a knife and leaving permanent scars on her shoulder and neck. (see videotaped interview)Witness states that MURPHY was also responsible for the death of two women during the years 2002-3 in Vancouver : a 21 year old Asian porn actress and a prostitute, both of whom were provided to MURPHY by MICHAELSON, and whose bodies were disposed of by the latter after MURPHY had tortured and raped them, and then overdosed them on drugs.

20.  Witness states that she reported the attack on her by MURPHY to a Detective SCOTT with the VPD, along with the claim of MURPHY’s murder of the two women, but when MICHAELSON learned of the complaint he tortured the witness with a knife, carving her neck and face, (see videotaped interview) and threatened to kill her if she pressed charges against MURPHY. Witness then withdrew her complaint. Detective SCOTT subsequently confirmed to the witness that MURPHY was responsible for the murders but they had not enough evidence to prosecute him.

21. Witness believes that MICHAELSON and his associates are “hunting prostitutes of intelligence” and are engaged “in a kind of ethnic cleansing … they target Indians and girls as young as twelve or thirteen.” She believes there is a connection between MICHAELSON’s network and the disappearances of aboriginal women along the Highway of Tears in northern British Columbia .

22. Witness states that she is kept under constant electronic surveillance by MICHAELSON and his associates, and that her apartment keys have been copied by them to allow their regular access. This is “standard procedure when it comes to women they have hooked into the game”, according to the witness.

23. All of the facts described herein by the witness were related by her in person to Linda Malcolm, a police woman with the VPD in January of 2006, as part of the Missing Women’s Task Force. No action has been forthcoming.

Further background on Eyewitness #1:

Annie PARKER states that she was raised in North Bay, Ontario and was used in a child pedophile ring in that city by her father, LEN PARKER, who was a prominent Freemason and newspaper editor who was associated with the NORAD military base in the same city. Annie PARKER says her father raped and tortured her throughout her childhood, and was involved in “mind control research” at the aforementioned NORAD base. He often spoke to her about the so-called “Marionette Syndrome”, whereby a subject is rendered into a mentally docile puppet as the result of extreme torture and trauma. He told the witness that these experiments were being done on children at the NORAD base by American researchers, and that the local pedophile ring existed to provide test subjects to these researchers, as well as child prostitutes to judges and politicians.

The witness also claims that, in 1961, when she was four years old, she and an aboriginal girl named Rosemary, who was six, were abducted and jailed in a farmhouse owned by Freemasons where they were serially raped. Rosemary had been abducted from the local Indian reserve. During the rapes, Rosemary tried to help the witness escape from the barn and was caught and killed, and then her skull was displayed in the local Freemason Hall. The witness feels forever indebted to Rosemary for saving her life, and is committed to helping children like her.

Eyewitness #2: Caucasian woman, mid fifties, normally domiciled in Powell River, B.C. but presently living in hiding in Alberta. Given name is Dagmar STEPHENS. As a former nurse, human resources social worker and child apprehension court worker in the Powell River and Zeballos area, the witness claims to have personal knowledge of the allegations made herein. Statement made during the week of 2-7 February, 2006, by telephone.

1.     Witness states that she was recently forced out of the coastal community of Powell River , B.C. and had her life threatened because of her firsthand knowledge of the role of local RCMP, church officials and doctors in the murder of local women and children, and in the importation of illegal drugs and armaments from overseas.

2.     Witness is a former social and court worker who worked in the aboriginal community and among youth between 1982 and 2004. She was a member of the Powell River United Church until forced from its congregation by ministers Dave NEWELL and Cameron REID after she claimed that local church members were importing drugs and engaging in pedophilia. (Note: REID was one of the two church officials who handed Rev. Kevin ANNETT his summary dismissal notice in 1995 after ANNETT began to uncover church crimes among native people  in Port Alberni)

3.     Witness has firsthand knowledge that Dr. Harvey HENDERSON of the Zeballos health clinic is deliberately addicting aboriginal people to a lethal drug named Oxycotin, a synthetic heroin that induces suicidal behavior. He is doing so at the behest of officials of the state-funded Nuu-Chah-Nulth Tribal Council (NTC) in Port Alberni , BC , in order for the land of his murdered patients to be bought up cheaply by NTC officers. HENDERSON has himself bought much native land on the Ahousat reserve on Flores Island , which he services as a doctor and where he freely distributes the Oxycotin drug. In 2005, all of the suicides among the Ahousats occurred while HENDERSON was working there. HENDERSON lives in Sayward , BC , north of Campbell River .

4.     In 2004, witness observed the unloading of drugs and armaments off a black seaplane in the Okeover Inlet near Powell River, under the oversight of Bob PAQUIN, former officer in Quebec secret police and convicted pedophile, Tracy ELKINS, former officer in the South African army, and Colin McCORMACK and Roland LEWIS, local businessmen and associates of the Mayor, coroner and RCMP. Witness claims that these men operate local drug importation with RCMP protection, and deal drugs to local youth and aboriginals. All three are local Freemasons and members of Catholic Knights of Malta , along with Stu ALFGARD, local coroner and pedophile.

