PLEASE SUPPORT PETER HOFSCHROER + GRANDMA B

Peter has already had to spend one Christmas locked away for something he claims he didn’t do – and it looks like he’ll spend  another Christmas the same as the first – in HMP Hull.  PLEASE feel free to support Peter and Grandma B in their ever worsening situation, and inform MPs etc, + media, in an effort to get some justice for them – Peter, 59, has been held since last mid-December, with a supposed “trial” next January, at TEESIDE court, and Grandma B is now far from being well..,.

———————————–
To:  Mr. Cameron, the Prime Minister, 10 Downing St., London
​ SW1A 2AA​
From:  /////////, 
3 September 2015
Dear Mr. Cameron, the Prime Minister,
 
 I am writing to you again in the interests of justice, and the proper enactment of the laws as they stand at present in the U.K., and it is my duty as a U.K. citizen to inform you, as Prime Minister, about very serious matters that need your attention, concerning pensioner Mr. Peter Hofschroer.​ To validate what I have written you about, I attatch 2 communications from Peter, the first [marked “1”] received in early July, before his supposed “trial date” was altered, and the 2nd attatchment [marked “2”] from a letter received during late August 2015.​
 Mr Hofschroer, son of Barbara, Hofschroer, 85, is a highly educated man, a historian & an author.  He believes (rightly or wrongly) that there has been serious malpractice on many levels by North Yorkshire Police, York Council & others, relating to his mother – 85 year old Barbara Hofschroer, who, Peter alleges, is  being very badly treated by other family members – Peter Hofschroer is the official carer, being her son, but he is unable to do anything about what he alleges is happening to his mother because he is imprisoned in HMP Hull, on certain charges that can only be described as questionable.
Peter has been in HMP Hull since December 2014, and is expected to be there at least until next January 2016, when a “trial” has been reported as to be taking place on these charges he questions.
Peter, along with others, has published much about his mothers [and his] predicaments prior to his imprisonment, but the reason I am writing to you is because the situation has worsened considerably regarding his mother’s position since Peter’s imprisonment last December, in that on seeing his mother on a prison visit a very short time ago, for the first time since last December, 2014, when he was put in prison,  he has reported that his mother is allegedly being mistreated by certain characters who are purporting to be caring for her  – one such person being Peter’s brother Robert – employed allegedly by York Social Services.
 
Peter has reported that, on seeing his mother recently on that visit, his mother’s face allegedly showed “bruising”, she had on an inappropriate pair of eyeglasses, she was “disorientated” and “confused”, had no idea where she actually was residing (only that she thought it maybe “a home”), and whats more, and infinitely more worrying, was the fact that she was being “stripped of her assets”, eg. her house, and finances, those exact possessions which she would not have had taken from her had she been in Peter’s official care during the past months recently.  Peter also alleges his own property is being taken from him and being sold, without his permission or guidance.
 Peter has has awful problems getting and working with legal representatives to defend him, and has taken on new representatives and the previous ones he was unhappy with. Whether this, getting a new legal team, was the real reason for his court hearing being put so far in the future is questionable also, as surely any legal team does not need more than 6 months to get up to speed on a case against Peter, if indeed such a case exists. Was this time delay of many months before his hearing could be heard made so that the sale of homes Peter was connected to, as his mothers official representative and carer, could be sold and all financial and other details completed without Peter having any say in any matters? It is thought that this is exactly the reason Peter’s hearing has been dragged out for so long – if not the main reason for his imprisonment in the first place –  so that he would remain in prison and be completely unaware of the details of these actions he objects to so strongly.
More facts are these:
 
 Barbara was living happily with Peter in Austria: He had been caring for his mother for several years: He was (& still is) her OFFICIAL carer: He had Power of Attorney (& still has):  Peter believes (rightly or wrongly) his brother Robert does not have his mother’s best interest at heart, & is only interested in getting his hands on her assets.  
 Peter & his mother moved to Germany, where there was a surprise attack:  Peter was arrested by German police & held for long enough for his mother to be abducted (against her will) by Robert Hofschroer & a posse of accomplices: Once that had been achieved, Peter was released without any charge whatsoever: 
 Peter only went back to England because, being concerned about his mother, he was taking steps through the English courts to have his mother restored to his care: As he went into court for that purpose, he was arrested & taken off in a police van, thus preventing him progressing the action. There was no reason to arrest him BEFORE the hearing: IF the arrest was justified, they could just as easily have waited until AFTER  the hearing. That they did so before could be classed as ‘Perverting the Course of Justice’, a very serious crime.  
Following Barbara’s abduction from Germany, it is understood she was first taken to live at Robert’s home, but has now been placed in a Home of some kind.
 Friends of Peter and Barbara Hofschroer ask you to intervene in these outrageous happenings befalling these completely vulnerable citizens, and
​ ask ​please that you attampt to correct matters. Noone will even tell Peter where his mother is residing!!
Thank you for your time.
 
signed ///////
​attmt. 1:

The Abuse of Grandma B: Update 1st July 2015
There have been significant developments in this case since the unlawful abduction of Peter Hofschroer, Grandma B’s carer, on 1st December 2014.Since being kidnapped from her refuge in Germany in May 2014, Grandma B’s abusers have been holding her prisoner in York. A report from York Social Services indicates she is fully aware that corrupt police officers were party to her abduction. 
 
Grandma B also told the social workers that it is her wish to spend her remaining days living in peace and safety in the care of her loyal son Peter.We have also heard a few weeks ago, Grandma B managed to sneak a letter to Peter passed her abusers. She again expressed her wish to be in Peter’s care in her own home.So how have Grandma B’s captors reacted to that wish? They have placed her house on the market. This is, of course, fraud and financial abuse. How have North Yorkshire Police and York Social Services reacted to that?Her carer Peter remains in custody in HMP Hull with bail being denied him despite there being no compelling reasons to keep him locked up, as the law requires. Grandma B’s abusers seized the opportunity to not only steal her house, we have seen reports they have also seized Peter’s house in Austria. In view of the role of the Austrian judiciary and police in this sordid affair, it doesnt take much imagination as to what is going on here [see “Crimes committed by Austrian Authorities”: http://www.grandmabarbara.wordpress.com/6-crimes-committed-by-the-austrian-authorities/ 
A trial date has been set for the 27th July 2015, in York Crown Court. The trial is expected to last at least one week. We have heard that it appears the “sex assault” allegation has been dropped, but that the number of “indecent images” found has increased from 6969 to around 28,000. Peter has pleaded “not guilty” to all these allegations. He also disputed every one of more than 20 different sets of allegations made against him by the police and others over the past seven years or so, all of which have been dropped due to there being no credible evidence.Last but not least is that certain of Grandma B’s abusers have had Leeds High Court issue “gagging orders” against Peter and various other journalists. As well as being ordered not to say any more about Grandma B’s case, they have also been prevented from making any further revelations in the child abuse scandal involving Savile, Jaconelli and Corrigan, as well as in the expenses controversy involving chief officers of North Yorkshire Police and their failure to investigate frauds, allegedly committed by former Police Authority chair Jane Kenyon [see articles from the “Yorkshire Post”:
http://www.real-whitby.co.uk/north-yorkshire-police-musical-chairs
The claimants here apparently include Grandma B’s abusive family members, a social worker dismissed for making false allegations against her carer, senior police officers and Jane Kenyon-Miller.What they want the court to accept is that when victims of crime are subjected to persecution by the police for having the nerve to complain about this, and journalists expose official corruption, then this amounts to harassment of the perpetrators.To any reasonable person, that is utter nonsense, but that is not how the courts seem to have seen this.Then, a letter dated 26 September 2014 is circulating in the public domain. 
It is from North Yorkshire Police and was sent to Peter stating that all the allegations of harrassment made against Peter by a group of people including Jane Kenyon have not resulted in charges being made against him as the CPS have determined there is no credible evidence.The biggest concern is the story circulating that police resources amounting to over £400,000 of public money has been spent on observing three critics of their actions and that the police appear to be funding a private civil action on behalf of civilians against a person the CPS have determined has not committed a criminal offence.It is unlikely this is lawful, but the courts do not appear to have a problem with this.We continue to remain very concerned about Grandma B. As well as being held prisoner and denied her wish to live in her own home cared for by Peter, she is being subjected to further serious financial abuse – with the support and blessing of the police and social services.Is anybody safe in Brave New Britain?
Google “The Abuse of Grandma B”.”
attmt. 2:
3a 29aug15041

[message ends]​

peter
​=============================================================

Lord Maginnis of Drumglass brought the Grandma B case up in Parliament way back, mentioned by PH here: https://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2013/10/16/grandma-b-update-16-oct-13/

For more information on this case search the archives here under “Grandma B” or “Peter Hofschroer” and Google the abuse of Grandma B or visit the main site: 
http://www.grandmabarbara.wordpress.com

More:  

Radio interview on “Anonymous Radio” December 2012:

https://vid.me/e/9bVD?stats=1&tools=1

2 interviews with Sonia Poulton + the Hofschroers:

 
 dated: 15 Jan ​2014 = https://www.vimeo.com/84524221

GRAN B

CRIMES COMMITTED AGAINST GRANDMA B

As the deeply disturbing case of Grandma B, as Barbara Hofschroer has come to be known is now in its 8th year we thought it a good idea to remind everybody what this 86-year-old great grandmother has been forced to endure from estranged family members and their associates in North Yorkshire Police [NYP], the City of York Council [CYC] and others.

In 2007 Grandma B signed over her house to certain family members in return for the promise of care services, which they did not provide, and with the agreement she would live in it for the remainder of her life. However, these family members unlawfully evicted her in 2010 and have made several attempts to sell her house. Legal opinion here is that they have committed fraud under Sections 2 and 4 of the Fraud Act 2006.

Neither NYP nor CYC have upheald the law here and prosecuted Grandma B’s abusers.

Since April 2008, these abusive family members have made incessant attempts to seize her life savings as well, a further criminal act that NYP have refused to investigate. Instead officers of NYP have made several attempts to oloocate her life savings presumably with the intention of handing them over to her abuser for a share of the proceeds.

The most recent attempt was in July 2013 when NYP applied to York Crown court in order to facilitate this act of extortion.

Grandma B has persistently refused to hand over her money to her abusers. Instead, she gave her younger son Peter powers of attorney to run her financial and property affairs.

Since then her abusers have made over 20 sets of false allegations against Peter culminating in his detention and imprisonment in December 2014 after incriminating material was planted in her house in York as well as in Peter’s house in Austria.

On the morning of the 3rd January 2009, a couple of hours after her husband of 60 years had died Grandma B’s abusers barged into her house with a police escort, assaulted her and then hurled abuse at both her and her husbands corpse. When Peter tried to protect her, the police assaulted him and threatened to arrest him​ ​

see interviews with Sonia Poulton dated

​ 15 Jan ​2014 = https://www.vimeo.com/84524221

and 3 Feb. 2014:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PER__Kx-EPs .

The IPCC has determined there was nothing wrong with the police action here.

Throughout the summer of 2009 the abusive family members stalked Grandma B and her carer. On one occasion, when Peter was out her abusers attempted to break in. Grandma B was so frightened that her carer has never been able to leaave her alone since.

NYP has refused to record and investigate any of these offences.

In December 2009, when Grandma B and her carer went to Austria for Christmas, a prearranged plan was implemented. Her abusers noticed she was not at home. York Social Services contacted her day club to establish she was away. Inspector Colin Moreton of North Yorkshire police had his officers make enquiries with neighbours to confirm this.

On 22nd february 2010 Grandma Bs aledged abusers forced entry to her house changed the locks and  unlawfully evicted her.

Neighbours called the police,who stood by and watched while Grandma Bs aledged abusers removed her belongings. 

The IPCC has determined there was nothing wrong with the police action here. In november 2010 Grandma B’s alleged abusers then made their first attempt to fraudently sell her house. Just after that the local goverment ombudsman called on NYP and CYC to urgently reopen the safeguarding investigation in to this care as he considered the original investigation to have been irregular as NYP and CYC council withheld all evidence of abuse. Five years have passed after this call. Grandma B has still not been safeguarded. In July 2011 bailiffs acting on behalf of Grandma B regained control of her house. She made ready for her to return home, but as NYP and CYC confirmed to refuse to safeguard her, she would not.

A year later Grandma B’s aledged abusers broke in to her house again changed the locks again and started this second attempt to fradently sell her house.

NYP has failed to record and investigate this crime as well.

Grandma B’s alleged abusers contrived to force her and her carer to leave their refuge in Austria.They then went to Germany where the authorities gave them persecuted persons status. Despite that the German police broke in to their refuge on 6 May 2014 and handed her over to the abusers, who brought her back to York,where they are alleged to have continued to abuse her.

NYP has refused to record and investigate these crimes.

Grandma Bs abusers then had the DWP [Department For Work And Pensions]  divert her pension in to a bank account under their control. They then put her house on the market. NYP have refused to record and investigate these crimes. All Grandma B wants are to spend her remaining days living in her own home in peace and safety in the care of her loyal son Peter. Instead of that,she has been kidnapped, then handed over to her aledged abusers,who are plundering her assets unhindered, while her loyal son is held allegedly in jail unlawfully so he cannot do anything about this.

In the past seven years, Grandma B has been the victim of serious criminal offences including fraud, extortion, kidnapping, theft, and harrassment. The perportrators of these crimes aledegedly include family members, North Yorkshire police and the City of York council, York social services, goverment officials, judiciary, and politicians.

When are these people going to stop abusing Grandma B ?

Grandma B recently smuggled a letter [below] past her captors to her loyal son Peter. We have reproduced it here. Sadly, she is too old to write it so she got a visitor to write it for her. The words are clearly hers and the signature genuine.

This letter shows all the accusations against her loyal son Peter are fake. Peter did write back with information on how Grandma B can visit him but she has been prevented from doing so which is emotional abuse.

This is how the police and social services treat the elderly.

Sonia Poulton describes this behaviour as obscene.

For more information on this case Google the abuse of Grandma B or visit: 
http://www.grandmabarbara.wordpress.com

LETTER: a copy of a letter from Grandma B to Peter H.

​ [received July ’15]​

AAA080AAA081

see more @ source:  https://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/07/04/peter-hofschroer-update-1-july-2015-grandma-b/

Thank you.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

FOUND: MORE SECRET FILES ON ALLEGATIONS OF SEX OFFENCES BY “V.I.P.’s” – EXARO NEWS 2 SEPT. 2015

EXARO 1 2SEPT15

continues @ source:  http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5648/found-more-secret-files-on-allegations-of-sex-offences-by-vips

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Microsoft Adding Windows 10 Spyware to Windows 7 and 8* + WINDOWS 10 NSA EDITION

 

Reblogged on WordPress.com

Source: Microsoft Adding Windows 10 Spyware to Windows 7 and 8*

Microsoft Adding Windows 10 Spyware to Windows 7 and 8*

Microsoft Adding Windows 10 Spyware to Windows 7 and 8*

How many hosts is Microsoft phoning everything home to? Is it feasible to just block them all with an external firewall so a Windows box simply can’t reach Microsoft?

The article below says that Windows 10 is ignoring the hosts file and phoning home anyway, so it seems like an external firewall would be the way to go.

Of course, as soon as you get your Microsoft blacklist established, if you’re still pulling OS updates, Microsoft could just change the hosts that the telemetry apps are using, and you’re back to square one. You would have to use a packet sniffer, firewall log, etc and make a new catalogue of hosts that Microsoft is using.

*pfft* It’s a shit sandwich, no doubt about it.

As bad as this situation is, my guess is that it’s overly optimistic to assume that 1% of Windows users even care. Of that 1%, maybe 1% of those users are able to run any sort of technical countermeasures. I hope this disaster doesn’t embolden Apple to screw its OSX users over in a similar manner.

Via: ghacks:

Windows 7 and 8 users have been plagued by “upgrade preparation” updates but left alone otherwise up until recently when it comes to this new level of data collecting.

This changed recently with the release of several updates for both operating systems that step up the game.

KB3068708 Update for customer experience and diagnostic telemetry – This update introduces the Diagnostics and Telemetry tracking service to existing devices. By applying this service, you can add benefits from the latest version of Windows to systems that have not yet upgraded. The update also supports applications that are subscribed to Visual Studio Application Insights. (Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows 7 Service Pack 1 (SP1), and Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1)
KB3022345 (replaced by KB3068708) Update for customer experience and diagnostic telemetry – This update introduces the Diagnostics and Telemetry tracking service to in-market devices. By applying this service, you can add benefits from the latest version of Windows to systems that have not yet been upgraded. The update also supports applications that are subscribed to Visual Studio Application Insights. (Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows 7 Service Pack 1 (SP1), and Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1)
KB3075249 Update that adds telemetry points to consent.exe in Windows 8.1 and Windows 7 – This update adds telemetry points to the User Account Control (UAC) feature to collect information on elevations that come from low integrity levels. (Windows 8.1, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows 7 Service Pack 1 (SP1), and Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1)
KB3080149 Update for customer experience and diagnostic telemetry – This package updates the Diagnostics and Telemetry tracking service to existing devices. This service provides benefits from the latest version of Windows to systems that have not yet upgraded. The update also supports applications that are subscribed to Visual Studio Application Insights. (Windows 8.1, Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2012 R2, Windows 7 Service Pack 1 (SP1), and Windows Server 2008 R2 SP1)

If these updates are installed on the system, data is sent to Microsoft regularly about various activities on it.

Microsoft lists two host names in KB3068708 that data is received from and sent to:

vortex-win.data.microsoft.com
settings-win.data.microsoft.com

These, and maybe others, appear to be hardcoded which means that the Hosts file is bypassed automatically.

Source* https://www.hwaairfan.wordpress.com/2015/08/31/microsoft-adding-windows-10-spyware-to-windows-7-and-8/

Related Topics:

Senior Russian Lawmaker Seeks Ban on Windows 10 in State Agencies*

======================================================

SEE ALSO [scroll down…]: Windows 10 NSA Edition  http://www.veteranstodaymoney.com/2015/08/windows-10-spy-edition/

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

MARGARET GOMM – The stealing of her home by the “British Establishment” – video, 30/08/15

Published on 30 Aug 2015

Patrick Cullinane talks to Margaret Gomm in CASE FILE #3. Margaret has been targeted since the 1970’s culminating in the stealing of her family home in 1990 by the Jewish Mafia otherwise known as the British Establishment. It doesnt end there however. Listen to her remarkable story and weep for what we have allowed, and continue to allow, to happen.

—————————————————————————

See archives for more posts re: Patrick Cullinane

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

PLEDGING RE: “The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership [TTIP,TPP]” – video

“Great news,

we have reached 100% of the reward for the TPP and are continuing to raise more. We are also well on our way to raising a €100,000 reward for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership or TTIP, which along with the TPP is part of the US plan to create a new global legal and economic system that Hillary Clinton called a new economic NATO. Help us make the world a more transparent place! Talk to your friends, share this video http://is.gd/ttippledge, or pledge here: https://wikileaks.org/pledge/

Regards,
The WikiLeaks Team”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Hampstead Cover Up. The Devil Tattoos Bill Maloney and Brian Gerrish Exposed. 30/08/2015

 

Hampstead Cover Up. The Devil Tattoos Bill Maloney and Brian Gerrish Exposed.

Posted in HAMPSTEAD "WHISTLEBLOWER KIDS" SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE [SRA], Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Janner’s court appearance 14/08/15 + Lord Janner sued by six alleged victims who claim he abused them as children 20/08/15 + JANNER ARCHIVE

Originally posted on cathyfox blog:

Greville Janner finally turned up in Court at 2.00pm for just 59 seconds before he was allowed to leave. He had not appeared when required to do so at 10.00am.

On Friday 14 Aug at 2.00pm Greville Janner, the 87 year old former Leicester MP and solicitor, finally appeared in Westminster Magistrates Court. This however had been under the direct threat that Janner would be arrested if he did not turn up and on the third hearing that day.

Janners legal team had gone to great lengths to try and prevent or delay even this brief appearance. Whilst they delayed slightly, ultimately they failed. Before describing Janner’s court appearance, it is worth recapping what his lawyers did recently to try to delay and prevent his appearance.

The previous day they had gone to the Queens Bench in the High Court of Justice.

High Court Queen’s Bench Division 13 Aug 2015

View original 9,162 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

CHRIS SPIVEY: SPARED JAIL 27/08/15 – “HARRASSED” – “DEAD MAN WALKING” + more

Internet troll, 52, who posted ‘sick’ claims that Lee Rigby’s murder was a conspiracy to provoke anti-Muslim hatred is spared jail for harassing soldier’s family 

source: : http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3212837/Internet-troll-52-posted-sick-claims-Lee-Rigby-s-murder-conspiracy-spared-jail-harassing-soldier-s-family.html#ixzz3k3PWR3EP

Harrassed

Harrassed

Christopher Spivey

(UNEDITED AT MOMENT)

Ahead of Thursday’s  sentencing, here are THE TRUE FACTS of what has really taken place since July 30th 2014, ALL OF WHICH CAN BE EVIDENCED. Please share this report far and wide because next time it could be you caught up in a nightmare from where there appears to be no escape.

(1) I was illegally arrested at 1:30 AM on the 30th of July 2014 for “Suspicion of harassment” by four very aggressive police officers. The four thugs, despite knowing that my then 1 year old grandson was in the property illegally entered and began an illegal search, ending with them illegally seizing my computers, a mobile phone, a keyboard and mouse, and a DVD writer. I was then illegally detained for a total of 19 hours. Therefore, there should never have been a court case and disregarding that fact, the evidence should have been deemed inadmissible.

(2) The facts listed in number 1 are evidenced thus:

  • A complaint was made, allegedly to Greater Manchester Police on the 16th of July 2014 by Witness A
  • An arrest request was then made, allegedly by the Greater Manchester Police (GMP) to Essex Police on the 17th of July 2014
  • In the two weeks that followed the GMP request on 17/7/14 and my actual arrest on 30/7/14, Essex Police did not bother to apply for an arrest or search warrant despite being able to obtain both in around 6 hours.
  • Instead, they came mob handed specifically to arrest me (as evidenced in the police witness statements) at a time which violates CODE B of PACE, following a briefing sometime between 11:30PM on the 29th of July 2014 and 1 AM on the 30th of July 2014, where my photo and description was handed out.

Untitledcourt4

  • When I refused to let them in because they had no warrants, one of them illegally used Section 32 of PACE to arrest me whilst the other three barged past me into my home.
  • Not only was the policeman abusing Section 32, he was also using it illegally as Section 32 of PACE only allows for a search of an arrested person’s home and seizure of their property if the offence that they are arrested for is and INDICTABLE offence. “Suspicion of harassment” is a SUMMARY offence.

10438975_687960854611197_8416581272682638545_n1

  • Neither myself or my daughter Stacey were allowed to supervise the search, despite it being our right to do so.
  • I told Stacey to film the police officers at which point one of the officers told her that if she did they would also take her phone with them when they left – violating Stacey’s right to do so. 
  • After spending around half an hour finger tip searching my daughter’s bedroom where my then 1 year old grandson was sleeping, 3 of the officers went to search my living room whilst myself and Stacey were held prisoner by the 4th officer, in Stacey’s bedroom.
  • The three officers spent over one and a half hours in my 16ft X 14 ft living room but missed a laptop computer, a computer hard drive and various memory sticks, non of which were hidden. The police have never told me what they were doing in there for 90 minutes, but it certainly could not be searching.
  • Knowing that I was going to be taken, Stacey had phoned two friends up to come and sit with her. The police would not let them in until the both provided their names, addresses, and DOB’s.
  • After completing the 9o minutes in the living room none of the officers bothered to search my bedroom, the bathroom, the kitchen or the walk-in hallway cupboard.
  • A police car was then brought into the spacious car park outside of my flat block, from where it had been parked out of sight way up the road and the computers were loaded into the back in what appeared to be unsealed bags.
  • I was then taken to a car parked way up the road and taken to Southend Central at approximately 4:30AM
  • I was not interviewed until around lunch time and the 60-90 minute interview was conducted by CID despite the offence only being a summary offence, normally dealt with by a PC.
  • I was then locked up again until around 6PM whereby I was released on bail with CONDITIONS.
  • Before I left the station I lodged a complaint about my arrest, the search and seizure and the four aggressive officers.

10543127_691240120949937_1653152108_n

(3) On the 30th of July 2014 – whilst I was still in custody – the social worker Nicole Miles began an assessment report on my grandson Clayton, based on a (later proven) malicious referral made by the police following my arrest. I believe that the police had hoped to find drugs or something else illegal in Stacey’s bedroom – hence the fingertip search – in order to allow them to get the social services involved. When they found nothing, they resorted to fabricating reasons to make a referral.

(4) Despite starting the assessment on the 30th of July, Nicole Miles did not receive the referral until TWO DAYS LATER on the 1st of August. This begs the question as to how did she know to begin the assessment on the 30th of July, on matters that were nothing to do with the SS yet seemingly important enough for Nicole Miles to inexplicably start her investigation before I had even been released from custody.

(5) When Nicole Miles came to visit I refused to cooperate on the basis that the reasons given in the malicious police refusal and “suspicion of harassment” were nothing to do with the social services. Miles, left but then tried co-opting the help of Clayton’s health visitor. Unfortunately for Miles, I get on extremely well with Clayton’s health visitor who has been around our home on numerous occasions. I believe that she quickly saw through the insidious nature of the referral and SS involvement and refused to have anything to do with it. The assessment was therefore terminated.

10622161_701483346592281_2054882667_n

(6)I was subsequently told, no less than 5 (FIVE) times in writing by Essex Police, Detective Chief Inspector, Paul Ahmed (the person tasked with investigating my easily evidenced complaint) that my complaint COULD NOT be investigated until the investigation was completed and any court action dispensed with. This then is a case of a very senior police officer investigating serious misconduct taking place within his own force. It should also be noted that had my extremely serious complaint been investigated it would immediately have put a stop to the police investigation and there would never have been a court case, let alone a conviction.

ah

(7)I was once again illegally arrested and my property illegally searched on the afternoon of 6th of October 2014, by THREE plain-clothed police officers who categorically told me that they had only come to talk. Once again they had come WITHOUT arrest or search warrant after “illegal images” were allegedly found on my computers which had been illegally seized on the 30th of July 2014. However, the police had informed the Social Services that I had been arrested on the 1st of October, hence they once again started an assessment on my grandson Clayton on that day, which they could not in fact begin for another 5 days until after I had been arrested. The police then -once again – incorrectly informed the social services that I had been arrested on the 3rd of October, three days before the event actually took place. This proves – for reasons previously documented and evidenced and briefly documented once again below – that the social services were working in cahoots with the police on a conspiracy to snatch my grandson Clayton.

10836424_750939134980035_1295523786_n

(8) When I refused the three officers entry they used a battering ram to break down my front door as well as one of them kicking down my back gate and smashing my bedroom window. Again the police knew that my teenage daughter and infant grandson was on the premises. You need to ask yourself why it had taken the police 2 months to find these “illegal images” and why they blatantly came to arrest me without a search warrant and an arrest warrant both of which can be obtained within 6 (SIX) hours. Watch and listen to the video below and hear how terrified my daughter is. Try and imagine yourself being branded as a nonce… And then tell me how would you feel especially so with you being innocent. 

(9) The paperwork for this illegal arrest states that I was [illegally] arrested under Section 17 of PACE. Section 17 of PACE can only be used under extreme circumstances such as somebody being in danger of serious personal harm. However, one of the three police officers is clearly seen & heard on videotape above, stating that I had been arrested under Section 32 of PACE. Moreover, despite being handcuffed, the officer was to out of breath to read me my rights

10717796_719596824780933_1967475410_n

(10) One of the officers then carried out a search which lasted no more than 5 minutes and consisted of a glance around my bedroom and the same around Stacey’s bedroom. He did not look in the walk-in hallway cupboard, the kitchen, the bathroom or the living room where i was being held. The hallway cupboard has around 30-50 photo albums in it, all of which could have contained photos of naked children for all that the officer knew. The living room contained THIS COMPUTER that I am writing on, as well as the laptop, memory sticks and hard drive that the 4 thug coppers missed on July 3oth. There are also over 1000 cased DVD’s in the living room, each case could have contained child porn, as well as 6 spools of recordable DVD’s which could have contained child porn. There was also a digital movie camera in the drawer. Yet the copper never so much as gave the room a second glance and NOTHING at all was taken in evidence. 

(11) Despite my front door having been battered down and unusable for 2 months (finally fixed in December 2014), my bedroom window smashed (and not fixed until December 2014) and my back gate being kicked down, the police wanted me to sign a declaration stating that they had caused NO DAMAGE

10720986_719595871447695_1088236900_n10578617_719599601447322_1518536312_n

(12)  I was later contacted and sent video evidence by someone who had been arrested by the same three officers, who – on film – subsequently attempted to strangle the man in the back of their unmarked police car causing evidenced bruising to his throat. Whilst the attacking police officer screamed: “I am going to fucking kill you” with his hands around the victim’s throat, the other two officers are seen blatantly trying to shield the assault from the person attempting to film it. You are best listening with headphones and the volume turned up.

(14) It has since come to light and is clearly evidenced that this 2nd [illegal] arrest, carried out on evidence blatantly planted by the police on my illegally seized computers, was not done to discredit me (hence the police refusal to say why I had been arrested when asked the reason by the press), but was done with the clear intent of furthering a joint conspiracy by the Essex Police and Castle Point District Council Social Services, to have my grandson taken into care as a means of shutting me up.

10681646_719869634753652_1047554584_n
(15) This clearly evidenced conspiracy, tantamount to kidnapping my well looked after, thriving, bright, happy and very much loved grandson thus ruining my life, my daughter’s life and most importantly the life of my infant grandson began at the time of my 1st arrest on the 30th of July 2014 and the conspiracy must therefore have been hatched before I was even arrested.

1000x7453a

Can you imagine how scared and confused he would have been had I not taken steps to thwart the SS stopping them taking him into care?Can you imagine the fate he faced as we all know what happens to children in care? Can you imagine how devastated my daughter would have been?

(16) The social worker, Nicole Miles and her boss Julie Robinson then arranged – behind our backs – a case management meeting with the police with a view to raising the assessment, supposedly being carried out under Section 17: A child in need to a Section 47: Protection order. This was because I had refused to let my daughter agree to them looking at her medical records. Because of this refusal, the social workers [wrongly] assumed that we had something to hide and FRAUDULENTLY using the guise of carrying out a Section 47 investigation (which allows the SS to view medical records without permission) they went ahead and accessed Stacey’s records – thus breaking the law on data protection, an offence which carries up to 7 years in prison.

10807812_750938908313391_2028977831_na1

(17) However, at the case management meeting with the police being held with a view to raising the Section 17 assessment to a Section 47, the police vetoed the proposal stating that I was not a danger to Clayton.

10540996_749796778427604_2146519469_na

(18) Despite the assessment NEVER being raised to a Section 42, Nicole Miles has indicated on the assessment that this had always been the case, thus had I not thwarted their efforts by catching on video, Miles & Robinson blatantly lying to me time & again, and the case reached court there would have been no question that Clayton would have been taken into care.

10540996_749796778427604_2146519469_naaa

(19) Because the police (who were obviously working in collusion with the SS) had made the referral to Miles & Robinson on the 1st of October 2014 – after which the assessment was started straight away, inexplicably on the assessment report that had been started on the 30th of July (on a malicious referral by the police made on the 1st of August) and which Miles had inexplicably kept for 2 months despite the assessment being terminated – meaning that Miles MUST HAVE KNOWN that I was going to be arrested again sometime in the coming months – the assessment had to end BY LAW on the 20th of November.

10822282_750938664980082_1626085819_nav

(20) However, because I wasn’t arrested until the 6th of October, the social workers had to lead us to believe that the assessment was started on the 6th of October. Bear in mind that you do not get to see the assessment until it is completed whereby the social worker goes through it with you on the day it is to be submitted. The fact that the assessment was started 5 days prematurely which the police and the SS were desperate that we should not find out about for obvious reasons, hence the strategy meeting with the police arranged for the 24th (see 2nd photo above) was pointless because the assessment had already been submitted on the 20th.

(21)  Miles and Robinson then arranged a [pointless]meeting with us for the 25 th of November so as they could go through the assessment with us – despite unbeknownst to us at the time that the assessment had been submitted 5 days earlier. However, instead they just left a copy of the assessment with us – by now they were well aware that I was no mug.

(22) When I came to read the assessment the following day, I quickly picked up on all the above, plus other Blatant lies and the fact that the assessment was incomplete (at least our copy was). Of all the shameful lies contained within the error filled report, one of the worst was the fact that it was stated that I posed a future risk to Clayton – despite me not having been charged with anything and the police stating to Julie Robinson that I was no danger, hence the assessment was never raised to a Section 47.

10818864_749799728427309_688472646_n

(23) What follows is a tape recording of Stacey speaking to Nicole Miles on the phone. Miles had desperately tried to avoid taking the calls knowing that they would be in connection to the many anomalies in her assessment of Clayton. And while it is obvious that Stacey had Miles in a fluster, only being 19 at the time, Stacey did not grasp the full impact of the assessment being completed on the 20th of November whilst Miles and Robinson kept up the pretence of the assessment being on-going. Nevertheless, Miles quickly changes the subject. Moreover, although Stacey has my first arrest date wrong, stating that it was the 31st, you will still hear Miles panicking as she tries to explain how the assessment was started on the 30th yet they did not receive the police referral until the 1st of August.

(24) What follows is a video of the second phone call between Stacey and Miles where Stacey pulls her about the raising of the assessment to a Section 47. You will note that Miles tries to bluster that the assessment was raised to a Section 47 at the strategy meeting held with the police on the 21st of October (also scroll up to the relevant screen shot) where the police in fact vetoed the motion being as they considered me no risk to Clayton (which they could state with confidence since they had been the ones who planted the photos on my computers) thus the assessment was NEVER raised to a Section 47 at any time – proving that Miles & Robinson broke the law by illegally accessing Stacey’s medical records.

(25) At the meeting between ourselves, Julie Robinson and Nicole Miles – instead of coming to discuss the assessment before it was submitted (which had already been submitted) – brought along a woman called Jan Dakin. At this meeting, Robinson said that we had to trust them, which I pointed towards Miles and said “how can we trust you when I have her on film blatantly lying to us on several occasions”? Robinson – nodding her head – replied “we will have to talk about that errrrr” and nodded towards the garden, meaning that we would have to talk about it in private where I couldn’t record her… We never did.

(26) Instead of talking about the assessment – which was just left with us when they left – Robinson said that if Stacey would go to five 1 hour sessions with Jan Dakin, then as far as she was concerned that would be the end of the SS involvement with us, no matter what the outcome of the police investigation was. However, the meetings were to be held away from our home, with only Stacy in attendance – in other words, somewhere where we couldn’t film and where I could not be there to protect Stacey whilst they stitched her up.

(27) However, we agreed – after which I briefed Stacey thoroughly and provided her with a voice recorder with the instructions not to tell Dakin that she was recording unless she asked. I should point out that if a person is doing their job properly, honestly and with integrity then what possible reason could they have for not wanting to be recorded. After all, to do so would protect both sides. Indeed, in my 20 years of being a Tattoo Artist, customers companions have filmed me tattooing countless times with me never once denying a request to do so. Therefore, once you listen to the following recording of that first meeting between Stacey & Dakin, I feel sure that you will agree that we were right to record and we were right to suspect that there was an ulterior motive to the sessions.

(28) Stacey attended the next arranged meeting with Dakin, whom if she had spoken to her boss about Stacy recording, then she certainly didn’t let on. Instead she once again asked Stacy if she was recording to which Stacey confirmed that she was, after which Dakin again terminated the session. We then received the following letter saying that Stacey had completed the work – although she hadn’t even started it – and the case was now closed. 

1

(29)  The two Social Workers involved in the joint conspiracy with Essex police, to kidnap my grandson are now being investigated by their governing body, the HCPC for this very serious offence – although I strongly believe that the investigation is being whitewashed. Interestingly enough, I received an email from the HCPC just the other day in response to my earlier inquiry as to why the two Social Worker’s, Nicole Miles & Julie Robinson had not been suspended whilst this very, very, serious complaint, backed by solid, indisputable evidence and made by myself and many, many other concerned members of the public was being investigated. The HCPC’s response was that the complaint did not involve sexual misconduct or drug abuse on the social workers part. Therefore, I can only assume that the HCPC do not view two of their social workers conspiring with the police to steal and ruin an innocent child’s life and illegally accessing DATA  (punishable by up to 7 years in prison) serious enough to warrant the suspension of social workers on their register.

I should just point out for clarification in regard to that email (below), that my friend Mrs Marshall – a very experienced registered social worker – had made the long slog from Blackpool in order to sit in at a meeting between ourselves, Miles & Robinson to ensure that they did not try anything underhand.

Untitledcourt5

(30) In December 2014, I was made aware by a practicing Barrister (not a member of my legal team) that Chief Inspector Paul Ahmed had been blatantly lying to me and my complaints – which would immediately have put a stop to both the police investigations into harassment and the illegal images – could indeed have gone ahead. The same Barrister also confirmed what I had already come to suspect, namely that all the big legal firms had been warned “from high up” not to defend my case Prior to my first court appearance in January 2015, I had written to over 30 law firms all of whom replied that they could not help me as they were all to busy.  

(31) I therefore immediately wrote to Inspector Paul Ahmed, as well as The Independent Police Complaint Commission, The Essex Chief Constable, Stephen Kavanagh, The Essex PCC, Nick Alston, and my MP James Duddridge, informing them that my complaint was deliberately not being investigated and that I now wanted Paul Ahmed’s conduct included in my complaint since not understanding the rules of complaint procedure is not a defence open to ANY police officer, as is clearly stated in the Police & complaints procedure handbook. I also quoted the applicable relevant sections set out in the police complaint guidelines handbook as well as those applicable by law. I then had the aforementioned barrister check the letter for accuracy before sending it on the 15th of December 2014. You can read that letter of complaint by clicking HERE

(32) The only reply to the letter sent by email was from the IPCC, who sent an automated acknowledgement that they had received the email

(33) On the 17th of December 2014, two days after I had sent the email, the Essex Chief of Police, Stephen Kavanagh took the highly unusual step of ordering a Postal Requisition Summons to be drawn up ordering me to court on January 20th 2015 for two counts of Harassment without Violence (1 committed against Witness A, 1 committed against Witness B) and two counts of sending a malicious communication (1 committed against Witness A, 1 committed against Witness B)

10884767_760313914042557_1527873471_n

(34) There can be no doubt that instead of doing the right thing, this postal requisition summons was sent with malice and as the Essex Chief Constable, Stephen Kavanagh’s ‘fuck you’ for me having had the audacity to point out that Essex Police were deliberately not dealing with my very serious complaint. Indeed, the very fact that the hastily drawn up summons was compiled two days after receiving my letter of complaint and more than a month before I was due to answer bail for the harassment charges is testament to the fact

10859370_760313707375911_2104681015_n

(35) The 4 charges are all summary offences thus adding greater weight to the fact that I was illegally arrested on the 30th of July 2014 . Remember, Section 32 of PACE only allows for a search and seizure of property if the offence that a person has been arrested for is an indictable offence. Therefore, the prosecution action should have been halted at this juncture – if not earlier.

(36) A postal requisition is a court summons sent by post and I was not eligible to be summoned by this method because two of the conditions needed to qualify for a postal requisition were not met. Those conditions were (A) A person must be informed before being released from custody following their arrest, that they are eligible for summons via postal requisition.(B) That the person must have no bail conditions attached to his release.

(37) I was not informed that I was eligible for a summons via postal requisition and I DID HAVE bail conditions attached to my release from custody. Therefore I was NOT eligible for a postal requisition summons. Indeed, the very fact that I was summoned this way means that I have NEVER been officially charged with the offences that I have now been convicted of.

(38) Judge Andrew or John Woollard (his name is a mystery that even the MSM cannot get to the bottom of) took it off his own bat – after obviously looking at my website – to ask the police officer in charge of the investigation, CID Detective Constable Adam Coombes, whilst he was on the stand under oath, if I had been summons via a postal requisition. When Coombes answered “yes”, the case should have been dismissed yet Judge Woollard made no further comment to Coombes affirmative.

(39) The prosecution case consisted of over 650 A4 photocopies of my articles and 5 witness statements (Two from Witness A, One from witness B, one from Witness C and one from Witness D yet the charges only apply to Witness A & Witness B). How can you determine where the specific offence is within 650 plus photocopied pages?

(40) To date, I have not been officially told what the specific crime was in those 650 pages.

11910643_895931377147476_826207840_n

(41) Only one of the five witness statements – the one allegedly made by Witness A, which made up the original complaint of harassment, allegedly taken by the Greater Manchester Police; allegedly on the 16th of July 2014 – was made before my arrest on the 30th of July 2014.

(40) This means that I have NEVER been arrested or questioned for the two offences (1 count of harassment without violence, 1 count of sending a malicious communication) for which I have been convicted of, relating to Witness B, whose witness statement was not taken until the 3rd of August 2014 – Four days after I had been released from custody.

(41) All 5 witness statements are either not signed or have not had the signature witnessed or are signed in the wrong place or have not got the case number on or have not been signed underneath the last line of text where a statement ends half way down the page leaving the statement open to having more added to, and as such all 5 of the statements should all have been inadmissible – a fact that Judge woollard was made fully aware of. Indeed, there is evidence to suggest that the police were not present when the statements were taken and that statements were re-written, which I cannot show you due to my bail conditions.

Nevertheless, the following are two examples taken from the statements. There is not one single page of the 20 odd pages that make up the statements that is correct and complete.

11128908_876387225768558_165156089_na

11749740_876387372435210_1231977118_na

(42) In regard to the 650 plus photocopied pages of my articles that the Prosecution were also relying on as evidence, it is highly significant that I was NEVER ONCE asked to remove these articles in the year between my arrest and the case coming to trial. Therefore, logic dictates that either there was NO OFFENCE committed within those 650 plus pages or I was guilty of harassment every single day of the 365 days that the case took to come to court, yet I have never so much as once been arrested or questioned on this matter since 30th of July 2014.

(43) Judge Woollard was blatantly biased and hostile towards me from my very 1st appearance in court in January 2015. It is indeed significant that I had a judge in charge of my case for the summary offences, obviously being heard in Magistrates court. On the 4 days immediately prior to my first appearance – for which I had not been able to secure legal representation – I had been extremely ill and confined to bed. When I attended court at 9:30 AM, the duty solicitor stated (without being told) that I was clearly unwell and that she would have a word with the judge and get me moved up to first on the list. Judge Woollard’s response to that request was to keep me waiting all day for my 5 minute plea hearing appearance and I did not in fact leave court until nearly 5 PM that day. Moreover, the same duty solicitor told me in front of 3 witnesses sat with me, that I would never be allowed to win this case.

(44) I stated to my friends who had come to court with me that day, that I would now have Judge Woollard at every appearance that I made – a fact that I was subsequently proved to be correct about. At various court appearances that I have made on these harassment charges, Judge Woollard has been seen by myself and others to roll his eyes and tut when talking about my point of view and defence of the case. Indeed, I am totally without doubt in my mind that Judge Woollard was specifically selected to oversee my case with a mandate to find me guilty at all costs.

(45) Judge Woollard has a proven track record of finding people guilty who have highlighted government corruption, usually on some other flimsy, unrelated charge

(46) After thwarting the attempt by the police and SS to ruin our lives by taking Clayton into care, the planted “illegal images” tellingly disappeared, the charges relating to those illegal images dropped and tellingly, a Judge has since refused – in a court of law – to allow my legal team access to the police forensic reports on the computer hard-drives of my illegally seized computers – which would prove that the images were either planted or never even on my computers. The CPS have however unbelievably charged me with TWO images – ONE LEGAL and ONE NOTHING TO DO WITH CHILDREN AND HARDLY LIKELY TO SPARK PUBLIC OUTRAGE.

(47) In charging me with the two images, the CPS has gone against their OWN prosecution guidelines (they rarely prosecute for less than 20 images and never prosecute for less than 4), yet are still intent on taking me to CROWN COURT for possession of 2 (TWO) images. The first one is called “Klara and Edda belly dancing” which is by Nan Golding and owned by Sir Elton John and has TWICE been deemed LEGAL in a BRITISH COURT OF LAW (2001, 2007). The photo remains perfectly LEGAL today as proved by a quick Google search should you wish to do  make one by typing the name of the image into your search bar.

(48) The proof that the photo is legal can be found in the BBC report found by clicking HERE, although following the year long investigation, the CID have been unable to find out what took me seconds. Interestingly enough the newspaper article found at that link states the following:

“Even if the photograph was now considered to be indecent, a defendant would be able to raise a legitimate defence, given that the photograph was distributed for the purposes of display in a contemporary art gallery after having been deemed not to be indecent by the earlier investigation.”

(49) Klara & Edda belly dancing is a disgusting photo that I censored (although I didn’t have to) and used in a couple of articles. I used it to highlight child abuse and the kind of perverts who own this type of disturbing “art”. That fact is BLATANTLY OBVIOUS to anyone who reads my articles. However, in 2013 (a year before my first arrest) a Detective Chief Inspector, Gary Biddle contacted me via post about this and other photos, asking to meet me due to the possibility that the photos may be illegal images. He sent this letter – which also clearly states that he understood why I had used the images – after twice coming to my door to talk about them.

10726813_719595504781065_1165658626_n

(50) I did not respond to the letter on the basis that if the images were illegal then the police would send someone round to tell me to take them down. If however they were legal – as I knew that they were – then there was nothing to talk about. Nevertheless, it is a bit sinister that a DCI would want to meet me to discuss the matter, although in the event I never heard from Biddle again – hence the photos MUST have been legal.

(51) The CPS and Prosecution know about this letter and have even found their own copy. I know this for a fact because the prosecution have to by law disclose the evidence that they are going to rely on in court as well as the evidence THAT THEY ARE NOT GOING TO USE. It was little surprise to me that the prosecution are not going to bring this letter up in court.

(52) The 2nd image is deemed as being mild “beastiality”  and I have never been arrested or questioned about the image. There can therefore be NO DOUBT that the reason for this court action that cannot possibly succeed (if the trial is not rigged) is malicious and is going ahead on the back of [Legal] evidence (in the case of the golding photo) gathered illegally.

(53) On July 1st 2014 (if memory serves, but it may have been the 4th), four weeks before the start of the trial, a case management hearing was held in which myself and my supporters were sent [deliberately] to the wrong court (Chelmsford Magistrates). Although I was certain that Chelmsford was to be the venue, a trusted friend had double checked on the day prior to this court appearance that the case was being heard in Chelmsford. However, when myself and supporters arrived at Chelmsford Magistrates (a good 30-45 minute drive from my home) at 9.30AM, we were told that the case was in fact being heard at Southend Magistrates court (a mere 10 minute drive from my home). Nevertheless, I was still able to make the hearing at Southend Magistrates despite being half an hour late.

(54) At a further case management hearing held on the 10th of July 2014, the Prosecution led by one of the most senior prosecutors in the country, Tony Abel – who just so happens to also be a part time high court judge – asked Judge Woollard to rule that his four witnesses should not have to testify in person and that their witness statements should suffice (known as hearsay evidence), a motion that my woefully inadequate barrister opposed on the grounds that (A) it is my right in law under Article 6 of the Human Rights Act to face my accusers in court and (B) a witness statement cannot be cross examined in court and as such it would be impossible for me to get a fair trial without the witnesses appearing in person.

(56) ALL of the witness statements were littered with blatant, easily provable lies and had the witnesses been made to take the stand, they would ALL have committed easily provable perjury – a crime punishable by a term in prison.

(57) I CAN prove that at least 3 of the 4 witnesses are at best dishonest verging on criminal. Amongst the many, many blatant lies in all 4 witness statements are:

  • Witness A: Insinuates that I hacked her Facebook to steal her photos because her FB was set to private. However, I took screenshots of the photos which clearly show a globe symbol meaning that anyone can see them… This should have been enough to null and void Witness A’s statement.
  • Witness B: Claims I harassed her in a FB msg (this was the only msg that I have ever sent to any of them and I was very polite). Witness B did not answer and I did not contact her again. The msg was sent in July 2013 but Witness B did not think to report it until over a year later, 4 days after my arrest… This should have been enough to null and void Witness B’s statement.

11774643_876387145768566_597574977_n 

  • Witness C: Claims that I contacted him multiple times and I was abusive to the point that  he felt threatened. I have never ever contacted Witness C but Witness C has contacted me AND MY DAUGHTER abusively on 3 or 4 occasions of which I  provided proof in court. However, it is telling that in the prosecution evidence bundle, they have left the first part of a copy of our ‘conversation’ out so as it can’t be seen who instigated the chat. However, I had a copy of the conversation in full which I produced in court. Moreover, DC Coombes had already admitted under oath that Witness C started all of the conversations, some of which I never even responded to. Moreover, Witness C was posting taunts on my Christopher C Spivey FB page before I had even been released from custody on the 30th of July 2014… This should have been enough to null and void Witness C’s statement.

2aUntitledasean1a

  • Witness D: Claims that I contacted him on Facebook introducing myself as a “cheap tattooist for bikers” after he had accepted my friend request. I have NEVER EVER sent Witness D a friend request and neither have I EVER spoken to him through any mode of communication. Indeed, whilst giving evidence I asked for proof of Witness D’s claims, in the same way that I just provided the chat logs for conversations between me and Witness C, when proving who contacted whom. I also made it quite clear to Judge Woollard that it was for reasons such as this (blatant lies made with no collaborating evidence) that the witnesses needed to be here so as they could be cross examined, adding that by not ordering the witnesses to attend, he (the Judge) had denied me a fair trial… Judge Woollard made no reply. However, the following screenshot makes a mockery of Witness D’s claim… This should have been enough to null and void Witness D’s statement.

1a

There you have one lie from each of the witnesses, I can promise you that there are many more. And as I mentioned earlier, none of the statements should have been admissible because of the various irregularities on each. Indeed, apart from the first Statement allegedly written on the 16th of July, all the other statements were written after my arrest meaning that I have never been arrested or questioned about the contents. All of the witness statements are written in the exact same colour ink and I believe that they were all written by the same person – two people at most.  

(58) However, the Judge Woollard sided with the prosecution and ruled that the witnesses did not have to appear, breaching my Human Rights under Article 6, and meaning that the witness statements, despite them all being littered with easily provable lies would now stand as FACT, thus denying me any chance of a fair trial.

(59) That ruling meant that I now faced the prospect of a trial which should never have been allowed to go ahead due to the many breaches in the rule of law, for four misdemeanor offences, to be presided over by a blatantly biased judge as opposed to three magistrates, without even so much as the flimsy safety net of a jury, prosecuted by one of the most senior barristers in the country; more used to dealing with serious organised crime and who also sits as a judge, based on Witness Statements made up of blatant lies which was by now accepted as being fact, made by 4 people of whom (A) there is strong evidence to cast doubt that they are who they are claiming to be (B) There is strong evidence to suggest that 3 of the 4 are involved in criminal activities

(60) Following that ruling, my woeful legal representation – whom I now half suspect had been ordered to deliberately sabotage my case, based on too many facts to list – immediately began preparing to submit a judicial review with a view to having Judge Woollards disgusting ruling on the witness non-attendance overturned on the grounds stated above (my human rights had been breached under Article 6 of the HRA, it was now impossible for me to get a fair trial) along with another important point of law, namely what is called “an inequality of arms” – in other words, the prosecution had the creme de la creme of barristers whilst my legal firm had not even been granted funding for legal counsel based on the fact that the charges were summary offences.

human

(61) A further hearing was held on the 17th of July 2014 which neither myself or my legal team were informed about. To date I have not been informed what went on at the hearing.

(62) On the morning of the 30th of July 2015 – the first day of my trial – my barrister, Mohammed Bashir told me before we had even entered court that although he “would do his best, I would still be found guilty”.

(63) The first 40 minutes of the trial was taken up with Mohammed Bashir arguing that I could not possibly be given a fair trial and that the judge should adjourn the trial until the judicial revue in regard to the witnesses having to appear, had been heard. Indeed, my solicitor, Tasmin Malcolm had previously tried to get a postponement when she had applied for the judicial review, only for her application to be somewhat mysteriously turned down.

Untitledcourt2

(64) Judge Woollard also refused to adjourn the trial on the very flimsy grounds that I might not be granted legal aid to fight the appeal (judicial review) despite Mohammed Bashir categorically stating that he would be representing me in the appeal even if legal aid funding was denied. He also said that he had asked time and again for a good reason that the witnesses should appear but got none. That maybe true but that was the fault of my barristers. Indeed, I even asked my solicitor to intervene when the [deliberately?] clueless barrister was fucking my case up. However, it was not for me to provide a good reason that the witnesses should appear, it was for Judge Woollard to have a good reason that they shouldn’t.

(65) Mohammed Bashir absolutely destroyed the one and only witness, Detective Constable Adam Coombes in regard to the unlawful way that the investigation had been carried out. Judge Woollard simply took no notice of the admissions that Coombes was forced to admit. These included:

  • All video’s, pictures, comments, etc were all taken from the mainstream media or were in the public domain.
  • I had not encouraged or incited anybody to commit any criminal activity.
  • That Witness C had contacted me first.
  • Agree that the witnesses did not have to go on my website
  • He was forced to admit that he didn’t know why they did.
  • Admit that the witnesses or anybody else including the police had never asked me to remove anything.
  • Admit that the witnesses could have got an injunction ordering me to take the offending posts down, but they didn’t.
  • When asked why it took the witnesses over a year to complain, he answered “I don’t know”.
  • When asked why it took the police two weeks to arrest me following the complaint he again answered “I don’t know”
  • He was forced to admit that I was arrested without search or arrest warrant.
  • When asked why the police had violated Code B of Pace and arrested me at an unacceptable hour, he was again forced to answer “I don’t know”.
  • He was asked if there had been any assault, or violence, or harassment to the witnesses since my arrest to which he admitted that there hadn’t been… Hence the witnesses claim to me causing them alarm and distress was unfounded. 
  • When asked if he had checked if there were other websites making the same claims as me he admitted he hadn’t. There are in fact tens of thousands all claiming the same as me.

(66) Despite myself never being served with the precise evidence that the prosecution were going to rely on in court, taken from the 650 plus pages of articles photocopied from my website, which I had never been ordered to remove, it quickly became obvious that the prosecution evidence spanned a period from the 23rd of May 2013 to the 11th of November 2014. This is very significant for many reasons:

  • Firstly, a complaint of harassment should be made within 6 months of the act. Therefore anything relating to a period before January 2014 should have been inadmissible.
  • Moreover, since the one and only time that I have been arrested and questioned in regard to this case was the 30th of July 2014, there should have been no evidence used against me in this case that pertained to any date thereafter – including the two charges against me relating to Witness B which were catalogued by the police on the 3rd of August 2014. The prosecution bundle shows that evidence was still being added on the 11th of January 2015 despite me being [illegally] summons on the 17 of December 2014.
  • For the prosecution to prove harassment they have to show a course of conduct that the accused should have known constituted harassing somebody. There can be no doubt whatsoever that Witness A and Witness B (whom the 4 offences relate to) knew about this website on or before the 18th of July 2013, yet no complaint was ever lodged until the 16th of July 2014 – one year later. And even then, there was no warning from the police in that two week period between the complaint being logged on the 16th of July and my arrest on the 30th of July, that I was and had been pursuing a course of conduct that was tantamount to harassment – as is the normal police procedure to do so. Therefore, since no one contacted me or told me to stop in that period between the 18th of July 2013 and the complaint being logged on the 16th of July 2014 and then the period between the 16th of July and the 30th of July 2014 – how could I have possibly known that what I was doing was pursuing a course of conduct tantamount to harassment?
  • The Malicious communication in the case of Witness B refers to ONE private message that I sent her on Facebook on the 18th of July 2013 in which I asked her very, very politely if she would be prepared to talk to me in my capacity as a journalist. She did not answer the message and I never made any attempt to contact her again. Therefore, if that messaged was not logged by the police until nearly 13 months later, how could the message possibly be construed as a ‘malicious communication’? Indeed by her own admission, Witness B states that she ignored my communication because she thought that I was a “weirdo”, whilst making no mention that the Facebook message had caused her distress or alarm.
  • The Judge made it quite clear to the court that I was NOT a journalist. He deliberately did this so as I could not use the Journalist’s defence against charges of harassment that state that someone is not guilty of harassment when in pursuit of detecting or proving a crime. However, there can be no doubt whatsoever that I am indeed a journalist (see HERE) and that I was detecting and proving a crime
  • The Malicious communications in regard to Witness A are in the form of a mock-up photograph of the front page of the Sun newspaper which someone made and posted on my Facebook page linked to this website. I believe that I am right in saying the the spoof headline of the Sun front page went viral and appeared on hundreds if not thousands of people’s facebook pages. Indeed, at no time did Facebook deem the image obscene, offensive or likely to cause harassment. It should also be noted that I have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the day to day running of my Facebook page (not to be confused with my Facebook account on which the spoof image did not appear). However, the fact that I did not remove that image from my Facebook page was subsequently deemed as a malicious communication by Judge Woollard.
  • The second Malicious Communication in regard to Witness A came in the form of a Facebook page made by someone alleging a crime and a Youtube account made by someone alleging the same crime as that of the Facebook page. Neither were anything whatsoever to do with me, but the fact that I added a screenshot of both in order to present a balanced view to the blatantly partisan view expressed by every national newspaper, somehow constituted me being responsible for making those two accounts and me being the person alleging the crime, in Judge Woollard’s opinion – despite DC Adam Coombes stating whilst under oath that the accounts were absolutely nothing to do with me.

