High Level Government Pedophile To Be Exposed: Victim Speaks Out – BRIAN CLARE – “OPERATION ROSE” + more

High Level Government Pedophile To Be Exposed: Victim Speaks Out

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

THE MUSA CASE: FROM SEPT. 2013: “GLORIA MUSA IN HOLLOWAY PRISON AND STILL BLEEDING INTERNALLY 16 MONTHS AFTER GIVING BIRTH ON MARCH 10 2012″

th_a8jpg2

From 7 September 2013:

Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2013, 08:47:55 PM »

GLORIA MUSA IN HOLLOWAY PRISON AND STILL BLEEDING INTERNALLY 16 MONTHS AFTER GIVING BIRTH ON MARCH 10 2012.

Posted on August 2, 2013 by butlincat

Visit to see Gloria Musa in Holloway Prison, 30 July 2013

We saw Gloria today at HMP Holloway. It was very sad. She was tearful for the whole visit of approximately an hour and full of anger too and wouldn’t you be if youd had 7 children removed for no reason, been given a 7 year sentence in prison on an extremely dubious conviction and have been bleeding from internally for 16 months after giving birth to your last baby in a cell in Holloway prison, and still are denied medical treatment for that and other major ailments, including the infection that is festering around ones private parts because of the untreated bleeding. This is exactly Gloria Musa’s situation today, as I write, and it is outrageous it is being allowed to happen at all.

 What I don?t understand is, if the so-called “Association of Mckenzie Friends” set-up is meant to be so helpful to families who have had or who are about to have children removed, along with the MP who is very much connected with it, how come Gloria Musa is still and has been suffering in prison for 16 months bleeding constantly since giving birth on March 10 2012? How come nobody connected to this “association” has done one single thing to alleviate Gloria Musa?s appalling suffering? This “association” cant claim they don?t know about Gloria’s situation because Sabine Mcneil, who began the set-up, has been making herself busy in the case for some time. Maybe actually making progress is not one of Ms. Mcneils fortes, or anyone else in the set-up for that matter, but getting known for something is. Its pathetic. The tiger with no teeth.

 Gloria Musa’s situation is so dire that she is even denied an adequate amount of sanitary towels to use, and whats more is forced to lie on bloodstained bedding, as she recounted to me during this visit.
Communications notifying of Gloria?s situation to the prison service, including the Independent Monitoring Board, and the Ministry of Justice and others, including numerous MPs are generally completely ignored, as are letters to the Holloway prison governor about Gloria’s outrageous situation. The rare replies that are received contain nothing of any worth, other than saying things are being looked into, or other vague statements. Well, they may be being looked into, but nothing is ever done about the appalling situation. The Ministry of Justice state, in a reply [below] to my notifying them of Gloria Musa’s constant internal bleeding and other serious ailments, state:
  “all organisations delivering NHS care strive to ensure that all patients receive the best possible treatment”.
This couldn?t be further from the truth, and Gloria Musa with her many serious untreated ailments is an absolute witness to the Ministry of Justice’s falsehood.
During the Musa’s dubious criminal trial half the court was in tears when the police themselves recounted the battering and mistreatment they gave Gloria at 3 in the morning in her single cubicle in hospital in the summer of 2010 when police and social workers took her 1st baby hours after birth when she was being breastfed by Gloria – its due to the injuries she received in the middle of the night then that Gloria cannot walk today. She has been in a wheelchair in Holloway prison many months with a chronic untreated knee ailment as she now cannot walk at all.
The prison sentence was for 7 years – an outrage in itself, but not treating Gloria Musa’s bleeding for half of it was not part of the sentence, and denying her an adequate amount of sanitary towels, and not treating the resulting infection is nothing less than barbaric. Its an utter outrage!

This is a true sworn statement by J. Graham 2 August 2013.

Letter dated 13 May 2013 from the Ministry of Justice after notifying them of Gloria Musa?s medical condition ? click on it to enlarge.

Red underlined states: “…all organisations delivering NHS care strive to ensure that all patients receive the best possible treatment…” – CLEARLY NOT THE CASE IN GLORIA’S SITUATION AND THIS CARE AS STATED IN THIS LETTER CANNOT BE BEING GIVEN AS SHE WAKES EACH DAY IN A NEWLY FORMED PATCH OF BLOOD AND HAS BEEN BLEEDING FROM INTERNALLY SINCE GIVING BIRTH TO HER BABY ON MARCH 10 2012!!white1 011aa

As I write on 21 May 2015, Gloria Musa is still undergoing treatment in a Nigerian hospital, and is awaiting serious operations which might allow her to walk proplerly again without aids. Gloria was in a wheelchair for the last half of the 3 years she was forced to endure in HM prisons, and the doctors in Nigeria stated they were surprised she was still alive after all she had been through since August 14 2012, up till November 27 2014, when the Musa parents Chiwar and Bishop Gloria were released and deported back home to Nigeria. The whereabouts of their 7 children is unknown, sadly.

See more: [links to be updated]: “The Musa case: 7 children snatched by a London council then the parents imprisoned for 7 years – outrageous!!” =

https://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/05/02/childstealing-by-the-state-the-m-case/

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , ,

MAURICE KIRK OUTSIDE CCRC OFFICES, B’HAM 16/05/15 video + MK ON FREEDOMTALK RADIO AND PATRICK CULLINANE 16/05/15

Criminal Cases Review and South Wales Police  – Maurice outside Birmingham CCRC offices, 16 May 2015 where he was again refused the documents [clerk of courts notes from hearing 1/12/2011] he was promised by a judge.

—————————————————————————

PATRICK CULLINANE  BEGINS THIS 16 MAY ’15 FREEDOMTALK RADIO SHOW, FOR THE FIRST 60 MINUTES, THEN MAURICE KIRK FOR THE FINAL HOUR: 

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/freedomtalkradionews/2015/05/16/patrick-cullinane-maurice-kirk-on-the-freedom-talk-radio-network

Scroll down for numerous articles, and see archives for artcles going back to 2013.

Maurice Kirk’s site, soon to be relocated, is  http://www.kirkflyingvet.com .

Below – pic taken 09 May ’15

7a.jpga

——————————————————————————————————————
“Criminal Cases Review Commission ‘HM” Nobbled
I am very busy as  CCRC being now nobbled, despite promise to me and now a lawyer, to send me copy of 1st Dec 2011  Cardiff magistrates court file.
Now CCRC is also withholding, with the clerk’s notes, the police 1st Dec11 custody records (me handcuffed in wheel chair) and also vital Geoamey Custody Services records identifying the five gaolers who will each , so easily, clear my name that no one served on me a ‘RESTRANING ORDER’
ON OFFER TO Geoamey Custodial Services Staff (now retired?)
A Breton house or equivalent in cash (sterling) for a relevant witness statement of what actually occurred 1st Dec 11 Cardiff magistrates cells rather than the pack of lies, so far, from prosecution witnesses to two juries.
Remember, even the 4th June 2012 jury asked , in writing, for the records and was refused as ‘un available’!
Remember, I have the full tape recording of District Judge John Charles’ 1st Dec 11 magistrates hearing and CPS barrister, David Gareth Evans, attempting to switch ‘WANTED’ posters after slipping a new allegation, after case had started, as someone had over looked the fact that no custodial sentence existed on his piece of paper in the relevant legislation .
Remember, His Honour Judge Llewellyn-Jones, as the then Recorder of Cardiff?, gave instructions prior to my being sentenced again without my knowledge:  
Remember, I threw that very piece of paper of seven nonsense allegations on the court floor and had it picked up again to make at least someone notice  in court and to take notes if it was not just the Glamorgan Gem newspaper! 
etc etc
CCRC obtained court file on 18th Feb 2013, after my request from prison, without telling me and now, by my having to arrest both prison officer the CPS prosecutor , two judges, at least, admit CPS having file and I can have a copy!!!!!!!
Eifion Edwards still refuses to release any of his CCRC activity, purported for me and on my written authority, whilst I was in prison. He has clearly alienated the CCRC staff, in  Birmingham, to affect this ‘impasse’. Edwards was the key but withheld defence witness evidence in each and every court case of mine since 1st Dec 2011.
Remember, Dr Janis Hillier of then Caswell Clinic psychiatric prison of mine, had almost fisticuffs with Eifion in the well of the court, in my 1st March 2012 ‘harassment appeal’, causing police to later seize the court exhibits proving conspiracy to pervert by just too many for my welfare to be further considered.
That fiasco of a conviction, for ‘harassing a proven criminal in a conspiracy with the ‘Cardiff cabal’, Edwards knows more about than you and me put together. 
Edwards and CCRC’s evidence included sight of some of Dr TW’s further fabricated medical evidence, the CAA are also waiting for, used in police 2nd  Dec 09 application, before His Honour Judge Bidder QC, to have me incarcerated in Ashworth psychiatric prison for life.
Remember, His Honour Judge Nicholas Cooke QC promised me  those very medical records , before Guy, on my acquittal from Feb 2010 ‘machine gun’ lengthy imprisonment…..I never got them, of course, remember, despite my deliberately delivering other related fabricated Caswell Clinic doctor records by airmail.
Remember, MUSA…..28th Feb 2011 magistrates case, you going to try and get Spencer Howell solicitor?, Kilburn High Street crooks, to hand over parents’ file. These solicitors refusing just to carry on milking for legal aid and so abandoning the Nigerian family and seven Haringey Council snatched children.
Jeff Matthews has now stolen well over £10,000 of my money, needed to pay urgent bills outstanding, reminding me if you have such friends as those two who needs the South Wales Police  as enemies?
I am going on radio, most likely tomorrow, before Birmingham demonstration outside CCRC offices…..waiting for banners to be made and finding my old much battered megaphone, leaking tent , primus stove and Portaloo!
Maurice J Kirk BVSc  
Tel 07708586202                                 
                                           
—————————————————————————————————————–
Pics from Maurice Kirk’s Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/maurice.kirk.92?fref=ts which shows updates from him going to Birmingham on the 15 May 2015 to get his long awaited documents he’s been promised previously by judges, et al, from the  Criminal Case Review Commission offices there, these documents very much relating to his terms of enforced imprisonments suffered recently, apart from anything else.
He was, of course, refused the docs there today, in fact theyre now refusing to speak with him at all, which will lead to further action from MK – as they say – watch this space!!
mk birmingham 15may153mk birmingham 15may152
————————————————————————————————————-
Message received earlier from MK on 15 MAY 2015:
“Patiently  I waited at CCRC [Criminal Cases Review Commission] offices in Birmingham, this morning, for half an hour and then asked them at reception to be on standby for my needing, possibly, to call the police if copy of 2011 Cardiff magistrates court file was not finally handed over.
CPS have conceded at least twice remember, in open court, I have already been given copy and entitled to another. In February 2013 the court even sent a copy of it to the CCRC following my falsified harassment conviction fiasco complaint.
The pantomime of deceit was witnessed by many from all over Europe and had been quietly tape recorded in anticipation of this inevitable multi faceted ‘authority’ cover up.
Reception, for CCRC, now tell me it will not even speak to me yet alone hand over the file  promised earlier this week to a lawyer. CCRC were wanting to send the file to me, direct and had asked the lawyer which was my current prison address? They need only wait until Monday pm to be able to hand deliver to Winston Green, I think is the  name of the local HMP.
Then the police turn up on their bicycles with Patrick ‘all sweetness, politeness and light’…….so just who is frightened of what, if you get my drift??
Could this be a simple example,  under the surface, of just how corrupt the British judicial system has become  in our 800th year of Magna Carta celebrations?  ”  [ends]
————————————————————————————————————————————

Message received from Maurice Kirk  14 May 2015: “If CCRC do not send today, by email, court documents I plan to go to their offices without warning. Also if that ridiculous 23-year need to sue SWP [South Wales Police] without their very own government documents, revealing proof of bullying, does not conclude,for appeal papers to go in, there will be local Cardiff cabal trouble as well. All to cover up machine gun conspiracy by barbara w, senior MAPPA and bent, sacked police psychiatrist.” [ends] 31 above + below: MK, 09 MAY 2015 

12a

===============================================

CLOSING SUBMISSIONS TO THE CIVIL HEARING AGAINST S. WALES POLICE [to be continued], which has already seen over 3 months in court hearings, at Cardiff Civic Centre, interrupted by MK’s enforced imprisonment of 17+ months in October 2013, being released on 27 March 2015:

  1a234567891011 12

To be continued… Maurice Kirk’s site [soon to be relocated] is at: http://www.kirkflyingvet.com Please scroll down or see archives here for many posts going back to 2011

Pic taken 9 May 2015, Bournemouth:

7a.jpga

From earlier: Audio from Maurice Kirk 28 April 2015:

MAURICE KIRK AUDIO 28/04/15 – DOCUMENTS REFUSED BY AUTHORITIES – WHY?

Published on 1 May 2015
Audio in this video from a phone call received 28 April ‘ 15 from Maurice Kirk, released on 27 March from HMP Cardiff after 17+ months imprisonment for his alleged “breaching the terms of a “restraining order””. Maurice tells us he is allegedly refused from the authorities certain court documents from his hearing of 1/12/11 which are relating very much to the aforementioned “restraining order” and therefore his subsequent imprisonment for the “breaching” of the order pertaining to it. Maurice was at the “Final Submissions” stage in his civil case against S. Wales police force held at Cardiff Civic Centre

for 20+ years harassment from them. Maurice had already been remanded in custody, before this term of questionable imprisonment at least 7 times since 2009 – these “remands without bail” totalling a period of over 3 years in custody which saw no actual convictions brought against Maurice, 70 – he being let free each time from these remands with no actual charges with convictions being realised.

Maurices site, which is packed with information, due to be revamped and relocated soon he tells us, is http://www.kirkflyingvet.com 01/05/2015

a m kirk Above pic made from when MK was on hunger strike [ended on 3 March 2014] in HMP Cardiff – an earlier pic has been used.

———————————————————————————–

Letter from MK, dated 24 April ’15:KIRK LETTER 24APR15

Certain authorities refuse to release to Maurice Kirk certain documents relating to him that he is perfectly entitled to have. He is questionably refused them wholesale [as with, also, certain medical records pertaining to his enforced stay in the “Caswell Clinic, Wales]. Maurice states that he will give his house [see post below] to anyone who can obtain these court documents.

Having spoken to M a few hours ago he says he’s now infinitely better regarding his medical situation, but is still undergoing tests for newer and equally serious ailments which have come about because of his denial of medical treatment whilst in HM prisons recently. Letters to the Prime Minister, more than once, could not get the authorities to let this urgent operation MK, 70, urgently needed proceed. MK became ill in March 2014 after being on “hunger strike” for approx. 33 days, but the urgent operation – a “colonoscopy” or something similar, was always refused, despite letters to the Prime Minister, Secretary of State, Home Office, MP’s, and last but not least, the “Ministry of Justice”. In HMP, often in excruciating pain, he would be refused treatment and pain-killing medication, and also when he most needed it – in the night. Hospital appointments were made but cancelled regarding his stomach ailment. Getting private medical treatment became impossible, and a cheque for £1000 that could have been used for such was refused to be cashed and put into MK’s a/c – it being received by MK in December 2014, and still uncashed in March ’15 when MK left HMP. MK was rushed to hospital once from a Cardiff court hearing on the judges orders in November 2014 as the pain from his ailments made him incapable of taking part in the court hearing.
Maurice Kirk is sueing S. Wales police for 20+ years harassment – this case is ongoing and was interrupted by MK’s imprisonment in October 2013. Great controversy surrounds the numerous “restraining orders” issued or not issued to MK – getting to the root of this subject is proving extremely difficult when, in reality, the entire subject could be cleared up easily and quickly.
Below is a letter from the MoJ concerning “medical treatment” supposedly given to citizens while ensconced in an HMP prison [as MK was until 27 March ’15, needing the urgent medical operation for over a year] – discernment is needed, unfortunately, regarding veracity of the MoJ’s statement!!ZZZZZAwhite1 011a
Maurice Kirk’s site, soon to be replaced with a new one, is http://www.kirkflyingvet.com .
Maurice Kirk <maurice@kirkflyingvet.com>

WRITES 26/04/15:
“This was the only restraining order that ever entered my Cardiff magistrates cell in 2011. It was stuffed under the door during fabricated police doctor ‘harassment’ case originated to cover up police concocted ‘machine gun’ trial that destroyed my marriage..
Evil Cardiff judges, CPS, Geoamey Custodial Services, clerks of courts and now, it appears, even Criminal Cases Review Commission have all since lied, through their back teeth, requiring them to have written and re written both Crown and Magistrates court logs and clerk’s notes etc and destroy (police seize) the equally fabricated Sept and Nov 2011 magistrates court exhibits all denied me in subsequent jury trials for ‘breach’ of exposing a criminal.
Also prosecution exhibits originated mid trial for the retrospective custodial sentence handed down by HHJ Llewellyn Jones QC, it appears, before the evidence was even given. This was the judge, remember, who had me sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act, in the first place, to be incarcerated in Aug 09 Caswell Clinic triggered from some fax sent by a South Wales police doctor who had not even examined me!
Anything to stop my damages claims, a real risk to their judicial autonomy.
Do I make it more confusing or did Voltaire get it right when he said,
“When the State get it wrong it is dangerous to be right”
This half doc needs maximum publicity worldwide or you may be next.”
Attatchment:

———————————————————-31

Legal Battles

My House for a Copy of Cardiff Magistrates Court Records of My Illegal Harassment Imprisonment

Watch this space My telephone is 07708586202 The jury asked for them and was refused and I asked for them, of course, as there is no record of any restraining order ever being served on me in the cells. CPS, police, judges and CCRC have them but we cannot…..does it stink? Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) has washed its hands of the case as further proof of the wide spread corruption within Cardoiff’s criminal courts is usually kept well under wraps MUSA six children snatch by Harringay Council is what it is actually all about…(.I was prevented from exposing the disgusting law firm (name later) in Kilburn High Street stealing the legal aid whilst pretending to be acting for a couple then gaoled for 7 years. I was arrested for ‘failing to attend’ the vital hearing for their release…..just minutes after the ‘restraining order ‘ was attempted to be stuffed into my pocket as I was being dragged out of my cell by very irrate five Geomey custody officers wanting to go home ! (Cardiff prison was ordered NOT to produce me!.)
Leaked HM Internal Memos.pdf kirk house Filed under: South Wales Police, Machine Gun, Caswell Clinic, MAPPA, General Medical Council, Cardiff Magistrates Court, Abuse of Process, Lawful Rebellion, NHS WALES, Professor Rodger Wood, Dr Bruce Fergusson, Luigi Stranati, District Judge Bodfan Jenkins. District Judge John Charles, David Gareth Evans

About Maurice Kirk

Maurice was born 12th March1945, a war baby, in Taunton, Somerset, West of England, within a final family of four brothers and one sister while mother and father were working 24/7 to run a country veterinary practice. Country pursuits very much dominated his spare time from most sports with his passion still for hunting , shooting and fishing! Maurice is currently trying to fly to South Africa in his WW2 Piper Cub,registration G-KURK. His other D-Day Cub, G-KERK, is destined, on skis, for a rather taller mountain after his promise to Sir Edmond, six years ago. Meanwhile, the task of obtaining justice in the UK courts, in order to practice veterinary surgery, is proving to be somewhat elusive.Authority has quite another agenda. source: http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2015/04/24/i-will-give-my-house-for-a-copy-of-cardiff-magistrates-court-records-for-my-illegal-harassment-conviction.aspx

video with MK’s sister, September 2014 when MK was still in HMP Cardiff: “Rough Justice: South Wales Police persecute former vet & pilot Maurice Kirk, who’s sueing them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c3tg6pDdR8

<a href=PublicEnquiry from 13 Sept. 2014
Maurice Kirk’s site is http://www.kirkflyingvet.com

More posts from 2015 + until September 2014 – see archives for posts before that:

 MAURICE KIRK: THE RESTRAINING ORDER 26/04/15 + “MY HOUSE FOR REFUSED COURT DOCUMENTS” 24/04/2015

 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/04/26/maurice-kirk-the-restraining-order-260415-my-house-for-refused-court-documents-24042015/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE: PHONE CALLS RECEIVED JAN 2014 etc. + “KIRKGATE” [1st] + “CRIMINAL CASES REVIEW COMMISSION CCRC + PRISON RELEASE”

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/04/16/maurice-kirk-update-criminal-cases-review-commission-ccrc-prison-release/

NEW!! Maurice Kirk uncaged and branchaged 3 April 2015

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/04/13/new-maurice-kirk-uncaged-and-branchaged-3-april-2015/

PICS OF MAURICE KIRK ON RELEASE FROM HMP SWANSEA 27 March 2015 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/28/maurice-kirk-has-been-released-27-march-2015/

MAURICE KIRK RELEASED + Documents [02/02/2015]: “Regina v. Kirk M. J. – “Summing Up”: IMPORTANT IRREGULARITIES EXPLAINED

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/20/maurice-kirk-some-of-the-story/

UPDATE 18 MARCH ’15: MAURICE KIRK: LETTER TO CARDIFF COUNTY COURT, + “DEFENDANT DENIED LEGAL PAPERS IN COURT” etc.

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/18/update-18-march-15-maurice-kirk-letter-to-cardiff-county-court-defendant-denied-legal-papers-in-court-etc/

11 MARCH – MAURICE KIRK VICTIMISED YET AGAIN IN HMP SWANSEA: FULL WEEKLY “CANTEEN” ALLOWANCE DENIED!

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/11/11-march-maurice-kirk-victimised-yet-again-in-hmp-swansea/

MAURICE KIRK: LEVESON: APPEAL APPLICATION JUDGEMENT / POSITION STATEMENT 25 FEB. ’15

 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/08/maurice-kirk-leveson-appeal-judgement-position-statement-25-feb-15/

MAURICE KIRK: UPDATED WITH “BARRY NEWS” ARTICLES – 1ST YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF ONSET OF SERIOUS and untreated! STOMACH AILMENT, CHEQUE FROM DEC. ’14 STILL REFUSED TO BE CASHED, CLERK OF COURTS DOCS STILL REFUSED AGAINST JUDGES ORDERS, + MORE

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/05/maurice-kirk-update-5-mar-2015-1st-year-anniversary-of-onset-of-serious-stomach-ailment-cheque-from-dec-14-still-refused-to-be-cashed-clerk-of-courts-docs-still-refused-against-judges-orders/

MAURICE KIRK IN PRISON 500 DAYS ON SUN. MARCH 1!! – WRIT OF “HABEUS CORPUS” ISSUED – POSITION STATEMENT 18 FEB. ’15

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/27/maurice-kirk-writ-of-habeus-corpus-10-feb-2015-position-statement-18-feb-15/

MAURICE KIRK – POSITION STATEMENT 18 +16 FEB. + DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 19 FEB. 2015 inc. LETTER TO GMC, RCJ APPEAL CT, + more:

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/19/maurice-kirk-documents-received-19-feb-2015/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 15 FEB. 2015 – regarding “the fairness, proportionality, apparent bias and bad faith in the decisions of 11 July 2014 to recall Mr. Maurice Kirk to prison”, + more:

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/15/maurice-kirk-update-15-feb-2015-mappa-docs-more/

MAURICE KIRK – THE STORY SO FAR – A BRIEF SYNOPSIS [UNTIL OCT. 2014] – FILES B, C, D. [30 pages] inc. “Fabicated Medical Records”, “Breach of Restraining Order Appeal” statement 6/6/14, + more:

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/09/maurice-kirk-the-story-so-far-until-oct-2014-files-b-c-d/

MAURICE KIRK – SOCIAL VISIT REFUSED 6 FEB. – POSITION STATEMENT 16 JAN. 2015, + more:

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/06/maurice-kirk-position-statement-26-jan-2015-more/

MAURICE KIRK v S. WALES POLICE: UPDATE 4 FEB. 2015: NOW HELD 475 DAYS IN HM PRISONS UNLAWFULLY! h

ttp://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/maurice-kirk-update-4-feb-2015/

MAURICE KIRK PAROLE HEARING – CANCELLED!! JUST LIKE THAT!!

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/30/maurice-kirk-parole-hearing-cancelled-just-like-that/

LETTER TO THE PRIME MINISTER: MAURICE KIRK – NOT TAKEN TO THE COURTROOM FOR HIS HEARINGS 7 TIMES!! [actually its more!]:

https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/22/letter-to-the-prime-minister-maurice-kirk-not-taken-to-the-courtroom-for-his-hearings-7-times/ 15 Jan.

UPDATE: MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 5 JAN. 2014 – OVER 420 DAYS IN H.M. PRISONS!! STILL NO STOMACH OPERATION AFTER 10 MONTHS!!

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/15/15-jan-update-maurice-kirk-important-documents-received-5-jan-2014-over-420-days-in-h-m-prisons-still-no-stomach-operation-after-10-months/

MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 5 JAN. 2014 – OVER 420 DAYS IN H.M. PRISONS!! STILL NO STOMACH OPERATION AFTER 10 MONTHS!!

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/10/maurice-kirk-important-documents-received-5-jan-2014-over-420-days-in-h-m-prisons-still-no-stomach-operation-after-10-months/

MAURICE KIRK IN PRISON OVER 420 DAYS – THE DISGUSTING UNHYGIENIC CONDITIONS MK IS HAVING TO PUT UP WITH IN HMP BRISTOL – 12 DEC. ’14, + IMPORTANT DOCS.

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/13/maurice-kirk-18-days-before-a-change-of-clothing-12-dec-2014/

MAURICE KIRK: 12 DEC.: WELSH GOVERNMENT REPLIES – A WASTE OF TIME:

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/12/maurice-kirk-12-dec-welsh-government-replies-a-waste-of-time/

ARCHIVES FROM 19 September 2014 until January 2015: MAURICE KIRK POSITION STATEMENT 10 DEC 2014

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/10/maurice-kirk-position-statement-10-dec-2014/ MAURICE KIRK

UPDATE 5 DEC.: FINED £1000 – THE WELSH ASSEMBLY – THE “BRAIN SCAN” + more

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/05/maurice-kirk-update-5-dec-fined-1000-the-welsh-assembly-the-brain-scan-more/

MAURICE KIRK LOCATED IN HMP BRISTOL – 2 DEC. ’14 / BREAKING THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/04/maurice-kirk-located-in-hmp-bristol-2-dec-14/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 30 NOV. 2014 – MAURICE GOES MISSING http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/maurice-kirk-update-30-nov-2014/

UPDATED: MAURICE KIRK: IMPORTANT DOCS RECEIVED 18 NOV. 2014 – MEDICAL UPDATES ETC. http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/18/maurice-kirk-important-docs-received-18-nov-2014/

MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 8 NOV. ’14 – Position Statement 5 Nov. ETC. http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/14/m-krk-docs-received-8-nov-14/

MAURICE KIRK – THE DISGRACEFUL PERSECUTION CONTINUES IN HMP SWANSEA – SUN. 2 NOV. 2014

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/02/maurice-kirk-the-disgraceful-persecution-continues-in-hmp-swansea-sun-2-nov-2014/

MAURICE KIRK: VERY ILL IN HMP SWANSEA, 30 OCT. ’14 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/30/maurice-kirk-very-ill-in-hmp-swansea-30-oct-14/

MAURICE KIRK – FILE A – THE CHARGES, etc.

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/28/maurice-kirk-file-a-of-19-documents/

MAURICE KIRK DOCUMENTS: 25 OCT. 2014 – POSITION STATEMENT 14 OCT. ’14 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/27/maurice-kirk-documents-25-oct-2014/

MAURICE KIRK: LATEST NEWS, 23 OCT. ’14 – PLS SIGN THE PETITION – + more http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/23/maurice-kirek-latest-news-23-oct-14-pls-sign-the-petition-more/ M

AURICE KIRK: LATEST NEWS, 23 OCT. ’14 – ALL CONTACTS REMOVED EXCEPT 1 FROM MK’S TELEPHONE CALL LIST, + PLS SIGN THE PETITION – + more

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/23/maurice-kirek-latest-news-23-oct-14-pls-sign-the-petition-more/

5 IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS FROM MAURICE KIRK 14 OCT. 2014, + MESSAGE TO THE JUSTICE, + ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMITTEE 23 OCT. ’14

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/21/5-important-documents-from-maurice-kirk-14-oct-2014-more/

MAURICE KIRK’S SISTER CELIA – RADIO INTERVIEW – + “THE NEFARIOUS PLOT TO ISOLATE MAURICE”

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/24/maurice-kirks-sister-celia-radio-interview/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE: 23 SEPT. “14: DOCUMENTS RECEIVED- “RECALL TO CUSTODY APPEAL” + “MALICIOUS PROSECUTION WITHOUT TRIAL”

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/23/maurice-kirk-update-23-sept-24-documents-received/

MAURICE KIRK – DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 18 SEPT. 2014 WHICH TELL OF HIS HELL

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/19/maurice-kirk-documents-received-which-tell-of-his-hell/

See archives at bottom of page from before 19 September ’14, or on right for posts from 2013 / 14.

M kirk SEPT 2013 1ba.jpgA.jpgB 

The above is a pic from Febuary 2013, outside the Cardiff Civic Centre – MK with some of his legal files to be used in his case against S. Wales police force.

 >>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

 photo BARRY_zps0hjorw7k.jpg 

[NB: MANY OF THESE NEWSPAPER REPORTS ARE VERY BIASED AND UNFACTUAL AGAINST MK – IT SHOULD BE SAID THAT IT IS ALLEGED MK HAS BEEN REMANDED TO PRISON AT LEAST 9 TIMES SINCE 2009, WITH A TOTAL OF OVER 3 YEARS SPENT IN PRISON ON THESE POINTLESS AND HARRASSING REMANDS, AS NO CONVICTIONS ACTUALLY OCCURRED RELATING TO THESE REMANDS BEFORE THIS PERIOD OF INCARCERATION BEGAN ON 16 OCTOBER 2013 [MK SPENT THE NIGHT OF 15 OCT. IN BARRY POLICE STATION CELLS, AND POSSIBLY OCT 14 ALSO]. ALSO SINCE 2009 MK HAS BEEN STOPPED OVER 35 TIMES, WHILST DRIVING HIS CAR, FOR DRINK-DRIVING TESTS. NOT ONE CONVICTION RESULTING AS A RESULT OF ANY STOP [ALLEGEDLY]. INDEED, MK TELLS US OFTEN HE WAS TAKEN TO THE POLICE STATION FOR THE DRINKING OF ALCOHOL TEST, ONLY TO BE RELEASED WITHOUT EVEN BEING GIVEN IT! MK HAS AN ONGOING CIVIL CASE AGAINST S. WALES POLICE FORCE

– see the radio broadcast interview with MK’s sister on “Dialect Radio”, September 2014 =

video: “Rough Justice: South Wales Police persecute former vet & pilot Maurice Kirk who’s them”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c3tg6pDdR8

 
——————————————————————————————————————–

Barry’s ‘flying vet’ fails in legal bid Barry And District News: APPEAL: Flying vet Maurice Kirk. 7:40am Thursday 7 July 2011

Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

ATTEMPTS by Barry’s ‘flying vet’ to bring criminal charges against a former chief constable, psychiatrist and solicitor were thwarted by a judge last week. Firearms charges for Barry’s ‘Flying Vet’ Barry And District News: Firearms charges for Barry's 'Flying Vet' 7:30am Thursday 25 June 2009

Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

BARRY’S ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk has been charged with alleged firearms offences Barry’s ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk cleared of firearms charges Barry And District News: FLYING VET: Maurice Kirk. 7:30am Thursday 11 February 2010

Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

BARRY’S ‘flying vet’ was this week cleared of charges relating to owning and trying to sell a machine gun.

‘Flying Vet’ sent to US psychiatric unit 11:33am Thursday 1 May 2008

  • Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template
  • BARRY’S ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk was this week locked up in an American psychiatric unit – after landing his plane near George W Bush’s Texas ranch.

 

SOURCE: http://www.barryanddistrictnews.co.uk/search/?page=1&topic_id=2308&search=maurice+kirk

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , ,

MAURICE KIRK / PATRICK CULLINANE ON FREEDOMTALK RADIO 16 MAY ’15 – : CRIMINAL CASES REVIEW COMMISSION “H.M.” NOBBLED + MORE

PATRICK CULLINANE  BEGINS THIS 16 MAY ’15 FREEDOMTALK RADIO SHOW, FOR THE FIRST 60 MINUTES, THEN MAURICE KIRK FOR THE FINAL HOUR: 

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/freedomtalkradionews/2015/05/16/patrick-cullinane-maurice-kirk-on-the-freedom-talk-radio-network

Scroll down for numerous articles, and see archives for artcles going back to 2013.

Maurice Kirk’s site, soon to be relocated, is  http://www.kirkflyingvet.com .

——————————————————————————————————————
“Criminal Cases Review Commission ‘HM” Nobbled
I am very busy as  CCRC being now nobbled, despite promise to me and now a lawyer, to send me copy of 1st Dec 2011  Cardiff magistrates court file.
Now CCRC is also withholding, with the clerk’s notes, the police 1st Dec11 custody records (me handcuffed in wheel chair) and also vital Geoamey Custody Services records identifying the five gaolers who will each , so easily, clear my name that no one served on me a ‘RESTRANING ORDER’
ON OFFER TO Geoamey Custodial Services Staff (now retired?)
A Breton house or equivalent in cash (sterling) for a relevant witness statement of what actually occurred 1st Dec 11 Cardiff magistrates cells rather than the pack of lies, so far, from prosecution witnesses to two juries.
Remember, even the 4th June 2012 jury asked , in writing, for the records and was refused as ‘un available’!
Remember, I have the full tape recording of District Judge John Charles’ 1st Dec 11 magistrates hearing and CPS barrister, David Gareth Evans, attempting to switch ‘WANTED’ posters after slipping a new allegation, after case had started, as someone had over looked the fact that no custodial sentence existed on his piece of paper in the relevant legislation .
Remember, His Honour Judge Llewellyn-Jones, as the then Recorder of Cardiff?, gave instructions prior to my being sentenced again without my knowledge:  
Remember, I threw that very piece of paper of seven nonsense allegations on the court floor and had it picked up again to make at least someone notice  in court and to take notes if it was not just the Glamorgan Gem newspaper! 
etc etc
CCRC obtained court file on 18th Feb 2013, after my request from prison, without telling me and now, by my having to arrest both prison officer the CPS prosecutor , two judges, at least, admit CPS having file and I can have a copy!!!!!!!
Eifion Edwards still refuses to release any of his CCRC activity, purported for me and on my written authority, whilst I was in prison. He has clearly alienated the CCRC staff, in  Birmingham, to affect this ‘impasse’. Edwards was the key but withheld defence witness evidence in each and every court case of mine since 1st Dec 2011.
Remember, Dr Janis Hillier of then Caswell Clinic psychiatric prison of mine, had almost fisticuffs with Eifion in the well of the court, in my 1st March 2012 ‘harassment appeal’, causing police to later seize the court exhibits proving conspiracy to pervert by just too many for my welfare to be further considered.
That fiasco of a conviction, for ‘harassing a proven criminal in a conspiracy with the ‘Cardiff cabal’, Edwards knows more about than you and me put together. 
Edwards and CCRC’s evidence included sight of some of Dr TW’s further fabricated medical evidence, the CAA are also waiting for, used in police 2nd  Dec 09 application, before His Honour Judge Bidder QC, to have me incarcerated in Ashworth psychiatric prison for life.
Remember, His Honour Judge Nicholas Cooke QC promised me  those very medical records , before Guy, on my acquittal from Feb 2010 ‘machine gun’ lengthy imprisonment…..I never got them, of course, remember, despite my deliberately delivering other related fabricated Caswell Clinic doctor records by airmail.
Remember, MUSA…..28th Feb 2011 magistrates case, you going to try and get Spencer Howell solicitor?, Kilburn High Street crooks, to hand over parents’ file. These solicitors refusing just to carry on milking for legal aid and so abandoning the Nigerian family and seven Haringey Council snatched children.
Jeff Matthews has now stolen well over £10,000 of my money, needed to pay urgent bills outstanding, reminding me if you have such friends as those two who needs the South Wales Police  as enemies?
I am going on radio, most likely tomorrow, before Birmingham demonstration outside CCRC offices…..waiting for banners to be made and finding my old much battered megaphone, leaking tent , primus stove and Portaloo!
Maurice J Kirk BVSc  
Tel 07708586202                                 
                                           
—————————————————————————————————————–
Pics from Maurice Kirk’s Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/maurice.kirk.92?fref=ts which shows updates from him going to Birmingham on the 15 May 2015 to get his long awaited documents he’s been promised previously by judges, et al, from the  Criminal Case Review Commission offices there, these documents very much relating to his terms of enforced imprisonments suffered recently, apart from anything else.
He was, of course, refused the docs there today, in fact theyre now refusing to speak with him at all, which will lead to further action from MK – as they say – watch this space!!
mk birmingham 15may153mk birmingham 15may152
————————————————————————————————————-
Message received earlier from MK on 15 MAY 2015:
“Patiently  I waited at CCRC [Criminal Cases Review Commission] offices in Birmingham, this morning, for half an hour and then asked them at reception to be on standby for my needing, possibly, to call the police if copy of 2011 Cardiff magistrates court file was not finally handed over.
CPS have conceded at least twice remember, in open court, I have already been given copy and entitled to another. In February 2013 the court even sent a copy of it to the CCRC following my falsified harassment conviction fiasco complaint.
The pantomime of deceit was witnessed by many from all over Europe and had been quietly tape recorded in anticipation of this inevitable multi faceted ‘authority’ cover up.
Reception, for CCRC, now tell me it will not even speak to me yet alone hand over the file  promised earlier this week to a lawyer. CCRC were wanting to send the file to me, direct and had asked the lawyer which was my current prison address? They need only wait until Monday pm to be able to hand deliver to Winston Green, I think is the  name of the local HMP.
Then the police turn up on their bicycles with Patrick ‘all sweetness, politeness and light’…….so just who is frightened of what, if you get my drift??
Could this be a simple example,  under the surface, of just how corrupt the British judicial system has become  in our 800th year of Magna Carta celebrations?  ”  [ends]
————————————————————————————————————————————

Message received from Maurice Kirk  14 May 2015: “If CCRC do not send today, by email, court documents I plan to go to their offices without warning. Also if that ridiculous 23-year need to sue SWP [South Wales Police] without their very own government documents, revealing proof of bullying, does not conclude,for appeal papers to go in, there will be local Cardiff cabal trouble as well. All to cover up machine gun conspiracy by barbara w, senior MAPPA and bent, sacked police psychiatrist.” [ends] 31 above + below: MK, 09 MAY 2015 

12a

===============================================

CLOSING SUBMISSIONS TO THE CIVIL HEARING AGAINST S. WALES POLICE [to be continued], which has already seen over 3 months in court hearings, at Cardiff Civic Centre, interrupted by MK’s enforced imprisonment of 17+ months in October 2013, being released on 27 March 2015:

  1a234567891011 12

To be continued… Maurice Kirk’s site [soon to be relocated] is at: http://www.kirkflyingvet.com Please scroll down or see archives here for many posts going back to 2011

Pic taken 9 May 2015, Bournemouth:

7a.jpga

From earlier: Audio from Maurice Kirk 28 April 2015:

MAURICE KIRK AUDIO 28/04/15 – DOCUMENTS REFUSED BY AUTHORITIES – WHY?

Published on 1 May 2015
Audio in this video from a phone call received 28 April ‘ 15 from Maurice Kirk, released on 27 March from HMP Cardiff after 17+ months imprisonment for his alleged “breaching the terms of a “restraining order””. Maurice tells us he is allegedly refused from the authorities certain court documents from his hearing of 1/12/11 which are relating very much to the aforementioned “restraining order” and therefore his subsequent imprisonment for the “breaching” of the order pertaining to it. Maurice was at the “Final Submissions” stage in his civil case against S. Wales police force held at Cardiff Civic Centre

for 20+ years harassment from them. Maurice had already been remanded in custody, before this term of questionable imprisonment at least 7 times since 2009 – these “remands without bail” totalling a period of over 3 years in custody which saw no actual convictions brought against Maurice, 70 – he being let free each time from these remands with no actual charges with convictions being realised.

Maurices site, which is packed with information, due to be revamped and relocated soon he tells us, is http://www.kirkflyingvet.com 01/05/2015

a m kirk Above pic made from when MK was on hunger strike [ended on 3 March 2014] in HMP Cardiff – an earlier pic has been used.

———————————————————————————–

Letter from MK, dated 24 April ’15:KIRK LETTER 24APR15

Certain authorities refuse to release to Maurice Kirk certain documents relating to him that he is perfectly entitled to have. He is questionably refused them wholesale [as with, also, certain medical records pertaining to his enforced stay in the “Caswell Clinic, Wales]. Maurice states that he will give his house [see post below] to anyone who can obtain these court documents.

Having spoken to M a few hours ago he says he’s now infinitely better regarding his medical situation, but is still undergoing tests for newer and equally serious ailments which have come about because of his denial of medical treatment whilst in HM prisons recently. Letters to the Prime Minister, more than once, could not get the authorities to let this urgent operation MK, 70, urgently needed proceed. MK became ill in March 2014 after being on “hunger strike” for approx. 33 days, but the urgent operation – a “colonoscopy” or something similar, was always refused, despite letters to the Prime Minister, Secretary of State, Home Office, MP’s, and last but not least, the “Ministry of Justice”. In HMP, often in excruciating pain, he would be refused treatment and pain-killing medication, and also when he most needed it – in the night. Hospital appointments were made but cancelled regarding his stomach ailment. Getting private medical treatment became impossible, and a cheque for £1000 that could have been used for such was refused to be cashed and put into MK’s a/c – it being received by MK in December 2014, and still uncashed in March ’15 when MK left HMP. MK was rushed to hospital once from a Cardiff court hearing on the judges orders in November 2014 as the pain from his ailments made him incapable of taking part in the court hearing.
Maurice Kirk is sueing S. Wales police for 20+ years harassment – this case is ongoing and was interrupted by MK’s imprisonment in October 2013. Great controversy surrounds the numerous “restraining orders” issued or not issued to MK – getting to the root of this subject is proving extremely difficult when, in reality, the entire subject could be cleared up easily and quickly.
Below is a letter from the MoJ concerning “medical treatment” supposedly given to citizens while ensconced in an HMP prison [as MK was until 27 March ’15, needing the urgent medical operation for over a year] – discernment is needed, unfortunately, regarding veracity of the MoJ’s statement!!ZZZZZAwhite1 011a
Maurice Kirk’s site, soon to be replaced with a new one, is http://www.kirkflyingvet.com .
Maurice Kirk <maurice@kirkflyingvet.com>

WRITES 26/04/15:
“This was the only restraining order that ever entered my Cardiff magistrates cell in 2011. It was stuffed under the door during fabricated police doctor ‘harassment’ case originated to cover up police concocted ‘machine gun’ trial that destroyed my marriage..
Evil Cardiff judges, CPS, Geoamey Custodial Services, clerks of courts and now, it appears, even Criminal Cases Review Commission have all since lied, through their back teeth, requiring them to have written and re written both Crown and Magistrates court logs and clerk’s notes etc and destroy (police seize) the equally fabricated Sept and Nov 2011 magistrates court exhibits all denied me in subsequent jury trials for ‘breach’ of exposing a criminal.
Also prosecution exhibits originated mid trial for the retrospective custodial sentence handed down by HHJ Llewellyn Jones QC, it appears, before the evidence was even given. This was the judge, remember, who had me sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act, in the first place, to be incarcerated in Aug 09 Caswell Clinic triggered from some fax sent by a South Wales police doctor who had not even examined me!
Anything to stop my damages claims, a real risk to their judicial autonomy.
Do I make it more confusing or did Voltaire get it right when he said,
“When the State get it wrong it is dangerous to be right”
This half doc needs maximum publicity worldwide or you may be next.”
Attatchment:

———————————————————-31

Legal Battles

My House for a Copy of Cardiff Magistrates Court Records of My Illegal Harassment Imprisonment

Watch this space My telephone is 07708586202 The jury asked for them and was refused and I asked for them, of course, as there is no record of any restraining order ever being served on me in the cells. CPS, police, judges and CCRC have them but we cannot…..does it stink? Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) has washed its hands of the case as further proof of the wide spread corruption within Cardoiff’s criminal courts is usually kept well under wraps MUSA six children snatch by Harringay Council is what it is actually all about…(.I was prevented from exposing the disgusting law firm (name later) in Kilburn High Street stealing the legal aid whilst pretending to be acting for a couple then gaoled for 7 years. I was arrested for ‘failing to attend’ the vital hearing for their release…..just minutes after the ‘restraining order ‘ was attempted to be stuffed into my pocket as I was being dragged out of my cell by very irrate five Geomey custody officers wanting to go home ! (Cardiff prison was ordered NOT to produce me!.)
Leaked HM Internal Memos.pdf kirk house Filed under: South Wales Police, Machine Gun, Caswell Clinic, MAPPA, General Medical Council, Cardiff Magistrates Court, Abuse of Process, Lawful Rebellion, NHS WALES, Professor Rodger Wood, Dr Bruce Fergusson, Luigi Stranati, District Judge Bodfan Jenkins. District Judge John Charles, David Gareth Evans

About Maurice Kirk

Maurice was born 12th March1945, a war baby, in Taunton, Somerset, West of England, within a final family of four brothers and one sister while mother and father were working 24/7 to run a country veterinary practice. Country pursuits very much dominated his spare time from most sports with his passion still for hunting , shooting and fishing! Maurice is currently trying to fly to South Africa in his WW2 Piper Cub,registration G-KURK. His other D-Day Cub, G-KERK, is destined, on skis, for a rather taller mountain after his promise to Sir Edmond, six years ago. Meanwhile, the task of obtaining justice in the UK courts, in order to practice veterinary surgery, is proving to be somewhat elusive.Authority has quite another agenda. source: http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2015/04/24/i-will-give-my-house-for-a-copy-of-cardiff-magistrates-court-records-for-my-illegal-harassment-conviction.aspx

video with MK’s sister, September 2014 when MK was still in HMP Cardiff: “Rough Justice: South Wales Police persecute former vet & pilot Maurice Kirk, who’s sueing them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c3tg6pDdR8

<a href=PublicEnquiry from 13 Sept. 2014
Maurice Kirk’s site is http://www.kirkflyingvet.com

More posts from 2015 + until September 2014 – see archives for posts before that:

 MAURICE KIRK: THE RESTRAINING ORDER 26/04/15 + “MY HOUSE FOR REFUSED COURT DOCUMENTS” 24/04/2015

 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/04/26/maurice-kirk-the-restraining-order-260415-my-house-for-refused-court-documents-24042015/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE: PHONE CALLS RECEIVED JAN 2014 etc. + “KIRKGATE” [1st] + “CRIMINAL CASES REVIEW COMMISSION CCRC + PRISON RELEASE”

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/04/16/maurice-kirk-update-criminal-cases-review-commission-ccrc-prison-release/

NEW!! Maurice Kirk uncaged and branchaged 3 April 2015

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/04/13/new-maurice-kirk-uncaged-and-branchaged-3-april-2015/

PICS OF MAURICE KIRK ON RELEASE FROM HMP SWANSEA 27 March 2015 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/28/maurice-kirk-has-been-released-27-march-2015/

MAURICE KIRK RELEASED + Documents [02/02/2015]: “Regina v. Kirk M. J. – “Summing Up”: IMPORTANT IRREGULARITIES EXPLAINED

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/20/maurice-kirk-some-of-the-story/

UPDATE 18 MARCH ’15: MAURICE KIRK: LETTER TO CARDIFF COUNTY COURT, + “DEFENDANT DENIED LEGAL PAPERS IN COURT” etc.