5.     Witness claims that a similar drug drop off point is at Bliss Landing seaport and helicopter pad, north of Powell River , where Americans regularly fly in drugs.

6.     Witness began to run afoul of this group when, in 1986, her local youth group resolved to confront drug use in Powell River schools, and found immediate resistance to their efforts from the school administration, churches, and social services. Witness then asked parents and local police to support them, which they did; an undercover squad of police began to monitor the activities of aforementioned suspects. But within one year, during 1988, all seven of these undercover policemen died, including head cop Bruce DENNISTON, and their deaths were all ruled as being caused by cancer by coroner and pedophile/drug importer ALFGARD.

7.     Witness claims that in 2002, a local Anglican minister named KAREN died suddenly after speaking out publicly about the role of the local Masonic Lodge in suspected drug dealing and pedophilia. Her fellow activist in this exposure, Foursquare Baptist church pastor Gord FRALIC, quickly moved out of town after KAREN’s death and relocated to Kelowna ..

8.     Witness is presently residing in Alberta in fear of her life, after being directly threatened and attacked by Tracy ELKINS, former South African army officer and principal drug dealer in Powell River area. Witness states that ELKINS assaulted her and drugged her son after witness continued to investigate local drug importing networks. Witness claims that BC politicians and Powell River residents Gordon WILSON and Judy TYABJI were made aware of all of these facts and declined to support her or the anti-drug educational work of her youth group.

Eyewitness #3: Aboriginal man in his mid forties, resident and maintenance worker employed at the Musqueam Indian Reserve off 51st Avenue on the west side of Vancouver , adjacent to the University of British Columbia . Given name of witness is Leslie GUERIN; domiciled at 3908 KeKait Place , Vancouver , cell phone No.: 778-772-5640. Initial statement made on videotape during the period 9 May – June 6, 2005, with additional statements made during period of 3 December – 18 January, 2006, in Vancouver ..

1.     Witness is a member of the Musqueam First Nation in Vancouver who has worked as a maintenance worker and labourer on the Musqueam Reserve since 1990. He is a confidant and associate of many Musqueam officials and politicians. In this position, witness claims to have firsthand and personal knowledge of the allegations he makes herein.

2.     Summary of allegations of witness: The Musqueam Reserve has operated as a mass grave and body dumping site since at least 1989. It is also a center of illegal drug and armaments importing through the adjoining Celtic Shipyards, and is connected to native-run pedophile rings that extend to northern B.C. and southern Alberta . The Musqueam band council leaders, especially the GUERIN, SPARROW and GRANT-JOHN families, are involved in these criminal activities in conjunction with officials of the RCMP, the First Nations Summit and the federal government of Canada . The government provides political and judicial protection for these crimes since the pedophile and body disposal activities by the PICTON brothers and others take place at the behest and in the interest of the government of Canada . The government and police also side with and protect the SPARROW and GUERIN families in their efforts to attack and undermine other families at Musqueam in order to seize their land and other effects, even when these methods result in deaths. One of these methods of terrorizing other Musqueams utilized by the SPARROW-GUERIN-JOHN clique is to seize their children and transport them off the reserve, including into pedophile rings connected with the provincial government’s Ministry of Children and Families. This clique conducts criminal activities on the Musqueam reserve, including drug dealing, strong-arming of dissidents or critics, illegally selling salmon and other fish as well as cigarettes and alcohol, wrongfully evicting band members from their homes and disentitling them of their land and DIA payments.

3.     Witness claims that the Musqueam Reserve has functioned as a body-dumping and mass burial site since at least 1989, when he personally observed Willie PICTON deposit and bury large garbage bags in a pit directly opposite the Musqueam First Nation office on the reserve. (See his statement, Exhibit A).Witness claims that he subsequently disinterred the contents of these bags and found numerous bones that upon examination proved to be human, including parts of pelvis, skull and femur. Witness retains samples of these remains in his possession while other samples, including an adult female humerus, are held at Simon Fraser University ….

4.     Corollary evidence of this allegation was provided by the witness in the form of a letter (Exhibit B) by Musqueam Housing Officer A. Glenn GUERIN dated 29 October 2004, which states that Dave PICTON, brother of Willie, was employed by the Musqueam band under contract for three of four months during 1989 or 1990, to provide land fill for a street extension.

5.     Witness states that the activities of Willie and Dave PICTON on the Musqueam reserve were fully known and approved by all the band councilors at Musqueam, including Wendy SPARROW, aka Wendy GRANT-JOHN, federal Department of Indian Affairs official and wife of accused pedophile-drug dealer Chief Ed JOHN, who is domiciled at the Musqueam reserve and owns adjoining Celtic Shipyards.