Untitledcourt3

(67) I have just typed into the Google search bar, asking if the person at the centre of the court case was guilty of that aforementioned crime – which brought up 298,000 results (0.43 seconds), yet I am the only person to have been convicted of questioning as to whether he was or whether he wasn’t to which I had clearly stated that ‘I didn’t know the answer’. Indeed, I had only added the information for the sake of balance. I have also just asked Google if the event that took place which was at the centre of the court case, was a false flag – bringing up 338,000 results (0.37) seconds. Coombes admitted on oath that I was not responsible for the allegations, yet as head of the investigation he should have checked how many others were writing up the same information as me.

(68) Witness A and Witness B allege in their witness statements that I got hold of and used their private photos in my articles. I can prove that all of the images that I used were in the public domain – a fact that given the statements made by Witness A and Witness B, they MUST have known that the Facebook photo settings used on the photos in question were set so as anyone can view them.

(69) There is also the allegation that I published the addresses of Witness A and Witness B. In regard to Witness B, I published the name of the road (but not the house number) that she lives in along with a photo of a row of houses which is no different to what the MSM do everyday and what they themselves have in fact done to me. Indeed, there was a posting on Twitter of my full name address and phone number, retweeted by hundreds, inciting violence against me and my family. I personally informed the police on the 28th of July 2014 at 2:24PM about this Tweet and no action was taken. I have never incited violence against anyone. I only published the name of the road to highlight the fraud that was taking place.

sean2

(70) In regard to the address of Witness A, I did not publish this address until after it became the address of a registered company. Publishing the address of a registered company is not an offence. The reason that I published the address of this company was in the pursuit of uncovering a crime, namely the company was posing as a charity and despite not being registered was receiving thousands of pounds in donations. Once this evidence was released in an article, the Charity ceased fundraising. However, it should also be noted that I hold proof that the Daily Mail printed this address in full (including the house number) in 2013 – long before the premises became a registered business and which WAS a criminal offence. I also hold proof that the Daily Mail published the same address in full (including the house number) on the 30th of July 2015.

(71) There can be no doubt that the guilty verdict against me in this illegal court action was decided long before the end of the trial by the fact that Judge Woollard did not even go through the pretence of retiring to consider his verdict. Instead he launched straight into his 15 to 20 minute guilty verdict as soon as my defence counsel had finished summing up. The Judges speech was far too detailed to have been ‘off the cuff‘.

(72) Judge Woollard has made it clear that he is considering a custodial sentence when I return to Chelmsford Magistrates for sentencing on the 27th of August 2015, despite there being a run of blatant harassment cases in the MSM recently with none of the harassers jailed despite some of them being found guilty in a Crown Court. Yet I have clearly not harassed anybody and still have the shadow of a prison sentence hanging over my head.

The following are but a few examples of the many cases of harassment far in excess of anything that I have done yet the perpetrators avoided prison. They are all from the same Source:

A 34 year old man was charged with harassment. He had no previous convictions. The police recorded stalking behaviour over a nine month period. Not all was proved in court but the evidence was extensive and included text messages, letters, requesting cosmetic surgery material be sent to the victim by mail order, attacks on the victim’s and the her family’s cars at home and at work places. The offender actually flew to another country to send letters to the victim to make her believe they came from her current partner. There was an arson attack on the home of the victim’s extended family whilst they were at home. The offender and victim were never actually in a relationship but the offender wanted to be. The victim was unaware of where the letters and texts were coming from for the first few months and the offender actually befriended her for some time. He received an eight week prison sentence suspended for 24 months with 12 months supervision and 200 hours unpaid work. He has not participated in any programmes. The man was described as high level of risk at MAPPA, was difficult to work with and had narcissistic and psychopathic traits. The court report author requested a psychological assessment but the court refused and instead imposed a supervision order. There is concern that without specialist guidance the work probation did with him might be counterproductive and increase risk.

A 44 year old male was charged with harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. He had previous convictions for theft, driving with excess alcohol and criminal damage. He has been breaching restraining orders since 2003. He admitted that his relationship with the victim had been violent and received two cautions for assault during the course of that relationship. The victim says she was punched in the face and that he was continually verbally abusive towards her particularly following excess bouts of alcohol. He received a suspended sentence for nine months plus a two year community order with a condition that he participate in a domestic abuse programme.

A 53 year old male was charged with harassment and burglary. He had one previous conviction for harassment. He has a history of making phone calls to his ex-partner, following her when she was visiting friends, sending test messages that he knew where she was. He broke into her home and stole notebooks and accessed her computer. He was then found hiding in her garden. This was all over a period of 12 months. He was given a 12 month community order with a condition that he take part in a domestic abuse programme. He did participate in the programme but it made little difference to his behaviour. He breached his order by phone but the victim refused to allow the police to confront him about his behaviour. Probation has experienced difficulty with her disclosures coupled with her refusal to make them formal.

A 39 year old man was charged with harassment. He had a number of previous convictions including acquisitive crime, sexual abuse of a half-brother, threats to kill and domestic violence. The stalking behaviour has been going on for three years. He received a community order for two years. 14 He is said to have been responding to supervision by focussing on his sexual abuse, his poor attachments and his addiction to drugs. Probation believe he may be suffering from post traumatic stress disorder. The perpetrator comes from a professional background and was able to express feelings well compared with most others convicted of similar offences. The victim also came from a professional background and was able to put forward an articulate victim impact statement, which again is thought to be rare.

A 28 year old male was charged with harassment. He had no previous convictions. The stalking behaviour involving following and phone calls had been going on for two months. He received a 24 month supervision order. He has not attended any programmes. The victim had made two previous complaints to the police before the matter was actioned.

A 36 year old male was charged with harassment. He had no previous convictions. His relationship had broken down in autumn 2010. The offender then persistently harassed the victim until she reported it to the police in April 2011. He would continually attend at the victim’s property, almost on a daily basis. He caused damage to property by smashing windows and doors and breaking and entering. He also threatened to set fire to the victim’s house on several occasions. He would also follow her to friend’s houses and then ring her and say he knew where she was. On at least one occasion he hid in the boot of her car whilst she drove to a friend’s house using keys that he had kept. He was given a 12 month supervision order and a condition that the do 100 hours unpaid work, and an indefinite restraining order. He has participated previously in community programmes but only unpaid work. It is of concern to probation that it took seven months before the behaviour was reported to the police.

A 50 year old male was charged with harassment. He has previous convictions for actually bodily harm. The stalking of the victim has been going on for 14 months. For the index offence he received a six month community order plus a three month curfew. He has not participated in any programmes. A restraining order is in place for 12 months expiring in late 2012.

The Study concludes:

The range of sentences handed down reflects how serious stalking behaviour can become and why the courts must take previous offending into account. Virtually all those given three months or more involved serious violence, attempts to kill or even homicide. These cases show how offending behaviour can escalate and the absence of mental health treatment. In every case the pattern in stalking involved following, unwanted and unannounced visits, threats, texts, emails, unwanted gifts and attention over a period of many months or even years. The remaining 41 perpetrators were given community sentences, although eight had not yet been sentenced or were on remand. The sentence for breach of a restraining order tended to be stated in days or week rather than months or years. They were usually for less than 12 months and

Yet I have harassed no one, have no previous convictions for harassment or sending malicious communications, and that is not to mention that the charges should have been dismissed time and again, yet the Judge considers my 1 polite Facebook message to Witness B worthy of a prison sentence!

(73) Since August 27th is beyond the 21 day period to put in an appeal against a conviction, the blatantly biased Judge Woollard is now going to pass sentence knowing that I have put in an appeal against conviction largely based on his blatant disregard of the law.

(74) I have had to put the appeal in myself since I appear to have been abandoned by my solicitor who has totally ignored my emails and despite promises from other staff at the law firm, that they will ensure that she rings me back – being as she is never there when I call – she has not done so to date.

(75) I was sent a prosecution disclosure bundle last week – as required by law – in regard to the two image trial in September which my solicitors had received before my harassment trial yet had inexplicably held onto for 3 weeks. Now bearing in mind that the 2 trials are linked by my illegally seized computers, what was interesting about this bundle was that tucked away at the back was a list of the evidence that the prosecution were not intending to bring up in court. And one of the items on that list was the fact that it had not been the Greater Manchester Police who requested Essex Police arrest me… It was in fact the Metropolitan Police who had done so.

11897204_895896407150973_2124457349_n

(76) Therefore, the immediate question to spring to mind was “why on earth would Witness A – a Manchester resident – make a complaint to a London police force about a fella from Essex? Makes no sense, although it does to me, but because my bail conditions prevent me defending myself – or put another way protect the guilty – I can’t tell you why.

(77) There can be no mistake because after submitting a FOI request to the Met police, it turns out that the [illegal] witness statement made by Witness A (allegedly on the 16th of July 2014) is partly typed with an illegal handwritten addition is done so on a Metropolitan Police witness statement sheet. Moreover, it is blatantly obvious that the date stated on the witness statement which formed the initial complaint filed by Manchester resident, to the Metropolitan Police about a man in Essex has been added sometime after the statement was compiled as it is written in different handwriting, by someone with a much heavier hand using a pen with a much darker shade of black ink.

(78) In turn, you also have to ask yourself why I, the Court, the Press and every person following the case has been deliberately led to believe that The Greater Manchester Police are responsible for ordering my arrest. For example, the following is a direct quote from an Essex Police Spokesmen which was quoted in nearly all of the nantional newspapers:

He is at Southend Police Station helping officers with their enquires. The arrest relates to an allegation of harassment via social media which has been referred to Essex Police by Greater Manchester Police.” Source

(79) The evidence that I collected over countless hours in a period of a year and a half is indisputable when read properly and as a whole. I have now been ordered to remove the evidence from this website – not because it is harrassing anyone, but because your government does not want you to know what they are really doing.

(80) When Judge Woollard had finished summing up in the trial, the prosecutor, Tony Abell – one of the country’s most experienced barristers and a part time high court judge to boot, who took the time off from prosecuting serious organized crime and multi-million pound fraud cases in order to prosecute me for a misdemeanour, gave Judge Woollard his view of the case to assist him in handing down an appropriate sentence, as is required by law. Tony Abell told Judge Woollard that this case was “high end” – a blatant lie because I have not harassed anyone and harassment at the “high end” comes under Section 4 and is an either way offence triable in Crown Court. Indeed, you only need read the examples above of harassment as a summary offence to realise that my case, at worst, is the very lowest of the low end. Tony Abell, then added – with perverse pleasure and in lieu of me having no previous convictions – that some of the photos that I had used in my articles were of Witness A’s  and witness B’s children (whilst neglecting to point out that the photos were all in the public domain and only used as proof that a hoax was taking place) before stating that I go on trial in September for possessing illegal images of children – which despite being a blatant lie, the inference is there for all to see.

Now, I can state that I have no regrets and would do it all again in the blink of an eye. A government filled with corrupt, thieving, paedophiles who are working to our detriment is not acceptable by any standards.

However, in uncovering the truth I do expect to have your support and backing… Therefore, I would ask that you share this report far and wide, keep sharing it and then share it some more…

You can find a full break down of the court case by clicking HERE

Those then are the TRUE facts all of which either have been or can be evidenced and anyone who thinks that treatment is acceptable in this country needs a serious reality check.

Indeed, anyone who agrees that the above is acceptable is giving their consent to people being taken away in the middle of the night by military type thugs without the need for any warrants, based on a single allegation made without evidence of a misdemeanour.

Indeed, anyone who agrees that the above is acceptable is giving their consent to the police kicking down your front door in the middle of the day without warrant on evidence that they themselves have planted without any recourse and under the protection of the law courts.

Indeed, anyone who agrees that the above is acceptable is giving their consent to children who are very much loved and well cared for, being taken from innocent parents, guilty at best of a misdemeanour, and placed in care homes where they are left to the mercy of paedophiles.

Indeed, anyone who agrees that the above is acceptable is giving their consent to the jailing of someone who questions the government narrative on any given subject.

Indeed, anyone who agrees that the above is acceptable can have no gripe when they are jailed for calling someone a liar in a private forum that the aggrieved has had to actively seek out to see if the slur was true.

NONE OF THE ABOVE IS EXAGGERATION.

You should be aware that what this abomination perpetrated against my family is every bit as bad as the crimes against humanity being committed in countries such as China, North Korea and Belarus.

You should also be aware that a petition started by someone over the persecution of me and my family at the time of my court trial was removed without any forthcoming explanation by the petition website.

There is clear, photographed evidence that another petition started by someone in protest at the persecution being aimed at me and my family is having many signatures removed from it, despite the petition website denying the fact.

76pet

The petition currently stands at 2362 and I would urge you all to sign it which you can do by clicking HERE

Bizarrely, those in charge really believe that people are as thick as shit… Although there could actually be some foundation to their belief.

It is vitally important that as many people as possible attend the sentencing court date on the 27th of August if for nothing else than to be seen to oppose the Police state that we live in. I realise that this is hard for some of you but it is REALLY important that you do make every effort to be there.

I also appreciate that some of you have ailments and are not up to the journey. That is fine, if that is the case I wouldn’t expect you to.

I further appreciate that the transport cost to some is a problem but maybe something can be sorted out as there is always car sharing. Indeed, I am sure that if you let Dogman or Lisa know where you are coming from they will do their best to put you in touch with someone else coming from nearby.

And should that not be possible, a very kind lady in Australia has donated £30 to add to the £50 already donated to a travel fund for people who cannot afford to travel to Chelmsford Magistrates. That is £80 so far with the promise of more to come.

*That total now stands at £180.

Think on, it is only one day that you need to put yourself out – one day that could make a significant difference to how yours lives and the lives of future generations pan out.

It is in fact fair to say that this disgraceful court decision has achieved a bit of unity in the Alternative Media and that is surely a good thing?

Indeed I understand that Henry from the Tap has been supportive of me as have aangirfan – although to be fair, the latter always has been. Never the less, a massive thank you to those two sites.

Danielle La Verite and Billy Carlin’s support has never wavered, thank you both.

A big thank you also to Ian R Crane who altered his ‘Crane Report’ schedule in order to to have me on his show, which you can watch by clicking HERE

Ian has also told me that he will definitely be attending the sentencing on August the 27th and I believe that Danielle intends to do the same.

Open Your Mind Radio were also kind enough to give me an interview so as I could get the word out about the injustice that has and still is taking place against me and my family. You can hear that interview by clicking HERE 

And of course, a big thank you to Dr Nick Kollerstrom for all of his help.

On a brighter note, I have been asked if I fancy speaking at next years Glastonbury Festival… It would be proper fucking rude of me not to wouldn’t it.

After all, it isn’t often that an uncouth, crack-pot fantasist with aspirations to be a journalist gets such a prestigious offer is it… Just sayin’.

 

source: http://www.chrisspivey.org/harrassed/
————————————————————————————————————

Friday, 21 August 2015

Chris Spivey- Dead Man Walking.

Chris Spivey is a dead man walking. Tragic news to his family, Chris Spivey has arrived at theterrible conclusion that the only way the Powers that Be can save themselves is to murder him while he’s in custody at Her Majesty’s pleasure.

Spelt out in crystal clarity in his latest article ’They Shoot Horses Don’t They,’ Chris Spivey proves beyond all reasonable doubt that not only is he is a victim of injustice, but he’s also earmarked to be murdered in Prison- in the not too distance future.

Spivey’s harassment conviction is built upon two counts of malicious communication against Lynn Rigby and Lee Rigby’s sister.

The first relates to ONE AND ONLY ONE Facebook message he sent on the 18th of July 2013 in which he was extremely polite and when he got no answer, did not attempt to contact the witness again.

The other malicious communication charge relates to a mock-up of a front page of the Sun newspaper, which was published on his Facebook Page.

(It’s interesting to note that “a Matt Taylor” was named in the court’s transcript as being the person responsible for posting the mock Sun newspaper front page. It has since been admitted that it was in fact posted by Lisa Pea, a member of Spivey’s administrative team.)

Chris Spivey maintains his innocence on this count claiming, “I DID NOT make this spoof page and never even acknowledged it. The person responsible posted it on my Facebook page that I do not have any dealings with in regard to things that people post on there.”

Guerrilla Democracy News accepts full responsibility for this picture

You would have thought the case would have been dismissed on these two points alone, but the miscarriage of justice runs deeper when we learn that the witness statements used to convict Spivey haven’t even been signed by those person(s) who wrote them.

Rather than shying away Spivey is maintaining his contention that all the witnesses who testified against him ARE’NT who they claim to be.

“All four witnesses are of easily provable dubious character with clear evidence relating to criminal behaviour.”

Here is what Spivey has to say on the subject:

“Here is the way I see it.

The prosecution fought tooth and nail using one of the country’s top barristers to keep their OWN four witnesses out of court… Why would they do that?

My aherm, aherm Barrister ignored all that I told her as to why the witnesses should appear i.e their witness statements were a tissue of easily exposed lies and as such, were they to be repeated under oath would mean that they would have committed perjury. And in any event, the witnesses are not who they pretend to be.

I therefore knew that if the witnesses were made to appear then the trial would not have gone ahead… The case would have been dropped.

However, the Judge, completely ignoring the rule of law sided with the prosecution – ruling that the witnesses be spared being torn to bits on the witness stand – thus blatantly denying me the right to a fair trial.”

“THE WITNESSES ARE NOT WHO THEY PRETEND TO BE.”

Propabably the most controversial statement to make related to the Woolwich incident is the claim that virtually every personality involved was an MI5 inspired creation – a crisis actor!

Spivey plans to appeal his conviction but in doing so he knows better than anyone that he’s signed his own death warrant.

Over to Spivey who explains:

“An appeal means that the witnesses WILL HAVE TO APPEAR NO MATTER WHAT because the appeal will be held in a Crown Court with a jury and will be based on the above facts.

And like I said, had the witnesses been made to appear then the case would have been dropped, not least because the witnesses – as the Crown fully knows – are not who they claim to be, are of dubious character and have alleged easily provable lies in all four witness statements… Therefore, they now have a real, real crisis on their hands because unlike the trial, they can not drop the appeal hearing and if that goes ahead, then it is not an understatement to say that at the very least, the outcome has the capacity to bring down the government.

Therefore, the only way to stop the appeal going ahead – which they have to at all costs – is if I am dead… Hence the forthcoming prison sentence.”

LATEST NEWS.

Sourced from Spivey’s Facebook status update.

“Guess who has been asked to appear at the Glastonbury Festival next year?

If I am still alive of course!

The following is a link to video footage of yesterday’s event in London where Dr Nick Kollerstrom handed a letter into the ministry of Justice in protest at the persecution of me and my family by the British Government.”

Transcript of the harassment trial of Christopher Spivey 30th-31st July 2015 at Chelmsford Magistrates Court. 

The trial began at about 10.20am, and the next 40 minutes consisted of Spivey’s barrister asking the Judge to postpone the trial until a Judicial Review application had been processed. Spivey’s barrister argued, that the trial would be ‘unfair’ because he could not ‘challenge the witnesses, because they were not there’. The barrister argued that the pictures of the Rigby family, their homes and addresses were not ‘private’ but already in the public domain and therefore could be downloaded by anybody. He also argued that Spivey, was ‘a journalist, therefore he had freedom of expression.’ The judge then asked if he could have a copy of the application for Judicial Review and was given a copy by the defence. He noticed straight away that it was not stamped and asked why. The Defence explained that the application for legal aid to pay for the application and legal costs to process such a form had still not been authorised. However it will be lodged either today (30th July) or tomorrow. The Judge said he disagreed with the Judicial Review application because at every court appearance he have always asked why Mr Spivey wanted the witnesses present and he had never received a satisfactory response to his question. He said that he felt that there was enough authority to proceed with the trial, and he would weigh up the hearsay evidence regarding its merits. The prosecution then outlined the case against Spivey, quoting from his Police Statement, “they don’t have to read it (the Rigby family)………… I have freedom of speech” The prosecution informed the court that there was ample evidence 1that Spivey’s article had caused harm and distress to the family, and either he knew it would or should have known. Spivey had deliberately targeted Lee Rigby’s mother and sister, and his comments were more than irritating. He acknowledged that Spivey had freedom of speech, however, section 10. 2 of the Harassment Act informs us that this also carries certain duties and responsibilities. Spivey’s comments were ‘bizarre’ and could have only come from a ‘crank’ and had caused alarm and distress and this all equalled harassment. The prosecution then read out Lee Rigby’s mother’s statement: We were now rebuilding our lives (family)…. How her Facebook site was/is private…. The Sun `hoax’ headlines front page…. She read the comments alleging her son was a rapist….. The website destroyed (her) happy memories” Then Lee Rigby’s sister`s statement was read out: “Contacted by Spivey via Facebook….. Claimed he had evidence of a hoax…. I Did not accept his `friend’ request` because I thought he was weird…… I looked at his website…. Spivey had published photos of me/family/home ….. I wondered how did he get my children`s names?….. I felt at risk, now may have to move” Mr Amos’ statement was then read out: “I am angry…. He used photos from my Facebook page….. Spivey sent messages…. I answered because I was intrigued…. (I felt) threatened, like I was being accused of being in on the hoax…. He exposing Rigby family fraud…. Spivey said that they will kill you not me, I have a high profile” Mr Vitler’s statement was then read out: “Spivey contacted me… He looked like a cheap tattooist for bikers… Photographs (of Spivey) freaked him out… I Felt like someone was watching me” 2The defence barrister then realised that his ‘bundle’ of documents were different than the Prosecution and Judges. The Judge commented that the management of papers by the CPS had been far from adequate since the start of Spivey’s court appearances. DC Coombes then was sworn in to give his evidence, reiterated all the points from the four statements to the Court. Spivey’s Barrister then asked about the article regarding the assertion that the soldier was a ‘rapist’ and it was confirmed by DC Coombes that it was not Spiveys’ article. The policeman confirmed with a simple “yes” that in all his investigations all video’s, pictures, comments, etc were all taken from the mainstream media or were in the public domain. The barrister then referred the DC to pictures of Margaret Thatcher’s funeral in the bundle. Asking first did he know that they were her funeral pictures? Answer, “I don’t know”. The barrister said, “Please believe me it was”. There were two photos of the funeral one implying a large crowd at her funeral, was photo shopped by the Mainstream Media. The next one that was in the Alternative Media, was of a very sparse crowd. Did he notice Spivey’s comments about the pictures? He replied “Yes” The DC also confirmed that Spivey’s publication of the families addresses, had not encouraged or incited anybody to commit any criminal activity. The DC also confirmed with a simple “Yes” that Mr Amos contacted Spivey first. The DC also agreed that the witnesses did not have to go on Spivey’s website (all four witnesses). When asked why they went on the website? The DC answered “I don’t 3know”. He was then asked, if the family ever asked Spivey to take posts down? He replied, “No”. He then said that the family could have got the posts taken down by an Injunction and this was confirmed by the DC. The Barrister asked why it took over a year for them to complain. The DC replied, “I don’t know” The barrister continued with questions such as: “Why did it take the police two weeks from the instigation of the complaint to Spivey’s arrest?” “I can’t account for why”. “In those two weeks before his arrest was the family asking why has he not been arrested yet? ” “No” He asked if there had been any assault, or violence, or harassment to the family since Spivey’s arrest? The DC replied, “No”. The next day, Friday morning, the DC was back in the dock. Spivey’s Barrister informed the court that Spivey was arrested with no search or arrest warrant. The DC confirmed that no other websites were checked regarding the Rigby families material, he said that it was not relevant to check other sites. Spivey then was sworn in. He was asked by his barrister about his background. The Judge asked about his dealings with the Sovereign Independent Newspaper, “how big is it’s circulation?” 4Spivey’s Barrister then asked Spivey the purpose of his website, Spivey’s response was, “to make comments not published in the mainstream media.” He asked Spivey to go to the bundle – “What was the purpose of the picture of Prince Charles being told by you to fuck off?” Spivey replied, “To attract attention”. He then asked if Spivey ever got any negative comments on Facebook. Spivey confirmed he had. The barrister asked about which subjects received such comments, and gave the example of Rolf Harris. Spivey replied that the comments were made by “organised trolls”. Spivey then stated that everything he writes is sourced, he analyses the evidence and then writes his opinions. His writing style was simplistic in nature, designed for his target audience, which he stated was “like speaking to somebody on a building site” (a previous occupation of his). He admitted to photo shopping photos of Lee Rigby to evidence his opinion they matched up with other persons. He claimed he did not target the Rigby family, there were numerous other websites regarding Woolwich. Spivey was asked if he knew the Rigby’s were looking at his site. Spivey replied, “No” Spivey said, “Amos contacted me…… Amos said, Come on big boy”. Spivey confirmed that he had never contacted Mr Vitler in any form whatsoever, nor had he contacted anybody to take a picture of Vitler. The Sun ‘mock headline’ was posted by a Matt Taylor as anybody can post on Spivey’s Facebook account. Spivey had been threatened with violence regarding various posts and subjects on Facebook in the past. 5He said: “his website, comments on his articles and his forum pages were only able to be accessed by subscription.” The subscription comprised of giving a valid email address. He had moderators who ran his site, he just wrote. The barrister asked how many hits he has had since he has started in 2012. Spivey responded, “10 and half million, and yesterday I had 15,000 hits”. The Judge asked, “Could the same people make multiple hits?”, Spivey replied, “Yes” Spivey was asked by his barrister, if he actively sought or engaged the Rigby family to view the site? He confirmed that he had not. Spivey said that he only knew that he was alleged to have harassed the family, at the time of his arrest. He never wanted to cause harassment. The Prosecution then questioned Spivey regarding his Facebook account and website, and implied that ‘links’ posted on his Facebook page were a kind of advertisement for his webpage. The Prosecution suggested that the ‘mock’ Sun posting on his Facebook page, even though posted by Matt Taylor had then been ‘adopted’ by him by not deleting it, and asked if Spivey agreed with its content. Spivey replied that he had, “No feelings one way or the other”. Spivey was then asked if he had attended the “Two Michaels” Old Bailey Trial, or informed the police, or defence solicitors for the “Two Michaels” that he could help the trial by revealing what he had discovered. Spivey responded, “No” 6 Spivey said his intention at one time was to present all his evidence to a Police Station. The Judge then asked Spivey, “Did you ever consider the possibility that you could be wrong?” Then asking, “did you not consider the hurt caused to the Rigby`s if you are wrong?” Spivey answered that his motive regarding exposing Woolwich as a hoax, was to publicise how anti – muslim feelings were being stirred up in the country, plus he wanted to expose the negative prospect of rewarding of the security services with a multi-million budget to further erode freedoms. The Judge then said this Rigby conspiracy was, “extremely wide”. He suggested that MI5 must have got everybody on board from the Old Bailey judge to the witnesses of the murder. Spivey used the example of Pearl Harbour to illustrate that cover ups do occur, in that it is now common knowledge that the Americans allowed this to happen so they could enter the Second World War. The Judge then asked Spivey his views on 9/11, 7/7, Tunisia and the Holocaust. Spivey replied he did not believe the Government narratives on all of these occurrences and he also informed the Judge that his daughter was Jewish. The Prosecution then asked Spivey if he agreed that the death of a son would upset the parents. Spivey confirmed that he agreed. Spivey also agreed that such a death would upset a half sibling and would be upsetting if the death was also violent and unexpected. The barrister then asked Spivey what was the purpose of inviting the sister to make contact. Spivey answered, “To get a story out…. I am a journalist” 7 The Judge then said that the sister had received his request, “out of the blue, and didn’t know you from Adam, and don’t you think she would check you out as an Investigative Reporter by checking your site…..” The Prosecution then asked how come so many agencies of the State have got it all wrong regarding Lee Rigby. Spivey responded with, “My job is for the good of the people”. The Prosecution then asked about the personal comments regarding the picture of Lee Rigby’s family home and also about Spivey’s’ comments about the allegations of rape. The Judge asked about Spivey’s comment, “9 times out of 10, I am usually right” in relation to the rape comments. The Prosecution then asked about his research for his topics. Spivey informed the court that all material used is in the public domain. Spivey confirmed that he is an internet campaigner because all our freedoms are being taken away. Spivey also confirmed that he had a Press Card and he was registered and that there was a Code of Ethics. Spivey then left the dock. The Prosecution then began his summing up: “….abundant evidence regarding the Lee Rigby family…. (That caused) alarm and distress… would have known or should have known it would cause alarm or distress” The Prosecution stated that there was definite targeting by Spivey. Informing the court that since the cases of harassment in 2001 and 2004, the “effect of publishing does not have to be direct”…. You can be found guilty even if you say, “don’t tell the person this”…. “In terms of Freedom of Speech, Spivey has crossed the line….” 8 “He was/is an obsessive conspiracy theorist who thinks he is free to act in this manner with impunity.” The Defence then summed up. The prosecution to prove their case had to prove Spivey was wrong in his opinion of the Woolwich incident. There are difficulties with “big events”, where people question the facts, the example he used were the Moon Landings. People can analyse the same evidence but come to different conclusions. The picture of the Rigby family at Christmas was freely available to the public. The home address was sourced by means of Companies House. The person who took the picture of Mr Vitler was never traced by the Crown to seek his motive. There was no evidence on Spivey’s computers when checked by the Police, nor that he had encouraged or incited anybody to do anything to the four witnesses, plus there was no evidence of the targeting of these individuals. Spivey had written about the whole Woolwich incident, the Rigby story was just a small piece in his essays. The Barrister stated the legal test for Spivey was, “was he aware he should not have done it”. Giving the example of the Rapist accusation which was removed the next day by Facebook. The Defence stated that fourteen months had passed from the first post about the Rigby`s to the date of Spivey’s arrest. No action was taken to take down Spivey’s publications. Spivey has never been asked by anybody to “please take it down” to the present day (31st July). Lee Rigby’s mother did not indicate in her statement when she first 9saw Spivey’s website, and how many visits she made over this 14 month period when the articles were up. Again the test for Spivey was whether he knew he was harassing anyone. Mr Amos in his statement never indicated that Spivey had “overstepped the line” and he was going to tell Mrs Rigby. In the same way the sister was never asked, “When did you view it?”, and how many times over this fourteen month period. Spivey had not asked anybody to, “Go and sort them out”, although he acknowledged that Spivey had contacted the sister, “only once”. The website was for his opinion only, he is a journalist not a “nut job”. Spivey’s comments on the mainstream media give an alternative opinion which are all his own views and assertions. After Spivey’s barrister finished his summing up, the Judge immediately delivered his summing up of the case and gave his verdict. Spivey, in the Judge’s opinion, in the ‘Reasonable Person’ test, had harassed the two family members of the Rigby family. There had been, “a course of conduct to those people, likely to cause distress… (Spivey) should have known” In the interest of Justice there was no reason for the Rigby family to attend court in his view. In the Judge’s opinion the website and Facebook account was the real issue, not Woolwich. Then he stated that Spivey considers himself a journalist, who questions stories from the mainstream media and by, “just looking at photos can say 9/11, 7/7, Pearl Harbour, Tunisia did not happen, and Lee Rigby was not murdered or was not real”. The Judge then said, “All in the (Woolwich) case have been seriously misled by MI5…..a massive conspiracy” “He (Spivey) thinks, “without a shadow of a doubt, I am right, and 10everybody else is wrong”. The Judge then said it is not for him to take a view regarding Woolwich, the test for him was just regarding the harassment of the two Rigby family members. He then said that Spivey was “a journalist with no code of ethics to speak of.” He debunked public figures and others, in his view in a “very unpleasant manner”. He had made personal, and unattractive remarks about the Rigby family and was guilty. The Prosecution then said that Spivey had planned this harassment over a long period, it was ‘high end’. The court costs to Spivey would be £3,980. He produced a Restraining Order for the Judge to order the take down all offending material on Spivey’s website by 12 midnight on the 31st of July. The Defence was then asked by the Judge to prepare a pre-sentence report as custody was an option. He also informed Spivey, that if he took the whole site down, then this could be used in mitigation when sentencing him on the 27th August.

source:  http://guerrillademocracy.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/chris-spivey-dead-man-walking.html

——————————————————————————————————

Chris Spivey on the Woolwich Psychodrama + Boston Bomb Hoax – Good Vibrations # 21 w/ Mark Devlin

http://embed.bambuser.com/broadcast/5692264

1 Chris Spivey Trial – 30 July 2015

http://embed.bambuser.com/broadcast/5692644

2  Chris Spivey Trial – 30 July 2015

yesterday at 21:28 [31 July]

Bad news Chris found GUILTY and http://chrisspivey.org going to be taken down at midnight! This is VERY sinister

————————————————————————————————————-

Conspiracy theorist ‘claimed Lee Rigby’s murder was a hoax and terrified his family by publishing their addresses online’ – D. Mail

  • Chris Spivey, 52, from Rochford, allegedly claimed soldier, 25, did not exist
  • Self-styled journalist said relatives had doctored family photos, court told 
  • He allegedly said murder was conspiracy to incite anti-Islamic messages
  • Spivey denies harassing Fusilier Rigby’s mother Lyn and sister Sarah 
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

COURTHOUSE NEWS SERVICE: “WikiLeaks Prosecutor Charts Rise of Insider-Threat Boom” by ADAM KLASFIELD

Subscribers

<!–

–>

<!–

–>

Courthouse News Service
Courthouse News Service

Wednesday, June 17, 2015Last Update: 12:22 PM PT

 

 WikiLeaks Prosecutor Charts Rise of Insider-Threat Boom

Click the hyperlinked text to visit Part II of this series, “Manning Prosecutor Breaks Silence on WikiLeaks Case,” or Part III, “Corporate America Enters the Cyber War Room.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

PROCTOR: GENERAL SIR HUGH BEACH RESPONDS TO PROCTOR ALLEGATIONS 26/08/15 + PROCTOR: FULL STATEMENT – DENIES ALLEGATIONS

Full Statement Of Harvey Proctor

One very important point to make is that this statement has not been checked exactly with what he actually said today.

CNQbnovWoAA1TTG

 STATEMENT BY MR KEITH HARVEY PROCTOR 

MADE IN THE MARLBOROUGH ROOM, ST.ERMIN’S HOTEL, LONDON

NOT FOR RELEASE BEFORE 2PM ON TUESDAY 25th AUGUST 2015

    I am a private citizen. I have not held public office and I have not sought public office since May 1987. As such, I am entitled to be regarded as a private citizen. Since the General Election of 1987 I have sought a private life. I have been enjoying a full life, gainfully employed and personally happy.

This all came to an abrupt end on 4th March 2015. What now follows is a statement on my present predicament created by an unidentified person making totally untrue claims against my name. Before going any further I wish to make it clear that the genuine victims of child sexual abuse have my fullest sympathy and support and I would expect the full weight of the law to be used against anyone, be he ‘ever so high, or ever so low’, committing such odious offences. Nobody and I repeat, nobody is above the law.

2. However, I attach equal weight to justice for innocent people wrongly accused of child sexual abuse, especially when it is done anonymously. This is what is happening to me and many high profile figures, many of whom are dead and cannot answer back. This statement is necessarily lengthy and detailed and at times complicated. Please bear with me and at the end I will be prepared to answer your questions.

3. On 18th June, 2015, at my request, I was interviewed by the Metropolitan Police Murder Squad “Operation Midland”. This interview lasted over 6 hours. At the very outset I had to help the Police with my full name which they appeared not to know. It may surprise you that it was over 3 and an half months after my home was searched for 15 hours and more than 7 months after the most serious allegations were made against me that I was interviewed. I went on to cooperate fully with the Police with their investigation.

4. The allegations have been made by a person who the Police have dubbed with a pseudonym – “NICK”. He appears on television with a blacked out face and an actor’s voice. All of this is connected with alleged historical child sexual abuse in the 1970ies and 1980ies. “NICK” was interviewed by the Police in the presence of a reporter from Exaro – an odd internet news agency.

5. As a Member of Parliament I always spoke in favour of the police. I believe in law and order and I believe in equipping the police to do their job and , with my track record, it will come as a surprise that I have grave and growing concerns about the Police generally and more specifically “Operation Midland”. I have decided to share these concerns with you. I believe I am not speaking just for myself today. I hope I am not being presumptuous when I say I feel I am speaking for those who have no voice whatsoever including the dead to whom I referred moments ago.

6. Two days before my interview with the Police, my Solicitors – Sakhi Solicitors of Leicester – were sent a “disclosure” document. It set out the matters the Police wished to discuss with me. It was the first time I had known of what I had been accused. On the day of my interview I was not arrested, nor placed on Police bail, I was told I could leave the Police Station at any time and that it was a voluntary interview. I and my Solicitors had previously been told I was not a suspect.

7. At the end of the interview I was given no information as to how much longer the Police investigation would take to bring the matter to a conclusion. I think you will understand I cannot allow this matter to rest.

8. So you can gauge how angry I am and in an attempt to stop the “drip, drip, drip” of allegations by the police into the media , I now wish to share with you in detail the uncorroborated and untrue allegations that have been made against me by “NICK”. Anyone of a delicate or a nervous disposition should leave the room now.

9. The following is taken from the Police disclosure document given to my Solicitors two days before my first interview with the Police under the headings “Circumstances”, “Homicides” and “Sexual abuse”.

I QUOTE:-

“ Circumstances

The victim in this investigation is identified under the pseudonym “Nick”. He made allegations to the Metropolitan Police Service in late 2014. Due to the nature of the offences alleged, “Nick” is entitled to have his identity withheld.

“Nick” stated he was the victim of systematic and serious sexual abuse by a group of adult males over a period between 1975 and 1984. The abuse was often carried out whilst in company with other boys whom were also abused by the group.

“Nick” provided names of several individuals involved in these acts including Mr HARVEY PROCTOR. He states MR PROCTOR abused him on a number of occasions which included sexual assault, buggery and torturous assault. He also states MR PROCTOR was present when he was assaulted by other adult males. Furthermore, “Nick” states he witnessed the murder of three young boys on separate occasions. He states MR PROCTOR was directly responsible for two of the allegations and implicated in the third.

The dates and locations relevant to MR PROCTOR are as follows:-

Homicides

1980 – at a residential house in central London. “Nick” was driven by car to an address in the Pimlico/Belgravia area where a second boy (the victim) was also collected in the same vehicle. Both boys, aged approximately 12-years-old, were driven to another similar central London address. MR PROCTOR was present with another male. Both boys were led to the back of the house. MR PROCTOR then stripped the victim, and tied him to a table. He then produced a large kitchen knife and stabbed the child through the arm and other parts of the body over a period of 40 minutes. A short time later MR PROCTOR untied the victim and anally raped him on the table. The other male stripped “Nick” and anally raped him over the table. MR PROCTOR then strangled the victim with his hands until the boy’s body went limp. Both males then left the room. Later, MR PROCTOR returned and led “Nick” out of the house and into a waiting car.

1981-82 – at a residential address in central London. “Nick” was collected from Kingston train station and taken to a “party” at a residential address. The witness was among four young boys. Several men were present including MR PROCTOR. One of the men told the boys one of them would die that night and they had to choose who. When the boys wouldn’t decide, the men selected one of the boys (the victim). Each of the four boys including “Nick” were taken to separate rooms for “private time”. When they all returned to the same room, Nick was anally raped by MR PROCTOR and another male as “punishment”. The other males also anally raped the remaining boys. MR PROCTOR and two other males then began beating the chosen victim by punching and kicking. The attack continued until the boy collapsed on the floor and stopped moving. All of the men left the room. The remaining boys attempted to revive the victim but he was not breathing. They were left for some time before being taken out of the house and returned to their homes.

Between May and July 1979 – in a street in Coombe Hill, Kingston. Nick was walking in this area with another boy (the victim) when he heard the sound of a car engine revving. A dark-coloured car drove into the victim knocking him down. “Nick” could see the boy covered in blood and his leg bent backwards. A car pulled up and “Nick” was grabbed and placed in the car. He felt a sharp pain in his arm and next remembered being dropped off at home. He was warned not to have friends in future. “Nick” never saw the other boy again. “Nick” does not identify MR PROCTOR as being directly involved in this allegation. However, he states MR PROCTOR was part of the group responsible for the systematic sexual abuse he suffered. Furthermore, he believes the group were responsible for the homicide.

Sexual Abuse

1978-1984 – Dolphin Square, Pimlico. “Nick” was at the venue and with at least one other young boy. MR PROCTOR was present with other males.MR PROCTOR told “Nick” to pick up a wooden baton and hit the other boy. When “Nick” refused he was punished by MR PROCTOR and the other males. He was held down and felt pain in his feet. He fell unconscious. When he awoke he was raped by several males including MR PROCTOR.

1978-1981 – Carlton Club, central London, “Nick” was driven to the Carlton Club and dropped off outside. MR PROCTOR opened the door. Inside the premises were several other males. “Nick” was sexually assaulted by another male (not by MR PROCTOR on this occasion ).

1978-1981 – swimming pool in central London. “Nick” was taken to numerous ‘pool parties’ where he and other boys were made to undress, and perform sexual acts on one another. He and other boys were then anally raped and sexually abused by several men including MR PROCTOR.

1981-1982 – Large town house in London. “Nick” was taken to the venue on numerous occasions where MR PROCTOR and one other male were present. He was forced to perform oral sex on MR PROCTOR who also put his hands around “Nick’’’s throat to prevent him breathing. On another occasion at the same location, MR PROCTOR sexually assaulted “Nick” before producing a pen-knife and threatening to cut “Nick’’’s genitals.MR PROCTOR was prevented from doing so by the other male present.

1979-1984 – residential address in central London.”Nick” was taken to the venue. MR PROCTOR was present with one other male. MR PROCTOR forced “Nick” to perform oral sex on him before beating him with punches.

1978-1984 – numerous locations including Carlton Club,Dolphin Square and a central London townhouse. “Nick” described attending several ‘Christmas parties’ where other boys were present together with numerous males including MR PROCTOR. “Nick” was given whiskey to drink before being forced to perform oral sex on several men including MR PROCTOR.

MR PROCTOR will be interviewed about the matters described above and given the opportunity to provide an account.”

10. I denied all and each of the allegations in turn and in detail and categorised them as false and untrue and, in whole, an heinous calumny. They amount to just about the worst allegations anyone can make against another person including, as they do, multiple murder of children, their torture, grievous bodily harm, rape and sexual child abuse.

11. I am completely innocent of all these allegations.

12. I am an homosexual. I am not a murderer. I am not a paedophile or pederast. Let me be frank, I pleaded guilty to four charges of gross indecency in 1987 relating to the then age of consent for homosexual activity. Those offences are no longer offences as the age of consent has dropped from 21 to 18 to 16. What I am being accused of now is a million miles away from that consensual activity.

13. At the start of the interview, I was told that although the interview would be recorded by the Police both for vision and sound, I would not receive a copy of the tapes. I asked to record the interview for sound myself but my request was refused. During the interview, to ensure that “Nick” had not identified the wrong person, I asked if I could see photographs purporting to be me which had been shown to him. My request was refused. At the end of the interview I was asked if I knew my 8 alleged co conspirators whose homes it was alleged I had visited. I believe I have a good recollection and the list comprised a number of people I knew, some who I had heard of but not met and some I did not know. None of the allegations were alleged to have taken place at my home and I have not visited the homes of any of the “gang”.

14. The list included the names of the late Leon Brittan and the late Edward Heath.

15. If it was not so serious, it would be laughable.

16. Edward Heath sacked me from the Conservative Party’s parliamentary candidates’ list in 1974. Mrs Thatcher restored me to the list 18 months later. Edward Heath despised me and he disliked my views particularly on limiting immigration from the New Commonwealth and Pakistan and my opposition to our entry into and continued membership of what is now know as the E.U. ; I opposed his corporate statist views on the Economy. I despised him too… He had sacked the late Enoch Powell, my political “hero” from the Shadow Cabinet when I was Chairman of the University of York Conservative Association. I regarded Enoch as an intellectual giant in comparison with Heath.

17. The same Edward Heath, not surprisingly, would never speak to me in the House of Commons but would snort at me as he passed me by in a Commons corridor. The feeling was entirely mutual.

18. Now I am accused of doing some of these dreadful things in his London house as well; a house to which I was never invited and to which Heath would never have invited me and to which I would have declined his invitation.

19. The same Edward Heath’s home with CCTV, housekeeper, private secretary, chauffeur, police and private detectives – all the trappings of a former Prime Minister – in the security conscious days of the IRA’s assault on London.

20. It is so farfetched as to be unbelievable. It is unbelievable because it is not true. My situation has transformed from Kafka- esque bewilderment to black farce incredulity.

21. I have nothing to hide and nothing to fear. I appeal to any witness who truthfully can place me at any of the former homes of Edward Heath or Leon Brittan at any time to come forward now. I appeal to any witness who can truthfully say I committed any of these horrible crimes to come forward now.

22. The “gang” is also alleged to have included Lord Janner ( a former Labour M.P.), Lord Bramall (Former Chief of the General Staff) , the late Maurice Oldfield (Former Head of Secret Intelligence Service – MI6), the late Sir Michael Hanley ( Director General of the Internal Security Service – MI5), General Sir Hugh Beach (Master-General of the Ordnance) and a man named – Ray Beech. I did not move in such circles. As an ex Secondary Modern School boy from Yorkshire, I was not a part of the Establishment. I had no interest being part of it. I cannot believe that these other 8 people conspired to do these monstrous things. I certainly did not.

23. Yesterday I was interviewed again by the Metropolitan Police Murder Squad for 1 hour 40 minutes. It was a voluntary interview. I was free to go at any time. I was not arrested. I am not on bail. Unhelpfully, the second disclosure document was given to me some 20 minutes after yesterday’s  interview was supposed to have started rather than last Friday as had been promised.  My Solicitors were told by the Police it was ready but had to be signed off by superior officers on Friday.  The Metropolitan Police are either inefficient or doing it by design. Whatever else, it is  inept and an unjust way to treat anyone.   During yesterday’s interview,  I was shown a photograph of “Nick” aged about 12. I did not recognise him. I was shown computer generated e fit images of 2 of the alleged murder victims created by “Nick”.  They looked remarkably similar  to each other but one with blonde hair and one dark brown. I did not recognise either image. I was asked if I knew Jimmy Saville. I told them I did not. “Nick” alleges – surprise surprise – that Saville attended the sex “parties”. I was asked if I knew a number of people including Leslie Goddard and Peter Heyman. I did not these two. I was asked if I knew well, a doctor – unnamed. Apparently “Nick” alleges the doctor was a friend of mine and allegedly he turned up to repair the damage done to the boys when they were abused at these “parties”. I could not help there . I was asked if I could recognise images of the pen knife mentioned earlier. It was suggested it was Edward Heath who persuaded me not to castrate “Nick” with it. I was obviously so persuaded by Mr Heath’s intervention that I placed the pen knife in “Nick’s” pocket ready for him to present it to the Metropolitan police over 30 years later as “evidence”. I could not identify the knife. I have never had a pen knife. I was asked if I visited Elm Guest House in Rocks Lane, Barnes. I wondered when that elephant in the room would be mentioned by the Metropolitan police. I am sorry to have to disappoint the fantasists on the internet but I did not visit Elm Guest House. I was unaware of its existence.  The so called “guest list” which makes its appearance on the net must be a fake.

24. During my first interview I was told that the Police were investigating to seek out the truth. I reminded them on a number of occasions that their Head of “Operation Midland”, Detective Superintendent Kenny McDonald had said on television some months ago “ I believe what “NICK” is saying as credible and true “. This statement is constantly used and manipulated by Exaro and other Media to justify their position.

25. This remark is very prejudicial to the police inquiry and its outcome. It is not justice and breaches my United Kingdom and Human Rights. This whole catalogue of events has wrecked my life, lost me my job and demolished 28 years of my rehabilitation since 1987.

26. The Police involved in “Operation Midland” are in a cleft stick of their own making. They are in a quandary. Support the “victim” however ludicrous his allegations or own up that they got it disastrously wrong but risk the charge of a cover up. What do I think should happen now?

Either:-

I should be arrested, charged and prosecuted for murder and these awful crimes immediately so I can start the process of ridiculing these preposterous allegations in open court

Or

“NICK” should be stripped of his anonymity and prosecuted for wasting police time and money, making the most foul of false allegations and seeking to pervert the course of justice. Those who have aided and abetted him should also be prosecuted. “NICK” should be medically examined to ensure he is of sound mind.

27. Detective Superintendent Kenny McDonald should resign from his position as Head of “Operation Midland”. He should resign or be sacked. But as the Metropolitan Police is a bureaucratic “organisation” I suggest, to save face, he is slid sideways to be placed in control of Metropolitan London parking, traffic, jay walking or crime prevention. He too should be medically examined to ensure he is of sound mind.

28. An investigation should be launched into “Operation Midland” and its costs. Detectives’ expense claims should be analysed and a full audit carried out by independent auditors.

29. Those Labour Members of Parliament who have misused parliamentary privilege and their special position on these matters should apologise. They have behaved disgracefully, especially attacking dead parliamentarians who cannot defend themselves and others and they should make amends. They are welcome to sue me for libel. In particular, Mr Tom Watson, M.P. should state, outside the protection of the House of Commons, the names of ex Ministers and ex M.P.s who he feels are part of the so called alleged Westminster rent boy ring.

30. Lady Goddard’s Inquiry should examine “Operation Midland’s” methods so as to sift genuine historical child sexual abuse from the spurious.

31. “Operation Midland” should be wound up by the Metropolitan Police Commissioner who should also apologise at the earliest opportunity. On the 6th August 2015, Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe shed crocodile tears criticising the Independent Police Complaints Commission and Wiltshire Police for naming Edward Heath as a suspect. He said it was not “fair” and his own force would not do such a thing. This is very disingenuous. When his Police officers were searching my Home and before they had left, the Press were ringing me asking for comment. I was identified. They had told “Nick” of the search who passed on the information to his press friends. The Metropolitan police have also told the press that they were investigating Heath and Brittan and others. Sir Bernard should resign for the sin of hypocrisy. If he does not, it will not be long before he establishes “Operation Plantagenet” to determine Richard III’s involvement in the murder of the Princes in the Tower of London.

32. Superintendent Sean Memory of Wiltshire Police should explain why he made a statement about Edward Heath in front of his former home in Salisbury and who advised him to select that venue. He should also resign.

33. Leon Brittan was driven to his death by police action. They already knew for 6 months before his death, on the advice of the DPP, that he would not face prosecution for the alleged rape of a young woman. But they did not tell him. They just hoped he would die without having to tell him. The Superintendent in charge of his investigation should resign.

34. The Police should stop referring automatically to people who make statements of alleged Historic child sexual abuse as “victims”. They should refer to them as “complainants” from the French “to lament” which would be more appropriate. Parliament should pass laws to better balance the right to anonymity of “victims” and the “accused”. Parliament should reinstate in law the English tradition of “innocence before being found guilty” which has been trashed in recent months by certain sections of the Police, the DPP, MPs, Magistrates and the Courts themselves.

35. I have not just come here with a complaint. I have come with the intention of showing my face in public as an innocent man. I have come to raise my voice as an aggrieved subject now deeply concerned about the administration of Justice. What has become increasingly clear about Police investigations into historical child sexual abuse is that it has been bungled in years gone by and is being bungled again NOW. The moment has come to ask ourselves if the Police are up to the task of investigating the apparent complexities of such an enquiry ? These allegations merit the most detailed and intellectually rigorous application.

36. What is clear from the last few years of police activity driven by the media, fearful of the power of the internet and the odd M.P. here and there is that the overhaul of the Police service up and down the country is now urgently required. We need “Super cops” who have been University educated and drawn from the professions. Such people could be of semi retirement status with a background in the supervision of complex, criminal investigations. These people could be drawn from the law, accountancy and insolvency practices. Former Justices of the Peace could chair some of these investigations. Adequate incentives should be provided to recruit them.

37. I speak for myself and, as a former Tory M.P. with an impeccable record in defending the Police, I have now come to believe that that blind trust in them was totally misplaced. What has happened to me could happen to anyone. It could happen to you.

38. In summary, the paranoid Police have pursued an homosexual witch hunt on this issue egged on by a motley crew of certain sections of the media and press and a number of Labour Members of Parliament and a ragbag of internet fantasists. There are questions to ask about what kind of Police Force do we have in Britain today. How can it be right for the Police to act in  consort with the press with routine  tip offs of House raids, impending arrests and the like. Anonymity is given to anyone prepared to make untruthful accusations of child sexual abuse whilst the alleged accused are routinely fingered publicly without any credible evidence first being found. This is not justice. It is an abuse of power and authority.

39. In conclusion, I wish to thank my Solicitors Mr Raza Sakhi and Mr Nabeel Gatrad and my family and friends for their support without which I would not have been able to survive this onslaught on my character and on my life.

I am prepared to take questions.

END

source: https://www.theneedleblog.wordpress.com/2015/08/25/full-statement-of-harvey-proctor/

Harvey Proctor Denies ‘Untrue’ Allegations At Press Conference

Originally posted on theneedleblog:

CNQbnovWoAA1TTG

The former MP Harvey Proctor today launched a blistering attack on a police “homosexual witch-hunt” after revealing that he had been questioned over claims of the alleged murder of three boys supposedly linked to an “elite Westminster sex ring”.

Mr Proctor said that he had been accused of being part of a child sex-ring with the late Prime Minister Edward Heath, ex-Home Secretary Leon Brittan along with ex-heads of MI5 and MI6. The allegations were based on the testimony of an anonymous witness that Scotland Yard had previously described as being “credible and true”.

In a sensational statement issued today, Harvey Proctor said he was “completely innocent” of accusations of paedophilia as he went public on the two rounds of questioning he had faced from the Metropolitan Police’s Operation Midland investigation.

His statement is the first detailed response from anyone who has been investigated by Operation Midland over claims of…

View original 122 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

CHRIS SPIVEY – HARRASSED 26/08/15 – + “DEAD MAN WALKING” + more

 

Harrassed

Harrassed

Christopher Spivey

 

(UNEDITED AT MOMENT)

Ahead of Thursday’s  sentencing, here are THE TRUE FACTS of what has really taken place since July 30th 2014, ALL OF WHICH CAN BE EVIDENCED. Please share this report far and wide because next time it could be you caught up in a nightmare from where there appears to be no escape.

(1) I was illegally arrested at 1:30 AM on the 30th of July 2014 for “Suspicion of harassment” by four very aggressive police officers. The four thugs, despite knowing that my then 1 year old grandson was in the property illegally entered and began an illegal search, ending with them illegally seizing my computers, a mobile phone, a keyboard and mouse, and a DVD writer. I was then illegally detained for a total of 19 hours. Therefore, there should never have been a court case and disregarding that fact, the evidence should have been deemed inadmissible.

(2) The facts listed in number 1 are evidenced thus:

  • A complaint was made, allegedly to Greater Manchester Police on the 16th of July 2014 by Witness A
  • An arrest request was then made, allegedly by the Greater Manchester Police (GMP) to Essex Police on the 17th of July 2014
  • In the two weeks that followed the GMP request on 17/7/14 and my actual arrest on 30/7/14, Essex Police did not bother to apply for an arrest or search warrant despite being able to obtain both in around 6 hours.
  • Instead, they came mob handed specifically to arrest me (as evidenced in the police witness statements) at a time which violates CODE B of PACE, following a briefing sometime between 11:30PM on the 29th of July 2014 and 1 AM on the 30th of July 2014, where my photo and description was handed out.

Untitledcourt4

  • When I refused to let them in because they had no warrants, one of them illegally used Section 32 of PACE to arrest me whilst the other three barged past me into my home.
  • Not only was the policeman abusing Section 32, he was also using it illegally as Section 32 of PACE only allows for a search of an arrested person’s home and seizure of their property if the offence that they are arrested for is and INDICTABLE offence. “Suspicion of harassment” is a SUMMARY offence.

10438975_687960854611197_8416581272682638545_n1

  • Neither myself or my daughter Stacey were allowed to supervise the search, despite it being our right to do so.
  • I told Stacey to film the police officers at which point one of the officers told her that if she did they would also take her phone with them when they left – violating Stacey’s right to do so. 
  • After spending around half an hour finger tip searching my daughter’s bedroom where my then 1 year old grandson was sleeping, 3 of the officers went to search my living room whilst myself and Stacey were held prisoner by the 4th officer, in Stacey’s bedroom.
  • The three officers spent over one and a half hours in my 16ft X 14 ft living room but missed a laptop computer, a computer hard drive and various memory sticks, non of which were hidden. The police have never told me what they were doing in there for 90 minutes, but it certainly could not be searching.
  • Knowing that I was going to be taken, Stacey had phoned two friends up to come and sit with her. The police would not let them in until the both provided their names, addresses, and DOB’s.
  • After completing the 9o minutes in the living room none of the officers bothered to search my bedroom, the bathroom, the kitchen or the walk-in hallway cupboard.
  • A police car was then brought into the spacious car park outside of my flat block, from where it had been parked out of sight way up the road and the computers were loaded into the back in what appeared to be unsealed bags.
  • I was then taken to a car parked way up the road and taken to Southend Central at approximately 4:30AM
  • I was not interviewed until around lunch time and the 60-90 minute interview was conducted by CID despite the offence only being a summary offence, normally dealt with by a PC.
  • I was then locked up again until around 6PM whereby I was released on bail with CONDITIONS.
  • Before I left the station I lodged a complaint about my arrest, the search and seizure and the four aggressive officers.

