MAURICE KIRK: BS614159 +2: REQUEST FOR JUDGEMENT + archive

BS614159 +2: REQUEST FOR JUDGEMENT

16-09-26-repeat-applic-re-court-log-police-corrected-sealed-judgments-bs614159

continues at: 

MAURICE KIRK: DODGY DOCTOR WILLIAMS FOUND IN NEW ZEALAND 25 SEPT. 16 + ARCHIVE

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

TOSIN [Oluwatosin Adediran] INVITATION – the false kidnapping and sectioning + Archive

tos2

Tuesday 27 Sept. 2016 Invitation for supporters Lambeth County Court Court House, Cleaver St, London SE11 4DZ

Nearest underground Kennington underground on Northern Line, 5 min walk
 
Tosin Mobile 07908904753
 
Tosin is very down due to monthly depot injection forced last thursday despite assurance that community mental health will review it
 
The false kidnap and sectioning occurred to stop a previous court hearing in the high Court, court 37 Queens Bench in Adideran V Southwark Council, now heard in Lambeth County Court at 10.30am on Tuesday 27th September 2016
 
The remedy she seeks is to stop kidnaps, stop secret research, and to provide a 2 bed house so she does not feel like a criminal having her son stay with her in a one bed tiny studio flat with hostile neighbours.
 
She wishes to break the revolving doors of secret research by Maudsley of separation from her son at birth and every year in the last 8 years.
 
She is not mentally ill – she is a loving mother trafficked through mental health secret research at Maudsley NHS Trust and THIS MUST STOP once she gets the 2 bed house/flat and can live in peace
 
Please help! 
Lambeth County Court
Court House, Cleaver St, London SE11 4DZ
Nearest underground Kennington 5 min walk
 
 
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: lou lotus <lotusprincess4u@googlemail.com>
Date: 19 September 2016 at 22:05
Subject: Fwd: 2016 09 27 B02LB162 ADEDIRAN V Southwark Council & Maudsley NHS Trust

FYI Tosin needs support on 27th September 2016 in her county court claim against Southwark council
 
Dear Tosin,
You need to attached Draft Order on a separate A4 sheet, email to court and Southwark Council & Maudsley NHS Trust who stole your baby at birth  see attached
 
 (amend the affidavit and redate it and resign it todays date and attach with draft order and send to both partiesas above include your discharge) – 
 
I wish to add Maudsley NHS Trusts as a Defendant after it conspired with Southwark Council to kidnap me into its mental health servies at Jim Birley Unit to absent me from an earlier hearing on XXXX and discredit me under false imputation of a mental illness after I witnessed the theft of my new born baby and successfully fought in court for his return to my loving care 8 years ago.
 
I was discharged from Jim Birley Unit on date XXX without a discharge plan and without providing me with suitable alternative accommodation to enable me to live in a mentally safe and secure environment with my son rather than a one bed flat with planted vicious neighbours), without further kidnaps, incarcerations in mental health units and State terrorism and persecutions
 
 to the affidavit below
 
I demand the attached Order from the Court
 

NAME OF PARTIES
NAME OF COURT AS ON THE ORDER FROM THE COURT

DRAFT ORDER

It is hereby ordered that Southwark Council & Interested Party Maudsley NHS Hospital Trust

1. Cease & desist the repeated kidnaps & harassment of the Claimant for secret mind control 

2. Provide suitable 2 bedroom accommodation so she may live with her son who was kidnapped at birth

3. Provide proper rehabilitation from PTSD trauma over the last 9 years from repeated secret mind control research persecutions after new born baby theft was reversed by a Judge in 2008??.

 
 
———- Forwarded message ———-
From: lou lotus <lotusprincess4u@googlemail.com>
Date: 30 July 2016 at 19:46
Subject: Demand for Remedy BY OLUWATOSIN ADEDIRAN – DRAFT
To:
annap@duncanlewis.com
Cc: Oluwatosin Adediran <tosina9@hotmail.co.uk>

Dear members of the Tribunal, Chief Executive, Lewisham & Maudsley NHS Trust, individual named employees, Directors, contractors & subcontractors.
C/O Anna Pacy, Duncan Lewis Solicitors, New Cross Gate,
 
Further to the previous communications, see below, dated 11 May 2016, I demand immediate independent review of management to my satisfaction as follows
1. STOP Fraud of kidnap to deny my remedy in my High Court claim against Southwark Council to stop all harassment against me
2. STOP Fraud of imputation of mental illness to discredit my allegations of forced secret pharmaceutical & mind control research frauds on my person 
3. STOP Further attempts on my life after at least four attempts in the 3 month forced admission, the latest on 30th July 2016 when 8 adults jumped on me, 5 men & 3 women, restrained me, forcibly injected me against my Will in attempted corporate manslaughter, with toxic anti-psychotics
4. STOP False imputation of mental illness on my friends who attended a previous tribunal hearing, but were denied my invitation to act on my behalf and were held hostage in the Jim Birley Unit under false pretences to prevent them attending in future, to isolate me from my protectors and well-wishers.
5. PROVIDE NAMES OF ALL STAFF WHO FORCIBLY INJECTED ME AGAINST MY WILL
6. CEASE ALL FURTHER INVOLVEMENT BY DR SOMLAI DUE TO CONFLICT OF INTERESTS

Jshrink Limited

09458936 (Active)

Director, Psychiatrist

25 Feb 2015 — Present (1 year, 3 months, 7 days)

Open

Somlai Medical Services Limited

05737162 (Dissolved)

Director, Doctor

14 Mar 2007 — Close

I demand immediate release from the fraudulent services
I do not consent to continued crimes against me
I demand independent housing without prejudice to the above demands to recover from THE PTSD of my REPEATED kidnapS by Maudsley Hospital when I was 8 months pregnant, TO DATE, for the theft of my new born baby, for 12 years of terrorism by mental health services.
 

 

IN THE TRIBUNAL

Jim Birley Ward, Ladywell Mental Health Unit, Lewisham, SE13 6LW

On Wednesday 11 May 2016  

ADEDIRAN V LEWSIHAM NHS TRUST

AFFIDAVIT OF TRUTH OF HONOUR by Oluwatosin Adediran

 I , Oluwatosin of the Adediran clan, born 11 November 1975, age 40, hereby give this Witness Statement in support of the remedies I demand from the Tribunal as detailed below.

I had a very happy childhood, despite the tragic loss of my father, to my dreams of coming to the UK to become a successful fashion designer.  

However, my dreams were shattered when I lost my first pregnancy in the UK and had my baby from a second pregnancy stolen from me by the Maudsley Hospital.  

It is evident that the un-dated, un-named, un-signed application to continue Section 2 under the Mental Health Act is a fraud, alleged to be by an un-named medical doctor, whilst it is omitting the relevant information of my trauma from the kidnap of my new born baby, Solomon, whilst I was heavily drugged with memory erasing medication as part of secret research at the Maudsley Hospital. 

I seek a public inquiry into the common practice of trafficking new born babies into the care system and of mothers into the mental health service.  

My life has been destroyed by the Mental health services after they kidnapped Solomon, which left me with a speech impediment from nerve damage from shock, prescribed anti-psychotic medication without my being mentally ill.  These facts have been omitted from this document.  On top of page 4, the word “baby” has been edited out to mislead the tribunal to pervert the course of justice.

I am traumatised from the long-term poor housing conditions belonging to London Borough of Southwark, which are not fit for living in for one person,  causing me to be forced separated from my son.  The Council is denying appropriate housing to enable my son and I to live as a family.  

Due to the continuing fraud by the mental health services, I demand a discharge plan with a trial in a 2 bed house for me to live with my son, a second opinion to review my diagnosis, for me to be weaned off the anti-psychotics with support in the community,  appropriate support with housing for me to live with my son in a 2 bedroom house where I can feel safe from agents of the State who are persecuting me because I won my son back in the courts.  

I have never had any mental illness as a child or whilst growing up or even when I came to the UK and managed to become a successful fashion designer.  It is not true that all my problems are due to the robbery of my money by a priest but due to the false diagnosis, false prescribed medication, kidnap of my new born baby and persecution by the local authority, NHS and mental health services because I won my son back in the court.

My friends tell me that I am highly intelligent because I won in court against the State.  My friends are willing to give statements of support for the remedies I seek above, namely to be provided with safety and security so I may live with my loving son in a 2 bedroom house.

AND I make this Solemn Declaration conscientiously believing the same to be true, and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declarations Act 1835

Oluwatosin Adediran

Declared  this  9th May 2016

Tosin [Oluwatosin Adediran Iyabode] 06 JUNE: Jim Birley Unit, Ladywell Mental Hospital, London + more – WATCH

tos2

Received:

From 5 June 16:

“Jim Birley Unit, SLAM – Modern day Nazi laboratory for kidnaps & attempted murders by the State?

IMG_20160602_163718

OUTRAGEOUS! Oluwatosin Adediran Iyabode KIDNAPPING: baby removed, forced injections, the electronic stalking, + more – 03 June 16

07 MAY 2016: on her facebook https://www.facebook.com/oluwatosinadedirani?fref=ts

“Oluwatosin Adediran Iyabode [aka “Tosin”]:

PUBLIC NOTICE: Oluwatosin Adediran Iyabode was kidnapped on 26 April 2016 from her home, 12 Aylton Estate Renforth Street, SE16 7JL, by 11 agents of the Mental Health services at Lewisham & Maudsley NHS Trust. She has been locked up in Jim Birley Unit in the Ladywell Mental Health Unit (the senior manager first lied that she was not there) with a false diagnosis of a mental illness and forced medicated with anti-psychotics – she is praying that people will come and visit her to support her release, to demand a second opinion from another psychiatrist. She has been seen by a female white doctor with blond hair who perhaps does not know that Oluwatosin was kidnapped by Maudsley hospital when 8 months pregnant, 9 years ago and has been terrorised by the local Southwark Council ever since. You may recall she spoke and gave out leaflets outside the RCJ on 15 June 2015 Magna Carta 800 year event.
9 years ago, at 8 months pregnant, she was given memory erasing drugs and her baby was stolen without her knowledge.

She found out she had had a baby when she received a letter 5 days later. She has been terrorised – The Million Supporters of Oluwatosin release group has spoken to the manager of Jim Birley Unit to demand a second opinion and her immediate discharge plan. She would be grateful to receive visitors and telephone calls on her phone – if you are a close friend – please message me – for her number….please let the hospital know you are members of the Million Supporters of Oluwatosin Release group…0203 228 6000 Her date of birth in 1975 is on facebook profile as well as her mobile and address – if you want to visit her message me for those details – HER MESSAGE – SOS on facebook 9pm last night:

“I have been imprisonment in mental health hospital by the police, local authority and the mental health criminals staffs after almost two years they have entrapped me the estate rented from the Southwark Council. They have been trying every effort to manipulating my case in the court want to representing me as a mentally heal person in the court. Any help is welcome! The Hospital they luck me up is Lady Well, Lewisham Hospital. Than you all.

https://www.facebook.com/oluwatosinadedirani?fref=ts

https://www.facebook.com/victor.pc.589/posts/10204921475595277

https://www.facebook.com/victor.pc.589/posts/10204912011918691

From 2 June 16:

Received:

“Date: 2 June 2016 at 00:26
Subject: Oluwatosin Adediran forced injected depot antipsychotic held down by 8 mental health nurses

In Jim Birley Unit since 26 April 2016, when 11 agents of Maudsley Hospital broke her door and kidnapped her to Ladywell Mental Health Unit of Lewisham hospital
 
recording made 01 June 2016 is attached
 
She needs visitors and people to report to police the crimes of kidnap and torture in secret research
 
 
email is Oluwatosin Adediran <tosina9@hotmail.co.uk> “
 
hear:  attached audio  https://vid.me/oWCg
—————————————————————————————————-

From the facebook page of  Oluwatosin Adediran Iyabode  https://www.facebook.com/oluwatosinadedirani?fref=ts

Oluwatosin Adediran Iyabode added 33 new photosfeeling annoyed with Ayobami Adediran and 2 others.

March 28 · London ·

This post is about the assassin in flat 20 Aylton Estate Renforht Street Rotherhithe London SE16 7JL. There is the operation of shooting weapon including electromagnetic weapons and laser guns that able to penetrate the walls. The person in this flat has been targeting my head from his flat by hit my head with electric laser guns and electromagnetic weapons. Is a Southwark Council tenant using his flat for the council to gain access to my apartment and strike and stun my head with weapons? The pictures take by the thermal camera show the damage this murderer cause to my head. This particular murderer has been targeting my head for almost years and using his weapons on me at least 300 times in a day. 
Oluwatosin Adediran Iyabode's photo.
Oluwatosin Adediran Iyabode's photo.
Oluwatosin Adediran Iyabode's photo.
Oluwatosin Adediran Iyabode's photo.
Oluwatosin Adediran Iyabode's photo.

see more important posts @  https://www.facebook.com/oluwatosinadedirani?fref=ts

a STOPEG (2)
FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use. Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107
 .
NB: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged | Leave a comment

MAURICE KIRK: DODGY DOCTOR WILLIAMS FOUND IN NEW ZEALAND 25 SEPT. 16 + ARCHIVE

FOUND: Dr Tegwyn Williams & Dr Janet Hilliar in Canterbury New Zealand

by mauricekirky

WANTED both as witnesses to give evidence, on oath, in both HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC’s 10 ongoing 23 years of civil damages claims and various private prosecutions, currently blocked by Cardiff courts, also against the South Wales Police and /or their Agents

Wilding Wanteddsc00529

 

lee-barker-1st-dec-2011-custody-manager 

Geoamey’s custody manager, on the wrong end of the handcuffs, is the key witness in the next most available court hearing by his simply revealing  all records of 1st December 2011 harassment conviction hearing from his employer, his own diary, court file, court clerk, the police in my ‘gate arrest’ upon release and London’s authority’s records surrounding the unlawful manner in which they conspired with the Welsh cabal to have the Musa’s six Nigerian children successfully snatched by the Haringey Council by preventing my evidence, on 28th November 2011, being given. 

dr-tegwyn-williams-wanted-poster

 

Extract of psychiatric report written by someone neither qualified on purported August 2009 brain scans nor even had examined his MAPPA 3/3 victim before recommending the police prisoner, for alleged  ‘trading in machine-guns’, be served a s35 incarceration under the 1983 Mental Health Act that immediately prevented either his name being replaced on the veterinary register nor right to pilot any aircraft in UK air space

Wood 

Professor Rodger Wood who is a major cause of this protracted injustice simply due to his plain arrogance and having got away with, so far, his falsifying 2009 psychology reports 

20160919_093108

A library recording this lot’s conduct on a once veterinary surgeon so stupid to be in Wales

John Graham Esq has just obtained a passport in order to visit South Island NZ to trace the exact whereabouts of the couple for two international witness summonses service.

Meantime, I will have a particular pleasure in serving a lot more summonses on Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University and his various devil-worshipping cronies, past and present senior police officers and Crown Prosecution lawyers, all of whom seriously intimidated Dr Tegwyn Williams to have written that Caswell Clinic MAPPA 3/3 medical report, put before His Honour Judge Neil Bidder QC on 2nd December 2009, in the first place.

Fabricated in order to avoid their already concocted machine-gun trial, by both he and CPS prosecution barrister, now judge, Richard Thomlow, both recommending their victim be further sectioned but this time to Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital,  IPP indefinitely,  in order to avoid any further proof of gross police misfeasance ‘going public’ as in the South Wales Police ‘garrotte’ HRH Prince Charles affair from emerging from civil claims.

to be continued……

 
mauricekirky | September 25, 2016 at 8:41 am | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/p13xk8-1jZ
.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

SHRIMPTON: “‘David Kelly was Murdered’ Says UK Intelligence Insider” WATCH

kelly‘Kelly was Murdered’ Says UK Intelligence Insider

Simon Aronowitz: ThoughtCrimeNews.com/PrisonPlanet.com

Shocking new details about the death of Dr David Kelly emerged exclusively today on the Alex Jones radio show. Michael Shrimpton, a UK national security lawyer who was a guest on the show, revealed that sources within MI5 and MI6 are `furious’ that Kelly was murdered.

Shrimpton spoke in depth about the details of Kelly’s murder on 17th July 2003, information which has been withheld by the British press.

With apparent backing from the organisations whose members he claims to speak for, Shrimpton presented their view that Dr Kelly had been murdered by a team of assassins and the charade of an apparent suicide was then played out to cover this up.

Speaking with impeccable credentials, including contributions to the Journal for International Security Affairs and having previously given a closed-doors confidential briefing to the US Senate Intelligence Committee, Shrimpton exploded the much-reported myth that Dr Kelly had taken his own life.

He spoke of the probable method of Kelly’s death, the group which most likely carried out the assassination, who arranged it and finally where the responsibility lies. Additionally, he explained the political context and motive for Kelly’s murder.

David Kelly went missing on 17th July 2003 and was found dead on 18th July. In the previous days, Kelly had testified before Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Select Committee that he was not the source of a BBC story which had accused the Government of making false claims about Iraq’s WMD. When Kelly’s body was found, the British press quickly reported it as a suicide, though several analysts had their doubts.

On Jones’ show, Shrimpton explained how he had learned that David Kelly was the BBC’s source before the BBC disclosed this fact. He went on to explain that his source from within the intelligence community knew David Kelly personally, and did not believe that he had committed suicide. After making their own enquiries, says Shrimpton, this source determined that Dr Kelly had not committed suicide, but rather had been assassinated.

Apparently at ease to discuss these explosive disclosures, Shrimpton explained that there was advance knowledge of Kelly’s death in Whitehall, but that the deed itself was most likely carried out by the French external security organisation, DGSE. There was no indication that anybody in MI5 or MI6 had been involved. He went further by suggesting that the hit squad itself was composed of Iraqis from the former regime’s Mukhabarat intelligence organisation, recruited from Damascus with the help of Syria’s own intelligence apparatus. They were apparently then flown into Corsica, seven days prior to the murder. He doubts that any of the hit-squad are still alive.

Officially, Kelly’s body was said to have been found in a copse, in a wood, but the forensic tents were set up in the adjacent field, suggesting, says Shrimpton, that the body was found in the field. This has not been explained to his satisfaction.

The incision in Kelly’s wrist was probably to conceal the injection of both Dextroprypoxythene, the active ingredient in Co-Proxamol, and Succinylcholine, a muscle relaxant, rather than as evidence of his bleeding to death, as highlighted by a group of six doctors in letters published in the British press. Shrimpton further agreed with the doctors by pointing out that Kelly only had one Co-Proxamol tablet in his body and that this was not sufficient to kill him.

According to Shrimpton, Kelly was murdered because he had been talking to the press and there was a fear of what else he might discuss with journalists. Furthermore, Kelly was due to return to Iraq and may have learned fresh information on that trip which Whitehall could not afford to trust him with.

Shrimpton’s appearance on Jones’ show gave him the first public opportunity to bring forward his information, since the story has been effectively censored by the British Press, who according to Shrimpton are concerned about losing the pro-Euro Tony Blair as Prime Minister were they to publish details of Kelly’s assassination. Blair’s departure, he says, could threaten Britain’s proposed adoption of the Euro as the national currency.

Whilst this story begins to circulate in the USA, the coverage in the UK may well remain nil, whilst maneuvering behind the scenes attempts to pre-empt Shrimpton’s accusation of government-sanctioned murder of one of its own operatives.

Only with public support, and a belief that this information should be widely known, can this information be brought into the wide open and covered by the mainstream media.

—————————-

Coming soon: transcript and MP3 file of the interview. E mail this out to EVERYBODY, it is a story of vital significance.

source http://www.prisonplanet.com/022304kellywasmurdered.html

Scroll down for more M Shrimpton posts or put “Shrimpton” in the search box…

The Death of Dr. Kelly: An Open Case

Published on 15 Jan 2013

This documentary studies the suspicious death of Dr. David Christopher Kelly, an internationally recognized British authority on biological weapons, after his claims before the Iraq war.

A Press TV Documentary, originally aired January 13, 2013
http://www.presstv.ir/doc/aperture.ht… Death of Dr. Kelly-An Open Case

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

LAURI LOVE EXTRADITION HEARING TRANSCRIPTION + videos

llove

APPLICATION AND BACKGROUND

1. This is an application by the Government of the United States of

America for the extradition of the requested person, Lauri Love,

(dob: 14.12.1984) a United Kingdom citizen, who is accused of

unlawfully accessing computers used by United States Federal

Agencies and private companies and misusing the data he

unlawfully obtained.

2. The United States of America is a Category 2 territory. Part 2 of the

Extradition Act 2003 (the Act) applies.

2

3. The criminal proceedings in the US have been commenced in three

judicial districts, the Southern District of New York, the District of

New Jersey and the Eastern District of Virginia. These proceedings

are referred to within a Diplomatic Note from the United States

dated 6th July 2015. The material relating to each of the judicial

districts was separately certified by the Secretary of State on 7th July

2015 and these proceedings are treated as a single request. The

bundle contains the warrants for Mr Love’s arrest in the three

districts and were issued by the Southern District of New York on

21st February 2015, District of New Jersey on 23rd March 2015 and

Eastern District of Virginia on 21st May 2015.

4. Following certification a warrant was issued for Mr Love’s arrest.

Mr Love was arrested on 15th July 2015 and appeared at

Westminster Magistrates’ Court on the same day. The initial hearing

was unchallenged. Mr Love did not consent to his extradition. He

was granted bail and has remained on bail throughout the

proceedings.

5. Section 78 of the Act requires the judge at the initial stages of the

extradition hearing to decide whether the documents received

include the documents referred to in section 70(9), the certified

request, the particulars of the person whose extradition is sought,

particulars of the offences specified in the request and, where a

person is accused of an offence, a warrant for his arrest has been

issued in the category 2 territory.

6. I have received prosecutor’s affidavits and photos which accord with

the particulars given in the Diplomatic Note which provides Mr

Love’s personal information and references to other names he is

known as including, “nsh”, “peace”, “shift”, “route”, “Smedley

Butler”.

EXTRADITION OFFENCES

7. The Government of the United States is not required by operation of

the Extradition Act 2003, in common with many other States, to

adduce a prima facie case and it is not for me to determine if there is

3

a case to answer, however, I have set out the nature and extent of

the evidence obtained by the United States prosecutors against Mr

Love. I will set out an overview of the evidence contained in the

affidavits to set out the extradition offences (details of the individual

indictments are contained in Mr Caldwell’s Opening Note dated 15th

June 2016, pages 5-12).

8. Mr Love is accused in three indictments that between the period

October 2012 to October 2013, he, working with others, made a

series of cyber-attacks on the computer networks of private

companies and United States Government agencies, (including the

US Federal Reserve, US Army, US Department of Defence, Missile

Defence Agency, NASA, Army Corps of Engineers, Department of

Health and Human Services, US Sentencing Commission, FBI

Regional Computer Forensics Laboratory, Deltek Inc, Department

of Energy, Forte Interactive, Inc) in order to steal and then publicly

disseminate confidential information found on the networks,

including what is referred to as personally identifiable information

(“PII”).

9. Mr Love is accused in three indictments in three districts as follows:

(i) Southern District of New York – Mr Love faces two counts on

Indictment, one of computer hacking (maximum sentence of

10 years imprisonment) and one of aggravated identity theft

(maximum sentence of 2 years imprisonment to be imposed

consecutively to the sentence for count 1).

(ii) The New Jersey request details two counts on one indictment.

One count is conspiracy to access a computer without

authorisation and obtain information from a department or

agency of the United States (maximum sentence of 5 years

imprisonment) and one of accessing a computer without

authorisation and obtaining information from a department or

agency of the United States (maximum sentence of 5 years

imprisonment).

(iii) The Eastern District of Virginia request contains nine counts on

an Indictment, count 1 – conspiracy to cause damage to a

4

protected computer and to commit access device fraud

(maximum sentence of 5 years imprisonment); counts 2 -7 –

causing damage to a protected computer and aiding and

abetting (maximum sentence of 5 years imprisonment); count

8 – access device fraud and aiding and abetting (maximum

sentence of 10 years imprisonment) and count 9 – aggravated

identity theft and aiding and abetting (maximum sentence of 2

years imprisonment).

10.In most of the attacks it is alleged Mr Love gained unauthorised

access by exploiting vulnerabilities in a programme the computers

ran known as Adode ColdFusion; software designed to build and

administer websites and databases (the “ColdFusion Attacks”). It is

further alleged Mr Love also carried out “SQL Injection Attacks” in

which unauthorised access was gained to computer databases by

manipulating “structured query language”, computer programming

language designed to retrieve and manage data on computer

databases (the “SQL Injection Attacks”).

11. Once inside the compromised computer systems, Mr Love and

others placed hidden “shells” or “backdoors” within the networks.

This allowed them to return and steal the confidential data which

included telephone numbers, social security numbers, credit card

details and salary information of employees, health care

professionals, and service personnel.

12. A confidential source working for the United States Federal Bureau

of Investigation (FBI) had access to a restricted online “chat room”

used by Mr Love and others from about 2012 to 2013. They had

discussions about their hacking activity in the chat room using

Internet Relay Chat (“IRC”). This allows multiple users to talk

about their activities using typed messages to each other. Various

online names were used to disguise their true identities. From this

the FBI has identified Mr Love’s nicknames as “nsh”, “peace”, “shift”

and “route”.

13. Mr Love used IRC to discuss how to “exfiltrate” the stolen data and

what could be done with it.

5

14. On 25th October 2013 officers of the National Crime Agency (NCA)

executed a search warrant at Mr Love’s address in Stradishall,

Newmarket, while he was present. One of his computers was logged

onto an online chat room using the name “nsh”. It is alleged some

of the computers in his possession had some of the data stolen

during the computer intrusions under investigation, including some

intrusions that he discussed online using the name “nsh” and other

names attributable to him.

15. Under section 137(3)(b) I have to be satisfied that the conduct

specified in the request would constitute offences in the United

Kingdom if they had occurred in England and Wales. Mr Caldwell’s

analysis of the offences (set out at page 13, para 52 of his Opening

Note) has not been challenged by Mr Cooper and I am satisfied the

conduct alleged would amount to the offences outlined at paragraph

52 and therefore are extradition offences, namely offences under

sections 1 and 2 of the Computer Misuse Act 1990 (carrying

maximum sentences of 2 years and 5 years imprisonment

respectively); sections 327, 328 and 329 of the Proceeds of Crime

Act 2002 (carrying maximum sentences of 14 years imprisonment)

and the common law offence of conspiracy.

EVIDENCE

16. I have been supplied with bundles of documents and have heard

oral evidence and submissions from the parties including written

submissions.

17. Reverend Alexander Love gave evidence in person and adopted

his three statements dated 3rd October 2015 (Bundle, pages 373-

384), 13th January 2016 (pages 385-386) and 27th June 2016. His

oral evidence can be summarised as follows: He gave evidence of his

son’s history of anxiety and low self-esteem, of how he “fell apart”

when he was at sixth form college, during his National Service in

Finland (he applied for a Finnish passport as his mother is Finnish

and was aware he would have to undertake military service) and

when he attend Nottingham and Glasgow Universities. In 2005,

6

whilst at Nottingham University, his son became depressed and

returned home a “mental and physical wreck” (bundle tab23, para

36). In 2006 he suffered anxiety and was referred to mental health

services

18. During Mr Love’s second year at Glasgow University his mental

health deteriorated so badly his parents had to collect him and bring

him home. He has told his parents that if it were not for them he

would have killed himself.

19. In his role as a prison Chaplin in Highpoint Prison in Suffolk,

Reverend Love told me of the approach used by the prison estate in

the UK to deal with potential suicidal risks in prisoners, which I

interpret as being an holistic approach, including engaging with the

prisoner’s family and encouraging the inmate to talk about their

situation. His son will not have parental support if extradited.

20.Under cross examination Reverend Love said his son would not take

his life “in an attempt to make us feel guilty” but that if he were on

remand in the United States and his family were no longer with him,

“despair will grip him deeper”.

21. Mrs Sirkka Love gave evidence in person and adopted her

statements dated 3rd October 2015 (Tab 25) and 28th June 2016

(Tab 39). Her oral evidence can be summarised as follows: She

confirmed her son was diagnosed with eczema as a baby; he also

suffers from asthma. In the last few years she has noticed a

correlation between his physical symptoms (screaming and

suffering pain) and his mental state. She agrees with her husband’s

statement (tab 23, page 9, para 4) in which he states, “The only

thing that keeps Lauri from killing himself is me and my wife and

having him at home with us. He has told me very clearly he would

kill himself if there was an order for extradition”.

22.Professor Simon Baron-Cohen gave evidence in person and

adopted his three reports dated 7th December 2015 (tab 4), 4th

February 2016 (tab 5) and 1st June 2016 (tab 6). He is Professor of

Developmental Psychopathology at the University of Cambridge and

Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. He is Director of the Autism

7

Research Centre in Cambridge. He has been involved in autism

research for 30 years and has been a consultant in the NHS for 15

years specialising in the diagnosis of Asperger Syndrome in adults.

23.He has considered the evidence of other experts in this case,

including Professor Kopleman’s witness statement and evidence of

the treatment Mr Love is likely to receive in US custody. He

confirmed Mr Love’s diagnosis of suffering from Asperger

Syndrome (AS) which is a sub group of the autistic spectrum. He

does not have AS in combination with learning difficulties, attention

deficit and language. He is high functioning.

24.Those suffering from AS struggle in social relations,

communication, develop unusual interests, have hypersensitivity

and cannot adjust to social change. Mr Love feels socially isolated

and suffers from severe depression, which is not uncommon in AS

sufferers. The questionnaire completed by Mr Love was self-
reporting and is used to determine scores to identify how many

autistic traits an individual has in order to be referred to a specialist.

When he sees a patient he always takes due diligence that someone

may be inflating their symptoms.

25.Under cross examination Professor Baron Cohen agreed that Mr

Love has capacity to participate in a trial, give instructions to his

lawyers and a fair trial process was available to him. He also said,

“to be balanced, in prison he could be as calm as he is now and put

his hand up and ask for help. Equally his mental health may

deteriorate and he cannot do that if the voice will tell him to kill

himself”. Psychological wellbeing fluctuates.

26.He agreed the overwhelming priority, if extradition were ordered,

was to keep Mr Love alive. This could be done on bail under the

supervision of his parents. Incarceration in the United Kingdom

prior to removal would not be a means of alleviating suicide. Mr

Love has thought through the way he could evade detection about

committing suicide and he is able to do this and said, “it would be a

risk to assume this is a fantasy”. He agreed that a previous attempt

at suicide might be an indicator of Mr Love attempting suicide

8

again, but in this case the self-neglect and being unwell which

necessitated him being brought home from University may be a sign

of suicidality.

27. Professor Baron-Cohen assessed Mr Love’s risk of suicide as very

high and if he were not at home his risk increased. Mr Love was

“way above average intelligence” and would be well aware the

authorities will do all they can to prevent suicide. When asked if Mr

Love’s suicide ideology was a voluntary act or through mental

illness, Professor Baron-Cohen’s evidence was Mr Love’s experience

of intent was not a reflection of a voluntary plan or act, he does not

want to die but his mental health is so dependent on being at home

with his parents and not being detained for an indefinite period, he

could not impose restraint on himself to stop himself committing

suicide. He has made it clear that at the point he is handed over his

suicidal feelings will increase.

28.The Professor was initially impressed with the United State’s highly

developed mental health system and how it cared for prisoners with

mental health issues but changed his mind after reading Dr

Kucharski’s report, which highlights staff shortages, prisoner ratios

and there being no experts in AS. There is insufficient clinical or

other support to prevent a likely suicide.

29.He said it would be pure speculation about what would happen to

Mr Love in solitary confinement.

30.He confirmed his opinion in his report dated 1st June 2016 (tab 6,

page 1, para 1a) that the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) protocols

are not satisfactory for Mr Love given mental health services are

only valuable on a non-emergency, voluntary basis and Mr Love

may not be allowed to see a private specialist.

31. Dr Thomas Kucharski gave evidence in person. He has been a

forensic psychologist for 30 years. For 2 1⁄2 years from 1991 he was

a forensic psychologist at the Federal Medical Centre in Rochester,

Minnesota (one of five medical facilities operated by the Federal

Bureau of Prisons). For the next 9 years he was a forensic

psychologist and promoted to Chief Psychologist at the

9

Metropolitan Correction Centre in New York (one of the facilities

Mr Love might be detained at if extradited). He has no direct

experience of the two contract facilities in New Jersey and Virginia

where Mr Love would be held during proceedings in those districts

but served for 1 year as Director of Mental Health at the Westchester

County Department of Corrections in Valhalla, New York, a county

jail that contracts to detain federal inmates. Since leaving BOP in

2002 he has maintained a part time forensic psychology assessment

practice. He said his experience was relatively up to date, he has

attended the Metropolitan Detention Centres in Brooklyn and

Manhattan and remains in contact with a number of people in the

facility.

32.He adopted his report dated 10th June 2016 (tab 15). He told me Dr

Lynn’s Affidavit correctly states there are 600 psychologists or staff

in the 122 Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) institutions but

mischaracterises their role; the true level of services is substantially

lower than that she states. Each institution has a Chief Psychologist

(which is in effect an administrative role). Out of 60, one

psychologist would be a drug abuse co-ordinator who would not

engage with prisoners and 30 are forensic psychologists who

prepare reports regarding competency to stand trial. All inmates in

segregation have to be seen every 30 days.

33.Dr Kucharski said it was most likely Mr Love would be sent to the

Metropolitan Detention Centre. That facility shares a full time

psychiatrist. He has concerns that, given Mr Love’s presentation, he

would be placed on suicide watch for a substantial period of time

and probably as soon as he arrived. There is also a high risk of

suicide if he were placed in segregation (where he would go if he

misbehaved). Dr Kucharski commented that a lot of mentally ill

prisoners are in solitary confinement as their behaviour “upsets the

apple cart”.

34.Suicide watch comprises being put in a room with an inmate

observing the prisoner 24 hours a day. The conditions in

segregation are the same as those on suicide watch save for inmate

10

observation. Mr Love would be seen by a psychologist once a day to

determine if he needed to stay on suicide watch. He commented,

“no one commits suicide on suicide watch”.

35. Dr Kucharski also told me the county jails probably have worse

mental health facilities than in the metropolitan areas, where

prisoners who are serving either short sentences or who are pre-trial

are detained.

36.Under cross examination Dr Kucharski said he assesses fitness to

plead, insanity cases, sex offender and civil commitment cases. He

was last amongst the prison population in 2002.

37. He has not dealt with someone extradited to the United States but

would hope the United States Marshalls would be aware of Mr

Love’s medical background. On arrival in the United States he

would go onto suicide watch at MDC.

38.He confirmed that prisoners suffering from acute symptoms or

those who could not function in a medical facility (he gave the

example of those suffering from severe schizophrenic symptoms)

would be transferred to medical centres.

39.Professor Michael Kopelman gave evidence in person. He is an

Emeritus Professor of Neuropsychiatry at Kings College London.

He adopted his three reports dated 7th December 2015 (tab 7) and

reports dated 12th May 2016 and 26th May 2016 (tab 8). His oral

evidence can be summarised as follows: Mr Love suffered from

recurrent depressive disorder at age 20, 24-25 and in his late 20s.

He has severe eczema and asthma. These conditions can predispose

someone to depression.

40.In August 2012 Mr Love was referred to his local community health

team by his GP. In his opinion, at that time, Mr Love was on the

verge of psychosis and was clinically depressed, scoring high on the

Beck Depression Inventory (53). Mr Love continues to describe

features of depression and the hallucination to kill himself when

either severely depressed or fatigued. If/when extradition becomes

“imminent his mental health with plummet. Hallucinations will get

worse as will his eczema and asthma and suicide ideas will become

11

prominent in his mind”. He suggested Mr Love should see an

expert in AS and a psychiatrist to help him with his depression.

41. After hearing Kucharski’s evidence, Dr Kopelman said it was likely

Mr Love would be in and out of suicide watch, likely to become

agitated and not tolerated by the prison authorities, resulting in him

being put in segregation, which is well known to have an adverse

mental effect on anybody. For someone with an existing

psychological disorder, such as Mr Love, it will be even worse. He

anticipated the consequences for Mr Love being held for a

prolonged period in pre-trial detention in the United States as

resulting in a severe deterioration in his mental state, a severe

exacerbation of his clinical depression, the possible onset of

psychotic ideas and experiences, a worsening of his eczema and

asthma and “in consequence, an exacerbation of suicidal ideas to a

“very high” level” (tab 8, bullet point 3).

42.Under cross examination Professor Kopleman confirmed he had

met Mr Love on 3 occasions and had spoken to him on the

telephone. He accepted he had given Mr Love the “Beck Depression

Inventory” questionnaire to complete to cast his mind back to how

he was feeling in 2012/2013 and agreed it was slightly artificial to

get someone to describe their mental state. Mr Love’s medical

records are limited, he has never been referred to either a senior

psychiatrist or a senior clinical psychologist. He has been seen by

his GP and a Community Mental Health Team Support Worker.

43.Dr Kopleman said it was not unreasonable to conclude at times of

intense stress Mr Love would experience episodes of psychosis given

he has had pseudo hallucinations and fragmentary thought

processes in the past. He too agreed with Professor Baron-Cohen’s

assessment that this was not a fantasy.

44.In his opinion what would tip Mr Love over the brink, from not

committing suicide, would be a severe deterioration in his

depression, psychotic symptoms (including hearing voices), asthma

and eczema.

12

45.His mental condition would remove his mental capacity to resist the

impulse to commit suicide. Segregation in a United Kingdom prison

is a last resort for the most serious cases of someone at risk of

committing suicide.

46.Mr Love has not been taking his medication which is why he needs

to be supervised by either a Consultant Psychiatrist or a Senior

Clinical Psychologist.

47. Naomi Colvin gave evidence in person. She adopted her

statements dated 30th November 2015 (tab 26) and 14th January

2016 (tab 27) is a campaigner and works for the Courage

Foundation, an international organisation dedicated to protecting

the rights of whistle-blowers worldwide. She told me of a number of

cases highlighting the fact that in like circumstances where

defendants in the United States were sentenced to imprisonment

they spent substantial time in pre-court detention and were subject

to coercive plea-bargaining.

48.Under cross examination she confirmed the Courage Foundation is

raising funds to cover Mr Love’s legal costs through social media

and campaigning on his behalf to help him avoid extradition.

49.Jennifer Arcuri gave evidence in person. She adopted her

statements dated 2nd February 2016 (tab 30), undated statement

(tab 40) and statement 29th June 2016. She set up Hacker House

with its aim of ethical hacking. She met Lauri Love 9 months ago.

She attests to his emotional fragility. He works at Hacker House

from Thursday – Monday.

50.Lauri Love adopted his four statements dated 10th December 2015

(tab 19), 13th January 2016 (tab 20), 1st February 2016 (tab 21) and

undated proof (tab 22). In his oral evidence he told me as a child he

felt a deep sense of alienation from his peers and remembered

thinking he was different to others. He was very close to his sister

and had a small group of friends. When the family moved to

Lowestoft his hair fell out. It grew back when he went to 6th form

college. However he dropped out and worked in a turkey factory.

He applied for a Finnish passport, because his mother is Finnish,

13

and had to undertake military service. This was not successful

because he could not interact with others and was transferred to the

civil service. He describes himself as “falling below water” when he

cannot function properly. He entered into crisis and was diagnosed

with depression. He was apprehensive about taking antidepressants,

giving an example of a friend’s problems taking them. He finds it

difficult to confide in people and does not “know how empathy and

autism are related, but if I share problems it seems unfair and I’ve

kept my counsel. It appears now, given my understanding of AS, I

have not been able to do this”. In respect of his eczema, he told me

he bathes every day and uses creams and steroids. He has tried

immune suppressant drugs in the past but given he has a

suppressed immune system, he is cautious about using them. He

experiences skin infections and his skin falls off. The pain from his

eczema causes him stress which in turn causes more inflammation

of his skin.

51. He is unable to resist the need to scratch, “every day I try my utmost

to tear apart the skin in my body. Every day I fail to control this

urge. If sent to the United States of America those conditions, urges

to die would be stronger than my urge to scratch every day. My

degree of control is already impaired because of these proceedings.

The urge, the despair, feeling of helplessness will result in my

ending my life”.

52. His involvement in activism started at Glasgow University. He was

involved in a 7 months occupation of the university. He also told me

about Aaron Schwartz who committed suicide after being

prosecuted for downloading documents from the Massachusetts

Institute of Technology. He feels the prosecutors have added

charges to obtain a plea bargain, which he will refuse. He also said

he will not be able to access the evidence against him if he were in

custody.

53. He is currently studying for a degree in electrical engineering at

University Campus Suffolk and teaching at the University. He works

for Hacker House advising on computer security systems.

14

54.Under cross examination, Mr Love was asked about his relationship

with the media and it was put to him that, with the assistance of

others, he was trying to liken himself to Gary McKinnon and that he

has exaggerated his symptoms to the professionals, which he

denied. Although he has been diagnosed with AS for over 6 months

he has not taken antidepressants because they are not for AS. He

denied seeking to promote his personal difficulties as a shield.

55. Sylvia Royce gave evidence over Scopia. She is a lawyer and

member of the Bar of the District of Columbia and of the Bar of the

United States Supreme Court. Between October 1995 and August

2000 she was Chief of the International Prisoner Transfer

Programme, which is part of the Criminal Division of the

Department of Justice. She adopted her reports dated 8th and 12th

February 2007 (tab 16) which she prepared for the case of Gary

McKinnon. Her knowledge of prisoner transfers is up to date. In

2016 she had two cases involving applications for transfer to the

United Kingdom which were both refused. The prosecutor’s

position is the single most important factor in the decision for

prisoner transfer and there is an expectation it will be part of a plea

bargaining process. She has seen cases where prosecutors will not

agree to a transfer without a plea bargain. Prisoners can apply for

reconsideration of prisoner transfer 3 years after the original

refusal.

56.Under cross examination Ms Royce confirmed the Chief of Transfer

makes recommendations to the signatory authority which are

usually granted. In this case, it will be Ms Woolf who will make the

decision if a request for transfer is made. A prisoner can make a

request for transfer within 8- 12 weeks of arrival at their federal

prison.

57. A district judge makes the decision about a financial order for

restitution. A probation officer undertakes a financial investigation

of the defendant but she was unsure what this would involve for a

foreign national and was not sure how the representations are

weighed when the defendant is a foreign national. There have been

15

cases where transfer has occurred without a financial order for

restitution being in place.

58.Joshua Dratel gave evidence. He is an attorney of the State of

New York and has been practicing criminal defence law since

admission to the Bar in 1982. He is a Senior Fellow for Legal

Research at Fordham University Law School Centre on National

Security. Since 1988 he has been a member of the Criminal Justice

Act panel in the South District of New York and in 2007 represented

a number of detainees in Guantanamo Bay.

59.He has provided three statements dated 26th January 2016, 25th

May 2016 and 27th June 2016 (tabs 9, 10 and 42) which he adopted.

His oral evidence is summarised as follows: Mr Love will not get bail

in the United States because he is not a United States citizen has no

status in the United States.

60.On arrival he will receive medical attention and then be placed in

segregated housing prior to determination of where he will be

placed. His first-hand knowledge from a client, about suicide watch,

will involve Mr Love being put in isolation rather than receiving

treatment. From his experience special inmates watch a potential

suicidal inmate and not medical staff. Inmates will say they are not

suicidal to get out of solitary confinement. Assurances given by the

Unite States authorities are worthless; judges defer to the prison

authorities about mental health issues. There is no policy to stop

mentally ill patients being put into solitary confinement.

61. Mr Love’s sentence could be either consecutive or concurrent but

even with mitigating circumstances he is likely to receive substantial

sentences in three jurisdictions.

62.Under cross examination Mr Dratel said he would defer to Dr

Kucharski’s evidence about what would happen to Mr Love on

return to the United States. Mr Dratel was questioned about

inmates he mentioned in his statement, and gave the example of his

client, Mr Mustafa (Abu Hamza), whose physical disabilities were

not being accommodated within the prison estate.

16

63.The statistics quoted in his statements about suicide rates in BOP

facilities has fluctuated over the years; he was unaware if this was

because of the way either the data had been gathered or if here was

better reporting.

64.He agreed that there was nothing technically wrong in prosecutions

being brought in three jurisdictions but it was unusual, given it

would be easy to establish jurisdiction in a federal court based on

the electronic evidence. Mr Love can apply for the cases to be heard

in one jurisdiction, and it will be for the prosecutor to agree joinder.

65.When asked if there was anything wrong in the prosecution asking

for a sentence within an applicable sentence range, Mr Dratel said it

is the norm for a prosecutor to suggest a judge goes outside the

Guideline. He said 97% of cases which fall below the guideline

arising in fast track cases and do not relate to family considerations.

In his experience he has never seen the Government support a

departure in cases other than in fast track cases.

66.If this case is run on the basis that Mr Love acted out of

conscience/necessity the judge will follow the law. Three

jurisdictions mean “three bites of the apple” and gives the

Government a significant advantage. A judge can increase a

sentence by imposing consecutive sentences. Sentences imposed

within the guidelines are presumed reasonable.

67.Zachary Katznelson gave evidence via Scopia. He is a lawyer of

16 years’ experience in the United States and was called to the Bar in

the United Kingdom in 2012. He was formerly Senior Counsel and

then Legal Director of Reprieve. He has provided two statements

dated 26th January 2016 and 25th May 2016 (tabs 11 and 12). He

adopted his statements and his oral evidence can be summarised as

follows: He has been conducting research into prison conditions for

10 1⁄2 years. His experience is current.

68.Under cross examination he said it is rare for a judge to depart from

the sentencing guideline on mental health grounds unless the

Government requests such a departure. A judge may be persuaded

to go to the lower range of the guidelines rather than the upper

17

range. A prosecutor will only charge all crimes they believe they can

prove. If there is a plea to some crimes, the guideline will be based

on the most serious offence. The guideline sentence is unlikely to

change even if a defendant pleads guilty. If all matters fell to be

sentenced in one jurisdiction, a defendant could be sentenced on a

concurrent basis.

69.A number of cases in which low sentences were passed were put to

Mr Katznelson. He could not comment on some as he was

unfamiliar with them and said he was not inflating the sentence Mr

Love is likely to face. Less than 1% of cases have resulted in judges

departing from the sentencing guidelines due to mental health

issues, but a judge has the discretion to do so.

70.Grace North gave evidence over Scopia. She works in “Starbucks”

but identified herself in her oral evidence as a full time prison

worker. She said she knew Jeremy Hammond as a friend. He was

recently put into solitary confinement because of an error in which

contraband was found in a postcard in his possession. Telephone

contact is limited and e mails can take time being received but there

is no restriction in sending e mails. She said her strong opinions

may be coloured by her friendship with Jeremy Hammond.

71. Marlo Caddedu gave evidence over Scopia. She is a lawyer and

prepared a statement dated 24th December 2015 (tab 29). She said

the rules in the United States provide for Counsel to see a client but

in reality it is difficult. She also gave evidence about clients being

able to access digital evidence whilst in custody. In cases where

there is substantial digital evidence the expectation is to undertake a

word search for each document. In practice this is difficult to do

and to provide to clients in custody with electronic discovery. The

Bureau of Prisons do not allow Counsel to take computers into their

facilities resulting in documents having to be printed off.

72. She commented on that the case of Mr Budovsky (referred to in the

prosecutors’ statement at para 24, tab 32) was extremely unusual, in

which pre-trial documents were downloaded onto individual hard

drives and a laptop was made available for him to use in prison. A

18

court could agree that laptops are brought into a prison but there

are no protocols governing this.

73. Kevin Gallagher gave evidence on Scopia. He is a computer

systems administrator, writer and activist. He has provided one

undated statement (tab 31). He is Mr Barratt Brown’s public

advocate, in the United States and was involved in getting media

attention for his case and raising money for his defence. He was not

surprised when Mr Brown pleaded guilty because the offence he was

originally charged with could have resulted in him going to prison

for 100 years. Since 2014 he has had some interaction with Mr Love

on line.

