MELANIE SHAW – 17 APRIL 2015

Got a nice note from Melanie Shaw [attd.] – if everyone sent her a £, wouldn’t that cheer her up? For screws being “nasty”, as she mentions, simply take a look also at how they treated the Musas [totally framed] + Maurice Kirk also during his totally unfair over-the-top 17+ months inside recently. Is this what the taxpayer pays these characters wages for? I don’t think so. Noone else is going to correct this barbaric behaviour so we have to!!

The address to send to send a postal order to Melanie Shaw is:

Melanie Shaw, A4126 DE
HMP Peterborough
Saville Rd,
Peterborough
PE3 7PD
The CROSSED postal order made out to THE GOVERNOR HMP PETERBOROUGH on the front of the p.o. – on the reverse side write MELANIE SHAW A4126 DE
Petition “Free Melanie Shaw” https://www.change.org/p/nottinghamshire-police-and-rt-hon-…
Melanie Shaw, Beechwood Child Abuse Witness, Held in Peterborough Prison – http://www.ukcolumn.org/…/melanie-shaw-beechwood-child-abus…

— cheers!MSHAW 17APR15533

See more:

 photo _zpsgneaqo9n.jpg
 photo mel_zps7gct8nkm.jpg

1 VIGIL FOR MELANIE SHAW, PETERBOROUGH, 5 APRIL 2015


2 VIGIL FOR MELANIE SHAW PETERBOROUGH 5 APRIL 2015

3 VIGIL FOR MELANIE SHAW PETERBOROUGH 5 APRIL

4 VIGIL FOR MELANIE SHAW PETERBOROUGH 5 APRIL

 photo luke_zpsa0jsjusr.jpg

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , ,

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE: PHONE CALLS RECEIVED JAN 2014 etc. + “KIRKGATE” [1st] + “CRIMINAL CASES REVIEW COMMISSION CCRC + PRISON RELEASE”

Recorded phone calls from Maurice Kirk January 2014, + 1 March ’14 whilst in HMP Cardiff telling of infinite irregularities and miscarriages and perversions of justice:

video [28mins.]:    https://vid.me/e/q8R9

MAURICE KIRK’S SISTER CELIA – RADIO INTERVIEW

 September 2014       

    video: “Rough Justice: South Wales Police persecute former vet & pilot Maurice Kirk who’s suing them”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c3tg6pDdR8&feature=youtu.be

PublicEnquiry from  PublicEnquiry on youtube

From April 2015:

kirkdraft1 12april152Latest News

Criminal Cases Review Commission CCRC & Prison Release

Maurice’s new mobile  07708586202

Jersey/Bristol interviews, re state of Welsh prisons, on https://www.facebook.com/

NEW WEBSITE SHORTLY  as cannot add any more data on this one or she ‘falls over’ !!¬!! 

Out of Pays des Galles and I am immediately 10 years younger ……seen doctor , blood tests and physical triage etc…..still need the medicine but bound for Pontivy hospital again, I suspect…….last time in Jan 2013 with Gendarmes after Welsh police tried to get them to section me just be3fore the civil trial. I arrived to be recognised by nurse who was there for my hip replacement ….’beaucoup des blagues’ et sujets de rire! The men in blue were very annoyed for failing to get me sectioned for Cardiff and Barry police.

I rang the Criminal Cases Review Commission just to bring me back into the real world. How I contained my temper I will never know

Having gathered, over 6 years, the documentary proof (court transcripts, court file, affidavits etc) of wide spread corruption in Cardiff’s courts on machine gun/police fabricated psychiatric fraud alone.

CCRC answered and after much shuffling on phones put onto a Ms Jenny Thomas.

To cut it short …..oh yes, the CCRC had Michael Williams’ court contemporaneous notes alright.

All record of that chaotic Sept/Dec 2011 Cardiff magistrates ‘harassment trial’ scandal followed with my re arrest re MUSA Nigerian case.

But Jenny said I was not going to get the public records because they were ‘not helpful’….The jury asked for the clerk’s notes

the Cardiff Crown Court told me nothiung about. I was not in court but was it Judge Paul Thomas (Jenny’s Uncle?) the one who knew the police had changed the machine gun colur to fool the jury?

Jury notes not available ‘not available” the May12 trial judge told them so how come the Crown Prosecution Service admits, in three different court proceedings, in having them?

How come Lord Leveson et al, on 14th March 2013, said there was ‘no evidence’ the jury had ever asked to see the clerk’s notes clearly accentuated by my gaoler’s cross examination that the service of the restraining order was ‘served’ but promised to be clealy recorded in Michael Williams’ notes  in the clandestine meet in the 1st Dec 11 magistrates’ court cells?

Para 9

There is a complaint also of the jury requested sight of the original custody notes and court log relating to the proceedings in the magistrates court but that the judge refused this request. However, so far as we can see from the transcript of the proceedings there is no trace of anything of that nature having been requested by the jury. 

 Para 13 

 For these reasons, we refuse permission to bring this appeal.

His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC’s e-mail sparked a court clerk reply that there are ‘no hand written drafts’ of the now notorious ‘restraining order’ in the court file. But my arresting the Crown prosecutor, David Gareth Evans, caused evidence to contradict his own CPS!

The Bristol CPS even went out of there way and visited Cardiff court  and extracted from the file that CCRC had acquired the ‘court file’ in Feb 13, before the latest jury trial conviction but all had kept ‘mum’. Only after it was re –written, now proved, following my ‘illegal court access’, CCRC consider, under disguise a year earlier.

Jenny Thomas was quick to highlight that incident but reluctant to admit that not just the court log has been now proved as forged but now numerous versions of District Judge John Charles’ hand written other notes and drafts in the public court file!

Evilness personified and a bunch of liars only concerned with ‘jobs worth’, the worrying trend to be reflected in forth coming elections. If they get away with it someone near you will be their next victim.

 So which version of the ‘hymn sheet’ did their Lordships, Leveson, Smelling and Males sing from now, this very week, the CCRC confirm His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC, Bristol CPS, Cardiff CPS and myself all appear to have different forgeries? 

source: http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/news/archive/2015/04/06/in-brittany-for-my-health-and-ring-criminal-cases-review-commission.aspx

PICS OF MAURICE KIRK ON RELEASE FROM HMP SWANSEA 27 March 2015

Maurice tells us, in a phone call received on 27/03/15, his day of release, that even though inmates are supposed to be released before 11am on the day of release, he was finally let out of HMP Swansea  “7 or 8 minutes after 11″ on the morning of 27th March – after his prearranged lift had gone “for a cup of tea”, thinking he’d been released earlier, he presumed, thus missing them. He had no choice but to manoeuvre the wheelchair he was in to the hospital, no mean feat, where prison doctors had told him he had an appointment awaiting. After finally arriving at the hospital he found there was no appointment made – this is typical of the prison regime behaviour – to feed him false info, something they’ve been doing for 17+ months. Finally he caught up with his lift [a car, not a “van” as the prison staff had him believe] and now he is pursuing medical treatment for his serious stomach ailments, for which his serious operation has been denied for so long – since the first week of March, 2014, some 55 weeks ago!

Maurice Kirk’s site is http://www.kirkflyingvet.com

From this site – previous posts:

MAURICE KIRK – Document [02/02/2015]: “Regina v. Kirk M. J. – “Summing Up”: IMPORTANT IRREGULARITIES EXPLAINED

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/20/maurice-kirk-some-of-the-story/

11 MARCH – MAURICE KIRK VICTIMISED YET AGAIN IN HMP SWANSEA: FULL WEEKLY “CANTEEN” ALLOWANCE DENIED!

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/11/11-march-maurice-kirk-victimised-yet-again-in-hmp-swansea/

MAURICE KIRK: LEVESON: APPEAL APPLICATION JUDGEMENT / POSITION STATEMENT 25 FEB. ’15

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/08/maurice-kirk-leveson-appeal-judgement-position-statement-25-feb-15/

MAURICE KIRK: UPDATED WITH “BARRY NEWS” ARTICLES – 1ST YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF ONSET OF SERIOUS and untreated! STOMACH AILMENT, CHEQUE FROM DEC. ’14 STILL REFUSED TO BE CASHED, CLERK OF COURTS DOCS STILL REFUSED AGAINST JUDGES ORDERS, + MORE

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/05/maurice-kirk-update-5-mar-2015-1st-year-anniversary-of-onset-of-serious-stomach-ailment-cheque-from-dec-14-still-refused-to-be-cashed-clerk-of-courts-docs-still-refused-against-judges-orders/

MAURICE KIRK IN PRISON 500 DAYS ON SUN. MARCH 1!! – WRIT OF “HABEUS CORPUS” ISSUED – POSITION STATEMENT 18 FEB. ’15
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/27/maurice-kirk-writ-of-habeus-corpus-10-feb-2015-position-statement-18-feb-15/

MAURICE KIRK – POSITION STATEMENT 18 +16 FEB. + DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 19 FEB. 2015 inc. LETTER TO GMC, RCJ APPEAL CT, + more:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/19/maurice-kirk-documents-received-19-feb-2015/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 15 FEB. 2015 – regarding “the fairness, proportionality, apparent bias and bad faith in the decisions of 11 July 2014 to recall Mr. Maurice Kirk to prison”, + more:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/15/maurice-kirk-update-15-feb-2015-mappa-docs-more/

MAURICE KIRK – THE STORY SO FAR – A BRIEF SYNOPSIS  [UNTIL OCT. 2014] – FILES B, C, D. [30 pages] inc. “Fabicated Medical Records”, “Breach of Restraining Order Appeal” statement 6/6/14, + more:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/09/maurice-kirk-the-story-so-far-until-oct-2014-files-b-c-d/

MAURICE KIRK – SOCIAL VISIT REFUSED 6 FEB. – POSITION STATEMENT 16 JAN. 2015, + more:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/06/maurice-kirk-position-statement-26-jan-2015-more/

MAURICE KIRK v S. WALES POLICE: UPDATE 4 FEB. 2015: NOW HELD 475 DAYS IN HM PRISONS UNLAWFULLY!
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/maurice-kirk-update-4-feb-2015/

MAURICE KIRK PAROLE HEARING – CANCELLED!! JUST LIKE THAT!!
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/30/maurice-kirk-parole-hearing-cancelled-just-like-that/

LETTER TO THE PRIME MINISTER: MAURICE KIRK – NOT TAKEN TO THE COURTROOM FOR HIS HEARINGS 7 TIMES!! [actually its more!]:
https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/22/letter-to-the-prime-minister-maurice-kirk-not-taken-to-the-courtroom-for-his-hearings-7-times/

15 Jan. UPDATE: MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 5 JAN. 2014 – OVER 420 DAYS IN H.M. PRISONS!! STILL NO STOMACH OPERATION AFTER 10 MONTHS!!
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/15/15-jan-update-maurice-kirk-important-documents-received-5-jan-2014-over-420-days-in-h-m-prisons-still-no-stomach-operation-after-10-months/

MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 5 JAN. 2014 – OVER 420 DAYS IN H.M. PRISONS!! STILL NO STOMACH OPERATION AFTER 10 MONTHS!!
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/10/maurice-kirk-important-documents-received-5-jan-2014-over-420-days-in-h-m-prisons-still-no-stomach-operation-after-10-months/

MAURICE KIRK IN PRISON OVER 420 DAYS – THE DISGUSTING UNHYGIENIC CONDITIONS MK IS HAVING TO PUT UP WITH IN HMP BRISTOL – 12 DEC. ’14, + IMPORTANT DOCS.
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/13/maurice-kirk-18-days-before-a-change-of-clothing-12-dec-2014/

MAURICE KIRK: 12 DEC.: WELSH GOVERNMENT REPLIES – A WASTE OF TIME:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/12/maurice-kirk-12-dec-welsh-government-replies-a-waste-of-time/

ARCHIVES FROM 19 September 2014 until January 2015:

MAURICE KIRK POSITION STATEMENT 10 DEC 2014

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/10/maurice-kirk-position-statement-10-dec-2014/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 5 DEC.: FINED £1000 – THE WELSH ASSEMBLY – THE “BRAIN SCAN” + more

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/05/maurice-kirk-update-5-dec-fined-1000-the-welsh-assembly-the-brain-scan-more/

MAURICE KIRK LOCATED IN HMP BRISTOL – 2 DEC. ’14 / BREAKING THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/04/maurice-kirk-located-in-hmp-bristol-2-dec-14/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 30 NOV. 2014 – MAURICE GOES MISSING

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/maurice-kirk-update-30-nov-2014/

UPDATED: MAURICE KIRK: IMPORTANT DOCS RECEIVED 18 NOV. 2014 – MEDICAL UPDATES ETC.

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/18/maurice-kirk-important-docs-received-18-nov-2014/

MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 8 NOV. ’14 – Position Statement 5 Nov. ETC.

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/14/m-krk-docs-received-8-nov-14/

MAURICE KIRK – THE DISGRACEFUL PERSECUTION CONTINUES IN HMP SWANSEA – SUN. 2 NOV. 2014

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/02/maurice-kirk-the-disgraceful-persecution-continues-in-hmp-swansea-sun-2-nov-2014/

MAURICE KIRK: VERY ILL IN HMP SWANSEA, 30 OCT. ’14

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/30/maurice-kirk-very-ill-in-hmp-swansea-30-oct-14/

MAURICE KIRK – FILE A – THE CHARGES, etc.

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/28/maurice-kirk-file-a-of-19-documents/

MAURICE KIRK DOCUMENTS: 25 OCT. 2014 – POSITION STATEMENT 14 OCT. ’14

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/27/maurice-kirk-documents-25-oct-2014/

MAURICE KIRK: LATEST NEWS, 23 OCT. ’14 – PLS SIGN THE PETITION – + more

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/23/maurice-kirek-latest-news-23-oct-14-pls-sign-the-petition-more/

MAURICE KIRK: LATEST NEWS, 23 OCT. ’14 – ALL CONTACTS REMOVED EXCEPT 1 FROM MK’S TELEPHONE CALL LIST, + PLS SIGN THE PETITION – + more

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/23/maurice-kirek-latest-news-23-oct-14-pls-sign-the-petition-more/

5 IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS FROM MAURICE KIRK 14 OCT. 2014, + MESSAGE TO THE JUSTICE, + ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMITTEE 23 OCT. ’14

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/21/5-important-documents-from-maurice-kirk-14-oct-2014-more/

MAURICE KIRK’S SISTER CELIA – RADIO INTERVIEW – + “THE NEFARIOUS PLOT TO ISOLATE MAURICE”

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/24/maurice-kirks-sister-celia-radio-interview/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE: 23 SEPT. “14: DOCUMENTS RECEIVED- “RECALL TO CUSTODY APPEAL” + “MALICIOUS PROSECUTION WITHOUT TRIAL”

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/23/maurice-kirk-update-23-sept-24-documents-received/

MAURICE KIRK – DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 18 SEPT. 2014 WHICH TELL OF HIS HELL

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/19/maurice-kirk-documents-received-which-tell-of-his-hell/

See archives at bottom of page from before 19 September ’14, or on right for posts from 2013 / 14.

 

M kirk SEPT 2013 1ba.jpgA.jpgB

[The above is an old pic]

 >>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

 photo BARRY_zps0hjorw7k.jpg

[NB: MANY OF THESE NEWSPAPER REPORTS ARE VERY BIASED AND UNFACTUAL AGAINST MK – IT SHOULD BE SAID THAT IT IS ALLEGED MK HAS BEEN REMANDED TO PRISON AT LEAST 9 TIMES SINCE 2009,  WITH A TOTAL OF OVER 3 YEARS SPENT IN PRISON ON THESE POINTLESS AND HARRASSING REMANDS, AS NO CONVICTIONS ACTUALLY OCCURRED RELATING TO THESE REMANDS BEFORE THIS PERIOD OF INCARCERATION BEGAN ON 16 OCTOBER 2013 [MK SPENT THE NIGHT OF 15 OCT. IN BARRY POLICE STATION CELLS, AND POSSIBLY OCT 14 ALSO].   ALSO SINCE 2009 MK HAS BEEN STOPPED OVER 35 TIMES, WHILST DRIVING HIS CAR, FOR DRINK-DRIVING TESTS. NOT ONE CONVICTION RESULTING AS A RESULT OF ANY STOP [ALLEGEDLY]. INDEED, MK TELLS US OFTEN HE WAS TAKEN TO THE POLICE STATION FOR THE DRINKING OF ALCOHOL TEST, ONLY TO BE RELEASED WITHOUT EVEN BEING GIVEN IT!  MK HAS AN ONGOING CIVIL CASE AGAINST S. WALES POLICE FORCE– see the radio broadcast interview with MK’s sister on “Dialect Radio”, September 2014 =  video:

“Rough Justice: South Wales Police persecute former vet & pilot Maurice Kirk who’s them”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c3tg6pDdR8      

<a href="/channel/UCvPbHiqhLtpNWA_cg_1NULw" class=" yt-uix-sessionlink     spf-link  g-hovercard" data-name="" data-ytid="UCvPbHiqhLtpNWA_cg_1NULw" data-sessionlink="ei=fcqoVPDdC4KB0AHJyoCYDA">PublicEnquiry</a> PublicEnquiry from 13 Sept. 2014]

  ——————————————————————————————————————–

Barry’s ‘flying vet’ fails in legal bid Barry And District News: APPEAL: Flying vet Maurice Kirk.
7:40am Thursday 7 July 2011

  Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

ATTEMPTS by Barry’s ‘flying vet’ to bring criminal charges against a former chief constable, psychiatrist and solicitor were thwarted by a judge last week.

Firearms charges for Barry’s ‘Flying Vet’ Barry And District News: Firearms charges for Barry's 'Flying Vet'
7:30am Thursday 25 June 2009

  Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

BARRY’S ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk has been charged with alleged firearms offences

Barry’s ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk cleared of firearms charges Barry And District News: FLYING VET: Maurice Kirk.
7:30am Thursday 11 February 2010

  Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

BARRY’S ‘flying vet’ was this week cleared of charges relating to owning and trying to sell a machine gun.

  • ‘Flying vet’ crash-lands in ocean Barry And District News: Aviator: Flying Vet' Maurice Kirk is an experienced pilot.
    11:22am Thursday 21 February 2008
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template
  • Rick on the Roof moves in with Flying Vet
    7:30am Thursday 23 October 2008

      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    ROOFTOP protester Ricky Canty is living with ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk in St Donats after a Cardiff court banned him from Barry.

    FLYING vet’ Maurice Kirk is out of hospital and planning to return to Barry following a death-defying crash at the weekend, his wife has said.

  • Vet is found guilty of misconduct
    12:00pm Thursday 10 March 2005
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    A BULGARIAN vet employed at the Barry practice owned by struck-off veterinary surgeon Maurice Kirk has been found guilty of disgraceful professional conduct.

  • ‘I’m 100 percent sure of winning’
    12:00pm Thursday 13 June 2002
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY vet Maurice Kirk has told how he is determined to fight on after a disciplinary hearing ruled he should not be allowed to practice any more.

  • Struck off for life
    12:00pm Thursday 10 November 2005
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    A VALE vet has been banned from the offices of his governing body after his latest run-in with the authorities.

  • Caring vet
    12:00pm Thursday 25 April 2002
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    I RECENTLY volunteered to give evidence at a Royal College of Vets hearing in London. I did this because Maurice Kirk has shown kindness to me and consideration for my pets over the past ten years.

  • Vet is struck off following hearing
    12:00pm Thursday 30 May 2002
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY ‘flying vet’ Maurice Kirk has been struck off after a disciplinary hearing in London.

  • ‘I was a victim of police’
    12:00pm Thursday 28 March 2002
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY’S notorious ‘flying vet’ says he has suffered years of harassment at the hands of local police in South Wales, Taunton, and Guernsey.

  • ‘Flying Vet’ is deported
    2:22pm Thursday 8 May 2008
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY’S Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk has been deported from the States following his spell in an American psychiatric unit.

  • Barry vet has third appeal dismissed by Royal College
    10:36am Thursday 19 October 2006
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    A BARRY vet who was struck off for misconduct four years ago has had his third appeal dismissed by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. 

‘Flying Vet’ sent to US psychiatric unit
11:33am Thursday 1 May 2008

  •   Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template
  • Disgraced vet blasts lawyers
    12:00pm Thursday 22 January 2004

      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY’S controversial vet Maurice John Kirk blasted “bent lawyers” after losing his appeal against professional disqualification last Monday.

  • Disciplinary hearing into Barry vet’s conduct
    12:00pm Thursday 21 March 2002
     Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY’S eccentric ‘flying vet’ has demonstrated a “pathetic waste” of police time, a disciplinary inquiry heard this week.

  • Vet faces disgrace
    12:00pm Thursday 31 January 2002
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    A BARRY vet faces being struck off in disgrace after being convicted of 20 offences in the last seven years, clocking up about £25,000 in fines, costs and compensation orders.

  • The vet who fell to Earth
    12:00pm Thursday 27 October 2005
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    AN eccentric British vet who was struck off after a string of convictions crashed his plane in Japan last Friday during a round-the-world solo journey.

  • BARRY’S ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk was this week locked up in an American psychiatric unit – after landing his plane near George W Bush’s Texas ranch.

  • Further rap for struck-off vet
    12:00pm Thursday 20 June 2002
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY vet Maurice Kirk was rapped by the disciplinary committee of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons this week for his “attitude and conduct” in his recent hearings which eventually saw him struck off.

  • ‘Flying vet’ in US custody Barry And District News: 'Flying vet' lands next to George Bush's Texan ranch
    7:10am Tuesday 29 April 2008
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    An amateur pilot nicknamed the Flying Vet is reported to be undergoing psychiatric tests after landing his plane near George Bush’s Texas ranch..

 SOURCE:  http://www.barryanddistrictnews.co.uk/search/?page=1&topic_id=2308&search=maurice+kirk

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

ANTI CHILD ABUSE RALLY SAT. JUNE 27 “VICTIMS + SURVIVORS UNITE – BREAKING THE CYCLE OF ABUSE”

rally june27
at 1:00pm – 4:00pm
 
A stage & PA system will be set up on the grass of Richmond Terrace directly opposite Downing street to allow survivors & guests to speakALL groups, campaigners and members of the public are welcome to attend

We will be updating this events page with information throughout the run-up to the rally

NOW is the time to make a stand and for our voices to be heard!

Organized by

Chris Tuck of http://www.survivors-of-abuse.com/ & Chris Wittwer of http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/

Please only click ‘going’ if you fully intend on actual going so we can gauge correct numbers & dont forget to invite your friends and share – Thankyou

source:  https://www.facebook.com/events/836299693090154/

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

WHY HASNT GREVILLE JENNER BEEN ARRESTED YET? + more

 photo JENNER 2_zpsa6swjma8.jpg

Why the hell hasn’t Greville Janner been arrested yet?

janner and cherieAbsoulute filth
 
In September 2104, we wrote a post about child-raping filth Greville Janner.Quite unbelievably , despite witness statements from many boys, the CPS are still fucking dithering about whether or not to arrest him.Hoping he’ll ‘die‘ like his pal Leon Brittan are they?

Or catch a plane back to his homeland in Israel?

Israeli PassportJanner and GellerLeon Brittan Old

Pull your fingers out you complicit scum.

Here’s the post in question

” Jewish peer, Greville Janner, is one of the most repulsive, twisted, slimy, pieces of paedophilic filth, walking the earth today.

As chairman of Britain’s Holocaust Educational Trust, Janner has spent a lifetime ‘hunting down’ Nazis, allegedly accused of war crimes during WWII, and has often vowed to target them even if they’re elderly, frail or suffering from serious illness.

Janner filthJanner and CameronChristian Dave 5

So when the tables are turned on child-raping Janner, we should be just as resilient in ensuring that he doesn’t escape justice either and we should indeed hunt him down too, despite the hilarious claims that he is himself now frail and suffering from paedophilia-induced ‘amnesia’ ( what an absolute pile of cack).

Of course, Janner is no ordinary, run-of-the-mill politician.

Due to his links to Israel and Mossad, he could be described as one of filthy Britain’s ‘untouchables’ and has been allowed to travel the land raping young boys at will, knowing full well that he would be protected by his friends in high places.

In fact a Leicestershire police officer has come forward with shocking claims that he was ordered to limit any abuse probe into Janner when he was first investigated over the rape of a vulnerable care-home boy who he buggered for over two years solid.

Janner University Leicester

According to the Mail:

” Police chiefs blocked a paedophile probe into a top politician 25 years ago, one of the country’s most senior officers said yesterday.

Derbyshire Chief Constable Mick Creedon was serving as a detective sergeant in Leicestershire when allegations surfaced against Labour MP Greville Janner in 1989.
Mr Creedon said he was ordered to limit his inquiries into the MP, now Lord Janner of Braunstone.
He was forbidden from arresting the politician or searching his home, despite ‘credible evidence’ that warranted further investigation.
The chief constable said the message was passed on by a superintendent, but he believes it came from higher up. ‘The decision was clear, he will be interviewed by appointment and there won’t be a search of his home, his constituency office or his office in the Commons,’ he said, adding: ‘It was a decision made by people more senior than me.’
His comments are likely to fuel widespread dissatisfaction with the way allegations against Lord Janner were originally handled.
The claims surfaced during an investigation into Frank Beck, the manager of Leicester children’s homes, who died in jail after being convicted of abusing boys in his care.”
In 2013, we published the following post about Janner and the mysterious death of Frank Beck:
” In 1994, Frank Beck died in Whitemoor prison whilst serving a staggering 5 life sentences for alleged child abuse.
Frank Beck

Frank Beck had been implicated in the abuse of boys in Leicestershire care homes.

Frank Beck had always maintained his innocence and claimed he was imprisoned because he’d exposed alleged abuse by a high-profile politician.

Frank Beck was appealing against his conviction and sentence.

Leave to appeal and legal aid were granted in January 1993 and Anthony Scrivener QC, one of Britain’s most eminent lawyers and former chairman of the Bar, agreed to take the case.

Frank Beck’s solicitor said at the time of his death

‘He was very impatient for the appeal to go ahead. His death came out of the blue. Normally the case would lapse and die with him but his family and close friends are discussing the possibility of carrying on with the appeal. This would not be unprecedented.’

Beck was convinced there was enough new evidence and material that was not put before the original court due to non-disclosure by the prosecution which would have made the original conviction unsafe and proved his innocence.’

In 2011 the following anonymous comments were left on a blog which was discussing his death:

“ In 1991, after accusing Janner of paedophilic behaviour with a teenager, Frank Beck was arrested and charged with the sexual and physical abuse of children in his care over a thirteen-year period.

At his trial Beck stated that: – “One child has been buggered and abused for two solid years by Greville Janner“.

Immediately after this, Janner who just happens to be, ironically, a long time member of the boy scouts association, and Sir David Napley, his solicitor, went to Police headquarters in Leicester.

Whereupon, the following statement was issued:

“We have advised Mr. Janner that he is prevented from making any statement at this stage”.

Shortly afterwards, the Director of Public Prosecutions, Alan Green, let it be known that “for lack of evidence”, Janner would not be prosecuted, even though Paul Winston, who was just thirteen when he and Janner first met, was able to describe Janner‘s home, the hotel rooms they had shared, and Janner’s habits and person in detail.

The Director of Public Prosecutions, himself, was arrested for kerb-crawling in Kings Cross a little while later.

Green had come to the attention of the police previously for this same misdemeanour and was quietly given a formal warning.

The scandal prompted his resignation from public office and the suicide of his wife.

In court, Paul Winston, who was, at the time of Beck’s trial, a married man with children, stood up for him, as did several other witnesses, paying credit to his achievements and behaviour and confirming his anti-Janner testimony.

He said Beck had counselled him over his relationship with the MP, and had brought the affair to an end.

He also stated that he had had a beneficial effect on his life. According to Winston’s evidence, he was invited to Janner’s home near Golders Green, whilst Janner‘s wife was away, and this led to his sharing Janner’s bed where they “cuddled and fondled each other”.

Thereafter Winston testified that, over the next two years, he was regularly sodomised by Janner.

Beck discovered what had been going on after Winston was put into his care, at which point, he informed his superiors at Leicester Social Services.

At one point, Janner visited the care home with a new bicycle for Paul but Beck denied him entry and would not allow the gift to be passed on. This was confirmed by another witness at the trial.

Nevertheless, Beck was found guilty and sentenced to twenty-four years in prison, with five life sentences to run concurrently for his “crimes”.

Janner was never brought to court, nor was he ever called upon to testify.

Frank Beck died suddenly of a “heart attack”, shortly before his appeal was due to begin.

He was, by all accounts, a fit man at the time of his death.

He never stopped protesting his innocence and Janner’s guilt.

His two main solicitors, who admitted to being sceptical in the first instance, believed him at the time that he was found guilty.

One of these solicitors has since been killed in a road accident, and the other has been subjected to police harassment on a major scale.

Frank Beck was a resident of Braunstone in Leicester when the events described above were taking place.

When Janner was ennobled in 1997, he took the title, Lord Janner of Braunstone.

The man responsible for ennobling Greville Janner was Tony Blair.

The following very interesting comments were left :

I was in the courtroom when beck gave his evidence in full :his death by food poisoning in custody was very convenient for all those he said he had supplied the boys to in the local area .”

Blair had a macabre sense of humour as Braunstone is the area Frank Beck used to live in. Beck was guilty. But he almost nailed Greville Janner.”

Freinds ReunitedMagic CircleTony Blair Lord Levy

It has since emerged that the disappearance of Maddie McCann may be connected in some way to the VIP abuse ring operating in this country.

The McCann’s have also received extra-special treatment from the authorities and coincidentally live in Leicestershire, where Gerry is thought to be a high-ranking Freemason.

Clarence Mitchell and McCanns

Intel agent, Clarence Mitchell was sent as their spokesman, and strangely was also one of the first people at the scene of the murder of Jill Dando.

Jill knew all about the VIP paedo-ring and was silenced by Mossad and Blair because she about to blow the lid.

Jill Dando Daily Star Headline

One of Greville Janner’s close friends is Margaret Oppenheimer-Hodge, who was responsible for the Islington children’s home abuse ring cover-up which culminated in the death of Jason Swift.

She also deliberately made sure children were sent to Jersey to be abused and murdered at the Haut de la Gaurenne care home by VIP filth.

Jason SwiftHodge filthy cowJersey Satanic Horrors

Quite unbelievably, her nephew Philip Edmond, was holidaying at the same resort as the McCanns’ when their daughter went missing, and he flew back to England just before the news broke of her disappearance.

Mandelson and HodgeNaughty Peter MandelsonChildren Born For Sacrifice

The Mark Warner resort in Portugal is also close to the home of Cliff Richard.

Cliff was forced to befriend Jill and find out how much she knew about paedophile politicians and royals.

https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/07/09/barry-george-jill-dando-jimmy-savile-bbc-paedophiles-cliff-richard-alan-farthing-nick-ross-and-britains-dirty-secrets/

Cliff and Tone

On his 51st birthday, Paul Boateng, another Labour Peer, was serenaded in the House of Commons by Michael Jackson, who was on a visit to the UK, organised by Uri Geller and Greville Janner.

In the 80’s a child-abuse scandal swept the London Borough of Lambeth, where thousands of children were subjected to horrific abuse in council-run care homes. The abuse was carried out with the full complicity of Lambeth social services and the police.

Charles an Paul BoatengLambeth abuse enquiryBlair Cover Up

By strange coincidence, the head of social services throughout this period was none other than Janet Boateng, the wife of Paul Boateng.

Quite why she has never been investigated for any wrongdoing is a complete and utter mystery.

It’s a little know fact that Cliff Richard is close pals with the Blairs:

” It’s comforting to find that beloved Christian singer Cliff Richard has friends in high places.

He kindly lent his villa in Barbados to close chum Tony Blair. Cliff was so concerned that Tony was looking ‘haggard’ after starting the Iraq war that he took it upon himself to do a good deed.

Tony’s wife Cherie Blair QC is also close to Cliff. She loves nothing better than to attend award ceremonies with Cliff and let the world know what a great guy he is.

They’ve even been joined by another pal, TV personality Melvyn Bragg. Some voices have alleged that Cliff and Melvyn share a rather repulsive hobby that the average person would find sickening.

Other voices have alleged that Cliff is linked to notorious boy-brothel Elm Guest House and used the pseudonym, Kitty.

Yet others claim that Cliff is a person of interest to Operation Fernbridge officers and may be linked to the murder of Jill Dando, who knew all about the paedophile ring at the BBC.

Some have questioned why Cliff recently renounced his British citizenship and is now a fully-fledged Barbadian.”

Cliff once went on a fact-finding mission with child-rapist Jimmy Savile and Lord Longford:

” One of Myra Hindley’s most famous supporters was Lord Longford, who spent years lobbying for her release. Lord Longford went on a fact-finding mission in the ’70′s to investigate pornography. He took along Jimmy Savile and Cliff Richard.

Harriet Harman's Uncle Lord LongfordCliff and SavileHodge and HarmanMonster Pie

Jill Dando knew all about the BBC paedo-ring run by Savile and told her close chum Cliff. She was soon shot dead on her doorstep as a warning to others to keep their mouths shut.

Longford was the uncle of Harriet Harman MP, who has recently been embroiled in the recent PIE paedophile scandal.