10543127_691240120949937_1653152108_n

(3) On the 30th of July 2014 – whilst I was still in custody – the social worker Nicole Miles began an assessment report on my grandson Clayton, based on a (later proven) malicious referral made by the police following my arrest. I believe that the police had hoped to find drugs or something else illegal in Stacey’s bedroom – hence the fingertip search – in order to allow them to get the social services involved. When they found nothing, they resorted to fabricating reasons to make a referral.

(4) Despite starting the assessment on the 30th of July, Nicole Miles did not receive the referral until TWO DAYS LATER on the 1st of August. This begs the question as to how did she know to begin the assessment on the 30th of July, on matters that were nothing to do with the SS yet seemingly important enough for Nicole Miles to inexplicably start her investigation before I had even been released from custody.

(5) When Nicole Miles came to visit I refused to cooperate on the basis that the reasons given in the malicious police refusal and “suspicion of harassment” were nothing to do with the social services. Miles, left but then tried co-opting the help of Clayton’s health visitor. Unfortunately for Miles, I get on extremely well with Clayton’s health visitor who has been around our home on numerous occasions. I believe that she quickly saw through the insidious nature of the referral and SS involvement and refused to have anything to do with it. The assessment was therefore terminated.

10622161_701483346592281_2054882667_n

(6)I was subsequently told, no less than 5 (FIVE) times in writing by Essex Police, Detective Chief Inspector, Paul Ahmed (the person tasked with investigating my easily evidenced complaint) that my complaint COULD NOT be investigated until the investigation was completed and any court action dispensed with. This then is a case of a very senior police officer investigating serious misconduct taking place within his own force. It should also be noted that had my extremely serious complaint been investigated it would immediately have put a stop to the police investigation and there would never have been a court case, let alone a conviction.

ah

(7)I was once again illegally arrested and my property illegally searched on the afternoon of 6th of October 2014, by THREE plain-clothed police officers who categorically told me that they had only come to talk. Once again they had come WITHOUT arrest or search warrant after “illegal images” were allegedly found on my computers which had been illegally seized on the 30th of July 2014. However, the police had informed the Social Services that I had been arrested on the 1st of October, hence they once again started an assessment on my grandson Clayton on that day, which they could not in fact begin for another 5 days until after I had been arrested. The police then -once again – incorrectly informed the social services that I had been arrested on the 3rd of October, three days before the event actually took place. This proves – for reasons previously documented and evidenced and briefly documented once again below – that the social services were working in cahoots with the police on a conspiracy to snatch my grandson Clayton.

10836424_750939134980035_1295523786_n

(8) When I refused the three officers entry they used a battering ram to break down my front door as well as one of them kicking down my back gate and smashing my bedroom window. Again the police knew that my teenage daughter and infant grandson was on the premises. You need to ask yourself why it had taken the police 2 months to find these “illegal images” and why they blatantly came to arrest me without a search warrant and an arrest warrant both of which can be obtained within 6 (SIX) hours. Watch and listen to the video below and hear how terrified my daughter is. Try and imagine yourself being branded as a nonce… And then tell me how would you feel especially so with you being innocent. 

(9) The paperwork for this illegal arrest states that I was [illegally] arrested under Section 17 of PACE. Section 17 of PACE can only be used under extreme circumstances such as somebody being in danger of serious personal harm. However, one of the three police officers is clearly seen & heard on videotape above, stating that I had been arrested under Section 32 of PACE. Moreover, despite being handcuffed, the officer was to out of breath to read me my rights

10717796_719596824780933_1967475410_n

(10) One of the officers then carried out a search which lasted no more than 5 minutes and consisted of a glance around my bedroom and the same around Stacey’s bedroom. He did not look in the walk-in hallway cupboard, the kitchen, the bathroom or the living room where i was being held. The hallway cupboard has around 30-50 photo albums in it, all of which could have contained photos of naked children for all that the officer knew. The living room contained THIS COMPUTER that I am writing on, as well as the laptop, memory sticks and hard drive that the 4 thug coppers missed on July 3oth. There are also over 1000 cased DVD’s in the living room, each case could have contained child porn, as well as 6 spools of recordable DVD’s which could have contained child porn. There was also a digital movie camera in the drawer. Yet the copper never so much as gave the room a second glance and NOTHING at all was taken in evidence. 

(11) Despite my front door having been battered down and unusable for 2 months (finally fixed in December 2014), my bedroom window smashed (and not fixed until December 2014) and my back gate being kicked down, the police wanted me to sign a declaration stating that they had caused NO DAMAGE

10720986_719595871447695_1088236900_n10578617_719599601447322_1518536312_n

(12)  I was later contacted and sent video evidence by someone who had been arrested by the same three officers, who – on film – subsequently attempted to strangle the man in the back of their unmarked police car causing evidenced bruising to his throat. Whilst the attacking police officer screamed: “I am going to fucking kill you” with his hands around the victim’s throat, the other two officers are seen blatantly trying to shield the assault from the person attempting to film it. You are best listening with headphones and the volume turned up.

(14) It has since come to light and is clearly evidenced that this 2nd [illegal] arrest, carried out on evidence blatantly planted by the police on my illegally seized computers, was not done to discredit me (hence the police refusal to say why I had been arrested when asked the reason by the press), but was done with the clear intent of furthering a joint conspiracy by the Essex Police and Castle Point District Council Social Services, to have my grandson taken into care as a means of shutting me up.

10681646_719869634753652_1047554584_n
(15) This clearly evidenced conspiracy, tantamount to kidnapping my well looked after, thriving, bright, happy and very much loved grandson thus ruining my life, my daughter’s life and most importantly the life of my infant grandson began at the time of my 1st arrest on the 30th of July 2014 and the conspiracy must therefore have been hatched before I was even arrested.

1000x7453a

Can you imagine how scared and confused he would have been had I not taken steps to thwart the SS stopping them taking him into care?Can you imagine the fate he faced as we all know what happens to children in care? Can you imagine how devastated my daughter would have been?

(16) The social worker, Nicole Miles and her boss Julie Robinson then arranged – behind our backs – a case management meeting with the police with a view to raising the assessment, supposedly being carried out under Section 17: A child in need to a Section 47: Protection order. This was because I had refused to let my daughter agree to them looking at her medical records. Because of this refusal, the social workers [wrongly] assumed that we had something to hide and FRAUDULENTLY using the guise of carrying out a Section 47 investigation (which allows the SS to view medical records without permission) they went ahead and accessed Stacey’s records – thus breaking the law on data protection, an offence which carries up to 7 years in prison.

10807812_750938908313391_2028977831_na1

(17) However, at the case management meeting with the police being held with a view to raising the Section 17 assessment to a Section 47, the police vetoed the proposal stating that I was not a danger to Clayton.

10540996_749796778427604_2146519469_na

(18) Despite the assessment NEVER being raised to a Section 42, Nicole Miles has indicated on the assessment that this had always been the case, thus had I not thwarted their efforts by catching on video, Miles & Robinson blatantly lying to me time & again, and the case reached court there would have been no question that Clayton would have been taken into care.

10540996_749796778427604_2146519469_naaa

(19) Because the police (who were obviously working in collusion with the SS) had made the referral to Miles & Robinson on the 1st of October 2014 – after which the assessment was started straight away, inexplicably on the assessment report that had been started on the 30th of July (on a malicious referral by the police made on the 1st of August) and which Miles had inexplicably kept for 2 months despite the assessment being terminated – meaning that Miles MUST HAVE KNOWN that I was going to be arrested again sometime in the coming months – the assessment had to end BY LAW on the 20th of November.

10822282_750938664980082_1626085819_nav

(20) However, because I wasn’t arrested until the 6th of October, the social workers had to lead us to believe that the assessment was started on the 6th of October. Bear in mind that you do not get to see the assessment until it is completed whereby the social worker goes through it with you on the day it is to be submitted. The fact that the assessment was started 5 days prematurely which the police and the SS were desperate that we should not find out about for obvious reasons, hence the strategy meeting with the police arranged for the 24th (see 2nd photo above) was pointless because the assessment had already been submitted on the 20th.

(21)  Miles and Robinson then arranged a [pointless]meeting with us for the 25 th of November so as they could go through the assessment with us – despite unbeknownst to us at the time that the assessment had been submitted 5 days earlier. However, instead they just left a copy of the assessment with us – by now they were well aware that I was no mug.

(22) When I came to read the assessment the following day, I quickly picked up on all the above, plus other Blatant lies and the fact that the assessment was incomplete (at least our copy was). Of all the shameful lies contained within the error filled report, one of the worst was the fact that it was stated that I posed a future risk to Clayton – despite me not having been charged with anything and the police stating to Julie Robinson that I was no danger, hence the assessment was never raised to a Section 47.

10818864_749799728427309_688472646_n

(23) What follows is a tape recording of Stacey speaking to Nicole Miles on the phone. Miles had desperately tried to avoid taking the calls knowing that they would be in connection to the many anomalies in her assessment of Clayton. And while it is obvious that Stacey had Miles in a fluster, only being 19 at the time, Stacey did not grasp the full impact of the assessment being completed on the 20th of November whilst Miles and Robinson kept up the pretence of the assessment being on-going. Nevertheless, Miles quickly changes the subject. Moreover, although Stacey has my first arrest date wrong, stating that it was the 31st, you will still hear Miles panicking as she tries to explain how the assessment was started on the 30th yet they did not receive the police referral until the 1st of August.

(24) What follows is a video of the second phone call between Stacey and Miles where Stacey pulls her about the raising of the assessment to a Section 47. You will note that Miles tries to bluster that the assessment was raised to a Section 47 at the strategy meeting held with the police on the 21st of October (also scroll up to the relevant screen shot) where the police in fact vetoed the motion being as they considered me no risk to Clayton (which they could state with confidence since they had been the ones who planted the photos on my computers) thus the assessment was NEVER raised to a Section 47 at any time – proving that Miles & Robinson broke the law by illegally accessing Stacey’s medical records.

(25) At the meeting between ourselves, Julie Robinson and Nicole Miles – instead of coming to discuss the assessment before it was submitted (which had already been submitted) – brought along a woman called Jan Dakin. At this meeting, Robinson said that we had to trust them, which I pointed towards Miles and said “how can we trust you when I have her on film blatantly lying to us on several occasions”? Robinson – nodding her head – replied “we will have to talk about that errrrr” and nodded towards the garden, meaning that we would have to talk about it in private where I couldn’t record her… We never did.

(26) Instead of talking about the assessment – which was just left with us when they left – Robinson said that if Stacey would go to five 1 hour sessions with Jan Dakin, then as far as she was concerned that would be the end of the SS involvement with us, no matter what the outcome of the police investigation was. However, the meetings were to be held away from our home, with only Stacy in attendance – in other words, somewhere where we couldn’t film and where I could not be there to protect Stacey whilst they stitched her up.

(27) However, we agreed – after which I briefed Stacey thoroughly and provided her with a voice recorder with the instructions not to tell Dakin that she was recording unless she asked. I should point out that if a person is doing their job properly, honestly and with integrity then what possible reason could they have for not wanting to be recorded. After all, to do so would protect both sides. Indeed, in my 20 years of being a Tattoo Artist, customers companions have filmed me tattooing countless times with me never once denying a request to do so. Therefore, once you listen to the following recording of that first meeting between Stacey & Dakin, I feel sure that you will agree that we were right to record and we were right to suspect that there was an ulterior motive to the sessions.

(28) Stacey attended the next arranged meeting with Dakin, whom if she had spoken to her boss about Stacy recording, then she certainly didn’t let on. Instead she once again asked Stacy if she was recording to which Stacey confirmed that she was, after which Dakin again terminated the session. We then received the following letter saying that Stacey had completed the work – although she hadn’t even started it – and the case was now closed. 

1

(29)  The two Social Workers involved in the joint conspiracy with Essex police, to kidnap my grandson are now being investigated by their governing body, the HCPC for this very serious offence – although I strongly believe that the investigation is being whitewashed. Interestingly enough, I received an email from the HCPC just the other day in response to my earlier inquiry as to why the two Social Worker’s, Nicole Miles & Julie Robinson had not been suspended whilst this very, very, serious complaint, backed by solid, indisputable evidence and made by myself and many, many other concerned members of the public was being investigated. The HCPC’s response was that the complaint did not involve sexual misconduct or drug abuse on the social workers part. Therefore, I can only assume that the HCPC do not view two of their social workers conspiring with the police to steal and ruin an innocent child’s life and illegally accessing DATA  (punishable by up to 7 years in prison) serious enough to warrant the suspension of social workers on their register.

I should just point out for clarification in regard to that email (below), that my friend Mrs Marshall – a very experienced registered social worker – had made the long slog from Blackpool in order to sit in at a meeting between ourselves, Miles & Robinson to ensure that they did not try anything underhand.

Untitledcourt5

(30) In December 2014, I was made aware by a practicing Barrister (not a member of my legal team) that Chief Inspector Paul Ahmed had been blatantly lying to me and my complaints – which would immediately have put a stop to both the police investigations into harassment and the illegal images – could indeed have gone ahead. The same Barrister also confirmed what I had already come to suspect, namely that all the big legal firms had been warned “from high up” not to defend my case Prior to my first court appearance in January 2015, I had written to over 30 law firms all of whom replied that they could not help me as they were all to busy.  

(31) I therefore immediately wrote to Inspector Paul Ahmed, as well as The Independent Police Complaint Commission, The Essex Chief Constable, Stephen Kavanagh, The Essex PCC, Nick Alston, and my MP James Duddridge, informing them that my complaint was deliberately not being investigated and that I now wanted Paul Ahmed’s conduct included in my complaint since not understanding the rules of complaint procedure is not a defence open to ANY police officer, as is clearly stated in the Police & complaints procedure handbook. I also quoted the applicable relevant sections set out in the police complaint guidelines handbook as well as those applicable by law. I then had the aforementioned barrister check the letter for accuracy before sending it on the 15th of December 2014. You can read that letter of complaint by clicking HERE

(32) The only reply to the letter sent by email was from the IPCC, who sent an automated acknowledgement that they had received the email

(33) On the 17th of December 2014, two days after I had sent the email, the Essex Chief of Police, Stephen Kavanagh took the highly unusual step of ordering a Postal Requisition Summons to be drawn up ordering me to court on January 20th 2015 for two counts of Harassment without Violence (1 committed against Witness A, 1 committed against Witness B) and two counts of sending a malicious communication (1 committed against Witness A, 1 committed against Witness B)

10884767_760313914042557_1527873471_n

(34) There can be no doubt that instead of doing the right thing, this postal requisition summons was sent with malice and as the Essex Chief Constable, Stephen Kavanagh’s ‘fuck you’ for me having had the audacity to point out that Essex Police were deliberately not dealing with my very serious complaint. Indeed, the very fact that the hastily drawn up summons was compiled two days after receiving my letter of complaint and more than a month before I was due to answer bail for the harassment charges is testament to the fact

10859370_760313707375911_2104681015_n

(35) The 4 charges are all summary offences thus adding greater weight to the fact that I was illegally arrested on the 30th of July 2014 . Remember, Section 32 of PACE only allows for a search and seizure of property if the offence that a person has been arrested for is an indictable offence. Therefore, the prosecution action should have been halted at this juncture – if not earlier.

(36) A postal requisition is a court summons sent by post and I was not eligible to be summoned by this method because two of the conditions needed to qualify for a postal requisition were not met. Those conditions were (A) A person must be informed before being released from custody following their arrest, that they are eligible for summons via postal requisition.(B) That the person must have no bail conditions attached to his release.

(37) I was not informed that I was eligible for a summons via postal requisition and I DID HAVE bail conditions attached to my release from custody. Therefore I was NOT eligible for a postal requisition summons. Indeed, the very fact that I was summoned this way means that I have NEVER been officially charged with the offences that I have now been convicted of.

(38) Judge Andrew or John Woollard (his name is a mystery that even the MSM cannot get to the bottom of) took it off his own bat – after obviously looking at my website – to ask the police officer in charge of the investigation, CID Detective Constable Adam Coombes, whilst he was on the stand under oath, if I had been summons via a postal requisition. When Coombes answered “yes”, the case should have been dismissed yet Judge Woollard made no further comment to Coombes affirmative.

(39) The prosecution case consisted of over 650 A4 photocopies of my articles and 5 witness statements (Two from Witness A, One from witness B, one from Witness C and one from Witness D yet the charges only apply to Witness A & Witness B). How can you determine where the specific offence is within 650 plus photocopied pages?

(40) To date, I have not been officially told what the specific crime was in those 650 pages.

11910643_895931377147476_826207840_n

(41) Only one of the five witness statements – the one allegedly made by Witness A, which made up the original complaint of harassment, allegedly taken by the Greater Manchester Police; allegedly on the 16th of July 2014 – was made before my arrest on the 30th of July 2014.

(40) This means that I have NEVER been arrested or questioned for the two offences (1 count of harassment without violence, 1 count of sending a malicious communication) for which I have been convicted of, relating to Witness B, whose witness statement was not taken until the 3rd of August 2014 – Four days after I had been released from custody.

(41) All 5 witness statements are either not signed or have not had the signature witnessed or are signed in the wrong place or have not got the case number on or have not been signed underneath the last line of text where a statement ends half way down the page leaving the statement open to having more added to, and as such all 5 of the statements should all have been inadmissible – a fact that Judge woollard was made fully aware of. Indeed, there is evidence to suggest that the police were not present when the statements were taken and that statements were re-written, which I cannot show you due to my bail conditions.

Nevertheless, the following are two examples taken from the statements. There is not one single page of the 20 odd pages that make up the statements that is correct and complete.

11128908_876387225768558_165156089_na

11749740_876387372435210_1231977118_na

(42) In regard to the 650 plus photocopied pages of my articles that the Prosecution were also relying on as evidence, it is highly significant that I was NEVER ONCE asked to remove these articles in the year between my arrest and the case coming to trial. Therefore, logic dictates that either there was NO OFFENCE committed within those 650 plus pages or I was guilty of harassment every single day of the 365 days that the case took to come to court, yet I have never so much as once been arrested or questioned on this matter since 30th of July 2014.

(43) Judge Woollard was blatantly biased and hostile towards me from my very 1st appearance in court in January 2015. It is indeed significant that I had a judge in charge of my case for the summary offences, obviously being heard in Magistrates court. On the 4 days immediately prior to my first appearance – for which I had not been able to secure legal representation – I had been extremely ill and confined to bed. When I attended court at 9:30 AM, the duty solicitor stated (without being told) that I was clearly unwell and that she would have a word with the judge and get me moved up to first on the list. Judge Woollard’s response to that request was to keep me waiting all day for my 5 minute plea hearing appearance and I did not in fact leave court until nearly 5 PM that day. Moreover, the same duty solicitor told me in front of 3 witnesses sat with me, that I would never be allowed to win this case.

(44) I stated to my friends who had come to court with me that day, that I would now have Judge Woollard at every appearance that I made – a fact that I was subsequently proved to be correct about. At various court appearances that I have made on these harassment charges, Judge Woollard has been seen by myself and others to roll his eyes and tut when talking about my point of view and defence of the case. Indeed, I am totally without doubt in my mind that Judge Woollard was specifically selected to oversee my case with a mandate to find me guilty at all costs.

(45) Judge Woollard has a proven track record of finding people guilty who have highlighted government corruption, usually on some other flimsy, unrelated charge

(46) After thwarting the attempt by the police and SS to ruin our lives by taking Clayton into care, the planted “illegal images” tellingly disappeared, the charges relating to those illegal images dropped and tellingly, a Judge has since refused – in a court of law – to allow my legal team access to the police forensic reports on the computer hard-drives of my illegally seized computers – which would prove that the images were either planted or never even on my computers. The CPS have however unbelievably charged me with TWO images – ONE LEGAL and ONE NOTHING TO DO WITH CHILDREN AND HARDLY LIKELY TO SPARK PUBLIC OUTRAGE.

(47) In charging me with the two images, the CPS has gone against their OWN prosecution guidelines (they rarely prosecute for less than 20 images and never prosecute for less than 4), yet are still intent on taking me to CROWN COURT for possession of 2 (TWO) images. The first one is called “Klara and Edda belly dancing” which is by Nan Golding and owned by Sir Elton John and has TWICE been deemed LEGAL in a BRITISH COURT OF LAW (2001, 2007). The photo remains perfectly LEGAL today as proved by a quick Google search should you wish to do  make one by typing the name of the image into your search bar.

(48) The proof that the photo is legal can be found in the BBC report found by clicking HERE, although following the year long investigation, the CID have been unable to find out what took me seconds. Interestingly enough the newspaper article found at that link states the following:

“Even if the photograph was now considered to be indecent, a defendant would be able to raise a legitimate defence, given that the photograph was distributed for the purposes of display in a contemporary art gallery after having been deemed not to be indecent by the earlier investigation.”

(49) Klara & Edda belly dancing is a disgusting photo that I censored (although I didn’t have to) and used in a couple of articles. I used it to highlight child abuse and the kind of perverts who own this type of disturbing “art”. That fact is BLATANTLY OBVIOUS to anyone who reads my articles. However, in 2013 (a year before my first arrest) a Detective Chief Inspector, Gary Biddle contacted me via post about this and other photos, asking to meet me due to the possibility that the photos may be illegal images. He sent this letter – which also clearly states that he understood why I had used the images – after twice coming to my door to talk about them.

10726813_719595504781065_1165658626_n

(50) I did not respond to the letter on the basis that if the images were illegal then the police would send someone round to tell me to take them down. If however they were legal – as I knew that they were – then there was nothing to talk about. Nevertheless, it is a bit sinister that a DCI would want to meet me to discuss the matter, although in the event I never heard from Biddle again – hence the photos MUST have been legal.

(51) The CPS and Prosecution know about this letter and have even found their own copy. I know this for a fact because the prosecution have to by law disclose the evidence that they are going to rely on in court as well as the evidence THAT THEY ARE NOT GOING TO USE. It was little surprise to me that the prosecution are not going to bring this letter up in court.

(52) The 2nd image is deemed as being mild “beastiality”  and I have never been arrested or questioned about the image. There can therefore be NO DOUBT that the reason for this court action that cannot possibly succeed (if the trial is not rigged) is malicious and is going ahead on the back of [Legal] evidence (in the case of the golding photo) gathered illegally.

(53) On July 1st 2014 (if memory serves, but it may have been the 4th), four weeks before the start of the trial, a case management hearing was held in which myself and my supporters were sent [deliberately] to the wrong court (Chelmsford Magistrates). Although I was certain that Chelmsford was to be the venue, a trusted friend had double checked on the day prior to this court appearance that the case was being heard in Chelmsford. However, when myself and supporters arrived at Chelmsford Magistrates (a good 30-45 minute drive from my home) at 9.30AM, we were told that the case was in fact being heard at Southend Magistrates court (a mere 10 minute drive from my home). Nevertheless, I was still able to make the hearing at Southend Magistrates despite being half an hour late.

(54) At a further case management hearing held on the 10th of July 2014, the Prosecution led by one of the most senior prosecutors in the country, Tony Abel – who just so happens to also be a part time high court judge – asked Judge Woollard to rule that his four witnesses should not have to testify in person and that their witness statements should suffice (known as hearsay evidence), a motion that my woefully inadequate barrister opposed on the grounds that (A) it is my right in law under Article 6 of the Human Rights Act to face my accusers in court and (B) a witness statement cannot be cross examined in court and as such it would be impossible for me to get a fair trial without the witnesses appearing in person.

(56) ALL of the witness statements were littered with blatant, easily provable lies and had the witnesses been made to take the stand, they would ALL have committed easily provable perjury – a crime punishable by a term in prison.

(57) I CAN prove that at least 3 of the 4 witnesses are at best dishonest verging on criminal. Amongst the many, many blatant lies in all 4 witness statements are:

  • Witness A: Insinuates that I hacked her Facebook to steal her photos because her FB was set to private. However, I took screenshots of the photos which clearly show a globe symbol meaning that anyone can see them… This should have been enough to null and void Witness A’s statement.
  • Witness B: Claims I harassed her in a FB msg (this was the only msg that I have ever sent to any of them and I was very polite). Witness B did not answer and I did not contact her again. The msg was sent in July 2013 but Witness B did not think to report it until over a year later, 4 days after my arrest… This should have been enough to null and void Witness B’s statement.

11774643_876387145768566_597574977_n 

  • Witness C: Claims that I contacted him multiple times and I was abusive to the point that  he felt threatened. I have never ever contacted Witness C but Witness C has contacted me AND MY DAUGHTER abusively on 3 or 4 occasions of which I  provided proof in court. However, it is telling that in the prosecution evidence bundle, they have left the first part of a copy of our ‘conversation’ out so as it can’t be seen who instigated the chat. However, I had a copy of the conversation in full which I produced in court. Moreover, DC Coombes had already admitted under oath that Witness C started all of the conversations, some of which I never even responded to. Moreover, Witness C was posting taunts on my Christopher C Spivey FB page before I had even been released from custody on the 30th of July 2014… This should have been enough to null and void Witness C’s statement.

2aUntitledasean1a

  • Witness D: Claims that I contacted him on Facebook introducing myself as a “cheap tattooist for bikers” after he had accepted my friend request. I have NEVER EVER sent Witness D a friend request and neither have I EVER spoken to him through any mode of communication. Indeed, whilst giving evidence I asked for proof of Witness D’s claims, in the same way that I just provided the chat logs for conversations between me and Witness C, when proving who contacted whom. I also made it quite clear to Judge Woollard that it was for reasons such as this (blatant lies made with no collaborating evidence) that the witnesses needed to be here so as they could be cross examined, adding that by not ordering the witnesses to attend, he (the Judge) had denied me a fair trial… Judge Woollard made no reply. However, the following screenshot makes a mockery of Witness D’s claim… This should have been enough to null and void Witness D’s statement.

1a

There you have one lie from each of the witnesses, I can promise you that there are many more. And as I mentioned earlier, none of the statements should have been admissible because of the various irregularities on each. Indeed, apart from the first Statement allegedly written on the 16th of July, all the other statements were written after my arrest meaning that I have never been arrested or questioned about the contents. All of the witness statements are written in the exact same colour ink and I believe that they were all written by the same person – two people at most.  

(58) However, the Judge Woollard sided with the prosecution and ruled that the witnesses did not have to appear, breaching my Human Rights under Article 6, and meaning that the witness statements, despite them all being littered with easily provable lies would now stand as FACT, thus denying me any chance of a fair trial.

(59) That ruling meant that I now faced the prospect of a trial which should never have been allowed to go ahead due to the many breaches in the rule of law, for four misdemeanor offences, to be presided over by a blatantly biased judge as opposed to three magistrates, without even so much as the flimsy safety net of a jury, prosecuted by one of the most senior barristers in the country; more used to dealing with serious organised crime and who also sits as a judge, based on Witness Statements made up of blatant lies which was by now accepted as being fact, made by 4 people of whom (A) there is strong evidence to cast doubt that they are who they are claiming to be (B) There is strong evidence to suggest that 3 of the 4 are involved in criminal activities

(60) Following that ruling, my woeful legal representation – whom I now half suspect had been ordered to deliberately sabotage my case, based on too many facts to list – immediately began preparing to submit a judicial review with a view to having Judge Woollards disgusting ruling on the witness non-attendance overturned on the grounds stated above (my human rights had been breached under Article 6 of the HRA, it was now impossible for me to get a fair trial) along with another important point of law, namely what is called “an inequality of arms” – in other words, the prosecution had the creme de la creme of barristers whilst my legal firm had not even been granted funding for legal counsel based on the fact that the charges were summary offences.

human

(61) A further hearing was held on the 17th of July 2014 which neither myself or my legal team were informed about. To date I have not been informed what went on at the hearing.

(62) On the morning of the 30th of July 2015 – the first day of my trial – my barrister, Mohammed Bashir told me before we had even entered court that although he “would do his best, I would still be found guilty”.

(63) The first 40 minutes of the trial was taken up with Mohammed Bashir arguing that I could not possibly be given a fair trial and that the judge should adjourn the trial until the judicial revue in regard to the witnesses having to appear, had been heard. Indeed, my solicitor, Tasmin Malcolm had previously tried to get a postponement when she had applied for the judicial review, only for her application to be somewhat mysteriously turned down.

Untitledcourt2

(64) Judge Woollard also refused to adjourn the trial on the very flimsy grounds that I might not be granted legal aid to fight the appeal (judicial review) despite Mohammed Bashir categorically stating that he would be representing me in the appeal even if legal aid funding was denied. He also said that he had asked time and again for a good reason that the witnesses should appear but got none. That maybe true but that was the fault of my barristers. Indeed, I even asked my solicitor to intervene when the [deliberately?] clueless barrister was fucking my case up. However, it was not for me to provide a good reason that the witnesses should appear, it was for Judge Woollard to have a good reason that they shouldn’t.

(65) Mohammed Bashir absolutely destroyed the one and only witness, Detective Constable Adam Coombes in regard to the unlawful way that the investigation had been carried out. Judge Woollard simply took no notice of the admissions that Coombes was forced to admit. These included:

  • All video’s, pictures, comments, etc were all taken from the mainstream media or were in the public domain.
  • I had not encouraged or incited anybody to commit any criminal activity.
  • That Witness C had contacted me first.
  • Agree that the witnesses did not have to go on my website
  • He was forced to admit that he didn’t know why they did.
  • Admit that the witnesses or anybody else including the police had never asked me to remove anything.
  • Admit that the witnesses could have got an injunction ordering me to take the offending posts down, but they didn’t.
  • When asked why it took the witnesses over a year to complain, he answered “I don’t know”.
  • When asked why it took the police two weeks to arrest me following the complaint he again answered “I don’t know”
  • He was forced to admit that I was arrested without search or arrest warrant.
  • When asked why the police had violated Code B of Pace and arrested me at an unacceptable hour, he was again forced to answer “I don’t know”.
  • He was asked if there had been any assault, or violence, or harassment to the witnesses since my arrest to which he admitted that there hadn’t been… Hence the witnesses claim to me causing them alarm and distress was unfounded. 
  • When asked if he had checked if there were other websites making the same claims as me he admitted he hadn’t. There are in fact tens of thousands all claiming the same as me.

(66) Despite myself never being served with the precise evidence that the prosecution were going to rely on in court, taken from the 650 plus pages of articles photocopied from my website, which I had never been ordered to remove, it quickly became obvious that the prosecution evidence spanned a period from the 23rd of May 2013 to the 11th of November 2014. This is very significant for many reasons:

  • Firstly, a complaint of harassment should be made within 6 months of the act. Therefore anything relating to a period before January 2014 should have been inadmissible.
  • Moreover, since the one and only time that I have been arrested and questioned in regard to this case was the 30th of July 2014, there should have been no evidence used against me in this case that pertained to any date thereafter – including the two charges against me relating to Witness B which were catalogued by the police on the 3rd of August 2014. The prosecution bundle shows that evidence was still being added on the 11th of January 2015 despite me being [illegally] summons on the 17 of December 2014.
  • For the prosecution to prove harassment they have to show a course of conduct that the accused should have known constituted harassing somebody. There can be no doubt whatsoever that Witness A and Witness B (whom the 4 offences relate to) knew about this website on or before the 18th of July 2013, yet no complaint was ever lodged until the 16th of July 2014 – one year later. And even then, there was no warning from the police in that two week period between the complaint being logged on the 16th of July and my arrest on the 30th of July, that I was and had been pursuing a course of conduct that was tantamount to harassment – as is the normal police procedure to do so. Therefore, since no one contacted me or told me to stop in that period between the 18th of July 2013 and the complaint being logged on the 16th of July 2014 and then the period between the 16th of July and the 30th of July 2014 – how could I have possibly known that what I was doing was pursuing a course of conduct tantamount to harassment?
  • The Malicious communication in the case of Witness B refers to ONE private message that I sent her on Facebook on the 18th of July 2013 in which I asked her very, very politely if she would be prepared to talk to me in my capacity as a journalist. She did not answer the message and I never made any attempt to contact her again. Therefore, if that messaged was not logged by the police until nearly 13 months later, how could the message possibly be construed as a ‘malicious communication’? Indeed by her own admission, Witness B states that she ignored my communication because she thought that I was a “weirdo”, whilst making no mention that the Facebook message had caused her distress or alarm.
  • The Judge made it quite clear to the court that I was NOT a journalist. He deliberately did this so as I could not use the Journalist’s defence against charges of harassment that state that someone is not guilty of harassment when in pursuit of detecting or proving a crime. However, there can be no doubt whatsoever that I am indeed a journalist (see HERE) and that I was detecting and proving a crime
  • The Malicious communications in regard to Witness A are in the form of a mock-up photograph of the front page of the Sun newspaper which someone made and posted on my Facebook page linked to this website. I believe that I am right in saying the the spoof headline of the Sun front page went viral and appeared on hundreds if not thousands of people’s facebook pages. Indeed, at no time did Facebook deem the image obscene, offensive or likely to cause harassment. It should also be noted that I have absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the day to day running of my Facebook page (not to be confused with my Facebook account on which the spoof image did not appear). However, the fact that I did not remove that image from my Facebook page was subsequently deemed as a malicious communication by Judge Woollard.
  • The second Malicious Communication in regard to Witness A came in the form of a Facebook page made by someone alleging a crime and a Youtube account made by someone alleging the same crime as that of the Facebook page. Neither were anything whatsoever to do with me, but the fact that I added a screenshot of both in order to present a balanced view to the blatantly partisan view expressed by every national newspaper, somehow constituted me being responsible for making those two accounts and me being the person alleging the crime, in Judge Woollard’s opinion – despite DC Adam Coombes stating whilst under oath that the accounts were absolutely nothing to do with me.

Untitledcourt3

(67) I have just typed into the Google search bar, asking if the person at the centre of the court case was guilty of that aforementioned crime – which brought up 298,000 results (0.43 seconds), yet I am the only person to have been convicted of questioning as to whether he was or whether he wasn’t to which I had clearly stated that ‘I didn’t know the answer’. Indeed, I had only added the information for the sake of balance. I have also just asked Google if the event that took place which was at the centre of the court case, was a false flag – bringing up 338,000 results (0.37) seconds. Coombes admitted on oath that I was not responsible for the allegations, yet as head of the investigation he should have checked how many others were writing up the same information as me.

(68) Witness A and Witness B allege in their witness statements that I got hold of and used their private photos in my articles. I can prove that all of the images that I used were in the public domain – a fact that given the statements made by Witness A and Witness B, they MUST have known that the Facebook photo settings used on the photos in question were set so as anyone can view them.

(69) There is also the allegation that I published the addresses of Witness A and Witness B. In regard to Witness B, I published the name of the road (but not the house number) that she lives in along with a photo of a row of houses which is no different to what the MSM do everyday and what they themselves have in fact done to me. Indeed, there was a posting on Twitter of my full name address and phone number, retweeted by hundreds, inciting violence against me and my family. I personally informed the police on the 28th of July 2014 at 2:24PM about this Tweet and no action was taken. I have never incited violence against anyone. I only published the name of the road to highlight the fraud that was taking place.

sean2

(70) In regard to the address of Witness A, I did not publish this address until after it became the address of a registered company. Publishing the address of a registered company is not an offence. The reason that I published the address of this company was in the pursuit of uncovering a crime, namely the company was posing as a charity and despite not being registered was receiving thousands of pounds in donations. Once this evidence was released in an article, the Charity ceased fundraising. However, it should also be noted that I hold proof that the Daily Mail printed this address in full (including the house number) in 2013 – long before the premises became a registered business and which WAS a criminal offence. I also hold proof that the Daily Mail published the same address in full (including the house number) on the 30th of July 2015.

(71) There can be no doubt that the guilty verdict against me in this illegal court action was decided long before the end of the trial by the fact that Judge Woollard did not even go through the pretence of retiring to consider his verdict. Instead he launched straight into his 15 to 20 minute guilty verdict as soon as my defence counsel had finished summing up. The Judges speech was far too detailed to have been ‘off the cuff‘.

(72) Judge Woollard has made it clear that he is considering a custodial sentence when I return to Chelmsford Magistrates for sentencing on the 27th of August 2015, despite there being a run of blatant harassment cases in the MSM recently with none of the harassers jailed despite some of them being found guilty in a Crown Court. Yet I have clearly not harassed anybody and still have the shadow of a prison sentence hanging over my head.

The following are but a few examples of the many cases of harassment far in excess of anything that I have done yet the perpetrators avoided prison. They are all from the same Source:

A 34 year old man was charged with harassment. He had no previous convictions. The police recorded stalking behaviour over a nine month period. Not all was proved in court but the evidence was extensive and included text messages, letters, requesting cosmetic surgery material be sent to the victim by mail order, attacks on the victim’s and the her family’s cars at home and at work places. The offender actually flew to another country to send letters to the victim to make her believe they came from her current partner. There was an arson attack on the home of the victim’s extended family whilst they were at home. The offender and victim were never actually in a relationship but the offender wanted to be. The victim was unaware of where the letters and texts were coming from for the first few months and the offender actually befriended her for some time. He received an eight week prison sentence suspended for 24 months with 12 months supervision and 200 hours unpaid work. He has not participated in any programmes. The man was described as high level of risk at MAPPA, was difficult to work with and had narcissistic and psychopathic traits. The court report author requested a psychological assessment but the court refused and instead imposed a supervision order. There is concern that without specialist guidance the work probation did with him might be counterproductive and increase risk.

A 44 year old male was charged with harassment under the Protection from Harassment Act 1997. He had previous convictions for theft, driving with excess alcohol and criminal damage. He has been breaching restraining orders since 2003. He admitted that his relationship with the victim had been violent and received two cautions for assault during the course of that relationship. The victim says she was punched in the face and that he was continually verbally abusive towards her particularly following excess bouts of alcohol. He received a suspended sentence for nine months plus a two year community order with a condition that he participate in a domestic abuse programme.

A 53 year old male was charged with harassment and burglary. He had one previous conviction for harassment. He has a history of making phone calls to his ex-partner, following her when she was visiting friends, sending test messages that he knew where she was. He broke into her home and stole notebooks and accessed her computer. He was then found hiding in her garden. This was all over a period of 12 months. He was given a 12 month community order with a condition that he take part in a domestic abuse programme. He did participate in the programme but it made little difference to his behaviour. He breached his order by phone but the victim refused to allow the police to confront him about his behaviour. Probation has experienced difficulty with her disclosures coupled with her refusal to make them formal.

A 39 year old man was charged with harassment. He had a number of previous convictions including acquisitive crime, sexual abuse of a half-brother, threats to kill and domestic violence. The stalking behaviour has been going on for three years. He received a community order for two years. 14 He is said to have been responding to supervision by focussing on his sexual abuse, his poor attachments and his addiction to drugs. Probation believe he may be suffering from post traumatic stress disorder. The perpetrator comes from a professional background and was able to express feelings well compared with most others convicted of similar offences. The victim also came from a professional background and was able to put forward an articulate victim impact statement, which again is thought to be rare.

A 28 year old male was charged with harassment. He had no previous convictions. The stalking behaviour involving following and phone calls had been going on for two months. He received a 24 month supervision order. He has not attended any programmes. The victim had made two previous complaints to the police before the matter was actioned.

A 36 year old male was charged with harassment. He had no previous convictions. His relationship had broken down in autumn 2010. The offender then persistently harassed the victim until she reported it to the police in April 2011. He would continually attend at the victim’s property, almost on a daily basis. He caused damage to property by smashing windows and doors and breaking and entering. He also threatened to set fire to the victim’s house on several occasions. He would also follow her to friend’s houses and then ring her and say he knew where she was. On at least one occasion he hid in the boot of her car whilst she drove to a friend’s house using keys that he had kept. He was given a 12 month supervision order and a condition that the do 100 hours unpaid work, and an indefinite restraining order. He has participated previously in community programmes but only unpaid work. It is of concern to probation that it took seven months before the behaviour was reported to the police.

A 50 year old male was charged with harassment. He has previous convictions for actually bodily harm. The stalking of the victim has been going on for 14 months. For the index offence he received a six month community order plus a three month curfew. He has not participated in any programmes. A restraining order is in place for 12 months expiring in late 2012.

The Study concludes:

The range of sentences handed down reflects how serious stalking behaviour can become and why the courts must take previous offending into account. Virtually all those given three months or more involved serious violence, attempts to kill or even homicide. These cases show how offending behaviour can escalate and the absence of mental health treatment. In every case the pattern in stalking involved following, unwanted and unannounced visits, threats, texts, emails, unwanted gifts and attention over a period of many months or even years. The remaining 41 perpetrators were given community sentences, although eight had not yet been sentenced or were on remand. The sentence for breach of a restraining order tended to be stated in days or week rather than months or years. They were usually for less than 12 months and

Yet I have harassed no one, have no previous convictions for harassment or sending malicious communications, and that is not to mention that the charges should have been dismissed time and again, yet the Judge considers my 1 polite Facebook message to Witness B worthy of a prison sentence!

(73) Since August 27th is beyond the 21 day period to put in an appeal against a conviction, the blatantly biased Judge Woollard is now going to pass sentence knowing that I have put in an appeal against conviction largely based on his blatant disregard of the law.

(74) I have had to put the appeal in myself since I appear to have been abandoned by my solicitor who has totally ignored my emails and despite promises from other staff at the law firm, that they will ensure that she rings me back – being as she is never there when I call – she has not done so to date.

(75) I was sent a prosecution disclosure bundle last week – as required by law – in regard to the two image trial in September which my solicitors had received before my harassment trial yet had inexplicably held onto for 3 weeks. Now bearing in mind that the 2 trials are linked by my illegally seized computers, what was interesting about this bundle was that tucked away at the back was a list of the evidence that the prosecution were not intending to bring up in court. And one of the items on that list was the fact that it had not been the Greater Manchester Police who requested Essex Police arrest me… It was in fact the Metropolitan Police who had done so.

11897204_895896407150973_2124457349_n

(76) Therefore, the immediate question to spring to mind was “why on earth would Witness A – a Manchester resident – make a complaint to a London police force about a fella from Essex? Makes no sense, although it does to me, but because my bail conditions prevent me defending myself – or put another way protect the guilty – I can’t tell you why.

(77) There can be no mistake because after submitting a FOI request to the Met police, it turns out that the [illegal] witness statement made by Witness A (allegedly on the 16th of July 2014) is partly typed with an illegal handwritten addition is done so on a Metropolitan Police witness statement sheet. Moreover, it is blatantly obvious that the date stated on the witness statement which formed the initial complaint filed by Manchester resident, to the Metropolitan Police about a man in Essex has been added sometime after the statement was compiled as it is written in different handwriting, by someone with a much heavier hand using a pen with a much darker shade of black ink.

(78) In turn, you also have to ask yourself why I, the Court, the Press and every person following the case has been deliberately led to believe that The Greater Manchester Police are responsible for ordering my arrest. For example, the following is a direct quote from an Essex Police Spokesmen which was quoted in nearly all of the nantional newspapers:

He is at Southend Police Station helping officers with their enquires. The arrest relates to an allegation of harassment via social media which has been referred to Essex Police by Greater Manchester Police.” Source

(79) The evidence that I collected over countless hours in a period of a year and a half is indisputable when read properly and as a whole. I have now been ordered to remove the evidence from this website – not because it is harrassing anyone, but because your government does not want you to know what they are really doing.

(80) When Judge Woollard had finished summing up in the trial, the prosecutor, Tony Abell – one of the country’s most experienced barristers and a part time high court judge to boot, who took the time off from prosecuting serious organized crime and multi-million pound fraud cases in order to prosecute me for a misdemeanour, gave Judge Woollard his view of the case to assist him in handing down an appropriate sentence, as is required by law. Tony Abell told Judge Woollard that this case was “high end” – a blatant lie because I have not harassed anyone and harassment at the “high end” comes under Section 4 and is an either way offence triable in Crown Court. Indeed, you only need read the examples above of harassment as a summary offence to realise that my case, at worst, is the very lowest of the low end. Tony Abell, then added – with perverse pleasure and in lieu of me having no previous convictions – that some of the photos that I had used in my articles were of Witness A’s  and witness B’s children (whilst neglecting to point out that the photos were all in the public domain and only used as proof that a hoax was taking place) before stating that I go on trial in September for possessing illegal images of children – which despite being a blatant lie, the inference is there for all to see.

Now, I can state that I have no regrets and would do it all again in the blink of an eye. A government filled with corrupt, thieving, paedophiles who are working to our detriment is not acceptable by any standards.

However, in uncovering the truth I do expect to have your support and backing… Therefore, I would ask that you share this report far and wide, keep sharing it and then share it some more…

You can find a full break down of the court case by clicking HERE

Those then are the TRUE facts all of which either have been or can be evidenced and anyone who thinks that treatment is acceptable in this country needs a serious reality check.

Indeed, anyone who agrees that the above is acceptable is giving their consent to people being taken away in the middle of the night by military type thugs without the need for any warrants, based on a single allegation made without evidence of a misdemeanour.

Indeed, anyone who agrees that the above is acceptable is giving their consent to the police kicking down your front door in the middle of the day without warrant on evidence that they themselves have planted without any recourse and under the protection of the law courts.

Indeed, anyone who agrees that the above is acceptable is giving their consent to children who are very much loved and well cared for, being taken from innocent parents, guilty at best of a misdemeanour, and placed in care homes where they are left to the mercy of paedophiles.

Indeed, anyone who agrees that the above is acceptable is giving their consent to the jailing of someone who questions the government narrative on any given subject.

Indeed, anyone who agrees that the above is acceptable can have no gripe when they are jailed for calling someone a liar in a private forum that the aggrieved has had to actively seek out to see if the slur was true.

NONE OF THE ABOVE IS EXAGGERATION.

You should be aware that what this abomination perpetrated against my family is every bit as bad as the crimes against humanity being committed in countries such as China, North Korea and Belarus.

You should also be aware that a petition started by someone over the persecution of me and my family at the time of my court trial was removed without any forthcoming explanation by the petition website.

There is clear, photographed evidence that another petition started by someone in protest at the persecution being aimed at me and my family is having many signatures removed from it, despite the petition website denying the fact.

76pet

The petition currently stands at 2362 and I would urge you all to sign it which you can do by clicking HERE

Bizarrely, those in charge really believe that people are as thick as shit… Although there could actually be some foundation to their belief.

It is vitally important that as many people as possible attend the sentencing court date on the 27th of August if for nothing else than to be seen to oppose the Police state that we live in. I realise that this is hard for some of you but it is REALLY important that you do make every effort to be there.

I also appreciate that some of you have ailments and are not up to the journey. That is fine, if that is the case I wouldn’t expect you to.

I further appreciate that the transport cost to some is a problem but maybe something can be sorted out as there is always car sharing. Indeed, I am sure that if you let Dogman or Lisa know where you are coming from they will do their best to put you in touch with someone else coming from nearby.

And should that not be possible, a very kind lady in Australia has donated £30 to add to the £50 already donated to a travel fund for people who cannot afford to travel to Chelmsford Magistrates. That is £80 so far with the promise of more to come.

*That total now stands at £180.

Think on, it is only one day that you need to put yourself out – one day that could make a significant difference to how yours lives and the lives of future generations pan out.

It is in fact fair to say that this disgraceful court decision has achieved a bit of unity in the Alternative Media and that is surely a good thing?

Indeed I understand that Henry from the Tap has been supportive of me as have aangirfan – although to be fair, the latter always has been. Never the less, a massive thank you to those two sites.

Danielle La Verite and Billy Carlin’s support has never wavered, thank you both.

A big thank you also to Ian R Crane who altered his ‘Crane Report’ schedule in order to to have me on his show, which you can watch by clicking HERE

Ian has also told me that he will definitely be attending the sentencing on August the 27th and I believe that Danielle intends to do the same.

Open Your Mind Radio were also kind enough to give me an interview so as I could get the word out about the injustice that has and still is taking place against me and my family. You can hear that interview by clicking HERE 

And of course, a big thank you to Dr Nick Kollerstrom for all of his help.

On a brighter note, I have been asked if I fancy speaking at next years Glastonbury Festival… It would be proper fucking rude of me not to wouldn’t it.

After all, it isn’t often that an uncouth, crack-pot fantasist with aspirations to be a journalist gets such a prestigious offer is it… Just sayin’.

 

source: http://www.chrisspivey.org/harrassed/
————————————————————————————————————

Friday, 21 August 2015

Chris Spivey- Dead Man Walking.

Chris Spivey is a dead man walking. Tragic news to his family, Chris Spivey has arrived at theterrible conclusion that the only way the Powers that Be can save themselves is to murder him while he’s in custody at Her Majesty’s pleasure.

Spelt out in crystal clarity in his latest article ’They Shoot Horses Don’t They,’ Chris Spivey proves beyond all reasonable doubt that not only is he is a victim of injustice, but he’s also earmarked to be murdered in Prison- in the not too distance future.

Spivey’s harassment conviction is built upon two counts of malicious communication against Lynn Rigby and Lee Rigby’s sister.

The first relates to ONE AND ONLY ONE Facebook message he sent on the 18th of July 2013 in which he was extremely polite and when he got no answer, did not attempt to contact the witness again.

The other malicious communication charge relates to a mock-up of a front page of the Sun newspaper, which was published on his Facebook Page.

(It’s interesting to note that “a Matt Taylor” was named in the court’s transcript as being the person responsible for posting the mock Sun newspaper front page. It has since been admitted that it was in fact posted by Lisa Pea, a member of Spivey’s administrative team.)

Chris Spivey maintains his innocence on this count claiming, “I DID NOT make this spoof page and never even acknowledged it. The person responsible posted it on my Facebook page that I do not have any dealings with in regard to things that people post on there.”

Guerrilla Democracy News accepts full responsibility for this picture

You would have thought the case would have been dismissed on these two points alone, but the miscarriage of justice runs deeper when we learn that the witness statements used to convict Spivey haven’t even been signed by those person(s) who wrote them.

Rather than shying away Spivey is maintaining his contention that all the witnesses who testified against him ARE’NT who they claim to be.

“All four witnesses are of easily provable dubious character with clear evidence relating to criminal behaviour.”

Here is what Spivey has to say on the subject:

“Here is the way I see it.

The prosecution fought tooth and nail using one of the country’s top barristers to keep their OWN four witnesses out of court… Why would they do that?

My aherm, aherm Barrister ignored all that I told her as to why the witnesses should appear i.e their witness statements were a tissue of easily exposed lies and as such, were they to be repeated under oath would mean that they would have committed perjury. And in any event, the witnesses are not who they pretend to be.

I therefore knew that if the witnesses were made to appear then the trial would not have gone ahead… The case would have been dropped.

However, the Judge, completely ignoring the rule of law sided with the prosecution – ruling that the witnesses be spared being torn to bits on the witness stand – thus blatantly denying me the right to a fair trial.”

“THE WITNESSES ARE NOT WHO THEY PRETEND TO BE.”

Propabably the most controversial statement to make related to the Woolwich incident is the claim that virtually every personality involved was an MI5 inspired creation – a crisis actor!

Spivey plans to appeal his conviction but in doing so he knows better than anyone that he’s signed his own death warrant.

Over to Spivey who explains:

“An appeal means that the witnesses WILL HAVE TO APPEAR NO MATTER WHAT because the appeal will be held in a Crown Court with a jury and will be based on the above facts.

And like I said, had the witnesses been made to appear then the case would have been dropped, not least because the witnesses – as the Crown fully knows – are not who they claim to be, are of dubious character and have alleged easily provable lies in all four witness statements… Therefore, they now have a real, real crisis on their hands because unlike the trial, they can not drop the appeal hearing and if that goes ahead, then it is not an understatement to say that at the very least, the outcome has the capacity to bring down the government.

Therefore, the only way to stop the appeal going ahead – which they have to at all costs – is if I am dead… Hence the forthcoming prison sentence.”

LATEST NEWS.

Sourced from Spivey’s Facebook status update.

“Guess who has been asked to appear at the Glastonbury Festival next year?

If I am still alive of course!

The following is a link to video footage of yesterday’s event in London where Dr Nick Kollerstrom handed a letter into the ministry of Justice in protest at the persecution of me and my family by the British Government.”

Transcript of the harassment trial of Christopher Spivey 30th-31st July 2015 at Chelmsford Magistrates Court. 