74.Tor Ekeland gave evidence in person. He is Mr Love’s United

States Counsel and is admitted in the New York State and several

Federal courts. He regularly defends individuals charged under the

Computer Fraud and Abuse Act in both criminal and civil cases. His

two statements dated 26th January 2016 (tab 13) and 23rd May 2016

(tab 14) deal with United States Federal prosecutions and the

possible effects on Mr Love’s liberty and wellbeing before, during

and after trial. He told the court that the alleged £13 million loss

incurred by the victims of the alleged crimes would be included in

the sentencing range and on that figure the sentence would be

categorised into the 188 -121 month range. The Guidelines are not

mandatory however judges follow them. Under cross examination

he said the loss in this case relates to the intrusion of the activity.

The civil standard is used at a sentencing hearing. He agrees with

Mr Dratel’s evidence and said the sentencing guidelines are

inherently irrational.

FINDINGS OF FACT (NOT FORUM)

75. It has been accepted by Mr Caldwell on behalf of the Government

that Mr Love suffers from Asperger Syndrome (AS) although the

nature and degree was challenged. It is clear from Professor Baron-
Cohen’s evidence, which I accept, that Mr Love is high functioning,

has the capacity to participate in a trial and give instructions to his

19

lawyers. He does not have AS in combination with learning

difficulties, attention deficit and language. His AS is a “very severe

disability because it causes him to become so absorbed in his

interests that he neglects important areas of his life, such as his

studies, and even his health” (Professor Baron-Cohen, 7th December

2015, tab 4, page 3, para 7).

76.It is also clear from the evidence, and from seeing Mr Love in court,

that he is highly intelligent and articulate. Professor Kopleman also

comments his “thinking processes are generally excellent” (tab 7,

page 14, para 7(iii)).

77. It is not disputed that Mr Love suffers from eczema, which he has

had since birth, and which is a partly stress related physical

condition exacerbated by his mental health issues (Professor Baron-
Cohen, tab 5, page 2, para 4). I have no doubt this causes him

severe problems given the evidence from his GP and Mr Love’s own

vivid evidence of his daily hygiene routines and his constant urge to

scratch. It is not disputed he suffers from asthma.

78.Dr Kopleman’s reports and oral evidence outlined Mr Love’s past

psychiatric history and depression, which started in 2004. Mr Love

also gave evidence about this. I find Mr Love has suffered from

depression in the past and it has got worse since these proceedings

began. However I also find that in the past he has not continued to

take medication prescribed that could help him with his depression.

Dr Kopleman also said more could be done for his depression and

suggested he saw an expert in AS and a psychiatrist; his symptoms

could be managed by taking antidepressants. In his report dated

26th May 2016, he said, “Mr Love has proved very reluctant to

engage in psychiatric or psychological treatment in the UK” (tab 8,

page 6, para 2).

79. There have not been any incidents of self-harm in the past but I

accept Mr Love has experienced suicidal thoughts intermittently,

both in the past and now. Mr Love denied any suggestion that he

had exaggerated his symptoms and his suicide risk which I accept

given the medical evidence.

20

80.I also accept Professor Baron-Cohen and Professor Kopleman’s

evidence that he would attempt suicide before extradition to the

United States. Both are of the opinion he would be at high risk of

suicide. I accept Professor Baron-Cohen’s oral evidence that Mr

Love’s intention is not a reflection of a voluntary plan or act but due

to his mental health being dependant on him being at home with his

parents and not being detained for an indefinite period.

81. I accept the evidence of Mr Panepinto (tab 34) who is employed by

the United States Department of Justice, United States Marshals

Services, about Mr Love’s transfer to the US being undertaken by

the United States Marshals. They routinely transport prisoner with

medical/mental health conditions including those at high risk of

suicide (page 2, para 9) and I am satisfied any risk in transit can be

ameliorated by appropriate arrangements being in place to prevent

suicide.

82.I heard evidence about prison conditions and what the United

States will do to mitigate Mr Love’s suicidal ideology, and about the

regime for those inmates suffering from mental health issues and, in

particular, suicide risk. I read and heard evidence from Mr Dratel, a

United States defence lawyer, who gave general evidence about pre-
trial detention facilities in the US and the medical care available to

such inmates. He deferred to Dr Kucharski’s evidence that Mr Love

would be placed on suicide watch. Dr Kucharski has been a forensic

psychologist for 30 years and worked for the Bureau of Prisons. I

accept he is an experienced clinician and I accept his evidence that

Mr Love would be screened as soon as he was admitted into prison,

with acutely suicidal inmates being placed on suicide watch; this

will happen to Mr Love. He also said “no one commits suicide on

suicide watch”. However I find the United States can deal with

suicide risks and provisions for prisoners with complex mental

health and physical needs given I accept the evidence of Dr Lyn, the

current Psychology Services Branch Administrator of the Federal

Bureau of Prisons, about the facilities provided the BOP both on

arrival and thereafter. Once in the United States Mr Love will be

21

screened within 24 hours and an assessment made of his imminent

risk of self-harm. Each psychology department has a full range of

services including psychological assessment and suicide risk

assessment. If he is found guilty Mr Love will be assessed as to

which designated facility he should be sent to and, when one has

been found, Mr Love will be screened by medical and mental health

professionals on arrival. The BOP can provide medical care for

inmates with eczema and asthma. In respect of Mr Love’s diagnosis

of AS, he will be assigned various workers and a psychology service.

The BOP’s Suicide Prevention Programme provides that if a

psychologist determines an inmate has an imminent potential for

suicide, he will be placed under supervision which involves the

prisoner wearing a tear resistant gown and tear resistant blanket. In

her statement dated 9th June 2016 Dr Lyn confirms that, as part of

the Suicide Prevention Programme, group and individual

counselling services are available for all BOP inmates considered

suicide risks (tab 37, para 3) and, although inmates are not

ordinarily permitted to use their own physicians or other healthcare

providers, any request for an inmate to be examined by a specific

physician will be considered by the Warden and Regional Director

and Medical Director (para 4).

83.I find there is nothing either unlawful or improper in proceedings

being undertaken in three jurisdictions in the United States. The law

enforcement agencies and prosecutors in the districts all started

separate investigations at different times given the criminal activity

happened in a number of districts. I accept such decisions have

been made in good faith (Combined Affidavit (undated) of Nicholas

P Grippo, Christian Everdell, Jay Prabhu and Ryan Dickey, tab 32,

paras 25-33). In fact Mr Love can request the cases are heard in one

jurisdiction, subject to the approval of the attorneys in the districts

(as above, para 29, footnote 5). Mr Dratel also accepted there is

“nothing technically wrong in prosecutions being brought in three

jurisdictions but it was unusual”.

22

84.I also find that the United States authorities provide adequate trial

preparations for defendants. I accept the evidence set out in the

prosecutors’ Affidavit that Mr Love will be afforded reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with his Counsel; he can apply

to be temporarily released from custody for the necessary

preparation of his case (which could mean being taking to an

interview room where he can meet his lawyer and review any

electronic evidence); various methods can be employed including

placing discovery on a stand-alone computer for him or to take him

to a United States Attorney’s Office to review the evidence

(prosecutor’s statement, tab 32, pages 10 -11, paras 21-23).

85.I was taken through the United States Sentencing Guidelines

(“USSG”) by a number of witnesses. There was no dispute between

them as to the sentence Mr Love might receive. There was also no

dispute that, as a matter of law, the USSG are not mandatory but

permit a sentencing judge the discretion to depart from a sentencing

range and move up and down the guideline. The Government

acknowledges Mr Love could receive numerous sentencing

enhancements under the Guidelines (as above, page 2, para 5) and

each district court could impose consecutive sentences to any other

term of imprisonment imposed in other districts but “under the

circumstances present in this matter, the Guideline counsel courts

to impose concurrent sentences” (as above, page 5, para 11). I also

find that if Mr Love pleads guilty upon his arrival in the United

States, or if he is convicted and pleads guilty to other matters

outstanding in another district, he could have his cases remitted to

one court for sentence (as above, page 15 footnote 5).

86.In Ms Royce gave evidence about prisoner transfer after conviction

and I read Ms Wolff’s statements on behalf of the Government. Ms

Wolff has been Chief of the International Prisoner Transfer Unit for

16 years. Ms Royce relied on statements made in 2007. In her oral

evidence Ms Royce told of two cases she has been involved with in

2016 in which both were denied transfer to the United Kingdom.

She did not say why. She said the court would make a decision about

23

the financial means of an applicant but was unsure what financial

investigation could be undertaken for a foreign national. Restitution

played a part in the decision for transfer. Any request made for

transfer would be sent to Ms Wolff. In her affidavit Ms Wolff

confirmed there is a transfer treaty with the United Kingdom.

Guidelines have been published setting out the evaluation of

transfer applications. Outstanding financial obligations do not

amount to an automatic bar to transfer, the ability of a prisoner to

pay and the views of the victims are taken into account (tab 36, para

7). I accept her evidence given she has been the current Chief of the

International Prison Transfer Unit. An agreement between the

United States and United Kingdom exists, a procedure exists for an

application to be made and a number of factors are taken into

account in deciding a prisoner transfer, which was not dependant

on, or primarily based on, the prosecutor’s views of restitution,

contrary to Ms Royce’s evidence.

FINDINGS AND DECISIONS ON THE ISSUES RAISED

SECTION 83A – FORUM

87.I have read the submissions from the parties and heard from them

in which they expanded their submissions. I have read the cases of

Dibden v France [2014] EWHC 3074 and Shaw v America

[2014] EWHC 465 (Admin) c0ntained in the bundle of

authorities (tabs 2 and 3).

88.In Shaw, Aitkens LJ emphasised two important considerations in

connection with the Section 83A (3) factors namely, the court has to

bear in mind each of the specified matters individually (and not any

others) and it may be that one factor is irrelevant or not present or

of little weight or of great importance (paras 40-41). The question is

whether it is in the interests of justice there should not be an

extradition to a requesting state. In every case the court will be

engaged in a fact specific exercise.

24

89.It is accepted the threshold requirement in section 83A (2) (a) is

satisfied because a substantial measure of Mr Love’s relevant

activity was performed in the United Kingdom.

90.Mr Cooper asked me to look outside the sequence of the Act and put

that which he says is the most important consideration first,

namely, Mr Love’s connection to the United Kingdom and to give it

the most weight. I will deal with the specified factors in the order in

which they appear in the section:

(a) the place where most of the loss or harm resulting from the

extradition offence occurred or was intended to occur: Most, if not

all, of the loss or harm resulting from Mr Love’s conduct occurred in

the United States as he is accused of stealing confidential

information belonging to individuals (including credit card details)

from US government computers and private companies. In my view

the harm is the stealing of that information with the potential illegal

use of the same, irrespective of where or not Mr Love did this for

financial gain. It appears he targeted the United States departments

and companies as part of his “hactivisim” and political activity

(b) the interests of any victims of the extradition offence: The

victims are the companies and government departments who had

their computers hacked into resulting in millions of dollars’ worth of

damage. There are also individual victims, those whose personal

details were stolen. In this case, the US are of the view that “none of

the victims of Love’s alleged crimes have an interest in this matter

being prosecuted in the United Kingdom” (Prosecutors statement,

as above, tab 32, page 18, para b). I do not accept Mr Cooper’s

submissions that the interests of the victims may not be served with

a prosecution in the United States given Dr Kopleman’s evidence

that Mr Love may not be fit to stand trial. That is conjecture at this

stage. Dr Kopleman’s exact evidence was any refusal of bail is likely

to cause a worsening of Mr Love’s clinical depression but it was

difficult to anticipate if this would affect him and whether he would

be fit to stand trial.

25

(c) any belief of a prosecutor that the United Kingdom, or a

particular part of the United Kingdom, is not the most appropriate

jurisdiction in which to prosecute D in respect of the conduct

constituting the extradition offence: The Crown Prosecution Service

is silent in this case and I agree with Mr Caldwell’s submission that

the absence of a prosecutor’s belief adds nothing to the decision

under the interests of justice test and therefore this specified matter

is neutral.

(d) were D to be prosecuted in a part of the United Kingdom for an

offence that corresponds to the extradition offence, whether

evidence necessary to prove the offence is or could be made

available in the United Kingdom: I agree, as did Mr Caldwell for the

Government that, in this digital age, evidence to prove the offence in

the United Kingdom is available or could be made available.

However, as already stated there are witnesses who will be required

to give evidence. One is the anonymous informant. It is unknown at

this time whether he would assist in any prosecution in the United

Kingdom and he may not be a compellable witness in the United

Kingdom. The Government has said it will call each of the victim

organisations, law enforcement officers, forensic evidence and some

individual victims whose personal information was stolen. The

prosecutor’s point out that it would be “substantially difficult to

make available to the United Kingdom all of the evidence necessary

to prosecute Love, particularly the witnesses the United States

anticipates calling at trail” (Prosecutors statement, tab 32, page 19).

(e) any delay that might result from proceeding in one jurisdiction

rather than another: It was submitted that a prosecution In the

United Kingdom was likely to be quicker than in the United States

given the involvement of the NCA in the case and they would be at

an advanced stage of readiness for trial. The latter suggestion is

speculation, because, apart from the NCA executing a search

warrant at Mr Love’s home address and seizing a number of

computers, some of which they could access, some they could not. I

do not have any other evidence as to any stage of readiness. In

26

contrast, the proceedings in the United States have started, evidence

has been obtained in three jurisdictions resulting in three Grand

Juries issuing Indictments. The United States prosecutors’

statement confirms that Mr Love has the right to be tried within 70

days following his first court appearance, unless he waives the same,

and, if he is tried in three separate districts, the same time limit

applies. (tab 32, para 70). I have also found there is nothing

procedurally incorrect in three districts wanting to prosecute Mr

Love. Mr Love could also apply for all his cases to be heard under

one jurisdiction (certainly for the conspiracy charges) which would

reduce delay (as above, para 2).

(f) the desirability and practicability of all prosecutions relating to

the extradition offence taking place in one jurisdiction, having

regard (“in particular”) to – (i) the jurisdictions in which witnesses,

co-defendants and other suspects are located, and (ii) the

practicability of the evidence of such persons being given in the

United Kingdom or in jurisdictions outside the United Kingdom:

There are no co-defendants. There are over twenty witnesses, all of

whom are in the United States. The digital evidence could be given

in the United Kingdom but the witnesses reside in the United States

and as a matter of desirability and practicality it is easier for them to

give evidence in the United States.

(g) D’s connection with the United Kingdom: Undoubtedly all Mr

Love’s connections are in the United Kingdom. He is a single man

with no dependants. He is a United Kingdom citizen and lives with

his parents. He is studying, teaching and working in the United

Kingdom. Mr Love has been diagnosed with AS. He also suffers

from depression, eczema and asthma. He has the support and

stability of his family. The experts agree Mr Love would be at a

severe risk of suicide if extradited to the United States. In my view

the submission that a defendant’s connection to the United

Kingdom proved decisive in ensuring other United Kingdom

hackers were prosecuted in the United Kingdom is not relevant to

Mr Love’s personal connections with the United Kingdom.

27

91. I accept Mr Love’s connections to the United Kingdom include his

own personal circumstances, his health and his support network,

and not merely his connection to the State, as submitted by Mr

Caldwell. Some of the evidence in this case is transportable but, in

my assessment, those factors do not outweigh the facts that the

conduct occurred in the United States, all the victims are in the

United States, their interests are best served with the case being

heard in the United States and any delay is not known because I do

not have any evidence as to how far any investigation has taken in

the United Kingdom. What I do know is that evidence has been

produced by the United States resulting in three Indictments being

issued by three Grand Juries.

92.It is the interests of justice for the case to be tired in the United

States and for this reason the forum bar fails.

SECTION 91 AND SECTION 87 – ARTICLE 3

93.I will deal with these issues together as the submissions are broadly

the same.

94.Under section 91 a Requested Person has the burden of proving

that, because of his physical or mental condition, it would be unjust

or oppressive to extradite him.

95.Article 3 provides that no-one shall be subjected to torture or

inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment. This is absolute

and prohibits extradition if there are substantial grounds for

believing that there is a real risk of treatment which violates Article

3. The burden is on the Requested Person to bring clear and cogent

evidence to show there are substantial grounds for believing that if

extradited, the person faces a real risk of either being killed or being

subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment.

96.I have been referred to a number of cases set out in the Authorities

Bundle. I have, in particular, considered the cases of Turner v

Government of the United States [2012] EWC 2426, and Polish

Judicial Authority v Wolkowicz [2013] EWHC 102

(Admin). In the case of Turner Aikens LJ summarised the

28

propositions derived from a number of previous cases that dealt

with the question as to whether the mental condition of a Requested

Person who poses a substantial risk of suicide amounts to his

extradition being unjust or oppressive or in breach of Article 3 (para

28). A high threshold has to be reached to satisfy the court that Mr

Love’s mental condition is such that it would be unjust or oppressive

to extradite him. As I have already found (para 79-81 above) I am

satisfied that there is a substantial risk Mr Love will commit suicide.

The evidence of Professor Baron-Cohen and Professor Kopleman is

clear; Mr Love’s mental condition is such that it removes his

capacity to resist the impulse to commit suicide. There will be a

high risk he will commit suicide if extradited. This will be prior to

removal, in transit and on arrival in the United States. Professor

Baron-Cohen warns that to dismiss this would be “a fantasy” (para

28 above). The key issue then is what measures are in place to

prevent any attempt at suicide being successful. In the United

Kingdom that risk would be lessened if Mr Love were on bail and

with his parents. If is custody I have heard of the holistic approach

of the United Kingdom prison system from the Reverend Love.

97. On transfer to the United States, Stephen Panepinto, the Deputy

Chief of the International Investigations Branch Investigative

Operations Division, states the United States Marshals Service will

be responsible for Mr Love’s transfer (statement dated 20th April

2016, tab 34). They routinely transport prisoners with medical

and/or health concerns (para 9). He sets out the procedure to be

adopted prior to his transfer and if deemed necessary a member of

the Medical Support Unit of the USMS could accompany Mr Love

during the flight. Medical records and the psychiatric assessments

should be given to those who have to accompany Mr Love during

transfer. I have found these safeguards are in place to ensure Mr

Love does not commit suicide in transit (para 82 above).

98.On arrival in the United States I have also found there are

arrangements in place to prevent suicide (para 83). I have carefully

considered the evidence of Dr Kucharski and Mr Dratel about what

29

will happen to Mr Love once he is in the United States and from the

Government and find that, despite the differences in the approaches

of the United States and United Kingdom to prisoners who are

exhibiting suicidal ideology, the preventative measure in place in

the United States are effective in preventing suicides.

99.I am also satisfied that Mr Love will receive dedicated mental and

physical health care in the United States, as set out in the

comprehensive report of Dr Lyn (tab 33) which I accept (at para 83

above). Such care will be available to Mr Love during the currency

of his incarceration.

100. I have not been provided with assurances, something raised by

Mr Cooper. I do not agree with his submission that absent such

assurances Mr Love faces a real risk of being suicide to and

inhuman and disproportionate punishment prohibited by Article 3

given my findings regarding the health and mental health care Mr

Love will receive in the United States. I have been told of the

maximum sentences available and the likely sentence in Mr Love’s

cases by Mr Ekeland. Certainly the sentencing regime is harsher in

the United States than in the United Kingdom for equivalent

offences but a number of factors can be taken into consideration at

sentencing, as set out in the evidence contained in the prosecutor’s

affidavit, including the court having the discretion to depart from a

sentencing range. The mental health of the defendant may be

relevant in this process. Each district has a discretion to impose a

consecutive terms to other terms of imprisonment against him (tab

32, para 11). It is for the Requesting State to set its own sentencing

policy unless it is disproportionate which, for the reasons stated, I

do not find it to be.

101. Mr Love has not shown it will be either unjust or oppressive to

extradite and there will be a real risk to Mr Love of being severely

ill-treated in a manner sufficiently severe to engage Article 3 for the

reasons given above.

102. The challenges under section 91 and Article 3 fail.

30

SECTION 87 – ARTICLE 6

103. Article 6 safeguards the right to a fair trial. The burden is on Mr

Love to show there are substantial grounds for believing that there

is a real risk of a flagrant denial of this right if extradited. It is

submitted Mr Love faces a real risk of a flagrant denial of his Article

6 right to a fair trial because access to his lawyer will be curtailed, he

will have difficulties in reviewing the evidence because computers

are not allowed into detention facilities. Ms Caddedu’s evidence is

that in such situations lawyers may have to print off documents for

defendants.

104. The evidence from the United States differs. I accept the

evidence form the Government (as set out in para 85 above) which

details the procedures in place to allow defendants to have access to

computers and/or disclosure and confidential facilities to see and

instruct lawyers.

105. Accordingly Mr Love’s challenge under article 6 fails.

SECTION 87 – ARTICLE 8

106. Article 8 provides that everyone has a right to respect for his

private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

107. In considering the evidence under article 8 I have had regard to

the principles in the context of extradition procedures as set out in

Norris v Government of the United States (no2) [2010]

UKSC 9 and HH v Italy [2012] UKSC 25.

108. The case of Polish Judicial Authorities v Celinski and

Ors [2015] EWHC 1274 (Admin) sets of the approach the court

has to take in respect to article 8 cases. In applying the “balance

sheet” approach recommended in Celinski I have to look at the

factors in favour of Mr Love’s extradition and those factors against.

Factors in favour of extradition

109. There is a strong public interest that the United Kingdom should

honour its extradition treaty obligations with other countries.

31

110. The offences for which Mr Love is sought are serious, they were

committed over three districts in the United States over a period of

one year.

111. Mr Love targeted computers in the United States.

112. Millions of dollars’ worth of damage was caused by hacking into

the computers and employee’s personal details were stolen.

113. It was submitted by Mr Caldwell that the United States has a

proven track record of managing vulnerable persons whose

extradition has been ordered by the United Kingdom. The United

States authorities are able to meet Mr Love’s medical and personal

needs.

Factors against extradition

114. Mr Love is a United Kingdom national and is 32 years of age

(dob: 14.12.1984). He is a single man who lives with his parents. He

suffers from Asperger Syndrome, depression, eczema and asthma.

115. He is at high risk of committing suicide if extradited due to his

mental health. He has suffered from eczema since birth and the

condition is exacerbated at times of stress and anxiety. He

undertakes a daily hygiene regime, uses creams and steroids to treat

the condition, takes medication and sees his GP regularly.

116. He is not currently taking antidepressants for his depression.

117. It was submitted that suicide prevention in United States prisons

would exacerbate rather than ameliorate Mr Love’s suicide risk, he

is likely to spend a significant amount of time in solitary

confinement and he would be isolated from his family which would

elevate such a risk.

118. It was also submitted his AS would not be treated properly in the

US.

119. The length of sentence he is likely to face.

120. Mr Love is of good character and is working and studying.

Decision

32

121. Mr Love’s Article 8 rights are clearly engaged. In balancing the

factors for and against extradition I am satisfied that the very strong

counter balancing factors required to find extradition would be

disproportionate are not found in this case. Mr Love faces extremely

serious charges for offences of computer hacking over a period of

one year from October 2012 to October 2013. I accept Mr Love

suffers from both physical and mental health issues but I have found

the medical facilities in the United States prison estate on arrival

and during any sentence if he is convicted available to him, are such

that I can be satisfied his needs will be comprehensively met by the

US authorities.

122. I am satisfied Mr Love’s extradition would be compatible with

his Convention rights and I send this case to the Secretary of State

for her decision as to whether or not Mr Love should be extradited.

District Judge (Magistrates’ Court) N Tempia

16th September 2016

Page 1 of 32

1

JUDICIARY OF

ENGLAND AND WALES

The Government of the United States of America

Requesting Judicial Authority

v

Lauri Love

Requested Person

Judge N Tempia

In the Westminster Magistrates’ Court

Advocates: Mr P Caldwell – Judicial Authority

Mr B Cooper – Requested Person

APPLICATION AND BACKGROUND

1. This is an application by the Government of the United States of

America for the extradition of the requested person, Lauri Love,

(dob: 14.12.1984) a United Kingdom citizen, who is accused of

unlawfully accessing computers used by United States Federal

Agencies and private companies and misusing the data he

unlawfully obtained.

2. The United States of America is a Category 2 territory. Part 2 of the

Extradition Act 2003 (the Act) applies.

Page 1 of 32

Page 2 of 32

2

3. The criminal proceedings in the US have been commenced in three

judicial districts, the Southern District of New York, the District of

New Jersey and the Eastern District of Virginia. These proceedings

are referred to within a Diplomatic Note from the United States

dated 6th July 2015. The material relating to each of the judicial

districts was separately certified by the Secretary of State on 7th July

2015 and these proceedings are treated as a single request. The

bundle contains the warrants for Mr Love’s arrest in the three

districts and were issued by the Southern District of New York on

21st February 2015, District of New Jersey on 23rd March 2015 and

Eastern District of Virginia on 21st May 2015.

4. Following certification a warrant was issued for Mr Love’s arrest.

Mr Love was arrested on 15th July 2015 and appeared at

Westminster Magistrates’ Court on the same day. The initial hearing

was unchallenged. Mr Love did not consent to his extradition. He

was granted bail and has remained on bail throughout the

proceedings.

5. Section 78 of the Act requires the judge at the initial stages of the

extradition hearing to decide whether the documents received

include the documents referred to in section 70(9), the certified

request, the particulars of the person whose extradition is sought,

particulars of the offences specified in the request and, where a

person is accused of an offence, a warrant for his arrest has been

issued in the category 2 territory.

6. I have received prosecutor’s affidavits and photos which accord with

the particulars given in the Diplomatic Note which provides Mr

Love’s personal information and references to other names he is

known as including, “nsh”, “peace”, “shift”, “route”, “Smedley

Butler”.

EXTRADITION OFFENCES

7. The Government of the United States is not required by operation of

the Extradition Act 2003, in common with many other States, to

adduce a prima facie case and it is not for me to determine if there is

Page 2 of 32

Page 3 of 32

3

a case to answer, however, I have set out the nature and extent of

the evidence obtained by the United States prosecutors against Mr

Love. I will set out an overview of the evidence contained in the

affidavits to set out the extradition offences (details of the individual

indictments are contained in Mr Caldwell’s Opening Note dated 15th

June 2016, pages 5-12).

8. Mr Love is accused in three indictments that between the period

October 2012 to October 2013, he, working with others, made a

series of cyber-attacks on the computer networks of private

companies and United States Government agencies, (including the

US Federal Reserve, US Army, US Department of Defence, Missile

Defence Agency, NASA, Army Corps of Engineers, Department of

Health and Human Services, US Sentencing Commission, FBI

Regional Computer Forensics Laboratory, Deltek Inc, Department

of Energy, Forte Interactive, Inc) in order to steal and then publicly

disseminate confidential information found on the networks,

including what is referred to as personally identifiable information

(“PII”).

9. Mr Love is accused in three indictments in three districts as follows:

(i) Southern District of New York – Mr Love faces two counts on

Indictment, one of computer hacking (maximum sentence of

10 years imprisonment) and one of aggravated identity theft

(maximum sentence of 2 years imprisonment to be imposed

consecutively to the sentence for count 1).

(ii) The New Jersey request details two counts on one indictment.

One count is conspiracy to access a computer without

authorisation and obtain information from a department or

agency of the United States (maximum sentence of 5 years

imprisonment) and one of accessing a computer without

authorisation and obtaining information from a department or

agency of the United States (maximum sentence of 5 years

imprisonment).

(iii) The Eastern District of Virginia request contains nine counts on

an Indictment, count 1 – conspiracy to cause damage to a

Page 3 of 32

Page 4 of 32

4

protected computer and to commit access device fraud

(maximum sentence of 5 years imprisonment); counts 2 -7 –

causing damage to a protected computer and aiding and

abetting (maximum sentence of 5 years imprisonment); count

8 – access device fraud and aiding and abetting (maximum

sentence of 10 years imprisonment) and count 9 – aggravated

identity theft and aiding and abetting (maximum sentence of 2

years imprisonment).

10.In most of the attacks it is alleged Mr Love gained unauthorised

access by exploiting vulnerabilities in a programme the computers

ran known as Adode ColdFusion; software designed to build and

administer websites and databases (the “ColdFusion Attacks”). It is

further alleged Mr Love also carried out “SQL Injection Attacks” in

which unauthorised access was gained to computer databases by

manipulating “structured query language”, computer programming

language designed to retrieve and manage data on computer

databases (the “SQL Injection Attacks”).

11. Once inside the compromised computer systems, Mr Love and

others placed hidden “shells” or “backdoors” within the networks.

This allowed them to return and steal the confidential data which

included telephone numbers, social security numbers, credit card

details and salary information of employees, health care

professionals, and service personnel.

12. A confidential source working for the United States Federal Bureau

of Investigation (FBI) had access to a restricted online “chat room”

used by Mr Love and others from about 2012 to 2013. They had

discussions about their hacking activity in the chat room using

Internet Relay Chat (“IRC”). This allows multiple users to talk

about their activities using typed messages to each other. Various

online names were used to disguise their true identities. From this

the FBI has identified Mr Love’s nicknames as “nsh”, “peace”, “shift”

and “route”.

13. Mr Love used IRC to discuss how to “exfiltrate” the stolen data and

what could be done with it.

Page 4 of 32

Page 5 of 32

5

14. On 25th October 2013 officers of the National Crime Agency (NCA)

executed a search warrant at Mr Love’s address in Stradishall,

Newmarket, while he was present. One of his computers was logged

onto an online chat room using the name “nsh”. It is alleged some

of the computers in his possession had some of the data stolen

during the computer intrusions under investigation, including some

intrusions that he discussed online using the name “nsh” and other

names attributable to him.

15. Under section 137(3)(b) I have to be satisfied that the conduct

specified in the request would constitute offences in the United

Kingdom if they had occurred in England and Wales. Mr Caldwell’s

analysis of the offences (set out at page 13, para 52 of his Opening

Note) has not been challenged by Mr Cooper and I am satisfied the

conduct alleged would amount to the offences outlined at paragraph

52 and therefore are extradition offences, namely offences under

sections 1 and 2 of the Computer Misuse Act 1990 (carrying

maximum sentences of 2 years and 5 years imprisonment

respectively); sections 327, 328 and 329 of the Proceeds of Crime

Act 2002 (carrying maximum sentences of 14 years imprisonment)

and the common law offence of conspiracy.

EVIDENCE

16. I have been supplied with bundles of documents and have heard

oral evidence and submissions from the parties including written

submissions.

17. Reverend Alexander Love gave evidence in person and adopted

his three statements dated 3rd October 2015 (Bundle, pages 373-

384), 13th January 2016 (pages 385-386) and 27th June 2016. His

oral evidence can be summarised as follows: He gave evidence of his

son’s history of anxiety and low self-esteem, of how he “fell apart”

when he was at sixth form college, during his National Service in

Finland (he applied for a Finnish passport as his mother is Finnish

and was aware he would have to undertake military service) and

when he attend Nottingham and Glasgow Universities. In 2005,

Page 5 of 32

Page 6 of 32

6

whilst at Nottingham University, his son became depressed and

returned home a “mental and physical wreck” (bundle tab23, para

36). In 2006 he suffered anxiety and was referred to mental health

services

18. During Mr Love’s second year at Glasgow University his mental

health deteriorated so badly his parents had to collect him and bring

him home. He has told his parents that if it were not for them he

would have killed himself.

19. In his role as a prison Chaplin in Highpoint Prison in Suffolk,

Reverend Love told me of the approach used by the prison estate in

the UK to deal with potential suicidal risks in prisoners, which I

interpret as being an holistic approach, including engaging with the

prisoner’s family and encouraging the inmate to talk about their

situation. His son will not have parental support if extradited.

20.Under cross examination Reverend Love said his son would not take

his life “in an attempt to make us feel guilty” but that if he were on

remand in the United States and his family were no longer with him,

“despair will grip him deeper”.

21. Mrs Sirkka Love gave evidence in person and adopted her

statements dated 3rd October 2015 (Tab 25) and 28th June 2016

(Tab 39). Her oral evidence can be summarised as follows: She

confirmed her son was diagnosed with eczema as a baby; he also

suffers from asthma. In the last few years she has noticed a

correlation between his physical symptoms (screaming and

suffering pain) and his mental state. She agrees with her husband’s

statement (tab 23, page 9, para 4) in which he states, “The only

thing that keeps Lauri from killing himself is me and my wife and

having him at home with us. He has told me very clearly he would

kill himself if there was an order for extradition”.

22.Professor Simon Baron-Cohen gave evidence in person and

adopted his three reports dated 7th December 2015 (tab 4), 4th

February 2016 (tab 5) and 1st June 2016 (tab 6). He is Professor of

Developmental Psychopathology at the University of Cambridge and

Fellow of Trinity College, Cambridge. He is Director of the Autism

Page 6 of 32

Page 7 of 32

7

Research Centre in Cambridge. He has been involved in autism

research for 30 years and has been a consultant in the NHS for 15

years specialising in the diagnosis of Asperger Syndrome in adults.

23.He has considered the evidence of other experts in this case,

including Professor Kopleman’s witness statement and evidence of

the treatment Mr Love is likely to receive in US custody. He

confirmed Mr Love’s diagnosis of suffering from Asperger

Syndrome (AS) which is a sub group of the autistic spectrum. He

does not have AS in combination with learning difficulties, attention

deficit and language. He is high functioning.

24.Those suffering from AS struggle in social relations,

communication, develop unusual interests, have hypersensitivity

and cannot adjust to social change. Mr Love feels socially isolated

and suffers from severe depression, which is not uncommon in AS

sufferers. The questionnaire completed by Mr Love was self- reporting and is used to determine scores to identify how many

autistic traits an individual has in order to be referred to a specialist.

When he sees a patient he always takes due diligence that someone

may be inflating their symptoms.

25.Under cross examination Professor Baron Cohen agreed that Mr

Love has capacity to participate in a trial, give instructions to his

lawyers and a fair trial process was available to him. He also said,

“to be balanced, in prison he could be as calm as he is now and put

his hand up and ask for help. Equally his mental health may

deteriorate and he cannot do that if the voice will tell him to kill

himself”. Psychological wellbeing fluctuates.

26.He agreed the overwhelming priority, if extradition were ordered,

was to keep Mr Love alive. This could be done on bail under the

supervision of his parents. Incarceration in the United Kingdom

prior to removal would not be a means of alleviating suicide. Mr

Love has thought through the way he could evade detection about

committing suicide and he is able to do this and said, “it would be a

risk to assume this is a fantasy”. He agreed that a previous attempt

at suicide might be an indicator of Mr Love attempting suicide

Page 7 of 32

Page 8 of 32

8

again, but in this case the self-neglect and being unwell which

necessitated him being brought home from University may be a sign

of suicidality.

27. Professor Baron-Cohen assessed Mr Love’s risk of suicide as very

high and if he were not at home his risk increased. Mr Love was

“way above average intelligence” and would be well aware the

authorities will do all they can to prevent suicide. When asked if Mr

Love’s suicide ideology was a voluntary act or through mental

illness, Professor Baron-Cohen’s evidence was Mr Love’s experience

of intent was not a reflection of a voluntary plan or act, he does not

want to die but his mental health is so dependent on being at home

with his parents and not being detained for an indefinite period, he

could not impose restraint on himself to stop himself committing

suicide. He has made it clear that at the point he is handed over his

suicidal feelings will increase.

28.The Professor was initially impressed with the United State’s highly

developed mental health system and how it cared for prisoners with

mental health issues but changed his mind after reading Dr

Kucharski’s report, which highlights staff shortages, prisoner ratios

and there being no experts in AS. There is insufficient clinical or

other support to prevent a likely suicide.

29.He said it would be pure speculation about what would happen to

Mr Love in solitary confinement.

30.He confirmed his opinion in his report dated 1st June 2016 (tab 6,

page 1, para 1a) that the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) protocols

are not satisfactory for Mr Love given mental health services are

only valuable on a non-emergency, voluntary basis and Mr Love

may not be allowed to see a private specialist.

31. Dr Thomas Kucharski gave evidence in person. He has been a

forensic psychologist for 30 years. For 2 1⁄2 years from 1991 he was

a forensic psychologist at the Federal Medical Centre in Rochester,

Minnesota (one of five medical facilities operated by the Federal

Bureau of Prisons). For the next 9 years he was a forensic

psychologist and promoted to Chief Psychologist at the

Page 8 of 32

Page 9 of 32

9

Metropolitan Correction Centre in New York (one of the facilities

Mr Love might be detained at if extradited). He has no direct

experience of the two contract facilities in New Jersey and Virginia

where Mr Love would be held during proceedings in those districts

but served for 1 year as Director of Mental Health at the Westchester

County Department of Corrections in Valhalla, New York, a county

jail that contracts to detain federal inmates. Since leaving BOP in

2002 he has maintained a part time forensic psychology assessment

practice. He said his experience was relatively up to date, he has

attended the Metropolitan Detention Centres in Brooklyn and

Manhattan and remains in contact with a number of people in the

facility.

32.He adopted his report dated 10th June 2016 (tab 15). He told me Dr

Lynn’s Affidavit correctly states there are 600 psychologists or staff

in the 122 Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) institutions but

mischaracterises their role; the true level of services is substantially

lower than that she states. Each institution has a Chief Psychologist

(which is in effect an administrative role). Out of 60, one

psychologist would be a drug abuse co-ordinator who would not

engage with prisoners and 30 are forensic psychologists who

prepare reports regarding competency to stand trial. All inmates in

segregation have to be seen every 30 days.

33.Dr Kucharski said it was most likely Mr Love would be sent to the

Metropolitan Detention Centre. That facility shares a full time

psychiatrist. He has concerns that, given Mr Love’s presentation, he

would be placed on suicide watch for a substantial period of time

and probably as soon as he arrived. There is also a high risk of

suicide if he were placed in segregation (where he would go if he

misbehaved). Dr Kucharski commented that a lot of mentally ill

prisoners are in solitary confinement as their behaviour “upsets the

apple cart”.

34.Suicide watch comprises being put in a room with an inmate

observing the prisoner 24 hours a day. The conditions in

segregation are the same as those on suicide watch save for inmate

Page 9 of 32

Page 10 of 32

10

observation. Mr Love would be seen by a psychologist once a day to

determine if he needed to stay on suicide watch. He commented,

“no one commits suicide on suicide watch”.

35. Dr Kucharski also told me the county jails probably have worse

mental health facilities than in the metropolitan areas, where

prisoners who are serving either short sentences or who are pre-trial

are detained.

36.Under cross examination Dr Kucharski said he assesses fitness to

plead, insanity cases, sex offender and civil commitment cases. He

was last amongst the prison population in 2002.

37. He has not dealt with someone extradited to the United States but

would hope the United States Marshalls would be aware of Mr

Love’s medical background. On arrival in the United States he

would go onto suicide watch at MDC.

38.He confirmed that prisoners suffering from acute symptoms or

those who could not function in a medical facility (he gave the

example of those suffering from severe schizophrenic symptoms)

would be transferred to medical centres.

39.Professor Michael Kopelman gave evidence in person. He is an

Emeritus Professor of Neuropsychiatry at Kings College London.

He adopted his three reports dated 7th December 2015 (tab 7) and

reports dated 12th May 2016 and 26th May 2016 (tab 8). His oral

evidence can be summarised as follows: Mr Love suffered from

recurrent depressive disorder at age 20, 24-25 and in his late 20s.

He has severe eczema and asthma. These conditions can predispose

someone to depression.

40.In August 2012 Mr Love was referred to his local community health

team by his GP. In his opinion, at that time, Mr Love was on the

verge of psychosis and was clinically depressed, scoring high on the

Beck Depression Inventory (53). Mr Love continues to describe

features of depression and the hallucination to kill himself when

either severely depressed or fatigued. If/when extradition becomes

“imminent his mental health with plummet. Hallucinations will get

worse as will his eczema and asthma and suicide ideas will become

Page 10 of 32

Page 11 of 32

11

prominent in his mind”. He suggested Mr Love should see an

expert in AS and a psychiatrist to help him with his depression.

41. After hearing Kucharski’s evidence, Dr Kopelman said it was likely

Mr Love would be in and out of suicide watch, likely to become

agitated and not tolerated by the prison authorities, resulting in him

being put in segregation, which is well known to have an adverse

mental effect on anybody. For someone with an existing

psychological disorder, such as Mr Love, it will be even worse. He

anticipated the consequences for Mr Love being held for a

prolonged period in pre-trial detention in the United States as

resulting in a severe deterioration in his mental state, a severe

exacerbation of his clinical depression, the possible onset of

psychotic ideas and experiences, a worsening of his eczema and

asthma and “in consequence, an exacerbation of suicidal ideas to a

“very high” level” (tab 8, bullet point 3).

42.Under cross examination Professor Kopleman confirmed he had

met Mr Love on 3 occasions and had spoken to him on the

telephone. He accepted he had given Mr Love the “Beck Depression

Inventory” questionnaire to complete to cast his mind back to how

he was feeling in 2012/2013 and agreed it was slightly artificial to

get someone to describe their mental state. Mr Love’s medical

records are limited, he has never been referred to either a senior

psychiatrist or a senior clinical psychologist. He has been seen by

his GP and a Community Mental Health Team Support Worker.

43.Dr Kopleman said it was not unreasonable to conclude at times of

intense stress Mr Love would experience episodes of psychosis given

he has had pseudo hallucinations and fragmentary thought

processes in the past. He too agreed with Professor Baron-Cohen’s

assessment that this was not a fantasy.

44.In his opinion what would tip Mr Love over the brink, from not

committing suicide, would be a severe deterioration in his

depression, psychotic symptoms (including hearing voices), asthma

and eczema.

Page 11 of 32

Page 12 of 32

12

45.His mental condition would remove his mental capacity to resist the

impulse to commit suicide. Segregation in a United Kingdom prison

is a last resort for the most serious cases of someone at risk of

committing suicide.

46.Mr Love has not been taking his medication which is why he needs

to be supervised by either a Consultant Psychiatrist or a Senior

Clinical Psychologist.

47. Naomi Colvin gave evidence in person. She adopted her

statements dated 30th November 2015 (tab 26) and 14th January

2016 (tab 27) is a campaigner and works for the Courage

Foundation, an international organisation dedicated to protecting

the rights of whistle-blowers worldwide. She told me of a number of

cases highlighting the fact that in like circumstances where

defendants in the United States were sentenced to imprisonment

they spent substantial time in pre-court detention and were subject

to coercive plea-bargaining.

48.Under cross examination she confirmed the Courage Foundation is

raising funds to cover Mr Love’s legal costs through social media

and campaigning on his behalf to help him avoid extradition.

49.Jennifer Arcuri gave evidence in person. She adopted her

statements dated 2nd February 2016 (tab 30), undated statement

(tab 40) and statement 29th June 2016. She set up Hacker House

with its aim of ethical hacking. She met Lauri Love 9 months ago.

She attests to his emotional fragility. He works at Hacker House

from Thursday – Monday.

50.Lauri Love adopted his four statements dated 10th December 2015

(tab 19), 13th January 2016 (tab 20), 1st February 2016 (tab 21) and

undated proof (tab 22). In his oral evidence he told me as a child he

felt a deep sense of alienation from his peers and remembered

thinking he was different to others. He was very close to his sister

and had a small group of friends. When the family moved to

Lowestoft his hair fell out. It grew back when he went to 6th form

college. However he dropped out and worked in a turkey factory.

He applied for a Finnish passport, because his mother is Finnish,

Page 12 of 32

Page 13 of 32

13

and had to undertake military service. This was not successful

because he could not interact with others and was transferred to the

civil service. He describes himself as “falling below water” when he

cannot function properly. He entered into crisis and was diagnosed

with depression. He was apprehensive about taking antidepressants,

giving an example of a friend’s problems taking them. He finds it

difficult to confide in people and does not “know how empathy and

autism are related, but if I share problems it seems unfair and I’ve

kept my counsel. It appears now, given my understanding of AS, I

have not been able to do this”. In respect of his eczema, he told me

he bathes every day and uses creams and steroids. He has tried

immune suppressant drugs in the past but given he has a

suppressed immune system, he is cautious about using them. He

experiences skin infections and his skin falls off. The pain from his

eczema causes him stress which in turn causes more inflammation

of his skin.

51. He is unable to resist the need to scratch, “every day I try my utmost

to tear apart the skin in my body. Every day I fail to control this

urge. If sent to the United States of America those conditions, urges

to die would be stronger than my urge to scratch every day. My

degree of control is already impaired because of these proceedings.

The urge, the despair, feeling of helplessness will result in my

ending my life”.

52. His involvement in activism started at Glasgow University. He was

involved in a 7 months occupation of the university. He also told me

about Aaron Schwartz who committed suicide after being

prosecuted for downloading documents from the Massachusetts

Institute of Technology. He feels the prosecutors have added

charges to obtain a plea bargain, which he will refuse. He also said

he will not be able to access the evidence against him if he were in

custody.

53. He is currently studying for a degree in electrical engineering at

University Campus Suffolk and teaching at the University. He works

for Hacker House advising on computer security systems.

Page 13 of 32

Page 14 of 32

14

54.Under cross examination, Mr Love was asked about his relationship

with the media and it was put to him that, with the assistance of

others, he was trying to liken himself to Gary McKinnon and that he

has exaggerated his symptoms to the professionals, which he

denied. Although he has been diagnosed with AS for over 6 months

he has not taken antidepressants because they are not for AS. He

denied seeking to promote his personal difficulties as a shield.

55. Sylvia Royce gave evidence over Scopia. She is a lawyer and

member of the Bar of the District of Columbia and of the Bar of the

United States Supreme Court. Between October 1995 and August

2000 she was Chief of the International Prisoner Transfer

Programme, which is part of the Criminal Division of the

Department of Justice. She adopted her reports dated 8th and 12th

February 2007 (tab 16) which she prepared for the case of Gary

McKinnon. Her knowledge of prisoner transfers is up to date. In

2016 she had two cases involving applications for transfer to the

United Kingdom which were both refused. The prosecutor’s

position is the single most important factor in the decision for

prisoner transfer and there is an expectation it will be part of a plea

bargaining process. She has seen cases where prosecutors will not

agree to a transfer without a plea bargain. Prisoners can apply for

reconsideration of prisoner transfer 3 years after the original

refusal.

56.Under cross examination Ms Royce confirmed the Chief of Transfer

makes recommendations to the signatory authority which are

usually granted. In this case, it will be Ms Woolf who will make the

decision if a request for transfer is made. A prisoner can make a

request for transfer within 8- 12 weeks of arrival at their federal

prison.

57. A district judge makes the decision about a financial order for

restitution. A probation officer undertakes a financial investigation

of the defendant but she was unsure what this would involve for a

foreign national and was not sure how the representations are

weighed when the defendant is a foreign national. There have been

Page 14 of 32

Page 15 of 32

15

cases where transfer has occurred without a financial order for

restitution being in place.

58.Joshua Dratel gave evidence. He is an attorney of the State of

New York and has been practicing criminal defence law since

admission to the Bar in 1982. He is a Senior Fellow for Legal

Research at Fordham University Law School Centre on National

Security. Since 1988 he has been a member of the Criminal Justice

Act panel in the South District of New York and in 2007 represented

a number of detainees in Guantanamo Bay.

59.He has provided three statements dated 26th January 2016, 25th

May 2016 and 27th June 2016 (tabs 9, 10 and 42) which he adopted.

His oral evidence is summarised as follows: Mr Love will not get bail

in the United States because he is not a United States citizen has no

status in the United States.

60.On arrival he will receive medical attention and then be placed in

segregated housing prior to determination of where he will be

placed. His first-hand knowledge from a client, about suicide watch,

will involve Mr Love being put in isolation rather than receiving

treatment. From his experience special inmates watch a potential

suicidal inmate and not medical staff. Inmates will say they are not

suicidal to get out of solitary confinement. Assurances given by the

Unite States authorities are worthless; judges defer to the prison

authorities about mental health issues. There is no policy to stop

mentally ill patients being put into solitary confinement.

61. Mr Love’s sentence could be either consecutive or concurrent but

even with mitigating circumstances he is likely to receive substantial

sentences in three jurisdictions.

62.Under cross examination Mr Dratel said he would defer to Dr

Kucharski’s evidence about what would happen to Mr Love on

return to the United States. Mr Dratel was questioned about

inmates he mentioned in his statement, and gave the example of his

client, Mr Mustafa (Abu Hamza), whose physical disabilities were

not being accommodated within the prison estate.