Harman is in turn a cousin of Prime Minister David Cameron, who is in turn a cousin of the Queen.

cameron and his blackmailerQueenies gone battyQueenie Wanted

Another high-profile Hindley campaigner was wealthy journo, David Astor who spent 20 years corresponding with her and was close to Longford:

Longford and Astor had known each other since Oxford. Their paths had often crossed in the beaten ways of liberal postwar Britain, and they shared an interest in prison reform. Astor was agnostic, verging on atheist, Longford  a devout Roman Catholic. Both were fascinated by the idea of redemption.”

By a strange coincidence, David Astor was the step-uncle of Samantha Cameron.”

Times editor, Danny Finkelstein, is a huge fan of Janner.

You see, the real Danny Finkelstein is what one might call a ‘great pretender’.

He’s merely pretending to be who he says he is, when in fact he’s one of a small group of ‘behind the scenes’ players who despise Britain and are pushing a sickening agenda that seeks to destroy this once great nation.

jc5874 x10845NerYisroelPannel

Danny ‘the fink’, runs the hugely powerful and influential, Policy Exchange organisation.

Policy Exchange claims to merely discuss political policy-making, but in fact writes the policies that Cameron, Gove, Osbourne and IDS have so disastrously adopted.

http://www.policyexchange.org.uk/people/trustees

The current education minister, Michael Gove, is extremely close to Finkelstein.

He used to run Policy Exchange.

They both adore child-raping Labour Peer, Greville Janner.

Some might call Gove, Finkelstein’s whipping boy.

Currie, Janner and Gove

Gove has recently been in the headlines because he mysteriously dismissed calls for the mandatory reporting of sex-abuse claims by pupils in schools.

He claimed that the idea would swamp ” child protection” officials.

http://www.exaronews.com/articles/4999/michael-gove-blocks-move-to-force-schools-to-report-sex-abuse

In light of the many recent scandals in private boys schools this pathetic excuse seem incredulous.

Did Finkelstein have a hand in Gove’s bizarre decision not to allow abuse to be reported?

The brilliant writer, Chris Spivey, has been pivotal in reporting on the huge numbers of children taken into care by social workers when their parents have done nothing wrong.

http://chrisspivey.org/

These children are often then abused in care homes by VIP filth.

In a recent article, Spivey exposed the links between the government’s faked austerity measures and the rise in the number of children being taken into care because their parents have been sanctioned by the DWP and they are left penniless and sometime homeless.

Danny Finkelstein commissioned a report into benefit sanctions and appeared to have invented a fairer approach, but it’s actually more callous than ever.

Fake-football ‘lover’ Danny wants to introduce a sinister yellow card warning system which promises much stricter punishments for anyone who deviates.

http://socialwelfare.bl.uk/subject-areas/services-activity/poverty-benefits/policyexchange/160124smartersanctions.pdf

This begs the question, why, oh why, would Danny Finkelstein want parents to lose their benefits and have their children taken into care?

We published the following claims about Finkelstein which he didn’t take too kindly too and accused us (and our readers) of being ‘nutters’ and needing our heads examining:

https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/05/03/max-clifford-and-the-vip-child-abuse-connection/

Between 1981 and 1990 Finkelstein was a member of the SDP and in 1987 was defeated in the Brent East by-election.

It’s highly likely he came across child-raping filth, Cyril Smith MP.

Finkelstein switched political allegiance and  joined the Tories, where he became political advisor to bald oddity, William Hague.

Hague himself is up to his neck in filth of the highest order and may have lots to tell the authorities about his links to the notorious Dolphin Square boy-brothel and the North Wales care-home scandal.

He was also the toy-boy of Margaret Thatcher, who spent a staggering amount of time with close chum, Jimmy Savile.

We now know that Jill Dando was shot in the head because she was about to blow the lid on the BBC paedophile-ring, linked to Savile, Parliament and the Royals.

Nick Ross Jill Dando

Her high-profile death was a warning to others to keep their mouth shut too.

The Crimestoppers helpline, run by Nick Ross, conveniently stopped working when an appeal was made for information about Jill’s murder.

Nick Ross BBC

Ross, who recently said he’d watch child-porn given half the chance, is married to the cousin of Esther Rantzen.

Rantzen runs the Childline charity and has been accused of ignoring the victims of Savile at the BBC.

Some voices claim that both organisations are used to gather and suppress reports of VIP child-abuse.

According to the Spectator:

” Lord Finkelstein is closer by far to George Osborne. One senior Times writer told me three years ago that he spoke ‘six or seven times a day. probably more’ to the Chancellor. Mr Osborne once reportedly remarked that he spoke to Mr Finkelstein more often then he did to his wife. But when Mr Osborne appeared in front of Lord Justice Leveson, the following exchange occurred:

Q. ‘Does he [Finkelstein] act for you as a sort of unpaid adviser and/or speech writer?

A. ‘No, he’s just a very good friend.

Osbourne has been embroiled in his own scandals after details emerged of his cocaine-habit and love of brothels.

In 2005, the BBC held a debate in response to the 7/7 bombings:

” To the Everyman Cinema last night with Tom Brent for a public meeting on current affairs. BBC presenter Emily Maitlis chaired a brisk discussion in which Shami Chakrabarti, director of Liberty, outshone distinguished panelists Sir Leon Brittan, Simon Hughes, and Daniel Finkelstein.”

Brittan and Hughes have both been linked to sordid allegations of abuse against boys.

Was Finkelstein aware of these allegations?

For many years, Daniel Finkelstein ran a company called ‘The Generation of Change Ltd’ with Neil Sherlock.

http://companycheck.co.uk/company/02499621/THE-GENERATION-OF-CHANGE-LIMITED/directors-shareholders

Sherlock became Nick Clegg’s special adviser in his private office and his wife, Kathryn Parminter, used to work as a parliamentary research assistant for Simon Hughes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathryn_Parminter,_Baroness_Parminter

Nick Clegg has been accused of covering-up what he knew about Cyril Smith and his child-raping ways.

In 2012, for some unknown reason, Finkelstein wrote an article for the Times, entitled, ‘The dead can’t enter a plea of guilty’.

The article appeared to cast doubt on the abuse claims made against Cyril Smith and Jimmy Savile:

Cyril Smith may have been a monster. But until we have reliable evidence we must not rush to judgment . Can I ask you a question? How do you know, really know, that Jimmy Savile is guilty of child abuse? The truth, let’s face it, is that you don’t.  You are like me. You’ve perhaps heard one or two TV interviews with victims. You’ve read the odd article including some fairly damning quotes. You’ve gathered that there is a police investigation and that, as a result, a number of famous people have been arrested, although oddly always in connection with allegations that have nothing to do with Savile.
And, most of all, you’ve heard people say that he always looked a little fishy and that come to think of it it was a dead giveaway that he always waltzed around in one of those gold lamé tracksuits that paedos love to wear. And that hair. And “now then, now then”. He definitely did it.

The following anonymous comments were left on a blog, detailing the case of Labour Peer, Greville Janner:

Greville Janner

” After accusing Janner of paedophilic behaviour with a teenager, care worker, Frank Beck was arrested and charged with the sexual and physical abuse of children in his care over a thirteen-year period. At his trial Beck stated that: –

One child has been buggered and abused for two solid years by Greville Janner“.

Immediately after this, Janner who just happens to be, ironically, a long time member of the boy scouts association, and Sir David Napley, his solicitor, went to Police headquarters in Leicester.

Whereupon, the following statement was issued: “We have advised Mr. Janner that he is prevented from making any statement at this stage”. Shortly afterwards, the Director of Public Prosecutions, Alan Green, let it be known that “for lack of evidence”, Janner would not be prosecuted, even though Paul Winston, who was just thirteen when he and Janner first met, was able to describe Janner‘s home, the hotel rooms they had shared, and Janner’s habits and person in detail.

The Director of Public Prosecutions, himself, was arrested for kerb-crawling in Kings Cross a little while later. Green had come to the attention of the police previously for this same misdemeanour and was quietly given a formal warning. The scandal prompted his resignation from public office and the suicide of his wife.”

Daniel Finkelstein must have been aware of the accusations against Janner but, for some unknown reason, posted the following tweet:

Watching Greville Janner in 1970 election prog. Attractive, incisive, intelligent, moderate. How did he not end up one of Lab’s leaders?”

The two were also listed together in the JC as being highly influential in their respective fields:

http://www.thejc.com/jc-power-100/the-jc-power-100-numbers-11-20

” The highest judge in the land is Lord David Neuberger.

Neuberger

He used to work at N.M Rothschild and Sons and is married to Angela Holdsworth.

He was responsible for evicting the Parliament Square peace campaign.

In May 2011, while commenting on super injunctions, he said that social media sites like Twitter were “totally out of control” and society should consider ways to bring such websites under control.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Neuberger,_Baron_Neuberger_of_Abbotsbury

By a very strange twist, his wife Angela, was a BBC executive for many years and must have known about Jimmy Savile’s child-raping activities.

She also worked with Nick Ross and Esther Rantzen on the controversial BBC show, Man Alive.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man_Alive_(BBC_TV_series)

Savile and RantzenSavile SatanRIP innocent child

Angela Holdsworth then became the editor of another well-known programme.

That programme was none-other than Crimewatch.

http://www.angelaholdsworth.com/

The phone-hacking judge, Brian Levenson was involved in the trial of Barry George.

Some claim the hacking scandal was a deliberate set-up to clamp down on the media.

Following the death of Jill Dando, a new research centre in her name was formed:

The UCL Jill Dando Institute of Security and Crime Science is the first Institute in the world devoted to Crime Science. Research is concentrated on new ways to cut crime and increase security ” .

By a strange twist, the Board of the Institute is run by none other than Nick Ross and Professor Anthony Finkelstein.

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/jdi/people/tabbed-box/board

Anthony Finkelstein is Daniel Finkelstein’s brother.”

We then made a shocking discovery.

Max Clifford Filth

Jailed pervert, Max Clifford, uses the following shady business address:

11-15 Acre House
William Road
London
United Kingdom
NW1 3ER

In February 2013, we were given a tip-off that Acre House is linked to less-than-kosher Conservative monetary shenanigans:

https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2013/02/04/acre-house-11-15-william-road-london/

By a strange coincidence, Finkelstein’s Policy Exchange uses the same address.

So does Tory child-pimp, Derek Laud.

So does crooked Gerald Ronson.

So does Leon Brittan.

https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2014/05/03/max-clifford-and-the-vip-child-abuse-connection/

Quite why they all share this debauched address is a complete and utter mystery.

But this shit just gets deeper and deeper.

What many people aren’t aware of is that Greville Janner and his sons are all high-ranking barristers and are well aware of how easy it is for someone to avoid justice by claiming they have dementia or Alzheimer’s and would be unable to recall key facts.

Well that’s not going to f*****g cut it in this case.

Janner should surely be proud of our persistence in hunting him down to the bitter end.

He did it to the ‘ Nazis’ so we’re merely returning the favour.

Don’t worry Grev, we won’t let you down.

You’ll get what’s coming to you.

It’s only a matter of time…

https://thecolemanexperience.wordpress.com/2015/04/09/the-weird-world-of-danny-finkelstein/

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , ,

“DEAR JUSTICE GODDARD RE: INQUIRY INTO CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE – from MICHAEL MURRIN 15 APRIL 2015

On 14 April 2015 at 23:39, michael murrin <michaelmurrin@hotmail.com> wrote:

“MICHAEL .H. MURRIN

21 GOODWOOD AVENUE

PRESTON   –   PR2 9TZ

0795 – 142 – 6617

michaelmurrin@hotmail.com 

Hon. Justice Lowell Goddard.

Independent Panel Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, 2 Marsham St, London, SW1P 4DF.                                                                                                        14th April 2015

 Dear Justice Goddard,

Re: INQUIRY INTO CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE. 

I am involved in investigating child sexual abuse linked to politicians at Westminster.  This letter should be read in conjunction with the attachments listed below. 

I became involved in the issue of child sexual abuse when the Jimmy Sa-vile story broke during 2012.  I noted that the press had not linked Sa-vile to the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE) which operated as a pressure group from 1974 – 1984. PIE sought to reduce the age of consent to five and it had significant support within Parliament and among Left wing political activists. It was affiliated to the National Council of Civil Liberties – NCCL – (Now called Liberty) when Harriet Harman (Deputy leader of the Labour Party), Patricia Hewitt (Former Secretary of State for Health {2005-2007} – Labour) and Jack Dromey (Labour front bench MP) were involved with the NCCL(1).  

 I ran an investigation into political corruption in the North West of England. During 1984 I was offered a copy of the PIE membership list. I was not in a position to purchase the list at that time but as “a taster” I was given the names of two people alleged to be on it. One was a senior Labour politician now sitting in the House of Lords, the second name was Jimmy Sa-vile. During 2012 I sought to bring the association between Sa-vile, senior politicians, and PIE into the mainstream media. This objective was secured during 2014(2) when extensive coverage appeared in the national press.

 I have sought to secure the investigation of PIE by the Child Abuse Inquiry from the beginning.  This proposal has been strenuously resisted by the Home Secretary and the Prime Minister. The reasons for this are clear. PIE was so deeply rooted in the realm of the social elite and the political establishment that it had extensive influence. To have these links fully examined now would lead to the exposure of many highly influential individuals as being either practising paedophiles or the promoters of paedophilia. It has to be remembered that Roy Jenkins (Home Secretary & the “Architect of the permissive society”) expressed support for PIE. The organisation also came close to having a private members bill to have the age of consent reduced to just five years of age introduced into Parliament. PIE was also linked to the security services. Some speculate that the security services used PIE to entrap, for the purposes of blackmail, people of influence. I believe that there is now sufficient circumstantial evidence in the public domain to support this assertion.  I did write to David Cameron to ask him to bring forward legislation to bar the security services from using child sexual abuse as a tool of their trade as they did at the Kincora Boys School in Northern Ireland.  Mr Cameron’s response was contemptuous. 

 I am still of the opinion that no Inquiry can get to the bottom of this issue if it does not investigate PIE.

On March 14th 2015 Theresa May was reported in The Daily Telegraph as saying “that the trail will lead into schools, hospitals, churches and youth clubs as well as ‘many other institutions that should have been places of safety but instead became the setting for the most appalling abuse’. She described revelations up to this point as ‘just the tip of the iceberg’ “. What Mrs May has failed to say is that the trail leads deep into the heart of the political and security service establishment.  This is the fact that Mrs May and Mr Cameron, et al, seeks to bury and shield from public scrutiny. 

It is a fact that the political Left were also instrumental in the promotion of paedophilia. Ms Harman, Ms Hewitt and Mr Dromey might not have openly promoted PIE but they gave it a veneer of social acceptability by allowing PIE to affiliate with the NCCL.  None of them took the step of resigning in protest. They helped to create the political climate within which PIE could operate and paedophilia could flourish in this country. These are the harsh and brutal realities which these politicians are not yet capable of facing up to. Mr Milliband recently put forward Mr Dromey as a Labour Party spokesman on a Radio 4 item focused on child sexual abuse. This demonstrates a disturbing level of detachment from both the facts and the realities of the NCCL relationship with PIE. The political Left must be forced to acknowledge the part they played in the propagation of this evil within British society.  PIE has to be subject to forensic examination if your Inquiry is to mean anything.

I have also campaigned for the Inquiry to be established as a Royal Commission.  This proposal was put forward because it would ensure that once the Inquiry was established it would be beyond the control of the political executive which is riddled with corruption, graft and malpractice.  The Inquiry would report directly to Parliament. It would also have the gravitas to ensure that the true importance of this issue is registered in the minds of the public. Again Mrs May and Mr Cameron sought to ignore this proposal and sabotage the establishment of any form of Judicial Inquiry. It is only after extreme pressure, and after the public exposure by the national media of two attempts to manipulate and corruptly establish non-judicial inquiries, that the current situation has been reached.

On January 25th of this year I wrote to my MP, Mr Ben Wallace. In that letter I stated that “I can now state that there is sufficient prima facie evidence to suggest that the Prime Minister, Mr Cameron, has acted corruptly in the matter of the proposed Inquiry into child sexual abuse. There is also evidence in the public domain which states that he has a personal relationship with Mr Derek Laud.  There are allegations in the public domain that Mr Laud has been connected to paedophilia. I have spoken to sources connected to the security services who allege that Mr Laud was connected to the child brothel known as the Elm Guest House.”  Mr Wallace failed to respond to the letter or address the content.  The fact that Mr Laud is a friend of Mr & Mrs Cameron is a matter of public record, he attended their wedding.  The question of Mr Laud’s alleged involvement in paedophilia has not been responded to.  Until such time as a denial is issued I think it is reasonable to assume that the reports are credible. This then connects the Prime Minister directly with a man who is deeply involved in paedophilia.  This could explain why Mr Cameron has been so obstructive when faced with demands for the issue of child abuse involving politicians to be properly investigated. It could also explain why his government is implementing policies which amount to the furthering of a pro-paedophile agenda. A copy of the letter is attached.

You will also find attached a copy of an email sent to Mr M. Rahman of the Independent Police Complaints Commission. The contents are self explanatory. I am now seeking to verify reports that Mrs May has been aware of the allegations concerning Sir Bernard since 2011. This poses the question why was Sir Bernard appointed to such a high profile position if these allegations were known about before he was appointed?  Was the vetting deficient or is a process of reverse vetting in operation? Is it the case that anyone with a clean record is being locked out of high profile appointments?  To rise to the top in the UK government machine do you now have to have a past that allows you to be “manipulated and blackmailed.”? There is now a situation where the Prime Minister is linked to a man alleged to be deeply involved in paedophilia. The Home Secretary has sought to corruptly manipulate the process of establishing an Inquiry into child sexual abuse and now seeks to curtail its remit so that it cannot effectively investigate the political links to paedophilia. The Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police is now being openly accused in the national media of having suppressed previous child abuse investigations. I repeat what I have said above – the political executive is riddled with corruption, graft and malpractice. The issue of the links of mainstream political party’s to drugs money is something I have raised in previous correspondence with my MP – he failed to respond. I will bring forward further allegations, supported by documentary evidence, of corruption involving drugs and paedophilia before the end of April. The report will be sent directly to the DPP.

Many government files have either been shredded or ‘lost.’  The destruction of documentary evidence by the political executive and the BBC has been undertaken on an industrial scale since 2012.  For this reason I have campaigned for the removal of the threat of prosecution under the official Secrets Act for any government employee who gives evidence to the Inquiry.  There have been moves within Parliament in recent weeks to table an amendment to the Official Secrets Act to enable police officers and security service personnel to give evidence unfettered by the Act.  This amendment was defeated by the government. Theresa May voted against it. This demonstrates her continued corrupt and duplicitous behaviour concerning this matter.  Despite her public statements to the contrary her actions demonstrate that she is determined to subvert any inquiry into the political and security service connections to paedophilia. She seeks to shift the focus away from these connections and is prepared to act corruptly and dishonestly to do so. 

On March 17th the Guardian reported that(3): “Conservatives have rejected suggestions that the law needs to be strengthened to protect police whistleblowers who fear they will be prosecuted under the Official Secrets Act for exposing a cover-up of a paedophile ring in the 1970s.

Damian Green, the former Home Office minister, said he believed the home secretary, Theresa May, had already given former police officers sufficient comfort by promising in the House of Commons they would not be prosecuted for revealing a cover-up.” If you examine the circumstances concerning the ‘letters of comfort’ given by the Blair government to Irish terrorists and the threat to now rescind them it becomes clear that nothing less than protection written into law will suffice to protect these people. I make the point again – the political executive is fundamentally corrupt and fundamentally dishonest. The Home Secretary’s words of assurance are worthless. The adage that ‘a verbal agreement is not worth the paper it is written on’ applies here with a vengeance.

In other correspondence attached to this letter I have raised the issue of individuals seeking to manipulate this issue for party political advantage.  I have personally spoken with activists who have said to me “this is a class war.”  Others have expressed their determination to use this issue to “bring down the Conservative party and the Monarchy.”  These comments might seem like the verbal rants of a few extremists but I would caution against dismissing them so lightly.  I recently published a series of reports focused on the on-line news agency, Exaro.  This agency has been very active in the area of the allegations focused on child sexual abuse. A key director is Mr Timothy Pendry (The nephew of the Labour Peer, Lord Pendry) Mr Timothy Pendry states that his experience “has included senior communications advice in some of the most significant takeovers& mergers in British corporate history as well as an advisory role during the Russian Mass Privatisation programme. Since the mid-1990s, he has dealt with reputational issues arising out of private sector collateral damage during the ‘war on terror.’” Clearly Mr Pendry is no fool and cannot be considered to be from the lunatic fringe. On September 10, 2009 at 4:44 pm Mr Pendry wrote the following on an internet blog: 

 “Unfocused Groupthink (whoever you are) – politics is a cesspit on all sides. We have not had a Revolution since 1688. One is overdue and it should sweep away the whole political class which probably includes 85% of those anonymous persons who regularly comment on Guido Fawkes’ blog and earn their living giving ‘advice’ to ease the paths of special interests to policy or are ambitious for their scribbling to gain the approval of other self-referential scribblers in the dying print media (perhaps not you and many others but these political molluscs infest the damp back garden of our democracy, you cannot deny)”

I think that talk of “revolution” is irresponsible and demonstrates an adherence to an ideological agenda which is designed to subvert the national interest.  Whilst I would agree with Mr Pendry that “politics is a cesspit on all sides” that is as far as our consensus goes. My objective is to exorcise the corruption from our political, economic and social institutions. I want reform and not revolution.

I have sought to engage in a dialogue with the Labour MP’s who have been campaigning on this issue but they have not responded. I have also sought to open a dialogue with Church of England representatives including The Bishop of Durham and The Archbishop of Canterbury.  The impression I have is that the various motives of these people might be less than altruistic. I think there is a hidden agenda which is political and ideological.  I would like to suggest that some of the protocols of the South African Truth & Reconciliation Commission be incorporated into the Inquiry.  This would, I feel, enable these destructive elements to be neutralised and allow the moderates to prevail.

 It is a fallacy to assume that paedophilia is a purely British problem. It is an issue which affects every country.  For this reason I have suggested that any Inquiry should look at the international perspective of this issue. Britain is an outward looking country, we should not be narrow and parochial when examining this issue.

We have nothing in common and it is unlikely that we will ever meet but there is one thing we do have in common as far as the political and social elite in London are concerned – We are viewed as being the Oikes from the provinces.  To them we are the unsophisticated, naive and parochial people who are looked down upon. Flattered and humoured – perhaps? But behind our backs we are viewed with contempt. We both know that this is far from the truth.  You have power beyond that which Theresa May has sought to confer upon you.  The government cannot afford to lose another Chair to this Inquiry. I repeat again that any Inquiry that does not forensically examine PIE is nothing other than a whitewash. If police officers are not released from the threat of prosecution, now or in the distant future, under the Official Secrets Act then you cannot get to the truth. If the security services are not opened up and their part in the use of paedophilia as a tool for manipulation and control of persons of influence is not brought into the daylight, then the Inquiry will not have got to the truth.

I would urge you to ferociously guard your independence. I would suggest that you should make a point of meeting with campaigners without the impediment of an entourage of officials from the Home Office, the security services or the police. Do not become a prisoner within a gilded cage.

I look forward to your response in due course.

Yours sincerely,

Michael .H. Murrin “

(1).   http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/labour/10659100/Harriet-Harman-Jack-Dromey-Patricia-Hewitt-and-the-Paedophile-Information-Exchange.html

 (2).   http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2568850/Harmans-pressure-group-advertised-members-magazine-paedophiles-New-evidence-links-NCCL-PIE-Harriet-legal-chief.html

 (3).   ww.theguardian.com/politics/2015/mar/17/police-told-drop-child-abuse-case-against-cyril-smith-whistleblower

 

2

APRIL-2015-CHILDRENS-COMMISSIONERAPRIL-2015-JUSTICE-GODDARD

APRIL-2015-JUSTICE-GODDARD

APRIL-2015-LETTER-2-THE-QUEEN-02

APRIL-2015-LETTER-2-THE-QUEEN-02 B.WALLACE-LAUD-CAMERON

IPCC-HOGAN-HOWE

IPCC-HOGAN-HOWE.docx2

MIRROR-HOGAN-HOWE

MOPAC – APRIL – 4th – 2015

WALLACE-MARCH-2015

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

NEW!! Maurice Kirk uncaged and branchaged 3 April 2015

Published on 2 Apr 2015

Maurice Kirk uncaged and branchaged 3 April 2015

——————————————————————————————-

Maurice Kirk’s god part 1 +  2 Jersey 31 March 2015

Scroll down and see archives for numerous posts,

and see MK’s site  http://www.kirkflyingvet.cm

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , ,

CAROL WOODS, EX SS CHILD PROTECTION OFFICER, SLATES THE LOWLIFE PRACTICES OF UK SOCIAL SERVICES…+ KELLIE COTTAM

CAROL WOODS, EX SS CHILD PROTECTION OFFICER, SLATES THE LOWLIFE PRACTICES OF UK SOCIAL SERVICES…
 
“Carol Woods is an ex child protection officer, a level 3 social worker. Who after being asked to wrongly edit paper work, take children from loving Mothers, target families and many other things, SHE BLEW THE Whistle. She readily admits on camera that Social services kidnap children from innocent parents. Let us not forget that these are the words of someone that worked for UK social services, this is not some angry parent that has an axe to grind for losing a child…. Watch it.”

Kellie Cottam (Forced Adoption Exposed) with Carol Woods CP whistle blower down at S.C.O.T UK

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

RALLY AGAINST CHILD ABUSE AND ANTI-PAEDOPHILIA – LONDON, PARLIAMENT SQ. / TRAFALGAR SQ. APRIL 11 ’15

IMAG0351[1]

RALLY AGAINST CHILD ABUSE AND ANTI-PAEDOPHILIA – LONDON, PARLIAMENT SQ. / TRAFALGAR SQ. APRIL 11 ’15

video 1

https://vid.me/e/fBAp

2

https://vid.me/e/eXVh

3 with Bill Maloney  of  pienmashfilms.com

https://vid.me/e/wb2v

4 Traffic Stop

https://vid.me/WC6t/WC6t 

 5 

https://vid.me/e/fBAp

6

https://vid.me/e/8T44

7

https://vid.me/e/1lJU

8

9

========================================================

Politics

Protesters angry at MP’s paedophile cover up – London, UK

 
Protesters angry at MPs paedophile cover up  London UK

  • Protesters march through Whitehall angry over the Government inaction to hold an enquiry into alleged serious child abuse offences by MPs

 
Protesters angry at MPs paedophile cover up  London UK
  • Protesters accuse the Government of not safeguarding children, just their own pockets during the protest in front of London Parliament.

 
Protesters angry at MPs paedophile cover up  London UK
  • Protesters stop traffic outside Parliament, angry over the Government inaction over accusation that 24 MPs were involved in historical serious child abuse offences

 
Protesters angry at MPs paedophile cover up  London UK
  • Protesters hold rally outside Parliament, angry over the Government inaction to hold an enquiry into 24 MPs accused of historical serious child abuse offences

 
Protesters angry at MPs paedophile cover up  London UK

 
Protesters angry at MPs paedophile cover up  London UK
  • Protesters hold rally outside Parliament, angry over the Government inaction to hold an enquiry into treatment of the elderly in failing care home and serious child abuse offences by MPs

 
Protesters angry at MPs paedophile cover up  London UK
  • No more cover ups claim protesters at a rally outside Parliament, angry over the Government inaction to hold an enquiry into 24 MPs accused of historical serious child abuse offences

 
Protesters angry at MPs paedophile cover up  London UK
  • An gents umbrella with names of institutions and people accused of serious child abuse offences or covering up the truth as the Government delays an enquiry into 24 MPs accused of historical serious child abuse offences

 
Protesters angry at MPs paedophile cover up  London UK
  • A protester wearing a superman costume holds a banner saying, ‘Honk if you support children’s rights’.

 
Protesters angry at MPs paedophile cover up  London UK
  • Protesters confront police officers outside Parliament, angry over Government inaction to hold an enquiry into treatment of the elderly in failing care home and serious child abuse offences by MPs

 
Protesters angry at MPs paedophile cover up  London UK
  • Protesters hold up traffic outside Parliament, angry over the Government inaction to hold an enquiry into treatment of the elderly in failing care home and serious child abuse offences by MPs

 
Protesters angry at MPs paedophile cover up  London UK
  • Protesters hold up traffic outside Parliament, angry over the Government inaction to hold an enquiry into treatment of the elderly in failing care home and serious child abuse offences by MPs

 
Protesters angry at MPs paedophile cover up  London UK
  • A protester with a white cross holds a prayer session outside Downing Street, angry over the Government inaction to hold an enquiry into treatment of the elderly in failing care home and serious child abuse offences by MPs

 
Protesters angry at MPs paedophile cover up  London UK
  • A protester wearing a gas mask and camouflage kit stands outside Downing Street

 
Protesters angry at MPs paedophile cover up  London UK
  • Protesters gather at Nelson’s column in Trafalgar Square angry over the Government inaction to hold an enquiry into alleged serious child abuse offences by MPs

 
Protesters angry at MPs paedophile cover up  London UK
  • Banners claiming that the Home Secretary, Theresa May will be gone after the May General Election

 
Protesters angry at MPs paedophile cover up  London UK
  • Protesters wearing ‘Anonymous’ masks gather in Trafalgar Square angry over the Government inaction to hold an enquiry into alleged serious child abuse offences by MPs

Protesters hold rally in London over the delayed paedophile enquiry. It’s been three months since John Mann MP’s disclosure and not one politician out of the 24 currently standing accused of child sexual offences has been arrested or questioned.

Submitted by

Jill Dando Daily Star Headline! A . the rich

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

WHAT IF #FatherPaul took a selfie to prove the #WhistleblowerKids wrong? His Witness Statement as part of Neelu’s arrest

April 10, 2015

15 03 06 CCPS4This 32-page document relating to Neelu’s arrest contains:

  1. a page of CHARGES: engage in riotous / violent /indecent behaviour in a church, chapel, churchyard etc – caused a disturbance and vexed the priest by filming in close personal space of the priest, asking inappropriate questions in the presence of others, caused trouble to church goers by banging on church doors causing the service to be disrupted, having to be escorted out of the service causing service to be stopped – contrary to Section 2 of the Ecclesiastical Courts Jurisdiction Act 1960. H.O. 195/39 Local None CJS EC360001.
  2. Details of Defendant
  3. a page of FACTS: an account of events on Sunday 22nd March 2015, relating to Priest Paul CONRAD, the Church Warden Paul GOSS, parishioner Sophie DIX.
  4. Summary of a 23 minute interview.
  5. A list of six victims and corroborative witnesses adding Alistair Philips, Betsy Davey, Jennifer Black to the above three names.
  6. A brief summary referring to Facebook footage.
  7. Officer declaration
  8. Paul CONRAD’s 4-page witness statement.
  9. V. U. GOSS’ 3-page witness statement.
  10. Retired priest Peter BLACKBURN’s 2-page witness statement.
  11. Father William DAVAGE, hon. assistant priest, 2-page witness statement.
  12. Church Wardne’s Paul GOSS’ 3-page witness statement.
  13. Actress Sophie DIX’ 3-page witness statement.
  14. Four pages from an Evidence and Actions Book relating to the arrest on 04 April 2015.
  15. Officer Alex FRASER’s two page witness statement relating to 22nd March and Body Worn Video (BWV) – [not ticked as available on page 6].
  16. Remand / Bail details.

Christine got 12 months suspended sentence providing she leaves the country on the 5th May. And a £165 fine.

Neelu has her case on 4th August at Tottenham Magistrates court,

MIND THE GAPS between

  • people’s perceptions, memories and interpretations
  • video equipment recording events
  • ‘realities’ created on paper.

Here’s the video as a one-hour compilation of the privately recorded statements by the children which contains Father Paul’s distinguishing marks. 

Here are videos relating to the event on 22 March and the church from Neelu’s Facebook page:

Hampstead Satanic Ritual Update 29 March 2015: Father Paul Conrad slips out of Christ Church, Hampstead Square, London,…

Posted by Ved Chaudhari on Sunday, 29 March 2015

//

Hampstead Christ Church Sunday 22 March 2015: There are many EXCELLENT POLICE OFFICERS on the streets who can help us get our remedies….This Police Officer is an example of one who will listen with compassion, who will assist in the remedies sought and who are serving humanity…They must be promoted and allocated to the new Police investigation…in Hampstead…

Posted by Ved Chaudhari on Thursday, 26 March 2015

//

Father Paul Conrad escapes after Sunday ServiceChrist Church Hampstead 22 March 2015: A crowd of Hampstead Kids supporters got duped when Father Paul Conrad, accused of rapes & sodomy, escaped through the back entrance of the Church

Posted by Ved Chaudhari on Wednesday, 25 March 2015

//

Father Paul Conrad’s back entrancesA public footpath has the main entrance to the Christchurch Primary school at a ground level about 20 feet below the foot path, to the right of this video, and the back entrance of the church to the left. As you look straight ahead, you can see the footpath splits into the car park of the church to the left and the steps out of the school for the children going towards the top of the Christchurch Hill

Posted by Ved Chaudhari on Tuesday, 24 March 2015

//

All are invited inside the church every Sunday 11am to 1222 March 2015: Hampstead update 02: The person in charge of the church building, Mr Morris? freaks out upon hearing the truth in the Witness Statement of Ella Draper dated 21 March 2015. He is in denial that medical evidence supports that children are raped and sodomized in the Christchurch Primary school and the Christ Church, itself, which is literally within the same grounds, next door.