The trial began at about 10.20am, and the next 40 minutes consisted of Spivey’s barrister asking the Judge to postpone the trial until a Judicial Review application had been processed. Spivey’s barrister argued, that the trial would be ‘unfair’ because he could not ‘challenge the witnesses, because they were not there’. The barrister argued that the pictures of the Rigby family, their homes and addresses were not ‘private’ but already in the public domain and therefore could be downloaded by anybody. He also argued that Spivey, was ‘a journalist, therefore he had freedom of expression.’ The judge then asked if he could have a copy of the application for Judicial Review and was given a copy by the defence. He noticed straight away that it was not stamped and asked why. The Defence explained that the application for legal aid to pay for the application and legal costs to process such a form had still not been authorised. However it will be lodged either today (30th July) or tomorrow. The Judge said he disagreed with the Judicial Review application because at every court appearance he have always asked why Mr Spivey wanted the witnesses present and he had never received a satisfactory response to his question. He said that he felt that there was enough authority to proceed with the trial, and he would weigh up the hearsay evidence regarding its merits. The prosecution then outlined the case against Spivey, quoting from his Police Statement, “they don’t have to read it (the Rigby family)………… I have freedom of speech” The prosecution informed the court that there was ample evidence 1that Spivey’s article had caused harm and distress to the family, and either he knew it would or should have known. Spivey had deliberately targeted Lee Rigby’s mother and sister, and his comments were more than irritating. He acknowledged that Spivey had freedom of speech, however, section 10. 2 of the Harassment Act informs us that this also carries certain duties and responsibilities. Spivey’s comments were ‘bizarre’ and could have only come from a ‘crank’ and had caused alarm and distress and this all equalled harassment. The prosecution then read out Lee Rigby’s mother’s statement: We were now rebuilding our lives (family)…. How her Facebook site was/is private…. The Sun `hoax’ headlines front page…. She read the comments alleging her son was a rapist….. The website destroyed (her) happy memories” Then Lee Rigby’s sister`s statement was read out: “Contacted by Spivey via Facebook….. Claimed he had evidence of a hoax…. I Did not accept his `friend’ request` because I thought he was weird…… I looked at his website…. Spivey had published photos of me/family/home ….. I wondered how did he get my children`s names?….. I felt at risk, now may have to move” Mr Amos’ statement was then read out: “I am angry…. He used photos from my Facebook page….. Spivey sent messages…. I answered because I was intrigued…. (I felt) threatened, like I was being accused of being in on the hoax…. He exposing Rigby family fraud…. Spivey said that they will kill you not me, I have a high profile” Mr Vitler’s statement was then read out: “Spivey contacted me… He looked like a cheap tattooist for bikers… Photographs (of Spivey) freaked him out… I Felt like someone was watching me” 2The defence barrister then realised that his ‘bundle’ of documents were different than the Prosecution and Judges. The Judge commented that the management of papers by the CPS had been far from adequate since the start of Spivey’s court appearances. DC Coombes then was sworn in to give his evidence, reiterated all the points from the four statements to the Court. Spivey’s Barrister then asked about the article regarding the assertion that the soldier was a ‘rapist’ and it was confirmed by DC Coombes that it was not Spiveys’ article. The policeman confirmed with a simple “yes” that in all his investigations all video’s, pictures, comments, etc were all taken from the mainstream media or were in the public domain. The barrister then referred the DC to pictures of Margaret Thatcher’s funeral in the bundle. Asking first did he know that they were her funeral pictures? Answer, “I don’t know”. The barrister said, “Please believe me it was”. There were two photos of the funeral one implying a large crowd at her funeral, was photo shopped by the Mainstream Media. The next one that was in the Alternative Media, was of a very sparse crowd. Did he notice Spivey’s comments about the pictures? He replied “Yes” The DC also confirmed that Spivey’s publication of the families addresses, had not encouraged or incited anybody to commit any criminal activity. The DC also confirmed with a simple “Yes” that Mr Amos contacted Spivey first. The DC also agreed that the witnesses did not have to go on Spivey’s website (all four witnesses). When asked why they went on the website? The DC answered “I don’t 3know”. He was then asked, if the family ever asked Spivey to take posts down? He replied, “No”. He then said that the family could have got the posts taken down by an Injunction and this was confirmed by the DC. The Barrister asked why it took over a year for them to complain. The DC replied, “I don’t know” The barrister continued with questions such as: “Why did it take the police two weeks from the instigation of the complaint to Spivey’s arrest?” “I can’t account for why”. “In those two weeks before his arrest was the family asking why has he not been arrested yet? ” “No” He asked if there had been any assault, or violence, or harassment to the family since Spivey’s arrest? The DC replied, “No”. The next day, Friday morning, the DC was back in the dock. Spivey’s Barrister informed the court that Spivey was arrested with no search or arrest warrant. The DC confirmed that no other websites were checked regarding the Rigby families material, he said that it was not relevant to check other sites. Spivey then was sworn in. He was asked by his barrister about his background. The Judge asked about his dealings with the Sovereign Independent Newspaper, “how big is it’s circulation?” 4Spivey’s Barrister then asked Spivey the purpose of his website, Spivey’s response was, “to make comments not published in the mainstream media.” He asked Spivey to go to the bundle – “What was the purpose of the picture of Prince Charles being told by you to fuck off?” Spivey replied, “To attract attention”. He then asked if Spivey ever got any negative comments on Facebook. Spivey confirmed he had. The barrister asked about which subjects received such comments, and gave the example of Rolf Harris. Spivey replied that the comments were made by “organised trolls”. Spivey then stated that everything he writes is sourced, he analyses the evidence and then writes his opinions. His writing style was simplistic in nature, designed for his target audience, which he stated was “like speaking to somebody on a building site” (a previous occupation of his). He admitted to photo shopping photos of Lee Rigby to evidence his opinion they matched up with other persons. He claimed he did not target the Rigby family, there were numerous other websites regarding Woolwich. Spivey was asked if he knew the Rigby’s were looking at his site. Spivey replied, “No” Spivey said, “Amos contacted me…… Amos said, Come on big boy”. Spivey confirmed that he had never contacted Mr Vitler in any form whatsoever, nor had he contacted anybody to take a picture of Vitler. The Sun ‘mock headline’ was posted by a Matt Taylor as anybody can post on Spivey’s Facebook account. Spivey had been threatened with violence regarding various posts and subjects on Facebook in the past. 5He said: “his website, comments on his articles and his forum pages were only able to be accessed by subscription.” The subscription comprised of giving a valid email address. He had moderators who ran his site, he just wrote. The barrister asked how many hits he has had since he has started in 2012. Spivey responded, “10 and half million, and yesterday I had 15,000 hits”. The Judge asked, “Could the same people make multiple hits?”, Spivey replied, “Yes” Spivey was asked by his barrister, if he actively sought or engaged the Rigby family to view the site? He confirmed that he had not. Spivey said that he only knew that he was alleged to have harassed the family, at the time of his arrest. He never wanted to cause harassment. The Prosecution then questioned Spivey regarding his Facebook account and website, and implied that ‘links’ posted on his Facebook page were a kind of advertisement for his webpage. The Prosecution suggested that the ‘mock’ Sun posting on his Facebook page, even though posted by Matt Taylor had then been ‘adopted’ by him by not deleting it, and asked if Spivey agreed with its content. Spivey replied that he had, “No feelings one way or the other”. Spivey was then asked if he had attended the “Two Michaels” Old Bailey Trial, or informed the police, or defence solicitors for the “Two Michaels” that he could help the trial by revealing what he had discovered. Spivey responded, “No” 6 Spivey said his intention at one time was to present all his evidence to a Police Station. The Judge then asked Spivey, “Did you ever consider the possibility that you could be wrong?” Then asking, “did you not consider the hurt caused to the Rigby`s if you are wrong?” Spivey answered that his motive regarding exposing Woolwich as a hoax, was to publicise how anti – muslim feelings were being stirred up in the country, plus he wanted to expose the negative prospect of rewarding of the security services with a multi-million budget to further erode freedoms. The Judge then said this Rigby conspiracy was, “extremely wide”. He suggested that MI5 must have got everybody on board from the Old Bailey judge to the witnesses of the murder. Spivey used the example of Pearl Harbour to illustrate that cover ups do occur, in that it is now common knowledge that the Americans allowed this to happen so they could enter the Second World War. The Judge then asked Spivey his views on 9/11, 7/7, Tunisia and the Holocaust. Spivey replied he did not believe the Government narratives on all of these occurrences and he also informed the Judge that his daughter was Jewish. The Prosecution then asked Spivey if he agreed that the death of a son would upset the parents. Spivey confirmed that he agreed. Spivey also agreed that such a death would upset a half sibling and would be upsetting if the death was also violent and unexpected. The barrister then asked Spivey what was the purpose of inviting the sister to make contact. Spivey answered, “To get a story out…. I am a journalist” 7 The Judge then said that the sister had received his request, “out of the blue, and didn’t know you from Adam, and don’t you think she would check you out as an Investigative Reporter by checking your site…..” The Prosecution then asked how come so many agencies of the State have got it all wrong regarding Lee Rigby. Spivey responded with, “My job is for the good of the people”. The Prosecution then asked about the personal comments regarding the picture of Lee Rigby’s family home and also about Spivey’s’ comments about the allegations of rape. The Judge asked about Spivey’s comment, “9 times out of 10, I am usually right” in relation to the rape comments. The Prosecution then asked about his research for his topics. Spivey informed the court that all material used is in the public domain. Spivey confirmed that he is an internet campaigner because all our freedoms are being taken away. Spivey also confirmed that he had a Press Card and he was registered and that there was a Code of Ethics. Spivey then left the dock. The Prosecution then began his summing up: “….abundant evidence regarding the Lee Rigby family…. (That caused) alarm and distress… would have known or should have known it would cause alarm or distress” The Prosecution stated that there was definite targeting by Spivey. Informing the court that since the cases of harassment in 2001 and 2004, the “effect of publishing does not have to be direct”…. You can be found guilty even if you say, “don’t tell the person this”…. “In terms of Freedom of Speech, Spivey has crossed the line….” 8 “He was/is an obsessive conspiracy theorist who thinks he is free to act in this manner with impunity.” The Defence then summed up. The prosecution to prove their case had to prove Spivey was wrong in his opinion of the Woolwich incident. There are difficulties with “big events”, where people question the facts, the example he used were the Moon Landings. People can analyse the same evidence but come to different conclusions. The picture of the Rigby family at Christmas was freely available to the public. The home address was sourced by means of Companies House. The person who took the picture of Mr Vitler was never traced by the Crown to seek his motive. There was no evidence on Spivey’s computers when checked by the Police, nor that he had encouraged or incited anybody to do anything to the four witnesses, plus there was no evidence of the targeting of these individuals. Spivey had written about the whole Woolwich incident, the Rigby story was just a small piece in his essays. The Barrister stated the legal test for Spivey was, “was he aware he should not have done it”. Giving the example of the Rapist accusation which was removed the next day by Facebook. The Defence stated that fourteen months had passed from the first post about the Rigby`s to the date of Spivey’s arrest. No action was taken to take down Spivey’s publications. Spivey has never been asked by anybody to “please take it down” to the present day (31st July). Lee Rigby’s mother did not indicate in her statement when she first 9saw Spivey’s website, and how many visits she made over this 14 month period when the articles were up. Again the test for Spivey was whether he knew he was harassing anyone. Mr Amos in his statement never indicated that Spivey had “overstepped the line” and he was going to tell Mrs Rigby. In the same way the sister was never asked, “When did you view it?”, and how many times over this fourteen month period. Spivey had not asked anybody to, “Go and sort them out”, although he acknowledged that Spivey had contacted the sister, “only once”. The website was for his opinion only, he is a journalist not a “nut job”. Spivey’s comments on the mainstream media give an alternative opinion which are all his own views and assertions. After Spivey’s barrister finished his summing up, the Judge immediately delivered his summing up of the case and gave his verdict. Spivey, in the Judge’s opinion, in the ‘Reasonable Person’ test, had harassed the two family members of the Rigby family. There had been, “a course of conduct to those people, likely to cause distress… (Spivey) should have known” In the interest of Justice there was no reason for the Rigby family to attend court in his view. In the Judge’s opinion the website and Facebook account was the real issue, not Woolwich. Then he stated that Spivey considers himself a journalist, who questions stories from the mainstream media and by, “just looking at photos can say 9/11, 7/7, Pearl Harbour, Tunisia did not happen, and Lee Rigby was not murdered or was not real”. The Judge then said, “All in the (Woolwich) case have been seriously misled by MI5…..a massive conspiracy” “He (Spivey) thinks, “without a shadow of a doubt, I am right, and 10everybody else is wrong”. The Judge then said it is not for him to take a view regarding Woolwich, the test for him was just regarding the harassment of the two Rigby family members. He then said that Spivey was “a journalist with no code of ethics to speak of.” He debunked public figures and others, in his view in a “very unpleasant manner”. He had made personal, and unattractive remarks about the Rigby family and was guilty. The Prosecution then said that Spivey had planned this harassment over a long period, it was ‘high end’. The court costs to Spivey would be £3,980. He produced a Restraining Order for the Judge to order the take down all offending material on Spivey’s website by 12 midnight on the 31st of July. The Defence was then asked by the Judge to prepare a pre-sentence report as custody was an option. He also informed Spivey, that if he took the whole site down, then this could be used in mitigation when sentencing him on the 27th August.

source:  http://guerrillademocracy.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/chris-spivey-dead-man-walking.html

——————————————————————————————————

Chris Spivey on the Woolwich Psychodrama + Boston Bomb Hoax – Good Vibrations # 21 w/ Mark Devlin

http://embed.bambuser.com/broadcast/5692264

1 Chris Spivey Trial – 30 July 2015

http://embed.bambuser.com/broadcast/5692644

2  Chris Spivey Trial – 30 July 2015

yesterday at 21:28 [31 July]

Bad news Chris found GUILTY and http://chrisspivey.org going to be taken down at midnight! This is VERY sinister

————————————————————————————————————-

Conspiracy theorist ‘claimed Lee Rigby’s murder was a hoax and terrified his family by publishing their addresses online’ – D. Mail

  • Chris Spivey, 52, from Rochford, allegedly claimed soldier, 25, did not exist
  • Self-styled journalist said relatives had doctored family photos, court told 
  • He allegedly said murder was conspiracy to incite anti-Islamic messages
  • Spivey denies harassing Fusilier Rigby’s mother Lyn and sister Sarah 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

FULL STATEMENT OF HARVEY PROCTOR + Harvey Proctor Denies ‘Untrue’ Allegations At Press Conference

butlincat:

Full Statement Of Harvey Proctor

One very important point to make is that this statement has not been checked exactly with what he actually said today.

CNQbnovWoAA1TTG

 STATEMENT BY MR KEITH HARVEY PROCTOR 

MADE IN THE MARLBOROUGH ROOM, ST.ERMIN’S HOTEL, LONDON

NOT FOR RELEASE BEFORE 2PM ON TUESDAY 25th AUGUST 2015

    I am a private citizen. I have not held public office and I have not sought public office since May 1987. As such, I am entitled to be regarded as a private citizen. Since the General Election of 1987 I have sought a private life. I have been enjoying a full life, gainfully employed and personally happy.

This all came to an abrupt end on 4th March 2015. What now follows is a statement on my present predicament created by an unidentified person making totally untrue claims against my name. Before going any further I wish to make it clear that the genuine victims of child sexual abuse have my fullest sympathy and support and I would expect the full weight of the law to be used against anyone, be he ‘ever so high, or ever so low’, committing such odious offences. Nobody and I repeat, nobody is above the law.

2. However, I attach equal weight to justice for innocent people wrongly accused of child sexual abuse, especially when it is done anonymously. This is what is happening to me and many high profile figures, many of whom are dead and cannot answer back. This statement is necessarily lengthy and detailed and at times complicated. Please bear with me and at the end I will be prepared to answer your questions.

3. On 18th June, 2015, at my request, I was interviewed by the Metropolitan Police Murder Squad “Operation Midland”. This interview lasted over 6 hours. At the very outset I had to help the Police with my full name which they appeared not to know. It may surprise you that it was over 3 and an half months after my home was searched for 15 hours and more than 7 months after the most serious allegations were made against me that I was interviewed. I went on to cooperate fully with the Police with their investigation.

4. The allegations have been made by a person who the Police have dubbed with a pseudonym – “NICK”. He appears on television with a blacked out face and an actor’s voice. All of this is connected with alleged historical child sexual abuse in the 1970ies and 1980ies. “NICK” was interviewed by the Police in the presence of a reporter from Exaro – an odd internet news agency.

5. As a Member of Parliament I always spoke in favour of the police. I believe in law and order and I believe in equipping the police to do their job and , with my track record, it will come as a surprise that I have grave and growing concerns about the Police generally and more specifically “Operation Midland”. I have decided to share these concerns with you. I believe I am not speaking just for myself today. I hope I am not being presumptuous when I say I feel I am speaking for those who have no voice whatsoever including the dead to whom I referred moments ago.

6. Two days before my interview with the Police, my Solicitors – Sakhi Solicitors of Leicester – were sent a “disclosure” document. It set out the matters the Police wished to discuss with me. It was the first time I had known of what I had been accused. On the day of my interview I was not arrested, nor placed on Police bail, I was told I could leave the Police Station at any time and that it was a voluntary interview. I and my Solicitors had previously been told I was not a suspect.

7. At the end of the interview I was given no information as to how much longer the Police investigation would take to bring the matter to a conclusion. I think you will understand I cannot allow this matter to rest.

8. So you can gauge how angry I am and in an attempt to stop the “drip, drip, drip” of allegations by the police into the media , I now wish to share with you in detail the uncorroborated and untrue allegations that have been made against me by “NICK”. Anyone of a delicate or a nervous disposition should leave the room now.

9. The following is taken from the Police disclosure document given to my Solicitors two days before my first interview with the Police under the headings “Circumstances”, “Homicides” and “Sexual abuse”.

I QUOTE:-

“ Circumstances

The victim in this investigation is identified under the pseudonym “Nick”. He made allegations to the Metropolitan Police Service in late 2014. Due to the nature of the offences alleged, “Nick” is entitled to have his identity withheld.

“Nick” stated he was the victim of systematic and serious sexual abuse by a group of adult males over a period between 1975 and 1984. The abuse was often carried out whilst in company with other boys whom were also abused by the group.

“Nick” provided names of several individuals involved in these acts including Mr HARVEY PROCTOR. He states MR PROCTOR abused him on a number of occasions which included sexual assault, buggery and torturous assault. He also states MR PROCTOR was present when he was assaulted by other adult males. Furthermore, “Nick” states he witnessed the murder of three young boys on separate occasions. He states MR PROCTOR was directly responsible for two of the allegations and implicated in the third.

The dates and locations relevant to MR PROCTOR are as follows:-

Homicides

1980 – at a residential house in central London. “Nick” was driven by car to an address in the Pimlico/Belgravia area where a second boy (the victim) was also collected in the same vehicle. Both boys, aged approximately 12-years-old, were driven to another similar central London address. MR PROCTOR was present with another male. Both boys were led to the back of the house. MR PROCTOR then stripped the victim, and tied him to a table. He then produced a large kitchen knife and stabbed the child through the arm and other parts of the body over a period of 40 minutes. A short time later MR PROCTOR untied the victim and anally raped him on the table. The other male stripped “Nick” and anally raped him over the table. MR PROCTOR then strangled the victim with his hands until the boy’s body went limp. Both males then left the room. Later, MR PROCTOR returned and led “Nick” out of the house and into a waiting car.

1981-82 – at a residential address in central London. “Nick” was collected from Kingston train station and taken to a “party” at a residential address. The witness was among four young boys. Several men were present including MR PROCTOR. One of the men told the boys one of them would die that night and they had to choose who. When the boys wouldn’t decide, the men selected one of the boys (the victim). Each of the four boys including “Nick” were taken to separate rooms for “private time”. When they all returned to the same room, Nick was anally raped by MR PROCTOR and another male as “punishment”. The other males also anally raped the remaining boys. MR PROCTOR and two other males then began beating the chosen victim by punching and kicking. The attack continued until the boy collapsed on the floor and stopped moving. All of the men left the room. The remaining boys attempted to revive the victim but he was not breathing. They were left for some time before being taken out of the house and returned to their homes.

Between May and July 1979 – in a street in Coombe Hill, Kingston. Nick was walking in this area with another boy (the victim) when he heard the sound of a car engine revving. A dark-coloured car drove into the victim knocking him down. “Nick” could see the boy covered in blood and his leg bent backwards. A car pulled up and “Nick” was grabbed and placed in the car. He felt a sharp pain in his arm and next remembered being dropped off at home. He was warned not to have friends in future. “Nick” never saw the other boy again. “Nick” does not identify MR PROCTOR as being directly involved in this allegation. However, he states MR PROCTOR was part of the group responsible for the systematic sexual abuse he suffered. Furthermore, he believes the group were responsible for the homicide.

Sexual Abuse

1978-1984 – Dolphin Square, Pimlico. “Nick” was at the venue and with at least one other young boy. MR PROCTOR was present with other males.MR PROCTOR told “Nick” to pick up a wooden baton and hit the other boy. When “Nick” refused he was punished by MR PROCTOR and the other males. He was held down and felt pain in his feet. He fell unconscious. When he awoke he was raped by several males including MR PROCTOR.

1978-1981 – Carlton Club, central London, “Nick” was driven to the Carlton Club and dropped off outside. MR PROCTOR opened the door. Inside the premises were several other males. “Nick” was sexually assaulted by another male (not by MR PROCTOR on this occasion ).

1978-1981 – swimming pool in central London. “Nick” was taken to numerous ‘pool parties’ where he and other boys were made to undress, and perform sexual acts on one another. He and other boys were then anally raped and sexually abused by several men including MR PROCTOR.

1981-1982 – Large town house in London. “Nick” was taken to the venue on numerous occasions where MR PROCTOR and one other male were present. He was forced to perform oral sex on MR PROCTOR who also put his hands around “Nick’’’s throat to prevent him breathing. On another occasion at the same location, MR PROCTOR sexually assaulted “Nick” before producing a pen-knife and threatening to cut “Nick’’’s genitals.MR PROCTOR was prevented from doing so by the other male present.

1979-1984 – residential address in central London.”Nick” was taken to the venue. MR PROCTOR was present with one other male. MR PROCTOR forced “Nick” to perform oral sex on him before beating him with punches.

1978-1984 – numerous locations including Carlton Club,Dolphin Square and a central London townhouse. “Nick” described attending several ‘Christmas parties’ where other boys were present together with numerous males including MR PROCTOR. “Nick” was given whiskey to drink before being forced to perform oral sex on several men including MR PROCTOR.

MR PROCTOR will be interviewed about the matters described above and given the opportunity to provide an account.”

10. I denied all and each of the allegations in turn and in detail and categorised them as false and untrue and, in whole, an heinous calumny. They amount to just about the worst allegations anyone can make against another person including, as they do, multiple murder of children, their torture, grievous bodily harm, rape and sexual child abuse.

11. I am completely innocent of all these allegations.

12. I am an homosexual. I am not a murderer. I am not a paedophile or pederast. Let me be frank, I pleaded guilty to four charges of gross indecency in 1987 relating to the then age of consent for homosexual activity. Those offences are no longer offences as the age of consent has dropped from 21 to 18 to 16. What I am being accused of now is a million miles away from that consensual activity.

13. At the start of the interview, I was told that although the interview would be recorded by the Police both for vision and sound, I would not receive a copy of the tapes. I asked to record the interview for sound myself but my request was refused. During the interview, to ensure that “Nick” had not identified the wrong person, I asked if I could see photographs purporting to be me which had been shown to him. My request was refused. At the end of the interview I was asked if I knew my 8 alleged co conspirators whose homes it was alleged I had visited. I believe I have a good recollection and the list comprised a number of people I knew, some who I had heard of but not met and some I did not know. None of the allegations were alleged to have taken place at my home and I have not visited the homes of any of the “gang”.

14. The list included the names of the late Leon Brittan and the late Edward Heath.

15. If it was not so serious, it would be laughable.

16. Edward Heath sacked me from the Conservative Party’s parliamentary candidates’ list in 1974. Mrs Thatcher restored me to the list 18 months later. Edward Heath despised me and he disliked my views particularly on limiting immigration from the New Commonwealth and Pakistan and my opposition to our entry into and continued membership of what is now know as the E.U. ; I opposed his corporate statist views on the Economy. I despised him too… He had sacked the late Enoch Powell, my political “hero” from the Shadow Cabinet when I was Chairman of the University of York Conservative Association. I regarded Enoch as an intellectual giant in comparison with Heath.

17. The same Edward Heath, not surprisingly, would never speak to me in the House of Commons but would snort at me as he passed me by in a Commons corridor. The feeling was entirely mutual.

18. Now I am accused of doing some of these dreadful things in his London house as well; a house to which I was never invited and to which Heath would never have invited me and to which I would have declined his invitation.

19. The same Edward Heath’s home with CCTV, housekeeper, private secretary, chauffeur, police and private detectives – all the trappings of a former Prime Minister – in the security conscious days of the IRA’s assault on London.

20. It is so farfetched as to be unbelievable. It is unbelievable because it is not true. My situation has transformed from Kafka- esque bewilderment to black farce incredulity.

21. I have nothing to hide and nothing to fear. I appeal to any witness who truthfully can place me at any of the former homes of Edward Heath or Leon Brittan at any time to come forward now. I appeal to any witness who can truthfully say I committed any of these horrible crimes to come forward now.

22. The “gang” is also alleged to have included Lord Janner ( a former Labour M.P.), Lord Bramall (Former Chief of the General Staff) , the late Maurice Oldfield (Former Head of Secret Intelligence Service – MI6), the late Sir Michael Hanley ( Director General of the Internal Security Service – MI5), General Sir Hugh Beach (Master-General of the Ordnance) and a man named – Ray Beech. I did not move in such circles. As an ex Secondary Modern School boy from Yorkshire, I was not a part of the Establishment. I had no interest being part of it. I cannot believe that these other 8 people conspired to do these monstrous things. I certainly did not.

23. Yesterday I was interviewed again by the Metropolitan Police Murder Squad for 1 hour 40 minutes. It was a voluntary interview. I was free to go at any time. I was not arrested. I am not on bail. Unhelpfully, the second disclosure document was given to me some 20 minutes after yesterday’s  interview was supposed to have started rather than last Friday as had been promised.  My Solicitors were told by the Police it was ready but had to be signed off by superior officers on Friday.  The Metropolitan Police are either inefficient or doing it by design. Whatever else, it is  inept and an unjust way to treat anyone.   During yesterday’s interview,  I was shown a photograph of “Nick” aged about 12. I did not recognise him. I was shown computer generated e fit images of 2 of the alleged murder victims created by “Nick”.  They looked remarkably similar  to each other but one with blonde hair and one dark brown. I did not recognise either image. I was asked if I knew Jimmy Saville. I told them I did not. “Nick” alleges – surprise surprise – that Saville attended the sex “parties”. I was asked if I knew a number of people including Leslie Goddard and Peter Heyman. I did not these two. I was asked if I knew well, a doctor – unnamed. Apparently “Nick” alleges the doctor was a friend of mine and allegedly he turned up to repair the damage done to the boys when they were abused at these “parties”. I could not help there . I was asked if I could recognise images of the pen knife mentioned earlier. It was suggested it was Edward Heath who persuaded me not to castrate “Nick” with it. I was obviously so persuaded by Mr Heath’s intervention that I placed the pen knife in “Nick’s” pocket ready for him to present it to the Metropolitan police over 30 years later as “evidence”. I could not identify the knife. I have never had a pen knife. I was asked if I visited Elm Guest House in Rocks Lane, Barnes. I wondered when that elephant in the room would be mentioned by the Metropolitan police. I am sorry to have to disappoint the fantasists on the internet but I did not visit Elm Guest House. I was unaware of its existence.  The so called “guest list” which makes its appearance on the net must be a fake.

24. During my first interview I was told that the Police were investigating to seek out the truth. I reminded them on a number of occasions that their Head of “Operation Midland”, Detective Superintendent Kenny McDonald had said on television some months ago “ I believe what “NICK” is saying as credible and true “. This statement is constantly used and manipulated by Exaro and other Media to justify their position.

25. This remark is very prejudicial to the police inquiry and its outcome. It is not justice and breaches my United Kingdom and Human Rights. This whole catalogue of events has wrecked my life, lost me my job and demolished 28 years of my rehabilitation since 1987.

26. The Police involved in “Operation Midland” are in a cleft stick of their own making. They are in a quandary. Support the “victim” however ludicrous his allegations or own up that they got it disastrously wrong but risk the charge of a cover up. What do I think should happen now?

Either:-

I should be arrested, charged and prosecuted for murder and these awful crimes immediately so I can start the process of ridiculing these preposterous allegations in open court

Or

“NICK” should be stripped of his anonymity and prosecuted for wasting police time and money, making the most foul of false allegations and seeking to pervert the course of justice. Those who have aided and abetted him should also be prosecuted. “NICK” should be medically examined to ensure he is of sound mind.

27. Detective Superintendent Kenny McDonald should resign from his position as Head of “Operation Midland”. He should resign or be sacked. But as the Metropolitan Police is a bureaucratic “organisation” I suggest, to save face, he is slid sideways to be placed in control of Metropolitan London parking, traffic, jay walking or crime prevention. He too should be medically examined to ensure he is of sound mind.

28. An investigation should be launched into “Operation Midland” and its costs. Detectives’ expense claims should be analysed and a full audit carried out by independent auditors.

29. Those Labour Members of Parliament who have misused parliamentary privilege and their special position on these matters should apologise. They have behaved disgracefully, especially attacking dead parliamentarians who cannot defend themselves and others and they should make amends. They are welcome to sue me for libel. In particular, Mr Tom Watson, M.P. should state, outside the protection of the House of Commons, the names of ex Ministers and ex M.P.s who he feels are part of the so called alleged Westminster rent boy ring.

30. Lady Goddard’s Inquiry should examine “Operation Midland’s” methods so as to sift genuine historical child sexual abuse from the spurious.

31. “Operation Midland” should be wound up by the Metropolitan Police Commissioner who should also apologise at the earliest opportunity. On the 6th August 2015, Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe shed crocodile tears criticising the Independent Police Complaints Commission and Wiltshire Police for naming Edward Heath as a suspect. He said it was not “fair” and his own force would not do such a thing. This is very disingenuous. When his Police officers were searching my Home and before they had left, the Press were ringing me asking for comment. I was identified. They had told “Nick” of the search who passed on the information to his press friends. The Metropolitan police have also told the press that they were investigating Heath and Brittan and others. Sir Bernard should resign for the sin of hypocrisy. If he does not, it will not be long before he establishes “Operation Plantagenet” to determine Richard III’s involvement in the murder of the Princes in the Tower of London.

32. Superintendent Sean Memory of Wiltshire Police should explain why he made a statement about Edward Heath in front of his former home in Salisbury and who advised him to select that venue. He should also resign.

33. Leon Brittan was driven to his death by police action. They already knew for 6 months before his death, on the advice of the DPP, that he would not face prosecution for the alleged rape of a young woman. But they did not tell him. They just hoped he would die without having to tell him. The Superintendent in charge of his investigation should resign.

34. The Police should stop referring automatically to people who make statements of alleged Historic child sexual abuse as “victims”. They should refer to them as “complainants” from the French “to lament” which would be more appropriate. Parliament should pass laws to better balance the right to anonymity of “victims” and the “accused”. Parliament should reinstate in law the English tradition of “innocence before being found guilty” which has been trashed in recent months by certain sections of the Police, the DPP, MPs, Magistrates and the Courts themselves.

35. I have not just come here with a complaint. I have come with the intention of showing my face in public as an innocent man. I have come to raise my voice as an aggrieved subject now deeply concerned about the administration of Justice. What has become increasingly clear about Police investigations into historical child sexual abuse is that it has been bungled in years gone by and is being bungled again NOW. The moment has come to ask ourselves if the Police are up to the task of investigating the apparent complexities of such an enquiry ? These allegations merit the most detailed and intellectually rigorous application.

36. What is clear from the last few years of police activity driven by the media, fearful of the power of the internet and the odd M.P. here and there is that the overhaul of the Police service up and down the country is now urgently required. We need “Super cops” who have been University educated and drawn from the professions. Such people could be of semi retirement status with a background in the supervision of complex, criminal investigations. These people could be drawn from the law, accountancy and insolvency practices. Former Justices of the Peace could chair some of these investigations. Adequate incentives should be provided to recruit them.

37. I speak for myself and, as a former Tory M.P. with an impeccable record in defending the Police, I have now come to believe that that blind trust in them was totally misplaced. What has happened to me could happen to anyone. It could happen to you.

38. In summary, the paranoid Police have pursued an homosexual witch hunt on this issue egged on by a motley crew of certain sections of the media and press and a number of Labour Members of Parliament and a ragbag of internet fantasists. There are questions to ask about what kind of Police Force do we have in Britain today. How can it be right for the Police to act in  consort with the press with routine  tip offs of House raids, impending arrests and the like. Anonymity is given to anyone prepared to make untruthful accusations of child sexual abuse whilst the alleged accused are routinely fingered publicly without any credible evidence first being found. This is not justice. It is an abuse of power and authority.

39. In conclusion, I wish to thank my Solicitors Mr Raza Sakhi and Mr Nabeel Gatrad and my family and friends for their support without which I would not have been able to survive this onslaught on my character and on my life.

I am prepared to take questions.

END

source: https://www.theneedleblog.wordpress.com/2015/08/25/full-statement-of-harvey-proctor/

Harvey Proctor Denies ‘Untrue’ Allegations At Press Conference

Originally posted on theneedleblog:

CNQbnovWoAA1TTG

The former MP Harvey Proctor today launched a blistering attack on a police “homosexual witch-hunt” after revealing that he had been questioned over claims of the alleged murder of three boys supposedly linked to an “elite Westminster sex ring”.

Mr Proctor said that he had been accused of being part of a child sex-ring with the late Prime Minister Edward Heath, ex-Home Secretary Leon Brittan along with ex-heads of MI5 and MI6. The allegations were based on the testimony of an anonymous witness that Scotland Yard had previously described as being “credible and true”.

In a sensational statement issued today, Harvey Proctor said he was “completely innocent” of accusations of paedophilia as he went public on the two rounds of questioning he had faced from the Metropolitan Police’s Operation Midland investigation.

His statement is the first detailed response from anyone who has been investigated by Operation Midland over claims of…

View original 122 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Lord Janner sued by six alleged victims who claim he abused them as children 20/08/15 + JANNER ARCHIVE

Lord Janner sued by six alleged victims who claim he abused them as children –  20 August 2015

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/lord-janner-sued-six-alleged-6288407

==============================================

video of Janner arriving at court  https://embed.theguardian.com/embed/video/uk-news/video/2015/aug/14/lord-greville-janner-arrives-court-after-judge-threatens-arrest-video

Greville Janner arrives at court to face child abuse allegations after his lawyers failed to prevent him being forced to attend. The former Labour peer arrived at Westminster magistrates court in central London on Friday afternoon in a silver car, hours after he was initially due. The deputy chief magistrate warned Janner’s barrister, Paul Ozin, that she would have him arrested if the matter was not resolved quickly

Lord Janner appears in court over child sex abuse charges

  • 46 minutes ago – BBC News
  • From the section UK
Sketch of Lord Janner in court

Lord Janner was escorted into the courtroom by a minder and woman believed to be his daughter

Lord Janner has appeared in court for the first time over historical child sex abuse charges.

The 87-year-old, who has dementia, appeared at Westminster Magistrates’ Court for less than a minute.

Lord Janner faces 22 charges spanning the 1960s to the 1980s and was told his case would be sent to crown court.

continues @  http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-33931860

 Lord Janner makes first court appearance over child sex abuse claims – “Guardian”

Former Labour peer finally, and briefly, attends hearing in relation to 22 abuse allegations after lawyers fail in last-ditch attempt to prevent it

Greville Janner has appeared in court for the first time to face a series of child sexual abuse allegations stretching back to the 1960s.

The former Labour peer was driven into Westminster magistrates court in chaotic scenes on Friday afternoon, as his saloon car was besieged by television crews and photographers.

Lord Janner, who has Alzheimer’s disease, appeared drawn and confused during his 59 second appearance before deputy chief magistrate Emma Arbuthnot. .

Continues, with video: http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/aug/14/lord-janner-makes-first-court-appearance-over-child-sex-abuse-claims?CMP=share_btn_fb

JANNER ARCHIVE =

JANNER LAWYERS LOSE HIGH COURT BID OVER CHILD ABUSE CHARGES 13 AUG. 2015 BBC + JANNER ARCHIVE.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

GUERILLA DEMOCRACY NEWS – CHRIS SPIVEY – DEAD MAN WALKING

Friday, 21 August 2015

Chris Spivey- Dead Man Walking.

Chris Spivey is a dead man walking. Tragic news to his family, Chris Spivey has arrived at theterrible conclusion that the only way the Powers that Be can save themselves is to murder him while he’s in custody at Her Majesty’s pleasure.

Spelt out in crystal clarity in his latest article ’They Shoot Horses Don’t They,’ Chris Spivey proves beyond all reasonable doubt that not only is he is a victim of injustice, but he’s also earmarked to be murdered in Prison- in the not too distance future.

Spivey’s harassment conviction is built upon two counts of malicious communication against Lynn Rigby and Lee Rigby’s sister.

The first relates to ONE AND ONLY ONE Facebook message he sent on the 18th of July 2013 in which he was extremely polite and when he got no answer, did not attempt to contact the witness again.

The other malicious communication charge relates to a mock-up of a front page of the Sun newspaper, which was published on his Facebook Page.

(It’s interesting to note that “a Matt Taylor” was named in the court’s transcript as being the person responsible for posting the mock Sun newspaper front page. It has since been admitted that it was in fact posted by Lisa Pea, a member of Spivey’s administrative team.)

Chris Spivey maintains his innocence on this count claiming, “I DID NOT make this spoof page and never even acknowledged it. The person responsible posted it on my Facebook page that I do not have any dealings with in regard to things that people post on there.”

Guerrilla Democracy News accepts full responsibility for this picture

You would have thought the case would have been dismissed on these two points alone, but the miscarriage of justice runs deeper when we learn that the witness statements used to convict Spivey haven’t even been signed by those person(s) who wrote them.

Rather than shying away Spivey is maintaining his contention that all the witnesses who testified against him ARE’NT who they claim to be.

“All four witnesses are of easily provable dubious character with clear evidence relating to criminal behaviour.”

Here is what Spivey has to say on the subject:

“Here is the way I see it.

The prosecution fought tooth and nail using one of the country’s top barristers to keep their OWN four witnesses out of court… Why would they do that?

My aherm, aherm Barrister ignored all that I told her as to why the witnesses should appear i.e their witness statements were a tissue of easily exposed lies and as such, were they to be repeated under oath would mean that they would have committed perjury. And in any event, the witnesses are not who they pretend to be.

I therefore knew that if the witnesses were made to appear then the trial would not have gone ahead… The case would have been dropped.

However, the Judge, completely ignoring the rule of law sided with the prosecution – ruling that the witnesses be spared being torn to bits on the witness stand – thus blatantly denying me the right to a fair trial.”

“THE WITNESSES ARE NOT WHO THEY PRETEND TO BE.”

Propabably the most controversial statement to make related to the Woolwich incident is the claim that virtually every personality involved was an MI5 inspired creation – a crisis actor!

Spivey plans to appeal his conviction but in doing so he knows better than anyone that he’s signed his own death warrant.

Over to Spivey who explains:

“An appeal means that the witnesses WILL HAVE TO APPEAR NO MATTER WHAT because the appeal will be held in a Crown Court with a jury and will be based on the above facts.

And like I said, had the witnesses been made to appear then the case would have been dropped, not least because the witnesses – as the Crown fully knows – are not who they claim to be, are of dubious character and have alleged easily provable lies in all four witness statements… Therefore, they now have a real, real crisis on their hands because unlike the trial, they can not drop the appeal hearing and if that goes ahead, then it is not an understatement to say that at the very least, the outcome has the capacity to bring down the government.

Therefore, the only way to stop the appeal going ahead – which they have to at all costs – is if I am dead… Hence the forthcoming prison sentence.”

LATEST NEWS.

Sourced from Spivey’s Facebook status update.

“Guess who has been asked to appear at the Glastonbury Festival next year?

If I am still alive of course!

The following is a link to video footage of yesterday’s event in London where Dr Nick Kollerstrom handed a letter into the ministry of Justice in protest at the persecution of me and my family by the British Government.”

Transcript of the harassment trial of Christopher Spivey 30th-31st July 2015 at Chelmsford Magistrates Court. 

The trial began at about 10.20am, and the next 40 minutes consisted of Spivey’s barrister asking the Judge to postpone the trial until a Judicial Review application had been processed. Spivey’s barrister argued, that the trial would be ‘unfair’ because he could not ‘challenge the witnesses, because they were not there’. The barrister argued that the pictures of the Rigby family, their homes and addresses were not ‘private’ but already in the public domain and therefore could be downloaded by anybody. He also argued that Spivey, was ‘a journalist, therefore he had freedom of expression.’ The judge then asked if he could have a copy of the application for Judicial Review and was given a copy by the defence. He noticed straight away that it was not stamped and asked why. The Defence explained that the application for legal aid to pay for the application and legal costs to process such a form had still not been authorised. However it will be lodged either today (30th July) or tomorrow. The Judge said he disagreed with the Judicial Review application because at every court appearance he have always asked why Mr Spivey wanted the witnesses present and he had never received a satisfactory response to his question. He said that he felt that there was enough authority to proceed with the trial, and he would weigh up the hearsay evidence regarding its merits. The prosecution then outlined the case against Spivey, quoting from his Police Statement, “they don’t have to read it (the Rigby family)………… I have freedom of speech” The prosecution informed the court that there was ample evidence 1that Spivey’s article had caused harm and distress to the family, and either he knew it would or should have known. Spivey had deliberately targeted Lee Rigby’s mother and sister, and his comments were more than irritating. He acknowledged that Spivey had freedom of speech, however, section 10. 2 of the Harassment Act informs us that this also carries certain duties and responsibilities. Spivey’s comments were ‘bizarre’ and could have only come from a ‘crank’ and had caused alarm and distress and this all equalled harassment. The prosecution then read out Lee Rigby’s mother’s statement: We were now rebuilding our lives (family)…. How her Facebook site was/is private…. The Sun `hoax’ headlines front page…. She read the comments alleging her son was a rapist….. The website destroyed (her) happy memories” Then Lee Rigby’s sister`s statement was read out: “Contacted by Spivey via Facebook….. Claimed he had evidence of a hoax…. I Did not accept his `friend’ request` because I thought he was weird…… I looked at his website…. Spivey had published photos of me/family/home ….. I wondered how did he get my children`s names?….. I felt at risk, now may have to move” Mr Amos’ statement was then read out: “I am angry…. He used photos from my Facebook page….. Spivey sent messages…. I answered because I was intrigued…. (I felt) threatened, like I was being accused of being in on the hoax…. He exposing Rigby family fraud…. Spivey said that they will kill you not me, I have a high profile” Mr Vitler’s statement was then read out: “Spivey contacted me… He looked like a cheap tattooist for bikers… Photographs (of Spivey) freaked him out… I Felt like someone was watching me” 2The defence barrister then realised that his ‘bundle’ of documents were different than the Prosecution and Judges. The Judge commented that the management of papers by the CPS had been far from adequate since the start of Spivey’s court appearances. DC Coombes then was sworn in to give his evidence, reiterated all the points from the four statements to the Court. Spivey’s Barrister then asked about the article regarding the assertion that the soldier was a ‘rapist’ and it was confirmed by DC Coombes that it was not Spiveys’ article. The policeman confirmed with a simple “yes” that in all his investigations all video’s, pictures, comments, etc were all taken from the mainstream media or were in the public domain. The barrister then referred the DC to pictures of Margaret Thatcher’s funeral in the bundle. Asking first did he know that they were her funeral pictures? Answer, “I don’t know”. The barrister said, “Please believe me it was”. There were two photos of the funeral one implying a large crowd at her funeral, was photo shopped by the Mainstream Media. The next one that was in the Alternative Media, was of a very sparse crowd. Did he notice Spivey’s comments about the pictures? He replied “Yes” The DC also confirmed that Spivey’s publication of the families addresses, had not encouraged or incited anybody to commit any criminal activity. The DC also confirmed with a simple “Yes” that Mr Amos contacted Spivey first. The DC also agreed that the witnesses did not have to go on Spivey’s website (all four witnesses). When asked why they went on the website? The DC answered “I don’t 3know”. He was then asked, if the family ever asked Spivey to take posts down? He replied, “No”. He then said that the family could have got the posts taken down by an Injunction and this was confirmed by the DC. The Barrister asked why it took over a year for them to complain. The DC replied, “I don’t know” The barrister continued with questions such as: “Why did it take the police two weeks from the instigation of the complaint to Spivey’s arrest?” “I can’t account for why”. “In those two weeks before his arrest was the family asking why has he not been arrested yet? ” “No” He asked if there had been any assault, or violence, or harassment to the family since Spivey’s arrest? The DC replied, “No”. The next day, Friday morning, the DC was back in the dock. Spivey’s Barrister informed the court that Spivey was arrested with no search or arrest warrant. The DC confirmed that no other websites were checked regarding the Rigby families material, he said that it was not relevant to check other sites. Spivey then was sworn in. He was asked by his barrister about his background. The Judge asked about his dealings with the Sovereign Independent Newspaper, “how big is it’s circulation?” 4Spivey’s Barrister then asked Spivey the purpose of his website, Spivey’s response was, “to make comments not published in the mainstream media.” He asked Spivey to go to the bundle – “What was the purpose of the picture of Prince Charles being told by you to fuck off?” Spivey replied, “To attract attention”. He then asked if Spivey ever got any negative comments on Facebook. Spivey confirmed he had. The barrister asked about which subjects received such comments, and gave the example of Rolf Harris. Spivey replied that the comments were made by “organised trolls”. Spivey then stated that everything he writes is sourced, he analyses the evidence and then writes his opinions. His writing style was simplistic in nature, designed for his target audience, which he stated was “like speaking to somebody on a building site” (a previous occupation of his). He admitted to photo shopping photos of Lee Rigby to evidence his opinion they matched up with other persons. He claimed he did not target the Rigby family, there were numerous other websites regarding Woolwich. Spivey was asked if he knew the Rigby’s were looking at his site. Spivey replied, “No” Spivey said, “Amos contacted me…… Amos said, Come on big boy”. Spivey confirmed that he had never contacted Mr Vitler in any form whatsoever, nor had he contacted anybody to take a picture of Vitler. The Sun ‘mock headline’ was posted by a Matt Taylor as anybody can post on Spivey’s Facebook account. Spivey had been threatened with violence regarding various posts and subjects on Facebook in the past. 5He said: “his website, comments on his articles and his forum pages were only able to be accessed by subscription.” The subscription comprised of giving a valid email address. He had moderators who ran his site, he just wrote. The barrister asked how many hits he has had since he has started in 2012. Spivey responded, “10 and half million, and yesterday I had 15,000 hits”. The Judge asked, “Could the same people make multiple hits?”, Spivey replied, “Yes” Spivey was asked by his barrister, if he actively sought or engaged the Rigby family to view the site? He confirmed that he had not. Spivey said that he only knew that he was alleged to have harassed the family, at the time of his arrest. He never wanted to cause harassment. The Prosecution then questioned Spivey regarding his Facebook account and website, and implied that ‘links’ posted on his Facebook page were a kind of advertisement for his webpage. The Prosecution suggested that the ‘mock’ Sun posting on his Facebook page, even though posted by Matt Taylor had then been ‘adopted’ by him by not deleting it, and asked if Spivey agreed with its content. Spivey replied that he had, “No feelings one way or the other”. Spivey was then asked if he had attended the “Two Michaels” Old Bailey Trial, or informed the police, or defence solicitors for the “Two Michaels” that he could help the trial by revealing what he had discovered. Spivey responded, “No” 6 Spivey said his intention at one time was to present all his evidence to a Police Station. The Judge then asked Spivey, “Did you ever consider the possibility that you could be wrong?” Then asking, “did you not consider the hurt caused to the Rigby`s if you are wrong?” Spivey answered that his motive regarding exposing Woolwich as a hoax, was to publicise how anti – muslim feelings were being stirred up in the country, plus he wanted to expose the negative prospect of rewarding of the security services with a multi-million budget to further erode freedoms. The Judge then said this Rigby conspiracy was, “extremely wide”. He suggested that MI5 must have got everybody on board from the Old Bailey judge to the witnesses of the murder. Spivey used the example of Pearl Harbour to illustrate that cover ups do occur, in that it is now common knowledge that the Americans allowed this to happen so they could enter the Second World War. The Judge then asked Spivey his views on 9/11, 7/7, Tunisia and the Holocaust. Spivey replied he did not believe the Government narratives on all of these occurrences and he also informed the Judge that his daughter was Jewish. The Prosecution then asked Spivey if he agreed that the death of a son would upset the parents. Spivey confirmed that he agreed. Spivey also agreed that such a death would upset a half sibling and would be upsetting if the death was also violent and unexpected. The barrister then asked Spivey what was the purpose of inviting the sister to make contact. Spivey answered, “To get a story out…. I am a journalist” 7 The Judge then said that the sister had received his request, “out of the blue, and didn’t know you from Adam, and don’t you think she would check you out as an Investigative Reporter by checking your site…..” The Prosecution then asked how come so many agencies of the State have got it all wrong regarding Lee Rigby. Spivey responded with, “My job is for the good of the people”. The Prosecution then asked about the personal comments regarding the picture of Lee Rigby’s family home and also about Spivey’s’ comments about the allegations of rape. The Judge asked about Spivey’s comment, “9 times out of 10, I am usually right” in relation to the rape comments. The Prosecution then asked about his research for his topics. Spivey informed the court that all material used is in the public domain. Spivey confirmed that he is an internet campaigner because all our freedoms are being taken away. Spivey also confirmed that he had a Press Card and he was registered and that there was a Code of Ethics. Spivey then left the dock. The Prosecution then began his summing up: “….abundant evidence regarding the Lee Rigby family…. (That caused) alarm and distress… would have known or should have known it would cause alarm or distress” The Prosecution stated that there was definite targeting by Spivey. Informing the court that since the cases of harassment in 2001 and 2004, the “effect of publishing does not have to be direct”…. You can be found guilty even if you say, “don’t tell the person this”…. “In terms of Freedom of Speech, Spivey has crossed the line….” 8 “He was/is an obsessive conspiracy theorist who thinks he is free to act in this manner with impunity.” The Defence then summed up. The prosecution to prove their case had to prove Spivey was wrong in his opinion of the Woolwich incident. There are difficulties with “big events”, where people question the facts, the example he used were the Moon Landings. People can analyse the same evidence but come to different conclusions. The picture of the Rigby family at Christmas was freely available to the public. The home address was sourced by means of Companies House. The person who took the picture of Mr Vitler was never traced by the Crown to seek his motive. There was no evidence on Spivey’s computers when checked by the Police, nor that he had encouraged or incited anybody to do anything to the four witnesses, plus there was no evidence of the targeting of these individuals. Spivey had written about the whole Woolwich incident, the Rigby story was just a small piece in his essays. The Barrister stated the legal test for Spivey was, “was he aware he should not have done it”. Giving the example of the Rapist accusation which was removed the next day by Facebook. The Defence stated that fourteen months had passed from the first post about the Rigby`s to the date of Spivey’s arrest. No action was taken to take down Spivey’s publications. Spivey has never been asked by anybody to “please take it down” to the present day (31st July). Lee Rigby’s mother did not indicate in her statement when she first 9saw Spivey’s website, and how many visits she made over this 14 month period when the articles were up. Again the test for Spivey was whether he knew he was harassing anyone. Mr Amos in his statement never indicated that Spivey had “overstepped the line” and he was going to tell Mrs Rigby. In the same way the sister was never asked, “When did you view it?”, and how many times over this fourteen month period. Spivey had not asked anybody to, “Go and sort them out”, although he acknowledged that Spivey had contacted the sister, “only once”. The website was for his opinion only, he is a journalist not a “nut job”. Spivey’s comments on the mainstream media give an alternative opinion which are all his own views and assertions. After Spivey’s barrister finished his summing up, the Judge immediately delivered his summing up of the case and gave his verdict. Spivey, in the Judge’s opinion, in the ‘Reasonable Person’ test, had harassed the two family members of the Rigby family. There had been, “a course of conduct to those people, likely to cause distress… (Spivey) should have known” In the interest of Justice there was no reason for the Rigby family to attend court in his view. In the Judge’s opinion the website and Facebook account was the real issue, not Woolwich. Then he stated that Spivey considers himself a journalist, who questions stories from the mainstream media and by, “just looking at photos can say 9/11, 7/7, Pearl Harbour, Tunisia did not happen, and Lee Rigby was not murdered or was not real”. The Judge then said, “All in the (Woolwich) case have been seriously misled by MI5…..a massive conspiracy” “He (Spivey) thinks, “without a shadow of a doubt, I am right, and 10everybody else is wrong”. The Judge then said it is not for him to take a view regarding Woolwich, the test for him was just regarding the harassment of the two Rigby family members. He then said that Spivey was “a journalist with no code of ethics to speak of.” He debunked public figures and others, in his view in a “very unpleasant manner”. He had made personal, and unattractive remarks about the Rigby family and was guilty. The Prosecution then said that Spivey had planned this harassment over a long period, it was ‘high end’. The court costs to Spivey would be £3,980. He produced a Restraining Order for the Judge to order the take down all offending material on Spivey’s website by 12 midnight on the 31st of July. The Defence was then asked by the Judge to prepare a pre-sentence report as custody was an option. He also informed Spivey, that if he took the whole site down, then this could be used in mitigation when sentencing him on the 27th August.

source:  http://guerrillademocracy.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/chris-spivey-dead-man-walking.html

——————————————————————————————————

Chris Spivey on the Woolwich Psychodrama + Boston Bomb Hoax – Good Vibrations # 21 w/ Mark Devlin

http://embed.bambuser.com/broadcast/5692264

1 Chris Spivey Trial – 30 July 2015

http://embed.bambuser.com/broadcast/5692644

2  Chris Spivey Trial – 30 July 2015

yesterday at 21:28 [31 July]

Bad news Chris found GUILTY and http://chrisspivey.org going to be taken down at midnight! This is VERY sinister

————————————————————————————————————-

Conspiracy theorist ‘claimed Lee Rigby’s murder was a hoax and terrified his family by publishing their addresses online’ – D. Mail

  • Chris Spivey, 52, from Rochford, allegedly claimed soldier, 25, did not exist
  • Self-styled journalist said relatives had doctored family photos, court told 
  • He allegedly said murder was conspiracy to incite anti-Islamic messages
  • Spivey denies harassing Fusilier Rigby’s mother Lyn and sister Sarah 
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hampstead Cover-up Update & The State of Pederasty in the UK – WBB156 extended version + MOTHER’S WITNESS STATEMENT + more

Hampstead Cover-up Update & The State of Pederasty in the UK – WBB156 extended version

Hampstead Cover Up Ella & Abe Expose Brian Gerrish Bill Maloney MI5 McKenzie RCJ 

Hampstead Cover Up Ella & Abe Expose Brian Gerrish Bill Maloney MI5 McKenzie RCJ Conspiracy

Posted in HAMPSTEAD "WHISTLEBLOWER KIDS" SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE [SRA] | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

WINDOWS 10 NSA Edition

Windows 10: The Spy Edition

Windows 10 should be renamed Windows 1984 as that is the true nature of the operating system.

windows10-evil-nsaBy M. PoorthovenWindows 10 was released a short while ago with millions having downloaded it already. It is being lauded as the most widely adopted Windows at launch. Windows 10 is free for the first year, even for pirated editions of Windows so that even people with illegal versions of Windows 7, 8 or 8.1 can use Windows 10 and get used to it and given a year Microsoft hope that even people who can’t afford it will eventually buy it.

Or at least that’s the illusion they are given for nothing comes free and this latest version of Windows is no exception. Putting all crashes, incompatibilities, lack of drivers, update problems and everything else that’s wrong with Windows 10, forcing Microsoft to release Service Pack 1 (they avowed not to release any more Service Packs after Windows 7 SP1, which is why we have Windows 8.1 and not Windows 8 SP1), aside there are problems that go far beyond all these blue screens and hardware that don’t work.

“If it’s free, you are the product”.

During Beta it became apparent that Microsoft were gathering vast amounts of telemetric data, from locations, to website visited. Most users are already used to this as Google, Bing, Yahoo (Bing), Baidu and basically all search engines do this, not to mention the unknown amount of cookies and trackers ads websites download onto a users computer. However, Microsoft weren’t happy with just collecting which websites people were visiting, they even collected all key presses and mouse clicks, files on the PC and their names, images viewed and files downloaded. Microsoft basically demanded full control of the OS during beta with all possible data being transmitted to their servers.

When this was pointed out many Beta users laughed at privacy concerned users stating that as this was Beta Microsoft could do as they pleased. Users were helping Microsoft improve the OS and had to put up with a lot more than just being the product. Every update would force a new reinstall of Windows 10, which was justified due to the Beta stage of the software.

Not long after release it turned out that those who were mocking privacy concerned users themselves were the fools for Windows 10 EULA stated clearly that Microsoft reserve the right to collect any and all data, including key presses, mouse clicks and all other forms of telemetric data and share it with whomever they pleased. Even Bit Locker passwords are saved on Microsoft’s servers. Websites all over the web exploded with outrage and many users dug deep to find out where the data was going and how to stop Microsoft from collecting whatever they like on their users. It’s turned out that Microsoft’s data collection makes that of Google and iOS look amateur.

The picture above, which is a collection of screen shots from Windows 10 shows that telemetric data gathering is far worse than anyone could have imagined and in some cases can’t even be disabled without going to quite an extent.

Why would Microsoft need to upload WiFi passwords or Facebook passwords to their servers? Why does Windows 10 need to, by default, create a WiFi network without a users consent in the first place?

Microsoft have also changed the way updates are received and rolled out. Users who decline the installation of a ‘feature’ more than twice will not be able to receive security updates either until those features have been installed. What those features could be are as of yet unknown. To add to this beyond irritating and mesmerising backward way of treating users is that users also can’t block driver updates. It has already been reported that users who installed up to date drivers for their hardware (motherboard, sound, video card, etc.) had them uninstalled and were forced by Windows 10 update to use outdated Windows drivers. This is one of the causes of massive headaches, BSOD’s and has made Windows 10 a nightmare. It can be argued that those who never update their drivers would benefit from this but those who do are severely affected by this design choice.

Fortunately a tool has been released by Microsoft that allows users who wish to have more control over their system to block drivers drivers and updates. The tool, which isn’t widely advertised, is not something Microsoft released willingly but had to due to immense problems Windows Update has created.

The tool can be found here at HowToGeek.com

And just when we thought we’d hit the bottom with how bad Windows 10 could get Microsoft dropped another bomb. They have reserved the right to disable unauthorised hardware and software. Unauthorised software pertains to services and programs such as Bing, Office, Skype and other Microsoft products but which hardware they are referring to is unknown as the terms are not clear and no list has been released. It’s possible that they will disable non-official Xbox controllers but they could easily take it to the extreme and block non-Microsoft mice, keyboards and everything else they desire within this grey area that they have created for themselves.

A list of products can be found here at OverClock.net

Unfortunately there are many ignorant people who willingly or unwillingly (paid, brainwashed or just too brain dead to understand) act as gatekeepers of the system with motto’s like “If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.” but that hasn’t stopped Windows 10 from being branded Win Spy or Win NSA Edition. Of course Microsoft have not revealed which third parties will be privy to this information but it’s obvious who those usual suspects are. Google censoring Youtube on behalf of the worlds most tyrannical despots shows that whoever demands this information will get it.

The US demand Google remove between 7 to 800 video’s from Youtube (increasing yearly) containing police brutality or criticism of the state. The UK is usually second with the rest of Europe and other Anglo Saxon moral wastelands coming next. China usually requests between 50 and 60 video’s to be removed, with most requests ignored.

It’s been known for years that all operating systems have back doors in them but now that Windows 10 doesn’t need a back door, it is the most intrusive and extensive spyware possible with an OS wrapping.

So what are the alternatives to Win Spy? Linux Ubuntu is not an alternative to this gigantic spyware as Ubuntu has Bing incorporated into it, making it as insecure and spy prone as Windows 10. Linux Mint, Arch, Gentoo and a few others are more privacy orientated as users have more input into the OS and there is a thriving community that helps build on them.

But Linux has its limits. Linux is not a Windows replacement yet as many programmes that run natively in Windows require Wine to run in Linux and Wine isn’t without its incompatibilities and problems. Many programs refuse to run in Wine and or are very unstable. Programs that require special permissions or install drivers won’t run as Wine can’t give such permissions as emulation is severely limited.

Mac OS is not an alternative either unless users wish to become locked into Apple’s eco system, which is also limited compared to that of Windows. In fact in many ways it’s far more limited than Linux. Microsoft have recently released Office for Mac but the problem with Apple PC’s is that users do not have control over the hardware, making repair or replacement either very costly or simply impossible.

Free BSD is also a possibility but again it’s a *nix based OS like Mac OS and Linux so it has its severe limitations. Android is also not an alternative but then who would want Google who are just as evil as Microsoft to develop an OS to replace Windows? Intel have been experimenting with Android x86 and it’s obvious that it can’t replace Windows now, if ever. It’s a phone and tablet orientated OS that lacks productivity. Office programs are not up to par and though WPS has been catching up fast it’s still a mere shadow of LibreOffice, let alone Microsoft Office. And this counts for the Windows version of WPS too.