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/18/update-18-march-15-maurice-kirk-letter-to-cardiff-county-court-defendant-denied-legal-papers-in-court-etc/

11 MARCH – MAURICE KIRK VICTIMISED YET AGAIN IN HMP SWANSEA: FULL WEEKLY “CANTEEN” ALLOWANCE DENIED!

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/11/11-march-maurice-kirk-victimised-yet-again-in-hmp-swansea/

MAURICE KIRK: LEVESON: APPEAL APPLICATION JUDGEMENT / POSITION STATEMENT 25 FEB. ’15

 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/08/maurice-kirk-leveson-appeal-judgement-position-statement-25-feb-15/

MAURICE KIRK: UPDATED WITH “BARRY NEWS” ARTICLES – 1ST YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF ONSET OF SERIOUS and untreated! STOMACH AILMENT, CHEQUE FROM DEC. ’14 STILL REFUSED TO BE CASHED, CLERK OF COURTS DOCS STILL REFUSED AGAINST JUDGES ORDERS, + MORE

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/05/maurice-kirk-update-5-mar-2015-1st-year-anniversary-of-onset-of-serious-stomach-ailment-cheque-from-dec-14-still-refused-to-be-cashed-clerk-of-courts-docs-still-refused-against-judges-orders/

MAURICE KIRK IN PRISON 500 DAYS ON SUN. MARCH 1!! – WRIT OF “HABEUS CORPUS” ISSUED – POSITION STATEMENT 18 FEB. ’15

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/27/maurice-kirk-writ-of-habeus-corpus-10-feb-2015-position-statement-18-feb-15/

MAURICE KIRK – POSITION STATEMENT 18 +16 FEB. + DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 19 FEB. 2015 inc. LETTER TO GMC, RCJ APPEAL CT, + more:

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/19/maurice-kirk-documents-received-19-feb-2015/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 15 FEB. 2015 – regarding “the fairness, proportionality, apparent bias and bad faith in the decisions of 11 July 2014 to recall Mr. Maurice Kirk to prison”, + more:

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/15/maurice-kirk-update-15-feb-2015-mappa-docs-more/

MAURICE KIRK – THE STORY SO FAR – A BRIEF SYNOPSIS [UNTIL OCT. 2014] – FILES B, C, D. [30 pages] inc. “Fabicated Medical Records”, “Breach of Restraining Order Appeal” statement 6/6/14, + more:

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/09/maurice-kirk-the-story-so-far-until-oct-2014-files-b-c-d/

MAURICE KIRK – SOCIAL VISIT REFUSED 6 FEB. – POSITION STATEMENT 16 JAN. 2015, + more:

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/06/maurice-kirk-position-statement-26-jan-2015-more/

MAURICE KIRK v S. WALES POLICE: UPDATE 4 FEB. 2015: NOW HELD 475 DAYS IN HM PRISONS UNLAWFULLY! h

ttp://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/maurice-kirk-update-4-feb-2015/

MAURICE KIRK PAROLE HEARING – CANCELLED!! JUST LIKE THAT!!

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/30/maurice-kirk-parole-hearing-cancelled-just-like-that/

LETTER TO THE PRIME MINISTER: MAURICE KIRK – NOT TAKEN TO THE COURTROOM FOR HIS HEARINGS 7 TIMES!! [actually its more!]:

https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/22/letter-to-the-prime-minister-maurice-kirk-not-taken-to-the-courtroom-for-his-hearings-7-times/ 15 Jan.

UPDATE: MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 5 JAN. 2014 – OVER 420 DAYS IN H.M. PRISONS!! STILL NO STOMACH OPERATION AFTER 10 MONTHS!!

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/15/15-jan-update-maurice-kirk-important-documents-received-5-jan-2014-over-420-days-in-h-m-prisons-still-no-stomach-operation-after-10-months/

MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 5 JAN. 2014 – OVER 420 DAYS IN H.M. PRISONS!! STILL NO STOMACH OPERATION AFTER 10 MONTHS!!

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/10/maurice-kirk-important-documents-received-5-jan-2014-over-420-days-in-h-m-prisons-still-no-stomach-operation-after-10-months/

MAURICE KIRK IN PRISON OVER 420 DAYS – THE DISGUSTING UNHYGIENIC CONDITIONS MK IS HAVING TO PUT UP WITH IN HMP BRISTOL – 12 DEC. ’14, + IMPORTANT DOCS.

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/13/maurice-kirk-18-days-before-a-change-of-clothing-12-dec-2014/

MAURICE KIRK: 12 DEC.: WELSH GOVERNMENT REPLIES – A WASTE OF TIME:

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/12/maurice-kirk-12-dec-welsh-government-replies-a-waste-of-time/

ARCHIVES FROM 19 September 2014 until January 2015: MAURICE KIRK POSITION STATEMENT 10 DEC 2014

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/10/maurice-kirk-position-statement-10-dec-2014/ MAURICE KIRK

UPDATE 5 DEC.: FINED £1000 – THE WELSH ASSEMBLY – THE “BRAIN SCAN” + more

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/05/maurice-kirk-update-5-dec-fined-1000-the-welsh-assembly-the-brain-scan-more/

MAURICE KIRK LOCATED IN HMP BRISTOL – 2 DEC. ’14 / BREAKING THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/04/maurice-kirk-located-in-hmp-bristol-2-dec-14/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 30 NOV. 2014 – MAURICE GOES MISSING http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/maurice-kirk-update-30-nov-2014/

UPDATED: MAURICE KIRK: IMPORTANT DOCS RECEIVED 18 NOV. 2014 – MEDICAL UPDATES ETC. http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/18/maurice-kirk-important-docs-received-18-nov-2014/

MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 8 NOV. ’14 – Position Statement 5 Nov. ETC. http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/14/m-krk-docs-received-8-nov-14/

MAURICE KIRK – THE DISGRACEFUL PERSECUTION CONTINUES IN HMP SWANSEA – SUN. 2 NOV. 2014

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/02/maurice-kirk-the-disgraceful-persecution-continues-in-hmp-swansea-sun-2-nov-2014/

MAURICE KIRK: VERY ILL IN HMP SWANSEA, 30 OCT. ’14 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/30/maurice-kirk-very-ill-in-hmp-swansea-30-oct-14/

MAURICE KIRK – FILE A – THE CHARGES, etc.

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/28/maurice-kirk-file-a-of-19-documents/

MAURICE KIRK DOCUMENTS: 25 OCT. 2014 – POSITION STATEMENT 14 OCT. ’14 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/27/maurice-kirk-documents-25-oct-2014/

MAURICE KIRK: LATEST NEWS, 23 OCT. ’14 – PLS SIGN THE PETITION – + more http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/23/maurice-kirek-latest-news-23-oct-14-pls-sign-the-petition-more/ M

AURICE KIRK: LATEST NEWS, 23 OCT. ’14 – ALL CONTACTS REMOVED EXCEPT 1 FROM MK’S TELEPHONE CALL LIST, + PLS SIGN THE PETITION – + more

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/23/maurice-kirek-latest-news-23-oct-14-pls-sign-the-petition-more/

5 IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS FROM MAURICE KIRK 14 OCT. 2014, + MESSAGE TO THE JUSTICE, + ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMITTEE 23 OCT. ’14

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/21/5-important-documents-from-maurice-kirk-14-oct-2014-more/

MAURICE KIRK’S SISTER CELIA – RADIO INTERVIEW – + “THE NEFARIOUS PLOT TO ISOLATE MAURICE”

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/24/maurice-kirks-sister-celia-radio-interview/

MAURICE KIRK UPDATE: 23 SEPT. “14: DOCUMENTS RECEIVED- “RECALL TO CUSTODY APPEAL” + “MALICIOUS PROSECUTION WITHOUT TRIAL”

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/23/maurice-kirk-update-23-sept-24-documents-received/

MAURICE KIRK – DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 18 SEPT. 2014 WHICH TELL OF HIS HELL

http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/19/maurice-kirk-documents-received-which-tell-of-his-hell/

See archives at bottom of page from before 19 September ’14, or on right for posts from 2013 / 14.

M kirk SEPT 2013 1ba.jpgA.jpgB 

The above is a pic from Febuary 2013, outside the Cardiff Civic Centre – MK with some of his legal files to be used in his case against S. Wales police force.

 >>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

 photo BARRY_zps0hjorw7k.jpg 

[NB: MANY OF THESE NEWSPAPER REPORTS ARE VERY BIASED AND UNFACTUAL AGAINST MK – IT SHOULD BE SAID THAT IT IS ALLEGED MK HAS BEEN REMANDED TO PRISON AT LEAST 9 TIMES SINCE 2009, WITH A TOTAL OF OVER 3 YEARS SPENT IN PRISON ON THESE POINTLESS AND HARRASSING REMANDS, AS NO CONVICTIONS ACTUALLY OCCURRED RELATING TO THESE REMANDS BEFORE THIS PERIOD OF INCARCERATION BEGAN ON 16 OCTOBER 2013 [MK SPENT THE NIGHT OF 15 OCT. IN BARRY POLICE STATION CELLS, AND POSSIBLY OCT 14 ALSO]. ALSO SINCE 2009 MK HAS BEEN STOPPED OVER 35 TIMES, WHILST DRIVING HIS CAR, FOR DRINK-DRIVING TESTS. NOT ONE CONVICTION RESULTING AS A RESULT OF ANY STOP [ALLEGEDLY]. INDEED, MK TELLS US OFTEN HE WAS TAKEN TO THE POLICE STATION FOR THE DRINKING OF ALCOHOL TEST, ONLY TO BE RELEASED WITHOUT EVEN BEING GIVEN IT! MK HAS AN ONGOING CIVIL CASE AGAINST S. WALES POLICE FORCE

– see the radio broadcast interview with MK’s sister on “Dialect Radio”, September 2014 =

video: “Rough Justice: South Wales Police persecute former vet & pilot Maurice Kirk who’s them”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c3tg6pDdR8

 
——————————————————————————————————————–

Barry’s ‘flying vet’ fails in legal bid Barry And District News: APPEAL: Flying vet Maurice Kirk. 7:40am Thursday 7 July 2011

Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

ATTEMPTS by Barry’s ‘flying vet’ to bring criminal charges against a former chief constable, psychiatrist and solicitor were thwarted by a judge last week. Firearms charges for Barry’s ‘Flying Vet’ Barry And District News: Firearms charges for Barry's 'Flying Vet' 7:30am Thursday 25 June 2009

Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

BARRY’S ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk has been charged with alleged firearms offences Barry’s ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk cleared of firearms charges Barry And District News: FLYING VET: Maurice Kirk. 7:30am Thursday 11 February 2010

Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

BARRY’S ‘flying vet’ was this week cleared of charges relating to owning and trying to sell a machine gun.

‘Flying Vet’ sent to US psychiatric unit 11:33am Thursday 1 May 2008

  • Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template
  • BARRY’S ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk was this week locked up in an American psychiatric unit – after landing his plane near George W Bush’s Texas ranch.

 

SOURCE: http://www.barryanddistrictnews.co.uk/search/?page=1&topic_id=2308&search=maurice+kirk

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , ,

PATRICK CULLINANE: IRISH IN BRITAIN REPRESENTATION GROUP [IBRG] NEWSLETTER, 15 MAY 2015

IRISH IN BRITAIN REPRESENTATION GROUP (IBRG)

 Working Against all the Odds!!

<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><><<<<<<<<<<<<<<> 

15 May 2015

FAO: All Addressees and All Those it Should Concern To STOP Organised Crime by Infiltrated Government Organisations,

Formal Complaint Re: Stephen Barrett, HOMELESS, C/O 42 Augustine Road, Harrow weald, Harrow, Middlesex, HA3 5NP

-v-

THE SATANIC TALMUDIC LAW IN UK

Thursday 14th May 2015

Property Auction commencing 2.00 p.m.at The New Continental Hotel, Millbay Road, Plymouth

http://www.shobrook.co.uk/property_auctions/view/592

John Paterson uploaded a new video from May 15 to his timeline.

Reporting David Cameron and Tony Blair’s Crimes to pleasant Lady at the local Sussex Police Station.

https://www.facebook.com/john.paterson.583/posts/10153240713497593?pnref=story

What more evidence does, We the People, need that the Police are assisting a Foreign Power to Asset Strip the People of the UK? – As you can see above, the Police failed in their duty to STOP the Auction yesterday of Stephen Barrett’s STOLEN PROPERTIES’.  And also failed to arrest and charge the CONSPIRING CRIMINALS.  The Police and the IPCC are ignoring Formal Complaints, and ALL FRAUDS and ROBBERIES against the We the People are classed as Civil matters.

Yours truthfully,
Patrick Cullinane, Common Law Lawyer and Victim of Jew Process in the UK’s COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts.

From: Patrick Cullinane [mailto:patrick.cullinane@tiscali.co.uk] Sent: 14 May 2015 12:49 To:Tracey.Lee@plymouth.gov.uk‘; ‘Nancy.Jennings@plymouth.gov.uk‘; ‘Rhiannon@curtissolicitors.co.uk‘; ‘Sue@cwcsolicitors.co.uk‘; ‘Info@nevesllp.co.uk‘; ‘Info@shobrook.co.uk‘; ‘justine.Carruthers@icaew.com‘; ‘Shauna.Mcken@icaew.com‘; ‘member.admin@icaew.com‘; ‘Helen.Lewis@willis.com‘; ‘Enquiries@bis.gov.uk‘; ‘DeidreDeward@eversheds.com‘; ‘DavidSweet@eversheds.com‘; ‘Ian@ianfraser.org‘; ‘Peter.Johnston@packetseries.co.uk‘; ‘Markh@grylls-Paige.co.uk:'; ‘Residential@harmen-healy.co.uk‘; ‘Kate.Brain@pearcebros.co.uk‘; ‘MahtabAziz@hotmail.co.uk‘; ‘Katherine.Montgomery@psni.pnn.police.uk‘; ‘postmaster@contact.actionfraud.police.uk‘; ‘C1FinancialCrimeAssessmentTeam@psni.pnn.police.uk‘; ‘Communication@nca.x.gsi.gov.uk‘; ‘daniel.turk@sussex.pnn.police.uk‘; ‘David.Henderson4@psni.pnn.police.uk‘; ‘Matthew.Austin@financial-ombudsman.org.uk‘; ‘Which? Campaigns'; ‘Sarah.Newton.MP@parliament.uk‘; ‘editor@veteranstoday.com‘; Nick Hurd – My (Con) MP; ‘info@victimsupporteurope.eu‘; ‘bernard.hogan-howe@met.police.uk‘; New Scotland Yard – Met Police Cc: Steve Barrett -v- THE SATANIC TALMUDIC LAW IN UK; John Paterson -v- ISRAELI HIJACK OF MAGNA CARTA 1215; ‘Joseph Henry'; ‘SophSweet@gmail.com‘; Colin Peters – Victim of COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts; Michael Vaughan & Family -v- THE ZIONIST CORRUPTION OF ÉIRE; Bryan Allen -v- THE ZIONIST CORRUPTION OF ÉIRE; ‘lincspatriot@hotmail.co.uk‘; Michael O’Neill -v- THE ZIONIST CORRUPTION OF ÉIRE; ‘Seven Gate'; Michael Clarke -v- ISRAELI HIJACK OF MAGNA CARTA 1215; ‘pidcockdavid8@gmail.com‘; John Wilson – Victim of Kangaroo Courts in Australia; John Cullinane – Victim of Solicitors & Judges in US; King Lion -v- ISRAELI HIJACK OF MAGNA CARTA 1215; ‘Enquiry@newlynplc.co.uk‘; ‘butlin cat’ Subject: STOP THE ASSET STRIPPING OF STEPHEN BARRETT IMMEDIATELY WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF ENGLAND’S COMMON LAW = Magna Carta 1215: – Importance: High

IRISH IN BRITAIN REPRESENTATION GROUP (IBRG)

 Working Against all the Odds!!

<>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>><><<<<<<<<<<<<<<> 

14 May 2015

FAO: All Addressees and All Those it Should Concern To STOP Organised Crime by Infiltrated Government Organisations,

Formal Complaint Re: Stephen Barrett, HOMELESS, C/O 42 Augustine Road, Harrow weald, Harrow, Middlesex, HA3 5NP

-v-

THE SATANIC TALMUDIC LAW IN UK

It is imperative that YOU peruse the correspondence below that IBRG received from Stephen Barrett, which is self-explanatory and warrants IMMEDIATE action by WHOEVER can do anything about this ORGANISED FRAUD against Stephen Barrett, as the Police have yet again FAILED to do their duty.

 Like, Patrick Cullinane, Stephen Barrett and his 9-year-old daughter Mia, are the victims of a massive CONSPIRACY by corrupt infiltrated Government Organisations in England to defraud and destroy them without Due Process of the Constitutional Common Law of the Land.

England is a Common Law jurisdiction and Stephen Barrett and his 9-year-old daughter have been and are being denied their guaranteed rights in Common Law to Due Process via Trial by Jury.  Trial by their Peers.

Plymouth City Council and their RUTHLESS Agents’ have CONSPIRED to defraud Stephen Barrett and his daughter of ALL their assets and happiness. – Despite never having the authority whatsoever in Common Law to do so.

Common Law does not include any statutes made by government or decisions made by judges!

Why did the Plymouth Police abuse their position and Public Office by NOT investigating and prosecuting these highly organised Asset Strippers’ operating outside of the English Constitutional Common Law of the Land?  –  Now it has been established, beyond all reasonable doubt, that the Police are involved in these ROBBERIES, as seen here yet again in the Barretts’ case.

Given that, all that has been presented is VEXATIOUS litigation, taken against the Barretts’ by Plymouth City Council, to KICK-OFF this FRAUDULENT TERRORIST chain of events, as they were TIME-BARRED to Six years, while Plymouth City Council were going back 11-years, and flatly refused to supply a Proof of Claim when requested.  –

How can Plymouth City Council collect Council Tax for derelict houses, taken out of the tax band, while under construction?  –

The following is VEXATIOUS LITIGATION to STEAL PROPERTY, on the malicious pretence that it is legitimate; when it is ALL FRAUD: –

Plymouth City Council bringing in the Rothschild Khazarian Mafia to Asset Strip the law abiding English, Barrett family, without Due Process.

Stephen Barrett is NOT Bankrupted his rental income was unlawfully taken by a well organised Mafia Gang to prevent him paying his mortgages, so they could foreclose on ALL his properties.  When Stephen Barrett’s tenants’ agreed to pay him TWO MONTHS RENT so he could pay his mortgages it was REFUSED by the Mafia Gangsters, as they wanted ALL his 23 Properties. – This is a massive SCAM in England, as the Police are in on it, as they are LYING to the English and Irish People that organised FRAUD by GANGSTERS’ in Government Organisations is a Civil matter: –

Rothschild Khazarian Mafia, all linked to Plymouth City Council to Asset Strip law abiding Christians’ without Due Process:

Stephen Barrett is in hiding now, he has NO MONEY, and he CANNOT sign on, as he will be MURDERED by these Mafia Gangsters to COVER-UP their crimes, and he has NO protection whatsoever from the Police. –  Which was the very same in the Patrick Cullinane case, and EVERY case that I have been dealing with.  We now have a ROGUE Police FORCE in England, Ireland, Australia and America attacking and ROBBING the Christian People.  Pretending to be working with the People, but the FRAUD always WINS out, it is never STOPPED, as seen here yet again: –

From: Steve Barrett [mailto:stevebarrett58@icloud.com]

Sent: 13 May 2015 15:06

To: patrick.cullinane@tiscali.co.uk

Subject: Fwd: 1.NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED-All Networks: FW: RE: CLIENTS ALLEGATIONS RE HBOS

Hi Patrick there is some Northern Ireland police in this email that I’d like you to send this email to Kathryn Montgomery and David Henderson they know what this is all about.

Thanks Steve

Sent from my iPhone

________________________________________

Begin forwarded message:

From: Mahtab Aziz <mahtabaziz@hotmail.co.uk>

Date: 29 March 2015 22:30:05 BST

To: “stevebarrett58@icloud.com” <stevebarrett58@icloud.com>

Subject: FW: 1.NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED-All Networks: FW: RE: CLIENTS ALLEGATIONS RE HBOS

Dear Steve,

Please find the email from the police re: contacting actionfraud.

Please do not contact any of the investigating NI Police officers direct as requested by TDC Inspector Montgomery.

Thanks.

Mahtab

________________________________________

From: katherine.montgomery@psni.pnn.police.uk

To: mahtabaziz@hotmail.co.uk

Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2015 09:31:42 +0000

Subject: 1.NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED-All Networks: FW: RE: CLIENTS ALLEGATIONS RE HBOS

Mr Aziz

I refer to the foregoing emails.

Whilst I still await the information requested in my emails as below, my Detective Inspector has received telephone calls on his work mobile from alleged victims of Bank of Scotland, who are resident in England.

Police in Northern Ireland are still in the process of assessing the Attorney General’s referral and have not commenced a criminal investigation to date;

  • Should any individual resident in mainland UK believe they are/have been a victim of Bank of Scotland then the correct procedure is to report the matter directly to Action Fraud, via Action Fraud’s online reporting mechanism which can be accessed thus – actionfraud.police.uk.  Action Fraud will collate the information and match with similar reports across the country including those within Northern Ireland;
  • No work mobile numbers for PSNI officers should be provided to potential victims who contact you.  The numbers were given to you for ease of contact with PSNI only.

I would be grateful if you could provide the information requested previously as this will assist me in the meetings I have scheduled with relevant bodies both in NI and mainland UK.

I look forward to hearing from you and your on-going assistance in this matter is appreciated.

Thank you & regards,

Katherine

Katherine Montgomery

T/D/C/Inspector

C1 Organised Crime Branch

Knocknagoney PSNI   –  Ext: 69357

——————————————————————————————-

From: mahtabaziz@hotmail.co.uk [mailto:mahtabaziz@hotmail.co.uk]

Sent: 04 March 2015 16:40

To: MONTGOMERY Katherine

Subject: Re: 1.NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED-All Networks: RE: CLIENTS ALLEGATIONS RE HBOS

Dear TDCI Montgomery,

Thank you for your email.

I am in communication with my clients and am in the process of gathering together the information you have requested.

I will revert to you asap.

Kind. Regards

Mahtab Aziz

Sent from my BlackBerry® smartphone on O2

__________________________________________

From: <katherine.montgomery@psni.pnn.police.uk>

Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 15:59:59 +0000

To: <mahtabaziz@hotmail.co.uk>

Cc: <C1FinancialCrimeAssessmentTeam@psni.pnn.police.uk>; <David.Henderson4@psni.pnn.police.uk>

Subject: 1.NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED-All Networks: RE: CLIENTS ALLEGATIONS RE HBOS

Mr Aziz

I have been forwarded a copy of your email communication with Police Service of Northern Ireland dated 5th January 2015, regarding the above subject.

For the purpose of clarification – the referral from Attorney General for Northern Ireland is currently with me and my Financial Assessment Team, to assess whether a criminal investigation should be instigated and if so, who is best placed to investigate same.

Having read your correspondence, I would be keen to learn the following information –

To your knowledge have any of your Clients made Formal Complaints to any Police Force in respect of this matter?

  • If so, which Police Force have they been in contact with?
  • How many complaints are you aware of currently?

his information is vital in establishing exactly how wide-ranging this investigation could potentially be and the aspect of locations of victims is important as well.

If you have trouble reaching me on the number below, my Deputy is Detective Inspector David Henderson and you can reach him either by email david.henderson4@psni.pnn.police.uk or on mobile number – 07795 607226.  He is aware of the referral, your correspondence and the issues surrounding same.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Regards,

Katherine Montgomery

Katherine Montgomery

T/D/C/Inspector

C1 Organised Crime Branch

Knocknagoney PSNI

Mobile: 07808144554

See attached Document 27, and the PUBLIC NOTICE – THE COMMON LAW COURTS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM

From: Steve Barrett [mailto:stevebarrett58@icloud.com] Sent: 11 May 2015 13:48 To: patrick.cullinane@tiscali.co.uk Subject: Fwd: Document (27).pdf

Hi Patrick as you will see I reported this to the National Crime Agency ref: CC1504-184 who also forwarded to the Devon and Cornwall Police. But once again NOT heard from them. Need crime number as well as what I have already which is a incident number. Speak soon Steve
Sent from my iPhone

________________________________________________

From: Communication <communication@nca.x.gsi.gov.uk> Date: 15 April 2015 00:22:08 BST To: “‘stevebarrett58@icloud.com‘” <stevebarrett58@icloud.com> Subject: RE: Document (27).pdf

OFFICIAL

Our reference – CC1504-184

Dear Mr Barrett,

With regards to your email below, if you feel there is immediate danger or a crime currently in action please contact the emergency services via 999.  If you have been a victim of crime you should report this to your local police station who will then take any necessary action.  You can do this in person at the nearest police station or your local force can be contacted via the 101 number and then selecting the local force.

We will pass this information to your local force but please contact the police force directly to follow this up.

Kind regards,

Duty Officer [MH]

National Crime Agency PO Box 58345, London, NW1W 9JJ

communication@nca.x.gsi.gov.uk

0370 496 7622

________________________________________

From: Steve Barrett [mailto:stevebarrett58@icloud.com] Sent: 14 April 2015 20:35 To: Communication Subject: Fwd: Document (27).pdf

Hi National Crime Agency, thought I’d make you aware of what is happening to me, worked 7days a week for over 35 years, I’m the best builder in the country and father, had my 9 year old girl kidnapped off me in order to steal all my portfolio. I am homeless and penniless since 2nd December 2014. And I’m fearing for my life. Maybe you can get me remedy/redress. I wait your speedy reply. Steve Barrett
Sent from my iPhone

_________________________________________

From: Steve Barrett <stevebarrett58@icloud.com> Date: 14 April 2015 19:33:38 BST To:postmaster@contact.actionfraud.police.uk” <postmaster@contact.actionfraud.police.uk> Subject: Document (27).pdf

Hi Actionfraud enclosed letter dated 14th April 2015 for your immediate attention, as I’m being held to ransom by these criminal cartels Eversheds etc. The Bank of Scotland/Eversheds need to be seen doing what they told the court service in Northern Ireland, that was Bank of Scotland announced on 15/12/14 “to suspend all without exception all litigation/repossessions in Northern Ireland, England and Wales until further notice” so in my case, they are misleading the court.

Hear from you soon.

Steve Barrett

It is imperative that you peruse my THREE comments on here: –

The Spectator: by Neil Darbyshire on 7 March 2015   –   278 Comments

The shocking truth about police corruption in Britain

It’s a growing problem. But they’re hunting whistleblowers instead

http://www.spectator.co.uk/features/9461322/the-shocking-truth-about-police-corruption-in-britain/

Jew Process in the Peoples Common Law Courts by the JEWdiciary is what caused, “THE CORRUPTION OF BRITAIN” – And CLEANSED the indigenous English and the ethnic immigrant Irish communities’ by FLEECING us without Jury Trials by our Peers.  A Foreign Power [JEWISH FRIENDS OF ISRAEL] have hijacked the Rule of Law and the Constitutional Common Law of the Land = Magna Carta 1215, and are now operating Jewish TALMUD Courts in the UK and Ireland etc, where Gentiles / Christians have NO rights to Property or Justice, as you can CLEARLY see and hear in the Cullinane video above:

THIRTEEN High Court Judges denied me my Constitutional Common Law rights under Magna Carta 1215 to a Trial by Jury:  =  HIGH TREASON

The Independent: By Tom Harper, Investigations Reporter on Friday 10 January 2014

The corruption of Britain: UK’s key institutions infiltrated by criminals

Secret report shows how organised crime infiltrated judicial system as well as police with prison service and HM Revenue & Customs also compromised

Tiberius disclosed that the Met interviewed the journalist who wrote the story after the murder of Solly Nahome, a Jewish money launderer credited as the “brains” behind the Adams’ criminal empire.

The Turkish drug dealer was later convicted and told police he was an HMRC informant. He said he knew of “corrupt contacts within the police” and had a Cyprus-based customs officer as a handler who “took money off him”.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/the-corruption-of-britain-uks-key-institutions-infiltrated-by-criminals-9052617.html

Now you/we know why the Police and the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) are NOT prosecuting FRAUD : –

The Independent: By Tom Harper, Investigations Reporter on Sunday 12 January 2014

Revealed: How gangs used the Freemasons to corrupt police

Gangsters able to recruit police officers through secret society, says investigation for Scotland Yard

Secret networks of Freemasons have been used by organised crime gangs to corrupt the criminal justice system, according to a bombshell Metropolitan Police report leaked to The Independent.

Freemasonry has long been suspected of having members who work in the criminal justice system – notably the judiciary and the police.

The political establishment and much of the media often dismiss such ideas as the work of conspiracy theorists

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/revealed-how-gangs-used-the-freemasons-to-corrupt-police-9054670.html

The following is what the Barrett family and ALL the Christian People in England are TRAPPED in, right now, with NO Due Process:

Magna Carta 1215: – Common Law has been replaced with Talmudic Law – Patrick Cullinane: –

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2YeAdYuAWE

These are the Jewish Courts that are operating in Ireland and England now; while Vincent Byrne is leading the Irish People ‘up the garden path’: –

The Whole Story Of Zionist Conspiracy [The Filthy History Of Paedophilia, Murder & Bigotry]

Uploaded on 29 Jan 2012

Note how God’s WRITTEN LAW was discarded for the Zionists UNWRITTEN made-up law to ROB, RAPE, TERRORISE and MURDER with IMPUNITY!  –

“The TALMUD, which has aptly been called; The Monument to HUMAN FOLLY” … “Gentiles they classed, not as men, but as Barbarians … And has NO right to property” … “The testimony of the Christian was NOT admitted in evidence in Jewish courts” – There you have it.

This story might (WILL) hurt us as human beings

http://bit.ly/1C61bzf

The Cambridge Union Society

This House Believes Israel is a Rogue State

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jjkivkkZYNo

I could NOT vote on 7th May 2015, as We the Sovereign People had NO choice, as ALL the Parties are HIJACKED by Jews, which you can see from the following – And is High Treason: –

“Naming and Shaming – The List Of Israel’s Agents Within British Politics”

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/06/naming-and-shaming-the-list-of-israels-agents-within-british-politics/

The following is the incontrovertible evidence that the Israeli MAFIA have HIJACKED, Magna Carta 1215, the Constitutional Law of the Land: + Constitutions and Governments’ in the UK, USA, Australia and Ireland by controlling 96% of the World’s MEDIA and infiltrating OUR Governments, JEWdiciary and Police, which are ALL working in support of the interests of the State of Israel now: –

http://bit.ly/1Ke81sd

Video – Channel 4 UK – Broadcast November 16, 2009

Dispatches: Inside Britain’s Israel Lobby

Dispatches investigates one of the most powerful and influential political lobbies in Britain, which is working in support of the interests of the State of Israel.

Political commentator Peter Oborne investigates how accountable, transparent and open to scrutiny the lobby is, particularly in regard to its funding and financial support of MPs.

Oborne examines how the lobby operates from within parliament and the tactics it employs behind the scenes when engaging with print and broadcast media.

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/33719/inside_britains_israel_lobby/

“Realities are turned upside-down and we are told, War is Peace, and the Lie becomes the Truth; effectively the Peace they promise is never-ending Asset Stripping and WAR”

David Cameron, Nick Clegg – UK Illuminati Puppets Exposed

This is a full length film exposing the most known UK politicians, who claim to be good guys just trying to help their country, in actual fact, their illuminati satanic, Freemason Bilderbergers who have no care about the people what so ever, this is a real eye opening look at the “chosen ones” Comment and share please! Get the truth out; these scum bags have too much people fooled This documentary is named Right Honorable Gentlemen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaNWx4ssGs0

David Cameron never won the sElection, it was RIGGED. – Who in their right mind would vote for, a Friend of Israel, who cannot tell the truth?

Veterans Today Posted by Preston James, Ph.D on 08 May 2015

PROPOSED DECLARATION of War against Rothschild Khazarian Mafia

A Plan to Declare War on the Rothschild Khazarian Mafia & Eradicate its espionage and penetration of America…

It is recognized beyond any reasonable doubt that most US National, State and Local elections have been plagued by vote-fraud, especially manipulation of electronic vote totals. All future voting will be by paper ballot only and will be hand-counted and hand tabulated with public observation allowed behind glass and all counting completely and fully video recorded to protect from fraud.

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/05/08/proposed-declaration-of-war-against-the-rothschild-khazarian-maa/

↕We need the very same in England and Ireland right NOW to protect us Christians!

I, Patrick Cullinane, am demanding my Home and Property back immediately, and FULL compensation for my losses, damages, prospects, blight of over 34-years of TERRORISM and TORTURE by a Foreign Power Established in England and Ireland by the State of Israel, which is HIGH TREASON: –

Who is going to STOP the Auction today in Plymouth of the Barretts’ Property, as it is all FRAUD? – In the public interet, ALL these Mafia Gangsters MUST be arrested TODAY, as they are selling – STOLEN PROPERTY!

Yours truthfully,
Patrick Cullinane, Common Law Lawyer and Victim of Jew Process in the UK’s COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts.

—–Original Message—– From: Steve Barrett [mailto:stevebarrett58@icloud.com] Sent: 13 May 2015 09:19 To: patrick.cullinane@tiscali.co.uk Subject: MY LIFE IS IN SERIOUS DANGER

Dear Patrick Cullinane,

Thank you for confirming to me, receipt of my letter, exposing names, email addresses and telephone numbers of the individuals in this cartel / criminal gang, who are terrorising me, making me in fear for my life, and are all involved in the CONSPIRACY to defraud and destroy me and my daughter Mia. The stealing of my identity, my income/rental income, my rental deposits, my bank accounts, all my houses’ and flats’, and all my antiques’ / furniture, personal belongings etc.

These individuals have a bounty out for me, to MURDER me in order for them to cover-up and get away with their organised crimes’.  It is sole destroying that that these thieving Mafia Gangsters are using my money, in a bounty, to find and MURDER me.

Patrick, I have been to the police and reported the crimes, but they are in on the theft of my money, 23 Properties’ and possessions, as they refused to give me a crime number, by telling me that the ROBBERY of my 23 Properties and Possessions is a Civil matter.  This, as you well know is a blatant LIE to pervert the course of justice and assist a massive robbery against me and my young daughter Mia.  I have no protection whatsoever from the Police, as they are in with the criminals to do me harm.

So Patrick, knowing all this, I am begging you, please please please help me, I don’t want to DIE, I’m the most honest “human being” on the land.  Please help me got my life back to normal.  The best thing that ever happened to me was, my little girl MIA, they have taken her from me.  I last seen my daughter on 8th September 2014, when she was KIDNAPPED from her Falmouth School in Cornwall.  After having 23 houses, I am now HOMELESS and have no home for my daughter Mia to bring her home to.  It is Hell upon Earth for my daughter and me, as she wanted to be with me.

Also can you please stop SHOBROOKS AUCTIONEERS. From Auctioning my properties 10 Wilderness Road, Plymouth, PL3 4RN and flat 1 72Durnford street, Plymouth, PL1 3QW. Tomorrow 14th May 2015 at 14.00pm.

I Stephen(of the Barrett) family of MARLBOROUGH HOUSE, FALMOUTH, TR11 4HW, give you PATRICK CULLINANE my CONSENT AND AUTHORITY TO ACT ON MY BEHALF.

Yours sincerely,

Stephen(of the Barrett) family.

Sent from my iPhone

5 Attachments

Preview attachment PUBLIC NOTICE – THE COMMON LAW COURTS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM…doc

PUBLIC NOTICE – THE COMMON LAW COURTS OF THE UNITED KINGDOM…doc

32 KB

Preview attachment Document (27).pdf

Document (27).pdf

522 KB

Preview YouTube video Common Law has been replaced with Talmudic Law – Patrick Cullinane

Common Law has been replaced with Talmudic Law – Patrick Cullinane

Preview YouTube video This House Believes Israel is a Rogue State

This House Believes Israel is a Rogue State

Preview YouTube video David Cameron, Nick Clegg – UK Illuminati Puppets Exposed

David Cameron, Nick Clegg – UK Illuminati Puppets Exposed

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged ,

UPDATED: MAURICE KIRK – AFTER VISITING BIRMINGHAM CCRC OFFICES FOR HIS PROMISED DOCUMENTS – 15 MAY 2015

Pics from Maurice Kirk’s Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/maurice.kirk.92?fref=ts which shows updates from him going to Birmingham on the 15 May 2015 to get his long awaited documents he’s been promised previously by judges, et al, from the  Criminal Case Review Commission offices there, these documents very much relating to his terms of enforced imprisonments suffered recently, apart from anything else.
He was, of course, refused the docs there today, in fact theyre now refusing to speak with him at all, which will lead to further action from MK – as they say – watch this space!!
mk birmingham 15may153mk birmingham 15may152
————————————————————————————————————-
Message received earlier from MK on 15 MAY 2015:
“Patiently  I waited at CCRC [Criminal Cases Review Commission] offices in Birmingham, this morning, for half an hour and then asked them at reception to be on standby for my needing, possibly, to call the police if copy of 2011 Cardiff magistrates court file was not finally handed over.
CPS have conceded at least twice remember, in open court, I have already been given copy and entitled to another. In February 2013 the court even sent a copy of it to the CCRC following my falsified harassment conviction fiasco complaint.
The pantomime of deceit was witnessed by many from all over Europe and had been quietly tape recorded in anticipation of this inevitable multi faceted ‘authority’ cover up.
Reception, for CCRC, now tell me it will not even speak to me yet alone hand over the file  promised earlier this week to a lawyer. CCRC were wanting to send the file to me, direct and had asked the lawyer which was my current prison address? They need only wait until Monday pm to be able to hand deliver to Winston Green, I think is the  name of the local HMP.
Then the police turn up on their bicycles with Patrick ‘all sweetness, politeness and light’…….so just who is frightened of what, if you get my drift??
Could this be a simple example,  under the surface, of just how corrupt the British judicial system has become  in our 800th year of Magna Carta celebrations?  ”  [ends]
————————————————————————————————————————————

Message received from Maurice Kirk  14 May 2015: “If CCRC do not send today, by email, court documents I plan to go to their offices without warning. Also if that ridiculous 23-year need to sue SWP [South Wales Police] without their very own government documents, revealing proof of bullying, does not conclude,for appeal papers to go in, there will be local Cardiff cabal trouble as well. All to cover up machine gun conspiracy by barbara w, senior MAPPA and bent, sacked police psychiatrist.” [ends] 31 above: MK, 09 MAY 2015 —————————————————————————- 12a………………………………………. Maurice…9 May – CLOSING SUBMISSIONS TO THE CIVIL HEARING AGAINST S. WALES POLICE [to be continued], which has already seen over 3 months in court hearings, at Cardiff Civic Centre, interrupted by MK’s enforced imprisonment of 17+ months in October 2013, being released on 27 March 2015:  1a234567891011 12 To be continued… Maurice Kirk’s site [soon to be relocated] is at: http://www.kirkflyingvet.com Please scroll down or see archives here for many posts going back to 2011 Pic taken 9 May 2015, Bournemouth: 7a.jpga From earlier: Audio from Maurice Kirk 28 April 2015: MAURICE KIRK AUDIO 28/04/15 – DOCUMENTS REFUSED BY AUTHORITIES – WHY?

Published on 1 May 2015
Audio in this video from a phone call received 28 April ‘ 15 from Maurice Kirk, released on 27 March from HMP Cardiff after 17+ months imprisonment for his alleged “breaching the terms of a “restraining order””. Maurice tells us he is allegedly refused from the authorities certain court documents from his hearing of 1/12/11 which are relating very much to the aforementioned “restraining order” and therefore his subsequent imprisonment for the “breaching” of the order pertaining to it. Maurice was at the “Final Submissions” stage in his civil case against S. Wales police force held at Cardiff Civic Centre

for 20+ years harassment from them. Maurice had already been remanded in custody, before this term of questionable imprisonment at least 7 times since 2009 – these “remands without bail” totalling a period of over 3 years in custody which saw no actual convictions brought against Maurice, 70 – he being let free each time from these remands with no actual charges with convictions being realised.

Maurices site, which is packed with information, due to be revamped and relocated soon he tells us, is http://www.kirkflyingvet.com 01/05/2015 a m kirk Above pic made from when MK was on hunger strike [ended on 3 March 2014] in HMP Cardiff – an earlier pic has been used. ———————————————————————————–

Letter from MK, dated 24 April ’15:KIRK LETTER 24APR15

Certain authorities refuse to release to Maurice Kirk certain documents relating to him that he is perfectly entitled to have. He is questionably refused them wholesale [as with, also, certain medical records pertaining to his enforced stay in the “Caswell Clinic, Wales]. Maurice states that he will give his house [see post below] to anyone who can obtain these court documents.

Having spoken to M a few hours ago he says he’s now infinitely better regarding his medical situation, but is still undergoing tests for newer and equally serious ailments which have come about because of his denial of medical treatment whilst in HMP proceed. Letters to the Prime Minister, more than once, could not get the authorities to let this urgent operation MK, 70, urgently needed proceed. MK became ill in March 2014 after being on “hunger strike” for approx. 33 days, but the urgent operation – a “colonoscopy” or something similar, was always refused, despite letters to the Prime Minister, Secretary of State, Home Office, MP’s, and last but not least, the “Ministry of Justice”. In HMP, often in excruciating pain, he would be refused treatment and pain-killing medication, and also when he most needed it – in the night. Hospital appointments were made but cancelled regarding his stomach ailment. Getting private medical treatment became impossible, and a cheque for £1000 that could have been used for such was refused to be cashed and put into MK’s a/c – it being received by MK in December 2014, and still uncashed in March ’15 when MK left HMP. MK was rushed to hospital once from a Cardiff court hearing on the judges orders in November 2014 as the pain from his ailments made him incapable of taking part in the court hearing.
Maurice Kirk is sueing S. Wales police for 20+ years harassment – this case is ongoing and was interrupted by MK’s imprisonment in October 2013. Great controversy surrounds the numerous “restraining orders” issued or not issued to MK – getting to the root of this subject is proving extremely difficult when, in reality, the entire subject could be cleared up easily and quickly.
Below is a letter from the MoJ concerning “medical treatment” supposedly given to citizens while ensconced in an HMP prison [as MK was until 27 March ’15, needing the urgent medical operation for over a year] – discernment is needed, unfortunately, regarding veracity of the MoJ’s statement!!ZZZZZAwhite1 011a
Maurice Kirk’s site, soon to be replaced with a new one, is http://www.kirkflyingvet.com .
Maurice Kirk <maurice@kirkflyingvet.com>

WRITES 26/04/15:
“This was the only restraining order that ever entered my Cardiff magistrates cell in 2011. It was stuffed under the door during fabricated police doctor ‘harassment’ case originated to cover up police concocted ‘machine gun’ trial that destroyed my marriage..
Evil Cardiff judges, CPS, Geoamey Custodial Services, clerks of courts and now, it appears, even Criminal Cases Review Commission have all since lied, through their back teeth, requiring them to have written and re written both Crown and Magistrates court logs and clerk’s notes etc and destroy (police seize) the equally fabricated Sept and Nov 2011 magistrates court exhibits all denied me in subsequent jury trials for ‘breach’ of exposing a criminal.
Also prosecution exhibits originated mid trial for the retrospective custodial sentence handed down by HHJ Llewellyn Jones QC, it appears, before the evidence was even given. This was the judge, remember, who had me sectioned under the 1983 Mental Health Act, in the first place, to be incarcerated in Aug 09 Caswell Clinic triggered from some fax sent by a South Wales police doctor who had not even examined me!
Anything to stop my damages claims, a real risk to their judicial autonomy.
Do I make it more confusing or did Voltaire get it right when he said,
“When the State get it wrong it is dangerous to be right”
This half doc needs maximum publicity worldwide or you may be next.”
Attatchment:

———————————————————-31

Legal Battles

My House for a Copy of Cardiff Magistrates Court Records of My Illegal Harassment Imprisonment

Watch this space My telephone is 07708586202 The jury asked for them and was refused and I asked for them, of course, as there is no record of any restraining order ever being served on me in the cells. CPS, police, judges and CCRC have them but we cannot…..does it stink? Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) has washed its hands of the case as further proof of the wide spread corruption within Cardoiff’s criminal courts is usually kept well under wraps MUSA six children snatch by Harringay Council is what it is actually all about…(.I was prevented from exposing the disgusting law firm (name later) in Kilburn High Street stealing the legal aid whilst pretending to be acting for a couple then gaoled for 7 years. I was arrested for ‘failing to attend’ the vital hearing for their release…..just minutes after the ‘restraining order ‘ was attempted to be stuffed into my pocket as I was being dragged out of my cell by very irrate five Geomey custody officers wanting to go home ! (Cardiff prison was ordered NOT to produce me!.) Leaked HM Internal Memos.pdf kirk house Filed under: South Wales Police, Machine Gun, Caswell Clinic, MAPPA, General Medical Council, Cardiff Magistrates Court, Abuse of Process, Lawful Rebellion, NHS WALES, Professor Rodger Wood, Dr Bruce Fergusson, Luigi Stranati, District Judge Bodfan Jenkins. District Judge John Charles, David Gareth Evans

About Maurice Kirk

Maurice was born 12th March1945, a war baby, in Taunton, Somerset, West of England, within a final family of four brothers and one sister while mother and father were working 24/7 to run a country veterinary practice. Country pursuits very much dominated his spare time from most sports with his passion still for hunting , shooting and fishing! Maurice is currently trying to fly to South Africa in his WW2 Piper Cub,registration G-KURK. His other D-Day Cub, G-KERK, is destined, on skis, for a rather taller mountain after his promise to Sir Edmond, six years ago. Meanwhile, the task of obtaining justice in the UK courts, in order to practice veterinary surgery, is proving to be somewhat elusive.Authority has quite another agenda. source: http://www.kirkflyingvet.com/blogs/legal/archive/2015/04/24/i-will-give-my-house-for-a-copy-of-cardiff-magistrates-court-records-for-my-illegal-harassment-conviction.aspx video with MK’s sister, September 2014 when MK was still in HMP Cardiff: “Rough Justice: South Wales Police persecute former vet & pilot Maurice Kirk, who’s sueing them: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c3tg6pDdR8

<a href=PublicEnquiry” width=”48″ height=”48″ /> PublicEnquiry from 13 Sept. 2014] Maurice Kirk’s site is http://www.kirkflyingvet.com