Posted by Ved Chaudhari on Monday, 23 March 2015

//

Caretaker of Christ Church invites everyone to the service22 March 2015: Hampstead update 01 – around 40 people gathered outside the Christ Church, Hampstead Square, London, NW3 1AB around 10.30 for the church service. Two Police were already present, another two arrived later. A helicopter was hovering briefly. Most people stood about 50 yards from the Church building, however a few were brave and went inside the church hall to attend the whole church service.Police were invited to take down Crime Reports and accept a copy of the Witness Statement of Ella Draper dated 21 March 2015, which they declined, stating that they were called only to prevent potential altercation, so the letter sent to the Barnet Council, Judge Pauffley, Ministry of Justice, & Councillors on 7th March 2015, copied to IPCC, SFO & Met was read out to the Police video to be passed on to the most senior officer for the return of the children, their re-patriation with their mother to Russia to join their grand-parents (who are in the UK since Dec to take them) and protection of witnesses and representatives of victims of rape, sodomy, murder of babies and cannibalism of babies.The person who is in charge of the building, who wouldn’t give his name (possibly Mr Morris) invited us into the church service – and could not explain why he relied on Judge Pauffley who committed Treason in her judgement.

Posted by Ved Chaudhari on Monday, 23 March 2015

Hampstead Christ Church, Hampstead Square, NW3 1AB, Service every Sunday at 10.30am for 11am for the return of the two children, raped, sodomised at school and church, then kidnapped by Police. IPCC investigation into Police failure to stop satanic rituals in UK schools.

Posted by Ved Chaudhari on Sunday, 22 March 2015

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Snatched from her loving family and handed to strangers: Sophia was an adored baby with a devoted mother and besotted grandparents. Then social workers took an extraordinary decision

mailza

Social workers prevented mother Samantha from taking baby Sophia home

  • Stems from father, who isn’t with Samantha, having committed sex assault 
  • Authorities now say she fails to recognise potential ‘future emotional harm’
  • Despite a lengthy court battle adored child will now be put up for adoption
The small pink bedroom remains pristine, untouched. The cot, its coverlet neat and pressed, stands empty. There are soft toys, a candy-coloured pedal car, a pushchair and a pretty little Moses basket.
Photos of a toddler — laughing, held aloft on her grandfather’s shoulders — give proof to a child’s existence, yet nothing in the room shows signs of use or life.
Indeed, the little girl — we’ll call her Sophia — for whom the bedroom was intended, has never slept in it. Since she was born 22 months ago, there has been no joyous welcome to the four-bedroom house on the South Coast in which her family live.
Instead, just two days after her birth, Sophia was wrenched from her family, and the shock was so profound, so terrible, that they are still reeling.
Torn apart: Sophia (whose identity has been obscured) with her proud mother Samantha

The law prevents us from using Sophia’s real name, because any day now the toddler will be forcibly adopted against her family’s wishes. She will, thereafter, become the child of strangers, who will raise her, without contact from her blood relatives, until she is an adult.
Yet Sophia already had a family who loved her; who were overjoyed by the prospect of caring for her. So much so that her 20-year-old mother, Samantha, had decided to live at her parents’ home so her daughter would have their love and support as well as hers.
In fact it was Sophia’s grandparents, Jayne Harley, 50, a doctors’ receptionist, and her husband Neil, 44, who runs a scaffolding company, who decorated the room in readiness for their first grandchild.
But our Nanny State decreed they should not be permitted to bring up their own child. A social worker and two police officers arrived at the hospital where Sophia was born, two days after her delivery by emergency Caesarean, and prevented them taking her home.
Today, unbelievably, forced adoptions still occur. But the Harleys’ story is so jaw-dropping, so harrowing, it is almost impossible to believe it happened in modern Britain.
But it did, and Sophia’s family spent 18 months fighting through the courts for the right to raise her. It was a battle that took them to the Court of Appeal in London and cost them £60,000 — raised from loans and savings — in legal fees.
Their ordeal began when Samantha, who was then aged 19, announced that she was pregnant.
‘We weren’t happy,’ recalls Jayne. ‘Sammy was still at college, training to be a nail technician, and her boyfriend, who was in his mid-20s, wasn’t working. It wasn’t the sort of relationship we wanted for her. We felt she could do better.
‘But Sammy was intent on keeping the baby — she wouldn’t consider a termination — so we agreed we’d support her in every way we could.’
'Cherished by her family': Little Sophia, aged six months, was taken away by social services

Jayne was concerned that Samantha, who had been a ‘challenging’ child and was diagnosed in her teens with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), would need help with parenting.
She and Neil, her husband of 14 years, resolved to step in: Samantha and the newborn should live at home with them, they all agreed.
Then Jayne discovered a disquieting fact about Samantha’s boyfriend John (not his real name). ‘We heard that he was on the Sex Offenders’ Register. My immediate thought was: “Oh God, please don’t let him be a rapist or paedophile.” ’
Court records, however, revealed that his crime was a sexual assault on a woman. ‘He had forced his hand up her skirt and kissed her against her will. It was a serious offence and it would be wrong to diminish it. But he wasn’t a paedophile or rapist,’ says Jayne.
Nonetheless, she was relieved when Samantha ended her relationship with John early on in the pregnancy. They remained friends, and Jayne accepted this as evidence that John intended to have a role in his child’s life, which seemed laudable.
Pending motherhood, moreover, gave Samantha a new sense of purpose. ‘She’d been defiant and disruptive, but she changed completely,’ recalls Jayne. ‘She improved herself, passed her driving test, bought a little car. She stayed in, devoted herself to studying and completed her college course.
‘And we started to look forward to the future. We got the baby’s room ready and bought everything she could possibly need.’
When, in June 2013, Samantha was admitted to hospital for the birth, Jayne was with her. She was surprised, however, when John, who was by then in a relationship with another young woman, arrived, too.
‘There was no plan for him to be there, but I didn’t regard him as a danger,’ recalls Jayne. ‘We’d even agreed that any future involvement between John and the baby would be arranged through social services.’
I knew was that two of the most precious people in our lives were being taken away and I couldn’t prevent it. I had no idea what we’d done wrong. It was barbaric. 
Sophia’s grandmother Jayne 
Jayne revelled in her new role as grandparent. ‘Holding Sophia was like holding my own daughter,’ she recalls. ‘There was the same level of love. Samantha had produced this beautiful baby girl. Seeing her for the first time was one of the happiest moments of my life.’
Then, two days after she was born in summer 2013, Jayne went to the hospital to collect her daughter and her baby to bring them home.
‘But there was delay after delay,’ she says. ‘Then a nurse said she needed to sign some paperwork. That was when the police and a social worker arrived and the nightmare started.’
What happened next was chilling.
‘They said Samantha had to go to a mother and baby unit outside the county, and that she had to leave immediately,’ says her mother.
‘My daughter was hysterical, screaming, “Mum, why are they doing this?” I couldn’t answer her. All I could think was that social services departments were there to keep families together, not tear them apart.
‘I was stunned. All I knew was that two of the most precious people in our lives were being taken away and I couldn’t prevent it. I had no idea what we’d done wrong. It was barbaric; inhumane.
‘I asked why on earth they were doing it. They said Sophia was at risk from her parents. I couldn’t understand it. I re-live that moment every day: my daughter’s terrified face, begging me to stop it from happening, screaming for help, and me being powerless to do a thing.’
Jayne has never been able to establish exactly why, but she believes Social Services were panicked by the arrival of John at the hospital, and Jayne and her daughter became scapegoats.
Before being packed off to a mother and baby unit outside London (where she would ultimately spend 16 weeks), Samantha had never spent a night away from home. She was bewildered and frightened.
‘They said that if she went, she could keep her baby,’ says Jayne. ‘We tried to be positive. We said: “They’ll teach you parenting skills.”
‘None of us knew it was to be an assessment — that Samantha would be under scrutiny 24/7.’
For the next four months, Jayne and Neil, who had raised Samantha and her sister from his wife’s first marriage since they were five and six respectively, made the 250-mile round-trip to the unit every Sunday. It was the only day they were permitted to visit.
They were cheered by Samantha’s progress. ‘We could see how well she was parenting Sophia, and the bond that was developing between them,’ recalls Jayne. ‘Sophia was content. She was a smiley, happy baby.’
You cannot commit a more inhumane act than to prise a baby from the arms of the family.
 Sophia’s grandmother Jayne
Despite this, greater trauma was in store. In October, when Samantha’s placement ended, she was told it had actually been an assessment — and that she had failed.
‘They said her parenting skills were not in doubt,’ says Jayne. ‘The problem was that she — like us, apparently — did not recognise her child could be exposed to “future emotional harm”.’
Sophia was wrenched peremptorily from the family who loved her and entrusted to the care of her prospective adoptive parents. The dreadful irony was lost on social workers.
Jayne says: ‘They kept saying Sophia was at risk of emotional harm from us, yet Social Services were the abusers. You cannot commit a more inhumane act than to prise a baby from the arms of the family that loves her and place her with strangers.’
Jayne and Neil, however, were not prepared to give up without a fight. In January 2014, they applied for a Special Guardianship Order.
Their application, through the courts, was to prove both long and costly — and ultimately futile. They are hard-working people but they did not have the financial resources to fund an expensive legal battle. Like all grandparents, they were not entitled to legal aid.
They raised £30,000 through a loan, borrowed £20,000 from their own parents and consumed their £10,000 nest egg on their fight.
Two GPs from the surgery where Jayne worked provided references for her, as did a young woman Jayne had informally fostered — at the request of the very Social Services department that now considered her a risk to her own grandchild — when she was a troubled adolescent. Yet still their application failed.
‘When I stood in the witness box, they treated me like a criminal,’ says Jayne. ‘I was traumatised. We felt helpless. It was as if they were trying to annihilate us.’
They employed a barrister, who said they had a strong case for appeal, so their quest reached the Court of Appeal in London.
That, too, failed. The decision left their solicitor, Michael Stocken, dumbfounded.
‘It seems as though the Court of Appeal bent over backwards to endorse the first court’s decision,’ he says. ‘But there’s no doubt that it is better for a child’s welfare to be with a loving kinship carer.
‘If grandparents with the Harleys’ background and commitment, and with all they had to offer their grandchild, lose a case like this, what hope is there for anyone else?
‘It has cost them a tremendous amount, and they were prepared to move heaven and earth to provide their grandchild with a loving home. They’re kind and genuine people. I cannot imagine the distress it has caused them all. They’ve had a very raw deal.’
She will know not a day passed when we did not think of her; that we loved her with all our hearts. 
Sophia’s grandmother Jayne 
This is scant solace for Jayne and Neil. All the while they pursued their case through the courts, they and Samantha were permitted to see Sophia just once a week at a supervised Family Contact Centre.
‘It was bittersweet,’ says Jayne. ‘We watched our granddaughter grow into a funny, feisty little character. She loved rough and tumble play with Neil. She called him DadDad, and I was Nana. Neil used to carry her on his shoulders and she would lay her little face against his.
‘She’s affectionate and loving, and we adore her. The pain of watching her tearful little face when we said goodbye each time, hearing her scream “Mummy”, and “Nana”, almost outweighed the pleasure of seeing her.’
Finally, their last line of appeal exhausted, they had to say a last and permanent goodbye to the child they all cherished; the little girl they loved so much that, as Jayne says: ‘We would have given our lives for her in a heartbeat.’
That final parting this January was unimaginably sad — not just for Jayne, Neil and Samantha but also for Sophia, now 22 months, who had formed a strong bond of love with them.
‘Shine like the little star you are. We will always love you,’ Jayne wrote in a farewell letter to her granddaughter. From Samantha there were presents of jewellery. ‘One day we will be one,’ she wrote, in hope, to her daughter. They’ve named a star after her.
‘When we went for the last time, I’m sure Sophia sensed it was a final goodbye,’ says Jayne, through tears. ‘She grabbed Samantha’s car keys. We had to prise her little hands out of ours.
‘All we could do was tell her how much we loved her; how although we weren’t with her, we’d be there always, waiting for her.
‘We don’t know what sort of turmoil her little mind is going through. Now, all we can do is pray for her, and wait until she is 18; until she’s old enough to come back to us. That’s all I live for now.
‘And until that day, everything will be left as it is. Her room will still be there, unchanged. We won’t part with a single thing. It will stay, with the memory box containing the photos of her first scan, the balloons we bought on the day she was born, her first knitted hat and her first tiny shoes.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , ,

A MOTHERS CRIES FOR HELP GO IGNORED: WHY PAUFFLEY’S WORDS ARE EVEN MORE DISTURBING

Correlation between Ella D and this mother:
.


A Moms cries for HELP from moral people goes ignored
​from here:
WHY PAUFFLEY’S WORDS ARE EVEN MORE DISTURBING
Citizen World

London, United Kingdom

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

FOUR DAY EVENT Thursday 9th – Sunday 12th April – Maintaining public awareness of the problem of child abuse and paedophilia within all sections of society and the establishment.

received:

FOUR DAY EVENT Thursday 9th – Sunday 12th April

 Maintaining public awareness of the problem of child abuse and paedophilia within all sections of society and the establishment. 
Thursday 9th April 9:30am outside Highbury Corner Magistrates Court
51 Holloway Road, London N7 8JA
Neelu and Christine Ann Sands will be appearing in court under a 1860’s Canon/ecclesiastical law, to defend themselves against charges of preventing a clergyman from conducting his duties by talking to him. 
I know that for some, Christine, is a controversial character however this is an opportunity to put our indifferences to one side and to have a presences at Highbury Magistrate Court for the sake of maintaining public awareness. 
DAILY FAIL HQ BOYCOTT RALLY 
Friday, 10th April 10am 
Associated Newspapers
2 Derry Street, London W8 5TT
Please take Friday off and show your support 

 

MASS RALLIES AGAINST CHILD ABUSE, SATURDAY 11 APRIL
 LONDON & LIVERPOOL (& Belfast Friday 10 April)
From Trafalgar Square 10 am via Downing Street to Parliament Square 12 am

 

 

 Sunday 12th April 12 noon – 3pm Top of Parliament Hill near to kite-flying area.  A chance to share concerns regarding the ‘Hampstead SRA case’ and any other issues concerning our children.
This event will be after the peaceful vigil outside Christ Church, Hampstead from 10:30 am to 12 noon.
Please share. Thank you
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , ,

VIGIL FOR MELANIE SHAW PETERBOROUGH 5 APRIL 2015 videos – WHY IS MELANIE SHAW IN PRISON? WHAT CRIME HAS SHE COMMITTED? NONE?

 photo _zpsgneaqo9n.jpg
 photo mel_zps7gct8nkm.jpg

1 VIGIL FOR MELANIE SHAW, PETERBOROUGH, 5 APRIL 2015


2 VIGIL FOR MELANIE SHAW PETERBOROUGH 5 APRIL 2015

3 VIGIL FOR MELANIE SHAW PETERBOROUGH 5 APRIL

 4 VIGIL FOR MELANIE SHAW PETERBOROUGH 5 APRIL

 photo luke_zpsa0jsjusr.jpg

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

APRIL 4: BARNET v DRAPER + #WakeUpCall: United against #ChildAbuse plus Warning: Demoralise, Destabilise, Control

butlincat:

Its a bit late to complain about the alleged abusers names etc being online when they’ve been online, in some guise or other, for weeks.

And what about the children’s pics being in every other video being uploaded still? That’s illegal too, according to the court judgement made, apart from it being an assault on these children’s privacy!!!!! Hasn’t the point been made by now, and we know what the children look like??

Full post with videos 04/04/15: 

http://www.victims-unite.net/2015/04/04/wakeupcall-united-against-childabuse-plus-warning-demoralise-destabilise-control/

Also:

#BARNET vs DRAPER – the most recent of all Satanic Abuse Cover- and Stitch-Ups to save ‘the system’ at all costs

http://www.whistleblowerkids.uk/2015/04/04/barnet-vs-draper-the-most-recent-of-all-satanic-abuse-cover-and-stitch-ups-to-save-the-system-at-all-costs/

Originally posted on Victims Unite!:

This is about the ‘rally of resistance’ on Saturday April 11. 

This is about the terror in Westminster re child abuse coming out and the reactions about an agenda of violence and imposing a police state.

“The smell of treason is becoming offensive…”

View original

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , ,

Petitioning Council of the European Union and 2 others

Petitioning Council of the European Union and 2 others

 Investigation Into Illegal Secret Civil Hearing Of Criminal Matters Of A Most Serious Nature #whistleblowerkids


14
Supporters

Coming soon…

Those of you familiar with this case will be signing because you are aware of the facts, however I will be compiling some notes here for the new comers.  

It should be noted the governments own petition site is down until after the general election is finished.  This is quite despicable given their own legality stipulates our protests must be heard within a certain time frame.

 No matter this blip on their part shall be a hindrance to them and not us.

Letter to:
Council of the European Union
United Nations
The Hague
Investigation Into Illegal Secret Civil Hearing Of Criminal Matters Of A Most Serious Nature #whistleblowerkids

PLEASE sign this petition:

http://www.change.org/p/council-of-the-european-union-united-nations-the-hague-investigation-into-illegal-secret-civil-hearing-of-criminal-matters-of-a-most-serious-nature-whistleblowerkids?just_created=true 1d

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , ,

UNITED AGAINST ALL ABUSE AND PAEDOPHILES – MASS MEETING: SATURDAY, 11 APRIL, PARLIAMENT SQ., LONDON, UK

United against all abuse and paedophiles from @AnonymousVideo on Vimeo.

Anonymous Press Release.

#OpUnited Call to Arms for Anonymous in Solidarity with Abuse Victims.

Greeting Citizens of the World.
We have had requests from several child sex abuse victims, abuse advocates & campaigners asking Anonymous to join forces with them in a street protest against child sex abuse, CSAInquiry delays, cover ups and the lack of legal action against all types of abusers.

This is a call to arms to all of AnonFamily to show solidarity with victims and help to support this demonstration against abuse in any way you can.

The demonstration will take place at 10am on Saturday 11th April in Parliament Square (London).

From Sex Abuse victims, to those abused and neglected because they are disabled, old, mentally afflicted, and vulnerable in and way shape or form, it is time for the UK to rise up and say no more!

Generations of victims have seen no justice for their unimaginable sufferings. It is time to raise your voice for victims now so that our next generations are neither abused nor silenced.

Read more ►

http://www.anonymousvideo.eu/united-against-all-abuse-and-paedophiles.html

http://www.truthizsexy.wordpress.com/

Anonymous Radio » AnonOps & AnonUK Radio ►

http://www.anonymousvideo.eu/anonymous-radio-anonops.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

RITUAL CHILD ABUSE NETHERLANDS: Stand up people for Demi and Nirvana who were brave enough to tell about horror abuse in Schoorl Noord-Holland

CITIZENS ARREST IN HOLLAND
HOLLANDS POLICE RITUAL ABUSE RING BEING EXPOSED
  

Embedded image permalink

Ritual child abuse Netherlands   source: http://free-our-girls-now.123website.nl/412263112

Posted on  by cathyfox

This appears to be a horrific case of child abuse and ritualistic child abuse in the Netherlands, protected by the Dutch police. Measures to tackle child abuse must be international in nature, because the abuse is internationally arranged by paedophiles in power internationally.

When this abuse was reported, the powers that be took the abused children away from the family, protecting the perpetrators and harrassing the parents and family.

This is their letter to Interpol, from the Freeourgirlsnow123 website [3] and also [4]

“We Leonie Minkema and Ben van den Brink ,parents of Demi and Nirvana van den Brink who have being kidnapped and abused for nearly 5 years in Holland,this happend after we told about horrific child abuse in the village of Schoorl and committed by the grandparents of Demi and Nirvana.

Ype Minkema / Emma Minkema-Onneweer who allso for years abused my partner (Demi and Nirvana smother).

We have being given your name by two people of which one of them is a senior police officer in London, he said we need to speak with Interpol officers from Germany or France ,NOT HOLLAND because of the Dutch police officers and judges involved in this shocking horror case.

We have found bones of children near care homes who have being killed or sacrificed in the past,Dutch police officers again involved and remains have being sealed and hidden by us until we speak directly with Interpol officers,

We have the names and locations of victims of Dutch Justice Chief Joris Demmink ,who is more than likely family of my partner Leonie B Minkema ,herself as a young child given to this vile family Minkema,YPE MINKEMA (THE GRANDAD/ FATHER) is himself born out of Incest and rape by a family member who raped his mother when she was 15 years old.

The ex police Detective Anton Wijers (Weijers) who has our daughters illegaly in Meerzicht Zoetermeer has being killing children in the past and knows VILE WARREN SPINKS very wel,i know the location of the remains  of two victims.

I have found 12 other victims who have being abused by these vile people who have at least abused 200 children in the past 25 years,the police in Holland have done nothing but try and set me up or get me killed, corrupt illegal court hearings against fully exposed with large amount of evidence with wil certainly lead to convictions.”

The timeline  below is taken from the excellent Bryn Alyn blogspot [1] 

Chain Of Events, Failure To Protect

This is a breakdown of the  events faced by one family as their lives were destroyed by the Zandvoort Network.

(Citizens Ministry for Child Protection)

Contact: Drs. F. Laméris, Zuidlaren: 050-4096142 – e-mail: frideslameris@gmail.com 

1. 2009. Mr. Ben van den Brink discovers that his two daughters Demi and Nirvana have been, and still are being abused and mistreated by his father-in-law and friends of his. During this period his wife Leonie Minkema tells him that the same abuse was done to her by her father, other family members and friends. Ben is furious and runs to his father-in-law, who has already called the police. Arriving at the doorstep he is surrounded by 11 police cars. Here is the first sign of police helping the members of a paedophile-network.
 
  1. September 15, 2009. Due to threatening his father-in-law, Ben is arrested while making an official complaint at the police station in Alkmaar, and he is imprisoned for 6 months. Neither investigation, nor any action takes place against Mr. Ype Minkema, his father-in-law, a man of influence in the local community of Schoorl. The police refuse the request of Ben to file a criminal complaint against Mr. Ype Minkema because of his abusive behaviour.
  1. September 24, 2009. While Ben is in jail, the children are taken away by Children’s Welfare Agency and brought to OCK1 Het Spalier in Zandvoort, a children’s institution for ‘custodial placement’. Both parents are shocked by the removal of their already traumatised children. The parents are hardly allowed any contact with the children, while grandfather Minkema is visiting the girls regularly. 
  1. During this time Leonie is at home alone, where she is being raped several times by her father and four friends, one of them being a policeman from Schoorl. 
  1. Early November 2009. The physician of the OCK Spalier examines both girls and suggests possible sexual abuse. 
  1. March 23, 2010. Ben gets out of jail. Leonie recalls more and more supressed memories and experiences, which prove she has been abused by a paedophile ring in Schoorl in which many families are involved as are the children of these families, many of them acting like this for generations. Totally shocked by this absurd abuse phenomenon and the unreasonable behaviour of Children’s Welfare Agency and police, Ben decides to start his own research.
 
  1. Ben requests assistance of friends and media, Scotland Yard, Morkhoven Group and Europol. He interrogates several employees of 9 different children’s institutions throughout the country, and posts at various places to make observations. This shows him amongst others, that many children are sexually abused at the OCK Spalier in Zandvoort. This institution denies these allegations. Furthermore, these investigations show Ben that tremendous child abuse takes place within these child care institutions.
Links are established by researchers between pedo-networks and the structural sexual abuse of children. The question is whether child trafficking is going on in the Netherlands.
  1. Structural and generational sexual abuse of babies and children is connected to satanic rituals. Unknown to many it is a subject that is now negotiable, allowing more insight to come in the how and why of child abuse. http://www.answers.org/satan/Sra.html 
  1. August 2010. Leonie visits the family physician with Demi for the removal of a genital wart, under the supervision of an employee from the OCK Spalier. Demi panics as the doctor touches her buttocks; she’s afraid “he’ll put something in there”. 
  1. March 2011. Ben and Leonie want Nirvana to be examined by an independent physician in Haarlem as well, to prove sexual abuse. As soon as OCK Spalier finds out, both children are rushed to a secret location elsewhere in the country (Later on this turned out to be Huizen). They are kept out of school for 8 days, in order to hide any trace of sexual abuse. Contact with the parents is denied, only Leonie is allowed to visit the girls once a fortnight, under supervision, for an hour and a half. 
  1. August 19, 2011. Demi and Nirvana are transferred again, this time to the Wilma House, a foster home in Zoetermeer. According to the behaviour of the girls Leonie knows by her own experiences the children are still being abused. 
  1. Sept. 20 and Oct. 19 2011. Ben is trialled twice and later finds out that these trials are not recorded in the official national register of court cases. Both trials therefore officially never took place and are illegal. 
  1. November 1, 2011. Unlawful and violent arrest Ben van den Brink. Ben and Leonie are brutally forced off the road by police cars. Ben is violently dragged out of his car and beaten up severely by several policemen and is taken to the hospital. Police threaten Ben and Leonie with a gun.
 Under false pretexts, Ben is imprisoned again. Attempts are made to enforce a psychological report for longer detention, without success. Release date: November 4. 
Increasing irregularities in official documents show up, as well as names and photographs of policemen with double employment at Children’s Welfare Agency and a number of judges who make decisions against the official rules. The procedures are published in detail, also showing relevant documents, and are discussed by many at the website www.argusoog.org. The website is forced by Children’s Welfare Agency to censor, in order to avoid juridical procedures with high penalties.
 
  1. November, 2011. Anneke Bleeker, owner of the nationally well-known website  www.verontrustemoeders.nl and citizen in the area where Ben en Leonie are living, has a meeting with the mayor of Bergen Mrs. Hetty Hafkamp and head of the police Mr. Kooijman for further explanation.
 
  1. December 9, 2011. Ben leaves with documents to Europol Germany in order to prevent unlawful imprisonment. He makes every effort needed to bring his daughters back home and more and more people start offering help. 
  1. December 16, 2011. Squad raid on a friend’s house elsewhere in the country in an attempt to find Ben. Without success. 
  1. January 21, 2012. Leonie, home alone, is regularly harassed by the police and again an unlawful raid takes place. Listen to the live recording here:http://www.argusoog.org/breaking-inval-in-huis-ben-van-den-brink/
Leonie decides to move to a friend to avoid intimidation and worse. Foster parents Wilmahuis ask permission for passport application for Demi and Nirvana. Ben and Leonie are fiercely against this and deny permission.
 
  1. February 2011. To punish the parents for refusing permission, Leonie is not allowed to visit the children for a month.
 
  1. February 22, 2012. Ben is arrested again. The obscure documents show double files, messing with time and copied stamps, and there are various other signs showing corruption and fraud of documents. 
  1. May 24, 2012. Ben is released by the judge’s verdict without suspension until a new hearing. The hearing is extended until July 11. Shortly before July 11 the session is cancelled as there is no probation report. This report will never come out, for Ben has, by his own will, no contact with the probation service. The case against Ben therefore remains unresolved and there is no further communication between the court and Ben for a while. 
  1. Grave concern too, concerning the status of children’s home Wilmahuis in Zoetermeer. According to the female owner/foster parents, she is in the service of /employed by the Hoenderloo Groep. Another website shows the Wilmahuis is a children’s home for Stichting Jeugdformaat. The Inspectorate for Youth Care, which is controlling both organizations, states neither is the case. Later on the foster parent says she is running her own business now, which is against the rules of the Inspectorate for Youth Care and therefore it is illegal to take care of children for the Inspectorate. The ex-husband of the woman, regularly visiting the Wilmahuis, is an ex-policeman. He is the same officer who filed the police report on November 2, 2011, one day after the arrest of Ben.
 
  1. July 21 – August 2012. Children are taken for a vacation to Croatia, against the wishes of the parents.
  2. Fake procedures, falsified documents and a number of not officially registered lawsuits within the Court, result in researching an “inner circle” within organizations by Ben and various other people. Furthermore is clear that the documents, on which the mother is suspended from custody over the children, have been printed on forged court papers, and are not listed in the national register of court cases at the District Court in Amsterdam.
  3. A new website, www.verontrustevaders.nl, appears online with one main subject, the horrific story of the Van den Brink family. The owner of the website, Frides Laméris, as a confidant of the Van den Brink family, files a complaint with the police headquarters of the city of Groningen concerning two fraudulent judges at the Court of Alkmaar, because of tampering with documents. The Court of Groningen also receives some detailed information about this.
  4. On CD’s which have the attention of national and international security services, persons involved in a paedophile network have been – possibly – recognized. Connections are leading to Noord Holland (police officers included). Special attention for the police station Alkmaar.
  5. 18 Sept. 2012. By mistake, Ben gets hold of a letter, probably included inadvertently in materials he receives from his (ex) lawyer Gerard van der Meer. It refers to a document which is supposed to be a ‘shadow report’ of the police. Close inspection reveals the many manipulations in this document. It is put on the internet, please see: http://www.verontrustevaders.nl/documenten/document.pdf
  6. October 2012. Demi and Nirvana are still not at home, despite official documents indicating that parents have full authority over their children. Four different courts i.e. Haarlem, Amsterdam, Den Haag and Alkmaar are informed with well documented files. The police station Alkmaar has by now refused to file a criminal complaint three times. The media are approached. When all the personnel of the schools Demi and Nirvana are emailed with detailed information, etc. it turns out, a secret ICT-procedure disallows the mails to reach their destination.
  7. October 7, 2012. A co-worker of OCK Het Spalier, the children’s institution where Demi and Nirvana have been in residence in 2010, makes a confession to some friends of Ben who visit them, that at least 8 colleagues have abused many children among which Demi and Nirvana. The names of these persons are known and have been published on the internet, only using their initials.
  8. October 2012. Prof. Dr. Onno van der Hart of the University of Utrecht, Faculty of Social Sciences, Clinical and Health Psychology (KGP), honorary Professor Psychopathology of the chronically traumatized, and therapist for satanic ritual abuse, follows this issue closely and – in writing – gives his full support to the Van den Brink family and other families involved.
  9. Stichting Alternatief Beraad (Foundation for Alternative Consultation – therapists, dedicated to helping victims of satanic ritual abuse) has contacted the Burgerministerie voor Kinderbescherming (Citizens Ministry for Child Protection) to offer support.
  10. 27-11-2012 A letter is sent to the mayor of Alkmaar, Mr. Piet Bruinooge, who is also head of the local police forces. He is asked for mediation so that Ben and Leonie can file their abuse charge against Mr. Minkema and his friends, a thing they already wanted to do three years ago now. Not unexpectedly the mayor refuses to mediate using some excuses.
  11. 29-11-2012: New Session at the Court Amsterdam for Ben van den Brink; continuation of the suspended hearing of 11 July 2012. A corrupted judicial call is sent to Ben to appear in court again on 29-11-2012. At the Court House in Amsterdam a chaotic session is held with corrupt judges, who try to catch Ben and put the whistle blower of the paedophile networks behind bars again. By an intelligent move Ben succeeds to escape from the court room and the session is suspended again. Around 20-25 people have witnessed this very curious and illegal court hearing. So after many ‘legal’ sessions Ben is still a free man.
  12. New (illegal) court session in Amsterdam is announced at 13th of February 2013. Ben will not attend, because by now it has become totally clear that these sessions are not properly convened, as this has been confirmed by an employee at the court.
  13. A charge is laid with the police in Utrecht against the three judges of the last two sessions for corruption: http://morkhoven.wordpress.com/2013/02/10/corrupte-rechters-moeten-opstappen-zaak-van-den-brink/
  14. Many publications are now appearing on the website www.hetuurvandewaarheid.info, highlighting a.o. new aspects of documentary and juridical fraud in ‘Case van den Brink’ (@casevandenbrink twitteraccount).
  15. The Belgian Werkgroep Morkhoven, an organization that is famous for fighting pedocriminality, whose main activist for humanitarian rights is Mr. Marcel Vervloesem – who has been arrested by the Belgian authorities on false charges almost 50 times now – has started to publicize intensively about the horror story of the family van den Brink. One of the leading Morkhoven members describes the situation in Holland with authorities as ‘indescribable’.
  16. The designation ‘indescribable’ or ‘unbelievable’ also applies of course to the so called Case Demmink, the Dutch and now ex-secretary of the ministry of Justice, who has become by now the world’s most renewed high placed pedophile, who is no longer welcome to visit the United States and who is completely exposed on the website www.arrestdemmink.com, but the Dutch authorities up till the second week of April 2013 not launching any kind of investigation, despite increasing international pressure.
  17. In the mean time the two daughters Demi and Nirvana of the family van den Brink continue suffering (and not only they) in their prison house in Zoetermeer, controlled by Child Care and Pedopolice officers.
  18. As in the case of Joris Demmink, authorities seem helpless, desperate or resistant to end this cruel story and bring the children home to their parents. It seems Dutch Parliamentary Democracy has turned into a tyrannical Pedocracy, where children’s and parents rights are denied and no justice is found. Dutch citizens are becoming more and more aware that the whole Child Care system and Service has been infiltrated by some kind of Child Robbing agency for the purpose of pornographic services to pedophiles of all ranks, high and low. 