Page 15 of 32

Page 16 of 32

16

63.The statistics quoted in his statements about suicide rates in BOP

facilities has fluctuated over the years; he was unaware if this was

because of the way either the data had been gathered or if here was

better reporting.

64.He agreed that there was nothing technically wrong in prosecutions

being brought in three jurisdictions but it was unusual, given it

would be easy to establish jurisdiction in a federal court based on

the electronic evidence. Mr Love can apply for the cases to be heard

in one jurisdiction, and it will be for the prosecutor to agree joinder.

65.When asked if there was anything wrong in the prosecution asking

for a sentence within an applicable sentence range, Mr Dratel said it

is the norm for a prosecutor to suggest a judge goes outside the

Guideline. He said 97% of cases which fall below the guideline

arising in fast track cases and do not relate to family considerations.

In his experience he has never seen the Government support a

departure in cases other than in fast track cases.

66.If this case is run on the basis that Mr Love acted out of

conscience/necessity the judge will follow the law. Three

jurisdictions mean “three bites of the apple” and gives the

Government a significant advantage. A judge can increase a

sentence by imposing consecutive sentences. Sentences imposed

within the guidelines are presumed reasonable.

67.Zachary Katznelson gave evidence via Scopia. He is a lawyer of

16 years’ experience in the United States and was called to the Bar in

the United Kingdom in 2012. He was formerly Senior Counsel and

then Legal Director of Reprieve. He has provided two statements

dated 26th January 2016 and 25th May 2016 (tabs 11 and 12). He

adopted his statements and his oral evidence can be summarised as

follows: He has been conducting research into prison conditions for

10 1⁄2 years. His experience is current.

68.Under cross examination he said it is rare for a judge to depart from

the sentencing guideline on mental health grounds unless the

Government requests such a departure. A judge may be persuaded

to go to the lower range of the guidelines rather than the upper

Page 16 of 32

Page 17 of 32

17

range. A prosecutor will only charge all crimes they believe they can

prove. If there is a plea to some crimes, the guideline will be based

on the most serious offence. The guideline sentence is unlikely to

change even if a defendant pleads guilty. If all matters fell to be

sentenced in one jurisdiction, a defendant could be sentenced on a

concurrent basis.

69.A number of cases in which low sentences were passed were put to

Mr Katznelson. He could not comment on some as he was

unfamiliar with them and said he was not inflating the sentence Mr

Love is likely to face. Less than 1% of cases have resulted in judges

departing from the sentencing guidelines due to mental health

issues, but a judge has the discretion to do so.

70.Grace North gave evidence over Scopia. She works in “Starbucks”

but identified herself in her oral evidence as a full time prison

worker. She said she knew Jeremy Hammond as a friend. He was

recently put into solitary confinement because of an error in which

contraband was found in a postcard in his possession. Telephone

contact is limited and e mails can take time being received but there

is no restriction in sending e mails. She said her strong opinions

may be coloured by her friendship with Jeremy Hammond.

71. Marlo Caddedu gave evidence over Scopia. She is a lawyer and

prepared a statement dated 24th December 2015 (tab 29). She said

the rules in the United States provide for Counsel to see a client but

in reality it is difficult. She also gave evidence about clients being

able to access digital evidence whilst in custody. In cases where

there is substantial digital evidence the expectation is to undertake a

word search for each document. In practice this is difficult to do

and to provide to clients in custody with electronic discovery. The

Bureau of Prisons do not allow Counsel to take computers into their

facilities resulting in documents having to be printed off.

72. She commented on that the case of Mr Budovsky (referred to in the

prosecutors’ statement at para 24, tab 32) was extremely unusual, in

which pre-trial documents were downloaded onto individual hard

drives and a laptop was made available for him to use in prison. A

Page 17 of 32

Page 18 of 32

18

court could agree that laptops are brought into a prison but there

are no protocols governing this.

73. Kevin Gallagher gave evidence on Scopia. He is a computer

systems administrator, writer and activist. He has provided one

undated statement (tab 31). He is Mr Barratt Brown’s public

advocate, in the United States and was involved in getting media

attention for his case and raising money for his defence. He was not

surprised when Mr Brown pleaded guilty because the offence he was

originally charged with could have resulted in him going to prison

for 100 years. Since 2014 he has had some interaction with Mr Love

on line.

74.Tor Ekeland gave evidence in person. He is Mr Love’s United

States Counsel and is admitted in the New York State and several

Federal courts. He regularly defends individuals charged under the

Computer Fraud and Abuse Act in both criminal and civil cases. His

two statements dated 26th January 2016 (tab 13) and 23rd May 2016

(tab 14) deal with United States Federal prosecutions and the

possible effects on Mr Love’s liberty and wellbeing before, during

and after trial. He told the court that the alleged £13 million loss

incurred by the victims of the alleged crimes would be included in

the sentencing range and on that figure the sentence would be

categorised into the 188 -121 month range. The Guidelines are not

mandatory however judges follow them. Under cross examination

he said the loss in this case relates to the intrusion of the activity.

The civil standard is used at a sentencing hearing. He agrees with

Mr Dratel’s evidence and said the sentencing guidelines are

inherently irrational.

FINDINGS OF FACT (NOT FORUM)

75. It has been accepted by Mr Caldwell on behalf of the Government

that Mr Love suffers from Asperger Syndrome (AS) although the

nature and degree was challenged. It is clear from Professor Baron- Cohen’s evidence, which I accept, that Mr Love is high functioning,

has the capacity to participate in a trial and give instructions to his

Page 18 of 32

Page 19 of 32

19

lawyers. He does not have AS in combination with learning

difficulties, attention deficit and language. His AS is a “very severe

disability because it causes him to become so absorbed in his

interests that he neglects important areas of his life, such as his

studies, and even his health” (Professor Baron-Cohen, 7th December

2015, tab 4, page 3, para 7).

76.It is also clear from the evidence, and from seeing Mr Love in court,

that he is highly intelligent and articulate. Professor Kopleman also

comments his “thinking processes are generally excellent” (tab 7,

page 14, para 7(iii)).

77. It is not disputed that Mr Love suffers from eczema, which he has

had since birth, and which is a partly stress related physical

condition exacerbated by his mental health issues (Professor Baron- Cohen, tab 5, page 2, para 4). I have no doubt this causes him

severe problems given the evidence from his GP and Mr Love’s own

vivid evidence of his daily hygiene routines and his constant urge to

scratch. It is not disputed he suffers from asthma.

78.Dr Kopleman’s reports and oral evidence outlined Mr Love’s past

psychiatric history and depression, which started in 2004. Mr Love

also gave evidence about this. I find Mr Love has suffered from

depression in the past and it has got worse since these proceedings

began. However I also find that in the past he has not continued to

take medication prescribed that could help him with his depression.

Dr Kopleman also said more could be done for his depression and

suggested he saw an expert in AS and a psychiatrist; his symptoms

could be managed by taking antidepressants. In his report dated

26th May 2016, he said, “Mr Love has proved very reluctant to

engage in psychiatric or psychological treatment in the UK” (tab 8,

page 6, para 2).

79. There have not been any incidents of self-harm in the past but I

accept Mr Love has experienced suicidal thoughts intermittently,

both in the past and now. Mr Love denied any suggestion that he

had exaggerated his symptoms and his suicide risk which I accept

given the medical evidence.

Page 19 of 32

Page 20 of 32

20

80.I also accept Professor Baron-Cohen and Professor Kopleman’s

evidence that he would attempt suicide before extradition to the

United States. Both are of the opinion he would be at high risk of

suicide. I accept Professor Baron-Cohen’s oral evidence that Mr

Love’s intention is not a reflection of a voluntary plan or act but due

to his mental health being dependant on him being at home with his

parents and not being detained for an indefinite period.

81. I accept the evidence of Mr Panepinto (tab 34) who is employed by

the United States Department of Justice, United States Marshals

Services, about Mr Love’s transfer to the US being undertaken by

the United States Marshals. They routinely transport prisoner with

medical/mental health conditions including those at high risk of

suicide (page 2, para 9) and I am satisfied any risk in transit can be

ameliorated by appropriate arrangements being in place to prevent

suicide.

82.I heard evidence about prison conditions and what the United

States will do to mitigate Mr Love’s suicidal ideology, and about the

regime for those inmates suffering from mental health issues and, in

particular, suicide risk. I read and heard evidence from Mr Dratel, a

United States defence lawyer, who gave general evidence about pre- trial detention facilities in the US and the medical care available to

such inmates. He deferred to Dr Kucharski’s evidence that Mr Love

would be placed on suicide watch. Dr Kucharski has been a forensic

psychologist for 30 years and worked for the Bureau of Prisons. I

accept he is an experienced clinician and I accept his evidence that

Mr Love would be screened as soon as he was admitted into prison,

with acutely suicidal inmates being placed on suicide watch; this

will happen to Mr Love. He also said “no one commits suicide on

suicide watch”. However I find the United States can deal with

suicide risks and provisions for prisoners with complex mental

health and physical needs given I accept the evidence of Dr Lyn, the

current Psychology Services Branch Administrator of the Federal

Bureau of Prisons, about the facilities provided the BOP both on

arrival and thereafter. Once in the United States Mr Love will be

Page 20 of 32

Page 21 of 32

21

screened within 24 hours and an assessment made of his imminent

risk of self-harm. Each psychology department has a full range of

services including psychological assessment and suicide risk

assessment. If he is found guilty Mr Love will be assessed as to

which designated facility he should be sent to and, when one has

been found, Mr Love will be screened by medical and mental health

professionals on arrival. The BOP can provide medical care for

inmates with eczema and asthma. In respect of Mr Love’s diagnosis

of AS, he will be assigned various workers and a psychology service.

The BOP’s Suicide Prevention Programme provides that if a

psychologist determines an inmate has an imminent potential for

suicide, he will be placed under supervision which involves the

prisoner wearing a tear resistant gown and tear resistant blanket. In

her statement dated 9th June 2016 Dr Lyn confirms that, as part of

the Suicide Prevention Programme, group and individual

counselling services are available for all BOP inmates considered

suicide risks (tab 37, para 3) and, although inmates are not

ordinarily permitted to use their own physicians or other healthcare

providers, any request for an inmate to be examined by a specific

physician will be considered by the Warden and Regional Director

and Medical Director (para 4).

83.I find there is nothing either unlawful or improper in proceedings

being undertaken in three jurisdictions in the United States. The law

enforcement agencies and prosecutors in the districts all started

separate investigations at different times given the criminal activity

happened in a number of districts. I accept such decisions have

been made in good faith (Combined Affidavit (undated) of Nicholas

P Grippo, Christian Everdell, Jay Prabhu and Ryan Dickey, tab 32,

paras 25-33). In fact Mr Love can request the cases are heard in one

jurisdiction, subject to the approval of the attorneys in the districts

(as above, para 29, footnote 5). Mr Dratel also accepted there is

“nothing technically wrong in prosecutions being brought in three

jurisdictions but it was unusual”.

Page 21 of 32

Page 22 of 32

22

84.I also find that the United States authorities provide adequate trial

preparations for defendants. I accept the evidence set out in the

prosecutors’ Affidavit that Mr Love will be afforded reasonable

opportunity for private consultation with his Counsel; he can apply

to be temporarily released from custody for the necessary

preparation of his case (which could mean being taking to an

interview room where he can meet his lawyer and review any

electronic evidence); various methods can be employed including

placing discovery on a stand-alone computer for him or to take him

to a United States Attorney’s Office to review the evidence

(prosecutor’s statement, tab 32, pages 10 -11, paras 21-23).

85.I was taken through the United States Sentencing Guidelines

(“USSG”) by a number of witnesses. There was no dispute between

them as to the sentence Mr Love might receive. There was also no

dispute that, as a matter of law, the USSG are not mandatory but

permit a sentencing judge the discretion to depart from a sentencing

range and move up and down the guideline. The Government

acknowledges Mr Love could receive numerous sentencing

enhancements under the Guidelines (as above, page 2, para 5) and

each district court could impose consecutive sentences to any other

term of imprisonment imposed in other districts but “under the

circumstances present in this matter, the Guideline counsel courts

to impose concurrent sentences” (as above, page 5, para 11). I also

find that if Mr Love pleads guilty upon his arrival in the United

States, or if he is convicted and pleads guilty to other matters

outstanding in another district, he could have his cases remitted to

one court for sentence (as above, page 15 footnote 5).

86.In Ms Royce gave evidence about prisoner transfer after conviction

and I read Ms Wolff’s statements on behalf of the Government. Ms

Wolff has been Chief of the International Prisoner Transfer Unit for

16 years. Ms Royce relied on statements made in 2007. In her oral

evidence Ms Royce told of two cases she has been involved with in

2016 in which both were denied transfer to the United Kingdom.

She did not say why. She said the court would make a decision about

Page 22 of 32

Page 23 of 32

23

the financial means of an applicant but was unsure what financial

investigation could be undertaken for a foreign national. Restitution

played a part in the decision for transfer. Any request made for

transfer would be sent to Ms Wolff. In her affidavit Ms Wolff

confirmed there is a transfer treaty with the United Kingdom.

Guidelines have been published setting out the evaluation of

transfer applications. Outstanding financial obligations do not

amount to an automatic bar to transfer, the ability of a prisoner to

pay and the views of the victims are taken into account (tab 36, para

7). I accept her evidence given she has been the current Chief of the

International Prison Transfer Unit. An agreement between the

United States and United Kingdom exists, a procedure exists for an

application to be made and a number of factors are taken into

account in deciding a prisoner transfer, which was not dependant

on, or primarily based on, the prosecutor’s views of restitution,

contrary to Ms Royce’s evidence.

FINDINGS AND DECISIONS ON THE ISSUES RAISED

SECTION 83A – FORUM

87.I have read the submissions from the parties and heard from them

in which they expanded their submissions. I have read the cases of

Dibden v France [2014] EWHC 3074 and Shaw v America

[2014] EWHC 465 (Admin) c0ntained in the bundle of

authorities (tabs 2 and 3).

88.In Shaw, Aitkens LJ emphasised two important considerations in

connection with the Section 83A (3) factors namely, the court has to

bear in mind each of the specified matters individually (and not any

others) and it may be that one factor is irrelevant or not present or

of little weight or of great importance (paras 40-41). The question is

whether it is in the interests of justice there should not be an

extradition to a requesting state. In every case the court will be

engaged in a fact specific exercise.

Page 23 of 32

Page 24 of 32

24

89.It is accepted the threshold requirement in section 83A (2) (a) is

satisfied because a substantial measure of Mr Love’s relevant

activity was performed in the United Kingdom.

90.Mr Cooper asked me to look outside the sequence of the Act and put

that which he says is the most important consideration first,

namely, Mr Love’s connection to the United Kingdom and to give it

the most weight. I will deal with the specified factors in the order in

which they appear in the section:

(a) the place where most of the loss or harm resulting from the

extradition offence occurred or was intended to occur: Most, if not

all, of the loss or harm resulting from Mr Love’s conduct occurred in

the United States as he is accused of stealing confidential

information belonging to individuals (including credit card details)

from US government computers and private companies. In my view

the harm is the stealing of that information with the potential illegal

use of the same, irrespective of where or not Mr Love did this for

financial gain. It appears he targeted the United States departments

and companies as part of his “hactivisim” and political activity

(b) the interests of any victims of the extradition offence: The

victims are the companies and government departments who had

their computers hacked into resulting in millions of dollars’ worth of

damage. There are also individual victims, those whose personal

details were stolen. In this case, the US are of the view that “none of

the victims of Love’s alleged crimes have an interest in this matter

being prosecuted in the United Kingdom” (Prosecutors statement,

as above, tab 32, page 18, para b). I do not accept Mr Cooper’s

submissions that the interests of the victims may not be served with

a prosecution in the United States given Dr Kopleman’s evidence

that Mr Love may not be fit to stand trial. That is conjecture at this

stage. Dr Kopleman’s exact evidence was any refusal of bail is likely

to cause a worsening of Mr Love’s clinical depression but it was

difficult to anticipate if this would affect him and whether he would

be fit to stand trial.

Page 24 of 32

Page 25 of 32

25

(c) any belief of a prosecutor that the United Kingdom, or a

particular part of the United Kingdom, is not the most appropriate

jurisdiction in which to prosecute D in respect of the conduct

constituting the extradition offence: The Crown Prosecution Service

is silent in this case and I agree with Mr Caldwell’s submission that

the absence of a prosecutor’s belief adds nothing to the decision

under the interests of justice test and therefore this specified matter

is neutral.

(d) were D to be prosecuted in a part of the United Kingdom for an

offence that corresponds to the extradition offence, whether

evidence necessary to prove the offence is or could be made

available in the United Kingdom: I agree, as did Mr Caldwell for the

Government that, in this digital age, evidence to prove the offence in

the United Kingdom is available or could be made available.

However, as already stated there are witnesses who will be required

to give evidence. One is the anonymous informant. It is unknown at

this time whether he would assist in any prosecution in the United

Kingdom and he may not be a compellable witness in the United

Kingdom. The Government has said it will call each of the victim

organisations, law enforcement officers, forensic evidence and some

individual victims whose personal information was stolen. The

prosecutor’s point out that it would be “substantially difficult to

make available to the United Kingdom all of the evidence necessary

to prosecute Love, particularly the witnesses the United States

anticipates calling at trail” (Prosecutors statement, tab 32, page 19).

(e) any delay that might result from proceeding in one jurisdiction

rather than another: It was submitted that a prosecution In the

United Kingdom was likely to be quicker than in the United States

given the involvement of the NCA in the case and they would be at

an advanced stage of readiness for trial. The latter suggestion is

speculation, because, apart from the NCA executing a search

warrant at Mr Love’s home address and seizing a number of

computers, some of which they could access, some they could not. I

do not have any other evidence as to any stage of readiness. In

Page 25 of 32

Page 26 of 32

26

contrast, the proceedings in the United States have started, evidence

has been obtained in three jurisdictions resulting in three Grand

Juries issuing Indictments. The United States prosecutors’

statement confirms that Mr Love has the right to be tried within 70

days following his first court appearance, unless he waives the same,

and, if he is tried in three separate districts, the same time limit

applies. (tab 32, para 70). I have also found there is nothing

procedurally incorrect in three districts wanting to prosecute Mr

Love. Mr Love could also apply for all his cases to be heard under

one jurisdiction (certainly for the conspiracy charges) which would

reduce delay (as above, para 2).

(f) the desirability and practicability of all prosecutions relating to

the extradition offence taking place in one jurisdiction, having

regard (“in particular”) to – (i) the jurisdictions in which witnesses,

co-defendants and other suspects are located, and (ii) the

practicability of the evidence of such persons being given in the

United Kingdom or in jurisdictions outside the United Kingdom:

There are no co-defendants. There are over twenty witnesses, all of

whom are in the United States. The digital evidence could be given

in the United Kingdom but the witnesses reside in the United States

and as a matter of desirability and practicality it is easier for them to

give evidence in the United States.

(g) D’s connection with the United Kingdom: Undoubtedly all Mr

Love’s connections are in the United Kingdom. He is a single man

with no dependants. He is a United Kingdom citizen and lives with

his parents. He is studying, teaching and working in the United

Kingdom. Mr Love has been diagnosed with AS. He also suffers

from depression, eczema and asthma. He has the support and

stability of his family. The experts agree Mr Love would be at a

severe risk of suicide if extradited to the United States. In my view

the submission that a defendant’s connection to the United

Kingdom proved decisive in ensuring other United Kingdom

hackers were prosecuted in the United Kingdom is not relevant to

Mr Love’s personal connections with the United Kingdom.

Page 26 of 32

Page 27 of 32

27

91. I accept Mr Love’s connections to the United Kingdom include his

own personal circumstances, his health and his support network,

and not merely his connection to the State, as submitted by Mr

Caldwell. Some of the evidence in this case is transportable but, in

my assessment, those factors do not outweigh the facts that the

conduct occurred in the United States, all the victims are in the

United States, their interests are best served with the case being

heard in the United States and any delay is not known because I do

not have any evidence as to how far any investigation has taken in

the United Kingdom. What I do know is that evidence has been

produced by the United States resulting in three Indictments being

issued by three Grand Juries.

92.It is the interests of justice for the case to be tired in the United

States and for this reason the forum bar fails.

SECTION 91 AND SECTION 87 – ARTICLE 3

93.I will deal with these issues together as the submissions are broadly

the same.

94.Under section 91 a Requested Person has the burden of proving

that, because of his physical or mental condition, it would be unjust

or oppressive to extradite him.

95.Article 3 provides that no-one shall be subjected to torture or

inhuman and degrading treatment or punishment. This is absolute

and prohibits extradition if there are substantial grounds for

believing that there is a real risk of treatment which violates Article

3. The burden is on the Requested Person to bring clear and cogent

evidence to show there are substantial grounds for believing that if

extradited, the person faces a real risk of either being killed or being

subjected to torture or to inhuman or degrading treatment.

96.I have been referred to a number of cases set out in the Authorities

Bundle. I have, in particular, considered the cases of Turner v

Government of the United States [2012] EWC 2426, and Polish

Judicial Authority v Wolkowicz [2013] EWHC 102

(Admin). In the case of Turner Aikens LJ summarised the

Page 27 of 32

Page 28 of 32

28

propositions derived from a number of previous cases that dealt

with the question as to whether the mental condition of a Requested

Person who poses a substantial risk of suicide amounts to his

extradition being unjust or oppressive or in breach of Article 3 (para

28). A high threshold has to be reached to satisfy the court that Mr

Love’s mental condition is such that it would be unjust or oppressive

to extradite him. As I have already found (para 79-81 above) I am

satisfied that there is a substantial risk Mr Love will commit suicide.

The evidence of Professor Baron-Cohen and Professor Kopleman is

clear; Mr Love’s mental condition is such that it removes his

capacity to resist the impulse to commit suicide. There will be a

high risk he will commit suicide if extradited. This will be prior to

removal, in transit and on arrival in the United States. Professor

Baron-Cohen warns that to dismiss this would be “a fantasy” (para

28 above). The key issue then is what measures are in place to

prevent any attempt at suicide being successful. In the United

Kingdom that risk would be lessened if Mr Love were on bail and

with his parents. If is custody I have heard of the holistic approach

of the United Kingdom prison system from the Reverend Love.

97. On transfer to the United States, Stephen Panepinto, the Deputy

Chief of the International Investigations Branch Investigative

Operations Division, states the United States Marshals Service will

be responsible for Mr Love’s transfer (statement dated 20th April

2016, tab 34). They routinely transport prisoners with medical

and/or health concerns (para 9). He sets out the procedure to be

adopted prior to his transfer and if deemed necessary a member of

the Medical Support Unit of the USMS could accompany Mr Love

during the flight. Medical records and the psychiatric assessments

should be given to those who have to accompany Mr Love during

transfer. I have found these safeguards are in place to ensure Mr

Love does not commit suicide in transit (para 82 above).

98.On arrival in the United States I have also found there are

arrangements in place to prevent suicide (para 83). I have carefully

considered the evidence of Dr Kucharski and Mr Dratel about what

Page 28 of 32

Page 29 of 32

29

will happen to Mr Love once he is in the United States and from the

Government and find that, despite the differences in the approaches

of the United States and United Kingdom to prisoners who are

exhibiting suicidal ideology, the preventative measure in place in

the United States are effective in preventing suicides.

99.I am also satisfied that Mr Love will receive dedicated mental and

physical health care in the United States, as set out in the

comprehensive report of Dr Lyn (tab 33) which I accept (at para 83

above). Such care will be available to Mr Love during the currency

of his incarceration.

100. I have not been provided with assurances, something raised by

Mr Cooper. I do not agree with his submission that absent such

assurances Mr Love faces a real risk of being suicide to and

inhuman and disproportionate punishment prohibited by Article 3

given my findings regarding the health and mental health care Mr

Love will receive in the United States. I have been told of the

maximum sentences available and the likely sentence in Mr Love’s

cases by Mr Ekeland. Certainly the sentencing regime is harsher in

the United States than in the United Kingdom for equivalent

offences but a number of factors can be taken into consideration at

sentencing, as set out in the evidence contained in the prosecutor’s

affidavit, including the court having the discretion to depart from a

sentencing range. The mental health of the defendant may be

relevant in this process. Each district has a discretion to impose a

consecutive terms to other terms of imprisonment against him (tab

32, para 11). It is for the Requesting State to set its own sentencing

policy unless it is disproportionate which, for the reasons stated, I

do not find it to be.

101. Mr Love has not shown it will be either unjust or oppressive to

extradite and there will be a real risk to Mr Love of being severely

ill-treated in a manner sufficiently severe to engage Article 3 for the

reasons given above.

102. The challenges under section 91 and Article 3 fail.

Page 29 of 32

Page 30 of 32

30

SECTION 87 – ARTICLE 6

103. Article 6 safeguards the right to a fair trial. The burden is on Mr

Love to show there are substantial grounds for believing that there

is a real risk of a flagrant denial of this right if extradited. It is

submitted Mr Love faces a real risk of a flagrant denial of his Article

6 right to a fair trial because access to his lawyer will be curtailed, he

will have difficulties in reviewing the evidence because computers

are not allowed into detention facilities. Ms Caddedu’s evidence is

that in such situations lawyers may have to print off documents for

defendants.

104. The evidence from the United States differs. I accept the

evidence form the Government (as set out in para 85 above) which

details the procedures in place to allow defendants to have access to

computers and/or disclosure and confidential facilities to see and

instruct lawyers.

105. Accordingly Mr Love’s challenge under article 6 fails.

SECTION 87 – ARTICLE 8

106. Article 8 provides that everyone has a right to respect for his

private and family life, his home and his correspondence.

107. In considering the evidence under article 8 I have had regard to

the principles in the context of extradition procedures as set out in

Norris v Government of the United States (no2) [2010]

UKSC 9 and HH v Italy [2012] UKSC 25.

108. The case of Polish Judicial Authorities v Celinski and

Ors [2015] EWHC 1274 (Admin) sets of the approach the court

has to take in respect to article 8 cases. In applying the “balance

sheet” approach recommended in Celinski I have to look at the

factors in favour of Mr Love’s extradition and those factors against.

Factors in favour of extradition

109. There is a strong public interest that the United Kingdom should

honour its extradition treaty obligations with other countries.

Page 30 of 32

Page 31 of 32

31

110. The offences for which Mr Love is sought are serious, they were

committed over three districts in the United States over a period of

one year.

111. Mr Love targeted computers in the United States.

112. Millions of dollars’ worth of damage was caused by hacking into

the computers and employee’s personal details were stolen.

113. It was submitted by Mr Caldwell that the United States has a

proven track record of managing vulnerable persons whose

extradition has been ordered by the United Kingdom. The United

States authorities are able to meet Mr Love’s medical and personal

needs.

Factors against extradition

114. Mr Love is a United Kingdom national and is 32 years of age

(dob: 14.12.1984). He is a single man who lives with his parents. He

suffers from Asperger Syndrome, depression, eczema and asthma.

115. He is at high risk of committing suicide if extradited due to his

mental health. He has suffered from eczema since birth and the

condition is exacerbated at times of stress and anxiety. He

undertakes a daily hygiene regime, uses creams and steroids to treat

the condition, takes medication and sees his GP regularly.

116. He is not currently taking antidepressants for his depression.

117. It was submitted that suicide prevention in United States prisons

would exacerbate rather than ameliorate Mr Love’s suicide risk, he

is likely to spend a significant amount of time in solitary

confinement and he would be isolated from his family which would

elevate such a risk.

118. It was also submitted his AS would not be treated properly in the

US.

119. The length of sentence he is likely to face.

120. Mr Love is of good character and is working and studying.

Decision

Page 31 of 32

Page 32 of 32

32

121. Mr Love’s Article 8 rights are clearly engaged. In balancing the

factors for and against extradition I am satisfied that the very strong

counter balancing factors required to find extradition would be

disproportionate are not found in this case. Mr Love faces extremely

serious charges for offences of computer hacking over a period of

one year from October 2012 to October 2013. I accept Mr Love

suffers from both physical and mental health issues but I have found

the medical facilities in the United States prison estate on arrival

and during any sentence if he is convicted available to him, are such

that I can be satisfied his needs will be comprehensively met by the

US authorities.

122. I am satisfied Mr Love’s extradition would be compatible with

his Convention rights and I send this case to the Secretary of State

for her decision as to whether or not Mr Love should be extradited.

District Judge (Magistrates’ Court) N Tempia

16th September 2016

Page 32 of 32

usa-v-love-judgment-1.pdf

[ENDS]

VIDEOS:

Lauri Love speaks to BBC Newsnight about the TalkTalk hack – YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCeQ63teBnM

23 Oct 2015 – Uploaded by David Thefan

Lauri Love speaks to BBC Newsnight about the TalkTalk hack …. The daddy is going to love his new pet, he’s …

Lauri Love speaks to BBC Newsnight – YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K10LBI9iOHE
28 Feb 2016 – Uploaded by The Truth Machine

Lauri Love speaks about the recent TalkTalk hack on BBC Newsnight.

FreeLauri #NoLOVE4USGov – Lauri Love – No Extradition … – YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DPZa6iAoJIg
14 Aug 2016 – Uploaded by Wesley Hall

Alleged Brit hacker Lauri Love, who is accused of compromising US government servers and faces extradition …

~~Anonymous Message to Lauri Love~~ – YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OMIiPTbU088
25 Jun 2016 – Uploaded by Pontifex Maximus

~~Anonymous Message to Lauri Love~~ … EXCLUSIVE: British hacker Lauri Love fears 99yr US …

lauri love channel 4 news – YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b-KkgkFLSFY
28 Dec 2015 – Uploaded by 1anonymous.com

Lauri Love on channel 4 news discussing investigatory powers bill and the implications it will have on the …

Anonymous UK – Lauri Love Facing Extradition … – YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RMcYE6YADRs
2 Aug 2016 – Uploaded by 2456Carl

A re-Upload of video by Wesley P P Hall Full text available from https://www.facebook.com/homesnotbanks

UK ‘hacker’ Lauri Love fears death in US prison – YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GhQi9uKYPIw
6 Sep 2016 – Uploaded by News Oversea

Subscible to our channel to get news everyday : https://goo.gl/04rKAh Follow us on twitter : https://twitter.com

Anonymous Message to Save Lauri Love from Extradition – YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qYG5b-AEd7A
2 Aug 2016 – Uploaded by Fearless One

Dr. Les Sachs, a whistle-blower from USA, author and most educated man in America (before he had to flee for …

Anonymous – Lauri Love – Extradition #FreeLauri – YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=me8KlhTl4uA
3 Jul 2016 – Uploaded by 2456Carl

A British activist and alleged hacker has told a court he fears he will take his own life if he is extradited to the …

Free Lauri Love – freelauri.com – #NoLove4USGov – YouTube

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KLiGbarL4y0
15 Jul 2016 – Uploaded by Wesley Hall

Alleged Brit hacker Lauri Love, who is accused of compromising US government servers and faces extradition …

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

MAURICE KIRK: Dimwit Maurice Too Slow for ‘Garrotte’ HRH Prince Charles Incident Conspiracy + ARCHIVE

Dimwit Maurice Too Slow for ‘Garrotte’ HRH Prince Charles Incident Conspiracy

Posted on by

Dozy me I have only just had time to put together a copy of the court management copy , prepared by the police purportedly from their choice of my documents (my originally court refused prosecution exhibits) stored for more than two decades to finally get the lying little welshing bastards off my back by needing to take civil action

Today is the first time, also, to have had the chance to copy those cherry picked documents released eventually from the Judge’s Chambers about two months ago!

The following pages (photos) is from the triage of files of same number and put along side each other to see what the police were attempting to hide.

My 90’s memo sheet, made up of my then secretary’s writing,  appeared in the court police prepared copy, the judge’s own copy but NOT in the returned copy from the police via Dolmans solicitor’s offices, in 2003, to me of my original papers.

The police made damned sure I did not see the content of it as it identifies those undisclosed police officers that I have been deprived of throughout the RCVS London 2004 disciplinary hearing at the Privy Council in Downing Street all implicated in ‘garrotte’ conspiracy.

Inspector Griffiths (one of same in non-cautioned in custody interview on ‘garrotte’, I wonder, Caspar?) knew about yet alone not allowing me to call these witnesses, concerning my imprisonment on the excuse I could not be ‘identified’ or giving sufficient time for the Guernsey police to have me extradited (see previous blogs). Griffiths, for the new Chief Constable, Vauagn, blatantly produced still further witness statement attempting to cover-up this in at least three other incident produced mid 2013 civil substantive trial before His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC.

BUT Inspector Griffiths confirmed to His Honour’s  court that ex Chief Constable Barbara Wilding’s six week late February 2009 sworn affidavit content had been correct in that full disclosure of police records had already been disclosed to this Claimant according to  LAW.

All routine stuff in Welsh courts  when all knew they were immune to prosecution, in any event,  so well experienced by  a then very naïve veterinary surgeon who had originally  only crossed  the bridge from England for only a two week locum tenens.

20160922_114634

 

20160922_161201[1].jpg

peter-vaughan

93 05 20 Interview Tape

MY May 1993 custody interview tape ‘found’ by police in 2016! Oh surprise , surprise ……so why did it belatedly get disclosed and for the judge to then swiftly seize it?   Don’t hold your breath for the truth as you are witnessing a thoroughly corrupt police force being aloud to continue to operate unchecked ESPECIALLY now so many voted Brexit.

So who was it so observant as to seeing on the document the name Inspector Hill and why the police had withheld my own document at the time of the Whitehall ‘vexatious litigant’ fairy tale story  the South Wales Police?  Chief Constable Burdon? spouted about this fairy tail, in 2003, to HM Solicitor -General .

Hill , remember, was the police officer who burst into the Barry court following the collapse of the case when Anti-Terrorism senior CPS officer from London ‘offered no evidence’ meaning the confiscated Crown Prosecutors file yet again by the Barry police in order to shred the concocted evidence by the Chief Constable in the first place.

Hill, in the full face of the court hearing, snatched that file just as Inspector Andrew Rice did not when accused of smuggling pigs into Ireland again but accused of having no car insurance that let to CPS officer Stan Soffa being arrested there and then.

To be continued

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Twice the South Wales Police have Smashed-in My Car Window for a Non Arrestable Offence & Cardiff’s Civil Trial Judge Has Ignored the Lot!

Like the proverbial ‘Shit stuck to a blanket’……No wonder too many voted for Brexit not realising their funded judiciary gravy-train is now on a down hill run, completely un checked, all the way to the bank.

Video appears to show police officer smash car window – BBC News

NOW watch my first of two incidents with South Wales Police and each Cardiff criminal  court up through the UK appeal nonsense , before my being eligible for Strasbourg, blocked this video from disclosure until too late to prevent my name being removed from the veterinary register.

20160919_093108

 

16-09-19-cr-l-3

WATCH THIS PACE later for my police incidents facts, chapter & verse with overhead video capturing police assault on me  as I am dragged out while stationary in a queue of Cardiff traffic. Meanwhile the cctv is recording but  the redacted police video is on my You Tube site clearly shows where the ‘splices’ were made to avoid the PC Osborne assault and then dragging me from the car where left for ages , alone, in wide open doored van in the traffic jam……..hoping I would attempt to run away…..no arrest  PACE procedure had even yet stated….

Action 2 Paragraph 11 stop at junction of Newport Road and Albany Road Cardiff 5 April 2000

This violent incident caught on their own CCTV shows the lengths to which the South Wales Police were prepared to go in order to delay its disclosure until after the criminal Crown Court appeal was lost so as to assist in causing the veterinary surgeon being ‘struck off the register.

The full extent of that redaction of the CCTV footage is not known, during the time PC Osbourne had smashed his way into the Appellant’s vehicle and assaulted him before then dragging him out having not been arrested.

No breath test was contemplated until instructions from senior management moving the video camera accordingly and no doubt, to try and fabricate an excuse of the actions of an officer in a flaming temper.

Their victim was left for a significant time, without handcuffs in a police van to deliberately try and provoke him to try and escape. their through the deliberately left hide open double back doors. The Appellant refused to fall for their obvious ploy to justify what had just happened and was later cleared on a negative police station definitive breath test without even an apology.

Osbourne’s excuse was either at magistrates, if there was a hearing or in Crown Court or at the Royal college that he saw some empty beer cans in the vehicle and assumed the driver was ‘over the limit’.

Appellant had been, all morning, proving the irregular conduct of Now Inspector Rice, then a sergeant in Barry police station having detained the Appellant, over night, whilst recovering from the violent assaults, first by ex inspector Howard Davies an then Security guard who had knocked him to the ground from behind, the Vale of Glamorgan Agricultural Show. He detained the Appellant, in custody over night, without either a charge or summons to allow it.

The learned trial judge in these civil proceedings had ‘struck out’ quite wrongly, part of the PC Osborne incident and the whole of the Vale of Glamorgan incident both successfully embellished upon before the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons’ 2002 Disciplinary Committee.

This civil court argument was that a conviction existed and therefore the conduct of PC Osborne is irrelevant. The Appellant submits that is wrong.

At original magistrates court all five offences were not defended in order not waste time as the appellant was very short staffed in an environment where, clearly, everything had already been settled even without evidence yet heard.

When the Appellant had brought it to their notice, again, that the MOT, insurance and ‘no seat belt’ were all easily proven as valid, by relevant documents, the latter valid by doctor’s letter, all three convictions were reversed. These, along with the CPS having already withdrawn the ‘mobile phone’ allegation, left only one.

Once the overhead video was known about the Appellant tried to again change his plea on the remaining breath test conviction but was refused, he believes unlawfully as no evidence was allowed to be heard at any time.

That video, in copy of original form, remains undisclosed along with the plethora of police audit trail, previously applied for and refused.

That single conviction remained in order for the police to have him off the road and make a written complaint to have his name removed from the veterinary register.

As for ‘using a mobile phone’ and the CPS having offered ‘no evidence’ further supports the Appellant’s claim that Osborne’s purported ‘car chase’ carried no offence nor had reasonable cause. It currently stands that the single conviction, denied, has nothing to do with the requirements of a veterinary surgeon but with Osborne making the assault on his victim, without an arrest, germane to the Appellant’s right of compensation.

EXTRACT FROM JUDGE’s PURPORTED 2015/16 JUDGMENT a year ago and still the cabal refuse to give me a sealed copy despite my travelling to The Royal Courts of Justice to try and lodge my case eventually for Strasbourg’/Action 2 Paragraph 11 stop at junction of Newport Road and Albany Road Cardiff 5 April 2000. This head of claim was subject of an application to strike out. I gave written judgment on 30 November 2010. For the reasons there set out I struck out the claim for wrongful arrest and malicious prosecution for an offence of failing to provide a specimen of breath. The other allegations remain. Those are (i) unlawful detention, namely that “the detention of the Claimant beyond 12.05 was longer than was reasonably necessary and was in breach of the provisions of the Police and Criminal Act 1984”; and (ii) malicious prosecution for offences of driving without valid insurance and MOT certificate, and failing to wear a seatbelt.

  1. The pleaded defence is that Mr Kirk was observed by PC Osbourne driving a Peugeot car in Park Place Cardiff, not wearing a seatbelt and observed to be using a mobile phone; further that when Mr Kirk’s vehicle was stopped at a junction, PC Osbourne went up to the window of the vehicle and requested him to stop, but Mr Kirk locked the doors to his car and drove off. It recites details of the arrest for refusal to provide a specimen of breath and removal to Roath Police Station; asserts that Mr Kirk’s detention was lawfully authorised by PS Roberts the custody officer, that Mr Kirk then informed PS Roberts that he would provide a specimen of breath, and arrangements were made to transport him to Rumney Police Station for a sample to be provided.

Where, exactly, did the Appellant ‘drive-off’ to when CCTV indicates stationary in a police cordoned off queue of stationary traffic?

  1. “Once at Rumney Police Station, the Claimant provided a specimen of breath which indicated an alcohol level below the legal limit. Such was the Claimant’s behaviour however, that the custody sergeant at Rumney Police Station Sergeant Pickett authorised…. Further detention so as to enable him to be assessed by a doctor as to whether he was driving whilst unfit through the consumption of drugs”. A Dr Lush arrived at 1:11am, Mr Kirk refused to allow the examination to proceed, on the grounds that Dr Lush was unable to provide written proof of his position; as a result Mr Kirk was charged with a number of matters following which he was released from custody at 2:02am. There is a denial that the police acted maliciously or without reasonable or probable cause.

Incorrect- police tried dealing their usually infallible ‘gulag card’ to incarcerate their victim in a psychiatric prison.

  1. As I set out in my judgment on preliminary issues, the stop was on 5 April 2000. In respect of the seatbelt, MOT, and no insurance prosecution, it appears from correspondence of the Crown Prosecution Service (letter of 22 May 2002) that Mr Kirk attended the CPS on 21 May 2002 to produce a valid MOT certificate, resulting in the CPS not wishing to pursue that matter further; and produced evidence of medical excuse for not wearing a seatbelt. As to the MOT certificate, it was urged for the Defendant that this, in May 2002, was the first indication that any MOT certificate had been produced; and that the production of evidence as to medical reason not to wear a seatbelt was a tacit acknowledgment that he was not wearing a seatbelt on the occasion of the incident on 5 April 2000. Thus, it was argued, there could not therefore be an absence of reasonable or proper cause to prosecute in respect of either of these matters; and the certificate of insurance that was produced appeared to be for a different vehicle.

 

  1. In my written judgment I noted the strong criticism expressed by His Honour Judge Jacobs of the evasive way in which Mr Kirk dealt with insurance for his various vehicles. These seemed to me powerful points, “which might very well decide the claim at the end of these proceedings after the hearing of all the evidence”. However I ruled that it was not inconsistent with the ultimate finding of the Court as a matter of record to pursue the claims and it was conceptually possible that Mr Kirk might deploy evidence and or make progress in questions of the police officers concerned, “in a way which gave more strength than now appears to his claims”, (paragraphs 113 and 114 of that judgment). I adopt in full those observations here.

A successful observation by His Honour Judge Peter Jacobs, the day he was due to get out of South Wales himself, for good it was assumed, following his own admission the Appellant’s insurance head office had again been bothered, this time by the CPS on behalf of his own Honour’s request.

What the learned criminal judge, however, did not make public was that he had, before the hearing, first asked the Cardiff Crown Court manager to plead with the Appellant’s good nature to explain the web ‘weaved’ by the police, to deceive.

The Appellant was NOT legally obliged to but for nearly an hour during his busy surgery time he answered the clerk’s questions proving the reasoning behind why this veterinary surgeon needed to use so many vehicles and insurance companies.

As this trial has now proved the police had pestered his agent and insurance company directly, knowing it would only be a matter of time before the motorist was refused insurance cover.

Why, also, there had to be so many practice vehicles appearing to be foreign and registered in such names including, ‘Onest ‘Arry, a retired Guernsey car dealer, G Mallory Esq, possibly the first climber to have conquered Everest, Whilbur Smith and numerous members, past and present, of the Kirk family.

  1. This was a morning when Mr Kirk had left the Crown Court “where I was spending most days, at the height of police harassment” and says that he was aware that he was again being followed by the police. In his statements he says that whilst stationary at a traffic jam he was attacked and dragged out of his car by PC Osbourne who promptly arrested him and, Mr Kirk is insistent, nonetheless left the door of the police van wide open in the hope that he would abscond and give the police yet more material to pursue against him.

 

  1. Whilst Mr Kirk says he did not ever refuse a breath test at the scene, that is a matter which is not open to me to consider, in the light of the binding conviction for failing to give a breath test and for the reasons set out in my judgment on preliminary issues of November 2010.

The learned civil court judge, it is submitted, erred in law again on this recurring issue as he was only too aware of the police psychiatrist’s conduct, as he had sat in judgement, (failed ‘strike out’ of the Claimant’s multi thousand damages claim against Dr Tegwyn Williams for falsifying his vitim’s psychiatric report when not having the knowledge/qualifications, in the first place, to have written it.

Police had blackmailed Williams to have the Appellant locked away, if not shot, for life and MAPPA registered should neither the fabricated police ‘machine gun’ case, for a mandatory minimum 10 year imprisonment or the Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital application, for life, also failed.

It is submitted that the overarching format of this incessant harassment in these and other similarly vivid particulars of claims should of been taken into consideration rather than ‘striking out’ such an incident so brilliantly exposed on film,as the Oborne would be, with disclosure, despite senior management intervention to leave the best ‘footage’ on their Bridgend HQ’s ‘cutting room’ floor.

  1. Mr Kirk says, “Later I was taken to two police stations, knocked about, refused custody videos be retained they leaving, as they do, my car full of drugs, unlocked with the window down…. A negative breath test caused further detention for a drug test and waiting for doctor. I was very frightened, as harassment had lately become dangerous and irrational” (witness statement 19 June 2009 paragraphs 692-693).

 

  1. Mr Kirk sets particular store on a video from a street camera which shows that it took only moments from the police van pulling up behind him to his window being smashed and him being removed very forcibly from his car. Objection was taken to me viewing this video, on the basis that judgement on preliminary issues barred Mr Kirk from complaining of the lawfulness of the arrest. I ruled that I should look at this evidence, in case it cast light on those allegations which remain. It shows that it is only some six seconds, from the police van pulling up behind Mr Kirk’s car at the junction of Newport Road and Albany Road, to his car window being smashed and his immediate forcible removal from the car.

 

  1. Mr Kirk relied on a witness statement prepared, according to its own date, on 6 April 2000 (in other words, the next day) in which he states that he was taken to Roath Police Station and made it clear that he was quite happy to do a breath test, and was transferred to Rumney Police Station where he gave two zero readings on their breath machine. “I told the Sergeant that they had to release me or they would be sued for false imprisonment. He said I believe you are under the influence of drugs and you will have to be detained and be examined by a doctor and if you refuse you will be detained in custody for Court tomorrow’ about an hour and a half later a doctor came to the cell and explained his position. I asked if I was legally obliged to be examined? He didn’t know, so I demanded the Sergeant. The Sergeant admitted that there was not a legal obligation but it would be recorded as a refusal. I asked to be examined without further delay”…. The doctor was unable or refused to produce any form of identification before the medical examination and appeared to leave the police station in haste! I was then detained a further half an hour for finger prints, DNA test and photographs”.

 

  1. As to the assertion that Mr Kirk was taken to two police stations “[and] knocked about….”, (statement of 19 June 2009) he made no suggestion of assault at the police station or stations in the statement he made the next day,

 

  1. The police evidence of what led to the stop is primarily that of PC 1215 Osbourne, with some contribution from PC 3689 Price, each of whom gave evidence at trial before me. PC Osbourne and PC Price were in a marked police vehicle in Park Place Cardiff and Mr Kirk was driving the other way. PC Osbourne says that the driver appeared not to be wearing a seatbelt and also to be using a mobile phone and so he turned and followed Mr Kirk’s vehicle. At a junction, Mr Kirk’s vehicle stopped at the lights, PC Price left the police vehicle and knocked on the passenger window of Mr Kirk’s car; PC Osbourne says the driver turned and looked at PC Price but then looked away, PC Price then went to the driver’s window and knocked, the driver looked at him and then locked the door driving off on the green light.

 

  1. There are handwritten “notes made at scene of incident/arrest” timed at 11:25 to 11:35 (namely some 25 minutes after the stop), on which there is a date stamp April 5 00 and a time stamp 11:35. PC Price has endorsed this with “I have read the above notes and they are a true account of the events that took place” (A2/5.79-80). According to this the Peugeot moved off and the police vehicle followed, PC Osbourne on his own account flashing the headlights on the police van and sounding two-tone horns in an effort to attract his attention and to get him to stop “so I then used my personal police radio to inform other police units we were following a vehicle which was refusing to stop”. Mr Kirk’s car came to a halt in lane three at the junction of Newport Road and Albany Road because of stationary traffic at the traffic lights.

 

  1. A marked police van stationed itself to block the movement of all vehicles in Newport Road including Mr Kirk, “at this point I left my vehicle and went to the drivers door of the Peugeot, it was still locked, I knocked on the window and Mr Kirk ignored me, I continued to indicate to him and ask him to open the door. He refused to do so. I then went to the rear passenger door, on the drivers side, this door was also locked so I then used my PR24 baton and I smashed the rear passenger window. I smashed the rear window so that Mr Kirk would not be sprayed with glass. I then reached into the vehicle and unlocked the drivers door by lifting the button on the door…. Having opened the drivers door of the Peugeot I removed him from the vehicle. I cannot recall if by now he had his seatbelt on.” (witness statement PC Osbourne, A2/5.22-23 paragraphs 7-11, emphasis supplied).