More posts from 2015 + until September 2014 – see archives for posts before that: MAURICE KIRK: THE RESTRAINING ORDER 26/04/15 + “MY HOUSE FOR REFUSED COURT DOCUMENTS” 24/04/2015 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/04/26/maurice-kirk-the-restraining-order-260415-my-house-for-refused-court-documents-24042015/ MAURICE KIRK UPDATE: PHONE CALLS RECEIVED JAN 2014 etc. + “KIRKGATE” [1st] + “CRIMINAL CASES REVIEW COMMISSION CCRC + PRISON RELEASE” http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/04/16/maurice-kirk-update-criminal-cases-review-commission-ccrc-prison-release/ NEW!! Maurice Kirk uncaged and branchaged 3 April 2015 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/04/13/new-maurice-kirk-uncaged-and-branchaged-3-april-2015/ PICS OF MAURICE KIRK ON RELEASE FROM HMP SWANSEA 27 March 2015 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/28/maurice-kirk-has-been-released-27-march-2015/ MAURICE KIRK RELEASED + Documents [02/02/2015]: “Regina v. Kirk M. J. – “Summing Up”: IMPORTANT IRREGULARITIES EXPLAINED http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/20/maurice-kirk-some-of-the-story/ UPDATE 18 MARCH ’15: MAURICE KIRK: LETTER TO CARDIFF COUNTY COURT, + “DEFENDANT DENIED LEGAL PAPERS IN COURT” etc. http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/18/update-18-march-15-maurice-kirk-letter-to-cardiff-county-court-defendant-denied-legal-papers-in-court-etc/ 11 MARCH – MAURICE KIRK VICTIMISED YET AGAIN IN HMP SWANSEA: FULL WEEKLY “CANTEEN” ALLOWANCE DENIED! http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/11/11-march-maurice-kirk-victimised-yet-again-in-hmp-swansea/ MAURICE KIRK: LEVESON: APPEAL APPLICATION JUDGEMENT / POSITION STATEMENT 25 FEB. ’15 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/08/maurice-kirk-leveson-appeal-judgement-position-statement-25-feb-15/ MAURICE KIRK: UPDATED WITH “BARRY NEWS” ARTICLES – 1ST YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF ONSET OF SERIOUS and untreated! STOMACH AILMENT, CHEQUE FROM DEC. ’14 STILL REFUSED TO BE CASHED, CLERK OF COURTS DOCS STILL REFUSED AGAINST JUDGES ORDERS, + MORE http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/03/05/maurice-kirk-update-5-mar-2015-1st-year-anniversary-of-onset-of-serious-stomach-ailment-cheque-from-dec-14-still-refused-to-be-cashed-clerk-of-courts-docs-still-refused-against-judges-orders/ MAURICE KIRK IN PRISON 500 DAYS ON SUN. MARCH 1!! – WRIT OF “HABEUS CORPUS” ISSUED – POSITION STATEMENT 18 FEB. ’15 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/27/maurice-kirk-writ-of-habeus-corpus-10-feb-2015-position-statement-18-feb-15/ MAURICE KIRK – POSITION STATEMENT 18 +16 FEB. + DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 19 FEB. 2015 inc. LETTER TO GMC, RCJ APPEAL CT, + more: http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/19/maurice-kirk-documents-received-19-feb-2015/ MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 15 FEB. 2015 – regarding “the fairness, proportionality, apparent bias and bad faith in the decisions of 11 July 2014 to recall Mr. Maurice Kirk to prison”, + more: http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/15/maurice-kirk-update-15-feb-2015-mappa-docs-more/ MAURICE KIRK – THE STORY SO FAR – A BRIEF SYNOPSIS [UNTIL OCT. 2014] – FILES B, C, D. [30 pages] inc. “Fabicated Medical Records”, “Breach of Restraining Order Appeal” statement 6/6/14, + more: http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/09/maurice-kirk-the-story-so-far-until-oct-2014-files-b-c-d/ MAURICE KIRK – SOCIAL VISIT REFUSED 6 FEB. – POSITION STATEMENT 16 JAN. 2015, + more: http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/06/maurice-kirk-position-statement-26-jan-2015-more/ MAURICE KIRK v S. WALES POLICE: UPDATE 4 FEB. 2015: NOW HELD 475 DAYS IN HM PRISONS UNLAWFULLY! http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/02/04/maurice-kirk-update-4-feb-2015/ MAURICE KIRK PAROLE HEARING – CANCELLED!! JUST LIKE THAT!! http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/30/maurice-kirk-parole-hearing-cancelled-just-like-that/ LETTER TO THE PRIME MINISTER: MAURICE KIRK – NOT TAKEN TO THE COURTROOM FOR HIS HEARINGS 7 TIMES!! [actually its more!]: https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/22/letter-to-the-prime-minister-maurice-kirk-not-taken-to-the-courtroom-for-his-hearings-7-times/ 15 Jan. UPDATE: MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 5 JAN. 2014 – OVER 420 DAYS IN H.M. PRISONS!! STILL NO STOMACH OPERATION AFTER 10 MONTHS!! http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/15/15-jan-update-maurice-kirk-important-documents-received-5-jan-2014-over-420-days-in-h-m-prisons-still-no-stomach-operation-after-10-months/ MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 5 JAN. 2014 – OVER 420 DAYS IN H.M. PRISONS!! STILL NO STOMACH OPERATION AFTER 10 MONTHS!! http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2015/01/10/maurice-kirk-important-documents-received-5-jan-2014-over-420-days-in-h-m-prisons-still-no-stomach-operation-after-10-months/ MAURICE KIRK IN PRISON OVER 420 DAYS – THE DISGUSTING UNHYGIENIC CONDITIONS MK IS HAVING TO PUT UP WITH IN HMP BRISTOL – 12 DEC. ’14, + IMPORTANT DOCS. http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/13/maurice-kirk-18-days-before-a-change-of-clothing-12-dec-2014/ MAURICE KIRK: 12 DEC.: WELSH GOVERNMENT REPLIES – A WASTE OF TIME: http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/12/maurice-kirk-12-dec-welsh-government-replies-a-waste-of-time/ ARCHIVES FROM 19 September 2014 until January 2015: MAURICE KIRK POSITION STATEMENT 10 DEC 2014 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/10/maurice-kirk-position-statement-10-dec-2014/ MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 5 DEC.: FINED £1000 – THE WELSH ASSEMBLY – THE “BRAIN SCAN” + more http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/05/maurice-kirk-update-5-dec-fined-1000-the-welsh-assembly-the-brain-scan-more/ MAURICE KIRK LOCATED IN HMP BRISTOL – 2 DEC. ’14 / BREAKING THE HIPPOCRATIC OATH http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/12/04/maurice-kirk-located-in-hmp-bristol-2-dec-14/ MAURICE KIRK UPDATE 30 NOV. 2014 – MAURICE GOES MISSING http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/30/maurice-kirk-update-30-nov-2014/ UPDATED: MAURICE KIRK: IMPORTANT DOCS RECEIVED 18 NOV. 2014 – MEDICAL UPDATES ETC. http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/18/maurice-kirk-important-docs-received-18-nov-2014/ MAURICE KIRK – IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 8 NOV. ’14 – Position Statement 5 Nov. ETC. http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/14/m-krk-docs-received-8-nov-14/ MAURICE KIRK – THE DISGRACEFUL PERSECUTION CONTINUES IN HMP SWANSEA – SUN. 2 NOV. 2014 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/11/02/maurice-kirk-the-disgraceful-persecution-continues-in-hmp-swansea-sun-2-nov-2014/ MAURICE KIRK: VERY ILL IN HMP SWANSEA, 30 OCT. ’14 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/30/maurice-kirk-very-ill-in-hmp-swansea-30-oct-14/ MAURICE KIRK – FILE A – THE CHARGES, etc. http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/28/maurice-kirk-file-a-of-19-documents/ MAURICE KIRK DOCUMENTS: 25 OCT. 2014 – POSITION STATEMENT 14 OCT. ’14 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/27/maurice-kirk-documents-25-oct-2014/ MAURICE KIRK: LATEST NEWS, 23 OCT. ’14 – PLS SIGN THE PETITION – + more http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/23/maurice-kirek-latest-news-23-oct-14-pls-sign-the-petition-more/ MAURICE KIRK: LATEST NEWS, 23 OCT. ’14 – ALL CONTACTS REMOVED EXCEPT 1 FROM MK’S TELEPHONE CALL LIST, + PLS SIGN THE PETITION – + more http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/23/maurice-kirek-latest-news-23-oct-14-pls-sign-the-petition-more/ 5 IMPORTANT DOCUMENTS FROM MAURICE KIRK 14 OCT. 2014, + MESSAGE TO THE JUSTICE, + ANTI-CORRUPTION COMMITTEE 23 OCT. ’14 http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/10/21/5-important-documents-from-maurice-kirk-14-oct-2014-more/ MAURICE KIRK’S SISTER CELIA – RADIO INTERVIEW – + “THE NEFARIOUS PLOT TO ISOLATE MAURICE” http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/24/maurice-kirks-sister-celia-radio-interview/ MAURICE KIRK UPDATE: 23 SEPT. “14: DOCUMENTS RECEIVED- “RECALL TO CUSTODY APPEAL” + “MALICIOUS PROSECUTION WITHOUT TRIAL” http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/23/maurice-kirk-update-23-sept-24-documents-received/ MAURICE KIRK – DOCUMENTS RECEIVED 18 SEPT. 2014 WHICH TELL OF HIS HELL http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2014/09/19/maurice-kirk-documents-received-which-tell-of-his-hell/ See archives at bottom of page from before 19 September ’14, or on right for posts from 2013 / 14. M kirk SEPT 2013 1ba.jpgA.jpgB The above is a pic from Febuary 2013, outside the Cardiff Civic Centre – MK with some of his legal files to be used in his case against S. Wales police force. >>>>>>>>>>>> <<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>><<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<  photo BARRY_zps0hjorw7k.jpg [NB: MANY OF THESE NEWSPAPER REPORTS ARE VERY BIASED AND UNFACTUAL AGAINST MK – IT SHOULD BE SAID THAT IT IS ALLEGED MK HAS BEEN REMANDED TO PRISON AT LEAST 9 TIMES SINCE 2009, WITH A TOTAL OF OVER 3 YEARS SPENT IN PRISON ON THESE POINTLESS AND HARRASSING REMANDS, AS NO CONVICTIONS ACTUALLY OCCURRED RELATING TO THESE REMANDS BEFORE THIS PERIOD OF INCARCERATION BEGAN ON 16 OCTOBER 2013 [MK SPENT THE NIGHT OF 15 OCT. IN BARRY POLICE STATION CELLS, AND POSSIBLY OCT 14 ALSO]. ALSO SINCE 2009 MK HAS BEEN STOPPED OVER 35 TIMES, WHILST DRIVING HIS CAR, FOR DRINK-DRIVING TESTS. NOT ONE CONVICTION RESULTING AS A RESULT OF ANY STOP [ALLEGEDLY]. INDEED, MK TELLS US OFTEN HE WAS TAKEN TO THE POLICE STATION FOR THE DRINKING OF ALCOHOL TEST, ONLY TO BE RELEASED WITHOUT EVEN BEING GIVEN IT! MK HAS AN ONGOING CIVIL CASE AGAINST S. WALES POLICE FORCE– see the radio broadcast interview with MK’s sister on “Dialect Radio”, September 2014 = video: “Rough Justice: South Wales Police persecute former vet & pilot Maurice Kirk who’s them” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c3tg6pDdR8

<a href=PublicEnquiry” width=”48″ height=”48″ /> PublicEnquiry from 13 Sept. 2014]
——————————————————————————————————————–

Barry’s ‘flying vet’ fails in legal bid Barry And District News: APPEAL: Flying vet Maurice Kirk. 7:40am Thursday 7 July 2011

Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

ATTEMPTS by Barry’s ‘flying vet’ to bring criminal charges against a former chief constable, psychiatrist and solicitor were thwarted by a judge last week. Firearms charges for Barry’s ‘Flying Vet’ Barry And District News: Firearms charges for Barry's 'Flying Vet' 7:30am Thursday 25 June 2009

Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

BARRY’S ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk has been charged with alleged firearms offences Barry’s ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk cleared of firearms charges Barry And District News: FLYING VET: Maurice Kirk. 7:30am Thursday 11 February 2010

Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

BARRY’S ‘flying vet’ was this week cleared of charges relating to owning and trying to sell a machine gun.

  • ‘Flying vet’ crash-lands in ocean Barry And District News: Aviator: Flying Vet' Maurice Kirk is an experienced pilot. 11:22am Thursday 21 February 2008
    Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template
  • Rick on the Roof moves in with Flying Vet 7:30am Thursday 23 October 2008

    Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    ROOFTOP protester Ricky Canty is living with ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk in St Donats after a Cardiff court banned him from Barry.

    FLYING vet’ Maurice Kirk is out of hospital and planning to return to Barry following a death-defying crash at the weekend, his wife has said.

  • Vet is found guilty of misconduct 12:00pm Thursday 10 March 2005
    Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    A BULGARIAN vet employed at the Barry practice owned by struck-off veterinary surgeon Maurice Kirk has been found guilty of disgraceful professional conduct.

  • ‘I’m 100 percent sure of winning’ 12:00pm Thursday 13 June 2002
    Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY vet Maurice Kirk has told how he is determined to fight on after a disciplinary hearing ruled he should not be allowed to practice any more.

  • Struck off for life 12:00pm Thursday 10 November 2005
    Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    A VALE vet has been banned from the offices of his governing body after his latest run-in with the authorities.

  • Caring vet 12:00pm Thursday 25 April 2002
    Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    I RECENTLY volunteered to give evidence at a Royal College of Vets hearing in London. I did this because Maurice Kirk has shown kindness to me and consideration for my pets over the past ten years.

  • Vet is struck off following hearing 12:00pm Thursday 30 May 2002
    Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY ‘flying vet’ Maurice Kirk has been struck off after a disciplinary hearing in London.

  • ‘I was a victim of police’ 12:00pm Thursday 28 March 2002
    Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY’S notorious ‘flying vet’ says he has suffered years of harassment at the hands of local police in South Wales, Taunton, and Guernsey.

  • ‘Flying Vet’ is deported 2:22pm Thursday 8 May 2008
    Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY’S Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk has been deported from the States following his spell in an American psychiatric unit.

  • Barry vet has third appeal dismissed by Royal College 10:36am Thursday 19 October 2006
    Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    A BARRY vet who was struck off for misconduct four years ago has had his third appeal dismissed by the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons.

‘Flying Vet’ sent to US psychiatric unit 11:33am Thursday 1 May 2008

  • Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template
  • Disgraced vet blasts lawyers 12:00pm Thursday 22 January 2004

    Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY’S controversial vet Maurice John Kirk blasted “bent lawyers” after losing his appeal against professional disqualification last Monday.

  • Disciplinary hearing into Barry vet’s conduct 12:00pm Thursday 21 March 2002
    Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY’S eccentric ‘flying vet’ has demonstrated a “pathetic waste” of police time, a disciplinary inquiry heard this week.

  • Vet faces disgrace 12:00pm Thursday 31 January 2002
    Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    A BARRY vet faces being struck off in disgrace after being convicted of 20 offences in the last seven years, clocking up about £25,000 in fines, costs and compensation orders.

  • The vet who fell to Earth 12:00pm Thursday 27 October 2005
    Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    AN eccentric British vet who was struck off after a string of convictions crashed his plane in Japan last Friday during a round-the-world solo journey.

  • BARRY’S ‘Flying Vet’ Maurice Kirk was this week locked up in an American psychiatric unit – after landing his plane near George W Bush’s Texas ranch.

  • Further rap for struck-off vet 12:00pm Thursday 20 June 2002
    Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    BARRY vet Maurice Kirk was rapped by the disciplinary committee of the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons this week for his “attitude and conduct” in his recent hearings which eventually saw him struck off.

  • ‘Flying vet’ in US custody Barry And District News: 'Flying vet' lands next to George Bush's Texan ranch 7:10am Tuesday 29 April 2008
    Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template Barry And District News: Image of a star used for marking the article relevance on the search results template

    An amateur pilot nicknamed the Flying Vet is reported to be undergoing psychiatric tests after landing his plane near George Bush’s Texas ranch..

SOURCE: http://www.barryanddistrictnews.co.uk/search/?page=1&topic_id=2308&search=maurice+kirk

Posted in Uncategorized

NORMAN SCARTH: NOMS? EMAILAPRISONER? 14 MAY 2015

To Mr Adam Brown, ‘National Offenders Management Service (NOMS) .

Dear Mr Brown,

Mr Carl Pencil (see lower down) tells us, “If you wish to discuss the ’emailaprisoner’ system I have been advised that my NOMS colleague Mr Adam Brown is available to converse on this subject.”

– – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – — – – – 

Before dealing with that subject, we again raise an issue about ‘NOMS’ we have raised before, but which has always been contemptuously ignored.  

We are told that the ‘National Offenders Management Service (NOMS) (is) an agency of the Ministry of Justice protecting the public & reducing re-offending  by delivering probation& prison services”. 

How can anyone have faith in the Ministry of JUSTICE, when THE VERY NAME of one of its agencies contains a most blatant untruth.   

There are obviously many in prison who are indeed ‘offenders’but many are not!

For a start, there are those who are held ‘On Remand’ &later found ‘Not Guilty’.   

Then there are the all too many who are in fact found ‘Guilty’, when they are completely innocent.   Yes, they are ‘convicts’, but they are certainly not ‘OFFENDERS’.    

Timothy John Evans, George Kelly, Mahmood Marchant, Daniel Steele & Stefan Kisko  are some we know about who were indeed ‘convicted’, when they were innocent ‘members of the public’ (which NOMS claims to protect).  They were in fact tragic victims of what purport to be ‘The Forces of Law & Order’, but can all too often be the Forces of Oppression& Persecution in Orwellian Britain.    They were CERTAINLY not ‘Offenders’. 

Many who are ‘rightly’ convicted, are ‘guilty’ only of breaking one or more of the many bad laws brought in by the mass murderers & war criminals of Lawyer Blair’s Regime (the fact that the prison population has doubled since they came to power speaks volumes!)    

We hope you are able to tell us that the name of NOMS will be changed to something more honest.  

– – – – – – — – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – –

However, to return to the question of ’emailaprisoner’, 

You will see in the thread below that we asked Mr Rick Stuart, Governor of HMP Hull, the question, “… why HMP Hull (which does operate the ’emailaprisoner’ system), does NOT allow that part of that system whereby the original sender can pay 20p to enable the prisoner to send a reply by email, with no drain on the very limited amount allowed to the prisoner for stamps etc.”

A response (also seen below) eventually came from Mr Carl Pencil, but it is not really an ‘answer’, just a confirmation of what we already know: i.e. That what purport to be Her Majesty’s Prisons are run by Governors as Private Fiefdoms, where they do exactly as they wish.  They only need to use the magic word ‘SECURITY’ (no matter how farcically) & any awkward questions or complaints disappear as though vapourised.

We hope you will be able to tell us that the ’emailaprisoner’ system, AND the 20p reply by email, are (or soon will be) available in ALL prisons, or give us a CONCRETE reason why not.  Thanking you in anticipation. 

The Article 6 Group. 

PS:  Fenner Brockway (later Lord Brockway) was a conscientious objector in WW1, & an MP before & after WW2.  He said, “I spent three years in prison, & three years in Parliament, & saw that character deteriorated faster in Parliament than it did in prison”!  

NS. 

– – – – – – – – – – – —  – – – – – —  – 

Mr, Carl Pencil (Assistant Disclosure Specialist | DACU-Communication and Information Directorate | Ministry of Justice | 10th Floor, post point 10.34| Frontline Disclosure Team| 102 Petty France|London |SW1H 9AJ) tells us 

“the ’emailaprisoner’ system is not owned by NOMS or HMPS and is in fact a private enterprise, it is the responsibility of each individual HMP establishment to decide if they wish to offer this service to prisoners. This is not a mandatory commissioned service and would be an addition to the traditional mail and phone systems currently available. I can confirm that MoJ has no immediate plans to offer this service, but will discuss the ’emailaprisoner’ system with a prisoner representative committee. If you wish to discuss the ’emailaprisoner’ system I have been advised that my NOMS colleague Mr Adam Brown is available to converse on this subject.

As the “emailaprisoner” system is not owned by NOMS or HMPS and is in fact a private enterprise, it is the responsibility of each individual HMP establishment to decide if they wish to offer this service to prisoners. This is not a mandatory commissioned service and would be an addition to the traditional mail and phone systems currently available. I can confirm that MoJ has no immediate plans to offer this service, but will discuss the “emailaprisoner” system with a prisoner representative committee. If you wish to discuss the “emailaprisoner’ system I have been advised that my NOMS colleague Mr Adam Brown is available to converse on this subject. His e-mail address is adam.brown@hmps.gsi.gov.uk ; If you have any new FoI requests please send them to the following e-mail address data.access@justice.gsi.gov.uk

From: data.access@justice.gsi.gov.uk To: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 10:59:36 +0100Subject: MoJ reply to FoI request 97115 Mr Scarth- Query about the reason HMP Hull does not operate the ’emailaprisoner’ system

Dear Mr Scarth, 

As requested please find attached  below the query which you made to HMP Hull and MoJ reply.

 I hope that helps. 

Kind regards,

Carl Pencil-Assistant Disclosure Specialist | DACU-Communication and Information Directorate | Ministry of Justice | 10th Floor, post point 10.34| Frontline Disclosure Team| 102 Petty France|London |SW1H 9AJ

To The Information Commissioner.

On 16th January 2015 we sent a request under the FoI Act to The Governor of Her Majesty’s Prison Hull, Mr Rick Stuart. The question was about the ’emailaprisoner’ system.

On 10th March 2015 we sent a reminder.

(The thread is below).

To date there has been neither acknowledgment nor reply.

We respectfully ask you to take such steps as are necessary to ensure we receive a reply.

Sincerely,

Norman Scarth,

Associate & Hon. Secretary of The Article 6 Group.

Athlone, Republic of Ireland.

From: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk To: rick.stuart@hmps.gsi.gov.uk CC: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk Subject: F o I request. Reminder. Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:10:18 +0000 

To The Governor of HMP Hull, Mr Rick Stuart.

Sir,

Please forgive me for reminding you of our F o I Act request, below.

We would be grateful for a speedy reply.

Norman Scarth,

Associate & Hon. Secretary of The Article 6 Group.

Athlone, Republic of Ireland.

From: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk To: rick.stuart@hmps.gsi.gov.uk CC: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk Subject: Freedom of Information Act: Query. Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:21:39 +0000 

To The Governor of HMP Hull, Mr Rick Stuart.

Sir,

Request under the Freedom of information Act.

We ask that you inform us why HMP Hull (which does operate the ’emailaprisoner’ system), does NOT allow that part of that system whereby the original sender can pay 20p to enable the prisoner to send a reply by email, with no drain on the very limited amount allowed to the prisoner for stamps etc.

Norman Scarth,

Associate & Hon. Secretary of The Article 6 Group.

Athlone, Republic of Ireland.

From: Norman Scarth [mailto:againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk] Sent: 04 May 2015 18:11To: Data Access & Compliance UnitSubject: MoJ97115. Carl Pencil. Pls send again.

To Carl Pencil-Assistant Disclosure Specialist | DACU-Communication and Information Directorate | Ministry of Justice | 10th Floor, post point 10.34| Frontline Disclosure Team| 102 Petty France|London |SW1H 9AJ www.gov.uk/moj | @MoJGovUK| @MoJPress

Dear Mr Pencil,

Being very old, I cannot always remember what has gone before. Being an aid to efficient communication, it is considered good email practice to include with your own message the one to which you are replying:

Will you please send your message again doing exactly that.

I will then be fully briefed to make contact with the person whose name you give in your letter.

Norman Scarth.  

_____________________________________________

From:    Data Access & Compliance Unit 

Sent:   20 April 2015 14:19

To:     ‘againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk

Subject:        MoJ reply to FoI request 97115 Mr Scarth- Query about the reason HMP Hull does not operate the ’emailaprisoner’ system

Importance:     High

Dear Mr Scarth

Please find attached a response to your Freedom of Information request.

<< File: 97115 Mr Norman Scarth.doc >>

Kind regards,

Carl Pencil-Assistant Disclosure Specialist | DACU-Communication and Information Directorate | Ministry of Justice | 10th Floor, post point 10.34| Frontline Disclosure Team| 102 Petty France|London |SW1H 9AJ www.gov.uk/moj | @MoJGovUK| @MoJPress

Working together to build a safe and just society

 This e-mail (and any attachment) is intended only for the attention of the addressee(s). Its unauthorised use, disclosure, storage or copying is not permitted. If you are not the intended recipient, please destroy all copies and inform the sender by return e-mail. Internet e-mail is not a secure medium. Any reply to this message could be intercepted and read by someone else. Please bear that in mind when deciding whether to send material in response to this message by e-mail. This e-mail (whether you are the sender or the recipient) may be monitored, recorded and retained by the Ministry of Justice. E-mail monitoring / blocking software may be used, and e-mail content may be read at any time. You have a responsibility to ensure laws are not broken when composing or forwarding e-mails and their contents. The original of this email was scanned for viruses by the Government Secure Intranet virus scanning service supplied by Vodafone in partnership with Symantec. (CCTM Certificate Number 2009/09/0052.) This email has been certified virus free. Communications via the GSi may be automatically logged, monitored and/or recorded for legal purposes.–Forwarded Message Attachment–

To The Information Commissioner.

On 16th January 2015 we sent a request under the FoI Act to The Governor of Her Majesty’s Prison Hull, Mr Rick Stuart.  The question was about the ’emailaprisoner’ system.   

On 10th March 2015 we sent a reminder.  

(The thread is below). 

To date there has been neither acknowledgment nor reply. 

We respectfully ask you to take such steps as are necessary to ensure we receive a reply.

Sincerely,

Norman Scarth,

Associate & Hon. Secretary of The Article 6 Group.     Athlone, Republic of Ireland. 

From: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk To: rick.stuart@hmps.gsi.gov.uk CC: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk Subject: F o I request. Reminder. Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:10:18 +0000

To The Governor of HMP Hull, Mr Rick Stuart.

Sir,  Please forgive me for reminding you of our F o I Act request, below. We would be grateful for a speedy reply.

Norman Scarth, Associate & Hon. Secretary of The Article 6 Group.     Athlone, Republic of Ireland. 

From: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk To: rick.stuart@hmps.gsi.gov.uk CC: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk Subject: Freedom of Information Act: Query. Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:21:39 +0000

To The Governor of HMP Hull, Mr Rick Stuart.

Sir,  Request under the Freedom of information Act. We ask that you inform us why HMP Hull (which does operate the ’emailaprisoner’ system), does NOT allow that part of that system whereby the original sender can pay 20p to enable the prisoner to send a reply by email, with no drain on the very limited amount allowed to the prisoner for stamps etc.  Norman Scarth, Associate & Hon. Secretary of The Article 6 Group.     Athlone, Republic of Ireland. ——————————————————————-

Attatchments:

1]

SCARTH 14MAY15

2]

To The Information Commissioner.

On 16th January 2015 we sent a request under the FoI Act to The Governor of Her Majesty’s Prison Hull, Mr Rick Stuart.  The question was about the ’emailaprisoner’ system.   

On 10th March 2015 we sent a reminder.  

(The thread is below). 

To date there has been neither acknowledgment nor reply. 

We respectfully ask you to take such steps as are necessary to ensure we receive a reply.

Sincerely,

Norman Scarth,

Associate & Hon. Secretary of The Article 6 Group.     Athlone, Republic of Ireland. 

From: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk To: rick.stuart@hmps.gsi.gov.uk CC: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk Subject: F o I request. Reminder. Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2015 12:10:18 +0000

To The Governor of HMP Hull, Mr Rick Stuart.

Sir,  Please forgive me for reminding you of our F o I Act request, below. We would be grateful for a speedy reply.

Norman Scarth, Associate & Hon. Secretary of The Article 6 Group.     Athlone, Republic of Ireland. 

From: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk To: rick.stuart@hmps.gsi.gov.uk CC: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk Subject: Freedom of Information Act: Query. Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:21:39 +0000

To The Governor of HMP Hull, Mr Rick Stuart.

Sir,  Request under the Freedom of information Act. We ask that you inform us why HMP Hull (which does operate the ’emailaprisoner’ system), does NOT allow that part of that system whereby the original sender can pay 20p to enable the prisoner to send a reply by email, with no drain on the very limited amount allowed to the prisoner for stamps etc.  Norman Scarth, Associate & Hon. Secretary of The Article 6 Group.     Athlone, Republic of Ireland.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , ,

MAURICE KIRK: MESSAGE RECEIVED 14 MAY 2015

Message received from Maurice Kirk today 14 May 2015:

“If CCRC do not send today, by email, court documents I plan to go to their offices without warning.

Also if that ridiculous 23-year need to sue SWP [South Wales Police] without their very own government documents, revealing proof of bullying, does not conclude,for appeal papers to go in, there will be local Cardiff cabal trouble as well.

All to cover up machine gun conspiracy by barbara w,  senior MAPPA and bent, sacked police psychiatrist.”
 
[ends]

31

above: MK,  09 MAY 2015

 

Posted in Uncategorized

NORMAN SCARTH: THE VICTIMS SUPPORT MOVEMENT

 

Norman Scarth writes

19:26 (14 hours ago)

to Victim
The ‘Victims Support Movement’ is composed of two sorts of people: 
(1) The evil instigators & controllers of the movement (the Quislings who now rule Britain being at the forefront), who pretend to be concerned about ‘victims’, & 
(2) those who actually are victims or relatives of victims, who are completely gullible, unable to see that they are being used by the instigators.
 

The former have not the slightest concern for victims, but cynically gain the support of the latter to enable corrupt courts to be even more oppressive than they already are.
  
We ask  ‘Victims Support Europe’ to take up the cases of those who are victims OF Police State Britain!    We can give you the names of a great many & look forward to hearing that you want to hear of them. 
The Article 6 Group.
(Committed to Fighting Criminal MIS-use of Law in British Courts).
Athlone, Ireland.  

Subject: Life streaming of VSE Annual Conference 2015, 13-14 May, Lisbon
From: h.heinrichs@victimsupporteurope.eu
To: againstcorruption@hotmail.co.uk
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 10:25:55 +0000

Join us live today for Victim Support Europe Annual Conference “Victims of Crime in Europe: The future is now!”:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1usemE4ty-g

For further information about the event, please visit the conference website: http://apav.pt/25/index.php/en/

Contact to Victim Support Europe:
+32 22310112 | info@victimsupporteurope.eu | www.victimsupporteurope.eu
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , ,

CHEAP TRAVEL TO THE Anti child abuse rally – “Victims & Survivors Unite – Breaking The Cycle Of Abuse”: 46 DAYS TO GO!!

Anti child abuse rally – “Victims & Survivors Unite – Breaking The Cycle Of Abuse”      
    
  Chris Wittwer posted in Anti child abuse rally – “Victims & Survivors Unite – Breaking The Cycle Of Abuse”
      
Chris Wittwer
May 13 at 3:44am
 
Travel from any part of the UK to London for under £30 return with Mega bus

Example – Manchester to London on 27th June ‘return’ – Just £14

 Cheap bus and train travel in the UK, Europe and Ireland  http://www.megabus.com
http://www.uk.megabus.com

Travel for less from just £1.50 with megabus.com to London, Birmingham, Manchester, Newcastle, Liver…

Anti child abuse rally – “Victims & Survivors Unite – Breaking The Cycle Of Abuse”

Chris Wittwer posted in Anti child abuse rally – “Victims & Survivors Unite – Breaking The Cycle Of Abuse” on Facebook https://www.facebook.com/events/836299693090154/

47 days to go…

“Victims & Survivors Unite – Breaking The Cycle Of Abuse” – Rally.
Anyone with an interest in child safety & child abuse awareness is welcome to attend
 
Giving survivors a voice!Please keep sharing & inviting your Facebook friends to this event page.

at 1:00pm – 4:00pm
Gloucester terrace London – Directly opposite Downing street

A stage & PA system will be set up on the grass of Richmond Terrace directly opposite Downing street to allow survivors & guests to speak

This rally is an ‘official’ rally & has been granted approval by the relevant councils & police

ALL groups, campaigners and members of the public are welcome to attend

We will be updating this events page with information throughout the run-up to the rally

NOW is the time to make a stand and for our voices to be heard!

Organized by Chris Tuck of http://www.survivors-of-abuse.com/
.
& Chris Wittwer of http://www.ukpaedos-exposed.com/

After this rally, the whole country will hear the survivors voice – We will make sure of that – WE will NO longer be the forgotten ones

Please only click ‘going’ if you fully intend on actual going so we can gauge correct numbers & dont forget to invite your friends and share

– Thankyou

Chris Wittwer's photo.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , ,

The Nottingham Common Purpose Effect, UK Col., + “FREE MELANIE SHAW” April ’15 demo [videos] + please sign the petition

Less than two months following publication of the Jay report into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham we learned that Nottinghamshire County Council and Nottingham City Council have both ordered an urgent investigation into historical allegations of child abuse in care homes across the area.

If we travel back in time to 1992 we discover that the Dawson Report revealed that “something is badly wrong with Nottinghamshire’s social services … in the past 18 months in Nottinghamshire 18 children have died at the hands of those with a duty to care for them.”
Then in 1993 during the trial of Colin Leat, who was convicted of murdering his three-year-old stepdaughter Leanne White, the trial judge criticised the County’s Social Services for having failed to protect Leanne, despite repeated calls from relatives and neighbours.
Ten years later, Christopher Atkins, 31, of Cotgrave, was jailed for a horrific sex attack on a girl, which left her with life-threatening injuries. The girl, under five years of age “had been in Nottinghamshire for nine weeks and was already subject to a protection plan because of neglect.” Nottinghamshire Safeguarding Children Board carried out a serious case review. This review criticised certain aspects of practice which included “a lack of robustness in assessing the child’s circumstances following the move to Nottinghamshire, in leadership of the child protection plan and in the responses to injuries sustained by the child.”
When announcing the new investigation, Nottinghamshire County Council Leader Alan Rhodes said, “It is also important to say that children’s social care services are unrecognisable today compared with even 20 years ago. Councils now operate differently and under much tighter controls and are monitored by Ofsted and independent Safeguarding Children Boards.” 
These and other cases beg the question why is Nottinghamshire suddenly interested now, when there has been a recognised history of failure in this area? Just how independent are the public bodies which have a statutory duty to protect our vulnerable children, and are they fit for purpose?
Even before the County and City Council investigations, Nottinghamshire Police had already set up Operation Daybreak to look into the matter. 80 complainants who attended five homes, including Beechwood, in Mapperley, have come forward. 
One of those, Melanie Shaw, found herself on remand in Sodexo high security prison Peterborough between 25 July and 17th October 2014 on charges of “Arson Reckless and Criminal Damage”. At her trial she was found guilty and was sentenced to two years probation. Members of the public who were present at her trial reported that among other irregularities, the trial judge had expressed the view that Operation Daybreak was “conspiracy theory”. Yet in December 2013 the Nottingham Post published an article revealing that “Operation Daybreak covers alleged abuse by staff at Beechwood Community House, Mapperley, Bracken House, which was in Thames Street, Bulwell, Ranskill Gardens, Bestwood, Wood Nook, in Beechdale Road, Beechdale, and Risley Hall, Derbyshire from the late 1960s until 2000.” 
Now that we have set the scene, let’s commence our investigative journey by returning to 1992 and reminding ourselves of the changes to our system of governance as a result of the United Nations Agenda 21 Treaty.

Public Private Partnerships and Agenda 21

The United Nation Agenda 21 programme describes itself as “a comprehensive plan of action to be taken globally, nationally and locally by organizations of the United Nations System, Governments, and Major Groups in every area in which humanity impacts on the environment.” 
The United Nations has this to say about re-modelling our system of Governance in Section III, Chapter 27 of Agenda 21:

With a view to strengthening the role of non-governmental organisations as social partners, the United Nations system and Governments should initiate a process, in consultation with non-governmental organisations, to review formal procedures and mechanisms for the involvement of these organisations at all levels from policy-making and decision-making to implementation.

In other words, in all aspects of our lives, decisions are now being made and implemented by governance structures that include Public Authorities, but also include so called Third-Sector Charities. One of those Third-Sector Charities is Common Purpose.

Definition of the Common Purpose Effect

We have long stated that by blurring the boundaries between people, professions, public and private sectors, responsibility and accountability, Common Purpose encourages graduates to believe that as new selected leaders, they can work together, outside of the established political and social structures, to achieve a paradigm shift or CHANGE. They call this doctrine “Leading Beyond Authority”. In doing so, the allegiance of the individual becomes ‘re-framed’ on Common Purpose colleagues and their NETWORK”.

Nottingham City Council

We have uncovered evidence that Nottingham City Council re-shuffled its senior management pack as recently as 2011. Of the six strong Chief Executives group four are Common Purpose Graduates. These are:
– Ian Curryer, Chief Executive, who was formerly Corporate Director of Children & Families (Nottingham Matrix 1996) 
– Ruby Bhattal, Head of Corporate Marketing & Communications (‘owner’ of the LinkedIn Nottingham Meridian Cohort 2010); 
– Dr Chris Kenny, Director Public Health (Sheffield Matrix 2002)
– Nigel Cooke, of One Nottingham who was previously working at the Government Office for the East Midlands (Derby Profile 2005).
“Matrix”, “Meridian” and “Profile” are all Common Purpose courses.

Alison Michalska

Also of note is Alison Michalska, Nottingham City Council’s Corporate Director of Children & Families, was previously the Director of Children Family and Adult Services at East Riding of Yorkshire Council.
In 2008, a report by the East Riding Safeguarding Children Board disclosed that up to 14 members of staff, at Headlands School and Community Science College, in Bridlington, East Yorkshire, had inappropriate relationships with pupils aged 11 to 18. The report highlighted persistent failures to protect pupils at Headlands over 13 years to 2004 and criticised management standards during that time.
At the time of the report Alison Waller, the director of children, family and adult services at East Riding of Yorkshire Council, said: “Any lessons learnt by the inquiry will be fully acted upon.” 
Research has uncovered that Alison Waller and Alison Michalska are the same individual. Perhaps more relevant is the fact that, whilst Area Director, Social Care & Health with Birmingham City Council in 2001, Alison Michalska became a Common Purpose Matrix Graduate under her previous incarnation as Alison Waller.

One Nottingham

According to their website “One Nottingham is the Strategic Partnership for the City, bringing together public, private, voluntary and community sector organisations to champion our long term vision for Nottingham and tackle disadvantage.” 
One Nottingham is a family of partnerships at the centre of which is the One Nottingham Board. The fourteen strong board includes:
– Councillor David Mellen, Nottingham City Council (Chair), who in the minutes of Board Meeting 23 November 2012 is recorded as stating that the “Autumn forum played an important part of the ON role in bringing agencies together with a common purpose”
– Ian Curryer, Chief Executive, Nottingham City Council (Common Purpose)
– Nigel Cooke, Director One Nottingham, Member Nottingham City Council Chief Executive’s Group (Common Purpose)
– Cecile Wright, Trustee of National Children’s Bureau, Nottingham Equal (Common Purpose)
– Mike Khouri-Bent, Corporate Director for Care Standards, Pathway Care Solutions Business Representative, Board Member of Nottingham City Homes (Common Purpose).
In 2011 a report pointed out that “widespread abuse of Nottingham’s council housing system was said to be one of the biggest scandals in the history of the city council”. The housing service was revealed to have wrongly given homes to some employees, their relatives, partners and friends in an Audit Commission investigation in 2009. In April 2005 the management of Nottingham City Council’s housing stock had been transferred to Nottingham City Homes (NCH), a newly formed arm’s length management organisation (ALMO). Nottingham City Council abandoned its investigation into the allocation of council houses. The police did not carry out any criminal investigation and didn’t pursue any cases. 
One Nottingham works with a range of partners across the City of Nottingham, including the Theme Partnerships, Area Committees and Area Partnerships as well as Nottingham Community and Voluntary Service, Nottingham Equal, Nottingham City Council and many other public and private sector organisations. The Theme Partnerships are leading on achieving the outcomes in The Nottingham Plan to 2020.
Current theme partnerships are: Nottingham Children’s Partnership (including the Priority Families Programme), Health and Wellbeing Board, Crime & Drugs Partnership, Housing Partnership for Nottingham, Working Nottingham and Green Nottingham.
The Nottingham Plan to 2020 sets the overall strategic direction and long term vision for the economic, social and environmental well-being of the City of Nottingham.
It is this Plan which links to the United Nations Agenda 21 programme.
On page 54 of The Nottingham Plan 2020 it states:

we will embed the common assessment framework and related practices to ensure a more integrated approach across all public services to keeping children safe

Nottingham Children’s Partnership

The Nottingham Children’s Partnership is one of the One Nottingham Theme Partnerships.
The Nottingham City Children & Young People’s Plan 2010-2014 (CYPP), sets out the priorities to be addressed by the Children’s Partnership Board, as agreed by the City Council and its partners.
All partners are accountable for the delivery of a wide range of services to children and young people in Nottingham City. Some of these can be delivered better where we work together. The Children’s Partnership Board is the vehicle for that joint working.
The Nottingham City Children’s Partnership Board (Acting as the Children’s Trust) Constitution and Governance Arrangements outlines the composition of the Children’s Partnership Board. It includes representatives from the following organisations:
– Nottingham City Council 
– NHS Clinical Commissioning Group 
– NHS Nottingham University Children’s Hospital. 
– Nottingham Governors’ Association
– Nottinghamshire Police 
– Nottingham City Safeguarding Children’s Board 
– Nottinghamshire Probation Service 
– Young People’s Learning Agency 
– Futures for Nottingham and Nottinghamshire 
– Job Centre Plus 
– Nottingham City Schools (including academies, nursery, primary, secondary and special school representation) 
– Further Education Sector 
– Voluntary Sector 
Included amongst this board we discovered: 
– Ian Curryer, Chief Executive, Nottingham City Council (Common Purpose)
– Alison Michalska, Corporate Director of Children & Families, Nottingham City Council (Common Purpose)
– Helen Kearsley-Cree, Chief Executive, Nottingham Council for Voluntary Services (Common Purpose)
Who regulates Nottingham Children’s Partnership?
The Partnership is governed by Nottingham Children’s Partnership Board, which is accountable to One Nottingham. One Nottingham is the strategic partnership for the whole of Nottingham and is accountable to the Government for the delivery of key targets for the City. 
Not only are some members of the Children’s Partnership board also sitting on the One Nottingham Board but Common Purpose graduates are present in both. One surely has to question if this is a healthy arrangement. One of the functions of the Children’s Partnership is to ‘Oversee the Early Intervention Programme and approve any progress reports for submission to the One Nottingham Board’.

Nottingham County Council

Mick Burrows was appointed to the post of Chief Executive of Nottinghamshire County Council in April 2008. Mick spent 22 years working in the Civil Service before joining the County Council in 1995 as a project manager in adult learning. He later became a strategy manager in the regeneration service and was subsequently appointed as Assistant Director of the Culture and Community Department in 1999. He became a Common Purpose Matrix Graduate in 1992. 
Jayne Francis-Ward is the Corporate Director, Policy, Planning and Corporate Services. She leads the County Council’s Transformation Programme and has held a number of roles at the Council, including the position of Assistant Chief Executive, and was appointed to her current post in March 2012. Francis-Ward became a Common Purpose Matrix Graduate in 1993.
Jas Hundel, Director of Property, Transport and Environment is a Common Purpose Matrix 2000 Graduate.

Nottinghamshire County Council Child Safeguarding Board

Local Safeguarding Children Boards (LSCB) were established by the Children Act 2004. The Nottinghamshire Safeguarding Children Board (NSCB) covers Nottinghamshire County – excluding the City of Nottingham.
The Board is the key statutory mechanism for agreeing how relevant organisations co-operate to safeguard and promote the welfare of children and ensure the effectiveness of what they do. The work of the NSCB fits within the wider context of the Children and Young People’s Strategic Plan and the Board is responsible for protecting the most vulnerable children and young people, which is a priority set out in the plan. The NSCB works with partners which include Children’s social care, Children’s Trust, Police, Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA), Education, Voluntary sector organisations and Faith organisations and the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP).

Nottinghamshire Police & Common Purpose

In January 2010 an expert team of Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary spent two weeks at Nottinghamshire Police in an attempt to work out how to improve performance. The team included:
– Keith Bristow, Chief Constable of Warwickshire (Common Purpose)
– Mike Craik, Chief Constable of Northumbria (Common Purpose)
– Ann Barnes, chairman of Kent Police Authority
– Paul Coen, interim Chief Executive of British Transport Police Authority
– Tony Wilkinson, former Chairman of Wilkinsons Limited. 
The team was coordinated by Adam Pemberton, deputy director of a “capability review team” at the Cabinet Office.
It’s worth highlighting the fact that the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP), which partners with Nottingham Safeguarding Childrens Board, was taken into the newly-created National Crime Agency (NCA) in 2013. Keith Bristow is the 1st Director-General of the National Crime Agency and took up his office in October 2013.
In February 2012 ‘Nottinghamshire’s Chief Constable Julia Hodson agreed a compensation settlement after being sued by her former deputy. Mr Howard Roberts was claiming victimisation after exposing wrongdoing by the Chief Constable, under whistleblowing laws. The allegations against Ms Hodson were not made public because the case was settled and will not be heard in court’. Hodgson retired as Chief Constable in August the same year.
We can also reveal that a number of Senior Officers in other Police Forces are also under investigation.
For example, on 15th September 2014 the IPCC announced that it is investigating the Chief Constable of Wiltshire Police, Patrick Geenty, an inspector and a detective constable from the force in relation to the way they dealt with complaints lodged in 2008 and 2009. Those complaints had been about the way the force handled allegations of sexual abuse. Chief Constable Patrick Geenty is a Common Purpose Graduate. 
In July this year it was revealed that ‘UK chief constable, Nick Gargan, is under criminal investigation for allegedly breaking data protection legislation to access personal information of younger females whom he’s accused of inappropriately propositioning. Following an investigation by UK police watchdog, the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC), Gargan has been suspended and is the subject of criminal investigation’. Chief Constable Nick Gargan was a speaker at a Common Purpose Event held at Avon and Somerset Police Headquarters. 
Following the Jay report into the sexual exploitation of young children in Rotherham the IPCC have written to the Chief Constable to advise him of the IPCC’s expectation that any evidence of failures or misconduct by South Yorkshire Police officers should be referred to them. In the ‘Rotherham Common Purpose effect’ published in our previous edition we revealed that David Crompton, Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police is also a Common Purpose Matrix Graduate as was his immediate predecessor Bob Dyson. 

Nottinghamshire Police & Crime Commissioner

Paddy Tipping was formerly MP for Sherwood who, in 2009, became the 46th MP to step down over the investigation into Parliamentary Expenses. Following the scandal, 112 sitting MPs said they would not be seeking re-election. Before entering Parliament Paddy worked as a social worker (1972 – 1979). From 1979 to 1983 he was Project Leader for the Church of England Children’s Society. Paddy was then a Councillor for Nottinghamshire County Council and Director of Nottinghamshire Co-operative Development Agency and he was also involved with the Nottingham Development Enterprise.
Chris Cutland (Deputy Police & Crime Comissioner) previously worked for Nottingham City Council – helping to develop area based community safety working groups which monitored the work of the local police beats and community protection officers. She also has experience of working with locally elected members and stakeholders to identify key issues and how to resolve these. She is a Common Purpose Matrix Graduate 2001.

Conclusion

There can be no doubt that the austerity programme introduced by the Coalition Government in 2010 has been a key driver of the accelerating transformation of our public services. This has resulted in the introduction of Local Thematic Partnership Boards which include unelected representatives drawn from the Charity Sector. It is no coincidence that these new governance structures match those outlined in Chapter 27 of the United Nations Agenda 21 programme.
Evidence also reveals that these model governance arrangements, where many key positions are held by Common Purpose Graduates, are being replicated all over the Country. This demonstrates ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ that a key function of Common Purpose Graduates is to covertly promote the UNs Agenda 21 programme.
A fatal flaw in these new governance arrangements was succinctly described by Professor Jay in her report ‘Independent Enquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham’. She wrote, “An issue or responsibility that belongs to everybody effectively belongs to nobody, and in the case of sexual exploitation of children in Rotherham, accountability was key.”
How many more such scandals will be witnessed if the Common Purpose Effect remains unrecognised, unchallenged and unchecked?

 
Document:

============================================================

from earlier, April 2015:

FREE MELANIE SHAW!!  PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION!!  PETERBOROUGH RALLY + VIGIL 11 APRIL, + ARTICLES + MORE!

Got a nice note from Melanie Shaw [attd.] – if everyone sent her a £, wouldn’t that cheer her up? For screws being “nasty”, as she mentions, simply take a look also at how they treated the Musas [totally framed] + Maurice Kirk also during his totally unfair over-the-top 17+ months inside recently. Is this what the taxpayer pays these characters wages for? I don’t think so. Noone else is going to correct this barbaric behaviour so we have to!!

The address to send to send a postal order to Melanie Shaw is:

Melanie Shaw, A4126 DE
HMP Peterborough
Saville Rd,
Peterborough
PE3 7PD
The CROSSED postal order made out to THE GOVERNOR HMP PETERBOROUGH on the front of the p.o. – on the reverse side write MELANIE SHAW A4126 DE
 
Petition “Free Melanie Shaw” https://www.change.org/p/nottinghamshire-police-and-rt-hon-…



Melanie Shaw, Beechwood Child Abuse Witness, Held in Peterborough Prison – http://www.ukcolumn.org/…/melanie-shaw-beechwood-child-abus…


— cheers!


MSHAW 17APR15533
See more:

 photo _zpsgneaqo9n.jpg
 photo mel_zps7gct8nkm.jpg

1 VIGIL FOR MELANIE SHAW, PETERBOROUGH, 5 APRIL 2015


2 VIGIL FOR MELANIE SHAW PETERBOROUGH 5 APRIL 2015

3 VIGIL FOR MELANIE SHAW PETERBOROUGH 5 APRIL

4 VIGIL FOR MELANIE SHAW PETERBOROUGH 5 APRIL

 
 
 photo luke_zpsa0jsjusr.jpg
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

HAMPSTEAD SRA: LETTER TO BEATRIX CAMPBELL – 12 MAY ’15

Letter To Beatrix Campbell

by jacquifarmer1984

Thanks to a valued supporter, the forensic linguist, who is so concerned about the children and Ella and Abraham’s welfare that he has spent hours on analyses and now takes the time to write to Beatrix Campbell and solicit her views on the case.

Beatrix Campbell ran for MP, as a Green, in Hampstead in 2010. She is an OBE and an influential marxist-feminist. She was ridiculed for her writing about ‘Ritual Sacrifice’, a conspiracy involving high-ranking members of the police and people in powerful places, in the New Statesman in 1990.

If Beatrix replies, we hope that she will be able to draw on lessons learned during the Cleveland cover-up and offer a little advice on what seems to be turning into a social media campaign.

Dear Beatrix

I came across your name while researching satanic ritual abuse. Because you identified its existence nearly 30 years ago – and a (potential) Establishment connection – I’d like to discuss with you a case that is happening now.

Have you heard about the allegations of ritual child abuse in Hampstead? It has been widely covered in the media as a hoax, following a public Family Court judgement by Justice Pauffley. However, the public availability of video evidence not considered by Pauffley as well as justifiable criticisms of her judgement and police conduct has led a significant and growing number of people to conclude that the allegations are, at the very least, worth investigating.

I am a forensic linguist and have been heavily involved in researching the case and analysing some of the interviews, working closely with the dedicated research team behind hampsteadresearch.wordpress.com. We are in contact with the mother of the two children (who were taken by Social Services following her reporting of the allegations against their father to the police) and legal representatives.

So we are close enough to the case to present it to you, in written form or conversation. We would like to communicate with you further about this. If you are interested, please drop me a line at xxxxxxx and I will send you more info or arrange a briefing.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Best regards

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , ,

MASS PEACEFUL PROTEST – MAY 23 – HAMPSTEAD, LONDON

tweet from: BBC BREAKING
@BBCBreakingLive

Solutions For The #WhistleBlowerKids

#whistleblowerkids #hampstead #london #tories #csa #wikileaks

Solutions For The #WhistleBlowerKids

Anonymous Mass Peaceful Protest May 23rd Hampstead, London.

https://www.vid.me/JJZB

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

HAMPSTEAD SRA: Another Child who Said No to the Cult

May 6, 2015May 6, 2015 

Anton LaVey,  founder of the Church of Satan, had two children. One, his son, was repulsed by his father and the filthy rituals. He refused to embrace Satanism……so his father castrated him. He later became a Christian.