XP could once have been considered an alternative but XP has had its time. It is a 32bit operating system that can’t use more than 3.5GB of RAM and though Microsoft patched its kernel (the core of the OS, not to be confused with source code) to that of Vista with SP 3 it can’t use more than two cores efficiently, leaving 6 and 8 thread or core CPU’s more or less in the cold as its scheduler is outdated. When XP was first released the most powerful computers were Pentium III or K6’s at about 500MHz with at most 128MB RAM and not even 10GB hard disks. XP64 was released but as that’s Server 2003 renamed to XP it lacks driver support and even that can’t use multiple cores efficiently.

windows10-spy

When Vista was released a group of developers tried to port DirectX10 (henceforth DX) to XP so that even XP users could use the marvels that DX10 brought but they gave up as it was extremely time consuming and difficult to extract DX10 from Vista. It is too enmeshed in Vista and the easiest way of using DX10 was for users to upgrade to Vista and beyond. It’s no accident that XP drivers don’t work in Vista or visa versa but Vista drivers do work in Win 7 and certain Vista drivers even work in Windows 8.1. This isn’t odd as Vista is Windows version 6, Win 7 is version 6.1, Win 8 is version 6.2 and finally Win 8.1 is version 6.3. Windows 10 breaks with this and is version 10 but it should be version 6.4 as drivers for Win 8.1 and even 7 work in Windows 10.

Microsoft are using DirectX12 as a selling point and luring many young gamers to Win 10, without those users understanding what is happening in and around the OS. Unlike DX10 that couldn’t easily be ported from Vista to XP DX12 can easily be made to work in Win 7 or 8.1 but Microsoft know that most gamers wouldn’t even touch Windows 10 in that case, as there would be no need for them to waste time dealing with bug fixes and waiting for Microsoft to patch everything that is broken in Win 10. The last thing Microsoft want is a repeat of XP, an operating system that lasts an eternity in the computing world.

The transition from DX9 to 10 to 11 were far smaller than the leap that Microsoft are making with DX12. DX12 brings some major changes to the way CPU’s and graphics cards communicate and work that goes beyond mere gaming. Some of the promises that Microsoft have been making in regards to the field of graphics card compute (GPGPU) can now be accomplished. But this isn’t Microsoft achieving something great, this is AMD’s Mantle and portions of HSA having been incorporated into DX12 and forming an integral part of it, which is why AMD ceased working on Mantle and directed developers to develop for Vulkan (OpenGL port of Mantle) and DX12. This seems to be the one and only thing good thing about Windows 10.

To make matters worse they have declared that this will be the last version of Windows as we know it. There will no be more an up front purchase of an entire OS that will then last for as long as the user desired. Microsoft will move towards an Apple style system of yearly releases and updates and micro transactions. It is possible that in time everything from the latest DirectX, to drivers, multiple screens, new hardware (such as motherboard, CPU, RAM, hard disk), will become monetised.

This is just an example, the possibilities are endless.

This idea has been floating around for years and the stage for such events were set when users had to call Microsoft to get their Windows validated after installation and most people accepted it as the new normal and warnings that contradicted the corporate doctrine were dismissed as tin foil hat conspiracies but what is happening now is beyond all dire predictions made. The only thing left for Microsoft, Apple and the like to do is move everything to the cloud and charge users by the minute for even daring to use their computers but it’s clear that the usual criminal suspects would charge us for the air we breathe for not being part of the chosen master race.

Not all hope is lost, there are ways to block Microsoft from gathering all and any data. The following links show the most effective ways to block all telemetric data, disable One Drive and prevent Win 10 from transmitting all possible data to Bing and their servers.

This link at Reddit.com contains the most definitive guide as to how it’s done

Before/During Installation

Do not use Express Settings. Hit Customize, and make sure everything is turned off.

It’s strongly preferred that you use a local account = with Windows 10.

After Installation

Head to Settings > Privacy, and disable everything, unless there are some things you really need.

While within the Privacy page, go to Feedback, select Never in the first box, and Basic in the second box.

Head to Settings > Update and Security > Advanced Options > Choose how updates are delivered, and turn the first switch off.

Disable Cortana by clicking the Search bar/icon.

(Optional) Disable web search in Search by going to Settings, and turning off Search online and include web results.

Change the name of your PC by going to Start (or hitting the Windows key), typing About PC, and clicking Rename PC.

Slightly Complex

Open up the Command Prompt by launching cmd as an administrator, and enter the following:

sc delete DiagTrack sc delete dmwappushservice echo “” > C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Diagnosis\ETLLogs\AutoLogger\AutoLogger-Diagtrack-Listener.etl
Open up the Group Policy Editor by launching gpedit.msc as an administrator. Go through Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > Windows Components > Data Collection and Preview Builds.

Double click Telemetry, hit Disabled, then apply.

NOTE: This only truly works in the Enterprise edition, but the final step provides a decent enough workaround for Pro users.

While still in the Group Policy Editor, go through Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > Windows Components > OneDrive, double click Prevent the usage of OneDrive for file storage, hit Enabled, then apply.

While still in the Group Policy Editor, go through Computer Configuration > Administrative Templates > Windows Components > Windows Defender, double click Turn Off Windows Defender, hit Enabled, then apply.

Open up the Registry Editor by launching regedit as an administrator. Go throughHKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Policies\DataCollection, select AllowTelemetry, change its value to 0, then apply.

First, download the and enable it. Then, head to the Hosts File by going throughC:\Windows\System32\Drivers\Etc, take ownership of the hosts file, and add all of the IPs from this page into the file (http://paste2.org/A1sv86VF).

Up To You

Replace Microsoft Edge/Internet Explorer with Firefox, Chromium, or any forks/variations of them.

Replace Windows Media Player with VLC or MPC-HC

Replace Groove Music with Foobar2000, Winamp, or MusicBee.

Replace Photos/Windows Photo Viewer with ImageGlass or IrfanView.

A more extensive guide at Reddit.com detailing the steps above with a list of links that need to be added to the Hosts file.

Here is a link at Reddit.com with a tool that automates this for inexperienced users.

A direct link to the tool at GitHumb.com

A note on the tool: disable will stop trackers but not remove them, delete will remove trackers entirely. Privacy concerned users are advised to use delete, not disable. This tool is open source so anyone concerned can check the code for themselves.

Users who do not trust Reddit will find that there are many websites detailing guides on how tracking and telemetrics can be disabled but Reddit contains the most extensive guides.

It is entirely unknown what Microsoft will do with the upcoming Service, it is possible that they disable these workarounds and somehow install more or new trackers but so far these guides are the only effective way of blocking data from within Windows. Alternatively it’s possible to add the addresses to which Microsoft transmit date to a routers block lost so they are also externally blocked.

Unfortunately not all routers support very long addresses in their block lists so the most effective way of blocking these addresses and ensure they remain permanently blocked is to build a pfSense or similar hardware router. It is possible to buy pfSense routers from pfSense.org but they can be rather costly and for people with limited means self assembling one out of old or second hand parts is a very good alternative as pfSense only requires very modest hardware to run on the majority of home connections.

The pfSense router website with hardware requirements.

The world Orwell envisaged was a shadow of the world we live in today. He couldn’t have known of the computers we have today, ranging from PC’s, laptops to phones, the Kinect or even Amazon’s listening post. But Microsoft have gone to the fullest extreme of electronic spying by planting an OS that spies on everything you do, say, watch and listen. Skype has been spied upon and recorded for years. No email is safe and Google and Microsoft hand over emails readily to governments but Microsoft have gone to the logical extreme of world domination and tyranny without people even realising it. This Perfect Day is already upon us and we sleep walked into 1984.

Windows 10 should be renamed Windows 1984 as that is the true nature of the operating system.

 

source: Windows 10 NSA Edition  http://www.veteranstodaymoney.com/2015/08/windows-10-spy-edition/

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

IN PHOTOS ~~ DEMO AT UN IN SUPPORT OF PALESTINIAN HUNGER STRIKER

butlincat:

Published on 18 Aug 2015

Palestinians attacked as they hold solidarity vigil for Muhammad Allan.

Video by Keren Manor, Faiz Abu Rmeleh and Oren Ziv of the ActiveStills collective for The Electronic Intifada

FULL STORY: https://electronicintifada.net/conten

 https://www.youtube.com/embed/zob3BzaUi8A?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent

Israelis celebrate child slaughter outside hunger striker’s hospital

Originally posted on Desertpeace:

First an update …..

Hunger striker Allan re-enters coma, in critical condition

(click HERE to see report)

Muhammed Allan's situation has sparked protests in support of his cause and demands for his release. (AFP/Said Khatib) Muhammed Allan’s situation has sparked protests in support of his cause and demands for his release. (AFP/Said Khatib)

On August 18th, several dozen people, mainly youth of the NYC Students For Justice In Palestine, gathered at the U.N. to protest the  Israeli  threatened intent to force feed Muhammad Allan who is now on a hunger strike to gain his freedom. There were Palestinian, Black & White youth in attendance.

Photos © by Bud Korotzer

SONY DSC

*

SONY DSC

*

SONY DSC

*

SONY DSC

*

SONY DSC

*

SONY DSC

*

SONY DSC

*

SONY DSC

*

SONY DSC

*

SONY DSC

*

SONY DSC

*

SONY DSC

*

SONY DSC

*

SONY DSC

*

SONY DSC

*

SONY DSC

Here is how solidarity demos are treated in Israel …

This video shows Israeli police and right-wing extremists violently attacking and assaulting Palestinians who had gathered outside the hospital where a Palestinian hunger striker is gravely ill.

Flag-waving Israeli extremists sing songs celebrating…

View original 454 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Paedophile Philip Chard Found Guilty (Despite Butler-Sloss Supporting Him.)

butlincat:

 

by | August 18, 2015 · 6:40 pm

Paedophile Philip Chard Found Guilty (Despite Butler-Sloss Supporting Him.

Baroness-Butler-Sl_2968609b

Paedophile Philip Chard has been convicted despite former CSA Inquiry chair Baroness Butler-Sloss being a character witness on his behalf. She’d previously told the court: “I had no concerns about Mr Chard. I was astonished by these allegations. I think he is a much less probable offender than many I have come across.”

She was WRONG!

This I think demonstrates just how ridiculous it is that character witnesses should be allowed to give evidence on behalf of defendants. Paedophiles are by nature deceitful and very few know what they are really like. I commend the good sense of the jury who have ignored Butler-Sloss’ ‘expert’ opinion and made their judgement on the facts of the case but really the jury in any criminal case should not be subjected to potentially prejudicial and subjective assessments by friends and acquaintances of the defendant.

Such opinions perhaps have a place in mitigation after the jury have delivered their verdict but not before.

On a different issue, I had to explained to this victim of Philip Chard previously why I had to hold this comment back while the trial was ongoing but I think her view is far more valuable than that of Barroness Butler-Sloss

Chard Victim

I was 17 and chard was 32 I was dating him at the time I use to go to dame Elizabeth butler sloss house with him she never really talked. Him and I was actually abused by this man at her home! How can she give a character witness about someone she knows nothing about? Just because the mum worker for her for many years and her character witness is given because of her persuasion. I have left the pass over 10 years ago and I wish I had said something. This man enjoyed young ladies and often dressed me as a school girl. Dame Elisabeth butler sloss is a very intelligent women I respect who she is but in this case she can not give this man a character reference and is protecting a predator of young girls! I hope her stupid character reference is not taken into account! She says he doesn’t look like a pedo… Sorry what does a pedo typically look like?…… Sicken by this all. This.man needs to be locked away and dame Elizabeth needs to stick her nose out of this she knows nothing. Charts mother who I know so well is just as sick as him!

Needle Comment

~

_84867952_76191428

A man has been found guilty of raping a 13-year-old girl.

Phillip Chard, from Lympstone, Exmouth, was convicted of rape and one count of sexual activity with a child.

During the trial at Exeter Crown Court, retired High Court Judge Lady Butler-Sloss had given evidence on behalf of the 44-year-old, and described him as a “much less probable offender than many I have come across”.

Mr Chard is due for sentencing at the same court on 14 September.

BBC News

 

Originally posted on theneedleblog:

Baroness-Butler-Sl_2968609b

Paedophile Philip Chard has been convicted despite former CSA Inquiry chair Baroness Butler-Sloss being a character witness on his behalf. She’d previously told the court: “I had no concerns about Mr Chard. I was astonished by these allegations. I think he is a much less probable offender than many I have come across.”

She was WRONG!

This I think demonstrates just how ridiculous it is that character witnesses should be allowed to give evidence on behalf of defendants. Paedophiles are by nature deceitful and very few know what they are really like. I commend the good sense of the jury who have ignored Butler-Sloss’ ‘expert’ opinion and made their judgement on the facts of the case but really the jury in any criminal case should not be subjected to potentially prejudicial and subjective assessments by friends and acquaintances of the defendant.

Such opinions perhaps have a place in mitigation after the…

View original 338 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

ANDREA DAVISON DEFENCE FUND + Andrea Davison, Jimmy Savile, SERCO, Gordon Bowden Internet Stalker + Troll and How it all Fits In With Child Abuse, Covert Arms Shipments and Government Fraud

Andrea Davison, Jimmy Savile, SERCO and How it all Fits In With Child Abuse, Covert Arms Shipments and Government Fraud 

Details have emerged  from Court Documents and colleagues about  ex spy  Andrea Davison,   who fled the UK in July 2012 after years of persecution by the British Authorities.  Continuing the persecution  DC 2056 Robinson of the   Derby Police recently told Andrea Davison’s stalker, Internet troll Gordon Bowden,where she was. The Derby Police told him she is living in Argentina and was not, as widely speculated, in the Ecuador Embassy  with Julian Assange.

INTERNET TROLL AND POLICE INFORMER GORDON BOWDEN OF DERBY

Andrea  was well known in Parliament and in the Media as a superlative investigator into covert arms deals, financial corruption and paedophilia in the Police, the Judiciary and the Government.  She rose to notoriety   during the 90’s when she was at the forefront of exposing the Conservative Government’s  secret and illegal arms deals to Iraq.  Working with the strange and enigmatic Spy Frank Machon  she was given  thousands of documents to prove the covert supply line and sent on a mission to expose to the Labour party that the Conservative Government was illegally selling arms to Iraq and Iran.
  

SPY OR EX SPY  ANDREA DAVISON

During the first Gulf war Andrea had been involved in drops  behind enemy lines when they called up all the reserves.  The  flights went  from RAF  Valley air base in Anglesey North Wales which is close to her home and  now has a famous Airman stationed Prince William.  Her  group used SAS bases in Iraq without their knowledge and went deep into Iraq to take out traitors working for the Iraqis and to meet up  with their own agents.  Due to these  missions her thyroid was damaged  because of  the Chemical and  Biological weapons deployed  on the Iraqi front lines.  Damage to the Thyroid effects every cell in the Body  and is a creeping  disease which, without medication,  slowly debilitates and then kills.
Around this period Andrea also found time to  work tirelessly  to investigate   paedophiles named by victims  in the Police  and the establishment  such as Tory Peter Morrison MP,  and Tory Derek Laud.  Both were close friends of  Conservative Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, a close friend of Jimmy Savile  who recently was exposed as a paedophile.   She started to work with the then shadow Home Secretary Tony Blair who tried to get the then Home Secretary Kenneth Clarke to take action against the Police.   But Clarke who years later as Justice Secretary would  make sure Andrea  was prevented from having a fair trial refused to help and instead protected the paedophiles in his Government and in the Police.   Last Month Ben Fellows accused Clarke of being a paedophile http://www.maxfarquar.com/2012/10/ben-fellows-kenneth-clarke/
Andrea   and  journalist Pete Sawyer continued the exposure through Scallywag magazine  who’s co founder, and editor of its successor Spiked, Angus James Wilson,  died mysteriously  in Cyprus around 1996.   Scallywag  also exposed  that MI5 took foreign diplomats and important people  to the North Wales homes and secretly filmed them abusing and torturing boys to use the tapes for blackmail. This is a classic Intelligence modus operandi with regard to child abuse by the famous and influential – especially politicians that they want to control.  The cover-up of  child abuse  over decades indicated the hand of the State Agencies.    This all linked covert arms deals and child abuse. 

 

In Interviews victims had named a number  of police officers  including Fraud Squad officer DC Stephen Winnard  who later arrested Andrea in 2010, senior judges,  celebrities,  and Politicians  including,  Derek Laud, McAlpine and Peter Morrison and also the Duke of Westminster. Victims claimed  they were collected from the Children’s Homes in expensive cars, including  Jimmy Savile’s  Rolls Royce and taken to be abused by an elite paedophile ring.  These interviews  and other evidence were kept  by Andrea.
 

Jimmy Savile routinely used his paedophile connections in the police to silence his victims and critics. An expensive onyx table lighter was inscribed: “To Jimmy Savile from his friends at the Fraud Squad  http://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/view/278141/Jimmy-Savile-was-tops-with-the-cops/
SAV
 
 Surrey Police protected Jimmy Savile http://wrightblog.dailymail.co.uk/2012/10/jimmy-savile-scandal.html
From 1991-1993 the North Wales Police mounted a huge retrospective investigation and subsequently referred some 800 allegations to the Crown Prosecutions Service.  Fewer than 3% of these referrals proceeded to trial, much to the dismay and mystification of many of the alleged victims and of the adults who knew the extent and nature of the alleged abuse
 
But the clamour for something to be done would just not stop. Following  several  internal council reports; an inquiry for the Welsh Office concluded that a full judicial inquiry would not be in the public interest. The Government were trying to keep the lid on the scandal.  
 
But eventually in 1994  a report was ordered  to be prepared for Clwyd council  into the abuse and Mr Jillings from Derbyshire Social Services  was ordered to make a full report into the abuse in Children’s Homes.  But  the Council  and the Government (Welsh Office)  refused to publish the  report because it dammed the Police, the care system, politicians  and implicated the Government.  The council pulped every copy of the report or so they believed.
 
November  7th Update:  from former Welsh Office Minister Rod Richards. http://www.channel4.com/news/north-wales-abuse-pulped-report-may-still-exist
 

Then in 1995  the story  broke into the main stream  when the Independent  HTV and Private Eye publicised the abuse. The Government Knew they would have to appear to do something 

 

 Waterhouse Report Graphic
So  much to the Tory Government’s dismay the scandal  just would not go away and  in 1996  the North Wales Child Abuse Tribunal of Inquiry was announced  by William Hague, then Secretary of State for Wales.  The announcement followed more than a decade of abuse allegations, counter allegations, police investigations, the conviction of a handful of former social workers, the broken promise of a public inquiry, the suppression of at least one damning report on abuse in children’s homes in North Wales, and mounting public and political concern.   The Waterhouse Tribunal  of  Inquiry was commissioned but  the judge instigated  severe reporting restrictions  and offered  immunity from prosecution to  paedophiles who gave evidence and so was a total whitewash. Solicitors working for the inquiry made victims delete the names of their abusers from their statements.  The  Judge also  made it contempt of court for anyone to publish the names of the paedophiles including senior Tory abusers  and so the names could never be spoken.   The police Officers, Solicitors, Judges and Politicians accused by the victims were never  arrested or questioned.
Inquires are used by  Government’s to placate the people, they stem criticism,  stop press speculation and limit the damage.  The Government controls  the judges and the evidence  but appears to actually be doing something.  The Other benefit of an Inquiry is they take years and by the end of that time interest has dropped away.  So the evidence against the Police, Senior Judges, Derek Laud, Peter Morrison and others  plus  a rare pirate copy of the Jilling report  lay gathering dust  in Andrea’s home until one of the accused DC Stephen Winnard  and DS Hunt of the Derby Police  together with officers from the North Wales Police Seized them.The documents have never been returned.

One  Solicitor  and BBC and S4C  TV Sports Presenter  Nic Parry  represented some of the Paedophiles accused of systematic child abuse.  Whilst  Andrea,  who was a trained Mental Health Advocate volunteered to represent  some of the victims.  Nic Parry dismissed the allegations  saying  to his colleagues in the  BBC
“Our concern at the start of this major inquiry is that perhaps public opinion has swayed the balance far too greatly in favour of those who make allegations of abuse and the understandable anxiety to look after their needs and care may outweigh justice.”
Nic Parry Became a Crown Court Judge in 2010  and it was Judge Niclas Parry who was later to sentence Andrea in her absence to Two and Half  years  for fraud after he admitted no-one had lost any money,      
read more JUDGE NICLAS PARRY  ANDREA DAVISON  WAT… http://google-law.blogspot.com/2012/12/what-links-judge-niclas-parry-andrea.html?spref=tw

In 2002  following instructions she had begin a small  business  which could be used to gather Intelligence.   In 2004  she  discovered  that Mr Brock a senior financial controller of NATO was defrauding NATO. Mr Brock pleaded guilty in 2004   but the people behind Mr Brock could not be prosecuted.   It was after this that Andrea’s illness began to manifest   leaving  her weak and mentally confused.  Undiagnosed this illness  put her out of operations for a number of years and increased her  natural paranoia.
Late 2009 she felt  able to  began a new investigation and  was instructed  to look into  SERCO http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serco_Group and who really owned Britain Nuclear deterrent. Silent Players were  making  fortunes from the grant of lucrative contracts involving billions of tax payer’s money and other secret money which appeared to be gathered from Government sponsored International fraud. SERCO was winning contracts in every area of British life from emptying the bins in Milton Keynes to running  Prisons and providing probabtion services. Its power was staggering and it was slowly and incrementally taking over the Criminal Justice System.
Evidence indicated   people in SERCO  were  covertly  selling nuclear technology to anyone who would pay  and  in   2009 a massive on-going fraud network began to surface possibly  linking the City of London Police and SERCO with frauds around the Globe. But just as this evidence was being compiled in January 2010 the Derby Fraud Squad working with the City of London Police Raided her small flat and removed all the evidence. At the same time they stole thousands of documents on arms to Iraq, the Jillings report  and interviews with the victims of sexual abuse naming Police Officers and High profile abusers.
Then followed years of persecution  by the Derby Police and the State culminating in a trial in her absence, allegedly  about documents the police had seized in January 2010 two and a half years earlier. During the trial   there was no mention of SERCO or the paedophiles  or the thousands of documents on Arms to Iraq.  The Prosecution called in the Barrister Felicity Gerry whom they could trust to withhold evidence.
Felicity Gerry rose to fame in 2011 when  it emerged  she had lied to the Crown Court in Nottingham   to get the Ratcliff  Power Station Activists  convicted.  Gerry  acting  for the Prosecution  was directly responsible for the conviction of the   Ratcliff power station activists.  Following their conviction the activists appealed  and during the hearing  of their  appeal it  emerged  that Gerry’s key  witness Mark Stone was actually an undercover cop  Mark  Kennedy.   Kennedy  had given  evidence using a false name and  was using  false ID  to live  undercover as Mark  Kennedy.  He was using  different identities and false ID  and had been committing  acts of terrorism   and other crimes for years all sanctioned by the Police.
Corrupt Barrister Felicity Gerry convinced  a jury that intelligence agent  Andrea Davison  was a bad person because she used different identities, although no-one had lost any money because of this. Gerry  also  convinced judicial investigators that Mark Kennedy was acting perfectly normally because as an  undercover Police officer  he was entitled to use false ID and different names and commit serious crimes.  You could not make it up!http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1345707/Undercover-policeman-Mark-Kennedy-Case-collapses-offers-evidence-defence
Bringing the case against Gerry up to date  we have two  stories.   1)   5th of April 2012  Despite an IPPC investigation no-one was charged with misconduct in public office and Gerry was not prosecuted or disbarred for lying to the Court http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/apr/05/ratcliffe-no-charges-withheld-tapes
 
CORRUPT BARRISTER FELICITY GERRY OF 36 BEDFORD ROW CHAMBERS LONDON  
2)  October the 11th 2012 Felicity Gerry wrote an article  published in  the Times Newspaper entitled ‘Jimmy Savile the Case for the Defence’  in which she defended Jimmy Savile. http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/law/article3564292.ece   These Paedophiles have no fear  because they are fully protected by the Police and the Courts and by SERCO who runs major parts of the Criminal Justice System.
Fortunately Andrea Davison was not without friends  and  although DC Stephen Winnard gloated  to  Andrea’s stalker Gorden Bowden  “we have seized her passport”  she easily  managed to  escape  from the United Kingdom and fly to the safety  of Argentina.  Andrea is now believed   to be writing a  very revealing book   and script together with a well know author.  The Movie should be a thriller.
One question arises,  on who’s behalf  did  the British police prosecute an important British Intelligence Agent and who in the Tory Government authorised it?   Something must be very wrong in the United Kingdom!   It appears to me that  Andrea is part  of  a Secret Intelligence war   and who can tell who is working for who?

source:  http://beforeitsnews.com/awakening-start-here/2015/07/andrea-davison-jimmy-savile-serco-and-how-it-all-fits-in-with-child-abuse-covert-arms-shipments-and-government-fraud-2930.html?currentSplittedPage=0

==============================

Andrea Davison Defense Fund

source:  http://www.gofundme.com/ctduww

 

 £315 of £100k

 
Raised by 13 people in 12 months

Donate Now

 123 TOTAL
SHARES 

22
 

101

Created August 10, 2014
Tara Davison 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Lord Lambton Scandal. Link to Child Abuse. Who was the third man?

butlincat:

 Lord Lambton Scandal. Link to Child Abuse. Who was the third man?

Norma Levy was a prostitute who slept with Lord Lambton, then Under-Secretary for Defence in Ted Heaths Conservative government. Photographs were taken of the liaison and attempts made to sell them to the papers.

normalevyminister_468x536

In the aftermath, Lord Lambton resigned. Due to confusion with the Jellicoe building and the minister, George Jellicoe (the Lord Privy Seal and Leader of the House of Lords), he also resigned after admitting casual affairs with call girls [8].

Norma named a third and possibly a fourth minister but this were denied by the Government [2]. Police were told to investigate the Sunday Peoples dossier by  Home Secretary Mr Carr, but did not contact Norma Levy [2].

To add to the intrigue a German “hostess operator” Hans Ulrich-Altoff was being tried for pimping in Germany [1] and had claimed to work with Norma and that they had an arrangement to swap girls between English and German outfits [1]. Part of the charges against him were that he tried to entice children to pose for erotic pictures, which he Hans denied [1].

In 2004 the BBC stated that “Documents released by the National Archives on Thursday under the 30-year rule show MI5 feared a scandal and Mr Heath had ordered a Security Commission inquiry into the implications of the affair” [7].

In 2007 Norma Levy was interviewed by the Independent, she maintained that there was a third minister who used all girls and named him. The newspaper, which knows but has not divulged the minister’s name, describes him as “today one of Britain’s most respected and best-known elder statesmen”. He was said to use a blonde German girl called “Rocha”[3] .

There is National Archive Document PREM 15/1906 labelled Consideration of publicity for statement made by Norma Levy concerning third minister in the Lambton/Jellicoe affair [4]

Colin Levy, Normas husband, has been described as a taxi driver ‘I never saw him drive any cab,’ she scoffs. In fact, she says, he never seemed to do much work at all, but he always had plenty of money, and a yacht in St Tropez. He also travelled extensively, went out at strange times, and mingled with mysterious people, prompting Norma to believe he was somehow involved with the security services.[5]

The Mail continues “Norma insists, not unconvincingly, that she had no part in the plot to trap Lambton on film. The first she knew about the notorious photographs taken in her bedroom, she says, was when a man – whom she presumes to have been a government agent – called at the flat, and suggested that she move abroad because a scandal was about to break.”[5]

Norma Levy died in 2007 of pancreatic cancer [10]. She was terrified powerful enemies were still out to get her’. Did they?

Heath has also slept with prostitutes [11] so depending on the timing of his use, could have been lucky to get away without scrutiny. The cabinet also had Reg Maudling, who previously had to resign in the Poulson affair and Keith Joseph who has been linked to child sexual abuse [12]

This leaves many questions some of which are below.

What is in the National Archive Document PREM 15/1906?

Who was the third minister named by Norma Levy? and who the possible fourth?

Was the Heath cabinet stuffed with users of prostitutes?

What were the results of the Report of the Security Commission inquiry?

What happened to Hans Ulrich-Altoff, what were his links to photographing children and his links to English pimping and prostitution?

At the time of Altoffs trial Heath was on a private visit to Bavaria -what was he doing, especially in view of the allegations about him being a DVD agent? [9]

What was the role of Colin Levy?

What was the role of MI5, especially given all the indications of the “elite” child sexual abuse paedosadism scandal that MI5 oversee it for blackmail purposes?

Time for the citizen sleuths to dig out more…

Please note that victims of abuse may be triggered by reading this information. The Sanctuary for the Abused [A] has advice on how to prevent triggers.  National Association for People Abused in Childhood [B] has a freephone helpline and has links to local support groups. Other useful sites are One in Four [C] and Havoca [D]. Useful post on triggers [E] from SurvivorsJustice [F] blog.

Links

[1] 1973 May 31 via Google Sydney Morning Herald Sex Trial Told of Girl Swap Plan https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1301&dat=19730531&id=bfhjAAAAIBAJ&sjid=qO
UDAAAAIBAJ&pg=3331,165701&hl=en

[2] 1973 May 30 The Age Definitely no Third Man UK assured  https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1300&dat=19730530&id=IthjAAAAIBAJ&sjid=0p
ADAAAAIBAJ&pg=3999,7774991&hl=en

[3] 2007 Jan 27 Independent Third minister in 1970s sex scandal, says Norma Levy http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/third-minister-in-1970s-sex-scanda
l-says-norma-levy-434020.html

[4] National Archives Consideration of publicity for statement made by Norma Levy concerning third minister in the Lambton/Jellicoe affair http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/record?catid=8399644&catln=6

[5] 2007 Jan 26 Daily Mail Call girl who nearly toppled a government reveals all http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-431781/Call-girl-nearly-toppled-govern
ment-reveals-all.html

[6] Wikipedia Anthony Lambton https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antony_Lambton

[7] 2004 Jan 1 BBC Sex scandal Tory blamed pressure http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3360629.stm

[8] Wikipedia George Jellicoe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Jellicoe,_2nd_Earl_Jellicoe

[9] Cathy Fox Blog Michael Shrimpton on Ted Heath https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2015/08/04/michael-shrimpton-on-ted-heath/

[10] Daily Mail Lonely death of call girl who brought down the Government: Norma Levy destroyed the careers of two Conservative ministers. And now she’s taken secrets of a THIRD Tory grandee – who’s still alive – to her grave http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2519622/The-lonely-death-girl-nearly-brought-Government.html

[11] 2015 Aug 15 Mirror Edward Heath ‘had male prostitutes delivered to Westminster hotels’ claims former madam http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/edward-heath-had-male-prostitutes-6260685

[12] Wikipedia Heaths Minstry https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heath_ministry

[13] 2014 Jul 13  Mirror Tory child abuse whistleblower: ‘Margaret Thatcher knew all about underage sex ring among ministers’ http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/tory-child-abuse-whistleblower-margaret-3849172

[A] Sanctuary for the Abused http://abusesanctuary.blogspot.co.uk/2006/07/for-survivors-coping-with-triggers-if.html

[B] NAPAC http://www.napac.org.uk/

[C] One in Four http://www.oneinfour.org.uk/

[D] Havoca http://www.havoca.org/HAVOCA_home.htm

[E] SurvivorsJustice Triggers post http://survivorsjustice.com/2014/02/26/triggers-what-are-they-and-how-do-we-work-through-them/

[F] SurvivorsJustice Blog http://survivorsjustice.com/

[G] Jim Hopper Mindfulness http://www.jimhopper.com/mindfulness/

[H] Jim Hopper Meditation http://www.jimhopper.com/mindfulness/#cultivate

This is all written in good faith but if there is anything that needs to be corrected please email cathyfox@bigfoot.com

cathyfox the truth will out, the truth will shout, the truth will set us free

 

Originally posted on cathyfox blog:

Norma Levy was a prostitute who slept with Lord Lambton, then Under-Secretary for Defence in Ted Heaths Conservative government. Photographs were taken of the liaison and attempts made to sell them to the papers.

normalevyminister_468x536 Lord Lambton and Norma Levy

In the aftermath, Lord Lambton resigned. Due to confusion with the Jellicoe building and the minister, George Jellicoe (the Lord Privy Seal and Leader of the House of Lords), he also resigned after admitting casual affairs with call girls [8].

Norma named a third and possibly a fourth minister but this were denied by the Government [2]. Police were told to investigate the Sunday Peoples dossier by  Home Secretary Mr Carr, but did not contact Norma Levy [2].

To add to the intrigue a German “hostess operator” Hans Ulrich-Altoff was being tried for pimping in Germany [1] and had claimed to work with Norma and that they had…

View original 859 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Lady Butler-Sloss criticised for giving evidence for defence in child rape trial – SCHOOL CARETAKER PHILLIP CHARD FOUND GUILTY [DESPITE BUTLER-SLOSS SUPPORTING HIM] – Michael Pendry ‘walks free’ from indecent images charge? + STUART KERNER, TEACHER, GETS SUSPENDED SENTENCE FOR SERIOUS CHILD ABUSE WITH PUPIL


Lady Butler-Sloss criticised for giving evidence for defence in child rape trial
 
Retired high court judge also gave character evidence in 2007 assault trial of Philip Chard, who was convicted this month of raping 13-year-old girl
 
Lady Butler-Sloss, a former president of the high court’s family division.

  
 Lady Butler-Sloss, a former president of the high court’s family division, told a jury she was astonished by the rape allegations against Philip Chard, the son of her long-serving cleaner. Photograph: Stefan Rousseau/PA
Steven Morris

Monday 24 August 2015 01.01 EDT  Last modified on Monday 24 August 2015 01.03 EDT 

A prominent retired high court judge, who specialised in family matters, has been criticised for giving evidence for the defence in the case of a man accused of raping a girl – though she knew he had a previous conviction for violence.

Lady Butler-Sloss, a former president of the high court’s family division and now a working peer, had told a jury she was astonished by the allegations against Philip Chard, the son of her long-serving cleaner. Despite her evidence, Chard was convicted of raping a 13-year-old girl and faces a long jail term.

Since then, the Guardian has learned that Butler-Sloss gave character evidence supportive of Chard at another trial eight years ago when he was accused of assaulting a man while working as a nightclub bouncer. Chard was also convicted for that offence, but on that occasion escaped being sent to prison.

Chard’s victim from the 2007 case and his family have expressed anger that Butler-Sloss, who last year stepped down as chair of the independent historical child abuse inquiry, was again prepared to apparently back him in court. Daniel Potter, who sustained a broken jaw in the nightclub attack, said: “She is someone who is very high up. It seems like she has tried to help him twice.”

Potter’s father, Steven, who was in court when Butler-Sloss gave her character evidence, said he had been surprised at the time she had testified given how violent the attack was. “It was strange to see this very powerful person supporting someone who had acted like this. The CCTV made it clear what had happened. Now she’s stood up in court again and tried to help him. I can’t understand it.”

Butler-Sloss was appointed by the government to chair the child sex abuse inquiry but she stood down after it was claimed that there was a conflict of interest because her brother, the late Sir Michael Havers, was attorney general during the 1980s – one of the periods that is to be examined by the panel.

Chard was found guilty of rape of the girl earlier this month. During the trial Butler-Sloss was called to give evidence by Chard’s defence team.

A jury at Exeter crown court was told how Chard, 44, crept into the bedroom where the 13-year-old was sleeping and put his hand inside her pyjamas before returning and forcing her to have sex. The victim said her mind went blank and she remembers feeling angry, shocked, frightened and confused.

Butler-Sloss said she had known Chard for 20 years because his mother, Valerie, was her cleaner at her home in east Devon. Chard, from Lympstone, near Exmouth in Devon, often took his mother to Butler-Sloss’s farmhouse home and sometimes stayed there for a couple of hours.

The peer said: “I was president of the family division and tried numerous cases over 34 years, mostly dealing with sexual or physical abuse. I have considerable experience although I retired in 2005. I was astonished to hear of these allegations. As a judge one knows that other people don’t know what goes on. I did think he is a much less probable offender than many I have come across.”

Chard shook and wept when the 10-2 majority guilty verdicts were returned. He was remanded in custody and told a lengthy jail term was inevitable. He was cleared of four other counts of sexual activity with a child.

In his 2007 trial, Chard was accused of causing grievous bodily harm to Potter while working as a doorman at a club in Exmouth. Potter fractured his jaw in four places, sustained cuts to his chin, lip and tongue and had to have two teeth surgically removed after Chard threw him out of the club for falling asleep on a sofa. Chard, who had no convictions at that point, claimed it had been an accident.

In court Butler-Sloss described him in warm terms. According to a BBC report of the case she said she knew him well. “He is a sensible, calm and very pleasant young man. He is quiet and extraordinarily helpful to me,” she told the court. “I have considerable respect for his common sense. I admire the way he looks after his mother.”

Butler-Sloss also said she knew that Chard went shooting and she had acted as a referee for his gun licence. “I have complete confidence in him and I was totally satisfied that I could act as a referee.”

But the jury found Chard guilty. The judge, John Neligan, told Chard: “[Potter] had not been causing any trouble in the club apart from being asleep and not leaving as quietly as perhaps he should. However, you have never been in trouble before and although this offence is so serious that a prison sentence is called for I feel able to suspend it.” Chard was ordered to pay his victim compensation and do 200 hours unpaid community work.

Asked by the Guardian why she had testified in the recent case when she must have known that Chard had a conviction for violence, Butler-Sloss said: “On the first occasion I gave evidence of character. I did not give evidence of character in the latest trial.” Rather she said she had given evidence of a factual nature and insisted she was not giving testimony about his “general character”. There is no suggestion that Butler-Sloss has broken any rules.

source:  http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/aug/24/lady-butler-sloss-criticised-for-giving-evidence-defence-child-rape-trial-philip-chard?l

———————————————————————————————-

by | August 18, 2015 · 6:40 pm

Paedophile Philip Chard Found Guilty (Despite Butler-Sloss Supporting Him.

Baroness-Butler-Sl_2968609b

Paedophile Philip Chard has been convicted despite former CSA Inquiry chair Baroness Butler-Sloss being a character witness on his behalf. She’d previously told the court: “I had no concerns about Mr Chard. I was astonished by these allegations. I think he is a much less probable offender than many I have come across.”

She was WRONG!

This I think demonstrates just how ridiculous it is that character witnesses should be allowed to give evidence on behalf of defendants. Paedophiles are by nature deceitful and very few know what they are really like. I commend the good sense of the jury who have ignored Butler-Sloss’ ‘expert’ opinion and made their judgement on the facts of the case but really the jury in any criminal case should not be subjected to potentially prejudicial and subjective assessments by friends and acquaintances of the defendant.

Such opinions perhaps have a place in mitigation after the jury have delivered their verdict but not before.

On a different issue, I had to explained to this victim of Philip Chard previously why I had to hold this comment back while the trial was ongoing but I think her view is far more valuable than that of Barroness Butler-Sloss

Chard Victim

I was 17 and chard was 32 I was dating him at the time I use to go to dame Elizabeth butler sloss house with him she never really talked. Him and I was actually abused by this man at her home! How can she give a character witness about someone she knows nothing about? Just because the mum worker for her for many years and her character witness is given because of her persuasion. I have left the pass over 10 years ago and I wish I had said something. This man enjoyed young ladies and often dressed me as a school girl. Dame Elisabeth butler sloss is a very intelligent women I respect who she is but in this case she can not give this man a character reference and is protecting a predator of young girls! I hope her stupid character reference is not taken into account! She says he doesn’t look like a pedo… Sorry what does a pedo typically look like?…… Sicken by this all. This.man needs to be locked away and dame Elizabeth needs to stick her nose out of this she knows nothing. Charts mother who I know so well is just as sick as him!

Needle Comment

~

_84867952_76191428

A man has been found guilty of raping a 13-year-old girl.

Phillip Chard, from Lympstone, Exmouth, was convicted of rape and one count of sexual activity with a child.

During the trial at Exeter Crown Court, retired High Court Judge Lady Butler-Sloss had given evidence on behalf of the 44-year-old, and described him as a “much less probable offender than many I have come across”.

Mr Chard is due for sentencing at the same court on 14 September.

BBC News

 School caretaker Michael Pendry ‘walks free’ from indecent images charge? 

By danbunting – 15th January 2015

Introduction

On 14th January 2015 the BBC (and other outlets) reported that Michael Pendry received a Community Order for possession of indecent images. Or, as it was actually headlined ‘Abuse images school caretaker Michael Pendry walks free‘. Cue outrage.

Sentence

So, is this an outrage? Should we be shocked at the sentence?

Well. The facts in the news reports are slim. He “had 658 “filthy images” of children in his cottage in the grounds of Radnor Primary School, Cardiff. He was caught after sharing the images online with other paedophiles for “sexual gratification”. Pendry admitted three counts of possessing indecent photographs of children and one count of possessing extreme pornographic images involving animals.”

The starting point is the Sentencing Guidelines – go to page 76. This is not as helpful as the old ones (isn’t that always the way?) but we can still work out what’s going on.

Although he was charged with possession, lets have a look at the table for distribution and the sentences from that over the page. What the appropriate sentence is depends on the Category. If this were 658 images at Category A, then the starting point (after a trial) is 3 years. In which case a Community Order looks very lenient.

If however there were 658 images at Category C, then the starting point is 13 weeks in prison. Mr Pendry pleaded guilty, so there will be a further reduction from that. In those circumstances, the Community Order seems absolutely spot on.

The reason why a Community Order rather a Suspended Sentence is that a Community Order can last for 3 years (the maximum for a Suspended Sentence is 2) which gives a full opportunity to complete the Sex Offenders Treatment Programme.

This is far, far more likely to stop him re-offending than a 10 week prison sentence where he will be out in 5 with no supervision. For that reason, if those were the facts, the Community Order was absolutely the right sentence.

 Comment

Was this sentence an outrage? Whilst it’s always nice and simple to see things in black and white, the answer here is ‘it depends on what the images were’. Or, in other words, ‘it depends on the facts of the case and we don’t have enough in the news report to say’.

Mr Pendry was lucky in the sense that after this was reported, the Stuart Kerner story broke, which deflected attention away from this. It is unlikely, therefore, that there will be an AG Ref on this one (unless these really were all Category 1 images).

One last thing – he didn’t ‘walk free’ from Court. He left Court on a 3 year Community Order, to suggest otherwise sounds like he ‘got away with it’. He didn’t. He is on the Sex Offenders Register, he is banned from working with children and he has three years of treatment and punishment in the Community ahead of him. Bad reporting from the BBC.

Dan is a barrister at 2 Dr. Johnson’s Buildings practising in crime.

New post on theneedleblog

Butler-Sloss Is Character Witness For Alleged Paedophile.

by gojam

Evidence, if it is needed, that I’m not infallible. A year ago I posted that I thought that Butler-Sloss should be given a chance as chair of the CSA Inquiry.

Now she’s a character witness for an alleged paedophile !

Eeeeerrrm…

I’m very pleased I have readers that are willing to point out when I’m wrong.

_84867952_76191428

A retired High Court Judge has given evidence on behalf of a man who is on trial for raping a 13-year-old girl.

Baroness Butler-Sloss told Exeter Crown Court she had 34 years experience of dealing with child abuse cases.

She gave character evidence on behalf of Philip Chard, 44, on trial for rape and sexual abuse of the girl.

The baroness was appointed in July 2014 to lead an inquiry into allegations of historical child abuse but stood down before the inquiry started.

Lady Butler-Sloss, who is a working peer in the House of Lords, said Mr Chard’s mother, Valerie, had been her cleaning lady at her home in East Devon for 20 years.

She said she knew Chard because he often took his mother to her home to work and sometimes stayed there for a couple of hours.

She said: “I had no concerns about Mr Chard. I was astonished by these allegations. I think he is a much less probable offender than many I have come across.”

Former doorman Chard, of Dawlish Park Terrace, Lympstone, denies rape and five counts of sexual activity with a child.

The girl has told Exeter Crown Court how Chard crept into her bedroom when she was staying overnight at his home.

Chard told the jury nothing sexual happened during the night or on a number of previous occasions.

The trial continues.

BBC News

source: https://theneedleblog.wordpress.com/2015/08/15/butler-sloss-is-character-witness-for-alleged-paedophile/

 Stuart Kerner gets suspended sentence – AG already stepping in. Before possibly stepping out …

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

ROOTSACTION: PLEASE SIGN PETITION AGAINST THREAT OF “INDEFINATE SOLITARY CONFINEMENT” FOR CHELSEA MANNING FOR HAVING TOOTHPASTE IN CELL!

        

Oppose new threat to Chelsea Manning!

GRAPHIC: Sign here button

Share this action on Facebook
Share this action on Twitter

PLEASE SIGN BEFORE WE DELIVER THIS TO THE PENTAGON ON TUESDAY!


Whistleblower Chelsea Manning is now facing the threat of “indefinite solitary confinement” in prison at Fort Leavenworth, where she is serving a 35-year sentence for providing WikiLeaks with documentation of a vast array of war crimes and deception by the U.S. government.

Click here to sign an emergency petition that will be delivered to prison authorities before a scheduled hearing early next week.

After you’ve signed the petition, please share this urgent appeal with your friends.

RootsAction is promoting this petition in solidarity with Chelsea Manning and in cooperation with other groups supporting her. Together, we can and must gather a huge number of signers on this petition — quickly.

Please become a signer now — but don’t stop there. It’s urgent that you forward this message to your friends right away.

As the petition says, “Putting any human being in indefinite solitary confinement is inexcusable, and for offenses as trivial as these (an expired tube of toothpaste, and possession of magazines?) it is a discredit to America’s military and its system of justice.”

The petition concludes: “We demand that these charges against Chelsea Manning be dropped, and request that Chelsea’s hearing on August 18th be made open to the public, to ensure she is treated fairly.”

By clicking here, you can add your voice to that demand.

An ACLU attorney just told BuzzFeed News, “Here Chelsea is at risk of losing various support networks simply because she had an expired tube of toothpaste, the Vanity Fair magazine that featured Caitlyn Jenner, and requested a lawyer when she felt she was being accused of misconduct.”

The charges against Chelsea are petty, absurd and vindictive. As Trevor Timm of the Freedom of the Press Foundation writes, she “is now being threatened with ‘indefinite solitary confinement’ for alleged infractions that are so minor it’s actually hard to believe.”

If justice had prevailed, Chelsea Manning would never have spent a day in prison — let alone enduring official abuse that began with prolonged solitary confinement before trial that amounted to torture.

Chelsea Manning deserves our undying gratitude and support for bravely informing all of us about terrible realities, with evidence like the infamous “Collateral Murder” video that showed the flippant and callous killing of unarmed civilians in Baghdad from U.S. military aircraft.

Help the petition take off today.

Chelsea has already paid a huge personal price for her moral courage. Now the government is ramping up persecution with charges that range from ridiculous to repressive to preposterous.

Time is short. The hearing that could lead to “indefinite solitary confinement” for Chelsea Manning is fast approaching. Please take a minute to follow up on signing the petition by sharing it with everyone you know who appreciates what Chelsea has done to help make this a better world.

The petition
needs your name and your help.

Thank you!

After signing the petition, please forward this message to your friends. You can also share it from the webpage after taking the action yourself.

This work is only possible with your financial support. Please chip in $3 now.

— The RootsAction.org Team

P.S. RootsAction is an independent online force endorsed by Jim Hightower, Barbara Ehrenreich, Cornel West, Daniel Ellsberg, Glenn Greenwald, Naomi Klein, Bill Fletcher Jr., Laura Flanders, former U.S. Senator James Abourezk, Coleen Rowley, Frances Fox Piven, Lila Garrett, Phil Donahue, Sonali Kolhatkar, and many others.

Background:
Newsweek: Chelsea Manning Faces Solitary Confinement for Having Caitlyn Jenner Magazine, Other Infractions
Trevor Timm, Freedom of the Press Foundation: Chelsea Manning Threatened with ‘Indefinite Solitary Confinement’ for Expired Toothpaste and Asking for a Lawyer
BuzzFeed News: Chelsea Manning Faces Solitary Confinement Under New Charges, Lawyer Says

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Tianjin Blasts.

butlincat:

 

The Tianjin Blasts.

Dashcam footage of the prelude to the massive blast in Tianjin, China August 12th, 2015.
Dashcam footage of the prelude to the massive blast in Tianjin, China August 12th, 2015.

August 15th, 2015.

The Tianjin Blasts.

On August 12th the Port area of the Chinese city of Tianjin was struck by two massive explosions. At least 85 people are known to have died in the explosions.

The cause of the blasts is unknown but the Chinese Government claim that the disaster was as the result of an industrial accident related to the storage of volatile chemicals.

The sheer size and scale of the second blast has led to much speculation about the blast being the result of some type of attack, especially involving a Nuclear weapon. The second blast was estimated to be the equivalent of 21 tonnes of TNT. Ironically, this matches the power of the device used against Nagasaki almost 70 years ago to the day almost identically.

Having watched as much footage of the incident as I could find there is no doubt that the blast seems to resemble a Nuclear explosion but until the contents of the storage area are known and the cause of the explosion is provided this will remain simply an hypothesis in search of evidence.

It is being claimed that the site has been attacked by a US B2 aircraft firing a missile. The available evidence does not appear to support an hypothesis that involves an external attack and there is nothing about the area of the blast that would make it a likely target of sabotage or attack as far as is currently known.

Sabotage is entirely possible, but there does not appear to be any basis for the claim that the site was struck by a missile.

The presence of fireman at the time of the blast (it is being reported that 21 died)  tends to support the idea that the explosion was due to a pre-existing fire, as CBC report:

“The toll included at least 21 firefighters among the more than 1,000 sent to the disaster. Firefighters initially responded to a fire at the warehouse and many of them apparently were killed by a series of explosions triggered 40 minutes after the fire was reported.”

There are no witness reports that mention aircraft, missiles or anything that would support the notion of an aerial attack.

 Tianjin Dongjiang Port Rui Hai International Logistics Co. Ltd

This is the best description I could find of the company running the business where the incident took place.

Backgrounder: The company with explosive warehouses in Tianjin – Xinhua | English.news.cn

“According to the company’s official website, Tianjin Dongjiang Port Rui Hai International Logistics Co. Ltd. was founded in 2011 and is a storage and distribution center of containers of dangerous goods at the Tianjin Port.”

“The company’s business includes the storage, transfer, distribution and customs declaration of dangerous chemicals. Freight volume through the company stands at one million tonnes each year, with annual revenues exceeding 30 million yuan.”

“The center includes two warehouses for dangerous goods. One is located next to an office building.”

Crater caused by the Tinjin blast on Chinese state media CCTV.
Crater caused by the Tinjin blast on Chinese state media CCTV.

700 Tonnes of Sodium Cyanide.

One controversial aspect of the incident that the Chinese Government appear to be trying to suppress is that according to al Jazeera  “at least 700 tonnes of sodium cyanide were at the site, along with other substances, and the poisonous chemical had been detected in sewage samples in the area.”

The al Jazeera report is derived from the Beijing News, who according to al Jazeera pulled the story.

“The report was no longer available on the (Beijing News) newspaper’s website on Friday.”

Sodium cyanide is apparently not a volatile substance, it was not what caused the explosion but it is extremely hazardous when dispersed in the air as an explosion would presumably do.

Nuclear and Chemical Experts.

On the other hand it is a fact that according to multiple media reports, the Chinese government are sending military experts in chemical and nuclear matters to investigate the incident. Al Jazeera report that:

“China has sent chemical experts into Tianjin to test for toxic gases after a series of deadly explosions.

“The team of nuclear and chemical experts is on the ground on Friday in the northern port city of Tianjin.”

It is highly likely that chemical experts would be asked to assess the situation regardless of the cause but the presence of the nuclear experts is harder to explain and indicates that perhaps the Chinese Government are suspicious that there may be a nuclear element to this event.

Either way, both sabotage and a nuclear accident are likely possible causes of this inferno. Although little about this incident can be stated with confidence at this stage the truth has a funny way of emerging over time.

Tianjin Explosion Aug 13 2015 Мощнейший взрыв произошел в городе Тяньцзинь
<iframe width=”1120″ height=”630″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/rM9jN7z6Lxs&#8221; frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen><!–iframe>

The Tianjin Explosion – Stabilized

<iframe width=”1120″ height=”630″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/H_nnZntSYjo&#8221; frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen><!–iframe>

天津市濱海新區大爆炸 explosion Tianjin, China Compilation
< iframe width=”1120″ height=”630″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/a41CgfjCJjM&#8221; frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen><!–iframe>

[RAW VIDEO] MASSIVE EXPLOSION MORTAL – CHINA – TIANJIN – COMPILATION – 爆炸 Bàozhà

Tianjin explosion from car dash cam

Aerial shots of blast zone 60 hours after Tianjin blast

 

Originally posted on Crimes of Empire:

Dashcam footage of the prelude to the massive blast in Tianjin, China August 12th, 2015. Dashcam footage of the prelude to the massive blast in Tianjin, China August 12th, 2015.

August 15th, 2015.

The Tianjin Blasts.

On August 12th the Port area of the Chinese city of Tianjin was struck by two massive explosions. At least 85 people are known to have died in the explosions.

The cause of the blasts is unknown but the Chinese Government claim that the disaster was as the result of an industrial accident related to the storage of volatile chemicals.

The sheer size and scale of the second blast has led to much speculation about the blast being the result of some type of attack, especially involving a Nuclear weapon. The second blast was estimated to be the equivalent of 21 tonnes of TNT. Ironically, this matches the power of the device used against Nagasaki almost 70 years ago to the day almost identically.