 

  1. Turning first to Mr Kirk’s evidence at trial, some of it was inherently unlikely. He was unaware that the police were trying to attract his attention with a view to stopping his vehicle. This is improbable. He said that something ‘caught his attention’, which he accepted might have been PC Price knocking on his car; and that he could see the “middle part of a person” behind his car whom he ‘assumed had something to do with’ the police van he saw directly behind him, In cross examination he told me that slightly further down the road, (it would appear at the next junction) he took a photograph of a (Volvo) car which he thought was a police car. This is consistent only with Mr Kirk being aware that the police were following him and trying to stop him.

 

  1. There is no allegation in the pleadings of assault at the police station thereafter but, in the light of Mr Kirk’s overarching case of being targeted and harassed by the police in South Wales, it is appropriate to deal with it.

 

  1. It was to Roath Police Station that Mr Kirk was taken first of all. The custody sergeant at Roath Police Station was PS Roberts. During his cross examination of PS Roberts, Mr Kirk suggested that he had there been assaulted by being dragged about by his feet while he was sitting on the floor. In cross examination, Mr Kirk told me that he was pulled around on the floor of his cell, “I’m not fingering Osbourne, ’cos I can’t remember”.

 

  1. A little later, Mr Kirk said that he did not exclude Osbourne or Price from being involved, or present. However he did not suggest either to PC Osbourne or to PC Price that they had taken part in, or might have taken part in, or were present when assault on him took place.

 

  1. Mr Kirk was not certain of whether the alleged assault was before or after his presentation to the custody sergeant. The custody record at Roath contains no complaint of assault, and Mr Kirk told me he could not remember whether he told the custody sergeant. There is no record of complaint at the succeeding Rumney Police Station, and Mr Kirk thought it very unlikely that he would have reported it there.

 

  1. A video, which was played to the court (it seemed to me as much at the insistence of the Defendant as Mr Kirk), shows Mr Kirk in the corridor to the custody desk, coming through with PC Osbourne and PC Price. The video footage was played at trial a number of times and I have given it the closest attention. The custody sergeant is seen behind his desk, throughout the relevant period, at the other end of the corridor in which Mr Kirk was waiting, behind his desk. Mr Kirk thought that his mistreatment occurred in a cell where he had to sit on the floor because there was no seating.

 

  1. The witness statement of Mr Roberts, since retired, is not lengthy. It records arrival at 11:27 and processing, at 11:31 Mr Kirk was read his rights and supplied with copies of Notice of Rights, refused to provide the custody sergeant with details; “He was concerned about animals in his vehicle and I allowed him to use the telephone to make arrangements for the animals. I have recorded that Mr Kirk was angry and refused to co-operate. He in fact sat on the floor crossed his arms and legs and refused to speak to me”. It was at 11:43 that Mr Kirk informed him that he would provide a specimen of breath so that at 11:44 Mr Kirk was transferred to Rumney Police Station. This is as set out in the contemporaneous custody record (A2/5.49-50). Thus in total, Mr Kirk was detained at Roath Police Station for some 17 minutes.

 

  1. PS Roberts gave evidence, which I have no reason to doubt, that the only cell which does not have a bench or seat within it was the “drunk” cell, which had a camera trained on it continuously which could be viewed by the custody sergeant. As to the video shown in court, other than for snatches of a few seconds, the only officers who were at Mr Kirk’s end of the corridor were PC Osbourne and PC Price and they remain in sight whether by the top of their hands or a hand or hands resting against a wall; if so, it is difficult to see how they could have assaulted, pulled, or knocked Mr Kirk about.

 

  1. The custody record, at Rumney police station, at 12:19 hours, records Mr Kirk as sitting on the floor as he was being booked in. Mr Kirk at trial said that this was because his ankle was hurting. (I note that the video footage displays timing at all times four minutes out from the custody record but the video footage is complete and nothing turns on this). Otherwise, it would appear to anyone else to be unusual behaviour.

 

  1. In my judgment the most striking fact of all is that in a statement made by him the very next day, Mr Kirk makes no complaint or mention of an assault or being dragged around the floor of a cell at Roath Police Station.

 

  1. As I have indicated, at Roath Police Station Mr Kirk was insistently sitting on the floor and in general refusing to speak to those with custody of him. Such was not contested by him in his oral evidence. It is, unless known to be because of pain or injury, unusual behaviour. It is of some interest that it is at 11:40, 13 minutes after his arrival that the log records, “DP has been identified as Mr Maurice Kirk”. At another time, the footage shows him periodically pacing around the custody unit, with his hands in his pockets.

 

  1. The custody log shows transfer of Mr Kirk being accepted at Rumney Police Station at 11:54. The custody sergeant was PS 2244 Pickett. There, at 13:05, the log records an intoximeter showing a lowest reading of nil (in fact both readings were nil) and “he has refused to sign the copy provided by the machine”. At 12:07, it records “In view of the above, I’m not happy with the DP’s demeanour. I am therefore authorising further detention for the DP to be assessed by a doctor re being unfit through drugs”; and at 12:19, “DP searched. Whilst property being booked in DP insisted on sitting on the floor”.

 

  1. The witness statement dated 16 January 2003 by Mr Pickett (since retired) is effectively a recital of the entries in the custody record. In oral evidence, he said that his view (that Mr Kirk might be under the influence of drugs) was based on entries by the other custody sergeant of being aggressive, refusing to answer questions or speak, “the fact that he is zero on the intoxylator indeed he might be intoxicated from some other cause. The entry at 12:19 hours of “sitting on the floor” added to the unusual behaviour.

 

  1. Mr Kirk asked him whether there was any obligation on his own part to answer any questions in custody. Mr Pickett agreed that there was not, but said that the impression that he might be under the influence of drugs came from the fact that he was refusing to answer questions, and the change in demeanour to being angry after being allowed to use the telephone. He said that it was not based purely on that entry (11:32 “I have allowed to use the phone to arrange for the animals. DP is angry and refuses to co-operate”) but “on my views when you came into custody, when you came into custody refusing to answer, refusing to co-operate in any form indicated to me that there may be other reasons why you were acting like that other than alcohol”.

 

  1. I myself rephrased a question from Mr Kirk, who had become too agitated to formulate an intelligible question, as follows: “Q. I think Mr Kirk is really asking this question. There’s nothing unusual about people refusing to answer questions at the police station when they are in custody? A. No, as I say everyone has a right not to answer the questions, but taken in total with the demeanour and the previous entries whilst he was in Roath I determined that there may be other reasons why he was behaving like that”.

 

A little later, Mr Kirk asked,

 

“Q. Right, point out where there is indication on the custody record that I was under the influence of drugs…. A. Uh the fact that you drove off from the officers.

  1. Sorry? A. The fact that you drove off from the officers as they tried to speak to you.
  2. Where, where was that? A. Circumstances for arrest and grounds for detention…. Your first page….. I can only base my answers on what’s on the custody record. I wasn’t present at the time.
  3. But you must have had a conversation with Osbourne…. About it…. About drugs… the possibility? A. No, I formed the opinion based on, purely on what was written on the custody record and having seen you before.
  4. So it was your idea? A. Yes.
  5. Are you sure about that? A. Yes….. because if there had been any evidence given to me by the officer I would have made a record in the custody record.

“Q. Right, point out where there is indication on the custody record that I was under the influence of drugs…. A. Uh the fact that you drove off from the officers.

  1. Sorry? A. The fact that you drove off from the officers as they tried to speak to you.
  2. Where, where was that? A. Circumstances for arrest and grounds for detention…. Your first page….. I can only base my answers on what’s on the custody record. I wasn’t present at the time.
  3. But you must have had a conversation with Osbourne…. About it…. About drugs… the possibility? A. No I formed the opinion based on, purely on what was written on the custody record and having seen you before.
  4. So it was your idea? A. Yes.
  5. Are you sure about that? A. Yes….. because if there had been any evidence given to me by the officer I would have made a record in the custody record. “

 

These citations are illustrations from a cross examination which repeated essentially the same questions and elicited the same answers, at some length.

 

  1. A doctor was called to examine Mr Kirk. A Dr Lush attended, who gave witness statement and oral evidence before me and who wrote a contemporaneous note at 13:00 hours, “Initially seen in cell to request examination for fitness to drive. Possibly under influence of drugs – breathalyser – ve. He had discussion with custody sergeant regarding legality of such request. He came to medical room and refused to speak unless I can provide written identification of my position. Coherent speech. No overt injury/ataxia. Returned to cell by custody officer” (emphasis supplied). Mr Kirk did not contest the evidence of Dr Lush.

 

 

  1. For completeness I record that I also received witness statement and oral evidence from retired PS Mahony who took over as custody sergeant for the shift from 14:00 hours to 22:00 hours. Mr Mahony had little present recollection of the event, but was the author of entries in the custody record at 13:33, “Change of custody officer: I have taken over custody duties and have enquired into the circumstances of detention and consider that they continue to be necessary. I have visited the detained person in the cell/detention room and find the detained person to be fit for detention. I have reminded the detained person of all rights and entitlements” and at 13:37 in the log records the charges placed with the unusual entries at 13:41 “the DP refused to sign charges unless he saw the length of fingers on the officers hand (sic, emphasis supplied)”, and at 13:52 “The DP is un-cooperative in taking of his fingerprints and force may have to be used. He has been warned of this”. At 13:59 he was bailed to the Magistrates Court.

 

  1. Self evidently, the assessment was, once seen by Dr Lush, that Mr Kirk was not under the influence of drugs and was fit to drive. Thus Mr Kirk was released some 22 minutes after Dr Lush wrote that the detained person refused to be examined because he could not provide written proof of his position.

 

  1. The charges were presented for hearing before the Cardiff Magistrates Court on 11 April 2000. Mr Kirk in fact pleaded guilty to all of the offences, (save for not having proper control of the vehicle; no evidence was offered in respect of that). He was subsequently sentenced in respect of the charges to which he had pleaded guilty (see A2/6.139-146). He then attempted to vacate his guilty pleas and enter not guilty pleas. In judgment on preliminary issues I recorded fully the sequence of appeals, application for judicial review to the single judge, and renewed application to the Administrative Court, and appeal with refusal of Mr Kirk’s attempts to resile from his plea of guilty.

 

  1. With remarkable persistence, Mr Kirk wrote to Cardiff Magistrates Court asking it to re-open his pleas of guilty to other offences, and on 20 May 2002 District Judge Watkins decided to set aside the conviction for no insurance and allowed Mr Kirk to change his plea with a not guilty verdict being entered. It is clear that the court was told that the prosecution accepted that Mr Kirk had valid insurance on the day of his offence. I refer, as elsewhere, to the caustic comments of His Honour Judge Jacobs about Mr Kirk’s insurance habits while driving vehicles registered in the name of others, and the late production, time and again, of evidence of insurance.

 

A basic necessity, now proved, of survival if one is so foolish to as to practice veterinary surgery and try to raise a family in a place like South Wales-see paragraph 862

  1. In relation to the offences of no seatbelt, no MOT certificate, and no insurance, I adopt that which I set out in the judgment on preliminary issues (including the fact that Mr Kirk later produced medical evidence of a reason not wear a seat belt, from which it is reasonable to infer that he was not wearing a seat belt when first seen by PC Osbourne; and Mr Kirk’s unusual habits of insurance which are calculated to induce suspicion of driving without insurance. In relation to these offences, nothing has emerged since that judgment which properly supports any case of malicious prosecution.
  2. I have borne in mind throughout the street camera video footage which shows Mr Kirk being dragged from his car. It demonstrates that it took only 6 or 7 seconds from the moment when PC Osbourne alighted from his own police vehicle to the time that he dragged Mr Kirk from the car. I found PC Osbourne’s explanations for this, and his evidence in general, profoundly unimpressive. I do not accept that he pursued the measured and rational process which he alleges in his witness statement (namely of going to the driver’s door, still locked, knocking on the window, Mr Kirk ignoring him, he “continuing” to indicate to Mr Kirk and asking him to open the door and only then going to the rear passenger door to smash the rear passenger window).

 

  1. On the other hand, it was reasonable for PC Osbourne to conclude that Mr Kirk had deliberately not responded to PC Price, first at his passenger window, and then at the driver’s window, at the previous location when Mr Kirk had come to a stop.

 

  1. I am bound by the finding of an offence of refusing to give a specimen of breath at the roadside (of which Mr Kirk remains convicted). In April 2000 PC Osbourne was a uniformed patrol officer stationed at Cardiff Central Police Station. Mr Kirk was no slave to authority or conventional restrictions. I find it strongly probable that Mr Kirk was not wearing a seatbelt (see above) and plausible that Mr Kirk was using a mobile phone when driving, as PC Osbourne says he was.

 

  1. It is natural for Mr Kirk to associate this stop with the fact that he had just returned from the Crown Court, dealing with matters of complaint against police actions. However there is no positive evidence of prior acquaintance between PC Osbourne and Mr Kirk (or between PC Price the accompanying officer and Mr Kirk). Once there was a refusal of breath specimen at the roadside, and given that such a finding binds me, there was lawful reason to arrest Mr Kirk and take him to the police station. Yet again, I have considered whether the facts of the immediate incident as I have found them are susceptible to proper inference of a wider picture that it was by way of targeting or malicious selection of him for police attention or treatment that Mr Kirk was stopped, and/or dealt with thereafter, on this date. However I find it strongly probable that he was wearing no seat belt, and probable that he was using a mobile phone as the police officers Price and Osbourne stated, so that there would be nothing particularly unusual in the police vehicle following him; conversely there was something unusual in the fact that the driver deliberately ignored PC Price knocking at his window, (since I am satisfied that Mr Kirk did ignore him knowing that it was a police officer), and that he then drove off. The sorry fact is that by now Mr Kirk’s view of the police was so bitter that he was prone (if he could) to ignore what any police officer said to him or did; and thereby he was prone to bring more suspicion upon himself by the individual police officers who encountered him.

 

  1. In rushing to Mr Kirk’s car to break a window and drag Mr Kirk out PC Osbourne was acting angrily, and it may be intemperately, but that is not the same as acting in pursuit of a conspiracy to target and inconvenience Mr Kirk, at least as evidenced directly in respect of this occasion.

 

  1. It scarcely needs to be stated that it follows, from the conviction of failure to give a breath test at the roadside which stands and which binds me, that there was lawful reason to detain Mr Kirk until the zero reading at Rumney Police Station at 12:05. Has it been shown to be lawful to detain him longer than that?

 

  1. Mr Kirk is certainly in a mould of his own, with his own logic and view of things. He clearly did not, in evidence or at trial generally, regard it as odd that he should sit on the floor in the custody reception area, or odd that he should refuse to be examined by a doctor unless the doctor produced written identification that he was a doctor. Others are likely to have found these behaviours more than odd. Custody officers unacquainted with Mr Kirk, (and I find on the balance of probabilities that these custody officers were unacquainted with Mr Kirk) may not know or see through the eccentricity. The behaviours were likely to be viewed as odd by custody officers both at Roath police station and at Rumney police station. On the authorities cited to me, a police officer including a custody sergeant (and in particular the custody sergeant at Rumney police station), is entitled to rely upon what he or she has been told by another officer whether that information is conveyed directly, or contained in documents, such as the custody record.

 

  1. In the end I have concluded that it is not implausible that the circumstances related by the arresting officer, with the (true) account of Mr Kirk driving on and not stopping despite the police approaching him, and his distinctly unusual behaviour at the police stations, would in the presence of a zero alcohol reading reinforce a suspicion that he may have been driving under the influence of another substance. Within 22 minutes of the doctor’s attendance he was discharged from custody. I consider that the Defendant has shown that it was lawful to detain him during the period they did.

 2nd Inspector Nicholas Khilberg incident …..smashing his way into my car, by using his truncheon

action-2-claim-9-1-december-1999-detention-of-mr-kjrks-vehicle

;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

 TO BE continued

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Twice Police Smashed My Car Window to Violently Drag Me Out for Non arrestable Offences

 
Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

   

The Welsh Assembly is Hell-Bent on Blocking My Machine-Gun Appeal getting to The Royal Courts of Justice

2nd hand machine-gun FOR SALE –excellent for rabbit-shooting or vermin extermination

CONTINUES + Archive

https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2016/09/18/maurice-kirk-the-welsh-assembly-is-hell-bent-on-blocking-my-machine-gun-appeal-getting-to-the-royal-courts-of-justice/

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

STOP THEM EATING DOGS!! “I WANT TO HELP DOGS” Humane Society + EBAY: STOP SELLING ANIMAL BODY PARTS!!

 

 

In the dog meat industry, all dogs are welcome.  

Please donate now to fight the dog meat trade »

View this message on our website.
alt text
 

main-feature

 
 
 

Lilly and Pinch were once family pets. But when their owners decided they didn’t want them anymore, they were sold to a South Korean dog meat farmer and destined for consumption during Bok Nal days, a period during summer months where dog meat is consumed widely.

Imagine what it must have been like for them to suddenly go from the only home they had ever known to suffering in a barren, filthy cage with no escape from the brutal heat at the peak of summer.
Please donate now to help fund this rescue and our campaign against the cruel dog meat trade »

Fortunately, Lilly and Pinch are now safe from suffering, and 31 more dogs from the same illegal farm will soon be free as well.

Without shelter, veterinary attention or comfort of any kind, these animals waited helplessly for death – until HSI and our local partners including Free Korean Dogs were able to shut down this horror and release them. Now these dogs will have the chance to start new lives in the United States. Please help them with a donation today »

Here is what your donation could provide for these dogs in need:
£25 – contributes to the purchase of items like food and bedding

£40 – covers all vaccinations required to bring one dog to the United States

£75 – buys a sturdy, comfortable crate for one large dog during their rescue to freedom

  

click:

 

With the support of compassionate advocates like you, HSI has been in South Korea since 2014 working with dog farmers to permanently close down their facilities and help them transition to new, humane occupations. Our vital work saves animals’ lives, but we can’t continue to do it without you.

Millions of dogs – whether raised on these facilities, abandoned by former owners, or “left over” from puppy mills – are still suffering on these terrible farms, destined for slaughter. On behalf of all those just like Lilly and Pinch who are still waiting, we thank you for helping us keep up the fight against this unforgiving industry.

Sincerely,

Andrew Rowan
President and CEO
Humane Society International

 

© 2016 Humane Society International/UK | All rights reserved
5 Underwood Street, London N1 7LY UK

We are committed to protecting your privacy, so your email address will NEVER be sold, rented, or exchanged.

 

EBAY! Stop selling the body parts of cats, dogs and wildlife ! SIGN the PETITION!!

500 UPVOTES PER HOUR @ NOON 13 JULY 16!

ANIMALS CAN BE VICTIMS TOO!

 
EBAY: stop selling the body parts of cats, dogs and wildlife
 
 
meet the petition author

Virginia Wiener
Care2 Member

 
 
                                  
Ebay sells an estimated 19,000 animal body parts every day, profiting from a trade reliant on an unimaginable scale of slaughter. It’s time for Ebay to stop supporting this industry of death.
 
From cat skulls to fox tails, it’s a macabre shopping experience. The wide range of animal body parts, including those of cats and dogs, are each the result of the killing of an innocent animal. Please sign this petition to demand that Ebay stop selling animal body parts.
Ebay is one of the largest and most well-known online companies in the world, and it has a responsibility to use its position ethically. We need to let Ebay know that we expect better. Selling the dismembered parts of beautiful wildlife and beloved domestic animals is wrong and needs to stop.
With enough public support, we can show Ebay that it’s time to stop profiting from animal cruelty and killing. Say NO to the trading of animal body parts.
 
 

Update #31 months ago
EBAY allows Chinese sellers like “yes26888” , “dongzhow1996814”, “yuanstore20130411”, and more to sell body parts of thousands of CATS and DOGS killed/eaten in China. 20,000 animals/body parts, turtles, birds are listed on TAXIDERMY sites EVERY DAY! EBAY is responsible for the murder of millions of animals for money! This must be stopped, before damage to wildlife becomes irreversible. Please contact EBAY, write letters, e-mails, ask to STOP selling murdered animals!

Full Update

 
Update #22 months ago
Is EBAY desperately in need of money? Why is EBAY allowing the skeletons of thousands of cats and dogs killed/eaten in China to be sold on its TAXIDERMY sites? EBAY is promoting the killings of our friends CATS and DOGS for profit. More than 20,000 (yes, 20,000) animals/body parts, birds, turtles are for sale on EBAY every DAY. Rare birds like puffins, cassowary, thousands of turtles, African trophies are murdered to be sold on EBAY. EBAY is promoting the destruction of our wildlife!

Full Update

 
Update #13 months ago
Chinese sellers found their gold mine: Kill the dogs and cats of China and sell their body parts on EBAY. Young cats and dogs are murdered; Chinese sellers are careful to mention that only healthy cats and dogs with perfect teeth are killed. One seller “wopkwoo0123” is even painting the cats skulls in various colors. EBAY is part of these crimes, EBAY encourages the murder of animals for money!

Full Update

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

OUTRAGEOUS!! Diabetic man blames DWP benefit sanctions for leg amputation + “HOLD AN INQUIRY INTO BENEFIT SANCTIONS THAT KILLED MY BROTHER!”

Diabetic man blames DWP benefit sanctions for leg amputation
Diabetic man blames DWP benefit sanctions for leg amputation

17:55, 7 Sep 2016 17:56, 7 Sep 2016 

David Boyce, from Weaste, was hit with benefit sanctions but has now won an appeal and wants compensation

A diabetic had to have his leg amputated when his condition spiralled out of control because he couldn’t afford to eat healthily when his benefits were halted for FIVE months.
David Boyce’s tragic case was revealed as protesters gathered to demonstrate against ‘immoral’ Jobcentre rules and welfare sanctions.
Campaigners helped the 54-year-old win an appeal against the sanctions, which saw him without cash for five months.
But by July, his complications from his type two diabetes had already caused irreversible damage.
David Boyce
David Boyce

 David, who lives in Weaste, said he couldn’t control his insulin intake and was unable to follow his strict diabetic diet because he had no money.

After he suffered diabetic ulcers and was diagnosed with the flesh-eating disease, necrotizing fasciitis, doctors were forced to amputate one of his legs.

  David, a former photographer who used to own a business, but was forced to quit because of ill-health.

He says he got into a dispute with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) about his jobseeker’s agreement and was sanctioned numerous times.
David said his benefits were frozen fourteen times because of issues with paperwork.
David Boyce 
David Boyce

In all, he says he went five months without payments.
The cash was eventually handed to David after he won on appeal, aided by Salford’s Unemployed and Community Resource Centre, with every sanction overturned.
But campaigners say that isn’t enough and are seeking compensation for David’s amputation, which could ‘run into the millions’.
David said: “My health deteriorated, my foot swelled up and I got ulcers.
“In July, I went into hospital. Somewhere along the line, I contracted necrotizing fasciitis, a flesh-eating bug, through the foot ulcer caused by my inability to sustain my diabetic diet.
Vincent Cole David Boyce
David Boyce

 “I suffered from depression and mental anxiety. I’m not a rich man. I had to sell everything to eat.

“You don’t tell anyone, it’s embarrassing, that’s what they prey on.
“You go into a depression. You lock yourself away.”
Campaigners gathered at Eccles Job Centre to protest against ‘immoral’ benefits sanctions this week, claiming scores of people were being left depressed and on the verge of suicide.
Salford Unemployed and Community Resource Centre manager Alec McFadden said the DWP had imposed ‘unachievable’ requirements for those in receipt of benefits.
David Boyce 
David Boyce

 

Last year, the organisation helped clients recover more than £500,000.
Mr McFadden added: “Illegal benefit sanctions need to be stopped and we will continue to use the law against these dangerous and illegal actions that bringing stress and the threat of suicide to so many people.”
A DWP spokesman said: “Sanctions are an important part of our benefits system and it is right that there is a system in place for tackling those few who do not fulfil their commitment to find work.
“They are only used in a very small percentage of cases, and the number of sanctions has fallen substantially in the last year.”

David Cameron: Hold an inquiry into benefit sanctions that killed my brother

by Gill Thompson · 211,605 supporters
Petition update – [see below the tragic story  of David Clapson, R.I.P. who sadly died after being “sanctioned” by the D.W.P..ed]

U.N. PUBLISHES DAMNING REPORT ON UK BENEFIT SANCTIONS

Gill Thompson

Stevenage, United Kingdom
13 Jul 2016 — The British Government’s austerity policies are a breach of international human rights, a new report by the UN has warned.

The UN having investigated the UK on the effects of the welfare reforms and human rights, have now published their findings.
The report states :
The UN are “seriously concerned” by the state of inequality in the UK.

It highlighted the problems with welfare reforms and benefit cuts and the impact it is having on the vulnerable in our society.
The report also expressed concerns over

Sanctions, unemployment, zero hours, the national minimum wage, homelessness, use of food banks, and discrimination. For detail please see the attached links below

http://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk/2016/06/un-declares-uk-s-austerity-policies-breach-international-human-rightshttp://www.communitycare.co.uk/2016/06/30/vulnerable-hit-disproportionately-uk-austerity-measures-un-warns/

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/austerity-government-policy-conservatives-poor-food-banks-inequality-un-a7110066.html

Thank you again for your support and helping ensure true change is possible.

best wishes,

Gill

Please feel free to contact me direct at: gill.a4u@outlook.com

The UN declares the UK's austerity policies in breach of international human rights obligations
http://butlincat.blogspot.com/2016/05/former-dwp-ministers-could-face-police.html—————————————————————————————

Original Petition

https://www.change.org/p/david-cameron-hold-an-inquiry-into-benefit-sanctions-that-killed-my-brother

Petitioning David Cameron

Hold an inquiry into benefit sanctions that killed my brother

My brother, David Clapson, a diabetic ex-soldier, died starving and destitute because he was penalised by the Job Centre for missing a meeting.

David had his £71.70 weekly allowance stopped meaning that he couldn’t afford food or electricity. He was penniless, starving and alone. His electricity card was out of credit meaning the fridge where he should have kept his diabetes insulin chilled was not working. Three weeks after his benefits were stopped he died from diabetic ­ketoacidosis – caused by not taking his insulin. 

David wasn’t a “scrounger”. He had worked for 29 years; 5 years in the Army – including two years in Northern Ireland in the 1970s, during the height of the troubles – 16 years with British Telecom, eight years with various other companies, and in recent years was a carer for our sick mother. When mum went into a home, David turned to the state for help, receiving benefits while he looked for work and taking unpaid work placements.

When he died he had just £3.44 to his name, six tea bags, a tin of soup and an out-of-date can of sardines. A coroner also found he had no food in his stomach.

People turn to the state when they are in need – that is what the system is for – a safety net for hard working people like my brother when they need a bit of support. That £71.70 a week was his lifeline. To withhold it from him for missing one meeting is cruel. And the heartbreaking thing is that he was really trying. CVs for job applications were found near David’s body. He had been on work placements, passed his fork lift truck certificate and had been on a computer training course.
Like many others I believe that benefits sanctions (penalties by the government for things like missing Jobcentre meetings) are completely out of control and putting those most in need at risk. A million people have been sanctioned in the last year – many of them are extremely vulnerable like my brother was.

I want to know how the Department of Work and Pensions can justify welfare sanctions that are driving people to foodbanks and leading to starvation and death. The DWP were aware of my brother’s  diabetes and insulin dependency, and, if as they say, they followed procedures and no errors were made, then why did my brother die?

Questions need to be asked of how Iain Duncan Smith is justifying benefit sanctions. What is the full impact of these sanctions? Are they working or simply putting the vulnerable further at risk?

I don’t want anybody else to die like this. 

Please sign my petition for a full independent inquiry into the DWP’s sanctions regime.

This petition was delivered to:

  • David Cameron

Read the letter
David Cameron

<p>Hold an inquiry into benefit sanctions that killed my brother</p></div><button class="btn btn-action mts phxxl js-hide-modal-confirm">OK</button>”>

Gill Thompson started this petition with a single signature, and won with 211,605 supporters. Start a petition to change something you care about.

Updates

  1. Victory

    22 Oct 2014 — We did it – MPs will hold an independent inquiry into the benefit sanctions that killed my brother David.
    My brother David was an ex-soldier who worked for 29 years but died, starving and destitute because he was penalised by the Job Centre for missing a meeting.
    Now thanks to the more than 211,000 people who signed my petition – the Government will be forced to investigate whether stopping and sanctioning his benefits contributed to his death.
    This victory is not just for David, it’s for all vulnerable people who need a safety net in tough times.
    I want to say a huge thank you to everyone who has supported this campaign. You are the ones that have helped make all this possible. Your wonderful support has forced MPs to act.
    Read the news of the victory in The Mirror

  2. 2 years ago
    200,000 supporters


Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

JUSTICE FOR JAMES THOMPSON – UNDO THE INJUSTICE

http://www.justiceforjamesthompson.com/

Justice for James Thompson

“A young, gifted, talented, happy and successful young man whose life has been torn apart. We – his parents, sister, relatives and friends – know and love him for the person he is. A son any parent would be proud to have.”

James Thompson on holiday Paris, 2009

James has lived in Formby all his life, brought up in a loving and stable home with his family and friends around him. He enjoyed a very happy childhood apart from when he lost his older brother Carl aged 24. However, no one could have anticipated what was going to happen to James when he went out on the night of 29th December 2009. He was the victim of a series of vicious assaults during the early hours of the following morning.

Battered, bloodied and concussed he ended up in prison. He is now serving a life sentence for murder, a crime he did not commit. He was a victim of assault.

The incident

At approximately 4:10 am on 30th December 2009 James was on his way home from a night out with friends. He went over to say hello to two young girls, but one pushed him away aggressively. After an exchange of words she then went on to attack James several times. This is clearly seen on CCTV. Later the girls, in a separate incident, incited three men to attack James and his group. As James turned to walk away he was attacked and punched repeatedly to the face and head. The attacker, aged 47 and over 18 stone, was fuelled by cocaine and alcohol. James tried to defend himself. By this time he had been beaten to the ground with his attacker on top of him. James was screaming at his attacker, “Get off me, get off me.”

James’s friend saw the man on top of James, James’s face was full of blood, he ran over and punched James’s attacker twice to the side. The attacker paused. As James was hauled to his feet he instinctively kicked out once and only once. The whole violent incident lasted a matter of seconds. Consequently the following happened to James:
An intoxicated off-duty police officer led James to a nearby doorway. On a 999 call, the off-duty police officer is heard shouting at James, “f***ing stay there you.” On arrival of the police this off-duty police officer claimed James had attacked the other man.

James injuries

 

Some of the injuries sustained by James during the attack. 

James was immediately treated as the aggressor by the police. He was supported to the police vehicle and arrested on suspicion of assault, the time was 04:20. The police then allowed everyone else to leave the scene. Tragically, the attacker died. At 08:45 James was cautioned and arrested for murder. From then on he was incarcerated and held incommunicado for three days. Subsequently James was subjected to highly emotive, incorrect and biased police press releases and hostile internet forums. Despite his injuries he did not receive any immediate first aid.

None of James’s assailants were cautioned or charged by the Police or the CPS despite CCTV evidence showing several attacks on James. Yet one of the other three assailants admitted to being armed with a weapon, a metal bar. The off-duty police officer became the ‘pivotal’ witness for the prosecution. However, this officer declined an immediate statement because he claimed, “he could not remember where he had been and had been drinking.”

James had been attacked, forced to defend himself and because of his injuries, was concussed, dazed and unable to fully assess what was going on about him.

see more / source: http://www.justiceforjamesthompson.com/

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

MAURICE KIRK: The Welsh Assembly is Hell-Bent on Blocking My Machine-Gun Appeal getting to The Royal Courts of Justice

The Welsh Assembly is Hell-Bent on Blocking My Machine-Gun Appeal getting to The Royal Courts of Justice

2nd hand machine-gun FOR SALE –excellent for rabbit-shooting or vermin extermination

dsc00529

My statistics of South Wales Police bullying culture that has ruined my life and many others.

16-09-15-statistics-re-south-wales-police-bullying

The Current Cardiff Judge His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC

HHJ Seys llewellyn QC

 

Cardiff’s GEOamey Custodial Services manager,  Lee Baker, also WANTED for perjury

lee-barker-1st-dec-2011-custody-manager

Only four boxes left of my court files for suing the police , back in the late 90s, after chaotic HM Treasury ‘Vexatious Litigant’ Investigation ended in quite an opposite conclusion when a babble of barristers, in Whitehall, upon examining each court action brought my success had been around 90% in my favour through the civil courts.

SWP court docs 19th July all files

Dr Tegwyn Williams, the police blackmailed Chief forensic Psychiatrist for Wales, is also wanted to simply correct and clarify my medical records as his reports, one to have me sectioned without even a clinical examination, continue to pay havoc in my life.

dr-tegwyn-williams-wanted-poster

The thoroughly arrogant and dishonest Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University

Wood

My Aug 2016 brain-scan BEFORE Barbara Wilding’s  Application to have me incarcerated in Ashworth for an indefinite period

09-08-28-spect-mri-scans

My 1st December 2009 English brain scan medical report deliberately withheld from His Honour Judge Bidder QC despite my ex MP, Walter Sweeney, having already faxed it to the Cardiff Crown Court. This was BEFORE  Crown Prosecutor , Richard Thomlow , during my forced absence in the cells below trying to beat the door down,  informed the learned judge in the court room with Tegwyn Williams that  I was  suffering from a possible brain tumour but no one has ever told me.

09-09-30-interim-psychiatric-report-oct1-2009-redacted

09-12-02-transcript-crn-crt-redacted

My brain-scan AFTER my Barry police station registration  as MAPPA 3/3 to be amongst  the top 5% most dangerous in the UK

Norman Scarth Esq being congratulated for his belief that ‘truth will prevail’

11 06 28 Contempt Appeal &amp; Norman MF 2

The current Chief Constable, Mr Vaughn & with Barbara also worried about is fat pension

peter vaughan

Part of my 200 odd arch-lever files I have on the South Wales Police’s years of nefarious activity back from a safe hiding place in Brittany.

13 02 12 files from France

Adrian Oliver Dolmans

Part of the Musa family, police reporting in, concerning their snatched six children by Haringey Council

Musa

Wilding Wanted

And now for something completely different

montage

as the wee cub needs a little ‘kirkyfing’ if she has any hope of making it all the way to Cape Town yet alone the planned landing on Horse Guards Parade, Central London, on 12th October 2016.fro a pre-flight party

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Application for Arrests of Lee Barker Cardiff Court’s GEOamey Custody Manager, Court Clerk Michael Williams, Prosecutors Jackie Seals & D Gareth Evans & Police Inspector Rice or I Will

                      Stop Press

Cardiff’s Cabal  Will  Stop at Nothing to Hide the Publicity of 23 years of Police Bullying

14th September 2016

Dear Sir/Madam,

I acknowledge receipt of your email, received in this office on 13th September 2016

Your email was referred to the Master of the Court of Appeal who has asked me to inform you that the court has not previously seen this letter. Please resend your Appellant’s Notice and the orders appealed.

Regards

Registry Team Civil Appeals Office

Royal Courts of Justice

London

 

FAO :

Civil Appeals Office
Royal Courts of Justice
The Strand
London
UK
 
13th September 2016
 
Dear Sir,

Cardiff Court’s Refusal to Process my Legal Aid Application

1   I have now established what lies at the bottom of this scandalous nonsense.
2. What is needed are Dr Tegwyn Williams’ 2013 lawyers from both London and Christchurch, New Zealand, as both he and his wife, Dr Janis Hillier, were  attempting to prevent my 4th police prosecution knowing it was an ‘abuse of process’, in itself and contrary to the 1997 Harassment Act.
 
Until I have established as to the  whereabouts of both, as the police refuse to tell me, re the 2nd jury trial, I will remain in some difficulties, as they say.
3. What is most urgent, of course, is obtaining a high court order from the RCJ concerning Cardiff County Court refusing to disclose related documents:
 
These include:
 
i)) Police 2013 ‘corrected’ ‘draft ‘ judgment for Maurice Kirk v South Wales Police from 23 year running civil damages claim
 
ii) the purported HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC  ‘sealed’ ‘approved’ BS614159 +2 judgment
 
iii) The relevant Cardiff County and Cardiff Magistrate’s court logs and
 
iv)  copy of my court  withheld prosecution exhibits also for the RCJ Civil Appeals Office three time attempted lodged appeal.
 

                        WANTED

   LEE BARKER GEOamey Custody Manager

 £100,000 Reward for Perjury Convictions

My reward for more up to date photographs of these individuals all wanted on perjury charges thanks to the help of the Criminal Cases Review Commission and private investigators. I will now double the previous cash for the information as to their current whereabouts in order for private summonses can be aerved on each of them.

Tel me 24/7 on +447708586202 or email maurice@kirkflyingvet.com-thankyou

LEE BARKER on the wrong end of ‘ses menottes’

lee-barker-1st-dec-2011-custody-manager

Lee Barker taken just before my 2011 string of arrests, on the usual fabricated excuses, when knowing I am extremely unlikely in getting bail following the Chief Constable’s 8th June clandestine meeting with Caswell Clinic staff to have me registered MAPPA category 3 level 3 victim in order to have me shot at moment of ‘witness statement exchange’ ordered by his Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC

HHJ Seys llewellyn QC

barker_statement-1

williams_statement-1

Restraining Order Never Served

A purported copy of the 1st December 2011 Dr Tegwyn Williams Restraining Order was first seen by Maurice Kirk only after he had been arrested at Wood Green Crown Court, London, on or about 12th December 2011 after having given evidence for the Musa Nigerian family who had had their six children snatched by the Haringey Council in the notoriously wicked UK family court system and set up purely for the lawyer theft of tax-payers’ money.

11-12-01-restraining-order

…….and remarkably similar to the one identified as ‘Exhibit One’ at 4th May 2012 Cardiff Crown Court also with the police station photocopier scratch right down the middle of it

Both South Wales Police and HM Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) have refused to explain to the past three juries or their victim as to the origins of  the date stamp on prosecution Exhibit One indicating a date after the alleged offence was committed or disclose the data relating to the hand written reference numbers also on the exhibit

12-10-21-clerk-restraining-order-witness-statement

t20120090-kirk-all-proeedings-04-05-12

So why were they both allowed to say somethings quite different, on oath, before a jury?

David Gareth Evans of Park Place Chambers, Cardiff, was the Crown Prosecutor who knows that the only thing shown to me on 1st Dec 2011, in  Cardiff magistrates cells, was a part district judge CPS hand written typed draft of a restraining order later admitted, on oath in Bristol Crown Court, after I had to arrest him tro get him in the box.

He quickly quit his job, as with most of the liars or was ‘pushed’, following the subsequent jury trial that even featured in the Sun newspaper.

In this, the first of three jury trials, so far, on the Dr Tegwyn Williams/MAPPA/ machine-gun saga to block my civil damages trials Judge Curran  deliberately refused the jury sight of relevant public records, despite their numerous requests after I was dragged  out of the court to prevent my trying to retrieve my defence court exhibits yet to be vacuated.

To be vacuated because in Welsh courts police victims are regularly not allowed their defence papers with them in any court proceedings unless, of course, they are lucky enough to be out on bail at the time.

Similarly, in Wales, prisoners in their criminal courts,when having to act as a ‘litigant in person’ behind bullet-proof glass for their protection and hearing precious little, are not allowed to have contemporaneous notes being taken of the evidence, on their behalf, even from their own family as was the case before District Judge John Charles for fear of immediate imprisonment.

13-04-08-crowther-refuses-extract-note-take

16-02-04-rcj-note-take-judgment

yet to be for medical attention or to allow me to know of their jury notes to him.

.http://www.9parkplace.co.uk/our-members/david-gareth-evans/

Michael Williams, then the clerk of the court, has since shredded and/or altered court logs and his contemporaneous notes of ridiculous evidence to obtain the ‘ultra vires’ harassment conviction before the  very dishonest District Judge John Charles later , too late for the CCRC enquiry, just to add to Cardiff Cabals almost daily nefarious activities, to protect Barbara Wilding’s healthy pension. He has done a runner from Wales as well!

Both Drs Tegwyn Williams and his wife, Dr Janis Hillyer, quickly disappeared to South Island, New Zealand or was also ‘pushed’.  Anyone, incidentally, needing the doctor’s address or their solictor’s telephone number who tried to prevent my last arrest in order to attempt to prevent the same prosecution of me on the thirs ‘breach of a restraining order please feel free and contact me before police succeed, again, in preventing my hospital internal examinations as they did while I was in Swansea prison and when I was released on ‘licence’.

dr-tegwyn-williams-wanted-poster

Wood

This complete idiot, villain Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University, had completely hood-winked Tegwyn into believing I had brain damage and possible brain tumour  from being ‘a long term drinking partner of the actor Oliver Reed’ and I had flown solo to Australia in a WW2 General Patten Piper Cub without even a map!

He went on to re write and back date the original information he had circulated around Caswell clinic my brain scan, machine-gun acquittal needing no defence what so ever when he was told by the police that their victim was not even told by courts, MAPPA, Welsh doctors or prisons he had a suspect brain tumour as the bloody lot were all in on the act.

This was then repeated to Judge Bidder QC —see 2nd Dec 2009 full transcript

09-09-30-interim-psychiatric-report-oct1-2009-redacted

Barbara Wilding at South Wales Police HQ jumped on this idiot’s late input, if not previously paid handsomely for it, in order to have me locked away for life, without the need, therefore, of the imminent machine-gun trial only carrying a 10 year mandatory prison sentence.

The subsequent secret MAPPA meeting therefore planned for my demise in Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital, instead, to stop her half dozen or so civil damages claims, by now, having to be defended. All claims identify South Wales Police malicious conduct on the English having been so stupid to have crossed either Severn Bridge into Wales in the first place.

HHJ Seys Llewellyn QC.s repeated refusal to recuse himself relates to the unusual content of his draft judgment as opposed to the facts of the case and why he is determined, it would also appear, never to allow any appeal to reach an English court in The Strand or for my 1CF 03361 machine-gun damages claim, that lost me my family, health, wealth and right to fly aircraft, for years, and practice veterinary surgery.

The illegally blocked machine-gun claim has been equally illegally blocked by welsh courts for six years and my 4th Action for even longer—–evil spineless little shysters

Summary of Machine-Gun Conspiracy

machine-gun-cps-brief-to-jury

12-08-20-mjk-mg11

1cf03361-mg-6th-action

16 08 26 Particulars of 4th Claim 7CF07345

BEFORE AMENDED

4th-action-7cf

The Chief Constable knew  that she had to have the antique Lewis machine -gun painted a different colour to fool the jury and introduce the fictitious ‘ foxy;’ as the under-cover policeman who has pretended to by her off me when first making contact on the telephone to the wrong person, my then wife.

The prosecution exhibit Gareth Evans tried to switch, mid trial, to  get past Charles failed but years later seized by the police from the Cardiff Crown Court office when a relation of mine had attempted to apply for what on earth was before the original court in the first place and needed there and then during the middle of the  March 2014 3rd ‘breach’ of a restraining order trial.

The good news for their victim, in November 2011, following the harassment conviction in his absence, contrary to the clear law on the subject, was that he was offered release  by the panicing district judge who had ‘ screwed up ‘ for Dolmans master plan.

Released, two weeks too early for what Dolmans (Chief Constables private lawyers in civil claims) had arranged with Charles, CPS (Wales) and the rest of the Cardiff’s  cabal meant no restraining order had even been typed out yet alone ready to serve despite their victim’s opportunity to leave the stench of the place at around 2pm. These documents are only served on the recipient of a restraining order once the prison is about to release I’m when he is a Litigant in Person like I am usually forced to be,

Their victim had refused to leave his cell, for a few hours, after the odour in the air had exceeded the norm as no paperwork had been disclosed to him as explanation for his too early release.

He was not falling for that very old police trick as they were waiting outside the court building for the subsequent ‘gate arrest’ for stitched up Musa Nigerian six children snatched by the Haringey Council.

11 09 17 Musas and MJK at Tottenham Police Station

It had been a  ‘long stop’ police precaution to prolong their victim’s incarceration under any pretext and jumped on the MUSA case, so needed by the London prosecution for their victims evidence not to be heard to blow a family court conspiracy plainly  for the oodles of cash and for the parents NOT to get their children back, again for the oodles of unchecked taxpayers ‘ cash.

The Cardiff prison simply stopped his attending to give vital evidence in the hearing, two days before and blocked any subsequent hearing in the Crown court later.

This South Wales Police refusing their victims attending court is the norm in Wales if the tax payers’ completely unchecked ‘gravy train’ is to keep chugging on to the bank.

You do not serve restraining orders in court cells on a prisoner due to go back in prison that same night.  Papers are served on their release.That is why Barker had to pretend I had received a court served order before 3pm  and one of the five GEO custody boys, at 5pm., while dragging me, flat on the floor, the length of the corridor in the custody suite to the exit, desperately trying to stuff it in my sock having failed to get it into my trouser pocket.

It was all Sabine’s fault, I joke,  for inviting so many people from across the UK  with my usual faithful Welsh Mackenzie Friends, sister  and a bemused Jeff Matthews to personally witness, ‘what really goes on in our UK law courts’.

You should of been there that day, late November 2011, behind the bullet-proof glass with me, you would hear practically nothing of the proceedings but did that matter as a ring-side seat you would of had to watch  the spectacle .

The  shock and panic on the face of the South Wales Administrator of all their courts, Mr Spengazi, Strinati or Spinatti?, some name like that, come rushing down from his office suite  into the court in his pin stripe suit and waste coat to  frantically, but personally, grab as many chairs as he could in the public gallery and removed them to prevent there being any more of the general public to witness the farce.

It is the ‘Gulag Card’ of which many will be dealt, with gay abandon, if Brexit gets its way.

Listen to the court tape of this magistrates caper on http://www.kirkflyingvet.com.

No wonder Lord Justice Thomas refused my being ever allowed to practice veterinary surgery again by having the RCJ court tape quickly corrupted.

BUT  I had taken a tea-totaller, no smoking , no swearing, gentleman from the Emerald Isle  witness His lordship by sitting quietly in the back of the court as was his habit.

Similarly, just as a Jeffrey Matthews crept into the public library so many years later unnoticed, at the end of the last 3rd or was it 4th ‘breach of a restraining order trial by now, originating, in law, as a blatant ‘abuse of process’ had it occurred in any English court room.

11-11-15-solicitor-letter-to-cardiff-magistrates

That is why Judge Rowland, around April 2014, quashed the Tegwyn Williams restraining order ‘as an abuse of process’ as both the CPS had now agreed it was ‘ridiculous’ as both lawyers had investigated the law in the case and new evidence in the last to jury trials that the 1997 Harassment Act made provision for this in that the  fabricated medical records and talk of a brain tumour, when never ever informing their victim, had been orchestrated under the duress of both Professor Rodger Wood and Barbara Wilding.

Whilst  designated as a hater of devil-worshippers and to be actually  locked away in Ashworth, purely to stop the cocked-up machine-gun case, was a crime that had been committed but not by Maurice John Kirk.

One cannot be convicted for a section 2 harassment offence if all the police victim was trying to do was to either ‘detect’ or ‘prevent crime’.

Remember, boys and girls of The Principality, there is only one ‘truth’ unless I am stupid?

This document below was one of many such taken to an English court while I was trying to get private prosecutions on some thirty odd in the South Wales establishment only to be told, with obvious sympathy , no English magistrate’s court can process an alleged crime in a foreign country, like Wales, despite their  being of the same jurisdiction—so Brexit lovers, in England, beware as what was first trialled in South Wales and partly succeeded then a ‘gulag card’ may now just be waiting to be dealt on YOU

10 09 28 Murphy st (1)

Inspector Rice tried to set this up  by goading me to retrieving the car from inside Penarth police station compound as all at police HQ were now frantic for having found out the name of my new insurance company to ‘lean on’ not to renew my cover.