This is a very rare, must-listen interview.

Notice that Anthony mentions that the Satanists calls their rituals “parties”.

source:  Another Child who Said No to the Cult.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , ,

BBC LOOK NORTH video – PROTESTERS .ON ROOF IN CLEGG’S CONSTITUENCY CLAIMING THERES BEEN A COVERUP RE: CHILD ABUSE

Tks to C. Tuck’s fb page!//

 
34,517 Views

Two protesters have scaled the roof of Nick Clegg’s Sheffield Hallam Constituency office claiming there has been a cover-up over alleged child sex abuse at Westminster in the 1970s and 80s.They accuse Mr Clegg of not doing enough to highlight the abuse. He worked for the former Home Secretary Leon Brittan in Brussels. Lord Brittan – who has been accused of being involved in the abuse – died earlier this year. Nick Clegg’s office says the actions of abusers were horrific, and with two police investigations under way, they must be allowed to do their job.

Posted by BBC Look North (Yorkshire) on Tuesday, May 5, 2015

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

HAMPSTEAD SRA: Satanists in 1960s Northern Ireland [2 x videos]

Satanists in 1960s Northern Ireland

May 4, 2015 jacquifarmer1984

Gripping testimony from a witness:

[2010]

via  Satanists in 1960s Northern Ireland.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , ,

CHILDSTEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

UPDATE: As I write on 21 May 2015, Gloria Musa is still undergoing treatment in a Nigerian hospital, and is awaiting serious operations which might allow her to walk proplerly again without aids. Gloria was in a wheelchair for the last half of the 3 years she was forced to endure in HM prisons, and the doctors in Nigeria stated they were surprised she was still alive after all she had been through since August 14 2012, up till November 27 2014, when the Musa parents Chiwar and Bishop Gloria were released and deported back home to Nigeria. The whereabouts of their 7 children is unknown, sadly.

LINKS + PICS TO BE UPDATED!

th_a8jpg2

CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

« on: September 06, 2013, 02:59:13 PM »

These articles originally appeared on Truth-wars site beginning last September 2012

th_a8jpg2aba

           
Truthwars –  Author Topic: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE   (Read 4737 times as of July 2013)

on: September 09, 2012, 01:09:30 PM

All over the country many children are being removed from good families under the most dubious of circumstances by town councils, SS and others, often in via the Secret Family Courts. When told about irregularities in cases the authorities do nothing. It is time it was stopped.

    photo: Chiwar and Gloria Musa outside the RCJ, August 2011 with the very much victimised Maurice Kirk’

THE MUSA CASE – 7 CHILDREN REMOVED BY A COUNCIL :

On the 8 April 2010 at around 4pm 8 policemen let themselves in by key to the Musa family council home and removed the Musa’s 5 children without any notice or prearrangement. The children were removed on what later were found to be totally untrue allegations made by certain employees at Y council. All allegations have been disproven, the allegations ranging from the children not being the Musas offspring and were being trafficked, to the children being beaten and generally mistreated by their parents.
Regarding the child trafficking allegation that the children were not the Musas offspring and they were part of a child trafficking network, DNA tests instigated by the Musa parents taking an unusually phenominally long time to undertake proved without a shadow of a doubt that the children were indeed the Musas children, proving also the children were in no way being trafficked in any shape or form. After this allegation was disproved other equally ridiculous allegations were made to keep the children from returning to their once happy home. One such allegation  was that Gloria Musa was an active sex worker – a prostitute – who plied her trade not only in front of and with her church congregation but also in front of her children. She is, in fact. an ordained bishop in the Evangelical Church of Africa and is not and has never been what this allegation alleges. This ridiculous allegation was made with no evidence of any kind to substantiate it yet the court believed this nonsense, along with other unsubstantiated allegations such as the children being beaten by the parents, even though medical examinations made when the council took the children showed no sign of anything to back their allegations of cruelty by the parents towards their children. Even though the allegations were proven groundless never was it mentioned that the children were to be returned to their parents as they should have been, of course. Quite the opposite in fact took place in that a 6th child was removed from the Musa parents, the hitherto unborn baby at the time of the April 8 2010 child removals. The baby x6 was stolen once at her birth, the violence of the police during the removal operation in the hospital at 3 in the morning directly after Gloria had just given birth nearly killing this defenceless mother {she is still suffering appalling injuries to this day which the prison,for she is in prison {see update below} will not address by denying her proper medical treatment}.

The baby was returned later after a matter of weeks, but was stolen again on even more dubious allegations on June 28th 2011, and the parents have not seen the baby since that date. The baby’s removal, like the entire case, needs an honest investigation away from the entities already involved.

Around 4 months after the children were removed the eldest, now 12 year old x1, complained of being “inappropriatly touched” – sexually molested in other words – by the teenage habitee of the home she was placed in. Ever since this child complained of this appalling sexual harrassment, in August 2010, all contact visits ordered by the court ceased – which was against all the orders the courts themselves made, against the governments “Childrens Charter” {which actually promotes contact between removed children and their parents}, and against the entire familiy’s Human Rights. For the child X1 not to have been seen for over 18 months since she claimed of being a victim of sexual abuse is surely outrageous. Nor has anybody from the Nigerian High Commission seen any of the children either during this entire period – especially after an injunction was put in place to stop anyone from the Commission seeing the children when the parents were imprisoned on remand the 28th November 2011 – some of the diplomats at the Commission are actually Godparents of some of the Musas’ children – and for over 18 months from when the child made the allegation of sexual abuse to her parents they did not know whether the child was alive or dead, or was even in this country as the council refused not only to allow any contact visits  but also refused to give any details whatsoever about the child when the parents enquired after her wellbeing. This is surely disgraceful and plainly cruel – the child was made to simply vanish from her parents lives to be never seen again.
The council had also allegedly changed this childs name – this article on “Parent Alienation Syndrome” shows how changing a childs name, location and lifestyle can turn her away from her loving parents and all she knew before her removal – a psychological “confidence trick” to which some vulnerable children can easily be made to succomb to – with or without prescribed medication. Often the entire trauma of the forced breakdown of the childs former loving family life helps the new identity take root – it is a form of Mind Control:

http://www.coeffic.demon.co.uk/pas.htm

Although commonly used in divorce cases it can of course be used to alienate parents after the child is moved into a foster home.

Recently on the 28th June 2011 the Musas took their baby x3 to Z hospital, London as they thought she seemed to have a fever – a temperature. This was enough for Z council to arrange for the police to remove the baby, claiming minutes later she had been administered hard drugs, even though tests taken by medical staff at the hospital at the time proved negative for all drugs in not only the baby but also in both parents. Nevertheless an Emergency Protection Order {EPO} was placed on the baby immediately and she has been removed from the Musa family and not seen by them since, even though the reasons for the baby’s removal are totally fictional. At a court hearng on the 7th July the judge, who happened to be the original judge who ordered the removal of the other 5 children, believing the Z councils allegations, confirmed he would be issuing an Interim Care Order {ICO} on the newly taken baby, thus effectively removing her from the parents care, when a 2 week period was up. This he duly did, and the x3 has not now been seen since 28th June 2011, some 16 months ago from the date of her removal. For no contact visits to be allowed during this period is totally illegal, against all orders the court has made regarding the childrens contact visits with their parents, against the “Childrens Act” and against the parents and baby’s Human Rights.

Allegations by the council, in the early stages of this case, were that Gloria Musa was given opium by her stepfather whilst in the UK as a teenager. These are complete lies, yet were part and parcel of the allegations used to remove and keep these children. Gloria Musa has no stepfather, has never taken opium at any time, and was not in the UK as a teenager. This is just one totally false allegation fabricated by the council and used in the removal of the Musa children. It has been said by the president of the secret closed family courts that “professionals dont lie”. This in itself is completely untrue which should be ignored completely always. There is overwhelming evidence of lies being told in this Musa case let alone numerous other cases of child removal in the UK, such as the cases of Vicki Haigh, Maureen Spalek, Cheryl Stannard, Eve Pears, the Baylis family, Paul Manning and many more – which of course is completely unacceptable. The people removing the children are public servants and are not paid to act like this – their wages are paid partly by the very people having their children removed under seemingly very dubious circumstances – it is wrong. The figures are at an all time high [from 14 April 2012]:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2128987/Children-stolen-state.html

  and the figures for children taken is ever increasing: Children waiting for adoption figures at all time high:

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/121893/ADOPTION

Many other irregularities and anomalies exist in this outrageous case:

 The court orders concerning contact visits with the children have not been adhered to by the agency responsible for them on scores of occasions, and nothing has ever been done about this, causing much unneccassary grief, worry and financial hardship for these parents who seem to have been targetted by Haringey council employees and those connected to it. Supporters have written hundreds of emails and many letters sent by postal recorded delivery to MPs and other so-called “authority figures” {such as police and a Chief Constable} all of which have been totally ignored, and have made each and every person told absolutely aware of so many irregularities an and crimes committed in this appalling case and who exactly has undertaken what is described. Even so nothing is ever done about anything by anybody clearly and concisely told about the unacceptable events, even when trying to inform them of 9 year old girl x1 {at the time} being sexually molested by a teenager she was sadly placed at the home of.
The Musa parents were remanded in prison on the 28th November 2011 and after a trial which began in May 2012 and lasted 6 weeks approx. they were found guilty of “mistreatment of their children” {see update below} and sentenced to 7 years each, and to be deported immediately on release back to Nigeria.

By a “balance of probabilities” at a Family Court last November at a 6 day hearing the verdict was given in favour of the prosecutions case. Injunctions against me forbid me to say any more about this, but the Musa parents are far removed from anything to do with what is alleged and did not even have legal representation for that important hearing as they simply couldnt get any, and they have not had legal representation for most of the legal hearings held, as not only can legal representatives not be got to represent the family for some strange reason as i said, but those that do take the case on strangely “change” after a couple of weeks to act in a way completely opposite to that which they should, viz. they stop acting in the parents interests. The legal profession is a very closely knit one – so many are “pals” with the “you scratch my back and ill scratch yours” attitude and many are previous colleagues even and word soon gets about which cases are a “no-no” and those which have a “tick” by their name – those “no-no”s seem to be protected by secrecy laws and dubious “high-ups” {who we the tax-payer pay the salaries of] who cannot afford any more public scandals such as the very sad “Baby P” case, of which it is well known Haringey council played a major part, {see:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Baby_P } and sadly we all know what happened to poor Peter Connolly, R.I.P.  Bless him and may he be at peace always…

There is a list of solicitors I personally have who’s actions leave much to be desired who most definately have not acted in their clients interests in this case – like, for example, not turning up for an important hearing as they were supposed to as Mr. Paul K-W didnt.
The list is long and it is such a shame things have come to be how they are.

The sentencing at the Musa’s trial was given on the August 14 2012 at Z crown court. [see below for update}.
A whistleblower from the crown court where the trial was held for the criminal case against the Musa parents has said the jury was not picked as it should have been – from the Electoral Roll etc.. Rather, it was handpicked by certain parties.
Also questions must be asked as to the eligibility of the judge who presided over the trial.
 The defence team did not do their jobs in so many ways, or they knew about certain things and did not act correctly as they should have. Much is to be said about their legal prowess which varied from sheer utter incompetance to blind ignorance of the basic facts of the case. The Musa family are paying dearly for these characters mistakes, deliberate and not and were, sadly, in a “no win” situation.
 
One can imagine that this case which began really around Christmas of 2009 has many twists and turns, but not only that but numerous irregularities and even outright crimes exist, undertaken by people who know better. The evidence for all I allege can be produced at any time.
    
These are just the basic facts of this harrowing case but so many more irregularities exist, and it is such a shame this has to be written at all.

This is a true sworn statement and I contend a factual opinion of what has taken place and any further details can be given on request from me John Graham adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk.

 Video: The Musa Case – The Irregular Interim Care Order Hearings: [to be updated]

——————————————————————————————

UPDATE  16  AUG.  2012
 
The Musa parents received 7 years imprisonment on the 14 Aug. 2012 at Y Court, and are to be deported to Nigeria immediately on finishing their sentence. They have served already 259 days leading up to today in custody in  prison.
 
Although grief stricken on receiving this verdict they bore the outrage with dignity before being dragged away from the glass-lined witness box to be taken back to their respective prisons to begin their completely unjust sentences.
 
Chiwar called at 7.30 pm and seemed very reasonable in the circumstances.
 
A great travesty of justice was performed today.
 
An appeal will be lodged alongside the appeal for the conviction itself.
 
There needs to be a thorough honest investigation and enquiry into the entire Musa case of their 7 children being removed by the UK government, where so many irregularities exist, along with contraventions of court orders, and blatant breaches of every family members human rights time and time again.
Regarding unanswered irregularities, as of the 9 Sept. 2012 there is still missing electronic data connected to the 2nd youngest baby x3’s medical records on her entry into hospital on the morning of 28 June 2011 that needs to be addressed, and also a handwritten “letter” allegedly written by the eldest Musa daughter x1, now 12, has never been officially confirmed as being written by her by any trained official graphologist but should have been. There is the unaddressed allegation that x1 suffered sexual abuse at the hands of the teenage member of the household she was placed with immediatly on being removed from her family in April 2010. The police have refused to investigate  properly in any shape or form anything regarding this matter, even though I have officially notified the Chief Constable of Dorset 3 times about this, along with every MP time and time again along with other government departments. 
These last 3 matters mentioned have not been addressed properly at all by the Musa’s legal representatives, who seem to have shirked completely certain responsibilities they clearly have regarding the important subjects just mentioned.

Other subjects exist too that need to be addressed but havent been, such as the childrens contact visits with their parents not taking place {for over 18 months in the case of the eldest child x1}, the worthless travel warrants issued to the Musa parents for the contact visits, which were continuously given even though the council were fully aware the travel warrants the Musas were given were worthless and unusable, and the feasance and malfeasance etc of the childrens “guardian solicitor”, for whom the Solicitors Regulation Authority refused to investigate time after time when official complaints were issued to them regarding her irresponsible, unprofessional and often criminal behaviour along with the Legal Ombudsman who also ignored notifications of serious wrongdoing by this rogue solicitor. Indeed, when I complained to the Legal Ombudsman about the actions of the SRA refusing to deal with the irresponsible behaviour by the children’s “guardian solicitor” and about my other grievances I was informed that the department was “closed” to me on these matters! “Closed” indeed!
 The prisons the Musas are resident at have consistently failed to provide the proper care and responsibility they are supposed to – mail to the Musas is often undelivered to them or takes weeks to get to them, prearranged visits are denied whereby visits are officially made yet when the visitors go they are denied seeing either Musa, and more – but the most serious inaction by Holloway womens prison is regarding the medical care Gloria is and was supposed to receive whilst resident with them – that medical care being almost nonexistent most of the time even though numerous government agencies have been notified time and time again about the situation.  
 
Chiwar has never ever set eyes on his newborn son born on March 10 2012, let alone ever hold him in his arms, and Gloria has only ever had a fleeting glimpse of her new son during birth and at no time since. They may never see any of their children ever again, as everything will be done to discourage any knowledge of anything to do with their children ever reaching these victimised and tortured parents once their lengthy prison sentences are completed and they are deported back to Africa. It is a public scandal and what has and is happening and something needs to be done about it immediately lest anything like this ever happens to any innocent victims ever again.
 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

 Much persecuted whistleblower + Musa supporter Maurice Kirk, pictured with Chiwar and Gloria Musa outside the Royal Courts of Justice Sept. 2011, when there was another of the numerous hearings held in a closed court.

Important Videos, Links, + Christopher Booker “Sunday Telegraph” Articles beginning April 2010:

1] My videos of interviews with Chiwar and Gloria Musa in their former home, under the control of of the X council who evicted them on ridiculously short notice in Aug. 2011. A very onesided appeal took place at Edmonton court, at which I was present, where the Musas stood no chance, especially with no legal representation, as the Musa’s lay legal rep. was ejected from the room at the very start of the proceedings. Another very wrong farce of a hearing. The Musas were duly evicted with nowhere to go and they became homeless, sleeping on friends couches to other friends couches, occasionally staying in church halls when the churches weren’t being used, until a few weeks aftwer being made homeless effectively the 7 years sentence began by them being placed on remand on the most dubious of charges on Nov. 28 2011 after being called to an emergency hearing at the Royal Courts of Justice – the scene of the closed court hearing from 4 weeks previously at which I was present. This is travesty reported elsewhere in these articles

These videos from April 2011 of Chiwar and Bishop Gloria Musa at their Haringey home, before their imprisonment [on remand] on Nov. 28 2011, before their 7 year sentencing 259 days later on Aug. 14 2012, and before the birth of their 7th baby, in Holloway prison, on March 10 2012 – the baby being removed at once before even Gloria could look at him properly, and Chiwar, the father, has never seen this child at all – he has simply vanished into the care system along with the other 6 children and who knows where they all are now: [videos total length 26 mins]
 
a] http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=11f53cd65762834b3af0b2d&skin_id=1603&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url
 
b] http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=11f5398ceed4e4e312670f4&skin_id=601&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

 
2}  Video: The Musa Case – The Irregular Interim Care Order Hearings: During 2010, from the date in April then the then 5 Musa children were removed by Haringey council and during November 2011 when the Musa parents were remanded in prison on very dubious charges every 28 days the Interim Care Order on each child had, by law, to be renewed in the Family court. It was the parents right to attend this hearing each time it occurred if they objected to the ICO being issued, which eas the case each 28 days. But on January 12 2012 when Chiwar Musa was due in court for the ICO renewal hearing instead of being taken to the court he was taken everywhere but. Coming from Pentonville prison he was at first driven in the prison transport to the Royal Courts of Justice but instead of being taken to the hearing there the van drove around the car park there for a few minutes before being taken to a completely different court where they parked up for hours before he was taken back to the prison. There could have been np mistake about this hearing, the participants and the location etc as this was a monthly ritual held every 28 days as stated, but not only that but I had confirmed everything with the court employee whowas very well versed and ready with answers regarding the events to come the following day when I called the court the day before. This was not the first time the Musas have been disallowed from appearing at their ICO hearings, as Chiwar and Gloria will tell anybody.  This type of thing is a typical irregularity within the legal framework of the Musas’ case – on other occasions I am told hearings have taken place without the Musas being present which, of course, is their legal right in every instance. If any complaint is made about anything it is quickly ignored and brushed aside – that has been the norm in 99% of instances for over 3 years.

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=12130faedd68d9190602b96&skin_id=3000&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

3}  Reporter Christopher Bookers articles for the “Sunday Telegraph” on this case {these links stop Aug. 2011 – more articles exist} =
 
http://mauricejohnkirk.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/11-08-03-sunday-telegraph.pdf
 
4}  April 2008 Daily Mail = “Baby P council falsely accused me of abusing a child, reveals whistleblower who feared she’d lose her daughter.”
{By Eileen Fairweather} =
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1086196/Baby-P-council-falsely-accused-abusing-child-reveals-whistleblower-feared-shed-lose-daughter.html

4a]  WHISTLEBLOWER UKRAINIAN PRIEST TELLS OF UNITED NATION’S [U.N.] AGENDA OF CHILDSTEALING WORLDWIDE….please persevere thru to the end with this video – the translating from Ukrainian to English takes its toll on some viewers,sadly…

https://www.vimeo.com/64441928

5a}  Figures at an all time high for children being removed from families, most often good, loving ones – Daily Mail April 12 2012 =
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2128987/Children-stolen-state.html

b] DAILY MAIL, 17 April 13 – “Thousands of children abused in their own homes are not being protected by local authorities, damning NSPCC report warns”

IT SEEMS THE NSPCC ARE ONE OF THE ORGANISATIONS BEHIND THE CHILDSTEALING RACKET IN THE UK – WHICH SPREADS WORLDWIDE VIA THE U.N. – ALL BACKED BY BRITISH TAX MONEY.
How do they know this? do they go into the hiomes and see the abuse? of course they dont – its propaganda used to steal children – and there mustake record is out of all comprehension.
The rubbish is here:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2310840/Thousands-children-abused-homes-protected-local-authorities-damning-NSPCC-report-warns.html?ito=feeds-newsxml%5B/url%5D

5c] The Guardian “Adoption and children in state care across England: get the data” – 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/sep/26/adoption-and-care-statistics-england?intcmp=239
 
6} The African publication “The Leadership”‘s articles are just 2 of many African exposes on the case:

http://leadership.ng/nga/articles/5282/2011/09/17/british_journalist_writes_jonathan_over_seized_nigerian_children.html

http://web.archive.org/web/20111201190116/http://leadership.ng/nga/articles/4068/2011/08/21/british_govt_detains_nigerian_couple%E2%80%99s_six_children.html

7]  Children waiting for adoption figures at all time high:

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/121893/ADOPTION__FIGURES_AT_ALL_TIME_HIGH_OF_CHILDREN_IN_CARE_WAITING_FOR_ADOPTION__SKY_NEWS_21_JAN_13/

 8]  Affadavits:
File1:
 File Name: MUSA MOJI AFFADAVIT.pdf
 Description: MOJI WORD AFFADAVIT 20/4/11
 File Size: 182.1 KB
 Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/5tt9am
 
File 2:
 File Name: MUSA FULL PDF 4 3 12.pdf
 Description: RESUME / GLORIA STATEMENT 4/3/12
 File Size: 130.6 KB
 Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/imddy9

8] Letter 20 March 2013 sent by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery to 5 Ministry ofJustice representatives – as usual  no replies have been received as of 25 days later – and one letter to Lord Mcnally didnt even get delivered, according to an operative at the post room at parliament. Many more letters have been sent by recorded delivery – 99% remain unanswered, especially from the Ministry of Justice:

http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/eblkjc

9] MailOnline article 26 July 2013 by Sue Reid: ‘For years I fought against secret courts breaking up families. At last there’s hope’

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2377084/SUE-REID-For-years-I-fought-secret-courts-breaking-families-At-theres-hope.html#ixzz2aJqP7uQa

10] Christopher Booker article 20 July 13: ‘Our child protection system is an international scandal’

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10191983/Our-child-protection-system-is-an-international-scandal.html

11] The council responsible for Baby Peter and Victoria Climbie has failed another child, a serious case review has found: BBC NEWS ONLINE 11 Oct. 2013

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-24484148

—————————————————-

   For more on the Musa case, Maurice Kirk, the Baylis family, Norman Scarth:

  http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com

…butlincat.

Maurice Kirk, Musa campaigner, at present in Cardiff prison for the 3rd time in the past 12 months on totally dubious “charges” – pls see my wordpress blog for recent phone calls from Cardiff prison + his case- + see videos on youtube, one being
 Last Edit: May 28, 2013, 06:01:07 AM by butlincat

——————————————————————————–
 
the leveller
Trusted
Hero Member
*****
 Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

 Reply #1 on: September 10, 2012, 09:23:46 PM
Landmark trial over baby snatched from Spain

In May and June I reported here more than once on the extraordinary legal drama over a baby born to an English couple living in France, Joe Ollis and Marie Black,  who was tracked down, seized and brought back to England by Norfolk social workers. A High Court judge then ruled that the social workers had acted illegally under an EU law, known as ‘Brussels II’. Because the baby had never had ‘habitual residence’ in England, he ruled that the British courts had no jurisdiction, ordering the child to be returned to its overjoyed parents in France.

At the same time, I reported on the equally disturbing case of a Welsh mother who had escaped to Spain for the birth of her baby in April. Social workers were determined to seize this baby because they had already taken an older child from her after an episode involving abuse by a former partner long out of her life. So desperate were they to track down the mother and new baby that the Welsh police in turn arrested the child’s grandmother, grandfather and father, who had returned to Britain, threatening them all with prison unless they revealed the child’s whereabouts.

Last week, the Spanish police arrived to seize the baby from its weeping mother’s arms, gabbling at her in Spanish, which she did not understand. The following day, an English-speaking Spanish court official explained that the baby was to be returned to Britain on the orders of the British social workers. The Spanish authorities, he said with tears in his eyes, had been powerless to refuse. The distraught mother contacted a London solicitor involved in the case of Joe and Marie, who, after making enquiries, was able to tell her an application for a care order on the child was to be heard next morning. The mother was told her baby was already on its way back to Britain, but that the case had been adjourned for a full hearing in the High Court this week.

This raises the question whether the Welsh social workers appear to have been acting in direct contravention of the principle of EU law upheld by that High Court judge in May, the five-month-old baby has never had ‘habitual residence’ anywhere but Spain. This week’s hearing could make legal history. Will the new judge follow his predecessor in upholding the principle that British courts have no jurisdiction over a child who has never lived in Britain? Or will that principle now be reversed?

There is a huge issue of law at stake, the implications of which go far beyond the plight of this one mother and child who have been so cruelly, and for no obvious good reason, torn apart.
CHRISTOPHER BOOKER—SUNDAY TELEGRAPH
——————————————————————————-
the leveller
Trusted
Hero Member
*****
 
Posts: 750
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

 Reply #2 on: September 11, 2012, 11:19:59 PM

http://www.bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/home/2012/09/a-serious-debate.html#.UEcnyP4ZaUJ.blogger
——————————————————————————–
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
 
Posts: 71
View Profile
 http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
 Email

Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

 Reply #3 on: September 12, 2012, 05:13:23 AM

Letter from Gloria Musa 5 Sept. from Holloway prison – see pics of the letter here:

https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2012/09/05/gloria-musa-5-sept-12/

 In it she states that she has seen a “Dr. REDACTED”  who gave her some imflammatory tablets, however she states she is still in great pain still and unable to leave the cell, and that also she cannot sleep at night and whats more is having panic attacks =
{qu.}”I saw Dr. REDACTED who prescribed inflammatory tablets to relieve the pain but im yet to see change yet, coupled with lacking sleep at night as i have to leave the light on, still having panic attacks more especially as the police gave evidence at their brutality to me at the hospital” {unqu.}.

 The full communication from Gloria is put here so as everybody – supporters and quislings alike can see it, removing of course the identity  the solicitors mentioned as 2 lots of solicitors have mysteriously declined recently from helping the Musas from formerly being enthusiastic about helping them. I believe somebody “put a spanner in the works” regarding this, and this behavior from solicitors has happened many times before with solicitors starting off on the right foot only to actively change after a short period of time. Is that not true solicitors Rajesh S., Paul K-W., Georgina C., Paul G., Ian J., C. in Harrow, plus others,…how do they sleep at night? And especially not forgetting the woman solicitor from Deptford who Sabine Mcneil arranged to visit Chiwar who charged £230 for “travel expenses” etc, travelling from Deptford to Pentonville – a distance of 3 miles or so – Chiwar telling her she was unsuitable on the day and bidding her farewell. I believe this entire visit by this character was a deliberate preplanned ploy to try and exhaust the Musas legal aid status by this outrageous charging by a solicitor who in Chiwars eyes was clearly not fit for the job – her name and the charge details stated here are on the recording of the call i made to her a couple of days after the event. With all the chopping and changing the Musas have been very lucky to retain their legal aid status at all – no thanks to the person who arranged the very expensive solicitor who added her outrageous figure to the legal aid bill yet did precisely nothing in return.
                                           ———————————

Sent by Royal Mail recorded delivery letter {twice} + and email to LORD MCNALLY, justice minister + K. CLARKE, sec of state for justice, 3 Sept. 2012: {LETTERS TILL NOT RECEIVED BACL AS OF 31 OCT 12}

https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2012/09/04/sent-by-rec-del-email-to-lord-mcnally-and-k-clarke-mp-3-sept-12/

For the attention of: the Minister of State, {and Deputy Leader of the House of Lords} –  the Rt. Hon. Lord McNally, and the Lord Chancellor, Secretary of State for Justice, the Rt. Hon. Mr. K. Clarke QC MP
 
Dear Lord McNally, and the Rt. Hon. Mr. K. Clarke,
I write to you today about very serious and grave miscarriages of justice that has happened in our high courts.  I have been notifying numerous MPs, including Mr. Pickles, Mr. Clarke and numerous others about the actions, or rather the criminal activities of X COUNCIL for some time, yet never have I received any kind of reply or even acknowledgement to my communications, by email and recorded delivery Royal Mail postal service. {update 11 Sept.  replies {pics below} from the IMB and Mr. N. Hardwick have now finally been received – the IMB, which says it is made up of ‘members of community’  is standard rhetoric – their letter begins ‘I have noted your observations but the IMB secretariat are not equipped to deal with personal circumstances of any individual unless they are unable to raise the issue themselves by application’ but then whichever ‘member of the community’ wrote this thing contradicts him/herself by stating {presumably about Glorias plight ‘They {IMB members} have also liased with the no. 1 governor regarding her case , and after receiving other letters and have had lengthy discussions’. Well make your mind up please. Either you are dealing with Gloria’s appalling mistreatment or your not. Either way not much is being done and Gloria should be in a hospital and getting proper medical treatment, not what is happening as no improvement is being shown – being in a cell and falling down and not being able to get up which she says has happened 8 times at least, and bleeding blood clots as Gloria has stated is happening still since giving birth on March 10 is simply not good enough. That is the gist of the letter from the IMB, whereas Mr. Hardwick simply gives an address to write to of yet another government department and the IPCC and says hes unable to deal with anything. Ms. Tysoe still has not replied at all}.
 

This council has removed 7 children from the Nigerian visitors here CHIWAR and GLORIA MUSA and this family has been subjected to the most gross irregularities that could befall a family – performed by personnel within X council who removed 7 children from these parents over a 2 and a half year period.
 
A 6 week trial during May and June 2012 saw these innocent parents subjected to a sentence of SEVEN years – the end result of a farcical, one-sided and very biased trial, presided over by a judge who performed great failings throughout the trial.

We have it from good authority from a whistleblower also at the court the trial was heard at  Z Crown in North London, that the jury was not chosen as it should have been, but rather it was rigged.
 

The entire case needs an honest and thorough investigation by honest parties, and I speak as one who has been closely involved in the case since April 2011, having attended many court hearings, some as a Mckenzie friend  particularly during a fact-finding hearing held at the Royal Courts of Justice beginning Oct. 31 until Nov. 6 2011, presided over by Sir Nicholas Wall. The entire 6 day hearing there was a farce, the Nigerian parents had no legal representation at all and little factual information came out during the hearing – medical records were missing {and remained missing even throughout the trial months later}, the legal bundle had been altered with items removed or the wording changed and tampered with and all sorts of irregularities took place during the hearing so as a certain result could be achieved & and was!!  The truth about more or less everything in this case has been twisted and altered out of all proportion to the actual truth & so as to conveniently admonish each and every participant who conspired with others to pervert the course of justice throughout this case ? from the solicitors involved, to the police, judiciary, social workers and a whole lot more.

Please use your powers to bring an honest thorough investigation regarding this shocking case. 7 children have been removed from their parents of the most fake of allegations & and as if that wasnt enough situations and falsehoods were manufactured by certain characters to compound the completely false case & the children brainwashed and coaxed into saying things they never would under normal circumstances & all to cover up the irregularities of most dubious social workers in the land, who are not fit to be employed by anybody & those employed by Haringey council,in my humble opinion..
I have no reason to lie or make anything up regarding anything to do with this case – I simply feel it is so wrong what has happened, and I ask you please to look at the attatched notes. Much didnt come out in court, {or wasnt allowed to} due to a pathetically incompetant defence team who played right into the hands of the prosecution and all they stood for. Much vital evidence was deliberately ignored and not brought into the trial, the entire thing was a farce. There is so much that needs to come out regarding this entire case, such as the witness intimidation that existed at the beginning of the case but was never mentioned, and the sexual abuse suffered by the eldest child, then 9 years of age when taken into care on April 8 2010. All has been conveniently hushed up and not mentioned during the trial, gross irregularities.

Now 2 innocent parents have been given 7 year sentences on the basis of a pack of untruths, and 7 children have lost their true parents. It is a disgrace.

Whilst on remand in prison awaiting her trial, and since whilst beginning her sentence, Gloria Musa has been treated completely appallingly, and illegally I might add. I have written numerous times along with others to the Governor of Holloway prison {a recent example below}, and also to various authorities but have never received any replies about the shocking treatment she is being given. My message to the Independant Monitoring Board {below} has still not been answered, and it is disgraceful the Prisons dept. under the guises of Mr. Hardwick and Ms. Tysoe {Prison Healthcare} have not answered my communications they have been sent regarding the appalling treatment Ms. Musa has received since she has been in Holloway prison since Nov. 28th 2011. She has been denied medical treatment for serious ailments, and denied visits when weve gone to visit her to deliberately keep certain things covered up, and a whole lot more.
What is happening to her in Holloway prison is a public scandal.

Please help and let the truth come out about this horrific case.

Thank you for your time.

Sincerely,
 
J. Graham
 
Mckenzie friend to the Musa family, and concerned citizen.
                                 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

This below was sent to the Independant Monitoring Board,  and Mr. Hardwick and Ms. Tysoe of the Prisons Dept. and Healthcare respectively – see full article + full pics of repliy letters recd. here {but not from Tysoe of “Prisons Healthcare}: .https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2012/09/04/sent-by-rec-del-email-to-lord-mcnally-and-k-clarke-mp-3-sept-12/

 To: as stated above
 Ashley House 2 Monck Street London SW1P 2BQ
 
From: J. Graham   supporter, and Mckenzie friend to the Musa family and concerned citizen.
 
 August 24  2012
 
Dear Ms. Elizabeth Tysoe, Mr. N. Hardwick, and whom it may concern at the Independant Monitoring Board,
 
I am writing to you concerning a shocking situation and an abuse of power by prison employes paid to know and act better regarding the mistreatment of a female prisoner in Holloway prison by the name of Ms. Gloria Musa, no A2767CJ. Helen, an erstwile and devoted Musa family supporter reports that Gloria Musa, the unjustly imprisoned Nigerian mother and prisoner had called her today Thursday 23rd August by telephone from Holloway prison where she is being denied medical treatment for serious conditions, and has been for about 10 months since her entry into the prison. Gloria has recently begun a 7 year sentence after already serving 259 days on remand there.
 
Gloria Musa has told of how she was attacked by countless police officers at 3am in the morning whilst breastfeeding her newborn baby in a side cubicle in a London hospital, in June 2010,  the police allegedly attacking her so badly whilst removing her baby that she still is suffering the damaging effects to this very day over 2 years later, and is being refused medical treatment still in Holloway as she has been since November 28th 2011 ? the day she was remanded in custody there on the most questionable of charges. Gloria told Helen she fell earlier in the day in her cell in Holloway prison and was in much pain and couldnt get up, and also she wet herself and was much humiliated by it all. She says she has been bleeding blood clots for weeks too after giving birth to her new baby on March 10 2012 – some 22 weeks ago and has been denied any kind of medical treatment to remedy the situation. After falling her cellmate got the warders who helped Gloria up and took her to the medical room and gave her a couple of paracetamol to ease the pain. It is outrageous that nothing has ever been done in the 10 months of her being in prison for the ailments she has.
 
Many times the authorities have been notified and complained to about the situation – a typical communication is below – but nothing is ever done about Gloria Musa’s ailments – indeed, our communications have never even been acknowledged let alone replied to by the characters that have been notified – MPs included. It is a truly disgraceful situation and the people written to dont care at all if any permanent damage is done through the lack of medical treatment regarding the ailments Gloria Musa is suffering. Why do they not take her to the hospital and give her proper medical treatment? No wonder they refused to find a wheelchair for her on the 12th August to bring her for our visit – if she had come she would’ve told us of her dire medical situation again and the refusal of the prison to give her the medical treatment that she is entitled to. As Gloria could be classed as a ‘difficult prisoner’ in the authorities eyes this is how they retaliate – by making her life as miserable and painful as possible.
 
What an absolute disgrace!

Authorities have been told for months and the prison too about the situation but they deliberatly ignore the situation to add insult to injury. Gloria said when a probation officer came a couple of weeks ago – a Martin Wagner – to interview her they found a wheelchair straightaway to take her to the meeting. Remember on the Sunday 12th Aug when they refused to bring Gloria to the visiting hall the prison warder – officer HY601 – blatantly lied and said there were ‘no wheelchairs in the prison’ while the warders superior in a suit 5 yards away in the visiting hall – a Mr. ATTARD – said that there were indeed wheelchairs in the prison – contradicting the officer HY601’s obvious lie. Why didnt they get one to bring Gloria to the visit? They had 5 days notice of the visit to find one as the visit was arranged on the preceeding Tuesday 5 days earlier, and also on the 9th Aug – the Thursday – i sent the letter {below} to the Governor complaining about the awful lack of treatment Gloria has been denied for 10 months now at this prison.
 
What if permanent damage is done to Glorias knee or hip? Nobody in the prison cares about that whatsoever!
 
Please help this lady.
 
Thank you very much.
J. Graham

Full article+ full size pics of the letters below: https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2012/09/04/sent-by-rec-del-email-to-lord-mcnally-and-k-clarke-mp-3-sept-12/

——————————————————————————–
the leveller
Trusted
Hero Member
*****
 
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

– Reply #4 on: September 12, 2012, 10:01:23 PM –

HAVE YOU TRIED ANY OF THE ORGANISATIONS LISTED HERE BUTLINCAT ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_abduction

——————————————————————————–
 the leveller
Trusted
Hero Member
*****
re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

– Reply #5 on: September 12, 2012, 10:17:04 PM –

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/crime/children-in-care-go-missing-warn-trafficking-experts-8129780.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19566617

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-13440736

 ——————————————————————————-
 
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

– Reply #6 on: September 20, 2012, 12:57:28 PM –

quote from: the leveller on September 12, 2012, 10:01:23 PM

HAVE YOU TRIED ANY OF THE ORGANISATIONS LISTED HERE BUTLINCAT ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_abduction

We have been to numerous agencies sending complaints about the state of the contact visits with the children, as descibed in articles viz. the Musa parents would go on a prearranged visit, as decreed by the court, only for, on many occasions only some of the children to be brought to the visit, if at all. The Musa parents would often spend all day getting to and from the visit centre, and the entire thing would be a waste of time. The agencies contacted were mostly in the UK – and only one reply ever received back, which is below too, – addresses being:

“And a letter to the foster agencies of the UK:
From: butlincat . (adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk)

Sent:  08 June 2011 11:19:48

 
To:  contactus@thefca.co.uk;
 
enquiries@ofsted.gov.uk; mail@baaf.org.uk; advice@frg.org.uk; helpdesk@adoptionuk.org.uk; duty@capstonevision.co.uk,
 lammyd@parliament.uk; mayt@parliament.uk; hc@nigeriahc.org.uk; infodesk@ohchr.org; publishing@echr.coe.int; dilek.dogus@haringey.gov.uk; lorna.reith@haringey.gov.uk;

————————————————————————————————-
From: Contact.Us@thefca.co.uk
To: adamski2012@hotmail.co.uk
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2011 10:58:10 +0100
Subject: your complaint.

With reference to your complaint I regret that we are unable to assist you. Please contact the local authority and make your complaint to them. They will have a complaints proceedure in place.
 
Kind Regards
Contact Us”
———————————————————————————-

butlincat
Moderator
*****
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

– Reply #7 on: September 22, 2012, 05:51:12 PM –
UPDATE 26 SEPT. 12 – We received a message from Gloria earlier this week and it is understood Gloria has ceased taking the medication she was being given and is feeling much better as a result.

7/09/2012 20:07, butlincat . wrote:

“On the 16 Sept. Sunday 15.30 gmt we – H and I – visited Gloria at Holloway prison.
 
1}  Gloria was in good spirits mostly but swayed into being near tears at times and the main points I wish to forward are these below. I hope Helen will confirm anything if anything is doubtful.

2}  Gloria said she is experiencing panic attacks still from when the police at the trial described their what many people say is appalling mistreatment of her.
She said after at least 7 police officers had entered her single cubilcle at the hospital at one point there were 2 officers sitting each on seperate legs whilst a third was strangling her. She said she was seriously choking and had stopped breathing and believes this was a deliberate attempt on her life. Photographs exist of wounds Gloria sustained during this episode.

 The baby having been removed from Gloria did not thrive over the 4 months gone and became quite unwell – so much so that she was returned to Gloria. The baby didnt take long to get back to her happy normal self. Then 7 or so months later on the 28th June 2011 the baby was removed again via an Emergency Protection Order after the Musa parents had taken the baby to St. Thonas’s hospital, London because she seemed to the parents to be unwell and running a temperature. Once at the hospital xxxxx arrived up after the council were called. xxxx was the top man – and Gloria felt it strange he should turn up at all.

   After a 6 day factfinding hearing beginning Oct 31 at the Royal Courts of Justice  it was deemed by a ‘balance of probabilities’ that the Musas had mistreated their baby which resulted in her being taken to the hospital on June 28 2011. The Musas had no legal representation throughout the  6 day hearing.For such an important hearing to be allowed to happen at all when the  ‘defendants’ had no legal representation whatsoever was surely highly irregular. Later the Musa parents were to receive 7 years imprisonment each for supposedly ‘mistreating their children’ after a ‘6 week trial’.
 
3} Gloria yesterday also spoke of acute pain in her knee, hip, back and arm – her arm from falling down at least 8 times. A new ailment has begun being she has now something wrong with her left eye. She described it as being ‘painful’ and her sight is affected and says it could be a result of one or more or a combination of 5 different drugs she is now being given as it wasnt happening before the drugs were introduced. She has fallen down over 8 times recently, and cannot get up once she has fallen and needs assistance to get up. She tells us she was left for 2 hours on the cell floor recently after falling down in the middle of the night – not getting any help to get up from the prison warders. Being in acute pain as she describes, and bleeding still from giving birth one wonders why she isnt getting proper treatment in a hospital, and having proper x-rays and blood and other tests done? This we have been trying for for over 10 months since Gloria first complained about her knee – damaged as a result of police action even they described during the ytrial when it was such tat jury members and public gallery members were reduced to tears. Being given drugs and not being told the names, as Gloria relates, is illegal. Surely on certain drugs one could go insane. Surely we must be careful Gloria is not pronounced mentally incapable or ill etc etc and sectioned off to a mental prison or similar, never to be seen again!
 
She understands she is being given a painkiller, but the name of this drug and the names of the other 4 being given are not forthcoming and Gloria says the prison refuse to tell her the names of the medications. This is surely highly questionable as surely one is allowed to know the names of the drugs one is being told to take, even if one is imprisoned. Still there have been no x-rays on her knee or anywhere to determine if her knee is actually broken. Also she has been bleeding internally constantly since giving birth to her baby on March 10 this year – for which there have been no proper medical examinations carried out,  or blood tests done – which must surely be far from the norm in a situation whereby someone is bleeding constantly.

4} Gloria told us that she had received a letter from a certain person on Thursday 11 September 2012 stating that the Musas legal aid “had run out” regarding representation by her defence team. Whether this is true or not or a fabrication  remains to be seen. Where the Musas stand now with supposedly 2 appeals underway – against conviction and sentencing – can only be imagined. Since when do legal representatives tell a member of the public things like that to tell the clients of the legal reps? Why have they not told the Musas themselves and why hasnt any lof the 3 legal representatives visited them since the conviction date of 14th August 2012 when the Musas received 7 years imprisonment on a charge of mistreating their children – something they did not do. The present legal team rarely visit either Musa. {update 22 Sept. – it is claimed one of the defence legal team did visit Gloria but this has yet to be confirmed}.

The amount of irregularities and anomalies in this case are such that an honest investigation needs to take place as soon as possible.

5} Gloria told us that she had not seen the numerous emails sent  via the “emailaprisoner” service in recent weeks.

7} Gloria told us  the reason she was not permitted to join the 3 supporters who tried to visit her on the 12 Aug. 2012 but were denied the visit because Gloria was not brought was because a particularly hostile female senior officer was on duty and was behind her deliberately not being given assistance to attend the visit. Gloria told us of apparently other hostile acts towards her have occurred by this person which I will not go into here.

Finally it is good that 4 visitors did not go to the prison for the visit as was tentatively arranged. Luckily 2 persons changed their minds at the last minute. 4 people arent allowed on a visit – only 3 are – but here is just 2 excerpts of the recording with the prison visits officer lieing and deliberately arranging for a 4th person to attend the visit – which he knows ISNT ALLOWED =

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=1180686de69bc0900c9943e&skin_id=1602&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

I asked repeatedy could 4 people go on a visit = = he replied in the affirmative each time and duly took the 4th name. When at the prison I asked a visits officer about the number allowed he said THREE ONLY. Another blatant lie told us regarding 4 visitors being allowed on a visit. We have been lied to many times and I have travelled before for a prearranged visit only to find out no such visit exists and is listed. It was then I bought a recording device which has proved extremely valuable when ive been able to prove a visit had been arranged when ive arrived at the prison for a visit only to be told one hadnt been arranged. Others have experienced the same irregularity and have been denied their visit when it had been absolutelly properly arranged. The prison simply does not reply to 99% of communications sent to them, of course, as havent scores of other departments and authority figures written to by numerous Musa supporters, including Mr. Martin Baker. Chief Constable of Dorset police, who refused to reply when I wrote notifying him of sexual abuse suffered by X1 Musa during the early part of her being placed in a care home after being removed from her parents on April 8 2010. I sent at least a total of 3 emails to Mr. Baker about this serious sexual crime upon a minor, but my emails were blocked after the 1st one sent, but I had already sent letters via recorded delivery Royal Mail. After my 2nd email to Mr. Baker was returned undelivered further emails were sent via Dorchester police HQ asking they be forwarded to Mr. Baker as CC. Nothing has ever been received back from anybody regarding this, but Mr. Baker has resigned {though of course not necessarily connected to anything written here – http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-19523330 

That is the gist of yesterdays visit with Gloria.
 
                                 —————————————-
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

– Reply #8 on: September 26, 2012, 04:18:27 PM –

  Yet another year rolls around and another anti-child abuse rally will take place in London on September 29 at Trafalgar Square, from 1.pm until 4 pm

Organised by: http://www.truthandhope.co.uk

 Home
  UK END CHILD ABUSE RALLY
  Our Fundraising Events
  Support Group Events
  State Endorsed Paedophilia
  SRE Parental Awareness Campaign
  Global Child Abuse Issues
  Support Our Cause
  Contact us

see full size pic @:  http://www.truthandhope.co.uk/london-2012.html

from David Icke:

http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/36895-uk-rally-against-child-abuse-trafalgar-square-london-saturday-august-7th-

Physical, emotional & sexual abuse – paedophilia & incest – exploitation -family court corruption – institutional, systematic & ritual abuse.

The UK Rally Against Child Abuse is an opportunity for people from all walks of life to join toge

Modify message

« Last Edit: October 20, 2013, 03:22:09 AM by butlincat »

 Report to moderator    46.165.210.17
——————————————————————————–

Posts on this forum are made by members and remian here in good faith. Any post you feel is illegal, libelous, defamortay or in anyway upsetting.
Please report it asap. The owner of this site takes no responsibility for the actions of others wishing to exercise their freedom of speach.

my blog http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com
my blog: http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
facebook: http://www.facebook.com
youtube: http://www.youtube.com/butlincat6

——————————————————————————–
 

Argos

——————————————————————————–
 

butlincat
Trusted
*****
 
Posts: 99
View Profile
 http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
 Email
 Personal Message (Online)
 

Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2013, 04:30:03 PM »

Quote
 Modify
 
——————————————————————————–
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

? Reply #9 on: September 27, 2012, 07:37:33 PM ?

X MUSA IS SIX TODAY!!!  HAPPY BIRTHDAY  X!!!  {gag orders with threats of imprisonment stop any public naming or anything to do with any of the Musa children}

 
——————————————————————————–
 
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

? Reply #10 on: September 28, 2012, 08:17:47 PM ?

PRESIDENT OF THE SECRET FAMILY COURT SIR NICHOLAS WALL RETIRES

“President of the Family Division, Sir Nicholas Wall, retires   by Natasha

The Ministry of Justice have just this moment notified its readers of the news that Sir Nicholas Wall, the current President of the Family Division is to retire on the 1st December, 2012 ( this year), on grounds of ill-health.

Working within the confines of the courts and the limits of the law, Sir Nicholas was one of the more outspoken judges of his time and certainly pioneered radical discussion on increasing rights for unmarried couples, implementing no-fault divorce and more access to the family courts through media reporting to help increase transparency inside the system. He was also kind enough to take time out of his busy schedule to be a panel member for our Westminster Debate for KIDS.

  We will be sorry to see him leave and wish him a quick recovery. However, the question which remains, is who will take Sir Nicholas’s place, as the new President of the Family Division?”