6.     Witness reported the activities of the PICTON brothers at Musqueam in 2002 to the Vancouver police (VPD), after the “ Piggy Palace ” story was reported in local media. But Ed and Leona SPARROW stopped the subsequent police investigation of the remains deposited at Musqueam by the PICTONs after arranging a cover-up with VPD Constable Scott ROLLINS (Badge #2028) and officer Jodine KELLER. Leona SPARROW was also seen attending parties at the PICTON’s “Pig Farm” in company of RCMP.

Missing women poster – see

and from the UK’s “Independent” “newspaper”:

“How the horrific case of serial killer William Pickton, who may have killed up to 50 women, shone light on plight of Vancouver’s First Nation women”

7.     The following media were contacted by the witness and informed of the remains deposited by the PICTONs at Musqueam, but declined from investigating: Mike CLARKE, City TV, Kelly RYAN, CBC radio, Gerald BELLETT, Vancouver Sun, and Karen Urguhart, The Province. Also notified by witness was William MACDONALD, Office of the Police Complaints Commissioner in Vancouver .

8.     After more than two years, on November 3, 2004, witness and fellow Musqueam band member Jim KEW made a formal complaint to the VPD Complaints Commissioner about the refusal of police to investigate either the burial site at Musqueam or the apparent role of the PICTONs in burying the remains. (Exhibit C) No response has been received from the VPD at any level.

9.     Witness reports seeing Uzi guns and other automatic weapons being unloaded from containers at Celtic Shipyards, 3150 Celtic Avenue , in the summer of 1988, under the supervision of SPARROW relatives Joe BECKER and Wayne GUERIN. BECKER spoke to witness at the time and referred to the importing of drugs through the same shipyard in vessels using false bow fronts. Witness worked as a security guard at Celtic Shipyards between 1995 and 2001, and observed similar unloading of guns and drugs during these years.

10. Witness claims that same Joe BECKER works as an enforcer for Musqueam band officials, including the GUERIN and SPARROW families, along with Walter Dunstan CAMPBELL, whom witness says was arrested with the body of a dead woman in his car trunk, but was quickly released. CAMPBELL also operates protection system for child porn film operation at Carrall and Hastings streets, which in 2004-5 operated behind the front of a bank..

11. Witness claims that other Musqueam officials involved in this child porn film operation include Robert GUERIN, Andrew CHARLES, Frank and Jason MALLOWAY (see Point No. 12 in Testimony #1, re: Stella MALLOWAY), a non-native drug dealer named “DA SILVA”, and Chief Ed JOHN. CHARLES, JOHN and CAMPBELL, along with Ed SPARROW, were responsible for the gang rape and beating of Marlon LOUIE, a band member, during 2003 after LOUIE had discovered a “hit list” of the Musqueam “goon squad” headed by Joe BECKER and Walter Dunstan CAMPBELL .

12. BECKER and CAMPBELL head this enforcement “goon squad” on Musqueam reserve that includes former Canucks hockey player Gino OJICK, who owns Musqueam Golf Course Café. Witness claims that OJICK attempted to kill him with poison in 2002 after witness went to the VPD with allegation about PICTON brothers’ activities at Musqueam.

13. Witness claims that the main security officer for the Musqueam reserve, ex-Edmonton policeman David LAVALLEE, is part of this enforcement/goon squad. LAVALLEE left the Edmonton police under a cloud of suspicion concerning his involvement in the rape and disappearance of local women and children.

14. Witness claims that the members of this enforcement/goon squad are responsible for the deaths of numerous Musqueam band members, often through staging fake car accidents or executing people with drug overdoses. These deaths occur in order to seize the homes and land of the murdered persons, and secure the power of the SPARROW-GUERIN clique. One such murder occurred in 2000 when a young native woman named GANARJEE was evicted for not being able to pay her property taxes, which had been wrongfully increased by the GUERIN-SPARROW clique. She then became homeless on Hastings street , was addicted to drugs by CAMPBELL , and then “overdosed” and died. The SPARROW family then received her home and property.

15. Witness claims that GANARJEE’s property was seized by lawyer Marvin STORROW of Blake, Cassells and Graydon law firm in Vancouver , who works closely with the SPARROW clique and their relative Chief Ed JOHN. (Note: STORROW represented JOHN in a 2002 BC Supreme Court lawsuit that silenced JOHN’s critics and imposed a gag order on any media reporting of the accusations of criminal actions by JOHN. )STORROW has a long history of involvement with the Musqueam band and the SPARROW family (see Exhibit D) and has strong ties with the federal Liberal party. Leona SPARROW who is associated with the PICTONs and concealed their activity at Musqueam (see Point No. 6) has worked for STORROW’s law firm.

16. Other lawyers and firms associated with the SPARROW clique and their activities include Lou HARVEY and Smithe-Radcliffe law firm. HARVEY is an old associate of STORROW and has helped to steal and illegally transfer Musqueam land into the control of Squamish politicians working for the federal government.