Having watched as much footage…

View original 721 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Boats and Child Sexual Abuse

butlincat:

 Boats and Child Sexual Abuse Posted on 2015, April, 15 by cathy fox blog This post is to highlight the use of boats in the abuse of children. Abuse happens on various types of boats from narrowboats used as houseboats on canals to sea going yachts. Boats of course have advantages for abusers. They can be a venue for abuse with the captain having almost absolute power over his crew. Boats are also means of transport – which can be used for carriage of pornographic books, tapes, images or even children and can cross more easily across borders without going through customs. Boats are away from immediate interference of police, or authorities. Indeed it is often confusing which authorities even have jurisdiction if any or supervisory capacity over children. International waters,  children from several countries,  holidays in a private capacity are complicating factors.  In the Azimuth case the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and Social Services Inspectorate had to be called upon, whereas it would normally be a local authority or Child Protection Authority. Boats can also be a means of dispose of bodies of victims. Azimuth Trust- Dr Roderick Morrison Fraser and Michael Johnson Adventure and Education Afloat was formed March 1989. It is not clear whether it changed its name, or merged to form Azimuth Trust in either 1989 or 1990, with Morris Fraser and Michael Johnson and John Lambeth as founders. The newsletter was called Sea Borne and often contained naked boys. The magazine was sold to other paedophiles. Four summer cruises were held from 1989 – 1992. The last one finished prematurely with Johnson being arrested after parents of boys on the cruise complained to an Azimuth Trustee who had alerted the Council. Azimuth was also the English offshoot of Ecole en Bateau. Dr Morris wrote an article for Society at Work extolling the virtues of independent living for children on the boat holidays and they advertised in “Education Otherwise” for Home Schoolers and the Times Education Supplement. Johnson owned schooner, Grace O’Malley, with his wife Elizabeth but by 1994 was being held by a bank to which Johnson owed money.  Also they had a 32 foot Gaff yawl “R” and 42 foot schooner “Mary Bryant”. [3] Johnson sailed to France 1986, Lanzarote, Canary Islands. Assaults on boys aged 11 and 9 took place on cruises to France, Denmark, Holland, Germany, Scilly Isles and the Outdoor Centre (St Justs) [3]  Fraser also travelled to abuse children in other countries, including America, Turkey, Holland and Denmark. [74] Johnson and Fraser had contact with paedophiles Charles Napier, Peter Righton, Terence Waters, Leo Kameneff and others. Only Michael Johnson was charged and jailed for abuse from Azimuth Trust, despite evidence of more child abusers in a network. [3] Leonid Kameneff / Kamenev Leonid Kameneff was a psychotherapist and set up Ecole en Bateau in 1969.  Between 1969 and 2002, more than 400 boys and around 60 girls took part, leaving their families for long journeys, some of which lasted over a year as an alternative to mainstream education [39]. The first complaint was in 1971 and subsequent complaints made in the 1990’s. Kameneff was imprisoned for two months in Martinique. Released, he took flight into international waters before being arrested in Caracas, Venezuela in 2008. He was extradited to France a few months later, and indicted for rape and sexual assaults on minors under 15 years. In 2012 in a rare ruling, the French state was found guilty of “denying justice” to the complainants by taking so long to bring a trial, and was ordered to pay large sums in compensation to the alleged victims. There were three boats, the “Karrek Ven” a fishing vessel, the “Paladin” and “Bilbo”. Kameneff was sentenced to 12 years in jail. The two co-accused were Bernard Poggi (also Poggi-Vérignon), 60, sentenced to 6 years. Himself abused as an 11 year old by Kamenev, who was then his teacher, Poggi returned as an instructor on the boat aged 20 and started to abuse boys then. Jean-François Tisseyre, 58, who also worked on the boat, received a suspended sentence of 5 years.  Their co-accused, a former student who was a minor at the time, was acquitted [21] [40]  Kameneff appears to have written a book “the court read several excerpts from a book published in 1979, when Leonid Kamenev told in terms sometimes very raw sexuality of young people on board” [41] Most of this paedophile network is still at large. [43a][43b]  More information from @snowfaked mostly: You Tube Kameneff [23] Paris Match [21]    Telegraph [42]  Azimuth Trust was linked to French ‘boat schools’ paedophile ring [43] Pédocriminalité et déni de Justice à Saint Malo [43a] Pédocriminalité et déni de Justice à Saint Malo autotranslate [43b] Edward Heath  [This is a brief guide to Heath and boats. There will be a vast amount of information not covered, and any relevant material or links will be welcomed in confidence if desireable.] Heath owned 5 boats called Morning Cloud.  Morning Cloud I date of launch 1971, II 1973 , III 1975 , IV 1977, V 1979. His wikipedia entry states. “Heath was a keen yachtsman. He bought his first yacht Morning Cloud in 1969 and won the Sydney to Hobart Yacht Race that year. He captained Britain’s winning team for the Admiral’s Cup in 1971 – while Prime Minister – and also captained the team in the 1979 Fastnet race. He was a member of the Sailing Club in his home town, Broadstairs.”[90] There is also an wikipedia entry for Morning Cloud [97]. In 24 hours before Sept 3 1974 two Morning Clouds sank in the same storm [53]. Morning Cloud had been sold in December 1970 to Stewart Benest of Jersey, who renamed it “Nuage de Matin”[30]. She was sunk off Gorey Castle, Jersey, on 2 September 1974, after the seas took her from her moorings [53] [56 p527]. Gorey Castle is close to Haut de la Garenne.  The second boat that sank was Morning Cloud III off the coast of Sussex, in which two people died [53][94] The bow section was restored and given to Arundell, Heaths old house [94][78]. Michael Shrimpton has spoken several times about Ted Heath’s child abuse, his yacht, and child murder and Haut de la Garenne in Jersey [1][75] . An ex resident of Haut de la Garenne Childrens Home claims he saw children from the home being taken on to Heaths yacht and came back crying [81]. There have been allegations that 11 boys left on Heaths boat and only ten returned when he went out with Savile. This was reported to the police with a Jersey Senator but nothing was done. Read direct from witness Lindas blog [83] or via the corporate oligarch owned media  [76][77]. Heath was a member of Broadstairs Club [34] near where he was born in Kent. The Royal Southern Yacht Club (RYS) in Hamble le Rice, (between Southampton and Portsmouth) was where Sir Edward and his crews put together their sailing strategies which led to his success in winning, inter alia, the Admiral’s Cup in 1971 [92]. His boats were built specially for him.  Morning Cloud 1-4 were designed by Sparkman and Stephens. 2 and 3 were constructed by Lallows (Isle of Wight) [97][92].  ‘New Morning Cloud 4 by Camper and Nicholson boatyard at Gosport, Hampshire, England. [99][97]  He appeared to very much frequent the Solent, Hamble, Gosport and Isle of Wight area with forays to Burnham on Crouch. He obviously visited many boat clubs, this picture below being at Royal Channel Island yacht club which is at St Peter Port in Guernsey. A Jersey Evening Post report from July 1976 documented one of Sir Edward’s visits to the Island to promote his autobiographical book  “Sailing: A Course of My Life”. He attended a dinner in St Helier (Jersey), where he was welcomed by then Advocate Helier Mourant and Bill Challinor, commodore of the Royal Channel Islands Yacht Club. [95]  During a speech, Sir Edward, who died in 2005 aged 89, is reported to have said: ‘According to your Deputy Bailiff [Peter Crill], people in Jersey are engaged in one of two things – sailing or crime.’ ! [95] In a statement at the begining of August 2015 the Jersey force said: ‘The States police can confirm that they are aware of the UK Independent Police Complaints Commission investigation into historical corruption allegations relating to child sexual abuse in Wiltshire. ‘Sir Edward Heath does feature as part of Operation Whistle, currently investigating historical allegations of abuse in Jersey.’ No one had come forward before  Lenny Harper was wrongly sacked and he is worried that it may distract from the rest of the inquiry [227] Heath, a child abuser who attended half a dozen meetings of the Paedophile Information Exchange meetings [116] at Westminster, had a luxury top floor apartment at the Waters Edge Hotel in Bouley Bay owned by his friend Mike Wavell [115]. Heath moored his boat off the cliffs in Bouley Bay [115]. Wavell later became President of the Defence Committee, in charge of Jersey’s police force. His 2011 obituary is here [118]. @StuartSyvret has tweeted “Mike Wavell is said in survivor circles to have been a child-abuser. Additionally and to my own knowledge, Wavell ran adult nursing homes where patient’s were abused  including a terminally ill woman who was raped by a psychopath male rogue nurse.” In addition Jimmy Savile, the prolific child molester is said to have rented ” ‘The Reef Villa’. It was in Bouley Bay but not at the ‘The Water’s Edge Hotel’ or their chalets. It was a small rental villa just up the hill past the chalets and tucked in beside the cliff pathway. Very private and all that. ” [117] Possibly the Reef View Villa is meant, which is now in the grounds of the Undercliff Guest House, and only about 100 metres from the Waters Edge Hotel [119]. Hopefully someone who is able to use the maps properly can provide a photo of a map with all these places marked on as my link is not very good [120] As though to get the their excuses in first the photo below was captioned “Ted Heath at the helm of Morning Cloud. It has been alleged that he anchored the yacht outside Jersey waters and therefore beyond the Island’s jurisdiction” [95]  It is not clear how far their jurisdiction goes. The photo below with Anthony Churchill and Heath is possibly on the Isle of White. It is from this article [85] Heath also opened the Racing Officers Hut at Creeksea Sailing Club Burnham on Crouch in Essex. [91] Jersey As Stuart Syvret points out whilst Heath is getting alot of attention as to whether he is a child abuser or not. Stuart thinks a more basic and fundamental question in the face of such allegations, is  “Does it appear that law-enforcement and other state agencies have acted unbiasedly – have acted lawfully – in investigating such claims?”  The authorities knew about Heath and Savile but covered it up [101]. Lenny Harper Police investigator of Haut de la Garenne said: “Savile chose his victims with great care; vulnerable and often troubled youngsters many in care homes. If they complained they were labelled troublemakers, or brutally put down. We know from court cases and statements made to my team [during the 2008 inquiry] that children in Jersey care homes were ‘loaned out’ to members of the yachting fraternity and other prominent citizens on the pretence of recreational trips but during which they were savagely abused and often raped.”  [44][52] Paul Every was the commanding officer of Jersey Sea Cadets [[4]s64]  who was arrested as part of Operation Ore for serious crimes against children but not suspended by the Jersey Sea Cadets. “I eventually had to go to London and threaten to stand at the gates of the Sea Cadet HQ and disclose to individual parents before they took action.” It was alleged that Jervis Dykes, a teacher at Victoria College abused children in the naval section of the Combined Cadet Force and on sailing trips around Jersey and to Greece. It was also alleged he took the boys to St Helier Yacht club at the same time that senior police officers were there. CI de la Haye stopped officers going to the club to make inquiries without him being present. The Detective also remembered interviewing the Deputy Headmaster and being told by the Deputy Head that Dykes had assaulted the boys as “payment for the time he provided in taking the boys sailing.”  The officer also revealed that one of his supervisors was a close personal friend of the Deputy Head.  Another officer remembers that this supervisor had at least one child at the college. [[4] s66-70] For some time, Legal Advisor Laurence O’Donnell and I had been concerned at the difficulty in prosecuting paedophiles in cases of historic abuse.  This had been exacerbated by difficulties over the case of **** ****, who was the commanding officer of the Jersey Sea Cadets and who was also a senior civil servant in the Chief Minister’s office.  He was arrested as part of the national “Operation Ore” where the FBI had netted thousands of suspects who had used their credit cards to pay for internet sites involving child pornography.  He was one of a number of senior Sea Cadet officers arrested for serious sexual crimes against children.  After his arrest he had not been suspended from Sea Cadet activities and because of my concerns for the safety of the children involved, I disclosed the information about his arrest to the Sea Cadet authorities.  Among the sites he had searched on his computer were a number involving “naked sea cadets” and other child pornography sites.  The Sea Cadet authorities in Jersey were not responsive, telling me that a man “is innocent until proven guilty.”  I eventually had to go to London and threaten to stand at the gates of the Sea Cadet HQ and disclose to individual parents before they took action….This was even more of a concern than it would have normally been as the Head of CID was also an officer in the Jersey Sea Cadets… Allegations were being made against Dykes that he abused children whilst on outings of the Combined Cadet Force (Naval Section) or on sailing trips around Jersey and to Greece.  Dykes was later convicted of a number of indecency offences.[49] The police investigation into Haut de la Garenne began in April 2006 after an investigation into abuse within the Jersey sea scouts [50] Care leavers have reported being taken to people on boats. The above are stills from “Sun Sea and Satan”, a documentary by Bill Maloney of Pie ‘N Mash Films on child sexual abuse in Jersey and is essential viewing [51] https://www.youtube.com/embed/AxZSxMuzZFs?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent Dyana Maloney, Bill Maloney’s sister, was brought to Haut de la Garenne, Jersey on a sailing trip in 1986 [[51] 45.00 mins] from a childrens home in Britain. She financed the making of the film and was found dead not long afterwards. Witness 195 of the Jersey Historical Abuse Inquiry tells of a visitor, described as a “well-dressed smooth-talker“, who began began violently sexually assaulting him [228][229]. He said the assaults continued for more than three years, most Saturdays, and at various locations around Jersey, including at sea on the man’s boat. Jimmy Savile’s child sexual abuse was prolific and much is public. He visited Haut de la Garenne [121].   He was a friend of Heath, he was believed also to stay at Reef View Villa [117], near where Heath stayed at the Waters Edge Hotel and was on Heaths boat when a child was reported missing from it [83]. Neil Hocquart was born in Jersey as was his ally Nick Rabet. They were child abusers who both killed themselves in custody. Rabet in Thailand and Hocquart in custody in Ely, Cambridgeshire, 1991, after being found with hundreds of paedophile videos. He had grown up in care in Norfolk and was taken to Guernsey, where he became the “cabin boy” of a sea captain, before returning to Britain to recruit children for the paedophile ring [122]. Rabet worked in Islington, two other Jersey-born social workers also worked in Islington. One arranged sailing trips to Guernsey; the other sent children to Rabet’s centre. Both were accused of abuse [211]. A police inspector’s body was washed up on exclusive beachfront after he ‘jumped off a ferry’ around the time of the Jersey care home investigation [71] In a comment on the article it says that Neil Munro was alleged to have been investigating the yachting community, following claims that children from Jersey care homes were being loaned out to wealthy yachtsmen [211]. Prosser visited Haut de la Garenne. He was part of the same paedophile network as Bonner Pink [see later], and he owned a childrens holiday home in Wales where children were sent from Portsmouth childrens homes. Variety the childrens charity of Jersey was started in 1968 at the The Waters Edge Hotel []. As detailed previously the hotel was owned by Mike Wavell who is said in survivor circles to have been a child abuser. I have no information that the Variety Jersey has had any connection with child abuse. In the last decade or so Variety Jersey have launched ‘Spirit of Variety’ sailing catamaran and ‘Spirit of Young Variety’ fishing boat. They replaced the ‘Spirit of Variety’ with ‘ The Vernon Lilford Spirit of Variety’, which is a bigger catamaran and better equipped for wheelchair bound sailors [123]. Bloggers from Jersey are FreeSpeechOffshore [101] Voice for Children [102] Rico Sorda  [103] , Bob Hill Jersey Blog [125] and Leah Goodman is the US journalist who was banned from Jersey for reporting about the child sexual abuse [104]  Lord Montagu of Beaulieu [All page numbers are from his autobiography [46]] Lord Montagu’s name appears alongside child sexual abuse as he was prosecuted in 1953 for having underage sex with a 14-year-old Boy Scout at his beach hut on the Solent, a charge he has always denied and which he was acquitted [48]. He maintains he was innocent but he states Kenneth Hume was behaving mildly indecently towards another scout. (Kenneth Hume was Shirley Basseys husband. Basseys father incidentally was also a child abuser). Montagu also claims that many years later, a scout who was there  told him that accusations arose from the scouts out boasting each other about their experience and the scoutmaster overhearing [p135]. So his story is that he was not a child abuser, but he does mention that he turned a blind eye to his friend, Hume who was. Montagu was arrested again in 1954 and charged with performing “gross offences” with an RAF serviceman during a weekend party at the same beach hut. He was imprisoned for 12 months and he blamed a deep vein of antihomosexual prejudice, from Home Secretary Sir David Maxwell Fyfe, the Lord Chief Justice Rayner Goddard, and Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police Sir John Nott-Bower who was convinced of a homosexual conspiracy. Sir John swore he would tear the cover of all filth spots [p98]. In Oct 1953 the Sydney Daily Telegraph reported there was a Scotland Yard plan to smash homosexuality. Within weeks of his incarceration there was a debate in House of Commons led by Bob Boothby and Leo Abse (both now believed to be child abusers) which led to a committee of Inquiry led by John Wolfenson, called “The Departmental Committee on Homosexual Offences and Prostitution” [p124]. As well as the infamous beach hut and land on the Solent, Lord Montagu owns Beaulieu River – banks, bed and all [46 p6]. He also owns a maritime museum at Buckler’s Hard, with a nearby marina, and the river harbours over 200 moored yachts [46 p9] [47]. Lord Montagu is the Commodore of the Beaulieu River Sailing Club [46 p20]. He was also vice commodore of the House of Lords Sailing Club [p203]. Montagu mentions a trip on his motor yacht once with Brian Jones of the Rolling Stones to the Isle of Wight, [p275]  when he was trying to lay low after drugs charges. He also mentions taking Roy Orbison out on the Solent on his yacht.  Montagu’s daughter [p103] used his motor launch Cygnet in June 1997 for her wedding. Montagu no doubt had access to many boats and his aunt and uncle, Lord and Lady Forster also owned a motor yacht Mirama [p20]. Diana Dors mentions going on his boat in her memoirs [] Montagu was an extremely well connected man, having been to Eton, and being in the House of Lords. He had links to paedophile Lord Mountbatten [p132] who asked him to go to Broadlands to meet members of his committee set up to investigate the security of prisons. Montagu was famous for his fancy dress balls, and Mountbatten was a guest at his first in 1963 to mark the opening of the Maritime Museum [p278] and again at his Great Gatsby Ball in 1974 to cebrate Montagus second marriage. Montagu also remembers other parties including one at Royal Yacht Squadron at Cowes. He was also known to Margaret Thatcher [p229], and friends with Long Longford [p 134] [p207] Many people are mentioned in his autobiography which is worth a read for people wishing to make connections between people and paedophiles. Ralph Bonner Pink MP owned an ex lifeboat called Ambler kept in Emsworth Harbour and was a member of Emsworth Sailing club [31] [32].  (An odd incident happened, which I mention in passing, at Emsworth Sailing Club in 2014 in which a retired naval captain drove his car at the club and set it alight and was charged with arson [33] ) In England Bonner Pink MP took his boat on the Beaulieu River and to the Montagu Estate, as well as to Portsmouth Harbour. When his daughter Jannella was young they went for two weeks each summer to Bembridge Harbour on the Isle of Wight except when they went to France. In France they went to Honfleur and Barfleur, in Normandy and visited Bayeaux [32]. Bonner Pink knew Edward Heath and of course Peter Prosser, child abuser who  also went to Haut de la Garenne as well as of course as Heath and Savile [32] Clifford Luton founded the North Sea Cruise Association, Ashley Rd Park Street, Poole, Dorset in 1964  [11] He was a BBC Northern Ireland correspondent. He was investigated for being in a child abuse network with Morris Fraser and Nicholas Reynolds. He  was thought to have links to the Azimuth Trust and investigated, but no charges were brought. He was skilled yachtsman, with 28 foot boat Sarah Jane.  [11][18] Rev. Jan Knos was a child abusing vicar  owned a barge and two ocean-going yachts at one time [20].  He died in jail of a [suspected] heart attack, waiting for trial on 28 charges of gross indecency and indecent assault against underage boys and girls [20]. He was going to be named by Geoffrey Dickens in Parliament, until Dickens was warned not to by Bernard Wetherill the speaker. Dickens helped in private prosecutions because it appeared that local police in Hull were protecting him. The police had decided not to prosecute, and that decision was taken in Hull but they wrongly said it was a CPS decision [19] . See also [38][37] Peter Clulow had access to young boys during maths lessons and  he preyed on them during sailing trips aboard his boat The Saraband [58]. Peter Shaw, for the prosecution at St Albans Crown Court on Tuesday, said: “The defendant had been a music teacher at Haberdashers’ Aske’s for 23 years, but left in 1985 following an allegation by two fourth form boys that he had indecently touched them while on his boat during the summer holidays. Notes from the school show he initially denied the abuse but the two boys amazingly had taken an audio recording device on board that captures some of the comments made by the defendant.[58] He taught sailing at the school. Clulow filmed at least one boys touching himself. [59] Fred Talbot Both of Talbot’s victims, said to be 14 or 15 at the time, were assaulted on school canal barge trips in the Cheshire area in the mid-1970s. Each boy was abused by Talbot as they slept in a partitioned area [22]. Unknown VIP Abusers The specialist Met team had traced a group of men using rent boys from the notorious “Chicken Rack” at London’s Piccadilly Circus. They had built up a bundle of intelligence from their HQ near King’s Cross station in central London, tailing suspects to hotels, public loos, private homes and even boats on the Essex coast. A member of the team said they knew they had “unearthed a minefield” leading to the heart of the establishment [35]. Daniel Bryant In 2013 Daniel Bryant finally admitted 10 indecent assaults against 5 boys committed between 1969 and 1985. He had been a policeman with Devon and Cornwall Police for more than 20 years before he finally retired on grounds of ill health in 1994 after a third complaint of child sexual abuse. Complaints had first began in 1987, when the victim was told that the allegations were uncorroborated, even though a ­second lad had also alleged abuse. Even after reports of child abuse Bryant continued as a PC in Devon and Cornwall Police’s juvenile bureau when authorities referred children to him for counselling. Bryant was founder member of the Devon and Cornwall Police Surf Life-saving Club, which operated until the early 1990s.  After leaving the Police, he was also a national volunteer with Surf Life-saving GB. He was the chairman of the rescue commission of the International Life Saving Federation of Europe.  He was even awarded a British Empire Medal for his youth work . In 1991 Bryant was one of two North Devon police constables to take part in a 128-mile Nijmegen March endurance walk in Holland, raising money for the RNLI. [15][16][17] It appears as though the Devon and Cornwall Police covered up Bryants child abuse, and the his record and other enablers need checking to see if they helped cover up the Azimuth Trust child abuse network which was at this time. Basil Elliston took a 15 year old pupil to the International Boat show. He was a keen yachtsman and made his moves on sailing trips he organised [13]. In 1986 the magistrate and headmaster of North London School jailed for 5 years for 9 offences of indecent assault against boys [14] It was heard that he often persuaded boys to play fantasy games involving nude canings, bondage and ice cold baths. Ken Rabone Camden Council took over Stockgrove Park School in 1989.  In 1992, following the insistence of Camden education director Peter Mitchell, a new headteacher was appointed. Ken Rabone, a man with no experience in dealing with emotionally disturbed pupils, was given the job. He failed to tell his interviewers that he had a criminal conviction for assault with an offensive weapon. The situation deteriorated dramatically in November 1992, when an anonymous letter was sent to the education director alleging that Mr Rabone and his wife had engaged in unacceptable practices on a canal boat activity trip. [24] Mervyn Dyer between January, 1 1969 and December 31, 1972, committed acts of indecent assault on a regular basis on at least one boy at St Mary’s Junior Sailing Club, Gosport. A victim finally reported him when an adult and after taking a child protection course at the club where he was abused. [63] Charles O’Neill and William Lauchlan committed numerous child abuse incidents in Irvine, Falkirk and Skelmorlie in Ayrshire as well as Alfaz del Pi, in Benidorm. They used a boat to dump a body of a woman they had killed in the sea off Ayrshire [68] Devryn Griffiths, 34, who lives on a barge on Macclesfield Canal, Cowbrook Lane, Bosley, admitted four counts of taking an indecent photograph of a child. He asked for 14 similar offences to be considered.[69] Three apparent police suicides within 4 days. As mentioned in the Jersey section, a Police inspector’s body washed up on exclusive beachfront after he ‘jumped off a ferry’ around the time of the Jersey care home investigation [71]. It is not mentioned in the article but Neil Munro was alleged to have been investigating the yachting community, following claims that children from Jersey care homes were being loaned out to wealthy yachtsmen. Another policeman Richard Fuller was a member of the Royal protection team.  [211] Thomas Hamilton – Dunblane Thomas Hamilton is best known for being the perpetrator of the Dunblane Massacre, as determined by the Cullen Report whose download link is here [114]. The transcript of the inquiry is also useful []. However the Cullen Report leaves many unanswered questions, and even Lord Burton an ex Grand Master himself, acknowledged there could have been a cover up with masonic links [127][126]. A good source for research is the book Dunblane Unburied by Sandra Uttley [100a] which appears now to not be easily available. The pages numbers with references to boats are from Dunblane Unburied by Sandra Uttley listed at reference [100b]. Raw information on boats is therefore included in Appendix 1, and this section goes into more detail than usual. From the information extracted from Dunblane Unburied [and placed in Appendix 1]  Hamilton probably had 3 boats, consecutively. A speed boat called Lady Sheila, then a 26 foot cruiser, name unknown with an inboard engine which he sold. The third was a large 40 foot cabin cruiser called Tropical Winter which was bought cheaply for about £5,000 from the police and which was destroyed by a gas cylinder exploding for which he received £36,000 from the insurance. He used the boats to transport boys to summer camps which lasted up to 6 weeks on Inchmoan Island in Loch Lomond. In 1998 he was found to have insufficient lifeboats for the number of boys. There were many complaints of various abuses at these camps, mainly physical, but some sexual. He also was on a barge with some boys [p38] The boats enabled him to make police contacts Michael Mill, Anthony Bushnell and Donald Cowan, some through the Central Scotland Police Diving team. He was also friends with other police who knew about the boat eg William MacDonald. Hamilton allowed friends to use his boat in his absence. Hamiltons paedophilia is not as well known as his shooting. Cullen admitted in his summary that Hamiltons “previous conduct showed indications of paedophilia”. This is a dimunition of the true situation. In the Inquiry Cullen had received a Report on Thomas Hamilton from Professor David J Cooke, Head of Forensic Psychology for the Glasgow Health Board and Professor of Forensic Psychology at Glasgow Caledonian University. He also had 3 Reports from Dr JA Baird Consultant forensic Psychiatrist at the State Hospital Carstairs containing a psychiatric assessment of Thomas Hamilton. Both expressed the view that Thomas Hamilton demonstrated Hamilton. Cooke suggested he had many characteristics of sexual sadism. Hamilton had masses of photographs of boys in trunks over the walls of his house, as well as many videos featuring semi naked boys. [5.48] Many parents had reservations about Hamiltons attitude to the children and his physical disciplining of the children some of which were reported to the police. Hamilton’s Scout Warrant was withdrawn in 1974, with the County Commissioner stating that he was “suspicious of his moral intentions towards boys” [113]. More evidence that Hamilton was a paedophile which will be dealt with in a future article on Dunblane, this article will address Hamiltons boats and where they link with boys. Cullen in his report chose to dismiss one major incident that a witness said happened on Hamiltons boat, of penetration of his rectum by Hamiltons fingers, detailed in the following pages of the Report. [100a] Many documents from the inquiry are not set to be released for 100 years with no adequate explanation. One possible reason for a cover up in the Cullen Inquiry and Report according to Norman Bassett written in Dunblane Unburied is that Thomas Hamilton was a procurer of young boys for paedophiles at Conservative Party Central Office [p96]. Another is the abuse of boys at Queen Victoria School Dunblane, and its link as a school used by the Ministry of Defence, its many Freemasonry links and that Hamilton was known to be a frequent visitor to Queen Victoria School. An ex housemaster blew the whistle but was investigated himself and only recently has it been added to the Scottish abuse inquiry. [127][128] Lord Burton claims a link to the Speculative Society which has as members Cullen and other member of the Judiciary Reference- The Scum Category Dunblane  [126] Mountbatten Lord Mountbatten was a notorious, prolific and violent child abuser, of which little has come out yet. The nearest perhaps that it has got to the corporate press is Richard Kerr stating that Mountbatten was involved with abuse at Kincora [106] This article will concentrate on Mountbattens association with boats. Mountbatten served as commander of the 1st cruiser squadron in the Mediterranean Fleet and, having been granted the substantive rank of vice admiral on 22 June 1949, he became Second-in-Command of the Mediterranean Fleet in April 1950. He became Fourth Sea Lord at the Admiralty in June 1950 and attended the funeral of King George VI in February 1952. He then returned to the Mediterranean to serve as Commander-in-Chief, Mediterranean Fleet and NATO Commander Allied Forces Mediterranean from June 1952. Promoted to the substantive rank of full admiral on 27 February 1953, he attended the coronation of the Queen Elizabeth II in June 1953. Mountbatten served his final posting at the Admiralty as First Sea Lord and Chief of the Naval Staff from April 1955 to July 1959, the position which his father had held some forty years prior. This was the first time in Royal Naval history that a father and son had both attained such high rank. He was promoted to Admiral of the Fleet on 22 October 1956. [107] Mountbatten’s  arranged the visit of King George VI and Queen Elizabeth to Dartmouth Royal Naval College on 22 July 1939, taking care to include the young Princesses Elizabeth and Margaret in the invitation, but assigning his nephew, Cadet Prince Philip of Greece, to keep them amused while their parents toured the facility. [107] Mountbatten became mentor to Prince Charles. Even in Mountbattens death it is speculated that the 15 year old “crew member” from County Fermanagh who was also killed on the fishing boat Ambler was in fact an abused child.[] Savile and boats Savile was buried at an angle of 45 degrees to fulfil his wish to “see the sea” in a cemetery at Scarborough.[wiki] Michael Burke regretted not pushing him off a boat [109] but a Captain did throw him off a boat, albeit onto land not into the briney. Savile was accused by a couple of abusing their 14 year old daughter on the Canberra, flagship of P&O fleet. The Captain quizzed Savile, believed the parents and not Savile, and confined him to his cabin for the rest of the trip until Gibraltar and then threw him off  [111][110] It is believed he worked for and frequented Cunard after this and cruised with them until 2011, the year before he died. He was known as a big friend to Cunard who were going to arrrange a sail by of his coffin in Scarborough, until the child abuse revelations broke into the corporate media after his death [112]. Jimmy Savile was given a Green Beret by the Royal Marines [238] and there were claims of abuse at the prestigious Royal Marine Commando Training Centre at Lympstone, East Devon [132] . Seven Royal Marines acted as Jimmy Saviles pall bearers at his funeral [238]. See the Jersey Section for Saviles activity on Jersey. Amsterdam Peter Howells, was involved in a particularly effective honey trap. He owned a theatrical agency for children, with offices in London and Amsterdam. It was called Bovver Boots. Howells is a convicted paedophile who has also been named in police statements by children from Hackney in north London who say that they were abused, photographed and filmed. Dutch police who visited Howells’ houseboat on Prinzengracht in Amsterdam found the walls papered with obscene photographs of young boys. [64] Frank has since told British police that Spinks and his friends were involved in producing films in which children were raped and killed. Edward, too, was close to Spinks and Frank at this time. He claims to have seen five videos which were produced by Spinks and Frank and Frank’s boyfriend, in which young boys were abused and murdered. There is one particular video which he has described for Network First with terrible clarity. There was a man, he says, “who was allowed to do anything he wanted” to a boy. They were on a boat and, he says, he saw the boy choke to death while being orally raped by the man: “There was sound on the camera. You could hear the waves slapping against the side of the boat, you could hear noises of water fowl in the background, you could hear the boy gagging, you could hear the man grunting [64] Abuse on Cruise Ships There is greater risk of sexual assault at sea than an american city and cruise lines are not legally obliged to report sexual assaults of children, or any crimes for that matter!  Information is therefore hard to come by on sexual assaults at sea, but one method is from court cases. This is a list of some sexual assaults at sea, 2009 – 2012 from Cruise Junkie site, some of which are child sexual abuse. [62] Paul Trotter was a play area supervisor and he was jailed for 4 years in 2012 for spanking boys aged 7-13 and filming it, and possession of other indecent images. He did this on Cunard cruise ships Queen Victoria, the Queen Elizabeth and the Queen Mary. [105][61] Another method abuse happens is by crew using key passes to enter rooms when parents have gone to their evening meal. There is good information on cruise boats and child abuse here [60] and hence how to avoid it. Royal Navy and ex Royal Navy Abusers Despite being common, buggery was an offence in the Royal Navy. Henry VIII made it a capital offence and in 1627 it was specifically made a hanging offence.  As for child abuse, a sailor in 1757 was given 500 lashes for buggering a boy and a Lieutenant William Berry was hanged in 1807 for the same offence. The author concludes that whatever may have gone on beneath the poop deck, sex with boys at sea was never openly tolerated in the Royal Navy, let alone made a fixture of the officers’ mess. [6] There are some books referenced on this subject on that link. “A ‘peg-boy’ is a young male who prostitutes himself to homosexuals; ‘peg-house’, a homosexual brothel. There is an unsubstantiated story that boys in East Indian peg-houses were required to sit on pegs between customers, giving them permanently dilated anuses.” [6] It is interesting that this is East India and possibly linked to the times of the East India Company, the worlds first Corporation. The Navy been 500 years collecting “intelligence” which then was converted into mind control techniques at Tavistock which can be used to manipulate children into being raped. [237] https://www.youtube.com/embed/NLPGphHOE0Q?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent The following are some examples of child molesters that are or have been in the Royal Navy. It is not comprehensive nor a random sample. However they do raise the question of whether the people that join or experience the armed forces or Royal Navy have a higher prevalence of being child abusers than the rest of the population.  Is there something intrinsic about being in the Armed forces, Royal Navy, being on a ship or the trauma of war or PTSD that is a factor in a higher level of child abuse? Frank Beck spent nine years as a Royal Marine, serving in Borneo and Aden and attaining the rank of sergeant. He was honourably discharged. [207] More inforamtion and sources on his child abuse and link to Janner are here [240] Johnnie Savile, an elder brother of Jimmy Savile who was also a child abuser was in the Royal Navy [239] Former Royal Navy sailor Alan Stewart was jailed for eight years for abusing three boys over a 26-year period.[133] Able Seaman Christopher Britnell told others online that he was interested in children aged 7 to 17, and was found with a number of bestiality images [134] Warrant Officer Tony Jacka, 50, was unmasked as a paedophile after boasting to other sex offenders about his crimes online.[136] Former Chief Petty Officer Geoffrey Rooney of Plymouth, Devon, was sentenced to 14 years in prison for a series of horrific sex crimes against children.[137] Former Royal Navy submariner Vernon – jailed for five-and-a-half years for sex attacks on a child [139] Cmdr Tom Herman was cleared and had been “foolish” to visit websites featuring girl models, some as young as 11, wearing G-strings and garters and exposing their buttocks [140] Peter Stokoe, who used to serve in the Royal Navy was jailed for nine months for 15 charges regarding possession of 4,236 pictures and videos of children aged between seven and 12 being sexually abused.[141] Serial paedophile Matthew Rawe has been jailed for 19 years after he befriended three different families so that he could abuse their children  [142] Paul Kidd was leading a secret double life as a serial child abuser who molested a string of boys over a 30 year period.[143] A former Royal Marine commando John Sharp covertly filmed female colleagues taking their clothes off in a changing room has been jailed for 22 months.[144] A Royal Navy sailor Leading Seaman Andrew Lomax escaped a jail sentence today after admitting downloading indecent images of boys while serving as part of a protection force on board an oil platform in the Persian Gulf.[145] David Bennett, of Harecastle Avenue, Talke, pleaded guilty to two charges of sexual assault of a child under 13; five offences of causing or inciting a child under 13 to engage in sexual activity; and one offence of causing a child to watch a sexual act. Bennett undertook nine tours of Northern Ireland while in the Royal Navy and received the General Service Medal [147] David Anderson, Royal Navy lieutenant, admitted two offences of sexual activity with a child and attempting to pervert the course of justice and was jailed for two and a half years by Judge Simon Carr at Exeter Crown Court.[148] A NAAFI worker Shaun Sparrow convicted of having child pornography on board a Royal Navy aircraft carrier has been spared jail.[150] Justin Hayward on long-term sick leave from the Royal Navy, admitted three counts of making indecent images of children and two of possessing them and was given a three-year community order and told to attend a community sex offender’s programme. [149] A former submariner Peter Dawson who raped a primary schoolgirl while babysitting 15 years ago has been jailed for seven years.[151] A high-ranking Royal Marine Lieutenant Colonel Russell Paul could be thrown out of the Armed Forces after he was convicted of voyeurism for spying on a schoolgirl with a mirror at a public swimming pool.[152] Former Royal Marine commando John Sharp – who was jailed for four years in 2001 for abusing two children – recorded the women stripping out of their uniforms.[153] Richard Kemp, 53, an odd job man at the Royal Navy Submarine museum in Gosport was convicted of killing Camilla Petersen at Winchester Crown Court. He was convicted of indecent exposure in 1970 and later spent eight years at Broadmoor hospital for sexually assaulting children.[154] David Claydon dismissed from the Royal Navy for committing gross indecency on a male colleague taught a seven-year-old girl how to pleasure him a court heard. [156] A paedophile sailor Able Seaman Christopher Britnell has been sacked from the Royal Navy for possessing indecent images of children and animals. [157] John Goode ex Royal Navy sailor corrupted the girl when she was just 12 and bribed her with sweets and tobacco before paying her £30 a time for sex.[158] James Launce former petty officer in the Royal Navy was given a suspended prison sentence in 2012 at Plymouth Crown Court when thousands of child abuse images were found.[159] Less than a year after former marine Stephen Salmon was jailed over a string of sex assaults on a child he has admitted carrying out attacks on two other girls. Salmon, who served on the Royal Yacht Britannia for Prince Charles and Princess Diana’s honeymoon, denied attacks in the 1970s on a girl called Natalie when she was aged between seven and 12 but was found guilty.[163]Former Royal Navy sailor Christopher Wilson (24) arranged to visit the girl’s home in Devon when he knew her mother was out and they had sex despite a nine year age difference. [164] A former Royal Navy sailor Keith Anderson who repeatedly raped two young girls has been jailed for seven years and four months.[165] Royal Navy veteran Christopher Beardmore downloaded thousands of indecent images of children for his sexual gratification. He used his laptop to access pornographic sites and search for children over a three-year period [166] Mark Luscombe was snared after asking an American officer – posing as the father of an 11-year-old girl – to assault his daughter live via webcam for him. He ‘paid’ for the request with around 50 images depicting the abuse of children. The former ground worker, who was applying to join the Royal Navy, was sentenced to a total of five years behind bars this afternoon[167] A widower Jim Dargavel who held an open house for teenagers where he supplied them with alcohol and cigarettes has been jailed for five years for abusing two boys. Michael Davies, a retired lieutenant commander in the Royal Navy was a character witness andsaid: “He is a very decent caring individual who wants to help people.” .[168] A sailor Anthony Newman who sexually abused two young boys 20 years apart has been jailed for 14 years.[171] Terrence Joseph Walker ex Royal Navy was a registered sex offender who was convicted in 2007 at Warwick Crown Court of five charges of indecent assault on a female under 14 and five offences of inciting a child to commit an act of gross indecency.[172] Retired Limerick prison officer Harry Daly ex British navy has been sentenced to 15 years in prison for the repeated abuse and rape of his daughter over 10 years in what she described as their “house of doom”.[173] Disgraced Lieutenant Commander Frederick Gerrell was found with more than 11,000 images and nearly 300 moving pictures of child pornography on various computers and discs.[174] Former Royal Navy Keith Bannon admitted 11 offences of possessing indecent images and two of extreme pornography.[175] Royal Navy petty officer Paul Opie, aged 36, used his mobile phone to shoot short video clips of the female crew as they used a shower block on the quayside at the HMS Drake naval base in Plymouth.He admitted seven offences of voyeurism at the Naval base and eight unrelated offences of making or possessing child pornography.[178] Stephen Freedman, who worked at Merchant Taylors’ in Crosby and in the Royal Navy section of the school’s Combined Cadet Force for more than 20 years, admitting 18 counts concerning thousands of sick images of children being abused, along with hundreds of videos, and images of people having sex with animals.[179] A ROYAL Navy diver James Mitchelmore had so many indecent images of children on his computers that police gave up counting has avoided prison.[180] Ex Royal Navy Wayne Stephenson, admitted sexual assault and inciting a child to engage in sexual activity. Today the 34-year-old is beginning two years in jail after it was revealed how the pair exchanged numerous messages over the Internet.[181] Former Royal Navy serviceman John Shill who downloaded hundreds of child porn images escaped a jail sentence on Monday at Lincoln Crown Court.[182] Former Royal Navy sailor Alan Stewart was jailed for eight years for abusing three boys over a 26-year period.[183] A Gulf War veteran Former Royal Navy communications engineer Andrew Mein was gaoled yesterday for two-and-a-half years after being found guilty of possessing almost a quarter of a million images of child porn downloaded from the Net. [184] Norman Laven ex Royal Marine admitted indecency with a child between August 1976 and June 1979. He  resigned after the crimes were reported to the Navy and they informed Dorset Police but said it is a mystery why the then 32-year-old was not charged at the time. [186] Ian Whitaker, 66, of Drake Close, Tyne Dock, South Shields, was a Chief Petty Officer in the Royal Navy when he repeatedly abused two girls in the late 1970s and early 80s. He was jailed for 18 months [185] A Navy veteran Michael Thomas Hilton who was jailed for 15 years for sordid sex attacks on a little boy has had an appeal against his convictions rejected by senior judges. [187] A FORMER police officer Royal Navy veteran and ex-Gloucestershire police officer Geoffrey Poole who had sex with a 16 year old girl after grooming her while he was commanding a Naval Training Corps for youngsters has been jailed for 15 months.[188] A former Royal Navy Officer Gordon Scott MBE, who admitted to storing hundreds of child porn images on his laptop computer has been told he will not go to jail [189] Former Royal Navy sailor Mark Butler covertly videoed four children on his mobile phone in jewellery, record and shoe stores, a court heard.[192] A MARRIED man John Noble with a distinguished career in the Royal Navy repeatedly exposed himself to schoolgirls over 18 months, a court heard.[193] A FORMER Royal Navy aircraft carrier flight deck director Derek Lawrence has been jailed after police found thousands of child porn images on his computer.[194] A former Royal Navy commander has been given a two-year supervision order after flashing at young girls and downloading pictures of child pornography. Craig Gilmour resigned from the Navy after the allegations were made, admitted four charges of indecent exposure as well as 19 charges of making indecent images and a further charge of possessing 359 indecent images of underage girls at earlier hearings.[195] AN EX-SCHOOL governor Andrew Davies has been jailed for three months after admitting having an “utter addiction” to child porn with 52,200 images – some stored under loft insulation [196] Dr Ruthven, who downloaded the 5,000 child porn picturesimages at his parents’ house in Flixton, Trafford, said in 2002, during a tour of duty on a submarine, he was driven “stir-crazy” by the conditions.[198] Derek Devine who once set fire to a Royal Navy ship, killing a crewman, later molested three young girls after being released on parole from his life sentence, a court heard.[197] NAVAL nurse is today behind bars after being caught with thousands of indecent photographs of children on his computer. Anthony Byrne, pleaded guilty to a total of 23 offences relating to the distribution and possession of indecent images of youngsters.[200] Douglas Harrison  ex Royal Navy was convicted on Monday at Plymouth Crown Court of four counts of indecent assault, one of indecency with a child and one of attempted rape.[201] A FORMER Royal Navy sailor Aaron Emmett has been jailed by Plymouth Crown Court after admitting having unprotected sex with a girl aged 14.[202] Christopher Bennett who recently left the Royal Navy after 31 years collected hundreds of pornographic pictures of children, a court heard.[203] A CHIEF Petty Officer in the Royal Navy will be dismissed from the service after admitting a string of serious sexual assaults against a young girl. Raymond Laundry, aged 47, was sentenced to four years and 32 weeks in jail for the sexual abuse, which spanned three years.[204] In August last year former Navy man Yusef Khan was convicted of performing two lewd acts at Costa coffee shop in Cribbs Causeway. He was given a three-month prison sentence, suspended for two years, with two years’ supervision and an order to continue his counselling until 2015.[205] Jeremy Pepper former Royal Navy chief petty officer has been jailed for two years after using the internet to try to have sex with a child.  [209] Joseph Richard Davey, 64, admitted 16 sickening sex offences, including rapes, against two children, the youngest of whom was only four when the abuse began. The former merchant seaman, was given the open-ended sentence.[226] Merchant Navy and ex Merchant Navy abusers The former Merchant Navy seaman Anthony Joy admitted accessing 161 images of child sex abuse, 10 of which were at the second highest level of four, and 73 extreme pornography images – some involving sex with a dog. He escaped jail. [160] A FORMER Merchant Navy seaman Derek Clark  who downloaded 10,000 child pornography from the Internet has been jailed for 18 months. [161] A 72-year-old former Merchant Navy seaman John Michael Kendrew has been jailed for 10 years after being found guilty of a series of sex attacks on teenage boys more than 30 years ago.[162] David Iggo former chief officer in the Merchant Navy was caught with nearly 500,000 images of children being sexually abused has been jailed for more than four years.[216] Alan Johansen ex merchant navy who sexually abused two young girls – was jailed for two years today.[220] Michael Hazelwood ex merchant navy has been jailed for sex offences committed against a young girl more than 35 years ago.[224] Kirk Jobson ex Merchant Navy whose historic abuse “haunted” the life of one of his two victims has been jailed for four years.[210]  A Naval seaman Christopher Carey, Merchant Navy who served in Iraq has admitted downloading pornographic images of chidlren from the internet. [221] A FASHION photographer Alan Hart ex marine engineer in the merchant navy had more than 15,000 sick child porn images on his computer.[225] Royal Family and the Navy Several members of the Royal Family have been in the Royal Navy. The Duke of Edinburgh Prince Philip served in the Royal Navy from 1939 to 1952, seeing active service throughout the Second World War. He is Admiral of the Royal Yacht Squadron. In 1948 the Island Sailing Club gave the Dragon Bluebottle to Princess Elizabeth and the Duke of Edinburgh as a wedding present in which he competed at many regattas including Cowes week. It was on the Duke of Edinburgh’s request that, in 1962, the royal family should buy Bloodhound, a 63ft Camper and Nicholson on which he cruised extensively with Prince Charles and Princess Anne.[236] The Prince of Wales Prince Charles  also served in the Royal Navy and also trained in the Royal Air Force. The Duke of YorkPrince Andrew served for over 20 years as an officer in the Royal Navy before leaving the Service in 2001. He flew as a second pilot in Sea King Helicopters on anti-submarine and transport duties during the Falklands conflict in 1982. Lord Mountbatten  has been covered in a previous section. Appendix 1  Information on Boats from Dunblane Unburied by Sandra Uttley Hamilton at the age of 25 owned a 40 foot motor cruiser. He appears to have bought it for £5,000 from a friend in Central Scotland Police. Within 3 years it was destroyed by a gas cylinder exploding on board and he received a payout of £36,000 from the insurance company. William MacDonald, a former policeman with Central Scotland Police and his wife went sailing with Hamilton as did Katherine and Ewan Anderson. During the 1970s Hamilton met members and formed relationships with the Central Scotland Police Diving team at Loch Lomond – Michael Mill (who became Chief Inspector) and Anthony Bushnell. [p19,20] Mr Mill was an acting Chief Inspector in the Police. Mills gave evidence that Hamilton also owned a small speed boat called Lady Sheila, before he then purchased another boat, a large cabin cruiser called Tropical Winter. The boat caught fire on the Strathclyde side of Loch Lomond and drifted over to Balmaha Bay and sank just off Inchmoan island. Mill as a member of the underwater unit had to help retrieve it in one of their weekly visits to Loch Lomond. [p27,28] Mrs Haggers son, on camps for boys on Loch Lomond was thrown off a boat without a life jacket into the water, despite his terror of water. Hamilton had made her son take all his clothes off, had taken them from him and made him put shorts on.[p57] Nothing was documented by Cullen about the boat, which was seized by police and given or sold to Hamilton, without record of payment. Apparently there was no complaint about the boat being seized from its owner. A boat was seized by Strathclyde police on Loch Lomond, which is a rare thing in the uk. Normally there is a trial and only seized if connected to the proven crime and then sold by public auction. Why was the valuable  boat sold without auction to Hamilton and the boats owner never complained? Was it blackmail? [p105, 106] William McDonalds evidence. Hamiltons Boat with an onboard engine on Loch Lomond kept at Balmaha 27 foot. That was sold and he got another one which went on fire. [p127, 128] Donald Cowan Police sergeant with Central Scotland Police went with the MacDonald family to Hamiltons boat on one or two occasions when Hamilton was not there.[p127, 128] Parents took their children in July and Aug 1998 to Balmaha Boat yard where children were taken by boat to Inchmoan Island and met by Hamilton. Only one boat which was used to fetch supplies from mainland. [p175] Children stayed between 1 and 6 weeks on the island with Hamilton. During this time a number of incidents occurred when children were assaulted by Hamilton as punishment for misbehaviour or failing to perform exercises to expectation. Boat examined by police and found to have insufficient life jackets. All children were wearing black swiming trunks [p175] Please note that victims of abuse may be triggered by reading this information. The Sanctuary for the Abused [A] has advice on how to prevent triggers.  National Association for People Abused in Childhood [B] has a freephone helpline and has links to local support groups. Other useful sites are One in Four [C] and Havoca [D]. Useful post on triggers [E] from SurvivorsJustice [F] blog. Links and References References from theukdatabase.com are included below but are not included in the text above as they remove the primary source from their information. Thus often the date and context and trustworthiness is uncertain, as well as this being unethical. If they did not do this and instead included a link to the orginal source, the database would be invaluable. [1] 2013 Jan 11 Shrimpton Interview about Heath amongst others on  Bristol Community Radio Tony Gosling http://youtu.be/QNelt33QP_8 [2] [3] 2015 Feb 11 Cathy Fox Blog Cornwall Council Publish 1994 Azimuth Trust Report https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2015/02/11/cornwall-council-publish-1994-azimuth-trust-report/ [4] Lenny Harper Affidavit on Free Speech Offshore Stuart Syvret http://freespeechoffshore.nl/stuartsyvretblog/jersey-or-palermo/ [5] Bits of Books Dr Morris Fraser, Belfast, Long Island New York, Islington https://bitsofbooksblog.wordpress.com/2014/09/13/dr-morris-fraser-2/ [6] 2008 Straight Dope Rum, sodomy, and the lash: Did the Royal Navy supply ships with “peg boys” for sex? http://www.straightdope.com/columns/read/2794/rum-sodomy-and-the-lash [7]The Pogues “Billy’s Bones” (Studio) Rum Sodomy & the Lash Shane MacGowan http://youtu.be/NLPGphHOE0Q [8] B. R. Burg. Boys at Sea: Sodomy, Indecency, and Courts Martial in Nelson’s Navy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. xv + 245 pp. $69.95 (cloth), ISBN 978-0-230-52228-2. Reviewed by Isaac Land (Indiana State University) The Full Monty http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=25525 [9] RUM, SODOMY AND THE LASH A Devon Lad’s Life in Nelson’s Navy by Anthony Blackmore SODOMY – A HANGING and “THE GOLDEN RIVET” http://www.blackant.me.uk/PRESS-GANG/hanging.htm [10] BOYS AT SEA Sodomy, Indecency, and Court Martial in Nelson’s Navy by Professor B. R. Burg (Arizona State University, USA) Hardcover, Palgrave/Macmillan, ISBN 978-0-230-52228-2 Review https://historicromance.wordpress.com/2008/03/14/books-boys-at-sea-by-professor-b-r-burg/ [11] 1989 July 23 Sunday Mirror Child doctor in porn ring probe  – Morris Fraser , Clifford Luton and Nicholas Reynolds https://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2014/05/22/child-doctor-in-porn-ring-probe-23-07-89/ [12] 2013 Mar 5  The Guardian Angelique Chrisafis French ‘boat schools’ rape trial opens. Kameneff trial http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/mar/05/french-boat-schools-rape-trial [13] 1986 Apr 30 Spotlight editorial and Daily Express Kinky capers Head jailed for 5 years https://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2013/06/18/paedophile-headmaster-abused-boys-on-sailing-trips/ [14] Bent Lawyers re Elliston  magistrate and headmaster boats http://www.bentlawyersandcops.com/a_rotten_judiciary.htm [15] 2013 Oct 7 Spotlight Devon and Cornwall Police, the Daniel Bryant cover-up, and the Azimuth Trust https://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2013/10/07/devon-and-cornwall-police-the-daniel-bryant-cover-up-and-the-azimuth-trust/ [16] 2013 May 23  North Devon Journal  Emma Glanfield Retired North Devon policeman accused of historic child sex offences http://www.northdevonjournal.co.uk/Retired-North-Devon-policeman-accused-historic/story-19056700-detail/story.html [17] 2013 Oct 6 Mirror Eileen Fairweather Paedophile police officer Daniel Bryant brought to book FORTY years after abusing boys http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/paedophile-police-officer-daniel-bryant-2341683 [18] 2001 Nov 3 Clifford Luton in N Ireland http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00lx6dp [19] Spotlight  Extract from Chasing Satan by Dianne Core re Rev Jan Knos https://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2013/06/27/a-man-of-god/#comments [20] 1986 Oct 28 Vicar in Child Sex case found dead in cell https://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2013/06/27/vicar-in-child-sex-case-found-dead-in-his-cell-28-10-86/ [20a]https://spotlightonabuse.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/g281086.jpg [21] 2013 Mar 23 Paris Match http://www.parismatch.com/Actu/Societe/Ecole-en-bateau-12-ans-de-prison-pour-Kameneff-234960 [22] 2015 Feb 13 Glasgow Herald Police investigate: did TV weatherman Fred Talbot commit sex offences in Scotland? http://www.heraldscotland.com/mobile/news/crime-courts/police-investigate-did-tv-weatherman-fred-talbot-commit-sex-offences-in-scotland.1423866191 [23] You Tube Kameneff http://youtu.be/4pVfPufKXMk [24] 1997 Aug 1 Evening Standard The warning signs that fell on deaf ears – Ken Rabone Stockgrove Park School https://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2013/06/14/the-warning-signs-that-fell-on-deaf-ears-1-8-97/ [25] Maxwell – no further information [26] [27] Channel Islands Brice Taylor – no futher information [28] Jim Stone Freelance Journalist U.S. Coast Guard is the tyrant of the sea http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/coastguard.html [29] Boat Ambler with Bonner Pink to Montagu at Beaulieu [30] 2015 Jun 3 accessed Wikipedia Morning Cloud http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morning_Cloud [31] Heartless Too An Autobiography by Janella boats page 48-50 [32] Steven George pers comm [33] 2014 Apr 23 Scotsman Ex-Navy captain ‘set fire to sailing club’  http://www.scotsman.com/news/odd/ex-navy-captain-set-fire-to-sailing-club-1-3384730 [34] 2009 Dec 29 Telegraph Sir Edward Heath made history 40 years ago by winning Sydney Hobart Race http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/othersports/sailing/6874534/Sir-Edward-Heath-made-history-40-years-ago-by-winning-Sydney-Hobart-Race.html [35] 2014 Jul 8 cfb The Sun VIP Paedos, the Chicken Rack and Met cover-up https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2015/05/22/vip-paedos-the-chicken-rack-and-met-cover-up-the-sun-2014-july-8/ [36] 2015 May 23 Mirror Fred Talbot was let free to roam for 20 years after catalogue of police blunders http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/fred-talbot-free-roam-20-5748432#ICID=sharebar_twitter [37] 1986 Apr 10 Hull Daily Mail Vicar Facing 28 charges https://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2013/06/21/vicar-facing-28-charges-10-4-86/ [38] 1986 Oct 27 Hull Daily Mail Sex-charge vicar dies https://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2013/06/26/sex-charge-vicar-dies-27-10-86/ [39] 2013 Mar 5 Guardian French ‘boat schools’ rape trial opens http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/mar/05/french-boat-schools-rape-trial [40] 2013 Mar 23 Le Monde  Le procès exemplaire de l’Ecole en bateau  http://prdchroniques.blog.lemonde.fr/2013/03/23/le-proces-exemplaire-de-lecole-en-bateau/ [41] 2013 Mar 7 L’Obs Ecole en bateau : Bernard Poggi reconnaît des abus sexuels http://tempsreel.nouvelobs.com/justice/20130307.OBS0981/ecole-en-bateau-bernard-poggi-reconnait-des-abus-sexuels.html [42] 1995 Nov 26 Sunday Telegraph GMC keeps child-sex doctor on medical register https://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2013/11/03/police-investigate-paedophile-infiltration-at-care-homes-26-11-95/#comments [43] 2013 Apr 17 Spotlight Azimuth Trust was linked to French ‘boat schools’ paedophile ring https://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/azimuth-trust-was-linked-to-french-boat-schools-paedophile-ring/#comments chess comment [43a] Pédocriminalité et déni de Justice à Saint Malo http://affaire-marine-saintmalo.over-blog.com/article-appel-aux-victimes-de-l-ecole-en-bateau-111685720.html [43b] Pédocriminalité et déni de Justice à Saint Malo autotranslate http://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522Karrek%2BVen%2522%2Bp%25C3%25A9dophile%26sa%3DX%26biw%3D1600%26bih%3D708&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=fr&u=http://affaire-marine-saintmalo.over-blog.com/article-appel-aux-victimes-de-l-ecole-en-bateau-111685720.html&usg=ALkJrhgyUb_zVyBowlMBiJZs9-2Nuobd0g [44] 2012 Oct 19 Telegraph Eileen Fairweather Jimmy Savile: ‘He was the tip of the iceberg’ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/jimmy-savile/9620223/Jimmy-Savile-He-was-the-tip-of-the-iceberg.html [45] Conspiracy Truths – Jimmy savile and others http://www.conspiracytruths.co.uk/jimmysavilebbcpaedophile.html [46] 2000 Lord Montagu of Beaulieu Wheels within Wheels ISBN 0297 81739 6 [47] Beaulieuriver.co.uk River History http://www.beaulieuriver.co.uk/about/river-history [48] 2015 July 2 Accessed Wikipedia Lord Montagu of Beaulieu https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Douglas-Scott-Montagu,_3rd_Baron_Montagu_of_Beaulieu [49] 2010 Oct 17 RicoSorda blog Lenny Harper Affidavit http://ricosorda.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/sworn-affidavit-of-mr-lenny-harper_17.html [50] Liz Davies Jersey Child Abuse Investigation Crimes against children in Jersey and the investigation http://lizdavies.net/campaigns-and-topics/jersey-child-abuse-investigation/ [51] 2014 Sun Sea and Satan remake Bill Maloney approx 45.00 Bill Maloneys sister Dyana Maloney brought to Haut De La Garenne on a sailing trip in 1986? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxZSxMuzZFs [52] 2012 Oct 19 Telegraph Jimmy Savile: ‘He was the tip of the iceberg’ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/jimmy-savile/9620223/Jimmy-Savile-He-was-the-tip-of-the-iceberg.html [53] 1974 Sep 4 The Age Heath Loses Two Yachts https://news.google.com/newspapers?nid=1300&dat=19740904&id=sf0QAAAAIBAJ&sjid=MpIDAAAAIBAJ&pg=3743,278332&hl=en [54] Google Map of Haut de La Garenne, Gorey Castle (Mont Orgeuil) and Yacht Moorings https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/Haut+de+la+Garenne,+Jersey/@49.1998007,-2.0261242,509m/data=!3m1!1e3!4m2!3m1!1s0x480c51f3f1141cdd:0xebc96ce013e2b5ec [55a] 2013 Jan 11 Tony Gosling talks to Michael Shrimpton https://youtu.be/v9ABUEu4XlU [55b] 2013 Jan 11 [56] 1998 Edward Heath The Course of My Life ISBN 0 340 70852 2 [57] 2014 Dec 12 Richie Allen Michael Shrimpton https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=25&v=xUSjgNf1gWg [58] 2009 May 5 Watford Observer Haberdashers’ Aske’s teacher went on to abuse boys after resignation from school http://www.watfordobserver.co.uk/news/4344277.Former_top_private_school_teacher_jailed_for_molesting_teens_on_boat/ [59] 2009 May 6  Telegraph Former teacher at top boys’ school jailed for sexually abusing boys http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/5280285/Former-teacher-at-top-boys-school-jailed-for-sexually-abusing-boys.html [60] 2010 Cruise Law News Top Ten Reasons Not To Cruise: No. 1 – Cruise Lines Are A Perfect Place To Sexually Abuse Children http://www.cruiselawnews.com/2010/04/articles/sexual-assault-of-minors/top-ten-reasons-not-to-cruise-no-1-cruise-lines-are-a-perfect-place-to-sexually-abuse-children/ [61] 2012 Cruise Law News Cruise Ship “Prey Zones” – U.S. Media Ignores Widespread Sexual Abuse Of Children On Cunard Cruise Ships http://www.cruiselawnews.com/2012/04/articles/sexual-assault-of-minors/cruise-ship-prey-zones-us-media-ignores-widespread-sexual-abuse-of-children-on-cunard-cruise-ships/ [62] Cruise Junkie Sexual Assaults at Sea, 2009 – 2012http://www.cruisejunkie.com/SA.html [63] 2013 Dec 30 http://www.portsmouth.co.uk Gosport church boat club predator is jailed for sex abuse http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/local/gosport-church-boat-club-predator-is-jailed-for-sex-abuse-1-5776713 [64] 1997 Mar 1 Nick Davies A paedophile ring in Amsterdam http://www.nickdavies.net/1997/03/01/a-paedophile-ring-in-amsterdam/ [65] [66] Hamilton Dunblane [67] Henry Makow Satanist Pedophiles Rule Great Britain http://henrymakow.com/illuminati-pedophiles-run-brit.html [68] 2012 Feb 8 STV News Paedophiles who murdered woman and dumped her body at sea appeal life sentences http://news.stv.tv/west-central/296839-paedophiles-who-murdered-woman-and-dumped-her-body-at-sea-appeal-life-sentences/  + [69] 2006 May 31 Paedophile took pictures of naked children http://www.macclesfield-express.co.uk/news/local-news/paedophile-took-pictures-naked-children-2537084 [70] 1986 April 30 Daily Express via Spotlight Kinky capers head jailed for 5 years https://spotlightonabuse.wordpress.com/2013/06/18/paedophile-headmaster-abused-boys-on-sailing-trips/ [71]  2008 Mar 14 Mail Police inspector’s body washed up on exclusive beachfront after he ‘jumped off a ferry’ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-533416/Police-inspectors-body-washed-exclusive-beachfront-jumped-ferry.html [72] Whale JERSEY:Children were loaned to rich paedophile yachtsmen http://www.whale.to/c/jersey7.html [73] Whale Ted Heath http://www.whale.to/c/ted_heath.html [74] Bits of Books Blog Dr Morris Fraser, Belfast, Long Island New York, Islington https://bitsofbooksblog.wordpress.com/2014/09/13/dr-morris-fraser-2/ [75] 2015 Aug 4 Cathy Fox Blog Michael Shrimpton on Ted Heath https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2015/08/04/michael-shrimpton-on-ted-heath/ [76] 2015 Aug 6 Mail Mother claims she had told police a child vanished after going on Sir Edward Heath’s yacht but officers were warned not to investigate by ‘someone above’ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3187665/Mother-claims-told-police-child-vanished-going-Sir-Edward-Heath-s-yacht-officers-warned-not-investigate-above.html#ixzz3i83h0OZX [77] 2015 Aug 6 Mirror ‘Eleven boys went on Edward Heath’s yacht but I counted only 10 who left his boat’ claims mum http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/eleven-boys-went-edward-heaths-6209310 [78] 2015 Jun 4 Salisbury Journal Ex-PM’s wishes ‘disrespected’ by bow restoration, says former crew member http://m.salisburyjournal.co.uk/news/13310176.Ex_PM___s_wishes____disrespected____by_bow_restoration__says_former_crew_member/ [79] 2005 Aug 5 Sky Edward Heath: Five Police Forces Investigating http://news.sky.com/story/1530217/edward-heath-five-police-forces-investigating [80] Whale Ted Heath http://www.whale.to/c/ted_heath.html [81] 2015 Aug 5 ITV Man claims children were taken onto Heath’s yacht http://www.itv.com/news/update/2015-08-05/man-claims-he-saw-children-taken-onto-heaths-yacht/ [82] 2015 Aug 5 Independent Ted Heath allegations: Jersey victims’ lawyer says linking former PM to child sex abuse like ‘pinning down a jellyfish’ http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/ted-heath-allegations-jersey-victims-lawyer-says-linking-former-pm-to-child-sex-abuse-like-pinning-down-a-jellyfish-10440311.html [83] 2015 Aug 4 Lindas Blog Will The Jersey Police continue to cover up for Edward Heath? http://lcorby.com/2015/08/04/will-the-jersey-police-continue-to-cover-up-for-edward-heath/ [84] 2015 Aug 5 The National Scot Island force confirms former PM Ted Heath ‘features’ in their sexual abuse probe http://www.thenational.scot/news/island-force-confirms-former-pm-ted-heath-features-in-their-sexual-abuse-probe.6006 [85] c.2011 Isle of Wight Life  A Little Bit of Everything http://www.visitilife.com/a-little-bit-of-everything/#lightbox/1/ [86] 2013 Jan 11 Radio A Infos Did Savile take Jersey boys on death ride for Tory PM Ted Heath? http://radio4all.net/index.php/program/65480 [87] 2001 Jun 1 BBC Friday Sailing’s growing mass appeal  re Chay Blyth River Hamble http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/other_sports/1312352.stm [88] 2015 May 13 Guardian Ed Miliband’s guide to raving in Ibiza http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/may/13/ed-miliband-guide-raving-ibiza or worse, Ted Heath, moored off the coast of las islas Baleares on Gypsy Moth, his skipper’s cap slightly askew as he played bongos in the warm wind. [89] Round the Island Race organised by Island Yacht Club (IOW) http://www.roundtheisland.org.uk/web/code/php/main_c.php?section=race&page=history Even during his term as Prime Minister, The Rt. Honourable Sir Edward Heath KG, MBE, MP was a keen supporter of sailing. He won the Round the Island Race four times; three of them in consecutive years in the early 1970s on “Morning Cloud II” and “Morning Cloud III”. In 1980 he took the top trophy once more in “Morning Cloud IV”. The Gold Roman Bowl has only been won twice by women – Mrs Tobin on “Barbar” in 1954 and Julia Dane on “Glass Onion” in 1982. [90] 2015 Aug Wikipedia Edward Heath https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_Heath  [91] Creeksea Sailing club http://www.creeksea.org.uk/csc1_003.htm [92] Royal Southern Yacht Club Newsdesk Trustees of Sir Edward Heath Foundation present Morning Cloud memento to Royal Southern Yacht Club re Morning Cloud II http://www.royal-southern.co.uk/News-Desk/ID/1284/Trustees-of-Sir-Edward-Heath-Foundation-present-Morning-Cloud-memento-to-Royal-Southern-Yacht-Club [93] 1971 Aug 11 BBC 1971 Admiral’s Cup triumph for Heath http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/hi/dates/stories/august/11/newsid_2974000/2974996.stm [94] 2015 May 18 Yachting World Memorial unveiled to the crew lost when Sir Edward Heath’s Morning Cloud broke up and sank http://www.yachtingworld.com/blogs/elaine-bunting/memorial-made-to-the-crew-lost-when-sir-edward-heaths-morning-cloud-broke-up-and-sank-64589 The accident, which badly damaged and flooded the 44ft Morning Cloud 3, forcing her crew to abandon to a liferaft, shocked the sailing community and made headlines round the world. [95] 2015 Aug 5 Jersey Evening Post Did Ted Heath abuse Children in Jersey? and video  http://jerseyeveningpost.com/news/2015/08/05/did-ted-heath-abuse-children-in-jersey/ [96] 2015 Aug 7 Lou Collins Blog Heath’s missing sailors and Bouley Bay  http://loucollins.uk/2015/08/07/heaths-missing-sailors-and-bouley-bay/ And Savile had a place in Bouley Bay………the villa was called ‘The Reef Villa’ and it was available to rent. It was in Bouley Bay but not at the ‘The Water’s Edge Hotel’ or their chalets. It was a small rental villa just up the hill past the chalets and tucked in beside the cliff pathway.Very private and all that. [97] 2015 Aug Wikipedia Morning Cloud https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Morning_Cloud [98] 2008 Sept 18 Guardian Owen Parker http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2008/sep/18/sailing [99] Getty Images Morning Cloud http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/mary-heath-the-step-mother-of-former-prime-minister-edward-news-photo/3364351 ‘New Morning Cloud’, at the Camper and Nicholson boatyard at Gosport, Hampshire, England. [100a] 2006 Dunblane Unburied Sandra Uttley ISBN 1- 905553 05 6 http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1905553056?keywords=dunblane%20unburied&qid=1439060743&ref_=sr_1_1&sr=8-1 [100b] Boat references are 19,20, 27,28, 57, 105, 106, 127, 128, 145, 175 [100c] Stolen Kids Dunblane http://stolenkids-dunblane.blogspot.co.uk/2005/11/2006-dunblane-unburied-by-sandra-uttley.html [101] FreeSpeechOffshore TED HEATH – CHILD-ABUSE – THE RULE OF LAW IN BRITAIN? http://freespeechoffshore.nl/stuartsyvretblog/ [102] Voice for Children blog http://voiceforchildren.blogspot.co.uk/ [103] Rico Sorda blog http://ricosorda.blogspot.co.uk/ [104] Leah Goodmans Blog http://leahmcgrathgoodman.com/category/jersey/ [105] 2012 May 11 Independent Cunard cruise ship worker jailed over spanking http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/cunard-cruise-ship-worker-jailed-over-spanking-7737748.html [106] 2015 Jul 18 Exaro Richard Kerr names powerful men who covered up Kincora http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5608/richard-kerr-names-powerful-men-who-covered-up-kincora [107] Wikipedia Lord Mountbatten https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Mountbatten,_1st_Earl_Mountbatten_of_Burma [108] Indymedia http://www.indymedia.ie/article/20885?userlanguage=ga [109] 2014 Nov 27 ITV Michael Buerk ‘regrets not pushing Jimmy Savile off a boat’ http://www.itv.com/news/2014-11-27/michael-buerk-regrets-not-pushing-jimmy-savile-off-a-boat/ [110] 2012 Oct 13 Mirror ‘I kicked sleazy Jimmy Savile off cruise ship’: Captain acted over claims he assaulted girl, 14 http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/jimmy-savile-thrown-cruise-ship-1376532 [111] 2012 Oct 4 Express The disgusted captain who threw Jimmy Savile off a cruise ship http://www.express.co.uk/expressyourself/349976/The-disgusted-captain-who-threw-Jimmy-Savile-off-a-cruise-ship [112] 2012 Oct 13 Cruise Law news Sir Jimmy Savile, a “True Friend of Cunard:” Cruise Ship Pedophile? http://www.cruiselawnews.com/2012/10/articles/sexual-assault-of-minors/sir-jimmy-savile-a-true-friend-of-cunard-cruise-ship-pedophile/ [113] Wikipedia Dunblane Massacre https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunblane_Massacre [114] Cullens Report of Public Inquiry into Dunblance massacre https://www.ssaa.org.au/research/1996/1996-10-16_public-inquiry-dunblane-lord-cullen.pdf [115] 2015 Aug 8 Mirror Edward Heath’s secret Jersey hideaway at centre of child sex abuse probe http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/edward-heaths-secret-jersey-hideaway-6220926 [116] 2015 Aug 9 Mirror Edward Heath fixed it for Jimmy Savile to receive OBE and attended Paedophile Information Exchange meetings http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/edward-heath-fixed-jimmy-savile-6220604 [117] Lou Collins blog Heath’s missing sailors and Bouley Bay http://loucollins.uk/2015/08/07/heaths-missing-sailors-and-bouley-bay/ [118] 2011 Jun 22 Independent Michael Wavell: Nurse and businessman who enriched the life of his native Jersey http://www.independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/michael-wavell-nurse-and-businessman-who-enriched-the-life-of-his-native-jersey-2300633.html [119] Freedom Holidays Reef View Villa https://www.freedomholidays.com/Jersey_self_catering_999.html [120] Map of Bouley Bay https://www.google.co.uk/maps/place/Bouley+Bay+JE3+5AS,+Jersey/@49.2384382,-2.0826451,16z/data=!4m2!3m1!1s0x480c5309b9394743:0xf7da6d813786f0cf [121] 2012 Oct 16 Daily Mail Savile pictured at the Jersey House of Horrors: Paedophile DJ is surrounded by children at care home where 192 ‘suffered abuse’ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2218517/Jimmy-Savile-pictured-surrounded-children-Jersey-care-home-192-suffered-abuse.html [122] 2012 Aug 19 Telegraph Jimmy Savile: ‘He was the tip of the iceberg’ http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/crime/jimmy-savile/9620223/Jimmy-Savile-He-was-the-tip-of-the-iceberg.html [123] Variety Club Jersey http://www.varietyjersey.org.je/content/about-variety-jersey [124] DVC Dunblane Massacre Resource Page http://www.dvc.org.uk/dunblane/ [125] Bob Hill Jersey Blog http://bobhilljersey.blogspot.com/ [126] The Scum Category Dunblane http://thescum.info/category/dunblane/ [127] The Scum Who are they? http://thescum.info/2003/12/28/who-are-they/ [128] Express Top Scots school in abuse claims http://www.express.co.uk/scotland/588918/Top-Scotland-school-abuse-claims [129] 2015 May 5  Navy Times http://www.navytimes.com/story/military/crime/2015/05/05/navy-annual-sexual-assault-prevention-response-report/26705151/ [130] 2015 May 31 Cathi Morgan Military Children were Unwitting Subjects in UK’s ‘MKULTRA’ Programs https://cathki.wordpress.com/2015/05/31/military-children-were-unwitting-subjects-in-uks-mkultra-programs/ [131] Cathi Morgan website http://www.mk.gowebs.co.uk/ [132] 2003 Jul 1 Plymouth Herald Royal Marine base at centre of new Jimmy Savile abuse claims Jimmy Savile http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Royal-Marine-base-centre-new-Jimmy-Savile-abuse/story-19442996-detail/story.html#axzz2bNqPnuER [133] 2010 Jan 21 Portsmouth News Ex-navy man locked up for child sex abuse – Alan Stewart http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/local/ex-navy-man-locked-up-for-child-sex-abuse-1-1246248 [134] 2015 Jan 29 Mirror Sailor sacked from Royal Navy over indecent images of children and animals – Christopher Britnell http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/sailor-sacked-royal-navy-over-5066721 [135] 2015 Aug 11  WhatDoTheyKnow Cathy Fox Pre FOI Royal Navy Child sexual abuse https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/user/cathy_fox/requests [136] 2015 Feb 3 Daily Mail Decorated Royal Marine once introduced to Duchess of Cornwall is exposed as a paedophile – and judge blasts CPS who could have caught him FIVE YEARS earlier – Tony Jacka ttp://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2938217/Decorated-Royal-Marine-introduced-Duchess-Cornwall-exposed-paedophile.html [137] 2015 Jan 30 Mail Royal Navy officer who led secret double life as predatory paedophile is jailed for 14 years for sexually assaulting two young children – Geoffrey Rooney http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2933334/Royal-Navy-officer-jailed-14-years-sexually-assaulting-two-young-children.html [138] 2015 Jan 23 Plymouth Herald ‘Depraved’ former Royal Navy man jailed for 14 years for sexually abusing young children Geoffrey Rooney http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Depraved-Royal-Navy-man-jailed-14-years-sexually/story-25914490-detail/story.html [139]  2015 Mar 19 Daily Record Paedophile predator feared to be trawling Scots primary schools for victims – but police have tried to keep it secret from parents – Paul Vernon http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/crime/paedophile-predator-feared-trawling-scots-5359233 [140] 2005 May 12 Guardian Navy officer cleared of child porn charges -Tom Herman http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2005/may/12/military.childprotection [141] 2010 Sept 4 Croydon Advertiser Ex-sailor jailed for downloading ‘disturbing’ child pornography – Peter Stokoe http://www.croydonadvertiser.co.uk/Ex-sailor-jailed-downloading-disturbing-child-pornography/story-11362567-detail/story.html [142] 2012 Dec 3 UFOHunter EX ROYAL NAVY Serial paedophile befriended families to abuse children – Matthew Rawe http://ufohunterorguk.com/2012/12/03/ex-royal-navy-serial-paedophile-befriended-families-to-abuse-children/ [143] 2008 Oct 1 Daily Mail Buckingham Palace butler ‘ran paedophile sex ring while working for the Royal Family’ – Paul Kidd http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1066171/Buckingham-Palace-butler-ran-paedophile-sex-ring-working-Royal-Family.html [144] 2014 May 21 STV news Convicted paedophile jailed for filming women undressing at hotel – John Sharp http://news.stv.tv/east-central/276101-convicted-paedophile-john-sharp-jailed-for-filmed-women-undressing-at-hotel/ [145] 2011 Dec 13 Southern Daily Echo Sailor avoids jail over child porn Andrew Lomax http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/9416711.Sailor_avoids_jail_over_child_porn/ [147] 2015 Aug 5 Stoke Sentinel Former firefighter David Bennett jailed for sex assaults on boy http://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/firefighter-David-Bennett-jailed-sex-assaults-boy/story-27552917-detail/story.html [148] 2015 Apr 30 Falmouth Packet RNAS Culdrose rescue hero from Falmouth jailed for unlawful sex with a 15-year-old that nearly drove her to suicide – David Anderson http://www.falmouthpacket.co.uk/news/12924696.RNAS_Culdrose_rescue_hero_from_Falmouth_jailed_for_unlawful_sex_with_a_15_year_old_that_nearly_drove_her_to_suicide/?ref=mr&lp=15 [149] 2024 Oct 4 Shropshire Star Shropshire family praised by judge after child sex photos shock Justin hayward http://www.shropshirestar.com/news/2014/10/04/shropshire-family-praised-by-judge-after-child-sex-photos-shock/ [150] 2014 Dec 8 Plymouth Herald NAAFI worker who had child pornography on Plymouth warship spared jail – Shaun Sparrow http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/NAAFI-worker-child-pornography-Plymouth-warship/story-25734940-detail/story.html [151] 2014 Jul 3 BBC Former Royal Navy man jailed for Helensburgh child rape – Peter Dawson http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-28145820 [152] 2014 Jun 10 Daily Mail Top Royal Marine spied on schoolgirl, 11,  as she changed after a swimming lesson using mirror placed under cubicle Lieutenant Colonel Russell Paul http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2653563/Highly-respected-Royal-Marine-officer-faces-kicked-forces-admits-spying-girl-11-changed-swimming-lesson.html [153] 2014 May 21 Edinburgh News Ex-Marine jailed for spying on changing rooms -John Sharp http://www.edinburghnews.scotsman.com/news/crime/ex-marine-jailed-for-spying-on-changing-rooms-1-3418456 [154] 2003 May 16 CSFES Danmark Handyman gets life for killing Danish student – Richard Kemp https://csfesdanmark.wordpress.com/2015/05/05/2003-may-16-handyman-gets-life-for-killing-danish-student/   + [155] 2013 Nov 14 Liverpool Echo Navy hopeful who filmed 16-year-old girls changing in swimming baths cubicles avoids jail – Andrew Shaw http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/navy-hopeful-who-filmed-16-year-old-6306380 [156] 2006 Sept 9 Ipswich Star Paedophile jailed 30 years after attacks – David Claydon http://www.ipswichstar.co.uk/news/paedophile_jailed_30_years_after_attacks_1_109961 [157] 2015 Jan 29 Mirror Sailor sacked from Royal Navy over indecent images of children and animals – Christopher Britnell http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/sailor-sacked-royal-navy-over-5066721 [158] 2014 Dec 9 Express and Echo Police praise courage of abuse victim after Devon sex offender is jailed for 15 years – John Goode http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Police-praise-courage-abuse-victim-Devon-sex/story-25740208-detail/story.html [159] 2014 Oct 12 Plymouth Herald Man hid child abuse images on a memory stick in a locker at his workplace – James Launce http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Man-hid-child-abuse-images-memory-stick-locker/story-23268420-detail/story.html [160] 2012 Sept 21 Knet Online Ex-seaman Anthony Joy spared jail over child abuse and bestiality images http://www.kentonline.co.uk/kent/news/ex-seaman-anthony-joy-spared-jai-a60396/ [161] Stinson Hunter Former seaman admits child abuse images addiction Derek Clark http://www.stinsonhunter.com/derek-clark-burton/ [162] 2015 Mar 27 Harrogate Advertiser Nidderdale man jailed for historical sexual abuse – John Michael Kendrew http://www.harrogateadvertiser.co.uk/news/crime/nidderdale-man-jailed-for-historical-sexual-abuse-1-7179482 [163] 2015 Apr 30 Sex assault marine convicted again as victims speak out – Stephen Salmon http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/crime/sex-assault-marine-convicted-again-as-victims-speak-out-1-6717650 [164] 2014 Aug 27 Exeter Express and Echo Railway worker jailed for wooing underage girl on facebook and having sex with her- Christopher Wilson http://www.exeterexpressandecho.co.uk/Railway-worker-jailed-wooing-underage-girl/story-22829879-detail/story.html [165] 2014 May 22 BBC Former sailor Keith Anderson jailed over child rapes http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-edinburgh-east-fife-27521130 [166] 2014 Mar 26 Stoke Sentinel Royal Navy veteran Christopher Beardmore downloaded child abuse images in his Meir home http://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/Royal-Navy-veteran-Christopher-Beardmore/story-20851512-detail/story.html [167] 2014 Jan 29 Bolton News Paedophile Mark Luscombe snared after trading images of children with undercover cops online http://www.theboltonnews.co.uk/news/10971487.Jailed__paedophile_who_was_snared_after_trading_images_of_children_with_undercover_cops_online/?action=complain&cid=12418014 [168] 2013 Aug 6 Wiltshire Times Pensioner jailed for sexually abusing teenage boys – Jim Dargavel http://www.wiltshiretimes.co.uk/news/10594148.Pensioner_jailed_for_sexually_abusing_teenage_boys/ [170]http://theukdatabase.com/2013/01/19/george-dixon-hull/ [171] 2012 April 18 Swindon Advertiser Jail for sailor who abused two boys -Anthony Newman http://www.swindonadvertiser.co.uk/news/9653713.Jail_for_sailor_who_abused_two_boys/ [172] 2011 Aug 24 Llannelli Star Child attacker didn’t tell police he stayed away – Terrance Joseph Walker http://www.llanellistar.co.uk/Child-attacker-didn-t-tell-police-stayed-away/story-13191222-detail/story.html [173] 2011 Jul 30 Irish Times Ex-prison officer gets 10 years for sex abuse of daughter – NAME http://www.irishtimes.com/news/ex-prison-officer-gets-10-years-for-sex-abuse-of-daughter-1.612708 [174] 2007 Apr 14 Portsmouth News Pervert blamed sick pics on wife and sons Lieutenant – Commander Frederick Gerrell http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/local/pervert-blamed-sick-pics-on-wife-and-sons-1-1277807 [175] Liverpool Echo Former Royal Navy spared prison over indecent images of children – Kevin Bannon http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/former-royal-navy-spared-prison-3373342 [176]http://theukdatabase.com/2013/03/27/ian-jones-hornsea/ [177] http://theukdatabase.com/2013/03/04/ian-barker-islington/ [178] 2009 Jan 16 Mail Jail for Royal Navy officer who secretly filmed female shipmates showering and changing – Paul Opie http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1118525/Jail-Royal-Navy-officer-secretly-filmed-female-shipmates-showering-changing.html [179] 2012 Aug 24 Liverpool Echo Former Merchant Taylors teacher Stephen Freedman jailed for child porn images http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/former-merchant-taylors-teacher-stephen-3338098 [180] 2012 Oct 20 Plymouth Herald Plymouth Royal Navy diver had so many child abuse images cops gave up counting – James Mitchelmore http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Plymouth-Royal-Navy-diver-child-abuse-images-cops/story-17133926-detail/story.html [181] 2012 Sept 27 Southern Daily Echo Wayne Stephenson used Facebook to groom 15-year-old girl for sex http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/9951018.Pervert_used_Internet_to_groom_girl_for_sex/ [182] 2012 Jul 30 Grantham Journal Ex-Navy man, of South Witham, had 3,000 indecent images John Shill http://www.granthamjournal.co.uk/news/local/ex-navy-man-of-south-witham-had-3-000-indecent-images-1-4109454 [183] 2010 Jan 21 Portsmouth News Ex-navy man locked up for child sex abuse – Alan Stewart http://www.portsmouth.co.uk/news/local/ex-navy-man-locked-up-for-child-sex-abuse-1-1246248 [184] 1999 Aug The Register Gulf War veteran gaoled for kiddie Web porn – Andrew Mein http://www.theregister.co.uk/1999/08/10/gulf_war_veteran_gaoled/ [185] 2012 May 19 Shields Gazette Victim watches as pervert jailed for 18 months Ian Whitaker http://www.shieldsgazette.com/news/crime/victim-watches-as-pervert-jailed-for-18-months-1-4564409 Ian Whitaker [186]  2012 May 1 Bournemouth Daily Echo Victim traces Royal Marine sex abuser 33 years after attack Norman Laven http://m.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/9679892.Victim_traces_Royal_Marine_sex_abuser_33_years_after_attack/?ref=arc [187] 2012 Dec 20 Derbyshire Times Pervert’s appeal is quashed by judge Michael Thomas Hilton http://www.derbyshiretimes.co.uk/news/grassroots/pervert-s-appeal-is-quashed-by-judge-1-5239401 [188] 2012 Mar 31 Gloucestershire Echo Geoffrey Poole Ex-police officer admits sex with teenager charge http://www.gloucestershireecho.co.uk/Ex-police-officer-admits-sex-teenager-charge/story-15677481-detail/story.html [189] 2006 Jan 18 BBC Child porn ex-officer spared jail Gordon Scott MBE  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4623956.stm [190]http://theukdatabase.com/2012/03/17/trevor-mulcahy-norwich/ [191]http://theukdatabase.com/2012/03/14/duncan-blair-winchester/ [192] 2014 Spet 19 Plymouth Herald Plymouth pervert jailed for secretly filming up skirts of girls -Mark Butler  http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Plymouth-pervert-jailed-secretly-filming-skirts/story-22952110-detail/story.html [193] 2011 Jan 28 Married man with distinguished Royal Navy career flashed at girls – John Noble http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Man-flashed-girls/story-11697328-detail/story.html [194] 2012 Apr 7 Scotsman Ex-Navy officer jailed after massive haul of child porn uncovered Derek Lawrence http://www.scotsman.com/news/scotland/top-stories/ex-navy-officer-jailed-after-massive-haul-of-child-porn-uncovered-1-2222047 [195] 2007 Jul 27 Mail Ex-Navy commander spared jail for downloading child porn and flashing at young girls – Craig Gilmour http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-471275/Ex-Navy-commander-spared-jail-downloading-child-porn-flashing-young-girls.html [196] 2009 May 5 Driffield Times and Post BREAKING NEWS – Ex Cherry Burton School governor jailed at Hull Crown Court over child porn photographs – Andrew Davies http://www.driffieldtoday.co.uk/news/local/breaking-news-ex-cherry-burton-school-governor-jailed-at-hull-crown-court-over-child-porn-photographs-1-830748 [197] 2011 Aug 12 Bristol Post Girls were abused by released killer – Derek Devine http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/Girls-abused-released-killer/story-13118454-detail/story.html [198] 2010 Jul 17  Liverpool Echo Doctor convicted of downloading child porn worked at Alder Hey Children’s Hospital – Stuart Ruthven http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/news/liverpool-news/doctor-convicted-downloading-child-porn-3401821 [200] 2008 Oct 25 Southern Daily Echo Falklands veteran jailed over child porn images Anthony Byrne http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/3791505.Falklands_veteran_jailed_over_child_porn_images/ [201] 2011 Oct 8 Plymouth Herald Pensioner jailed for sex assaults 20 years ago Douglas Harrison http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Pensioner-jailed-sex-assaults-20-years-ago/story-13503981-detail/story.html [202] 2010 Jul 21 Western Morning News Ex-Royal Navy sailor, 25, jailed for having sex with girl, aged 14 Aaron Emmett http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Jailed-sex-girl-14/story-11748973-detail/story.html [203] 2011 Jul 18 Plymouth Herald Ex-Navy sailor of 31 years avoids prison for child porn John Burroughs http://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/Ex-Navy-sailor-31-years-avoids-prison-child-porn/story-12963133-detail/story.html [204] 2010 Jan 16 West Briton Navy CPO admits child sex assaults Raymond Laundry http://www.westbriton.co.uk/Navy-CPO-admits-child-sex-assaults/story-11476653-detail/story.html [205] 2015 Mar 15 Bristol Post Flasher who performed lewd acts is banned from every coffee shop in Bristol Yusef Khan http://www.bristolpost.co.uk/Flasher-performed-lewd-acts-banned-coffee-shop/story-26175132-detail/story.html [206] 2015 Jan 1 Daily Mail EXCLUSIVE: Notorious British pervert accused of molesting eight-year-old boys in Philippines faces extradition over child sex offences linked to vile Paedophile Information Exchange group in the 1970s Douglas Slade http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2892279/Notorious-British-paedophile-accused-molesting-eight-year-old-boys-Philippines-set-extradited-child-sex-offences-linked-vile-PIE-group-Britain-1970s.html [207] Wikipedia  Frank Beck https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Beck_%28sex_offender%29 Beck spent nine years as a Royal Marine, serving in Borneo and Aden and attaining the rank of sergeant. He was honourably discharged. [208] 2010 Aug 7 Western Morning News Paedophile sent back to prison after being caught on internet days after jail release David McGuin http://www.westernmorningnews.co.uk/Paedophile-sent-prison/story-11659190-detail/story.html [209] 2004 Oct 1 BBC Navy officer jailed over e-mails Jeremy Pepper http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/3707464.stm [210] 2014 Oct 22 Wales online Paedophile Kirk Jobson jailed for four years after abusing two boys in the 1970s http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/paedophile-kirk-jobson-jailed-four-7980859 [211] 2008 Mar Aangirfan Jersey child abuse link to Islington, London http://aangirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2008/03/jersey-child-abuse-link-to-islington.html Anonymous said…I think that the supposed suicides of three policemen within a few of days of each other around the time the Jersey story broke is also highly suspicious. Although not mentioned in the link Neil Munro was rumoured to have been investigating the yachting community after allegations of children from the Jersey homes being loaned out to wealthy yachtsman. Another policeman Richard Fuller was a member of the Royal protection team. I personally think this could have something to do with Lord Mountbatten as well, who was reported to have been involved with the abuse at Kincora boys’ home in Ireland. It’s also been alleged that a second cousin to the Queen was involved in a paedophile ring that involved Thomas Hamilton, the Dunblane killer. Could that be Mountbatten again? There was also a photograph published in a paper which showed Jimmy Saville leaving the Jersey home, which has now disappeared out of circulation, and in the link below it mentions Saville’s possible connection to Mountbatten. [212] Royal Gov website http://www.royal.gov.uk/MonarchUK/ArmedForces/MembersoftheRoyalFamilyservingintheArmedForces.aspx [213] Wikipedia Military Service by Royal Family https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_service_by_the_members_of_the_British_Royal_Family [214] 2015 Aug 12 Harrogate Advertiser Nidderdale man jailed for historical sexual abuse John Michael Kendrew http://www.harrogateadvertiser.co.uk/news/crime/nidderdale-man-jailed-for-historical-sexual-abuse-1-7179482 [215]http://theukdatabase.com/2015/02/25/dennis-carroll-widnes/ [216] 2014 Feb 28 Daily Record Former museum boss caged for huge haul of vile child abuse images http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/in-your-area/former-museum-boss-caged-huge-3191322 [217] Burton Mail Derek Clark http://www.burtonmail.co.uk/seaman-admits-child-pornography  addiction/story-21474382-detail/story.html [218] George Dixon [219] 2012 Sept 21 Kent Online Ex-seaman Anthony Joy spared jail over child abuse and bestiality images http://www.kentonline.co.uk/kent/news/ex-seaman-anthony-joy-spared-jai-a60396/ [220] 2011 Jan 21 Gazette Dursley man jailed for sexually abusing two young girls Alan Johansen http://www.gazetteseries.co.uk/news/8805434.Dursley_man_jailed_for_sexually_abusing_two_young_girls/ [221] 2003 Sept 3 BBC  Gulf sailor had child porn Christopher Carey  http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/tyne/3078634.stm [222] Wales Online Kirk Jobson http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/paedophile-kirk-jobson-jailed-four-7980859 [224] < 2012 Dec 30 via Diss Express Michael Hazelwood http://timetostartcaring.com/2012/12/30/suffolk-man-jailed-for-child-sex-offences/ [225] 2010 Oct 9 Daily Post Colwyn Bay photographer had 15,000 child porn images Alan Hart http://www.dailypost.co.uk/news/north-wales-news/colwyn-bay-photographer-15000-child-2743103 [226] 2013 Jun 17 Coventry Telegraph Coventry child abuser fails appeal against lifelong jail sentence Joseph Richard Davey http://www.coventrytelegraph.net/news/coventry-news/coventry-child-abuser-fails-appeal-4331481 [227] 2015 Aug 6 Ricosorda Ulter Radio Interview with Lenny Harper http://ricosorda.blogspot.co.uk/2015/08/lenny-harper-ulster-radio-6th-august.html [228] Aangirfan Rape Torture and Murder of children http://aanirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2015/02/rape-torture-and-murder-of-children-on.html [229] 2014 Nov 25 BBC Dozens accused of historical abuse at Jersey care home http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-jersey-30199727 [230]  CHILD ABUSE ‘COVER-UP’; Police call off Sea Cadets abuse inquiry http://aangirfan.blogspot.co.uk/2008/09/child-abuse-cover-up-police-call-off.html [231] Daily Mail Soviet spy ‘copied risque pictures of a young Prince Philip partying with elite drinking club’ http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2456883/Soviet-spy-copied-risque-pictures-young-Prince-Philip-partying-elite-drinking-club.html [232] Chris Spivey Prince Philip Is this the sickest man in the UK? http://chrisspivey.org/prince-philip-is-this-the-sickest-man-in-the-uk/ [233] Wikipedia Frank Beck https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Beck_%28sex_offender%29 9 years as a marine. [234] Wikipedia Lord Moutbatten Admiral of the Fleet Louis Francis Albert Victor Nicholas Mountbatten, 1st Earl Mountbatten of Burma KG, GCB, OM, GCSI, GCIE, GCVO, DSO, PC, FRS From 1954 until 1959 he was First Sea Lord. Supreme Allied Commander South East Asia Command (1943–46). He was the last Viceroy of India (1947) and the first Governor-General of the independent Dominion of India (1947–48) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_Mountbatten,_1st_Earl_Mountbatten_of_Burma [235] Hallett Report No 1 http://www.theworldoftruth.net/GH/TheHallettReportNo1.html#.Vc5O9_mA_yI [236] Yachting World Prince Philip leads European Royals to Cowes for historic fleet review of yachts at Royal Yacht Squadron Prince Phillip http://www.yachtingworld.com/news/prince-philip-leads-european-royals-to-cowes-for-historic-fleet-review-of-yachts-at-royal-yacht-squadron-64858 [237] World of Truth http://www.theworldoftruth.net/HallettReport/No6.html#.Vc5u-vmA_yJ [238] 2012 Oct 19 Exmouth Journal Royal Marines ‘erase’ the memory of Jimmy Savile http://www.exmouthjournal.co.uk/news/royal_marines_erase_the_memory_of_jimmy_savile_1_1662912 [239] 2014 Jul 6 Daily Mail The making of a monster: Can sordid sexual depravity run in a family? In this ground-breaking analysis, the writer who has spent ten years probing the dark twisted mind of Jimmy Savile reveals the most deeply disturbing truths of all… http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2681719/The-making-monster-Can-sordid-sexual-depravity-run-family-In-ground-breaking-analysis-writer-spent-ten-years-probing-dark-twisted-mind-Jimmy-Savile-reveals-deeply-disturbing-truths-all.html [240] Cathy Fox Blog Leicestershire Child Abuse 1 – Frank Beck -working document https://cathyfox.wordpress.com/2015/04/19/child-abuse-in-leicestershire-working-document-frank-beck/ [A] Sanctuary for the Abused http://abusesanctuary.blogspot.co.uk/2006/07/for-survivors-coping-with-triggers-if.html [B] NAPAC http://www.napac.org.uk/ [C] One in Four http://www.oneinfour.org.uk/ [D] Havoca http://www.havoca.org/HAVOCA_home.htm [E] SurvivorsJustice Triggers post http://survivorsjustice.com/2014/02/26/triggers-what-are-they-and-how-do-we-work-through-them/ [F] SurvivorsJustice Blog http://survivorsjustice.com/ [G] Jim Hopper Mindfulness http://www.jimhopper.com/mindfulness/ [H] Jim Hopper Meditation http://www.jimhopper.com/mindfulness/#cultivate This is all written in good faith but if there is anything that needs to be corrected please email cathyfox@bigfoot.com cathyfox the truth will out, the truth will shout, the truth will set us free source:  https://www.cathyfox.wordpress.com/2015/04/15/boats-and-child-sexual-abuse/  