PLEASE NOTE THIS VIEW IS NOT SHARED BY MANY MOTHERS I HAVE SPOKEN TO WHO HAVE HAD THE MISFORTUNE TO BE ON THE RECEIVING END OF THIS TYPE OF JUSTICE! – AND WHAT HAPPENED TO THE MUSA FAMILY IS A PUBLIC SCANDAL THAT NEEDS A PROPER HONEST INVESTIGATION BY NEUTRAL HONEST PARTIES!!

Natasha | September 28, 2012 at 4:42 pm | Categories: Family Law |

URL:   http://wp.me/pzLid-Nm http://researchingreform.wordpress.com/2012/09/28/president-of-the-family-division-sir-nicholas-wall-retires/
————————————————-

From the “Sunday Telegraph” by Christopher Booker:

30 10 2011 – Christopher Booker

Lord Justice Wall takes on an alarming child-snatching case

This seems to be a classic instance of the way social workers make a crashing initial mistake, then add ever more questionable allegations to defend their blunder.   A mother and her daughter have been fighting a care order Photo: ALAMY By Christopher Booker 7:00PM BST 29 Oct 2011 In the child-snatching story that I have reported on here most often, the latest twists are as disturbing as anything that has gone before. The case has been taken over by Lord Justice Wall, the President of the Family Division. It is a classic instance of how, when social workers seize children on the basis of what appears to be a crashing initial mistake, they then seem to make ever more questionable allegations against the parents to defend their original blunder.

On June 27, a year-old baby that had been torn from its mother?s arms at birth (but was later returned to the couple on a judge?s orders) developed a fever. When the parents took the baby to hospital for medical advice, the staff contacted social workers, who called in the police on an allegation that the parents had drugged the baby with opium. The parents were arrested and held in a police cell for 27 hours. The baby was taken back into care.

This month, I am told, the police announced that no charges would be brought against the couple, lab tests having shown no trace of any drugs. The social workers had apparently known this for weeks. Meanwhile, they asked the police to arrest the couple on a charge of conspiracy to abduct their other five children from foster homes and take them abroad. The parents had no idea where their children were, having not seen them for many months. Again, it seems, no charges are to be brought, because there was no evidence.

Despite an order by Lord Justice Wall that the parents must again be given regular contact with their children, his order has, I gather, been ignored. There is much in this alarming case for the learned judge to investigate.

For legal reasons, comments have been disabled on this story.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8857570/Lord-Justice-Wall-takes-on-an-alarming-child-snatching-case.html
 ———————————————————————-

Statement of Gloria Musa for the High Court;21/7/2011

1:-My name is Gloria Musa.My husband Chiwar and I have six {update: as of March 10 2012 there are 7 children upon the birth of X7 in Holloway prison – ed}  children who have never been ill or in hospital before the intervention of X councils social services, X1, X2, X3, X4, X5, X6, + X7.

I am of Nigerian nationality and a respected evangelist preacher and bishop,author of many books and my sermons can be found on DVDs on line including one preached to a large congregation at the Hilton Metropole hotel in London.I was a virgin when I married and in accordance with my strict Christian beliefs I have never had sexual relations with any man other than my husband.We are visitors in this country and our dearest wish is to return to Nigeria with our 6 children to live a normal family life in an African culture.We would all leave immediately if permitted.
 2:-The reason given at the time for taking away my children in April 2010 was a letter found in the garden allegedly written by X1 (then aged 9) saying that I was a cruel mother who beat her without mercy.This letter was written in an adult hand that bore absolutely no resemblance to X1’s writing in her school exercise book but Judge Brasse refused to look at my evidence so that the handwriting could be compared ,refused to look at the graphologist report confirming that X1 was not the author of the letter,saying that it did not matter as “we have gone beyond that”.With respect the judge erred as if X1 did not write the letter then the person who did forge her signature also perverted the course of justice and the matter should have been investigated.
 3:-It was a terrible shock in April 2010 that my 5 younger children were taken away with no prior warning by police and social workers whilst I was still pregnant with my youngest X6.
 Originally when the children were taken X local authority applied for an interim care order, Judge Brasse heard the barrister for the local authority state as a fact that I was a sex worker (I was not allowed to speak in order to either question the barrister or deny the allegations). ,that I had been abused in childhood and taken drugs , that the children were multiparented and had been traffiked into the country and would entail jail sentences for those responsible.Judge Brasse in answer to my denials of all this promised rather sceptically that if I produced my medical records and dna results to prove my denials true that was all I needed to do.I assumed that he mean’t that I would then have my children returned.
 4:-DNA proved all six were mine and my husband’s my medical records showed a normal happy drugfree and uneventful childhood ,and the care assistant who wrongly and illegally described herself as a social worker admitted she had no evidence of sex working other than that “she ticked all the boxes as she never claimed benefits”She made several enquiries from parents at my children’s school asking if they knew I was a sex worker causing uproar,dismay,and a lot of bad publicity.The lack of evidence was recorded on a court document that was sent to me by Haringey inadvertently !.Judge Brasse then studied reports made by social workers and other documents handed in by them which I was not allowed to see ! Surely denying me a fair hearing contrary to my human rights.Judge Brasse at a later hearing did not keep his promise ,and it was only just before the fact finding hearings in February 2011 that allegations of child beatings on all five elder children were made against me purely on hearsay to justify the further care orders being put in place;I was refused permission by judge Brasse to question Joyce the allotted social worker at that time and refused permission to play a recording that would have proved conclusively that she had lied under oath.Surely contrary to my human right right to a fair hearing.?
 5:-When my 6th child , X6 was born,8 police came into the hospital with two social workers after 3am ,4 hours after the baby was born and seized my baby by force waking up other mothers in the ward . I was badly bruised when this took place perhaps because I shouted that I would resist until they showed me a court order which they did not.With such an uproar the affair was put very much in the public domain by those who witnessed it.Judge Brasse refused to consider the unecessary taking of my child at the instance of X council but blamed me for the bad publicity! Surely he should have considered this evidence when judging my behaviour against that of X council?
 6:- Some months later my baby who was continually ill in care was returned to me where she thrived,proving surely that if I was no danger to a helpless baby then I was was surely no danger to my older children who judge Brasse had ordered to be fostered in London .They were in fact fostered in Dartford via Capstone Fostering agency.Judge Brasse refused to enforce his own order leaving me to carry my baby plus food for the children to contact vie bus from my flat to seven sisters tube,then on to London bridge station ,from there to Dartford,and then Taxi to the contact centre.All this was 3 or 4 times a week at my own expense as the only time X council gave us two tickets we did not notice  they were singles so my husband and I were both fined ?50 on the return journey !Judge Brasse refused to believe X council had not provided financial help, calling me a liar and refused to allow social workers to be questioned on that point.
 .7:- Despite the fact that the independent social worker and the psychiatrist both reported to me that X1 aged 10 wanted to see her mother,I have been denied contact face to face and by telephone,I have not seen or heard from my daughter for nearly a year; Social workers informed me that they had changed her name to “Y”,. When the children’s grandparents came from Africa to see her and her aunt came from the USA both were denied access. Even X1’s siblings told me they had not seen her at all this year.
 Judge Brasse ignored the fact that in August 2010 X1 had alleged sexual abuse by the son of her foster family and asked as a present for her birthday a diary with a lock on it so that she could record her secret thoughts; Judge Brasse decided instead to deprive her of all contact with her parents ;He refused me permission to telephone to say happy birthday and later happy Xmas nothing more than two words and supervised to boot..This neglect to enquire into a possible crime but instead to sequester the complaining child from that day forward was surely illegal or at least contrary to goog legal practice?
 Her workbook produced by the independent social worker late last year revealed her answer to  the exercise titled”your thoughts” when she chose to ring “fed up”,”pressured” and “angry”
 8:- I and Chiwar share parental responsibility for all our children and therefore have the right to see medical records and school reports for all of them but these have been consistently refused both by social workers and by judge Brasse since the children were taken in April 2010.Surely the judge erred in this?
 9-The ABE police video made when the children were taken shows all 5 older children denying that they were ever beaten or struck with implements by their parents.This video has been illegally witheld from evidence with judge Brasse’s consent, and apart from a letter “found” in a garden purporting to have been written by X1 in a handwriting in no way resembling her own ,no written or verbal evidence from the children themselves alleging beatings or showing any marks has ever been presented.The children themselves could have cleared up the matter by coming to court as all clamoured to come home at contact and all 4 still allowed to see me said they had been told to say they had been beaten otherwise contact would be stopped ,which it now has been ! Their right to make their views known and to testify if competent  was denied them contrary to the UN Declaration of Children’s Rights and also to a recent Supreme court decision W(children) 2010.
 Instead social workers said the children admitted to being beaten and their hearsay evidence was preferred by judge Brasse to the live evidence on the police video of the children’s own words ! To find as fact that the children were ill treated on hearsay evidence when photographs of happy well dressed children with their parents and the childrens own denials were disregarded surely shows that the judge erred,
 .10:-Recently a health visitor gave the baby “X6″ a normal injection against childish ailments that resulted in giving the baby a high temperature (not unusual)  When to be on the safe side I took her to hospital I was accused of feeding her opium and police prevented me from approaching the baby even after discharge from hospital when it was shown that no traces of drugs of any kind were found in the blood of the baby or us her parents.Despite this the child has not been returned but has been witheld illegally since no theshold has been crossed given the mistaken belief in opium poisining and the inadvertent abuse of the baby by the hospital who at the insistence of social workers that the baby was suffering from opium poisoning gave her large doses of an antidote which made the child very ill indeed before she was finally discharged and fostered.
 11:-I am representing myself with (I hope!) the assistance of a Mckenzie friend because every solicitor that has acted for me or been consulted by me has insisted that the only way to regain my children would be for me to accept all the allegations of X council that I am a prostitute,a drug user,and a child beater but apart from the absurd slur on my character this would be perjury and having sworn to tell the truth I shall continue to do exactly that in all circumstances
 12:-The most worrying aspect of this affair is the immediate sequestration of X6 following her complaint of sexual abuse by 19 year old R (son of the fosterers) .My other children reported that she had been seen by police and also by a psychiatrist,but even X3 with whom she shared a foster family stated that she had not seen X1 since Xmas and neither had the other children;
 Contact with all five elder children was stopped with no reason two months ago and I have had no contact with X6 ,my baby since she was taken for the second time.
 Judge Brasse refused to consider any of this and forced me under duress of “consequences” to sign an agreement not to approach X1’s foster family or school. Surely he erred in doing this without any kind of investigation as to X1’s circumstances given her”disappearance” following her protest of sexual abuse Surely his refusal to allow  even a supervised telephone call to say “happy Xmas”and refusal to allow access to granparents,aunt,and even the high commissioner for Sierra Leone (a friend) was contrary to the children’s act 1989 giving priority to uniting families not destroying them?
 There have been allegations that I wildly accuse all those involved of “grand design” and Conspiracies” when in fact it is very obvious that Haringey and his honour judge Brasse have made several very serious errors and are anxious to cover them up to justify their actions rather than admit them or to put matters right.A very human and very common failing.
 I hope my Lord that you will put matters right and at the very least order some form of supervised contact with X1 as

 I DO NOT KNOW IF SHE IS ALIVE OR DEAD.

Signed……………………                 Date……………………

——————————————————————————-
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

? Reply #11 on: October 01, 2012, 04:36:43 AM ?

The UK RALLY AGAINST CHILD ABUSE LONDON 29 SEPT 2012 

VIDEO 64 MINS.: https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=xCGVlZVzuFk
——————————————————————————–
 
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
 Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

? Reply #12 on: October 12, 2012, 11:37:07 AM ?

Affadavit from Gloria Musa’s mother proving Gloria is of Nigerian nationality  

– for full view go here:

    https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2012/10/12/affadavit-from-glorias-mother/

——————————————————————————-
 
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
 
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

? Reply #14 on: October 14, 2012, 07:15:28 AM ?

 From “The Sunday Telegraph” – the Musa case is towards the bottom of the article “Parents who lost their six children”

“The worst scandal I have seen in my 50-year career

By Christopher Booker
 13 Oct 2012

Our ‘child protection’ system is severely dysfunctional, but it has not come to the centre of national attention because it hides its workings behind a veil of secrecy
 
One mother had her child taken away after falling out of a window and becoming temporarily paralysed. Social workers portrayed it as a suicide bid, and her as an alcoholic and a drug addict
 
Scarcely a week goes by without more evidence emerging to indicate that our ?child protection? system is so dysfunctional that it should be looked on as a major national scandal. On one hand, we see the number of applications by social workers to take children into care soaring to nearly 1,000 a month, having more than doubled in the four years since the tragedy of Baby P. On the other, we hear of horrific episodes, like those recently reported from Rochdale and Rotherham, where social workers and police turned a blind eye to the systematic mass-rape of underage girls, many themselves in state care.

For three years I have been investigating scores of cases of children seized from their parents for what appear to be quite absurd reasons. This outrage has not yet come to the centre of national attention only because our child protection system hides its workings behind a veil of secrecy. I have been amazed to discover how our family courts routinely turn all the cherished principles of British justice upside down. The most bizarre allegations, based on hearsay, can be levelled against parents who are then denied the right to challenge them.

Although I have reported on several such cases more than once, they drag on through the courts so long that I haven?t been able to explain how they ended. I summarise three of them here to indicate why this is the most disturbing story I have covered in all my years as a journalist.
The fateful fall

Related Articles
Slovaks protest at Britain’s ‘illegal child snatching?
22 Sep 2012
Don?t ask your grandson how his jaw got broken
01 Sep 2012
Vicky Haigh is freed – despite telling her story to the press
18 Aug 2012
Police won?t return an innocent girl?s laptop
11 Aug 2012
A teetotaller branded as ‘alcoholic’ loses her child
04 Aug 2012

My first case centres on a mother who, five months after the birth of her daughter, fell from a first-floor window. Lying in hospital, temporarily paralysed from the neck down, she took a call from a social worker who told her that her baby was being taken into care. Although no one had suggested that her fall was anything other than an accident, the social workers made out that it was a suicide bid and that she was an alcoholic and a drug addict. A psychiatric report and clinical tests found that none of these accusations were true.

The mother had to make a weekly 80-mile round trip to have ?supervised contact? with her daughter. The contact supervisor wrote glowing reports on how closely they seemed to be bonded. But when, at a case conference, a social worker was challenged by the supervisor for having excised any references to this from her reports, it was the supervisor the council suspended. After a succession of hearings at which, I gather, the judge became increasingly impatient with the social workers for their sloppy handling of paperwork and repeated requests for adjournments, it seemed the case was going the mother?s way. Her wish for her daughter to be returned to her was supported by the child?s ?guardian? (an official appointed by the court to represent the child?s interests).

But then, for no clear reason, fortune swung back the other way. Two years after the case began, the judge ruled that the child should be sent for adoption. As the mother made a final plea to the Appeal Court, a lurid report in the local paper repeated all the original claims of the social workers: that the mother was an alcoholic, a drug addict and had tried to commit suicide. A family friend tells me she witnessed the distraught mother being allowed a ?goodbye session? with her daughter, the centre of her life for three years, whom she will never be allowed to see again.

The runaways

My second case centres on a mother who fled to Ireland with her teenage son because social workers had been making enquiries about them, due to the fact that the father, who had been out of their lives for six years, was an alcoholic prone to violence. When they had been happily settled in their new home for six months, with the boy doing well at school, British social workers brought the father to Ireland and persuaded an Irish judge, on evidence that mother and son were not allowed to see, to order the boy?s deportation back to England. He was so depressed that he attempted suicide. (I spoke to the boy in hospital shortly afterwards).

After being taken to England, the boy was placed in foster care, where he managed repeatedly to convey to his mother that he was desperately unhappy. Although bright, he was initially sent to a special needs school, where he was bullied for being so different from the others. He was denied the right to attend court to express his wishes, in contravention of the UN Convention on Children?s Rights. Neither he nor the mother had anyone to speak up for them and, although there is no evidence that she ever harmed her son, it was ruled that he must remain in foster care until he is 18 (normally, children are released from care when they are 16). The mother continues to work in Ireland, denied any further contact with her son until he is old enough to return to her.

Parents who lost their six children

My third case is the strangest and most disturbing of any I have covered. I first came to it shortly after the mother of a large family had given birth to her sixth child. Her new baby had been torn from her arms in a hospital bed by six policemen and three social workers just three hours after the birth. Three months earlier, the social workers had removed five older children from the family home in the belief that the mother was a ?sex worker? engaged in child trafficking with her husband, whom they claimed was not the father of any of the children. The social workers also had a letter, allegedly written by one of the children, claiming that her mother had beaten her.

What made all this particularly odd was that, one by one, these claims seemed to crumble. DNA tests showed that the children all came from the husband. The letter was in a different hand from that of the child supposed to have written it, but no graphological tests were allowed and it was eventually admitted that the letter had been ?destroyed?.

For a time, the parents were allowed occasional supervised contact with their children, although for this they had to travel for four hours. The oldest child claimed at one meeting that she had been sexually interfered with in her foster home ? after which she was never allowed to see her parents again.

But the case against them began to seem so flimsy that the baby was returned to them. However, they subsequently took the baby to a hospital to ask for advice on a puzzling complaint. A junior doctor carried out blood tests which apparently showed nothing amiss, but when the family?s name came up on a computer, the social workers were summoned. More tests were carried out, the parents were accused of giving their child a dangerous drug and the baby was again taken into care.

Events then took a still more serious turn. The couple were arrested, accused of planning to abduct their older children (even though they had no idea where they were) and fly them abroad in a private plane. They were sent to prison on remand, while a long list of further charges was compiled, ranging from physical abuse of their children to a claim that they had sought to kill the baby.

At their trial, 44 prosecution witnesses were called. Only two were allowed for the defence. The children spoke on video link, but their parents were not allowed to question them. The parents were given long prison sentences and a family court then ruled that the children must all be sent for adoption.

However odd all this may seem, I know enough about this family, and a story I have followed since 2010, to believe that it represents a travesty of justice which says much about what our child protection system has become.

 >> source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/9606161/The-worst-scandal-I-have-seen-in-my-50-year-career.html
——————————————————————————–
 
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
  re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

? Reply #15 on: October 18, 2012, 06:11:33 PM ?
Please see “Messages to a Chief Constable regarding the sexual abuse on a Minor” =

 http://truth-wars.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=245.msg373#msg373

 …b.
——————————————————————————–
 

butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

? Reply #16 on: October 20, 2012, 09:57:19 AM ?

CHIWAR?S LETTER FROM PENTONVILLE 17 OCT. 12

I got a letter from Chiwar today {17 Oct.} from Pentonville prison mentioning being ?peaceful?- a bit odd i thought in the circumstances and not needing to be said  as we cant go around as some have. 

Anyway it is THEM that use violence ? mental and emotional violence ? acute physical violence was used against Gloria by at least 5 policemen and 3 social workers in the middle of the night 3 hours after she gave birth to her baby X6 in a hospital in the summer of 2010 ? her injuries from then have got progressively worse from then and now she cannot walk without crutches or a wheelchair {which has been denied her when weve tried to visit her in prison, so the visit couldnt take place ? see the above post about the Aug. 12 2012 aborted visit to Gloria then} – and the mental violence this family has had to suffer from certain ?authorities? is blatantly shocking ? like not being allowed to see their eldest child for over 18 months after she had been removed as all contact visits were allowed to lapse with her ? {see my official complaint to the SRA + the Legal Ombudsman about the ?guardian solicitors? lack of ethical code and duty about this} with the other 4 children not being allowed to be seen for 6 months too ? breaking all orders the court made regarding contact visits between parents and their children as well as going against the ?Childrens Charter? touted by the government {which actually promotes contact between removed children + parents}, and also against all parties Human Rights.
 
I replied to Chiwar immediately sending him an email saying i thought it admirable in the circumstances he says what he says when so much violence has been used against him and Gloria and the children in so many ways. Whether he got my email is a different matter and unknown as so much mail ? and emails ? sent to both Chiwar and Gloria never is received, we have learnt. 
The letter received from Chiwar on Weds.: The full size pic of this letter can be seen here along with other articles on the Musa case: 

https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2012/10/20/chiwars-letter-from-pentonville-17-oct-12/

——————————————————————————–
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

? Reply #17 on: November 05, 2012, 03:43:52 AM ?

God Bless Tom Watson for having the courage to speak out against these perverts in high places!!

10 days that shook my world
November 3rd, 2012 |

“It’s ten days since I raised a question about intelligence suggesting a paedophile ring that touched the very heart of a previous government. I’d done so because a very credible retired child protection professional had lived with a gnawing suspicion of a cover up for many years.
These people are the rarest of human beings. They’re the people who labour in anonymity, day in day out, trying to make the world a better place. They have always been the foundations of our public services. Yet this retired public servant had, through a quirk of fate, stumbled on something that appeared so huge, that almost everyone he’d ever raised his concerns with had baulked at the challenge.
Since then though, many more ordinary people have contacted me about suspicions they have had of a wider wrongdoing ? in some cases so heinous it made me cry.
They have talked of psychopaths marking children with Stanley knifes to show “ownership”. They tell of parties where children were “passed around” the men. They speak of golf course car parks being the scenes for child abuse after an 18 hole round.
And they have named powerful people ? some of them household names ? who abused children with impunity.
Two former police officers have raised their concerns of cover-ups. Child protection specialists have raised their fears that the network of convicted paedophile Peter Righton, the nexus of the group, was wider than at first thought. Others have identified a former cabinet minister who regularly abused young boys.
Some have raised mysterious early deaths, disappeared children, suspicious fires, intimidation and threats.
It’s bewildering.
These allegations go way beyond the claims made on BBC Newsnight yesterday. Newsnight failed to name the paedophile mentioned by a North Wales survivor. I can understand why. A career can be destroyed by an allegation of such magnitude. There needs to be a high bar of proof.
Yet the thing I learnt most from the hacking scandal, and for that matter, the Savile case, is that the intelligence was staring the police in the face. These people were hiding in daylight. So powerful, so brazen in their actions, those who had an inkling of what was happening turned a blind eye.
Or maybe none of this happened. Maybe the 50 plus emails and numerous phone calls and letters I have received were all from fantasists. Maybe the allegations of the victims ? made for many years, consistently to anyone that would listen, maybe they’re bogus.
One thing is for certain: someone has to join the dots. And that should be the police. There are a few hardy child protection specialists who for many years, have been burrowing away, trying to uncover the truth. Their work and insight should be taken more seriously. The police should work with them.
The hacking scandal was about the police failing to follow clear leads of wrongdoing by powerful people. They could do this because politicians turned a blind eye.
This is potentially worse. Some of those powerful people involved in a cover up may well have been ? and could still be ? powerful politicians.
I’m not going to let this drop despite warnings from people who should know that my personal safety is imperilled if I dig any deeper. It’s spooked me so much that I’ve kept a detailed log of all the allegations should anything happen.
As I type this blog post, I’m half-smiling about how insane all this appears. It sounds like I’ve taken leave of my senses ? just like they said I had during the early days of the hacking scandal. Maybe I have. Yet with a properly resourced investigation, with the voice of victims being heard in public and with the political will we can get to the facts.
I wish I could fight the case of everybody who has been abused by a paedophile who has so far got away with it, but I can’t. That is a job for the police. Up and down the country private grief is being stirred by these stories. I cannot help in each individual case, but the police and support services can, must and will. If you were abused a long time ago and want justice now, go to the police. It is not too late.
What I am going to do personally is to speak out on this extreme case of organised abuse in the highest places. At the core of all child abuse is the abuse of power. The fundamental power of the adult over the child. Wherever this occurs it is an abomination. But these extreme cases are abuse of power by some of the most powerful people. Abuse of trust by some of the most trusted. It is a sickening story, but one which ? like the truth about Jimmy Savile ? is now going to be told.”

source:  http://www.tom-watson.co.uk/2012/11/10-days-that-shook-my-world

——————————————————————————–
 
butlincat
Moderator
Jr. Member
*****
Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

? Reply #18 on: November 24, 2012, 01:55:36 AM ?

Below is an article from the “Daily Mail” sent by Ian Josephs supposed to explain why the Nigerian government has refused so far to help the Musa family – its all apparently to do with politics and aid etc etc. Note how the Slovak government stood up for the Slovak family who were victims of child stealing too by certain people here. It is a great pity the Nigerian government have come nowhere near equalling the Slovaks’ actions in supporting their countryfolk.
The Nigerian High Commission has never really been of any use to the Musa family. Indeed, on the occasions I visited the Commission with the Musas it was a complete waste of time talking with the diplomats there, who didnt seem interested at all in the Musas heartfelt pleas regarding their tragic plight of having a total of 7 children now stolen by our government. Note some of the diplomats at the Commission are Godparents too to some of the Musa children. The words “lily livered” and “cowards” spring to mind. Such disloyalty is rarely seen in a government

Excerpt from the “Daily Mail” article 20 11 12:

 “Aid down the drain
In a blistering report, a parliamentary watchdog finds a ?230million aid project for Nigerian schools has produced ?no major improvement in pupil learning?.

And no wonder. On a visit to a typical rural school, funded by British taxpayers, an inspector from the Independent Commission on Aid Impact found almost no teachers had turned up for work, leaving pupils to play football all day.

Elsewhere, trainee teachers had given up their courses because state officials had failed to release scholarship money.

Indeed, everywhere the researchers looked, they found appalling waste.

Yet despite the ever-mounting reports of corruption and incompetence, the
Department for International Development is to give the country
?1billion over the next four years, from its fast-growing ? and ring-fenced ? budget.

How much more evidence do ministers need before they stop squandering our money abroad, to no effect, when it has never been more needed at home?”

source:  http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2235520/The-Lords-halt-draconian-plan.html#ixzz2CjgtxUkG

————————————————————————

The article from the African publication “The Leadership” – 21 08 2011 – detailing the shocking Musa case:

British Govt Detains Nigerian Couple?s Six Children
Sun, 21/08/2011

Six children, including an infant of a Nigerian couple are in the custody of British authorities, because the British Police insist the children are not biological children of the couple.
The five minors were said to have been whisked away by the men of the Y Police to the X Social Service  on June 12, 2010, after they had stormed the Z Hospital, where the woman claimed she had given birth to the last child, who is also in custody of the police.

Chiwar and Gloria Musa, who claim to be parents of the children, were said to have been reported to the London Borough of X by one A, on the ground that the mother is a sex worker, and that the children had different fathers.

But Chiwar told this reporter that a DNA test revealed that the six children namely; B. C. D. E and F are children of the couple, contrary to the report made to the Police by A.

Efforts by LEADERSHIP SUNDAY to confirm the story from the Metropolitan Police, however failed to yield results, as the officer in charge of enquiries refused to comment.
Also, several attempts to reach the Nigerian High Commissioner to the United Kingdom, Ambassador Dalhatu Sarki Tafida, proved abortive.

However, an official of the Nigerian High Commission, who sought anonymity, confirmed that the matter was being considered by the Commission in London.
The couple?s petition, dated August 13, 2011, and addressed to the British government to intervene, made available to LEADERSHIP SUNDAY, read in part: ?With a sorrowful heart, I wish to bring to your notice the bizarre, unthinkable, and worrisome act perpetrated by the men of the Y Police and Y social service who invaded Z Hospital, unleashed mayhem and abducted a new born baby from her unsuspecting mother. This atrocity was meted out against me and my new born baby, F, at Z Hospital, at about 3a.m on June 12, 2010.

?Regretable,painful and inhuman as it were, the action of the police did not only cause pandemonium, discomfort, unnecessary tension, and embarrassment to the patients and staff of the hospital, it revealed a plan that is Devilish in character and lacking in human feeling, insouciant in her approach to assigned duties, amateurish in style, brutish in operation, and dastardly in her acts of executing a hidden agenda that runs counter to westernised forms of civility in police modus operandi. It is unbelievable that a country like the U.K, highly respected as an icon of democracy with commendable human rights records could stoop so low to authorise  police to perpetrate acts that are antithetical and inimical to the course she goes all out to protect?.

Mr. Chiwar claimed that, ?My family has done practically nothing to deserve this painful and unwarranted suppression. Five of my children were, without cogent reason, abducted by eight policemen from Y, and while the case for their release is still being battled, nine policemen, again, in an unprovoked attack, swooped on me and my new born baby in the hospital, seizing the baby, thereby denying it of its right to natural love, breastfeeding and care by its biological parents. This is injustice of the highest order to me, my family in general and the new born baby in particular.?

Made available to LEADERSHIP SUNDAY, was a letter addressed to a senior official of the Nigerian High Commission in London, Mr. M.M.B. Aliyu, by a British columnist with the Sunday Telegraph, Christopher Booker dated 17th August 2011, which read in part: ?Since last June, as a columnist with the Sunday Telegraph, I have been following, very closely, the case of Chiwar and Gloria Musa, Nigerian citizens whose six children were last year taken from them by social workers of Y council.

?Not only have I followed on a regular basis what ensued from their loss of their children, but I have also been made familiar with many papers relating to the case. It has been quite clear to me that Y council was very seriously misled over the evidence on which it originally tore this family apart. On the basis of hearsay, they were under the impression that Mrs. Musa was a ?sex worker? and that the six children were all from different fathers?.

The letter added that ?Impressions could not have been more mistaken. Mrs. Musa is, in fact, a respected Christian preacher and an author of several books. Mr. Musa is a respectable businessman. DNA tests on the parents and children confirmed that Mr. Musa was the father of all of them?.
But, in a turn of events, the correspondent is said to have subsequently changed her report to suit the line of action of the Y police, that the children did not wish to come home. The oldest child, according to the alleged author of the handwritten letter, had not been seen by her parents since August or by her brother and sisters for several months. There are considerable grounds for disquiet as to what may have happened to her.”

source:
 http://web.archive.org/web/20111201190116/http://leadership.ng/nga/articles/4068/2011/08/21/british_govt_detains_nigerian_couple%E2%80%99s_six_children.html

 {This article has been heavily censored due to injunctions}.

———————————————————————————————–

ARTICLE FROM THE “SUNDAY TELEGRAPH”  by C. BOOKER  on: April 13, 2013, 07:33:21 AM ?

1] “The lawyer mother who beat the social workers

 A barrister who fought for parents trying to keep their children found herself a victim of the same system

The more the mother expressed unhappiness about the situation the social worker had created, the more she was told she was being ‘obstructive’ (picture posed by model) Photo: ALAMY

By Christopher Booker

4:45PM BST 06 Apr 2013

Whenever I report a new story of parents struggling to prevent social workers seizing their children for what seems no good reason, I try to give a new slant on the wider picture of how our ”child protection?? system has gone so tragically off the rails.What makes this week?s example so unusual is that it centres on a barrister who for 10 years fought hundreds of cases on behalf of parents trying to hold on to their children, in a system where she describes them as being ?like lambs led to slaughter? ? only to find herself a victim of the same system after she complained to the police over serious allegations made by her older daughter against the girl?s father.

 The police called in Barnet social services, who initially shared the mother?s concerns, advising that the girl should have no more contact with her drug-addicted father. But when a new social worker took over, she took the opposite view, working for the child to live with the father. This made the girl so miserable that she took to self-harming by slashing herself, leaving her mother distraught.

 The more the mother expressed unhappiness about the situation the social worker had created, the more she was told she was being ”obstructive?? and that there were ?concerns about her parenting?. Last December she was summoned to a meeting to be told that the council wished to apply for care orders on both her children. Knowing how automatically the courts grant such orders, the mother ? who although British was also an Israeli citizen ? saw her only hope of retaining her children was to escape to Israel.

 Within 36 hours, having obtained written permission from the older girl?s father, she took her daughters, now aged 14 and five, on several flights across Europe, terrified each time they landed that she might be arrested by police.

 Scarcely had they arrived in Israel than she heard that the council had been granted care orders. Barnet approached our embassy in Tel Aviv to arrange for the children to be deported to Britain, with the co-operation of Israeli social services. After assessing the family, however, the Israelis advised that they could see no reason why the children ? now having nightmares about being returned ? should not remain in Israel.

Related Articles

 ?Haringey tried to crush our family
 07 Apr 2013
 ?I know all about broody men who long to be dads. I am one
 03 Apr 2013
 ?’His things were thrown to the wolves?
 22 Mar 2013
 ?Good parenting can?t be measured in GDP
 20 Mar 2013
 ?Help! My four-year-old daughter is embarrassed by me
 08 Mar 2013
 ?Beware the wrong kind of Leafs on the road
 06 Apr 2013
 
In Britain the matter returned to court before a circuit judge, who criticised Barnet for its ?relentless? pursuit of the family, ordering a further hearing in February. At this, although the social worker testified that the older girl had said that she would be happy to live in foster care in England, the mother was allowed to take part by video link, along with a ?guardian? from the court advisory service, Cafcass, who had interviewed the 14-year-old on Skype. When the guardian supported the children?s wish to remain with their mother, the judge ruled that the children were now out of English jurisdiction, ordering Barnet to withdraw its case.

 The two overjoyed children are thus free to continue living with their mother in Israel, with no more nightmares about being bundled on to a plane to live with strangers 2,000 miles from what they now regard as their new home.

 Says the mother, in words many other parents would echo, ?It seems my only real mistake was to dare to seek help from the authorities in the first place.

source: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/mother-tongue/familyadvice/9974950/The-lawyer-mother-who-beat-the-social-workers.html?fb
see more C. Booker articles, many involving the Musa case [up until Aug. 2011]: 

http://www.mauricejohnkirk.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/11-08-03-sunday-telegraph.pdf

—————————————————————————————

ANOTHER SERIOUSLY OUTRAGEOUS CASE:

WARNING: HARROWING VIDEO OF CHILD REMOVAL:

“Received:”Of all the SS child snatching films I have watched this has to be the most distressing I have seen, I became so angry with emotion that I couldn’t stop crying. This is the cruel social services at their worst, at their most evil, at their most heartless. You will notice that once they had forcibly grabbed little Ben they were out of the door like a flash, leaving the grieving mother to cope with her distress on her own, with no care for her, no remorse and no doctor on scene to help the poor woman. This is what our country has come to, this is child snatching at its most extreme. If I had been there I’m sorry to say that if I had a gun I would have used it, this film was that upsetting to me, and no I’m not crazy, I just care too much. If you care then please make this go viral and share it like I have and make your own comments too. Dear God help all our little children and protect them all from the wickedness of the Social services scum that steal kids from innocent parents.”

https://www.facebook.com/video/embed?video_id=443476159069924

Modify message

« Last Edit: October 20, 2013, 03:20:19 AM by butlincat »

 Report to moderator    46.165.210.17
——————————————————————————–

Posts on this forum are made by members and remian here in good faith. Any post you feel is illegal, libelous, defamortay or in anyway upsetting.
Please report it asap. The owner of this site takes no responsibility for the actions of others wishing to exercise their freedom of speach.

my blog http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com
my blog: http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
facebook: http://www.facebook.com
youtube: http://www.youtube.com/butlincat6

——————————————————————————–
 

-~@~-
Buy Blacks Law Dictionary – Amazon
-~@~-

——————————————————————————–
 

butlincat
Trusted
*****
 
Posts: 99
View Profile
 http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
 Email
 Personal Message (Online)
 

Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2013, 06:09:08 PM »

Quote
 Modify
 

Letter sent by recorded delivery 12 Aug. 2013:
 For the attention of: Lord McNally, Mr. R. Wright, Ms. H. Grant, Mr. D. Green, and Mr. C. Graying, Ms. A. Romeo,  Mr. T. Breedon, Ms. C. Lee, Dame Sue Street, Mr. M. Spurr, Mr. M. Coats, Mr. P. Hancock, Mr. B. Griffiths at the Ministry of Justice, Petty France, London.

Dear Sir / Ms.,

Regarding the unfairly imprisoned Gloria Musa, at present very unwell in Holloway prison, London.

Today, 9 Aug. 2012,  I,  John Graham,  Mckenzie Friend to the Musa Family and concerned citizen received a letter from Gloria Musa containing the attatched items, below, which are:

a] Gloria Musas’ 2nd official complaint, about certain things – her first complaint being completely ignored as she states in her statement.
b]  a report by a solicitor employed by Gloria Musa recently, who describes in detail what she has been having to put up with.
 c] 2 replies received from the “Prison Inspectorate” after my numerous messages to them concerning Gloria Musa’s situation in Holloway prison.
d] a reply received from the “Offenders Management” government department.

Below also is my report of a visit to see Gloria Musa at Holloway prison on the  30 July 2013, along with just a small selection of recorded delivery letters sent to authority figures, such as the Holloway prison governor Ms. J. Killick, Lord Mcnally Justics Minister, parliamentary undersecretaries at the Ministry of Justice, and the Prison Inspectorate and Prison Welfare at Monck St., London. Rarely have I received any replies, but those I have received, such as the one enclosed from Mr. N. Hardwick from the “Prison Inspectorate” were, sadly, without credibility and no progress was made whatsoever regarding the shocking ailments Gloria Musa has never had proper medical treatment for since 28 November 2011 when she arrived at Holloway prison, London, despite myself and others, including a solicitor notifying the authorities over and over.    

The attatchments contain Ms. Musa’s official complaint about her being taken to Downview prison under the most irregular of circumstances last December, only to be refused by Downview because, they allege, they do not administer to inmates who have to use wheelchairs. Twice Gloria was taken to Downview, as if once wasn’t enough. This, to take her to this Surrey prison at all for her to be refused is surely the equivalent of some kind of punishment having to endure this, viz. having to lie on her luggage on the floor because no proper seat or equivalent was available in the transporting van. One can only wonder with incredulity the mentality behind taking Gloria not once but twice to Downview prison, Surrey for her to be refused entry there on each occasion. Can the communications and professionalism between Holloway prison personnel and also Downview prison personnel be so incredibly bad that the 1st refusal by Downview regarding Gloria Musa was not understood? These unnecassary actions by the Holloway prison governor and  staff have caused Ms. Musa untold grief and something surely needs to be done about this level of incompetence by so-called professionals. Tax money isnt paid so as it can be squandered like this on trips back and forth between prisons with even the most basic needs for the prisoner concerned going unattended.

Also contained within the complaint and what is worrying is that Gloria tells of receiving hostile visits by a Ms. Cardiz or Candiz on the dates

 27 3 2013,

 3  4  2013,

8 4 2013,

25 4 2013,

24 6 2013,

5 7 2013,

16 7 2013

No further details are given.

Ms. Musa states in her complaint clearly she is being harassed by this person visiting along with others from Holloway prison. What on earth is going on and why are Holloway prison making a disabled convicted prisoner endure such hostilities – why are they refusing to do anything about her official complaints and why are her serious medical ailments not being given the proper attention? Why is Gloria Musa having to put up with an infection in her private parts because of this prolonged untreated bleeding which began upon her giving birth on March 10 2012? Surely the Holloway governor has much to answer for regarding denying Gloria Musa getting the correct medical treatment.

Also attatched is an report from Prime Solicitors of 26A The Centre
 Feltham
 Middlesex
 TW13 4AU 
which gives in detail a much more concise report of what Gloria Musa is having to endure in Holloway prison. I know the report is based on fact because many of the items described within this report I have tried to notify authorities of myself, such as Gloria’s shocking medical condition – her many ailments, including bleeding internally since giving birth to her baby in a cell in Holloway prison on March 10 2012 being always denied proper medical treatment. Also Gloria should not be in a wheelchair but that is a result of not getting proper medical treatment for a painful and badly damaged knee.

The prison has always denied Gloria Musa proper medical care. As I stated already I have notified the authorities many times – the 5 high-ups at the Ministry of Justice [pls see below my letter to them] and many MPs and numerous others in authority but always my notifications are treated with contempt and ignored.

sincerely,

——
Mckenzie friend to the Musa family and concerned citizen 9 Aug. 2013

Please read these enclosed articles concerning the convicted prisoner in Holloway womens’ prison Bishop Gloria Musa – no. A2767CJ.

Gloria has serious medical ailments which go untreated at the prison.
Perhaps the most serious ailment she has is that she has been bleeding non-stop from internally since giving birth to a baby in a cell in Holloway prison on March 10 2012 – some 17 months ago. She has been bleeding profusely since then and now a painful infection has developed in her private parts, for which she is shockingly denied medical treatment, along with other serious ailments.
 Bishop Gloria Musa is now disabled and needs the use of a wheelchair permanently and is unable to walk since entering Holloway prison, and also has eyesight problems, an arm and a painful hip problem too, all of which go untreated. Please read this solicitors report written recently:
  File 4:

Solicitors recent report re: Gloria Musa – sheet 1
 Download Link:  http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/syyjo5

 File 5:

Solicitors recent report re: Gloria Musa – sheet 2
 Download Link:  http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/mmgjcw

I have written numerous letters to authority figures such as Lord Mcnally, Jeremy Corbyn MP, N. Hardwick [prison inspectorate] and many more including notably the Holloway governer Ms. J. Killick, who has always treated my communications with contempt, mostly ignoring them all, but worse than that she allows Ms. Musa to be denied proper medical treatment, which has been the subject of my Recorded Delivery communcations to her on many occasions. When i did write to her stating about Ms. Musas’ medical treatment was being denied proper medical care I was told I was making “serious allegations” – here is that reply from Ms. Killick dated 10 October 2012:

http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/i1ka2a

 How close to death is Ms. Musa, due to blood poisoning, or whatever?

Bishop Gloria is also  the victim of much victimisation and illtreatment by the warders there, as she will tell you. It is truly shameful how many of the Holloway prison staff have always had their own personal agendas against Ms. Musa – instead of doing their jobs properly and with responsibility. Instead, for example, they do not allow her the adequate amount of sanitary towels she needs with her condition, the result being Gloria awakens in the mornings lieing in blood. Please read the solicitors report enclosed. The prison staff often chide and mock her relentlessly, and make unnecassary insidious comments showing insult and derision. It is truly disgraceful how she is being treated [take the trips to Downview prison for example, where she was forced to lie on her luggage on the floor of the transporting vehicle, which cause her much pain and distress] and I personally have been on the receiving end of certain Holloway prison warders venom on occasion on visits to Gloria Musa. However this message is not about me and I am naming no warders names – I am trying to communicate with you about the denial of proper care and medical treatment Gloria Musa should be getting and is ENTITLED TO in Holloway prison.

The attatchments sent originally with the recorded delivery letters sent to “authority figures” are below – none of whom replied to previous recorded delivery letters sent to them previously, apart from those mentioned herein.

Thank you for your time.

Mckenzie friend to the Musa family and very concerned citizen. 

15 Aug. 2013

…………………….Attatchments:

 File 1:

 Gloria’s 2nd complaint – sheet 1

 Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/39daoc

 File 2:
 
 Gloria’s 2nd complaint – sheet 2

 Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/mavvc3

 File 3:

 Gloria’s 2nd complaint – sheet 3

 Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/c215wt

 File 4:

Solicitors recent report re: Gloria Musa medical situation – sheet 1

 Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/syyjo5

 File 5:

Solicitors recent report re: Gloria Musa’s medical situation – sheet 2

 Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/mmgjcw

 File 6:

Reply to myself to a letter sent to many authority figures – the “Offenders Management” replying here stating “all organisations delivering NHS  care strive to ensure that all patients receive the best possible treatment” – this statement is ludicrous and just shows how out of touch this supposed government department is with whats really going on. MS. MUSA IS NOT RECEIVING ANY MEDICAL TREATMENT FOR HER SERIOUS AILMENTS AND HAS BEEN BLEEDING FROM INTERNALLY SINCE GIVING BIRTH IN A CELL ON 10 MARCH 2012, THE RESULT BEING SHE NOW HAS A PAINFUL INFECTION IN HER PRIVATE PARTS WHICH ALSO GOES COMPLETELY UNTREATED. THESE AILMENTS COULD SOON PROVE LIFE THREATENING – YET THE PRISON AND OTHER AUTHORITIES DO NOTHING ABOUT MS. MUSAS SERIOUS MEDICAL CONDITION – AND THEY HAVE BEEN TOLD ABOUT THIS EVER WORSENING SITUATION IN MANY RECORDED DELIVERY LETTERS TO THEM FOR MONTHS.

http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/0kzp8r

File 7:

Rare reply from Ms. Killick, Holloway prison governor stating I am making “serious allegations” regarding Ms. Musa;

 http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/i1ka2a

Modify message

« Last Edit: September 06, 2013, 06:22:31 PM by butlincat »

 Report to moderator    46.165.221.13
——————————————————————————–

Posts on this forum are made by members and remian here in good faith. Any post you feel is illegal, libelous, defamortay or in anyway upsetting.
Please report it asap. The owner of this site takes no responsibility for the actions of others wishing to exercise their freedom of speach.

my blog http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com
my blog: http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
facebook: http://www.facebook.com
youtube: http://www.youtube.com/butlincat6

——————————————————————————–
 

-~@~-
Purchase – Moriarty’s police law – Amazon
-~@~-

——————————————————————————–
 

butlincat
Trusted
*****
 
Posts: 99
View Profile
 http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
 Email
 Personal Message (Online)
 

Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

« Reply #3 on: September 07, 2013, 08:47:55 PM »

Quote
 Modify
 
GLORIA MUSA ? IN HOLLOWAY PRISON AND STILL BLEEDING INTERNALLY 16 MONTHS AFTER GIVING BIRTH ON MARCH 10 2012.

Posted on August 2, 2013   by butlincat   

Bishop-Gloria-Musa1

Visit to see Gloria Musa in Holloway Prison, 30 July 2013

?I saw Gloria today at Holloway ? it was very sad. She was tearful for the whole visit of approximately an hour ? and full of anger too ? and wouldn?t you be if youd had 7 children removed for no reason, been given a 7 year sentence in prison on an extremely dubious conviction and have been bleeding from internally for 16 months after giving birth to your last baby in a cell in Holloway prison, and still are denied medical treatment for that and other major ailments, including the infection that is festering around ones private parts because of the untreated bleeding. This is exactly Gloria Musa?s situation today, as I write, and it is outrageous it is being allowed to happen at all.
 What I don?t understand is, if the so-called ?Association of Mckenzie Friends? set-up is meant to be so helpful to families who have had or who are about to have children removed, along with the MP who is very much connected with it, how come Gloria Musa is still and has been suffering in prison for 16 months bleeding constantly since giving birth on March 10 2012? How come nobody connected to this ?association? has done one single thing to alleviate Gloria Musa?s appalling suffering? This ?association? cant claim they don?t know about Glorias? situation because Sabine Mcneil who began the set-up has been making herself busy in the case for some time. Maybe actually making progress is not one of Ms. Mcneils fortes, or anyone else in the set-up for that matter, but getting known for something is. Its pathetic. The tiger with no teeth.
 Gloria Musas? situation is so dire that she is even denied an adequate amount of sanitary towels to use, and whats more is forced to lie on bloodstained bedding, as she recounted to me during this visit.
 Communications notifying of Gloria?s situation to the prison service, including the Independent Monitoring Board, and the Ministry of Justice and others, including numerous MPs are generally completely ignored, as are letters to the Holloway prison governor about Glorias? outrageous situation. The rare replies that are received contain nothing of any worth, other than saying things are being looked into, or other vague statements. Well, they may be being looked into, but nothing is ever done about the appalling situation.The Ministry of Justice state, in a reply [below] to my notifying them of Gloria Musas? constant internal bleeding and other serious ailments:
?all organisations delivering NHS care strive to ensure that all patients receive the best possible treatment?.
This couldn?t be further from the truth, and Gloria Musa with her many serious untreated ailments is an absolute witness to the Ministry of Justices? untrue statement.
 During the Musas? dubious criminal trial half the court was in tears when the police themselves recounted the battering and mistreatment they gave Gloria at 3 in the morning in her single cublcle in hospital in the summer of 2010 when police and social workers took her 1st baby hours after birth when she was being breastfed by Gloria ? its due to the injuries she received in the middle of the night then that Gloria cannot walk today. She has been in a wheelchair in Holloway prison many months with a chronic untreated knee ailment as she now cannot walk at all.
 The prison sentence was for 7 years ? an outrage in itself ? but not treating Gloria Musa?s bleeding for half of it was not part of the sentence, and denying her an adequate amount of sanitary towels, and not treating the resulting infection is nothing less than barbaric. Its an utter outrage!

This is a true sworn statement by J. Graham 2 August 2013.

 Letter dated 13 May 2013 from the Ministry of Justice after notifying them of Gloria Musa?s medical condition ? click on it to enlarge.

 Red underlined states: “…all organisations delivering NHS care strive to ensure that all patients receive the best possible treatment…”  – CLEARLY NOT THE CASE IN GLORIA’S SITUATION AND THIS CARE AS STATED IN THIS LETTER CANNOT BE BEING GIVEN AS SHE WAKES EACH DAY IN A NEWLY FORMED PATCH OF BLOOD AND HAS BEEN BLEEDING FROM INTERNALLY SINCE GIVING BIRTH TO HER BABY ON MARCH 10 2012!! 

white1 011aa

——————————————————————————– 

butlincat
Trusted
*****
 
Posts: 99
View Profile
 http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
 Email
 Personal Message (Online)
 

Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

« Reply #4 on: September 07, 2013, 09:39:16 PM »

Quote
 Modify
 

Friday, 6 September 2013

Top judge’s war on secret courts: Family hearings must be exposed to ‘glare of publicity’
Sir James Munby, president of the Family Division of the High Court  said parents of children taken into care should no longer be gagged by courts

Judgment came in case of parents whose four children taken into state care
Council tried to ban video of seizure in April by social workers and police 
[another: The video the judges tried to block: WARNING: HARROWING VIDEO:   http://truth-wars.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=2356.0

Sir James said there is a ‘pressing need’ for workings of family courts to be opened up to public scrutiny

By Steve Doughty, Social Affairs CorrespondentOne of Britain?s most senior judges vowed yesterday to expose family courts to ?the glare of publicity? after decades of obsessive secrecy.