Links

[1] 2014 Sept 10  http://brynalynvictims.blogspot.nl/2013/10/chain-of-events-failure-to-protect.html

[2] http://www.free-our-girls-now.123website.nl/412220623

[3] http://www.free-our-girls-now.123website.nl/412019283

[4] http://www.citiziens-arrests-in-holland.webnode.com/news/free-demi-and-nirvana-van-den-brink-now-exposure-now-excelerating-each-day-dutch-police-look-worse-and-more-vile-each-day-/
source: http://www.free-our-girls-now.123website.nl/412263112

Familie Korver (politie Bergen) / and Minkema ,close relations getting exposed in full ,INTERPOL / FBI / MET POLICE U.K

16-02-2015 15:07

KORPS LEIDING POLITIE NOORD-HOLLAND ,VERWIJDER PATRICK KORVER UIT ZIJN FUNCTIE ALS SCHOORLSE WIJKAGENT ONMIDDELIJK.

DIRECTE BETROKKENHEID EN HECHTE RELATIES MET GRUWEL MISBRUIK FAMILIE MINKEMA IN SCHOORL ,ZIEKE RKK RITUEEL MISBRUIK FAMILIES DIE ELKAAR AFDEKKEN EN BESCHERMEN. 

HECHTE RELATIES POLITIE BERGEN / FAMILIE MINKEMA,DENK AAN DE JAARLIJKSE MEIDENMARKT OP HET KLIMDUIN.WAAR ZAT DE POLITIE ALTIJD TE POSTEN /FILMEN,PRECIES IN HET APARTEMENT VAN YPE MINKEMA / EMMA MINKEMA ONNEWEER OP DE ROODE LEEUW.

HOW SATANIC RITUEEL ABUSE FAMILIES CAN GET AWAY WITH HORRIFIC ABUSE FOR YEARS AND YEARS.THIS SCHOORL VILLAGE BOBBY PATRICK KORVER IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF THIS.

HIS FAMILIE (KORVER) ARE CLOSE FRIENDS OF THE HORROR INCEST / ABUSE FAMILIE MINKEMA ,AND HAVE BEEN FOR 97 YEARS AT LEAST.

THE FILTH ABUSE MINKEMA FAMILIE WHO ABUSED (LEONIE)  FOR OVER 20 YEARS ,THEN THEY STARTED TO ABUSE DEMI AND NIRVANA AND WE TRIED TO REPORT IT.

THE FAMILIES KORVER AND MINKEMA HAVE BEING PLAYING IN FOOTBALL TEAMS TOGETHER SINCE 1923,PLAYING TENNIS TOGETHER FOR DECADES AND THE VILLAGE BOBBY S FAMILIE WERE REGULAIR VISITORS OF THE RESTAURANT HET KLIMDUIN IN SCHOORL RUN BY YPE MINKEMA / EMMA MINKEMA-ONNEWEER.

(RKK FOOTBALL CLUB SCHOORL) WERE YPE MINKEMA /EMMA MINKEMA RAN THE FOOTBALL KANTINE ON A VOLUNTARY BASIS.

NOTE THE FOOTBALL KANTINE SCHOORL NEARLY CONNECTED TO THE OLD SCHOORL POLICE STATION.

NOTE THE FOLLOWING,THE MONEY TO START THE KLIMDUIN CAME FROM MARTINUS ONNEWEER (RKK),THE SUM 100.000 DUTCH GUILDERS. 

HE COMMITTED EVIL SATANIC HORROR ABUSE FOR YEARS AND YEARS TO MY PARTNER LEONIE B MINKEMA AND EVERY MINKEMA FAMILIE MEMBER KNEW ,WATCHED AND TOOK PART IN THE ABUSE.

THE FAMILIES KORVER AND MINKEMA VISITED THE SAME ABUSE LOCATIONS FOR 37 YEARS 

THE MINKEMA PAVILJOEN IN CAMPERDUIN WAS A LOCATION OF CHILD HORROR AND ABUSE,WERE THERE WAS A CAGE WITH A MONKEY IN IT.

THEY USED TO THROW LEONIE INTO THE CAGE ,AND THE MONKEY WOULD SCREAM AND ATTACK IMMEDIATLY,THAT CAUSED THE DISSOCIATION TO BLOCK OUT THE ABUSE THAT SOON FOLLOWED.

THE IMAGES WE SENT TO FBI / INTERPOL (36 IMAGES) SHOW DIFFERENT MEMBERS OF THE KORVER FAMILIE LAUGHING AT THE BAR WHILE A YOUNG LEONIE WAS SCREAMING IN THE MONKEY CAGE.

PATRICK KORVER,INCEST FILTH BASTARD WHO WE RECORDED ,ADMITTING DEMI AND NIRVANA ARE KIDNAPPED BY POLICE OFFICERS.

THIS SAME PIECE OF SHIT TRIED IN A SNEAKY MANNER TO SET ME-UP BY WALKING INTO POLICE STATION BERGEN VOLUNTARY ,I DID 6 MONTHS IN JAIL UNDER FALSE MADE NAME (BRINK) THE LAST TIME I DID THAT.   

Gemeente
Gemeente Bergen,
Postbus 175,
1861 AD  Bergen
072-888 0000
Politie
Alkmaar
Postbus 21,
1800 Aa Alkmaar, SATANISCH ,ALTIJD EEN GROOTE EN EEN KLEINE, Aa, FAMILIES KORVER EN MINKEMA 100 JAAR LANG DIKKE MISBRUIK MAATJES,ZIEKE GEKKEN DIE GRUWELHEDEN PLEGEN MET JONGE KINDEREN ,MASKERS EN CAPES DRAGEN,KINDEREN IN KISTEN  OPSLUITEN,VERGEET NIET DE ZIEKE FAMILIE KORVER /MINKEMA SPECIALE ZWEMBAD FEESTJES IN VELSEN WAAR DE KINDEREN DOOR ALLES EN IEDEREEN DAAR MISBRUIKT WORDEN. 
 
translation into English: FAMILIES KORVER AND Minkema 100 YEARS LONG THICK ABUSE buddies , SICK lunatics who COMMIT ABOMINATION PRESENT WITH YOUNG CHILDREN, MASKS AND CAPES BEAR CHILDREN IN BOXES incarcerated , REMEMBER THE SICK FAMILY KORVER / Minkema SPECIAL POOL PARTIES IN VELSEN WHERE THE CHILDREN THROUGH EVERYTHING AND EVERYONE THERE ARE
 
 
Tel. 0900-8844
Fax. 072-549 7010
Geopend: De frontoffice is bereikbaar van 09.00-21.00 uur
Kantoor Bergen,?????  K B / KINDERBESCHERMING
Wijkagent voor Schoorl is:
 
Patrick Korver,   
klik hier voor een introductiebrief van Patrick
0900-8844
Twitter: @Wag_PKorver
Geopend: ma t/m vr van 13.00 – 17.00 uur, 24/7 telefonisch bereikbaar.
Wonen
Woningbouwvereniging Kennemer Wonen,
kantoor Bergen,
Natteweg 41,
1862 CW Bergen
072-581 3501
Hulp
WonenPlus [see below for English translation]
WonenPlus biedt een gecoördineerd pakket van diensten op het gebied van wonen, welzijn en zorg, op het snijvlak van vrijwilligersdiensten, professionele diensten en commerciële diensten. WonenPlus staat voor persoonlijke ondersteuning en praktische dienstverlening.
WonenPlus bemiddelt naar diverse organisaties die producten en diensten aanbieden, van alarmering tot onderhoudswerk en van een thuiskapster tot een pedicure aan huis. Daar waar het bestaande aanbod tekortschiet ontwikkelt WonenPlus – vraaggestuurd – een aanvullend aanbod. De basis wordt gevormd door een servicepunt dat dagelijks bereikbaar is en dat een breed scala van diensten kan leveren: van noodopvang tot maaltijden, van klussen tot thuisadministratie, was- en strijkservice, boodschappenservice enz. Een abonnement kost meestal €4,- per maand, waarbij alle vrijwilligersdiensten gratis zijn.
WonenPlus in de gemeente Bergen: www.wonenplusnoordholland.nl/bergen.html
Bibliotheek
Heereweg 150,
1871 EM Schoorl
072-509 2121
Openingstijden: maandag 14.30 – 20.00 uur, woensdag en vrijdag 14.30 – 17.30 uur en zaterdag 11.00 – 14.00 uur
 
English
Translation beginning at the address at nearly the bottom of the text above:
Police
Alkmaar
P.o. box 21,
1800 A
a Alkmaar, SATANIC, always a GREAT and a SMALL, Aa, FAMILIES KORVER and MADHU 100 years LONG THICK ABUSE BUDDIES, diseased MADMEN that ABOMINATION PRESENT CONSULT with YOUNG CHILDREN, WEAR MASKS and CAPES, CHILDREN LOCKED UP IN BOXES, don’t forget the SICK FAMILY KALE/MINKEMA SPECIAL SWIMMING POOL PARTIES IN VELSEN where the CHILDREN by ALL and SUNDRY THERE being abused.

Tel. 0900-8844

Fax. 072-549 7010

Open: The front office is available from 09.00-21.00 hours

Office Mountains,????? K B/CHILD PROTECTION

District agent for Schoorl is:

Patrick Kaleta,

Click here for a letter of introduction by Patrick

Joost Ivanghlaan 2,

1862 GJ Mountains

0900-8844

e-mail: patrick.korver@noord-holland.politie.nl

Twitter: @Wag_PKorver

Open: Monday to Friday from 13: 00-17: 00, 24/7 by phone.

http://www.politie.nl

Live

Housing Association Kennemer Live,

Office mountains,

Natteweg 41,

1862 CW Mountains

072-581 3501

http://www.kennemerwonen.nl/

Help

WonenPlus

WonenPlus offers a coordinated package of services in the areas of housing, welfare and care, on the cutting edge of volunteer services, professional services and commercial services. WonenPlus stands for personal support and practical services.

WonenPlus mediates to various organizations that provide products and services, from early warning to maintenance work and a thuiskapster to a pedicure at home. Where the existing supply shortage shoot develops an additional demand-drivenWonenPlusoffer. The basis is formed by a service point that daily accessible and that can deliver a wide range of services: from emergency shelter to meals, doing odd jobs to Home Administration, laundry and ironing service, shopping service, etc. A subscription usually costs 4,per month, which all volunteer services are free.

WonenPlus in the municipality of Bergen: http://www.wonenplusnoordholland.nl/bergen.html

Library

Heereweg 150,

1871 EM Schoorl

072-509 2121

Opening hours: Monday, Wednesday and Friday 14.30-20.00 hours 14.30-17.30 hrs and Saturday 11.00-14.00 hours

Embedded image permalink


Embedded image permalink
FREE OUR GIRLS NOW!!

http://free-our-girls-now.123website.nl/411828741

WHO TO CALL WHEN THE POLICE KIDNAP YOUR KIDS?

http://who-to-call.123website.nl/411046293

PoliceNL abuse / kidnap team

when cops NL kidnap to cover-up abuse
 
Embedded image permalink
Child killer cop Sander V also belongs to this horrific abuse
 ring in Zoetermeer
 
Embedded image permalink

by Dutch police officers to cover-up SATANIC ABUSE, help free Demi and Nirvana

Embedded image permalink

 

Ben van den Brink @Nirvana_Demi  ·  2h 2 hours ago  
We caught DUTCH COPS in the Ock Het Spalier childrens home (Zandvoort) in the middle of the night, ,Police children
Leonie Minkema / Ben van den Brink ,demand the release of our daughters ,
 
 
23website.nl/412272445
Serious crimes committed by COPS NL , release now shit filth DUTCH POLICE
See MORE:
Stand up people for Demi and Nirvana who were brave enough to tell about horror abuse in Schoorl Noord-Holland
 
Some Dutch cops should be allready behind bars(prison),Demi and Nirvana should allready be back at home now !!


@SIAorganisation / @FBI / @INTERPOL / banged to rights in all manner

TRY COVERING THIS UP NOW ,DUTCH POLICE FILTH SCUM ,SICK FILTH EVIL BASTARDS.KIDNAPPING TWO BRAVE YOUNG GIRLS DEMI AND NIRVANA WHO DARED TELL ABOUT HORRIFIC ABUSE

Now release our daughters Demi and Nirvana today DUTCH POLICE FILTH !!

http://who-to-call.123website.nl/410804185

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

HOLLIE GREIG ROBERT GREEN GAGGED FOREVER BY COURT! + 2009: 1st TIME H.G. EVER MENTIONED ONLINE + more

ROBERT GREEN GAGGED FOREVER BY COURT!

UK Column NEWS 26th March 2015 a must watch

Robert Green sentenced to community service, and gagged forever!!!

HOLLIE GREIG: B. GERRISH: 1st TIME EVER MENTIONED ON INTERNET  

when a case of rape is reported, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary for the police to question the alleged perpetrators without delay;
 
when a case of rape is reported, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary for the police immediately to search the homes of those named for corroborative evidence;
 
 
when a case of rape is reported, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary to seize and examine the computers of those named at the earliest opportunity;
 
when allegations of rape are supported by evidence from well-respected medical and psychological experts who unanimously confirm not only that systematic abuse has taken place, but go so far as to name two of the most likely perpetrators, you, as representative of the Crown Office, believe it right to dismiss their testimony and allow those named to leave the country;
 
when a school doctor twice reports an under-age girl to be at risk, and that girl’s headmaster – one of those subsequently named as a serial rapist – consistently fails to alert the child’s mother or to take any steps to protect her, you, as representative of the Crown Office, believe this to be the normal behaviour of a responsible, and guiltless, person;
 
when a case of rape is reported by a girl with speech difficulties, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe it is necessary to supply her with support during police interviews, but are happy to use her handicap, in this respect, to discredit her spoken evidence;
 
when a case of repeated multiple gang rape over many years is reported by a young girl who also names seven fellow victims, you, as representative of the Crown Office, do not believe that, in view of the Scottish law regarding corroboration, it is absolutely essential that the police question those she has named immediately.
 
When an acknowledged victim of rape receives a substantial award from the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority, you, as representative of the Crown Office, feel justified in continuing to maintain that the allegations on which this award was based were fully investigated and found to be false.

HOAXER TALK

We believe, beyond reasonable doubt, that Hollie Greig was abused and has been badly let down by the Scottish justice system and that this same system has treated Robert Green disgracefully.We are very angry and upset that the words and actions of a number of misguided people who think of themselves as supporters of Hollie and Robert, have created the present situation where this gravely serious case has been reduced to a farce.Sarah McLeod
JUST WEEKS LATERMCLEOD WAS SAYING IT WAS A HOAX
Mar 10
Sarah McLeod you are quite correct Danny, the evidence was never there to start with and the story
was used to appeal to people on a visceral
level, both of the HG case and now the
Hampstead one. Have you ever tried
appealing to BGs sensible side about
either cases?

   ————————————————————————————————————

Sunday, 29 March 2015

WOW 3000 VIEWS IN ONE DAY , THANK YOU

ALEC SALMONDS SHAME? GOOGLE HOLLIE GREIG

Pageviews today
3,029
Pageviews yesterday
2,049
Pageviews last month
64,422
Pageviews all time history
470,832
holliegreig justice
 
27 followers,659,109 views
Cover photo

source http://linkis.com/blogspot.com/OseA4

—————————————————————————————-

26 MARCH: Rotherham: Complaints Made Against 42 Officers 

More than 100 allegations have been made against 42 police officers over their handling of child sexual exploitation in Rotherhamhttp://www.news.sky.com/story/1453296/rotherham-complaints-made-against-42-officers

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

PICS OF MAURICE KIRK ON RELEASE FROM HMP SWANSEA 27 March 2015

13A4AMaurice Kirk has been released after 17+ months  unfair imprisonment and will be continuing his civil case against S. Wales police, for 20+ years of harassment. His civil case against them being at the “Final Submissions” stage before he was imprisoned.

Maurice tells us, in a phone call received on 27/03/15, his day of release, that even though inmates are supposed to be released before 11am on the day of release, he was finally let out of HMP Swansea  “7 or 8 minutes after 11″ on the morning of 27th March – after his prearranged lift had gone “for a cup of tea”, thinking he’d been released earlier, he presumed, thus missing them. He had no choice but to manoeuvre the wheelchair he was in to the hospital, no mean feat, where prison doctors had told him he had an appointment awaiting. After finally arriving at the hospital he found there was no appointment made – this is typical of the prison regime behaviour – to feed him false info, something they’ve been doing for 17+ months. Finally he caught up with his lift [a car, not a “van” as the prison staff had him believe] and now he is pursuing medical treatment for his serious stomach ailments, for which his serious operation has been denied for so long – since the first week of March, 2014, some 55 weeks ago!

Maurice Kirk’s site is http://www.kirkflyingvet.com

From this site – previous posts:

MAURICE KIRK – Document [02/02/2015]: “Regina v. Kirk M. J. – “Summing Up”: IMPORTANT IRREGULARITIES EXPLAINED

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/20/maurice-kirk-some-of-the-story/

11 MARCH – MAURICE KIRK VICTIMISED YET AGAIN IN HMP SWANSEA: FULL WEEKLY “CANTEEN” ALLOWANCE DENIED!

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/11/11-march-maurice-kirk-victimised-yet-again-in-hmp-swansea/

MAURICE KIRK: LEVESON: APPEAL APPLICATION JUDGEMENT / POSITION STATEMENT 25 FEB. ’15

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/08/maurice-kirk-leveson-appeal-judgement-position-statement-25-feb-15/

MAURICE KIRK: UPDATED WITH “BARRY NEWS” ARTICLES – 1ST YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF ONSET OF SERIOUS and untreated! STOMACH AILMENT, CHEQUE FROM DEC. ’14 STILL REFUSED TO BE CASHED, CLERK OF COURTS DOCS STILL REFUSED AGAINST JUDGES ORDERS, + MORE

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/05/maurice-kirk-update-5-mar-2015-1st-year-anniversary-of-onset-of-serious-stomach-ailment-cheque-from-dec-14-still-refused-to-be-cashed-clerk-of-courts-docs-still-refused-against-judges-orders/

MAURICE KIRK IN PRISON 500 DAYS ON SUN. MARCH 1!! – WRIT OF “HABEUS CORPUS” ISSUED – POSITION STATEMENT 18 FEB. ’15
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/27/maurice-kirk-writ-of-habeus-corpus-10-feb-2015-position-statement-18-feb-15/

MAURICE KIRK – POSITION STATEMENT 18 +16 FEB. + DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 19 FEB. 2015 inc. LETTER TO GMC, RCJ APPEAL CT, + more:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/19/maurice-kirk-documents-received-19-feb-2015/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 15 FEB. 2015 – regarding “the fairness, proportionality, apparent bias and bad faith in the decisions of 11 July 2014 to recall Mr. Maurice Kirk to prison”, + more:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/15/maurice-kirk-update-15-feb-2015-mappa-docs-more/

MAURICE KIRK – THE STORY SO FAR – A BRIEF SYNOPSIS  [UNTIL OCT. 2014] – FILES B, C, D. [30 pages] inc. “Fabicated Medical Records”, “Breach of Restraining Order Appeal” statement 6/6/14, + more:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/09/maurice-kirk-the-story-so-far-until-oct-2014-files-b-c-d/

MAURICE KIRK – SOCIAL VISIT REFUSED 6 FEB. – POSITION STATEMENT 16 JAN. 2015, + more:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/06/maurice-kirk-position-statement-26-jan-2015-more/

MAURICE KIRK v S. WALES POLICE: UPDATE 4 FEB. 2015: NOW HELD 475 DAYS IN HM PRISONS UNLAWFULLY!
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/maurice-kirk-update-4-feb-2015/

MAURICE KIRK PAROLE HEARING – CANCELLED!! JUST LIKE THAT!!
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/30/maurice-kirk-parole-hearing-cancelled-just-like-that/

LETTER TO THE PRIME MINISTER: MAURICE KIRK – NOT TAKEN TO THE COURTROOM FOR HIS HEARINGS 7 TIMES!! [actually its more!]:
https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/22/letter-to-the-prime-minister-maurice-kirk-not-taken-to-the-courtroom-for-his-hearings-7-times/

15 Jan. UPDATE: MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 5 JAN. 2014 – OVER 420 DAYS IN H.M. PRISONS!! STILL NO STOMACH OPERATION AFTER 10 MONTHS!!
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/15/15-jan-update-maurice-kirk-important-documents-received-5-jan-2014-over-420-days-in-h-m-prisons-still-no-stomach-operation-after-10-months/

MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 5 JAN. 2014 – OVER 420 DAYS IN H.M. PRISONS!! STILL NO STOMACH OPERATION AFTER 10 MONTHS!!
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/10/maurice-kirk-important-documents-received-5-jan-2014-over-420-days-in-h-m-prisons-still-no-stomach-operation-after-10-months/

MAURICE KIRK IN PRISON OVER 420 DAYS – THE DISGUSTING UNHYGIENIC CONDITIONS MK IS HAVING TO PUT UP WITH IN HMP BRISTOL – 12 DEC. ’14, + IMPORTANT DOCS.
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/13/maurice-kirk-18-days-before-a-change-of-clothing-12-dec-2014/

MAURICE KIRK: 12 DEC.: WELSH GOVERNMENT REPLIES – A WASTE OF TIME:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/12/maurice-kirk-12-dec-welsh-government-replies-a-waste-of-time/

ARCHIVES FROM 19 September 2014 until January 2015:

MAURICE KIRK POSITION STATEMENT 10 DEC 2014

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/10/maurice-kirk-position-statement-10-dec-2014/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 5 DEC.: FINED £1000 – THE WELSH ASSEMBLY – THE “BRAIN SCAN” + more

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/05/maurice-kirk-update-5-dec-fined-1000-the-welsh-assembly-the-brain-scan-more/

MAURICE KIRK LOCATED IN HMP BRISTOL – 2 DEC. ’14 / BREAKING THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/04/maurice-kirk-located-in-hmp-bristol-2-dec-14/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 30 NOV. 2014 – MAURICE GOES MISSING

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/maurice-kirk-update-30-nov-2014/

UPDATED: MAURICE KIRK: IMPORTANT DOCS RECEIVED 18 NOV. 2014 – MEDICAL UPDATES ETC.

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/18/maurice-kirk-important-docs-received-18-nov-2014/

MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 8 NOV. ’14 – Position Statement 5 Nov. ETC.

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/14/m-krk-docs-received-8-nov-14/

MAURICE KIRK – THE DISGRACEFUL PERSECUTION CONTINUES IN HMP SWANSEA – SUN. 2 NOV. 2014

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/02/maurice-kirk-the-disgraceful-persecution-continues-in-hmp-swansea-sun-2-nov-2014/

MAURICE KIRK: VERY ILL IN HMP SWANSEA, 30 OCT. ’14

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/30/maurice-kirk-very-ill-in-hmp-swansea-30-oct-14/

MAURICE KIRK – FILE A – THE CHARGES, etc.

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/28/maurice-kirk-file-a-of-19-documents/

MAURICE KIRK DOCUMENTS: 25 OCT. 2014 – POSITION STATEMENT 14 OCT. ’14

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/27/maurice-kirk-documents-25-oct-2014/

MAURICE KIRK: LATEST NEWS, 23 OCT. ’14 – PLS SIGN THE PETITION – + more

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/23/maurice-kirek-latest-news-23-oct-14-pls-sign-the-petition-more/

MAURICE KIRK: LATEST NEWS, 23 OCT. ’14 – ALL CONTACTS REMOVED EXCEPT 1 FROM MK’S TELEPHONE CALL LIST, + PLS SIGN THE PETITION – + more

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/23/maurice-kirek-latest-news-23-oct-14-pls-sign-the-petition-more/

5 IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS FROM MAURICE KIRK 14 OCT. 2014, + MESSAGE TO THE JUSTICE, + ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMITTEE 23 OCT. ’14

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/21/5-important-documents-from-maurice-kirk-14-oct-2014-more/

MAURICE KIRK’S SISTER CELIA – RADIO INTERVIEW – + “THE NEFARIOUS PLOT TO ISOLATE MAURICE”

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/24/maurice-kirks-sister-celia-radio-interview/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE: 23 SEPT. “14: DOCUMENTS RECEIVED- “RECALL TO CUSTODY APPEAL” + “MALICIOUS PROSECUTION WITHOUT TRIAL”

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/23/maurice-kirk-update-23-sept-24-documents-received/

MAURICE KIRK – DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 18 SEPT. 2014 WHICH TELL OF HIS HELL

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/19/maurice-kirk-documents-received-which-tell-of-his-hell/

See archives at bottom of page from before 19 September ’14, or on right for posts from 2013 / 14.

 

M kirk SEPT 2013 1ba.jpgA.jpgB

[The above is an old pic]

 >>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

 photo BARRY_zps0hjorw7k.jpg

[NB: MANY OF THESE NEWSPAPER REPORTS ARE VERY BIASED AND UNFACTUAL AGAINST MK – IT SHOULD BE SAID THAT IT IS ALLEGED MK HAS BEEN REMANDED TO PRISON AT LEAST 9 TIMES SINCE 2009,  WITH A TOTAL OF OVER 3 YEARS SPENT IN PRISON ON THESE POINTLESS AND HARRASSING REMANDS, AS NO CONVICTIONS ACTUALLY OCCURRED RELATING TO THESE REMANDS BEFORE THIS PERIOD OF INCARCERATION BEGAN ON 16 OCTOBER 2013 [MK SPENT THE NIGHT OF 15 OCT. IN BARRY POLICE STATION CELLS, AND POSSIBLY OCT 14 ALSO].   ALSO SINCE 2009 MK HAS BEEN STOPPED OVER 35 TIMES, WHILST DRIVING HIS CAR, FOR DRINK-DRIVING TESTS. NOT ONE CONVICTION RESULTING AS A RESULT OF ANY STOP [ALLEGEDLY]. INDEED, MK TELLS US OFTEN HE WAS TAKEN TO THE POLICE STATION FOR THE DRINKING OF ALCOHOL TEST, ONLY TO BE RELEASED WITHOUT EVEN BEING GIVEN IT!  MK HAS AN ONGOING CIVIL CASE AGAINST S. WALES POLICE FORCE– see the radio broadcast interview with MK’s sister on “Dialect Radio”, September 2014 =  video:

“Rough Justice: South Wales Police persecute former vet & pilot Maurice Kirk who’s them”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c3tg6pDdR8      

<a href="/channel/UCvPbHiqhLtpNWA_cg_1NULw" class=" yt-uix-sessionlink     spf-link  g-hovercard" data-name="" data-ytid="UCvPbHiqhLtpNWA_cg_1NULw" data-sessionlink="ei=fcqoVPDdC4KB0AHJyoCYDA">PublicEnquiry</a> PublicEnquiry from 13 Sept. 2014]

  ——————————————————————————————————————–

Barry’s ‘flying vet’ fails in legal bid Barry And District News: APPEAL: Flying vet Maurice Kirk.
7:40am Thursday 7 July 2011

  Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

ATTEMPTS by Barry’s ‘flying vet’ to bring criminal charges against a former chief constable, psychiatrist and solicitor were thwarted by a judge last week.

Firearms charges for Barry’s ‘Flying Vet’ Barry And District News: Firearms charges for Barry's 'Flying Vet'
7:30am Thursday 25 June 2009

  Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

BARRY’S ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk has been charged with alleged firearms offences

Barry’s ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk cleared of firearms charges Barry And District News: FLYING VET: Maurice Kirk.
7:30am Thursday 11 February 2010

  Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

BARRY’S ‘flying vet’ was this week cleared of charges relating to owning and trying to sell a machine gun.

  • ‘Flying vet’ crash-lands in ocean Barry And District News: Aviator: Flying Vet' Maurice Kirk is an experienced pilot.
    11:22am Thursday 21 February 2008
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template
  • Rick on the Roof moves in with Flying Vet
    7:30am Thursday 23 October 2008

      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    ROOFTOP protester Ricky Canty is living with ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk in St Donats after a Cardiff court banned him from Barry.

    FLYING vet’ Maurice Kirk is out of hospital and planning to return to Barry following a death-defying crash at the weekend, his wife has said.

  • Vet is found guilty of misconduct
    12:00pm Thursday 10 March 2005
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    A BULGARIAN vet employed at the Barry practice owned by struck-off veterinary surgeon Maurice Kirk has been found guilty of disgraceful professional conduct.

  • ‘I’m 100 percent sure of winning’
    12:00pm Thursday 13 June 2002
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY vet Maurice Kirk has told how he is determined to fight on after a disciplinary hearing ruled he should not be allowed to practice any more.

  • Struck off for life
    12:00pm Thursday 10 November 2005
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    A VALE vet has been banned from the offices of his governing body after his latest run-in with the authorities.

  • Caring vet
    12:00pm Thursday 25 April 2002
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    I RECENTLY volunteered to give evidence at a Royal College of Vets hearing in London. I did this because Maurice Kirk has shown kindness to me and consideration for my pets over the past ten years.

  • Vet is struck off following hearing
    12:00pm Thursday 30 May 2002
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY ‘flying vet’ Maurice Kirk has been struck off after a disciplinary hearing in London.

  • ‘I was a victim of police’
    12:00pm Thursday 28 March 2002
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY’S notorious ‘flying vet’ says he has suffered years of harassment at the hands of local police in South Wales, Taunton, and Guernsey.

  • ‘Flying Vet’ is deported
    2:22pm Thursday 8 May 2008
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY’S Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk has been deported from the States following his spell in an American psychiatric unit.

  • Barry vet has third appeal dismissed by Royal College
    10:36am Thursday 19 October 2006
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    A BARRY vet who was struck off for misconduct four years ago has had his third appeal dismissed by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. 

‘Flying Vet’ sent to US psychiatric unit
11:33am Thursday 1 May 2008

  •   Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template
  • Disgraced vet blasts lawyers
    12:00pm Thursday 22 January 2004

      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY’S controversial vet Maurice John Kirk blasted “bent lawyers” after losing his appeal against professional disqualification last Monday.

  • Disciplinary hearing into Barry vet’s conduct
    12:00pm Thursday 21 March 2002
     Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY’S eccentric ‘flying vet’ has demonstrated a “pathetic waste” of police time, a disciplinary inquiry heard this week.

  • Vet faces disgrace
    12:00pm Thursday 31 January 2002
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    A BARRY vet faces being struck off in disgrace after being convicted of 20 offences in the last seven years, clocking up about £25,000 in fines, costs and compensation orders.

  • The vet who fell to Earth
    12:00pm Thursday 27 October 2005
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    AN eccentric British vet who was struck off after a string of convictions crashed his plane in Japan last Friday during a round-the-world solo journey.

  • BARRY’S ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk was this week locked up in an American psychiatric unit – after landing his plane near George W Bush’s Texas ranch.

  • Further rap for struck-off vet
    12:00pm Thursday 20 June 2002
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY vet Maurice Kirk was rapped by the disciplinary committee of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons this week for his “attitude and conduct” in his recent hearings which eventually saw him struck off.

  • ‘Flying vet’ in US custody Barry And District News: 'Flying vet' lands next to George Bush's Texan ranch
    7:10am Tuesday 29 April 2008
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    An amateur pilot nicknamed the Flying Vet is reported to be undergoing psychiatric tests after landing his plane near George Bush’s Texas ranch..

 SOURCE:  http://www.barryanddistrictnews.co.uk/search/?page=1&topic_id=2308&search=maurice+kirk

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

PATRICK CULLINANE ON THE RADIO: ON “THE COMMON LAW COURT OF WALES SHOW” 26/02/15

Subject: Patrick Cullinane On The Common Law Court Of Wales Show with Darren Latham – Thursday 26th February.

To Whom It May Concern:

 Patrick Cullinane Part1

Patrick Cullinane  On The Common Law Court Of Wales Show with Darren Latham – Thursday 26th February.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-UEXH_CeRU

 The ONLY deceivers and pathological  LIARS in the WORLD with a VOICE are the Jews: –

 The Jewish HIJACK of Magna Carta 1215 and the Constitution of Ireland – has been covered-up by Six Jewish Companies Controlling 96% of the World’s Media: –

http://bit.ly/1Ke81sd

 A jury of one’s peers is one’s lawful right under common law; the Law of the Land.  When are the Jews going to be FORCED to respect this and be prosecuted for High Treason?  It is imperative that you peruse the attached document and see all the laws that the Jews are breaking, while enforcing their SICK Satanic Talmud laws with their own alien Police Forces’ operating for decades now in the UK, Ireland, Australia and America: –

The Whole Story Of Zionist Conspiracy [The Filthy History Of Pedophilia, Murder & Bigotry]

Uploaded on 29 Jan 2012

Note how God’s WRITTEN LAW was discarded for the Zionists UNWRITTEN made-up law to ROB, RAPE, TERRORISE and MURDER with IMPUNITY!  –

 “The TALMUD, which has aptly been called; The Monument to HUMAN FOLLY” … “Gentiles they classed, not as men, but as Barbarians … And has NO right to property” … “The testimony of the Christian was NOT admitted in evidence in Jewish courts” – There you have it.