Originally posted on cathyfox blog:

This post is to highlight the use of boats in the abuse of children.

Abuse happens on various types of boats from narrowboats used as houseboats on canals to sea going yachts. Boats of course have advantages for abusers. They can be a venue for abuse with the captain having almost absolute power over his crew.

Boats are also means of transport – which can be used for carriage of pornographic books, tapes, images or even children and can cross more easily across borders without going through customs.

Boats are away from immediate interference of police, or authorities. Indeed it is often confusing which authorities even have jurisdiction if any or supervisory capacity over children. International waters,  children from several countries,  holidays in a private capacity are complicating factors.  In the Azimuth case the Foreign and Commonwealth Office and Social Services Inspectorate had to be called upon, whereas it would…

View original 14,007 more words

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Butler-Sloss Is Character Witness For Alleged Paedophile.

 

New post on theneedleblog

Butler-Sloss Is Character Witness For Alleged Paedophile.

by gojam

Evidence, if it is needed, that I’m not infallible. A year ago I posted that I thought that Butler-Sloss should be given a chance as chair of the CSA Inquiry.

Now she’s a character witness for an alleged paedophile !

Eeeeerrrm…

I’m very pleased I have readers that are willing to point out when I’m wrong.

_84867952_76191428

A retired High Court Judge has given evidence on behalf of a man who is on trial for raping a 13-year-old girl.

Baroness Butler-Sloss told Exeter Crown Court she had 34 years experience of dealing with child abuse cases.

She gave character evidence on behalf of Philip Chard, 44, on trial for rape and sexual abuse of the girl.

The baroness was appointed in July 2014 to lead an inquiry into allegations of historical child abuse but stood down before the inquiry started.

Lady Butler-Sloss, who is a working peer in the House of Lords, said Mr Chard’s mother, Valerie, had been her cleaning lady at her home in East Devon for 20 years.

She said she knew Chard because he often took his mother to her home to work and sometimes stayed there for a couple of hours.

She said: “I had no concerns about Mr Chard. I was astonished by these allegations. I think he is a much less probable offender than many I have come across.”

Former doorman Chard, of Dawlish Park Terrace, Lympstone, denies rape and five counts of sexual activity with a child.

The girl has told Exeter Crown Court how Chard crept into her bedroom when she was staying overnight at his home.

Chard told the jury nothing sexual happened during the night or on a number of previous occasions.

The trial continues.

BBC News

source: https://theneedleblog.wordpress.com/2015/08/15/butler-sloss-is-character-witness-for-alleged-paedophile/

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

JANNER MAKES 1ST COURT APPEARANCE 14 AUG. BBC – JANNER LAWYERS LOSE HIGH COURT BID OVER CHILD ABUSE CHARGES 13 AUG. 2015 BBC + JANNER ARCHIVE

video of Janner arriving at court  https://embed.theguardian.com/embed/video/uk-news/video/2015/aug/14/lord-greville-janner-arrives-court-after-judge-threatens-arrest-video

Greville Janner arrives at court to face child abuse allegations after his lawyers failed to prevent him being forced to attend. The former Labour peer arrived at Westminster magistrates court in central London on Friday afternoon in a silver car, hours after he was initially due. The deputy chief magistrate warned Janner’s barrister, Paul Ozin, that she would have him arrested if the matter was not resolved quickly

Lord Janner appears in court over child sex abuse charges

  • 46 minutes ago – BBC News
  • From the section UK
Sketch of Lord Janner in court

Lord Janner was escorted into the courtroom by a minder and woman believed to be his daughter

Lord Janner has appeared in court for the first time over historical child sex abuse charges.

The 87-year-old, who has dementia, appeared at Westminster Magistrates’ Court for less than a minute.

Lord Janner faces 22 charges spanning the 1960s to the 1980s and was told his case would be sent to crown court.

continues @  http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-33931860

 Lord Janner makes first court appearance over child sex abuse claims – “Guardian”

Former Labour peer finally, and briefly, attends hearing in relation to 22 abuse allegations after lawyers fail in last-ditch attempt to prevent it

Greville Janner has appeared in court for the first time to face a series of child sexual abuse allegations stretching back to the 1960s.

The former Labour peer was driven into Westminster magistrates court in chaotic scenes on Friday afternoon, as his saloon car was besieged by television crews and photographers.

Lord Janner, who has Alzheimer’s disease, appeared drawn and confused during his 59 second appearance before deputy chief magistrate Emma Arbuthnot. .

Continues, with video: http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/aug/14/lord-janner-makes-first-court-appearance-over-child-sex-abuse-claims?CMP=share_btn_fb

JANNER ARCHIVE =

JANNER LAWYERS LOSE HIGH COURT BID OVER CHILD ABUSE CHARGES 13 AUG. 2015 BBC + JANNER ARCHIVE.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

JUSTICE FOR ASSANGE – STATEMENT UPON HEARING THE EXPIRY OF 3 ALLEGATIONS – FAQ, TIMELINE, BACKGROUND

ass3

Justice for Assange Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

CENTREPOINT, LONDON: HELP HOMELESS PEOPLE OFF THE STREET – FOREVER!! SPONSOR A ROOM @ CENTREPOINT!

centre p 13aug15

Sponsor a room now!!  https://www.centrepointroom.org.uk/signup/form_1

cen2

source:  http://www.centrepointroom.org.uk/john?AppealID=RWA1516FB&PackageID=C089&utm_source=FB&utm_medium=RWA1516&utm_campaign=C089&xtor=AD-2029-[C089]-[/]-[RS]-[FB]

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

ASSANGE – THE INHUMAN ENFORCED DETENTION audio,video: “Sex crime allegations against WikiLeaks chief Assange to expire in days”

Sex crime allegations against WikiLeaks chief Assange to expire in days    

FILE PHOTO © Olivia Harris
Sexual assault allegations leveled against Julian Assange are set to expire within a week due to Sweden’s statute of limitations. The WikiLeaks editor has never been charged and maintains the allegations are baseless.
Three out of four potential charges of unlawful coercion and sexual molestation against Assange have a five-year limit under Swedish law, and will expire on August 18.
The 44-year-old Australian has been based in the Ecuadorian embassy in London since 2012, and continues to deny the allegations.
Sweden announced on Wednesday it is ready to negotiate an agreement which could enable prosecutors to question Assange at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London over the claims. A previous attempt in June was dropped, with both states accusing each other of blocking the proceedings.
Swedish prosecutors had previously refused to travel to Britain to meet the WikiLeaks founder, but changed their minds in March citing the impending expiration of three out of four allegations.
According to a law and policy blog, authored by Financial Times commentator David Allen Green, two allegations of sexual molestation and one allegation of unlawful coercion will expire on August 14, 17 and 18 respectively.

The claims date back to 2010 and were made by a woman known only as AA, who accused Assange of trying to have sex with her without a condom.
After they expire, Assange will never be required to formally answer questions about what happened in August 2010 and will never be charged for the alleged offences.
However a fourth allegation of rape, made by a woman known as SW, will remain on the books as it has a ten-year limit.
The Swedish government confirmed that Ecuador has welcomed its offer of talks, which was made last Thursday and accepted by Quito on Monday.
A European Arrest Warrant (EAW) was issued in Assange’s name in 2010 and, following a series of legal challenges by the WikiLeaks founder, resulted in Britain’s Supreme Court upholding the warrant in May 2012.
Assange was granted political asylum by Ecuador in 2012 and moved into its London embassy in order to avoid extradition to Sweden.
The WikiLeaks editor believes he will be sent to the United States to face questions over a number of explosive US government leaks including the 2010 ‘Cablegate’ publication of diplomatic cables.

After years of refusing to interview Assange regarding the allegations in the UK, Swedish Director of Public Prosecutions Marianne Ny relented in March 2015 and agreed to travel to London.

However, the meeting planned for June 17 was called off at the last minute, as Ny said Sweden had not received official permission from Ecuador to enter its London embassy. Assange scorned Ny’s decision, saying it was nothing more than “a public relations exercise.

Sweden and Ecuador have said they will begin talks regarding a second attempt to interview Assange, however they did not stipulate a timeframe.
A member of Assange’s legal team, Jen Robinson, says that a number of important questions have been raised, adding that “Julian hasn’t been charged, yet he is being punished.”

First, they refused to take his testimony while he remained in Sweden. Then they refused to hear it in the UK, saying it was illegal to come here. Five years later, after being rebuked by their own courts, they say they’ll consider it,” she told the Press Association.
Instead of hearing what he had to say, the prosecutor chose to cast a shadow of suspicion over Julian by seeking his extradition. We offered his testimony from London before the arrest warrant was issued, and have continued to offer it since.

The British government has so far spent £12 million (US$18.6 million) on a round-the-clock police operation outside the Ecuadorian embassy, with officers standing guard, poised to arrest Assange if he leaves the premises.

LISTEN MORE:

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

NEW HOPE FOR RABBITS!! WHO NEEDS ANGORA WOOL FROM RABBITS?? ONLY IDIOTS, THATS WHO!!

 

New Hope for Rabbits!
 

New Hope for Rabbits!

Donate Now

Dear you,

Ninety per cent of the world’s angora wool comes from China, where there are no animal-protection laws.

Since PETA Asia’s groundbreaking investigation of the angora industry first documented the intense pain endured by rabbits whose fur is ripped from their skin on Chinese farms, angora has become almost as reviled as fur among many retailers, designers and consumers.

We need your support to help keep that tremendous momentum going – and allow us to accomplish even more for rabbits and all other animals.

If you see a cardigan, a hat or another retail item that contains angora, the wool to make it most likely originated in China, even if the finished product is marked as having been made or assembled elsewhere – which is why the release of PETA Asia’s exposé sent such powerful shockwaves through the global fashion industry. Within hours, PETA’s international affiliates began receiving e-mails and phone calls from major retailers asking to meet with them, and ever since, we’ve continued to see tremendous progress that is helping to save rabbits’ lives.

The release of PETA Asia’s investigation grabbed headlines around the world, and already more than 4 million people have seen the disturbing video footage of rabbits screaming on angora farms as their hair is ripped out by the handful. Even in China itself, PETA Asia’s tweets about the exposé on Sina Weibo – that country’s Twitter-like service – were shared nearly 60,000 times, reaching more than 20 million Chinese consumers through the popular social network.

PVH Corp – the parent company of Calvin Klein, Tommy Hilfiger and many other brands – was among the first to move to ban angora, announcing that it was pulling angora from its store shelves just days after the investigation broke. In the following months, dozens of caring retailers moved to join it, including fashion giants AllSaints, Mango, New Look, Lacoste and Topshop. The world’s largest clothing retailer, Inditex – owner of Zara and other popular brands – not only permanently banned angora products from its clothing lines but also donated 20,000 brand-new angora wool garments from previous seasons to Syrian refugees in Lebanon.

john, we’ve seen so much tremendous progress towards ending the suffering of rabbits and other animals in the last year, and your support right now will help PETA’s vital work move forward.

In June, massive international retailer Benetton – a company with nearly 6,000 stores around the world – moved to ban angora less than a day after a PETA day of action mobilised thousands to contact the Italian company about its angora sales. Global fashion brand HUGO BOSS also recently confirmed it will no longer sell products containing angora.

Ending horrific abuses like those revealed by PETA Asia is a huge task requiring a sustained effort, and we won’t stop working for rabbits and all other animals until the abuse stops.

Please support our campaigns by making the most generous gift that you can right away.

Your action today will make a difference for animals.

Kind regards,


Ingrid E Newkirk
Founder

PS: We must keep the great momentum going and continue to stop the abuse of thousands of rabbits and other animals, but much of that further success depends on the help of caring PETA donors. Please make a much-needed gift online right NOW!

sourcehttps://www.e-activist.com/ea-campaign/action.handleViewInBrowser.do?ea.campaigner.email=us8xaX9a2f%2BQ0QOjf8ClwXAKavcdc8QFxBrO2W%2B4sz4=&broadcastId=84934&templateId=61125

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

SWEDISH PROSECUTORS INTERVIEWED 44 SUBJECTS IN THE UK, BUT NOT ASSANGE – IS THIS OUTRAGEOUS OR WHAT?? + AUDIO

Double standards? Sweden interviews 44 in London, but not Assange

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. ©

Julian Assange is believed to have been ‘victimized’ by Swedish prosecutors following revelations that they interviewed 44 people in the UK, but refused to interview the WikiLeaks head in the Ecuadorian Embassy, where he has been for over three years.

A Freedom of Information request submitted by the Hazel Press news organization has revealed that Sweden has granted 44 requests to interview witnesses or suspects in the UK since 2010, the Press Association reports. This has led supporters of the WikiLeaks founder to claim that Assange has been “singled out,” as he has also agreed to be interviewed by Swedish prosecutors inside the embassy concerning sex allegations in the Scandinavian country.

A member of Assange’s legal team, Jen Robinson, says that a number of important questions have been raised, adding that “Julian hasn’t been charged, yet he is being punished.”

First, they refused to take his testimony while he remained in Sweden. Then they refused to hear it in the UK, saying it was illegal to come here. Five years later, after being rebuked by their own courts, they say they’ll consider it,” she told the Press Association.

ASS2

  WikiLeaks
 https://twitter.com/wikileaks

 

@wikileaks

The Julian case—here are five important facts. Find out more: http://justice4assange.com 

“Instead of hearing what he had to say, the prosecutor chose to cast a shadow of suspicion over Julian by seeking his extradition. We offered his testimony from London before the arrest warrant was issued, and have continued to offer it since.”

In March, the Swedish director of public prosecutions, Marianne Ny, agreed to question Assange on Ecuadorian embassy soil, as the sexual assault allegations reach the statute of limitations in August.

However, the meeting planned for June 17 was called off at the last minute, as Ny said Sweden had not received official permission from Ecuador to enter its London embassy. Assange scorned Ny’s decision, saying it was nothing more than “a public relations exercise.”

eanwhile, UK human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell said that by agreeing to interview 44 people in the UK, but not Assange, Sweden was “guilty of double standards and victimization,” adding they are “making an exception of him.”

It is wrong to deny Assange the option to be interviewed in the UK, which has been extended to others and which he has been offering for five years,” the Press Association cited him as saying.

The Swedish authorities are not applying the law about overseas interviews consistently and fairly. They are acting in an exceptional and discriminatory way towards Assange. Julian Assange has been in various forms of detention for five years, without ever having been charged with any offence. This amounts to pre-trial punishment and is a gross abuse of his human rights and the legal system.

If Assange steps out of the Ecuador Embassy, he will be arrested and extradited to Sweden. Police officers are keeping a round the clock watch on the Australian’s refuge, which has already cost the British tax payer more than £12 million ($18.6 million).ASS 1108152

  WikiLeaks  

Will the Cameron government spend another £12 million to detain a person who hasn’t been charged, simply because Sweden refuses to make use of the mechanisms available to resolve Julian’s case?” Robinson asked.

The 43 year-old sought asylum in the embassy because he fears that his extradition to Sweden on suspicion of rape and sexual assault will lead to his transfer to the US, where he could face trial over WikiLeaks’ publication of classified US documents.

Assange denies Sweden’s accusations, calling them politically motivated. He claims that the ultimate goal of this legal process is to transfer him to the United States.

source:  http://www.rt.com/news/312116-assange-sweden-victimization-interview/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

LENNY HARPER: “NO COMPLAINTS AGAINST EDWARD HEATH IN JERSEY” [there were of course – it was all just covered up!]

 

Lenny Harper: ‘No Complaints Against Edward Heath In Jersey’

Lenny Harper is concerned that the Edward Heath allegations could be used as a smokescreen to cover-up other allegations on Jersey

Reblogged from the excellent Rico Sorda Blog~

Seven years after former Senior Investigating Officer, Lenny Harper, retired from the States of Jersey  Police he is still sought after by journalists and responds to any requests concerning the Jersey Child Abuse Investigation (Operation Rectangle). This is in stark contrast to the disappearing, leaking to David Rose, Mick Gradwell who took over from Lenny Harper in September 2008. It will be interesting to see if Mick Gradwell does indeed turn up to the Jersey Committee of Enquiry.

.

Lenny Harper has always been there to support the cause of victims of child abuse. Seven years after retiring from the jersey police force his support has never faltered as further demonstrated in the recording below. .

Lenny Harper reminds us that there are still suspected abusers working with vulnerable children in the sates of jersey (in the interview below) .

There is no doubt that the truth of the cover-up is coming out in the Committee of Enquiry..

Reblogged from the excellent Rico Sorda Blog

Leave a comment

Filed under Abuse, Jersey, News

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

EDWARD HEATH, the BBC -“PAEDOPHILES ARE US” GOES TO NEW [LOW] LEVELS- from M. Murrin 10 Aug. ’15

Campaign Against Child Abuse

FACEBOOK POST – 9th AUGUST 2015.

https://www.facebook.com/pages/Campaign-Against-Child-Abuse/621212031266307?ref=bookmarks

EDWARD HEATH (THE PAEDOPHILE) AND HIS FRIENDS.

For those not familiar with the allegations that have been circulating concerning the former Prime Minister, Edward Heath, allow me to enlighten you. Heath is alleged to have been a supporter / member of the Paedophile Information Exchange (PIE). He is also alleged to have been involved in snuff movies and child killing. Yes it all sounds unbelievable but set this in the context of the Commissioner of The Metropolitan Police having already gone on record as saying they are investigating the alleged involvement of former government ministers, et al, in child killing at Dolphin Square. Those who now dive in to protect their former ‘colleague’ and ‘friend’ would be well advised to take a step back.


Then there are those who are now saying in the national media (Nick Ross of the BBC is among them), who dare to suggest,  that just because these evil acts were perpetrated upon children 30 / 40 / 50 years ago the perpetrators should not be exposed and/or brought to book. Personally I expect such petitioning from the BBC and some of its employees. The organisation was responsible of harbouring legions of paedophiles and furthering their social /liberal agenda. When they had the documentation and information that would have enabled them to destroy PIE they chose not to use it. They deliberately suppressed it. I would like to see these paedophile apologists (Nick Ross among them) come face to face with the victims of the perpetrators of this evil and tell them why they should be denied justice.


Roy Jenkins, the former Labour Home Secretary and ‘architect of the permissive society, was also a PIE supporter. There are serving Peers from the Labour benches who also supported PIE. The deputy leader of the Labour Party, Harriet Harmen, Jack Dromey, MP, and the former Labour cabinet minister, Patricia Hewitt all provided PIE with credibility and a safe haven when they allowed it to affiliate with the NCCL.


PIE was the epicentre of paedophilia in the United Kingdom from 1974 – 1984. Heath, et al, supported it. Harman, Dromey & Hewitt, in effect, promoted it. You ain’t seen, read or heard, nothing yet. Brian Binley, Nick Ross and their like minded supporters should take note and reassess their priorities.

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3190773/Rein-police-lynch-mob-former-Heath-aide-urges-Home-Secretary-faces-calls-curb-vigilante-style-behaviour-wake-child-abuse-allegations-against-late-former-Prime-Minister.html

http://www.express.co.uk/comment/columnists/nick-ferrari/597110/Nick-Ferrari-Ted-Heath-government-corruption

“Why on the scantiest of evidence are the police encouraging such a fuss over Mr Heath who, after all, died ten years ago? The huge publicity is bound to excite fantasists, as well as false memory syndrome from which none of us is immune.”

THE VOICE OF COMPLACENCY???

Nick Ross – BBC TV Presenter – Crimewatch

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-3190690/Why-prioritising-crimes-50-years-ago-crimes-50-minutes-wake-Heath-scandal-BBC-star-NICK-ROSS-provocative-view.html

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Sabine McNeil ARRESTED in the RCJ, London UK. August 4, 2015

 

Saturday, 8 August 2015

Sabine McNeil ARRESTED in the RCJ, London UK.  August 4, 2015

The Sabine McNeil Show !!

– written by Ella and Abe.  August 6, 2015.

Why did Sabine choose to return to the U.K. the day before the appeal hearing ?

Hampstead Cover Up The McKenzie “Friends” Staged Arrest At The Satanic Courts Of InJustice

Published on Aug 5, 2015
first 2 mins is audio with video added. This Video was not edited how i wanted it, and it got leaked after i shared it privately with someone. I woke up, and saw 170 views. So Now Its Live. This had 18 dislikes before I made it public, by the trolls/cult and some of them are in the video  – Guidance 2222

Why did Belinda visit Collindale Police Station last week?

Was it because she was in “fear of her life” as she alleges ?

Why did Jaqui Farmer/Charlotte/Scarlett make a point on Hampstead Research of supporting this lie/charade by reporting that the alleged death threat had been sent to Ella and Abraham’s legal team ?

Is this the same Jacqui/Charlotte/Scarlett/Ward that lived with Belinda for a year and who assisted her in court on various occasions, who also runs the Hampstead Research Psy-op ?