In a landmark ruling, Sir James Munby said parents of children taken into care must no longer be gagged by the courts and the public should be told what social workers are up to.

Sir James, who is president of the Family Division of the High Court, said the removal of children from their families had become the most drastic matter judges dealt with now there was no death penalty. He said the rulings could affect mothers for ?upwards of 60 or even 70 years? and children for even longer.

There was a ?pressing need? for the workings of the family courts to be opened to public view and the arguments for scrutiny and public accountability were compelling.

Parents must be given the freedom to criticise judges, the courts and social workers, and the Press must be free to report what has happened without the interference of judges, Sir James added. The break-up of families by the state must no longer happen in secret, on the pretext of protecting the children involved.

The Mail has reported numerous cases where the names of social workers, experts who advise the courts and even the names of councils have been kept under legal wraps. The voices of those whose families are split up by social workers and kept apart on the orders of family court judges have been routinely silenced. 

But Sir James?s unprecedented ruling is likely to punch a hole through this curtain of secrecy.

His judgement came in the case of parents whose four children have been taken into state care. The father made a video of the seizure in April of the couple?s newborn by social workers and police. The film was posted widely over the internet.

Sir James rejected a sweeping injunction designed to effectively prevent anyone in the world from seeing the film, knowing the names of the social workers involved, or even discovering the name of the local authority that applied for the order, Staffordshire County Council.

More…
The video judges tried to block: Father secretly records harrowing moment six-hour-old baby is taken away by social services
Health Secretary demands ‘urgent clarification’ of decision not to prosecute doctors who agreed to perform illegal abortions because of the babies’ sex
Judge allows controversial bite mark analysis in trial of man accused of strangling woman in Times Square hotel
Mother who spent 23 years on Death Row for murder of her son, 4, before appeal court threw out her conviction is to be released pending retrial

The order means the video, which includes pictures of the baby, can be more widely distributed and watched by anyone.

The submission by Staffordshire that naming the authority or its social workers would lead to identification of the baby was ?merely fanciful?, the judge said.

Sir James, who is president of the Family Division of the High Court (pictured),
Sir James, who is president of the Family Division of the High Court (pictured), said the removal of children from their families has become the most drastic matter judges deal with

However Sir James said the names of the parents and the baby must stay secret in order to protect the child from any harm publicity might bring.

The parents of the baby, known only as J, have never been accused of harming their children, the father said yesterday. Instead social workers decided that his wife was incapable of bringing them up because of her learning disability, he claimed.

 ?Freedom of speech is not something to be awarded to those who are thought deserving and denied to those who are thought undeserving?, Sir James Munby

?They were taken away as a preventative or precautionary measure,? he said.

Sir James said the case raised ?important questions about the extent to which the public should be able to read and see what disgruntled parents say when they speak out about apparent deficiencies in the family justice system?.

He added: ?It must never be forgotten that, with the state?s abandonment of the right to impose capital sentences, orders of the kind which family judges are typically invited to make in public law proceedings are amongst the most drastic that any judge in any jurisdiction is ever empowered to make.

?When a family judge makes a placement order or an adoption order in relation to a 20-year-old mother?s baby, the mother will have to live with the consequences of that decision for what may be upwards of 60 or even 70 years, and the baby for what may be upwards of 80 or even 90 years.?

The ruling in the case of child J promises to end years of gagging of parents, who have found themselves threatened with legal sanctions and imprisonment if they try to talk about what has happened when their children are taken into care or adopted.

Liberal Democrat MP John Hemming welcomed the judgment 
Liberal Democrat MP John Hemming welcomed the judgment

Newspapers and broadcasters trying to investigate the behaviour of social workers have found themselves prevented by law from speaking to parents or publishing any details of what has happened to them.

The system has ensured that the stories of how more than 60,000 youngsters who live in children?s homes or with foster parents in the care system cannot be known.

Sir James, who took over as head of the family court system in January, set down new guidance for the courts in July that called for much greater transparency. He said the public had the right to read judgements now rarely published.

The guidance also applies to the Court of Protection, the secretive system which decides the affairs of people too ill to make their own decisions.

 Earlier this year Sir James and Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge ordered the family courts and the Court of Protection to stop imposing in secret jail sentences for contempt of court.

This followed the disclosure by the Daily Mail that a Court of Protection judge secretly imprisoned 50-year-old Wanda Maddocks for disobeying its instructions and trying to remove her father from a care home his family disliked.

John Hemming, a Liberal Democrat MP who has been pressing for more openness in the family courts, said: ?People have been going to jail for complaining about what is done to them, and that is wrong. This is a good judgement.
?I was very pleased when Sir James was appointed as president of the Family Division because I thought he would change the direction of an unaccountable and opaque system to an open system.?
Philip Atkins, leader of Staffordshire County Council said: ?It is a ground breaking ruling because the court has recognised and clarified the need to protect children?s interests within the electronic world that we now live.
?Ultimately, this ruling means that websites hosted in England and Wales must not publish information which identifies a child who is being protected by care proceedings. From now on children will have the same protection for privacy in the electronic world as they do in print.?

We don’t need new law to muzzle the Press: Judge’s comments put him on collision course with lawyers and politicians
Sir James Munby struck a blow for free speech yesterday, putting the leading judge on a collision course with fellow lawyers and politicians who are trying to restrict it.

As part of a ruling against secrecy in the family courts, Sir James declared: ?Freedom of speech is not something to be awarded to those who are thought deserving and denied to those who are thought undeserving?.

Sir James’s comments counters Lord Justice Leveson’s (pictured) report on the culture, practice and ethics of the Press 
Sir James’s comments counters Lord Justice Leveson’s (pictured) report on the culture, practice and ethics of the Press
He defended the right of the Press to criticise ? even in the most ?robust? terms ? and stressed the importance of its power to expose wrongdoing.

His views clashed starkly with those of other judges who have in recent years developed wide privacy laws that have prevented newspapers and broadcasters from publishing uncomfortable truths about the rich and famous.

It also counters Lord Justice Leveson?s report on the culture, practice and ethics of the Press published last autumn.

Lord Leveson condemned the ?outrageous? behaviour of some of the Press and called for a new and tougher regulatory system backed by new laws ? effectively state regulation of newspapers.

Sir James, who is president of the Family Division of the High Court, said the Press was necessary to ensure scrutiny of the courts and that occasional bad behaviour by some journalists had to be tolerated.

If Press criticism ?exceeds what is lawful? there are already laws to deal with that.
?It is not the role of the judge to seek to exercise any kind of editorial control over the manner in which the media reports information which it is entitled to publish,? he said. ?Comment and criticism may be ill informed and based on misunderstanding or misrepresentation of the facts.
?The fear of such criticism, however justified the fear may be, is, however, not of itself a justification for prior restraint by injunction.?

He also stood up for the rights of tabloid newspapers to express criticism in ?intemperate language?.

?If there is no basis for injuncting a story expressed in the temperate or scholarly language of a legal periodical or the broadsheet press, there can be no basis for injuncting the same story simply because it is expressed in the more robust, colourful or intemperate language of the tabloid press or even in language which is crude, insulting and vulgar.

?The publicist … may be an unprincipled charlatan seeking to manipulate public opinion by feeding it tendentious accounts of the proceedings. But freedom of speech is not something to be awarded to those who are thought deserving and denied to those who are thought undeserving.?
Lord Leveson condemned the ‘outrageous’ behaviour of some of the Press
Lord Leveson condemned the ‘outrageous’ behaviour of some of the Press and called for a new and tougher regulatory system backed by new laws ? effectively state regulation of newspapers
Unlike Lord Leveson, he emphasised the ?enormous challenges? posed by the internet
?The law must develop and adapt, as it always has done down the years in response to other revolutionary technologies.?

Privacy law, developed by judges and based on the Human Rights Act, has encouraged increasing numbers of celebrities to apply for injunctions concealing embarrassing stories about themselves.

It led to a controversy in 2011 which led to MPs and peers using parliamentary privilege to name two individuals who had used privacy injunctions to suppress news of extra-marital affairs, ex-Royal Bank of Scotland chief Fred Goodwin and footballer Ryan Giggs.

PUBLIC HAVE RIGHT TO KNOW: EDITED VERSION OF SIR JAMES’ RULING

There is a pressing need for more transparency, indeed for much more transparency, in the family justice system.

There are a number of aspects to this. One is the right of the public to know, the need for the public to be confronted with what is being done in its name.

Nowhere is this more necessary than in relation to care and adoption cases. Such cases, by definition, involve interference, intrusion, by the state, by local authorities and by the court, into family life.

In this context the arguments in favour of publicity ? in favour of openness, public scrutiny and public accountability ? are particularly compelling.

The public generally, and not just the professional readers of law reports or similar publications, have a legitimate, indeed a compelling, interest in knowing how the family courts exercise their care jurisdiction.

I have said this many times in the past but it must never be forgotten that, with the state?s abandonment of the right to impose capital sentences, orders of the kind which family judges are typically invited to make in public law proceedings are amongst the most drastic that any judge in any jurisdiction is ever empowered to make.

When a family judge makes a placement order or an adoption order in relation to a 20-year-old mother?s baby, the mother will have to live with the consequences of that decision for what may be upwards of 60 or even 70 years, and the baby for what may be upwards of 80 or even 90 years. We must be vigilant to guard against the risks.

We must have the humility to recognise ? and to acknowledge ? that public debate, and the jealous vigilance of an informed media, have an important role to play in exposing past miscarriages of justice and in preventing possible future miscarriages of justice.

The compelling need for transparency in the family justice system is demanded as a matter of both principle and pragmatism.

It is vital that public confidence in the family justice system is maintained or, if eroded, restored. There is a clear and obvious public interest in maintaining the confidence of the public at large in the courts.

It is vitally important, if the administration of justice is to be promoted and public confidence in the courts maintained, that justice be administered in public ? or at least in a manner which enables its workings to be properly scrutinised ? so that the judges and other participants in the process remain visible and amenable to comment and criticism.

The family lawyer?s reaction to complaints of ?secret justice? tends to be that the charge is unfair, that it confuses a system which is private with one which is secret. This semantic point is, I fear, more attractive to lawyers than to others.

The remedy, even if it is probably doomed to only partial success, is ? it must be ?  more transparency; putting it bluntly, letting the glare of publicity into the family courts.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2413373/Top-judges-war-secret-courts-Family-hearings-exposed-glare-publicity.html#ixzz2eEswIOPk

———————————————————————————————–

 FRAUD ? END THE SOCIAL SERVICES CHILD ABDUCTION SYSTEMS WORLDWIDE

A message from the campaign:

GIVE US BACK OUR CHILDREN, OUR
 FAMILIES, OUR LIVES! NOW!!!

There are hundreds of thousands of families and even more children suffering at the hands of CPS/SS/Corrupt Family Court and there is no one doing anything about it. 

We must DEMAND an audit of the hundreds of billions of dollars that are funneled through the federal government to TITLE-IV FUNDS that are used to abuse and destroy families and they force children into foster care, forced adoptions and lives with abusers and pedophiles, and except for those of us who are victims of this system of CHILD TRAFFICKING no one seems to believe it is really happening?

IT IS HAPPENING, AND SOON, IT COULD HAPPEN TO YOUR DAUGHTER OR YOUR GRANDDAUGHTER OR YOU, and then you will see that you have no protection, no rights and soon, no children, no family, no home, no job and NO LIFE~ and you can thank the organized crime that runs our government, big business, churches and OUR COURT SYSTEM in pursuit of financial gain via THE INVISIBLE HAND OF GREED that runs the world.

find us, join us and fight with us. we are MOTHERS WHO WANT OUR CHILDREN BACK  and we will NEVER GIVE UP! you may also find us on the blog:

http://links.causes.com/s/clL7HP?r=baaEg

and fb group: HUMANITY AGAINST CHILD STEALING ? BRING THE CHILDREN HOME?

https://www.causes.com/causes/661915-end-the-social-services-child-abduction-systems-worldwide/updates/799244

Modify message

« Last Edit: September 22, 2013, 01:21:53 AM by butlincat »

 Report to moderator    46.165.208.207
——————————————————————————–

Posts on this forum are made by members and remian here in good faith. Any post you feel is illegal, libelous, defamortay or in anyway upsetting.
Please report it asap. The owner of this site takes no responsibility for the actions of others wishing to exercise their freedom of speach.

my blog http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com
my blog: http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
facebook: http://www.facebook.com
youtube: http://www.youtube.com/butlincat6

——————————————————————————–
 

 

——————————————————————————–
 

butlincat
Trusted
*****
 
Posts: 99
View Profile
 http://www.butlincat.blogspot.com
 Email
 Personal Message (Online)
 

Re: CHILD STEALING BY THE STATE – THE MUSA CASE

« Reply #5 on: September 17, 2013, 04:01:28 AM »

Quote
 Modify
 
Important Videos, Links, + Christopher Booker “Sunday Telegraph” Articles beginning April 2010:

1] My videos of interviews with Chiwar and Gloria Musa  in their former home, under the control of of the X council who evicted them on ridiculously short notice in Aug. 2011. A very onesided appeal took place at Edmonton court, at which I was present, where the Musas stood no chance, especially with no legal representation, as the Musas legal rep. was ejected from rthe room at the very start of the proceedings. Another very wrong farce of a hearing. The Musas were duly evicted with nowhere to go and they became homeless, sleeping in church halls and at friends fior very short periods. My accomodation did not allow for stayers or they could gladly have come stay with me, but anyweay, that wouldve been impractical in many ways.

These videos from April 2011 of Chiwar and Bishop Gloria Musa at their Haringey home, before their imprisonment [on remand] on Nov. 28 2011, before their 7 year sentencing 259 days later on Aug. 14 2012, and before the birth of their 7th baby, in Holloway prison, on March 10 2012 – the baby being removed at once before even Gloria could look at him properly, and Chiwar, the father, has never seen this child at all – he has simply vanished into the care system along with the other 6 children and who knows where they all are now: [videos total length 26 mins]
 
a] http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=11f53cd65762834b3af0b2d&skin_id=1603&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url
 
b] http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=11f5398ceed4e4e312670f4&skin_id=601&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

 
2}  Video: The Musa Case – The Irregular Interim Care Order Hearings: During 2010, from the date in April then the then 5 Musa children were removed by Haringey council and during November 2011 when the Musa parents were remanded in prison on very dubious charges every 28 days the Interim Care Order on each child had, by law, to be renewed in the Family court. It was the parents right to attend this hearing each time it occurred if they objected to the ICO being issued, which eas the case each 28 days. But on January 12 2012 when Chiwar Musa was due in court for the ICO renewal hearing instead of being taken to the court he was taken everywhere but. Coming from Pentonville prison he was at first driven in the prison transport to the Royal Courts of Justice but instead of being taken to the hearing there the van drove around the car park there for a few minutes before being taken to a completely different court where they parked up for hours before he was taken back to the prison. There could have been np mistake about this hearing, the participants and the location etc as this was a monthly ritual held every 28 days as stated, but not only that but I had confirmed everything with the court employee whowas very well versed and ready with answers regarding the events to come the following day when I called the court the day before. This was not the first time the Musas have been disallowed from appearing at their ICO hearings, as Chiwar and Gloria will tell anybody.  This type of thing is a typical irregularity within the legal framework of the Musas’ case – on other occasions I am told hearings have taken place without the Musas being present which, of course, is their legal right in every instance. If any complaint is made about anything it is quickly ignored and brushed aside – that has been the norm in 99% of instances for over 3 years.

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=12130faedd68d9190602b96&skin_id=3000&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

3}  Reporter Christopher Bookers articles for the “Sunday Telegraph” on this case {these links stop Aug. 2011 – more articles exist} =
 
http://mauricejohnkirk.files.wordpress.com/2011/09/11-08-03-sunday-telegraph.pdf
 
4}  April 2008 Daily Mail = “Baby P council falsely accused me of abusing a child, reveals whistleblower who feared she’d lose her daughter.” 
{By Eileen Fairweather} =
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1086196/Baby-P-council-falsely-accused-abusing-child-reveals-whistleblower-feared-shed-lose-daughter.html

4a]  WHISTLEBLOWER UKRAINIAN PRIEST TELLS OF UNITED NATION’S [U.N.] AGENDA OF CHILDSTEALING WORLDWIDE….please persevere thru to the end with this video – the translating from Ukrainian to English takes its toll on some viewers,sadly…

http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p=1210cd4417dc19da0b7c4fc&skin_id=1602&utm_source=otm&utm_medium=text_url

5a}  Figures at an all time high for children being removed from families, most often good, loving ones – Daily Mail April 12 2012 =
 
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2128987/Children-stolen-state.html

5b] The Guardian “Adoption and children in state care across England: get the data” – 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2012/sep/26/adoption-and-care-statistics-england?intcmp=239
 
6} The African publication “The Leadership”‘s articles  are just 2 of many African exposes on the case:

http://leadership.ng/nga/articles/5282/2011/09/17/british_journalist_writes_jonathan_over_seized_nigerian_children.html

http://leadership.ng/nga/articles/4068/2011/08/21/british_govt_detains_nigerian_couple%E2%80%99s_six_children.html

7]  Children waiting for adoption figures at all time high:

http://www.disclose.tv/action/viewvideo/121893/ADOPTION__FIGURES_AT_ALL_TIME_HIGH_OF_CHILDREN_IN_CARE_WAITING_FOR_ADOPTION__SKY_NEWS_21_JAN_13/

 8]  Affadavits:
File1:
 File Name: MUSA MOJI AFFADAVIT.pdf
 Description: MOJI WORD AFFADAVIT 20/4/11
 File Size: 182.1 KB
 Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/5tt9am
 
File 2:
 File Name: MUSA FULL PDF 4 3 12.pdf
 Description: RESUME / GLORIA STATEMENT 4/3/12
 File Size: 130.6 KB
 Download Link: http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/imddy9

8] Letter 20 March 2013 sent by Royal Mail Recorded Delivery to 5 Ministry of Justice representatives – as usual  no replies have been received as of 25 days later – and one letter to Lord Mcnally didnt even get delivered, according to an operative at the post room at parliament. Many more letters have been sent by recorded delivery – 99% remain unanswered, especially from the Ministry of Justice:

http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/eblkjc

9] MailOnline article 26 July 2013 by Sue Reid: ?For years I fought against secret courts breaking up families. At last there?s hope?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2377084/SUE-REID-For-years-I-fought-secret-courts-breaking-families-At-theres-hope.html#ixzz2aJqP7uQa

10] Christopher Booker article 20 July 13: ?Our child protection system is an international scandal?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10191983/Our-child-protection-system-is-an-international-scandal.html

11] Outright witness intimidation has happened many times throughout this case – I was introduced to 3 single mothers who fell victim to intimidation because of supporting the Musa family – one such witness’s story is here:

http://www.sendspace.com/pro/dl/qbgf23

12] WARNING: HARROWING VIDEO:  THE VIDEO THE JUDGES TRIED TO BLOCK: TOP JUDGE SIR JAMES MUNBY RULING:

http://truth-wars.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=2356.0

13] CAUL GRANT ARRESTED – THE UTTER CORRUPTION – CAMPAIGN FOR TRUTH + JUSTICE:

See more: http://butlincat.blogspot.com/2013/09/the-utter-corruption-of-some-judges.html

http://truth-wars.co.uk/forum/index.php?topic=2333.0
—————————————————————————————————————–

Here is the updated report of yesterdays [27 Oct. 13] visit to see Gloria Musa in HMP Send, Woking, Surrey.
We saw Gloria Musa this afternoon Sunday 27 Oct. 13 at HMP Send, near Woking, Surrey. Friend B had come down from Tilbury to Woking, taking 4 hours, to visit Gloria.

 We saw Gloria who was tearful much of the time in a decrepit old wheelchair falling to bits – the new one supporters bought her costing £104 has been denied her, but was delivered to Holloway on 4 March – the records from the delivery firm confirm that. This is theft, and this matter is ongoing.

Gloria was denied the use of her slippers for the visit, as theyre more comfortable…. How a person can be denied the use of their own slippers beats me.

She had to leave the visit early – an hour early – because she was in so much pain.

We heard that she is still bleeding profusely from internally, in her groin area, and is not allowed to wash her blood-soaked clothes out properly. She can only rinse her undergarments out in her cell and dry them by hanging them up somewhere in the cell. No wonder a massive lump has appeared now in her groin and a painful infection too has existed for months – both of which are denied medical treatment. It is a fact if you or I were bleeding from the groin it would have stopped a week or so later after being given the proper medical treatment. Gloria has been bleeding for over 19 months now and the authorities have ignored every message and notification about this outrageous situation. Other ailments still exist too – inflicted on her by the police when they snatched her 1st baby in mid-2-10 at her birth at 3 in the morning after Gloria had just given birth to her and was breast feeding her. At least 6 police and a number of social workers we are told burst into her single cublicle in hospital and removed the baby, causing Gloria Musa many injuries in the process the baby – strangling her at one point to near unconciousness. Other patients heard the commotion but were told to ignore it. Gloria received a damaged hip and knee from that event, [and photographs exist of injuries received then] which has never had the proper medical treatment, hence her need for a wheelchair – and Holloway witheld the one that was got for her and was delivered on 4 March 2013 – what happened to it?

Also Gloria is forced to do cleaning jobs even though she cant stand up without aids, such as crutches. They forced her to clean her cell windows, and of course you cannot ask a person who cant stand to clean high-up windows 6 feet from the floor. They  wouldn’t have it that she couldn’t stand and clean windows and just gave her grief.

 Gloria is still living on bottled water, bananas, oranges and noodles bought from the canteen, and I wouldn’t eat the prison food they dish up either as it could well have been compromised with anything, such as illegal drugs. Gloria cannot take the risk that one of the continual crazy drug tests she has to undergo come back positive for illegal drugs, or whatever.

 Also she told us a letter was delivered to her that i sent last March 2012!!! Holloway had not delivered it to her and those at Send gave it to her the other day. We have been aware since her entry into Holloway prison on 28 November 2011 that mail to and from Gloria is messed with neverendingly – some gets through – some doesn’t and I know I have complained about this along with others to no avail – also Chiwars mail is messed with also with important letters not reaching their destination, and not being received also by him.

Also Gloria said she doesnt go to the toilet anymore and hasnt for months. Thats bad news as well and not natural, brought on by her sparse diet.

…..Thats it. What an awful day. I feel so much for Gloria in her situation. Prison sentences aren’t meant to be like this, but hers has always been sustained far from the norm, with certain high-up prison officers continually treating her with scorn, insult, ridicule and often outright hostility and injury. I know of examples of each unacceptable quality just described, and prison warders, especially the governor and those of similar ranks, are required to perform their public duty to a certain standard with a level of caring professionalism – sadly these 2 qualities are extremely often very much lacking regarding their behaviour towards Gloria Musa – these government employees warders simply fail the oath they took when taking the job – it is a public scandal Gloria has been treated with such contempt since November 2011 – Chiwar Musa too – yet when authorities are informed about the constant irregularities, they do absolutely nothing, thus showing the utmost contempt not only for their rules and regulations but also towards another human being, for example:

a] Glorias’ constant internal bleeding continues still after 19+ months with no proper adequate medical treatment,

b] Glorias’ trips to Downview prison earlier this year for a supposed prison transfer – twice – were highly irregular as she had to lie on the floor of the transporting vehicle to the place and back as no adequate seating was present – her lieing on the floor of the vehicle on her luggage for hours at a time caused her great pain and distress. These visits to Downview were a hoax – as twice she was taken there but the Downview regime refused to accept Gloria as she was in a wheelchair, which they don’t cater for which surely Holloway personnel knew about as they liase beforehand – they just don’t turn up with prisoners on a prison transfer , they discuss it first – so the Holloway prison personnel mustve known the fact that inmates in wheelchairs aren’t catered for – if not regarding the first trip but definitely the 2nd but still Gloria was subjected to this cruel callous irregular treatment by Holloway prison staff. After the first trip to Downview Gloria was returned to Holloway and got back during the  evening but was put in a new cell but couldn’t get onto the bunk bed. She tells that when trying to get onto the bed because she is disabled she fell and was left for hours lieing on the floor of the cell as she couldn’t reach the button to call the warders higher up on the wall.

Why isn’t Gloria being cared for properly? She tells us prison warders tell her there is nothing wrong with her and she is putting it all on. Why then don’t they take her for an x-ray on her hip, or knee, for example, both of which Gloria tells us are badly damaged? X-rays would show conclusively if she is lieing or not, as if the blood-stained sheets all the time don’t show she isn’t lieing. Of course the prison regime wont arrange for x-rays because its 99% probable that any x-rays would show irregular medical conditions that are in need of urgent medical treatment, which has never been given and very much should’ve been.

 And what is that lump that Gloria speaks of in her groin that has recently developed since getting the chronic infection and constant internal bleeding in her groin area? The prison authorities in 2 prisons – Holloway and Send – don’t want to know about any of that – it is disgraceful!”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , ,

How did Ella meet Dearman?

How did Ella meet Dearman?

I’ve just been emailed this question by a good friend of Hampstead Research who was confused  about how Ella had got involved with alleged  cult member/financier  Will Draper then, as if that was not bad enough, landed up with Ricky Dearman! So I thought I’d blog my reply for your interest.

But this is only what I was told by one of the McKenzie Friends.

This is not from Ella.

So I don’t know if it’s true.

It sounds quite feasible, though. As follows:

 

Will Draper went wife-hunting in Russia (not an agency, by the way). Met Ella, who was, being sweet and innocent, easily fooled.

They got married, returned to London, had a son.

Probably she knew something was wrong – she left him. He took their son James.

Ella set up her yoga business.

One day Ricky Dearman turned up as a yoga student. Talking vegan!

Draper had tipped him off – “Get in there – good breeding material, naive woman etc”.

Ella fell for his acting.

And that was it.

Again, please remember that I don’t know if it is true – I imagine we will hear the full story in Ella and Abraham’s audio book.

Ella – I hope you don’t mind that I have blogged  this. I think people will want to know. Please correct us if we’re wrong.

J

 

source:

How did Ella meet Dearman?.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , ,

HAMPSTEAD: Satanic Fundraising

Satanic Fundraising

I can’t tell you how many times I and the other researchers on the team have stopped to say, “Another fundraising event?!”

We noticed right from the start, when rummaging through alleged cult members’ Facebook pages that there was a strong fundraising theme with these people.

Even though many of them have full-time jobs – some are highly-placed executives – they still found the time to get out their begging bowls.

They were frequently contributing to each other’s efforts.

We decided that this might be rooted in a karmic belief – something about repaying evil deeds with money. Like the spiritual “indulgences” the Catholic Church used to sell: if you were rich enough you could buy your way out of it and remain in heaven.

So you could eat babies and run it off in the London Marathon!

We’re not saying that all people who fundraise are Satanists, of course. We’ve done enough of it ourselves – in the days before we realized we were all being taken for a ride by these big charities.

Most people who fundraise are just good decent people who want to support a cause or feel called to contribute in some way.

But I’m just skim-reading the (must-read) PDF we were sent – linked in our previous post –

https://hampsteadresearch.wordpress.com/2015/05/01/cannibalism-blood-drinking-and-high-adept-satanism/

about High Satanism. And came across this explanation:

The idea is that everyone in the Illuminati must produce income for their superiors or they must do some type of work that the Committee considers to be useful.

So that’s it! These fundraisers are doing all this marathon running and swimming and trekking and cycling  and bunjee jumping and all the rest of the tomfoolery because it is considered “useful” by the higher ups!

Just like Jimmy Savile.

Of course, he was fundraising for Stoke Mandeville hospital a lot of the time – so that we would pay for a venue at which he could abuse children…….and who knows what else went on there?

Childline is a popular charity for cult members, too – it sounds so good to be running a Marathon to help Childline: no normal person will suspect you are funding an organization that keeps a close eye on what abuse survivors know!

We’ll be posting more on this.

J

PS Thanks to this supporter for drawing attention to this fascinating document. We will be featuring Jeanice Barcelo very soon – we love her work.

source:

Satanic Fundraising.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , ,

ROLF HARRIS TO FACE NEW CHARGES? 01/05/15

Video:

https://vid.me/e/0blp

ROLF HARRIS TO FACE NEW CHARGES?  01/05/15


FAIR USE NOTICE

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , ,

HAMPSTEAD SRA: Freemasonic Pictures in Christ Church

 Freemasonic Pictures in Christ Church

Thanks to a dear friend of Hampstead Research (that means all of us) who – naughty naughty – sneaked into the Church toilets and photographed the pictures that were hanging in them. Note the Freemasonic themes.

So this cult may well have Freemasonic connections.

Can anybody help us with what they are?

Would anybody like to research the Lodges at Hampstead? There must be a few in the area.

Thanks

J

Christchurch 12

Christchurch 10

Christchurch 8

Christchurch 7

Christchurch 6

Christchurch 5

Christchurch 4

christchurch 3

christchurch 2

 Freemasonic Pictures in Christ Church.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , ,

HAMPSTEAD SRA: The school’s new website 01 MAY ’15

butlincat:

 

The school’s new website

Thanks to Mrs G who reminds us that the school has a new website. It’s been up for a few weeks now but we thought we’d post it so everybody can see that all the names have been removed.

So rather than increase accountability and transparency in the light of these very serious allegations, which have not been properly investigated, the school chooses to reduce them.

It’s not the only school in Hampstead without a staff list. Highly suspicious.

I feel very sorry for any of the parents who might be worried about what’s going on: it’s not that easy to move your child from school to school.

I wonder who the new head teacher is. Let’s hope it’s not carousing “Mission Priest” Simon Atkinson, being shunted across from New End; another school the children allege hosts ritual abuse.

source:

http://www.christchurchschool.co.uk/

 

Originally posted on Hampstead Research:

Thanks to Mrs G who reminds us that the school has a new website. It’s been up for a few weeks now but we thought we’d post it so everybody can see that all the names have been removed.

So rather than increase accountability and transparency in the light of these very serious allegations, which have not been properly investigated, the school chooses to reduce them.

It’s not the only school in Hampstead without a staff list. Highly suspicious.

I feel very sorry for any of the parents who might be worried about what’s going on: it’s not that easy to move your child from school to school.

I wonder who the new head teacher is. Let’s hope it’s not carousing “Mission Priest” Simon Atkinson, being shunted across from New End; another school the children allege hosts ritual abuse.

http://www.christchurchschool.co.uk/

View original

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , ,

PATRICK CULLINANE: FAO: John Paterson: – To Sabine McNeill from Patrick Cullinane and Kenn d’Oudney, DEMOCRACY DEFINED. – On 20 July 2013

To Brian Gerrish:

Brian, why will you not show the UK Column interview with Patrick Cullinane from his demo outside the RCJ in October 2013?

Thank you.

J. Graham

Videos of Patrick et al outside the RCJ October 2013:  http://www.butlincat.wordpress.com/2013/10/06/patrick-cullinane-protest-at-the-royal-courts-of-justice-1-4-oct-2013/

———- Forwarded message ———- From: Patrick Cullinane <patrick.cullinane@tiscali.co.uk> Date: 1 May 2015 at 02:17 Subject: FAO: John Paterson: – To Sabine McNeill from Patrick Cullinane and Kenn d’Oudney, DEMOCRACY DEFINED. – On 20 July 2013

Dear John Paterson, 

Brian Gerrish of the UK Column is doing the exact same as, Sabine Kurjo McNeill, which you can see in the correspondence below that is self-explanatory: – 

John, can you please take this fundamental issue up with the team from UK Column, in front of EVERYONE, when you meet them in Nottingham tomorrow – 1st May 2015.  Unfortunately, I cannot make Nottingham myself tomorrow to ask these pertinent questions myself, as I am engaged elsewhere with the Talmudic  JEWdicial HIJACK of the Constitutional Common Law of the Land.  – Please note: The UK Column has ignored ALL my correspondence since its inception, which smells the High Heavens, does if NOT?  – It is high time to face and confront the FACTS here;  Why is the UK Column NOT Campaigning for the authentic Constitutional Trial by Jury Justice System, which is guaranteed by Article 39 of Magna Carta 1215 – the Law of the Land? 

The UK Column are giving the UK People all the HORROR stories in gory detail, but they will NOT interview me on the show, or campaign for a REMEDY for their horror stories via Common Law Trial by Jury.  Brian Gerrish and the UK Column are happy with the JEWdiciary operating OUR UK Courts without JURIES, which is High Treason: – 

“High Treason – Laws Against Establishing a Foreign Power in England”: –

ESTABLISHING AN IMPERIUM IN IMPERIO: THE JEWS

The Jews had been in England in Anglo-Saxon times dealing in slaves. Jews however came into England with the Norman Conquest. They made themselves a threat to the people of this country by (1) clipping the gold coinage and turning the clippings into bullion for sale overseas (2) dispossessing good Christian Englishmen of their lands and property by high interest rates in usury (3) by the ritual murder of young Christian boys by crucifixion and drawing off the blood for ritual purposes; particularly Hugh of Lincoln in 1255; a child sacrificed in Nottingham in 1279…

http://www.heretical.com/mkilliam/treason.html 

I, Patrick Cullinane, am demanding my Home and Property back immediately, and FULL compensation for my losses, damages, prospects, blight of over 34-years of TERRORISM and TORTURE by a Foreign Power Established in England and Ireland by the State of Israel, which is HIGH TREASON: – 

Why do you think the UK Column is COVERING-UP these fundamental issues, and treats Patrick Cullinane and his LIFE SAVING work with utter CONTEMPT? 

See the attached Magna Carta BANNER hanging on the railings of the Royal Courts of In-Justice that the UK Column ignored.  – The UK Column is now known far and wide as the: Show With NO SOLUTIONS!  

John, while you are at it, please also ask the UK Column team; where is the VIDEO of the interview that, Patrick Henningsen, from the UK Column did with me during my FOUR day Campaign from, 1st to 4th October 2013,  outside the Royal Courts of In-Justice to RESTORE the Constitutional Common Law of the Land in OUR UK Courts?  – I was assured by Mr Henningsen that this was a GOOD Video!  – Where is it NOW; years on from the event?

This pledge has now closed; it was successful!

http://www.pledgebank.com/Trial-by-Jury 

Please give me a report back John, as I greatly fear the UK Column is a DISTRACTION to STEAL our THUNDER, and OBSTRUCT our Campaign to RESTORE the Rule of Law in the UK, by leading OUR People up a ‘cul de sac’, a blind alley. – Just like Sabine McNeill was doing. 

Yours truthfully,
Patrick Cullinane, Common Law Lawyer and Victim of Jew Process in the UK’s COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts.
 

From: Patrick Cullinane [mailto:patrick.cullinane@tiscali.co.uk] Sent: 20 July 2013 23:34 To: ‘Campaign@democracydefined.org‘ Cc: ‘Sabine Kurjo McNeill'; ‘bradmeyer@collaboration.co.uk‘; ‘ian@leakbusters.net‘; ‘Tony Farrell – former Principle Intelligence Analyst at South Yorkshire Police'; ‘Kay Lintern – Has Vital Evidence on Peter Sutcliffe'; ‘Charles Seven – Victim of UK’s Kangaroo Courts'; ‘Colin Peters – Victim of COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts'; ‘Campaign@democracydefined.org‘; ‘DS: – STOP INJUSTICE NOW'; ‘Victor Foglia – Victim of the Corrupt Government Organisations'; ‘John Cullinane – Victim of Solicitors & Judges in US'; ‘Stuart Russell'; ‘willcpowell@talktalk.net‘; ‘Steve Steel – Victim of Kangaroo Courts in UK'; ‘scrielly63@yahoo.co.uk‘; ‘scubaduderon@hotmail.com‘; ‘John Challinor – Victim of Judicial corruption'; ‘jim.jewell@live.co.uk‘; ‘jimcorbett1@blueyonder.co.uk‘; ‘Arthur Wallis – Victim of Local Council’s PCN'; ‘Norman Scarth- Victim of the Kangaroo Courts in the UK'; ‘a.pennington@hotmail.co.uk‘; ‘ambylla@gmail.com‘; ‘Albert Burgess'; ‘Brian Hudson – Victim of the Corrupt UK Judiciary'; ‘bellettp@yahoo.com‘; ‘Dafydd Morgan – Victim of UK’s Kangaroo Courts'; ‘Gedaljahu Ebert – Victim of Corrupt High Court ‘Judges”; ‘David Holloway – Victim of Insurance Ombudsman'; ‘Dr. Sheida Oraki – HM Victim'; ‘caul.grant@hotmail.com‘; ‘Michael Doherty – Victim of POLICE CORRUPTION'; ‘diarmaidfleming@gmail.com‘; ‘Elizabeth Watson – One Voice Action Group'; ‘diansmt5@aol.com‘; ‘David Cozens – Campaign'; ‘jonor1951@hotmail.com‘; ‘edwarddoyle10@gmail.com‘; Brian Gerrish – The UK Column; ‘malcolm@ukcolumn.org‘; John Hemming – Good Member of Parliament; ‘mitchellav@parliament.uk‘; ‘mcdonnellj@parliament.uk‘; ‘David.Whyte@liverpool.ac.uk‘; ‘George Wescott – Victim of OP Poisoning & Corruption'; Jean Tyzack – Victim of HM Partnerships; ‘Wayne Fontana – HMRC Victim'; ‘Chris Fogarty, Reporter – IAN'; ‘Tim Fleming'; ‘jeanjames@telus.net‘ Subject: FW: To Sabine McNeill from Patrick Cullinane and Kenn d’Oudney, DEMOCRACY DEFINED.  

Dear Kenn d’Oudney, 

Not alone is Sabine McNeil going up a ‘cul de sac, but she is also leading a lot of Sheeple up that very same ‘cul de sac’, a blind alley – where it can only end in tears for ALL her followers. 

“Advising people that their method of campaigning is fundamentally flawed and going up a ‘cul de sac’, a blind alley, is a thankless task, but it remains the fact that until the Constitutional Trial by Jury Justice System is restored giving authority to decide justice issues to the randomly chosen ‘ordinary’ adults men and women sitting in the Jury, all and any gains or concessions achieved by petitions and appeals can be promptly reversed by subsequent legislation from Westminster or Brussels.”

I too tried to advise Sabine McNeil, when I first met her, about the importance of the RESTORATION of common law Trial by Jury, but she proved to be a very difficult person to get this message through to.  I now keep my distance from this woman, as she has a totally different agenda to me. 

If Kurjo McNeil is NOT promoting Magna Carta 1215 the Great Charter, which is the Law of the Land, and guarantees due process via Trial by Jury; then who exactly is she working for? 

Kenn, I agree with you one 100%.  We can now monitor how Sabine Kurjo McNeill and her many POACHED followers are going to do a U-turn from the ‘cul de sac’ blind alley and follow our example re the RESTORATION of Common Law – Trial by Jury, which is the ONLY way forward to due process and Natural Justice for ALL. 

Thanks again for this Kenn, as there was much damage being done and many Sheeple were being taken in. 

Yours truthfully, 

Patrick Cullinane, Common Law Lawyer and Victim of the UK’s COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts. 

From: Campaign@democracydefined.org [mailto:campaign@democracydefined.org] Sent: 20 July 2013 18:17 To: Sabine Kurjo McNeill Cc: ian@leakbusters.net; ‘Patrick Cullinane'; ‘Tony Farrell – former Principle Intelligence Analyst at South Yorkshire Police'; ‘Kay Lintern – Has Vital Evidence on Peter Sutcliffe'; ‘Charles Seven – Victim of UK’s Kangaroo Courts'; ‘Colin Peters – Victim of COMMERCIAL Kangaroo Courts'; Campaign@democracydefined.org; ‘DS: – STOP INJUSTICE NOW'; ‘Victor Foglia – Victim of the Corrupt Government Organisations'; ‘John Cullinane – Victim of Solicitors & Judges in US'; ‘Stuart Russell'; willcpowell@talktalk.net; ‘Steve Steel – Victim of Kangaroo Courts in UK'; scrielly63@yahoo.co.uk; scubaduderon@hotmail.com; ‘John Challinor – Victim of Judicial corruption'; jim.jewell@live.co.uk; jimcorbett1@blueyonder.co.uk; ‘Arthur Wallis – Victim of Local Council’s PCN'; ‘Norman Scarth- Victim of the Kangaroo Courts in the UK'; a.pennington@hotmail.co.uk; ambylla@gmail.com; ‘Albert Burgess'; ‘Brian Hudson – Victim of the Corrupt UK Judiciary'; bellettp@yahoo.com; ‘Dafydd Morgan – Victim of UK’s Kangaroo Courts'; ‘Gedaljahu Ebert – Victim of Corrupt High Court ‘Judges”; ‘David Holloway – Victim of Insurance Ombudsman'; ‘Dr. Sheida Oraki – HM Victim'; caul.grant@hotmail.com; ‘Michael Doherty – Victim of POLICE CORRUPTION'; diarmaidfleming@gmail.com; ‘Elizabeth Watson – One Voice Action Group'; diansmt5@aol.com; ‘David Cozens – Campaign'; jonor1951@hotmail.com; edwarddoyle10@gmail.com; ‘George Wescott – Victim of OP Poisoning & Corruption'; ‘Wayne Fontana – HMRC Victim'; ‘Chris Fogarty, Reporter – IAN'; ‘Tim Fleming'; ‘Paul Talbot-Jenkins’ Subject: To Sabine McNeill from Kenn d’Oudney, DEMOCRACY DEFINED.  

http://www.democracydefined.org/ The Home Page of The Democracy Defined Campaign for RESTORATION and UNIVERSAL ADOPTION of CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW TRIAL BY JURY.

THE  DEMOCRACY DEFINED INTERNATIONAL EDUCATIONAL CAMPAIGN.

VERITAS, COGNITIO, IUSTITIA, LIBERTAS. 

Media and General Enquiries: campaign@democracydefined.org

 Kenn d’Oudney, Mrs. Joanna d’Oudney & Astra d’Oudney. CEO/Directors.

(Standard English Spelling) 

ACTIVIST MEMBERS from all walks of life in FIJI, NEPAL, SRI LANKA, SCOTLAND, AUSTRALIA, CANADA, EIRE, INDIA, GERMANY, ULSTER, SOUTH AFRICA, JORDAN, PAKISTAN, FRANCE, THE UNITED STATES AND ENGLAND.

THE CAMPAIGN PHILOSOPHY is spread worldwide by its Members. The Democracy Defined Campaign Philosophy is endorsed by academics, attorneys, doctors (of jurisprudence, medicine, homeopathy, philosophy, etc.) and judges (U.S. & U.K.).

 THE SOLE LEGAL PANACEA. 

Dear Sabine, 

It is disappointing to see you continually dissipating your energies with desultory efforts for various good causes few of which can succeed until government-paid judges are once again legally prevented from taking those decisions which, according to the Constitution, secular morality and legem terræ common law, should and must be decided, not by judges, but by ‘ordinary’ men and women in Juries. 

The authentic Constitutional Trial by Jury Justice System operates either

(i) as a means of cost-free private civil, criminal or fiscal prosecution to establish rights and punish or obtain redress for wrongs, including those committed by judges, politicians people in government,

or

(ii) as a right by which to establish a person’s innocence (lack of guilt or liability) in defence from all and any fines, summary punishments, accusation or prosecution.

 Be it known: Trial by Jury is the ONLY peaceful means known to mankind by which to prevent or redress the deeds and punish the personnel of a government bent on injustice. Common Law Trial by Jury is the unique overall cure for the numerous government-inflicted injustices against which you and we are campaigning.

By contrast, petitions and the numerous separate and disparate causes (including regarding victims of injustice) generally prove to be examples of wasted effort because, in most cases, they cannot win…

…they do not campaign for restoration of the citizen’s authority to judge and overrule the iniquitous legislation and the decisions of corrupted, prejudiced, and incompetent judges; …they seldom bring relief to victims of judicial wrongdoing; and …they do not bring about permanent expunction (repeal) of unjust laws and unconstitutional procedures by which the Trial by Jury is illegally denied.

These latter worthy goals are only achieved by (RESTORATION of) Trial by Jury.

Advising people that their method of campaigning is fundamentally flawed and going up a ‘cul de sac’, a blind alley,is a thankless task, but it remains the fact that until the Constitutional Trial by Jury Justice System is restored giving authority to decide justice issues to the randomly chosen ‘ordinary’ adults men and women sitting in the Jury, all and any gains or concessions achieved by petitions and appeals can be promptly reversed by subsequent legislation from Westminster or Brussels.

Bear in mind that population controls and even the right to have and be part of a family are subject to legislation adopting the unconscionable Platonic treaties of the NWO UNO Agendas, which are here to stay — unless the People re-take control of their own destiny and well-being. This can only be peacefully achieved by the people having control over the system of the enforcement of law. This is the issue above all others, and by which injustices are prevented or put to rights.

The Common Law Trial by Jury is indispensable (and installed within Constitutions) not only to protect the people from common crimes by ascertaining guilt or innocence of the accused and where necessary apportioning retribution, but also, of transcendent importance, it is explicitly and precisely emplaced as a barrier to protect the vast mass of innocent citizenry from the crimes of arbitrary government, i.e., unjust laws, tyranny; and from the corruption, prejudices and incompetence of fallible judges.

 This is achieved by the two aspects of Constitutional Common Law Trial by Jury as mentioned above: one for private, cost-free prosecution (by single or multiple plaintiffs); the other as jurors judging on the justice of the law, and, by pronouncing the Not Guilty Verdict, annulling any law or act of enforcement which is deemed unfair or unjust to the accused, according to the juror’s conscience (i.e., sense of right and wrong).

RESTORATION of the sovereign power of the Jury referred to in Item (i) above, would swiftly produce ALL the goals which we all seek; economic, socio-political and legislative.

All societies, regardless of time or place, race, culture, religion, background or nationality, govern by their Justice System. The power to punish carries with it ALL power. It remains a universal eternal criterion of justice that the validity and justice of laws and all acts of their enforcement require to be judged not by those who make and enforce the laws (government), but by those who voluntarily agree to abide by the laws (all the adult citizens).

All who do not uphold this tenet are then promoting unlawful rule by a tyrannical élite. Unwittingly, or for self-advantage, they serve despots, abet tyranny, and are the criminal enemies of freedom and equal justice.

Because the fairness and justice of the laws and all acts of law enforcement require to be judged by those who agree to abide by the laws, according to natural law, common law, constitutional law, and the paramount requirement for Equal Justice, the Common Law Trial by Jury of ordinary adult citizens in which the jurors judge the justice of the law and each act of enforcement, is the only justice system which is legal and just everywhere, for all process of law, civil, criminal and fiscal.

That is why Common Law Trial by Jury is installed by all legitimate constitutions as the sole justice system for all crimes (unimpeachable), civil, criminal and fiscal.

On the aforesaid grounds, there is NO legal enforcement of ANY law but by the Trial by Jury. It is uniquely in the nature of Trial by Jury that juries fulfil the function and purpose of law in a democratic society. These are to maintain Justice by protecting the citizen from injustice and crime of all kinds, whether perpetrated by the state or by other citizens; and to uphold the rights, freedom and legitimate interests of all.

The Juror is sovereign* in Trial by Jury.

*Definition: Sovereignty, pre-eminence; the supreme and independent power expressed through the making and enforcing of the laws.

Trial by Jury defines democracy, sine qua non. Within a Hellenic or modern democracy…

The Jury Comprises the Supreme Legislature and Judicature.

THIS CASE RULING EXEMPLIFIES DEMOCRACY AT WORK:

If the jury feels the law is unjust, we recognise the undisputed power of the jury to acquit even if its verdict is contrary to the law as given by the judge, and contrary to the evidence.

If the jury feels that the law under which the defendant is accused is unjust, or that exigent circumstances justified the actions of the accused, or for any reason which appeals to their logic or passion, the jury has the power to acquit, and the courts must abide by that decision.” United States v. Moylan; U.S. Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, 1969, 417 F. 2d 1002.

Neither in the United States, Britain, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, nor in all of Continental Europe and elsewhere, have legislatures ever been invested by the People with authority to impair the powers, to change the oaths, or abridge the jurisdiction of jurors to govern government; nor to remove the universal Right of the accused to the Trial by Jury of peers for any charge or offence whatever, however serious or trivial.