This story might (WILL) hurt us as human beings

http://bit.ly/1C61bzf

Brother Nathanael

The Jewish Talmud Exposed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZA-JCLYeDro

Home Secretary, Theresa May MP is Jewish, Eric Pickles MP Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government is Jewish and Harriet Harman MP, along with Patricia Hewitt MP who lobbied Parliament to have SEX with Children are both Jewish: –

According to the old laws of England, which are still in force, many current British politicians qualify for hanging and their laws are null and void: –

 High Treason – Laws Against Establishing a Foreign Power in England and Ireland: –

 “Being prohibited aliens by the Edict of Expulsion Jews have no right to sit in our houses of parliament, nor on our local government councils. They have no right to be in the judiciary nor to hold office in the executive of government nor in the police force. All purported laws and purported acts of parliament in which Jews have taken part in the voting are illegal, unconstitutional: null and void…

The British Nation is bedevilled today by alien organisations that have established themselves within our Christian Nation and aim to take us over, to destroy our Christian culture and force us to follow their preconceived designs. Unfortunately they have infiltrated themselves into our educational and religious systems and have educated many adepts among our people who unknowingly carry out their will. Many of them have been advanced to high places.

http://www.heretical.com/mkilliam/treason.html

 The Expulsion of the Jews from England in, 1290, for exactly the same Satanic TALMUD Rituals 666 and LAWLESSNESS that they are doing right NOW in the UK, Ireland, Australia and America!

Who is going to join me to take BACK our COURTS, and KICK the Jews out of ALL positions of POWER?

 The JEWdiciary have HIJACKED the Constitutional Common Law of the Land, which guarantees us = Trial by OUR Peers / Equals = High Treason

Yours truthfully,
Patrick Cullinane, Common Law Lawyer and Victim of Jew Process in the UK’s COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged

MUST SEE!! SHAME ON YOU, LONDON BOROUGH OF BARNET!!

Shame on you, London Borough of Barnet!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , ,

MAURICE KIRK RELEASED + Documents [02/02/2015]: “Regina v. Kirk M. J. – “Summing Up”: IMPORTANT IRREGULARITIES EXPLAINED

MAURICE RELEASED FROM HMP CARDIFF 27/03/15:
Maurice tells us, in a phone call received on 27/03/15, his day of release, that even though inmates are supposed to be released before 11am on the day of release, he was finally let out of HMP Cardiff  “7 or 8 minutes after 11″ on the morning of 27th March – after his prearranged lift had gone “for a cup of tea”, thinking he’d been released earlier, he presumed, thus missing them. He had no choice but to manoeuvre the wheelchair he was in to the hospital, no mean feat, where prison doctors had told him he had an appointment awaiting. After finally arriving at the hospital he found there was no appointment made – this is typical of the prison regime behaviour – to feed him false info, something they’ve been doing for 17+ months. Finally he caught up with his lift [a car, not a “van” as the prison staff had him believe] and now he is pursuing medical treatment for his serious stomach ailments.

  The 3 documents directly below [entitled “Regina v. Kirk M. J. – “Summing Up” – pages 1 – 3] attempt to highlight  very important factors relating to serious abuses of process, miscarriages of justice and severe irregularities etc. regarding cases against Maurice Kirk, particularly since the false “brain tumour” report from 2009.

THE LAYOUT: For example, at the end of the very first paragraph on page 1 – [item 1] of the “Summing Up” below, is the text in light blue: “cf: Doc. B and E”. Following the 3 pages of the “Summing Up” are the documents “B and E” referred to which attempt to offer an explanation of the initial statement made in “Paragraph 1: Item 1″.

Following paragraph 1 is paragraph 2, which begins with, in light blue print, the references “Doc. B and C” – these 2 docs can be found below “cf. Doc. B and E” of paragraph 1, below the 3 pages of the “Summing Up”.

The light blue references in the text of the 3 pages of the “Summing Up” are labelled accordingly and follow each other after the 3 pages of the “Summing Up” directly below:  

Pages 1 – 3 – “Regina v. Kirk M. J. – “Summing Up”:2507sum up 2 linkssum up 3 links

Paragraph 1: Docs. B and E:  doc.  B:B REDACT

doc. E:E1E2E3

Paragraph 2:  Docs B and C = doc C refuting doc B, from the doctor [consultant psychiatrist] of the “Caswell Clinic”, Wales:B REDACT

doc C – refuting doc B:c

Paragraph 3:  doc. E:E1E2E3

Paragraph 4 – doc Hh and docs R and Rr: –  doc Hh [not here]:

Docs R and Rr: – doc. R:

R

Doc Rr:Rr

Paragraph 5:  doc J = ref. page 19A – outlined in red:JJ2.jpgb outlined

Paragraph 6:  doc. K: TYPED RESTRAINING ORDER with JUDGE’S ADDITIONS:K

Paragraph 7: Doc. L: statement of the witness in Public Gallery of the court hearing on 1/12/11 who followed matters very closely: Followed by Doc. M and O:

Doc. L [4 sheets]:L1L2L3L4

Paragraph 8:  Doc. M, followed by Doc. O –

Doc. M [next 3 sheets]:

MM1M2

Doc. 0 – pdf file:     O. T20127589 – KIRK – 03.09.12

Doc. Q:    Q. CCRC3July14

Paragraph 9: Doc. P:PP1P2P3

Paragraph 9:  Doc. V  [pdf file]       V

 >>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

 photo BARRY_zps0hjorw7k.jpg

[NB: MANY OF THESE NEWSPAPER REPORTS ARE VERY BIASED AND UNFACTUAL AGAINST MK – IT SHOULD BE SAID THAT IT IS ALLEGED MK HAS BEEN REMANDED TO PRISON AT LEAST 9 TIMES SINCE 2009,  WITH A TOTAL OF OVER 3 YEARS SPENT IN PRISON ON THESE POINTLESS AND HARRASSING REMANDS, AS NO CONVICTIONS ACTUALLY OCCURRED RELATING TO THESE REMANDS BEFORE THIS PERIOD OF INCARCERATION BEGAN ON 16 OCTOBER 2013 [MK SPENT THE NIGHT OF 15 OCT. IN BARRY POLICE STATION CELLS, AND POSSIBLY OCT 14 ALSO].   ALSO SINCE 2009 MK HAS BEEN STOPPED OVER 35 TIMES, WHILST DRIVING HIS CAR, FOR DRINK-DRIVING TESTS. NOT ONE CONVICTION RESULTING AS A RESULT OF ANY STOP [ALLEGEDLY]. INDEED, MK TELLS US OFTEN HE WAS TAKEN TO THE POLICE STATION FOR THE DRINKING OF ALCOHOL TEST, ONLY TO BE RELEASED WITHOUT EVEN BEING GIVEN IT!  MK HAS AN ONGOING CIVIL CASE AGAINST S. WALES POLICE FORCE– see the radio broadcast interview with MK’s sister on “Dialect Radio”, September 2014 =  video:

“Rough Justice: South Wales Police persecute former vet & pilot Maurice Kirk who’s them”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c3tg6pDdR8      

<a href="/channel/UCvPbHiqhLtpNWA_cg_1NULw" class=" yt-uix-sessionlink     spf-link  g-hovercard" data-name="" data-ytid="UCvPbHiqhLtpNWA_cg_1NULw" data-sessionlink="ei=fcqoVPDdC4KB0AHJyoCYDA">PublicEnquiry</a> PublicEnquiry from 13 Sept. 2014]

  ——————————————————————————————————————–

Barry’s ‘flying vet’ fails in legal bid Barry And District News: APPEAL: Flying vet Maurice Kirk.
7:40am Thursday 7 July 2011

  Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

ATTEMPTS by Barry’s ‘flying vet’ to bring criminal charges against a former chief constable, psychiatrist and solicitor were thwarted by a judge last week.

Firearms charges for Barry’s ‘Flying Vet’ Barry And District News: Firearms charges for Barry's 'Flying Vet'
7:30am Thursday 25 June 2009

  Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

BARRY’S ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk has been charged with alleged firearms offences

Barry’s ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk cleared of firearms charges Barry And District News: FLYING VET: Maurice Kirk.
7:30am Thursday 11 February 2010

  Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

BARRY’S ‘flying vet’ was this week cleared of charges relating to owning and trying to sell a machine gun.

  • ‘Flying vet’ crash-lands in ocean Barry And District News: Aviator: Flying Vet' Maurice Kirk is an experienced pilot.
    11:22am Thursday 21 February 2008
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template
  • Rick on the Roof moves in with Flying Vet
    7:30am Thursday 23 October 2008

      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    ROOFTOP protester Ricky Canty is living with ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk in St Donats after a Cardiff court banned him from Barry.

    FLYING vet’ Maurice Kirk is out of hospital and planning to return to Barry following a death-defying crash at the weekend, his wife has said.

  • Vet is found guilty of misconduct
    12:00pm Thursday 10 March 2005
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    A BULGARIAN vet employed at the Barry practice owned by struck-off veterinary surgeon Maurice Kirk has been found guilty of disgraceful professional conduct.

  • ‘I’m 100 percent sure of winning’
    12:00pm Thursday 13 June 2002
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY vet Maurice Kirk has told how he is determined to fight on after a disciplinary hearing ruled he should not be allowed to practice any more.

  • Struck off for life
    12:00pm Thursday 10 November 2005
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    A VALE vet has been banned from the offices of his governing body after his latest run-in with the authorities.

  • Caring vet
    12:00pm Thursday 25 April 2002
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    I RECENTLY volunteered to give evidence at a Royal College of Vets hearing in London. I did this because Maurice Kirk has shown kindness to me and consideration for my pets over the past ten years.

  • Vet is struck off following hearing
    12:00pm Thursday 30 May 2002
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY ‘flying vet’ Maurice Kirk has been struck off after a disciplinary hearing in London.

  • ‘I was a victim of police’
    12:00pm Thursday 28 March 2002
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY’S notorious ‘flying vet’ says he has suffered years of harassment at the hands of local police in South Wales, Taunton, and Guernsey.

  • ‘Flying Vet’ is deported
    2:22pm Thursday 8 May 2008
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY’S Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk has been deported from the States following his spell in an American psychiatric unit.

  • Barry vet has third appeal dismissed by Royal College
    10:36am Thursday 19 October 2006
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    A BARRY vet who was struck off for misconduct four years ago has had his third appeal dismissed by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons. 

‘Flying Vet’ sent to US psychiatric unit
11:33am Thursday 1 May 2008

  •   Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template
  • Disgraced vet blasts lawyers
    12:00pm Thursday 22 January 2004

      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY’S controversial vet Maurice John Kirk blasted “bent lawyers” after losing his appeal against professional disqualification last Monday.

  • Disciplinary hearing into Barry vet’s conduct
    12:00pm Thursday 21 March 2002
     Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY’S eccentric ‘flying vet’ has demonstrated a “pathetic waste” of police time, a disciplinary inquiry heard this week.

  • Vet faces disgrace
    12:00pm Thursday 31 January 2002
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    A BARRY vet faces being struck off in disgrace after being convicted of 20 offences in the last seven years, clocking up about £25,000 in fines, costs and compensation orders.

  • The vet who fell to Earth
    12:00pm Thursday 27 October 2005
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    AN eccentric British vet who was struck off after a string of convictions crashed his plane in Japan last Friday during a round-the-world solo journey.

  • BARRY’S ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk was this week locked up in an American psychiatric unit – after landing his plane near George W Bush’s Texas ranch.

  • Further rap for struck-off vet
    12:00pm Thursday 20 June 2002
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY vet Maurice Kirk was rapped by the disciplinary committee of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons this week for his “attitude and conduct” in his recent hearings which eventually saw him struck off.

  • ‘Flying vet’ in US custody Barry And District News: 'Flying vet' lands next to George Bush's Texan ranch
    7:10am Tuesday 29 April 2008
      Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    An amateur pilot nicknamed the Flying Vet is reported to be undergoing psychiatric tests after landing his plane near George Bush’s Texas ranch..

 SOURCE:  http://www.barryanddistrictnews.co.uk/search/?page=1&topic_id=2308&search=maurice+kirk

More posts from 2015:

11 MARCH – MAURICE KIRK VICTIMISED YET AGAIN IN HMP SWANSEA: FULL WEEKLY “CANTEEN” ALLOWANCE DENIED!

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/11/11-march-maurice-kirk-victimised-yet-again-in-hmp-swansea/

MAURICE KIRK: LEVESON: APPEAL APPLICATION JUDGEMENT / POSITION STATEMENT 25 FEB. ’15

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/08/maurice-kirk-leveson-appeal-judgement-position-statement-25-feb-15/

MAURICE KIRK: UPDATED WITH “BARRY NEWS” ARTICLES – 1ST YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF ONSET OF SERIOUS and untreated! STOMACH AILMENT, CHEQUE FROM DEC. ’14 STILL REFUSED TO BE CASHED, CLERK OF COURTS DOCS STILL REFUSED AGAINST JUDGES ORDERS, + MORE

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/05/maurice-kirk-update-5-mar-2015-1st-year-anniversary-of-onset-of-serious-stomach-ailment-cheque-from-dec-14-still-refused-to-be-cashed-clerk-of-courts-docs-still-refused-against-judges-orders/

MAURICE KIRK IN PRISON 500 DAYS ON SUN. MARCH 1!! – WRIT OF “HABEUS CORPUS” ISSUED – POSITION STATEMENT 18 FEB. ’15
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/27/maurice-kirk-writ-of-habeus-corpus-10-feb-2015-position-statement-18-feb-15/

MAURICE KIRK – POSITION STATEMENT 18 +16 FEB. + DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 19 FEB. 2015 inc. LETTER TO GMC, RCJ APPEAL CT, + more:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/19/maurice-kirk-documents-received-19-feb-2015/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 15 FEB. 2015 – regarding “the fairness, proportionality, apparent bias and bad faith in the decisions of 11 July 2014 to recall Mr. Maurice Kirk to prison”, + more:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/15/maurice-kirk-update-15-feb-2015-mappa-docs-more/

MAURICE KIRK – THE STORY SO FAR – A BRIEF SYNOPSIS  [UNTIL OCT. 2014] – FILES B, C, D. [30 pages] inc. “Fabicated Medical Records”, “Breach of Restraining Order Appeal” statement 6/6/14, + more:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/09/maurice-kirk-the-story-so-far-until-oct-2014-files-b-c-d/

MAURICE KIRK – SOCIAL VISIT REFUSED 6 FEB. – POSITION STATEMENT 16 JAN. 2015, + more:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/06/maurice-kirk-position-statement-26-jan-2015-more/

MAURICE KIRK v S. WALES POLICE: UPDATE 4 FEB. 2015: NOW HELD 475 DAYS IN HM PRISONS UNLAWFULLY!
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/maurice-kirk-update-4-feb-2015/

MAURICE KIRK PAROLE HEARING – CANCELLED!! JUST LIKE THAT!!
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/30/maurice-kirk-parole-hearing-cancelled-just-like-that/

LETTER TO THE PRIME MINISTER: MAURICE KIRK – NOT TAKEN TO THE COURTROOM FOR HIS HEARINGS 7 TIMES!! [actually its more!]:
https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/22/letter-to-the-prime-minister-maurice-kirk-not-taken-to-the-courtroom-for-his-hearings-7-times/

15 Jan. UPDATE: MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 5 JAN. 2014 – OVER 420 DAYS IN H.M. PRISONS!! STILL NO STOMACH OPERATION AFTER 10 MONTHS!!
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/15/15-jan-update-maurice-kirk-important-documents-received-5-jan-2014-over-420-days-in-h-m-prisons-still-no-stomach-operation-after-10-months/

MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 5 JAN. 2014 – OVER 420 DAYS IN H.M. PRISONS!! STILL NO STOMACH OPERATION AFTER 10 MONTHS!!
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/10/maurice-kirk-important-documents-received-5-jan-2014-over-420-days-in-h-m-prisons-still-no-stomach-operation-after-10-months/

MAURICE KIRK IN PRISON OVER 420 DAYS – THE DISGUSTING UNHYGIENIC CONDITIONS MK IS HAVING TO PUT UP WITH IN HMP BRISTOL – 12 DEC. ’14, + IMPORTANT DOCS.
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/13/maurice-kirk-18-days-before-a-change-of-clothing-12-dec-2014/

MAURICE KIRK: 12 DEC.: WELSH GOVERNMENT REPLIES – A WASTE OF TIME:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/12/maurice-kirk-12-dec-welsh-government-replies-a-waste-of-time/

ARCHIVES FROM 19 September 2014 until January 2015:

MAURICE KIRK POSITION STATEMENT 10 DEC 2014

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/10/maurice-kirk-position-statement-10-dec-2014/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 5 DEC.: FINED £1000 – THE WELSH ASSEMBLY – THE “BRAIN SCAN” + more

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/05/maurice-kirk-update-5-dec-fined-1000-the-welsh-assembly-the-brain-scan-more/

MAURICE KIRK LOCATED IN HMP BRISTOL – 2 DEC. ’14 / BREAKING THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/04/maurice-kirk-located-in-hmp-bristol-2-dec-14/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 30 NOV. 2014 – MAURICE GOES MISSING

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/maurice-kirk-update-30-nov-2014/

UPDATED: MAURICE KIRK: IMPORTANT DOCS RECEIVED 18 NOV. 2014 – MEDICAL UPDATES ETC.

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/18/maurice-kirk-important-docs-received-18-nov-2014/

MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 8 NOV. ’14 – Position Statement 5 Nov. ETC.

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/14/m-krk-docs-received-8-nov-14/

MAURICE KIRK – THE DISGRACEFUL PERSECUTION CONTINUES IN HMP SWANSEA – SUN. 2 NOV. 2014

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/02/maurice-kirk-the-disgraceful-persecution-continues-in-hmp-swansea-sun-2-nov-2014/

MAURICE KIRK: VERY ILL IN HMP SWANSEA, 30 OCT. ’14

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/30/maurice-kirk-very-ill-in-hmp-swansea-30-oct-14/

MAURICE KIRK – FILE A – THE CHARGES, etc.

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/28/maurice-kirk-file-a-of-19-documents/

MAURICE KIRK DOCUMENTS: 25 OCT. 2014 – POSITION STATEMENT 14 OCT. ’14

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/27/maurice-kirk-documents-25-oct-2014/

MAURICE KIRK: LATEST NEWS, 23 OCT. ’14 – PLS SIGN THE PETITION – + more

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/23/maurice-kirek-latest-news-23-oct-14-pls-sign-the-petition-more/

MAURICE KIRK: LATEST NEWS, 23 OCT. ’14 – ALL CONTACTS REMOVED EXCEPT 1 FROM MK’S TELEPHONE CALL LIST, + PLS SIGN THE PETITION – + more

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/23/maurice-kirek-latest-news-23-oct-14-pls-sign-the-petition-more/

5 IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS FROM MAURICE KIRK 14 OCT. 2014, + MESSAGE TO THE JUSTICE, + ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMITTEE 23 OCT. ’14

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/21/5-important-documents-from-maurice-kirk-14-oct-2014-more/

MAURICE KIRK’S SISTER CELIA – RADIO INTERVIEW – + “THE NEFARIOUS PLOT TO ISOLATE MAURICE”

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/24/maurice-kirks-sister-celia-radio-interview/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE: 23 SEPT. “14: DOCUMENTS RECEIVED- “RECALL TO CUSTODY APPEAL” + “MALICIOUS PROSECUTION WITHOUT TRIAL”

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/23/maurice-kirk-update-23-sept-24-documents-received/

MAURICE KIRK – DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 18 SEPT. 2014 WHICH TELL OF HIS HELL

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/19/maurice-kirk-documents-received-which-tell-of-his-hell/

See archives at bottom of page from before 19 September ’14, or on right for posts from 2013 / 14.

Maurice Kirk’s site is:  http://www.kirkflyingvet.com

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

MAURICE KIRK: DOCS RECEIVED 20 MARCH, WHICH TELL OF MORE IRREGULARITIES

Received today: 20 March ’15, documents from Maurice Kirk:

 1]  reply from S. Wales police regarding a complaint made against them by MK, 

2]  Sworn affidavit from MK’s son Charles Kirk, re: 19/11/2014 hearing, during which MK was rushed to hospital from the court with dire stomach pain, due to his severe and serious stomach ailment not receiving the medical operation that has been denied him since the first week of March 2014,

3]  Regina v. Kirk M.J. – case no. 201402428-C1-JIB – pages 1 – 3 of “Summing Up”, 

4]  2 pages of court transcript: 19 Nov. 2014 – A20140082 – pages 67 and 19.

1]  reply from S. Wales police regarding a complaint made against them by MK150025012502

2]  Sworn affidavit from MK’s son Charles Kirk, re: 19/11/2014 hearing, during which MK was rushed to hospital from the court with dire stomach pain, due to his severe and serious stomach ailment not receiving the medical operation that has been denied him since the first week of March 2014,2503

3]  Regina v. Kirk M.J. – case no. 201402428-C1-JIB – pages 1 – 3 of “Summing Up”250725092510

4]  2 pages of court transcript: 19 Nov. 2014 – A20140082 – pages 67 and 19:25042505

Maurice Kirk’s site is =  http:/www.kirkflyingvet.com

Scroll down and see archives on right of page or below for many more articles.

More posts from 2015:

11 MARCH – MAURICE KIRK VICTIMISED YET AGAIN IN HMP SWANSEA: FULL WEEKLY “CANTEEN” ALLOWANCE DENIED!

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/11/11-march-maurice-kirk-victimised-yet-again-in-hmp-swansea/

MAURICE KIRK: LEVESON: APPEAL APPLICATION JUDGEMENT / POSITION STATEMENT 25 FEB. ’15

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/08/maurice-kirk-leveson-appeal-judgement-position-statement-25-feb-15/

MAURICE KIRK: UPDATED WITH “BARRY NEWS” ARTICLES – 1ST YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF ONSET OF SERIOUS and untreated! STOMACH AILMENT, CHEQUE FROM DEC. ’14 STILL REFUSED TO BE CASHED, CLERK OF COURTS DOCS STILL REFUSED AGAINST JUDGES ORDERS, + MORE

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/05/maurice-kirk-update-5-mar-2015-1st-year-anniversary-of-onset-of-serious-stomach-ailment-cheque-from-dec-14-still-refused-to-be-cashed-clerk-of-courts-docs-still-refused-against-judges-orders/

MAURICE KIRK IN PRISON 500 DAYS ON SUN. MARCH 1!! – WRIT OF “HABEUS CORPUS” ISSUED – POSITION STATEMENT 18 FEB. ’15
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/27/maurice-kirk-writ-of-habeus-corpus-10-feb-2015-position-statement-18-feb-15/

MAURICE KIRK – POSITION STATEMENT 18 +16 FEB. + DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 19 FEB. 2015 inc. LETTER TO GMC, RCJ APPEAL CT, + more:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/19/maurice-kirk-documents-received-19-feb-2015/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 15 FEB. 2015 – regarding “the fairness, proportionality, apparent bias and bad faith in the decisions of 11 July 2014 to recall Mr. Maurice Kirk to prison”, + more:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/15/maurice-kirk-update-15-feb-2015-mappa-docs-more/

MAURICE KIRK – THE STORY SO FAR – A BRIEF SYNOPSIS  [UNTIL OCT. 2014] – FILES B, C, D. [30 pages] inc. “Fabicated Medical Records”, “Breach of Restraining Order Appeal” statement 6/6/14, + more:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/09/maurice-kirk-the-story-so-far-until-oct-2014-files-b-c-d/

MAURICE KIRK – SOCIAL VISIT REFUSED 6 FEB. – POSITION STATEMENT 16 JAN. 2015, + more:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/06/maurice-kirk-position-statement-26-jan-2015-more/

MAURICE KIRK v S. WALES POLICE: UPDATE 4 FEB. 2015: NOW HELD 475 DAYS IN HM PRISONS UNLAWFULLY!
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/maurice-kirk-update-4-feb-2015/

MAURICE KIRK PAROLE HEARING – CANCELLED!! JUST LIKE THAT!!
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/30/maurice-kirk-parole-hearing-cancelled-just-like-that/

LETTER TO THE PRIME MINISTER: MAURICE KIRK – NOT TAKEN TO THE COURTROOM FOR HIS HEARINGS 7 TIMES!! [actually its more!]:
https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/22/letter-to-the-prime-minister-maurice-kirk-not-taken-to-the-courtroom-for-his-hearings-7-times/

15 Jan. UPDATE: MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 5 JAN. 2014 – OVER 420 DAYS IN H.M. PRISONS!! STILL NO STOMACH OPERATION AFTER 10 MONTHS!!
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/15/15-jan-update-maurice-kirk-important-documents-received-5-jan-2014-over-420-days-in-h-m-prisons-still-no-stomach-operation-after-10-months/

MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 5 JAN. 2014 – OVER 420 DAYS IN H.M. PRISONS!! STILL NO STOMACH OPERATION AFTER 10 MONTHS!!
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/10/maurice-kirk-important-documents-received-5-jan-2014-over-420-days-in-h-m-prisons-still-no-stomach-operation-after-10-months/

MAURICE KIRK IN PRISON OVER 420 DAYS – THE DISGUSTING UNHYGIENIC CONDITIONS MK IS HAVING TO PUT UP WITH IN HMP BRISTOL – 12 DEC. ’14, + IMPORTANT DOCS.
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/13/maurice-kirk-18-days-before-a-change-of-clothing-12-dec-2014/

MAURICE KIRK: 12 DEC.: WELSH GOVERNMENT REPLIES – A WASTE OF TIME:
http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/12/maurice-kirk-12-dec-welsh-government-replies-a-waste-of-time/

ARCHIVES FROM 19 September 2014 until January 2015:

MAURICE KIRK POSITION STATEMENT 10 DEC 2014

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/10/maurice-kirk-position-statement-10-dec-2014/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 5 DEC.: FINED £1000 – THE WELSH ASSEMBLY – THE “BRAIN SCAN” + more

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/05/maurice-kirk-update-5-dec-fined-1000-the-welsh-assembly-the-brain-scan-more/

MAURICE KIRK LOCATED IN HMP BRISTOL – 2 DEC. ’14 / BREAKING THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/04/maurice-kirk-located-in-hmp-bristol-2-dec-14/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 30 NOV. 2014 – MAURICE GOES MISSING

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/maurice-kirk-update-30-nov-2014/

UPDATED: MAURICE KIRK: IMPORTANT DOCS RECEIVED 18 NOV. 2014 – MEDICAL UPDATES ETC.

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/18/maurice-kirk-important-docs-received-18-nov-2014/

MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 8 NOV. ’14 – Position Statement 5 Nov. ETC.

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/14/m-krk-docs-received-8-nov-14/

MAURICE KIRK – THE DISGRACEFUL PERSECUTION CONTINUES IN HMP SWANSEA – SUN. 2 NOV. 2014

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/02/maurice-kirk-the-disgraceful-persecution-continues-in-hmp-swansea-sun-2-nov-2014/

MAURICE KIRK: VERY ILL IN HMP SWANSEA, 30 OCT. ’14

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/30/maurice-kirk-very-ill-in-hmp-swansea-30-oct-14/

MAURICE KIRK – FILE A – THE CHARGES, etc.

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/28/maurice-kirk-file-a-of-19-documents/

MAURICE KIRK DOCUMENTS: 25 OCT. 2014 – POSITION STATEMENT 14 OCT. ’14

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/27/maurice-kirk-documents-25-oct-2014/

MAURICE KIRK: LATEST NEWS, 23 OCT. ’14 – PLS SIGN THE PETITION – + more

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/23/maurice-kirek-latest-news-23-oct-14-pls-sign-the-petition-more/

MAURICE KIRK: LATEST NEWS, 23 OCT. ’14 – ALL CONTACTS REMOVED EXCEPT 1 FROM MK’S TELEPHONE CALL LIST, + PLS SIGN THE PETITION – + more

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/23/maurice-kirek-latest-news-23-oct-14-pls-sign-the-petition-more/

5 IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS FROM MAURICE KIRK 14 OCT. 2014, + MESSAGE TO THE JUSTICE, + ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMITTEE 23 OCT. ’14

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/21/5-important-documents-from-maurice-kirk-14-oct-2014-more/

MAURICE KIRK’S SISTER CELIA – RADIO INTERVIEW – + “THE NEFARIOUS PLOT TO ISOLATE MAURICE”

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/24/maurice-kirks-sister-celia-radio-interview/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE: 23 SEPT. “14: DOCUMENTS RECEIVED- “RECALL TO CUSTODY APPEAL” + “MALICIOUS PROSECUTION WITHOUT TRIAL”

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/23/maurice-kirk-update-23-sept-24-documents-received/

MAURICE KIRK – DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 18 SEPT. 2014 WHICH TELL OF HIS HELL

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/19/maurice-kirk-documents-received-which-tell-of-his-hell/

See archives at bottom of page from before 19 September ’14, or on right for posts from 2013 / 14.

Maurice Kirk’s site is:  http://www.kirkflyingvet.com

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , ,

HAMPSTEAD CHILD ABUSE: OUTRAGEOUS COVERUP! !! “‘Satanic cult’ dismissed by judge” – DAILY MAIL + TELEGRAPH: “Satanic cult claims dismissed by High Court judge” + JUDGEMENT!

Look at this rubbish! The “Times” should be sued! From the morning of March 20 ’15: 

“Children brainwashed over satanic Cult”

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/uk/crime/article4387571.ece

‘Satanic cult’ dismissed by judge – Daily Mail

Claims that a “satanic cult” where children were abused by paedophiles has been operating in north London have been dismissed by a High Court judge .

Mrs Justice Pauffley said detail of the claims has been circulating on the internet.

She said she had been asked to investigate by social services bosses, and had conducted a fact-finding exercise, at a family court hearing in London.

The judge delivered her ruling at the High Court in London

The judge said in a ruling today that the claims were “baseless” and she described people who sought to perpetuate them as “evil” or “foolish”.

Mrs Justice Pauffley said the case centred on two children – aged eight and nine – whose parents were separated.

The judge said the London Borough of Barnet had begun care proceedings in relation to the youngsters.

She said last September “lurid allegations of the most serious kind” were drawn to the attention of police.

It was suggested that the youngsters were part of a large group of children from north London who belonged to a “satanic cult”.

She said there were allegations of “significant paedophile activity” – allegations that children had been sexually abused and made to abuse one another.

Mrs Justice Pauffley said allegations were made by the two children, their mother and her partner.

“Specifically, it was said that babies were supplied from all over the world,” she said.

“They were bought, injected with drugs and then sent by TNT or DHL to London. The assertions were that babies had been abused, tortured and then sacrificed.

“Their throats were slit, blood was drunk and cult members would then dance wearing babies’ skulls (sometimes with blood and hair still attached”) on their bodies.

“All the cult members wore shoes made of baby skin produced by the owner of a specified shoe repair shop.”

She said it was alleged that the “main action” occurred at a school – and at least seven other schools were named.

A swimming pool was identified as a meeting place.

It was alleged that “rituals” were performed at a McDonald’s fast-food restaurant when “the boss” allowed child sacrifice because he was a member of the cult, said the judge.

And it was said that babies were prepared and cooked in ovens in a “secret kitchen” then eaten by cult members.

Mrs Justice Pauffley said it was alleged that the father of the two children at the centre of the case was the “cult leader” and members included a school head, a teacher, priest, social workers and police.

It was alleged that more than 100 people were “doing sex” to the children.

“I am able to state with complete conviction that none of the allegations are true,” said Mrs Justice Pauffley in her ruling. “The claims are baseless.”

She added: “Those who have sought to perpetuate them are evil and/or foolish.”

Mrs Justice Pauffley said she had analysed the case at a hearing lasting nearly two weeks, heard evidence from 16 witnesses and read thousands of pages of written material.

She added: “The forensic inquiry has been full and thorough.”
sourcehttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/pa/article-3002267/Satanic-cult-dismissed-judge.html#ixzz3UqFfYBP7

===============================================================
 photo TELE_zpssyvdtnal.jpg

Satanic cult claims dismissed by High Court judge

Mrs Justice Pauffley says claims circulating on internet are ‘baseless’ as she describes people who seek to perpetuate them as ‘evil’ or ‘foolish’ after fact-finding exercise Mr Imam-Sadeque, who brought a claim at the High Court in October, insisted the email was innocuous and that he should be paid his bonus.

The case was heard at London’s High Court Photo: ALAMY
Claims that a “satanic cult” where children were abused by paedophiles has been operating in north London have been dismissed by a High Court judge.
Mrs Justice Pauffley said detail of the claims have been circulating on the internet.
At a family court hearing in London, she said she had been asked to investigate by social services bosses and had conducted a fact-finding exercise.
The judge said in a ruling on Thursday that the claims were “baseless” and she described people who sought to perpetuate them as “evil” or “foolish”.

Mrs Justice Pauffley said the case centred on two children – aged eight and nine – whose parents were separated. The judge said the London Borough of Barnet had begun care proceedings in relation to the youngsters. She said that “lurid allegations of the most serious kind” were drawn to the attention of police last September. Russian Satanists jailed for ‘ritual sacrifice’ teen killingsSatanic cult blamed for beheaded horse on beach It was suggested that the youngsters were part of a large group of children from north London who belonged to a “satanic cult”, the judge added. She said there were allegations of “significant paedophile activity” – allegations that children had been sexually abused and made to abuse one another.

Mrs Justice Pauffley said allegations were made by the two children, their mother and her partner.

“Specifically, it was said that babies were supplied from all over the world,” she said. “The assertions were that babies had been abused, tortured and then sacrificed.”

source:  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/11482303/

#SatanicCult? Dismissed. You must be joking! #DamePauffley knows!?