In another of the hundred or so police incidents, when I had to arrest another Welsh Crown Prosecutor, a Mr Stan Sofa for having deliberately hidden the clear speed-trap photograph of another, not me, who should been prosecuted for speeding, it  was why it had to be  Inspector Andrew Rice again, it appears, that had rushed from Barry police station with all  sirens  blaring on both police vehicles stuffed with fellow officers.

They had burst into the court room and, instead of taking the CPS solicitor to his cell, instead, he confiscated the CPS file in front of us all to make sure it never  reached any enquiry either in London  or by an outside police force.

Exactly as he or Sergeant Hall, was it, did in another equally police concocted ‘smuggling pigs into Ireland’ alleged incident leaving the collapsed trial in the usual shambles and no apologies to me for the inconvenience.

The apparently perverse verdict of Judge Seys Llewellyn QC is of particular note, in the above random examples that involve  Rice, shortly to be arrested, in that he remarked, mid civil trial that, despite the utter commotion with court staff fleeing the room I had even written down in my 200 odd prison battered arch leaver files, the very collar number of Inspector Rice as he was pinching property again.

Rice, of course, denied he knew anything about the CPS arrest incident, on oath, just as he had to be most singularly the one to have my name removed from the veterinary register, as custody sergeant that night, fiddling the custody records never to allow never them going before the presiding magistrates. He had had three versions of the ‘complaint’ over an alleged  Breach of the Peace with which CPS lawyer, Jackie Seals and ex Inspector Howard Davies had conspired in.

Why oh why, with well over twenty veterinary practice vehicles in strange registrations, such as Amy Johnson, Amelia Earhart, Buzz Aldrin and Joseph F Bloggins, was a DVLI enquiry or prosecution, on their own?  Why I was I never quizzed on it even over twenty four years of police bullying and weeks through the substantive trial?–It stinks, does not?

Part of my appealhere, currently being blocked for the Royal Courts of Justice, features the Sofa arrest:  Draft ‘grounds’

action-2-claim-5-2nd-oct-1997-speed-camera-st-nicholas-f

Seven Times Welsh Prisons have Maliciously Stopped My Attending Courts as A Litigant in Person- Standard Blackmail to make their Victim have to confide in a local  Lawyer 

SENT 2nd time on 10th sept 2016 owing to no response

Civil Appeals Office

Royal Courts of Justice

London WC2A 2LL

Your Ref:   2016/PI/11303

My Ref. CO/4737/2014

31stJuly 2016

Dear Sir

MAURICE JOHN KIRK BVSc v DPP

I thank you for your letter dated 13th July 2016 regarding my Appellant’s Notice and Supporting Grounds of Appeal sent to the court in this matter.

You state that the matter was referred to the Master of the Court of Appeal who directed that the court had no jurisdiction to deal with the application concerning the order of Mr. Justice Blake dated 15th April 2016, on the basis that there is no right of appeal regarding an order made under CPR Pt. 52.17(7).

However, it was made plain in my Grounds of Appeal that I considered that the Honourable Judge had in fact proceeded with my set aside application under the wrong rule, when he could and should have considered the application under CPR Pt 3.1(7) to revoke the previous order of dismissal of Mr. Justice Gilbart made on 21st January 2015.

Without prejudice to whether or not the court had jurisdiction to consider an application to appeal against Mr. Justice Blake’s order, the prohibitions in respect of appeal didn’t apply to Mr. Justice Hickinbottom’s subsequent order dated 14th June 2016.

This wasn’t an application under CPR Pt. 52.17(2), but an application to set aside Mr. Justice Blake’s previous order purportedly made under CPR Pt. 52.17(2).

Mr. Justice Hickinbottom purported to rule that he had no jurisdiction to entertain my application for set aside in respect of Mr. Justice Blake’s previous order. As can be ascertained from my supporting Grounds of Appeal, I don’t agree with that ruling, and irrespective of whether any appeal would have lain directly in respect of Mr. Justice Blake’s order, the prohibition against an appeal didn’t apply to Mr. Justice Hickinbottom’s order.

I consider that the paper ruling of the Master of the Court of Appeal was a denial of access to justice under article 6(1) ECHR as incorporated under schedule 1 of the Human Rights Act 1998 accordingly without any hearing regarding the matter under review, or hearing my submissions relating to jurisdiction etc.

I would therefore request that the matter be referred to a Lord Justice of Appeal accordingly or the matter be remitted back to the Master for further reconsideration accordingly.

I re-enclose a copy of my original Appellant’s Notice and Grounds of Appeal and the three orders of Mr. Justice Gilbart dated 21st January 2015, Mr. Justice Blake dated 15th April 2016 and Mr. Justice Hickinbottom dated 14th June 2016.

I look forward to hearing from you accordingly.

Yours faithfully

Maurice Kirk BVSc

Encs

UK’s judiciary is just all one big confidence -trick into fooling the general public ‘what really goes on in our law courts’ is both legal and morally sound!…..dream on.

 

Duty Inspector,

Somerset and Avon Police

Taunton

Somerset

11th September 2016

Dear Sir/Madam,

I would like to make an appointment to lay information as a criminal complaint concerning the South Wales Police’s most recent nefarious activities designed, as we all know, in order to frustrate both my civil actions against them, including the fabrication of my allegedly ‘trading in machine guns’ nonsense, now being deliberately being delayed by both Cardiff’s civil and criminal courts.

Litigation long before I employed my Bristol lawyers, over 20 years ago, to get the Welsh police finally ‘off my back’, actually included my arrest and a failed prosecution, of course, whilst I was simply conducting a flight as a commercial pilot from Taunton via Cardiff airport to Dublin.

On another occasion on a private flight, again from Taunton and this time to Northern Ireland with my then wife, I was detained by Welsh police resulting in the substantial damage to a police vehicle for obstructing my perfectly lawful flight. The UK tax payer not the Welsh police, as usual, was made to foot the bill for the launching of at least one RAF Hawker Hunter out of RAF Brawdy that day.

There are a number of other Welsh police incidents, you may think bizarre and too many to list other than in a court room but I have been told, again, your officers have again out knocking on doors looking for me, this time told it appeared be about a Dr Tegwyn Williams again

I have spent time telephoning and visited the police station but failed to find out what it is about.

Before our proposed appointment could someone explain why I appear to being followed by your helicopter despite my visits and calls to reduce the fuel bill. This is exactly what happened in South Wales putting my terrified passenger in the aircraft at serious risk as no radio contact was made and it flew within 50 ft of my wing all contrary to statute.

action-2-claim-7-4-july-1999-the-police-helicopter-v2

I have spent the best part of two days a week ago trying to find from your police station what on earth it is all about now even needing visits to places of other people ‘s residences when there is a perfectly good telephone somewhere in your building to just ring me

Yours,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Tel 07708586202

maurice@kirkflyinging vet.com

mauicejohnkirk.wordpress.com

(No reply, as  yet, from my Taunton MP, I notice. Is this going to be a repeat, I wonder, as to what I experienced from our country’s current Secretary of State for Wales?)

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Two Applications to Quash illegally STOPPED Machine-Gun Damages Claim & NHS (Wales) Caswell Clinic Investigation

FOR SIX YEARS THE CARDIFF CABAL HAS BLOCKED PROPER IVESTIGATION

MJK letters of complaint to the General Medical Council & Alun Cairns MP

10-10-17-gmc-wales-complaint

10-11-24-gmc-complaint_0001

11-01-17-gmc

Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) has deliberately withheld, for three jury trials and for the original utter nonsense harassment conviction many important defence witnesses and this letter, below, which is why CPS and police so fervently opposed, every time, my bail applications to keep me locked up in Welsh prisons unable to properly prepare for either civil ligation or criminal hearings, the whole purpose of the Barbara Wilding MAPPA Machine-gun conspiracy in the first place.

Police make me in top 5% most dangerous in the country as a MAPPA 3/3 victim for Ministry of Justice’s printed libel, below, just to influence each jury, Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons designed purely to successfully oppose my bail applications as exactly was the case to have me locked up for months prior to my machine-gun acquittal Judge/CPS/police conspiracy when no defence evidence was even tendered.

14-07-11-restricted-mappa-doc-redacted

12-01-20-remand-warrant-12-02-22-judge-curran-qc-court-order-redacted

11-11-08-mr-mike-curry

 

Chief Clerk,
Cardiff Magistrates Court
Wales

9th September 2016

Dear Sir/Madam,

Application to Quash 1st Dec 2011 Dr Tegwyn Williams Restraining Order

dr-tegwyn-williams-wanted-poster

I now understand from both HM Crown Prosecution Service and Criminal Cases Review Commission, following the disclosure of new evidence, some of which was referred to by Dr Tegwyn William’s solicitor to the police some time ago without my knowing about it, I have plausible argument that the purported ‘restraining order’, never served on me in the first place, should be quashed.

As I am also to go abroad I would be grateful for an early date in order that I may attend in person.

Yours Faithfully,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc
Tel 07708586202

enclosed:

caswell-clinic-medical-records-leak-redacted

Initial Statement by Eifion Edwards.

Court Appointed lawyer does not have the evidence that is essential for the cross examination of Dr Tegwyn Williams.

1. Time is needed to organise evidence in support of the defendant Mr M J Kirk that is essential for court appointed lawyer to use in the cross examination of Dr Tegwyn Williams to expose Dr TW unusual dishonesty and malice.

2. On 1 May 2012, the day before trial, the Crown Court told me they had they had asked Apex Chambers to provide Counsel as the Court appointed lawyer, but no decisions had been taken on who would act. I need to provide very complex papers and there is now no time.

3. I believe to proceed without my evidence that is needed to cross examine Dr TW would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.

4. I ask that proceedings switch to focus on a re-trial of the original conviction of December 2011 & 1& 2 March 2012 because my evidence has been hidden from the Courts for their fair deliberations – despite my writing to the Crown Prosecution Service and attending both Magistrates Court and the appeal at the Crown Court. I was prevented from giving evidence on both occasions by improper ‘goings on’.

5. The matter is so complex and lengthy I merely give the direction of my evidence at this time, and ask for time to submit more.

The direction of my evidence.

6. I can confirm that Mr Kirk telephoned me on his release in December 2011 and when I pointedly asked him to detail the latest bail conditions or restraining order that he was under, that he was unaware of any restraining order.

7. As in my attached letter to Mr M Curry Head of Unit at Cardiff CPS and a much fuller letter to Keith Starmer, Director of Public Prosecutions I can explain why Mr Kirks actions are reasonable and lawful and that not only should Mr Kirk not be convicted, but that Mr Kirk should not even be prosecuted.

8. I wish to explain why I believe Dr TW and parties are dishonest and malicious.

Dr TW’s breach of a High Court Order restraining Dr TW from obstructing my care and harassing me – and how Dr TW misleads the Crown Court on 1 March 2012

9. Please see where in the transcript of 1 March 2012 Dr TW tries to imply he has no one else objecting to his actions, when I have had take Dr TW to the High Court over his endless dishonesty and now seemingly a breach of his undertaking to the High Court. Dr TW and parties have interfered in Cardiff NHS very much to try to stop me complaining to the General Medical Council about him.

10. I have had disclosure of Caswell Clinic papers to confirm that a multi agency committee has been meeting based around Caswell clinic to prevent anyone lawfully complaining to the General Medical Council about Dr T Williams. Before Mr Kirk’s alleged harassment charges took place, the committee detail how they aim to get those who complain about Dr T Williams imprisoned for many years. My and Mr Kirk’s initials are on the heading of the emails that organise the agenda of these meetings. (I have no criminal convictions/cautions by 55 years and am a well qualified professional man.)

11. The Caswell clinic multi agency committee seems to have unreasonable influence and control over the Courts, CPS and Mr Kirk’s custody at Prison, to seemingly pervert justice.

12. I am presently organising the complaints to the GMC for both Mr Kirk and myself. The GMC have confirmed that the GMC legal team have approved a larger than usual investigation will occur regards my complaint. I now start to explain the GMC about what Dr T Williams does wrong regards Mr Kirk:-

a) Maliciously denying Mr Kirk access to Caswell Clinic when the staff team of the Caswell had decided in writing that they wanted to build a therapeutic relationship with Mr Kirk. Yet when Mr Kirk would approach Caswell for staff to have opportunity to draw him in, Dr T W maliciously and dishonesty called the police etc.

b) I believe that Dr T W did this because Dr T W cannot discuss the close detail of clinical reports on Mr Kirk because the reports are seemingly malicious and unusually dishonest. Dr TW calls police and falsely alleges harassment to try to cover up exceptional wrongdoing of in bad faith trying to deny Mr Kirk’s liberty indefinitely.

c) That Dr T W refuses to receive questions and information to clarify or correct his reports. Dr T W refused to make a statement to explain himself in civil proceedings, to imply guilt.

Mr Justice Beatson saw an extract of what I believe Dr TW ‘made up’ about Mr Kirk.

13. The evidence I wish Dr T W to be cross examined on is seemingly reliable of genuine concern. When I shared what I knew with Mr Justice Beatson on 19 January 2012 sitting at Cardiff Administrative Court he said in Judgement:-

“Some of the allegations that the Claimant (myself) makes about CPS policy, if supported by evidence, would be very serious. Today he has given me a swatch of papers about Mr Maurice Kirk, a litigant who is well-known in these courts. Mr Edwards relies on what he says is evidence that it was said that Mr Kirk was mentally unfit and had brain damage, which a summary of Mr Kirk’s record based on a surgery home visit report shows was not true.”

14. I wish explain why Mr Kirk has not yet had a fair trial to explore what Mr Justice Beatson describes as “very serious” and “a ….report shows was not true”. Yet both the Crown Prosecutor and the Court appointed lawyer withheld my evidence from the appeal at Cardiff Crown Court. There are also more complex reasons why my evidence was withheld from the Court(s). I believe the Courts need to now switch to a re-trial and for the “first time” to explore how Dr T W and parties do wrong to Mr Kirk.

15. As for example is in the attached one page extract of recent papers lodged at the High Court 18 April 2012, I am asking the High Court to refer the abuse of power (such as in Mr Kirk’s case) and where there is no Remedy for that abuse, to the Supreme Court.

Eifion Edwards 1 May 2012

10-06-16-caa-medical

11-11-08-mr-mike-curry

09-08-28-spect-mri-scans9-12-1-medical-kemp

12-12-21-cps-dicken-ro

12-12-30-cps-dicken-re-rcj-appeal

09-09-30-interim-psychiatric-report-oct1-2009-redacted

11-11-15-solicitor-letter-to-cardiff-magistrates-redacted

Where the ‘buck’ finally stops:

Just one of the many versions of redacted/re-written police and court records one tends to find in Cardiff after decades of my life wasted by trying to simply practice veterinary surgery in South Wales that has still not managed to fiddle judicial autonomy and its own police force.

?

Withheld court log from 4th May 2012 1st ‘breach of a restraining order’

Even the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) have been gagged.

Application for Access to Court Files

16-09-09-appl-lift-mg-stay-and-sealed-judgment-release

AND what about my confiscated custody interview tape re ‘garrotte type instrument’ used on HRH Prince Charles’ farm?

This part of the tape transcript to get me goaled as ‘unidentifiable’-later, when I can find it!

I take a pin and random sample ‘grounds’ for appeal on one from 33 incidents in dispute

16-03-15-provisional-grounds-of-appeal-bs614159-etc-3

16-03-15-rcj-prov-grds-appeal-2nd-example

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Why Cardiff’s Current Conduct re Blocking My Machine-Gun Trial Compensation

Chief Constable of South Wales Police
Police Head Quarters,
Bridgend
South Wales

7th September 2016

Dear Mr Vaughan,

machine-gun-cps-brief-to-jury

mg-uk-column-jan-09010

Machine gun 252x326.aspxMachine gun aspx

The antique was black when I purchased her on the DH2 1916 replica biplane, from a Dorset Air Museum, as opposed to the above 2nd photo back in the Lincolnshire museum, after trial. A single police officer from Wales (the regulations are a minimum of three armed officers plus 2nd vehicle should the first break down) returned with it by police car to Barbara Wilding’s boudoir to paint the now only partly black relic of the Somme just to match my video of it, incidentally, shown to the jury, on day of the aircraft sale more than a year earlier!

Barbara had the colour altered to try and fool the jury but on acquittal allowed it to be returned to Lincolnshire not even the same shade of colour as Mr Cooper had painted it within days of first buying.

(In the pub, immediately after the trial, nine of the jury were still quite bemused as to why was not both the seller to me and the buyer of a purported ‘prohibitive weapon’ not also up in the dock beside me? Curious and especially at the end of each day of the two week trial, my son watched some police officer picked up Prosecution Exhibit One, sling it over his shoulder to walk out alone onto a public pavement to strut slowly up the road back to some local police station).

The problem arose when 11 of the 12 jury decided NOT GUILTY on first day of evidence which ultimately led to her having to be returned to the museum that wrong colour. The 12th , speak to the rest of the jury, was clearly a police ‘plant’, the standard ploy in Cardiff Crown courts to feed info back, this time to judges Paul Thomas QC and Richard Thomlow, then the bent CPS prosecutor.

As an aside,  both Caspar and myself were quietly amused as to the ‘modus operandi’ of slimy fingers attached to those in positions of privilege and answerable to no one but their Maker.

We were both waiting , of course, for the police’s excuses for Exhibit One, an integral part of a British registered aircraft and critical to its C of G, for safe flight as well as being CAA documented in the certification documents, aircraft log books prominently displayed on the prosecutor’s table.

Both Richard Thomlow and Judge Paul Thomas QC, wash your mouth out, Maurice,  were fully aware of the conspiracy, for without them why would Barbara bother?

Thomlow was seen frantically trying to slip the airframe log book, without looking down for it, under his pile of prosecution papers as my enquiries were now dangerously leading embarrassingly in that direction as it was time for my  tea.

That is why, despite my paying thousands of pounds after the acquittal for my videoed statement of complaint recorded at Barry police station, South Wales Police or should I not say, Patrick, HM Partnership, refused me that, their court transcript, copy of exhibits, court log or police custody, IRIS and MAPPA records when the latter,  when drawn up , was again in the presence of their blackmailed Chief Forensic Psychiatrist for Wales, Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams.

dr-tegwyn-williams-wanted-poster

That is also why, including the switching of the sex of some police officer, code named ‘Foxy’ and hidden behind the witness box screen to also try and fool the jury, could not be  properly cross examined by me for fear the earlier telephone call, when she (not a he) rang my then wife, trying to acquire the Lewis,  before being part of the 2nd hit squad of ‘Operation Tulip’ or was it Buttercup, to snatch our then 10 year old little daughter,  Genevieve, after the police and twenty odd , many armed police had left the scene in their ridiculous ‘Operation Chalice’ public scandal.

Any excuse for yet another Sunday over time paid ‘joy ride’ in Barbara’s  taxpayer paid for new helicopter just to chase me. (That is why HHJ Seys Llewelyn QC struck out my civil claim as the pilots and or crew would surely be implicated again in more unlawful conduct and why the machine-gun claim has been blocked by the same judge, for well over six years or be allowed a jury hearing in England.

So Barbara Wilding authorised her being painted black, to match my You tube video made on day of sale to museum for jury to see ( prosecution exhibit 2) to the original grey the new owner had painted her.

Ah, but when I took statements, well over a year later, from the museum I was told by all in the aircraft hangar she had even came back, after that ridiculous trial with  criminal HHJ Judge Paul Thomas,  a different shade of grey to what the new owner had painted her on purchase.

That is the real state of our Welsh law courts, but do you care, Mr Vaughan?

peter-vaughan

Your HM Partnership is designed to fleece the unsuspecting general public under the myth surrounding the very lucrative world of HM and if it was not for Brexit, we could quash it.

Incidentally, I have come into the possession of information concerning a Dr Hillier of Caswell Clinic from a former patient which appears to directly relate to whatever evidence was presented by Judge Richard Thomlow in Cardiff Crown Court, without me, in order to both avoid the 2010 machine-gun trial, due in a few days and other pending alleged related MAPPA category 3 level 3 crimes from ‘going public’ but, instead, to have me locked away for life without even a trial.

I believe the current level of criminal activity now being occasioned in your Cardiff law courts, to cover up the above conspiracy, urgently requires the invitation of an outside police force being called in to investigate. Even the Criminal Cases Review Commission and IPCC have been gagged.

16-09-07-amended-parole-board-particulars-of-claim-c90cf012

As you know I have had to leave your area for health reasons and due to your adverse control over both the Vale of Glamorgan’s general practitioners and hospital specialists, being at a level quite unimaginable anywhere else in the United Kingdom, I was neglected in your various prisons by your South Wales Police repeatedly preventing my pre-arranged hospital appointments being kept.
You will recall that on more than six occasions your police denied my attending both civil and criminal courts in Cardiff as each of the cases related to my civil actions against your continuing the bullying that your predecessor was also so extremely good at.

You are also aware that there are a number of other civil damages claims still outstanding against both yourself and NHS (Wales) and in particular implicating other clinical staff who are still at your controlled Caswell Clinic medium secure psychiatric hospital based in Bridgend.

Remember, despite a direct invitation by Dr Gaynor Jones, involving a Dr Ruth Bagshaw and others, I was promptly arrested on arrival at the Caswell Clinic, gaoled for ‘attempted burglary’ and other typical nonsense allegations only for all charges, once again, being dropped once matters had been sufficiently protracted for my maximum harm, of course, in a closed court, of course and refused police data pertaining to it, of course, all routine on an Englishman so stupid to have set foot in the Principality in so south a location.

Your predecessor, Ms Barbara Wilding, had me incarcerated there for the maximum term, under s35 of the 1983 Mental Health Act, in the hope I would finally accept medication and therefore lawfully transferred to Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital for an indefinite period.

Upon my release from prison, following the acquittal without even the need of defence evidence, both Wilding’s 2009 fabricated sworn affidavit and the allegation of my ‘trading in machine-guns’ and numerous other MAPPA3/3 related charges, all require an outside police’s intervention as it is becoming obvious that your similarly controlled Cardiff County Court has no intention in my subsequent civil claim being allowed the light of day yet alone with the facts before a jury.

Cardiff County Court’s repeated refusal to transfer my subsequent claims to either an English court or for your conspiracy, needing both Dr Tegwyn Williams and Professor Rodger Wood to be investigated, is an abuse of process. The police led 2nd December 2009 Crown Court application, that I be incarcerated in Ashworth for life, still remains your responsibility and disclosure of its data.

In October 2013 I visited Barry police station to lay further information only to be gaoled without an arrest for over an hour while senior welsh police officers pleaded with Dr Tegwyn Williams’ lawyer, in London, to persuade his reluctant client to make another false complaint and making, for sure, no Cardiff court would, again, process my legal aid applications or allow my documents in the court.

Not dissimilar to the 2nd aborted jury trial incident, is it, of a ‘breach of a restraining order ‘ never served in the first place? Dr TW signed a witness statement that police had prevented my burning his and Dr Hillier’s house down when you all knew the allegation was a figment of his imagination after too many years with you lot, I presume, with your day to day nefarious conduct continuing to be unchecked unless Brexit can be overturned

The doctors are down in New Zealand we are all told where a contingency, on my behalf and for other aggrieved parties, are planning to visit to find more on the police back-mail that caused this inconvenience to both me and my family to have happened in the first place.

I require from you the details of your past chief forensic psychiatrist’s solicitor and current one, if need be, as I intend travelling to London to see him or her this Friday in order that your refusing to allow my NHS (Wales) medical records from ever being released may be resolved ‘out of court’.

You very well know that without those medical records being redacted, completely expunged from the record or facing a further scrutiny in the 4th jury trial, in the matter, I cannot successfully re-apply for my commercial pilot’s licences, the return of my police confiscated shot guns and hold appropriate gun certificates or become, again, a member of the veterinary profession before I leave for on my convoluted journey, this November, around the world.

Yours faithfully,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Copy to Ms Rebecca Pow MP of the Vale of Taunton

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

source: https://mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com/

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

THE CAROL WOODS COVERUP: HER LIFE IN DANGER? “Reckless endangering of life: Lancs.” 17 Sept. 16

Please see below, under the video etc. links, the latest update from whistleblower and ex-UK Government Social Worker Level 3 and Child Protection Officer Ms. Carol Woods, received 17 September 2016, [and before].

While the more recent updates from Ms. Woods may concentrate on the more current ID frauds and similar relating to her at her present abode, it must be fully understood that these actions, by parties known and unknown, are seemingly being enacted as a direct result of Ms. Woods reporting, or attempting to report, certain findings when employed by a UK town council as a senior Level 3 Social Worker, and Child Protection Officer, as described within the videos and radio broadcasts that follow these paragraphs, entitled “IMPORTANT VIDEOS”.  The massive corruption that is described, has so far gone unchecked, and ignored wholesale by whichever UK government agency it is reported to, which is clearly described within the videos.

More crimes and misdemenours committed against Ms. Woods include: 

the theft of her home [as happened also to Patrick Cullinane, Len Lawrence, Joseph Henry [multiple houses stolen], Tom Crawford, and so many more],

at least 4 separate enforced incarcerations in mental hospital units for no earthly good reason – one excuse used  for such incarcerations being that Ms. Woods was mentally “deluded” in her findings of utter corruption within a Lancs. council – her latest incarceration being between November 2015 and Febuary 2016. Carol was also forced to take psychotropic drugs against her will during these hospital stays, and was threatened with re-arrest before her leaving the “Cygnet” unit, Lancs. in Febuary 2016.

fake IDs used [for example: for expensive commercial criminal frauds], 

chronic gangstalking and/or harrassment by government connected sources,

home burglaries,

the inflicting of tracking devices upon her motor vehicle, and also numerous attempted thefts of that vehicle, and the attempted destruction of her motor vehicle, 

enforced “bankruptcy”

Many more seriously criminal activities exist, committed against this lone female, which have been reported accordingly to no avail, along with her discoveries as a Level 3 Social Worker and Child Protection Officer. All of what is described, especially within the videos and related data below is a public scandal, and equally as disgusting is that nothing being done about any of it by any UK government employee contacted, from the Prime Minister down, let alone the heads of police forces!

IMPORTANT VIDEOS 

1] PLAYLIST [3 videos]: EXPOSING FAKE SOCIAL WORKERS ETC. 06 Febuary 2016

www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCT5hwoao38ThHG5Y6q3GSp_hsTwMK2UD

2] Please listen to this vital radio show interview with Ms. Woods from the 12 March 2016

www.mixcloud.com/TheFreedomTalkRadioNetwork/lancashire-greater-manchester-harrow-councils-cops-crime-coruption-carol-woods-whistleblower/

3] CAROL WOODS WHISTLEBLOWER ON RADIO lancashire police corruption county council 06 Febuary 2016

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/freedomtalkradioscotland/2016/02/21/andys-sunday-night-show-with-guest 

GOOGLE “CAROL WOODS” for more videos and articles.

carolwoods

Reckless endangering of life: Lancs.  17 Sept. 16

I am Carol Woods Ms under duress at 28 Fell View Caton LA2 9RP my car is X165 YUB a red Toyota. That has been my only car from Jan 2012 and is not shared, loaned out or used to drive lowlife about. PLEASE note that the PURPLE car at CHARNOCK SERVICES was NOT the small tidy VW almost a purple shade today stalking me from Caton to Lancaster with the Gestapo sitting ready in the most inconvenient space to “confirm” they saw a purple VW and as I was then in Lancaster it was me! She told to wear black and white as that is usually proof a person is me.This document is to be sent out as and when it has been added to as I have absolutely no doubt it will be added to. Many know I keep daily records of my use of electrical power given the thieves and fraudsters I “live” among in Fell View who use phones as if they are me, Internet and so forth with the ILLEGAL devices in MY loft installed ready for my moving to 28 Fell View so PLANNED, PREMEDITATED and ORGANISED in CONSPIRACY as a number of persons are involved. They include: Mr and Mrs Williams in 30 Fell View who apparently are me as if I am married; Jackson in 26 as if she is me, Jarvis in 41 who I apparently live with being cared for and driven about by them, McHarran and Hicks in 43 as she is also apparently me, Hunter in 22, Dalton in 45 who with their collected yobs and trolls are all “me”. There are others but that serves to show this corruption. All are unemployed-by-trade. How can they be me when they all look so different to me and to each other? Their FRAUDS and THEFTS are conducted via the Internet and phone use so they are not seen. BUT Williams has ID provided for her in MY name and cars, as does Jackson. They “explain” how they can be me and themselves by claiming they had identical twins yet the twins surely look like them and not me?  A minor detail for the lunatic instructing in this IAN YOUNG police and county legal rep. In that of course the thieves and fraudsters have to have “relatives” found for them which is not even funny now: “daughters” are as old as “parents”, sons change into daughters and dead parents are resurrected.  Williams was told to dye her short, thin, grey hair yellow to make it more like mine, Jarvis was told to dye her longer grey hair and tie it in a Lancaster face lift style when she was one of herself but leave it loose when she was the other of herself (me). 

The use of light aqua sweaters, T shirts, jackets is common and they are all to be one car used in serious FRAUD Y96 OBU an old Rover and as that was linked to me by one murderous thief RYCROFT flat 4 Penhale Gardens then according to the lunatic in Lancashire, if persons wear light aqua they are seen to be “me” in that car! Jackson was bought a jacket, Williams was bought a sweater and Jarvis was bought a sweater and they rotate such as 16/9/16 when Williams’ and Jackson’s frauds, INTENT, bullying and worse failed they used the deranged Jarvis; like all they wear an item then change it after an hour or so to be their “twin” Carol Woods so by 3 30pm on 16/9/16 Jarvis had her hair loose and had changed into the light aqua sweater. She was me POSTING: she sent, to be posted, a card in a GREEN envelope as green is highly significant in this in relation to serious fraud and ID theft using a passport but out of scope of this. She did not take it herself; a local troll took it in such a farce conducted in the street one wonders if they could ever have been sane. Why didn’t Jarvis take it herself? Because about 18 months ago she, loudly shouted to her children, to post an item which she was using as me in bank fraud in forgery of my signature. The children wanted to go to nearest box which is the scene of many photos including Gestapo and vehicles of 31/12/14 aiding and abetting thief Jackson who they, sat, at YOUR, expense to say they saw me and I posted a DWP claim when they watched her! The Gestapo used at least 5 vehicles that day and one red taxi and I used my camera. The box used often, Jackson found one not far away behind Fell View and with the old fraudster and doxy in BK53 EWE from 31 Fell View, who drove Jackson as me for DWP claims in FRAUD, did use that box it being nearer to 31, Jarvis wanted to maintain that FRAUD. How did Jarvis know what box anyone else used anyway? The box has since been removed by the Royal Mail so there is only the one near Fell View which is why Jarvis made a song and dance about getting the card there; it cannot be sent from the one used earlier. That is classic Masonic revision history.                                                                                                                                                                              Small children are “borrowed” and used as “cover” for related frauds because they think if a child is seen than a fraud will not be perpetuated and, they know I will not take photos if children are around so they USE SMALL CHILDREN AS SHIELDS which shows what lowlife they are.

That is a preamble to this which is nothing I have not already recorded and sent out scores of other times. I was asked recently why I could not move away from this lowlife; where to? This lowlife are replacements of the same types of murdering thieves and fraudsters from the address I had then, 3 Penhale Gardens LA3 2QA and they were replacements for murdering lowlife where I rented prior to that, caravan 1A @ 298 Oxcliffe Rd LA3 3EJ and ALL have been provided with ID in my name for fraudulent claims, a provisional driving licence as if I am not one who has a licence thus not me AND THAT TO INCLUDE A CAR YK02 VPF LOOTED FROM A MURDER VICTIM who lived in flat 3 Penhale Gardens prior to me, ID to work as “volunteer” in HMYOI Lancaster Farms to make the lowlife Williams in 30 Fell View be seen to be me and she with the 5 (FIVE) cars bought/hired for her as if she is me. My car does not apparently exist.

All that is part of a kaleidoscopic picture and how the lunatics in charge of the asylum shake every so often to get a new picture but using the same old nonsense in lunatic repetition. Apparently, YOUNG recorded (when he pretended he was a psychiatrist) that I had called into a council office and was repetitious which was apparently proof I was mentally ill.  Apart from the fact he is a liar on that point, and maybe if Lancashire employed persons with even half a brain one would not have to repeat oneself to make oneself understood using plain, simple English, then he corners any market in repetition. I have a few documents that record events done time and time again where each time they hope for a different result than the previous occasion. As the result is never different they just keep trying. One list I am compiling is noting places and dates of items of mail posted as if I have posted. Recently 13/9/16 Galgate edge of Lancaster and at least 1 item posted as if I had posted:  14/9/16 M5 motorway between Swansea and London at least 2 items posted. Mail FRAUD is out of the scope of this because this is now going to start to record every single incident where the Gestapo recklessly endanger life to achieve the “end” of me, one way or another.

I cannot record here all that has taken place although for a jury a full list with dates, times, photos etc will be provided. To show the lengths they go to and link to use of small children I have to record that REID in 49 Fell View more fraudsters who tried to pretend I lived there AS WELL AS AT 22 OTHER ADDRESSES ROUND FELL VIEW, did risk the life of their toddler 3 times in entrapment of me and a small boy once. The toddler I did not know was a girl as she was so young it was hard to see. Now she is that much older it is obvious. Fell View, a blind bend approaching and on 3 occasions they in 49 had that toddler (about 3 now) stuck by the roadside ready for me driving back to 28 (the GPS on my car allows for all this). I was not expected to run the child over in speeding but I was to take a photo to show it left alone on the dangerous bend which yobs, all unemployed, use to race round in uninsured cars and without licences. (All reported- all ignored.) That is apparently a serious criminal offence taking photos of children. I did not take photos. The alternative expectation was that I would lead the child back where they could scream I tried to kidnap it. What photos I did take were of those such as sleazy postman hiding to be the “witness”. On the 3rd occasion they used a small boy with the toddler who was not school age so I guess about 4. That sums them up.

On 13/9/16 they had such “plans” for me which failed as usual and to try to repeat what had failed like they had Jarvis send a card to be posted on 16/9/16 to be the event from 18 months ago, they went to the lengths of using the Gestapo helicopter as I drove along the M6; that had caught them completely by surprise: I have no false friends now who regurgitate all I tell them to the Gestapo for a pat on the back. They sent the helicopter about 11 55am to hover above me on the M6 south bound, quite low and then about 15 miles further on they had arranged for a thug-woud-be-fraudster to join the M6 to try and recover the fraud that had failed earlier. It failed: I saw the INTENTION and got my photos. Thus after SWANSEA where apparently I was not but Williams was there from 30 Fell View, I apparently only think I was, I drove the M4 into London. They had to “re-enact” the helicopter from the north and my comment sent by email that it had been “low”. This one was so low I could practically have touched it; it hovered right where there were overhead cables, it was amazing they did not entangle; I got a photo to show how close they were and that over a busy motorway. That’s what lunatics I deal with and one can see what deluded, deranged half-wits they have to recruit as no one with any intelligence would want any involvement.

The farces at every service area where I stopped after my stay overnight in London where apparently Jarvis collected me and drove me back to 41 Fell View hours before I actually left London (that card she had posted today will be drivel linked to that FRAUD) are not for this but as each failed and as I neared Lancaster area the Gestapo became more desperate; it was getting very late, they had a P reg car full of yobs stalking but who did not linger at the service area (that is to rewrite the bogus daughter of Jackson now and another car used in THEFT and FRAUD P514 JBC) but another yob did. A cherry red VW of a colour and design I had not seen previously, low to the ground it was built, X reg. He followed me to get fuel but was up to no good. I can always tell after all my experiences. A van pulled up and sat with his headlights doing nothing and on a service road; it was all “odd”. I waited and the yob though, assuming I was setting off after paying he set off without lights. The van driver did not signal him using his headlights as is done, the car I was amazed to see continued without lights, and I watched him join the motorway feeling sure he’d notice, not within my view he didn’t. The motorway was still busy with HGVs; that could have caused a major accident; he could have ended up dead but it was staged: the van driver was to claim he saw a small red X reg car drive off without lights: I was to be the one “endangering life”. He may not have lights for only minutes: it would take seconds to cause a major incident driving right into heavy traffic from a slip road with no lights and such a low car hardly visible.

That was not the end of it: Charnock Richards services 1 30 am approx. Hardly any traffic at service area, I get fuel, a lorry driver buys food and leaves; I pay and start to cross the forecourt to reach my car, the only car there, the lorry driver is parked in the lorry park; a PURPLE large low slung car drives out of nowhere, ACROSS the forecourt, not onto it by the entry road: his INTENTION was to run me down and claim I wasn’t looking I guess. He did not get fuel; he messed about not sure what to do and I left. And all that for what? So lowlife thieves, fraudsters, old parasites well past their sell-by don’t need to invent any more family and can keep their ill-gotten gains without questions being asked.

THE CAROL WOODS COVERUP: MORE LANCS. POLICE LED CORRUPTION + NAMING THE NAMES 13 SEPT. 16

Gross Breaches RIPA and Intercept communications Lancs  13 Sept 16

21-20-08 001, 003, 004. This set of photos shows how yobs are used to be “me” as Mr Carol Woods. Seeing the old thief in 30 Fell View LA2 9RP who also claims to be me, WILLIAMS and various others all in and between the reader can see what lunacy is involved as they are all “me”. I apparently live in various houses (23 at least) round Fell View as “disabled” or “ill”. BUT I am also various who are not “ill”. 24 Fell view has been used from March 2015 especially by a lout in KS53 VLF car and he I knew lived near-by but would call to 24 (empty house but used by more fraudsters) while I was out (he being tipped off) and he to use computer equipment in 24 as if he was me using it when I was out. That had been done using caravan 3 @ 298 Oxcliffe Rd LA3 3EJ when I rented caravan 1A. Thus the louts, thugs whatever they are then claim to have MY data and thus it was typed not by me but by them as Mr Carol Woods. I found where the lout driving KS53 really lived; he “disappeared” to be “replaced” by a “stand-in” using DX53 KTO. In that the unemployed yob in 45 DALTON is also me caught using MY email address supplied by the Gestapo with MY password etc. All in this are unemployed lowlife.

DALTON wanders about in grey ‘trackies’ and hoodie as he is told to BUT does swap for “black” when told to. It depends on what photos the Gestapo think they are “rewriting”. Jackson in her 70’s in 26 is “me” as was a looter of the dead in flat 5 Penhale Gardens LA3 2QA when I rented flat 3 after renting caravan 1A. Both those 2 old trolls were told to wear grey hoodies to hide their scruffy grey hair and flabby faces then provided with cars to drive them about so they could be said to be me. Thus yobs are often told to wear grey hoodies, they are mostly told to shave their heads unless they have auburn hair, in which case they can have hair as that is proof they are me or my son! This yob was caught out again recently to late Aug 2016 and reported for serious computer misuse and theft, fraud and more. The Gestapo visit in the early hours to socialise so my report goes nowhere. They tried to claim I shared my email address with those fraudsters.

On 12/9/15 Dalton was not where I was (in a café I was known to frequent Sun St Lancaster) and this one was to sit outside and use his Internet picking up the WiFi; he was to be me as I was in the café. That has been done many times. 15/9/15 and the Gestapo tried again. This one was to sit opposite an Internet café I used regularly until I found the interference was caused by lowlife sitting outside using their phones and lap tops linked to the BT system I used. These are a selection of photos; there are many yobs. Some have to wear facial hair, those with have to shave it off, the Gestapo try to hide found out fraudsters and in usual masonic invasion try to hide the lowlife already found out by having them shave off any facial hair and have others then grow to be them; HUNTER thief and fraudster, stalker and harasser in 22 Fell View is one such fool told to grow some facial hair to cover for found out thief and DWP fraudsters using MY name.

In Morecambe on 17/8/16 after I had found Dalton again trying to be linked to me, the Gestapo have to cover for him so send this yob to sneak along behind me and hope he looks as if he is DALTON and “with me”. I stopped to take a photo of the new mosaics on Victoria St and this yob did not know what to do so dodged into the only doorway available. He in “blue” is really in a blue car apparently. The Gestapo use colours as “symbols” of cars as they have another shaved headed yob in 31 Fell View with a blue car and he is also me so anyone like Dalton but in blue is the unemployed yob in 31 Fell view as well with blue car R945 KEC. This yob from the doorway then continues as do I; he uses his phone which then links to this call box near -by as I pass. The Gestapo tried to rewrite an event of end 07 (linked to murder of GMP MIKE TODD then on the cards for March 08) trying to make me a MR CAROL WOODS of that time. The red car Y191 SLF with R945 is at 31 Fell View and he is also me, apparently. Another unemployed male has it now but the car was first driven by a female troll in 31 to show Jackson in her grey hoodie seen in a red car was “me”. My car is RED TOYOTA YARIS X165 YUB. The Gestapo are not finicky about “minor detail” like that. The cars at 31 Fell View are to be the ones in the photo at the roadside of 298 Oxcliffe Rd LA3 3Ej, one being the car of thief, liar and worse, DIANE LENNON blue Saxo X486 DDC she who never lived at 298 but left the car pretending to rent caravan 3A so she could call to 298 to steal MY mail. The red car just seen is my Toyota. The lunatics trying to rewrite those photos from 298 bought the 2 cars to park at 31 Fell View and use as if it was 298 Oxcliffe Rd. the elderly lone tenant of 28 Fell View was bullied to death to get 28 free for me to move into as 28 Fell View was to become 298 Oxcliffe Rd miles away – again. The LENNON from 298 was to be a LENNON in 29 Fell View which ensured a nail in the coffin of the elderly tenant of 28 when it was decided that there was much that could be used round Fell View to try to make me “forget” 298 and then flat 3 Penhale Gardens LA3 2QA. LENNON being in 29 with me then in 28 was “convenient” and 31 used with various lowlife renting as “tenants” of tenant to make 31 Fell View be a “version” of 298, a small caravan site in Morecambe. LENNON from 29 was moved out when it was obvious I knew what she was involved in, she a council employee given huge amounts of time off work to pretend to be driving me about; she was replaced by an equally nasty piece of work, JANE SLATER who was left with Lennon’s car AF07 XLL to muddy waters of investigation. Jane Slater was then “replaced” by JANE UPTON LCC employee who I was friendly with for years. Jane Upton did not move house; she is just sent to “bump into me” to tell me nonsense which she reels off in a “list” and is to be the SLATER troll.

The photos with the yob in the doorway show one yob driven to Lancaster University library to sit and use his lap top and phone ready for when I logged on; the interference always seen; it took me no time at all to find the yobs sent. Women have been used and they are supplied with folders of work to look as if they are “working”. Without exception they are dullards and will spend their lives grunting to their “friends” on Facebook which they have used as if I use it. That was started in 2011 via my sister’s 17 year old grand-daughter, Dani Deval  instructed by VANESSA KILDAY false friend aged 18 sent to worm her way into my sister’s house, she daughter apparently of GMP staff, and Kilday was to corrupt Deval where she then claimed to be me using Facebook etc which is what the lowlife do in 34 Fell View NOW, 12 and 13 Fell View at least. The centre photo is Jackson’s unemployed by trade son Kenneth who called to 26 Fell View often in 2014 to use his phone placing orders for goods as if I placed the orders. All round Fell View gained a great deal as the Gestapo declined to investigate the bank accounts and mail theft involved. 13/9/14 this photo, I had caught him almost in my doorway, crouched down hoping I would not see, I did so he moved to be visible so I’d not suspect anything.

The cars PK07 EDX and PJ60 BYR are seen on the front yard at 298 Oxcliffe Rd LA3 3EJ; PK07 I found was owned by ELIZABETH MASON of SANTANDER bank she who set up at least 5 accounts in MY name in FRAUD using lowlife at 298 to claim to be linked to me so they could gain. PJ60 BYR was used by a MARTIN BRANKIN aka N RANKIN and others, a total stranger to me but I found he claimed I drove him about in this car. This repeated using a malicious old dullard in 32 Fell View Mary Lamb who claims to be my dead mother driven about by me in PF08 WDJ. The photo was taken 14/4/12.

The photo of the blue Hyundai is YD54 VYR and HUNTER from 22 Fell View this day driving about pretending he drove me to live in 22 as HIS mother, more deluded total strangers. A taxi involved was also photographed as he raced off seeing they were found out. Hunter assumed I’d drive off from 28 and would not know what was taking place. I returned being well experienced in the ways of deluded half-wit thieves and fraudsters by then. This cretin thought he was going to do EXACTLY the same again on 27/8/16. The bottom photo is Mrs Hunter. When they were found out claiming that I lived in 22 as his mother, she decided that I was her mother but then decided she was me. Her hair is bleached and like poor quality straw so those with the same type of hair are found to stalk me as proof I am Hunter or Hunter is seen with me thus is linked to me. How can I be “Hunter” when for example I am in Barcelona as Oct 2015? The Gestapo via their Freemason links find someone they think could be said to be Hunter so had these 2 hiding in a doorway I was to pass each day en-route for the metro in Barcelona. This was to be “proof” Hunter was in Barcelona so was “me”. Another troll of more recent days was sent to wait in the University library in the space I always use for the scanner. This roughneck was to link her phone when she saw I was all set up and then the Gestapo can interfere with MY use of my computer. This one was sent to be “Hunter”; she was too young and seen close up, to be even coarser and duller than Hunter.

The troll in the 3rd photo was used a few times as she was supposed to be my sister’s grand-daughter. This was one to be loaned “maths” file and was clearly a few sandwiches short of a picnic. On 26/8/16 I found that Fell View having a number of these unemployed has them not only used in 45 Fell View, 14 and 12 but also no 2 Fell View and 2 Milestone Place off Fell View. On 26/8/16, a day of such lunacy in the then “plan” to defraud me which failed (the council wanted me to send them my bank details claiming they wanted to repay me some rent I had paid, the bank details would be said to have been different to what I provided and in another name as the Gestapo try to invent me as a non-existent person, I told them I would not be giving my bank details and that as far as my file shows, I am owed nothing. They think I am gullible), many waited for me to drive away from 28 Fell View so they could drive off and either be me or driving me. That is done every single day. All I had to do was to sit in my car until the lowlife had all raced off, one after the other. I found that the Gestapo then alerted their bloated old stalker in 2 Hall Drive also off Fell View and he drives to 2 Milestone Place and collects one of the trolls to drive behind me. I pull in so he has to pass, I then found he also collects ANOTHER of the same type from SYCAMORE RD in the next village and drives them to University library where they expect me to go so one can be seen and then leave and one can stay and hide and hope I don’t notice. The car DG51 WRL belongs to 2 Fell View (notice use of 2 Fell View, 2 Hall drive, 2 Milestone Place) and WOODRUFF are in 2 Fell view and they claim to be me. The tarty piece drives to 45 Fell View and it seen there is proof that thieves, fraudsters and worse in 45 are somehow linked to me and not committing serious crime. She driving that (one of at least 3 drivers) is a type the same as Deval and the troll leaving the library after setting up her lap top to try to look as if she was a student. This events happen EVERY single time I try to use a computer anywhere, mine or public. On 13/9/16 I drove down south and checked into a Travel lodge finding the usual types sent to linger outside to harass as I entered and left to go out and then on my return: they apparently are “with me” and have driven me. In what car I do not know as mine is parked. The INTENTION is to claim that I in Travel Lodge with my passport as ID am not me but am the person Lancashire try to invent me being to allow for such as Williams in 30 Fell View and Jackson in 26 to be me along with 21 others.1 2 3

Phone lines to aid ID THEFT/ FRAUD  12 Sept. 16

00-51-38 I am Carol Woods Ms of 28 Fell View (under duress) LA2 9RP where you all know that at least 23 others all claim in fraud, harassment, bullying and thuggery aided by police in organised crime claim to be me. The old thief and worse in 26 Fell View is ONE such person: see how she is aided. I have the photos of BT personnel at 26, do ask if you did not receive them when I sent them some days ago. End July 2016 Jackson in 26 Fell View LA2 9RP had a visit from BT to install a phone. Agnes Jackson poses as me: she is a thief, liar and fraudster and worse aided and abetted by Lancashire Gestapo. More than enough evidence gathered they decided to say she was 2 people; she has an identical twin and it is the “twin” who is me. Jackson has been filmed making a call as if she was me having tried to dress to sound as if she fitted my description of what I wore. Jackson has been heard making calls as if she is me BUT so has her criminal associate in 30 Fell View JUNE WILLIAMS as she is also me and she also has an identical twin BUT JARVIS in 41 is also me with an identical twin and all their identical twins are Carol Woods and they all live in their council houses. O’Conner in 39 is the same; none of the “twins” appears on the electoral register.