17. Witness claims that the SPARROW clique evade federal laws limiting the  commercial sale of salmon by aboriginal people, and completely monopolize an illegal blackmarket in fish operating out of the Musqueam reserve… Wendy GRANT-JOHN (a former SPARROW) operates her own fish store, Longhouse Seafoods in the Dunbar region of Vancouver , which illegally sells sockeye and other salmon. The enforcement/goon squad silence band criticism of these acts.

18. Similarly, in a written statement dated December 26, 2005, the witness claims “For the record, all the elders whom have died, it’s Wendy’s family (who) lives in each and every home that comes from another unexpected death … they (the SPARROW clique) have a group of people monitoring each band member and so they wait for a window of opportunity to strike. They pick targets in the community and slowly tear them apart – dilibritly destroy lives.”

19. The witness has drawn three separate maps of the Musqueam reserve that identify the location of two major body dumping and burial sites (Exhibit E, 1-3).

Witness #4: Retired aboriginal man in his late fifties, a band councilor and member of the Musqueam band and a friend of Witness #3. Given name is Arthur STOGAN sr, he is a direct descendent of the hereditary chiefs of the Musqueam people. Resides on the reserve, phone 604-263-6295.His lifelong residence at Musqueam and involvement as a band councilor gives him a personal knowledge of the facts he alleges herein. Initial statement made on videotape during the period 9 May – June 6, 2005, with additional statements made during period of 3 December – 18 January, 2006, in Vancouver .

1.       Witness affirms all that witness #3 alleges in his statement, adding that he and his extended family are being targeted by the SPARROW clique for their opposition to the crimes described. In particular, witness claims that his grandchildren have been deliberately seized by Ministry of Children and Family (MCF) officials and sent into foster homes operated by known pedophiles in order to silence the witness and force him into conformity. (See Exhibit F) (Note: MCF was run by SPARROW relative and Musqueam enforcer Ed JOHN during 2000-2001 when he served in the provincial government after being appointed, though unelected, to the cabinet of Premier Ujjal DOSANJH)..

2.       Witness claims that after the death of his father, Vincent STOGAN, the hereditary chief of the Musqueam, in 2000, attacks against he and his family were made by the SPARROW clique on the reserve, especially after the witness began to speak out against that clique’s corrupt and nepotistic practices. These attacks culminated in February of 2004, when all fourteen of the witnesses’ grandchildren were seized by Xyolhemeylh, the Child Protection Society of the Sto”lo First Nation near Chilliwack . Witness was denied any visiting rights, even though one of his grand daughters was placed in the home of a convicted pedophile by Xyolhemeylh worker Loretta ROSZA, who also falsified reports and made false claims about the children. ROSZA is associated with Wendy GRANT-JOHN (SPARROW) through the Sumas First Nation. Both the Chilliwack and Mission detachments of the RCMP refused to investigate complaints by the witness regarding these actions. (Exhibit F)

3.       Witness states that another reason for this attack on he and his family is his discovery of evidence that the present SPARROW clique and their relatives cooperated with the federal government in destroying traditional records and histories of the Musqueam and Coast Salish people during the 1970’s, as part of the effort to ethnically cleanse west coast aboriginal people and steal their land. A letter from the Department of Indian Affairs dated September 22, 1972 states that individual records of native people in B.C. were to be destroyed under the scrutiny of Chief Clarence Joe, a SPARROW relative. (see Exhibit G)These records included evidence of original land ownership and genealogy..

4.       Witness states that there is a direct link between criminal and pedophile networks involving aboriginal politicians in both Musqueam and Cowichan nations because of traditional kinship ties across Georgia Straight. Witness claims that Joe BECKER, Delbert GUERIN and Andrew CHARLES are linked to Cowichan chiefs who are heavily involved in the drug trade, illegal fishing and pedophile rings operating out of Nanaimo , centred around the HARRIS family of the Chemainus First Nation.

5.       In December of 2005, the witness compiled these allegations into a letter to Amnesty International, and sent with this letter forensic samples of the alleged human remains unearthed by Witness #3 at the Musqueam burial site visited by the PICTONs. This letter and package were returned to the witness unopened. Both witness and Witness #3 live in daily fear for their lives.

Witness #5: An aboriginal man, age fifty five, who is traditional hereditary chief of the Chemainus Nation in Oyster Bay , BC , on Vancouver Island. Given name is Steven SAMPSON jr., he resides on his traditional family land near Shell Beach .. He has lived all of his life in proximity with the people described in his statement, and as a traditional chief and a former activist in the American Indian Movement and the Red Power Movement, he has direct and personal knowledge of the facts alleged herein. Statement made during the period 3-19 June, 2005, in Shell Beach .