March 19, 2015March 19, 2015 Barnet Police, Christ Church Primary School, Co-Creators, Cover-Ups, Daily Mail, Dame Anna Pauffley OBE, Facebook, High Courts of Justice, LB Barnet, LB Camden, Mainstream Media, News, Online Media, The Guardian, The Telegraph, UK Authorities, Video 

“Here is Ella, the children’s mother, speaking to partner Abraham who got them to talk and admit that it was their father who taught them to touch each other sexually. Their audio file on a video is on:
http://www.vid.me/HvNC
With a key point made by Ella:
after the children retracted their allegations, why keep them in care?But there is no logic! There is only one agenda:

Thanks to commenter Sancho Panzer, the judgement is published here.

The Daily Mail reports – with clearly a well prepared report rather than investigated:

The Telegraph also:

  • Satanic cult claims dismissed by judge
  • Mrs Justice Pauffley says claims circulating on internet are ‘baseless’ as she describes people who seek to perpetuate them as ‘evil’ or ‘foolish’ after fact-finding exercise.

Funny that neither article tells us about the fate of the children… Hampstead Research videos show her what fact finding is about!

And I will forever maintain that it is not compatible with EU Directives to Use the Secrecy of UK Family Courts to Cover-Up Criminal Activities. MEPs will look into this emergency application to the Petitions Committee in Brussels.

You can’t make it up. But then it is hard to live in reality. We need to go through ‘societal disillusionment’ towards ‘social empowerment’.

But: mind the gap between the internet community of good people advocating transparency and truth (99%) and the global elite (1%) using mainstream media (MSM) who thrive on secrecy and lies…

The battlefield has widened and our armies are growing, while the ‘bullets’ are being ‘sharpened':

  1. the blog is now www.whistleblowerkids.uk
  2. the US techie-version is on www.whistleblowerkids.com with a phenomenal list of ‘leaks’ about the non-existing satanic cults relying on papa and others killing babies
  3. a NZ ‘paper publication on-screen’ is on http://bit.ly/1FEwsgK or   https://paper.li/BronnyNZ/1426379990#!headlines
  4. I have added lots of links of ‘co-creators’ to the blog
  5. I published the full story of the deletion of our two petitions – due to ‘court proceedings’ – here.

The essence is:

Dear Mr Mowrey

For you to have deleted two of my petitions, supposedly irretrievably, is a really serious violation of professional standards by an internet platform:

1. I just happened to have discovered your ‘Notice’ of 4 March, i.e. NOT an email as you claimed you sent!

2. Before removing petitions, your IT department MUST ensure that the petitioner has been ‘served’, i.e. has DEFINITELY received your ‘warning’!

3. To allow for mistakes, such as you with your Notice (rather than email with receipt confirmed) and your colleague Debbie not knowing about it, you MUST be able to RESTORE petitions!

If I didn’t have bigger fish to fry, I would certainly take you and Change.org to court.

This way, I trust that you’ll LEARN, as most people only seem to be able to learn from PAINFUL experiences, i.e. mistakes.

Yours with all possible customer dissatisfaction,

Sabine

source:  http://whistleblowerkids.uk/2015/03/19/sataniccult-dismissed-you-must-be-joking-damepauffley-knows/

England and Wales Family Court Decisions (High Court Judges)


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> England and Wales Family Court Decisions (High Court Judges) >> P and Q (Children: Care Proceedings: Fact Finding) [2015] EWFC 26 (19 March 2015)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2015/26.html
Cite as: [2015] EWFC 26

[New search] [Context] [View without highlighting] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

This judgment was delivered in public. The judge has given leave for this version of the judgment to be published on condition that (irrespective of what is contained in the judgment) in any published version of the judgment the anonymity of the children is preserved. All persons, including representatives of the media, must ensure that this condition is strictly complied with. Failure to do so will be a contempt of court. 

Neutral Citation Number: [2015] EWFC 26
Case No:  ZC14C00315 

IN THE FAMILY COURT
Sitting at the Royal Courts of Justice

Royal Courts of Justice
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL
19/03/2015

B e f o r e :
MRS JUSTICE PAUFFLEY
____________________

Re P and Q (Children: Care Proceedings: Fact Finding)

____________________
Hannah Markham for the London Borough of Barnet
Ella Draper, the mother, did not appear and was not represented
June Venters QC for the father, Ricky Dearman
Justin Ageros for the children by their guardian
Hearing dates: 17 – 20 February, 3 – 6 and 10 – 12 March 2015

____________________
HTML VERSION OF JUDGMENT ____________________
Crown Copyright ©

Mrs Justice Pauffley:
Introduction and executive summary

    1. This judgment is being given in public and without anonymisation save as to the children’s names.
    1. The subject children have been named repeatedly on the internet. Their photographs and film clips in which they feature have been published and re-published widely. Filmed police interviews of the children have been uploaded on to publicly accessible websites; so, too, intensely personal information relating to both children. As at 10 March 2015, more than 4 million people worldwide had viewed online material relating to this case.
    1. It is inevitable that a large proportion of those have a sexual interest in children. Any rational adult who uploads film clips to Youtube featuring children speaking about sexual activity must be assumed to realise that fact.
    1. I considered but ultimately rejected the suggestion that the children’s names should appear within the judgment. My priority is to protect them from further harm of whatever kind. Those who have posted material identifying the children have done so with flagrant disregard for their welfare interests. I see no good reason for adding to the damage already done. Only those with prurient or unhealthy curiosity will take steps to identify the children. My faith in humanity indicates that the overwhelming majority of individuals will do nothing because they, like me, have no interest in inflicting further harm.
    1. In the period before 13 January 2015, there had been some relatively limited online publication of court and other relevant material. It had been my hope that after discussion with the mother and her McKenzie Friend on 13 January, there would have been withdrawal of material from the internet. Since about 26 January the volume posted in a variety of formats on different sites has increased markedly; and the claims made against the father, the children’s former head teacher, other teachers, professionals and a very large number of parents at the children’s former school have proliferated.
    1. Many of those individuals are now living in fear because they have been identified on the internet as abusers of children and their contact details including telephone numbers, home and email addresses have been published. Lives have been disrupted. Several of those implicated have received malicious, intimidating ‘phone calls and emails at all hours of the day and night from all over the world. For example, “Hey cock. We’re coming for you. You scum paedo.
    1. It has been necessary for the police to protect worried parents and children at the gates of the school in Hampstead at the centre of the allegations. Prospective parents have wondered whether to withdraw their children from allocated places. Existing parents have been uniformly supportive of the school and every member of the teaching staff.
    1. All the signs are that those responsible for posting material derive a great deal of personal satisfaction from attracting interest to their spiteful work from many thousands of people. It’s akin to the sensation, I imagine, of a Facebook user receiving an indication that some posting or other has been “liked.”
    1. This necessarily lengthy judgment has one essential purpose. It is to provide definitive conclusions upon a quantity of evidence at the end of a thorough-going hearing. I have surveyed the relevant history as well as all of the significant developments in a wide-ranging police and social services investigation. Everything of importance on all sides of the dispute has been considered so as to enable me to arrive at authoritative findings.
    1. These are care proceedings brought by the London Borough of Barnet relating to two children, P and Q who are 9 and 8 years old respectively. Their parents are Ella Draper and Ricky Dearman.
    1. In September 2014, lurid allegations of the most serious kind were drawn to the attention of the Metropolitan Police. In a variety of ways, it was suggested that P and Q were part of a large group of children from north London who had been sexually abused, made to abuse one another and that they had belonged to a satanic cult in which there was significant paedophile activity.
    1. Specifically, it was said that babies were supplied from all over the world. They were bought, injected with drugs and then sent by TNT or DHL to London. The assertions were that babies had been abused, tortured and then sacrificed. Their throats were slit, blood was drunk and cult members would then dance wearing babies’ skulls (sometimes with blood and hair still attached) on their bodies. All the cult members wore shoes made of baby skin produced by the owner of a specified shoe repair shop.
    1. Children, it was alleged, would be anally abused by adult members of the cult using plastic penises or “willies.”
    1. Christchurch Primary School in Hampstead was said to be where the “main action” occurred but at least seven other local schools were named. East Finchley swimming pool was identified as one of the other meeting venues for the paedophile ring. Rituals were performed, so it was claimed, in an upstairs room at the McDonald’s restaurant where the “boss” allowed child sacrifice because he was a member of the cult. Human babies were prepared, cooked in the ovens within a secret kitchen and then eaten by cult members.
    1. It was alleged that the children’s father, Ricky Dearman, was the leader of the cult and that others included the children’s headteacher, Ms Forsdyke, another teacher, Mr Hollings, the priest at the adjacent church, a large number of named parents of other children, social workers, CAFCASS officers and police officers. It was said that, in all, more than a hundred people were involved in ‘doing sex‘ to the children.
    1. I am able to state with complete conviction that none of the allegations are true. I am entirely certain that everything Ms Draper, her partner Abraham Christie and the children said about those matters was fabricated. The claims are baseless. Those who have sought to perpetuate them are evil and / or foolish.
    1. All the indications are that over a period of some weeks last summer, P and Q were forced by Mr Christie and Ms Draper, working in partnership, to provide concocted accounts of horrific events. The stories came about as the result of relentless emotional and psychological pressure as well as significant physical abuse. Torture is a strong word but it is the most accurate way to describe what was done to the children by Mr Christie in collaboration with Ms Draper.
    1. The children were made to take part in filmed mobile ‘phone recordings in which they relayed a series of fabricated satanic practices. Subsequently, at the instigation of Abraham Christie and Ella Draper, the children repeated their false stories to Jean-Clement Yaohirou, Mr Christie’s brother in law, in a late night discussion. It lasted for about three hours; Mr Christie and Ms Draper did most of the talking.
    1. P and Q were ABE (Achieving Best Evidence) interviewed on 5, 11 and 17 September 2014. On the first two occasions, they supplied information about events they claimed had occurred, similar in their overall content to the mobile ‘phone video clips and audio recording. On 17 September, in ABE interview, both children withdrew their allegations. Each stated they had been made to say things by Abraham Christie, the mother’s partner, which were not true; and they gave very full details of the way in which he had secured their compliance.
    1. Ms Draper and Mr Christie have not participated by being present in court. I am as sure as I can be that their absence has been deliberate. They have chosen to remain away; but the internet campaign has continued. Countless online articles have been posted in which the truth of the satanic abuse claims is asserted repeatedly. Notwithstanding injunctions restraining Ms Draper and Sabine McNeill, one of her supporters, from publishing information from the proceedings on the internet or elsewhere, such material continues to be uploaded. Efforts to persuade internet servers to remove material have been of only limited value. As soon as information is removed by one provider, it emerges elsewhere.
    1. The hearing has been lengthy. I listened to evidence from 16 witnesses. I read thousands of pages of written material and watched six ABE interviews. I viewed a dozen or so short film clips of the children being questioned by Ms Draper and Mr Christie and listened to the very lengthy audio recording.
    1. The forensic inquiry has been full and thorough. It has made little difference that Ms Draper has been absent. I have been actively assisted in my investigative role by Ms Markham, Counsel for the local authority, and Mr Ageros who represents the guardian. Each has asked questions designed to explore those matters which, in all probability, the mother would have raised. Close attention has been given to the claims she’d made in her written material so as to ensure her case was put to all relevant witnesses.

Essential background

    1. Ms Draper has an older child, R, now almost an adult, who is not related to Mr Dearman. His father is Will Draper. R has lived with his father full time since the summer of 2010.
    1. The parents of P and Q met in 2003. Their relationship had disintegrated by 2006 when the father went to live in an adjacent street. There were occasional referrals to the police when domestic violence was alleged. Ms Draper initiated private law proceedings in 2008.
    1. Over the course of the next six years, there was never a time when the children’s contact with their father proceeded smoothly. Countless returns to court achieved very little. If there was an attempt to achieve judicial continuity it failed miserably. Between November 2010 and August 2014 when the case was pending at First Avenue House, High Holborn it drifted between no fewer than seven different judges. None of the nine hearings resulted in a considered judgment on the basis of oral evidence. The essential cause of the problems was never the subject of judicial determination.
    1. A non molestation injunction order was made against the father in 2010. There was some involvement on the part of the London Borough of Camden; in December 2008 a core assessment was prepared. Between May 2010 and October 2013, therapeutic sessions occurred intermittently at the Tavistock Clinic. There was a period, notably between November 2011 and November 2012, when the children did not have contact with their father.
    1. There was intermittent concern about P’s relationship with her mother and also that both children were presenting as and complaining of being hungry at school.
    1. In May 2014, after a period of renewed involvement by the London Borough of Camden, Mr Dearman had contact with the children for the first time since October 2013. In that same month, the mother met Abraham Christie.
    1. On 4 June 2014, there was a scene in the playground at Christchurch School when Mr Christie was collecting P and Q at the end of the school day. He was loud and aggressive, accusing the teachers of poisoning the children by giving them the food supplied at the school. By the middle of June, according to Ms Draper, Mr Christie was staying over at her home on two or three nights each week.

Evolution of the allegations

    1. In August 2014, at a time when he was holiday in France, Jean-Clement Yaohirou received ‘phone calls and messages from Mr Christie in which he said he had information regarding the abuse of children. In evidence, Mr Yaohirou said that Abraham “had not been coming forward with specific information” but was “trying to give (him) justification.” Abraham Christie had said that a church, a school in Hampstead and a police station in Haringey were involved. Mr Yaohirou had asked whether Mr Christie “had evidence“. He said, “Yes;” and “that was it for July.”
    1. In early August, the mother, Mr Christie and the children went abroad. They travelled to Gibraltar and then Morocco. They returned on 4 September.
    1. It seems entirely probable that the majority of the short film clips of the children ‘speaking to camera’ were made at the airport whilst awaiting their flight back to England. There are others which appear to have been made whilst Q was either getting ready for bed or had awoken from sleep.
    1. When Mr Yaohirou came back to England on 3 September, he had told Mr Christie over the ‘phone that “anyone can make an allegation” but he would need “sufficient evidence for the police to take the case forward.” Mr Christie had replied, “I will bring you evidence.”
    1. On 4 September 2014 in the late evening, Mr Yaohirou returned to his home after work to find Mr Christie, P and Q present. They were subsequently joined by Ms Draper.
    1. With great presence of mind, Mr Yaohirou recorded the conversations between himself, Mr Christie, the children and the mother on his mobile ‘phone.
    1. Because, according to Mr Christie, Haringey police officers were implicated, Mr Yaohirou decided to report the matter to Scotland Yard. Subsequently, he was in touch by email with Detective Inspector Cannon, the senior investigating officer with responsibility for overseeing the police inquiry. By then Mr Yaohirou was, as he said in evidence, “greatly concerned for the children’s welfare.”
    1. Mr Yaohirou described how he had suggested to DI Cannon that the children should be placed in a safe environment until the case had been sorted out. Mr Yaohirou said he had been unsettled by what he’d heard and believed the children needed some medical or psychological assistance.
    1. On 5 September at about 15.00 Barnet Police began what DI Cannon described in evidence as a “wide ranging investigation” involving as it seemed “threats to life.” In all, six officers were deployed. That evening, DC Martin conducted ABE interviews with P and Q. Overnight, in response to the mother’s perceived fear, a panic alarm was installed at the home. DI Cannon compiled his summary of events that evening and logged it onto the system at 00.44 on 6 September.
    1. On Monday 8 September, the children were taken by the police on a drive around the area in an unsuccessful attempt to identify specific locations where abusive practices had occurred.
    1. On 10 September, DS Fernandez and DC Martin visited and inspected the interior of the church adjacent to Christchurch School. No notice had been given of their intended arrival. They had a good look around the vestry, including within the drawers where the priest’s vestments were stored, searching for material to assist in their inquiries. They found nothing of interest to the inquiry.
    1. That same day, P and Q underwent further ABE interviews, led by DC Martin. DS Fernandez interviewed the mother. He described in evidence how Ms Draper had told him in great detail about abuse but there had been “no tears at all.” There was, he said, “a distinct lack of emotion.” It was “just like she had learned this – it was quite strange.”
    1. On 11 September, P and Q were made the subjects of a Police Protection Order.
    1. On 12 September, both children were examined by Dr Hodes, a consultant community paediatrician at both the Royal Free Hospital and University College London Hospital.
    1. On 16 September, Dr Hodes performed a second examination of both children.
    1. On 17 September, there were further ABE interviews.

The mother’s and Mr Christie’s participation

    1. In the initial stages of the proceedings, Ms Draper had the advantage of representation by experienced Solicitors and Counsel. On 10 December 2014, at court, she dispensed with her legal team. My first involvement with the case was on 13 January 2015. Dates were secured for this hearing as follows: 17 – 20 February, 3 – 6 and 10 – 12 March. On 13 January, the indications from Ms Draper were that once again she would avail herself of legal representation.
    1. Until 26 January 2015, the mother appeared as a litigant in person assisted by McKenzie friends. On 9 February my clerk notified the parties, by email, that there would be a hearing the following day. Ms Draper failed to attend court on 10 February when mandatory and prohibitory injunctions were made against her. Ms Draper has not filed further evidence nor any schedule of the detailed findings sought as directed by my order of 20 January. Arrangements had been made for her to attend at the offices of the local authority to collect the final bundle and Practice Direction documents. Ms Draper did not attend although her email communication had suggested she would.
    1. The oral evidence began on 17 February. At 08.51 that day, my clerk received an email from Ms Draper in which she asked permission for her McKenzie friend, Belinda McKenzie to represent her and her parents’ interests in court. Ms Draper stated that she had been “prevented from being present in the court” and that Ms McKenzie had her “formal instruction to convey (her) position.” Ms McKenzie reiterated that request at the beginning of the hearing. But, as I explained to Ms McKenzie, in circumstances where the mother herself was absent, the Practice Guidance relating to McKenzie Friends expressly prohibits such an individual from acting as the litigant’s agent or from conducting the litigation on her behalf. In Ms Draper’s absence, it seemed to me that there was no proper role for Ms McKenzie.
    1. In response to my inquiry, it was established that Ms McKenzie remained in contact with Ms Draper. She assured me she would pass on a message urging the mother to participate by coming to court and informing her that the hearing would continue in her absence. Outside court on 17 February, Ms McKenzie apparently indicated to the local authority’s legal team that Ms Draper was in the process of instructing a lawyer. However, at no stage, has there been any contact with anyone purporting to act on behalf of Ms Draper.
    1. The mother has remained absent from the court. Her partner, Abraham Christie was outside the front entrance of the building on 17 February as part of the group campaigning for the “return of the ‘Whistleblower Kids’ to their Russian family.” A witness summons was issued requiring his attendance to answer questions on Friday 20 February. Attempts to serve that summons were unsuccessful.
    1. Earlier attempts at securing Mr Christie’s participation in the proceedings because of the likelihood that the local authority would seek findings against him were wholly unsuccessful. A series of communications from the local authority’s Solicitor went unanswered.
    1. It may be the mother would contend that she has been prevented from attending this hearing as the result of police action on the evening of 12 February. DS Paul Speer from Colindale police station described in evidence what happened firstly on the morning of 10 February when he spoke with Ms Draper over the telephone to discuss the material on the internet. Ms Draper told DS Speer that “it was nothing to do with (her).” She did not wish to speak to him and did not trust the police.
    1. On 12 February, police officers attended at Ms Draper’s address. Her car was on the driveway. A gentleman spoke with the police through the letter box and indicated that he was the mother’s lawyer. The police explained they were there to discuss possible offences committed under s.4 of the Harassment Act 1997. They were denied entry to the property. Whilst the police were waiting for the means to secure a forced entry, three people climbed out of a first floor window, ran along the roof line of three or four houses and climbed down onto some nearby garages where they disappeared from sight.
    1. The mother has not been seen by anyone in authority since 12 February. There are rumours that she has fled abroad. Her mother, Mrs Gareeva, told me she had had several phone conversations with her daughter. The last occasion was the day before the grandparents came to give evidence on 4 March. Ms Draper had not said where she was and had not mentioned the court hearing. Mrs Gareeva said she had tried to persuade her daughter to come back. In response, Ms Draper had said she was afraid she would be arrested and would not be able to “fight for the children.” Mrs Gareeva also said that Mr Christie who they had seen as recently as 17 February had said that they, the grandparents “should not know” where their daughter was.
    1. There is no substance in the assertion that the mother has been prevented from participating at this hearing. If she had been arrested on 12 February in connection with harassment allegations, the overwhelmingly likelihood is that she would have been released on bail enabling her to come to court on 17 February. If she had been remanded in custody, I would have been in contact with the police and prison authorities so as to make appropriate arrangements for Ms Draper’s attendance at court.
    1. As it is, Ms Draper has not communicated either with the local authority or with my clerk at any time since 17 February. Nor has she had contact with or made any inquiry about the children.
    1. Within her position statement for 26 January hearing, written for her by Ms Sabine McNeill as she later revealed, the mother made a thinly veiled threat as to what would happen if the children “were not returned to their mother and grandparents with immediate effect.” Ms Draper stated that the consequence would be “high level embarrassment.” An open letter to Theresa May, the Home Secretary, posted on the internet, explicitly states that the Position Statement was “our offer NOT to expose this scandal in exchange for returning the children.”
    1. The clear message from recent events is that whilst Ms Draper is prepared to campaign using the internet she is not willing to take part in this inquiry.

The mother’s case

    1. The mother’s case is clearly stated within those documents filed by her. Within a document entitled, “Summaries in support of the accusations made by my children,” Ms Draper says this – “The statements made …are not only exceptionally serious, but also so outrageous that they are effectively unbelievable. Hence my then partner Abraham Christie and I talked to them separately on holidays to ensure that their allegations were the truth.”
    1. According to the mother, the “most convincing argument of their believability is the utter consistency between what they are saying separately and together, on holiday, back home, when with Jean Clement Yaohirou on 04.09.14 and in the interviews with Barnet Police on 05.09.14 and 11.09.14.” Ms Draper also contends that the medical reports “clearly confirm sexual abuse over many months.” She places emphasis on children having “repeatedly expressed (their) fears of their father killing them, their nightmares and generally post traumatic stress.
    1. In relation to the children’s “supposed retractions,” the mother suggests they are inconsistent with their previous accounts over many weeks to different people. Neither their stories nor their body language on the police video of 17.09.14 are, she says, convincing.
    1. Though it did not emerge in any detail from the children’s police interviews, the mother’s claims against the father of the most serious kinds of sexual abuse extend back to the time when P and Q were babies and include grotesque assertions of repeated interference. She also claims that Mr Dearman rather than Mr Christie was responsible for the assaults which led to physical signs of injury as found by Dr Hodes last September.

The father’s response

    1. Mr Dearman was taken in evidence to the entire series of sexual and other allegations made against him. He denied there was truth in anything suggested. He does accept that the breakdown of his relationship with the mother both at the time and subsequently was acrimonious. But, said Mr Dearman, “There are two sides to the story. I’m not perfect. I’m a decent guy and a good father.” Of the mother, he said this – “When Ella is not doing crazy stuff she is a really beautiful person.”

The law

    1. The law in this area is well-known. There is only one standard of proof, namely the simple balance of probabilities. The burden of proof is on the party who makes the allegations: Re B [2008] UKHL 35. The ‘inherent probability or improbability’ of an event is a matter to be taken into account when weighing the probabilities and deciding whether, on balance, the event occurred – “common sense, not law, requires that in deciding this question regard should be had to whatever extent appropriate to inherent probabilities.”
    1. Neither the seriousness of the allegation nor the seriousness of the consequences should make any difference to the standard of proof in determining the facts. In our legal system if a judge finds it more likely than not that something did take place, then it is treated as having taken place. If he finds it more likely than not that it did not take place, then it is treated as not having taken place. He has to find for one side or the other. He is not allowed to sit on the fence. Sometimes the burden of proof will come to the rescue: the party with the burden of showing that something took place will not have satisfied him that it did. But generally speaking a judge is able to make up his mind where the truth lies without needing to rely upon the burden of proof.
    1. As the then President, Dame Elizabeth Butler-Sloss, said in Re T [2004] 2FLR 838,Evidence cannot be evaluated and assessed in separate compartments. A judge in these difficult cases must have regard to the relevance of each piece of evidence to other evidence and to exercise an overview of the totality of the evidence in order to come to the conclusion whether the case put forward by the local authority has been made out to the required standard of proof.”
    1. There was an acceptance, on all sides, that it would not have been appropriate for either child to have given oral evidence. Applying the criteria set out in Re W (Children) (Abuse : oral evidence) [2010] UKSC 12, the uncontroversial answer to the essential test – as to whether justice can be done to all parties without further questioning of the child – is that it could.
    1. Accordingly, it becomes necessary to consider how the hearsay evidence comprised within the children’s ABE interviews should be treated. It is admissible as a matter of law. Pursuant to s.4 of the Civil Evidence Act 1995, when estimating the weight to be given to hearsay evidence, the court must have regard to any circumstances from which any inference can reasonably be drawn as to the reliability or otherwise of the evidence. When a judge considers whether to rely on the statements of a child made to others … the following factors, amongst others, are relevant – the child’s age; the context in which the statement had been made; the surrounding circumstances; the child’s previous behaviour; the child’s opportunities to have had knowledge from other sources; any knowledge of a child’s predisposition to tell untruths or fantasize.

The mobile phone recordings

    1. The mobile ‘phone film clips made by the mother and Mr Christie form part of the material relied upon by Ms Draper to support the claims of exceptionally serious abuse. There are 16 short clips in all although 3 appear to be copies. It is useful to set out a reasonably full extract of the first film clip because of the way it sets the scene for the rest.
    1. The children are standing at the side of a car in a public place, possibly at an airport. P and Q look tired. There is a noticeable graze on P’s chin and, seemingly, a large bruise in the centre of her forehead.
    1. The conversation begins between the two children and Mr Christie. P and Q talk about deciding to stop touching each other and the children. P says they will “face their fear – and face our urge – and stop touching ourselves.” Mr Christie asks, “… what else are you going to stop?” Q replies, “And stop killing babies.” Mr Christie says, “You’re going to face your fear? Because fear is what?” P replies, “Fear is the mind killer.” Mr Christie then says, “And you’re going to help us catch, who are you going to help us catch?” Both children reply, “All the paedophiles.” P adds, “Papa, Mr Hollings.” Both children say, “the school.” Ms Draper interjects, “All the policemen, all the – Social Services.” Mr Christie urges the children to “speak up, speak up.” The children then repeat, “All the Social Services” and add, “All the shopkeepers – Cafcass – all the cafes, all the Pizza Express – McDonalds.”
    1. Mr Christie asks, “Who’s Cafcass? … What’s Cafcass” P and Q reply, “Cafcass is, they work with – they’re for children – they work with Social Services.” Mr Christie asks, “And what did they do to you?” Both children, one after the other, respond, “They do sex … They touch each other – they touch me and Q. They have plastic willies. And they stick it in our bottom.”
    1. Mr Christie then asks the children to say who has done this. The children reply, “Everybody does.” In response to his direct questions, “Who, who, who?” the children say, “Papa, Mr Hollings – the school …” The mother interjects, “Parents.” Q adds, “My dad’s family.” Mr Christie then says, “Tell me more people, tell me some more people because I’m interested.” P adds, “Parents, policemen –.”
    1. Mr Christie asks, “What about the teachers at the school, who are the main ones?” The children give names and then they are asked what the head teacher does. Both reply simultaneously, “And she does sex.” Next Mr Christie asks, “And what happens in the church?” P replies, “And we do sex with the baby sacrifice and eat the baby.” Mr Christie asks what she means and she says, “So we kill the baby and eat it and drink the blood from it.” Mr Christie asks Q whether that is true. He replies, “Yes. And we dance with the skulls… Baby skulls.”
    1. One of Mr Christie’s final questions is as to who kills the babies. Both children reply, “Papa.” Mr Christie then says, “And what, he gets you to help him?” Both children say, “Yes.” P adds, “So he tells us to hold our hand in a knife and then he holds his hand on our hand, so then he cuts the baby’s head off. And he tip it upside down and then we drain the blood.” Ms Draper asks, “And then what they do?” P replies, “And then we cook it and then we drink the blood and after we pick the bones, dance with the skulls…”
    1. The other film clips are similar in that the interrogation of the children is undertaken in the main by Mr Christie with occasional interventions by Ms Draper. More and more information about the activities of the cult and the identities of those involved is recorded. In the second extract, the children are instructed to “Tell the camera…. Say what you said to the camera.” Ms Draper at one point says, “So what are we going to do? We’re going to protect other babies – and children, huh? And save those children who are involved or have been forced to be involved, right?”
    1. The eighth clip starts with Mr Christie saying to Q, “Keep saying it to her.” It seems that he and the children are, by then, on a plane. Q then pleads with P to “Tell the truth.” He begs her saying, “P it’s really important. If you won’t tell the truth you’ll get yourself into big trouble … so please tell the truth.” The tenth clip continues similarly, Q fervently pleads with P to tell the truth. He says, “Mum and Papa Hemp are protecting you and you have to help them protect yourself … and to protect all of us because we’re in a group. If the group lies we’ll start to get wrong, things will start to happen wrong. And you might like, you might broke a glass, you might hurt yourself.” Mr Christie asks, “What about the babies?” Q replies, “And you might get your back your payment for the babies, you might get killed by someone.”