End Aug 2014 and photos were taken of WILLIAMS in 30 having a 2nd SKY TV and dish installed in their tiny one-bedroomed bungalow which was registered to me. That was to be “rewritten” end of July 2016, almost 2 years later in the usual “revision history” nonsense. The intention was to have a 2nd phone in 26 Fell View in the same MOTIVE of a 2nd SKY TV etc in 30 Fell View, to PRETEND that the tiny one-bedroomed bungalows are split into 2 for the “identical twins”. Thus Jackson had a 2nd line installed via the rear kitchen of 26 Fell View. That will be one for her and one for her as her identical twin – “me”.4

Part 1 of 2 Corrupt POLICE Lancs  12 Sept 16

I had typed this data ready to send out when I had Internet use. Meanwhile I had managed to send out my data in relation to “Hiding Places”; those places where thieves, fraudsters, bullying trolls and worse HID to then drive off when they see my car and they pretend to be “with me” of having “met with me”. The hiding places data includes how sleazy “professionals” would hide and link up with taxis to pretend what their perverted selves wanted. That has been “arranged again with sleazy caught hiding in OTHER places which I will photograph and send out. The pair of old trolls on Friday (se ref to corrupt PCSO harassment) were in PJ07 VUR when usually it is YP06 UEH, both silver cars. Today I pulled in and at least 5 drove past, one had been an old doxy in PK07 a dark grey 4 wheel drive to be ELIZABETH MASON fraudster SANTANDER BANK see below April 2013 and PCSO P Shepherd and then CS R BAYLY. Her car PK07 EDX is a red Kia Picanto, not grey anything. Then 3 more were sent after I parked up: the usual white Mini to be PATRICIA ALLEN of Lancashire Social Services perjurer and worse as per data sent out and a yob to race ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE ROAD on the busy STONEWELL area of Lancaster to be the thugs x 2 of 9/9/16 trying to run me off the road to be 9/9/08 at MY house again. His car ANOTHER PK15 YWA KIA prior to which I had PJ59 LRU white Kia. Mason was bought a white car after the Gestapo knew I had found about the driver of PK07 EDX who had been pretending she was me with her “small red car”. The PJ59 was sleazy “professional” trying to pretend she had dropped me off when she had to go and pay as I had really the only spare space left in the well used FREEHOLD area.

The pair of thieves and fraudsters WILLIAMS in 30 FELL VIEW CATON LA2 9RP are hiding again with the yobs using 45 Fell View hiding the car PJ65 WLL which Williams claim is theirs BUT as if they are me. They move that and PRETEND then that they in 30 are out when they are not. What is the INTENTION today? On Friday I was finally allowed my water rates bill, days late as it was expected that I would have been “seen off” and then given to lowlife to pay as if they were me in 30 Fell View. Thus they pretend to be out (their car not parked) and I pay my water rates but the sleazy confirm I have just moved to 28 Fell View again so I paying MY bill is really the lowlife in 30 Fell View. Masonic lunacy Dark Farces. I will pay my bill when I decide to: the Gestapo know for YEARS OF ILLEGAL MONITORING FROM MY HOUSE that I usually pay a bill as soon as I receive it. This can wait. This POLICE CORRUPTION data will have to be sent in 2 parts. It is not my fault their corruption is so bad that my data extends as far as it does and believe me, this is nothing compared to what there really is.

List 4 Corrupt Public servants,criminals and gangsters, bandits, reprobates etc. Historical parallels, TontonsMacoute, Gestapo, SS, KGB etc. In 2010 after my court hearing with Justice MacKay where he, livid, about one false court document I showed him in regard to the THEFT OF MY HOUSE (in Lancaster) telling me to go home, forcibly remove anyone in MY house, sue and prosecute them, I with a daughter went to the FCO to show them related documents and inform them of the High Court decision. I had had some involvement with FCO staff after reporting such as liar, bully, grossly unprofessional DOMINIC in Paris Consulates office earlier in 2010. What was he doing for the Gestapo? My morning visit was dealt with as it should have been; I was to return after lunch AFTER “Dominic” had taken advice. I was to take the file papers I had.

Returning after lunch, the usual stage sets had been arranged with the usual trolls acting out their “roles”. I had to wait to listen to all that drivel (which is STILL done sending false friends to spout nonsense and hope I believe something a 5 year old would find unbelievable, when the Gestapo has no one to “send” they have those I “live” among stand outside me in 28 Fell View LA2 9RP and talk to each other by shouting gibberish to each other or, by deranged pretending to converse using their phones again just screeching gibberish; I ignore them but note some for posterity) which is referred to as “brainwashing” thus MY experiences are to be heard by me as if someone else had them. In Paris, my appointment time came and went then there was no one but me. “Dominic” would make a banal comment, he thought he was clever and amusing; he amused only himself. He could only say what he had been told to say and this is STILL done, the idiot telling persons what to say obviously cannot predict what I will say in reply thus the quisling is left needing to ask what then to say. This farce has taken place with others including GLASGOW police, NEWCASTLE police all liars who dealt with me and they all have to keep leaving me to say “What can I say now?” In Paris, “Dominic” had someone stood behind a door which he kept pooping round to see, the person hiding could hear what I had said so then was to relay to the gormless “Dominic” what to respond to me and so it went on. The events in Paris over the following 2 days included being told by hotel receptionist that I could not return to my room as it was being cleaned at 5pm one afternoon: I knew that was not right so went up and found 2 persons searching; they looked for the file documents I had had with me in the Consulate’s office: they didn’t find them. I kept them with me at all times. The hotel, when I asked for a receipt for payment, gave me something which I accepted as a receipt but then found another guest had a different receipt: that had a formal stamp of payment as well. I asked for one the same as theirs and got it. The INTENTION for YEARS wherever I stayed right to July 2013 was to claim I stayed in places without paying; even rent books from March 2012 were given to me in a name not mine as the landlady then was instructed in the pretence I was not me. Most “landlords” such as B PILLING (Sept 09 – Jan 2010), Z SKIBA (May 2010 – Aug 2010), J BOURNEN (March 2011 – June 2011) refused to give me receipts and insisted on only cash payments.The INTENTION of trying to have me charged with staying somewhere without paying was to “rewrite” the false court documents sent to me in MY house and to a daughter who had never lived there and to “Any Other Persons” with someone thinking they were “covering all bases”. Those false documents (all kept safe) were from LANCASTER COIUNTY COURT and evicting me for rent arrears FROM MY OWN HOUSE. Apparently I had sold my house to thug HALLIDAY (see below), agreed to pay rent to stay in it but forgot I had sold it and thus forgot to pay rent thus was evicted. Remember also sleazy NHS told to tell me in Aug. 2011 “But luvvie, you sold your house” (but had forgotten thus was mentally ill).  I complained about “Dominic” and that was my contact with FCO for 2010; I had had earlier contact in 09 but out of scope of this.

My complaint went nowhere because of interception of my communications. With one of my daughters and photos of MY house wrecked and looted and “court documents” a manager in the FCO said that it was obviously police led so they would have to get me live abroad. Why move me? I’m not the problem; they knew who organised the thuggery so deal with them. One following me outside later said, “You are up against the Dark Forces”. In my vast experience I would suggest we refer to them as Dark Farces. Mostly it is the Freemason and their lunatic “inversion” of making FICTION from FACT and declaring it to be FACT.

In April 2016 I was introduced to one who was a false friend, DAVID FABB of CLEOBRIDGE. In that a fraud on me was PLANNED which I guessed after our first meeting but, always give the benefit of the doubt so met a 2nd time. I was sure then: the man (a Freemason) was an idiot, instructed, and his conversation was as usual, a string of events linked into gibberish to make MY past experiences seem to have been his. He was a liar leading me to believe things that were not true. Without going into all that, one thing he had to keep telling me was that he would help me with my case (when he could barely use a computer) but I should leave out the police involved. Why should I? I shouldn’t. These then are SOME involved: all my documents typed are from memory so I look forward to seeing all the lowlife who claim to be me on the witness stand relating MY case. I cannot name the corrupt in order and some I will have forgotten but any reader will get the gist of what led to the murder of MIKE TODD GMP as he was the only one doing what he was paid to do. See what started the events http://www.criticalreader2006.blogspot.com/Other blogs will come up recording other corrupt agencies.

On 9/9/2016 at 10pm I switched off my lamp, radio and then my mains power supply as usual. (There is a related document as to why I have no mains lights but just a lamp and have to limit my use of mains power  because of MY wiring added to 30 and 26 as apparently my bungalow does not exist and they in both 26 and 30 are more who claim to be me.) For 3 nights I had staggered my mains going off, anytime from 9 30pm and watched. I was sure the Gestapo were up to the old tricks of having lowlife parked hiding PRETENDING they were with me and usually using their phones for Internet posing as me. They do that because lowlife in 24, 22, 41, 43, 45, activate illegal devices in my loft when they link THEIR devices via pre-prepared BT links IN MY LOFT to make the use seem to be me in 28; I can hear the sounds and refer to them as Loft noises keeping a faithful record of times and what the sounds indicate, I can usually tell phone use from computer use. The main offenders reported for serious computer misuse in 45 Fell View were the ones the Gestapo visited and arranged a perjured witness statement and manufactured a photo INTENDING to prove something totally untrue about MY car and me. Obviously, what I reported remained ignored. The lowlife in 43 one I am sure is Gestapo linked, PAUL HICKS, are away this week, that might explain why lowlife have taken to hiding in cars again and pretending something. Thus I switch off what little I have on at 10pm, wait for the thug to drive off from hiding behind 31 Fell View finding I was right again after checking 3 nights in a row to make sure, and then he goes; when he is about 2 miles away, I switch on my mains again, my lamp ad my radio. From July 2013 to recent I have gone out at night to find the “hiders” and have them on camera.  I will write and ask for the names, ranks and badge numbers of Gestapo who arrange this thuggery.

I feel to lighten the tone I should add 2 quotes which must be for the record. JUDGE JOHN APPLETON Freemason Church St Lodge now Rowley Lodge Lancaster, inebriate, who insists on hearing all cases which involve the police and is allowed to, in gross breaches of rules and protocols, “The police don’t lie” That is why there are no real records of who makes a claim against them: they are all settled out of court. Maybe someone could make an FOI request? Mine are ignored. PC/SGT/INSP JIM EDMUNDS March 09 on the wrecking, seizing, looting of my house, he sent to ‘bump into me’ to tell me I had to go to civil court; it was not a criminal matter and, “People only come to us because we’re free”.

PAUL STEPHENSON 2001 Chief Constable Lancashire Police who ignored corporate manslaughter.   JANE WEBB DC who submitted a PERJURED document for my claim 2406569/01 she protecting an unqualified social services manager who worked with a false CV and claims to qualifications that did not exist. WEBB totally incompetent on a serious case of serious sex abuse of a 2 year old girl with learning difficulties. She bore a grudge because I had been case worker on that and was right; WEBB was wrong in her actions. The statement from WEBB (she did not appear so it could not be tested and thus should not have been allowed; it seemed that LCC with their whole bench of educated idiots and bribed chairman knew nothing of the law at all. They certainly hadn’t expected me to know The Perjury Act 1911 Sec 5 with Case Law.BILL RALPHSON rank forgotten but something akin to DS sent to tell me that it was “time to consider your heath”, ask about my “children” adding, “You can’t win, it’s coming from the government” (that was 2 days after LCC with Cherie Blair as their legal rep had been to the High Court in London and LOST their case in relation to my whistle-blowing). My complaint about Webb was so diluted it made orange juice seem like tap water.PC JIM EDMUNDS aka SGT aka INSPECTOR as a fraudster and liar using different collar numbers and presenting himself to me as if he had powers he did not have which is a CRIMINAL OFFENCE.PC RICHARD TREDDENICK who aided and abetted EDMUNDS. EDMUNDS had another associate ANDREW HALLIDAY he helped to claim was police and who I apparently sold MY house to in May 08 by Hallidayjust parking his van at my gates and he standing outside. I cannot be given his rank and badge number despite asking formally, in writing for YEARS.                                                                                                                                                                                         SGT PINDER bullying liar who spoke to me via a daughter’s phone about my reporting issuing to me of false court documents. PINDER’s conversation and responses did not fit into what I was saying at all and then I realised the bullying thug was manufacturing  a taped conversation where MY voice was to be deleted and another’s inserted to fit with what he shouted. I am sure it would have been PINDER in a squad van at MY house on 27 Oct 2008 wrecking MY house and threatening neighbours with arrest if they tried to help me.PC FINCH from May 2006 when the Investigatory Powers Tribunal started to fully investigate my case. He had been sent in a panic about a Jan. 2006 serious matter of witness intimidation, criminal damage, and more which had been ignored when reported in Jan. 2006. I never spoke to him, nothing was followed through because the Gestapo thought it would be easier to tell the IPT that I did not exist and was really someone else living somewhere else; they told the IPT that I was my sister about 60 miles from me. That was never checked: it was believed. It took me to MARCH 2008 to find out what they had been told SEE LINK TO MIKE TODD’s murder in MARCH 08. FINCH was one of about 9 to arrest me as a likely terrorist when I went to ask for help AFTER the court instruction to return to MY house. I asked a number of times for all names, ranks and badge numbers of those with Finch but remain ignored.                                                                                                                                                                       WPCSO CHRIS GRIFFITHS perjury; her sworn statement for a court hearing is safe.                                                                      

PCSO DENNIS NELSON aiding and abetting in ID THEFT and LOOTING THE DEAD.PCSO PAUL SHEPHERD who called to tell me 28/8/12 that the police had never heard of me! Hecalled to tell me that knowing where I lived and who I was when I opened the door. He also later told me that MY reports of crime could not be investigated until I had had a mental health assessment by a “social worker”. I made a FOI request for all hours of police with social workers assessing victims of crime. No reply.WPCSO ANGELA HALL who was to assist Shepherd make me believe something untrue; they claimed ALL victims of crime had to be assessed prior to being interviewed by police. Those 2 called again 18/4/13 to offer to set up a sleazy social worker but really to ask me for sight of the letter SANTANDER had sent to me from their Fraud Dept about the accounts set up in MY name linking me to DWP fraudsters and worse. THEY were ignored. I did not show him my letter.They knew I had it because they had had a referral from Santander. Shepherd was to tell me that he, the PCSO was not prepared to conduct an investigation into bank fraud. I told him he couldn’t conduct a bus.                                   

CS RICHARD BAYLY joined the fray; writing to me later on 18/4/13 on bogus police stationery and altering my name enough to make me someone else, WOOD from WOODS. Apparently he had conducted a full investigation into my case and found nothing untoward. He could not supply even an incident number to start that ball rolling. How could he investigate MY case without MY name?TIM JACQUES, CHRIS AIREY, CHRIS STEVENSON were some prior to BAYLY. One of them had supplied the looter of the dead from flat 5 Penhale Gardens LA3 2QA with a provisional driving licence IN MY NAME.

Part 2 Corrupt POLICE Lancs  12 Sept 16

Part 2 Please contact me (and hope it is not intercepted) if I fail to send both parts and you would like both. Carol Woods Ms. STEVE FINNEGAN who succeeded Paul Stephenson as Chief Constable and claimed not to know about my case. I had driven to HQ HUTTON to hand deliver, I had sent faxes to HQ Professional Standards, HMIC had “spoken” to him and after I hand delivered MY formal complaints about RICHARD SPEDDING as requested and ANDREW MASSINGHAM, Finnegan decides to take early retirement.RICHARD SPEDDING CI or something akin to that 2010 sent MY photo with a false name to Met. Police and told them “I” was wanted. In that he bribed my then landlord ZBIGNIEW SKIBA and partner AGNIESZKA RACHFALSKA of 52 Adderley Rd Harrow Weald (promising not to prosecute them for their found out FRAUD) to steal my mail from DWP which agency was corresponding with me. The INTENTION in the mail theft was to deprive me of the mail with the MOTIVE of claiming I was not me so would not receive it anyway. SKIBA as told to me by the DWP in 2012 was returning MY mail addressed to me where I rented with “Not at this address” on the envelope. Spedding arranged that with Met thugs who knew who I was especially when they tried to lure me into a local station using bogus police stationery, (Met police will be named together), and after the court case where I was instructed by a senior Judge to go home, forcibly remove anyone in MY house and visit to FCO they had to silence me so arrested me AGAIN (there were at least 7 wrongful arrests in that time)and claimed I was mentally ill.That led to illegal detention using sleazy, dull NHS who had no legal jurisdiction at all to hold me yet spent 3 weeks trying to persuade me to admit myself into their hospital. When I told them I would sue they set a trap for me: I was told at 6pm one evening that I could leave. Of course I could, they detained me on no legal grounds whatsoever. The INTENTION had been to keep me from returning to court as the Justice requested to continue the investigation into the “court document” I had apparently had issued to me by that court but manufactured as drivel by the lunatic in residence in LCC IAN YOUNG who is also the police legal rep.It was a trap: I was to be stupid enough to think I could just walk out without anything in writing so they could claim I had “escaped” and then have the Gestapo arrest for “escaping”. I declined to leave that evening. I was to leave the next day and despite them telling me for 6 HOURS that I could just go, I refused to go without something in writing.I did get something in writing and then found more bribed bullying liars over a full week were recruited to try to steal it from me. They had been promised a passport for the son who was “on the run” so if that is not aiding and abetting a criminal, I don’t know what is. That lowlife did not steal my document.One Met officer found my driving licence, “But this is you” they said, they knew I was not the person named with MY photo from Lancashire Gestapo. See recent events with more manufacturing of photos and “witnesses”.SPEDDING matter of formal complaint still outstanding.PC ANDREW MASSINGHAM, liar, perjurer, dullard and bully all job requirements.He is the assigned officer forCaton LA2 9RP where I apparently live in at least 23 houses being “cared for and driven about” by lowlife he aids and abets. Formally reported but ignored, he for aiding Williams in 30 Fell View, Jackson in 26 Fell View and her unemployed-by-trade thug son who lives close by who were to race round MY rear garden, screeching and shouting trying to provoke me on 12/8/14 with Massingham racing round and round at the front and the following day with the MOTIVE of forcing me to respond so they could claim they were “victims” with the INTENTION of forcing me out of 28 Fell View to be 12/8/12 again when a Gestapo moll, DIANE LENNON with car Saxo X486 DDC who had been used to be ‘me’ from March 2012 was found out and did arrive to MY accommodation then and steal the mail that had been sent for me then “running away” so on the 12th of any month since the Gestapo have tried to arrange events to “see me off” to rewrite that. Lennon was coarse, rough and common, she may have been Gestapo. MASSINGHAM did call to see me early May 2014 after I moved to 28 Fell View on 24/3/14. Williams in 30 had put weed killer on my plants that were growing well; jealous. According to him, my plants had just not settled well. Really? I, a qualified teacher of “A” level horticulture and I can’t say why ALL plants go brown and die overnight? And I had received a malicious communication from council corrupt bullies (they named in separate document) who claimed that one manager had called to see MY DANGEROUS PLANT POTS IN MY GARDEN but he could not say when he had called because he had to know when I was out to claim he called when I was out which is why he sent a letter. His letter written by the lunatic YOUNG records that he told me when he ‘signed me up for 28 Fell View’……………… which was false: he had not signed me up for 28 Fell View at all and thus he had told me nothing.The Williams were to go on and kick my plant pots about my garden and generally do such on any day the Gestapo wanted them to provoke me so that I would respond and they could race to Fell View to “rescue” the degenerate parasites WILLIAMS from my actions, they in 30 with 5 cars IN MY NAME, SKY TV installed IN MY NAME, and known as Mr and Mrs Carol Woods with bank account related; that is not worth Gestapo time to drop by to ask about. Williams have a whole catalogue of events showing what they are. She of course has ID IN MY NAME and was given a volunteer’s post in HMYOI Lancaster Farms. That is not worth police time apparently. She is not the only one. JACKSON in 26 has also been aided and abetted by Massingham for example 2/10/15 when he was to drive out to Caton when they thought I had gone out so the “coast was clear” for him to claim AGNES JACKSON in 26 Fell View was 2 people in that she had an identical twin which twin was me, CAROL WOODS. They had a plan for 5/10/15 when I was going away on holiday; (known via illegal monitoring of me) they INTENDED to act behind my back with Jackson to claim she was me while I away was to be someone WHO HAD STOLEN MY OWN ID. I was onto them in all that which led eventually to being arrested for “following someone to a localairport”. We don’t have one but why “local” was used was more sinister and a typical DARK FARCES “plan” not for this document. Massinghamclaimed they had sought me for 2 days before arresting me, liar, I was in 28 all day on 5/11/15 and the GPS on MY car confirmed as being intact on 5/5/16 would tell them where I was and is how they arrange for sleazy “professionals” to stalk to harass such as the old troll in ML03 ZST on 6/11/5 (those sleazy have a document all to themselves as well). That complete farce where I had to tell Massingham how to arrest me led to another illegal detention as I was “mentally ill” in“following someone to a local airport”. Asking from then to NOW who I followed, when and where their proof was I found out end Aug 2016 that I had followed serious criminals from 45 Fell View; they were going to Tenerife from Manchester. The Gestapo had popped by (as they call to socialise with such on a regular basis) to show them a photo of MY car at Manchester airport; the photo from CCTV I asked for from Nov 2015 but could not be shown one. The Gestapo also had a witness statement of another who confirmed they saw me on Fell View between 5 and 10 Oct 2015. That now is the perjury of Massingham proven and covered for in that pathetic attempt; I was in Liverpool airport with MY car pre-paid booked in the car park on 5/10/15 and I have ALL my travel documents, holiday photos, and so on. Could the Daltons show me their travel documents to prove they were in Manchester airport on 5/10/15? No. Could they show me any holiday photos? No. Could they say what time their flight was? Why not? Because they went nowhere, they don’t even have passports; they can’t even decide what their surname is. How then could the Gestapo have MY car at Manchester airport? Because that is where I flew from in JUNE THIS YEAR which is why they only have a photo AFTER my return in July 2016 and why the witness statement is perjury. I have asked for copies under Sec 7 Data Protection Act 1998 but remain ignored. The Gestapo then found the unemployed- all- his- life yob from 45 a job in the village shop. That is to make him seem honest, principled and so forth. Massingham involved in attempts to run me off the road on 9/9/16 arranged on Fell View Caton where he sat in house55 Copy Lane which “55” is used in car plates in the masonic lunacy see below with the squad car parked ready to leap into action when MY car was run off the road: it wasn’t. The “witness” statement of perjurer claiming I was on Fell View when I was not was to be “rewritten” using an old troll like Jackson which old troll was to literally stand about until my car drove off and she was to be the one who saw me on Fell View but Sept 2016 NOT Oct 2015 and I have to suggest that the perjured statement by a local lowlife will be of 9 Oct 2015. IAN READER made a statement in 2009 claiming he saw me at MY house when he did not and if he had, so what? That is the statement the Gestapo thought they had “rewritten” with the 2015 perjury and that they thought they had rewritten with the Sept 2016 INTENDED WITNESS.

TRACEY KENNEDY rank and badge number not supplied despite my asking from 2010 when I found out she was a police officer IN MY HOUSE. She was another to have lots of jobs found for her after a lifetime of unemployed as a parasite. How she worked as police a jury will find “interesting”. She was “elected” as Green Party councillor while police (apparently) and manager of Lancaster Homeless Unit (apparently). Tracey Kennedy on 23/10/08 posed as me in Liverpool Magistrates Court. She posed as me on 27 Nov 09 in Newcastle Magistrates Court. In that she was interviewed as if she was me when they all knew she was not especially as police herself they must have seen her at “work” often must they not? (An idiot can see the discrepancies in this.) Both courts had been involved in my private prosecutions and as the resident lunatic thinks it is truly clever to reverse FACT he decided that I could be being prosecuted in those courts. For what? Nothing, they just make it up. BUT on 27 Nov 09 (sworn witness statements PERJURY all kept safe) sheclaimed I harassed her as she posed as me thus I harassed myself. I have the tapes of theinterview; I am not on those tapes. See bullying thug PINDER above, routine thuggery to manufacture “evidence”.  Kennedy was bought a red Toyota Starlet R205 XRJ when they saw I had my red Toyota Yaris had R205 left outside MY house which was apparently proof she was me and I did live in MY house. She did not drive. My licence is X165 YUB and does not correspond to any of the 5 cars Williams in 30 Fell View have had IN MY NAME. Full details with photos available as usual. At the end of this document I will list ALL cars bought for work-shy lowlife to try to muddy waters of investigation and hope to “rewrite” history. Thus my email re the attempt to cause an “accident” of 9/9/16 to be 9/9/08 MY house I refer to REID in 49 risking the lives of their toddler 3 times and a small boy once: they have a white Vauxhall and who should now arrive to 24 Fell View with a white Vauxhall, same model, Curwen, I list all the cars that thieving collection of fraudsters who are also apparently me have had. Today then, he arrived in SY61 YCK. They in 24 allow others to use 24 which is “empty” all that in my documents running to over 120 pages now of recording SOME police organised crime and events.

Sgt FOSTER another bullying thug he of the tapes business with Kennedy.InspBROWNSMITH he aiding MASSINGHAM Nov 2015 depriving me of a solicitor and Inspector’s Review after being held ON NO CHARGES for more than 6 hours. I was deprived again of the custody record as I always am but a local solicitor contacted them; I had to send 2 faxes to request a copy but did receive it. I could prove irrefutably that they were false. Lancs.police are not the brightest lights on the Xmas tree.May 2006 and one posing as PC CLAUDINE BINNS West Yorks police when I went to report serious wrongdoing and theft of £2000 from me by BLACKS SOLICITORS of LEEDS, via a RICHARD COULTHARD. Lancs police sent over an inarticulate yob to pose as Binns and take information from me about my whistle-blowing. West Yorks police had provided that yob with Binns ID badge hoping I would not ask to see it closely. “You are going to cause a full inquiry” she has shouted at me. Good. Not getting the response she wanted she then threatened me with “something happening to a close relative” (if I did not cease my case). The West Yorks police aiding that will be named separately. The “full inquiry” was the Investigatory Powers Tribunal starting their inquiry into my case. (See above.) The IPCC actually assigned one NOT corrupt (those corrupt named separately) who found in my favour and instructed CHRIS WEIGH to name the inarticulate yob sent; he just ignored them.                            

CHRIS WEIGHHead of Professional Standards, a liar and much worse arranged for NHS to refuse me treatment for life threatening injury caused by his thugs in Sept 04 which is why they try NOW Sept 2016 to repeat that. The NHS corrupt get their own document. PCSO PETER WOOD with at least 2 others and use of at least 2 vehicles 9/9/14 called to keep me talking in 28 Fell View while AGNES JACKSON went to a GP as if she was me. The Gestapo must ‘prefer’ useless old parasites because the massive effort to cover for her FRAUDS from March 2014 amounts to an enormous sum of money. Add that to the same for WILLIAMS in 30 who poses as me, JARVIS in 41, HUNTER in 22, MILLS in 20, DALTON in 45, McHARRAN in 43, WOODRUFF in 2, ELY in 12 and so on all found out. It was and is known that when I knew someone was going out to be me that I went out to be somewhere else to spoil their FRAUDS, PCSO WOOD was sent to make sure I stayed in 28. What was he sent to talk about? Apparently “someone” (it is always “Someone” unnamed when I name anyone I need to) had reported I took photos of children. Did they have photos of me taking photos of children? No. Did they have any evidence at all? No. Then it was a malicious communication: P Wood told me he would go and speak to HIM about it: I knew he referred to CLARKE in 23 child abuser, fraudster, thief reported many times, ignored; the Gestapo in usual Masonic inversion thought they should REVERSE FACT and create FICTION and cover for not only child abuser Clarke in 23 Fell View but Jackson in 26. The lowlife still send their children to scream at my gate and hope they provoke me and take photos: the deranged Jarvis sends any one of their 3 young children to try to provoke me as routine, Mills in 20, Hunter in 22, Jackson has been provided with 2 small children by sleazy NHS and then sent the children to try to provoke me as I returned to 28 after being out. There are many such facts to relate.    EAST SUSSEX police acting on instruction from Lancashire thugs, Aug 2011 MORE PERJURY waiting to be deal with and I ended up locked up with an inarticulate roughneck troll posing as a psychiatrist GILLIAN HARRISON who could only have been provided by Lancashire. East Sussex police have since claimed never to have heard of me. She made threats as to what he would do if I did not hand over certain documents: I handed her nothing. See related NHS sleazy to be drawn up.             

 Nov 2008 and Sgt PINDER above the bullying big mouth did aid and abet a DS DENT from MORPETH police to pose as a secretary to a solicitor and hand me junk she claimed were court documents. The smirk went right off her stupid face when I reminded her of the law County Court Act 1967 Sec 133, 135, 136 at least. She tried to remove the junk from me but succeeded in only removing2 documents from 4. Those added corrupt police forces in separate document.                          
 In Feb 2016 Sgt PHILIP SPENCER decided that I had not been taught the lesson I apparently needed and claimed he would arrest me again. For what? They don’t trouble to worry about detail: my case went public; he then said he would not arrest me and would draw a line under events from Nov 2015. I have less than no intention of drawing any lines under anything. We’ve seen the calibre of his crew and their perjury and the perpetual organising of lowlife, parasites and seedy old fools so if that’s his “army”, there will be no surrender from me. I have often asked for names, ranks and badge numbers of thugs involved on many occasions such as 12/2/12 2 at least aiding and abetting TRACEY KENNEDY at MY HOUSE. 5 Oct 212 and at least 3 vehicles and 5 Gestapo used in a staged event using one to scream at me with at least 5  “witnesses” to “witness” my reaction which they did not get, where only I knew the law and had to tell them. I have never been provided with any names, ranks and badge numbers I have asked for. On 7/11/15 amid the rest of his amazing “police work” MASSINGHAM was to whisper to me, “You’ve been given the rank and badge number of TraceyKennedy” in a “brainwashing” scenario which I think is typical of corrupt police all over trying to make people who are a thorn in their sides believe something untrue and then to act and react in a way that does them no favours. Massingham was a liar in that as well: I have not been given the rank and badge number of PERJURER TRACEY KENNEDY, THIEF, FRAUDSTER, and worse. She another so deluded to think if she dyed her hair “red” she could be me. Jackson in 26 has stopped short of that but Williams, Jarvis, Dalton and others have not. There are more but I will include those with the 2nd Gestapo document of corrupt public servants. I need to get the name and number of the PCSO who was watching me HARASSMENT to tell others that I had just left M & S on Friday 9th thus the sleazy “professionals” could wait by my car and pretend whatever their delusions allowed.

Some cars of significance which found out in fraud and more, the Gestapo try to “revise” using others of similar plates. These are a few examples: I have many others. See the 55 Copy Lane used on 9/9/16. In autumn 2011 I stayed at my sister’s in Shaw and we found a few times, a bleached haired old doxy stood on the pavement outside the house or, just sitting in her car MF55 VYX, a slate blue Audi. We had no idea who she was, neither did anyone else. I found out she was PRETENDING to visit ME about MY house in the usual FRAUD. Thus YM55 TGK used at 26 Fell View when I moved in to 28, thug filmed in action; a son of hers who has not called since. OE55 UVO used at 26 on 2/4/14, SO55 SOO black BMW corrupt Preston police trying to harass me and cover for bleached haired old doxy who has stalked me for months pretending to deal with MY house, she in SX03 SUE. She was ONE who met with a seedy old parasite EDITH CURWEN in flat 15 Penhale Gardens posing as MY DEAD MOTHER and arranging to sell MY house 4/;2/14. MF55 MGE at 23 Fell View pretends to drive me about. MM55 LNY Saab pretends in fraud: SN55 DGO a Rover used by thug lying across his front seats using his Internet via phone 4/9/15 pretending to be me, caught red-handed on photos. The car then passed to CURWEN thieves and fraudsters in 24 when they call to “work” on the empty house, they use it for a few weeks then it disappears. SJ55 is a white removal van used often to pretend to move me about. PF55 SRX a bronze Citroen at 38 Fell View where I also apparently live that car significant in serious theft from Aug 2013 as filmed. The cars bought for K Jackson, to drive about his mother when she is me: YM55 TGK the first one, he is her older son in his 50’s PK63 SFE a black Mercedes he had after YM55 “disappeared”. Y807 FHJ a black Ford, then a black KaNK06 KXX shared with sleazy NHS, black VW Y313 YEC,R881 OEO red Ford, YR51 WRE light aqua Rover, PE03 DXS silver Vauxhall, P514 JBC a light blue BWM but he often has 2 at once. Who pays all the administration fees to swap insurances? How does he being fully unemployed as for ever? Jackson herself was also driven about in KS53 VLF a few times and he would also use 2 other vehicles see 24 Fell View. In those she was me and he was MY son as Mr Carol Woods. BK53 EWE drove her about as did Y191 SLF when she had to wear a grey hoodie to hide her face and grey hair and hope people saw her in a red car so it was proof she was me. Both from 31 Fell View. 41 has driver her about in fraud, as has 43 and 21. She also takes taxis as if she is me as on 11/9/16 one booked. All round Fell View change their cars that often; some even more.

Lancs Police continue in org. crime   11 Sept 16

Dear Sirs please feel free to quote me;
This data below was prepared to send out with the Gestapo as usual seeing ILLEGALLY what I type, what photos I develop and so on. This is today in a time slot of 3 hours. The old thief and fraudster JUNE WILLIAMS 30 Fell View LA2 9RP who poses for GAIN as if she is me was to go out on Saturday 10/9/16 and wait for me to go out to follow me and pretend she in same place was proof she was me. She drives PJ65 WLL as you all know yet ignored despite the use in FRAUD and ID THEFT of me. I did not go out: that seedy old fraudster is not me. Today as I always do Sunday, prepared to go out seeing the other seedy old fraudster in 26 Fell View LA2 9RP who is also me; hiding waiting to go out when I did. She was dressed in black: not a pretty sight but she thinks somehow it is proof she is me. I heard the loft noises which tell me she makes a call as if she is me all linked to MY bungalow 26 Fell View which you all know about and ignore also. She rang for a taxi as she does not drive. I saw the taxi racing to Caton. The Gestapo planned something: the photo below goes uphill in the Skerton area of Lancaster; they were pretending a Mr Carol Woods lives there. Photos of today to be sent out next week. I then found the poster of ID THEFT had been covered over so that photo will be sent again with its “replacement”. In that they then had a dreary old troll like Jackson following me as Jackson in her taxi was found out. I left her and found that they had a yob stalking me in PJ07 grey car to be their unmarked used in organised crime PJ06 JUW. Later a fat old woman I found sitting in her car after a taxi waited near to my car parked: the Gestapo know I go a garden centre most Sundays. The taxi pretended he had dropped me off after I had been out walking; she was then rush in behind me which proved what? Harassment, illegal monitoring and INTENT to show others are me and in their absence use those the Gestapo THINKS could be said to them. As DALTON covered for in PERJURY of Gestapo why pick them in 45 Fell View to claim not to have been there but to have been followed to the airport and thus in Tenerife when I was in Spain? Because I opened my emails on a chance seeing an Internet cafe in Barcelona. The yobs in 45 were using AGAIN MY EMAIL address s if they were me now the Gestapo want to claim there were not in UK so it was not them. Now we know what liars they are. The email address those yobs used is cherrytrees2007@yahoo.co.uk. Carol Woods Ms under duress at 28 Fell View LA2 9RP.

01-15-03 001 002 On 8/9/16I sent out some data and photos in regard to places used for “hiding” cars and for persons who hid in their cars yet pretended they had “met with” me. The lunacy extends to MILES out of Caton and often not even in Caton LA2 area but in Lancaster or Morecambe, basically anywhere my car is driven THE GPS ILLEGALLY INSTALLED allows for this, persons are sent in their cars to pretend whatever the lunacy allows. If I go to Preston or somewhere for a day out, the same happens, sleazy sit in cars near mine and PRETEND. This is how there can be at least 35 cars A DAY used PLUS Gestapo and seedy NHS vehicles all used in embezzlement of tax-payers’ monies as NONE of the use is legal or warranted. Obviously my photos will be needed to show interested parties what CORRUPTION entails in Lancashire. I am Carol Woods Ms under duress at 28 Fell View Caton LA2 9RP. Those copied this will know by now that in Fell View,  55 houses, mostly council houses, I apparently live in 23 all at the same time being cared for and driven about by thieves, lowlife and worse. BUT among that some are actually ME. Thus Hunter in 22 is a “me”, JARVIS in 41 is a “me”, WILLIAMS in 30 is “me”, JACKSON in 26 is “me”, SCOTT in 15 is “me”, DALTON in 45, WOODRUFF in 2 and so on. That full record is out of scope of this but suffice to say that DWP in false claims do nothing at all.

Within the hiding in cars (if they hide near me they lie across the front seats to make it seem as if no one is in the car so I won’t be suspicious) persons go into 30, 26, 41 etc and they pretend they are in with me in 28! Or, they go into houses of those who claim to be “me” and pretend they are with me so that I in 28 must be someone else. The lunacy knows no bounds as lunacy, by definition, does not. Thus returning after being out on 8/9/16 amid a day of Gestapo arranging old trolls to be “seen” where I was to be PROOF Jackson in 26 was me and also WILLIAMS in 30 her co-conspirator  as a sort of “back-up plan”. Both are serious thieves and fraudsters, bullies and more. JARVIS a “me” in 41 tried to set yet ANOTHER trap which is so tedious it failed; they always do now I have the measure of the lowlife and Gestapo. On return to 28 Fell View on 8/9/16, aside from the usual lowlife hiding behind 31 Fell View to drive off as I parked up, they to pretend they had driven me and dropped me off (I apparently don’t have my car), aside from lowlife from 2 Fell View using 45 to use their phones sending texts to those in 12 who are also my family and care for me – apparently, I was 100% certain that Jackson and Williams hid; they do this almost every day; the motive is to pretend they are out and hope to catch me doing something they can scream is “crime”, what I do not know but in this parallel universe, anything is possible. About 7 45pm I had to go out via my rear door and my timing was perfect, Jackson was hiding in 30 with Williams all in the kitchen of 30; from the front of 30 it looked as if no one was in but I know when they hide; I can smell them. It is usual for Jackson to hide in 30 leaving 26 in darkness. The INTENTION is to pretend they are all out so the phone use MUST be in 28 as I am “in”; I have no phone and the links are to ILLEGAL devices in MY loft fitted by BT. See photos to be sent out.

Among that, I have found these other hiding places and have more to add but these will satisfy any jury and show what I refer to. RYELANDS estate in Lancaster was used for 2 years as I have to pass that when travelling to Lancaster, then they stopped wasting money on taxis to pretend they drove me (I apparently live in at least 35 addresses all at once PLUS the 23 round Fell View) and reverted recently to gormless trolls who are prepared to drive about at their own expense! The routine is that one waits for me to drive into view and they join the traffic flow behind me from Ryelands council estate. They drive off where they want but when I park up in Caton about 8 miles away, a car the same or similar drives from hiding behind 29 or 31 and they pretend they were the one collecting me from RYELANDS and dropping me off in Caton: my photos show that ALL cars have DIFFERENT licence plates: the Gestapo have not learned and understood that yet.  These then are a few more favoured hiding places: photo 1 is on the edge of Caton and private land (A freemason I guarantee) I found this by chance as I drove very slowly past recently and the usual type of old doxy was just pulling out with a white vehicle the type which pretends it has just “moved me”. It was amid a day of lunacy: I was right. THE OTHER MOTIVE IS TO SAY THEY MET “ME” AND I SIGNED A COMPROMISE AGREEMENT. Obviously, the deluded who claim to be me will know nothing of my case, they will have no documents and would not be able to testify, they would be seen to be exactly what they are within seconds. Thus LCC and the Gestapo want to claim I signed an agreement not to disclose MY case. I have not.

The Scarthwaite Hotel is on the edge of Caton (Lancaster side) which I pass thus any time I go out. I apparently live here as well. Notice the holiday chalets, they are actually (apparently) tatty old holiday caravans and I rent one and this is really 298 Oxcliffe Rd LA3 3EJ miles away as I still rent a caravan there as well. (I left 298 on 1/7/13.) 298 is a small scrap yard with 5 old caravans which are used by DWP fraudsters which I found out when renting there (given there was nowhere else to live) so the Gestapo pretend in usual masonic inversion that I was the fraudster living in another address and only using 298 as a mailing address in FRAUD. To “help” me think it is 298 and hope to “brainwash me” the Gestapo have shipped to Caton persons they THINK could be “mistaken” for ruffians who used 298 thus it really is 298! They have them standing at the entry where they take the bus to Lancaster so those on the bus can claim someone of a certain description did take the bus more proof apparently! This place has been used by many to hide and PRETEND and stalkers have waited to then stalk me as I pass.

BUT I also apparently live here about 2 miles out of Caton, also towards Lancaster, New Parkside Farm scene of much. This is also a site for holiday lets and on bank Holiday Sunday for example, the Gestapo used their helicopter to hover over this lane to the site where they had a male with his dog walking to the site and they were to claim it was PROOF MR CAROL WOODS lived there and that, apparently is me as well. They have gained much at this site in deliveries. The Gestapo are desperate to prove I am male and that I have a dog. Those they use to be “me” as male are told to shave their heads if they have hair or to grow hair if they have been used with shaved heads, they have to shave if they have facial hair and grow some if clean shaven. At least 2 used often and daily have been told to wear glasses when they want to walk up and down outside me. Obviously I can name the main offenders and show photos. They have had person change their names, dye their hair, grow it longer, have it cut, and they are all so stupid they do that and think it makes them someone else. Only days prior to this the Gestapo used their helicopter over Fell View to claim they saw me move into 15 Fell View, then only on 7/9/16 they used the helicopter again to claim I was MR CAROL WOODS with a “small red car” behind 31 Fell View. My car is a small red TOYOTA YARIS. Given the lay-out of Fell View 28 is nowhere near 29 and 31. The helicopter is used 4 or 5 times a WEEK to claim they see something they make up as liars and perjurers as planned. Who pays for all that? YOU DO. 298 Oxcliffe Rd LA3 3EJ had a name in its distant past: WAYSIDE. An idiot can see how they used that.

This farm then had other links which I found out. There is a lay-by further along the road, when I moved to Caton 24/3/14, lowlife council staff were sent to Caton to pretend they drove me about as did taxis. (YOU funded all that as well.) I complained about the costs involved as a tax-payer so they started to pretend they met at the lay-by. Apparently lowlife trolls drove me from Caton to the lay-by and a taxi would meet me there. I took photos; I then watched one car of sleazy looking “council staff” pretend to drop me off and take a lane off the lay-by; watching I saw it went to the farm then found that the lane led past the farm and back to the main road. I reported that as harassment saying that those on the farm MUST have given permission for that access in FRAUD and HARASSMENT. The 4th photo is the lane from the lay-by. Taken from inside my car which raises a few questions.

I also find out the farm was used much more than I knew; it was used from March 2015 hiding cars of one regular fraudster who claimed to be me as Mr Carol Woods. In that he took out the old thief and worse in 26 AGNES JACKSON posing as her son when she posed as me thus making him my son. There is much more to that suffice to record here that my photos of that lout being good only 3 weeks ago he was sent to Fell view to linger with his shaved head and wearing of glasses to be someone totally different which was laughable.

On 8/9/16 I sent out information as to why various old doxies are used to pretend they met with me. It is to pretend they have my signature when they have not.5 6

Continues @ https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2016/09/04/the-vcarol-woods-coverup-serious-lancs-police-led-corruption-archive-4-sept-2016/

……………………………

FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

NB: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

MAURICE KIRK: “Wishing to make statement of complaint” 13 Sept. 16 + archive

Complaint to the Avon & Somerset Constabulary 13 Sept. 16

I find, the civil court in Cardiff is refusing to properly co-operate in my lodging an appeal to the Royal Courts of Justice in advance of receiving either the police corrected judgment or judge’s sealed judgment of my BS614159 claim etc that are also continuing to be refused.
The court is also refusing to release court copy of the prosecution exhibits even at my expense.
New information has now come into my possession due to world-wide coverage in some of the above issues and in particular the machine–gun conspiracy that has caused me to be subjected to both imprisonment and the after affects of my police fabricated medical reports used or written by a Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams the then Chief forensic Psychiatrist of Wales.
The police, in Wales, have repeatedly refused to call in an outside police force to investigate, as does IPC (Wales), my serious criminal allegations concerning a number of ring leaders’ conduct, mainly based in South Wales, now directly adversely influencing HM Judiciary (Wales) and Royal Courts of Justice.
I enclose my MG11 Machine-Gun witness statement in my civil claim !CF03361 that even His Honour Judge Seys Llewellyn QC is now appearing to refuse to progress, these past six years or pass on to another judge anywhere in the UK
——————————————————————————————-

Inspector Rice or I Will →

Two Applications to Quash illegally STOPPED Machine-Gun Damages Claim & NHS (Wales) Caswell Clinic Investigation

 

FOR SIX YEARS THE CARDIFF CABAL HAS BLOCKED PROPER IVESTIGATION

MJK letters of complaint to the General Medical Council & Alun Cairns MP

10-10-17-gmc-wales-complaint

10-11-24-gmc-complaint_0001

11-01-17-gmc

Crown Prosecution Service (Wales) has deliberately withheld, for three jury trials and for the original utter nonsense harassment conviction many important defence witnesses and this letter, below, which is why CPS and police so fervently opposed, every time, my bail applications to keep me locked up in Welsh prisons unable to properly prepare for either civil ligation or criminal hearings, the whole purpose of the Barbara Wilding MAPPA Machine-gun conspiracy in the first place.

Police make me in top 5% most dangerous in the country as a MAPPA 3/3 victim for Ministry of Justice’s printed libel, below, just to influence each jury, Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons designed purely to successfully oppose my bail applications as exactly was the case to have me locked up for months prior to my machine-gun acquittal Judge/CPS/police conspiracy when no defence evidence was even tendered.

14-07-11-restricted-mappa-doc-redacted

12-01-20-remand-warrant-12-02-22-judge-curran-qc-court-order-redacted

11-11-08-mr-mike-curry

 

Chief Clerk,
Cardiff Magistrates Court
Wales

9th September 2016

Dear Sir/Madam,

Application to Quash 1st Dec 2011 Dr Tegwyn Williams Restraining Order

dr-tegwyn-williams-wanted-poster

I now understand from both HM Crown Prosecution Service and Criminal Cases Review Commission, following the disclosure of new evidence, some of which was referred to by Dr Tegwyn William’s solicitor to the police some time ago without my knowing about it, I have plausible argument that the purported ‘restraining order’, never served on me in the first place, should be quashed.

As I am also to go abroad I would be grateful for an early date in order that I may attend in person.

Yours Faithfully,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc
Tel 07708586202

enclosed:

caswell-clinic-medical-records-leak-redacted

Initial Statement by Eifion Edwards.

Court Appointed lawyer does not have the evidence that is essential for the cross examination of Dr Tegwyn Williams.

1. Time is needed to organise evidence in support of the defendant Mr M J Kirk that is essential for court appointed lawyer to use in the cross examination of Dr Tegwyn Williams to expose Dr TW unusual dishonesty and malice.

2. On 1 May 2012, the day before trial, the Crown Court told me they had they had asked Apex Chambers to provide Counsel as the Court appointed lawyer, but no decisions had been taken on who would act. I need to provide very complex papers and there is now no time.

3. I believe to proceed without my evidence that is needed to cross examine Dr TW would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.

4. I ask that proceedings switch to focus on a re-trial of the original conviction of December 2011 & 1& 2 March 2012 because my evidence has been hidden from the Courts for their fair deliberations – despite my writing to the Crown Prosecution Service and attending both Magistrates Court and the appeal at the Crown Court. I was prevented from giving evidence on both occasions by improper ‘goings on’.

5. The matter is so complex and lengthy I merely give the direction of my evidence at this time, and ask for time to submit more.

The direction of my evidence.

6. I can confirm that Mr Kirk telephoned me on his release in December 2011 and when I pointedly asked him to detail the latest bail conditions or restraining order that he was under, that he was unaware of any restraining order.