Today, U.S. v Moylan is not exemplified by the modus operandi of courts. Democracy has been overturned by miscreant politicians and judiciary, and the genuine emancipatory Trial by Jury is no more (ref. the illegally denied simple Juror’s Duties definitive of Trial by Jury, which are delineated on the webpage).

Sabine,

ALL those worthy causes, restitution, compensation and redress will be swiftly WON by folks following RESTORATION of the Juror’s Authority to decide such issues in the People’s all-powerful Courts of the Constitutional Common Law Trial by Jury backed by the full apparatus of police, prison service and Armed Services.

 In effect, your ongoing failure to teach others with whom you communicate how the simple mechanisms of the genuine Trial by Jury embody the sole effective panacea against government crime and injustice misleads them to waste time, effort and resources on countless little petitions, ‘campaigns’ and efforts alas doomed from the outset.

 Instead of, as you say, “With lots of sighs and hopes against all odds,” you greatly change the odds when you transfer to others the straightfoward facts about their superior Common Law and its sole Justice System for all causes, civil, criminal and fiscal; that of Trial by Jury. For by that activity, rather than sighs and hopes, you give people the omnipotent weapon which they so desperately need and by which they can once more peacefully decide their laws and liberties for themselves.

 Restoration permanently removes unconstitutional undue ‘authority’ from the felonious one-sided government-paid judges, Trial by Jury justly restoring this supreme sovereign rôle to We the People.

 Yours sincerely, Kenn d’Oudney. www.democracydefined.org

 —– Original Message —–

From: Sabine K McNeill

To: ‘Sabine K McNeill’

Sent: Saturday, July 20, 2013 2:16 PM

Subject: Victims Unite: of Child Snatchers outside Downing Street – and as McKenzie Friends

 Hi [with apologies for any duplication] I would have liked to alert you to Caul Grant’s court hearing last Tuesday, but BT lost my landline and broadband for a week! Whether as victim of a telecoms company, other corporations, Social Services, family or other courts, it is only a small consolation to know that one is not alone. It helps – especially when we get to know one another and end up helping each other. There’s an opportunity for victims of child snatchers outside Downing Street – until next Friday when petition signatures will be deliverd. A networking meeting also took place at the House of Commons and in the Jubilee Cafe again – and the video is on http://victims-unite.net/2013/07/07/voting-with-your-mouse-house-of-commons-meeting-for-early-day-motions-and-petitions/ or in short http://bit.ly/16ZXegn. The video is accompanied by an excellently presented exposure: retired BA pilot Len Lawrence shows how he was made a victim of the Court of ‘Protection’, so that his house could be sold under value, with lawyers cashing £100,000 and his ex-wife getting 85%. It’s called being ‘sectioned’ or having ‘lack of capacity’. The mental capacity to manage your own affairs. I was first made aware of this situation by an expatriate in Canada whose aunt suffered this fate so that she could not inherit, but everybody who was nearer the honey pot or public gravy train. John Hemming MP has been interested in these ‘secret prisoners’ for they may end up not only without ‘capacity’ but also in prison or mental hospitals, as Maurice Kirk and Norman Scarth have experienced. From his experience, Len Lawrence has discovered not only the unlawful use of the Mental Capacity Act, but also the connection with adoptions without parental consent. What an easy way of getting hold of your assets, when you are old, and your children, when you are young: let’s declare you not to have mental capacity. In fact, we can go further: once you leave prison, we can put you under a ‘Community Treatment Order’, i.e. you’ll get an injection once a month. We don’t need to tell you what’s in it. And why should you know what the side effects may be… I know one very remarkable woman who has been through this process. Fortunately, she’s, so far, the only one I know. In my attempts to help individual cases as well as draw public attention to white collar crimes and criminals, I am maintaining a few blogs: · Punishment without Crime is a development of Ian Josephs’ forced adoption and focuses on child snatching as the most heinous of all white collar crimes – with an utter perversion of ‘justice’ in secret family courts: o The Secrecy of Family Courts should be lifted now is an going petition that is before the President of the Family Division as well as the Attorney General. o Abolish Adoptions without Parental Consent is our appeal to the EU Parliament via their Petitions Committee – please sign so that we can reach the 2,000 limit soon! o The Dossier of Evidence is a compilation of links that hopefully will convince anybody that children are screaming to be heard. · Victims Unite is the general melting pot with posts, comments and visits o Public inquiry into white collar crimes is still open for signatures and we will approach the Justice Select Committee next. · When victims become starfighters, campaigners and activists, they often help others as McKenzie Friends o Hence we formed the Association of McKenzie Friends for voluntary public advocacy while assisting Litigants in Person § We have found a professional McKenzie Friend Alex Moore who acts as our legal advisor. § We have also found the Public Law Barrister Tomor Bahja who has submitted an excellent Judicial Review to stop the deportation of an American mother in jail who has not seen her 5-year-old son for 20 months. § And we anticipate acquiring charitable status and organise training as next steps. § Since the Judicial Working Group published its report about Litigants in Person, we need to mind the gap between ‘them’ the legal professionals and us the victims and ‘amateurs’! o Help4Lips is a partner organisation that has not only a Womens Lawyer on board but also premises that can be used for mediation, meeting and training purposes. · We Who Oppose Deception is for everybody who sees through the illusions produced by Hollywood and the mainstream media: o I write this letter on the 10th anniversary of the Iraq War on behalf of my fellow Iraq War veterans is my latest post. All in all, I would prefer if you clicked on the FOLLOW THIS BLOG button rather than hope I maintain email lists. This ‘decentralised’ way of organizing communication is much more congenial to the pace at which we change interest and email addresses, besides the ability to cope with too many missives. And thus I wish you a ‘happy click and read’, while I keep doing my best NOT to despair at all crimes and cruelty that people do to others – by ‘just doing their job’ – just as in Nazi times, it seems… With lots of sighs and hopes against all odds, Sabine

 Better never to vote at all than vote for a person who does not make EQUAL JUSTICE the prime aim of government by RESTORATION and UNIVERSAL ADOPTION of Constitutional Legem Terræ Common Law Trial by Jury.”

Click to read about the authentic Constitutional Trial by Jury Justice System.

 Kenn d’Oudney is the author of books and essays including the following:

Kenn d’Oudney est auteur de livres et essais y compris les suivants: Kenn d’Oudney ist Autor von Büchern und Essays einschließlich der folgenden:

 MYTHS DISPELLED: AN OPEN LETTER TO JAMES MADISON (descendant). Essay: read it and see for yourself how the Constitution’s Justice System is supposed to work to protect rights, liberty, property ownership and use, and achieve equal justice for all and discover… THE ILLEGALITY OF THE STATUS QUO. http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm

 Hi Kenn: What a magnificent article! I intend to incorporate parts of it into my speeches and writings. Yours in freedom and justiceProfessor Julian Heicklen, Jury Rights’ Activist; Coordinator, Tyranny Fighters; U.S.

 Kenn d’Oudney is a brilliant writer and researcher when it comes to Democracy and Trial by Jury. The best source of common law is Kenn d’Oudney.

Dr. John Wilson,

Jury Rights’ Activist; co-Founder & Chairman, Australian Common Law Party.

 Superb. Should be read in every law school.” John Walsh, Barrister-at-Law, Author; Constitutional lawyer (U.S. & Australia).

 MAGNA CARTA, THE GREAT CHARTER CONSTITUTION;

freely downloadable information about pan-European legem terræ common law, the Law of the Land, whose central tenet and sole justice system is the all-powerful People’s Trial by Jury Courts, defining the true European and pan-Occidental Constitution. http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm

 Thank you for your excellent work on Magna Carta. What a masterly exposition.” JOHN GOURIET, Chairman, Defenders of the Realm; Battle for Britain Campaign supported by The Duke of Wellington; Edward Fox, OBE, and Frederick Forsyth, CBE.

Kenn, Your rebuttal is masterly. Your essay is a very good read.” ROBIN TILBROOK, Chairman & Party Leader; English Democrat Party.

 Thank you so much for this contribution. It is very much appreciated.” ASHLEY MOTE, MEP (Member of the European Parliament); Vice-President, Alliance of Independent Democrats in Europe.

 Thanks, Kenn. I’ve circulated this.”

SIMON RICHARDS, Campaign Director; The Freedom Association; Founded by John Gouriet; the Viscount de L’Isle, VC, KG, PC; Ross McWhirter and Norris McWhirter, CBE.

 TRIAL BY JURY: ITS HISTORY, TRUE PURPOSE AND MODERN RELEVANCE ISBN 9781902848723, with endorsements and edited section authored by U.S. lawyer Lysander Spooner; http://www.democracydefined.org/2trialbyjury.htm

 SRC Publishing Ltd., London, available from world distribution by LULU of North Carolina.

 THE REPORT, CANNABIS: THE FACTS, HUMAN RIGHTS AND THE LAW ISBN 9781902848204, co-authored by Joanna d’Oudney; Foreword by a Nobel laureate former Official Adviser to the U.S. government; endorsed by a Professor of Physiology Fellow of the Royal Society, academics, doctors (of a variety of disciplines) and judges (U.S. & U.K.); Softback, 260 large-size pages. http://www.democracydefined.org/1report.htm

 You have done a splendid job of producing a comprehensive summary of the evidence documenting that the prohibition of the production, sale and use of cannabis is utterly unjustified and produces many harmful effects. Any impartial person reading your REPORT will almost certainly end up favouring the re-legalisation of cannabis.” NOBEL LAUREATE PROFESSOR MILTON FRIEDMAN, former Economics’ Adviser to U.S. government; Author, video and TV series writer and presenter; Senior Research Fellow, Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace; Professor Emeritus, University of Chicago.

 You represent a worthy part of the fight in many countries for the logical and beneficial use of cannabis. I thank you for that.” PROFESSOR PATRICK D. WALL, M.D., Author; Professor of Physiology, UMDS St. Thomas’s (Teaching) Hospital, London; Fellow of the Royal Society; DM, FRCP.

 I did enjoy reading it. THE REPORT should contribute much.” THE HON. JONATHON PORRITT, Bt., former Adviser to U.K. government on Environment; Author; Founder, Friends of the Earth; TV series writer and presenter.

SRC Publishing Ltd., London, available here from world distribution by LULU of North Carolina. Available as a textbook.

SO YOU THOUGHT CANNABIS PROHIBITION HAS NO EFFECT UPON YOU ?

 THE REPORT ISBN 9781902848204: Part (chapter) Two  contains the unprecedented (new) Cannabis Biomass Energy Equation (CBEE; Modern Uses) which proves the clean-combusting production-cost-free, i.e., FREE, cannabis by-product pyrolytic CH3OH is the immediate non-polluting, renewable, total world replacement for fossils and uranium, whilst macro-cultivation simultaneously significantly increases world production of staple seed food (protein-rich; no relaxant in seed). The CBEE exposes the bankowner-corporate-government monumental ulterior motive behind fraudulent prohibition. ‘Prohibition’ is a venal, cartel-fabricated subterfuge; a false fuel-energy MONOPOLY.

 The CBEE Formulation proffers CH3OH oil-gasoline-type fuel combustion for all power-station, industrial, land, sea and air transportation and domestic energy supply, with ZERO net atmospheric increase of CO2. Viz. the CBEE thereby simultaneously demonstrates governments’ mendacity in their claims to wish to reduce carbon emissions, and proves the “eco” and “carbon taxes” to be fraudulent: a criminal government imposture completely without foundation. The misuse of exorbitant, world-economy-depressing fossils and uranium as ‘fuel’ is potentially catastrophic, legally and economically unjustifiable, and requires to be prohibited forthwith.

See pyrolysis diagrams, photo, equation, etc.

 Part Six of THE REPORT, PROHIBITION: THE PROGENITOR OF CRIME. “To cause crime to occur is to be accountable for the crime, morally and legally. To consent to any measure is to share responsibility for its results.” Legalised, cannabis grows anywhere: the benign herb’s foliage and flowers come free or at an insignificant price, but yielding no revenues to government and no profits to corporations. However, prohibition creates the Black Market: the Economic Effects of Prohibition (scarcity + enforcement, etc.) augment “street” value by 3000% plus, making all Black Market associated crime inevitable. The political commodities’ prohibition, the War on Drugs, rather that is to say, the politicians who pass and the judiciaries who maintain the legislation engender (cause) and are culpable for not less than 75 – 80 percent of all crimes (official statistics) throughout the West.

 EXONERATIVE FINDINGS OF FACT; Official Empirical Research; THE REPORT collates the medico-scientific Findings of Fact and Conclusions of the government-funded clinical studies conducted by world-respected research and academic institutions into non-toxic, non-addictive natural herb cannabis (differentiated from pharmaceutical laboratory toxic product THC). The investigations’ empirical evidence exonerates cannabis from all allegations of ‘harm’ and ‘impairment’ (including tests on simulated driving) exempting cannabis from all legislative criteria of control (‘prohibition’). All citizens persecuted thereunder are due Amnesty and Restitution (as for other Wrongful Penalisation).

 MEDICATION: Efficacious in over 100 adverse medical conditions (viz. Official Pharmacopoeias) including applications which are life-saving, preserve eyesight, Curative and/or Preventive, and with potential cheaply to replace numerous lines of lucrative but ineffective, debilitating, addictive, toxic pharmaceuticals, rendering massive financial government-corporate ulterior revenue and profit motive (trillions) behind apocryphal prohibition by perjurious derogation. + Medical Case Histories.

 Six Parts (chapters) include expert documentary, legal, academic, scientific, technical, medical, economic, social, criminological, philosophical evidence, and that which is based on grounds of equity, vindicating all private cultivation, trade, possession and use, and which further exposes perjury and venality behind prohibition ‘legislation’, all acts of enforcement constituting crime per se.

 Part Seven, RESTORATION: JUSTICE AND THE CONSTITUTION, exposes corruption, ineptitude and injustice in the justice process; examines Law: natural law, supreme secular legem terræ Constitutional common law, treaties, statutes; quotes presidents, judges, lawyers and chief justices.

 THE REPORT is regularly presented pre-trial by defendants to courts (judges) who routinely forbid all Findings of Fact, evidence and defences which “dispute the legality of the law” before the jury. The official and expert evidence in THE REPORT establishes the apocryphal, illegal nature of the legislation. THE REPORT quotes legal grounds (national and international) which demonstrate numerous infractions of laws by the prohibition legislation, and which show all acts of its enforcement to be crime per se. All citizens persecuted thereunder are due Amnesty and Restitution (as for other Wrongful Penalisation). This textbook demonstrates in the law: injustice, inequity, invalidity, adverse effects, venal ulterior motive, perjury, fallacious derogation, and the inherent illegality of law which creates the Black Market and engenders all associated crime.

The outcomes of this procedure of presenting THE REPORT as documentary evidence to the judge have proved beneficial in the extreme for defendants. *Courts require documentary evidence presented as the published textbook (not copies or e-book).

 WE THE PEOPLE AND THE MATTER OF WORDS; freely downloadable, indispensable information for the creation and sustainment of legitimate government and society; http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm

 

THE CONSTITUTION TREATISE: Why the d’Estaing (‘European’) Constitution-Treaty Is the Antithesis of Democracy ISBN 9781902848747, see website for endorsements by U.S. & U.K. cognoscenti; http://www.democracydefined.org/5constitution.htm

 

 “The d’Oudney analysis is as insightful as it is comprehensive. It will stand for years to come as the definitive critique of the European Constitution prepared by Giscard d’Estaing and others. I look forward to sharing the d’Oudney analysis with my colleagues.” HOWARD PHILLIPS, Founder, U.S. Constitution Party; three-time presidential nominee; Chairman, Conservative Caucus.

SRC Publishing Ltd., London.

 

THE PRINCIPAL TENETS OF THE CONSTITUTIONS OF DEMOCRACIES,

An essay by Kenn d’Oudney.

Educational Information Series EIS#28. http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm

 

DEMOCRACY DEFINED: ON THE ETYMOLOGY, HISTORY AND SIGNIFICATION OF THE WORD DEMOCRACY; the Sciences of Etymology, Semantics, Semasiology, and Philology determine whether your country is a definitive democracy or your government is a despotism. Viz. The word ‘democracy’ is widely abused and ‘defined’ incorrectly: Democracy is a state of society realised neither by referenda (mass voting for new laws), nor by suffrage (electoral voting for representatives), nor by representatives’ majorities’ legislatorial voting. Electoral voting, majority rule and ‘consensus politics’ neither create nor define democracy. This essay defines and summarises the unique signification and inestimable value to the human race of genuine Constitutional Democracy.

http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedcampaign.htm#democracy

 

9-11 TRUTH LINKS COMPENDIUM; exposition with select video analysis & lectures; contributions by professors, architects, scientists, Federal Aviation Authority experts, former CIA, FBI, military and government officials, firemen, reporters and other eye-witnesses present; freely download this Compendium which serves as an introduction to the subject, and as a source of additional references for those already familiar with the 9/11 Truth Movement.

Note: The URL addresses of these serious documentaries do change from time to time. If you find the link broken, then paste the TITLE of the video given in our Compendium into YouTube and find the documentary video that way.

http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm

 

IN PROTECTION OF AUSTRALIANS’ RIGHTS IN GENERAL AND THE RIGHTS OF HOME OWNERS AND FARMERS IN PARTICULAR.

http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm

 

THE VALUE OR OTHERWISE OF LAW DICTIONARIES; part of the contents of a forthcoming book to be published by SRC Publishing. It is nevertheless, for the time being anyway, downloadable for free; http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm

 

ON REFERENDA AND MAJORITY RULE; part of the contents of a forthcoming book downloadable for free;

http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm

 

RADIOACTIVITY FROM CROPS FED WITH PHOSPHATE ‘FERTILISER’ IS THE PRINCIPAL CAUSE OF CANCER; some Findings of Fact downloadable for free, extracted from THE REPORT ISBN 9781902848204 (referred to above);

http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedmaterial.htm

 

CHIEF JUSTICE VAUGHAN’S RULING; on perhaps the most famous trial in history; Juror’s Rights and Duty and photo of the Old Bailey Commemorative Plaque; http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedcampaign2.htm#intervention

 

WHY THE LEGAL PROFESSION CANNOT DEFEND YOU; consider some of the judicable breaches of common law and Constitution to which modern government resorts in order to enforce its inequitable, illegal, and money-motivated statutes;

http://www.democracydefined.org/democracydefinedcampaign4.htm#lawyers

 

Further reading on the website:

http://www.democracydefined.org/ The Home Page of The not-for-profit Educational Campaign for RESTORATION and

UNIVERSAL ADOPTION of CONSTITUTIONAL COMMON LAW TRIAL BY JURY. The Democracy Defined Campaign Philosophy is endorsed by academics, attorneys,

doctors (of jurisprudence, medicine, homeopathy, philosophy, etc.) and judges ( U.S . & U.K.). Join the Campaign ! Download and distribute free posters and educational pamphlets.

Membership gratis.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , ,

Meet the Ukip housing spokesman raking in £800,000 in Housing Benefit

12:02, 30 April 2015

Ukip’s spokesman for housing and environment, Andrew Charalambous, has received over £1.5m in Housing Benefit over two years for housing vulnerable tenants

source:   http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/ampp3d/meet-ukip-housing-spokesman-raking-5572810

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , ,

Surrey Police Operation Outreach Savile Report April 2015

Surrey Police Operation Outreach Savile Report April 2015

Operation Outreach

The Report from Surrey Police about Savile, – the closing Report from 29th April 2015 of Operation Outreach largely at Duncroft was somewhat lost amongst more Janner publicity so I reproduce it here. This is the pdf download wordpress link [1a] or from the Surrey Police website [1b] and following this introduction is the accompanying Press statement.

Following this statement I have included similar links and statement from Surrey Police on Operation Ornament from 2013.

Closing report published on further investigation into abuse by Jimmy Savile at former school in Staines 2015 April 29th

A report on an investigation into offences by Jimmy Savile at a former girls’ school has been published today by Surrey Police (Wednesday April 29th) [2]

It follows the publication of the Force’s ‘Operation Ornament’ report in January 2013, which looked at a previous investigation by Surrey Police into Savile in 2007-9.

A second investigation, Operation Outreach, was launched in 2012 to establish a clearer picture of the breadth of Savile’s offending at the former Duncroft School in Staines-Upon-Thames; to investigate what may have been known by former staff; and to look at whether any criminal offences had been committed as a result.

In May 2014, following extensive enquiries, a case file was passed to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) in relation to two former members of staff at Duncroft.  In November 2014 the CPS determined there was no realistic prospect of conviction and no criminal charges would be brought.

Today’s factual closing report is being published to be open and clear on what enquiries and actions have been taken by Surrey Police in relation to Duncroft School since 2012.

Assistant Chief Constable Stuart Cundy said: “The Outreach investigation was launched to ascertain the level of offending at Duncroft School, to look at the knowledge of staff and, in conjunction with the CPS, to determine if any criminal charges should be brought.

“In January 2013, when the Force published its report into the original investigation at Duncroft (Operation Ornament) we identified several key failings. These included that the focus on a specific time period between 1977 and 1979 was too narrow and the decision not to interview staff at that time should have been reviewed.

“As today’s report shows, extensive investigative work has since been carried out to review all material available from MIND and Barnardo’s, who each managed the school for a period between 1974 and 1979, as well as speaking to former members of staff.  In total 44 statements have now been taken, 300 officer reports submitted and 166 former pupils contacted in relation to this enquiry.

“Enquiries in the original 2007-9 investigation pre-dated much of what we now know about Savile and his pattern of abuse. The Force has always accepted there are things which should have been done differently in Operation Ornament and these were highlighted in the report published by Surrey Police in 2013.

“I thank all those who came forward during the course of the Outreach investigation as it is only with their support that a large number of other offences by Savile at Duncroft have been uncovered.”

Operation Ornament

The 2013 Jan 11 Report can be downloaded from wordpress [3a] or the Surrey Police website [3b]

The Press statement that follows is available from [4]

Statement and Force report on the investigation into Jimmy Savile

STATEMENT AND REPORT EMBARGOED UNTIL 10AM ON FRIDAY 11 JANUARY 2013

Statement from Surrey Police Assistant Chief Constable Jerry Kirkby:

“Prior to the Home Secretary’s announcement of a review by HerMajesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary (HMIC) into all police contact with Jimmy Savile, Surrey Police has undertaken an internal review of its 2007 investigation.

“This review is being published today in order to be clear and open about what action was taken, to avoid any inaccurate reports, and to share any lessons which can be learned.

“Victims of historic abuse cases are often reluctant to speak out for fear of not being believed and I welcome acknowledgement by the Principle Legal Advisor in her report that officers at Surrey Police took the allegations seriously.

“It is important the actions taken by the investigation team are viewed in context. This should take into account what information was known about Jimmy Savile in 2007 and the necessary consideration given by police to the impact of their actions on securing successful court action against him.

“At the time, there was nothing to suggest the level of offending now being reported on a national scale. In July 2007, Surrey Police used national systems to conduct intelligence checks with every other police force in England and Wales. These checks found no record of any police intelligence or prior allegations relating to Jimmy Savile. The picture which was presented to Surrey Police as a result of these checks was that our investigation was the first police enquiry to be carried out into him.

“We now know previous allegations had been made including two in London, one in the 1980s and one in 2003. Whilst we cannot be certain what the outcome of an earlier connection to a wider pattern of offending would have been it may have altered the course of the Surrey investigation.

“The individual who reported witnessing an incident of sexual abuse at Duncroft Children’s Home in the 1970s was taken seriously by Surrey Police, as were all victims subsequently identified by the investigation. Contact was made with West Yorkshire Police, where Savile was residing, and with Surrey Children’s Services as part of the investigation strategy.

“The initial allegation prompted a series of enquiries both to former residents of Duncroft and to Barnardo’s who managed the children’s home during that period. Two further reports from the 1970s came to light as a result. One related to Savile asking a Duncroft resident to perform oral sex which she declined. The other was an allegation he kissed a teenage girl who was attending a concert at Stoke Mandeville Hospital. The girl was unconnected to the hospital and was not a patient.

“From an early stage officers recognised the complexities of securing a conviction in historic abuse cases. As such, advice was sought from the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) during the course of the investigation. From the outset, the indication from the CPS was that they considered it unlikely these matters would result in a prosecution.

“As the investigation continued it was escalated to a senior level in the Force for oversight. At the time, the action taken was considered proportionate to the information being received. In hindsight, the focus of the investigation on a specific time period in the 1970s was too restrictive.

“The decision not to share accounts between victims has also been examined by the review. This decision was initially taken to ensure the integrity of evidence so there could be no suggestion of collusion,contamination or prompting between accounts – a factor which has led previous cases involving multiple victims to be dismissed in court.

“This was seen as best practice at the start of the investigation and it is noteworthy that current national police guidance continues to highlight disclosure of information between victims in such cases as a risk. However, it is right to question whether this was later balanced against the confidence of victims to support further legal action.

“It is not possible to know how this would have influenced individuals at the time but decisions around disclosure and victim care should have been reviewed at a later stage in the enquiry. The Force accepts more could have been done to encourage victims to support police action and we have apologised to each of the victims involved.

“I agree with the Director of Public Prosecutions that the officers involved were experienced and committed individuals who acted in good faith by seeking to work within national guidelines.

“The internal review has identified a number of learning points which will influence the way future reports of historical abuse cases are dealt within Surrey.

“We will continue to co-operate with the HMIC as they conduct their national review and would support any new guidance issued by ACPO and the CPS on the handling of these complex cases.

“The Force has detectives specially trained in dealing with child abuse cases and now has a dedicated unit for investigating sexual assault offences.We remain committed to bringing abusers to justice and victims should continue to have confidence in coming forward.”

Links

[1a] 2015 Apr 29 Operation Outreach- pdf download wordpress https://cathyfox.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/operation-outreach-29-4-2015-11186-link.pdf

[1b] 2015 Apr 29 Operation Outreach- pdf download Surrey Police website http://www.surrey.police.uk/Portals/0/pdf/news/Operation-Outreach-29-4-2015-11186-link.pdf

[2] 2015 Apr 29 Closing report published on further investigation into abuse by Jimmy Savile at former school in Staines Press Statement http://www.surrey.police.uk/News/Statements/Article/11186

[3a] 2013 Jan 11 Operation Ornament Report wordpress https://cathyfox.files.wordpress.com/2015/04/operation_ornament_report_11-01-2013.pdf

[3b] 2013 Jan 11  Operation Ornament Report Surrey Police website http://www.surrey.police.uk/Portals/0/pdf/news/operation_ornament_report_11.01.2013.pdf

[4] Statement and Force report on the investigation into Jimmy Savile FRIDAY 11 JANUARY 2013 from Surrey Police Assistant Chief Constable Jerry Kirkby http://www.surrey.police.uk/News/Statements/Article/2940

[A] Sanctuary for the Abused http://abusesanctuary.blogspot.co.uk/2006/07/for-survivors-coping-with-triggers-if.html

[B] NAPAC http://www.napac.org.uk/

[C] One in Four http://www.oneinfour.org.uk/

[D] Havoca http://www.havoca.org/HAVOCA_home.htm

[E] SurvivorsJustice Triggers post http://survivorsjustice.com/2014/02/26/triggers-what-are-they-and-how-do-we-work-through-them/

[F] SurvivorsJustice Blog http://survivorsjustice.com/

This is all written in good faith but if there is anything that needs to be corrected please email cathyfox@bigfoot.com

cathyfox the truth will out, the truth will shout, the truth will set us free

 source:  Surrey Police Operation Outreach Savile Report April 2015.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , ,

TOO EXPENSIVE TO COLLATE INFO?? HARINGEY COUNCIL F.O.I.A. REQUEST COST £1000 TO COLLATE THAT 195 CHILDREN WERE TAKEN INTO CARE THERE IN 2014-15???

HARINGEY COUNCIL F.O.I.A. REQUEST REPLY [below] STATES IT COST £1000 TO COLLATE THAT 195 CHILDREN WERE TAKEN INTO CARE THERE IN 2014-15 [that’s approx. 4 per week]??? THE REST OF THE FOIA REQUEST WAS DEEMED TOO EXPENSIVE TO REPLY TO, SO IT WASNT REPLIED TO. £1000? IS THIS REAL??  at that [alleged] cost its a good reason to say its too expensive to complete the request.

Self- harm suicide and depression in children whilst under social services

S. Prichard made this Freedom of Information request to Haringey Borough Council
This request has an unknown status. We’re waiting for S. Prichard to read a recent response and update the status.

From: S. Prichard

16 April 2015

Dear Haringey Borough Council,Following our request dated 27th November 2014 regarding social
services causing emotional harm to childrenhttps://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/s… and a study by Nyas

“NYAS has found that in the past five years there have been at
least one thousand children and young people have been admitted to
mental health in-patient units while they were in care. The fact
that there is no shared data across central government departments
is concerning.”
https://www.nyas.net/archives/5682  [how can NYAS figure of 1000 be correct?? this figure does not relate to just Haringey council – see the link! At 195 / year Haringey co. would’ve shown a figure for 5 years of nearly 1000 alone – what about the rest of the country?? the true figure for the country must be phenomenal?  ed.]

1. We would like to know how many children in care have suffered
emotional harm or mental health issues AFTER children were removed
from parents care and have had the following issues:-

a) Self-harmed
b) Committed suicide – please state methods
c) Attempted suicide – please state methods
d) Sectioned
e) Abused in care
i) Physically
ii) Emotionally
iii) Sexually
f) Anorexia
g) Bulimia
h) Drug or substance abuse
i) Depression
j) Suicidal Thoughts

2. What is your councils policy with dealing with any of the above

We want stats where the children are only diagnosed once placed in
care and after the children were removed from parents care, and had
no diagnoses prior to removal. from parents. Please go back 5
years, stats year on year.

Yours faithfully,

S. Prichard

From: FOI
Haringey Borough Council

17 April 2015

Dear S  Prichard,Freedom of Information Request: Reference LBH/4208015I acknowledge your request for information received on 17 April 2015.

This information request will be dealt with in accordance with the Freedom
of Information Act 2000 and we will send the response by 18 May 2015.

If you have any questions, please contact us on 020 8489 1988 or
[

email address].Yours sincerely

Sirkku Pietikäinen

Feedback Review Officer

Haringey Council

River Park House, 225 High Road, London N22 8HQ

T. 020 8489 2552

[1][

email address][2]www.haringey.gov.uk

[3]twitter@haringeycouncil

[4]facebook.com/haringeycouncil

show quoted sections

From: Bhardwaja Neelam
Haringey Borough Council

29 April 2015

Ms PrichardFreedom of Information Act Request (ref: LBH 4208015)Fees Notice

Thank you for your e-mail which was received on 17^th April 2015 in which
you request the following information;

1.    How many children in care have suffered emotional harm or mental
health issues AFTER children were removed from parents care and have had
the following issues:-

a)    Self-harmed

b)    Committed suicide – please state methods

c)    Attempted suicide – please state methods

d)    Sectioned

e)    Abused in care

i)    Physically

ii)   Emotionally

iii)  Sexually

f)    Anorexia

g)    Bulimia

h)    Drug or substance abuse

i)    Depression

j)    Suicidal Thoughts

2.    What is the local authority council policy with dealing with any of
the above .

You also request statistics that relate to the previous 5 years (year on
year) to focus on situations where the children are only diagnosed once
placed in care, after the children were removed from parents care, and
where there was no diagnoses prior to removal from parents.

In terms of Question 2. The local authority response centres on a
multi-agency multi-disciplinary approach in meeting the needs of children
and young people who are looked after by the local authority, these being
internal and external partners.

I can confirm that the number of children who became looked after in the
years you specified are:

Stat Neighbour
2010-11 2011-12 2012013 2013-14 2014-15-Provisional 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14
310 255 195 225 195 203 216 226

2014-2015 (provisional)

195In terms of Question 1, the information is not collected in an easily
accessed format.  Section 12 of the Freedom of Information Act allows
public authorities to refuse requests for information where the cost of
dealing with them would exceed the appropriate limit, which for local
government is set at £450.  This represents the estimated cost of one
person spending 18 hours in determining whether the department holds the
information, locating, retrieving and extracting the information.  In this
instance we have estimated that it will cost £1,000 to provide you with
the required information.  This amount is therefore over the appropriate
limit as specified in the regulations and consequently we are not obliged
by the Freedom of Information Act to respond to your request.  We will not
therefore be processing your request further.

The fee has been calculated as follows:


Task Estimated Hours
number of multiplied by
Hours £25
 

Determining whether the information is held 10 £250
 

Locating the information 10 £250
 

Retrieving the information 10 £250
 

Extracting the information from other 10 £250
documents
 

Total 40 hours £1,000

It may be possible to amend your request so that it does not incur a
charge.  For example, you may wish to refine your request by being more
specific about what information you particularly wish to obtain, including
any dates or period of time relevant to the information required.

Please note however that any amended request received would be considered
a new request and new timescale would apply.

If you have any further queries, or are unhappy with how we have dealt
with your request and wish to make a complaint, please contact the
Feedback and Information Team as below.  (Please note you should do this
within two months of receiving this response.)

Feedback and Information Team

River Park House

225 High Road,

N22 8HQ

Telephone: 020 8489 2550

Email: [1][email address]

If you are not content with the outcome of your complaint you may apply
directly to the Information Commissioner (ICO), although generally the ICO
cannot make a decision unless you have exhausted the complaints procedure
within Haringey Council.  The contact details for the ICO are:

FOI/ EIR Complaints Resolution

Information Commissioner’s Office

Wycliffe House

Water Lane

Wilmslow

Cheshire

SK9 5AF

Telephone: 01625 545 745

Email: [2][email address]

Website: [3]www.ico.org.uk

Regards.

Neelam Bhardwaja

Assistant Director – Safeguarding & Social Care

Haringey Council

The Children & Young People’s Service

1^st floor, River Park House, 225 High Road, London N22 8HQ

Tel : 020 8489 4676 – PA 3860

[mobile number]

Email: [4][email address]

[5]www.haringey.gov.uktwitter@haringeycouncil

facebook.com/haringeycouncil

P THINK OF THE ENVIRONMENT – PLEASE DO NOT PRINT THIS EMAIL UNLESS YOU
REALLY NEED TO

show quoted sections

We don’t know whether the most recent response to this request contains information or not – if you are S. Prichard please sign in and let everyone know.

Things to do with this request

Anyone:

Haringey Borough Council only:

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

BRICE TAYLOR “THANKS FOR THE MEMORIES” BOOK – PDF – BOB HOPE + KISSINGERS SEX SLAVE + COMPUTER

BRICE TAYLOR

“THANKS FOR THE MEMORIES” BOOK

PDF  – TRUE STORY FROM BOB HOPE + KISSINGER’S SEX SLAVE + COMPUTER

BRICE TAYLOR TKS 4 MEMORIES

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , ,

NEW: IMPORTANT: Mum June Wiggan’s comment

Mum June Wiggan’s comment.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , ,

Justice For Carol – The True Story of Carol Felstead

Ex-Head of Ethics of the British Medical Association Attempts Illegal Cremation of Vulnerable Mentally Ill Patient

Justice For Carol – The True Story of Carol Felstead
The Creation of a Satanic Myth in the United Kingdom

Justice For Carol Book

The Justice For Carol book – telling the extraordinary story of Carol’s life and death – has recently been published. Click here or on the cover to download a copy or to preview sample chapters.

 

 

This article has been written by members of the Felstead Family.

OUR FAMILY WOULD LIKE TO HEAR FROM REPUTABLE LAWYERS WHO MAY BE INTERESTED IN TAKING LEGAL ACTION ON OUR BEHALF.

Our beloved daughter and sister Carole Myers (formerly known as Carol Felstead) happy and healthy aged 20, as a student nurse, shortly after Carol achieved her childhood dream to become a fully qualified nurse. This picture was taken before meeting Dr Fleur Fisher and before Carol became a victim of Recovered Memory Therapy.

Introduction

This website has been specifically created to draw public attention to the behaviour of Dr Fleur Fisher, the Ex-Head of Ethics of the British Medical Association, following the death of our beloved daughter and sister, Carole Patricia Myers (formerly known as Carol Patricia Felstead).

Our family made an official complaint to the Metropolitan Police on the 13th August 2008. Dr Fleur Fisher was interviewed under police caution at Wandsworth Police Station on the 16th April 2009. The criminal offences that she was being questioned over were the attempted illegal cremation of Carol, perverting the course of justice, the theft of all of Carol’s possessions from Carol’s flat and the theft of Carol’s car.

The Metropolitan Police conducted a fifteen month investigation into our complaint and stated that there is not enough evidence to prosecute Dr Fisher. The Independent Police Complaints Commission upheld the decision of the police. The General Medical Council also states that there is not enough evidence to take any action against Dr Fisher. The Metropolitan Police, the Crown Prosecution Service, the Independent Police Complaints Commission and the General Medical Council have all seen and heard all of the following evidence that we are now presenting to the public. In total it has taken five and a half years for each of the above organisations to conduct their individual investigations and effectively conclude that Dr Fisher’s behaviour is acceptable. We believe that their decisions are appalling.

This is a story about abuse of professional power. Before we tell our story, we would like to make it clear that we now understand and accept that Carol was severely mentally ill and that she was not in any way responsible for her actions. We will always remember Carol as a fun loving, caring, sociable and kind-hearted person. Wherever you are now Carol, you are in all of our hearts and we will always remember you with affection.

Our Story

Our beloved daughter and sister, Carol, a vulnerable and mentally ill adult, was found dead in her flat at 17a Swanage Road, Wandsworth, London, SW18 2DZ on the 29th June 2005 at about 3:30pm. The cause of death was indeterminable. Our family have been fighting for five years to get to the bottom of the extraordinary events surrounding her death. The facts are as follows: Carol died on 29 June 2005; our family were not notified of her death by the Coroner’s Office until the 14 July 2005. In the meantime, an eminent doctor, Dr Linda Fleur Fisher, had arranged Carol’s cremation and disposed of her personal possessions.

Dr Fisher told the Metropolitan Police, Battersea Coroner’s Office and Servite Housing Association that she was Carol’s next of kin and executor. She was accepted on her word and was not asked to provide any evidence to support these preposterous claims. In an interview with journalist Will Storr (The Observer Magazine, 11 December 2011), Fisher admitted ”that she had no legal claim to be Carol’s next of kin.” The article can be found here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/dec/11/carole-myers-satanic-child-abuse

Because our family were not informed about Carol’s death until two weeks after she had died, we did not see her before she was buried (her body was placed in a sealed coffin) and we were not present or represented at her post-mortem. Nor were we allowed to attend the pre-inquest into her death because we were not even aware that she had died at the time it took place. No member of our family has ever identified Carol.

No member of our family – except Carol – has ever met Dr Fisher. In fact, prior to 2005, we had never even heard of her.  Following Carol’s death, we have checked with the Court of Protection, the Probate Registry, the High Court and many other official bodies to find out if Carol ever appointed Dr Fisher to act as her representative in any legal capacity. No such appointment was ever made prior to 2005; no appointment was ever made.

Our family have in our possession Carol’s medical records which illustrate that Dr Fisher knew about the existence of our family, and had done so for some considerable time.

Every single thing to do with Carol’s death is disturbing. Consider, for example, the manner in which our family were informed of her death. Carol’s brother received a telephone call on 14 July 2005 from Sharon Marshall, an officer in Battersea Coroner’s Court, who told him that Carol had died and was being cremated the following day. The officer said she knew why Carol had died but she did not provide any details about her death. Marshall stated further that Carol’s ‘next of  kin’ had told her that Carol did not have a family.

Two minutes later, Carol’s brother received another phone call. This call was even worse. The female caller refused to reveal her identity or position. The person who rang declared that she was Carol’s next of kin. She then invited Carol’s brother to a cremation service, which, she said, had been arranged for Carol the following day. We recorded the telephone number of the caller at the time via the NTL 1471 Facility. We have legally applied for and received Carol’s telephone records. We now know that this anonymous caller was Dr Fisher.

The cremation was prevented by our family less than 24 hours before it was due to take place and Carol was brought back home to Stockport and given a family service and burial.

Our family have been told that the Coroner’s Assistant and Dr Fisher only became aware of Carol’s family after discovering a letter written to Carol by her brother.

The letter was written, ironically, on 29 June, the day that Carol died. On receipt of the letter, the Coroner’s Assistant and Dr Fisher are supposed to have realised for the first time that Carol had a family to contact. We do not believe this scenario. On the 7th July 2005 Dr Fisher insured Carol’s car in her own name. The recording of this transaction is provided below. Dr Fleur Fisher can be heard in her own words confirming that she is completely aware that Carol has a family.

Dr Fisher did not provide any documentary evidence to the Metropolitan Police or the Coroner’s Office to demonstrate that she was legally entitled to represent Carol in any capacity whatsoever, because she did not have any. She was allowed to literally walk in off the street and illegally arrange Carol’s cremation and take Carol’s possessions. Our family think that this is an outrage.

On 28 July 2005, Carol’s brother received by post a small parcel. He opened the parcel which contained an unmarked box. The box was 14 inches long, 9 inches wide and 3 inches deep. It looked like a shoebox.  The box contained no details of the sender. There was no letter or note inside the box identifying who had sent it. The box contained what was left of Carol’s possessions – these consisted of various documents including bank statements, and almost all of the documents were about three years old or older; there was also an old passport. The passport contained Carol’s father’s name and address. These details are accurate to this day. Our family believe that Dr Fisher committed this callous act of cruelty. The only personal items of Carol’s that we received were Carol’s watch, a ring and a pendant, which came in an evidence bag from the Metropolitan Police.

An inquest into Carol’s death took place on 12 August 2005 (the inquest returned an Open Verdict). Dr Fisher was not even named in the inquest. In fact, our family were quite unaware of her existence at this time.

Not only did Dr Fisher arrange Carol’s cremation; she also helped identify Carol. We have a letter from the coronial office which states that the Coroner’s Assistant took a photograph of Carol in a mortuary and compared this with a photograph provided by Dr Fisher. Our family were to find out after the inquest that, on the day that Carol died, Dr Fisher made an emergency 999 phone call to the Police in relation to Carol’s death, while she was in Manchester, some 200 miles away.

The Metropolitan Police, despite repeated requests over the last five and a half years, have refused to allow our family to hear this 999 telephone call.  This call has been confirmed by the Metropolitan Police as still in existence and is stored on Metropolitan Police systems. We are hoping that public support and pressure will force the Metropolitan Police to allow our bereaved family to hear this emergency 999 call which was made by Dr Fisher at 15:14 on the 29thJune 2005.  We want to know all of the circumstances of Carol’s death.

Update: (On 27 November 2011),  After six years of repeated refusals the Metropolitan Police have finally provided a Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) of the emergency 999 phone call Dr Fisher made, at 3.14 pm, on the 29th June 2005 to the Metropolitan Police, directly in relation to Carol’s death. This CAD of the phone call was secured by Andrew Stunnell MP via the Directorate of Legal Services in New Scotland Yard. The following extracts are recorded by the Metropolitan Police Operator in the CAD:

  • Dr Fisher stated that she ”is a friend of Carole Myers. She has serious concerns that female may have taken an overdose of drugs.” This suspected overdose was not mentioned at Carol’s inquest – which took place on 12 August 2005.
  • Dr Fisher further stated in this call that ”Female will be in bedroom which is in the rear of the property.”
  • At 5. 17 pm Dr Fisher made a further call to the Operator from the Metropolitan Police. The Computer Aided Dispatch records the following information: ”She has asked me if the person is deceased. I have not told her anything. She asks that she can speak directly to Inspector Rogers and she states that his mobile number was given to her. She believes that she knows what this is all about and that the dead person was in a depressive state and she may have taken her own life… She said she would be sitting down if I wanted to give her bad news…”
  •  The CAD additionally records that, when asked to disclose her home address, Dr Fisher did not ”furnish this information.”

The emergency 999 phone call was not mentioned at Carol’s inquest. Our family only became aware of Dr Fisher after a police officer inadvertently mentioned her name in a telephone conversation after the inquest had taken place. We did a quick internet search on Dr Fisher and were astonished to find out that she specialises in health care ethics and was formerly Head of Ethics at the British Medical Association.

Our family have not been provided with an estimated time of death for Carol. We have repeatedly asked, in writing, for an estimated time of death, The  purpose of the callout to the Metropolitan Police, as stated in the inquest, was to attend Carol’s flat to undertake a welfare check.

At the inquest and recorded in the inquest transcript (we have a copy) the Coroner stated that the callout was because “a friend had called her friend’s doctor as she was concerned for her friend ‘Caroline Myers’”. (This should have said Carole Myers, not Caroline Myers) The Coroner did not name either the friend or the doctor.

The police officer who received the emergency 999 call also gave evidence at the inquest and his evidence is also recorded in the inquest transcript. He stated that he was on duty on the 29th June 2005 and received a call to attend 17a Swanage Road, Wandsworth. When giving his evidence he did not state who made the call, nor was he asked by the Coroner to identify who had made the call..

In 2010, we applied under the Freedom of Information Act and received the actual ambulance call-out sheets for Carol’s death. The ambulance call-out sheets are unambiguous and state that the reason for the call-out was “F suspected drug overdose”. No reason has ever been given to our family, by either the Metropolitan Police or the Coroner’s Office, to explain how Dr Fisher could have possibly known from 200 miles away that Carol had taken a suspected drug overdose.

Carol’s father wrote a detailed letter to the Coroner’s Office, following the inquest. In this letter, our family expressed concern about the identification of Carol and sought clarification about a number of points regarding the circumstances of Carol’s death. In total, we submitted 299 questions to the Coroner. In contrast to what is stated in the letter from the Coroner below, our family did not, at any point, ask to remain anonymous during the inquest. For reasons that will become clear at a later point in this narrative, the truth of the matter is that Carol’s father warned officers from the Coroner’s Court that he would prosecute any witness who gave testimony which slandered our family.

Carol’s father received a letter written by Dr Shirley Radcliffe, Deputy Coroner. The letter is signed and dated. In this letter, Dr Fisher is not named explicitly but is  referred to as ‘the next of kin.’ Dr Radcliffe confirms in the letter that ‘the next of kin’ told her that there was no family to contact. The ‘next of kin’ was Dr Fisher.

Dr Fisher was not named or mentioned at all in the inquest. We could not ask any questions about Dr Fisher at the inquest, because at the time we were totally unaware of her identity and the extent of her involvement following Carol’s death. The deliberate omission of Dr Fisher’s name can be seen by looking at the inquest transcript, of which we have a copy.

Coroner’s Letter

Page 1, Click here Page 2, Click here Page 3, Click here

It is the considered view of Carol’s family that the inquest was inadequate because Dr Fisher did not appear and was not named at the inquest. Given her role in events following Carol’s death, we find the deliberate omission of Dr Fisher in these proceedings to be frankly astonishing.

The Telephone Call made by Dr Fisher to Diamond Insurance Company on the 7th July 2005 at 12:45pm.

Dr Fisher continued to have a sinister involvement in Carol’s affairs, even after Carol had died.

Here is a recording of a telephone call made by Dr Fisher to Diamond Car Insurance on the 7th July 2005. Dr Fisher can be heard taking out insurance on Carol’s car, so that she can drive the car to her home in Plymouth.

This recording has been edited to remove Dr Fisher’s personal contact details. The full recording is more than 17 minutes long. We do have a copy of the unedited recording.  This recording was obtained lawfully under the Freedom of Information Act from Diamond Insurance Company.

IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE, WHEN LISTENING TO THIS RECORDING, THAT CAROL HAS BEEN DEAD FOR EIGHT DAYS. IT IS A FURTHER SEVEN DAYS BEFORE OUR FAMILY WERE INFORMED OF CAROL’S DEATH. DR FISHER IS MAKING THIS TELEPHONE CALL IN THE CERTAIN KNOWLEDGE THAT OUR FAMILY HAVE NOT BEEN INFORMED THAT CAROL IS DEAD.

CAROL DIED ON THE 29TH JUNE 2005. OUR FAMILY WERE NOT NOTIFIED OF CAROL’S DEATH UNTIL THE 14TH JULY 2005.

Click here to listen to this recording

Main Points of the Call

(1) Dr Fisher states that she is next of kin of Carol in all documents.

This is demonstrably false. Joseph Felstead (Carol’s father) is and always has been Carol’s next of kin. In an interview with journalist Will Storr (The Observer Magazine, 11 December 2011), Fisher herself admitted ”that she had no legal claim to be Carol’s next of kin.” Click here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/dec/11/carole-myers-satanic-child-abuse

We have copies of Carol’s medical records, which were legally obtained under the Freedom of Information Act from the Primary Care Trust responsible for the records. Dr Fisher is not named as Carol’s next of kin in any of Carol’s medical records. As Carol was a vulnerable mental patient who had been on the severe mental illness register since June 29 1992, for Dr Fisher to have acted as the next of kin of Carol or as her personal representative, it would have been necessary for her to have been designated as such by the Court of Protection, which is the Court set up specifically to safeguard the legal rights of the mentally ill.