The 4 September recorded discussion between Abraham Christie and the children

    1. The 4 September audio recording made by Jean Clement Yaohirou on his mobile ‘phone is a key component of the material relevant to this inquiry. It provides an invaluable record of the interaction between Mr Christie and the children, the various prompts and instructions given by him to the children and, later, an insight into the mother’s attitude towards the children’s relationship with their father.
    1. At the very beginning, Mr Christie instructs the children, “Don’t tell Jean Clement any lies … Do you hear me?” He continues, “Otherwise we’ll have to lock you up in the jail. Have you got room to lock her up tonight Jean Clement? Have you got room, yes or no?” Mr Christie then laughs and says, “So tell him what you said. You deserve to be locked up for killing the baby. Listen did you kill any babies?”
    1. One of the children replies “No.” Mr Christie asks, “Who killed the babies?” A child replies, “Papa. Papa hold our hand… We put on our hand but we – ” Mr Christie then interrupts, saying “No, he puts your hand on.” The child continues, “And then he puts his hand on ours, cuts off the baby’s head. Because he’s strong – .” Mr Christie interrupts again, “But he teaches you (inaudible).”
    1. Mr Christie then explains to Jean Clement Yaohirou in the presence of the children what this is all about. He says, “… you don’t understand what I’m telling you? They are killing babies wholesale, wholesale. They are killing them, they are drinking the blood and they are eating meat, and the skulls of the babies they are tying them, four skulls here …., one here, two here, elbows here. And they are making, what about the shoes, this baby – ” One of the children says, “Yeah, skin, baby skin shoes.” Mr Christie asks “Who makes the baby skin shoes?” A man’s name is given, and in response to the question as to whether he is a shoemaker, the child answers that he is.
    1. There is a period early on when Mr Christie asks the children a series of quick fire questions, “What about the doctor, is he one as well? Answer “Yes.” What about your headmistress, is she one as well? A. “Yes” Q. “How many skulls does she wear when she’s dancing?” A. “20.” Q. So how many adults are involved then? A. “So maybe like 400, 400 plus, 450, 430, something like that.” Q. “How many skulls do they wear?” A. “20.” Mr Christie then says, “So, there’s over 400 adults and they’re all wearing 20 skulls each. Can you do the maths? Over 800 (sic).”
    1. A little later on in the discussion with Mr Yaohirou, Mr Christie introduces the notion that the mother’s three children are involved with “this cult“. He said the mother had come to him because she knew he could help her, “she didn’t know how and (he, Mr Christie) didn’t know how.” Mr Christie then said, “some of her friends that come to the house – they come to the house and they go to the school and they sex the children behind her back.” Mr Yaohirou asks if everything happened in the school. Mr Christie replies, “In the school, in the church and above at the swimming pool, at the local swimming pool.” One of the children adds, “In the house.” Mr Christie goes on to say, “Happens in school during school hours. You go there on a Wednesday and you will arrest them all. And you will take the children in the school because they do it to every child in the school and I guarantee you, out of the children, 100 of them will talk.
    1. P then says, “And they sell us for £50 each. So Papa sells me and Q.” Mr Christie adds, “At the parties. And 100 people do sex with them … 200 times 50 is how much? 10 grand, I’ve done the maths already…. What else do they sell?” One of the children starts to reply but is told to “Shut up” by Mr Christie who then says, “He makes movies. He makes snuff movies of the babies and he sells them in the Ukraine, in Russia, in Brazil, in Portugal, in Brussels, in England, he sells them all over the world.
    1. At times, Mr Christie sounded very agitated and aggressive, for example when he told Mr Yaohirou that they “have to give the (children’s) passports back to the solicitor who is a member of the paedophile group;” and also when he said “… But we’re not going to let him (the father) see them (the children). We can’t let him see them. They (sic) will kill them.”
    1. A little later, there is discussion between Mr Christie and Mr Yaohirou about the court proceedings between the mother and father. Mr Christie explains that Mr Dearman has taken the mother to court “because he wants to see his children.” Mr Christie rhetorically asks, “But why does he want to see them? To do sex to them, to make party, to sell them to other people and to make movies…. We cannot allow it to happen anymore. He must be arrested.” Mr Christie then introduces the topic of “Papa’s secret room” asking one of the children to say what is done there. But nothing is said by either child.
    1. There is evident pressure upon the children when, for example, Mr Christie asks, “Has father got keys to the house.” A. “Yeah.” Mr Christie says, “Is it a lie? Is it a lie? We do not have time for lies.”
    1. Mr Christie is directive towards the children saying, “Be quiet and go outside now, come on. Hurry up. Outside. Outside. Outside. I don’t play around, just stay there. That’s it. That’s right, discipline.” And a little later, “Sit round the table properly, son. Don’t let me tell you again, you sit down properly, thank you. Thank you. Don’t let me tell you again, sit down at the table properly.” He adds a few minutes later, “and you speak when you’re spoken to. You understand? Come on. Let’s have some respect … let’s help each other and let’s make sure that no more children get killed, ay?” One of the children adds, “And make sure papa goes to jail.”
    1. When Ms Draper joined the discussion she initially concentrates upon establishing that a letter and some drawings have been seen by Mr Yaohirou. She also relates a lengthy history of the court proceedings saying she had not wanted “to give (Mr Dearman) the children really.” She had wanted to “kind of limit (contact).” She related the incidents when there was alleged domestic violence; and indicated that Mr Dearman had been “fighting for this contact and (she) had been trying to limit it as much as possible.” One of the children interjects when the mother is struggling to describe the frequency of contact, saying it is “Every Saturday.”
    1. Ms Draper tells Mr Yaohirou of a problem she’s had with an upstairs neighbour who didn’t like it that there was a large trampoline in the communal garden. Mr Christie adds that the neighbour complained about “just about anything.” Ms Draper then says, “Apparently the same lady, she’s part of this cult as well.” There is then a discussion between one of the children and Mr Christie in which the child is asked, “Did that old lady upstairs abuse you? She never touched you did she? A. “No but Papa is friends with her … they met each other.” Mr Christie responds, “Papa is friends with her but she does not have an appetite for children?” A. “No.” Mr Christie then says, “She just, in fact she’s just an associate of the cult and she helps them and they help her.” One of the children chip in, “She doesn’t really like children.”
    1. In response to Mr Yaohirou’s question as to whether the neighbour attended the meeting, Ms Draper replied, “She was in the parties, you know, these fun set (?sex) parties.” She then asked the children, “did she … participate in, you know, killing babies and drink the blood and all this?” One of the children replied, “Yes, yes, yes, but she doesn’t, she doesn’t touch, like, she doesn’t go near the children she does, sometimes drink the blood, she does.”
    1. About two thirds of the way through the discussion, Mr Christie and Ms Draper tells Mr Yaohirou that they had only “discovered this … four weeks ago.” Mr Christie said he had his “first suspicions – about almost two months ago – when he first heard (Mr Dearman’s) voice on the Skype.” That was when he’d had his suspicions. Mr Yaohirou asked, “Oh, from the tone of his voice?” Mr Christie replied, “Yes.” He added, “And also because of the clues … from them touching the dog.” P said, “We’d be touching the dog’s privates.” Mr Christie added, “So another clue is I began to suspect heavily and then when we got to Morocco and I realised they were touching each other on a regular basis I said to them, ‘You guys are doing this regularly. How come no one’s caught you? Who else is touching you? Who is, I know someone else is touching you, you’ve learnt this from an adult, who is it? Who is it?’ And then they opened this bag [?]
    1. Mr Christie described something of the way in which the children had been questioned saying of P, “She lies, instinctively she lies.” He had believed her story, so he told Mr Yaohirou, “Because (he) had questioned her 10 times and then (he) would question him.” They had questioned the children “separately like the police do …” Ms Draper explained it had taken “four weeks to get to the – ” Mr Christie adds, “Ella and I, we will begin to discuss certain aspects of the situation – and by discussing it – we brainstorm and we come up or we work out, we work things out. What she (P) will do while we are talking, she will interrupt us – and distract us with something and send us, like attempt to send us in another complete – We say to her, ‘Be quiet … Don’t distract us anymore”
    1. The mother interjects, “Or she listen to our conversation. And she will – ” Mr Christie continues “– use the information, and he does it as well.”
    1. Towards the end of the recording there is a passage when the children and Mr Christie are all shouting, excitedly, “Kill, kill, kill.” Mr Christie urges the children to “Say it… Say it how they say it.” A. “Kill, kill, kill.” …. Mr Christie, “What’s the word that you say?” A. “Kill.” Mr Christie, “Say it more for me. I want to hear it…. I like the sound of it. Can you say it together, say it, let’s all say it together.” There is then repeated chanting of the word “Kill” and a little later of the phrase, “Kill the baby.” Once more Mr Christie urges the children on saying, “Let’s say it together. Let’s say it together. Kill the baby.” And they do.
    1. Mr Christie brings the discussion to a close saying that it is “a quarter past one” in the morning. He makes clear that he is tired, adding, “Some of us have been working on this for a month full-time, some of us haven’t slept for a month.

Conclusions in relation to the film clips and audio recording

    1. The recorded information just described – the film clips and the audio recording – are critically important in understanding how the children came to make their subsequent allegations in ABE interviews and elsewhere.
    1. Any proper investigation of sexual abuse claims will necessarily focus on the circumstances surrounding the initial complaints. It is always essential to consider how and to whom they are made; the associated emotion, if any, on the part of the complainant; the response of the individual(s) who hear the first version of the allegation and the evolution of the story.
    1. The person who has the most to contribute on the audio recording is Mr Christie. It seems from their interjections as though the children were present throughout as might be expected given that they were in Mr Yaohirou’s house.
    1. As for the very first indication of possible sexual abuse, Mr Christie’s account to Mr Yaohirou is both extraordinary and significant. To entertain suspicions about Mr Dearman from the tone of his voice over a Skype call defies reason. Moreover, senseless assumptions would seem to have been made by Mr Christie and the mother if, in fact, the children had touched the dog and were “touching each other.” To believe that children who demonstrate curiosity about and touch their own, the dog’s and their sibling’s genital areas must have, or probably have, been sexually abused is plainly ridiculous. It either shows alarming ignorance about normal childish behaviour or, as is much more likely here, wilful determination to distort innocent activities into something sinister and depraved.
    1. On Mr Christie’s and Ms Draper’s own account, the children were subjected to ten separate interrogations over a period of four weeks interspersed with ‘brainstorming’ sessions in which Mr Christie and Ms Draper came up with or worked out what they – and possibly the children – put forward as having happened. In the context of what P and Q later describe was done to them by Mr Christie in that four week period, it is clear that they were effectively persecuted so as to compel them to tell false stories.
    1. There is every reason to conclude that over the course of the four weeks spent abroad last summer, the children’s minds were filled with ever more elaborate, fantastical and sexually explicit stories. Over time, more and more detail was supplied to the central core of the fabricated story. ‘Brainstorming‘ brought about expanded versions of events. More and more individuals were named as participants within the cult. Venues for abusive activities grew in number, spread across Hampstead and Highgate. Ever more sexually explicit details were woven in to the fabric of the fantasies in an attempt to make the children’s accounts believable and seemingly authentic.
    1. By the time the children arrived at the airport for the journey back to England, at Mr Christie’s and Ms Draper’s instigation, they were able to ‘speak to camera’ about the stories concocted during the brainstorming. The obvious purpose of the film clips was to provide ‘proof.’ It was part of a deliberate plan by Mr Christie and Ms Draper. The children do as they are told. They do so forthrightly, without inhibition and with apparent conviction.
    1. The key speakers within the audio recording made by Mr Yaohirou are Mr Christie and later Ms Draper. The majority of the information conveyed comes from or is prompted by them. The children are asked many, many leading questions. Most of the time, they are simply required to join in with the accounts being supplied by Mr Christie.
    1. Even in the presence of Jean Clement Yaohirou, Mr Christie’s relationship with the children, at times, was harsh and coercive. He had known their mother by then for about four months, had assumed a quasi parent role and taken it upon himself to enforce discipline.
    1. Another significant feature of the audio recording relates to the intense animation generated by Mr Christie when he is urging the children to chant, over and over again, “Kill the babies … Kill, kill, kill … Let’s say it together … I like the sound of it!” The children, unsurprisingly, join in with the chanting and Mr Christie’s evident excitement.
    1. It is a curious fact that prior to the launch of these proceedings, no police officer had listened to the audio recording made by Jean Clement Yaohirou or watched the film clips of the children. DI Cannon made inquiries at my request to discover that DC Rogers, the member of his team who received the film clips and the audio recording from Mr Yaohirou, had sent them to a property store in Chingford. The focus would appear to have been upon arranging almost immediate ABE interviews.
    1. I say no more at this stage than that the police and social services inquiry could have taken an entirely different course if attention had been given to those recordings. At the very least, the questions asked of P and Q at interview would have been directed towards other areas of interest.

The ABE interviews of 5 and 11 September

    1. The ABE interviews of 5 and 11 September are remarkable for a number of reasons. Firstly because the children describe a number of detailed allegations of ritualistic abuse; and second because they do so articulately, with good eye contact and without a trace of distress. P can barely wait for the next question before she is chipping in with an answer. Both children are entirely ‘matter of fact’ about what they say has happened. There is no trace of any emotional arousal.
    1. The children both describe killing and eating babies, drinking blood, being anally penetrated and being injected with drugs. They provide details of all the people who have been involved – all the teachers, parents of children at the school, social services. P says that the killing of babies is done with “cleavers“; the blood from the babies is poured into a “silver bowl” and she and her brother are “sold for £50 each every single day.” When P is asked what sex is, she initially says it’s when they are hit with a big plastic stick between their legs. Then she says “real sex is, like, they get plastic willies, they stick it in our bum, that’s what kind of sex they do.” When asked about the people involved in these activities, P suggests the police should “catch the whole school, catch all the staff there.” She adds a little later that “all the Hampstead schools do it.
    1. Q tells the police all about the plastic willies, who makes them and how his dad has the biggest because he’s “the boss of every single thing.” Q says that his bottom bleeds and that the last time this happened was on the last day of school when there was a big party. All the children, says Q, “do sex to him;” and at the end of the party his Dad “kills babies and eats the meat.” Like P, Q suggests that “all the teachers, (his) dad’s friends … and also the parents who are really mean” to him are involved.
    1. When P was re-interviewed by DC Martin on 11 September she described how Mr Christie would give her and Q “soft licks … it’s like a spoon hit … because we keep on lying … the only way that we could tell is by him hurting us.” Asked what her Mum said about that, P answered, “She thought it was a good idea. Because then after, when we had licks and we have water torture … So us so that we could tell.” According to P, her Mum thought it was “a good idea he gets loads of jugs of warm water – spills it on us, he says that he’s blessing to do that so that (they) could tell.
    1. P also said that she and Q would call Mr Christie “Papa Hemp” and that they made soup out of “you know the weed that you smoke … it’s real name is hemp.” She also gave many more details about the places where the killings of babies occurred as well as descriptions of the implements and objects used by the group. She seems completely immersed in the story as she described a secret room in the church where secret things are kept. She says, “It just looks like … patterned, patterned, like imagine this …. It’s like, imagine there’s this big like cupboard here – and it looks like a wardrobe. They’ve got loads of wooden patterns on … they got a big key lock there.” The descriptions go on and on. P has a seemingly endless supply of information to convey. The more questions she’s asked the more expansive she becomes.
    1. Q’s interview on the same day comprises explicit details of penetrative abuse upon him and sexual acts he was made to perform upon others. He gave an account of “rubbing” until “the white stuff” comes out of boys. Q continued, “And it’s really dangerous, my Mum told me never put it on a girl’s privates because … if I put it in my sister’s privates she’s create a baby … but the baby would have a problem and it might be blind and it might walk like this and … keep falling over… it might have no teeth” Asked what the white stuff felt like, Q said it “just feels like wee … it’s like a seed. … You have to have a microscope to see it.” Q also said that “lots” of this white stuff came out of his willy, “Like you can fill up like half of a bottle – a normal, like this big bottle.”
    1. Like P, Q had no difficulty in supplying an endless stream of information about the activities of the group. He said the school nurse had given him a sleeping injection if he screamed too much. His father came to the school “every day” and “he will do sex to us and they also do sex to the other children.” Like P, Q was able to supply a great deal of detail about secret rooms, cupboards, secret doors, locks, keys and killing babies in the kitchen.

Conclusions in relation to the 5 and 11 September interviews

    1. Again and again, as I watched the interviews of 5 and 11 September my sense was that the children, for the most part, were in the realms of fantasy. There was an urgency and an excitement about what they were saying as the detail became ever more elaborate. It was as if they had been transported away from reality and into dream land. There were obvious parallels in what P was saying with some aspects of the story line in C.S. Lewis’ ‘The Lion the Witch and the Wardrobe.’
    1. There was no change in the presentation of either child when they described apparently horrific acts as experienced by them and others. There did not appear to be any emotional connection with what they were saying except that they seemed energised.
    1. The other significant deduction is that material supplied by P relating to the physical abuse of both children by Mr Christie in order to get them to talk should alert any sensible observer to the potential for false reporting.

The physical examinations and associated statements made by the children

    1. Both children were examined on 12 and 16 September 2014 by Dr Hodes.
    1. Arising out of the first examination, it was reported that P and Q had a number of scars and abrasions consistent with their assertions of having been physically abused by Mr Christie. The examination of P’s perianal area was performed in the left lateral position – as recommended by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health Review of March 2008. Dr Hodes identified 3 linear scars extending almost to the anal verge as well as anal laxity after 10 seconds of gentle buttock traction. There was, she said, no reflex anal dilatation.
    1. As for Q, Dr Hodes identified one anal fissure scar and no reflex anal dilatation. In relation to both children, Dr Hodes concluded there were physical signs which supported the children’s allegations of physical and sexual abuse.
    1. The second examinations occurred on 16 September. The resulting reports written that day, relate that the purpose was to meet the foster carer and children again for further history and medical examination, as well as for police photography of the injuries. When she gave evidence, Dr Hodes described more of the rationale for asking to re-examine the children’s genital areas. She said, “I’ve got this allegation which has been made to several people…” Dr Hodes had thought about it over the weekend and, “on reflection believed (she) should have examined the children in the ‘knee chest’ position.” She added, “it’s not what you do it’s how you do it.”
    1. On 16 September, each child provided Dr Hodes with graphic details of how they claimed to have been sexually abused – including the use of Vaseline on their “bottoms and willies.” They both said they’d experienced bleeding afterwards and said they were given a wet tissue with which to wipe themselves.
    1. Dr Hodes’ further genital examination of P revealed, “persistent reflex anal dilatation during buttock separation.” The three linear healed scars were confirmed. In relation to Q, Dr Hodes “confirms the physical findings of a scar in the anus from a healed fissure, consistent with inflicted injury from a blunt penetrating force that he has alleged.”
    1. Dr Hodes wrote a further report on 22 September, 5 days after the children had retracted their allegations. She repeated her physical findings and then comments upon the retraction in these terms – “Until a study in 2007 it was mostly thought that recantation rates were related to the certainty with which child sexual abuse is substantiated and that retraction of true allegations is rare and that when retraction occurs the allegation is likely to be false. Lindsay et al found a recantation rate of 16.9% in 257 substantiated cases of CSA which had relied on formal interviews by police and social services. This is four times higher than previously reported in the most often cited study by Bradley and Wood in 1996. Analyses of their data found predictors for recantation included younger age child, a parent figure being the perpetrator and a lack of support from the non offending care giver.” In summary, said Dr Hodes, “recantation does occur in a significant number of cases especially with the predictors that are present in both children.”
    1. In her concluding “Summary”, Dr Hodes states that both children have physical signs of sexual abuse that support their allegations; they have symptoms of post traumatic stress; and it is her opinion “the extensive and detailed accounts given by both children, repeated to different professionals, contain details of sexual acts that such young children would need to have had some sort of direct experience (sic).
    1. On 26 September, Dr Hodes and a Senior House Officer met with Ms Draper “for further information regarding the children’s medical history.” A little over two pages of the four page report are devoted to the “allegations allegedly made by P and Q to their mother.” The main focus of the interview was upon sexual complaints. Ms Draper claimed that Mr Dearman rather than Abraham Christie was responsible for the children’s physical injuries as documented by Dr Hodes.
    1. Subsequently, Dr Hodes took this case to a peer review meeting. As explained in her Amended Medical Report of 4 December 2014, her anogenital findings in relation to both children were then significantly amended. The previously confirmed fissures were said to be irregularities in the ruggae (folds, wrinkles or ridges) and their clinical significance was described as “possible normal variant.”
    1. The only persisting physical sign post peer review was reflex anal dilatation in P which, so Dr Hodes, maintains is “consistent with her allegation of the blunt penetrating force to her anus i.e. sexual abuse.” In evidence she referred to her colleagues agreeing it was “abnormal and striking.” It is a sign which is “rarely seen.” In her written report she also said, “There is evidence in the literature that the absence of physical signs neither supports not (sic) refutes an allegation of anal penetration. In this case it was alleged that lubrication was used which adds to the probability of abuse.
    1. Dr Hodes’ very last report – of 5 February 2015 – was written in response to written questions. She states that “the overall situation is such that it is my view that the allegations / accounts need to be taken very seriously despite the confusing picture.” Dr Hodes’ view is that whilst it is a matter for the court to decide, she recommends “a series of more detailed observations and assessments over a longer period of time by a psychiatrist or psychotherapist with a particular interest and expertise in child maltreatment including sexual abuse.”
    1. Her oral evidence surrounding the importance of the physical sign found in P amounted to this – “It was there – clear – it is rarely seen … it is not diagnostic but is associated with anal abuse – part of the jigsaw.”

Conclusions in relation to Dr Hodes’ evidence

    1. Overall, I feel impelled to observe that the level of Dr Hodes’ involvement in this case was unusual. I remind myself of the several cautionary considerations when a court is considering the contributions made by experts as comprised within Re U; Re B [2004] EWCA Civ 567 – i) The cause of an injury or an episode that cannot be explained scientifically remains equivocal. … iv) The court must always be on guard against the over-dogmatic expert, the expert whose reputation or amour propre is at stake, or the expert who has developed a scientific prejudice.
    1. I was dismayed to find, twenty seven years after the Report of the Inquiry into Child Abuse in Cleveland 1987 that Dr Hodes adopted so definite a view as to the likelihood of sexual abuse to which she then adhered notwithstanding several noteworthy contraindications. One of the cardinal messages from Cleveland was as to the importance of multi agency collaboration so as to understand amongst many other things the context in which suspicions arose.
    1. In her very last report, Dr Hodes said that “the current evidence is that prolonged reflex anal dilatation (the finding in P) is associated with anal abuse;” and cited the Royal College of Paediatrics 2008 Review. The Review also reflects, I would observe, that there continues to be a debate about the significance of RAD. It is a sign seen in up to a third of children with a history of anal abuse although it can also be seen in small numbers of children selected for non abuse (the evidence base is very limited and unclear on this).
    1. I was troubled too that the children were subjected to intimate examinations to search for further signs twice in five days. I regret that Dr Hodes was not asked exactly what she hoped to gain by the second examination positioning the children differently. The 2008 Review suggests, arising out of Myrhe’s 2001 study, that there are differences in the muscle tone in the two positions.
    1. I consider it unusual, to say the least, that Ms Draper was invited to discuss her version of the history at a lengthy separate interview with the paediatrician and her SHO at a time when the social work team as well as the police were undertaking inquiries.
    1. I was perturbed that Dr Hodes was prepared to conclude and then confirm the presence of fissures when subsequent peer review resulted in them being described as a normal variant. Similarly, I found it curious that even although the physical signs had reduced in number to a single finding of RAD in P, nonetheless Dr Hodes adhered to her view saying that lubrication was used which “added to the probability of abuse.”
    1. When confronted, in cross examination, with the evidence about Ms Draper’s treatment of the children with enemas, Dr Hodes did not pause before saying, “No, it does not affect my conclusions. It’s another possible cause of trauma.”
    1. I was bemused by Dr Hodes’ suggestion of further psychiatric or psychotherapeutic intervention when she knew that Dr Clare Sturge – one of the leading and most experienced child and adolescent psychiatrists in the country – had already supplied two reports, the first arising out of her assessment of the children after interview.

The 17 September retractions

    1. DC Martin was asked to explain why the decision was made to interview the children again on 17 September. It is Ms Draper’s case that between 11 and 17 September the police and the children’s foster carers placed pressure upon them to change their story. DC Martin said that prior to collecting P and Q from the foster home he had not met either foster parent. DC Martin was accompanied by DC Carl Savage, who had not previously met the children. Neither of them had any conversation with the foster parents relating to the allegations. If anything of note had been said by anyone prior to the ABE interviews it would have been recorded.
    1. The decision to have a third interview arose because “of the sheer amount of stuff” emerging from the second, said DC Martin, and for clarification. During the drive to the interviewing suite, according to DC Savage, the children had said something along the lines of ‘they had made up the allegations and it was all to do with the Mask of Zorro.
    1. As emerges from the interviews themselves, both P and Q did indeed withdraw their claims, all of them. P said that Abraham had told them what to say. She had told him that E, one of her female friends, had touched her – Abraham had said, “No, it’s your Dad.” P said that “it was all made up,” everything about the school, the church, the swimming pool; none of it was true. Abraham, she said, “had hurt (her) and used bad words … ‘ a stupid little cunt“. She was scared and worried. Her mother had not stopped Abraham “because she loves him so much.” P described him as “an idiot.” As for her father, P said he is “fine and good.”
    1. Q’s interview was initially somewhat confused. He said, “Yeah there is still some of the babies killed … Not much (are there babies killed)…. I lied about it because he (Mr Christie) made me say it.” A little later, Q said, “None of it was real…. The plastic willies were not true.” Abraham had “slapped (his ear) as hard as he could.” Q said, “I hate Abraham” and he did not want to see him again. He described how his mother “would be really angry with (him).

Dr Sturge’s assessment of the children

    1. Dr Sturge assessed the children on 5 November 2014. P related that Mr Christie would tell her that “for lying she would go to prison for 20 years and never see her grandparents or Mum again.” P commented, “Abraham loved my Mum so much. He even blamed her for being in the gang.” He had kept on asking her, “Any other people.” He had threatened her with the spoon and poked her so hard in the chin with it that she had a big mark. When Abraham had asked her about plastic willies in her bottom, she had denied this. He had said, “How come Q told me.” The Vaseline had been, said P, Q’s idea. He knew one of her friends used it (for her lips). P said, “Thing is, Abraham came up with stuff we didn’t know and came up with ideas too.” Abraham was always saying Q was a good boy for telling him things and that she was lying and would go to jail.
    1. Dr Sturge asked P what the word ‘paedophile’ means. P replied that Abraham had said her Dad is a paedophile and explained what it meant. P had only a minimal understanding of ‘the facts of life’ and sex was “inappropriate stuff like touching each other in the privates.” Dr Sturge asked P about living with her mother. She said, not at the moment – “I feel angry with her, letting Abraham do all that stuff to us.” She had one question of Dr Sturge, could she live with her foster mother until she is 14 or 15?
    1. Q responded immediately to Dr Sturge’s question as to whether he knew why she was seeing him. He said, “cos Abraham said something I never did and he forced me to say it, he was really mean to us.” Abraham had accused him of touching his sister in the private parts which he “never, ever did.” And he forced them to say their Dad touches them. Abraham had also forced them to say they kill babies. Q said he had wanted Abraham to stop hitting him, “I was scared for him to hit me.” At that Q’s face creased up and he began to cry quietly. “He kept asking us questions again, and again and again.” His mother had started to believe him. Q said, “It upsetted me” and he became even more distressed.
    1. Q described how Abraham had been asking them all day. He had even woken them up and hit them. The hitting was if they didn’t wake up and talk. Asked how his mother had reacted, Q said “she didn’t mind.” He was asked about living with his mother and replied that “if she still believes it, (he) wouldn’t want to live with her.” Later he described with great vehemence that he would never live with his Mum while Abraham was still in the British Isles. She would just phone him and he’d come to their house. Q also said, spontaneously, that he hates Abraham, describing him as “the worst person I’ve ever met.”
    1. Dr Sturge asked Q directly about Vaseline. He said, “He (Abraham) forced me to say my Dad puts Vaseline on my willy – plastic and normal ones.” Q added, as if puzzled, that Vaseline is used to rub on your hands when they are sore. He was clear that Abraham had used the Vaseline word first. Asked about seeing willies, Q said he and a friend at school had shown each other their willies in the toilet.
    1. Q was distressed again when talking about having to stand when cold water was poured on him – “(dressed) just in our pants – he thought we was lying – when I cried and said my Mum never touched us, he said, ‘If you’re crying you’re lying.‘” By then, according to Dr Sturge, Q was crying in a very distressed way.

Demeanour on 17 September and during assessment by Dr Sturge

    1. The children’s demeanour during the 17 September interview with the police and in their discussion with Dr Sturge is a factor of relevance to the inquiry.
    1. It seemed to me that on 17 September P in particular was relieved to be unburdening herself and revealing the truth. Some of the ongoing and quite complex processes in Q’s mind were manifest. At the outset, it seemed as though he was still confused but gradually he, too, became clear in saying he had been forced to make untrue claims. There was none of the frantic scramble to provide answers to questions as in the earlier interviews. Both children were a great deal calmer.
    1. Q was evidently and genuinely connected on an emotional level with the content of his revelations to Dr Sturge.

Overall conclusions in relation to Ms Draper’s allegations

    1. In addition to my findings already made both within the opening paragraphs of the judgment and subsequently it is necessary to consider how and the extent to which the children have been harmed.
    1. Both P and Q have suffered significantly. Their innocence was invaded. Their minds were scrambled. Their grip on reality was imperilled. They were introduced to sexual practices of which they had no real understanding at a time when they should have been shielded from such things.
    1. Perhaps most significantly of all, the children were made to absorb and repeat on film and in interview grotesque claims against so many blameless people including the father whom they love.
    1. I have no doubt but that the physical injuries described by the children as having been inflicted by Abraham Christie were, indeed, caused by him. I reject as baseless Ms Draper’s suggestion that instead Mr Dearman was responsible. A straightforward conclusion given that neither child had seen him for about three months at the time of Dr Hodes’ examination and subsequent police photography. Those photographs clearly show recent rather than healed injuries.
    1. There is good evidence to find, as I do, that in the three months leading to their reception into care both children ingested cannabis. Scientific analysis revealed that both children had metabolites of the drug (THC) in their hair – a finding which could not be explained by ingestion of ‘hemp based products’ because none would contain sufficient levels of cannabis to produce the metabolite. It is impossible for the analysts to say whether the children had ingested the drug whether by passive smoking or oral ingestion. However, the children were clear in interview when describing the way hemp was made into soup using the juicer.
    1. The amounts found in the children’s hair samples suggested their ingestion had not been, as Ms Cave of Lextox described, a “one-off” but regular over the period. It is hard to imagine how any parent could deliberately expose a child to an illegal drug. But it may have been part of Mr Christie’s and Ms Draper’s plan so as to gain the children’s compliance. I need hardly say now profoundly damaging it was to administer illegal drugs to a child.
    1. The posting of film clips featuring the children speaking about sexual matters has exposed P and Q to the potential for very serious embarrassment and humiliation in the years ahead maybe, even, throughout the whole of the rest of their lives. Doubtless they will grow and develop so that their visual appearances will alter. But it may be difficult to shield them from unwelcome interest and reputational damage unless radical steps to divert attention are taken.

Final thoughts about the investigation

    1. If there is one key message at the end of this inquiry it is that it is not and never will be sufficient to consider just one or two evidential features in isolation. It is always necessary to take account of all the material not just a selection. Those who arrived at their own early conclusions on the basis of partial material were woefully misguided.
    1. The individuals who have watched online film clips, read online articles and believed in the allegations would do well to reflect that ‘things may not be what they seem’ and that it is all too easy to be duped on the basis of partial information. There are many campaigning people, sadly, who derive satisfaction from spreading their own poisonous version of history irrespective of whether it is true or not.
    1. Proper consideration should always be given to the context within which allegations are made. In this instance, years of court conflict over the issue of contact and Ms Draper’s antipathy for Mr Dearman provided fertile territory for the creation of false allegations and their reiteration by the children.
    1. The history of the key protagonists may also play a part in untangling the intrigue so as to get at the truth. Mr Christie has a background of criminality for drugs offences, violence and dishonesty. More recently, he received a police caution for assaulting his adolescent son.
    1. Finally, that it is never possible to predict how a court inquiry of this kind will unfold. Against the preconceptions of many including my own, when the maternal grandparents gave evidence on 4 March 2015 they made their views about the allegations plain. They consider them to be “total nonsense and fantasies.”
    1. This is a summary of my salient findings –

•     Neither child has been sexually abused by any of the following – Ricky Dearman, teachers at Christchurch Primary School Hampstead, the parents of students at that school, the priest at the adjacent church, teachers at any of the Hampstead or Highgate schools, members of the Metropolitan Police, social workers employed by the London Borough of Camden, officers of Cafcass or anyone else mentioned by Ms Draper or Mr Christie.
•    The children’s half brother, his father and stepmother – Will and Sarah Draper – are likewise exonerated of any illicit or abusive acts involving the children.
•    There was no satanic or other cult at which babies were murdered and children were sexually abused.
•    All of the material promulgated by Ms Draper now published on the internet is nothing other than utter nonsense.
•    The children’s false stories came about as the result of relentless emotional and psychological pressure as well as significant physical abuse. Torture is the most accurate way to describe what was done by Mr Christie in collaboration with Ms Draper.
•    Both children were assaulted by Mr Christie by being hit with a metal spoon on multiple occasions over their head and legs, by being pushed into walls, punched, pinched and kicked. Water was poured over them as they knelt semi-clothed.
•    The long term emotional and psychological harm of what was done to the children is incalculable. The impact of the internet campaign is likely to have the most devastating consequences for P and Q.


 

BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWFC/HCJ/2015/26.html

Posted in Uncategorized

WHISTLEBLOWER BRIAN PEAD ARRESTED [NOW RELEASED] – BOTH HAMPSTEAD CHILD ABUSE PETITIONS CLOSED DOWN BY GOVERNMENT

 

stealing children”

WHISTLEBLOWER Brian Pead arrested last night; pls call 0300 333 4444 and ask about him at Southend Police Station

Brian Pead is innocent

Never underestimate the power of the enemy. But it’s hard to imagine HOW far ‘they’ go in their determination to hide crimes and cover them up with more crimes:

  • in Wales, Police entered the home of a family and took money from the safe without giving a receipt
  • their computer and phones were confiscated ‘until after the trial’
  • the mother of the child was imprisoned with the charge of ‘conspiracy to abduct a child’

In Southend on Sea, Brian Pead was arrested unlawfully last night when reporting a crime of Unlawful Entry and Harassment of a 75-year-old lady. Instead, he was arrested for ‘not providing his personal details as required’. His co-author who was with him went to get the evidence – didn’t make a difference.

The Rule of Law has not only been replaced by the Rule of Money: the Innocent get charged, while the Criminals rule!

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged ,

PATRICK CULLINANE: IBRG NEWSLETTER: DESCRIBING “CORRUPTION UNLIMITED” IN THE UK 17 MARCH 2015

IRISH IN BRITAIN REPRESENTATION GROUP (IBRG) 

Working Against all the Odds!!

<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><><<<<<<<<<<<<<<> 

Harrow Weald

Harrow

Middlesex, HA3 5NP

17 March 2015

FAO: JCIO

Sir/Madam,

Judges sacked for watching porn + OFFICIAL STATEMENT

17 March 2015 Last updated at 13:59

http://www.judicialconduct.judiciary.gov.uk/documents/JCIO_press_statement_-_4_judges_-_17_March_2015.pdf

When are the 13 Zionist ‘Judges’ in my case below going to be SACKED and IMPRISONED for CONSPIRING and denying me my guaranteed Common Law Rights to a Trial by my Peers under Article 39 of Magna Carta 1215, which is the Common Law of the Land? –  Trial by ‘Judge’ is High Treason.

In the public interest and the interest of justice it is imperative that ALL these ‘Judges’ are JAILED immediately, as they have corrupted Britain to the core.

I await your speedy reply.

Yours truthfully,
Patrick Cullinane, Common Law Lawyer and Victim of Jew Process in the UK’s COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts.

From: Patrick Cullinane Subject: Mayra Pooley-Reyes – IBRG Authorisation Consent Form attached: – Plus unlawful THREATS by ‘Landlord’ to EVICT my clients’ in the morning – 17/03/15: –

 

IRISH IN BRITAIN REPRESENTATION GROUP (IBRG) 

Working Against all the Odds!!

<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><><<<<<<<<<<<<<<> 

42 Augustine Road

Harrow Weald

Harrow

Middlesex, HA3 5NP

17 March 2015

Your Ref: HPU/GB 

FAO: Mary Harpley Chief Executive, Mrs K Shandhu and George Balogun

London Borough of Hounslow

Civic Centre

Lampton Road

Hounslow

Greater London, TW3 4DN

Tel: 020 8583 2000

Re: My Clients’ Mayra Pooley-Reyes and her young Family

-v-

THE CORRUPTION OF BRITAIN

Further to my telephone conversation yesterday at noon with Mr ‘Ward’  – Simon ‘Wood’, as he gave me TWO surnames.  The call ended with this Public Servant putting the phone down on me.  I am making a claim and, I want this incident fully investigated, as I was discussing very serious matters.

Peruse the THREE attached documents, which are self-explanatory.  Why is Hounslow Council ringing messages through to the staff at Maharaja (Cockroach infested) ‘Hotel’ for Mayra Pooley-Reyes without her authorisation?  – Has Mayra Pooley-Reyes and her Family got any rights?  – Please supply the RECORDS / DATES when this Flea and Cockroach infested premises was inspected by Hounslow Council in the last five-years.