7. As in my attached letter to Mr M Curry Head of Unit at Cardiff CPS and a much fuller letter to Keith Starmer, Director of Public Prosecutions I can explain why Mr Kirks actions are reasonable and lawful and that not only should Mr Kirk not be convicted, but that Mr Kirk should not even be prosecuted.

8. I wish to explain why I believe Dr TW and parties are dishonest and malicious.

Dr TW’s breach of a High Court Order restraining Dr TW from obstructing my care and harassing me – and how Dr TW misleads the Crown Court on 1 March 2012

9. Please see where in the transcript of 1 March 2012 Dr TW tries to imply he has no one else objecting to his actions, when I have had take Dr TW to the High Court over his endless dishonesty and now seemingly a breach of his undertaking to the High Court. Dr TW and parties have interfered in Cardiff NHS very much to try to stop me complaining to the General Medical Council about him.

10. I have had disclosure of Caswell Clinic papers to confirm that a multi agency committee has been meeting based around Caswell clinic to prevent anyone lawfully complaining to the General Medical Council about Dr T Williams. Before Mr Kirk’s alleged harassment charges took place, the committee detail how they aim to get those who complain about Dr T Williams imprisoned for many years. My and Mr Kirk’s initials are on the heading of the emails that organise the agenda of these meetings. (I have no criminal convictions/cautions by 55 years and am a well qualified professional man.)

11. The Caswell clinic multi agency committee seems to have unreasonable influence and control over the Courts, CPS and Mr Kirk’s custody at Prison, to seemingly pervert justice.

12. I am presently organising the complaints to the GMC for both Mr Kirk and myself. The GMC have confirmed that the GMC legal team have approved a larger than usual investigation will occur regards my complaint. I now start to explain the GMC about what Dr T Williams does wrong regards Mr Kirk:-

a) Maliciously denying Mr Kirk access to Caswell Clinic when the staff team of the Caswell had decided in writing that they wanted to build a therapeutic relationship with Mr Kirk. Yet when Mr Kirk would approach Caswell for staff to have opportunity to draw him in, Dr T W maliciously and dishonesty called the police etc.

b) I believe that Dr T W did this because Dr T W cannot discuss the close detail of clinical reports on Mr Kirk because the reports are seemingly malicious and unusually dishonest. Dr TW calls police and falsely alleges harassment to try to cover up exceptional wrongdoing of in bad faith trying to deny Mr Kirk’s liberty indefinitely.

c) That Dr T W refuses to receive questions and information to clarify or correct his reports. Dr T W refused to make a statement to explain himself in civil proceedings, to imply guilt.

Mr Justice Beatson saw an extract of what I believe Dr TW ‘made up’ about Mr Kirk.

13. The evidence I wish Dr T W to be cross examined on is seemingly reliable of genuine concern. When I shared what I knew with Mr Justice Beatson on 19 January 2012 sitting at Cardiff Administrative Court he said in Judgement:-

“Some of the allegations that the Claimant (myself) makes about CPS policy, if supported by evidence, would be very serious. Today he has given me a swatch of papers about Mr Maurice Kirk, a litigant who is well-known in these courts. Mr Edwards relies on what he says is evidence that it was said that Mr Kirk was mentally unfit and had brain damage, which a summary of Mr Kirk’s record based on a surgery home visit report shows was not true.”

14. I wish explain why Mr Kirk has not yet had a fair trial to explore what Mr Justice Beatson describes as “very serious” and “a ….report shows was not true”. Yet both the Crown Prosecutor and the Court appointed lawyer withheld my evidence from the appeal at Cardiff Crown Court. There are also more complex reasons why my evidence was withheld from the Court(s). I believe the Courts need to now switch to a re-trial and for the “first time” to explore how Dr T W and parties do wrong to Mr Kirk.

15. As for example is in the attached one page extract of recent papers lodged at the High Court 18 April 2012, I am asking the High Court to refer the abuse of power (such as in Mr Kirk’s case) and where there is no Remedy for that abuse, to the Supreme Court.

Eifion Edwards 1 May 2012

10-06-16-caa-medical

11-11-08-mr-mike-curry

09-08-28-spect-mri-scans9-12-1-medical-kemp

12-12-21-cps-dicken-ro

12-12-30-cps-dicken-re-rcj-appeal

09-09-30-interim-psychiatric-report-oct1-2009-redacted

11-11-15-solicitor-letter-to-cardiff-magistrates-redacted

Where the ‘buck’ finally stops:

Just one of the many versions of redacted/re-written police and court records one tends to find in Cardiff after decades of my life wasted by trying to simply practice veterinary surgery in South Wales that has still not managed to fiddle judicial autonomy and its own police force.

?Withheld court log from 4th May 2012 1st ‘breach of a restraining order’

Even the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) have been gagged.

Application for Access to Court Files

16-09-09-appl-lift-mg-stay-and-sealed-judgment-release

AND what about my confiscated custody interview tape re ‘garrotte type instrument’ used on HRH Prince Charles’ farm?

This part of the tape transcript to get me goaled as ‘unidentifiable’-later, when I can find it!

I take a pin and random sample ‘grounds’ for appeal on one from 33 incidents in dispute

16-03-15-provisional-grounds-of-appeal-bs614159-etc-3

16-03-15-rcj-prov-grds-appeal-2nd-example

Maurice Kirk: Application to Quash Damages Claim Stay and “Restraining Order” 9/9/16 + Archive

Applications to Quash Unlawful Six Year Stay on Machine-Gun Damages Claim and Dr Tegwyn Williams’ Restraining Order

Posted on by

Chief Clerk,
Cardiff Magistrates Court
Wales

9th September 2016

Dear Sir/Madam,

Application to Quash 1st Dec 2011 Dr Tegwyn Williams Restraining Order

I now understand from both HM Crown Prosecution Service and Criminal Cases Review Commission, following the disclosure of new evidence, some of which was referred to by Dr Tegwyn William’s solicitor to the police some time ago without my knowing about it, I have plausible

continues @ https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2016/09/09/maurice-kirk-application-to-quash-damages-claim-and-restraining-order-9916-archive/

FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

BRIAN SETCHFIELD REVEALS MASSIVE CORRUPTION + CRIME IN SUSSEX POLICE? WATCH

Mr. Setchfield, David Cameron, Theresa May, Katy Bourne, Sussex Police, Giles York, Martin Richards

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Maurice Kirk: Application to Quash Damages Claim Stay and “Restraining Order” 9/9/16 + Archive

z 9 may 2015Applications to Quash Unlawful Six Year Stay on Machine-Gun Damages Claim and Dr Tegwyn Williams’ Restraining Order

Posted on by

Chief Clerk,
Cardiff Magistrates Court
Wales

9th September 2016

Dear Sir/Madam,

Application to Quash 1st Dec 2011 Dr Tegwyn Williams Restraining Order

I now understand from both HM Crown Prosecution Service and Criminal Cases Review Commission, following the disclosure of new evidence, some of which was referred to by Dr Tegwyn William’s solicitor to the police some time ago without my knowing about it, I have plausible argument that the purported ‘restraining order’, never served on me in the first place, should be quashed.

As I am also to go abroad I would be grateful for an early date in order that I may attend in person.

Yours Faithfully,

Maurice J Kirk BVSc
Tel 07708586202

enclosed:

Initial Statement by Eifion Edwards.

Court Appointed lawyer does not have the evidence that is essential for the cross examination of Dr Tegwyn Williams.

1. Time is needed to organise evidence in support of the defendant Mr M J Kirk that is essential for court appointed lawyer to use in the cross examination of Dr Tegwyn Williams to expose Dr TW unusual dishonesty and malice.

2. On 1 May 2012, the day before trial, the Crown Court told me they had they had asked Apex Chambers to provide Counsel as the Court appointed lawyer, but no decisions had been taken on who would act. I need to provide very complex papers and there is now no time.

3. I believe to proceed without my evidence that is needed to cross examine Dr TW would bring the administration of justice into disrepute.

4. I ask that proceedings switch to focus on a re-trial of the original conviction of December 2011 & 1& 2 March 2012 because my evidence has been hidden from the Courts for their fair deliberations – despite my writing to the Crown Prosecution Service and attending both Magistrates Court and the appeal at the Crown Court. I was prevented from giving evidence on both occasions by improper ‘goings on’.

5. The matter is so complex and lengthy I merely give the direction of my evidence at this time, and ask for time to submit more.

The direction of my evidence.

6. I can confirm that Mr Kirk telephoned me on his release in December 2011 and when I pointedly asked him to detail the latest bail conditions or restraining order that he was under, that he was unaware of any restraining order.

7. As in my attached letter to Mr M Curry Head of Unit at Cardiff CPS and a much fuller letter to Keith Starmer, Director of Public Prosecutions I can explain why Mr Kirks actions are reasonable and lawful and that not only should Mr Kirk not be convicted, but that Mr Kirk should not even be prosecuted.

8. I wish to explain why I believe Dr TW and parties are dishonest and malicious.

Dr TW’s breach of a High Court Order restraining Dr TW from obstructing my care and harassing me – and how Dr TW misleads the Crown Court on 1 March 2012

9. Please see where in the transcript of 1 March 2012 Dr TW tries to imply he has no one else objecting to his actions, when I have had take Dr TW to the High Court over his endless dishonesty and now seemingly a breach of his undertaking to the High Court. Dr TW and parties have interfered in Cardiff NHS very much to try to stop me complaining to the General Medical Council about him.

10. I have had disclosure of Caswell Clinic papers to confirm that a multi agency committee has been meeting based around Caswell clinic to prevent anyone lawfully complaining to the General Medical Council about Dr T Williams. Before Mr Kirk’s alleged harassment charges took place, the committee detail how they aim to get those who complain about Dr T Williams imprisoned for many years. My and Mr Kirk’s initials are on the heading of the emails that organise the agenda of these meetings. (I have no criminal convictions/cautions by 55 years and am a well qualified professional man.)

11. The Caswell clinic multi agency committee seems to have unreasonable influence and control over the Courts, CPS and Mr Kirk’s custody at Prison, to seemingly pervert justice.

12. I am presently organising the complaints to the GMC for both Mr Kirk and myself. The GMC have confirmed that the GMC legal team have approved a larger than usual investigation will occur regards my complaint. I now start to explain the GMC about what Dr T Williams does wrong regards Mr Kirk:-

a) Maliciously denying Mr Kirk access to Caswell Clinic when the staff team of the Caswell had decided in writing that they wanted to build a therapeutic relationship with Mr Kirk. Yet when Mr Kirk would approach Caswell for staff to have opportunity to draw him in, Dr T W maliciously and dishonesty called the police etc.

b) I believe that Dr T W did this because Dr T W cannot discuss the close detail of clinical reports on Mr Kirk because the reports are seemingly malicious and unusually dishonest. Dr TW calls police and falsely alleges harassment to try to cover up exceptional wrongdoing of in bad faith trying to deny Mr Kirk’s liberty indefinitely.

c) That Dr T W refuses to receive questions and information to clarify or correct his reports. Dr T W refused to make a statement to explain himself in civil proceedings, to imply guilt.

Mr Justice Beatson saw an extract of what I believe Dr TW ‘made up’ about Mr Kirk.

13. The evidence I wish Dr T W to be cross examined on is seemingly reliable of genuine concern. When I shared what I knew with Mr Justice Beatson on 19 January 2012 sitting at Cardiff Administrative Court he said in Judgement:-

“Some of the allegations that the Claimant (myself) makes about CPS policy, if supported by evidence, would be very serious. Today he has given me a swatch of papers about Mr Maurice Kirk, a litigant who is well-known in these courts. Mr Edwards relies on what he says is evidence that it was said that Mr Kirk was mentally unfit and had brain damage, which a summary of Mr Kirk’s record based on a surgery home visit report shows was not true.”

14. I wish explain why Mr Kirk has not yet had a fair trial to explore what Mr Justice Beatson describes as “very serious” and “a ….report shows was not true”. Yet both the Crown Prosecutor and the Court appointed lawyer withheld my evidence from the appeal at Cardiff Crown Court. There are also more complex reasons why my evidence was withheld from the Court(s). I believe the Courts need to now switch to a re-trial and for the “first time” to explore how Dr T W and parties do wrong to Mr Kirk.

15. As for example is in the attached one page extract of recent papers lodged at the High Court 18 April 2012, I am asking the High Court to refer the abuse of power (such as in Mr Kirk’s case) and where there is no Remedy for that abuse, to the Supreme Court.

Eifion Edwards 1 May 2012
Tel 029/ 20 225953

dr-tegwyn-williams-wanted-poster

10-06-16-caa-medical

11-11-08-mr-mike-curry

09-08-28-spect-mri-scans9-12-1-medical-kemp

12-12-21-cps-dicken-ro

12-12-30-cps-dicken-re-rcj-appeal

09-09-30-interim-psychiatric-report-oct1-2009-redacted

11-11-15-solicitor-letter-to-cardiff-magistrates-redacted

Where the ‘buck’ finally stops:

Just one of the many versions of redacted/re-written police and court records one tends to find in Cardiff after decades of my life wasted by trying to simply practice veterinary surgery in South Wales that has still not managed to fiddle judicial autonomy and its own police force.

?

Withheld court log from 4th May 2012 1st ‘breach of a restraining order’

Application for Access to Court Files

16-09-09-appl-lift-mg-stay-and-sealed-judgment-release

Taunton’s MP Ms Rebecca Pow Told of State of Current Welsh Law Courts

by mauricekirky

Ms Rebecca Pow,
MP for the Vale of Taunton, Somerset.
2th September 2016

Dear Ms Pow,

HMC&TS Malfeasance
I have recently moved back to the West Country where I was born, educated, worked and incidentally, married at your own local church in Stoke St Mary.
My purpose was, primarily, to restore my failing health due to being unable to obtain proper medical services in South Wales owing to the intransigence amongst a string of NHS (Wales) doctors. Each refused to stand-up to either Chief Forensic Psychiatrist for Wales, a Dr Tegwyn Williams, now sacked, but a Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University due to his fabricated medical records.
They had been requested by a Barbara Wilding, the then Chief Constable of the South Wales Constabulary, following legal advice from Dolmans, solicitors, that her own fabricated soon to be heard ‘machine -gun trial, carrying in itself a minimum ten prison sentence, for me, was doomed and I needed, instead, to be incarcerated, indefinitely, in a high security psychiatric hospital in order for her to avoid the ongoing civil litigation from affecting her final pension.
Cardiff Court staff first fabricated evidence, as long ago as 2002, in that I was a potential ‘vexatious litigant’ and therefore the needing for HM Court & Tribunal Service (Wales) to send many, if not all, of my court files to HM Solicitor-General’s office in Whitehall for registration. The files primarily concerned my local civil and criminal litigation in the Welsh courts involving my suing the police for incessant bullying. This regime of theirs has led to the loss of many files being lost, some believe on purpose, in order to further frustrate and delay my right of ‘remedy’ through our UK courts of law.
I have also returned to Taunton to retrieve my ‘general state of mind’ in an environment more conducive to my up-bringing and life style and to finally get away from the twenty-four years of South Wales Police persecution following their apparent immunity to any form accountability as the result of their considerable fabricated prosecution evidence concocted over the years.
However, my need to contact my local Member of Parliament is for a more serious a reason in that I am now in possession of considerable evidence of wide spread malfeasance within the Cardiff’s judiciary which has implicated both the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, in the past and continues to have a such serious impact on my family wherever I or they should be.
HMC&TS (Wales) have ‘lost’:
1. Numerous Cardiff County Court files, court exhibits and court logs or refuse to disclose

2. numerous Cardiff Crown Court files with some also confiscated by the South Wales police

3. numerous Cardiff Magistrate’s court clerks’ contemporaneous notes, records of evidence, court exhibits, pages from the official court logs and the documentary evidence of both Crown Prosecution Service and Geoamey Custodial Services’ applications to confirm that would also confirm my never having received a ‘restraining order’ in the court cells of the Magistrates courts on 1st December 2011.

4. The latest, my reason for writing to you as it really is the ‘last straw’, is that the Cardiff County Court clerk is ‘unable’ to supply me with a copy of a purported October 2015 250 odd page ‘handed-down’ judgment, involving all the above nefarious activities and much, much more, besides, that had been, purportedly, emailed to me in order for me to immediately appeal its content.

5. As with the Magistrates public records needing to be disclosed, that will, alone, overturn well over three years of my prison sentences, likewise, the immediate disclosure of County Court logs, recovery of its exhibits and my police custody records will allow my being able to practice veterinary surgery once again as the truth will finally be revealed over ridiculous criminal convictions and fairy tale that two dogs had ever fallen over a cliff in the first place.

6. I seek an appointment, please, in order for that you may be made further aware, with Brexit now being a serious possibility and neither lawyers nor HM court staff any longer needing to be accountable for their actions.

7. This has partly come about due to politicians’ lawyers’ abusive 1989 Human Rights Act by someone, we know, deliberately having omitted both Articles 1 and 13 of what was original drafted to avoid ‘remedy’ for someone like myself.

Yours sincerely

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Maurice@kirkflyingvet.com
Tel. 07708586202

source: https://mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com/2016/09/06/tauntons-mp-ms-rebecca-pow-told-of-state-of-current-welsh-law-courts/

 

MAURICE KIRK’S SISTER CELIA’S RADIO INTERVIEW

 September 2014       

    video: “Rough Justice: South Wales Police persecute former vet & pilot Maurice Kirk who’s suing them”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c3tg6pDdR8&feature=youtu.be

PublicEnquiry from  PublicEnquiry on youtube

 MAURICE KIRK v S WALES POLICE: POSITION STATEMENT 26 AUG. 16 + APP. TO ADJOURN – 26AUG16 

1] Claimant Position Statement – BS614159 +2 / 7CF07345 Kirk v Chief Constable of South Wales Police 26 Aug. 16

1. The Claimant has failed to locate any evidence of a ‘sealed’ judgment of 26th October2015, for the first three actions or one purported to have been sent to him on the 26th October 2015 by email as stated in conversation with court clerk.

2, Repeated requests for copy of same have not been successful as with release of purported court copy of police corrected version returned before judgment handed down

3. Two visits and the last by post to RCJ Court of Appeal office, to tender an appeal with a printed ‘judgment’ and fee, has been refused, each time, as not sealed.

4. The Claimant continues to be refused sight of the court log or obtain copy of it

5. The Claimant continues to have identified some of his considerable number of prosecution exhibits served on both Defendant and court.

6. 1st Action para 8.6,the Grand Avenue Ely ‘garrotte’ incident , in which a dozen breaches in PACE 1984 were committed, with his preliminary appeal submission focused on that incident, from thirty three similar. so far cited of incessant police bullying, there now appears irregularity jeopardising the Claimant;s right to appeal

7.1st Action para 8. Claimant’s copy of his police interview without even a caution, when police switched to the indictable allegation as he was ‘identifiable’, has been seized by the court and refused it be investigated by an outside police force.

8. 7CF07345 2916 amended particulars of claim, served on the court by another, is being withheld from the claimant despite requests from both donor and court to release.

9. The 7CF07345 October 2007 Claimant’s Particulars of Claim contained numerous police incidents that required the nefarious assistance of a few Cardiff court staff and CPS (Wales) lawyers to obtain those key criminal convictions, within the first four of some ten Actions time period, to cause the Claimant’s name from being removed from the veterinary register.

10, Neither the donor nor the court will furnish the Claimant with a copy of that purported 8th august 2016 varied submission, referred to in para 4 of His Honour’s August 2016 note.

11. The Claimant is therefore unable to include into the amended particulars, already with the court, those specific incidents identifying Cardiff ‘court officers’ repeatedly being omitted by any fellow Cardiff ‘court officer’ approached for the task, during this last decade, for fear of his or her job and rightly so.

12. Hence the need for more and more litigants in person, so often against their wishes, hampering the running of our completely outdated British law courts driven by avarice.

13. Therefore a further seven days is needed for this Claimant to draft the amended version so granted by the honourable court.

13. Incidents excluded by Claimant’s proposed representatives include:

I) Court official, ex police officer, causing a suspect fracture of the Claimant’s leg when pushed down the court steps whilst on his crutches because he was seeking public records

ii) Court official, CPS prosecutor Jackie Seal, aware but misleading the Barry lay magistrates that the three versions of Claimant’s alleged ‘Breach of the Peace’. incident, at the Vale of Glamorgan Show, drafted under the control of then Barry custody sergeant, Andrew Rice, while refusing the Claimant bail, then had switched the allegation to one of ‘common assault.

The BOP allegation, was only dropped for fear the claimant may go to prison (see court records on Claimant’s old web site) All this conduct was opposed by the CPS barrister, Ieun Rees, when made aware of the full facts but told to ‘shut up’.

11)Jackie Seal, when fully aware that retired police inspector Howard Davies, had ‘struck the first blow at the Show and again had attacked the Claimant, with force, in the police witness room in Cardiff Crown Court before numerous uniformed police officers, then went into the witness box before HHJ Nicholas Gaskill QC and despite his rebuke at her refused to clarify the mistakes of the lower court and wicked conduct of then Sergeant Andrew Rice who has so heavily featured in all four Actions.

12) The Claimant has record that Ms Seal and many other Cardiff Court officials later, all immune to criminal proceedings by HM Partnership, then went on and committed perjury over the incident leading to the Claimant having his name removed from the veterinary register

13) Over the past twenty three years of this Claimant requesting both relevant public court and police records, of relevant data to allow both a fair trial and have his name restored to the veterinary register, he has been refused. [ends]

ATTATCHMENT:

1] BS614159 +2 re Quantum damages and why all 10 Actions should be assessed together 

16 08 25 Claimant’s submissions re Quantum BS614159 etc

2] Application to adjurn 7 days enclosed 7CF07345 – 26 Aug. 16

“FAO

Cardiff County Court                                        case 7CF07345
am 26th August 2016 
Dear Sir/Madam,
The Claimant’s carhas malfunctioned see facebook and unable to find office faculties in the time, elsewhere to print , scan and fax to court my to days dated N244 form for adjournment.
The Claimant has  had no response from anyone from his email to all parties being the preliminary grounds for adjournment (subject to having to return to the UK to obtain copy) re difficulties in obtaining the document last served by another being amended by 4pm  served  and paid for.
The Claimant attempts to pay court fee in a few minutes over the telephone on court’s receipt of enclosed photos of my application as internet on HMCS web site will not allow the form being filled in on line as usually is the way.
The Claimant apologises
ATTATCHMENT:
Claimant Witness Statement of Truth   26th August 2016
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Criminal Cases Review Commission Refusal to Disclose Magistrates Records

by mauricekirky 16 Aug. 2016

DRAFT just for starters

Claimant Position Statement BS614159 etc &
7CF07345 (4th Action)/C90CF012 (parole board)/1CF03361 (machine-gun) etc, etc.

1. 7th August 2015 FOI application to disclose the above is refused by the CCRC

2. Sept15 HM Crown Prosecution letter, under FOI, reveals it is also refusing to disclose above

3. CCRC continue to refuse to reply to their victim’s letters for same

4. CCRC state, as full disclosure of 1st 2011 Cardiff magistrates ‘Harassment’ conviction despite devoid of:

I) clerk of the court’s contemporaneous notes

II) any copy of either CPS or Defendant applications

III) any copy of any court exhibits of which this case is pivotal

IV) the court log

V) nor how, by whom, when or where the subsequent ‘restraining order’, re South Wales Police/Dr Tegwyn Williams fabricated psychiatric reports, was served on their victim knowing, full well, no such service ever took place.

5. His Honour Judge Seys Llewelyn QC continues to refuse to disclose Cardiff court public/Claimant lodged records despite having adjudicated over the similar withholding of South Wales Police MAPPA 3/3 fabricated records to incarcerate their victim, indefinitely.

6. No lawyer can be found in the UK to even draught a Judicial Review Application against the CCRC or even obtain copy of the above public records from Bristol HM Crown Prosecution Service. It had admitted this in Bristol Crown Court of having them during their victim’s re located appeal for having arrested the original 1st December 2011 corrupt prosecutor, barrister David Gareth Davies of Park Place Chamber, Cardiff as he had repeatedly lied the original public gallery and subsequent 4th May 2012 Cardiff Crown Court jury whilst fully protected by His Honour Judge John Curran presiding.
Their cosy relationship, all based on greed, is now guarrenteed longevity should Brexit succeed.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc
16th August 2016

MAURICE KIRK v the Chief Constable of S. Wales: POSITION STATEMENT 11 Aug. 16

Maurice Kirk    -v-     The Chief Constable of South Wales Constabulary

         Claimant’s 11th August 2016   Position Statement

 

                                                                                                                                           BS614159

                                                                                                                                            CF101741

                                                                                                                                            CF204141

                                                                                                                                            7CF07345

                                                                                                                                            1CF03361

                                                                                                                                             C90CF012

                                                                                                                                             T20097445

                                                                                                                                             A20110290

                                                                                                                                            2012/3241/D2

                                                                                                                                            A2014008

                                                                                                                                            T20130801

                                                                                                                                             T20131144

                                                                                                                                            A20140005

                                                                                                                                            A20130139

                                                                                                                                            8CF02269

                                                                                                                                            62EA0223612

                                                                                                                                            3CF01374

                                                                                                                                     62EA0223612/JDB

                                                                                                                                            C70CF041

                                                                              & outstanding CCRC Judicial Review Applications

 Some Reasons for an Adjournment Application for the 12th August 2016 Hearing 

  1. Cardiff courts’ refusals to disclose to the Claimant corrected and/or sealed judgments as requested by the Court of Appeal in its 1st June 2016 letter and on 1st December 2011, from the court cells, whilst being assaulted by at least four Geoamey Custody Services gaolers.

     

  2. Cardiff courts’ refusal to allow the Claimant’s attendances, no less than seven times, during the duration of these particular three Actions when held in custody within their jurisdiction.

     

  3. The Cardiff courts’ refusal to disclose to the Claimant the court logs, clerk of the court’s notes, his court exhibits, his lodged files, original custody interview tapes and copy ofcontent remaining within its red ‘moth-eaten’ court file marked, ‘Maurice John Kirk – ‘Potential Vexatious Litigant’, following its return or not from the HM Solicitor General’s Office.

     

  4. None of the Claimant’s Mackenzie’s Friends, of which there are many, can comprehend, without further clarification of the wording within the purported 26th October 2015 judgment, as to whether the extreme conduct of the Defendant in recent decades, simply to prejudice his position, is to be under the judge’s consideration under CPR rule 44.

     

  5. The Cardiff court’s failure to lift its six year stay on the ‘Lewis Machine Gun’ no 1CF03361 case, Parole Board’s fabricated Defendant no. C90CF012 and most importantly, the Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams/MAPPA 3/3 similar Defendant concocted cases deliberately buried.

     

  6. The Claimant’s 8th June 2016 Position Statement states that for any costs to be awarded, either way, cannot be fairly concluded without the above cases having been concluded.

     

  7. Despite fifteen years or so of the Claimant’s repeated asking for the Defendant’s break-down of costs incurred, to date, in order to assess in the eyes of any future tribunal the most efficient and economical way forward, he always been refused.

This list is far from being exhaustive

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

11th August 2016

SHOCKING!!: MAURICE KIRK: “Criminal Case Review Commission Depravity” 26 July 16

Criminal Case Review Commission Depravity

by mauricekirky

I had to arrest the Crown Prosecution Barrister, David Gareth Evans, in Cardiff ‘s court in order to prove the conspiracy between certain Cardiff judges, CPS and various other inherently deceitful HM Court Service spineless Welsh sheeple.

I was reliant, before I arrested a prison officer and prosecutor, on the CCRC obtaining the court records neither my 4th May 2012 Cardiff Crown Court jury nor myself had asked refused by thoroughly corrupt His Honour Judge Curran.

It has taken five years, so far,only to find the CCRC have deliberately withheld the evidence in magistrate’s clerk’s notes that confirm no ‘restraining order’ was ever served on me in the first place, on the 1st December 2011, in the magistrate’s cells.

Far more to the point the Geoamey Custody Services and South Wales Police both ordered by the Cardiff Cabal to try and DEPOSIT A COPY IN MY POCKET as I was being dragged across the floor towards a police cell and my wheel chair.

No less than fourteen Cardiff judges, to date, have so far conspired to try and cover-up the years of false imprisonment this travesty of justice it has caused.

Criminal discrimination it would appear.

Now the police have been into the Crown Court and confiscated the court exhibits and one which the prosecutor had tried to introduce, mid trial, before another very corrupt spineless man, District Judge John Charles, all quietly tape recorded from the public gallery while he convicted me in my absence. I had been refused the right to cross examine the police or Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams, the chief forensic psychiatrist for the whole of Wales, so I saw little point in leaving my cell.

Stupid Charles had been ordered not just to allow me to cross examine the police but to hand down the maximum sentence to affect my civil damages claims, for countless malicious South Wales Police prosecutions.

The idiot panicked when he saw Sabine and a huge number of other Mackenzie Friends in the public gallery, bused in from all over the UK. Luigi filth Stranati, area court supervisor, was watched while he pathetically barred more entering the court until he had to remove the court chairs as an excuse.

I warn you, if Brexit is not overturned, this will be routine stuff soon in English and Northern Ireland courts.

This had also meant the ‘restraining order had not even been typed-up when I was was ‘released’ at lunch time—-all recorded in public records the CCRC have now deliberately assisted in having shredded.

I was not falling for their disgusting routine and therefore refused to leave my cell for four hours until they told me the outcome of the case and I was served the papers. I never was, of course, only to be dragged out by five Geoamey staff as confirmed in my custody records in the Musa Nigerian Children ‘snatched’ by Haringey Council case in a London court after a night in a police call.

In a police cell for ‘failing to attend’ the court two days earlier when Cardiff prison were ordered not to allow my transfer to London.

All good Enid Byton stuff!

16 06 12 CCRC Failed Discl

16 07 20 CCRC Admissions Letter.jpg

12 05 04 Judge Ignored Jury Noteswitched WANTED014

This REWARD is still outstanding

I will now  be looking for a Christchurch based lawyer, in New Zealand, to press for criminal charges of the conspiracy against the blackmailed doctor, just one of the numerous judges, for starters and  the past and present Chief Constables of South Wales, United Kingdom and not forgetting the one who watched the plan for the ‘gravy train, Adrian Oliver of Dolmans, solicitors.

Wilding Wanted

 source:  https://mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com/2016/07/26/criminal-case-review-commission-depravity/

Shyster South Wales Police

by mauricekirky 22 July 16

The US President will still not let me in the country, to visit Oshkosh Air Show to give one of my talks, as South Wales Police have registered me MAPPA 3/3 as one of the top 5% most dangerous in the UK. The FAA have confirmed I did nothing wrong in attempting to visit President Bush by cub.

Currently in Cardiff County Court, for 8th August hearing, much scheming will be witnessed by those who have accurately followed my track record where nefarious plots of the South Wales Police are concerned.

I have been persuaded, this time, to re draft my 6th Action, the ‘machine-gun/NHS (Wales)/Dr Tegwyn Williams damages claim against the local police and have it all consolidated with a much shortened 4th Action originally containing over 40 odd further examples of police bullying.

Attention span problems seem to be within all parties, now, after 23 years of this scandalous perverse litigation while Dolmans are promised their millions, in any event, which is why these similar shysters will never negotiate as my original 1994 Bristol solicitors said they must do.

Bobbetts Mackan, of Berkely Square, also took many a few thousand pounds off me when always promising me, as did His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, a jury for without the inherent deceit around may dominate.

The jury decision would settle the 4th Action and no doubt, the next six Actions now awaiting consolidation in the High Court.

In the High Court, of course, iswhere it should all of bloody well gone to in the first place but the royal courts of Justice refuse owing to my previous 60 odd Judicial Review Applications there.

Ah, Ah, but no that cannot happen, the lawyers say or none of our fellow scavengers, clinging to our quite out-dated UK judicial system, their ‘gravy train’, cannot make any quick dishonest money out of the chance.

With Brexit looming then things in the judiciary here will only get worse as lawyers and court officials , here in the UK, no longer have effective disciplinary systems to bring them to account.

Come along on the 8th August, with your ice-lolly and pop-corn, and see the deals that have been done, behind closed doors, to have my actions ‘struck out’ on the usual spurious reasons and listen to how the Cardiff police oh, so mysteriously, have just found my 1993 custody interview tape.

It contains the fact I was not even cautioned for ‘being in possession of an offensive weapon’ on HRH The Prince of Wales’ farm in the Vale of Glamorgan found armed with a ‘garrotte like instrument’ meant I was for immediate custody back to Guernsey to face an overdue parking fine or was it another prosecution for daring to house an Englishman in my home.

(that first case soon got knocked on the head by attending appropriately addressed)

HRH Prince Charles

HM Privy Council

Maurice protests up a crane

nazi-loose-in-guernsey

Welsh Restraining Order Myth

by mauricekirky 17 July 16

The Welsh Restraining Order Myth

Back in 2000 I wished to find a way in enlightening so many of my client’s following my horror to what I had to listen to, so often, whilst consulting in my Barry Veterinary Hospital and Cardiff surgeries. It became abundantly clear that the vast majority of the general public, at least here in South Wales, had little clue as to ‘what really goes on in our law courts’. It’s NOT just in Wales but also right across England.

My researches that followed my being forced to attend numerous police cells and local law courts, around Cardiff, that matters of public importance, the very reason for statute law, was rarely being reported properly, if at all, in the local media. I thought I was right back working in a tax haven, like Guernsey of all places or some equally barbaric state practising Sharia law!

I have now spent nearly three years of my life in the Welsh prisons following the fabricated construction of a ‘restraining order’ that never served on me or known to me in the first place.

This was deliberate in order to guarantee the restraining order would be broken. Once I found out about it in Cardiff prison too late, of course, I was repeatedly refused a hearing to have the ridiculous terms within it ‘varied’ as was my right in law.

By shear chance, in 2014, a then ‘Mackenzie Friend’ passing by, over heard the previous trial judge, who had just gaoled me for 16 months, quash the restraining order giving no reason having only then becoming aware there was a member of public in their midst. Judge Rowland and ten previous judges damned well knew the reason but no one will tell me about it having anticipated the repercussions.

Also the prison was never told, of course, to immediately release me, on the contrary, the prison governor was ordered by the court to double my sentence without even my right of public adjudication. The prison was never told, of course, because a chance accident in the A Wing shower block, caused a brain scan needing to be carried out that could not be air-brushed out of the records as before.

The prosecuting barrister’s complaint was that I continue publishing the evidence [see WANTED poster attached], namely the truth behind the Machine-gun/MAPPA/Dr Tegwyn Williams/South Wales Police conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.

Incidentally, whilst in Cardiff prison I was never told, either, I was registered amongst the top 5% most dangerous in our UK community, I had a suspected brain tumour and ‘significant brain damage’. Upon release no Welsh GP would support my having a follow-up brain scan, once I found as, no doubt, they all knew it had all been a police hoax in the first place against an Englishman publishing the obvious.

BUT when it came to my urgently needing a hip replacement I could find an NHS (Wales) anaesthetist prepared to assist in the operation leading to my being banned from numerous medical practices when I pursued the possible alternatives. Nine months later I had to eventually, whilst on crutches and morphine sulphate, travel to France to have the operation quickly done at my own expense.

Since the South Wales Police conspiracy, to issue my restraining order, was first concocted by Barbara Wilding, as Chief Constable in 2008, the Welsh authorities have repeatedly had me detained under the 1983 Mental Health Act only then fail following independent second opinions including that from two Civil Aviation psychiatrists. I was once even detained in France, using these fabricated Welsh medical records, with the hope it would stop, once and for all, my ongoing civil damages claim against the current Chief Constable, Mr Vaughan.

Over twenty psychiatrists, so far, have contradicted the medical reports by both Professor Rodger Wood, of Swansea University and Wales’ chief forensic psychiatrist, Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams fabricated for that 2009 Cardiff Crown Court application, in my absence, that I be incarcerated in Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital indefinitely.

The Welsh authorities are determined not to allow the general public becoming aware of the scale of corruption within their judiciary and power of their misused restraining orders.  Their use of the ‘Gulag card’, on their victim, is only the next card played after a victim’s ‘restraining order’ should it fail in shutting him or her up from exposing the truth. Is it the same in England I often wonder?

Anyone wishing to challenge my web site data or need information on what and why restraining orders are used and abused so much, here in Wales, then please ring on 07708586202 or email me on maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

14 03 14 CR Crt App Refusal

Are you starting to appreciate the lengths to which the Welsh Authorities have been prepared to go to cover-up the widespread corruption in Cardiff’s courts, HMC&TS and prison to now be affecting the Criminal Cases Review Commission, Independent Police Complaints Commission, Information Commissioner  and newspapers?

All emanating from the ‘shoot to kill’ Barbara Wilding

11 06 10 Barbara Wilding WANTED

above: Retired Chief Constable

14 11 25 CPS FOI Result

All originating from this Wanted poster

Dr Tegwyn Williams WANTED poster

  

Austin Psych

  
mauricekirky | July 17, 2016 at 10:48 am | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/p13xk8-Y4

MAURICE KIRK: SHOCKING POLICE/JUDICIAL CORRUPTION: “ANOTHER S WALES POLICE CONSPIRACY GOES SERIOUSLY WRONG” 4 July 16

 

 Another South Wales Police Conspiracy Goes Seriously Wrong

by mauricekirky 4 July 16

Ten Cardiff Crown Court Judges Accused  of Culpable Negligence

In order for the MAPPA conspiracy to succeed senior police officers relied on the co-operation from those that controlled the few avenues of redress available to their victims.

This meant that ‘HM Partnership’, consisting of many in the ‘funny hand shake’ brigade of devil worshippers in our courts of Wales and HM prisons, could so easily shuffle the respective court papers of their incarcerated victim whilst denying him legal representation, access to court, his legal papers or access to helpers even via telephone.

Photos, names and home addresses of culprits will be published on website  world wide.

Archive continues at:https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2016/07/05/maurice-kirk-another-s-wales-police-conspiracy-goes-seriously-wrong-4-july-16-archive/

>> MAURICE KIRK’S site is: https://mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com

FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

NB: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes regarding this site’s publication of data.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

HAMPSTEAD SRA: NEELU BERRY: THE UK PRIVATE LTD. COMPANY [COUNCILS] + SEX TRADE LICENSING + ARCHIVE 7SEPT16

PRESS RELEASE! 07 September 2016: For Free + immediate publication:
The United Kingdom Private Limited Company, parading as a country or State has been issuing licenses for sex slave industry via the local authorities.  It appears that the issuing of sex trading licenses was taken offline after the Hampstead Two case broke out in September 2014,  but since the fraudulent Hampstead Whisleblower trials ended in a “No Case To Answer”, the local councils do not appear to be issuing such licenses online.  Researchers are invited to telephone their local authorities to enquire whether such licenses are still being issued, the cost of the licenses, the criteria required before issuing such licenses, the numbers and locations of licenses issued, the names of the managers and the data collected on the identities of the users of such services.
Freedom of Information requests can be made similar to the one made for Bristol City Council https://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/sexual_entertainment_venues#incoming-769412
Examples of licenses issued by Local Governments at Bolton, Warwick, Bedford, Hounslow, Luton & Milton Keynes are attached below. 
The granted licenses should be made available for the public to inspect so that any “underground” trafficking of humans including children for the sex slave industry can be fully investigated, as alleged by the two Hampstead Children at Council run premises such as local swimming leisure centres and at local businesses such as McDonalds.
The local Governments or Councils, are required to remedy to end all trafficking of humans through these sex licenses which have ended in humans being abused, tortured and murdered being covered up by public servants.
Mainstream media is invited to revisit the allegations made by the mother of the two Hampstead children at 33 minutes of the Youtube video
“Satanic Church Exposed”
Modern day slave trading involves a UK resident paying the local council a license fee to traffic sex slaves, see attached, application fee structure, for Bedford Council (no doubt, including children), who place the immigrants in private rented accommodation with private landlords leaving huge bills…
The Police wait till the new network of customers is up and running, then do a few raids, scare off the immigrants or take them in for their private side businesses, then it starts all over again…the social services supply enough children to keep it rolling over…for the elite customers to remain buried in these surface activities…
On the basis of the attached document, we can do a FOI on all councils if they have ever charged such license fees for sex slave trades and deem all Councils closed for illegal slave trading.
Now we are shifting form the cops to the Councils…in our determination of the root of the evil….in local Councils…
and how they service the Parliamentarians structure of blackmail and death threats using international slaves…as front liners prostitutes, pimps and poisons…
IPCC given 7 days Notice to remedy the Hampstead case
Other Notices being planned in London
8 Attachments 

Preview attachment sev_application_form.pdf

sev_application_form.pdf
182 KB

Preview attachment Sex establishment application form.pdf

Sex establishment application form.pdf
125 KB

Preview attachment Sex_Establishment_Application_01.04.2013.pdf

Sex_Establishment_Application_01.04.2013.pdf
114 KB

Preview attachment Sex Establishment Guidance Notes V7 10.12-2.pdf

Sex Establishment Guidance Notes V7 10.12-2.pdf
28 KB

Preview YouTube video SATANIC CHURCH EXPOSED!!!!!!!!!

SATANIC CHURCH EXPOSED!!!!!!!!!
31 Aug 2016: UK London: IPCC issued with Notice to provide Hampstead Remedy in 7 days
HAMPSTEAD SRA: STATE TERRORISM AGAINST NEELU BERRY CONTINUES 22 AUG. 16 + ARCHIVE, WATCH

Received:

“State Terrorism against Neelu Berry continues

The man showing us a badge “Pyemont 220563”, he is wearing round his neck, see photo attached, was actually impersonating a female Inspector, Ellie Pyemont.  pyemont james ellie

http://timewise.co.uk/people/ellie-pyemont-penny-coombe-metropolitan-police-service/

I am guessing the lady, in the photo attached, with him is Inspector Ellie Pyemont who does 60% jobshare after having twins, with another female on 60% and that she is his wife.

He looks like “James Pyemont”, a cricketer, who fits the same description as in the photo attached and the man me and Paddy saw on 11 August 2016 – there is no record on internet search of him being a Police officer let alone an Inspector.  Maybe he is MI5 so he can impersonate Inspectors… I leave it to you to guess as my mind is boggling, maybe someone can do an FOI on www.whatdotheyknow.com – and find out if he is a qualified psychiatrist as well… otherwise he should be locked up for impersonating one..

http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/news-photo/james-pyemont-sussex-c-c-c-news-photo/87751994#james-pyemont-sussex-ccc-picture-id87751994 

Report by Neelu Berry 11 August 2016 – Serving of Documents to nearest Met Police station at Walworth Road.

Paddy and Neelu attended Blackfriars Crown Court around 4pm on 11 August 2016 to serve two 1-page documents and date stamp additional 9 copies of each.

They went into Court 9 where HHJ Peter Clarke was in the middle of a trial.  His clerk Mr Steven Garbett came over to me and took one copy of each of the two documents and said he would give them to Judge Hillen the next day.

They attended Walworth Road Police Station at around 5.30pm to deliver two documents for the attention of the Metropolitan Police.  Station Officer Robert Amoakoh refused to accept or date stamp any documents. A female officer also refused to accept the documents or give a receipt.

They asked for a more senior officer.  A Detective Sergeant, Denise Burgess, badge 16MD, read the documents and stated that these had nothing to do with the Police and she did not understand them.  She checked the details for Betsy Davey and ascertained that she was at Camden and she would forward the documents to Betsy Davey but was unwilling to give them any receipt or seal on the other documents.  They asked for her senior officer.  She stated that he would tell them exactly the same as her.

Around 6.30pm, A tall man came out with a badge “Pyemont 220563”, asking Neelu to explain what the case was about.  He stated that the charge of vexing a priest or conspiracy to intimidate witnesses were not charges that the Crown Court could have heard because it only deals with much more serious criminal offences.  He then accused Neelu of making very serious allegations  and told Neelu Berry that it was his duty of care to her to be concerned about her

mental health and that the officer behind him was also concerned for Neelu’s mental health and that he would be making a report to that effect about her mental health.  He asked for her personal details and pointed to them on the form.  He copied her name and address from the two documents.  He then asked for her date of birth.  Neelu refused to give her date of birth, told him Neelu  Neelu did not require his services and asked if he was under his oath, to which he refused to answer.  They noticed they were closed in the cubicle.  The doors opened and they exited.  Neelu had no doubt that they would have been sectioned and sent to a mental health hospital straight away.

TRANSCRIPT FROM TWO AUDIOS 

5:30pm in Walworth Road Police Station 11 August 2016

AUDIO 1

Paddy: You see that document, we need proof that you have got that document, all the rest of them are stamped as proof that you have received that document, it is very simple 

DS Denise Burgess Denise Burgess: It is very simple I completely understand, If you bear with me for a moment, I will check… 

Neelu Berry to Station officer: Do you have anybody more senior? This is Detective Sergeant Denise Burgess, do you have anybody more senior to this lady?

Robert Amoakoh: No. You can call anyone, but then what we are saying is the same thing that anyone is going to say 

Neelu Berry: What is your name please? 

Robert Amoakoh: I will give you my name.  What you want is proof that we have got it. 

Neelu Berry: Yes yes. This is a Metropolitan Police Station 

Robert Amoakoh: This is a Metropolitan Police Station

Neelu Berry: At Walworth Road 

Robert Amoakoh: Walworth Road.  Yes What you should have done actually is to go there, to go to your borough and give it there.  If you are giving it in a police station, all we can do is put it in a transit envelope, address it to the officer who is dealing with it, that is how we do it 

Paddy: It is a royal commission case it is way above that 

Neelu Berry: Sorry what was your name? 

Robert Amoakoh: My name is Robert Amoakoh.  As soon as you mention my name, as you were able to find the other person [Betsy Davey], 

N: Who is above you?  

Robert Amoakoh: Who is above you? I have a DS Denise Burgess: 

DS Denise Burgess: I am not going to sign that 

Paddy: That is a refusal 

DS Denise Burgess: That is a refusal.  For me, that is not an official document 

Paddy: What has it to be an official document?  

DS Denise Burgess: Something that we actually understand as an actual official document. What I will say is that this case is about a previous case that you have already had dealt with in court, the only person who will know in relation to that case is the officer in charge of that case. I can tell you that is and what police station they are from and that will be the person I will send that to. So if you wanted to take the copies and speak to the officer in the case about this 

Neelu Berry: Sorry I do not accept your decision, I would like to speak to his sergeant 

DS Denise Burgess: Whose Sergeant? 

Neelu Berry: Mr Robert Amoakoh’s 

DS Denise Burgess: I am the duty Sergeant here 

Neelu Berry: Who is above you? 

DS Denise Burgess: Inspector 

Neelu Berry: I need to speak to the inspector 

Paddy: See that there, Royal commission

DS Denise Burgess: I can put you through to the inspector. He will just tell you the same thing again 

Neelu Berry: That is fine, we can wait for him thank you 

AUDIO 2

After 10 minutes, a man wearing a badge “Inspector James Pyemont 220563” appeared in the side cubicle.  He asked Neelu to explain the background to the case, which she did.  He then asked her for her date of birth to do a report about her Mental Health, to which refused, denied and exited.

Neelu Berry: I just need to know whether you are refusing to take the documents

today, or are you going to take it and give us a receipt

Man wearing a Badge Pyemont:: I would like to find out a bit more about this court case

Neelu Berry: Why would you do that?  You know you don’t need to do that!  I take that as a refusal

Man wearing a Badge Pyemont:: From what you are telling me, you are making very serious allegations

Paddy:  you are taking away from the subject, this is very simple, it is not hard to understand, right, you stamp the documents, you sign the documents, take a copy of one document , if you don’t do that it is a refusal,

Man wearing a Badge Pyemont:: I am going to do a report, can I have your date of birth

Neelu Berry: Its not a service I require from you, are you on your oath?

Man wearing a Badge Pyemont:: So I’m going to put a report on, I am actually quite concerned about your mental health

Neelu Berry: No you are not, about my mental health?

Man wearing a Badge Pyemont:: Thats why I have a duty of care as an officer, as all officers do

Neelu Berry: It is not a service I require of you thank you very much

Man wearing a Badge Pyemont:: I understand that OK”

——————————————-

Property Recovery report by Neelu Berry

Thursday 18th of August 2016 

On 11 August 2016, Neelu was threatened with Sectioning under the Mental Health Act by a man wearing a necklace badge “Pyemont” which belongs to a female Inspector Pyemont, after he was told that the officer in the Case, PC Betsy Davey, of Camden Borough, had failed to return property after an acquittal and his junior officer DS Denise Burgess had accessed the Police Computer records that there were no trials held in any court in Crown V Berry.