1.             Witness claims that the present leadership of the Chemainus First Nation is deeply involved in illegal activity, and are responsible for murders on the local reserves. This leadership revolves around George HARRIS and George, Ed and Peter SEYMOUR, whom witness claim operate the local drug and child trafficking and child porn networks in conjunction with Nanaimo criminal Willie CURRIE. CURRIE operates a local equivalent of the PICTON “Pig Farm” in a house on Jingle Pot Road in Nanaimo , where he has raped and murdered numerous young girls, including Lisa Marie DEYONG in 2004.

2.             Witness states that George HARRIS is closely connected to the GUERIN-SPARROW clique in Musqueam, and engages in illegal fishing and drug importation practices with them across Georgia Straight. The parents of HARRIS, Irene and Lawrence HARRIS, were Catholic church-sponsored “watchmen” who transported children into the Kuper Island Residential School during the 1940’s and ‘50’s, and who were descended from collaborating puppet “chiefs” set up by Catholic missionaries in the 19thcentury.

3.             Witness claims that the HARRIS clique have tried to force him and his family off their land for years, through physical intimidation, murder, poisoning their water, and attempting to kill off the SAMPSON blood line through involuntary sterilizations inflicted on both of the witness’ sons, Troy and Steve, at Royal Jubilee Hospital in Victoria, BC.

Witness #6: Aboriginal woman in her mid-fifties, given name is Bernice WILLIAMS (native name SKUNDAAL), of Haida and Nuu-Chah-Nulth ancestry. Member of the Downtown Eastside Womens’ Centre in Vancouver, and an activist since the 1970’s with native and womens’ groups across B.C. Statement made on April 3 and April 28, 2006, in Vancouver, B.C.

1.     Witness claims that a senior Vancouver police officer named Dave DICKSON is responsible for the rape and murder of numerous aboriginal women in the downtown eastside. DICKSON holds a senior position of responsibility in the Missing Womens’ Task Force and is very prominent in the downtown eastside of Vancouver, serving on community liaison boards.

2.     Witness claims that she has been attacked on several occasions by policemen and women associated with DICKSON because of her investigation into the missing women. In February, 2006, witness was attacked without warning by five policemen in an alley of the two hundred block east Hastings , was struck in the head, pepper-sprayed and handcuffed, and was being forced into a police van for a “midnight ride”, during which she expected to be killed. Witness screamed for help and a local resident saw the attack, and raised a furor, at which point the police let the witness go. A similar attack and near-murder was inflicted on witness’ co-worker, Carol MARTIN.

3.     Witness confirms the statements of Witness #1, Annie PARKER, concerning the identity of Bruce MICHAELSON and other police connected to the disappearance, torture, rape and murder of women in Vancouver.

4.     Witness claims that the disappearance of Vancouver aboriginal women as part of the aforementioned “Hooker Game” is directly connected to the murder of women in northern B.C. along the so-called “Highway of Tears”, and is being actively covered-up by government, judges and police in B.C.

5.   Witness claims that she and her associates at the Downtown Eastside Womens’ Centre (DEWC) face continual harassment by the police and by former DEWC senior staff, some of whom actively resisted their efforts to expose the murderers of aboriginal women in Vancouver . Witness claims that these staff and others are aware of the identity of these murderers and are working with city police and others to conceal their identity.

6. Witness claims that the disappearance of women in the downtown eastside is related to the drug trade which is heavily controlled by the Vancouver police, the RCMP, and their underworld associates. Drugs are imported from overseas, especially from Asia, in magnetic containers attached to the outer hulls of deep-sea vessels moored at Ballentyne Pier on Vancouver’s waterfront. The unloaded drugs are supervised by police and loaded into ambulances driven by Vancouver paramedics.

7. Witness also claims that many of the disappeared women were Indian residential school survivors, and were killed because of their knowledge of the involvement of church and government officials in the deaths of children in the residential schools… Witness mentions at least one murdered woman, Ms. Obotsway, who was threatening to “tell all” about such murders just before she disappeared in the summer of 1998, after she attended a session of the UN affiliated Tribunal into residential schools organized by Kevin ANNETT.

Witness #7: Aboriginal woman, now deceased, age seventy three at time of her demise. Given name was Harriett NAHANEE, native name Tsebeoilt, of the Squamish native band in North Vancouver. Witness died in Vancouver prison in February 2007 after being arrested soon after mounting a legal challenge against the government-funded Squamish band council for their alleged illegality in selling off land without permission for 2010 Olympic “Sea to Sky” highway. Interviews were conducted over a four year period during 1995-6, and then again 2001-2003.

1. Witness claimed that she witnessed the murder of a fellow student while incarcerated at the United Church residential school in Port Alberni, BC, December 24, 1946. Victim’s name was Maisie Shaw, age 14, murdered by Principal Alfred Caldwell. (Vancouver Sun, December 18, 1995) Witness claimed that many children at the Alberni school were used in pedophile rings involving senior church and police officials, and that this ring continues to the present day and in Vancouver, is based out of the elite Vancouver Club at 915 West Hastings.