I informed ‘Ward’ or ‘Wood’ that my clients were being TERRORISED by the Police, Courts and Councils, that they were the victims of a massive CONSPIRACY where the Police had broken into her own home and assaulted her breaking her back.  – ‘Ward’ or ‘Wood’ assured me that he would be reporting this to the Police, as he was duty bound to do so.  Therefore, we now need proof that ‘Ward’ or ‘Wood’ reported this CRIME to the Police, and the name of the Police Station, as the TERRORISM has NOT stopped: –

At around 6:00pm last evening, I was contacted by my client, Mayra Pooley-Reyes in a very stressed state; saying that she was visited by an Asian man claiming to be the Landlord, who said that he was EVICTING her and her Family in the morning at 10:00am on to the STREET?  –  Was ‘Ward’ or ‘Wood’ behind this UNLAWFUL attack by the Asian ‘landlord’ on the Pooley-Reyes Family at 6:00pm on the 16 March 2015 when he knew everything was SHUT for the night to cause maximum STRESS and PANIC, which could have triggered a heart attack and DEATH?

It is obvious that ‘Ward’ or ‘Wood’ told me a pack of LIES, as he said that he was going to sort this matter out immediately.  It is also obvious that ‘Ward’ or ‘Wood’ is part of the CONSPIRACY against the Pooley-Reyes Family to do them FURTHER serious harm.

At around 7:00PM, I rang 999 and reported this CRIME to Officer: 724 024   –  Cad No:  7974 – 16/03/2015

If this Asian man is the landlord, is he fit to be a landlord, putting vulnerable Families on to the STREET on behalf of Hounslow Council, the Police and the Courts without Due Process of the Law of the Land = Magna Carta 1215 – Article 39?

Why was Mayra Pooley-Reyes and her young Family EVICTED from their own HOME; 43 Sunnybank, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 7DY by the Police without Due Process in a Common Law Court of Law: = Trial by their Peers / Equals?  –

Why was Patrick Cullinane EVICTED from his own HOME; 48 Girton Avenue, Kingsbury, London, NW9 9SU by the Police without Due Process in a Common Law Court of Law: = Trial by my Peers / Equals?  –

A Foreign Power (FRIENDS OF ISRAEL) have infiltrated the English and Irish Government Organisations’ and HIJACKED the Common Law of the Land: –

Video – Channel 4 UK – Broadcast November 16, 2009

Dispatches: Inside Britain’s Israel Lobby

Dispatches investigates one of the most powerful and influential political lobbies in Britain, which is working in support of the interests of the State of Israel.

Political commentator Peter Oborne investigates how accountable, transparent and open to scrutiny the lobby is, particularly in regard to its funding and financial support of MPs.

 

Oborne examines how the lobby operates from within parliament and the tactics it employs behind the scenes when engaging with print and broadcast media.    (Notwithstanding, Six Jewish Companies Control 96% of the World’s Media, denying us Christians’ a VOICE)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0E70BwA7xgU

The Press is a key weapon in a just society to expose wrong-doing. – However, NOT if 96% of the World’s Media is Controlled by Six Jewish Companies promoting the TALMUD and covering-up Magna Carta 1215, and the Constitution of Éire, which guarantees Due Process and the Rule of Law to EVERY Sovereign Irish citizen: –   http://bit.ly/1Ke81sd

Patrick Cullinane On The Common Law Court Of Wales Show

On Thursday 26th February 2015

7pm UK Time 2pm Eastern USA Canada Time.

Broadcast in News  – 1 week ago

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/freedomtalkradionews/2015/02/26/patrick-cullinane-on-the-common-law-court-of-wales-show

How was I Bankrupted when I had NO debt and the Inland Revenue owing me over £5,000 in tax rebates? –

Report by Phillip Inman of The Guardian, Jobs & Money, Saturday May 10, 2003:

This man was right all along

Patrick Cullinane has fought a running battle with the Inland Revenue since the day he was accused of not paying income tax. And the taxman fought dirty – so dirty he lost his home and nearly lost his sanity. Now, a batch of confidential documents reveal fatal weaknesses in the Revenue’s case. Phillip Inman reports

http://www.theguardian.com/money/2003/may/10/tax.scamsandfraud

Report by Phillip Inman of The Guardian, Financial Section, Monday 25 August 2008

Evidence put to the high court shows that Cullinane, far from owing tax, was due a rebate.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2008/aug/25/tax.taxandspending1 

The 13 High Court Judges who conspired in Patrick Cullinane’s case to terrorise and defraud him in the interests of the State of Israel: – 

  1. Mr Registrar Pimm
  2. Mr Registrar Simmonds
  3. Mr Registrar Baister
  4. Mr Justice Jacobs
  5. Mr Justice Neuberger – Promoted for Crime:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/law/2012/jul/12/lord-neuberger-appointed-supreme-court-president
  6. Lord Justice Stewart-Smith  –  Also covered-up the Hillsborough disaster. Mr Jonathan Parker
  7. Mr Justice Hart
  8. Master Leslie
  9. Mrs Justice Ebsworth
  10. Mr Justice Ferris
  11. Mr Justice Pumfrey
  12. Mr Justice Mann

THIRTEEN High Court Judges denied me my Constitutional Common Law rights under Magna Carta 1215 to a Trial by Jury:  =  HIGH TREASON

Due process and Trial by Jury is the lawful requirement that the state must respect all of the lawful rights that are owed to a person. Due process balances the power of law of the land and protects individual persons from it. When a government harms a person without following the exact course of the law, this constitutes a due-process violation, which offends against the rule of law.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Due_process

Magna Carta 1215 = Trial by Jury = FOREVER:

Magna Carta (1215) {Article 38} reads:  “In future no official shall put anyone to trial merely on his own testimony, without reliable witnesses produced for this purpose.”

{Article 39} reads:  “No freeman shall be arrested or imprisoned or deprived of his freehold or outlawed or banished or in any way ruined, nor will we take or order action against him, except by the lawful judgment of his equals (Trial by Jury) and according to the law of the land.”

{Article 40} reads: “To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay Right or Justice.”

{Article 45} reads: “We will appoint as justices, constables, sheriffs, or bailiffs only such as know the law of the realm and mean to observe it well.

http://www.iamm.com/magnaarticles.htm

Therefore, the Rule of Judge, Police, Magistrate or Local Government; is NOT the Rule of Law!  –  It is TREASON!

Steve Sigmond supports your right to a trial by jury.

Published on 18 Oct 2012

As American citizens, we are entitled to trial by jury.   –   (Also as Irish & English citizens, we are entitled to Trial by Jury)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nd2n0KsEd6w

The Pope’s Decree:  http://bit.ly/1xwzEm8

The Independent: By Tom Harper, Investigations Reporter on Friday 10 January 2014

The corruption of Britain: UK’s key institutions infiltrated by criminals 

Secret report shows how organised crime infiltrated judicial system as well as police with prison service and HM Revenue & Customs also compromised

Tiberius disclosed that the Met interviewed the journalist who wrote the story after the murder of Solly Nahome, a Jewish money launderer credited as the “brains” behind the Adams’ criminal empire.

The Turkish drug dealer was later convicted and told police he was an HMRC informant. He said he knew of “corrupt contacts within the police” and had a Cyprus-based customs officer as a handler who “took money off him”.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/the-corruption-of-britain-uks-key-institutions-infiltrated-by-criminals-9052617.html 

Now you/we know why the Police and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) are NOT prosecuting FRAUD: 

The Independent: By Tom Harper, Investigations Reporter on Sunday 12 January 2014

Revealed: How gangs used the Freemasons to corrupt police

Gangsters able to recruit police officers through secret society, says investigation for Scotland Yard

Secret networks of Freemasons have been used by organised crime gangs to corrupt the criminal justice system, according to a bombshell Metropolitan Police report leaked to The Independent.

Freemasonry has long been suspected of having members who work in the criminal justice system – notably the judiciary and the police.

The political establishment and much of the media often dismiss such ideas as the work of conspiracy theorists

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/revealed-how-gangs-used-the-freemasons-to-corrupt-police-9054670.html 

The Police in the UK are so INFILTRATED by FREEMASONS and Zionist GANGSTERS that they treat blatant FRAUD by Government Organisations against We the People as a CIVIL matter: –

The police have told Patrick Cullinane on VIDEO that the robbery of his property, home and possessions is a civil matter: –

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xeI1xO4luPg

It is imperative that you peruse my THREE comments on here: –

The Spectator: by Neil Darbyshire on 7 March 2015   –   278 Comments

The shocking truth about police corruption in Britain

It’s a growing problem. But they’re hunting whistleblowers instead

http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/9461322/the-shocking-truth-about-police-corruption-in-britain/

Which?   Will you help us change this?

Just take the case of Which? supporter Jackie who was left distressed by the treatment her father received in hospital when he broke his back. He wasn’t properly washed or fed even though he couldn’t move. Despite Jackie raising problems with the staff, no action was taken. 

It’s experiences like this that leave many people thinking it’s not even worth making the effort to complain. In fact Which? research shows that over 5 million people in the UK who had a problem with a public service didn’t go on to complain.

We think it’s time for the complaints system to change. That’s why we have submitted a report to all political parties calling for the next Government to make major improvements to the complaints system.

Over 60,000 people, including many public service workers, have signed our petition so far. You can add your voice to theirs by signing our petition today.

For the record: The Solicitors and Barristers involved in this case have FAILED to effectively REPRESENT Mayra Pooley-Reyes and her Family and have STOLE their MONEY giving them NO protection whatsoever; only further TERRORISM and ROBBERY.  – Why was Mayra Pooley-Reyes and her mother forced to live in a motor vehicle?  – And why was Mayra Pooley-Reyes jailed on numerous occasions without Due Process, which Magna Carta 1215 – Article 39 guarantees her?

We will NOT be copying this correspondence into Mr Virendra Sharma who is Mayra Pooley-Reyes MP, as he has already proved himself to be worse than useless in other non-Asian cases that we submitted to him.

Mayra’s son Stephen has told me that he wants to stay with his mother, but his home was STOLEN from over his head.

We look forward to hearing from Hounslow Borough Council, as my clients are being put through hell-upon-earth by CORRUPT Government Organisations to MURDER them.

Yours truthfully,
Patrick Cullinane, Common Law Lawyer and Victim of Jew Process in the UK’s COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts.

From: Bea P.R. [mailto:mayrarosa38@hotmail.com] Sent: 16 March 2015 14:32

To: Patrick Cullinane Subject: IBRG Authorisation Consent Form

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

Hampstead: Leaked Medical Reports End All Doubt About Sexual Abuse Claims

March 11, 2015March 16, 2015 Child Abuse, Corruption, Cover up, justice, satanism, UK

Witness and Victim G.

Witness and Victim G.

March 11th, 2015.

Leaked Medical Reports End All Doubt About Sexual Abuse Claims.

The medical reports end any debate regarding the fact that children A and G were the victims of child sexual abuse in Hampstead and underline the criminal nature of the police interviews of September 17th, 2014. The question now is who is being protected? Who has the influence and power to cause the British police such an obvious and inexplicable mid investigation rethink? Clearly there is much more than a Z grade actor and the reputation of a school at stake here. Neither would logically merit the police choice to destroy this investigation and cover up these heinous crimes.

Background Chronology

September 5th 2014.
“A referral was made to the Barnet CAIF by (mother’s partner’s) brother in law who is a special constable. Following a disclosure by A and G that they had been sexually abused by their father and “teachers” and were part of a cult. This disclosure had been made when they were in Morocco over the summer. And the parents stated they were unsure who to inform as many people seemed to be involved, (including allegedly police and social workers.)
Initial police interviews conducted.
8/9/14. Initial strategy meeting held.
10/9/14. Visit to family home ahead of ABE interview.
11/9/14. Emergency Police Protection Order issued after the ABE yesterday evening during which witness A, witness G and witness E (mother) were interviewed separately.
Allegations of physical abuse from the mother’s partner towards both children and sexual abuse against both children by their father and “teachers”. They are now in Emergency Foster Placement.”

17/9/14.
Police conduct the retraction interviews in transparent attempt to bury the truth and vandalise justice.
Interviewing officers clearly bully false retractions from the children for unknown reasons that can only be sinister.
22/9/14. Police inform the mother E that they have found that the crimes against the children cannot be confirmed. The investigation is over.
22/9/14. Dr. Hodes writes the second medical report affirming the veracity of the sexual abuse allegations despite the retractions. Dr. Hodes cites a specific research finding that found that 16% of victims will retract the allegations and affirming therefore that the physical evidence of abuse should outweigh the retractions.

Lindsay C Malloy, MA Thomas D Lyon JD, and Joia A Quas
Fillal Dependency and recantation of Child Sex Abuse Allegations.
J.Am Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 46:2, 2007.

These statements were made without reference to the disgraceful performance of the interviewing officer in the retraction interviews, which only strengthen Dr. Hodes’ assertions.

The Medical Reports. Who wrote them and are they authentic?

There are two Medical Reports, one dated September 15th, 2014, the other September 22nd. Written on the stationary of the University College of London in a way that leaves no doubt as to their authenticity. Background checks on the names of the people who signed the documents end any doubt . To illustrate this I will cite the best known of the Doctors who have signed these reports Dr. Deborah Hodes (FRCPCH) Consultant Community Paediatrician. A cursory internet search indicates that Dr. Hodes is employed in that role at the University College London and is an expert in the field of child abuse having more than twenty years experience.

Dr Deborah Hodes

https://www.uclh.nhs.uk/OurServices/Consultants/Pages/DrDeborahHodes.aspx

Dr Deborah Hodes Consultant Paediatrician an expert with decades of experience and she is unequivocal. Abuse occurred.

Dr Deborah Hodes Consultant Paediatrician an expert with decades of experience and she is unequivocal. Abuse occurred.

The first report dated September 15th appears to have been written by Dr Harriett Gunn (SHO Senior House Officer)* but is also signed by Dr. Hodes,  The second Report of September 22nd appears to have been written entirely by Dr. Hodes, as she is the sole signatory.

The Medical Examiners are highly experienced and well qualified.
This does not mean that they are infallible, of course, but these medical reports have been signed by medical practitioners considered to be authorities in the field with decades of experience.
Dr, Deborah Hodes,  part of the examination and assessment team that physically examined the children on several occasions is absolutely unequivocal, even after the retraction interviews  that the children have physical injuries, that substantiate their claims of physical abuse at the hands of the mother’s partner and more importantly the sexual abuse at the hands of the father and cohorts.

A Brief Overview of the Facts that Emerge from the Medical Reports.
The counter narrative states that the children’s stories were coached and fed to them by their mother’s partner who was himself guilty of minor physical abuse of the children.

The police retraction interviews tried to construct a narrative that the children had been denying the actions of the mother’s partner whilst making the claims against the father and school, yet the Medical Reports show that the children made the claims concurrently and were concurrently examined for both the injuries related to the minor physical abuse at the hands of the mother’s partner and the extremely serious sexual abuse at the hands of the father and staff at the school.
The male has one scar on his anus consistent with blunt force trauma, the female has several and has actually been physically damaged by the abuse in ways that really do not bear mentioning suffice to say that she has multiple injuries “consistent with the application of a blunt instrument.”
They could not be clearer. Someone has been doing deeply unpleasant things to these children, the more lurid claims relating to this case may be exaggerated, but there is a very simple and unmistakeable truth expressed in those medical reports.
After they were taken into Foster care, the children were heard to discuss the use of Vaseline as a lubricant their abusers used on them. They are no longer in the presence of the mother’s partner, there is no need for any story to be told, yet they were speaking about it in a matter of fact way.

The children independently told their story on multiple occasions to numerous Doctors and other disinterested parties and were consistent in their claims against both parties. There was medical evidence to support the claims that were made against both parties.

Both children were observed to be suffering the symptoms of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder.
Both children complained at their treatment at the hands of the mothers partner, yet it was absolutely clear to the examiners that it was the father they feared. Each child independently expressed the fear that their father would kill them, one had nightmares about it. Expressions of fear do not get more profound than that.

The details outlined in these reports are deeply unpleasant. Unfortunately it is necessary to do this and I will ensure that only the completely necessary information is included. There is a duty to attempt to spread the truth in a matter of gross injustice such as this case represents and I have sought not to identify anyone by name other than the Doctors whose role appears to have been an honourable one.

Key Excerpts from the Two Medical Reports.

September 15th, 2014.

“Witness G “does not report any history of constipation or diarrhoea . However he does report that it does often hurt and he has often bled when opening his bowels although this had decreased significantly in the past two months which his sister says is because it is two months since they have seen their father. (the children were also removed from the school). He opens his bowels everyday and reports that his stool is soft. “( a detail that is unfortunately necessary due to later events)
Physical Abuse.
“Both G and A report that they have been hit multiple times with a metal spoon by mother’s partner over the head and the legs. They also report they have been pushed into walls. They also allege that mother’s partner holds his hand over their mouth till they “can’t breathe.” On a recent visit to Morocco over the summer witness G explains that he was hit on the ear by the mother’s partner in the left ear which caused his ear to bleed and his left eye to be swollen and bruised. G and A said that G was then not allowed to leave the holiday home until the bruises had disappeared.”
(Note: the details contained here completely destroy the notion that these allegations were made as the result of coaching. Did the mother’s partner also coach the children to make all these detailed and specific allegations against him? Of course he didn’t. The fact that these allegations against the mother’s partner were made at the same time as the allegations of sexual abuse is clearly overwhelming evidence that these children spoke the truth to the best of their ability about both issues and were not under external control of either party to a custody dispute as they made the allegations.)

Sexual abuse allegations.

“ A has explained that at school a teacher named Mr. H calls children over and makes them take off their underwear. A explained that she and other children including G are made to bend over and a “plastic willy” is inserted into the anus. Whilst Mr. H holds onto their hips. A also stated that Mr.H “makes noises” while this is done.

Of note, she says that he gives them a refresher bar to eat as a reward and to chew on while this is happening so they “can’t scream or make a noise” and they are asked to face forwards and not look backwards. G has said that the same thing has happened to him. G says that after this has happened he has bleeding from the anus and subsequently. it is very painful when he opens his bowels.”

Victim G Physical injuries described.
His (G) anus was examined in the left lateral position using gentle buttock separation for 30 seconds. He had one anal fissure scar at 9 o’clock on examination of the anus. There was no reflex anal dilation.”

Summary.
“In both the general physical examination and the genital examination of G today. There are physical signs consistent with the allegations given by G and A. The scar in the anus is from a healed fissure, secondary to the application of a blunt penetrating force that he (G) has alleged.
In summary, G has physical signs consistent with his allegations of both physical abuse and sexual abuse. “
Dr. Harriett Gunn (SHO) to
Dr. Deborah Hodes.
Medical Report Dated September the 22nd 2014.

The report begins with Dr, Hodes outlining her extensive experience in the field. Twenty four years worth.
Dr.Hodes states that she was present at two strategy meetings and two physical examinations relating to this case. In addition Dr. Hodes has spoken to Camden area social workers and also reviewed the photographic evidence pertaining to the children’s injuries.

Victim and WItness A on September 17th 2014.

Victim and Witness A during a Police interview.

Summary of Relevant Evidence Victim A..
“She alleged that lubrication was used prior to the insertion of the penis or plastic penis and identified and discussed this with her foster carer.. She also told me about having had an injection. She alleged that bleeding occurred after the event and then had pain on opening her bowels.”
“She told me that she has difficulty getting to sleep and she has bad dreams including dreaming of her father killing her ”
Physical Findings.
“Below is a list of injuries found in a physical examination of A shown in body maps and the police photographs.”

1.“3 x 4mm abrasion to the pinna of her left ear and 3mm laceration posterior to her left ear overlying the mastoid, A alleged she was pinched and picked up by her ear on Morocco.”

2. “7mm longtitudinal abrasion (excoriated) on the right lateral aspect of her right ankle. A alleged she had been pushed against an outside wall and “had picked it” when she was in Morocco.”

3. “2.0cm x 0.5cm healing abrasion on the left side of the chin. A alleged that she was hit across the face with a metal spoon while in Morocco.“

Below is a list of injuries found on ano-genital examination of A recorded in the DVDs.
(Warning Note: This is deeply unpleasant and awful and a quick summary is that there are multiple and in my opinion horrific injuries to A’s nether regions)
“1. In the left lateral position with gentle buttock separation there was anal laxity and a brief view of the rectum. In the knee chest position with gentle buttock separation, there was reflex anal dilation (RAD) after 5-10 seconds. The reflex anal dilation continued and there was a view into the rectal ampulla and there was no stool present.
2. There was a healed scar in the ruggae at the 10 -11 o’clock position extending from the anal orifice to the anal verge. It was seen in both the left lateral position and the knee to chest position. The abnormalities in the ruggae at the 4 0′ c;ock and 5 o’clock positions may represent healed scar tissue or variation in the ruggae.configuration.”
There are between two and four injuries, with two undoubted and two speculative.
Conclusions regarding the allegations.
“The physical injuries found on her skin are consistent with the physical abuse she described.
In the absence of a history of constipation, medical illness or accidental trauma according to the GP’s notes, the anogenital findings of the scar and the RAD are consistent with her allegations of the application of a blunt penetrating force to her anus (2); sexual abuse.”
She has described symptoms of post traumatic stress.”

Summary of A and G by Dr. Hodes.
“In my opinion A and G are suffering significant harm as evidenced by the following:-
1.Both children have physical signs of physical abuse that support their allegations.
2.Both children have physical signs of sexual abuse that support their allegations.
3.They have symptoms of post traumatic stress.
4. It is now understood from a 2007 substantiated study of child sexual abuse that retraction occurs far more commonly (16% in this series) than previously thought.
5. In my opinion, the extensive and detailed accounts given by both children that were repeated to different professionals contain details of sexual acts that such young children would need to have direct experience of.”  (Note: in order to be able to describe them is the unwritten implication.)

To put it simply, Dr. Hodes is stating that there is physical evidence in support of both sets of allegations which really highlights how farcical the entire “they were coached” counter-narrative really is. Because children who have been coached to make false allegations in order to influence a custody battle we are told, were not even coached to lie about the minor physical injuries they suffered at the hands allegedly of the mother’s partner. What kind of coaching is that?
It really shows the desperation to protect that this preposterous and absurd notion was even floated as the counter-narrative. It is pathetic and insulting. Truly laughable.

Dr Hodes signature

Dr. Hodes signs off on the September 22nd report. She plainly rejected the retractions.

Ethical and Legal Issues.

The leaking of these documents may constitute a criminal offense, I honestly do not know, but it is obvious that these records have been released in the broader public interest in order to oppose and expose a clear and outrageous injustice. These are exceptional circumstances in which otherwise unethical or even unlawful actions are necessary and just in my opinion.

Why is this happening?

It beggars belief that this investigation was curtailed and destroyed in order to protect a Z grade actor or even the Staff and Institutional reputation of the school and church involved. Something far more important is being protected here, but it is completely unclear whom or what have managed to engineer the stunning travesty that led to the Investigating Police coaching and bullying retractions from the child victims, Witnesses and Victims A and G.
The real mystery at this point is who is protecting this and why?
The way it is being covered up you would almost get the on it’s face ludicrous idea that this was some type of mad, satanic leadership induction program. The people involved may believe they are doing what is right for their children in some sick parallel universe sense.

We Are Living in a Twilight Zone of Serial Denial.

It is completely possible that elements of the stories the children tell that do not relate to events they actually witnessed may be embellished or even incorrect. There is sadly no doubt that whatever the veracity of the claims the police made a decision, a bizarre and inexplicable decision to destroy the case and conduct a cover up. Unless and until the police have a rethink as is inevitable but may take  decades, there is little that can be done to even begin to seek justice for the Hampstead victims beyond trying to expose this to enough people that it causes an uproar that requires an immediate police rethink.

We seem to exist in a bizarre twilight zone where anyone with any connection to power can apparently do what they like to children and expect to suffer only the infamy of the grave. As long as you are not fussed about your reputation when deceased and you are connected you do not even have to be discreet. Once you die it will all emerge of course and your name and reputation will be destroyed but other than that there is no penalty.
While it has become clear again and again that the unthinkable has actually been rather routine, that these unbelievably evil crimes have been happening for decades and yet when confronted with a genuine contemporary cover up, the entire “official” British media have literally not a word to say.

Other than the Hamptead and Highgate Express. The local weekly paper had their say recently,  they covered the story from the point of view of the alleged perpetrators, predictably, so the reference to the case was rather incidental, but telling.
Google under fire after leaked personal details of Hampstead residents remain on web – Crime & Court – Hampstead Highgate Express

http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/crime-court/google_under_fire_after_leaked_personal_details_of_hampstead_residents_remain_on_web_1_3967235

The real story is instantly dismissed thus “The claims, which the mainstream media is barred by court order from reporting on, are said to have been investigated by police and found to be baseless.” Which I think can be fairly claimed to be a downright lie. Perhaps gratitude is the right response to the total lack of mainstream news coverage. Please note the brazen hypocrisy of the Hampstead and Highgate Express stating that “ which the mainstream media is barred by court order from reporting on” before continuing “are said to have been investigated by police and found to be baseless.” Clearly reporting (and indeed completely mendaciously and inaccurately) without naming or even alluding to a source, let alone any evidence to back up their dishonest claim. I hope they are proud of their work at the Hampstead and Highgate Express. Their efforts in support of evil will be rewarded in the deserved manner eventually I am sure, one way or another. It’s only a matter of time.

Return #WhistleblowerKids and #AbuseSurvivors to their Russian Family!

https://www.change.org/p/the-rt-hon-theresa-may-mp-return-whistleblowerkids-and-abusesurvivors-to-their-russian-family

Sabine Kurjo McNeill | Voluntary Public Interest Advocacy

http://mckenzie-friends.co.uk/author/bombs/

http://mckenzie-friends.co.uk/petitions/

Sources.
14 09 15 Medical report.pdf – Google Drive

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Byzy22cCtwpdbERtNXNhQ0Y5RmM/edit

14 09 22 Medical report.pdf – Google Drive

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Byzy22cCtwpdYy0xdVZFcGxscXM/edit

Aangirfan: HAMPSTEAD – DOCUMENTS

http://www.aanirfan.blogspot.com.au/2015/03/hampstead-documents.html

Aangirfan: FROM HAMPSTEAD TO SAN FRANCISCO

http://www.aanirfan.blogspot.com.au/2015/03/from-hampstead-to-san-francisco.htm

Royal Free Hospital in Hampstead to be investigated over links with Jimmy Savile – Health – Hampstead Highgate Express

http://www.hamhigh.co.uk/news/health/royal_free_hospital_in_hampstead_to_be_investigated_over_links_with_jimmy_savile_1_3058052

PLAYLIST of 45 videos re #Whistleblower and #WhistleblowerKids | ‘Whistleblower Kids’ in the Court of Public Interest

https://whistleblowerkids.wordpress.com/2015/03/01/playlist-of-45-videos-re-whistleblower-of-whistleblowerkids/

JUSTICE DENIED: Live Recording as Police raid Pedophile Ring Whistle-blower kids mum’s home

http://google-law.blogspot.gr/2015/02/live-recording-of-police-raid-on.html

Abusers Online | ‘Whistleblower Kids’ in the Court of Public Interest

https://whistleblowerkids.wordpress.com/social-media/links-to-videos/abusers-online/

Whistleblower Kids’ in the Court of Public Interest | From Child Snatching and the Secrecy of Family Courts to Forced Adoptions, Child Sexual Exploitation and Satanic Ritual Abuse

https://whistleblowerkids.wordpress.com/

JOINING Video Dots with #WhistleblowerKids: Exposing World run by Powerful #Paedophiles | ‘Whistleblower Kids’ in the Court of Public Interest

https://whistleblowerkids.wordpress.com/2015/03/06/joining-video-dots-with-whistleblowerkids-exposing-world-run-by-powerful-paedophiles/

Dr Deborah Hodes

https://www.uclh.nhs.uk/OurServices/Consultants/Pages/DrDeborahHodes.aspx

FORWARD UK on Twitter: “FORWARD Trustee, Dr Deborah Hodes, announces opening of the first specialist #FGM clinic in London

ZeeklyTV – Anonymous’s Channel

http://zeeklytv.com/user/Anonymous

Dr Hodes Sources.
Lindsay C Malloy, MA Thomas D Lyon JD, and Joia A Quas
Fillal Dependency and recantation of Child Sex Abuse Allegations.
J.Am Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry. 46:2, 2007.

Bradley Ar, Wood, JM, How Do Children Tell?
The disclosure process in child sexual abuse.
Negl. 20 881-891. 1996

The British Medical Association Confidentiality Guide for Staff.(called the confidentiality toolkit)

confidentialitytoolkit_full.pdf

http://bma.org.uk/-/media/files/pdfs/practical%20advice%20at%20work/ethics/confidentialitytoolkit_full.pdf

Excerpts Relevant to this Case.

1. The duty of confidentiality
Confidentiality is an essential requirement for the preservation of trust between patients and health professionals and is subject to legal and ethical safeguards. Patients should be able to expect that information about their health which they give in confidence will be kept confidential unless there is a compelling reason why it should not. There is also a strong public interest in maintaining confidentiality so that individuals will be encouraged to seek appropriate treatment and share information relevant to it.

Using and disclosing information
3. data should be anonymised wherever possible .
occasionally, when it is not practicable to obtain consent, information may be disclosed where the law requires or where there is an overriding public interest, eg where child abuse is suspected
• disclosures should be kept to the minimum necessary to achieve the purpose
5. Anonymisation
Information may be used more freely if the subject of the information is not identifiable in any way.
Usually, data can be considered to be anonymous where clinical or administrative information is separated from details that may permit the individual to be identified such as name, date of birth and postcode. Even where such obvious identifiers are missing, rare diseases, drug treatments or statistical analyses which have very small numbers within a small population may allow individuals to be identified. A combination of items increases the chances of patient identification.
When anonymised data will serve the purpose, health professionals must anonymise data to this
extent and, if necessary, take technical advice about anonymisation before releasing data. Whilst it is not ethically necessary to seek consent for the use of anonymised data, general information about when their data will be anonymised should be available to patients.

http://www.abbreviations.com/term/1407008

*S.H.O Senior House Officer A junior doctor in the pre Modernising Medical Careers era (pre-2007) of training in the UK, in the 2nd post-graduate year–i.e., immediately after the PRHO–pre-registration house officer year, which is now designated Foundation Year 1–FY1. SHOs are now called FY-2. Some SHO posts still exist and are taken as a prelude to certain specialities–e.g., surgery, but are no longer a standard year in training schemes for junior doctors in the UK 

source:  http://crimesofempire.com/2015/03/11/hampstead-leaked-medical-reports-end-all-doubt-about-sexual-abuse-claims/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , ,

VIP paedophile scandal: Police pinpoint ‘dungeon’ flat linked to abuse parties and child murder – + VIDEOS December 2014

20:42, 14 March 2015  By , Mark Conrad

Officers have identified a luxuey flat in Pimlico, London, which is connected to a large cellar believed to have been used as a ‘holding area’ for abuse victims

Gimp Dungeon

New development: Police have pinpointed a London flat where they believe witness ‘Nick’ and other abuse victims were held

Police investigating a VIP ­paedophile ring have pinpointed a luxury flat where they believe boys were held before being ­sexually abused by prominent men – and in one case murdered.The apartment is in upmarket Pimlico, central London, and is connected to a large cellar.

In a chilling development, detectives from Operation Midland believe the premises were used as a holding area for youngsters before they were driven a short distance to abuse parties.

The Sunday People and the Exaro ­investigative website can reveal ­detectives also suspect the apartment could be linked to a murder allegedly involving members of the paedophile network.

They are now preparing to take a former abuse victim to the property.

Officers want him to confirm their ­suspicions that the address is a key site in their investigation.

One line of enquiry is whether a cellar at the flat was used to keep one or more boys before they were sexually abused at ­another property nearby.

The exact location of the flat cannot be identified at this stage, nor can the ­evidence that relates to it, for fear of ­disrupting the police investigation.

Detectives regard the property as ­potentially crucial but have identified other premises they want to look at.

They plan to take a key witness, known as Nick to protect his identity, on a ­drive-around of locations in central London that may have been used by the paedophile network.

Nick came forward last year with a series of allegations.

He says a group of influential and wealthy men sexually abused him as a boy at Dolphin Square, the apartment ­complex in Pimlico where many MPs have homes, and elsewhere.

He also claims to have seen members of a Westminster paedophile network murder three boys. And he is keen to help Operation Midland get to the truth.

Sunday People paedo cover ring

In an open appeal, he said:

“I would like to make a personal request to all the boys who were hurt alongside me to come forward if you can and if you have not done so already.

“You will not remember ‘Nick’. It is not my real name. But you will recognise what went on and where.

“I totally understand why you might not feel able to, and I know the fear that they instilled in us back then stopped me from speaking out previously. But now is the right time to come forward.

“If the fear of certain members of the inner circle is holding you back, you need not worry.

“It did not stop me, and the police can explain more if you get in touch.

“There are some excellent detectives from the Metropolitan Police who are working on the information that I have given to them. They want to help, they want to listen, and they are not afraid to go where the evidence takes them.

“It is not an easy thing to do. It is really hard to find that courage to come forward and then have to go through with the police what happened.

“But they have made it as easy for me as they possibly could have done.