Belinda Tavispeaking her “alleged” death threat >> Belinda: 

I’m a completely public person; I’ve never hidden behind false names or avatars, I sit here in my house day after day in full view of anyone passing by in the street; anyone can knock the door and I’ll open it so if anyone wants to stick a knife or a bullet in me on my front doorstep it would be the easiest thing in the world to do. As for what will happen if you do come back, that was explained to me last week by DS Paul Speer of Barnet police Public Protection Unit who said he organised the raiding party which visited you on 12th February (he regrets the fact that he didn’t force the door straightaway!!) and he will be handling the operation of receiving you, were you to decide to come back. You will be picked up at the port and be taken into police custody for questioning and you will most likely be released on bail pending trial but by now I don’t trust any police and they might hold you on remand at least during the court proceedings so the public can’t see you BUT we would see you at the Appeal on 4th August, they would have to bring you to that.

Belinda, didn’t you tell your friend DS Speer that Ella was innocent as you had written to the RCJ and Pauffley Belinda ?

Did Belinda McKenzie and Sabine McNeill organise the staged arrest of her “joined at the hip” charity-scamming-colleague Sabine McNeill whilst chatting with her friend DS Speer?”

Was this a staged arrest performed to redirect the energy of many the REAL supporters to Collindale police station where Sabine McNeill was taken in the afternoon, off the appeal hearing when the predetermined verdict was announced to cries of “child abusers” from the remaining supporters in the public gallery ??

– AND an attempt to maintain the illusion that they are actually working to help Ella and her children in order for the Mckenzie “friends” to continue fleecing the public, all in the name of “charity” ?

Detective Sergeant ‘I Believe Ella Draper’ – Hampstead Whistleblower Kids

Published on Mar 30, 2015

Christ Church Hampstead Sunday 29 March 2015

Watch Belinda McKenzie in the top video and compare her performance to the one at the Christ Church vigils when Belinda McKenzie and FBI stooge “Christine Ann Sands” [bogus name used by the FBI informant CAS], play supporting roles to ex-policeman Ray Savage as he redirects the energy of the Church vigils to the Elections. 

These two (McKenzie nor McNeill) obviously haven’t heard Ella and Abraham’s latest interview with guidance 2222 , OR read Drifloud’s latest, exposing the mechanics of their combined effort with others at the RCJ to frame and jail Ella for something that the Mckenzie Friends knew she was innocent of, or were they too busy planning this little theatre. 

What is with the Cult and theatrics ? After 5 months of no contact with the Mckenzie “Friends” due to their continued treachery and attempted Tavispeak “handling ” of the case, Ella has issued a statement publicly disassociating from the Mckenzie “Friends”…

Dear Sirs, 

Yesterday Mrs Belinda McKenzie forwarded me an email addressed to both of you. I am stating here that neither Mrs Belinda McKenzie, nor Ms Sabine McNeill, nor any other members of McKenzie Association are part of the proceedings (case No. ZC14c00315 ) and have nothing to do with me, Ella Draper or my children who are the focus of the case. They do not represent us.

Sincerely yours, Ella Draper.

 This was sent to the court and supporters yesterday. (Aug 5, 2015)

Posted in HAMPSTEAD "WHISTLEBLOWER KIDS" SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE [SRA], Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

HEATH: MET ALSO INVESTIGATES CLAIMS OF CHILD SEX ABUSE

heath1heath2

source: http://www.exaronews.com/articles/5629/sir-edward-heath-met-also-investigates-claims-of-child-sex-abuse

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

WHO WANTED KAY SHUT UP? + HAMPSTEAD SRA: DRIFLOUD SPEAKS OUT + more

WHO WANTED KAY SHUT UP?

“Kay was a strong Musa family supporter. right from the very beginning of the family’s troubles – her story is online.

On a date in January 2012 I was staying at B Mckenzies house in N London and I was speaking on my mobile phone to Kay, and we were discussing the merits of the asst. solicitor for Musas defence. This conversation took some 15 minutes or so and I found out at a date shortly after that after my call to Kay Sabine Mcneil had called Kay directly after I had finished speaking with Kay to berate her most strongly, shouting at her over the phone about her and myself criticising the asst. solicitor. What had happened was that Ms. Mckenzie had gone into another room from where she was overhearing my conversation with Kay and had called Mcneil whilst I was on my mobile to Kay, telling Mcneil about our criticising the asst. solicitor. I was surprised Mckenzie could do this as I was actually on the phone to Kay when she called Mcneil from another room – a room used as her office. Both myself and Kay had been critical of the defence team, and obviously Mcneil and Mckenzie would hear no wrong said about them – would hear no wrong about a defence team who performed miserably throughout the trial omitting much vital evidence, calling only 2 witnesses for the Musas defence to the prosecutions 44, and a whole lot more. I, and others, believe this lame performance was premeditated and deliberate. The Musas have now done 25 months in prison – that certainly was no defence team – and Mcneils angry attack on Kay, and myself indirectly via that phone call defending these legal types I believe says a lot – that no way should this defence team be criticised in any way, possibly leading to a change of defence representatives for the Musas. That way the defence team would be kept, to perform a dismal performance defending these tortured parents, and they would go on to receive their length sentence.

Kay was intimidated so much by the authorities for being a worthy supporter that she had to flee the country. leaving all her possessions and everything behind, in order to stay with her child who, she alleges, was to be taken from her because she was a Musa supporter and basically knew the score about things, so she left everything overnight and fled to Eire to try and get away from this unacceptable victimisation, but the long arm of collusion and intimidation followed her to Eire where her life was immediately made unbearable there too – she was denied any benefits, having to rely on friends and finding it almost impossible to get accomodation at first {the landlords siding with the authorities} the balatant vindictiveness grew from the locals who had been fed a pack of lies by certain people making her stay there an extremely unpleasant one, and after 7 months she finally gave in and returned from whence she came after realising her life and that of her child may have very much have been in danger there. Atypical email received at the time from Kay:

From: k

Sent: 26 January 2012 11:14:51
 To: me

Hello J,

Sorry, I just do not feel I can trust anyone anymore to evenexplain…. PLEASE DO NOT TAKE THIS PERSONALLY. I am very much alone here – -CERTAIN THE PERSON/S who originallyhelped me when I got here – HAVE BEEN PAID OFF….. they couldsuddenly afford to DECORATE THEIR HOME DESPITE 1 being a STUDENT andthe other ON DISABILITY ALLOWANCE… The person let slip the wallpaper they were putting around their fire place cost the equivalent of£10 A ROLL!!! I also noticed a GREEN ‘P’ FOR PASSED SIGN on their car (which hasnow suddenly changed back to a ‘RED’ ‘L’ SIGN — after she had seenme … ANOTHER PERSON who was involved in helping me when I got here— when I saw her in TESCO HERE – DID NOT ASK ME “Hello, how are youdoing?” – BUT ASKED ME “HELLO, WHEN ARE YOU GOING BACK TO ENGLAND!”. I am disappointed that even someone who had lost HER CHILDREN to UK SShas done this to me too.. Sadly, she is trusted amongst many otherswho help people. Tc – K
——————————————————+

From: kay
 Sent: 26 January 2012 11:34:00
 To: me

John – thank you for your message.. (below) – I AM PREPARING those who know / care for me to EXPECT MY DEATH / FALSE IMPRISONMENT / SECTION TO A MENTAL INSTITUTION AND / OR MY CHILD BEING TAKEN FROM ME…. WHICH WILL ALSO BE FABRICATED.

I HAVE HAD TO – ESPECIALLY NOW I KNOW 100% there are MORE PERSONS INVOLVED IN HATFIELD, HERTFORDSHIRE – where I lived and in the ‘Adult Mental Health’ Depts there.

I feel so very sick….. and sad … and alone …. and gutted ….. and scared for my child and all children…

I HOPE THEY ALL ROT IN HELL FOR THEIR WICKEDNESS.

Take care – let me know how you get on today. K

—————————————————
From: butlincat
 To: kay
 Subject: RE: LOST
 Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:17:16 +0000

hey = dont get too despondant…things might not turn out as bad as you think…try and stay positive and you are not alone…and anyway i will always try and help you, and in reality i dont tink ill be going anywhere for quite a while, even tho i say stupid things to the opposite, so please just try and stay positive or it will be no good…bye for now
—————————————————-

I for one contacted numerous government departments and figures about this entire situation to be ignored wholesale every time I wrote by each and every one contacted.
 During the unpleasantness of Kays return i was appalled to get an email from someone who claims outright to help people in exactly the position Kay Young was in. I received the email below which i found outrageous in the fact that the person wanted Kay “shut up” as she was deemed “a problem” by this character. I was shocked at the hypocracy – the email =

“From: b.mckenzie@
 > To: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk

> Subject: Musas

> Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:56:08 +0000>

> Hi John

> Are you OK? haven’t heard from you in a while. Have you given up on

> the Musas? I don’t blame you not being able to come up so often

> anymore, it’s a miracle you managed that awful journey as many times as

you did.>

> Yesterday Haringey weren’t ready to start the proceedings, had only

> just served the indictment!

> So the ‘Plea & Case Management’ hearing has been deferred till 29th

> February. Another month!

> Don & new barrister Mr O (couldn’t quite get his name) seem confident

> there are enough cards in the Musas’ hands to win this criminal case.

> But in the meantime adoption proceedings commence this month and the

> final care hearing is next month which is why Haringey are delaying

> things.

> Must tell you that Kay is a problem. Not only did she send abusive

> emails to the family doctor (which is why bail was refused, but of

> course any excuse) but she’s also been sending really rude ones to Don, he

showed them to me.

> “She is not helping the Musas doing this kind of thing” he said, I agreed.

> Is there any way of shutting her up? but I know she can be prickly.

> Can you try please, John?

> Really hope everything’s OK with you! Also that chap you’re in touch

> with every day.

> Love

> Belindax”

The emails mentioned that Kay is supposed to have sent is an outright gross exagerration, and blatant lies have been told about them – premeditated exagerrated lies used by the incompetant puppets the defence team who were only too happy to have something to hold against Kay Young.No emails from Kay have ever been produced in or out of court and the mentioning of them is being deliberately used as some kind of tool against her – a nonsensical tool to make her seem erratic, unpredictable and even not worthy of trust. If anybody should have been called as a witness in the Musa trial Kay should of been as she was there from the very beginning of the case, but with stuff like this being thrown at her making her seem irresponsible it is easy to see why she wasnt called. Actually only 2 witnesses out of a potentially huge figure were actually called but that is down to the failings of the cdefence team and a seperate subject. Anyway a certain person has admitted sending emails to members of the defence team UNDER AN ASUMED NAME – this i have in writing in an email from that person – also linked closely to Mcneil and this farcical “Mckenzie friend” set-up.

The asst. solicitor for the defence team used the excuses prior to the picking of the witnesses for the defence that Kay wouldnt be called as a witness because she might “lose it” whilst in the witness box, as he told me personally one day during the beginning of the Musa criminal trial, beginning May 2012. He seemed to think she might get angry and upset and thus do damage perhaps to the case, thus depriving the Musas of a valuable witness, and blackening her good name at the same time. Note this asst. solicitor has never ever met Kay, or even spoken to her, and is basing his outrageous assumptions on total rubbish got from people such as who wrote the rubbish email to me above telling me Kay is a “problem” and should be “shut up”. The entire subject of any emails that Kay is supposed to have sent is not worth bothering about, and I know for a fact many people have sent emails to the defence team complaining about their poor performance when defending the Musas – I myself have made my feelings known to these characters and i know of others who have admitted using false names when writing to them on the subject. Note only Kay is ever mentioned regarding sending emails to the defence team – and noone else.
 Certain people did want Kay Young “shut up”, and as has been shown they would use the most underhand method of trying to achieve that aim, even asking me to do it!!

Also, in between the end of the Musa criminal trial and the date the initial appeal docs had to be given in by to the court – around the end of July and mid Autumn respectively – lunches were held between at least mcneil, and probably mckenzie, with the defence team barristers in London – probably at some up market café somewhere. This assembly could only have met to discuss what must have been the topic of the day – the Musas had been sentenced and with the appeal coming up there was only one thing to discuss – what was going to make up the appeal submission – something to this day Chiwar Musa has never seen! No other Musa supporters knew about these clandestine meetings taking place whatsoever, even though certain longtime supporters had a much greater knowledge of the case than this pair put together along with the barristers and others that attended these meetings. Why has Chiwar never been allowed to see his own defence appeal submission? Could the submission have been so lame and lacking in proper substance Chiwar would have objected greatly to its contents? That is a good question – Chiwar has asked for a very long time for his appeal docs, but never got them. I have asked the court on his behalf as a Mckenzie friend too for them – even going along to the appeal court itself and asking – but always the request is refused, and my recorded delivery letter to the defence barrister asking for the docs was returned unoped by the post office a month after sending. Anyway, secret meetings and the consequent results of appeals and the behaviour of certain legal representatives I feel speak for themselves. Dark breeds more dark – and every appeal the Musas have put forward have all failed.
 I was told the information about these clandestine meetings by another supporter who had got fed up with certain things via emails, [which i still have], and decided to tell me about these these meetings, and more that i wasnt aware of.
 My questions are – how come no long term supporters were present at these meetings? There isn’t exactly a shortage of them. Remember only 2 witnesses were called at all out of the many supporters the Musas had at the their “criminal” trial, where both Gloria and Chiwar received 7 years imprisonment each. I had met and stayed many times with the Musas since meeting them in April 2011 – Kay had known and supported them for over a year longer, and been through hell and back because of the actions taken against her by certain authorities [something the mcneil and mckenzies of this world always ignore], yet we have always been treated as idiots by this defence team, and by mcneil and mcKenzie also – a typical example being the holding of clandestine lunches. I still maintain they know little of the case – events and details I witnessed whilst with them at hearings or whatever and those things Kay had witnessed from before i came along that Chiwar and Gloria had taken hours telling me about during my stays with them. I had gone on contact visits with Chiwar and Gloria to see their children [I waited in a cafe nearby] a few times and seen for myself how they were mistreated at the contact centre miles away in Surrey 20 miles away as the crow flies – or a whole lot longer via train, tube and bus, and then a 30 minute walk on arrival at Croyden. Often the contact centre would be shut upon arriving on a preorganised visit, or Chiwar would be ejected from the contact meeting with some of his siblings after only 10 minutes. I saw how the council refused to pay the Musas travel expenses for over 40 contact visit journeys – something the Musas were fully entitled to, and I saw the invalid and void travel warrants or tickets they were given to use on these journeys, and how, when they complained to the council showing them the accumulated 40+ void travel tickets the council, and even a judge once, completely ignored their complaints and refused to honour their responsibilities to reimburse their travel costs by law they were entitles to. These contact visit journeys with the void travel warrants went on from April 2010 until November 2011, and half the time the children the Musas had hoped to see werent even brought to the contact visit, with lame excuses being made as to why the children didnt attend.
 Anyway, I digress.
 So, the appeal submission documents Chiwar Musa does not have and has not seen surely were originated at these clandestine lunches, and discussed between these 2 so-called “supporters” and this lame defence team.
 The female barrister representing Gloria never visited her once – not once – throughout Gloria’s imprisonment beginning Nov. 28 2011. The other barrister representing Chiwar went hardly once or twice also. The assistant solicitor, making up the final member of this defence team, also hardly visited the Musas whilst imprisoned as he should have. What a team!! The female barrister representing Gloria didn’t bother either turning up at the final criminal appeal, held in Febuary 2014, which, of course, failed miserably. New details for the appeal submission – a revised and much fuller and more relavent medical statement written by a biochemist supporter – was submitted but ignored out of hand. This entire case has been riddled with serious irregularities from day one – not helped by these so-called “supporters” mentioned already.

There is a lot more that should be put here, but that will have to suffice for now.

This is a true sworn statement – J. Graham

[ends]

The  [alleged] “Mackenzie Friends” group is a fake set-up, with dubious aims. I am a real M. Friend for the Musas, and refused to join the set-up when it was formed late 2011/early 2012 because i knew something was wrong. Former MP Hemming, ex-Yardley, Birmingham MP is a gatekeeper who worked with Mcneil when MP, and, for all I know, still does. Why did he do nothing about the decade-long Birmingham child scandal? He was MP there for 5 years!!

source: http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/child-sexual-exploitation-bombshell-official-8862316

————————————————————————————————

DRIFLOUD SPEAKS UP AND SPEAKS OUT!!

ToothlessGetRuthless

———————

How to Arrange the Arrest/Imprisonment of a “Troublesome” Mum Who Loves Her Children and WILL NOT Accept That Social Services and the Local Authority Have Any Right to Abduct Her Children.

A “problem mother” who is also refusing to accept some black-gowned, white-wigged, Filth-From-The-Temple criminal’s “decision” in support of his/her confederates in The Authorities. An irritating nuisance of a parent, who WILL NOT just slink of defeated, to drown herself in a sea of alcohol and valium – killing herself slowly/quickly. A “smartarse” mother who DIDN’T freak out when the authorities snatched her children because she saw that that was EXACTLY what The Authorities wanted: a “mentally unstable hysterical mother” – who should be sectioned. Of course, by not freaking out, ella was then labelled “a mentally unstable NON-hysterical mother” – who should be sectioned. This is reminiscent of the trials by Satanic judges (warlocks, wearing robes and head-dress pretty much the same as they do now) in 17th century England (please see footnote below).

So, with such a mother, a frame-up of some sort is necessary – to arrest and imprison mother, in order to silence her.

Step 1: Accuse mother of a crime she didn’t commit.

Here we see the first stage in action: the introduction of the completely FALSE assumption that ella is “in contempt of court”. This is an excerpt from an email from the HOSTILE litigant, solicitor x, to z’s clerk, y on 9th February, 2015 at 12;15:

“At the time of writing, the Papa Kills Babies mobile phone footage that has been uploaded onto You Tube has been viewed by nearly 163,000 people. The other 2 videos which are on You Tube also have been viewed by thousands.”

“The London Borough of C are taking legal advice about what steps they may need to take to address issues that arise for them from the dissemination of this material.”

“It would seem clear from the events of the end of last week that both Ms McNeil and the mother are in contempt of court for publishing material which forms part of the evidence in these proceedings on the internet and, by osting the videos of the children, together with numerous references to their first names, thereby causing them to be very easily identified as the subjects of these proceedings.”(italics and bold type are mine for emphasis)

Interestingly, even though x considers ella AND Sabine McNeill to be in contempt of court, only ella is CC’d in this communication – McNeill is conspicuously omitted.

Step 2: Arrange to Try mother for a crime she has not committed.

The reply from y, The Clerk at 13:08, 9th February 2015:

“Dear All,

Mrs Justice z has decided to hear this case tomorrow, Tuesday, 10 February at 2.00pm. May I please impose on Ms x to ensure that all concerned are made aware. Thank you.

Regards”

So, a court hearing is set up for 24 HOURS LATER – BY EMAIL?!! – to hear a case where ella is to be accused of contempt of court!!! y The Clerk doesn’t even bother to email the “accused”, ella, directly. Instead, she is just CC’d in on this email to x. And z The Clerk ASKS a hostile litigant “to ensure that all concerned are made aware”! ella’s name is NOT MENTIONED ANYWHERE in this email, yet she faces being found guilty of contempt of court, arrested and possibly imprisoned at the outcome of a hastily and UNLAWFULLY arranged court case, just 24 hours away!

Again, curiously, Sabine McNeill is not even CC’d in this email from z The Clerk, even though McNeill is THE ONE who published (“inadvertently”, as the computer expert, multi-blogger and petition writer extraordinaire never tires of reminding us) those materials online.

However, ella could have easily refuted this accusation – she could even have called as a witness, Belinda McKenzie, who has stated publicly: “that the mother herself is entirely innocent of publishing materials online”. And McKenzie KNEW for certain that McNeill was responsible, as she has also stated publicly: “my colleague in the Association of McKenzie Friends Sabine McNeill who is responsible for having leaked the home-videos of the 2 whistle-blower children to a blogger”

So, it was necessary not to try to arrest ella for a crime she had not committed (which she could easily refute -and refute dangerously loudly), but to arrest her for a “crime” that could be made TO APPEAR she had committed: breaching an injunction/being in contempt of court.

So, ella was set up to be framed for BREACHING AN INJUNCTION for a crime she hadn’t committed: publishing material online. Of course she could have easily refuted that injunction too – proving with the help of testimony from Belinda McKenzie AND Sabine McNeill, if they’d felt so inclined – her complete innocence in the matter. But that wasn’t part of the plan. It was essential NOT to give ella a realistic chance to refute the contempt of court charge/breach of injunction, or to prove her innocence. That’s why ella wasn’t given notice directly, but just CC’d in on an email to the hostile litigant, who had every intention of seeing ella served with that impossible injunction: “to remove all offending materials from the internet by 16.00 on Friday 13th February 2015”. This was why ella was given ridiculously inadequate and UNLAWFUL notice to appear in court, and given NO warning that she was going to be served an injunction. The point of this was to have ella as ill-prepared as possible to refute this trumped-up contempt of court charge/breach of injunction, confusing and intimidating her as much as possible. This was achieved by NOT issuing a court summons served by a court official, or a courier-transported summons which HAS TO BE signed for by the respondent on receipt of said summons, i.e. to have PROOF that the summons has been served. Instead, an EMAIL was sent to the HOSTILE LITIGANT! The hostile litigant, x, was of course, EAGER TO SECURE AN INJUNCTION AGAINST ELLA. In short, this was all carried out by totally UNLAWFUL means.

Step 3: Keep silent when ella looks for help from McKenzie “Friends”.

At ten past ten at night, February 9th 2015, ella sent an email to Sabine McNeill, Belinda McKenzie and Terence Ewing among others, forwarding them the email that z The Clerk sent to x, the hostile litigant (see above).

ella included her message: “They want me to come to court tomorrow”

There was no response from Sabine McNeill, Belinda McKenzie or Terence Ewing that day. The following morning, February 10th – the day of the hastily and UNLAWFULLY arranged court hearing – ella received this message from another recipient who APPEARS to be genuinely concerned about this mockery of justice, and is also aware of the danger ella is facing (which is why she is not named here):

“The rescheduling of this case today 10th Feb, what is that all about, what are the plans now? 10.10pm this instruction comes through surely this is not lawful?”

This email was sent out to ella, with Sabine McNeill, Belinda McKenzie and Terence Ewing, CC’d at 06:24.

Step 4: Leave ella, unprepared, with NO assistance from “McKenzie Friends”, to face the Wrath of The Court, and a skilled hostile lawyer on her own.

Belinda McKenzie emailed ella, exactly two hours later, at 08:24. Only the apparently concerned person was CC’d – So, just ella and “Apparently Concerned” received the following email, with no mention of Sabine McNeill whatsoever:

“We are going to have to do this preparing of the docs this morning, please come as soon as you can. We have an ex-policeman who is going to go into the court with you and demand the return of the children.”

Remember Belinda McKenzie is a lay legal advisor, who KNEW this “summons” to appear in court was completely UNLAWFUL. She could easily have informed the court the summons was unlawful, rejecting it out of hand for the unlawful method of notification of a summons – as well as citing the ridiculously inadequate notice to attend. The FACT that McKenzie DID NOT do this shows her intention: to cast ella TOTALLY UNPREPARED into court, up against a hostile skilled lawyer, eager to obtain an injunction against ella, together with a judge and her clerk, who had underhandedly set up this trap of a “hearing”. Of course, McKenzie chose not to go into court with ella that day because – AS A WITNESS – she could have been called upon to swear, under oath, “that the mother herself is entirely innocent of publishing materials online”. But having any charges of contempt of court and breaching an injunction against ella THROWN OUT, were definitely NOT part of the plan.

But not to worry: with a completely unknown, so-called ex-policemen to assist her, ella should be all right…

So we have Belinda McKenzie effectively saying to ella: “Off you go with the nice ex-policeman, dear – and good luck! (You’ll need it, heh, heh). I’m really sorry I’m not going to be there in person to testify for you, but I’m there in spirit!( heh, heh, cackle , cackle). And where is the notification for Sabine McNeill to appear in court? Well, McNeill wasn’t the one the Satanic Witches wanted to frame, was she? And why should they want to frame a fellow member of their coven? McNeill was busy packing her bags to take a break in Germany, where she would twist things with numerous, instantly set up skype interviews while “on the run”, to give the appearance she was THE HERO of this evil frame-up.

I have to admit, she had me fooled for a while.

from a conscious living being,

Drifloud ”   27th July

——————————————————

Hampstead Cover-up Update & The State of Pederasty in the UK – WBB156 extended version – 20 August 2015

Hampstead Cover Up Ella & Abe Expose Brian Gerrish Bill Maloney MI5 McKenzie RCJ Conspiracy

Guidance 2222

Posted in HAMPSTEAD "WHISTLEBLOWER KIDS" SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE [SRA] | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

HAMPSTEAD SRA UPDATE 7 AUG. ’15 – RICKY DEARMAN IN COURT

Hampstead Cover Up- Exclusive from the RCJ : Is Ricky Dearman A Psychopath ?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

NEARLY 1000 DOCTORS STILL PRACTISING DESPITE CONVICTIONS FOR CHILD PORN ETC

Saturday, 29 December 2012

NEARLY 1000 DOCTORS STILL PRACTISING DESPITE CONVICTIONS FOR CHILD PORN ETC

Nearly 1,000 doctors could still be practising despite convictions for possessing child porn and drug trafficking

Medical bosses cannot ban some doctors because it could breach their human rights

By Ryan Kisiel
|

  • Conviction: Dr Benjamin Obukofe (left) was convicted of two sexual assaultsConviction: Dr Benjamin Obukofe (left) was convicted of two sexual assaults
 

Hundreds of doctors convicted of serious crimes – including obtaining indecent images of children – have been allowed to continue to practise, it has emerged.
A total of 927 have kept their jobs despite being found guilty of offences including trafficking drugs, kerb crawling and causing death by dangerous driving.
And thousands of patients have been kept in the dark about their doctor’s serious convictions.
It is believed that some of the medics who have not been struck off the professional register after being found guilty of downloading child pornography are still treating minors.
But the General Medical Council says that it cannot automatically strike off those on the sex offenders’ register in case doing so breaches their human rights
The figures obtained under the Freedom of Information Act also reveal that none of the physicians’ patients has been informed about their convictions.
It found 25 had been convicted of actual bodily harm and three for grievous bodily harm.
Three doctors were found with indecent images of children, two of causing death by dangerous driving and two of trafficking drugs.

Patients are not being told about the disgraced physicians, surgeons and GPs, who are still working in surgeries and hospitals across the country (file photo)

Patients are not being told about the disgraced physicians, surgeons and GPs, who are still working in surgeries and hospitals across the country (file photo)

Another two have convictions for cruelty to children, nine for attacking their partners, five for harassment and two for possessing offensive weapons.
A doctor made threats to kill, another was found guilty of perverting the course of justice and five were guilty of fraud.
A further eight medics were convicted of kerb crawling. Some of them had more than one conviction.

More

The largest number – 296 – was for drink-driving offences.
Some 182 have been convicted of dangerous driving.
Critics yesterday said that patients should be told if their GP or surgeon has been convicted of a serious crime. Roger Gross, of Patient Concern, said: ‘Patients should be made aware if their doctor is found guilty of serious criminal offences that could affect their care and be allowed to make up their own minds if they want to risk being treated by them.
‘The problem is that the GMC is funded by doctors while their prime duty is to protect patients – but these two things often come into conflict.’
Dr Benjamin Obukofe was found guilty by a court last year of sexually assaulting two colleagues, including a girl of 17, at Spire Hospital in Leicestershire.
Suspension: Sudhakar Siriama was allowed to carry on working despite squeezing the breast of a junior member of staff at Castle Hill Hospital in Cottingham

Suspension:
Sudhakar Siriama was allowed to carry on working despite squeezing the breast of a junior member of staff at Castle Hill Hospital in Cottingham

Although the married father was given a suspended sentence and put on the sex offenders’ register, he was not struck off and will be free to work next year.
The GMC ruled that although his convictions were ‘serious’ they were not deemed to be ‘fundamentally incompatible’ with continuing to practise medicine.
Under the law, doctors have to be examined by the GMC after receiving a caution or conviction.
However, in many cases the watchdog allows them to continue to practise while it issues them with a warning or temporary suspension.
The GMC has no access to the sex offenders’ register and relies upon the police to inform its officials of court sentences.
It said that it looked at applying an automatic ban for medics on the sex offenders’ register, but decided against the move after legal advice said it might breach their human rights.
Individual NHS trusts are free to take their own action against convicted doctors.
Health chiefs at the GMC said they were still looking for a way to impose an automatic ban on sex offenders.
Niall Dickson, chief executive of the General Medical Council, said: ‘Our job is to protect patients by ensuring that only doctors who are fit to practise are able to do so.
‘The number of licensed doctors with criminal convictions is extremely small and in the vast majority of cases these are either subject to restrictions on their practice or struck off.’


CRIMES COMMITTED BY OUR DOCTORS

Possession of indecent photo of child 2
Take or make indecent image of child 1
Criminal damage 4
Dangerous driving (not drink) 182
Driving under the influence of drink 296
Driving under the influence of drugs 4
Failing to provide a specimen for analysis 25
Possession of controlled drugs 15
Trafficking of controlled drugs 2
Driving without tax/insurance 71
Failing to disclose 18
Forgery 24
Fraud 5
Causing death by dangerous/careless driving 2
Health and safety offences 2
Other notable offences 23
Perjury 1
Perverting the course of justice 1
Protection from eviction 1
Soliciting for the purpose of prostitution 8
Concealing the truth 2
Handling stolen goods 1
Theft 9
Theft employee 2
Actual bodily harm 25
Cruelty or neglect of children 2
Domestic violence 9
Grievous bodily harm 3
Harassment 5
Other offences against the state or public order 8
Possession of dangerous weapons 2
Threats to kill 1
Pre 2008 convictions not categorised 257
Source: Daily Mirror

 source: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2254047/Almost-1-000-doctors-guilty-crimes-including-possession-child-porn-drug-trafficking-allowed-jobs.html#ixzz2GR9PfvsA

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

ELLA + ABRAHAM – UPDATE 06/08/15

Message from Ella and Abraham 6 Aug. 2015:

“Court Hearing . Our legal team withdrew from the legal process  due the fraudulent hearing not being Article 6 compliant. Documents ordered to be served by Munby in their entirety have been redacted and withheld thereby denying Ella Gareeva to a fair trial.”

Posted in HAMPSTEAD "WHISTLEBLOWER KIDS" SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE [SRA], Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

TOTTENHAM MEETING 7 AUG. WITH GEORGE GALLOWAY

 

 

“From: “George Galloway” <galloway4london@gmail.com>
To:
Subject: Reminder: Tottenham Meeting tomorrow at Holy Trinity Church at 7pm 

Dear Friends,George Galloway will hold a meeting in Tottenham tomorrow on Friday 7th
August. The Respect candidate for the London Mayoral election will be
speaking at the Holy Trinity Church on Philip Lane N15 4GZ. The event,
billed as ‘Share with the Mayor’, starts at 7pm.

On his decision to hold his fifth campaign meeting in Tottenham,
constituency of David Lammy MP Galloway said: “I will be holding meetings
in every borough in London several times throughout the campaign, but it’s
significant that I’m heading to Tottenham before the other parties have
even announced their candidates. I’m taking the fight for City Hall
straight to the manors of the other candidates: David Lammy in the case of
Tottenham and I’ll be heading to Tooting, Sadiq Khan’s constituency, on
August 19th.”

“My campaign slogan is ‘A London For All’, and I want to show the people of
Tottenham that I intend to speak up for every part of this diverse city,
not just those at the top dripping in gold,” Galloway continued.

“Many of the problems faced by Londoners, from housing to policing, are
felt especially acutely in Tottenham. I have original, radical ideas about
how we might solve some of these problems. I represent something
different from what the political class has been trying, and failing, to do
in places like Tottenham for decades.”

Galloway will be joined by guest speakers Zita Holbourne, co-chair of BARAC
(Black Activists Rising Against the Cuts) and Reparationist and Broadcaster
Esther Stanford-Xosei.

The event is free entry although those wishing to attend are advised to
arrive in good time to ensure a seat.

Look forward seeing you then!

With Respect,

Team Galloway 4 London”

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

TED HEATH – ABUSE WITNESS COMES FORWARD – 4 AUG15

https://vid.me/e/wbKm?stats=1&tools=1

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

MICHAEL SHRIMPTON QC JAILED!!

Jail for pervert barrister who said nuclear bomb would blow up the Queen at the London Olympics

Friday 06 February 2015

Michael Shrimpton on the USS Enterprise in 2006

A barrister who made a high-level hoax call saying a nuclear bomb was poised to blow up the Queen at the London 2012 Olympics has been jailed.
Michael Shrimpton, 57, of Jusons Glebe, Wendover, was found guilty last year and today he was sentenced to 12 months at Southwark Crown Court.

Michael Shrimpton has been jailed for 12 months

Michael Shrimpton has been jailed for 12 months

On April 19 2012, Shrimpton contacted the office of the Defence Secretary Philip Dunne, and David Lidington MP claiming a nuclear warhead had been placed in London, possibly near to a hospital to be detonated at the opening ceremony of the Olympic Games.

He claimed that intelligence had been blocked from being passed through official channels because the Germans had infiltrated MI5, MI6 and GCHQ.

Both offices say they thought the calls were a hoax, but they had to be passed to the Olympic Security Team and the police due to the nature of the threat.
The court heard that Shrimpton is a self-appointed intelligence expert who suggested a sinister German intelligence agency was responsible for this plot to blow up the opening ceremony of the London Olympics.
Shrimpton had come to the attention of various police forces over the years and following the London terrorist attacks in July 2005, he earned himself the official label of ‘an intelligence nuisance’.
He was described by the prosecution counsel as an “unrelenting networker, desperate to associate himself with persons in real power and influence, and using any even marginal association with such people to bolster his credibility with other such people”.

On handing down the 12 month sentence HHJ Judge McCreath said: “I must have regard to the very clear risk of disruption which Mr Shrimpton must have recognised when he made the false reports.
“This is a case that cries out for immediate custody, it is impossible for me to suspend the sentence in this case, however I am prepared to take a merciful approach.”
Last year Shrimpton, who says he legally advised General Pinochet in the nineties, failed in his appeal against a conviction for possesing indecent images of children.
He said that images of young boys found on a computer memory stick were put there by secret service agents, and that he was the victim of a government stitch-up.

Senior investigating officer, Detective Sergeant Andrew Mottau, from the South East Counter Terrorism Unit, said: “The nature of such a claim had to be taken very seriously, despite it transpiring to be a hoax.
“This incident could have caused enormous disruption at a time of heightened tension and resulted in the diversion of valuable resources.
“I hope today’s sentence serves as a reminder that wasting police time is a serious offence and anyone who does it can expect to be robustly dealt with.
“I would like to thank the large number of witnesses in this case, their support cannot be understated and their testimony was vital in securing this conviction.”
Adrian Foster, Chief Crown Prosecutor for Thames and Chiltern Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) said: “This case involved the making of two bomb hoaxes on 19 and 20 April 2012 relating to the London 2012 Olympics when preparations for the Games were at an advanced stage.

“During the hoaxes Michael Shrimpton passed extraordinary and dramatic information about a threatened nuclear attack on the Games to senior authority figures. Although the information passed was outlandish and fanciful, there was a great deal of national tension in the months preceding the Games and it would have been foolish to reject or ignore the threats, especially when made by a professional man.
“Shrimpton is a barrister with a fascination for politics, the military and intelligence. The bomb hoaxes were not so much an attempt to cause disruption, but a mechanism to gild his self-constructed reputation as an intelligence expert. However, the imparting of such false information had the potential to cause enormous disruption, diversion of scarce resources, and wasted public money.
“Shrimpton represented himself during the trial and pleaded not guilty to the offences claiming he acted in good faith to pass on the information from his ‘sources’ and did so without malice or intent. However, he was found guilty by a jury on 25 November 2014, of two counts of communicating false information with intent after a two week trial at Southwark Crown Court.
“Due to the hard work and dedication of the prosecution team a just outcome has been achieved and Michael Shrimpton, who is not just a harmless eccentric, but a menace has today been sentenced accordingly.”

source: http://www.bucksherald.co.uk/news/more-news/jail-for-pervert-barrister-who-said-nuclear-bomb-would-blow-up-the-queen-at-the-london-olympics-1-6566127

Michael Shrimpton Exposes Ted Heath (and others)

davidicke

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

THE LONG, STRANGE SAGA OF LEON BRITTAN – the needleblog 4/08/15

 

by | August 4, 2015 · 6:13 pm

THE LONG STRANGE, SAGA OF LEON BRITTAN

Written by journalist and filmmaker Tim Tate and reproduced in full with permission. Originally posted – timtate.co.uk~

Over recent months two separate police forces have been carrying out enquiries into a snippet of 30-year-old gossip about a dead man. The Met and North Yorkshire Police have been interviewing people who, in the early to mid 1980s, heard a rumour that the then Home Secretary Leon Brittan had molested a young boy at a weekend retreat. I am one of them.

There are a number of oddities to this story, and, together with the rest of the strange saga of Leon Brittan, they shine a light on the frustratingly opaque progress of historic child sex abuse investigations. They also provide a litmus test for Lord Justice Goddard’s Independent panel Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse.

The rumour first.   In the early 1980s I was a researcher on Roger Cook’s BBC Radio 4 investigative programme, “Checkpoint”.  The editor of the series had a source inside 10 Downing Street who was in the habit of passing on juicy titbits of scurrilous gossip about members of Margaret Thatcher’s cabinet.

Why he did this was something of a mystery: “Checkpoint” was a fine programme, but it rarely strayed into political investigations. I never met the source, but according to our editor, he simply enjoyed gossiping over drinks at a private club both belonged to. To my knowledge, nothing had ever been done with the tittle-tattle he related.

The Brittan story, though, was different. According to the source, Brittan had been attending a weekend house party somewhere in North Yorkshire (he was initially MP for Cleveland & Whitby, then Richmond, N. Yorks): at some point he was supposed to have molested a young boy.   Local police allegedly attended, but very quickly were ordered off the case by Special Branch officers. There were no details of where exactly this happened, nor what exactly Brittan was supposed to have done.

Despite the sketchy nature of the rumour – and perhaps because I still lived in Yorkshire and had some relevant police contacts – I was instructed by my editor and the BBC’s (then) assistant director-general, Alan Protheroe, to make some discreet enquiries.

Over several weeks I spoke to a succession of contacts within the police. All said they knew nothing. Finally, I approached an officer in the neighbouring West Yorkshire Police Special Branch with whom I had an occasional, if slightly uneasy, working relationship. He agreed – reluctantly – to make some enquiries: very quickly thereafter he told me he was not going to pursue them.

And there our own investigations stopped. We told Alan Protheroe that we could find no evidence to support the rumour and I went back to work on more regular “Checkpoint” stories.

We were not, of course, alone in hearing this rumour. Private Eye had also picked it up and subsequently ran a short piece suggesting that members of the security service were trying to smear Brittan with false child abuse allegations.

Private-Eye-Brittan-1984

Over the next decades I made a succession of films and wrote a number of books, investigating child sexual abuse and paedophile networks. But I rarely gave any thought to the Brittan allegations until claims about paedophile parties at the Elm Guest House in south-west London surfaced in late 2013.

A  report on the Exaro news website, repeated in national newspapers and over the internet, claimed a video tape had been seized by Operation Fairbank (later known as Fernbridge),the Metropolitan Police’s unit investigating allegations of historic “VIP” child sexual abuse.  According to Exaro the tape showed a senior former Tory minister – plainly Brittan, though since he was still alive he was not named – in compromising circumstances at the guest house.

I had a contact in Operation Fernbridge,   Immediately after the story appeared, I met up with him: he denied absolutely – and vehemently – that any such tape had been seized. But because no official denial was issued by New Scotland Yard, the story fed into the growing public rumour-mill about ‘paedophile politicians’.

Two further issues quickly emerged which further inflamed the mood. The first was the mystery over what had happened to a dossier given in 1984 to Leon Brittan (while he was Home Secretary) by a back-bench Conservative MP, Geoffrey Dickens. Newspapers at the time had reported  that this dossier – which stemmed from Dickens’ earlier attempts to have the Paedophile Information Exchange proscribed – named a number of high-profile active child abusers.

In dealing with enquiries (in 2013) about what had happened to the Dickens material The Home Office did not exactly cover itself in glory: it initially claimed that it could not find 11 files, some of which included the dossier; then was forced (after a succession of Freedom of Information Act requests and demands by the Home Affairs Select Committee) to disclose that it had discovered the remnants of not 11, but 114 files relating to correspondence from Dickens or other MPs about alleged paedophiles and the prosecution of child sexual abuse.

The Home Office had also maintained in 2013 that the files themselves had been destroyed in line with “applicable document retention policies” at the time. Yet a year later it was forced to admit in response to my FOI request that it didn’t actually have a copy of this policy: it did not explain the apparent conflict between the absence of this policy and its previous assurance that the child abuse documents had been properly destroyed.

29875-Tate letter 28 Aug 2014 Final-1

Leon Brittan, for his part, was initially unable to recall the Dickens’ dossier before later remembering that he had passed it on to his officials who had in turn discussed it with the Director of Public Prosecutions.

The second incident was a story in the Express and on the Exaro News website alleging that in 1982 a Customs Office called Maganlal Solanki had seized child pornography films or videotapes sent or brought to the UK by Russell Tricker, a convicted British paedophile living in Amsterdam: one of these allegedly showed a former Tory cabinet minister sexually abusing children.   Once again, Brittan was not named, but there were clear hints in the stories that he was the politician in question (in 1982 he was Chief Secretary to the Treasury).

Mr Solanki had unquestionably seized the tapes and films referred to. An official 1982 notice in the London Gazette recorded the seizure and his name was shown as the Customs officer responsible.

lb-customs-seizure-1982

This did not specify the exact nature of the material – child pornography was then not legally defined, nor indeed was simple possession of it specifically illegal: the notice simply stated that the films and tape were indecent.  Crucially, though, it listed the title of the video as “LB”. [Note: in the 1980s there was a commercially-produced series of child pornography films entitled “Loverboys”.]

The coincidence of these initials with those of Leon Brittan led the Express reporter to doorstep Mr Solanki at his home in Leicester. The reporter recorded the conversation. The Express and Exaro claimed that during the interview the now-retired Customs officer confirmed clearly that the seized material showed the politician sexually abusing children.

I obtained a copy of the recording and transcribed it. Far from confirming the Express/Exaro claims, this clearly showed that Mr Solanki had repeatedly refused to confirm the reporter’s allegations that Leon Brittan was shown on the tapes. The most he appeared to concede was that the ex-minister was “involved” somehow with a tape: but he made clear that he was not at liberty to talk and told the reporter to speak to H.M. Customs.

However, the story had another twist in it.   In April 2014 I met with the senior Operation Fernbridge detective with whom I had previously spoken. Over the course of a two hour, off the record interview he told me that his officers had also interviewed Mr Solanki. The former Customs officer had, according to the detective, insisted that he couldn’t remember anything about the 1982 Tricker seizure – much less having viewed the tape and films. (Mr Solanki is in his 80s and somewhat infirm).

But what he said next was even more potentially explosive. He told the officers that he clearly remembered stopping Leon Brittan on another occasion – he could not recall the year, but it was at some point in the 1980s – when the politician came into the port of Dover from Europe. Mr Solanki recalled that he was on normal duty, working in a two-person team with another officer.   Mr Solanki observed the driver of a car behaving suspiciously: he pulled it over and the two officers discovered video tapes inside.   Mr Solanki told the Fernbridge detectives that he took the tapes away to his office, viewed them and saw that they were child pornography.   The detectives asked what exactly was on the tapes: Mr Solanki was embarrassed, but said they depicted boys and girls, clearly under 12, having sex with each other.

How, the detectives asked, did he know the man he stopped was Leon Brittan ?   Mr Solanki explained that he had asked to see the man’s passport. Additionally, Brittan had described himself as “an MEP”.

This posed a problem. Leon Brittan was never an MEP. He went from being a government minister to the backbenches following the Westland Affair, before being knighted and appointed European Commissioner For Competition in 1989.  The detectives eventually decided that Mr Solanki was telling the truth as he recalled it, but that he had most likely misheard (or misremembered) the phrase “MEP”, when in fact Brittan had said “MP”.

Mr Solanki also told the detectives that he had seized the tapes, sent Brittan on his way and referred the incident to his superiors. He indicated that the videotape seizure would have been recorded in the log book kept by Customs officers at Dover. The senior Fernbridge detective was making plans to look for these when we spoke. He was also trying to locate the date on which – according to vaguely remembered details – late one evening in the 1980s the Westminster press lobby gathered, at short notice, outside Downing Street, apparently having been briefed to expect an announcement concerning Leon Brittan.

Meanwhile, he was simultaneously following another two lines of investigation concerning Brittan and child sexual abuse.  The first was the old rumour about him molesting a boy at the weekend house party. In the intervening years, the incident now had two separate alleged locations: North Yorkshire and London.   But Operation Fernbridge had been unable to trace anyone who had any first hand knowledge: most importantly no alleged victim could be found in either place, and the detective now believed that the story was something of an urban myth which had probably arisen out of the mysterious late-night gathering of press in Downing Street.

The second lead was very much firmer – and very much more disturbing.   It involved Elm Guest House in south-west London.  In 1982 the Metropolitan Police had raided the guest house believing – correctly – that it was being used for (adult) male prostitution. The officer in charge of the raid had alerted the local social services department that there was a possibility at least one child might be on the premises and that, if so, a social worker and a temporary place of safety would be needed.

The police did indeed find one child – a boy of around eight years old – in the guest house. He was taken to a local children’s home and, according to a document the Fernbridge detective found in the council archives, was jointly interviewed by a detective constable and a social worker.

Fernbridge tracked down the (now-retired) officer in question.   He was interviewed and described the boy as being the most sexualised child he had ever seen. He also said that the boy described being sodomised by nine adult men at the guest house, but seemed somewhat surprised that the police were concerned. He told his interviewers that “Uncle Leon” would take care of the problem, and that “Uncle Leon” worked up at “the big house”. The former officer said he had understood this to be a reference to Parliament and had realised that Uncle Leon was probably Leon Brittan.

All of this should have been recorded in a statement. But the Fernbridge team was surprised to discover that although a statement of sorts did exist, it was not signed by the boy; nor did it make any mention of “Uncle Leon”. They questioned the retired constable: he explained that it was late at night when the boy was questioned and he had taken a joint decision with the social worker that the statement could be signed after the boy had got some sleep.   But next morning the boy had “acted out” and refused to sign.

The Fernbridge officers also questioned the retired officer about why he hadn’t recorded the “Uncle Leon” information in the (unsigned) statement: he then apparently became uncooperative, giving the distinct impression that he was concerned about either disciplinary proceedings or a potential threat to his police pension.

Fernbridge went on to track down the boy – now a man in his early 40s and living in America. A US Marshall, previously on secondment to the Metropolitan Police, went to see him. Although the man initially seemed willing to speak, he later refused to do so.

Shortly after the Fernbridge detective gave me the above information, he left the unit. I have not spoken with him since and do not know whether he was ever able to progress the investigations into Leon Brittan.

What I do know is that he was absolutely convinced that there was prime facie evidence that Brittan had a sexual interest in children; and that – unless he was lying to me (which I doubt) – Operation Fernbridge holds documentary evidence suggesting that Brittan was involved in either the attempted importation of child pornography, or the sexual abuse of a young boy. Or both.

In November 2014 a separate Metropolitan Police investigation – Operation Midland – was established to examine claims of historical child sex abuse and murder at the Dolphin Square apartment block near Westminster. Exaro News claimed the credit for this, alleging that its reporting of allegations by two men it called “Nick” and “Darren” had forced the Met to open the inquiry.   The men claimed that their abusers had included two former Conservative MPs, one of them a former Cabinet Minister.

Leon Brittan (who had been ennobled as Baron Brittan of Spennithorne in 2000) died in January this year. Within a week Exaro named him as the former Cabinet Minister being investigated by Operation Midland.

In February, the Sunday Times columnist Dominic Lawson (son of former Chancellor of the Exchequer, Nigel Lawson) defended his father’s former Cabinet colleague. He attacked the Exaro allegations as part of what he saw as a long-standing campaign by “foil-hatted conspiracy theorists who see the Palace of Westminster as nothing other than a cover for satanic rituals”.

The thrust of Lawson’s attack – that irresponsible reporting of anonymous allegations was tarnishing the names of dead men whom he simply presumed to be honourable – was given more life than it deserved by Exaro’s involvement in an Australian television programme in July.   Whilst it unquestionably raised the profile of the story internationally, the 60 Minutes Special presented the claims by Exaro’s stable of complainants as established facts rather than allegations under police investigation.   It named Leon Brittan as an abuser.

I have no means of knowing whether the claims by “Nick”, “Darren” and the other complainants whose cause Exaro has promoted are accurate.   They are very serious allegations and are rightly being examined by the Met.   But in so far as they relate to Leon Brittan, this police investigation poses a problem.

Because Brittan passed away in January this year, there can be no criminal proceedings.  Therefore none of the evidence being collected by Operation Midland – nor the documentary evidence already held by Operation Fernbridge (let alone the enquiries still being made by North Yorkshire and Scotland Yard detectives into the mysterious house party rumour) – will ever be produced in court.

There is only one forum now in which the allegations about Leon Brittan can publicly be examined: Lord Justice Goddard’s Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse.

This week I formally asked the Inquiry’s press office the following questions:

  1. Has the Inquiry yet established direct contact with Operation Fernbridge ?
  2. Will the Inquiry be examining documentary evidence held by Operation Fernbridge concerning its investigations into the late Baron Brittan ?
  3. Specifically, will the Inquiry secure from Operation Fernbridge copies of all such documents including, but not limited to, formal statements made under caution, officers’ notebooks, internal memoranda and historical documents acquired during its investigation into the late Baron Brittan ?
  4. Does the Inquiry plan to require public testimony from the current head of Operation Fernbridge, AND its former senior investigating officer, [NAME REDACTED HERE] concerning the late Baron Brittan?
  5. Does the Inquiry plan to require public testimony from the former Customs and Excise officer Maganlal Solanki who gave evidence to Operation Fernbridge concerning the alleged seizure of child pornography from the late Baron Brittan ?
  6. Does the Inquiry plan to take evidence from the US Marshall formerly attached to Operation Fernbridge in connection with a visit he made at the request of Operation Fernbridge to a suspected victim of Baron Brittan ?
  7. Does the Inquiry plan to publish the documents acquired and/or generated by Operation Fernbridge during the course of its investigation into Baron Brittan ?

The Inquiry has yet to provide a response.

The long, strange saga of Leon Brittan is a litmus test of how rigorous and open Lord Justice Godard’s enquiry intends be. The enquiry must summons – as it has the power to do – Mr. Solanki and the officers from operation Fernbridge to give evidence on oath. It must also obtain all the statements taken by Fernbridge which relate to Brittan.

Leon Brittan was no obscure politician or ordinary Cabinet Minister. For more than two years he occupied one of the three great offices of state: Home Secretary.  Unquestionably, he should have been subjected to positive vetting by MI5 before being appointed: Goddard must insist on seeing those vetting reports.   She must also discover what, if any, subsequent vetting took place before David Cameron appointed Brittan as a trade advisor in 2010.

And, just as crucially, she must reveal all of this evidence to the public which is, after all, paying for the Inquiry.

There remain, too, legitimate and unanswered questions about Brittan’s opposition to proscribing the Paedophile Information Exchange (and indeed about PIE’s alleged involvement with the Home Office itself while he was a Minister Of State there between 1979 and 1981).

The announcement last week that further (and previously undisclosed) Cabinet papers from the era had been located and in some unspecified way referred to Brittan,  make it even more vital for the Inquiry to examine – publicly – the claims that the former Home Secretary was involved in the sexual abuse of children.

If it does not, then the public will have every right to doubt the integrity of the Goddard enquiry – and to question why substantial sums of public money are being devoted to a series of police investigations which will never see the light of day.

And rightly or wrongly the as yet unproven allegations of an overarching Westminster plot to protect a powerful paedophile politician will become entrenched in the public mind as unchallenged fact.

Related

1 Comment

Filed under Abuse, Fernbridge, News, Politics

source: https://www.theneedleblog.wordpress.com/2015/08/04/the-long-strange-saga-of-leon-brittan/

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

S MCNEILL ARRESTED AT RCJ

s mcneil arrested – Maurice kirk tells me,

+ taken to Colindale pol stn.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

THE PATRICK COYLE STORY – PUBLIC SERVANTS COLLUSION + CORRUPTION IN N.I.

The Patrick Coyle Story Collusion Corruption By Public Servants in NI –

hear the show: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/freedomtalkradiostudiob/2015/08/03/the-patrick-coyle-story-collusion-corruption-by-public-servants-in-ni

The Patrick Coyle Story Collusion Corruption By Public Servants in Northern Ireland

A GP, Dr P S, Campbell surgery, has been caught red-handed, threatening a dad of four kids, Patrick Coyle, to hand over his kids to social services or be sectioned under the Mental health Act in a tape recording that has gone viral. 

The GP has persisted in carrying out his threat and admitted Patrick to a mental health hospital despite being sacked by his patient for trafficking patients and their children into mental health institutions and Foster care.  In a shocking conversation during a private consultation, the GP threatens the dad in front of his 7 year old that his mental health is questionable because he refused to engage in the kidnap attempts by social workers.

Hours later, Patrick was kidnapped by Police and social workers, DG & LG, acting on secret information without any warrant, incident or cause, and without any  previous issues or dealings with his family or 4 children.   The documents alleged to be from a Judge M were not properly signed or sealed or from a due process being followed and without giving any notice to the Coyle family.  Patricks’ 7 year old son who was with him, and his 13 year old son who was staying with a friend, was hunted down by Police like a criminal, from a field where he was hiding from his kidnappers. 20 Police officers and 15 Police cars from Dungannon Police station surrounded his bungalow at  Sy Road Pomeroy 

source: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/freedomtalkradiostudiob/2015/08/03/the-patrick-coyle-story-collusion-corruption-by-public-servants-in-ni

The Patrick Coyle Story

A GP, Dr PS, Campbell surgery, has been caught red-handed, threatening a dad of four kids, Patrick Coyle, to hand over his kids to social services or be sectioned under the Mental health Act in a tape recording that has gone viral. 
The GP has persisted in carrying out his threat and admitted Patrick to a mental health hospital despite being sacked by his patient for trafficking patients and their children into mental health institutions and Foster care.  In a shocking conversation during a private consultation, the GP threatens the dad in front of his 7 year old that his mental health is questionable because he refused to engage in the kidnap attempts by social workers.
 
 
Hours later, Patrick was kidnapped by Police and social workers, DG & LG, acting on secret information without any warrant, incident or cause, and without any  previous issues or dealings with his family or 4 children.   The documents alleged to be from a Judge M were not properly signed or sealed or from a due process being followed and without giving any notice to the Coyle family.  Patricks’ 7 year old son who was with him, and his 13 year old son who was staying with a friend, was hunted down by Police like a criminal, from a field where he was hiding from his kidnappers.
 
 
20 Police officers and 15 Police cars from Dungannon Police station surrounded his bungalow at  S Road Pomeroy 

​ at 11am on Friday ​

 
​31 July 2015 for 5 hours without any cause, warrant or law, terrorising Patrick and his 7 year old before kidnapping them. 
 
Patrick Coyle has been found unlawfully detained in a Mental Health Hospital after 36 hours of disappearance, admitted by Dr S despite sacking him.  Patrick was told by the Consultant at the Southern Health & Social Care Trust in Craigavon Area Hospital Portadown, Tel 028 3861 3960 that there was nothing wrong with Patrick’s mental state but the Consultant had no choice but to follow orders from the ex-GP S.
Patrick was admitted to Silverwood Ward,Bluestone Unit Craigavon Area Hospital County Arman BT63 5QQ Tel by Dr P S of Campbell Surgery, who was not Patrick’s GP at the time.  A Nurse on the ward, P C, refused to allow Patrick to leave the hospital or show him the documentation signed by a lawful or legal authority by which he is being detained against his wishes.  
Patrick Coyle has not seen any due process or honour by any public servants and has issued a commercial lien to the GP, NHS Trust, social services for these kidnappings of his family members to get the remedy of the return of his 4 children and the return of others incarcerated by public servants in Northern Ireland Institutions.  
A local charity run by AC has been involved in the break-up of the marriage and the social services have split the family further by the handing over of two of the four children, the two daughters, 8 & 16, to the mother who earlier abandoned all four children.  Paddy is a good dad to all four children and has told his wife, the door is always open for her to come back.  Paddy had asked for his daughters to be returned to him because he knew his wife, who has a spending addiction, could not properly care for them and feared that the social services intended to traffic his daughters into the care system.
 
Freedom Talk Radio is urging members of the public who have been affected by trafficking by the State to get in touch 01444 390 270 or www.freedomtalkradio.co.uk
 
Live shows are aired daily to deal with real issued dodged by mainstream media.
Please complain and support Patrick Coyle. 
 
Dr DC Health Centre Director of Mental Health & Learning Disabilities 68 Login Road County