Dr Fisher did not have any legal entitlement to represent Carol at any time. See Heading: Next of Kin Status for a legal definition of the rights of next of kin.

(2) Dr Fisher states that she will be the executor of Carol’s estate.

By stating that she will be, and currently is not, the executor of Carol’s estate, Dr Fisher confirms that she is acting as Carol’s executor without any legal entitlement.

Dr Fisher was not the executor of Carol’s estate.  She was not named in a will, and she did not go through Probate. By the laws of intestacy which apply to every death in the UK, she had no legal right to act as Carol’s executor whatsoever.

(3) Dr Fisher states that ‘Carol was a survivor of brutal family abuse over many years’.

This appalling, ridiculous, slanderous and totally false allegation confirms that Dr Fisher was fully aware of the existence of our family and always had been. She is also completely aware that our family at the time of this telephone call do not even know that Carol is dead.

Dr Fisher is a medical ethicist and a campaigner for the privacy and confidentiality of medical records. Dr Fisher reveals Carol’s medical information which is false, sensitive and confidential to a complete stranger.

Dr Fisher has never met any member of our family with the exception of Carol. She did not meet Carol until Carol was 21 years old. Dr Fisher has no personal knowledge whatsoever of Carol’s childhood or of Carol’s family.

This ‘brutal family abuse’ was explicitly defined in a preposterous document that Dr Fisher passed to both the Metropolitan Police and to the Coroner’s Office before we were informed of Carol’s death. The document contained a number of claims that could be independently checked for truth by anyone. This document allegedly depicted Carol’s life from birth to late adulthood. This purported ‘Life Assessment’ document was typed, unsigned, undated, and was supposedly written by Carol whilst she had been in a mental hospital undergoing psychiatric treatment. Dr Fisher personally vouched for the truthfulness of its contents. The document does not contain specific names of individuals, it does not contain any actual dates or addresses – in fact, every single piece of information is generic. In an interview with Journalist Will Storr (The Observer Magazine 11th December 2011) Fisher was asked by Will Storr: ”Are you aware of any evidence that any of Carole’s claims actually happened?” Fisher replied “I never looked for any evidence.”

Upon being acquainted with these claims WE immediately instigated a number of police investigations which ALL confirmed that they were complete nonsense. See the section False Allegations.

In an interview with journalist Daniel Foggo (published in the Sunday Times on 12 June 2011), Fisher confirmed that Carol had ”no knowledge” of ritual abuse when she first saw her.  A link to the article can be found here: http://www.richardfelstead.com/sunday-times-article-satanic-abuse-claims-doomed-our-girl/

Dr Fisher was subsequently interviewed by the police after our family lodged a formal complaint about arranging an illegal cremation, theft and perverting the course of justice.  Here is what Detective Sergeant Grant Lander, in a letter to Carol’s father, had to say about these allegations:

“You provided me with photographs and documents for Carol, which proves she had a very happy upbringing and was a loved and cherished daughter. However she seems to have suffered deteriorating mental and physical health from her early twenties up to her untimely death in June 2005. There is absolutely no evidence that I have obtained in my investigation that showed that Carol ever suffered abuse by yourself or any members of your family.”

Detective Sergeant Grant Lander also stated: ‘In fact I find it quite incredible that Dr Fisher seemed to take everything Carol told her on face value’.

(4) Dr Fisher confirms when she is making this telephone call from Carol’s flat that she is removing all of Carol’s possessions.

Carol did not make a will; Dr Fisher did not go through Probate. She had no legal right to dispose of Carol’s possessions which, under Probate Law, belonged to Carol’s family.

Dr Fisher was interviewed under Police caution. The interview took place on 16 April 2009 in Wandsworth Police Station. Dr Fisher said in interview that she needed to clear Carol’s flat out urgently as she had received a Demand for Recovery of Premises from Servite Housing Association.  Detective Sergeant Lander provided a summary of this interview to Carol’s father in which he states that this rebuts any suggestion of dishonest intent. This is patent nonsense.

Here is the real housing policy of Servite Houses, the Housing Association responsible for Carol’s flat. It has been extracted from ‘Servite Houses – Your Tenancy With Us’, reference SH RH 0509:

‘Upon your death, your executors must continue to pay four weeks’ rent while your belongings are being removed from the property or until the keys have been returned, whichever is the latest.’

According to this statement, there was not an urgent imperative from the housing association to clear Carol’s flat. The need to empty out a dead person’s flat immediately after their death is not supported by the Housing Association’s own tenant’s policy.

Carol lived in an unfurnished flat. Therefore all of the furnishings in the flat belonged to Carol. Our family are in possession of a copy of Carol’s Housing Benefit Form (written by Carol) which confirms this.

The Metropolitan Police, despite interviewing Dr Fisher under police caution, have never explained to our family what happened to the contents of Carol’s flat.

(5) Dr Fisher confirms that she is arranging Carol’s Cremation.

Dr Fisher is arranging Carol’s cremation in the the full knowledge that our family has not even been informed of Carol’s death. It is a criminal offence to falsely complete Cremation Forms.

(6) Dr Fisher declares that Carol was her unofficial daughter.

This statement is absolutely ridiculous. No one in our family had even heard of Dr Fisher before Carol’s death. Dr Fisher is the ex-Head of ethics of the British Medical Association. She is also a professional ethicist who delivers lectures and workshops on maintaining ethical boundaries between Doctors and Patients. How ethical was this relationship?

(7) The insurance employee states that Carol is owed a refund on her insurance. The insurance employee then states that the money is to be refunded to Carol’s credit card on the 12th July 2005. Dr Fisher can be heard in the taped recording of this telephone call requesting that this money should be sent to her. Copies of the transaction details provided by Diamond Insurance state that this refund was for £357.04.

(8) Dr Fisher states that she is insuring Carol’s Car for three days and is driving the car to Plymouth, where she lives. She had no legal entitlement to take Carol’s car.

Following Carol’s Death, her father contacted the DVLA and put a scrapping order on the car. No member of our family has ever seen this car or driven it. The car was registered as scrapped by the DVLA at an ATF Plant in London, on 30th September 2005. We have a print-out of the details of the destruction. We would like to know what happened to the car in the three month period after Dr Fisher had driven it to Plymouth.

Evidence that Dr Fisher did not have any legal right to represent Carol in any Capacity

Note: Documents have been redacted to remove personal details.

Letters of Administration from the High Court of Justice

The Letters of Administration grant Carol’s father the legal right to deal with Carol’s affairs and possessions.  Such rights exist in association with those inherent in being the father of the deceased.  Since this is a printed copy it does not bear the Court Seal. We do have the original copy with the embossed seal. Click here

Probate Registry Search

Our family instigated a search with the Probate Registry. This letter states that Carol did not make a will and therefore did not bequeath her possessions to anyone.  Probate Law then applies, with the possessions falling to the direct members of the deceased’s family. Click here

Certificate of Search from the Public Guardianship Office on behalf of the Court of Protection

The Court of Protection exists to administer the affairs and estates of those permanently or temporarily mentally incapacitated.  The search was made to establish whether Carol legally provided Dr Fisher or any other person with Enduring Powers of Attorney.  None were ever assigned during Carol’s life or after it.  Carol was registered as mentally disabled; therefore all powers of Attorney and Receivership could only be invested by the Court of Protection. Click here

Reply from the Public Guardianship Office on behalf of the Court of Protection

After enquiring whether Powers of Receivership or of Enduring Powers of Attorney have been granted by the Court of Protection to anyone before or after Carol’s death, the Public Guardianship Office searched their records and concluded no application had ever been made.  Carol did not legally appoint anyone to administer her affairs. Click here

Letter from Wandsworth Council confirming Non-Existence of Carer

Carol did not register herself as having a Carer with Wandsworth Council. She also specifically wrote to them stating that she did not have a Carer.  We have copies of this statement written in Carol’s own handwriting. Click here

Rules of Intestacy

This is an Authoritative diagram from TaxationWeb (www.taxationweb.co.uk) demonstrating the rules of intestacy in a simple and easy to understand manner. According to the Rules of Intestacy, Dr Fisher was not legally entitled to dispose of Carol’s possessions at any time. Click here

Medical Records

Following her death, Carol’s father wrote to her doctor to request copies of Carol’s medical records. Carol’s GP, Dr Staples, refused to supply details from her medical files, on the grounds that her records remained confidential – even following her death. Our family believe that decision is appalling.

We did eventually obtain from the Primary Care Trust (PCT) Carol’s medical records (what is left of them). These records were legally obtained in 2008 following a Freedom of Information Request. When we received these records, the first twenty one years of Carol’s life – with the exception of 3 documents – were missing.  All sectioning medical records are missing. Many pre-operative and post-operative medical records for a number of operations are missing.

Carol’s father was informed by the PCT that on the very day that he contacted Dr Staples to obtain copies of Carol’s medical records, Dr Staples requested that all of Carol’s medical files be returned to herself. Dr Staples kept these files for 9 months. Our family would like to know what happened to Carol’s missing medical records. These records will reveal categorically that Carol’s physical and psychological health was exemplary before the age of 21.

We do have a letter in Carol’s notes which states that Dr Fisher gave Carol counselling in 1986. Carol was aged 22 at this time. All medical notes relating to this treatment are also missing. However, the onset of Carol’s physical and mental deterioration can be pinpointed exactly to this period when she first came under the influence of Dr Fisher. Amongst the medical records which we have in our possession are a number which demonstrate that Dr Fisher was fully aware of the existence of Carol’s family.

Next of Kin Status

Here is the law in relation to next of kin status.

An individual claiming to be next of kin – whether genuinely or falsely as in Dr Fisher’s case – has no legal rights. Probate, Powers of Attorney, Enduring Powers of Attorney (or Lasting Attorney, as it is now called), Powers of Receivership, and appointments by the High Court take precedence.

Without other legal entitlement, next of kin status has no special legal validity. In the House of Commons on 13 June 2006, Harriet Harman, the Minister of State, Department for Constitutional Affairs, said that the law relating to next of kin was not going to be changed:

“Being someone’s next of kin does not automatically give a person the right to do anything. Being next of kin does not, for example, give a person a right to bury someone, or to administer their estate.” (Source: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200506/cmhansrd/cm060613/text/60613w0886.htm#0606147000455. This online link to the parliamentary debates has since been removed. A new one can be found here: www.theyworkforyou.com/wrans/?id=2006-06-13b.76572.h.)

A copy will of course still exist in the records of Hansard for the day. Next of kin status has thus been defined by a Minister of State.

False Allegations

Dr Fisher passed the ridiculous and totally unbelievable document to which we’ve previously referred, to both the Metropolitan Police and to the Coroner’s Office. The document made a number of preposterous (and, quite frankly, impossible) claims, such as:  that Carol’s mum had murdered another daughter Joan Julie Felstead in 1967, sat the dead baby on top of Carol and then attempted to murder Carol by setting the house on fire (Joan Julie is also not named and is referred to as ‘my sister who was born with Down’s Syndrome’).

The Coroner’s Officer informed our family that Carol had changed her name by deed poll some years earlier. Our family were completely unaware of this fact, though it does help to explain why it had previously been difficult to contact Carol.

Carol had been repeatedly sectioned under the Mental Health Act. As Carol’s nearest relative was never informed, this sectioning was illegal under the Mental Health Act. Our family had no knowledge of Carol’s mental illness, for reasons which will become clear. Given Carol’s severe mental health problems, our family are frankly astonished that these claims were  accepted as having any basis in fact by both the Metropolitan Police and the Coroner’s Office.

In addition to the so-called Life Assessment document, Carol’s father was then informed by the Coroner’s Assistant that he had been involved in a court case in which he and the rest of his family were supposed to have been the defendants in a major criminal trial accused of Satanic Ritual Abuse. This court case did not occur; it was completely fictitious.  We instigated a police investigation into it and it was proven that it had never existed. But this fictitious court trial was recorded on Metropolitan Police systems as if it had actually occurred.  The trial is meant to have taken place in the late 1980’s/early 1990’s.  (Carol’s mother and father are not named explicitly (they are mentioned generically as mother and father). The trial is supposed to have collapsed.)  As previously mentioned – in an interview with journalist Daniel Foggo (published in the Sunday Times on 12 June 2011), Fisher confirmed that Carol had ”no knowledge” of ritual abuse when she first saw her.  A link to the article can be found here: http://www.richardfelstead.com/sunday-times-article-satanic-abuse-claims-doomed-our-girl/

These slanderous allegations were placed on intelligence systems of the Metropolitan Police Force. These claims are completely false. However, the Coroner’s Assistant left Carol’s father in no doubt whatsoever that these allegations were accepted with deadly seriousness – that is as real events which actually took place. At no point in 2005 were these allegations simply considered to be the outpouring of an unbalanced and disturbed mind. In consequence, Carol’s father wrote to the Coroner’s Office and provided family photographs, a copy of Carol’s school leaving certificate together with death certificates to demonstrate that these events did not occur. Carol’s father has a copy of this letter.

After being informed about these false allegations, we questioned the Data Protection Team of the Metropolitan Police and upon receiving answers of a totally unsatisfactory nature, immediately instigated an Independent Police Complaints Commission inquiry into these events which involved Greater Manchester Police, Cheshire Constabulary and the Metropolitan Police.

The results of this inquiry were:

  • There had never been a court case.
  • Joan Julie Felstead (who suffered from Downs Syndrome) died a medically documented natural death in Stepping Hill Hospital, Stockport, on the 7th October 1962; the date and details of her death are on her death certificate
  • The fire was a real event based on a household accident and took place in 1963; it was reported in the local newspaper at the time – the ‘Stockport Express’ – as being a tragic, accidental event, but, fortunately, no-one was serious injured. Our family have a copy of the original article, which shows that Carol’s mother was extremely upset and distressed at the time.
  • Carol was born on June 8th 1964 in Stepping Hill Hospital in Stockport, as is apparent by looking at her birth certificate.
  • Therefore Carol was not alive as she had not been born when Joan Julie died or when the fire took place. These events are not just false, they are actually impossible.

On receipt of Carol’s medical records, our family believe that we have found where this purported life assessment has come from. In Carol’s psychiatric notes, she states that two former Cabinet Members abused her at Conservative Party Headquarters, and that these well- known politicians and our family were all members of a Satanic Cult. Carol also said that she suspected that the police and medical doctors were part of the cult. The conclusion of Carol’s psychiatrist was that Carol was delusional. The Carol we knew would never have said anything as ridiculous as this. What has happened in the copy of the purported life assessment passed by Dr Fisher to the Metropolitan Police is that the two Cabinet Members and the Police have been removed so that the alleged perpetrators are only our family. We believe that Dr Fisher’s intention in passing this purported life assessment over to the police was to have members of our family arrested and imprisoned for crimes that never even occurred.

Recovered Memory Therapy

From Carol’s medical records and other information that we have acquired since Carol’s death, it appears that Carol had been given ‘regressive memory therapy’ or recovered memory therapy as it is commonly known. The basis for the therapy is that a patient turns up at a doctors with an innocuous complaint like stomach ache. No physical cause can be found, so the doctor asserts that the cause must be psychological. The patient is then referred for therapy.

The therapist asserts that the patient has suffered some kind of terrible abuse – which he/she has repressed and therefore have no conscious memories of whatsoever; this, unbelievably, is supposed to be the case, even if the abuse is meant to have occurred thousands of times over many years. The purpose of recovered memory therapy is to recover the ‘lost memories’. Some patients receiving this treatment have undergone drug-assisted interviewing (using sodium amytal), hypnosis and age regression.  We believe that this therapy was responsible for Carol’s mental illness. After having this treatment, Carol became convinced that she had been a victim of events which never actually occurred.

After receiving recovered memory therapy, Carol’s medical records reveal that she made claims that are so preposterous that nobody would believe them without some evidence, except it seems Dr Fisher,  Carol’s therapists and other like-minded individuals who never bothered to check if any of these ridiculous claims were actually true. Carol’s medical records also reveal that her therapy was supported with extensive medication.

Before meeting Dr Fisher in 1985, Carol was a fully qualified nurse, capable of running a hospital ward. Carol was a happy, sociable and outgoing young woman. Carol enjoyed her life and seemed to have the world in front of her. Carol’s brother used to work at the same hospital and regularly had his tea break with Carol when they both used to work the same shift. Carol was independent and had moved away from home, although she maintained regular contact with her family. She had a regular boyfriend with whom Carol’s brother still occasionally has contact. Carol had a very normal life with a bright future ahead of her.

We now know that after 1985, because of Dr Fisher’s secretive involvement in separating Carol from her family, Carol’s contact with the family became less and less frequent and she moved away to live in London.  Throughout the last twenty years of her life Carol maintained sporadic but relatively regular contact with the family; about once every eighteen months she would contact various members of the family and send birthday cards and Christmas cards.

The reason that Carol always gave for the lack of contact with her family was that she was furthering her career. This was never really convincing and the lack of contact with Carol was frustrating, to say the least. Carol’s family made repeated attempts to contact her, but we now realise that these attempts were hampered significantly by the fact that Carol had apparently changed her name by deed poll in 1992. Our family simply never had any idea that Carol was mentally unwell – ever. Her mental illness was deliberately kept from us by Carol and by Dr Fisher.

Carol’s gradual separation from her family was very difficult to accept. It broke her parents’ hearts and although it was something which we had to come to terms with, it didn’t really make any sense. There were periods when we didn’t have a contact address or telephone number, but we now know that when our family  were under the illusion she was a nurse working in various hospitals, furthering her career, the real truth is that Carol was a mental patient who spent a considerable amount of her adult life in various mental institutions. Carol was asked repeatedly to make more of an effort to contact us. She would always state that she was not having any problems and that she was working shifts and pursuing her career. Carol living in London and the rest of our family living in Stockport did not help. We were forced, with much regret, to accept that Carol was an independent adult and was moving on with her life. Although she did ring up and send birthday and Christmas cards, all of which tended to contain the message of how she would come to see us in the near future, nobody in our family actually saw Carol from 1995 onwards.

Two of the therapists who treated Carol are Vera Diamond – or Vera Diamond-Carruthers – as she is sometimes known and Valerie Sinason.

Here are a couple of examples of their beliefs:

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-1492.html

British therapist, Vera Diamond, working with people subjected to Satanic and mind control abuse says, “Children say the word Satan is used more frequently than any other, but other demons include Baphomet and Behemoth. Molech seems to be one particularly associated with eating babies, and one called Choronzon. These do seem to be associated with eating babies.“ p299 Biggest Secret

Below is a video clip of Vera Diamond, where she reconstructs a therapy session and describes her belief in satanic cults. Further information about this video clip: http://www.saff.ukhq.co.uk/devilvid.htm

http://www.saff.ukhq.co.uk/indyhoax.htmPlease follow this link for Valerie Sinason and man eating dead baby.

Carol was also treated by other prominent believers in Satanic Abuse such as Robert Hale. Carol’s medical records contain a letter written by Dr Hale. The letter is dated 28 May 1993 and it is signed by Dr Hale. The letter confirms that Carol had received weekly therapy from Hale and Valerie Sinason, over an eight- month period. Significantly, Carol was placed on the mental health register in 1992. Dr Hale’s prognosis is that Carol was a victim of Satanist abuse and this abuse had begun in ‘very early childhood.’ In Carol’s psychiatric notes, it states that her parents were the High Priest and High Priestess of a Satanic Cult. Our family are supposed to have dug up graves and performed ritual sacrifices, which include murder. Here is a letter written by Valerie Sinason to a Dr Frances Raphael on 9th July 1997. In the letter Valerie Sinason confirms that Carol was the first Satanic Ritual Abuse patient that she had treated. As Carol was not a victim of Satanic Ritual Abuse, as there was no ritual cult whatsoever, as Carol was never abused or injured in any way, shape or form, and as the events attributed to Carol’s life did not happen and were incontrovertibly impossible, Dr Valerie Sinason’s method for treating patients such as Carol was clearly invalid, irrational, and dangerous. Page 1, Click here Page 2, Click here.

Update: Here is an excerpt from a Valerie Sinason  interview with journalist Will Storr (The Observer Magazine, 11 December 2011), which gives an insight into Sinason’s belief system.

Sinason arrives, in her north London counselling room, tanned and relaxed in a loose smock, dark leggings and trainers. There’s a chaise longue with a crowd of teddies resting in its crook. On the floor, shoved beneath a table, a large cloth boy gazes sadly into space. We’re joined by her husband David, who takes notes throughout our talk.

Sinason insists she doesn’t use recovered-memory techniques. “I’m an analytic therapist,” she says. “The idea of that is someone showing, through their behaviour, that all sorts of things might have happened to them.” Signs that a patient has suffered satanically include flinching at green or purple objects, the colours of the high priest and priestess’s robes. “And if someone shudders when they enter a room, you know it’s not ordinary incest.”

Another warning, she says, is the patient saying: “I don’t know.” “What they really mean is: ‘I can’t bear to say.’” A patient who “overpraises” their family is also suspicious. “The more insecure you are, the more you praise. ‘Oh my family was wonderful! I can’t remember any of it!’”

In the medical records, Sinason noted that Carole was her first chronic sadistic-abuse patient. Today, when I ask about her first patient, Sinason describes the arrival of two medical professionals – a nurse and a psychologist – one of whom was limping.

“I just had that nasty feeling,” she says. “It’s her, and she’s been hurt by them.”

“You could tell that from the limp?” I ask.

“Yep.”

Soon, we get to the actual satanism. Sinason talks of a popular ritual in which a child is stitched inside the belly of a dying animal before being ‘reborn to satan’. During other celebrations, “people eat faeces, menstrual blood, semen, urine. There’s cannibalism.” Some groups have doctors performing abortions. “They give the foetus to the mother and she’s made to kill the baby.”

“And the cannibalism – that’s foetuses?” I clarify.

“Foetuses and bits of bodies.”

“Raw or cooked?”

“The foetuses are raw.”

“Not even a bit of salt and pepper?” I ask.

“Raw. And handed round like communion. On one major festival, the babies are barbecued. I can still remember one survivor saying how easy it is to pull apart the ribs on a baby. But adults are tougher to eat.”

She describes large gatherings in woodlands and castles, with huge cloths being laid out. “That’s normally when there’s a sacrifice,” she notes, “and because the rapes are happening all over the place. There’s a small amount of cannon fodder in terms of runaways, drug addicts, prostitutes and tramps that are used. There’s sex with animals. Horses, dogs, goats. Being hanged upside down. In the woods, on a tree.”

“How do they get an animal to have sex with a human?” I wonder.

Sinason’s husband thinks for a moment. “Well,” he says, “plenty of dogs have a go at people’s legs.” “True,” says Sinason, adding poignantly: “However horrible it sounds, the dog, at least, is friendly afterwards.”

“Because at least the dog’s had a good time,” I say.

“And the child loves the pet,” Sinason nods. “The pet is made to have sex with the child – but the pet, at least, is still their friend.” A link to the full article can be found here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/society/2011/dec/11/carole-myers-satanic-child-abuse

Carol’s medical history is littered with the who’s who of Satanic Ritual Abuse believers. The myth of Satanic Ritual Abuse is in our opinion a national scandal. And it is a scandal which needs exposing. In 1994, Valerie Sinason edited a collection of essays about putative satanic abuse. The book, Treating Survivors of Satanist Abuse, was reviewed by one commentator as: ‘useful for anyone who needs a startling, clear demonstration of the amazing ability of 20th century human beings to persuade themselves firmly to believe in utter claptrap and nonsense.’ Carol almost certainly forms one of the case studies discussed in chapter 32 of the book.

Conclusion

It is our settled opinion that any doctor who attempts to illegally cremate a patient, takes their possessions after they have died, and does not inform the family about the death of their relative, should be prosecuted, struck off the Medical Register, and never allowed to practice again.

Illegal Cremation

Falsely filling in details on cremation forms (or knowingly allowing the Coroner to do so) is perverting the course of justice and is also a criminal offence under the Cremation Act. Cremation forms are very specific – if someone other than the family is arranging the cremation, it has to be stated why the family are not arranging the cremation.

The following are quotes from a standard cremation form, as in use today. It is Cremation Form 1 and replaces Cremation Form A, however the questions below have been common to cremation forms for many years.

Part 4 The application

1. Are you a near relative or an executor of the person who has died?

Near relative means the widow, widower or surviving civil partner of the person who has died, or a parent or child of the person who has died, or any other relative usually residing with the person who has died.

If no, please give the nature of your relationship and explain why you are

making the application rather than a near relative or an executor.

2. Is there any near relative(s) or executor(s) who has not been informed of the proposed cremation?

4. What was the date and time of death of the person who has died?

 

Part 6 Statement of truth

 

. I am aware that the facts given in this application are true. I am aware that it is an offence to wilfully make a false statement with a view to obtaining the cremation of any human remains.

 

[A printed name, with a signature and date are then required to complete the form.]

Metropolitan Police Investigation

The Metropolitan Police conducted a 15 month investigation into Dr Fisher, after we lodged a formal complaint. Dr Fisher was interviewed under caution in Wandsworth Police Station. The investigation concluded in 2009. Our family lodged a formal complaint against Dr Fisher regarding arranging an illegal cremation, perverting the course of justice and theft of Carol’s possessions from her flat and the theft of Carol’s car. On 16 October 2009, DS Lander wrote to Carol’s father: ‘I have now heard from the Crown Prosecution Service. They have advised me that there is insufficient evidence for a realistic prospect of a conviction in this case. Therefore no further action will be taken against Dr Fisher.’ As part of his investigation, DS Lander conducted enquiries with the Coroner’s Office, Servite Housing Association and Diamond Insurance Company. This investigation lasted approximately fifteen months.  The investigation conducted by Detective Sergeant Lander is different from every other criminal case in the United Kingdom in that the investigation does not have a crime reference number, case reference number or a crown prosecution service reference number or any other unique identifying reference number whatsoever. The investigation is not recorded on the Crime Report Information System (CRIS). This fact has been confirmed by the Independent Police Complaints Commission. Our family are staggered by the sheer incompetence of this investigation. Page 1, Click here Page 2, Click here Page 3, Click here Page 4, Click here.

 

Dr Fisher can be heard in the taped recording on 7 July 2005 to Carol’s insurance company stating that she is emptying Carol’s flat and insuring Carol’s car, so that she can drive it home to Plymouth.

Detective Lander stated in his investigation that Dr Fisher told him in interview under police caution that she deposited the car at the Coroner’s Office and that our family drove it away. A subsequent investigation by the Independent Police Complaints Commission concluded that Dr Fisher deposited the keys to Carol’s car, at the Coroner’s Office.

Sergeant Lander has a copy of the taped recording from Carol’s insurance company.

Detective Sergeant Lander has stated that he believes that a member of our family collected the car from the Coroner’s Office. This statement is ridiculous and completely false. No member of our family has ever seen the car. We are appalled at his incompetence. We have asked him, in writing, to provide a signature from the Coroner’s Office of the family member who was supposed to have picked up the car. He has not replied.

The Coroner’s Office are also completely aware that the only time that they have ever seen any member of our family was at the inquest into Carol’s death on the 12th August 2005.

The car was registered as scrapped by the DVLA at an ATF Plant in London, on 30th September 2005. We have a print-out of the details of the destruction. If a member of our family is supposed to have collected the car from the Coroner’s Office, then they would have had to:

(a) Travel from Stockport to London.

(b) Get the car and the keys from the Coroner’s Office without having to sign for the car.

(c) Drive the car uninsured back to Stockport.

(d) Keep the car uninsured for three months.

(e) Drive the car back up to London uninsured and then scrap it at London Auto Parts in London.

(f) Travel back from London to Stockport.

This scenario is totally false.

The insurance policy granted to Dr Fisher by Diamond Insurance Company (8 days after Carol’s death) lasted for 3 days. The insurance expired on 11 July. Our family were not informed of Carol’s death until 14 July. How on earth could we have driven the car away when we did not even know that Carol had died?

There is also another problem with this scenario. According to the inquest transcript, the Coroner’s Assistant, Sharon Marshall, identified Carol on the 12th July 2005. If Dr Fisher deposited the car at the Coroner’s Office it must have been between the 7th July 2005 and the 11th July 2005, unless she drove the car uninsured. If Dr Fisher deposited the car at the Coroner’s Office for our family to collect, then the Coroner’s Office must have been aware of the existence of our family between the 7th July 2005 and the 11th July 2005. If the statement in the inquest transcript is true, why did Sharon Marshall identify Carol on the 12th July 2005 instead of informing our family of Carol’s death? And why did she not then ask a member of our family to identify Carol?

We believe that the statement in the inquest transcript that Sharon Marshall identified Carol on the 12th July 2005 is false. We do not know why. As a pre-inquest had already taken place without our knowledge on the 4th July, we believe that Carol’s identity was clearly already known.

We do not believe that Dr Fisher deposited the car at the Coroner’s Office. We believe that she drove it to Plymouth where she lives, exactly like she states in the recording to Diamond Insurance Company. We do not know what she did with the car after she drove it to her home in Plymouth.

False Information passed to the Metropolitan Police by Dr Fisher

We cannot understand how and why the false information about our family was recorded on Police Systems, yet the investigation conducted by the Metropolitan Police into Dr Fisher is not recorded on the Crime Report Information System.

The General Medical Council Investigation into Dr Fisher (GMC Case Reference Number: IH/CI-231021645)

The General Medical Council have seen all of the evidence in this case and state that there is not enough evidence to put Dr Fisher before a fitness to practise panel. To demonstrate to the public how wrong this shocking and outrageous decision is, given the evidence provided to the GMC, we have provided our full complaint to the GMC below.

The Involvement of the GMC

General Medical Council (GMC) Investigating Officer in the case:

Ian Howell
Investigation Officer
Standards & Fitness to Practise Directorate
Direct Line: 020 7189 5166
Direct Fax: 020 7189 5103
Address for correspondence: 3 Hardman St, Manchester M3 3AW.

On the 11th November 2009 we received an email from Detective Sergeant Lander who stated that during his ongoing investigation into our complaint against Dr Fisher he had received an enquiry from the General Medical Council who were requesting disclosure of his investigation under their fitness to practise procedures. Detective Sergeant Grant Lander then provided the GMC with details of his investigation.

On the 14 March 2010, we received a letter from Detective Sergeant Lander, in the letter he stated that he had received a letter from the GMC. They had informed him that their Fitness to Practise enquiry with regard to Dr Fisher had been concluded and no further action was to be taken.

During their entire investigation into Dr Fisher’s fitness to practice, the GMC did not ever contact my family for any input from us. We were appalled that the GMC were not taking any action against Dr Fisher and we think it is an absolute disgrace that they did not contact us. We subsequently contacted the GMC and on the 31st March 2010, Ian Howell confirmed that the GMC had indeed reached the conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to support the allegations and no realistic prospect of establishing that Dr Fisher’s fitness to practise was impaired to a degree justifying action on her registration and that the case was now closed.

As we did not know how much information Detective Sergeant Lander had actually provided to the GMC in regards to his investigation, in order to ensure that the GMC were definitely supplied with all of the evidence in our case, we informed Ian Howell that we would be submitting a complaint in due course directly from ourselves to the GMC.

Here is the actual complaint that was made to the GMC. Please click here to view it.

On the 6 May 2011, Ian Howell confirmed that he had been passed our complaint from the 11th March 2011 against Dr Fleur Fisher and he had been asked to respond.

He stated that the allegations in our complaint had been  previously considered by the GMC and closed by the case examiners with no action and confirmed that the case reference is: C1-231021645.

The last week of Carol’s life

Carol sent her mum and dad a Christmas card in December 2004; in the card she stated that she would be coming to visit them in the early part of 2005. We still have the Christmas card. Carol did not visit and nothing further was heard from Carol until the 21st June 2005. Carol also spoke with her brother twice on the last week of her life. She stated that she was fed up with living in London because she was lonely and wanted to come back to be near her family. Carol was supposed to be coming to Stockport on the week that she died. The next week she was dead.

What would have happened if Carol’s brother had not written to her on 29 June? Presumably the cremation arranged by Dr Fisher would have gone ahead as planned. We would not even know that she had died. Our family are extremely concerned that this may have happened to other vulnerable, mentally ill women. Carol was given recovered memory therapy and then deliberately separated from her family. This was done in total secrecy. Her name was changed in secret. She was illegally sectioned under the Mental Health Act in secret. She was almost cremated in secret.

Our family have obtained copies of Carol’s telephone records; they show that Carol rang her brother on the last week of her life. The very next call that Carol makes is to Dr Fisher. We believe that Dr Fisher knew that Carol wanted to come back to live in Stockport with her family. Dr Fisher must also have known that if Carol actually met our family, then her involvement in Carol’s life over the last twenty years would be revealed.

Dr Fisher did not appear at Carol’s inquest. Dr Fisher did not attend Carol’s funeral. Dr Fisher did not make any enquiries about where Carol’s funeral was taking place. Dr Fisher did not send flowers or a card to the funeral. In our opinion, Dr Fisher’s influence on Carol’s life has been malign from beginning to end, and has continued in that vein after Carol’s death.

As a result of the secretive separation of Carol from her family over the last twenty years by Dr Fisher, our family has only had limited contact with Carol, whereas Dr Fisher has had a controlling relationship with Carol involving a lot of personal contact. As a result, a number of people and organisations, including the Metropolitan Police, seem to believe that Dr Fisher was entitled to represent Carol. This conclusion is completely wrong. Dr Fisher had no legal entitlement to represent Carol in any capacity whatsoever. She had no legal right to arrange Carol’s cremation and to dispose of Carol’s possessions. Our family do not believe that any other doctor would behave like this. We do not believe that any other doctor would arrange a cremation. We do not believe that any other doctor would have disposed of Carol’s possessions. Nor do we believe that any other doctor would have acted as next of kin and executor without any legal authority to do so.

Our family think that Dr Fisher’s behaviour is an absolute disgrace. We are equally appalled that the authorities will not take action against her. Indeed, it is the considered view of our family that they are protecting Dr Fisher. Our family want to expose this scandal and get justice for Carol. Carol’s life was precious to our family.

A system is in place which permits anybody to arrange a cremation without the dead person’s family being informed of their relative’s death. At present this can be done without having to produce any supporting legal documents. There is no legal process in place that will prevent illegal cremations. The police do not have a legal obligation to check for direct family and apparently neither does the Coroner’s Office. The process needs to be changed so that it is impossible to arrange an illegal cremation or burial. It must be made mandatory by law that a search for the family of the deceased is made in order to inform them of the death of their relative. It should not be possible to cremate or bury anyone without any legal entitlement to do so.

109 Responses to Ex-Head of Ethics of the British Medical Association Attempts Illegal Cremation of Vulnerable Mentally Ill Patient

  1. What a tragic story! I am not sure how the FMS Foundation can help. We can certainly write about your story in the next FMSF Newsletter.

  2. mel matthews says:

    my heart goes out to your family, i think yous are entitled to some explanations and this dr fisher should be prosecuted and struck off,
    this detective sgt lander seems to be in cohorts with dr fisher and should be thoroughly investigated by scotland yard,
    i hope you all get the proper outcome you are entitled to, regards mel matthews.

  3. ian F says:

    At best this is a case of theft, malpractice and incompetence. At worst ……… I hate to think. The police must pick this up, otherwise there is no justice

  4. Jason Carroll says:

    I though the British criminal system was bent and corrupt but this beggers belief. you need answers.

  5. amanda woolfoot says:

    This is the most disturbing story I have ever heard of. My thoughts are with you, and I hope that you will get justice, surely this is the least you would expect given all the facts.

  6. J McPartland and L Sutcliffe says:

    How sad, our thoughts are with your family……these people are in a position of trust and things like this shouldnt be aloud to happen, justice for Carol and answers and truth for her family so you can at least get closure….Good Luck x

  7. So it is with Recovered Memory Therapy again and again. Valerie Sinason is a sick, twisted, and depraved individual who helped build the delusional, conspiracist notions that still plague the minds of the vulnerable who were unfortunate enough to find themselves in therapy with quacks who believed her pornographic, supernatural horror stories. I believe her wikipedia entry needs revising:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valerie_Sinason

  8. bill felstead says:

    I remember our discussion on Castle street and you said “I would be shocked” well uncle Joe that does not cover it, I am appalled and the little faith I had in our so called legal system has now gone.
    As a family we should all step forward and fight this appalling case.
    Thinking of you all

  9. Colin Richardson says:

    It is the right of every human being to be able to get justice for their loved one’s. This is clearly not the case here. This casue should be looked at by an independent inquiry and the truth established. Absolutely disgusting.

  10. Karen L says:

    This is an appalling story my heart goes out to you all. Have you tried engaging the help of your local MP?

  11. Morwenna says:

    I hope you get justice for Carol.

  12. shaun edwards says:

    i really do hope you get ‘justice for carol’. Reading this i never would’ve imagined professionals who your supposed to trust with your life not to play with for their sadistic pleasures could be so sick. Hope all goes well bset wishes shaun

  13. James Felstead says:

    My niece, Carol was a most lovely girl in every way.It is atrocious that she should die in these circumstances. My brother Joseph and his sons have been fighting for several years to get justice and find the truth about Carols death.They have had to fight for every peice of evidence in this Justice for Carol exposee. I hope that this Doctor Fleur Fisher will be compelled to answer for her wicked ways in her treatment of Carol and my brother Joseph and his family. Justice for Carol now.

  14. Paula H says:

    I am so very sad for your family and the way you have been treated over the death of Carol. What has happened regarding cover ups within the police and politicians does not surprise me at all. I too have had experience of such matters and felt completely at a loss as to who to go to in order to obtain justice. These powerful people close ranks and guard each others backs. To those who are an exception to this rule please accept my apology. However I believe you are few and far between.
    Your family are a credit in your strength and determination to bring this terrible story to the front. Good luck in all you do to help Carol.

    • dave smethurst says:

      You are absolutely on the money. I have just had an open and shut libel case against a doctor thrown out. The way i was treated in court was disgusting and clearly orchestrated. The judge was furious that I had the audacity to sue as an LIP and the doctors solicitor is now trying to ruin me with a costs claim. It is all bent, right to the top. Nothing about Carole’s story surprises me in the slightest. This doctor conspired with my son’s stepfather after his mother’s premature death to uphold an ADHD diagnosis she knew beyond doubt was false and strained every sinue to assist in his enforced drugging to keep control of him. He is now with me and his brother and sister recovering. His life would, without doubt, have been completely destroyed.

  15. aunty margaret uncle colin says:

    Think of you all the time carol and i hope justice will be done.

  16. Sheri Byce says:

    While the details following Carol’s death are beyond tragic, the scenario preceding her death has become tragically familiar. From America, Spain, China and the UK, many patients and their families have been tortured by devastating fallout from (iatrogenic) recovered memories. This site is thorough and your passion for answers and justice, evident. Bring your story to the media – news stations, etc. Outrage for Carol and for your family will be an impetus for proper investigation and prosecution of each responsible party. My heart goes out to you.

  17. Karen Douglas-Bhanot says:

    I always remember my cousin Carol as a really happy, smiley girl – full of life! I feel so sad that her last years were unhappy ones and that her life was cut short and ended the way it did. Uncle Joe – I’m really sorry you and your family have had to go through what can only be described as a nightmare – my heart goes out to you.

    However, I think you’re doing absolutely the right thing by publicising all the details, even though it must have cost you a lot of personal heartache to do so, and I hope you get justice soon..

    Sending love to you all xxx

  18. Helen & John Disley says:

    I seriously think that the investigation into Dr Fisher needs to be revisited, I think you shouldnt give up no matter what happens until you find the truth. You should add a petition section to this site, so that you can obtain names addresses etc to go to the police with and hope that they will re-investigate this case. especially since youve already done the best part of the investigation for them, not to mention that the cause of death is still not determined. Is Dr Fisher still in medical practice, are there others you are not aware off???? so many questions that the police should consider but most importantly “what happened to Carol???” and “what was Dr Fishers part, motives, etc???” We wish you all the best and hope that you find peace soon in the truth

  19. I think that this is a case that Dr Fisher should be brought to justice because something in this story is untoward.
    I think Dr Fisher has caused enough grief to this family and I think that uncle Joe deserves answers.
    Dr fisher don’t you think that my uncle Joe needs answers now that he has lost his daughter and his wife.

  20. Tom Howling says:

    What a scary and sad story. It is alarming that none of the investigations that have taken place seem to have fully considered all the evidence presented here. It seems that a respected doctor in authority can do quite a lot without question still. It reminds me of how nobody suspected the respected GP who was Harold Shipman for so long. I too wonder if an MP could take this up – I am not sure what other options are still left open. I hope you eventually get some answers.

  21. julie chapman says:

    Dear uncle joe and the lads

    I cannot believe what you must have gone through as a family i’m sure you will get the justice that you all deserve so carol can rest in peace . As a family member you can count on my support .There are questions that must be answered and this has gone on for long enough lets have justice for carol x

  22. paul douglas says:

    I think it is disgusting the way dr fisher has acted and find it quite scary that she is in control of so many lives. I also think the truth would soon come out in a court room and it wouldnt take long for a jury to realise she has abused her position and is quite frankly a liar. Carol would be so proud of you as a family the way you have stayed strong and put all this together and i hope for your family and carol’s sake justice is served

  23. Keith Bottomley says:

    There needs to be a Royal Commission into this case. Apply for a Royal Commission.

  24. SIMON.G says:

    Shocking, wonder how many similar cases there are, all still covered up!, it needs dealing with otherwise sick twisted individuals like this will continue, hope for your family justice is served on a personal level and for sake of others!!

  25. Alan Dean says:

    This is a tragic story but this family must be given answers and not have to carry on suffering, it does however raise the question of what horrors may be uncovered ! Is this just a shocking single scenario or are the authorities frightened of what an independant enquiry may uncover ! They thought the respected Dr Shipman was just a friendly family doctor, this story has the potential to uncover many more victims of what i can only describe as a cult ! Isolating and brainwashing vulnerable people, stealing their identities,stealing all their posessions and ultimately their lives ! THIS INVESTIGATION MUST BE REVISITED.

  26. Lovely sharp publish. By no means believed that it was this straightforward. Extolment to you!

  27. Donna Douglas says:

    Having read all the posts and evidence it is quite obvious this case needs to be taken higher and from an independent source. The involvement of all involved Dr Fisher, The Police and the Coroner need to be thoroughly investigated again. My thoughts go out to my uncle Joe and all his family. I hope you get the answers you deserve and then you may let Carol rest in peace and continue with your lives. Love to you all Donna Steve and Ryan xxx

  28. Simon T says:

    The evidence appears to lead one to suspect Dr Fleur Fisher cherry picked and groomed this girl and has abused her position of professional trust riding roughshod beyond authority with regard to record keeping, family and patient consent, and tried and tested mainstream peer reviewed medical procedures. It further appears she was able to make the GMC, Metropolitan Police, Coroners Office and the legal system lift off their hats and wave her through as it appears they all conveniently left things inconclusive as they felt she had a significant professional influence at board level and was too much part of the establishment. It seems they had very little knowledge of what is acceptable and reasonable with regard to experimental practise of such controversial techniques as ‘Recovered Memory Therapy’ – with the aid of Sodium Amytal etc and could not challenge with intellectual rigour and thoroughness all the ethical approval and research documentation when using human subjects of which the first and second stage outcomes should have been peer reviewed published and filed (where are they?) and therefore she was able to shake a stick at the establishment. It is painfully embarrassing and degrading to have to make an outcome fit the expected request to keep ones position. I could not do it. The apparent elimination of records and key witnesses being renamed as ‘a friend of her doctors’ in formal documents and non-entry of reference threads is a serious crime for the key people in the government authorities as it is a challenge to parliament from the evidence you have presented. There is enough evidence to take this on and to look at all the cases she has ever handled just like the Dr Harold Shipman enquiry as there will likely be a repeated pattern and then to investigate the apparent lack of accountability and record keeping that is allowed to go unchecked.
    Simon T

  29. anthonydunne says:

    On the basis of of that which is recounted above there are many unanswered questions, and if justice is to be seen to be done, then a full public enquiry should
    be undertaken.

  30. Nova says:

    You’ve done such a good job presenting your case. Here in Alabama we’d say you’re dealing with “The Good Old Boys Network.” Here this is marked by a network of goold old boys sticking together and going to battle to protect their own.

    Your story is so good that I think director Ron Howard would love to make a movie of this. Then these Good Old Boys will be exposed to the whole world for what they are and they or those above them will HAVE to do what’s right because of the public outcry.

    I have dealt with the “Good Old Boys Network of Shame” when my son was killed by a drunk hit and run driver who got out of her car looked at him and then doubled back to The New Year’s Eve Millennium where she got drunk in the first place and hid her car. She got charged with leaving the scene of an accident that caused an injury and driving without a license – the same charge she would have faced if she had merely broken a finger on his hand – instead of hitting him twice without ever applying the brakes – then dragging him down the median until his body finally broke loose from her car by falling in a ditch. I believe she had a dishonest lawyer as well as a politician in her family. In civil court, I represented myself in the wrongful death suit and won a million dollar judgement. Y’all could do the same and at least get some minor justice eventhough the money’s meaning is insignifigant to the hurt you have suffered.

    I shall pray for your family that you will feel Carol around you often. I hope you realize that if you can pray to God or Jesus, and Carol is right there with them, then you can pray to her. After all, that is the promise God makes…

    • Linda Whyte says:

      Your comment really touched me. To have gone through what you have gone through and then have the compassion to empathise with Carol’s family says a lot for you. A movie of Carol’s story would certainly expose a corrupt system (and I think the fact that Fleur was a doctor had a lot to do with what she got away with). I also think you are so right that you don’t ever really lose anyone. Your soul is not destroyed by ANY horrific events, including death.

  31. christine holden ( felstead ) says:

    ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!! WHAT ARE THEY ALL HIDING? ITS ABOUT TIME THAT THE TRUTH CAME OUT, YOU ALL HAVE BEEN MET WITH UNACEPTABLE AVOIDANCE & LIES, COVERUPS. SOME ONE HAS TO BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR ALL THIS!! & LET CAROL & HER FAMILY HAVE CLOSURE,,& PEACE. WE MUST ASK OURSELVES WHY THE PEOPLE INVOLVED ARE CLOSING RANKS. JUST WHAT IS IT THAT THEY ARE HIDING? OBVIOUSLY THE TRUTH!!.THEY ARE ALL SUPPOSED TO BE PILLARS OF THE COMMUNITY OF WHOM THE PUBLIC TRUST. POLICE, DOCTORS, BUT THAT DOES NOT GIVE THEM THE RIGHT TO CHEAT CAROL & HER FAMILY OUT OF TRUTHFUL ANSWERS,AND EXPLANATIONS OF THE HORRENDOUS AND HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS ACTS THAT HAVE LEAD TO THE DEATH OF CAROL, ITS SO OBVIOUS THAT THIS IS ONE MASSIVE COVERUP, AND THAT THIS SO CALLED DR HAS AN INPUT INTO THIS, & CONTROL OVER THE PUBLIC FIGURES, OR ARE THEY ALL IN THIS SECRET SECT? WHY CAN’T THE FAMILY HAVE JUSTICE? WHY CAN’T THEY HAVE HONEST ANSWERS? WHY CAN’T THE POLICE RELEASE THE 999 CALL THAT WAS MADE BY THE SO CALLED DR? & WHY?. MAYBE THEY HOPE THE FAMILY WILL GIVE UP, AND THIS WILL DIE DOWN!! WHY ISN’T THERE SOMEONE OUT THERE THAT CAN PROVIDE ALL THESE ANSWERS, & HAS THE AUTHORITY TO SAY “GIVE CAROL & HER FAMILY JUSTICE “, & LETS GET TO THE TRUTH, COME ON YOU PUBLIC FIGURES, COME CLEAN!! & ACCEPT RESPONSIBILITY FOR INFLICTING THIS HORRENDOUS INJUSTICE ON CAROL & HER FAMILY!!, TURN IT AROUND!!! GIVE CAROL & HER FAMILY JUSTICE!!

  32. jane Kilo says:

    Its appalling. Please continue to fight for justice and get a proper investigation. Go to your MP or to the Ombudsman. Sounds very sinister and dark and Dr Fisher should be brought to account. It sounds like she took the furnature from Carols flat to her own house in Plymouth using Carol’s car to transport everything down there…. I also sounds very sinister that Carol was about to move back to be near you and that after she made that decision, she made a phone call to Dr Fisher, who may have panicked hearing that news…and how did Dr Fisher know to alert an ambulance to Carols flat when she was 200 miles away? I hope you will be able to do something so that you can finally get some peace of mind. Have you approached the newspapers to highlight this tragic story to the world?

  33. Nathan Garside says:

    Reading this story for the first time I can understand your need to bring these events into the public domain. There is clearly a need for an independent investigation and your mis-givings really can not be understated.

    You must not give up in your pursuit of the truth which I hope will allow your family to find peace of mind and justice for Carol.