2. Witness claimed to have witnessed the transportation of two children from her home Squamish Indian reserve to the backdoor of the Vancouver Club on an evening in February, 1999. A white stretch limosine picked up two local native children, ages eight and nine years old, wearing heavy makeup, and was followed by NAHANEE and aboriginal reporter Noel LITTLE to the rear of the Vancouver Club.. Witness departed, but the site was monitored by LITTLE until approx. 3 am, when both children appeared form the back door carport entrance of the Club. They appeared hurt and disoriented. LITTLE attempted to speak to and interview the children. He was quickly grabbed from behind by unkown assailants, knocked unconscious, and his tape recorder was stolen. The children vanished and were never seen again.

3. Witness claimed that several Squamish band council chiefs and staff members are actively involved in providing children from their reserve to the Vancouver Club pedophile ring, and receive judicial protection from Supreme Court judges ESSON and MACEACHERN. Witness claimed that native lawyer Renate AUGER had the Vancouver Club infiltrated in the fall of 1993, and obtained photographs of ESSON engaged sexually with a young boy under ten years old. AUGER was subsequently disbarred and her life was threatened, she fled the province and the photos disappeared.

4. Witness claimed that in the fall of 1998, after speaking at the U.N. Tribunal into residential schools, she was approached by a man named James CRAVEN and offered money if she would publicly denounce her ally, Kevin ANNETT, and join a government-sponsored “black ops” smear campaign against ANNETT [untrue…ed.]. CRAVEN told witness that he had received FBI training in surveillance and had worked with undercover groups monitoring the Vancouver Club. CRAVEN confirmed to witness the pedophile activity at the Club and spoke of his knowledge of the involvement of United Church lawyer and national church official Jon JESSIMAN in the Club pedophile ring. (JESSIMAN led the campaign to expel and defrock Kevin ANNETT from the United Church after ANNETT uncovered the link between the Alberni residential school sex ring and the Vancouver Club, while a minister in Port Alberni.CRAVEN continues to incite people against ANNETT with classic smear tactics and misinformation).


I, Jeremiah Jourdain, of 360 Columbia Street in Vancouver, B.C., do solemnly declare and swear that these statements and the facts alleged herein were shared with me by each of the persons named as witnesses in this memorandum, and were recorded by me on video camera on the dates given.

Jeremiah Jourdain

March 1, 2009

Vancouver, B.C.
email: genocidetribunal@…

(signed in the original and on deposit with a lawyer outside Canada and with International Human Rights monitoring groups)


–People, these criminals MUST be exposed, stopped & brought to justice! It is EVERYONE’S responsibility to expose this kind of EVIL! Our society, & indeed, our very survival depends upon it.

Yes, even the so-called “New-Agers”, who so readily turn there back; choose to ignore; or put on their “rose colored glasses”, and so naively proclaim that it is “negative”, or it is “not part of my reality!”
Well, guess what? It IS part of your reality – and you have a duty to expose it – or you become a party to it – further, you are perpetuating the crime by ALLOWING it! (So forget what the New Age Teachers tell you – they are selling you a damaging pack of lies!)

And, still others proclaim that: “It is their Karma” or “they chose this situation in this life” – and so the mantra goes…Well this may well be true BUT,  THEY DID IT FOR US – don’t you see? They have sacrificed themselves to these horrifying experiences, that we may see the difference between right & wrong!
Are you going to let their incredible sacrifice go to waste – without speaking out against these atrocities?!?!? Do you want that black mark on your Soul?
Because IF you do choose to ignore this evil – then indeed you can expect your “karma” (that you all love to speak of), to come up and bite you in the ass – and you (or your sister or daughter or wife), will then fall victim to the same crimes that you ignored!

This is how we learn our lessons (or not?!?), it’s up to you.

Please ponder hard on these questions people – you who would turn a blind eye, so as to not “rock the boat”
As always, the choice is yours.
Now go ahead and make the RIGHT choice – the obvious choice. –Luke 3:16


—– Original Message —–
From: butlincat
To: GIBSON, Baroness ; ; newsdesk ; ; ; ; ;
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2010 7:54 AM

——- Original Message ——–
Subject: … Utah’s MORMON Satanic Ritual Abuses and Bloody Ritual Murders
Date: Sun, 28 Mar 2010 23:10:03 -0400 (EDT)
From: Freiherr Wolfram Grätz – Sui Juris


Keep on reading and send it to your friends !


Utah’s MORMON Satanic Ritual Abuses and Bloody Ritual Murders

On 19 July 1990, Elder Glenn L Pace, then a counselor in the Presiding Bishopric, sent a memo to the “Strengthening Church Members Committee” on the subject of “Ritualistic Child Abuse.”1

Pursuant to the Committee’s request, I am writing this memorandum to pass along what I have learned about ritualistic child abuse. Hopefully, it will be of some value to you as you continue to monitor the problem.