A phone call made to the Kentish Town Property Store 0208 733 6088 ascertained that PC Betsy Davey has no intention of returning the property after 3 arranged collections were foiled under various unreasonable excuses

1. Items could not be delivered to my local Police Station according to Kentish Town Property Store – but this is not true because they do not have the items to make decisions

2. PC Davey was on a training course week commencing 8th August – but she could have sent an email just as she sent the email on 11th August authorising collection

3. Major Summer overhaul (Refurbishment) at Kentish according to PC Betsy Davey is actually a “cupboard in various locations in the borough” according to Shanti Makkar and “a cupboard needing the items to be added” according to Ivan Larkins.

4. These actions are not of PC Davey – when she was asked on 18th July 2016 at 12.30pm in the presence of my barrister in the doorway of courtroom  if she could arrange the items to local Police station at Barkingside, she said “I can’t see that being a problem”.  There is no objection by the Kentish Town either because they do not have the property.  So the decision makers are either Davey’s boss Sergeant Anwen Gardner or his boss Inspector Howard Hornby.

END OF REPORT

Property Recovery report by Neelu Berry 

Wednesday 17th of August 2016 

I dialled 101 and asked to be put to at the Kentish Town property store for Camden borough 0208 733 6088.  I provided custody reference numbers 01EO1704/2015, 01EO2077/2015, 01EO2185/2015 to Shanki Makkar for the collection of my property. I was informed  that the property was not at the Kentish Town property store, and it was not logged in on the system, she did not know what it was, that there was a date when it was removed but the officer was unwilling to give me the date.  She put me through to her senior manager Mr Ivan Larkins who confirmed that he had been in touch with the officer in the case PC Betsy Davey, yesterday, that the items had been removed for the court case, and were most probably in a cupboard at a location only known to PC Davey so it could be collected once officer PC Betsy Davey logged it in.  He confirmed there was no refurbishment or major overhaul at the property store, and it was just a cupboard that needed sorting out.

The emails below from PC Betsy Davey are misleading that she was “unable to withdraw the items” – because of a major refurbishment overhaul for the next 2 weeks.

END OF REPORT

Property Recovery report by Neelu Berry 

Tuesday 16 August 2016

Betsy Davey now says the Kentish Town Property Store for Camden Borough is having a Total summer overhaul (refurbishment) and she cannot access my property.  I wonder if this is significant because we know from the property store that my property is not there???

Even so, the Major Crime Unit had many other officers, Rachel Head, Gordon, Jennifer Black, Sergeant Anwen Gardner above PC Davey who could have dealt with property recovery…last week…when Davey said on 11 August 2016 that she was on a training course…

My phone calls to the property store at Kentish Town on Sunday 7th August and Monday 8th to pick it up at 12pm on 8th August failed because my property was not logged into the property store – The most probable location is a secret location only known to Inspector Hornby or PC Davey’s boss, “Sergeant Anwen Gardner” who were most likely behind my kidnappings without warrants o steal my research material.

END OF REPORT

On 16 August 2016 13:32, PC Betsy Davey wrote to Neelu’s lawyer
Re: BERRY property issue

“Unfortunately, I went to pick up BERRY’s property today for tomorrow and our property store, who are in charge of all the boroughs property, is under a massive summer overhaul. Therefore at this time I was unable to withdraw her items.

They are in the store and I will endeavour to book them out to her as soon as possible, however I will not be able to have them for tomorrow.

I’m sorry to mess her around it was not my intention and this is beyond my control.

The re-sort is going to take two weeks so I can book a slot for BERRY to pick them up at Holborn Wed 31st at 12pm?

My sincere apologies and thanks.”

On 11/08/2016, Neelu’s lawyer wrote:

Dear Neelu

PC Davey has advised that she has training this week so the earliest she can

have it available is on Wednesday 17th 1500hrs at Holborn. Is that OK?

Please let me know so I can confirm with her.

Thanks

On 11 August 2016 at 21:52, Neelu responded

Subject: Re: Property

To: lawyer

Yes that is fine, confirmed

On 4 August 2016 at 15:11

Subject: Re: Return of property Neelu Berry

Neelu’s lawyer sent her a message 

“The following message is from PC Betsy Davey 

“In regards to Ms BERRYs property, I have checked with our property store and we are unfortunately unable to despatch property from one police station to another off borough.

Therefore BERRY will need to attend either Kentish Town or Holborn police station, whichever suits her more to collect this.

Let me know in good time and I will arrange its release”

NEELU EMAILED HER LAWYER ON 4TH AUGUST 2016 WHO FORWARDED TO PC DAVEY TO ARRANGE TO COLLECT THE ITEMS FROM HOLBORN POLICE STATION AT 12PM ON MONDAY 8TH AUGUST 2016 – this could not take place because  PC Davey IGNORED it until 11 August making out she was on a training course

On 4 August 2016 at 18:03 Neelu wrote to her lawyers to arrange to pick up the items on Monday 8th August between 12-2pm

Subject: Re: Return of property Neelu Berry

To: Neelu’s lawyer

“Monday midday to 2pm from Holborn Police Station please”

On 01 August 2016 20:16:39, Neelu wrote to her lawyers and barrister

Subject: Ref: Return of property Neelu Berry

“Please could you assist in the Police delivery of my property to Barkingside Police Station in Essex,

Address1 High St, Barkingside, Ilford IG6 1QB

Phone020 7230 1212 

I have not received the travel expenses from the lower or crown court 

1. Apple Mac Book Pro 2012 with CD drive 500mb

registered to Mr Amrit Berry with black keyboard

2. Apple Minimac server 1TB, without CD drive

3. All silver Mac Book pro 2008 

4. Nikon Camera L28 red

5. Nikon Camera L28 silver

6 Nikon Camera Black

7. Samsung Tablet Q1

8 Dell Inspiron 3000 silver & Black

9. Dell 6000 

10. Nikon mobile phone

chargers, 

The material on the equipment is research material to stop crimes against babies and children in the public interests of a value of £10,000,000 which I demand with interest at the rate of 8% since in police in an insurance clain under the public liability insurance bond against the Metropolitan Police, Home Office, UK Prime Minister and the Crown. 

[ends]

THE BACKGROUND: THE HAMPSTEAD SATANIC RITUAL ABUSE CASE

Hampstead Case Updates -Crown V Berry & McNeill 11 Aug 2016

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

MAURICE KIRK: REPORTING VERY SERIOUS IRREGULARITIES IN S WALES COURTS 6SEPT16 + Archive

 

New post on Flying Vet challenges South Wales Police

Taunton’s MP Ms Rebecca Pow Told of State of Current Welsh Law Courts

by mauricekirky

Ms Rebecca Pow,
MP for the Vale of Taunton, Somerset.
2th September 2016

Dear Ms Pow,

HMC&TS Malfeasance
I have recently moved back to the West Country where I was born, educated, worked and incidentally, married at your own local church in Stoke St Mary.
My purpose was, primarily, to restore my failing health due to being unable to obtain proper medical services in South Wales owing to the intransigence amongst a string of NHS (Wales) doctors. Each refused to stand-up to either Chief Forensic Psychiatrist for Wales, a Dr Tegwyn Williams, now sacked, but a Professor Rodger Wood of Swansea University due to his fabricated medical records.
They had been requested by a Barbara Wilding, the then Chief Constable of the South Wales Constabulary, following legal advice from Dolmans, solicitors, that her own fabricated soon to be heard ‘machine -gun trial, carrying in itself a minimum ten prison sentence, for me, was doomed and I needed, instead, to be incarcerated, indefinitely, in a high security psychiatric hospital in order for her to avoid the ongoing civil litigation from affecting her final pension.
Cardiff Court staff first fabricated evidence, as long ago as 2002, in that I was a potential ‘vexatious litigant’ and therefore the needing for HM Court & Tribunal Service (Wales) to send many, if not all, of my court files to HM Solicitor-General’s office in Whitehall for registration. The files primarily concerned my local civil and criminal litigation in the Welsh courts involving my suing the police for incessant bullying. This regime of theirs has led to the loss of many files being lost, some believe on purpose, in order to further frustrate and delay my right of ‘remedy’ through our UK courts of law.
I have also returned to Taunton to retrieve my ‘general state of mind’ in an environment more conducive to my up-bringing and life style and to finally get away from the twenty-four years of South Wales Police persecution following their apparent immunity to any form accountability as the result of their considerable fabricated prosecution evidence concocted over the years.
However, my need to contact my local Member of Parliament is for a more serious a reason in that I am now in possession of considerable evidence of wide spread malfeasance within the Cardiff’s judiciary which has implicated both the Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons, in the past and continues to have a such serious impact on my family wherever I or they should be.
HMC&TS (Wales) have ‘lost’:
1. Numerous Cardiff County Court files, court exhibits and court logs or refuse to disclose

2. numerous Cardiff Crown Court files with some also confiscated by the South Wales police

3. numerous Cardiff Magistrate’s court clerks’ contemporaneous notes, records of evidence, court exhibits, pages from the official court logs and the documentary evidence of both Crown Prosecution Service and Geoamey Custodial Services’ applications to confirm that would also confirm my never having received a ‘restraining order’ in the court cells of the Magistrates courts on 1st December 2011.

4. The latest, my reason for writing to you as it really is the ‘last straw’, is that the Cardiff County Court clerk is ‘unable’ to supply me with a copy of a purported October 2015 250 odd page ‘handed-down’ judgment, involving all the above nefarious activities and much, much more, besides, that had been, purportedly, emailed to me in order for me to immediately appeal its content.

5. As with the Magistrates public records needing to be disclosed, that will, alone, overturn well over three years of my prison sentences, likewise, the immediate disclosure of County Court logs, recovery of its exhibits and my police custody records will allow my being able to practice veterinary surgery once again as the truth will finally be revealed over ridiculous criminal convictions and fairy tale that two dogs had ever fallen over a cliff in the first place.

6. I seek an appointment, please, in order for that you may be made further aware, with Brexit now being a serious possibility and neither lawyers nor HM court staff any longer needing to be accountable for their actions.

7. This has partly come about due to politicians’ lawyers’ abusive 1989 Human Rights Act by someone, we know, deliberately having omitted both Articles 1 and 13 of what was original drafted to avoid ‘remedy’ for someone like myself.

Yours sincerely

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

Maurice@kirkflyingvet.com
Tel. 07708586202

source: https://mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com/2016/09/06/tauntons-mp-ms-rebecca-pow-told-of-state-of-current-welsh-law-courts/

 

MAURICE KIRK’S SISTER CELIA’S RADIO INTERVIEW

 September 2014       

    video: “Rough Justice: South Wales Police persecute former vet & pilot Maurice Kirk who’s suing them”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c3tg6pDdR8&feature=youtu.be

PublicEnquiry from  PublicEnquiry on youtube

 MAURICE KIRK v S WALES POLICE: POSITION STATEMENT 26 AUG. 16 + APP. TO ADJOURN – 26AUG16 

1] Claimant Position Statement – BS614159 +2 / 7CF07345 Kirk v Chief Constable of South Wales Police 26 Aug. 16

1. The Claimant has failed to locate any evidence of a ‘sealed’ judgment of 26th October2015, for the first three actions or one purported to have been sent to him on the 26th October 2015 by email as stated in conversation with court clerk.

2, Repeated requests for copy of same have not been successful as with release of purported court copy of police corrected version returned before judgment handed down

3. Two visits and the last by post to RCJ Court of Appeal office, to tender an appeal with a printed ‘judgment’ and fee, has been refused, each time, as not sealed.

4. The Claimant continues to be refused sight of the court log or obtain copy of it

5. The Claimant continues to have identified some of his considerable number of prosecution exhibits served on both Defendant and court.

6. 1st Action para 8.6,the Grand Avenue Ely ‘garrotte’ incident , in which a dozen breaches in PACE 1984 were committed, with his preliminary appeal submission focused on that incident, from thirty three similar. so far cited of incessant police bullying, there now appears irregularity jeopardising the Claimant;s right to appeal

7.1st Action para 8. Claimant’s copy of his police interview without even a caution, when police switched to the indictable allegation as he was ‘identifiable’, has been seized by the court and refused it be investigated by an outside police force.

8. 7CF07345 2916 amended particulars of claim, served on the court by another, is being withheld from the claimant despite requests from both donor and court to release.

9. The 7CF07345 October 2007 Claimant’s Particulars of Claim contained numerous police incidents that required the nefarious assistance of a few Cardiff court staff and CPS (Wales) lawyers to obtain those key criminal convictions, within the first four of some ten Actions time period, to cause the Claimant’s name from being removed from the veterinary register.

10, Neither the donor nor the court will furnish the Claimant with a copy of that purported 8th august 2016 varied submission, referred to in para 4 of His Honour’s August 2016 note.

11. The Claimant is therefore unable to include into the amended particulars, already with the court, those specific incidents identifying Cardiff ‘court officers’ repeatedly being omitted by any fellow Cardiff ‘court officer’ approached for the task, during this last decade, for fear of his or her job and rightly so.

12. Hence the need for more and more litigants in person, so often against their wishes, hampering the running of our completely outdated British law courts driven by avarice.

13. Therefore a further seven days is needed for this Claimant to draft the amended version so granted by the honourable court.

13. Incidents excluded by Claimant’s proposed representatives include:

I) Court official, ex police officer, causing a suspect fracture of the Claimant’s leg when pushed down the court steps whilst on his crutches because he was seeking public records

ii) Court official, CPS prosecutor Jackie Seal, aware but misleading the Barry lay magistrates that the three versions of Claimant’s alleged ‘Breach of the Peace’. incident, at the Vale of Glamorgan Show, drafted under the control of then Barry custody sergeant, Andrew Rice, while refusing the Claimant bail, then had switched the allegation to one of ‘common assault.

The BOP allegation, was only dropped for fear the claimant may go to prison (see court records on Claimant’s old web site) All this conduct was opposed by the CPS barrister, Ieun Rees, when made aware of the full facts but told to ‘shut up’.

11)Jackie Seal, when fully aware that retired police inspector Howard Davies, had ‘struck the first blow at the Show and again had attacked the Claimant, with force, in the police witness room in Cardiff Crown Court before numerous uniformed police officers, then went into the witness box before HHJ Nicholas Gaskill QC and despite his rebuke at her refused to clarify the mistakes of the lower court and wicked conduct of then Sergeant Andrew Rice who has so heavily featured in all four Actions.

12) The Claimant has record that Ms Seal and many other Cardiff Court officials later, all immune to criminal proceedings by HM Partnership, then went on and committed perjury over the incident leading to the Claimant having his name removed from the veterinary register

13) Over the past twenty three years of this Claimant requesting both relevant public court and police records, of relevant data to allow both a fair trial and have his name restored to the veterinary register, he has been refused. [ends]

ATTATCHMENT:

1] BS614159 +2 re Quantum damages and why all 10 Actions should be assessed together 

16 08 25 Claimant’s submissions re Quantum BS614159 etc

2] Application to adjurn 7 days enclosed 7CF07345 – 26 Aug. 16

“FAO

Cardiff County Court                                        case 7CF07345
am 26th August 2016 
Dear Sir/Madam,
The Claimant’s carhas malfunctioned see facebook and unable to find office faculties in the time, elsewhere to print , scan and fax to court my to days dated N244 form for adjournment.
The Claimant has  had no response from anyone from his email to all parties being the preliminary grounds for adjournment (subject to having to return to the UK to obtain copy) re difficulties in obtaining the document last served by another being amended by 4pm  served  and paid for.
The Claimant attempts to pay court fee in a few minutes over the telephone on court’s receipt of enclosed photos of my application as internet on HMCS web site will not allow the form being filled in on line as usually is the way.
The Claimant apologises
ATTATCHMENT:
Claimant Witness Statement of Truth   26th August 2016
……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….

Criminal Cases Review Commission Refusal to Disclose Magistrates Records

by mauricekirky 16 Aug. 2016

DRAFT just for starters

Claimant Position Statement BS614159 etc &
7CF07345 (4th Action)/C90CF012 (parole board)/1CF03361 (machine-gun) etc, etc.

1. 7th August 2015 FOI application to disclose the above is refused by the CCRC

2. Sept15 HM Crown Prosecution letter, under FOI, reveals it is also refusing to disclose above

3. CCRC continue to refuse to reply to their victim’s letters for same

4. CCRC state, as full disclosure of 1st 2011 Cardiff magistrates ‘Harassment’ conviction despite devoid of:

I) clerk of the court’s contemporaneous notes

II) any copy of either CPS or Defendant applications

III) any copy of any court exhibits of which this case is pivotal

IV) the court log

V) nor how, by whom, when or where the subsequent ‘restraining order’, re South Wales Police/Dr Tegwyn Williams fabricated psychiatric reports, was served on their victim knowing, full well, no such service ever took place.

5. His Honour Judge Seys Llewelyn QC continues to refuse to disclose Cardiff court public/Claimant lodged records despite having adjudicated over the similar withholding of South Wales Police MAPPA 3/3 fabricated records to incarcerate their victim, indefinitely.

6. No lawyer can be found in the UK to even draught a Judicial Review Application against the CCRC or even obtain copy of the above public records from Bristol HM Crown Prosecution Service. It had admitted this in Bristol Crown Court of having them during their victim’s re located appeal for having arrested the original 1st December 2011 corrupt prosecutor, barrister David Gareth Davies of Park Place Chamber, Cardiff as he had repeatedly lied the original public gallery and subsequent 4th May 2012 Cardiff Crown Court jury whilst fully protected by His Honour Judge John Curran presiding.
Their cosy relationship, all based on greed, is now guarrenteed longevity should Brexit succeed.

Maurice J Kirk BVSc
16th August 2016

MAURICE KIRK v the Chief Constable of S. Wales: POSITION STATEMENT 11 Aug. 16

Maurice Kirk    -v-     The Chief Constable of South Wales Constabulary

         Claimant’s 11th August 2016   Position Statement

 

                                                                                                                                           BS614159

                                                                                                                                            CF101741

                                                                                                                                            CF204141

                                                                                                                                            7CF07345

                                                                                                                                            1CF03361

                                                                                                                                             C90CF012

                                                                                                                                             T20097445

                                                                                                                                             A20110290

                                                                                                                                            2012/3241/D2

                                                                                                                                            A2014008

                                                                                                                                            T20130801

                                                                                                                                             T20131144

                                                                                                                                            A20140005

                                                                                                                                            A20130139

                                                                                                                                            8CF02269

                                                                                                                                            62EA0223612

                                                                                                                                            3CF01374

                                                                                                                                     62EA0223612/JDB

                                                                                                                                            C70CF041

                                                                              & outstanding CCRC Judicial Review Applications

 Some Reasons for an Adjournment Application for the 12th August 2016 Hearing 

  1. Cardiff courts’ refusals to disclose to the Claimant corrected and/or sealed judgments as requested by the Court of Appeal in its 1st June 2016 letter and on 1st December 2011, from the court cells, whilst being assaulted by at least four Geoamey Custody Services gaolers.

     

  2. Cardiff courts’ refusal to allow the Claimant’s attendances, no less than seven times, during the duration of these particular three Actions when held in custody within their jurisdiction.

     

  3. The Cardiff courts’ refusal to disclose to the Claimant the court logs, clerk of the court’s notes, his court exhibits, his lodged files, original custody interview tapes and copy ofcontent remaining within its red ‘moth-eaten’ court file marked, ‘Maurice John Kirk – ‘Potential Vexatious Litigant’, following its return or not from the HM Solicitor General’s Office.

     

  4. None of the Claimant’s Mackenzie’s Friends, of which there are many, can comprehend, without further clarification of the wording within the purported 26th October 2015 judgment, as to whether the extreme conduct of the Defendant in recent decades, simply to prejudice his position, is to be under the judge’s consideration under CPR rule 44.

     

  5. The Cardiff court’s failure to lift its six year stay on the ‘Lewis Machine Gun’ no 1CF03361 case, Parole Board’s fabricated Defendant no. C90CF012 and most importantly, the Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams/MAPPA 3/3 similar Defendant concocted cases deliberately buried.

     

  6. The Claimant’s 8th June 2016 Position Statement states that for any costs to be awarded, either way, cannot be fairly concluded without the above cases having been concluded.

     

  7. Despite fifteen years or so of the Claimant’s repeated asking for the Defendant’s break-down of costs incurred, to date, in order to assess in the eyes of any future tribunal the most efficient and economical way forward, he always been refused.

This list is far from being exhaustive

Maurice J Kirk BVSc

11th August 2016

SHOCKING!!: MAURICE KIRK: “Criminal Case Review Commission Depravity” 26 July 16

Criminal Case Review Commission Depravity

by mauricekirky

I had to arrest the Crown Prosecution Barrister, David Gareth Evans, in Cardiff ‘s court in order to prove the conspiracy between certain Cardiff judges, CPS and various other inherently deceitful HM Court Service spineless Welsh sheeple.

I was reliant, before I arrested a prison officer and prosecutor, on the CCRC obtaining the court records neither my 4th May 2012 Cardiff Crown Court jury nor myself had asked refused by thoroughly corrupt His Honour Judge Curran.

It has taken five years, so far,only to find the CCRC have deliberately withheld the evidence in magistrate’s clerk’s notes that confirm no ‘restraining order’ was ever served on me in the first place, on the 1st December 2011, in the magistrate’s cells.

Far more to the point the Geoamey Custody Services and South Wales Police both ordered by the Cardiff Cabal to try and DEPOSIT A COPY IN MY POCKET as I was being dragged across the floor towards a police cell and my wheel chair.

No less than fourteen Cardiff judges, to date, have so far conspired to try and cover-up the years of false imprisonment this travesty of justice it has caused.

Criminal discrimination it would appear.

Now the police have been into the Crown Court and confiscated the court exhibits and one which the prosecutor had tried to introduce, mid trial, before another very corrupt spineless man, District Judge John Charles, all quietly tape recorded from the public gallery while he convicted me in my absence. I had been refused the right to cross examine the police or Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams, the chief forensic psychiatrist for the whole of Wales, so I saw little point in leaving my cell.

Stupid Charles had been ordered not just to allow me to cross examine the police but to hand down the maximum sentence to affect my civil damages claims, for countless malicious South Wales Police prosecutions.

The idiot panicked when he saw Sabine and a huge number of other Mackenzie Friends in the public gallery, bused in from all over the UK. Luigi filth Stranati, area court supervisor, was watched while he pathetically barred more entering the court until he had to remove the court chairs as an excuse.

I warn you, if Brexit is not overturned, this will be routine stuff soon in English and Northern Ireland courts.

This had also meant the ‘restraining order had not even been typed-up when I was was ‘released’ at lunch time—-all recorded in public records the CCRC have now deliberately assisted in having shredded.

I was not falling for their disgusting routine and therefore refused to leave my cell for four hours until they told me the outcome of the case and I was served the papers. I never was, of course, only to be dragged out by five Geoamey staff as confirmed in my custody records in the Musa Nigerian Children ‘snatched’ by Haringey Council case in a London court after a night in a police call.

In a police cell for ‘failing to attend’ the court two days earlier when Cardiff prison were ordered not to allow my transfer to London.

All good Enid Byton stuff!

16 06 12 CCRC Failed Discl

16 07 20 CCRC Admissions Letter.jpg

12 05 04 Judge Ignored Jury Noteswitched WANTED014

This REWARD is still outstanding

I will now  be looking for a Christchurch based lawyer, in New Zealand, to press for criminal charges of the conspiracy against the blackmailed doctor, just one of the numerous judges, for starters and  the past and present Chief Constables of South Wales, United Kingdom and not forgetting the one who watched the plan for the ‘gravy train, Adrian Oliver of Dolmans, solicitors.

Wilding Wanted

 source:  https://mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com/2016/07/26/criminal-case-review-commission-depravity/

Shyster South Wales Police

by mauricekirky 22 July 16

The US President will still not let me in the country, to visit Oshkosh Air Show to give one of my talks, as South Wales Police have registered me MAPPA 3/3 as one of the top 5% most dangerous in the UK. The FAA have confirmed I did nothing wrong in attempting to visit President Bush by cub.

Currently in Cardiff County Court, for 8th August hearing, much scheming will be witnessed by those who have accurately followed my track record where nefarious plots of the South Wales Police are concerned.

I have been persuaded, this time, to re draft my 6th Action, the ‘machine-gun/NHS (Wales)/Dr Tegwyn Williams damages claim against the local police and have it all consolidated with a much shortened 4th Action originally containing over 40 odd further examples of police bullying.

Attention span problems seem to be within all parties, now, after 23 years of this scandalous perverse litigation while Dolmans are promised their millions, in any event, which is why these similar shysters will never negotiate as my original 1994 Bristol solicitors said they must do.

Bobbetts Mackan, of Berkely Square, also took many a few thousand pounds off me when always promising me, as did His Honour Judge Nicholas Chambers QC, a jury for without the inherent deceit around may dominate.

The jury decision would settle the 4th Action and no doubt, the next six Actions now awaiting consolidation in the High Court.

In the High Court, of course, iswhere it should all of bloody well gone to in the first place but the royal courts of Justice refuse owing to my previous 60 odd Judicial Review Applications there.

Ah, Ah, but no that cannot happen, the lawyers say or none of our fellow scavengers, clinging to our quite out-dated UK judicial system, their ‘gravy train’, cannot make any quick dishonest money out of the chance.

With Brexit looming then things in the judiciary here will only get worse as lawyers and court officials , here in the UK, no longer have effective disciplinary systems to bring them to account.

Come along on the 8th August, with your ice-lolly and pop-corn, and see the deals that have been done, behind closed doors, to have my actions ‘struck out’ on the usual spurious reasons and listen to how the Cardiff police oh, so mysteriously, have just found my 1993 custody interview tape.

It contains the fact I was not even cautioned for ‘being in possession of an offensive weapon’ on HRH The Prince of Wales’ farm in the Vale of Glamorgan found armed with a ‘garrotte like instrument’ meant I was for immediate custody back to Guernsey to face an overdue parking fine or was it another prosecution for daring to house an Englishman in my home.

(that first case soon got knocked on the head by attending appropriately addressed)

HRH Prince Charles

HM Privy Council

Maurice protests up a crane

nazi-loose-in-guernsey

Welsh Restraining Order Myth

by mauricekirky 17 July 16

The Welsh Restraining Order Myth

Back in 2000 I wished to find a way in enlightening so many of my client’s following my horror to what I had to listen to, so often, whilst consulting in my Barry Veterinary Hospital and Cardiff surgeries. It became abundantly clear that the vast majority of the general public, at least here in South Wales, had little clue as to ‘what really goes on in our law courts’. It’s NOT just in Wales but also right across England.

My researches that followed my being forced to attend numerous police cells and local law courts, around Cardiff, that matters of public importance, the very reason for statute law, was rarely being reported properly, if at all, in the local media. I thought I was right back working in a tax haven, like Guernsey of all places or some equally barbaric state practising Sharia law!

I have now spent nearly three years of my life in the Welsh prisons following the fabricated construction of a ‘restraining order’ that never served on me or known to me in the first place.

This was deliberate in order to guarantee the restraining order would be broken. Once I found out about it in Cardiff prison too late, of course, I was repeatedly refused a hearing to have the ridiculous terms within it ‘varied’ as was my right in law.

By shear chance, in 2014, a then ‘Mackenzie Friend’ passing by, over heard the previous trial judge, who had just gaoled me for 16 months, quash the restraining order giving no reason having only then becoming aware there was a member of public in their midst. Judge Rowland and ten previous judges damned well knew the reason but no one will tell me about it having anticipated the repercussions.

Also the prison was never told, of course, to immediately release me, on the contrary, the prison governor was ordered by the court to double my sentence without even my right of public adjudication. The prison was never told, of course, because a chance accident in the A Wing shower block, caused a brain scan needing to be carried out that could not be air-brushed out of the records as before.

The prosecuting barrister’s complaint was that I continue publishing the evidence [see WANTED poster attached], namely the truth behind the Machine-gun/MAPPA/Dr Tegwyn Williams/South Wales Police conspiracy to pervert the course of justice.

Incidentally, whilst in Cardiff prison I was never told, either, I was registered amongst the top 5% most dangerous in our UK community, I had a suspected brain tumour and ‘significant brain damage’. Upon release no Welsh GP would support my having a follow-up brain scan, once I found as, no doubt, they all knew it had all been a police hoax in the first place against an Englishman publishing the obvious.

BUT when it came to my urgently needing a hip replacement I could find an NHS (Wales) anaesthetist prepared to assist in the operation leading to my being banned from numerous medical practices when I pursued the possible alternatives. Nine months later I had to eventually, whilst on crutches and morphine sulphate, travel to France to have the operation quickly done at my own expense.

Since the South Wales Police conspiracy, to issue my restraining order, was first concocted by Barbara Wilding, as Chief Constable in 2008, the Welsh authorities have repeatedly had me detained under the 1983 Mental Health Act only then fail following independent second opinions including that from two Civil Aviation psychiatrists. I was once even detained in France, using these fabricated Welsh medical records, with the hope it would stop, once and for all, my ongoing civil damages claim against the current Chief Constable, Mr Vaughan.

Over twenty psychiatrists, so far, have contradicted the medical reports by both Professor Rodger Wood, of Swansea University and Wales’ chief forensic psychiatrist, Dr Tegwyn Mel Williams fabricated for that 2009 Cardiff Crown Court application, in my absence, that I be incarcerated in Ashworth high security psychiatric hospital indefinitely.

The Welsh authorities are determined not to allow the general public becoming aware of the scale of corruption within their judiciary and power of their misused restraining orders.  Their use of the ‘Gulag card’, on their victim, is only the next card played after a victim’s ‘restraining order’ should it fail in shutting him or her up from exposing the truth. Is it the same in England I often wonder?

Anyone wishing to challenge my web site data or need information on what and why restraining orders are used and abused so much, here in Wales, then please ring on 07708586202 or email me on maurice@kirkflyingvet.com

14 03 14 CR Crt App Refusal

Are you starting to appreciate the lengths to which the Welsh Authorities have been prepared to go to cover-up the widespread corruption in Cardiff’s courts, HMC&TS and prison to now be affecting the Criminal Cases Review Commission, Independent Police Complaints Commission, Information Commissioner  and newspapers?

All emanating from the ‘shoot to kill’ Barbara Wilding

11 06 10 Barbara Wilding WANTED

above: Retired Chief Constable

14 11 25 CPS FOI Result

All originating from this Wanted poster

Dr Tegwyn Williams WANTED poster

  

Austin Psych

  
mauricekirky | July 17, 2016 at 10:48 am | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/p13xk8-Y4

MAURICE KIRK: SHOCKING POLICE/JUDICIAL CORRUPTION: “ANOTHER S WALES POLICE CONSPIRACY GOES SERIOUSLY WRONG” 4 July 16

 

 Another South Wales Police Conspiracy Goes Seriously Wrong

by mauricekirky 4 July 16

Ten Cardiff Crown Court Judges Accused  of Culpable Negligence

In order for the MAPPA conspiracy to succeed senior police officers relied on the co-operation from those that controlled the few avenues of redress available to their victims.

This meant that ‘HM Partnership’, consisting of many in the ‘funny hand shake’ brigade of devil worshippers in our courts of Wales and HM prisons, could so easily shuffle the respective court papers of their incarcerated victim whilst denying him legal representation, access to court, his legal papers or access to helpers even via telephone.

Photos, names and home addresses of culprits will be published on website  world wide.

Archive continues at:https://butlincat.wordpress.com/2016/07/05/maurice-kirk-another-s-wales-police-conspiracy-goes-seriously-wrong-4-july-16-archive/

>> MAURICE KIRK’S site is: https://mauricejohnkirk.wordpress.com

FAIR USE NOTICE: This item may contain copyrighted (© ) material. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues. This constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed for analysis, commentary, educational and intellectual purposes. In some cases comedy and parody have been recognized as fair use.
 Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. For more information please visit:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/17/107

NB: Everything posted on this site conforms to the meaning of the word “alleged” as defined under UK and US Laws and Statutes regarding this site’s publication of data.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Shocking!: SUSSEX POLICE: STOP FINING THE HOMELESS FOR BEING HOMELESS!! 4SEPT16 + BOURNEMOUTH HOMELESS TARGETED – WITH BAGPIPE MUSIC??

Sussex Police: NO to arresting and fining rough sleepers!

SIGN THE PETITION: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/en-gb/takeaction/576/913/589/

35,033 SUPPORTERS in United Kingdom

 60,742 SUPPORTERS

65,000 GOAL

 Sussex Police has been using plain clothes police officers to arrest homeless people who are then fined for begging. This approach does nothing to alleviate homelessness, instead creating a cycle of punishment and further poverty. Please sign this petition to ask the Sussex police stop arresting rough sleepers and having them fined for non-aggressive begging.

Ray Pape, a defence lawyer who works with homeless people, has seen a rise in the number of clients prosecuted for begging. 

He said: It is difficult to see why it is in the public interest … I am not talking about aggressive begging or harassment but situations where people have asked for a few pence … Is this a good use of public money?”


Many of the rough sleepers who risk begging are particularly vulnerable and desperate. Some are struggling with addiction, a problem which requires understanding and support. Arrests and unaffordable fines are not a compassionate or effective response.

Please sign this petition and demand that Sussex Police stop arresting rough sleepers. It’s time to stop the cycle of poverty and fines, and find more appropriate ways to respond to the issues facing local homeless people.

 Update #13 months ago

Thanks so much for the signatures, shares and thoughtful comments. After a great community demo in Brighton to highlight the needs of rough sleepers, the petition was delivered both in person at the town hall, and electronically. It will be taken into consideration as part of the current Rough Sleepers Strategy consultation. It has also been sent to the newly appointed Police and Crime Commissioner. You can still sign, share and comment until we get this unfair practice overturned.

Sign Petition

60,742 supporters

Local CommentsLocal SignaturesAll

Laurel F.

United Kingdom

just now

Please find a way of working compassionately in partnership with these people and other agencies to find longtetm solutions.

send

Robin P.

United Kingdom

just now

How can fining people who have no money and no home be a solution to begging? Of course it’s a problem and a real issue. One that needs to be addressed in a humane and compassionate way. But for the Grace of God it could be any one of us in that situation …

send

Suella P.

United Kingdom

just now

We don’t sleep rough from choice. Support not persecute.

send

name not displayed

United Kingdom

a minute ago

Disgusting!…..leave them alone and go and solve proper crimes and attend burglaries etc! Stop picking on the weak and vulnerable like the big bullies you all are! Go and help them….give your figures to the shitty government so they can find homes for them instead of all the rubbish coming into this country!

Gordon W.

United Kingdom

just now

Go and chase some real criminals you idiots

send

Juanita S.

United Kingdom

a minute ago

Leave them alone, or rehouse them. They aren’t migrants. Most are born in UK.

send

Emily A.

United Kingdom

a minute ago

How is punishing poverty with poverty ethical in any way? These people are trying to self help to improve their status. To deny them of this right is utterly selfish. Unless the community In which they are begging in is doing something to aid and get them off the streets, then they have every right to try help themselves if the people will not.

send

Jane P.

United Kingdom

a minute ago

Find a better way to help rough sleepers. They are not doing this by choice. Help and support not punishment.

send

Anne W.

United Kingdom

a minute ago

i used to work (medic) with homeless people – and ‘arrest and fine’ does NOTHING to help this problem and can only further perpetuate homelessness and poverty

send

CARMEN R.

United Kingdom

a minute ago

For goodness sake! Sussex Police, HAVE A HEART! These people are not willingly making themselves homeless! With zero contract hours more and more people who don’t have children of school age are ending up on the streets. WHY ARE YOU PUNISHING THEM! This is an unacceptable policy – DO YOU WANT PEOPLE TO CONSIDER WE ARE LIVING IN A POLICE STATE, which has happened in USA, you really want it in UK as well? Please re-think and put charity before political pressure. Thank you!

send

Paula T.

United Kingdom

a minute ago

How does fining someone for being homeless stop them being homeless?

SIGN THE PETITION: http://www.thepetitionsite.com/en-gb/takeaction/576/913/589/

——————————————————————————————–

BOURNEMOUTH STATION BAGPIPE MUSIC UPDATE 21 JAN: video – 10 Jan: FACING THE MUSIC – COMPLAINTS TO COUNCIL MEAN NOTHING REGARDING THE BOURNEMOUTH STATION HOMELESS – “HOPE FOR FOOD” CHARITY INTERVIEW

UPDATE 21 January 2016 @ 5.30am – video: the bagpipe music plays at Bournemouth train + coach concourse:

click on following pic to enlarge: 

So much for listening to the thousands of complaints about bombarding the homeless in Bournemouth with loud music all night to put them off attempting to sleep in public places – at the local train station, and covered car parks, etc.  Many sites where the homeless sleep at night are bombarded sound-wise from midnight onwards by extremely loud music, courtesy of the local council, to deter the homeless from sleeping at the locations. At the beginning of December 2015 there was a news piece about this at the local train station where the homeless would gather at night -“BOURNEMOUTH, UK: “BAGPIPE MUSIC” USED TO DRIVE AWAY HOMELESS FROM TRAVEL INTERCHANGE!!” http://beforeitsnews.com/scandals/2015/12/bournemouth-uk-bagpipe-music-used-to-drive-away-homeless-from-travel-interchange-2435936.html 

Nevertheless the extra loud music continues to be played all night at the railway station and at other sites to deter homeless sleepers from congregating. Hardly any accomodation is offered to these people – just loud music. I’m told one has to be homeless for 28 days before one is eligible for the sparse housing from the council, and then the wait for that accomodation is at least 4 months minimum.

—————————————————————————————————- 

3 Dec. 2015:  video: BAGPIPE MUSIC USED TO DRIVE HOMELESS AWAY FROM BOURNEMOUTH INTERCHANGE

   https://vid.me/e/DCKp?stats=1&tools=1

———————————————————————————–

“4000 TELL COUNCIL: “STOP USING BAGPIPE MUSIC TO DRIVE AWAY HOMELESS”

Toby Wadey / Tuesday 1 December 2015 / Bournemouth
A PETITION calling for Bournemouth council to stop using bagpipe music as a deterrent for rough sleepers has attracted almost 4,000 signatures. 
The authority has deployed the tactic of playing loud music at the Travel Interchange in a bid to reduce anti-social behaviour. 
This strategy was adopted after reports that commuters felt intimidated by the growing number of homeless people drinking there and using it as a place to sleep at night. 
But protestor Carla Johnson, who has recently moved away from the town to Essex, has launched a petition against the scheme, claiming it “goes against the morals of the majority of Bournemouth residents”. 
“At a time of year when the weather is becoming increasingly cold and wet Bournemouth council should be finding a solution to help the homeless in our town, not to drive them away,” she said. 
“Playing loud music at the interchange is in no way a solution as it will simply move the homeless people on to another area in the town.”
She added: “By offering no support, I believe the issues the council have with the homeless will only worsen.

“These people need our support, and not to be treated like wild animals, driven out of one area to the next.” Ms Johnson told the Daily Echo she plans to send the petition, which as of Friday evening had accumulated 3,804 supporters, to the council.
“I understand why the council has decided to do this in terms of giving the right impression to tourists,” she said. “But the people of Bournemouth are friendly people and this goes against their nature – nobody chooses to be homeless and we should be looking at different ways to help.”

A Bournemouth council spokesperson said: “The playing of music was done in this particular location in the town to address a very specific anti-social behaviour problem of intimidating begging and other issues.” 
The spokesperson also dismissed an accusation in the petition that the authority had recently closed a soup kitchen, pointing out it does not have the power to do this unless there is a food safety issue.

And cabinet member for planning and environment, Cllr David Smith, said: “The playing of music at the station is one tiny part of the wider approach which includes close working with the police and the use of enforcement measures where appropriate in order to motivate people to assist them in changing their behaviour. Alongside this, however, we always offer people the accommodation and support they need and achieve many successes with this as people safely move inside.”
source: http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/news/districts/bournemouth/14114471.4_000_tell_council_____Stop_using_bagpipe_music_to_drive_away_homeless___/

What’s next? this? 

 “Oxford City Council ‘criminalising homelessness’” 13 April 2015 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-32282822

————————————————————————————————–

Interview with Hope for Food Founder Claire Matthews

Hope for Food is a Food bank and soup kitchen focussed in Bournemouth, where families can come and receive food, clothes and support. Claire Matthews, founder of Hope for Food describes the charities aims and pressures over the Christmas season, in this interview. 

Are you busiest at this time of year, on the build up to Christmas?

Yes its really busy this time of year, we’re feeding at least 30 families each time, every Tuesday and Thursday evening, as well we work on Saturdays, we need to because there’s just so many people who need feeding.

Who is the charity aiming at?

We aim to help homeless people in Bournemouth particularly vulnerable people. Usually people in shared accommodation. People with a lack of heat or eat and we get help a lot of families as well.

How is Food For Hope making a difference?

If we didn’t feed these people, they wouldn’t eat it is as simple as that, we don’t act like a food bank providing hampers. We work differently, people who are under the breadline come to us and we feed them.

Do lots of people get involved?

We get loads of volunteers. At the moment we have up to 60, and we usually get an extra 30 for Christmas. If it wasn’t for the volunteers, then we wouldn’t be able to feed so many people.

Are you the biggest soup kitchen charity in Bournemouth?

I wouldn’t go as far to say we’re the biggest, but we work hard on a lot of nights throughout the week, and we’ve only been running for 2 years now.

Story Info

! homeless 4apr16

! homeless2 5apr16

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

THE CAROL WOODS COVERUP: SERIOUS LANCS POLICE LED CORRUPTION + archive 4 Sept. 2016

Please see below, under the video etc. links, the latest update from whistleblower and ex-UK Government Social Worker Level 3 and Child Protection Officer Ms. Carol Woods, received 4 September 2016, [and before].

While the more recent updates from Ms. Woods may concentrate on the more current ID frauds and similar relating to her at her present abode, it must be fully understood that these actions, by parties known and unknown, are seemingly being enacted as a direct result of Ms. Woods reporting, or attempting to report, certain findings when employed by a UK town council as a senior Level 3 Social Worker, and Child Protection Officer, as described within the videos and radio broadcasts that follow these paragraphs, entitled “IMPORTANT VIDEOS”.  The massive corruption that is described, has so far gone unchecked, and ignored wholesale by whichever UK government agency it is reported to, which is clearly described within the videos.

More crimes and misdemenours committed against Ms. Woods include: 

the theft of her home [as happened also to Patrick Cullinane, Len Lawrence, Joseph Henry [multiple houses stolen], Tom Crawford, and so many more],

at least 4 separate enforced incarcerations in mental hospital units for no earthly good reason – one excuse used  for such incarcerations being that Ms. Woods was mentally “deluded” in her findings of utter corruption within a Lancs. council – her latest incarceration being between November 2015 and Febuary 2016. Carol was also forced to take psychotropic drugs against her will during these hospital stays, and was threatened with re-arrest before her leaving the “Cygnet” unit, Lancs. in Febuary 2016.

fake IDs used [for example: for expensive commercial criminal frauds], 

chronic gangstalking and/or harrassment by government connected sources,

home burglaries,

the inflicting of tracking devices upon her motor vehicle, and also numerous attempted thefts of that vehicle, and the attempted destruction of her motor vehicle, 

enforced “bankruptcy”

Many more seriously criminal activities exist, committed against this lone female, which have been reported accordingly to no avail, along with her discoveries as a Level 3 Social Worker and Child Protection Officer. All of what is described, especially within the videos and related data below is a public scandal, and equally as disgusting is that nothing being done about any of it by any UK government employee contacted, from the Prime Minister down, let alone the heads of police forces!

IMPORTANT VIDEOS 

1] PLAYLIST [3 videos]: EXPOSING FAKE SOCIAL WORKERS ETC. 06 Febuary 2016

www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLCT5hwoao38ThHG5Y6q3GSp_hsTwMK2UD

2] Please listen to this vital radio show interview with Ms. Woods from the 12 March 2016

www.mixcloud.com/TheFreedomTalkRadioNetwork/lancashire-greater-manchester-harrow-councils-cops-crime-coruption-carol-woods-whistleblower/

3] CAROL WOODS WHISTLEBLOWER ON RADIO lancashire police corruption county council 06 Febuary 2016

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/freedomtalkradioscotland/2016/02/21/andys-sunday-night-show-with-guest 

GOOGLE “CAROL WOODS” for more videos and articles.

carolwoods

 DPA Sec 7 AND serious police corruption Lancs  4 Sept. 16:

Please see this, I was arrested (in a farce which was not an arrest) denied a solicitor despite reporting serious misconduct of at least 2 officers (PACE regs) and locked up in 2 mental hospitals UNDER DIFFERENT NAMES for 4 months. One “serious” matter proving I was “mentally ill” was the reported FACT that I followed “someone to a local airport”. Who? I could not be told and was told only last week, a house full of fraudsters who have been using the Internet and claiming DWP as if they are me and linked to me. 45 Fell View who are now said not to be the named persons on the electoral register. They could show no travel documents, no holiday photos (apparently they went to Tenerife from Manchester airport) they had no details of anything but I have, I also have my passport and travel docs to Spain at the same time. Obviously I have holiday photos.The Gestapo have showed them a photo of MY car at Manchester airport on 5 10 15 when they took the photo JUNE this year when I was there to travel to Italy. In Oct 2015 I flew to Spain from Liverpool. To cover my recent report of serious computer misuse by TRAVIS DALTON in 45 Fell View and various others, the police called to ask them to have someone write a statement saying they saw me on Fell View while I was in Spain. Perjury leading to more perjury. This Assistant has not responded EXCEPT to a) send over helicopter AGAIN on 2/9/16 to claim  I was seen in 15 Fell View so am not me in 28, then a squad car with 2 staff on 3/9/16 to Caton to claim they saw a B and Q delivery thus I used a phone, ordered goods and so on which is an old FRAUD and not one murmur from one of you. I copy to Mr Hunt as he assumed I was locked up as I was deemed to be “ill”. My recent Section 14 Data Protection Act 1998, 4th Principle to have the lies and perjury seen to be such on MY records brought about the lunatic “reprisals”. All police led. On this day (4th) July 2014 AGNES JACKSON the old thief and worse in 26 admitted herself into a local mental hospital as me and they NHS returned her 6/7/14. How funny and clever they all thought they were. The INTENTION has been to hope the thuggery makes me so ill I admit myself NOW. Carol Woods Ms waiting to testify.

31 August 2016, 15:41, carol woods wrote:

Dear Assistant Chief Constable, I would like to ask about personal data: there appears to be data in my name in regard to SERIOUS matters. Thus I would like the data Section 7 Subject Access Request, Data Protection Act 1998 Amended 2000.

The data for this small matter is the photo which apparently shows MY car X165 YUB red Toyota at Manchester airport on 5 Oct 2015. Given I was in Liverpool airport then Spain I eagerly await that photo.

I also believe that a SWORN statement has been made by an un-named person claiming that they saw me, Ms Carol Woods, on Fell View Caton LA2 9RP while I was in Spain as apparent PROOF I was not in Spain or, if I was then I had used a passport not mine and had stolen my own ID to use it. Apparently my car was not parked at Liverpool airport. That SWORN statement is clearly PERJURY when seen to be false, but I am assured it exists so, I would like a copy.

There will be other data, some of which I can ask for in this as well: apparently I am not in Morecambe library typing this, apparently I am disguised as JUNE WILLIAMS somewhere on holiday with her repulsive old husband. Unless of course they only claim to be me and they have stolen MY ID?
I require their phone records as asked for, their utility bills as asked for as they are in MY name apparently. SKY TV in my name I require all documents related if in my name (they in 30 Fell View have 2 SKY systems in that tiny one-bedroomed bungalow), I require all their car log details, MOT’s of all 5 cars they have had IN MY NAME, any household insurances in my name.

I have also asked for phone records from 26 Fell View AGNES JACKSON as she thinks she can be me for gain when it suits and the family in 45 Fell View who were known as DALTON but tell me they have changed their name. 24 Fell View a veritable nest of corruption seems to have been used in my name so anything at all that can be gathered I would like copies of.

As I said, there will be more to add but I would be gratef