You have already received the LDS Social Services report on Satanism dated May 24, 1989, a report from Brent Ward, [Utah State Attorney General] and a memorandum from myself dated October 20,1989 in response to Brother Ward?s report.

Therefore, I will limit this writing to information not contained in those papers.

I have met with sixty victims. That number could be twice or three times as many if I did not discipline myself to only one meeting per week. I have not wanted my involvement with this issue to become a handicap in fulfilling my assigned responsibilities. On the other hand, I felt someone needed to pay the price to obtain an intellectual and spiritual conviction as to the seriousness of this problem within the Church.

Of the sixty victims with whom I have met, fifty-three are female and seven are male. Eight are children. The abuse occurred in the following places: Utah (37), Idaho (3), California (4), Mexico (2), and other places (14). Fifty-three victims are currently living in the State of Utah. All sixty individuals are members of the Church. Forty-five victims allege witnessing and/or participating in human sacrifice. The majority were abused by relatives, often their parents. All have developed psychological problems and most have been diagnosed as having multiple personality disorder or some other form of dissociative disorder.

Ritualistic child abuse is the most hideous of all child abuse. The basic objective is premeditated to systematically and methodically torture and terrorize children until they are forced to dissociate. The torture is not a consequence of the loss of temper, but the execution of well-planned, well-thought out rituals often performed by close relatives. The only escape for the children is to dissociate. They will develop a new personality to enable them to endure various forms of abuse. When the episode is over, the core personality is again in control and the individual is not conscious of what happened. Dissociation also serves the purposes of the occult because the children have no day-to-day memory of the atrocities. They go through adolescence and early adulthood with no active memory of what is taking place. Oftentimes they continue in rituals through their teens and early twenties, unaware of their involvement. Many individuals with whom I have spoken have served missions and it has not been until later that they begin to remember. One individual has memories of participating in rituals while serving as a full-time missionary.

The victims lead relatively normal lives, but the memories are locked up in a compartment in their minds and surface in various ways. They don’t know how to cope with the emotions because they can’t find the source. As they become adults and move into another environment, something triggers the memories and, consequently, flashbacks and/or nightmares occur. One day they will have been living a normal life and the next they will be in a mental hospital in a fetal position. The memories of their early childhood are recalled in so much detail that they once again feel the pain that caused the dissociation in the first place.

There are two reasons why adults can remember with such detail events that happened in their past: First, the terror they experienced was so stark that it was indelibly placed in their mind. Second, the memory was compartmentalized in a certain portion of the mind and was not subjected to the dilution of experiences of ensuing years. When it is tapped, it is as fresh as if it happened yesterday.

The memories seem to come in layers. For example, the first memory might be of incest, then they remember robes and candles; next they realize that their father or mother or both were present when they were being abused. Another layer will be the memory of seeing other people hurt and even killed. Then they remember having seen babies killed. Another layer is realizing that they participated in the sacrifices. One of the most painful memories may be that they even sacrificed their own baby. With each layer of memory comes another set of problems with which they must deal.

Some have said that the witnesses to this type of treatment cannot be trusted because of the victim’s unstable condition and because practically all of them have some kind of dissociative disorder; in fact, the stories are so bizarre as to raise serious credibility questions. The irony is that one of the objectives of the occult is to create multiple personalities within the children in order to keep the “secrets.” They live in society without society having any idea that something is wrong since the children and teenagers don’t even realize there is another life occurring in darkness and in secret. However, when sixty witnesses testify to the same type of torture and murder, it becomes impossible for me, personally, not to believe them.

I mention multiple personalities because the spiritual healing which must take place in the lives of these victims cannot happen without their priesthood leaders understanding something about it

The spiritual indoctrination which takes place during the physical abuse is one of the most difficult to overcome. In addition to experiencing stark terror and pain, the children are also instructed in satanic doctrine. Everything is completely reversed: white is black, black is white, good is bad, bad is good, Satan is going to rule during the Millennium.

Children are put in a situation where they believe they are going to die-such as being buried alive or being placed in a plastic bag and immersed in water. Prior to doing so, the abuser tells the child to pray to Jesus to see if He will save her. Imagine a seven year old girl, having been told she is going to die, praying to Jesus to save her and nothing happens, then at the last moment she is rescued, but the person saving her is a representative of Satan. He uses this experience to convince her that the only person who really cares about her is Satan, she is Satan’s child and she might as well become loyal to him.

Just before or shortly after their baptism into the Church, children are baptized by blood into the satanic order which is meant to cancel out their baptism into the Church. They will be asked if they understand or have ever felt the Holy Ghost. When they reply that they have, they will be reminded of the horrible things they have participated in and will be told that they have become a son (or daughter) of perdition and, therefore, have no chance of being saved or loved by our Father in heaven or Jesus.

All of this indoctrination takes place with whichever personality has emerged to endure the physical, mental, and spiritual pain. Consequently, there develops within each of these individuals the makings of what I call a civil war. As the memories begin to surface, there are personalities who feel they have given themselves to Satan, and there is no hope for forgiveness. The core person is an active member of the Church, often with a temple recommend. As integration takes place, the civil war begins. Sometimes, in an interview, personalities of the dark side have come out. They are petrified or perhaps full of hate for me and what I represent. Eventually those personalities need to be dealt with spiritually and psychologically.

Most victims are suicidal. They have been brainwashed with drugs, hypnosis, and other means to become suicidal as soon as they start to tell the secrets. They have been threatened all of their lives that if they don’t do what they are told their brother or sister will die, their parents will die, their house will be burned, or they themselves will be killed. They have every reason to believe it since they have seen people killed. They believe they might as well kill themselves instead of wait for the occult to do it. Some personalities feel it is the right thing to do.

The purpose of this detail is to stress the complexity of psychological and spiritual therapy for these individuals. Our priesthood leaders, when faced with such cases, are understandably at a loss of how to respond. Orthodox counsel is completely ineffective. For example, some victims have been told that this all happened in their past and that they should put it behind them and get on with their lives. This is just not possible. Part of the spiritual therapy necessary is for priesthood leaders to assist with the conversion process of the personalities who have been indoctrinated into Satanism. Victims must integrate their personalities so that they can function as whole persons and be able to deal with their problems and then get on with their lives. Often, some of the parts will begin to act out, perhaps promiscuously, and a good intentioned priesthood leader, following the General Handbook of Instructions, will disfellowship or excommunicate an individual. All this does is reinforce the satanic indoctrination of the victims that they are no good.

I’m sorry to say that many of the victims have had their first flashbacks while attending the temple for the first time. The occult along the Wasatch Front uses the doctrine of the Church to their advantage. For example, the verbiage and gestures are used in a ritualistic ceremony in a very debased and often bloody manner. When the victim goes to the temple and hears the exact words, horrible memories are triggered. We have recently been disturbed with members of the Church who have talked about the temple ceremony. Compared to what is happening in the occult along the Wasatch Front, these are very minor infractions. The perpetrators are also living a dual life. Many are temple recommend holders. This leads to another reason why the Church needs to consider the seriousness of these problems. In effect, the Church is being used.

I go out of my way to not let the victims give me the names of the perpetrators. I have told them that my responsibility is to help them with spiritual healing and that the names of perpetrators should be given to therapists and law enforcement officers. However, they have told me the positions in the Church of members who are perpetrators. Among others, there are Young Women leaders, Young Men leaders, bishops, a patriarch, a stake president, temple workers, and members of the Tabernacle Choir. These accusations are not coming from individuals who think they recognized someone, but from those who have been abused by people they know, in many cases their own family members.

Whatever the form of abuse our main concern is for the victims, but there are legal ramifications. We are disturbed to receive reports that a scoutmaster has abused the boys in his troop. It is not difficult to imagine what would happen if we learn that a bishop or stake president has participated in the abominations of ritualistic child abuse. Not only do some of the perpetrators represent a cross section of the Mormon culture, but sometimes the abuse has taken place in our own meetinghouses.

I don’t pretend to know how prevalent the problem is. All I know is that I have met with 60 victims. Assuming each one comes from a coven of 13, we are talking about the involvement of 800 or so right here on the Wasatch Front. Obviously, I have only seen those coming forth to get help. They are in their twenties and thirties for the most part. I can only assume that it is expanding geometrically and am horrified at the numbers represented by the generation who are now children and teenagers.

Another reason for concern is that there are several doctrinal issues that need to be resolved. The Church and society in general are very skeptical as to whether the occult and its activities do exist. There is no First Presidency statement relative to some of the doctrinal issues: What does a priesthood leader tell individuals who come forward and say that they have participated in these rituals, which may include human sacrifice? Should they have a temple recommend? Will they ever be forgiven? There are questions regarding free agency and accountability. Is a person who has been raised in an occult from infancy accountable for things that take place in a dissociated state, even though those acts were committed after the age of eight? I have formed my own opinions to these questions and have done the best I can. However, I don’t have the mantle to make these doctrinal and policy decisions. I have relied on the mantle of a bishop regarding discernment and being a common judge.

The few priesthood leaders who have had to face these issues are crying out for help because they don’t want to give their own opinions and yet there is no place to go for an answer. A bishop will go to his stake president who says he doesn’t believe it is happening and that the member is just crazy. The stake president might go to an Area Presidency who will react in a similar way. Most people are afraid to surface it to the First Presidency for fear of getting the same reaction and don’t want to appear crazy themselves for asking the question.

I hope you will excuse me if I am being presumptuous, but I am concluding this paper with scriptures I feel support my belief that these activities are real and cannot be ignored.